.
IA na Europa:
pânico ou vanguarda?
𝖣𝗈𝗂𝗌 𝗆𝖾𝗌𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖾𝗉𝗈𝗂𝗌 𝖽𝖺 𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝖺 𝗉𝖾́𝗌 𝗃𝗎𝗇𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖺 𝖮𝗉𝖾𝗇𝖠𝖨 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝗈 𝗆𝗈𝖽𝖾𝗅𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖨𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗅𝗂𝗀𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝖠𝗋𝗍𝗂𝖿𝗂𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗅 𝗀𝖾𝗇𝖾𝗋𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗏𝖺 𝖢𝗁𝖺𝗍𝖦𝖯𝖳, 𝖺 𝖾𝗌𝗉𝖾𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗅𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖺 𝖾𝗎𝗋𝗈𝗉𝖾𝗂𝖺 𝖾𝗆 𝖾́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝖺 𝖦𝗋𝗒 𝖧𝖺𝗌𝗌𝖾𝗅𝖻𝖺𝗅𝖼𝗁 𝖿𝖾𝗓 𝗌𝗈𝖺𝗋 𝗈𝗌 𝖺𝗅𝖺𝗋𝗆𝖾𝗌 𝗌𝗈𝖻𝗋𝖾 𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗏𝖺 𝖺 𝖺𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝖾𝖼𝖾𝗋. 𝖠 𝖽𝗂𝗌𝗉𝗈𝗇𝗂𝖻𝗂𝗅𝗂𝗓𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖺 𝖺𝗉𝗅𝗂𝖼𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖺𝗈 𝗉𝗎́𝖻𝗅𝗂𝖼𝗈, 𝗌𝖾𝗆 𝗌𝖺𝗅𝗏𝖺𝗀𝗎𝖺𝗋𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝗍𝗋𝖾𝗆𝖾𝗇𝖽𝖺 𝗈𝗉𝖺𝖼𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝗌𝗈𝖻𝗋𝖾 𝖺𝗌 𝖿𝗈𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗌, 𝖾𝗋𝖺 𝖺𝗅𝗍𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝖻𝗅𝖾𝗆𝖺́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝖺, 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗌𝗂𝖽𝖾𝗋𝗈𝗎
𝖯𝗈𝗋𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗌 𝗍𝖾𝖼𝗇𝗈𝗅𝗈𝗀𝗂𝖺𝗌 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝖺𝗉𝖾𝗇𝖺𝗌 𝗍𝖾́𝖼𝗇𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗌, 𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝗌𝗈́𝖼𝗂𝗈-𝗍𝖾́𝖼𝗇𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗌. 𝖳𝖾̂𝗆 𝗎𝗆 𝗂𝗆𝗉𝖺𝖼𝗍𝗈 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝖿𝗎𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝗇𝖺 𝗌𝗈𝖼𝗂𝖾𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖾 𝖾́ 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝖼𝗂𝗌𝗈 𝗉𝖾𝗇𝗌𝖺𝗋 𝖾𝗆 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝗌𝖾𝗋𝖺̃𝗈 𝖺𝗉𝗅𝗂𝖼𝖺𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗈𝖼𝗈𝗋𝗋𝖺𝗆 𝖾𝖿𝖾𝗂𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖾𝗏𝖺𝗌𝗍𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗋𝖾𝗌 - 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝗈𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗏𝗂𝗆𝗈𝗌 𝖺𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝖾𝖼𝖾𝗋 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝖺𝗌 𝗋𝖾𝖽𝖾𝗌 𝗌𝗈𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗂𝗌, 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖺𝗏𝖺𝗇𝖼̧𝖺𝗋𝖺𝗆 𝗌𝗈𝖻𝗋𝖾 𝗇𝗈́𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝗋𝗈𝗅𝗈𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗈𝗋𝖾𝗌 𝗌𝖾𝗆 𝗈𝗉𝗈𝗌𝗂𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝗋𝖾𝗀𝗎𝗅𝖺𝗍𝗈́𝗋𝗂𝖺 𝗈𝗎 𝖾́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝖺.
