.
.02/11/2025
EURICO REIS
.
Sim, Ventura e o Chega têm
mesmo de cumprir a lei porque
Portugal não é uma Chegolândia
Ora acontece que, infelizmente, as instituições do Estado, ao seu mais alto nível, são as primeiras a prevaricar.
𝐻𝑎𝑣𝑒𝑟 𝑙𝑒𝑖𝑠, 𝑜𝑢 𝑚𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑒𝑥𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑛𝑜𝑟𝑚𝑎𝑠 𝑗𝑢𝑟𝜄́𝑑𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑠 𝑒𝑚 𝑣𝑖𝑔𝑜𝑟, 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑠𝑎̃𝑜 𝑐𝑢𝑚𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑠, 𝑒𝑠𝑝𝑒𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑙𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝑎𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑐𝑒 𝑑𝑒 𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑚𝑎 𝑜𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑠𝑖𝑣𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑡𝑢𝑖 𝑢𝑚 𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑠𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑚𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑒𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑜 𝐸𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝐷𝑖𝑟𝑒𝑖𝑡𝑜 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎́ 𝑎 𝑓𝑢𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑟 𝑛𝑜𝑟𝑚𝑎𝑙 𝑒 𝑎𝑑𝑒𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑑𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒.
𝐸 𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑎 𝑑𝑒𝑏𝑖𝑙𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑖𝑛𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑡𝑢𝑖𝑐̧𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑜𝑐𝑜𝑟𝑟𝑒 𝑠𝑒𝑗𝑎 𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑙 𝑓𝑜𝑟 𝑜 𝑛𝑜𝑟𝑚𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑜 𝑙𝑒𝑔𝑎𝑙, 𝑝𝑜𝑟 𝑚𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑖𝑛𝑠𝑖𝑔𝑛𝑖𝑓𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑞𝑢𝑒, 𝑎̀ 𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑖𝑟𝑎 𝑣𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑎, 𝑝𝑜𝑠𝑠𝑎 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑟 𝑠𝑒𝑟.
𝐸́ 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑜𝑏𝑟𝑖𝑔𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑙𝑒𝑔𝑎𝑙𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑣𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑎 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑒́ 𝑐𝑢𝑚𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑑𝑎 𝑒, 𝑎𝑖𝑛𝑑𝑎 𝑝𝑜𝑟 𝑐𝑖𝑚𝑎, 𝑜 𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑣𝑎𝑟𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑟 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑠𝑜𝑓𝑟𝑒 𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑙𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑟 𝑝𝑢𝑛𝑖𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑒𝑞𝑢𝑒̂𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑎 𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑎 𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑣𝑎𝑟𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜, 𝑜 𝑒𝑓𝑒𝑖𝑡𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑎 𝑠𝑖𝑡𝑢𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑔𝑒𝑟𝑎 𝑒́ 𝑜 𝑠𝑒𝑔𝑢𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒: 𝑠𝑒 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑙𝑒𝑖 𝑝𝑜𝑑𝑒 𝑠𝑒𝑟 𝑖𝑚𝑝𝑢𝑛𝑒𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑣𝑖𝑜𝑙𝑎𝑑𝑎, 𝑝𝑜𝑟 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑟𝑎𝑧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑡𝑒𝑛𝘩𝑜 𝑒𝑢 𝑑𝑒 𝑜𝑏𝑒𝑑𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑟 𝑎 𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑎 𝑙𝑒𝑖, 𝑒, 𝑗𝑎́ 𝑎𝑔𝑜𝑟𝑎, 𝑝𝑜𝑟 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑟𝑎𝑧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑡𝑒𝑛𝘩𝑜 𝑒𝑢 𝑑𝑒 𝑜𝑏𝑒𝑑𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑟 𝑎 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑙𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑟 𝑙𝑒𝑖 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑚𝑒 𝑖𝑚𝑝𝑜𝑛𝘩𝑎 𝑜 𝑐𝑢𝑚𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑜𝑏𝑟𝑖𝑔𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑒𝑢 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑟𝑜 𝑟𝑒𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑧𝑎𝑟.ᐣ
𝐸 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎 𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑖𝑎 𝑠𝑜𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑙𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑔𝑜𝑠𝜄́𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑚𝑎 𝑎𝑙𝑎𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑎 𝑚𝑢𝑖𝑡𝑜 𝑓𝑎𝑐𝑖𝑙𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑚𝑢𝑖𝑡𝑜 𝑠𝑖𝑔𝑛𝑖𝑓𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑎 𝑟𝑎𝑝𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑧.
𝐸́ 𝑜 𝑐𝘩𝑎𝑚𝑎𝑑𝑜 “𝑒𝑓𝑒𝑖𝑡𝑜 𝑚𝑎𝑛𝑐𝘩𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑜́𝑙𝑒𝑜”.
𝑂𝑟𝑎 𝑎𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑐𝑒 𝑞𝑢𝑒, 𝑖𝑛𝑓𝑒𝑙𝑖𝑧𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒, 𝑎𝑠 𝑖𝑛𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑡𝑢𝑖𝑐̧𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑑𝑜 𝐸𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑑𝑜, 𝑎𝑜 𝑠𝑒𝑢 𝑚𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑎𝑙𝑡𝑜 𝑛𝜄́𝑣𝑒𝑙, 𝑠𝑎̃𝑜 𝑎𝑠 𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑖𝑟𝑎𝑠 𝑎 𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑣𝑎𝑟𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑟.
𝐴 𝑡𝜄́𝑡𝑢𝑙𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑚𝑒𝑟𝑜 𝑒𝑥𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑙𝑜, 𝑐𝑎𝑢𝑠𝑎-𝑚𝑒 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑚𝑢𝑖𝑡𝑜 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑓𝑢𝑛𝑑𝑎 𝑖𝑛𝑑𝑖𝑔𝑛𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑜 𝑑𝑖𝑟𝑒𝑖𝑡𝑜 𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑐𝑎𝑠𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝘩𝑒𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑜𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑥𝑢𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑒 𝑑𝑒 𝑙𝑒́𝑠𝑏𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑠 𝑒 𝑎𝑠 𝑚𝑢𝑙𝘩𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑠 𝑠𝑒𝑚 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑐𝑒𝑖𝑟𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑠𝑒 𝑒𝑛𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑚 𝑛𝑎𝑠 𝑠𝑖𝑡𝑢𝑎𝑐̧𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑙𝑒𝑔𝑎𝑙𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑣𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑠 𝑛𝑜 𝑛.º 𝟸 𝑑𝑜 𝑎𝑟𝑡𝑖𝑔𝑜 𝟾º 𝑑𝑎 𝐿𝑒𝑖 𝑛.º 𝟹𝟸/𝟸𝟶𝟶𝟼, 𝑑𝑒 𝟸𝟼 𝑑𝑒 𝑗𝑢𝑙𝘩𝑜 (𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑜 𝑒́, 𝑛𝑜𝑠 𝑐𝑎𝑠𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑎𝑢𝑠𝑒̂𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑢́𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑜, 𝑑𝑒 𝑙𝑒𝑠𝑎̃𝑜 𝑜𝑢 𝑑𝑒 𝑑𝑜𝑒𝑛𝑐̧𝑎 𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑒 𝑜́𝑟𝑔𝑎̃𝑜 𝑜𝑢 𝑜𝑢𝑡𝑟𝑎 𝑠𝑖𝑡𝑢𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑐𝑙𝜄́𝑛𝑖𝑐𝑎 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑖𝑚𝑝𝑒𝑐̧𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑚𝑎 𝑎𝑏𝑠𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑡𝑎 𝑒 𝑑𝑒𝑓𝑖𝑛𝑖𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑎 𝑎 𝑔𝑟𝑎𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑧 𝑑𝑎 𝑚𝑢𝑙𝘩𝑒𝑟), 𝑎̀ 𝑐𝑒𝑙𝑒𝑏𝑟𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑔𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑠𝑢𝑏𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑡𝑢𝑖𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜, 𝑠𝑒 𝑒𝑛𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑒𝑚 𝘩𝑎́ 𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑠𝑒 𝑡𝑟𝑒̂𝑠 𝑎𝑛𝑜𝑠, 𝑖𝑚𝑝𝑒𝑑𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑒𝑥𝑒𝑟𝑐𝑒𝑟 𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑒 𝑑𝑖𝑟𝑒𝑖𝑡𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑙𝘩𝑒𝑠 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎́ 𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑜𝑛𝘩𝑒𝑐𝑖𝑑𝑜 𝑛𝑎 𝑙𝑒𝑔𝑖𝑠𝑙𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑒𝑚 𝑣𝑖𝑔𝑜𝑟 𝑒𝑚 𝑃𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑢𝑔𝑎𝑙.
𝑇𝑟𝑒̂𝑠 𝑎𝑛𝑜𝑠, 𝑟𝑒𝑝𝑖𝑡𝑜, 𝑜𝑢 𝑠𝑒𝑗𝑎, 𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑑𝑒 𝑜 𝑑𝑖𝑎 𝟷𝟽 𝑑𝑒 𝑗𝑎𝑛𝑒𝑖𝑟𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝟸𝟶𝟸𝟸.
𝐸 𝑛𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑒 𝑐𝑎𝑠𝑜 𝑎 𝑐𝑢𝑙𝑝𝑎 𝑎 𝑐𝑢𝑙𝑝𝑎 𝑒́ 𝑖𝑔𝑢𝑎𝑙𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑡𝑖𝑙𝘩𝑎𝑑𝑎 𝑝𝑒𝑙𝑜 𝑔𝑜𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑛𝑜 𝑒𝑚 𝑓𝑢𝑛𝑐̧𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑒 𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑜𝑖𝑠 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑜 𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑑𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑚, 𝑙𝑜𝑔𝑜 𝑖𝑛𝑐𝑙𝑢𝑖𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑜 𝑔𝑜𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑛𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑒𝑟𝑎 𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑖𝑟𝑜-𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑜 𝑜 𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑢𝑎𝑙 𝑃𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑑𝑜 𝐶𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑒𝑙𝘩𝑜 𝐸𝑢𝑟𝑜𝑝𝑒𝑢 𝐴𝑛𝑡𝑜́𝑛𝑖𝑜 𝐶𝑜𝑠𝑡𝑎.
𝐸 𝑒́ 𝑚𝑒𝑠𝑚𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑐𝑢𝑙𝑝𝑎 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑠𝑒 𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑎 𝑝𝑜𝑟𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑜 𝑑𝑒𝑐𝑟𝑒𝑡𝑜 𝑟𝑒𝑔𝑢𝑙𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑟 𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑣𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑜 𝑛𝑜 𝑎𝑟𝑡𝑖𝑔𝑜 𝟻º 𝑑𝑎 𝐿𝑒𝑖 𝑛.º 𝟿𝟶/𝟸𝟶𝟸𝟷, 𝑑𝑒 𝟷𝟼 𝑑𝑒 𝑑𝑒𝑧𝑒𝑚𝑏𝑟𝑜, 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑓𝑜𝑖 𝑒𝑙𝑎𝑏𝑜𝑟𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑝𝑜𝑟𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑠 𝑡𝑟𝑒̂𝑠 𝑠𝑢𝑐𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑣𝑜𝑠 𝑔𝑜𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑛𝑜𝑠 𝑜𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑠𝑖𝑣𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑒 𝑝𝑜𝑟 𝑟𝑎𝑧𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑝𝑢𝑟𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑜𝑙𝑜́𝑔𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑠, 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑖𝑠𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑚 𝑐𝑢𝑚𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑟 𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑎 𝐿𝑒𝑖 𝑜𝑠 𝑜𝑏𝑟𝑖𝑔𝑎𝑣𝑎 𝑎 𝑓𝑎𝑧𝑒𝑟. 𝑁𝑒𝑚 𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑚.
𝐸 𝑜𝑢𝑡𝑟𝑜𝑠 𝑒𝑥𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑙𝑜𝑠 𝑝𝑜𝑑𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑚 𝑠𝑒𝑟 𝑟𝑒𝑓𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑑𝑜𝑠, 𝑛𝑜𝑚𝑒𝑎𝑑𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑎 𝑓𝑎𝑙𝑡𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑓𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑝𝑒𝑙𝑎𝑠 𝑎𝑢𝑡𝑜𝑟𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒𝑠 𝑎𝑑𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑎𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑒𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑠 𝑑𝑜 𝑐𝑢𝑚𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜 𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑟𝑒𝑔𝑟𝑎𝑠 𝑙𝑒𝑔𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑟𝑒𝑙𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑎𝑠 𝑎̀ 𝑐𝑒𝑙𝑒𝑏𝑟𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑏𝑎𝑙𝘩𝑜 𝑠𝑢𝑏𝑜𝑟𝑑𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑑𝑜, 𝑏𝑒𝑚 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑜 𝑎̀𝑠 𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑝𝑒𝑖𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑠 𝑎̀ 𝘩𝑖𝑔𝑖𝑒𝑛𝑒 𝑒 𝑠𝑒𝑔𝑢𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑐̧𝑎 𝑛𝑜 𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑏𝑎𝑙𝘩𝑜, 𝑒 𝑎̀𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑑𝑖𝑐̧𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑠𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑏𝑟𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝑒 𝑠𝑒𝑔𝑢𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑐̧𝑎 𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑢𝑐̧𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑎 𝑠𝑒𝑟 𝑢𝑠𝑎𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑎 𝘩𝑎𝑏𝑖𝑡𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑝𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑜𝑎𝑠.
