.
30/11/2025
MIGUEL SOMSEN
.
UM TEXTO HILARIANTE
Quanto mais debates
mais eu gosto de ti
Marques Mendes assume-se como o candidato do “consenso e diálogo”, que
as prioridades são a “estabilidade e a consciência social”. Em suma, é o
candidato do “extremo-centro”, como referia Manuel João Vieira..O prometido é devido: fui ver a primeira semana de debates.
𝐽𝑜𝑠𝑒́ 𝐴𝑙𝑏𝑒𝑟𝑡𝑜 𝐶𝑎𝑟𝑣𝑎𝑙ℎ𝑜 𝑚𝑜𝑑𝑒𝑟𝑜𝑢, 𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑑𝑎̃𝑜, 𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜𝑢 𝑚𝑜𝑑𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑟 𝑜 𝑑𝑒𝑏𝑎𝑡𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝐴𝑛𝑡𝑜́𝑛𝑖𝑜 𝐽𝑜𝑠𝑒́ 𝑆𝑒𝑔𝑢𝑟𝑜 𝑒 𝐴𝑛𝑑𝑟𝑒́ 𝑉𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑎, 𝑠𝑒𝑔𝑢𝑛𝑑𝑎-𝑓𝑒𝑖𝑟𝑎 𝟷𝟽 𝑑𝑒 𝑛𝑜𝑣𝑒𝑚𝑏𝑟𝑜 𝑛𝑎 𝑇𝑉𝐼. 𝑂 𝑚𝑜𝑑𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑟 𝑓𝑒𝑧 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑜𝑑𝑢𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑐𝑒𝑟𝑐𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝟽𝟶 𝑠𝑒𝑔𝑢𝑛𝑑𝑜𝑠, 𝑜 𝑚𝑎́𝑥𝑖𝑚𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑡𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑜 𝑠𝑒𝑔𝑢𝑖𝑑𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑣𝑖𝑟𝑖𝑎 𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑒𝑔𝑢𝑖𝑟 𝑓𝑎𝑙𝑎𝑟 𝑛𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑎 𝑛𝑜𝑖𝑡𝑒. 𝐷𝑒𝑝𝑜𝑖𝑠 𝑑𝑖𝑠𝑠𝑜, 𝑜 𝑑𝑖𝑙𝑢́𝑣𝑖𝑜.
𝑆𝑒𝑔𝑢𝑟𝑜 𝑒́ 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑎 𝑓𝑎𝑙𝑎𝑟 𝑠𝑜𝑏𝑟𝑒 𝑝𝑎𝑐𝑜𝑡𝑒 𝑙𝑎𝑏𝑜𝑟𝑎𝑙 𝑒 𝑎 𝑔𝑟𝑒𝑣𝑒 𝑔𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑙.
𝑉𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑎 𝑖𝑛𝑖𝑐𝑖𝑎 𝑜 𝑑𝑖𝑠𝑐𝑢𝑟𝑠𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑢𝑚 “𝑣𝑎𝑚𝑜𝑙𝑎̀𝑣𝑒𝑟” 𝑑𝑖𝑔𝑛𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝐴𝑛𝑡𝑜́𝑛𝑖𝑜 𝐶𝑜𝑠𝑡𝑎, 𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑎𝑡𝑎𝑐𝑎𝑟 𝑜𝑠 𝑠𝑖𝑛𝑑𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑡𝑜𝑠 𝑒 𝑎𝑠 𝑙𝑒𝑖𝑠 𝑑𝑎 𝑈𝑛𝑖𝑎̃𝑜 𝑆𝑜𝑣𝑖𝑒́𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑎.
𝑆𝑒𝑔𝑢𝑟𝑜 𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑎 𝑑𝑖𝑎𝑙𝑜𝑔𝑎𝑟, 𝑚𝑎𝑠 𝑒́ 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑖𝑑𝑜 𝑝𝑜𝑟 𝑉𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑎, 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑜 𝑎𝑐𝑢𝑠𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑠𝑒𝑟 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑜 “𝑜 𝑀𝑒𝑙ℎ𝑜𝑟𝑎𝑙, 𝑛𝑒𝑚 𝑓𝑎𝑧 𝑏𝑒𝑚 𝑛𝑒𝑚 𝑓𝑎𝑧 𝑚𝑎𝑙”.
𝑆𝑒𝑔𝑢𝑟𝑜 𝑓𝑎𝑧 𝑏𝑒𝑚, 𝑒 𝑖𝑛𝑠𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑒 𝑒𝑚 𝑐𝑎𝑡𝑎𝑙𝑜𝑔𝑎𝑟 𝑉𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑎 𝑑𝑒 “𝑠𝑒𝑛ℎ𝑜𝑟 𝑑𝑒𝑝𝑢𝑡𝑎𝑑𝑜”, 𝑎𝑙𝑒𝑔𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑒𝑙𝑒 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎́ 𝑛𝑎𝑠 𝑒𝑙𝑒𝑖𝑐̧𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑎𝑑𝑎𝑠.