𝖥𝗈𝗂 𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗌𝖾 𝗂𝗆𝖾𝖽𝗂𝖺𝗍𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖾𝗏𝗂𝖽𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖾𝗋𝖺 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝖼𝗂𝗌𝗈 𝗋𝖾𝗀𝗎𝗅𝖺𝗋 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖾𝗌 𝖺𝗏𝖺𝗇𝖼̧𝗈𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗈𝗋 𝗎𝗋𝗀𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺. 𝖠 𝖴𝗇𝗂𝖺̃𝗈 𝖤𝗎𝗋𝗈𝗉𝖾𝗂𝖺 𝖺𝗇𝖽𝖺𝗏𝖺 𝗁𝖺́ 𝖽𝗈𝗂𝗌 𝖺𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝖺 𝗍𝗋𝖺𝖻𝖺𝗅𝗁𝖺𝗋 𝖾𝗆 𝗋𝖾𝗀𝗎𝗅𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖺 𝖨𝖠 𝖾 𝗂𝗌𝗌𝗈 𝖿𝗈𝗂 𝖿𝗂𝗇𝖺𝗅𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖺𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗏𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝗉𝖾𝗅𝗈 𝖯𝖺𝗋𝗅𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝖤𝗎𝗋𝗈𝗉𝖾𝗎, 𝗈 𝖠𝖨 𝖠𝖼𝗍, 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝗈 𝗍𝗂𝗉𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗋𝗂𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗆𝗎𝗂𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝖾𝗌𝗉𝖾𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗅𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗌 𝗍𝖾̂𝗆 𝖽𝖾𝖿𝖾𝗇𝖽𝗂𝖽𝗈.
𝖯𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗈𝗌 𝗋𝖾𝗀𝗎𝗅𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗋𝖾𝗌, 𝗂𝗌𝗍𝗈 𝖾́ 𝖺 𝖤𝗎𝗋𝗈𝗉𝖺 𝗇𝖺 𝗏𝖺𝗇𝗀𝗎𝖺𝗋𝖽𝖺 𝖽𝗎𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺 𝗆𝖺𝖽𝗋𝗎𝗀𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝖽𝖺 𝖨𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗅𝗂𝗀𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝖠𝗋𝗍𝗂𝖿𝗂𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗅. 𝖬𝖺𝗌 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝖺𝗌 𝖾𝗆𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗌𝖺𝗌 𝖾𝗎𝗋𝗈𝗉𝖾𝗂𝖺𝗌, 𝖺 𝗅𝖾𝗀𝗂𝗌𝗅𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗉𝗈𝗌𝗍𝖺 𝖾́ 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝖾𝗏𝗂𝖽𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝖽𝗈 𝗉𝖺̂𝗇𝗂𝖼𝗈 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗋𝖾𝗀𝗎𝗅𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗋𝖾𝗌. 𝖢𝗈𝗇𝖿𝗋𝗈𝗇𝗍𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗍𝖾𝖼𝗇𝗈𝗅𝗈𝗀𝗂𝖺 𝗉𝗈𝖽𝖾𝗋𝗈𝗌𝗂́𝗌𝗌𝗂𝗆𝖺 𝖾 𝖽𝖾 𝖾𝗏𝗈𝗅𝗎𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾𝗑𝗉𝗈𝗇𝖾𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗅, 𝗈𝗌 𝗅𝖾𝗀𝗂𝗌𝗅𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗋𝖾𝗌 𝗌𝖺𝗅𝗍𝖺𝗋𝖺𝗆 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝖼𝗂𝗆𝖺 𝖽𝖾𝗅𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝖽𝖾𝖿𝖾𝗌𝖺𝗌 𝖿𝗈𝗋𝗍𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖺 𝗉𝗋𝗂𝗏𝖺𝖼𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾, 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝗂𝗋𝖾𝗂𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖺𝗎𝗍𝗈𝗋 𝖾 𝖽𝖺 𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗌𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺. 𝖤́ 𝖼𝖾𝗋𝗍𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖺 𝖨𝖠 𝗀𝖾𝗇𝖾𝗋𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗏𝖺 𝖾́ 𝖺𝗉𝖾𝗇𝖺𝗌 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝖽𝗂𝗌𝖼𝗂𝗉𝗅𝗂𝗇𝖺 𝖽𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗋𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗎𝗆 𝖼𝖺𝗆𝗉𝗈 𝗏𝖺𝗌𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗍𝖾𝖼𝗇𝗈𝗅𝗈𝗀𝗂𝖺𝗌. 𝖬𝖺𝗌 𝖾́ 𝖺𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗅𝖺 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺́, 𝗇𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖾 𝗆𝗈𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈, 𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗁𝖾𝖼𝖾𝗋 𝖺 𝖾𝗑𝗉𝖺𝗇𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝖺𝗌𝗌𝗈𝗅𝖺𝗉𝖺𝖽𝖺.