𝑇𝑜𝑑𝑎𝑣𝑖𝑎, 𝑎𝑠 𝑚𝑎𝑖𝑜𝑟𝑒𝑠 𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑎𝑐̧𝑎𝑠 𝑎̀ 𝐷𝑒𝑚𝑜𝑐𝑟𝑎𝑐𝑖𝑎 𝑒 𝑎𝑜 𝐸𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝐷𝑖𝑟𝑒𝑖𝑡𝑜 𝑒𝑚 𝑃𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑢𝑔𝑎𝑙 𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑢𝑙𝑡𝑎𝑚 𝑑𝑎 𝑖𝑔𝑛𝑜𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑖𝑜𝑠𝑎 𝑒 𝑠𝑜𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑙𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑔𝑜𝑠𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑙𝑒𝑡𝑎 𝑖𝑚𝑝𝑢𝑛𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑎𝑠 𝑔𝑟𝑜𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑖𝑟𝑎𝑠 𝑒 𝑜𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑠𝑖𝑣𝑎𝑠 𝑣𝑖𝑜𝑙𝑎𝑐̧𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝐿𝑒𝑖 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝐴𝑛𝑑𝑟𝑒́ 𝑉𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑎 𝑒 𝑜𝑠 𝑠𝑒𝑢𝑠 𝑎𝑝𝑎𝑛𝑖𝑔𝑢𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑜 𝐶𝘩𝑒𝑔𝑎, 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑢𝑖𝑡𝑜𝑠 𝑐𝑙𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑣𝑜𝑐𝑎𝑡𝑜́𝑟𝑖𝑜𝑠, 𝑡𝑒̂𝑚 𝑣𝑖𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑎 𝑝𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑟 𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑑𝑒 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑒 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑡𝑖𝑑𝑜 𝑓𝑜𝑖 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑡𝑢𝜄́𝑑𝑜, 𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑠𝑖𝑔𝑛𝑖𝑓𝑖𝑐𝑎 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑠 𝑐𝑟𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑠 𝑠𝑎̃𝑜 𝑝𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑎𝑝𝑒𝑛𝑎𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑚𝑎 𝑙𝑖𝑣𝑟𝑒, 𝑣𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑛𝑡𝑎́𝑟𝑖𝑎 𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑐𝑖𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒, 𝑚𝑎𝑠 𝑡𝑎𝑚𝑏𝑒́𝑚 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑚𝑒𝑑𝑖𝑡𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜.
𝐸 𝑜 𝑓𝑒𝑖𝑡𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑢𝑙𝑡𝑎 𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑎 𝑎𝑣𝑖𝑙𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑠𝑖𝑡𝑢𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑒́ 𝑜 𝑎𝑐𝑟𝑒́𝑠𝑐𝑖𝑚𝑜 𝑑𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑓𝑙𝑖𝑡𝑢𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝑒 𝑑𝑎 𝑣𝑖𝑜𝑙𝑒̂𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑎 𝑚 𝑡𝑜𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑜𝑠 𝑡𝑖𝑝𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑟𝑒𝑙𝑎𝑐𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟-𝑝𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑜𝑎𝑙.
𝐸 𝑑𝑒𝑝𝑜𝑖𝑠 𝑎𝑑𝑚𝑖𝑟𝑎𝑚-𝑠𝑒 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑗𝑎 𝑎 𝑐𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑐𝑒𝑟 𝑜 𝑛𝑢́𝑚𝑒𝑟𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑐𝑟𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑠 𝑣𝑖𝑜𝑙𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜𝑠 𝑝𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑛𝑜 𝑝𝑎𝜄́𝑠 𝑒 𝑎 𝑝𝑟𝑜́𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑎 𝑔𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑢𝑖𝑡𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝑒 𝑓𝑢𝑡𝑖𝑙𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝑑𝑎 𝑚𝑜𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑎 𝑝𝑟𝑎́𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑎 𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑠 𝑐𝑟𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑠.
𝐴𝑔𝑜𝑟𝑎 𝑡𝑢𝑑𝑜 𝑝𝑜𝑑𝑒 𝑠𝑒𝑟 𝑑𝑖𝑡𝑜 𝑒 𝑡𝑢𝑑𝑜 𝑝𝑜𝑑𝑒 𝑠𝑒𝑟 𝑓𝑒𝑖𝑡𝑜, 𝑠𝑒𝑚 𝑓𝑟𝑒𝑖𝑜𝑠 𝑜𝑢 𝑏𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑖𝑟𝑎𝑠 𝑎𝑜𝑠 𝑒𝑔𝑜𝜄́𝑠𝑚𝑜𝑠 𝑝𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑜𝑎𝑖𝑠. 𝐴𝑔𝑜𝑟𝑎 𝑚𝑎𝑡𝑎-𝑠𝑒 𝑠𝑖𝑚𝑝𝑙𝑒𝑠𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑝𝑜𝑟𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑠𝑒 𝑔𝑜𝑠𝑡𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑝𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑜𝑎.
𝐴𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑐𝑒 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑛𝑎 𝑉𝑖𝑑𝑎 𝑒 𝑛𝑎 𝑉𝑖𝑑𝑎 𝑒𝑚 𝑆𝑜𝑐𝑖𝑒𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑒𝑥𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑚 𝑎𝑏𝑠𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑡𝑜𝑠, 𝑙𝑜𝑔𝑜, 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑒𝑥𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑚 𝑑𝑖𝑟𝑒𝑖𝑡𝑜𝑠 𝑎𝑏𝑠𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑡𝑜𝑠 𝑒 𝑡𝑢𝑑𝑜 𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑢𝑙𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑝𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑎 𝑎 𝑗𝑢𝑠𝑡𝑎 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑝𝑜𝑟𝑐𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝑒́ 𝑒́𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑎 𝑒 𝑠𝑜𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑙𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑐𝑒𝑖𝑡𝑎́𝑣𝑒𝑙 𝑒 𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑎𝑑𝑜.
𝑃𝑜𝑟𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑒𝑥𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑚 𝑚𝑒𝑠𝑚𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑖𝑠𝑎𝑠 (𝑜𝑝𝑖𝑛𝑖𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑒 𝑎𝑐𝑐̧𝑜̃𝑒𝑠) 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑠𝑎̃𝑜 𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑎𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑒 𝑎𝑙𝑔𝑢𝑚𝑎𝑠 𝑠𝑎̃𝑜 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑎𝑝𝑒𝑛𝑎𝑠 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑓𝑢𝑛𝑑𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑎𝑑𝑎𝑠, 𝑚𝑎𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑡𝑢𝑒𝑚 𝑐𝑟𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑠.
𝐸 𝑛𝑎 𝑠𝑢𝑎 𝑎̂𝑛𝑠𝑖𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑟𝑎̃ 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑟 𝑠𝑒𝑟 𝑑𝑜 𝑡𝑎𝑚𝑎𝑛𝘩𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑢𝑚 𝑏𝑜𝑖, 𝐴𝑛𝑑𝑟𝑒́ 𝑉𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑎 𝑒 𝑜 𝐶𝘩𝑒𝑔𝑎 𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑔𝑖𝑟𝑎𝑚 𝑢𝑚 𝑎𝑖𝑛𝑑𝑎 𝑚𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑒𝑙𝑒𝑣𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑝𝑎𝑡𝑎𝑚𝑎𝑟 𝑑𝑒 𝑐𝑎𝑛𝑎𝑙𝘩𝑖𝑐𝑒 𝑒 𝑣𝑖𝑙𝑒𝑧𝑎; 𝑟𝑒𝑓𝑖𝑟𝑜-𝑚𝑒, 𝑜𝑏𝑣𝑖𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒, 𝑎̀ 𝑎𝑓𝑖𝑟𝑚𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜, 𝑟𝑒𝑝𝑒𝑡𝑖𝑑𝑎 𝑖𝑛𝑐𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒, 𝑑𝑒 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑃𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑢𝑔𝑎𝑙 𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑖𝑠𝑎 𝑑𝑒 “𝑡𝑟𝑒̂𝑠 𝑆𝑎𝑙𝑎𝑧𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑠” 𝑒 𝑎𝑜𝑠 𝑐𝑎𝑟𝑡𝑎𝑧𝑒𝑠 𝑛𝑜𝑠 𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎́ 𝑒𝑠𝑐𝑟𝑖𝑡𝑜 “𝑂𝑠 𝑐𝑖𝑔𝑎𝑛𝑜𝑠 𝑡𝑒̂𝑚 𝑑𝑒 𝑐𝑢𝑚𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑟 𝑎 𝑙𝑒𝑖” 𝑒 “𝑃𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑢𝑔𝑎𝑙 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑒́ 𝑜 𝐵𝑎𝑛𝑔𝑙𝑎𝑑𝑒𝑠𝘩”.
𝐶𝑜𝑚𝑒𝑐̧𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑝𝑒𝑙𝑜𝑠 𝑐𝑎𝑟𝑡𝑎𝑧𝑒𝑠, 𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑢́𝑑𝑜 𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑎𝑠 𝑒𝑥𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑛𝑒𝑙𝑒𝑠 𝑖𝑛𝑠𝑐𝑟𝑖𝑡𝑎𝑠 𝑒́ 𝑜𝑏𝑣𝑖𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑢́𝑝𝑖𝑑𝑜.
𝑇𝑜𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑛𝑜́𝑠, 𝑠𝑒𝑗𝑎 𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑙 𝑓𝑜𝑟 𝑎 𝑛𝑜𝑠𝑠𝑎 𝑒𝑡𝑛𝑖𝑎 𝑜𝑢 𝑠𝑒𝑥𝑜, 𝑡𝑒𝑚𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑐𝑢𝑚𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑟 𝑎 𝐿𝑒𝑖 - 𝑡𝑜𝑑𝑎 𝑎 𝑔𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑒 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑎𝑝𝑒𝑛𝑎𝑠 𝑎𝑠 𝑝𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑜𝑎𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑒𝑡𝑛𝑖𝑎 𝑐𝑖𝑔𝑎𝑛𝑎. 𝐸 𝘩𝑎́ 𝑝𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑜𝑎𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑡𝑜𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑎𝑠 𝑒𝑡𝑛𝑖𝑎𝑠 𝑎 𝑝𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑟 𝑐𝑟𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑠.
𝐸, 𝑝𝑜𝑟 𝑡𝑜𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑜𝑠 𝑚𝑜𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑜𝑠, 𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑒𝑐̧𝑎𝑟 𝑝𝑒𝑙𝑜𝑠 𝑔𝑒𝑜𝑔𝑟𝑎́𝑓𝑖𝑐𝑜𝑠, 𝑒́ 𝑎𝑏𝑠𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑡𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑒𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑃𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑢𝑔𝑎𝑙 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑒́ 𝑜 𝐵𝑎𝑛𝑔𝑙𝑎𝑑𝑒𝑠𝘩 (𝑝𝑒𝑠𝑒 𝑒𝑚𝑏𝑜𝑟𝑎, 𝑠𝑒𝑔𝑢𝑟𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒, 𝑎𝑙𝑔𝑢𝑚𝑎𝑠 𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒𝑠 𝑝𝑎𝑡𝑟𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑎𝑚𝑏𝑖𝑐𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑒𝑚 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑃𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑢𝑔𝑎𝑙 𝑑𝑒𝑖𝑥𝑒 𝑑𝑒 𝑡𝑒𝑟 𝑎𝑠 𝑟𝑒𝑔𝑟𝑎𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑡𝑒𝑐𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑏𝑎𝑙𝘩𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑟𝑒𝑠 𝑒 𝑜 𝑠𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑚𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑠𝑒𝑔𝑢𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑐̧𝑎 𝑠𝑜𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑙 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑜 𝑑𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑔𝑢𝑒𝑚 𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑒 𝑜𝑢𝑡𝑟𝑜 𝑑𝑒𝑛𝑠𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑝𝑜𝑣𝑜𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑝𝑒𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑛𝑜, 𝑝𝑜𝑏𝑟𝑒 𝑒 𝑖𝑛𝑓𝑒𝑙𝑖𝑧 𝑝𝑎𝜄́𝑠 𝑖𝑛𝑑𝑜𝑠𝑡𝑎̂𝑛𝑖𝑐𝑜, 𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑙𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑒 𝑎 Í𝑛𝑑𝑖𝑎, 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑜 𝑟𝑜𝑑𝑒𝑖𝑎 𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑠𝑒 𝑡𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒, 𝑒 𝑀𝑦𝑎𝑛𝑚𝑎𝑟, 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑟𝑒𝑔𝑖𝑎̃𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑖𝑟𝑎 𝑛𝑜 𝑐𝘩𝑎𝑚𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝐺𝑜𝑙𝑓𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝐵𝑒𝑛𝑔𝑎𝑙𝑎).