𝐽𝑜𝑠𝑒́ 𝐴𝑙𝑏𝑒𝑟𝑡𝑜 𝐶𝑎𝑟𝑣𝑎𝑙ℎ𝑜 𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑎 𝑎𝑣𝑎𝑛𝑐̧𝑎𝑟 𝑛𝑜𝑠 𝑡𝑒𝑚𝑎𝑠, 𝑚𝑎𝑠 𝑗𝑎́ 𝑛𝑖𝑛𝑔𝑢𝑒́𝑚 𝑜 𝑜𝑢𝑣𝑒.
𝑉𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑎: “𝐸𝑠𝑡𝑜𝑢 𝑛𝑎 𝑒𝑙𝑒𝑖𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑎𝑑𝑎 𝑠𝑒 𝑠𝑒𝑟 𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑒́ 𝑠𝑒𝑟 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑗𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑒𝑛𝑓𝑒𝑖𝑡𝑎𝑟”.
𝑆𝑒𝑔𝑢𝑟𝑜: ”𝑆𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑑𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝐸𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑒́ 𝑖𝑚𝑝𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑒”.
𝑉𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑎: “𝐶𝑜𝑛𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑠𝑎 𝑑𝑎 𝑡𝑟𝑒𝑡𝑎”, 𝑙𝑜𝑔𝑜 𝑠𝑒𝑔𝑢𝑖𝑑𝑜 𝑑𝑒 “𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑠𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑐ℎ𝑎𝑐ℎ𝑎”.
𝑀𝑜𝑑𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑟 𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑎 𝑛𝑜𝑣𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 “𝑟𝑒𝑖𝑣𝑖𝑛𝑑𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑟 𝑎𝑢𝑡𝑜𝑟𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝑑𝑜 𝑑𝑒𝑏𝑎𝑡𝑒”.
𝑉𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑎 𝑟𝑒𝑖𝑣𝑖𝑛𝑑𝑖𝑐𝑎 𝑎 𝑎𝑢𝑡𝑜𝑟𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝑑𝑜 𝑑𝑒𝑏𝑎𝑡𝑒 𝑓𝑎𝑙𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑑𝑒 “𝑝𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑢𝑔𝑢𝑒𝑠𝑒𝑠 𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑖𝑟𝑜” 𝑒 “𝑡𝑒𝑚𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑝𝑜̂𝑟 𝑎𝑠 𝑚𝑎𝑖𝑜𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑠 𝑒𝑚 𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑖𝑟𝑜 𝑙𝑢𝑔𝑎𝑟”.
𝑆𝑒𝑔𝑢𝑟𝑜 𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑜𝑟𝑑𝑎 𝑎 𝑉𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑎 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑡𝑒𝑠𝑒 𝑑𝑒 𝑑𝑜𝑢𝑡𝑜𝑟𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜 𝑑𝑒… 𝐴𝑛𝑑𝑟𝑒́ 𝑉𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑎 𝑒𝑚 𝟸𝟶𝟷𝟸, 𝑒𝑚 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑜 𝑑𝑒𝑝𝑢𝑡𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑑𝑒𝑓𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑖𝑎 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑠𝑒 𝑑𝑒𝑣𝑖𝑎 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑔𝑚𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑧𝑎𝑟 𝑎𝑠 𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑜𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑠.
𝐽𝑜𝑠𝑒́ 𝐴𝑙𝑏𝑒𝑟𝑡𝑜 𝐶𝑎𝑟𝑣𝑎𝑙ℎ𝑜 𝑝𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑎 𝑎 𝑠𝑒𝑟 𝑎 𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑜𝑟𝑖𝑎 𝑛𝑜 𝑑𝑒𝑏𝑎𝑡𝑒, 𝑟𝑒𝑝𝑒𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑑𝑜 “𝑚𝑒𝑢𝑠 𝑠𝑒𝑛ℎ𝑜𝑟𝑒𝑠”, “𝑚𝑒𝑢𝑠 𝑠𝑒𝑛ℎ𝑜𝑟𝑒𝑠”, 𝑚𝑎𝑠 𝑜𝑠 𝑠𝑒𝑛ℎ𝑜𝑟𝑒𝑠 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑚 𝑠𝑎𝑏𝑒𝑟.
𝑁𝑜 𝑑𝑖𝑎 𝑠𝑒𝑔𝑢𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒, 𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑐̧𝑎-𝑓𝑒𝑖𝑟𝑎 𝟷𝟾 𝑑𝑒 𝑁𝑜𝑣𝑒𝑚𝑏𝑟𝑜, 𝐶𝑙𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑆𝑜𝑢𝑠𝑎 𝑚𝑜𝑑𝑒𝑟𝑜𝑢 𝑜 𝑑𝑒𝑏𝑎𝑡𝑒 𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑒 𝐴𝑛𝑡𝑜́𝑛𝑖𝑜 𝐹𝑖𝑙𝑖𝑝𝑒 𝑒 𝑀𝑎𝑟𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑠 𝑀𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑒𝑠 𝑛𝑎 𝑆𝐼𝐶.