𝖮𝗌 𝖾𝗑𝖾𝖼𝗎𝗍𝗂𝗏𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝟣𝟧𝟢 𝖾𝗆𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗌𝖺𝗌 𝖾𝗎𝗋𝗈𝗉𝖾𝗂𝖺𝗌, 𝗂𝗇𝖼𝗅𝗎𝗂𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝖱𝖾𝗇𝖺𝗎𝗅𝗍, 𝖢𝖺𝗋𝗋𝖾𝖿𝗈𝗎𝗋, 𝖧𝖾𝗂𝗇𝖾𝗄𝖾𝗇, 𝖢𝖺𝗉𝗀𝖾𝗆𝗂𝗇𝗂, 𝖲𝗂𝖾𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗌 𝖾 𝖠𝗂𝗋𝖻𝗎𝗌, 𝖾𝗌𝖼𝗋𝖾𝗏𝖾𝗋𝖺𝗆 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝖼𝖺𝗋𝗍𝖺 𝖺𝖻𝖾𝗋𝗍𝖺 𝖾𝗆 𝗈𝗉𝗈𝗌𝗂𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖺̀ 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗉𝗈𝗌𝗍𝖺 𝗅𝖾𝗀𝗂𝗌𝗅𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗏𝖺, 𝖺𝗋𝗀𝗎𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖺𝗌 𝗋𝖾𝗀𝗋𝖺𝗌 𝗇𝖾𝗅𝖺 𝗂𝗇𝗌𝖼𝗋𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗌 𝗉𝗈𝖽𝖾𝗆 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖽𝖾𝗇𝖺𝗋 𝖺 𝗌𝗈𝖻𝖾𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗂𝖺 𝗍𝖾𝖼𝗇𝗈𝗅𝗈́𝗀𝗂𝖼𝖺 𝖽𝖺 𝖤𝗎𝗋𝗈𝗉𝖺. 𝖢𝗈𝗇𝗌𝗂𝖽𝖾𝗋𝖺𝗆 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖺 𝖨𝖠 𝖺𝖻𝗋𝖾 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗈𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗍𝗎𝗇𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝖺 𝖴𝗇𝗂𝖺̃𝗈 𝗏𝗈𝗅𝗍𝖺𝗋 𝖺 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗋 𝗇𝖺 𝗏𝖺𝗇𝗀𝗎𝖺𝗋𝖽𝖺 𝖽𝖺 𝗍𝖾𝖼𝗇𝗈𝗅𝗈𝗀𝗂𝖺 𝖾 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗌 𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗋𝗂𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝗏𝖺̃𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖽𝖾𝗇𝖺𝗋 𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖾𝗌 𝖾𝗌𝖿𝗈𝗋𝖼̧𝗈𝗌.