𝑃𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑜, 𝑠𝑒 𝑎𝑠 𝑓𝑟𝑎𝑠𝑒𝑠 𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑑𝑢𝑧𝑒𝑚 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑖𝑛𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑜𝑟𝑛𝑎́𝑣𝑒𝑙 𝑒 𝑖𝑛𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝜄́𝑣𝑒𝑙 𝑚𝑎𝑛𝑖𝑓𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑢𝑝𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑧, 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑜𝑏𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝐴𝑛𝑑𝑟𝑒́ 𝑉𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑎 𝑡𝑒𝑟 𝑗𝑎́ 𝑑𝑒𝑚𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑣𝑎́𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑠 𝑣𝑒𝑧𝑒𝑠 𝑞𝑢𝑒, 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑎𝑙𝑒́𝑚 𝑑𝑒 𝑚𝑎𝑙𝑐𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑑𝑜, 𝑒́ 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑐𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑎 𝑖𝑔𝑛𝑜𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑒 𝑏𝑜𝑐̧𝑎𝑙 𝑎 𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑚 𝑜 𝑒𝑙𝑖𝑡𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑎 𝑆𝑎𝑙𝑎𝑧𝑎𝑟 𝑛𝑢𝑛𝑐𝑎 𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑎 𝑑𝑖𝑟𝑖𝑔𝑖𝑑𝑜 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑢́𝑛𝑖𝑐𝑎 𝑝𝑎𝑙𝑎𝑣𝑟𝑎 (𝑜𝑢 𝑠𝑒𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑟 𝑙𝘩𝑒 𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑎 𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑚𝑖𝑡𝑖𝑑𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑑𝑒𝑙𝑒 𝑠𝑒 𝑎𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑥𝑖𝑚𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑒), 𝑎 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑠𝑢𝑏𝑗𝑎𝑐𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑎̀ 𝑒𝑥𝑖𝑏𝑖𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑠 𝑐𝑎𝑟𝑡𝑎𝑧𝑒𝑠 𝑠𝑜́ 𝑝𝑜𝑑𝑒 𝑠𝑒𝑟 𝑜𝑢𝑡𝑟𝑎.
𝐸 𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑎 𝑜𝑢𝑡𝑟𝑎 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑒́ 𝑐𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑟 𝑜́𝑑𝑖𝑜 𝑒 𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑓𝑖𝑎𝑛𝑐̧𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑎 𝑜𝑠 𝑔𝑟𝑢𝑝𝑜𝑠 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑠𝑎̃𝑜 𝑜 𝑎𝑙𝑣𝑜 𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑠 𝑐𝑎𝑟𝑡𝑎𝑧𝑒𝑠, 𝑖𝑛𝑐𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑎 𝑝𝑟𝑎́𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑝𝑜𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑣𝑖𝑜𝑙𝑒̂𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑎 𝑖𝑛𝑑𝑖𝑠𝑐𝑟𝑖𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑑𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑎 𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑎𝑠 𝑝𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑜𝑎𝑠 – 𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑠 𝑜𝑢𝑡𝑟𝑜𝑠 𝑠𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑠 𝘩𝑢𝑚𝑎𝑛𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑑𝑖𝑔𝑛𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝑒 𝑚𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑑𝑜𝑟𝑒𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑝𝑒𝑖𝑡𝑜.
𝑁𝑎𝑠 𝑠𝑜𝑐𝑖𝑒𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒𝑠 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑜𝑟𝑔𝑎𝑛𝑖𝑧𝑎𝑚 𝑠𝑒𝑔𝑢𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑜 𝑚𝑜𝑑𝑒𝑙𝑜 𝑑𝑜 𝐸𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝐷𝑖𝑟𝑒𝑖𝑡𝑜, 𝑠𝑜́ 𝑝𝑜𝑑𝑒𝑚 𝑠𝑒𝑟 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑑𝑒𝑛𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑠 – 𝑒 𝑠𝑜𝑓𝑟𝑒𝑟 𝑎𝑝𝑒𝑛𝑎𝑠 𝑎𝑠 𝑝𝑒𝑛𝑎𝑠 𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑣𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑠 𝑛𝑎 𝐿𝑒𝑖 - 𝑎𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑙𝑒𝑠 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑣𝑎𝑑𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑝𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑚 𝑐𝑟𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑠 𝑒 𝑑𝑒𝑝𝑜𝑖𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝑡𝑒𝑟 𝑠𝑖𝑑𝑜 𝑎𝑝𝑢𝑟𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑎𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑣𝑒́𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑢𝑚 𝑗𝑢𝑙𝑔𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜 𝑙𝑒𝑎𝑙, 𝑒𝑞𝑢𝑖𝑡𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑜 𝑒 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑐𝑒𝑖𝑡𝑢𝑜𝑠𝑜, 𝑟𝑒𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑧𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑒𝑚 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑚𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑟𝑒𝑔𝑟𝑎𝑠 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑐𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑢𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑣𝑖𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑑𝑒𝑓𝑖𝑛𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑣𝑒𝑛𝑖𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑎𝑝𝑙𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑑𝑎𝑠.
𝐶𝑙𝑎𝑟𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑒́ 𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑒 𝑜 𝑚𝑜𝑑𝑒𝑙𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑠𝑜𝑐𝑖𝑒𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑖𝑧𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑝𝑒𝑙𝑜 𝐶𝘩𝑒𝑔𝑎, 𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑠 𝑠𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑐𝑎𝑑𝑎 𝑣𝑒𝑧 𝑚𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑒𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝐴𝑛𝑑𝑟𝑒́ 𝑉𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑎 𝑒 𝑜𝑠 𝑠𝑒𝑢𝑠 𝑎𝑝𝑎𝑛𝑖𝑔𝑢𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑚 𝑒 𝑛𝑜𝑠 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑝𝑜̃𝑒𝑚 𝑒́ 𝑢𝑚 𝑟𝑒𝑔𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑜 𝑎̀ 𝐷𝑖𝑡𝑎𝑑𝑢𝑟𝑎 𝑑𝑜 𝐸𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑁𝑜𝑣𝑜, 𝑢𝑚 𝑟𝑒𝑔𝑖𝑚𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑟𝑟𝑢𝑝𝑡𝑜, 𝑎𝑡𝑒́ 𝑒𝑚 𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑚𝑜𝑠 𝑚𝑜𝑟𝑎𝑖𝑠, 𝑎𝑡𝑒́ 𝑎̀ 𝑚𝑒𝑑𝑢𝑙𝑎 𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑜𝑠𝑠𝑜𝑠, 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑜𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑚𝑖𝑢 𝑎𝑠 𝑝𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑢𝑔𝑢𝑒𝑠𝑎𝑠 𝑒 𝑜𝑠 𝑝𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑢𝑔𝑢𝑒𝑠𝑒𝑠 𝑑𝑢𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝟺𝟾 𝑎𝑛𝑜𝑠.
𝐷𝑎𝜄́ 𝑜 𝑎𝑝𝑒𝑙𝑜 𝑎𝑜𝑠 𝑡𝑟𝑒̂𝑠 𝑆𝑎𝑙𝑎𝑧𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑠.
𝐸𝑠𝑠𝑎 𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑢𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑔𝑒𝑟𝑜𝑢 𝑢𝑚 𝑚𝑢𝑖𝑡𝑜 𝑠𝑎𝑢𝑑𝑎́𝑣𝑒𝑙 𝑐𝑜𝑟𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑡𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑜𝑠 𝑒 𝑎𝑡𝑒́ 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑗𝑢𝑠𝑡𝑎 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑖𝑝𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑖𝑟𝑖𝑔𝑖𝑑𝑎 𝑎𝑜 𝑃𝑟𝑜𝑐𝑢𝑟𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑟-𝐺𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑙 𝑑𝑎 𝑅𝑒𝑝𝑢́𝑏𝑙𝑖𝑐𝑎 (𝑃𝐺𝑅) 𝑝𝑒𝑙𝑜 𝐴𝑑𝑣𝑜𝑔𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝐴𝑛𝑡𝑜́𝑛𝑖𝑜 𝐺𝑎𝑟𝑐𝑖𝑎 𝑃𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑖𝑟𝑎.
𝐸 𝑒𝑚 𝑏𝑜𝑎 𝘩𝑜𝑟𝑎 𝑜 𝑓𝑒𝑧, 𝑒𝑠𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑒𝑢 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎 𝑖𝑛𝑖𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑎 𝑡𝑒𝑛𝘩𝑎 𝑚𝑎𝑖𝑜𝑟 𝑠𝑢𝑐𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑜 𝑑𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑜𝑢𝑡𝑟𝑎 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑓𝑜𝑖 𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑒𝑛𝑐𝑎𝑑𝑒𝑎𝑑𝑎 𝑒𝑚 𝟷𝟽 𝑑𝑒 𝑑𝑒𝑧𝑒𝑚𝑏𝑟𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝟸𝟶𝟷𝟿, 𝑛𝑎 𝑠𝑒𝑞𝑢𝑒̂𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑎 𝑑𝑎 𝑜𝑐𝑜𝑟𝑟𝑒̂𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑎, 𝑒𝑚 𝟷𝟶 𝑑𝑒 𝑎𝑔𝑜𝑠𝑡𝑜 𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑒 𝑚𝑒𝑠𝑚𝑜 𝑎𝑛𝑜, 𝑑𝑒 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑟𝑒𝑢𝑛𝑖𝑎̃𝑜 𝑒𝑚 𝑃𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑢𝑔𝑎𝑙 𝑑𝑒 𝑜𝑟𝑔𝑎𝑛𝑖𝑧𝑎𝑐̧𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑒𝑥𝑡𝑟𝑒𝑚𝑎-𝑑𝑖𝑟𝑒𝑖𝑡𝑎 𝑒𝑢𝑟𝑜𝑝𝑒𝑖𝑎𝑠, 𝑒 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑢 𝑛𝑎 𝑎𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑛𝑎 𝐴𝑅 𝑑𝑒 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑝𝑒𝑡𝑖𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜, 𝑑𝑖𝑟𝑖𝑔𝑖𝑑𝑎 𝑎𝑜 𝑃𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑑𝑎 𝐴𝑅, 𝑎𝑜 𝑃𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑑𝑜 𝑇𝑟𝑖𝑏𝑢𝑛𝑎𝑙 𝐶𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑡𝑢𝑐𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑙 (𝑇𝐶), 𝑎̀ 𝑀𝑖𝑛𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑎 𝑑𝑎 𝐽𝑢𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑐̧𝑎 𝑒 𝑎𝑜𝑠 𝐺𝑟𝑢𝑝𝑜𝑠 𝑃𝑎𝑟𝑙𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑠 𝑑𝑎 𝐴𝑅, 𝑝𝑒𝑑𝑖𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑎 𝑖𝑙𝑒𝑔𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑧𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑎 𝑜𝑟𝑔𝑎𝑛𝑖𝑧𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑁𝑜𝑣𝑎 𝑂𝑟𝑑𝑒𝑚 𝑆𝑜𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑙 𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑖𝑑𝑖𝑑𝑎 𝑝𝑜𝑟 𝑀𝑎́𝑟𝑖𝑜 𝑀𝑎𝑐𝘩𝑎𝑑𝑜.
𝐴 𝑜𝑟𝑔𝑎𝑛𝑖𝑧𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑠𝑢𝑠𝑝𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑒𝑢 𝑎 𝑠𝑢𝑎 𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑡𝑒𝑟 𝑠𝑖𝑑𝑜 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑓𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑑𝑎 𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑙𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑟 𝑑𝑒𝑐𝑖𝑠𝑎̃𝑜 𝑒 𝑀𝑎́𝑟𝑖𝑜 𝑀𝑎𝑐𝘩𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎́ 𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑢𝑎𝑙𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑜, 𝑚𝑎𝑠 𝑝𝑜𝑟 𝑡𝑒𝑟 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑑𝑒𝑛𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑝𝑒𝑙𝑎 𝑝𝑟𝑎́𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑢𝑚 𝑐𝑟𝑖𝑚𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑐𝑟𝑒𝑡𝑜.