𝐶𝑙𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑆𝑜𝑢𝑠𝑎 𝑟𝑒𝑝𝑒𝑡𝑖𝑢 𝑐𝑜𝑜𝑟𝑑𝑒𝑛𝑎𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑑𝑎 𝑇𝑉𝐼 𝑑𝑒 𝑛𝑜𝑖𝑡𝑒 𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑜𝑟 𝑒 𝑖𝑛𝑖𝑐𝑖𝑜𝑢 𝑑𝑒𝑏𝑎𝑡𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑔𝑟𝑒𝑣𝑒 𝑔𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑙 𝑒 𝑝𝑎𝑧 𝑠𝑜𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑙, 𝑖𝑛𝑞𝑢𝑖𝑟𝑖𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑀𝑎𝑟𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑠 𝑀𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑒𝑠. 𝑀𝑎𝑟𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑠 𝑀𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑒𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑒𝑐̧𝑎 𝑝𝑜𝑟 𝑑𝑎𝑟 𝑚𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑖𝑔𝑎 𝑎 𝐶𝑙𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑆𝑜𝑢𝑠𝑎 𝑒 𝑒𝑙𝑜𝑔𝑖𝑎 𝑜 𝑠𝑒𝑢 𝑜𝑝𝑜𝑛𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒, 𝑗𝑎́ 𝑠𝑒 𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑐𝑒𝑏𝑒𝑢 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑀𝑎𝑟𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑠 𝑀𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑒𝑠 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑟 ℎ𝑜𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑙𝑖𝑧𝑎𝑟 𝑛𝑖𝑛𝑔𝑢𝑒́𝑚, 𝑛𝑒𝑚 𝑚𝑒𝑠𝑚𝑜 𝑎 𝑔𝑟𝑒𝑣𝑒 𝑔𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑙, 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑟𝑎 “𝑙𝑒𝑔𝜄́𝑡𝑖𝑚𝑎”, 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑣𝑒𝑧 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑠𝑒𝑟𝑎́ 𝑢𝑚 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑐𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑜 𝑙𝑜𝑛𝑔𝑜 𝑑𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑙 𝑒𝑙𝑒 𝑒𝑣𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑢𝑎𝑙𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑝𝑜𝑑𝑒 “𝑣𝑖𝑟 𝑎 𝑠𝑒𝑟 𝑎́𝑟𝑏𝑖𝑡𝑟𝑜”, 𝑐𝑎𝑠𝑜 𝑠𝑒𝑗𝑎 𝑒𝑙𝑒𝑖𝑡𝑜.
𝑀𝑎𝑟𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑠 𝑀𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑒𝑠, 𝑠𝑢𝑎 𝑣𝑒𝑙ℎ𝑎 𝑟𝑎𝑝𝑜𝑠𝑎.
𝐴𝑛𝑡𝑜́𝑛𝑖𝑜 𝐹𝑖𝑙𝑖𝑝𝑒 𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑢𝑠𝑎 𝑎 𝑝𝑜𝑚𝑏𝑎 𝑑𝑎 𝑝𝑎𝑧 𝑑𝑒 𝑀𝑎𝑟𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑠 𝑀𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑒𝑠, 𝑟𝑒𝑓𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑜𝑠 𝑐𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑡𝑜𝑠 𝑠𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑖𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑔𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑠. 𝑄𝑢𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑒𝑐̧𝑎 𝑎 𝑒𝑠𝑐𝑟𝑢𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑟 𝑜 𝑝𝑎𝑐𝑜𝑡𝑒 𝑙𝑎𝑏𝑜𝑟𝑎𝑙, 𝑒́ 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑖𝑑𝑜 𝑝𝑜𝑟 𝑀𝑎𝑟𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑠 𝑀𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑒𝑠, 𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑑𝑎̃𝑜, 𝑝𝑜𝑟 𝐶𝑙𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑆𝑜𝑢𝑠𝑎: “𝐸 𝑎𝑠 𝑒𝑥𝑖𝑔𝑒̂𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑠 𝑑𝑜 𝑚𝑢𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑑𝑜 𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑏𝑎𝑙ℎ𝑜.ᐣ”. 𝑆𝑖𝑚, 𝑎 𝑚𝑜𝑑𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑟𝑎 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑒𝑢 𝐴𝑛𝑡𝑜́𝑛𝑖𝑜 𝐹𝑖𝑙𝑖𝑝𝑒 𝑎𝑜𝑠 𝟺𝟺 𝑠𝑒𝑔𝑢𝑛𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑎 𝑠𝑢𝑎 𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑖𝑟𝑎 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑣𝑒𝑛𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜.
𝑀𝑎𝑟𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑠 𝑀𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑒𝑠 𝑎𝑐𝑢𝑠𝑎 𝐹𝑖𝑙𝑖𝑝𝑒 𝑑𝑒 “𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑟 𝑛𝑜𝑢𝑡𝑟𝑎 𝑒𝑙𝑒𝑖𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜”, 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑜 𝑆𝑒𝑔𝑢𝑟𝑜 𝑓𝑒𝑧 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑉𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑎 𝑛𝑎 𝑛𝑜𝑖𝑡𝑒 𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑜𝑟. 𝐶𝑙𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑆𝑜𝑢𝑠𝑎 𝑎𝑔𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑎 𝑝𝑎𝑙𝑎𝑣𝑟𝑎𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑀𝑎𝑟𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑠 𝑀𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑒𝑠, 𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑠𝑎𝑏𝑒𝑟 𝑠𝑒 𝐴𝑛𝑡𝑜́𝑛𝑖𝑜 𝐹𝑖𝑙𝑖𝑝𝑒 𝑠𝑒𝑟𝑎́ “𝑐𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑡𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑓𝑎𝑐𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 [𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑢𝑛𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑎]”. 𝐹𝑖𝑙𝑖𝑝𝑒: “𝑆𝑜𝑢 𝑡𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑓𝑎𝑐𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑜 𝑀𝑎𝑟𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑠 𝑀𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑒𝑠 𝑒́ 𝑑𝑜 𝑃𝑆𝐷”. 𝐿𝑜𝑔𝑜 𝑎 𝑠𝑒𝑔𝑢𝑖𝑟, 𝐴𝑛𝑡𝑜́𝑛𝑖𝑜 𝐹𝑖𝑙𝑖𝑝𝑒 𝑒𝑥𝑝𝑙𝑖𝑐𝑎 𝑝𝑜𝑟𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑐𝑒𝑙𝑒𝑏𝑟𝑎𝑟𝑎́ 𝑜 𝟸𝟻 𝑑𝑒 𝑛𝑜𝑣𝑒𝑚𝑏𝑟𝑜: “𝑂 𝟸𝟻 𝑑𝑒 𝑛𝑜𝑣𝑒𝑚𝑏𝑟𝑜 𝑒́ 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑎 𝑜 𝟸𝟻 𝑑𝑒 𝑎𝑏𝑟𝑖𝑙, 𝑝𝑜𝑟𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑠𝑜́ 𝑠𝑒 𝑙𝑒𝑚𝑏𝑟𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑚 𝑑𝑒 𝑜 𝑐𝑒𝑙𝑒𝑏𝑟𝑎𝑟 𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑜 𝟸𝟻 𝑑𝑒 𝑎𝑏𝑟𝑖𝑙 𝑓𝑒𝑧 𝟻𝟶 𝑎𝑛𝑜𝑠. 𝑂 𝑜𝑏𝑗𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑜 𝑒́ 𝑑𝑒𝑚𝑜𝑛𝑖𝑧𝑎𝑟 𝑜 𝟸𝟻 𝑑𝑒 𝑎𝑏𝑟𝑖𝑙 𝑒 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑖𝑠𝑠𝑜 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑚 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑖𝑔𝑜”.
𝑀𝑎𝑟𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑠 𝑀𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑒𝑠 𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑢𝑚𝑒-𝑠𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑜 𝑜 𝑐𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑡𝑜 𝑑𝑜 “𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑒𝑛𝑠𝑜 𝑒 𝑑𝑖𝑎́𝑙𝑜𝑔𝑜”, 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑎𝑠 𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑜𝑟𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒𝑠 𝑠𝑎̃𝑜 𝑎 “𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑏𝑖𝑙𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝑒 𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑐𝑖𝑒̂𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑎 𝑠𝑜𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑙”. 𝐸𝑚 𝑠𝑢𝑚𝑎, 𝑒́ 𝑜 𝑐𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑡𝑜 𝑑𝑜 “𝑒𝑥𝑡𝑟𝑒𝑚𝑜-𝑐𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑜”, 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑜 𝑟𝑒𝑓𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑎 𝑀𝑎𝑛𝑢𝑒𝑙 𝐽𝑜𝑎̃𝑜 𝑉𝑖𝑒𝑖𝑟𝑎.
𝐴𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑠 𝑑𝑜 𝑓𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑙, 𝐶𝑙𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑆𝑜𝑢𝑠𝑎 𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑔𝑢𝑛𝑡𝑎 𝑎 𝑀𝑎𝑟𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑠 𝑀𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑒𝑠 𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑓𝑎𝑟𝑎́ 𝑢𝑚 𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑠𝑒 𝑜 𝑝𝑎𝜄́𝑠 𝑐𝑎𝑚𝑖𝑛ℎ𝑎𝑟 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑎 “𝑑𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑣𝑎 𝑎𝑢𝑡𝑜𝑟𝑖𝑡𝑎́𝑟𝑖𝑎”. 𝑀𝑎𝑟𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑠 𝑀𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑒𝑠: “𝐸𝑠𝑡𝑎́ 𝑎 𝑓𝑎𝑙𝑎𝑟 𝑑𝑒 𝑞𝑢𝑒̂, 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑐𝑟𝑒𝑡𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒.ᐣ”. 𝐴 𝑚𝑜𝑑𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑟𝑎 𝑖𝑛𝑠𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑒: “𝐷𝑒 𝑜 𝑝𝑎𝜄́𝑠 𝑐𝑎𝑚𝑖𝑛ℎ𝑎𝑟 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑑𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑣𝑎 𝑎𝑢𝑡𝑜𝑟𝑖𝑡𝑎́𝑟𝑖𝑎”…
𝐷𝑜𝑖𝑠 𝑑𝑖𝑎𝑠 𝑑𝑒𝑝𝑜𝑖𝑠, 𝑛𝑎 𝑞𝑢𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑎-𝑓𝑒𝑖𝑟𝑎 𝟸𝟶 𝑑𝑒 𝑛𝑜𝑣𝑒𝑚𝑏𝑟𝑜, 𝑉𝑖𝑡𝑜𝑟 𝐺𝑜𝑛𝑐̧𝑎𝑙𝑣𝑒𝑠 𝑚𝑜𝑑𝑒𝑟𝑜𝑢 𝑑𝑒𝑏𝑎𝑡𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝐽𝑜𝑎̃𝑜 𝐶𝑜𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑚 𝐹𝑖𝑔𝑢𝑒𝑖𝑟𝑒𝑑𝑜 𝑒 𝐻𝑒𝑛𝑟𝑖𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝐺𝑜𝑢𝑣𝑒𝑖𝑎 𝑒 𝑀𝑒𝑙𝑜 𝑛𝑎 𝑅𝑇𝑃.
𝑂𝑠 𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑖𝑟𝑜𝑠 𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑢𝑡𝑜𝑠 𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑎𝑚 𝑎 𝑓𝑎𝑙𝑎𝑟 𝑑𝑎 𝑖𝑛𝑑𝑒𝑝𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑒̂𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑎 𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑐𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑡𝑜𝑠, 𝑡𝑒𝑚𝑎 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑎 𝑧𝑒𝑟𝑜 𝑎𝑜𝑠 𝑝𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑢𝑔𝑢𝑒𝑠𝑒𝑠.
𝐶𝑜𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑚 𝑚𝑜𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑜𝑢-𝑠𝑒 𝑜𝑓𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑖𝑑𝑜 𝑝𝑜𝑟 𝐺𝑜𝑢𝑣𝑒𝑖𝑎 𝑒 𝑀𝑒𝑙𝑜 𝑜 𝑎𝑐ℎ𝑎𝑟 𝑢𝑚 “𝑐𝑎𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑇𝑟𝑜́𝑖𝑎”, 𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑒́ 𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑟𝑎, 𝑒 𝑒𝑥𝑖𝑔𝑖𝑢 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑝𝑜𝑠𝑡𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝐺𝑜𝑢𝑣𝑒𝑖𝑎 𝑒 𝑀𝑒𝑙𝑜, “𝑜𝑙ℎ𝑜𝑠 𝑛𝑜𝑠 𝑜𝑙ℎ𝑜𝑠”. 𝐺𝑜𝑢𝑣𝑒𝑖𝑎 𝑒 𝑀𝑒𝑙𝑜 𝑣𝑒𝑖𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑜́𝑐𝑢𝑙𝑜𝑠 𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑖𝑠𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑝𝑜𝑛𝑑𝑒𝑟 𝑜𝑙ℎ𝑜𝑠 𝑛𝑜𝑠 𝑜𝑙ℎ𝑜𝑠 𝑎 𝐶𝑜𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑚: “𝑉𝑜𝑢 𝑑𝑖𝑧𝑒𝑟 𝑛𝑎 𝑠𝑢𝑎 𝑐𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝐽𝑜𝑎̃𝑜 𝐶𝑜𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑚 𝐹𝑖𝑔𝑢𝑒𝑖𝑟𝑒𝑑𝑜 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑣𝑎𝑖 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑒𝑔𝑢𝑖𝑟 𝑠𝑒𝑟 𝑖𝑛𝑑𝑒𝑝𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒”. 𝐶𝑜𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑚 𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑝𝑜𝑛𝑑𝑒𝑢 𝑎̀ 𝑙𝑒𝑡𝑟𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑢 𝑠𝑒𝑟 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑑𝑟𝑎 𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑠𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑜𝑠 𝑝𝑜𝑝𝑢𝑙𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑠: “𝑂́ 𝐺𝑜𝑢𝑣𝑒𝑖𝑎 𝑒 𝑀𝑒𝑙𝑜, 𝑖𝑠𝑠𝑜 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑓𝑎𝑧 𝑠𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑑𝑜, 𝑣𝑎𝑖 𝑑𝑖𝑧𝑒𝑟 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑒́ 𝑐𝑎𝑑𝑎𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑜 𝑡𝑒𝑟 𝑝𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑡𝑖𝑑𝑎́𝑟𝑖𝑜.ᐣ” (𝐼𝑠𝑡𝑜 𝑐𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑠𝑜𝑎 𝑚𝑒𝑙ℎ𝑜𝑟).
𝐴𝑝𝑒𝑠𝑎𝑟 𝑑𝑒 𝑛𝑎𝑣𝑒𝑔𝑎𝑟 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑣𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜 𝑎 𝑓𝑎𝑣𝑜𝑟, 𝑜 𝐴𝑙𝑚𝑖𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑟𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑔𝑎𝑛ℎ𝑎 𝑣𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑔𝑒𝑛𝑠 𝑛𝑜 𝑑𝑒𝑏𝑎𝑡𝑒, 𝑒 𝐶𝑜𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑚 𝑎𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑣𝑒𝑖𝑡𝑎-𝑠𝑒 𝑏𝑒𝑚, 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑞𝑢𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑜 𝑛𝑜𝑠 𝑎𝑟𝑔𝑢𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜𝑠 𝑒 𝑛𝑎 𝑐𝑙𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑧𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑖𝑎𝑠: “𝑆𝑜𝑢 𝑎 𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒𝑖𝑟𝑎 𝑣𝑎𝑐𝑖𝑛𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑎 𝑜 𝑝𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑚𝑖𝑠𝑚𝑜 𝑒 𝑜 𝑚𝑒𝑑𝑜 𝑑𝑜 𝑓𝑢𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑜”, 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑐𝑙𝑢𝑖𝑢. 𝑀𝑎𝑠, 𝑛𝑢𝑚 𝑟𝑒𝑔𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑜 𝑝𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑣𝑜-𝑎𝑔𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑣𝑜, 𝑖𝑛𝑠𝑖𝑛𝑢𝑜𝑢 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝐺𝑜𝑢𝑣𝑒𝑖𝑎 𝑒 𝑀𝑒𝑙𝑜 𝑠𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑎 𝑚𝑎𝑐̧𝑜𝑛. 𝐺𝑜𝑢𝑣𝑒𝑖𝑎 𝑒 𝑀𝑒𝑙𝑜, 𝑛𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑝𝑜𝑠𝑡𝑎 𝑖𝑔𝑢𝑎𝑙𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑝𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑣𝑎-𝑎𝑔𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑣𝑎, 𝑑𝑖𝑠𝑠𝑒 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 ℎ𝑎𝑣𝑖𝑎 𝑢𝑚 𝑚𝑎𝑐̧𝑜𝑛 𝑛𝑎𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑙𝑎 𝑠𝑎𝑙𝑎.
𝐸𝑛𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑜 𝑠𝑒 𝑑𝑖𝑠𝑐𝑢𝑡𝑖𝑎 𝑎 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑒́𝑔𝑖𝑎 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑎 𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑣𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑧𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑎 𝑇𝐴𝑃, 𝐶𝑜𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑚 𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑜𝑟𝑑𝑜𝑢 𝑜 𝑎𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑖𝑠𝑚𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑢𝑚 𝑠𝑒𝑢 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑓𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑜𝑟: “𝐶𝑎𝑑𝑎 𝑣𝑒𝑧 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑠𝑒 𝑓𝑎𝑙𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑒́𝑔𝑖𝑎 𝑛𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑎, 𝑠𝑖𝑔𝑛𝑖𝑓𝑖𝑐𝑎 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑎𝑙𝑔𝑢𝑒́𝑚 𝑣𝑎𝑖 𝑎𝑜 𝑏𝑜𝑙𝑠𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑎𝑙𝑔𝑢𝑒́𝑚”.
𝑀𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑡𝑎𝑟𝑑𝑒, 𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑠𝑎 𝑑𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑣𝑜𝑢 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑎 𝑔𝑟𝑒𝑣𝑒 𝑔𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑙, 𝑜 𝑝𝑎𝑐𝑜𝑡𝑒 𝑙𝑎𝑏𝑜𝑟𝑎𝑙 𝑒, 𝑖𝑛𝑒𝑣𝑖𝑡𝑎𝑣𝑒𝑙𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒, 𝑎 “𝑛𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝑑𝑒 𝑓𝑙𝑒𝑥𝑖𝑏𝑖𝑙𝑖𝑧𝑎𝑟 𝑜 𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑏𝑎𝑙ℎ𝑜”. 𝐸𝑢, 𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑜𝑖𝑐̧𝑜 𝑝𝑜𝑙𝜄́𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑜𝑠 𝑒 𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑎́𝑟𝑖𝑜𝑠 𝑎 𝑓𝑎𝑙𝑎𝑟 𝑑𝑒 “𝑓𝑙𝑒𝑥𝑖𝑏𝑖𝑙𝑖𝑧𝑎𝑟”, 𝑡𝑎𝑚𝑏𝑒́𝑚 𝑠𝑖𝑔𝑛𝑖𝑓𝑖𝑐𝑎 𝑠𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑟𝑒 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑎𝑙𝑔𝑢𝑒́𝑚 𝑣𝑎𝑖 𝑎𝑜 𝑏𝑜𝑙𝑠𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑎𝑙𝑔𝑢𝑒́𝑚…
𝑇𝑟𝑒̂𝑠 𝑑𝑖𝑎𝑠 𝑑𝑒𝑝𝑜𝑖𝑠, 𝑑𝑜𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑔𝑜 𝟸𝟹 𝑑𝑒 𝑛𝑜𝑣𝑒𝑚𝑏𝑟𝑜, 𝐶𝑙𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑆𝑜𝑢𝑠𝑎 𝑚𝑜𝑑𝑒𝑟𝑜𝑢 𝑑𝑒𝑏𝑎𝑡𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝐶𝑎𝑡𝑎𝑟𝑖𝑛𝑎 𝑀𝑎𝑟𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑠 𝑒 𝐻𝑒𝑛𝑟𝑖𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝐺𝑜𝑢𝑣𝑒𝑖𝑎 𝑒 𝑀𝑒𝑙𝑜 𝑛𝑎 𝑆𝐼𝐶.
𝐺𝑜𝑢𝑣𝑒𝑖𝑎 𝑒 𝑀𝑒𝑙𝑜 𝑎𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑢 𝑠𝑒𝑚 𝑜́𝑐𝑢𝑙𝑜𝑠 𝑒 𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑜𝑢 𝑎 𝑚𝑎𝑡𝑎𝑟, 𝑎𝑓𝑖𝑟𝑚𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑒𝑥𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑒 𝑢𝑚 “𝑜𝑐𝑒𝑎𝑛𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑑𝑖𝑓𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑐̧𝑎𝑠” 𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑒 𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑜𝑖𝑠 𝑐𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑡𝑜𝑠 𝑒 𝑎𝑐𝑢𝑠𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝐶𝑎𝑡𝑎𝑟𝑖𝑛𝑎 𝑀𝑎𝑟𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑟 𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑒 𝐵𝑟𝑢𝑥𝑒𝑙𝑎𝑠 𝑒 𝐿𝑖𝑠𝑏𝑜𝑎. “𝑆𝑜𝑢 𝑝𝑒𝑙𝑜 𝑚𝑒𝑟𝑐𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑙𝑖𝑣𝑟𝑒 𝑒 𝑎 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑒𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑣𝑎𝑑𝑎” 𝑒𝑟𝑎 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑓𝑟𝑎𝑠𝑒 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑝𝑜𝑑𝑖𝑎 𝑡𝑒𝑟 𝑢𝑠𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑛𝑜 𝑑𝑒𝑏𝑎𝑡𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝐶𝑜𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑚, 𝑜𝑢 𝑝𝑒𝑙𝑜 𝑝𝑟𝑜́𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑜 𝐶𝑜𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑚, 𝑎𝑞𝑢𝑖 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑢 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑑𝑒𝑐𝑙𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑔𝑢𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝐺𝑜𝑢𝑣𝑒𝑖𝑎 𝑒 𝑀𝑒𝑙𝑜 𝑎𝑜 𝐵𝑙𝑜𝑐𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝐸𝑠𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑟𝑑𝑎.
𝐶𝑎𝑡𝑎𝑟𝑖𝑛𝑎 𝑀𝑎𝑟𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑠 𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑝𝑜𝑛𝑑𝑒𝑢: “𝐴 𝑚𝑖𝑚 𝑛𝑖𝑛𝑔𝑢𝑒́𝑚 𝑚𝑒 𝑑𝑖𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑢𝑖 𝑝𝑜𝑟 𝑡𝑒𝑟 𝑠𝑖𝑑𝑜 𝑒𝑙𝑒𝑖𝑡𝑎. 𝐸𝑠𝑡𝑜𝑢 𝑎𝑞𝑢𝑖 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑑𝑒𝑓𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑒𝑟 𝑎 𝑙𝑖𝑏𝑒𝑟𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝑒 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑜𝑠 𝑠𝑜𝑛ℎ𝑜𝑠 𝑠𝑎𝑙𝑎𝑧𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑉𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑎”. 𝐷𝑒𝑝𝑜𝑖𝑠 𝑑𝑒𝑣𝑜𝑙𝑣𝑒𝑢 𝑎 𝑎𝑐𝑢𝑠𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜: “𝐹𝑒𝑧 𝑚𝑎𝑙 𝑒𝑚 𝑖𝑟 𝑎𝑙𝑚𝑜𝑐̧𝑎𝑟 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑎 𝑒𝑥𝑡𝑟𝑒𝑚𝑎-𝑑𝑖𝑟𝑒𝑖𝑡𝑎”. 𝐺𝑜𝑢𝑣𝑒𝑖𝑎 𝑒 𝑀𝑒𝑙𝑜 𝑒𝑛𝑔𝑜𝑙𝑖𝑢 𝑒𝑚 𝑠𝑒𝑐𝑜.
“𝑂 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑏𝑙𝑒𝑚𝑎 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑒́ 𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑒𝑗𝑎𝑚𝑜𝑠 𝑛𝑜 𝑓𝑖𝑚, 𝑚𝑎𝑠 𝑜 𝑐𝑎𝑚𝑖𝑛ℎ𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑓𝑎𝑧𝑒𝑚𝑜𝑠 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑙𝑎́ 𝑐ℎ𝑒𝑔𝑎𝑟”, 𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑔𝑢𝑟𝑎 𝐺𝑜𝑢𝑣𝑒𝑖𝑎 𝑒 𝑀𝑒𝑙𝑜. “𝐻𝑎́ 𝑒𝑚 𝑃𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑢𝑔𝑎𝑙 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑐𝑢𝑙𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑖𝑚𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑣𝑖𝑠𝑜 𝑒 𝑓𝑎𝑙𝑡𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑟𝑖𝑔𝑜𝑟”, 𝑎𝑐𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑐𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑎. 𝑀𝑎𝑠 𝑑𝑒𝑝𝑜𝑖𝑠 𝑓𝑎𝑧 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑝𝑎𝑢𝑠𝑎 𝑒 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑒𝑛𝑣𝑜𝑙𝑣𝑒 𝑜 𝑎𝑟𝑔𝑢𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜. 𝐶𝑎𝑡𝑎𝑟𝑖𝑛𝑎 𝑀𝑎𝑟𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑠 𝑎𝑔𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑎 𝑎 𝑜𝑝𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑢𝑛𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝑒 𝑟𝑒𝑓𝑒𝑟𝑒 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑑𝑒𝑣𝑒𝑚𝑜𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑐𝑟𝑒𝑡𝑖𝑧𝑎𝑟 𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑚𝑜𝑠 𝑎 𝑑𝑖𝑧𝑒𝑟: “𝐺𝑜𝑢𝑣𝑒𝑖𝑎 𝑒 𝑀𝑒𝑙𝑜 𝑗𝑎́ 𝑡𝑒𝑣𝑒 𝑣𝑎𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑠 𝑜𝑝𝑖𝑛𝑖𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑠𝑜𝑏𝑟𝑒 𝑣𝑎́𝑟𝑖𝑜𝑠 𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑢𝑛𝑡𝑜𝑠, 𝑏𝑒𝑚 𝑠𝑒𝑖 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑜 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑠𝑎̃𝑜 𝑎𝑠 𝑙𝑒𝑔𝑖𝑠𝑙𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑎𝑠, 𝑚𝑎𝑠 𝑒́ 𝑖𝑚𝑝𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑠𝑎𝑏𝑒𝑟 𝑑𝑒 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑙𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑒́ 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎́”.
𝐺𝑜𝑢𝑣𝑒𝑖𝑎 𝑒 𝑀𝑒𝑙𝑜 𝑓𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑧𝑎 𝑠𝑢𝑏𝑙𝑖𝑛ℎ𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎́ “𝑑𝑜 𝑙𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑑𝑎 𝑒𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑜𝑚𝑖𝑎 𝑙𝑖𝑣𝑟𝑒 𝑒 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑧𝑎𝑑𝑎”. 𝑀𝑎𝑠 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑒́ 𝑝𝑜𝑟 𝑖𝑠𝑠𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑓𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑚𝑜𝑠 𝑎 𝑠𝑎𝑏𝑒𝑟 𝑑𝑒 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑙𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑒́ 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑒𝑙𝑒 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎́, 𝑜𝑢 𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑝𝑒𝑑𝑖𝑢 𝑑𝑒 𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑛𝑜 𝑎𝑙𝑚𝑜𝑐̧𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑎 𝑚𝑎𝑐̧𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑟𝑖𝑎 𝑜𝑢 𝑎 𝑒𝑥𝑡𝑟𝑒𝑚𝑎 𝑑𝑖𝑟𝑒𝑖𝑡𝑎.
* Copywriter da TVI
IN "NASCER DO SOL" -29/11/25 .
4253-UNIÃO
EUROPEIA
MULHERES!
UNAM OS JOELHOS!!!!
(ponham os homens a acalentar-se com a mão,
são adeptos da manosfera)
Quais são os países da UE com
maiores disparidades de investimento
entre homens e mulheres?
FONTE: Euronews-28/11/25
putin HUYLO
putin é um canalha .
Trump is also a killer
of innocent people Ukrainians
É também um aplicativo russo
.
4341
Senso d'hoje
MARIANA MORTÁGUA
DEPUTADA À A.R.
BLOCO DE ESQUERDA
A última intervenção como
Coordenadora do "BE"
"FOI O ORGULHO DA MINHA VIDA"
FONTE:
NR: Não beliscaremos a dignidade de MM. As críticas que lhe tecemos foram por causa da falta de capacidade de aumentar o número de eleitores do partido, da falta de capacidade de reunir uma equipa competente à sua volta.
Subscrever:
Comentários (Atom)