𝖤́ 𝗎𝗆 𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗋𝗂́𝗏𝖾𝗅 𝖽𝗂𝗅𝖾𝗆𝖺. 𝖮𝗌 𝖾𝗌𝗉𝖾𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗅𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗌 𝗌𝖺𝖻𝖾𝗆 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖾́ 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝖼𝗂𝗌𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗅𝗈𝖼𝖺𝗋 𝗌𝖺𝗅𝗏𝖺𝗀𝗎𝖺𝗋𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝖺̀ 𝗏𝗈𝗅𝗍𝖺 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝖾𝗇𝗏𝗈𝗅𝗏𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈𝗌, 𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖾́ 𝖺𝗋𝗋𝗂𝗌𝖼𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝖽𝖾𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝖽𝖾𝗂𝗑𝖺𝗋 𝖺 𝖮𝗉𝖾𝗇𝖠𝖨 𝖾 𝗈𝗎𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗌 𝗆𝗈𝗏𝖾𝗋𝖾𝗆-𝗌𝖾 𝗋𝖺́𝗉𝗂𝖽𝗈 𝖾 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝗍𝗂𝗋𝖾𝗆 𝖼𝗈𝗂𝗌𝖺𝗌 𝗉𝖾𝗅𝗈 𝖼𝖺𝗆𝗂𝗇𝗁𝗈. 𝖯𝗈𝗋 𝗈𝗎𝗍𝗋𝗈 𝗅𝖺𝖽𝗈, 𝖺𝗌 𝗌𝖺𝗅𝗏𝖺𝗀𝗎𝖺𝗋𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗉𝗈𝖽𝖾𝗆 𝗌𝖾𝗋 𝖾𝗑𝖼𝗅𝗎𝗌𝗂𝗏𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗋𝖾𝗀𝗂𝖺̃𝗈. 𝖭𝖺̃𝗈 𝗏𝖺𝗅𝖾 𝖽𝖾 𝗆𝗎𝗂𝗍𝗈 𝖾𝗋𝗂𝗀𝗂𝗋 𝗋𝖾𝗀𝗎𝗅𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗌𝖾𝗃𝖺 𝗏𝖺́𝗅𝗂𝖽𝖺 𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝖤𝗌𝗍𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖴𝗇𝗂𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖾 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝖺 𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗅 𝖺 𝖢𝗁𝗂𝗇𝖺 𝗌𝖾 𝗏𝖺́ 𝗆𝖺𝗋𝗂𝗆𝖻𝖺𝗋. 𝖠 𝗍𝖾𝖼𝗇𝗈𝗅𝗈𝗀𝗂𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗂𝗇𝗎𝖺𝗋𝖺́ 𝖺 𝗌𝖾𝗋 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝖾𝗇𝗏𝗈𝗅𝗏𝗂𝖽𝖺, 𝖾 𝗈 𝖮𝖼𝗂𝖽𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗉𝗈𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝖺𝗋-𝗌𝖾 𝖺𝗈 𝗅𝗎𝗑𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖿𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗋 𝗉𝖾𝗅𝗈 𝖼𝖺𝗆𝗂𝗇𝗁𝗈 - 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝖼𝗂𝗌𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝗌𝖾𝗋 𝗍𝖺̃𝗈 𝗉𝗈𝖽𝖾𝗋𝗈𝗌𝖺 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖾́ 𝗃𝖺́ 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝖺̀ 𝗂𝗇𝗏𝖾𝗇𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝖺𝗋𝗆𝖺𝗌 𝗇𝗎𝖼𝗅𝖾𝖺𝗋𝖾𝗌.
𝖮 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖿𝖺𝗓𝖾𝗋, 𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺̃𝗈? 𝖤𝗇𝗏𝖾𝗋𝖾𝖽𝖺𝗋 𝗉𝖾𝗅𝗈 𝗉𝖺̂𝗇𝗂𝖼𝗈 𝗈𝗎 𝗋𝖾𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗁𝖾𝖼𝖾𝗋 𝗈 𝗉𝗈𝗍𝖾𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗅 𝖽𝖾 𝗋𝖾𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗊𝗎𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗉𝗈𝗌𝗂𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖼𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗂𝗋𝖺? 𝖭𝖾𝗆 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗇𝖾𝗆 𝗈𝗎𝗍𝗋𝖺. 𝖤́ 𝗉𝗈𝗎𝖼𝗈 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗏𝖺́𝗏𝖾𝗅 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖺 𝖤𝗎𝗋𝗈𝗉𝖺 𝗉𝖺𝗌𝗌𝖾 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝖺 𝗅𝗂𝗇𝗁𝖺 𝖽𝖺 𝖿𝗋𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝗇𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖽𝗂𝗓 𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗉𝖾𝗂𝗍𝗈 𝖺̀ 𝖨𝖠. 𝖬𝖺𝗌 𝗍𝖺𝗆𝖻𝖾́𝗆 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗏𝖾́𝗆 𝗆𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾̂-𝗅𝖺 𝗋𝖾𝖿𝖾́𝗆 𝖽𝖾 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗉𝗈𝗌𝗂𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖺𝗏𝖺𝗇𝖼̧𝖺𝖽𝖺.