𝐴𝑖𝑛𝑑𝑎 𝑎 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑒 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑝𝑜́𝑠𝑖𝑡𝑜, 𝑟𝑒𝑙𝑒𝑚𝑏𝑟𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒, 𝑛𝑜𝑠 𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑚𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑜 𝑎𝑟𝑡𝑖𝑔𝑜 𝟼º 𝑑𝑎 𝐿𝑒𝑖 𝑛.º 𝟼𝟺/𝟽𝟾 𝑎𝑝𝑒𝑛𝑎𝑠 𝑜 𝑃𝑅, 𝑎 𝐴𝑅, 𝑜 𝐺𝑜𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑛𝑜, 𝑜 𝑃𝑟𝑜𝑣𝑒𝑑𝑜𝑟 𝑑𝑒 𝐽𝑢𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑐̧𝑎 𝑒 𝑜 𝑃𝐺𝑅 𝑡𝑒̂𝑚 𝑙𝑒𝑔𝑖𝑡𝑖𝑚𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑟𝑒𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑟 𝑎𝑜 𝑃𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑑𝑜 𝑇𝐶 𝑎 𝑑𝑒𝑐𝑙𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑜𝑟𝑔𝑎𝑛𝑖𝑧𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑓𝑖𝑙𝘩𝑎 𝑎 𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑜𝑙𝑜𝑔𝑖𝑎 𝑓𝑎𝑠𝑐𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑎 𝑒 𝑎 𝑑𝑒𝑐𝑖𝑠𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑑𝑒𝑐𝑟𝑒𝑡𝑎𝑟 𝑎 𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑝𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑎 𝑒𝑥𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜.
𝐸 𝑚𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑐𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎́ 𝑒𝑚 𝑐𝑎𝑢𝑠𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑎 𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑖𝑥𝑎 𝑎𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑑𝑎 𝑝𝑒𝑙𝑜 𝐴𝑑𝑣𝑜𝑔𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝐴𝑛𝑡𝑜́𝑛𝑖𝑜 𝐺𝑎𝑟𝑐𝑖𝑎 𝑃𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑖𝑟𝑎, 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑒́ 𝑎𝑝𝑒𝑛𝑎𝑠 𝑑𝑎𝑟 𝑖𝑛𝜄́𝑐𝑖𝑜 𝑎 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑎𝑐𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑜 𝑜𝑏𝑗𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑠𝑒𝑟 𝑑𝑒𝑐𝑙𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑜 𝐶𝘩𝑒𝑔𝑎 𝑒́ 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑜𝑟𝑔𝑎𝑛𝑖𝑧𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑓𝑖𝑙𝘩𝑎 𝑎 𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑜𝑙𝑜𝑔𝑖𝑎 𝑓𝑎𝑠𝑐𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑎 𝑒 𝑑𝑒 𝑣𝑒𝑟 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑓𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑑𝑎 𝑎 𝑑𝑒𝑐𝑖𝑠𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑑𝑒𝑐𝑟𝑒𝑡𝑎𝑟 𝑎 𝑠𝑢𝑎 𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑝𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑎 𝑒𝑥𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜, 𝑚𝑎𝑠, 𝑑𝑒 𝑖𝑔𝑢𝑎𝑙 𝑚𝑜𝑑𝑜, 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑠𝑒𝑗𝑎𝑚 𝑖𝑛𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑢𝑟𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑖𝑛𝑞𝑢𝑒́𝑟𝑖𝑡𝑜𝑠 𝑣𝑖𝑠𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑑𝑒𝑛𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝐴𝑛𝑑𝑟𝑒́ 𝑉𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑎 𝑒 𝑣𝑎́𝑟𝑖𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑠𝑒𝑢𝑠 𝑎𝑝𝑎𝑛𝑖𝑔𝑢𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑝𝑒𝑙𝑎 𝑝𝑟𝑎́𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑐𝑟𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑠 𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑣𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑜𝑠 𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑝𝑢𝑛𝑖𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑏𝑒𝑙𝑒𝑐𝑖𝑑𝑎 𝑛𝑜 𝐶𝑜́𝑑𝑖𝑔𝑜 𝑃𝑒𝑛𝑎𝑙 𝑝𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑢𝑔𝑢𝑒̂𝑠 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑓𝑜𝑖 𝑎𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑣𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑛𝑜 𝑗𝑎́ 𝑙𝑜𝑛𝑔𝜄́𝑛𝑞𝑢𝑜 𝑎𝑛𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝟷𝟿𝟾𝟸 𝑒 𝑟𝑒𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑚𝑢𝑙𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑒𝑚 𝟷𝟿𝟿𝟻.
𝐻𝑎́ 𝑚𝑢𝑖𝑡𝑜 𝑡𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑜, 𝑝𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑜.
𝑉𝑜𝑙𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑎𝑜 𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒, 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑜 𝑒𝑟𝑎 𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑓𝑒𝑖𝑡𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑒𝑠𝑝𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑎́𝑣𝑒𝑙, 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑎𝑝𝑒𝑛𝑎𝑠 𝐴𝑛𝑑𝑟𝑒́ 𝑉𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑎 𝑒 𝑜𝑠 𝑠𝑒𝑢𝑠 𝑎𝑝𝑎𝑛𝑖𝑔𝑢𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑠𝑒 𝑣𝑖𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑚 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑣𝑒𝑧 𝑚𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑎𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑟 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑜 𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑠𝑒𝑔𝑢𝑖𝑑𝑜𝑠 “𝑝𝑒𝑙𝑎 𝐸𝑠𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑟𝑑𝑎”, 𝑐𝘩𝑒𝑔𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑎𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑙𝑒 𝑎̀ 𝑓𝑎𝑙𝑡𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑔𝑜𝑛𝘩𝑎 𝑒 𝑑𝑒 𝑝𝑢𝑑𝑜𝑟 𝑑𝑒 𝑎𝑓𝑖𝑟𝑚𝑎𝑟 𝑞𝑢𝑒 “𝑒𝑥𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑔𝑢𝑖𝑟 𝑜 𝐶𝘩𝑒𝑔𝑎 𝑠𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑎 𝑒𝑥𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑔𝑢𝑖𝑟 𝑎 𝑝𝑟𝑜́𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑎 𝑑𝑒𝑚𝑜𝑐𝑟𝑎𝑐𝑖𝑎”, 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑜, 𝑑𝑒 𝑖𝑔𝑢𝑎𝑙 𝑚𝑜𝑑𝑜, 𝑢𝑚 𝑐𝑜𝑟𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑠𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑒𝑓𝑒𝑛𝑠𝑜𝑟𝑒𝑠 𝑑𝑎 𝐿𝑖𝑏𝑒𝑟𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝑠𝑒 𝑎𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑚 𝑒𝑚 𝑝𝑢́𝑏𝑙𝑖𝑐𝑜 𝑎 𝑎𝑓𝑖𝑟𝑚𝑎𝑟 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑎𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑙𝑒 𝑟𝑎𝑐𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑎, 𝑥𝑒𝑛𝑜́𝑓𝑜𝑏𝑜 𝑒 𝑓𝑎𝑠𝑐𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑎 𝑠𝑒𝑚𝑒𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑟 𝑑𝑒 𝑜́𝑑𝑖𝑜𝑠 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑣𝑎 𝑎 𝑒𝑥𝑒𝑟𝑐𝑒𝑟 𝑎 𝑠𝑢𝑎 𝑙𝑖𝑏𝑒𝑟𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝑑𝑒 𝑒𝑥𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑎̃𝑜.
𝐸 𝑑𝑖𝑧-𝑠𝑒 𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑎 𝑔𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑙𝑖𝑏𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑙 𝑒 𝑑𝑒𝑚𝑜𝑐𝑟𝑎́𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑎. 𝑆𝑒𝑟𝑎́ 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑠𝑒 𝑒𝑠𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑚 𝑜𝑢 𝑠𝑒 𝑐𝑎𝑙𝘩𝑎𝑟 𝑛𝑢𝑛𝑐𝑎 𝑎𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑚, 𝑑𝑒 𝑢𝑚 𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑞𝑢𝜄́𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑚𝑜 𝑏𝑟𝑜𝑐𝑎𝑟𝑑𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑠𝑒 𝑎𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑖𝑎 𝑙𝑜𝑔𝑜 𝑛𝑜 𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑖𝑟𝑜 𝑎𝑛𝑜 𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝐹𝑎𝑐𝑢𝑙𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝐷𝑖𝑟𝑒𝑖𝑡𝑜 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑏𝑒𝑙𝑒𝑐𝑖𝑎 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑎 𝑚𝑖𝑛𝘩𝑎 𝑙𝑖𝑏𝑒𝑟𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝑎𝑐𝑎𝑏𝑎 𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑒𝑐̧𝑎 𝑎 𝑙𝑖𝑏𝑒𝑟𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝑒 𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑖𝑟𝑒𝑖𝑡𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑜𝑢𝑡𝑟𝑜𝑠.ᐣ
𝑄𝑢𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑐𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑛𝑐̧𝑎𝑠 𝑏𝑖𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑠 (𝑚𝑎𝑠 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑠 𝑎𝑡𝑒́ 𝑡𝑒̂𝑚 𝑎𝑙𝑔𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑐𝑢𝑙𝑝𝑎 𝑝𝑜𝑟 𝑐𝑎𝑢𝑠𝑎 𝑑𝑎 𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒), 𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑠 𝑎𝑢𝑡𝑜-𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑐𝑙𝑎𝑚𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑔𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑒𝑠 𝑙𝑖𝑏𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑒 𝑑𝑒𝑚𝑜𝑐𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑎𝑠 𝑎𝑐𝘩𝑎𝑚 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑡𝑢𝑑𝑜 𝑝𝑜𝑑𝑒 𝑠𝑒𝑟 𝑑𝑖𝑡𝑜 𝑒 𝑡𝑢𝑑𝑜 𝑝𝑜𝑑𝑒 𝑠𝑒𝑟 𝑓𝑒𝑖𝑡𝑜 - 𝑒 𝑜𝑠 𝑒𝑙𝑒𝑖𝑡𝑜𝑟𝑒𝑠 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑑𝑒𝑐𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑚.
𝐽𝑎́ 𝑠𝑒 𝑠𝑎𝑏𝑖𝑎 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑐𝑒𝑖𝑡𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝐸𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝐷𝑖𝑟𝑒𝑖𝑡𝑜 𝑒́ 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑖𝑠𝑎 𝑚𝑢𝑖𝑡𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑙𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑑𝑎 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑎𝑠 𝑝𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑜𝑎𝑠 𝑠𝑎́𝑏𝑖𝑎𝑠, 𝑚𝑎𝑠 𝑐𝑎𝑏𝑒 𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑔𝑢𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑟, 𝑠𝑒𝑟𝑎́ 𝑞𝑢𝑒, 𝑎𝑓𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑙, 𝑒𝑙𝑎𝑠 𝑡𝑎𝑚𝑏𝑒́𝑚 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑠𝑎𝑏𝑒𝑚 𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑠𝑖𝑔𝑛𝑖𝑓𝑖𝑐𝑎 𝑜 𝑡𝑎𝑙 “𝑠𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑚𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑓𝑟𝑒𝑖𝑜𝑠 𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑝𝑒𝑠𝑜𝑠” 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑒𝑛𝑐𝘩𝑒𝑚 𝑜𝑠 𝑠𝑒𝑢𝑠 𝑑𝑖𝑠𝑐𝑢𝑟𝑠𝑜𝑠 𝑒 𝑜𝑠 𝑠𝑒𝑢𝑠 𝑒𝑠𝑐𝑟𝑖𝑡𝑜𝑠.ᐣ 𝑆𝑒 𝑐𝑎𝑙𝘩𝑎𝑟 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑠𝑎𝑏𝑒𝑚.
𝑀𝑎𝑠 𝑒 𝑝𝑒𝑑𝑖𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑐𝑢𝑙𝑝𝑎 𝑝𝑒𝑙𝑎 𝑒𝑥𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑠𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑎 𝑗𝑢𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑓𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑎𝑓𝑖𝑟𝑚𝑜 (𝑚𝑎𝑠 𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎́ 𝑒𝑚 𝑐𝑎𝑢𝑠𝑎 𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑚 𝑜 𝑒𝑥𝑖𝑔𝑒), 𝑒𝑖𝑠 𝑎𝑠 𝑟𝑎𝑧𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑝𝑒𝑙𝑎𝑠 𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑟𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝐴𝑛𝑡𝑜́𝑛𝑖𝑜 𝐺𝑎𝑟𝑐𝑖𝑎 𝑃𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑖𝑟𝑎 𝑡𝑒𝑚 𝑟𝑎𝑧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑚𝑢𝑙𝑎 𝑎 𝑠𝑢𝑎 𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑖𝑥𝑎 𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑜 𝑃𝐺𝑅.
𝐷𝑒 𝑓𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑜, 𝑎𝑝𝑒𝑠𝑎𝑟 𝑑𝑒, 𝑒𝑚 𝑚𝑖𝑛𝘩𝑎 𝑜𝑝𝑖𝑛𝑖𝑎̃𝑜, 𝑙𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑣𝑒𝑙𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑚𝑜𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑎𝑐̧𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑎𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑎𝑛𝘩𝑜 𝑛𝑒𝑚 𝑠𝑢𝑏𝑠𝑐𝑟𝑒𝑣𝑜, 𝑑𝑜 𝑡𝑒𝑥𝑡𝑜 𝑑𝑜 𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑢𝑎𝑙 𝑎𝑟𝑡𝑖𝑔𝑜 𝑑𝑎 𝐶𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑡𝑢𝑖𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑝𝑒𝑖𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑎̀ 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑡𝑢𝑖𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑡𝑖𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑝𝑜𝑙𝜄́𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑜𝑠 (𝑎𝑟𝑡𝑖𝑔𝑜 𝟻𝟷º) 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑓𝑜𝑖 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑜𝑑𝑢𝑧𝑖𝑑𝑜 𝑝𝑒𝑙𝑎 𝑟𝑒𝑣𝑖𝑠𝑎̃𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑡𝑢𝑐𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑙 𝑑𝑒 𝟸𝟶𝟶𝟻 (𝑎𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑣𝑎𝑑𝑎 𝑝𝑒𝑙𝑎 𝐿𝑒𝑖 𝐶𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑡𝑢𝑐𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑙 𝟷/𝟸𝟶𝟶𝟻, 𝑑𝑒 𝟷𝟸 𝑑𝑒 𝑎𝑔𝑜𝑠𝑡𝑜 - 𝑒𝑟𝑎 𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑎̃𝑜 𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑖𝑟𝑜-𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑜 𝐽𝑜𝑠𝑒́ 𝑆𝑜́𝑐𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑠 𝐶𝑎𝑟𝑣𝑎𝑙𝘩𝑜 𝑃𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑆𝑜𝑢𝑠𝑎), 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑟 𝑜 𝑛𝑢́𝑚𝑒𝑟𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑣𝑎 𝑖𝑛𝑠𝑐𝑟𝑖𝑡𝑜 𝑛𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑎 𝐿𝑒𝑖 𝑀𝑎𝑖𝑜𝑟 𝑎𝑡𝑒́ 𝑎̀ 𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑑𝑎 𝑒𝑚 𝑣𝑖𝑔𝑜𝑟 𝑑𝑎𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑙𝑒 𝑑𝑖𝑝𝑙𝑜𝑚𝑎 𝑎𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑣𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑛𝑎 𝐴𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑚𝑏𝑙𝑒𝑖𝑎 𝑑𝑎 𝑅𝑒𝑝𝑢́𝑏𝑙𝑖𝑐𝑎, 𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑙 𝑠𝑒𝑗𝑎, 𝑜 𝑛𝑢́𝑚𝑒𝑟𝑜 𝟺 𝑑𝑜 𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑜𝑟 𝑎𝑟𝑡𝑖𝑔𝑜 𝟺𝟼º (𝑐𝑢𝑗𝑎 𝑒𝑝𝜄́𝑔𝑟𝑎𝑓𝑒 𝑒𝑟𝑎 𝐿𝑖𝑏𝑒𝑟𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝑑𝑒 𝐴𝑠𝑠𝑜𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜), 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑡𝑖𝑛𝘩𝑎 𝑎 𝑠𝑒𝑔𝑢𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑟𝑒𝑑𝑎𝑐𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜: “𝑁𝑎̃𝑜 𝑠𝑎̃𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑜𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑐̧𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑎𝑟𝑚𝑎𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑛𝑒𝑚 𝑑𝑒 𝑡𝑖𝑝𝑜 𝑚𝑖𝑙𝑖𝑡𝑎𝑟, 𝑚𝑖𝑙𝑖𝑡𝑎𝑟𝑖𝑧𝑎𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑜𝑢 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑚𝑖𝑙𝑖𝑡𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑠, 𝑛𝑒𝑚 𝑜𝑟𝑔𝑎𝑛𝑖𝑧𝑎𝑐̧𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑟𝑎𝑐𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑠 𝑜𝑢 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑓𝑖𝑙𝘩𝑒𝑚 𝑎 𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑜𝑙𝑜𝑔𝑖𝑎 𝑓𝑎𝑠𝑐𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑎.”, 𝑖𝑠𝑠𝑜 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑠𝑖𝑔𝑛𝑖𝑓𝑖𝑐𝑎 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑐𝑒𝑖𝑡𝑜 𝑑𝑒 “𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑡𝑖𝑑𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑓𝑖𝑙𝘩𝑎 𝑎 𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑜𝑙𝑜𝑔𝑖𝑎 𝑓𝑎𝑠𝑐𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑎”, 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑓𝑜𝑖 𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑎𝑑𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑗𝑢𝑛𝑡𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑖𝑛𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑢𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜𝑠 𝑗𝑢𝑟𝜄́𝑑𝑖𝑐𝑜𝑠 𝑣𝑖𝑛𝑐𝑢𝑙𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑜𝑠 𝑎𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑙 𝑡𝑜𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑒 𝑡𝑜𝑑𝑎𝑠 (𝑒 𝑡𝑜𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑎𝑠 𝑖𝑛𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑡𝑢𝑖𝑐̧𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑒 𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒𝑠 𝑝𝑢́𝑏𝑙𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑠 𝑒 𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑣𝑎𝑑𝑎𝑠) 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎̃𝑜 𝑜𝑏𝑟𝑖𝑔𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑎 𝑜𝑏𝑒𝑑𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑟.
𝑅𝑒𝑝𝑖𝑡𝑜, 𝑜𝑏𝑟𝑖𝑔𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑎 𝑜𝑏𝑒𝑑𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑟, 𝑠𝑜𝑏 𝑝𝑒𝑛𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑙𝑒𝑔𝑎𝑙 𝑠𝑎𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜.
𝐴 𝑏𝑒𝑚 𝑑𝑎 𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒 (𝑝𝑜𝑟𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑎 𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝑒𝑥𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑒, 𝑎𝑝𝑒𝑠𝑎𝑟 𝑑𝑒 𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑟𝑠𝑎 𝑛𝑢𝑚 𝑢𝑛𝑖𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑠𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑐𝑒𝑝𝑐̧𝑜̃𝑒𝑠, 𝑎 𝑚𝑎𝑖𝑜𝑟 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑡𝑒 𝑑𝑒𝑙𝑎𝑠 𝑓𝑎𝑙𝑠𝑎𝑠), 𝑛𝑜 𝑛𝑢́𝑚𝑒𝑟𝑜 𝑑𝑎𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑙𝑒 𝑎𝑟𝑡𝑖𝑔𝑜 𝟻𝟷º 𝑑𝑎 𝐶𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑡𝑢𝑖𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜, 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎́ 𝑒𝑚 𝑣𝑖𝑔𝑜𝑟 𝑒 𝑐𝑢𝑗𝑎 𝑒𝑝𝜄́𝑔𝑟𝑎𝑓𝑒 𝑒́ “𝐴𝑠𝑠𝑜𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑐̧𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑒 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑡𝑖𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑝𝑜𝑙𝜄́𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑜𝑠”, 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎́ 𝑒𝑠𝑐𝑟𝑖𝑡𝑜 𝑎𝑙𝑔𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒, 𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑜𝑛𝘩𝑒𝑐̧𝑜, 𝑒́ 𝑠𝑢𝑏𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑙𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑑𝑖𝑓𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒:
“𝟹. 𝑂𝑠 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑡𝑖𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑝𝑜𝑙𝜄́𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑜𝑠 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑝𝑜𝑑𝑒𝑚, 𝑠𝑒𝑚 𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑗𝑢𝜄́𝑧𝑜 𝑑𝑎 𝑓𝑖𝑙𝑜𝑠𝑜𝑓𝑖𝑎 𝑜𝑢 𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑜𝑙𝑜𝑔𝑖𝑎 𝑖𝑛𝑠𝑝𝑖𝑟𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑟𝑎 𝑑𝑜 𝑠𝑒𝑢 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑔𝑟𝑎𝑚𝑎, 𝑢𝑠𝑎𝑟 𝑑𝑒𝑛𝑜𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑛𝘩𝑎 𝑒𝑥𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑑𝑖𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑟𝑒𝑙𝑎𝑐𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑖𝑠𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑟 𝑟𝑒𝑙𝑖𝑔𝑖𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑜𝑢 𝑖𝑔𝑟𝑒𝑗𝑎𝑠, 𝑏𝑒𝑚 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑜 𝑒𝑚𝑏𝑙𝑒𝑚𝑎𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑓𝑢𝑛𝑑𝜄́𝑣𝑒𝑖𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑠𝜄́𝑚𝑏𝑜𝑙𝑜𝑠 𝑛𝑎𝑐𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑜𝑢 𝑟𝑒𝑙𝑖𝑔𝑖𝑜𝑠𝑜𝑠.
𝟺. 𝑁𝑎̃𝑜 𝑝𝑜𝑑𝑒𝑚 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑡𝑢𝑖𝑟-𝑠𝑒 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑡𝑖𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑞𝑢𝑒, 𝑝𝑒𝑙𝑎 𝑠𝑢𝑎 𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑖𝑔𝑛𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑜𝑢 𝑝𝑒𝑙𝑜𝑠 𝑠𝑒𝑢𝑠 𝑜𝑏𝑗𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑜𝑠 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑔𝑟𝑎𝑚𝑎́𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑜𝑠, 𝑡𝑒𝑛𝘩𝑎𝑚 𝜄́𝑛𝑑𝑜𝑙𝑒 𝑜𝑢 𝑎̂𝑚𝑏𝑖𝑡𝑜 𝑟𝑒𝑔𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑙”.
𝑇𝑜𝑑𝑎𝑣𝑖𝑎, 𝑜 𝑂𝑟𝑑𝑒𝑛𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜 𝐽𝑢𝑟𝜄́𝑑𝑖𝑐𝑜 𝑑𝑜 𝑝𝑎𝜄́𝑠 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑠𝑒 𝑒𝑠𝑔𝑜𝑡𝑎 𝑛𝑎 𝐶𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑡𝑢𝑖𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜, 𝑒, 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑜 𝑗𝑎́ 𝑟𝑒𝑓𝑒𝑟𝑖, 𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑐𝑒𝑖𝑡𝑜 𝑑𝑒 “𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑡𝑖𝑑𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑓𝑖𝑙𝘩𝑎 𝑎 𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑜𝑙𝑜𝑔𝑖𝑎 𝑓𝑎𝑠𝑐𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑎”, 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑓𝑜𝑖 𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑎𝑑𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑗𝑢𝑛𝑡𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑖𝑛𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑢𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜𝑠 𝑗𝑢𝑟𝜄́𝑑𝑖𝑐𝑜𝑠 𝑣𝑖𝑛𝑐𝑢𝑙𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑜𝑠.
𝐸, 𝑑𝑒 𝑡𝑜𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑠 𝑛𝑜𝑟𝑚𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑜𝑠 𝑙𝑒𝑔𝑎𝑖𝑠, 𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑐𝑜 𝑛𝑜𝑚𝑒𝑎𝑑𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑠:
𝑎) 𝑎𝑟𝑡𝑖𝑔𝑜 𝟷𝟶º 𝑑𝑎 𝐿𝑒𝑖 𝑂𝑟𝑔𝑎̂𝑛𝑖𝑐𝑎 𝑑𝑜 𝑇𝑟𝑖𝑏𝑢𝑛𝑎𝑙 𝐶𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑡𝑢𝑐𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑙:
“𝐶𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑒𝑡𝑒 𝑎𝑜 𝑇𝑟𝑖𝑏𝑢𝑛𝑎𝑙 𝐶𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑡𝑢𝑐𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑙 𝑑𝑒𝑐𝑙𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑟, 𝑛𝑜𝑠 𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑚𝑜𝑠 𝑒 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑜𝑠 𝑒𝑓𝑒𝑖𝑡𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑎 𝐿𝑒𝑖 𝑛.º 𝟼𝟺/𝟽𝟾, 𝑑𝑒 𝟼 𝑑𝑒 𝑜𝑢𝑡𝑢𝑏𝑟𝑜, 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑙𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑟 𝑜𝑟𝑔𝑎𝑛𝑖𝑧𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑓𝑖𝑙𝘩𝑎 𝑎 𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑜𝑙𝑜𝑔𝑖𝑎 𝑓𝑎𝑠𝑐𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑎 𝑒 𝑑𝑒𝑐𝑟𝑒𝑡𝑎𝑟 𝑎 𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑝𝑒𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑎 𝑒𝑥𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜.”
𝑏) 𝑎𝑟𝑡𝑖𝑔𝑜𝑠 𝟷º, 𝟸º 𝑒 𝟹º 𝑑𝑎 𝐿𝑒𝑖 𝑛.º 𝟼𝟺/𝟽𝟾, 𝑑𝑒 𝟼 𝑑𝑒 𝑜𝑢𝑡𝑢𝑏𝑟𝑜
“𝐴𝑟𝑡𝑖𝑔𝑜 𝟷.º
𝑆𝑎̃𝑜 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑖𝑏𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑎𝑠 𝑜𝑟𝑔𝑎𝑛𝑖𝑧𝑎𝑐̧𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑓𝑖𝑙𝘩𝑒𝑚 𝑎 𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑜𝑙𝑜𝑔𝑖𝑎 𝑓𝑎𝑠𝑐𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑎.
𝐴𝑟𝑡𝑖𝑔𝑜 𝟸.º
𝟷 - 𝑃𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑜 𝑒𝑓𝑒𝑖𝑡𝑜 𝑑𝑜 𝑑𝑖𝑠𝑝𝑜𝑠𝑡𝑜 𝑛𝑜 𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑑𝑒𝑐𝑟𝑒𝑡𝑜, 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑟𝑎-𝑠𝑒 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑒𝑥𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑒 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑜𝑟𝑔𝑎𝑛𝑖𝑧𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑠𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑟𝑒 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑠𝑒 𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑓𝑖𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑙𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑟 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑐𝑒𝑟𝑡𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑜𝑢 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑗𝑢𝑔𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑣𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑑𝑒𝑠 𝑜𝑢 𝑒𝑠𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑐̧𝑜𝑠, 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑜𝑢 𝑠𝑒𝑚 𝑎𝑢𝑥𝜄́𝑙𝑖𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑚𝑒𝑖𝑜𝑠 𝑚𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑖𝑠, 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑒𝑥𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑒̂𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑎 𝑗𝑢𝑟𝜄́𝑑𝑖𝑐𝑎, 𝑖𝑛𝑑𝑒𝑝𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑑𝑎 𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑚𝑎, 𝑜𝑢 𝑎𝑝𝑒𝑛𝑎𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑓𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑜, 𝑑𝑒 𝑐𝑎𝑟𝑎́𝑐𝑡𝑒𝑟 𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑚𝑎𝑛𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑜𝑢 𝑎𝑝𝑒𝑛𝑎𝑠 𝑒𝑣𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑢𝑎𝑙.
𝟸 - 𝐶𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑚-𝑠𝑒, 𝑛𝑜𝑚𝑒𝑎𝑑𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒, 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑡𝑢𝑖𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑜𝑟𝑔𝑎𝑛𝑖𝑧𝑎𝑐̧𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑜𝑢 𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑜𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑐̧𝑜̃𝑒𝑠, 𝑎𝑖𝑛𝑑𝑎 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑠𝑒𝑚 𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑠𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝑗𝑢𝑟𝜄́𝑑𝑖𝑐𝑎, 𝑜𝑠 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑡𝑖𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑒 𝑚𝑜𝑣𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜𝑠 𝑝𝑜𝑙𝜄́𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑜𝑠, 𝑎𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑖𝑠𝑠𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑒𝑠𝑝𝑒𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑖𝑠, 𝑎𝑠 𝑠𝑜𝑐𝑖𝑒𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒𝑠 𝑒 𝑎𝑠 𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑎𝑠.
𝐴𝑟𝑡𝑖𝑔𝑜 𝟹.º
𝟷 - 𝑃𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑜 𝑒𝑓𝑒𝑖𝑡𝑜 𝑑𝑜 𝑑𝑖𝑠𝑝𝑜𝑠𝑡𝑜 𝑛𝑜 𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑑𝑒𝑐𝑟𝑒𝑡𝑜, 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑟𝑎-𝑠𝑒 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑓𝑖𝑙𝘩𝑎𝑚 𝑎 𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑜𝑙𝑜𝑔𝑖𝑎 𝑓𝑎𝑠𝑐𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑎 𝑎𝑠 𝑜𝑟𝑔𝑎𝑛𝑖𝑧𝑎𝑐̧𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑞𝑢𝑒, 𝑝𝑒𝑙𝑜𝑠 𝑠𝑒𝑢𝑠 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑡𝑢𝑡𝑜𝑠, 𝑝𝑒𝑙𝑜𝑠 𝑠𝑒𝑢𝑠 𝑚𝑎𝑛𝑖𝑓𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑜𝑠 𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑢𝑛𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑠, 𝑝𝑒𝑙𝑎𝑠 𝑑𝑒𝑐𝑙𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑐̧𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑠𝑒𝑢𝑠 𝑑𝑖𝑟𝑖𝑔𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑠 𝑜𝑢 𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑝𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑎́𝑣𝑒𝑖𝑠 𝑜𝑢 𝑝𝑒𝑙𝑎 𝑠𝑢𝑎 𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑢𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜, 𝑚𝑜𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑒𝑚 𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑝𝑡𝑎𝑟, 𝑑𝑒𝑓𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑒𝑟, 𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑒𝑟 𝑑𝑖𝑓𝑢𝑛𝑑𝑖𝑟 𝑜𝑢 𝑑𝑖𝑓𝑢𝑛𝑑𝑖𝑟 𝑒𝑓𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑜𝑠 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑜𝑟𝑒𝑠, 𝑜𝑠 𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑛𝑐𝜄́𝑝𝑖𝑜𝑠, 𝑜𝑠 𝑒𝑥𝑝𝑜𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑠, 𝑎𝑠 𝑖𝑛𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑡𝑢𝑖𝑐̧𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑒 𝑜𝑠 𝑚𝑒́𝑡𝑜𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑐𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑒𝑟𝜄́𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑟𝑒𝑔𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑠 𝑓𝑎𝑠𝑐𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑠 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑎 𝐻𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑜́𝑟𝑖𝑎 𝑟𝑒𝑔𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑎, 𝑛𝑜𝑚𝑒𝑎𝑑𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑜 𝑏𝑒𝑙𝑖𝑐𝑖𝑠𝑚𝑜, 𝑎 𝑣𝑖𝑜𝑙𝑒̂𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑜 𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑚𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑙𝑢𝑡𝑎 𝑝𝑜𝑙𝜄́𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑎, 𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑙𝑜𝑛𝑖𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑠𝑚𝑜, 𝑜 𝑟𝑎𝑐𝑖𝑠𝑚𝑜, 𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑟𝑝𝑜𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑖𝑠𝑚𝑜 𝑜𝑢 𝑎 𝑒𝑥𝑎𝑙𝑡𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑠𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒𝑠 𝑚𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑟𝑒𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑎𝑠 𝑑𝑎𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑙𝑒𝑠 𝑟𝑒𝑔𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑠.
𝟸 - 𝐶𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑟𝑎-𝑠𝑒, 𝑛𝑜𝑚𝑒𝑎𝑑𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒, 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑓𝑖𝑙𝘩𝑎𝑚 𝑎 𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑜𝑙𝑜𝑔𝑖𝑎 𝑓𝑎𝑠𝑐𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑎 𝑎𝑠 𝑜𝑟𝑔𝑎𝑛𝑖𝑧𝑎𝑐̧𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑏𝑎𝑡𝑎𝑚 𝑝𝑜𝑟 𝑚𝑒𝑖𝑜𝑠 𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑚𝑜𝑐𝑟𝑎́𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑜𝑠, 𝑛𝑜𝑚𝑒𝑎𝑑𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑢𝑟𝑠𝑜 𝑎̀ 𝑣𝑖𝑜𝑙𝑒̂𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑎, 𝑎 𝑜𝑟𝑑𝑒𝑚 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑡𝑢𝑐𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑙, 𝑎𝑠 𝑖𝑛𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑡𝑢𝑖𝑐̧𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑑𝑒𝑚𝑜𝑐𝑟𝑎́𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑠 𝑒 𝑜𝑠 𝑠𝜄́𝑚𝑏𝑜𝑙𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑎 𝑠𝑜𝑏𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑖𝑎, 𝑏𝑒𝑚 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑜 𝑎𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑙𝑎𝑠 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑓𝑖𝑙𝘩𝑒𝑚 𝑜𝑢 𝑑𝑖𝑓𝑢𝑛𝑑𝑎𝑚 𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑖𝑎𝑠 𝑜𝑢 𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑝𝑡𝑒𝑚 𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑚𝑎𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑙𝑢𝑡𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑎́𝑟𝑖𝑎 𝑎̀ 𝑢𝑛𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝑛𝑎𝑐𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑙.”
𝑐) 𝑎𝑟𝑡𝑖𝑔𝑜𝑠 𝟸𝟺𝟶º 𝑒 𝟸𝟿𝟿º 𝑑𝑜 𝐶𝑜́𝑑𝑖𝑔𝑜 𝑃𝑒𝑛𝑎𝑙:
“𝐴𝑟𝑡𝑖𝑔𝑜 𝟸𝟺𝟶º (𝐷𝑖𝑠𝑐𝑟𝑖𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑒 𝑖𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑡𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜 𝑎𝑜 𝑜́𝑑𝑖𝑜 𝑒 𝑎̀ 𝑣𝑖𝑜𝑙𝑒̂𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑎)
𝟷. 𝑄𝑢𝑒𝑚:
𝑎) 𝐹𝑢𝑛𝑑𝑎𝑟 𝑜𝑢 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑡𝑢𝑖𝑟 𝑜𝑟𝑔𝑎𝑛𝑖𝑧𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑜𝑢 𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑒𝑛𝑣𝑜𝑙𝑣𝑒𝑟 𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑝𝑎𝑔𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑎 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑖𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑡𝑒𝑚 𝑜𝑢 𝑒𝑛𝑐𝑜𝑟𝑎𝑗𝑒𝑚 𝑎̀ 𝑑𝑖𝑠𝑐𝑟𝑖𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜, 𝑎𝑜 𝑜́𝑑𝑖𝑜 𝑜𝑢 𝑎̀ 𝑣𝑖𝑜𝑙𝑒̂𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑎 𝑝𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑜𝑎 𝑜𝑢 𝑔𝑟𝑢𝑝𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑝𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑜𝑎𝑠 𝑒𝑚 𝑟𝑎𝑧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑎 𝑠𝑢𝑎 𝑜𝑟𝑖𝑔𝑒𝑚 𝑒́𝑡𝑛𝑖𝑐𝑜-𝑟𝑎𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑙, 𝑜𝑟𝑖𝑔𝑒𝑚 𝑛𝑎𝑐𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑙 𝑜𝑢 𝑟𝑒𝑙𝑖𝑔𝑖𝑜𝑠𝑎, 𝑐𝑜𝑟, 𝑛𝑎𝑐𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒, 𝑎𝑠𝑐𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑒̂𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑎, 𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑖𝑡𝑜́𝑟𝑖𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑜𝑟𝑖𝑔𝑒𝑚, 𝑟𝑒𝑙𝑖𝑔𝑖𝑎̃𝑜, 𝑙𝜄́𝑛𝑔𝑢𝑎, 𝑠𝑒𝑥𝑜, 𝑜𝑟𝑖𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑠𝑒𝑥𝑢𝑎𝑙, 𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝑜𝑢 𝑒𝑥𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑔𝑒́𝑛𝑒𝑟𝑜 𝑜𝑢 𝑐𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑒𝑟𝜄́𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑠 𝑠𝑒𝑥𝑢𝑎𝑖𝑠, 𝑑𝑒𝑓𝑖𝑐𝑖𝑒̂𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑎 𝑓𝜄́𝑠𝑖𝑐𝑎 𝑜𝑢 𝑝𝑠𝜄́𝑞𝑢𝑖𝑐𝑎; 𝑜𝑢
𝑏) 𝑃𝑎𝑟𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑖𝑝𝑎𝑟 𝑛𝑎𝑠 𝑜𝑟𝑔𝑎𝑛𝑖𝑧𝑎𝑐̧𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑟𝑒𝑓𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑛𝑎 𝑎𝑙𝜄́𝑛𝑒𝑎 𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑜𝑟, 𝑛𝑎𝑠 𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒𝑠 𝑝𝑜𝑟 𝑒𝑙𝑎𝑠 𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑜𝑢 𝑙𝘩𝑒𝑠 𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑟 𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑒̂𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑎, 𝑖𝑛𝑐𝑙𝑢𝑖𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑜 𝑠𝑒𝑢 𝑓𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜;
𝑒́ 𝑝𝑢𝑛𝑖𝑑𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑝𝑒𝑛𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑠𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑢𝑚 𝑎 𝑜𝑖𝑡𝑜 𝑎𝑛𝑜𝑠.
𝟸 - 𝑄𝑢𝑒𝑚, 𝑝𝑢𝑏𝑙𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒, 𝑝𝑜𝑟 𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑙𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑟 𝑚𝑒𝑖𝑜 𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑎 𝑑𝑖𝑣𝑢𝑙𝑔𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜, 𝑛𝑜𝑚𝑒𝑎𝑑𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑎𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑣𝑒́𝑠 𝑑𝑎 𝑎𝑝𝑜𝑙𝑜𝑔𝑖𝑎, 𝑛𝑒𝑔𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑜𝑢 𝑏𝑎𝑛𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑧𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑔𝑟𝑜𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑖𝑟𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑐𝑟𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑔𝑒𝑛𝑜𝑐𝜄́𝑑𝑖𝑜, 𝑔𝑢𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑎 𝑜𝑢 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑎 𝑎 𝑝𝑎𝑧 𝑒 𝑎 𝘩𝑢𝑚𝑎𝑛𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒:
𝑎) 𝑃𝑟𝑜𝑣𝑜𝑐𝑎𝑟 𝑎𝑡𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑣𝑖𝑜𝑙𝑒̂𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑎 𝑝𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑜𝑎 𝑜𝑢 𝑔𝑟𝑢𝑝𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑝𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑜𝑎𝑠 𝑝𝑜𝑟 𝑐𝑎𝑢𝑠𝑎 𝑑𝑎 𝑠𝑢𝑎 𝑜𝑟𝑖𝑔𝑒𝑚 𝑒́𝑡𝑛𝑖𝑐𝑜-𝑟𝑎𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑙, 𝑜𝑟𝑖𝑔𝑒𝑚 𝑛𝑎𝑐𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑙 𝑜𝑢 𝑟𝑒𝑙𝑖𝑔𝑖𝑜𝑠𝑎, 𝑐𝑜𝑟, 𝑛𝑎𝑐𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒, 𝑎𝑠𝑐𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑒̂𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑎, 𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑖𝑡𝑜́𝑟𝑖𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑜𝑟𝑖𝑔𝑒𝑚, 𝑟𝑒𝑙𝑖𝑔𝑖𝑎̃𝑜, 𝑙𝜄́𝑛𝑔𝑢𝑎, 𝑠𝑒𝑥𝑜, 𝑜𝑟𝑖𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑠𝑒𝑥𝑢𝑎𝑙, 𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝑜𝑢 𝑒𝑥𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑔𝑒́𝑛𝑒𝑟𝑜 𝑜𝑢 𝑐𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑒𝑟𝜄́𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑠 𝑠𝑒𝑥𝑢𝑎𝑖𝑠, 𝑑𝑒𝑓𝑖𝑐𝑖𝑒̂𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑎 𝑓𝜄́𝑠𝑖𝑐𝑎 𝑜𝑢 𝑝𝑠𝜄́𝑞𝑢𝑖𝑐𝑎;
𝑏) 𝐷𝑖𝑓𝑎𝑚𝑎𝑟 𝑜𝑢 𝑖𝑛𝑗𝑢𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑟 𝑝𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑜𝑎 𝑜𝑢 𝑔𝑟𝑢𝑝𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑝𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑜𝑎𝑠 𝑝𝑜𝑟 𝑐𝑎𝑢𝑠𝑎 𝑑𝑎 𝑠𝑢𝑎 𝑜𝑟𝑖𝑔𝑒𝑚 𝑒́𝑡𝑛𝑖𝑐𝑜-𝑟𝑎𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑙, 𝑜𝑟𝑖𝑔𝑒𝑚 𝑛𝑎𝑐𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑙 𝑜𝑢 𝑟𝑒𝑙𝑖𝑔𝑖𝑜𝑠𝑎, 𝑐𝑜𝑟, 𝑛𝑎𝑐𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒, 𝑎𝑠𝑐𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑒̂𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑎, 𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑖𝑡𝑜́𝑟𝑖𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑜𝑟𝑖𝑔𝑒𝑚, 𝑟𝑒𝑙𝑖𝑔𝑖𝑎̃𝑜, 𝑙𝜄́𝑛𝑔𝑢𝑎, 𝑠𝑒𝑥𝑜, 𝑜𝑟𝑖𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑠𝑒𝑥𝑢𝑎𝑙, 𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝑜𝑢 𝑒𝑥𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑔𝑒́𝑛𝑒𝑟𝑜 𝑜𝑢 𝑐𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑒𝑟𝜄́𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑠 𝑠𝑒𝑥𝑢𝑎𝑖𝑠, 𝑑𝑒𝑓𝑖𝑐𝑖𝑒̂𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑎 𝑓𝜄́𝑠𝑖𝑐𝑎 𝑜𝑢 𝑝𝑠𝜄́𝑞𝑢𝑖𝑐𝑎;
𝑐) 𝐴𝑚𝑒𝑎𝑐̧𝑎𝑟 𝑝𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑜𝑎 𝑜𝑢 𝑔𝑟𝑢𝑝𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑝𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑜𝑎𝑠 𝑝𝑜𝑟 𝑐𝑎𝑢𝑠𝑎 𝑑𝑎 𝑠𝑢𝑎 𝑜𝑟𝑖𝑔𝑒𝑚 𝑒́𝑡𝑛𝑖𝑐𝑜-𝑟𝑎𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑙, 𝑜𝑟𝑖𝑔𝑒𝑚 𝑛𝑎𝑐𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑙 𝑜𝑢 𝑟𝑒𝑙𝑖𝑔𝑖𝑜𝑠𝑎, 𝑐𝑜𝑟, 𝑛𝑎𝑐𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒, 𝑎𝑠𝑐𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑒̂𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑎, 𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑖𝑡𝑜́𝑟𝑖𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑜𝑟𝑖𝑔𝑒𝑚, 𝑟𝑒𝑙𝑖𝑔𝑖𝑎̃𝑜, 𝑙𝜄́𝑛𝑔𝑢𝑎, 𝑠𝑒𝑥𝑜, 𝑜𝑟𝑖𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑠𝑒𝑥𝑢𝑎𝑙, 𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝑜𝑢 𝑒𝑥𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑔𝑒́𝑛𝑒𝑟𝑜 𝑜𝑢 𝑐𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑒𝑟𝜄́𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑠 𝑠𝑒𝑥𝑢𝑎𝑖𝑠, 𝑑𝑒𝑓𝑖𝑐𝑖𝑒̂𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑎 𝑓𝜄́𝑠𝑖𝑐𝑎 𝑜𝑢 𝑝𝑠𝜄́𝑞𝑢𝑖𝑐𝑎; 𝑜𝑢
𝑑) 𝐼𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑡𝑎𝑟 𝑎̀ 𝑑𝑖𝑠𝑐𝑟𝑖𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜, 𝑎𝑜 𝑜́𝑑𝑖𝑜 𝑜𝑢 𝑎̀ 𝑣𝑖𝑜𝑙𝑒̂𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑎 𝑝𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑜𝑎 𝑜𝑢 𝑔𝑟𝑢𝑝𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑝𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑜𝑎𝑠 𝑝𝑜𝑟 𝑐𝑎𝑢𝑠𝑎 𝑑𝑎 𝑠𝑢𝑎 𝑜𝑟𝑖𝑔𝑒𝑚 𝑒́𝑡𝑛𝑖𝑐𝑜-𝑟𝑎𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑙, 𝑜𝑟𝑖𝑔𝑒𝑚 𝑛𝑎𝑐𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑙 𝑜𝑢 𝑟𝑒𝑙𝑖𝑔𝑖𝑜𝑠𝑎, 𝑐𝑜𝑟, 𝑛𝑎𝑐𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒, 𝑎𝑠𝑐𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑒̂𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑎, 𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑖𝑡𝑜́𝑟𝑖𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑜𝑟𝑖𝑔𝑒𝑚, 𝑟𝑒𝑙𝑖𝑔𝑖𝑎̃𝑜, 𝑙𝜄́𝑛𝑔𝑢𝑎, 𝑠𝑒𝑥𝑜, 𝑜𝑟𝑖𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑠𝑒𝑥𝑢𝑎𝑙, 𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝑜𝑢 𝑒𝑥𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑔𝑒́𝑛𝑒𝑟𝑜 𝑜𝑢 𝑐𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑒𝑟𝜄́𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑠 𝑠𝑒𝑥𝑢𝑎𝑖𝑠, 𝑑𝑒𝑓𝑖𝑐𝑖𝑒̂𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑎 𝑓𝜄́𝑠𝑖𝑐𝑎 𝑜𝑢 𝑝𝑠𝜄́𝑞𝑢𝑖𝑐𝑎;
𝑒́ 𝑝𝑢𝑛𝑖𝑑𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑝𝑒𝑛𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑠𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝟼 𝑚𝑒𝑠𝑒𝑠 𝑎 𝟻 𝑎𝑛𝑜𝑠.
𝟹 - 𝑄𝑢𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑜𝑠 𝑐𝑟𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑠 𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑣𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑜𝑠 𝑛𝑜𝑠 𝑛𝑢́𝑚𝑒𝑟𝑜𝑠 𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑜𝑟𝑒𝑠 𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑒𝑚 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑒𝑡𝑖𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑎𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑣𝑒́𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑠𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑚𝑎 𝑖𝑛𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑚𝑎́𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑜, 𝑜 𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑏𝑢𝑛𝑎𝑙 𝑝𝑜𝑑𝑒 𝑜𝑟𝑑𝑒𝑛𝑎𝑟 𝑎 𝑒𝑙𝑖𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑖𝑛𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑚𝑎́𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑜𝑠 𝑜𝑢 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑢́𝑑𝑜𝑠.
𝐴𝑟𝑡𝑖𝑔𝑜 𝟸𝟿𝟿º (𝐴𝑠𝑠𝑜𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑐𝑟𝑖𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑜𝑠𝑎)
𝟷 - 𝑄𝑢𝑒𝑚 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑚𝑜𝑣𝑒𝑟 𝑜𝑢 𝑓𝑢𝑛𝑑𝑎𝑟 𝑔𝑟𝑢𝑝𝑜, 𝑜𝑟𝑔𝑎𝑛𝑖𝑧𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑜𝑢 𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑜𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑐𝑢𝑗𝑎 𝑓𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝑜𝑢 𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝑠𝑒𝑗𝑎 𝑑𝑖𝑟𝑖𝑔𝑖𝑑𝑎 𝑎̀ 𝑝𝑟𝑎́𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑢𝑚 𝑜𝑢 𝑚𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑐𝑟𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑠 𝑒́ 𝑝𝑢𝑛𝑖𝑑𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑝𝑒𝑛𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑠𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑢𝑚 𝑎 𝑐𝑖𝑛𝑐𝑜 𝑎𝑛𝑜𝑠.
𝟸 - 𝑁𝑎 𝑚𝑒𝑠𝑚𝑎 𝑝𝑒𝑛𝑎 𝑖𝑛𝑐𝑜𝑟𝑟𝑒 𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑚 𝑓𝑖𝑧𝑒𝑟 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑡𝑒 𝑑𝑒 𝑡𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑔𝑟𝑢𝑝𝑜𝑠, 𝑜𝑟𝑔𝑎𝑛𝑖𝑧𝑎𝑐̧𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑜𝑢 𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑜𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑐̧𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑜𝑢 𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑚 𝑜𝑠 𝑎𝑝𝑜𝑖𝑎𝑟, 𝑛𝑜𝑚𝑒𝑎𝑑𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑛𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑎𝑟𝑚𝑎𝑠, 𝑚𝑢𝑛𝑖𝑐̧𝑜̃𝑒𝑠, 𝑖𝑛𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑢𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑐𝑟𝑖𝑚𝑒, 𝑔𝑢𝑎𝑟𝑑𝑎 𝑜𝑢 𝑙𝑜𝑐𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑎𝑠 𝑟𝑒𝑢𝑛𝑖𝑜̃𝑒𝑠, 𝑜𝑢 𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑙𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑟 𝑎𝑢𝑥𝜄́𝑙𝑖𝑜 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑠𝑒 𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑟𝑢𝑡𝑒𝑚 𝑛𝑜𝑣𝑜𝑠 𝑒𝑙𝑒𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜𝑠.
𝟹 - 𝑄𝑢𝑒𝑚 𝑐𝘩𝑒𝑓𝑖𝑎𝑟 𝑜𝑢 𝑑𝑖𝑟𝑖𝑔𝑖𝑟 𝑜𝑠 𝑔𝑟𝑢𝑝𝑜𝑠, 𝑜𝑟𝑔𝑎𝑛𝑖𝑧𝑎𝑐̧𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑜𝑢 𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑜𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑐̧𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑟𝑒𝑓𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑛𝑜𝑠 𝑛𝑢́𝑚𝑒𝑟𝑜𝑠 𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑜𝑟𝑒𝑠 𝑒́ 𝑝𝑢𝑛𝑖𝑑𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑝𝑒𝑛𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑠𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑑𝑜𝑖𝑠 𝑎 𝑜𝑖𝑡𝑜 𝑎𝑛𝑜𝑠.
𝟺 - 𝐴𝑠 𝑝𝑒𝑛𝑎𝑠 𝑟𝑒𝑓𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑝𝑜𝑑𝑒𝑚 𝑠𝑒𝑟 𝑒𝑠𝑝𝑒𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑙𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑢𝑎𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑜𝑢 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑡𝑒𝑟 𝑙𝑢𝑔𝑎𝑟 𝑎 𝑝𝑢𝑛𝑖𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑠𝑒 𝑜 𝑎𝑔𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑖𝑚𝑝𝑒𝑑𝑖𝑟 𝑜𝑢 𝑠𝑒 𝑒𝑠𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑐̧𝑎𝑟 𝑠𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑝𝑜𝑟 𝑖𝑚𝑝𝑒𝑑𝑖𝑟 𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑢𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑔𝑟𝑢𝑝𝑜𝑠, 𝑜𝑟𝑔𝑎𝑛𝑖𝑧𝑎𝑐̧𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑜𝑢 𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑜𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑐̧𝑜̃𝑒𝑠, 𝑜𝑢 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑢𝑛𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑟 𝑎̀ 𝑎𝑢𝑡𝑜𝑟𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝑎 𝑠𝑢𝑎 𝑒𝑥𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑒̂𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑚𝑜𝑑𝑜 𝑎 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎 𝑝𝑜𝑑𝑒𝑟 𝑒𝑣𝑖𝑡𝑎𝑟 𝑎 𝑝𝑟𝑎́𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑐𝑟𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑠.
𝟻 - 𝑃𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑜𝑠 𝑒𝑓𝑒𝑖𝑡𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑜 𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑎𝑟𝑡𝑖𝑔𝑜, 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑟𝑎-𝑠𝑒 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑒𝑥𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑒 𝑔𝑟𝑢𝑝𝑜, 𝑜𝑟𝑔𝑎𝑛𝑖𝑧𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑜𝑢 𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑜𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑗𝑎 𝑒𝑚 𝑐𝑎𝑢𝑠𝑎 𝑢𝑚 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑗𝑢𝑛𝑡𝑜 𝑑𝑒, 𝑝𝑒𝑙𝑜 𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑜𝑠, 𝑡𝑟𝑒̂𝑠 𝑝𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑜𝑎𝑠, 𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑢𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑐𝑒𝑟𝑡𝑎𝑑𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑑𝑢𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑢𝑚 𝑐𝑒𝑟𝑡𝑜 𝑝𝑒𝑟𝜄́𝑜𝑑𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑡𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑜.”
𝑇𝑜𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑠 𝑐𝑟𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑠 𝑡𝑒̂𝑚 𝑛𝑎𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑒𝑧𝑎 𝑝𝑢́𝑏𝑙𝑖𝑐𝑎, 𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑠𝑖𝑔𝑛𝑖𝑓𝑖𝑐𝑎 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑎𝑠 𝑖𝑛𝑣𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑔𝑎𝑐̧𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑝𝑜𝑑𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑚 𝑡𝑒𝑟 𝑗𝑎́ 𝑠𝑖𝑑𝑜 𝑖𝑛𝑖𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝘩𝑎́ 𝑚𝑢𝑖𝑡𝑜 𝑡𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑜, 𝑒 𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑒𝑠𝑝𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑎 𝑒́ 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑖𝑠𝑠𝑜 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑡𝑒𝑛𝘩𝑎 𝑎𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑐𝑖𝑑𝑜 𝑙𝑜𝑔𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑎𝑠 𝑎𝑐𝑐̧𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑐𝑟𝑖𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑜𝑠𝑎𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑒𝑐̧𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑚 𝑎 𝑠𝑒𝑟 𝑝𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑑𝑎𝑠.
𝐸 𝑒́ 𝑒𝑥𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑝𝑜𝑟𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑠 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑐𝑒𝑑𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑛𝑎𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑒𝑧𝑎 𝑐𝑟𝑖𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑙 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑎𝑚 𝑖𝑛𝑖𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝘩𝑎́ 𝑚𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑡𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑜 𝑠𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑖𝑚𝑝𝑢𝑛𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑠 𝑖𝑔𝑛𝑜́𝑏𝑒𝑖𝑠 𝑟𝑎𝑐𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑠, 𝑥𝑒𝑛𝑜́𝑓𝑜𝑏𝑜𝑠 𝑒 𝑓𝑎𝑠𝑐𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑠 𝑠𝑒𝑚𝑒𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑟𝑒𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑜́𝑑𝑖𝑜𝑠 (𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑜 𝑠𝑎̃𝑜, 𝑠𝑒𝑗𝑎 𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑙 𝑓𝑜𝑟 𝑜 𝑛𝑢́𝑚𝑒𝑟𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑝𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑜𝑎𝑠 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑛𝑒𝑙𝑒𝑠 𝑣𝑜𝑡𝑒𝑚) 𝑐𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑐𝑒𝑢 𝑎𝑜 𝑝𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑒𝑙𝑒𝑠 𝑒 𝑒𝑙𝑎𝑠 𝑠𝑒 𝑎𝑡𝑟𝑒𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑚 𝑎𝑔𝑜𝑟𝑎 𝑎 𝑑𝑖𝑧𝑒𝑟 𝑒 𝑓𝑎𝑧𝑒𝑟 𝑐𝑜𝑖𝑠𝑎𝑠 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑢𝑙𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑝𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑎𝑚 𝑡𝑜𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑜𝑠 𝑙𝑖𝑚𝑖𝑡𝑒𝑠 𝑑𝑎 𝑑𝑒𝑐𝑒̂𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑎 𝑒 𝑑𝑎 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑏𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒.
𝐴𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒, 𝑜𝑠 𝑣𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑠 𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑃𝑎𝜄́𝑠𝑒𝑠 𝐵𝑎𝑖𝑥𝑜𝑠 (𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑔𝑎 𝐻𝑜𝑙𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑎) 𝑗𝑎́ 𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑐𝑒𝑏𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑚 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑝𝑜𝑑𝑒𝑚 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑟 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑟𝑎𝑐𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑠, 𝑥𝑒𝑛𝑜́𝑓𝑜𝑏𝑜𝑠 𝑒 𝑓𝑎𝑠𝑐𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑠 𝑠𝑒𝑚𝑒𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑟𝑒𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑜́𝑑𝑖𝑜𝑠 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑜𝑙𝑣𝑒𝑟 𝑜𝑠 𝑠𝑒𝑢𝑠 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑏𝑙𝑒𝑚𝑎𝑠 𝑒 𝑜𝑠 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑏𝑙𝑒𝑚𝑎𝑠 𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑒 𝑝𝑎𝜄́𝑠. 𝑆𝑜́ 𝑓𝑜𝑖 𝑝𝑒𝑛𝑎 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑡𝑒𝑛𝘩𝑎𝑚 𝑙𝑒𝑣𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑜 𝑡𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑜 𝑎 𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑐𝑒𝑏𝑒𝑟 𝑖𝑠𝑠𝑜.
𝐸 𝑠𝑜́ 𝑒𝑠𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑛𝑜́𝑠, 𝑝𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑢𝑔𝑢𝑒𝑠𝑒𝑠 𝑒 𝑝𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑢𝑔𝑢𝑒𝑠𝑎𝑠, 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑛𝑜𝑠 𝑜𝑏𝑟𝑖𝑔𝑢𝑒𝑚𝑜𝑠 𝑎 𝑛𝑜́𝑠 𝑝𝑟𝑜́𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑜𝑠 𝑎 𝑝𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑎𝑟 𝑝𝑜𝑟 𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑎 𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑎𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑜𝑠𝑎 𝑒𝑥𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑒̂𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑎.
𝐸́ 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝘩𝑎́ 𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑠𝑎̃𝑜 𝑖𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎́𝑣𝑒𝑖𝑠. 𝑂𝑙𝘩𝑒𝑚 𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝐷𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑙𝑑 𝑇𝑟𝑢𝑚𝑝 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑒𝑔𝑢𝑖𝑢 𝑓𝑎𝑧𝑒𝑟 𝑎̀ 𝑒𝑟𝑎 𝑝𝑜𝑙𝜄́𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑎 𝑖𝑛𝑖𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑑𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑜𝑠 𝐴𝑐𝑜𝑟𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝐵𝑟𝑒𝑡𝑡𝑜𝑛 𝑊𝑜𝑜𝑑𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑗𝑢𝑙𝘩𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝟷𝟿𝟺𝟺 𝑒 𝑎 𝐶𝑜𝑛𝑓𝑒𝑟𝑒̂𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝐼𝑎𝑙𝑡𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑓𝑒𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑖𝑟𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝟷𝟿𝟺𝟻.
𝐸𝑠𝑠𝑎 𝑒𝑟𝑎 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎́ 𝑑𝑒𝑓𝑖𝑛𝑖𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑒𝑛𝑐𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑎𝑑𝑎 𝑒 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑛𝑒𝑚 𝑚𝑒𝑠𝑚𝑜 𝑜 𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑎𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝐷𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑙𝑑 𝑇𝑟𝑢𝑚𝑝 𝑑𝑎 𝑐𝑒𝑛𝑎 𝑝𝑜𝑙𝜄́𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑎 𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑚𝑖𝑡𝑖𝑟𝑎́ 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑙𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑟 𝑠𝑢𝑎 𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑜𝑠𝑖𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑜𝑢 𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑡𝑢𝑖𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜. 𝐸 𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑚 𝑔𝑎𝑛𝘩𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑖𝑠𝑠𝑜 𝑒́ 𝑎 𝐶𝘩𝑖𝑛𝑎, 𝑝𝑎𝜄́𝑠 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑒́ 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝐷𝑒𝑚𝑜𝑐𝑟𝑎𝑐𝑖𝑎 𝑛𝑒𝑚 𝑒́ 𝑢𝑚 𝑝𝑎𝜄́𝑠 𝑜𝑟𝑔𝑎𝑛𝑖𝑧𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑠𝑒𝑔𝑢𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑜 𝑚𝑜𝑑𝑒𝑙𝑜 𝑑𝑜 𝐸𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝐷𝑖𝑟𝑒𝑖𝑡𝑜 𝑒 𝑛𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑙 𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑖𝑟𝑒𝑖𝑡𝑜𝑠 𝘩𝑢𝑚𝑎𝑛𝑜𝑠 𝑢𝑛𝑖𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑠𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑠𝑎̃𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑜𝑡𝑖𝑑𝑖𝑎𝑛𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑒𝑠𝑝𝑒𝑧𝑖𝑛𝘩𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑠.
* Juíz desembargador jubilado
Presidente da Direcção da Associação Movimento Cívico Não Apaguem a Memória (NAM)
Vice-presidente da Direcção da Liga Portuguesa dos Direitos Humanos - Civitas (LPDH-C)
Ex-presidente do Conselho Nacional de Procriação Medicamente Assistida (CNPMA)
IN "SÁBADO"- 02/11/25.
* Bem haja senhor Desembargador por este texto.
4227-UNIÃO
EUROPEIA
AUSÊNCIA DA EUROPA
Quando o interesse é uma intrujice,
fingimento dos donos do dinheiro
ANDRÉ GUIMARÃES
Em vésperas da COP30,
especialista critica a UE: “Mudança
climática não espera a guerra acabar"
FONTE: Euronews-02/11/25
putin HUYLO
putin é um canalha .
Trump is also a killer
of innocent people Ukrainians
Agora também um activo russo
..
( HÁ INTERVENIENTES CUJO VERNÁCULO VEM DO BERÇO)
αø$ δøʍιπĝø$ ĝø$†αʍø$ δε ιπcøʍøδαƦ!!
Mι$έƦια ιπ†εlεc†uαl lu$ι†απα
🅿️💍®️🍄⛎🇬🅰️👢
RACISMO E XENOFOBIA
CONTRA BRASILEIROS
Para o poder instalado
quantos mais racismo melhor
Os ricos não pagam a racismo,
o racismo é o negócio!
ᚣ ᛰⳘᛊᛖ ᚧᚣ́ ᛩᛊᛁᚾᛜ ?
Título original: Brasileiros são lixo-Xenofobia cresce em Portugal, não querem mais brasileiros no país
FONTE: 
Tribo Urbana-08/10/25
Tribo Urbana-08/10/25NR: O ódio rácico e xenófobo é fabricado pelos donos do dinheiro que alimentam uma multidão de ignorantes, sem capacidade intelctual para discernir sobre o bem e o mal. Os fabricantes são acolitados por grupos sociais e políticos que fazem tudo para ter tempo de antena.
Subscrever:
Comentários (Atom)