𝖤́ 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝖼𝗂𝗌𝗈 𝗋𝖾𝗀𝗎𝗅𝖺𝗋 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝖺 𝗇𝗈𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖺𝗌 𝖾𝗆𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗌𝖺𝗌 𝗉𝗈𝖽𝖾𝗆 𝗌𝗂𝗆𝗉𝗅𝖾𝗌𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝗋𝖾𝗍𝗂𝗋𝖺𝗋-𝗌𝖾 𝖽𝖺 𝗋𝖾𝗀𝗂𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾𝗎𝗋𝗈𝗉𝖾𝗂𝖺 𝗌𝖾 𝖺𝗌 𝗋𝖾𝗀𝗋𝖺𝗌 𝖿𝗈𝗋𝖾𝗆 𝖽𝖾𝗆𝖺𝗌𝗂𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝗈𝗇𝖾𝗋𝗈𝗌𝖺𝗌, 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗉𝗅𝖾𝗑𝖺𝗌 𝖾 𝖽𝖾𝗆𝗈𝗋𝖺𝖽𝖺𝗌. 𝖤́ 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝖼𝗂𝗌𝗈 𝗍𝖺𝗆𝖻𝖾́𝗆 𝗇𝖾𝗀𝗈𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗋 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝗈𝗌 𝗈𝗎𝗍𝗋𝗈𝗌 𝖻𝗅𝗈𝖼𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗍𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺𝗋 𝖼𝗁𝖾𝗀𝖺𝗋 𝖺 𝗎𝗆 𝗉𝖺𝗍𝖺𝗆𝖺𝗋 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗎𝗆 𝖽𝖾 𝗌𝖺𝗅𝗏𝖺𝗀𝗎𝖺𝗋𝖽𝖺𝗌.
𝖮 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗌𝖾 𝗉𝗈𝖽𝖾 𝖾́ 𝖽𝖾𝗂𝗑𝖺𝗋 𝗂𝗌𝗍𝗈 𝗇𝖺𝗌 𝗆𝖺̃𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝗈 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗏𝖾𝗋𝖻𝗂𝖺𝗅 𝗆𝖾𝗋𝖼𝖺𝖽𝗈, 𝖽𝖾 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗆𝖺̃𝗈 𝖼𝗁𝖾𝗂𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝗈𝗅𝗂𝗀𝖺𝗋𝖼𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝗂𝗀𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗂𝗌, 𝗈𝗎 𝖽𝖾 𝖺𝗎𝗍𝗈-𝗉𝗋𝗈𝖼𝗅𝖺𝗆𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗏𝗂𝗌𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺́𝗋𝗂𝗈𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗉𝗅𝖾𝗑𝗈 𝗆𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗂𝖺̂𝗇𝗂𝖼𝗈. 𝖠 𝖿𝖺𝗌𝗊𝗎𝗂𝖺 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺́ 𝖽𝖾𝗆𝖺𝗌𝗂𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝖾𝗅𝖾𝗏𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝖾 𝖺 𝖤𝗎𝗋𝗈𝗉𝖺 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗌𝗈́ 𝗉𝗈𝖽𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝖽𝖾𝗏𝖾 𝖺𝗅𝗎𝗆𝗂𝖺𝗋 𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖾 𝖼𝖺𝗆𝗂𝗇𝗁𝗈.
* Jornalista sediada em Los Angeles como correspondente da Agência Lusa, colaboradora do Dinheiro Vivo.
IN "DINHEIRO VIVO" - 04/07/23 .
Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário