𝖭𝗈 𝗉𝖺𝗌𝗌𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝗆𝖾̂𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖺𝖻𝗋𝗂𝗅, 𝗇𝗈 𝖬𝗎𝗌𝖾𝗎 𝖽𝗈 𝖯𝖺𝗅𝖺𝗓𝗓𝗈 𝖬𝖺𝖿𝖿𝖾𝗂, 𝗇𝖺 𝖼𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗅𝗂𝖺𝗇𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝖵𝖾𝗋𝗈𝗇𝖺, 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗏𝖺 𝖾𝗑𝗉𝗈𝗌𝗍𝖺 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗉𝖾𝖼̧𝖺 𝗂𝗇𝗍𝗂𝗍𝗎𝗅𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝖠 𝖢𝖺𝖽𝖾𝗂𝗋𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝖵𝖺𝗇 𝖦𝗈𝗀𝗁, 𝖽𝖺 𝖺𝗎𝗍𝗈𝗋𝗂𝖺 𝖽𝗈 𝖺𝗋𝗍𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖺 𝖭𝗂𝖼𝗈𝗅𝖺 𝖡𝗈𝗅𝗅𝖺, 𝗁𝗈𝗆𝖾𝗇𝖺𝗀𝖾𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖺𝖽𝗋𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖵𝖺𝗇 𝖦𝗈𝗀𝗁 𝗉𝗂𝗇𝗍𝗈𝗎 𝖾𝗆 𝟣𝟪𝟪𝟪. 𝖠𝗈 𝗌𝖾𝗋 𝗈𝖻𝗌𝖾𝗋𝗏𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝗎𝗆 𝖼𝖺𝗌𝖺𝗅 𝖽𝖾 𝗍𝗎𝗋𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗌, 𝗈 𝗁𝗈𝗆𝖾𝗆 𝖺𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗑𝗂𝗆𝗈𝗎-𝗌𝖾 𝖽𝖺 𝖼𝖺𝖽𝖾𝗂𝗋𝖺 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖺 𝗆𝗎𝗅𝗁𝖾𝗋 𝗈 𝖿𝗈𝗍𝗈𝗀𝗋𝖺𝖿𝖺𝗌𝗌𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝗈 𝗌𝖾𝗎 𝗍𝖾𝗅𝖾𝗆𝗈́𝗏𝖾𝗅; 𝗌𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈𝗎-𝗌𝖾, 𝖺 𝖼𝖺𝖽𝖾𝗂𝗋𝖺 𝖼𝖾𝖽𝖾𝗎 𝖾 𝖿𝗂𝖼𝗈𝗎 𝖺𝗆𝗈𝗅𝗀𝖺𝖽𝖺 - 𝗈 𝖼𝖺𝗌𝖺𝗅 𝗌𝖺𝗂𝗎 𝗋𝖺𝗉𝗂𝖽𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖽𝖺 𝗌𝖺𝗅𝖺 𝗈𝗇𝖽𝖾, 𝗇𝖺𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗅𝖾 𝗆𝗈𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈, 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗁𝖺𝗏𝗂𝖺 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝗇𝗂𝗇𝗀𝗎𝖾́𝗆.
𝖮 𝗆𝗎𝗌𝖾𝗎 𝖽𝖾𝗎 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝖺 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺 𝗈𝖼𝗈𝗋𝗋𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝗁𝖺́ 𝗉𝗈𝗎𝖼𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝗂𝖺𝗌, 𝖺𝖼𝗋𝖾𝗌𝖼𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾, 𝖺𝗉𝖾𝗌𝖺𝗋 𝖽𝖾 𝗈 𝖺𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝖾𝖼𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝗍𝖾𝗋 𝗌𝗂𝖽𝗈 𝗋𝖾𝗀𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝗏𝖺́𝗋𝗂𝖺𝗌 𝖼𝖺̂𝗆𝖺𝗋𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗏𝗂𝗀𝗂𝗅𝖺̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺, 𝗈 𝖼𝖺𝗌𝖺𝗅 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗂𝗇𝗎𝖺 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝗂𝖽𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗂𝖿𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗋 (𝗈 𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗉𝖾𝗍𝗂𝗏𝗈 𝗏ı́𝖽𝖾𝗈 𝖾𝗇𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖺-𝗌𝖾 𝗇𝗈 𝖸𝗈𝗎𝖳𝗎𝖻𝖾 𝖾 𝗍𝖺𝗆𝖻𝖾́𝗆 𝖾𝗆 𝗌𝗂𝗍𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗏𝖺́𝗋𝗂𝖺𝗌 𝗉𝗎𝖻𝗅𝗂𝖼𝖺𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌, 𝗂𝗇𝖼𝗅𝗎𝗂𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝗈 𝗃𝗈𝗋𝗇𝖺𝗅 𝖻𝗋𝗂𝗍𝖺̂𝗇𝗂𝖼𝗈 𝖳𝗁𝖾 𝖦𝗎𝖺𝗋𝖽𝗂𝖺𝗇). 𝖭𝖺 𝗌𝗎𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗎𝗇𝗂𝖼𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈, 𝖺𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗅𝖺 𝗂𝗇𝗌𝗍𝗂𝗍𝗎𝗂𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝗅𝖾𝗆𝖻𝗋𝖺 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗁𝖺𝗏𝗂𝖺 𝖺𝗏𝗂𝗌𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗍𝗈𝖼𝖺𝗋 𝗇𝗈 𝗈𝖻𝗃𝖾𝗍𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖾́, 𝖽𝖾 𝖿𝖺𝖼𝗍𝗈, 𝗆𝗎𝗂𝗍𝗈 𝖿𝗋𝖺́𝗀𝗂𝗅 - 𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗍𝖺-𝗌𝖾 𝖽𝖾 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗋𝗎𝗍𝗎𝗋𝖺 𝗈𝖼𝖺, 𝗎𝗇𝗂𝖽𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝗉𝖺𝗉𝖾𝗅 𝖽𝖾 𝖺𝗅𝗎𝗆ı́𝗇𝗂𝗈 𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝖻𝖾𝗋𝗍𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝖼𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗇𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖼𝗋𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝖲𝗐𝖺𝗋𝗈𝗏𝗌𝗄𝗂.
𝖤𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖾𝗍𝖺𝗇𝗍𝗈, 𝖿𝗈𝗂 𝗉𝗈𝗌𝗌ı́𝗏𝖾𝗅 𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗎𝗋𝖺𝗋 𝖺 𝗈𝖻𝗋𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝖭𝗂𝖼𝗈𝗅𝖺 𝖡𝗈𝗅𝗅𝖺 𝖾 𝗏𝗈𝗅𝗍𝖺𝗋 𝖺 𝖾𝗑𝗉𝗈̂-𝗅𝖺 𝗇𝗈 𝗆𝗎𝗌𝖾𝗎. 𝖲𝖾𝗃𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝖿𝗈𝗋, 𝗁𝖺́ 𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗅𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗋 𝖼𝗈𝗂𝗌𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝗂𝗇𝗌𝖺𝗇𝗈 𝖾𝗆 𝗍𝗎𝖽𝗈 𝗂𝗌𝗍𝗈, 𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗅𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗋 𝖼𝗈𝗂𝗌𝖺 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗇𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗌𝖾𝗀𝗎𝖾 𝖺𝗍𝖾𝗇𝗎𝖺𝗋, 𝗇𝖾𝗆 𝗆𝖾𝗌𝗆𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝗍𝖾𝗆𝗈𝗌 𝖺 𝗍𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗈𝗅𝗁𝖺𝗋 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗈 𝖺𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝗈 𝗁𝗈𝗆𝖾𝗆 𝖺 𝖼𝖺𝗂𝗋 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗂𝗆𝗂𝗍𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝗂𝗇𝗏𝗈𝗅𝗎𝗇𝗍𝖺́𝗋𝗂𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝖼𝖾𝗇𝖺 𝖻𝗎𝗋𝗅𝖾𝗌𝖼𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝗎𝗆 𝖿𝗂𝗅𝗆𝖾 𝗆𝗎𝖽𝗈.
𝖢𝗅𝖺𝗋𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗈 𝗆𝗎𝗌𝖾𝗎, 𝖺𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗏𝖾́𝗌 𝖽𝖺 𝖽𝗂𝗋𝖾𝗍𝗈𝗋𝖺 𝖵𝖺𝗇𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖺 𝖢𝖺𝗋𝗅𝗈𝗇, 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖾𝗂𝗑𝗈𝗎 𝖽𝖾 𝗅𝖾𝗆𝖻𝗋𝖺𝗋 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗁𝖺𝗏𝗂𝖺 𝖺𝗏𝗂𝗌𝗈𝗌 𝖼𝗅𝖺𝗋𝗈𝗌 𝗌𝗈𝖻𝗋𝖾 𝖺 𝖿𝗋𝖺𝗀𝗂𝗅𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝖺 𝗉𝖾𝖼̧𝖺, 𝗌𝗎𝖻𝗅𝗂𝗇𝗁𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝗍𝖺𝗆𝖻𝖾́𝗆 𝗈 𝖼𝗁𝗈𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖾́ 𝗉𝖾𝗋𝖼𝖾𝖻𝖾𝗋 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖺𝗅𝗀𝗎𝖾́𝗆 𝖿𝗈𝗀𝖾 𝖽𝖾 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗌𝗂𝗍𝗎𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖾 𝗍𝖾𝗈𝗋 𝗌𝖾𝗆, 𝗉𝖾𝗅𝗈 𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗈𝗌, 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗎𝗇𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗋 𝖺𝗈𝗌 𝖿𝗎𝗇𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺́𝗋𝗂𝗈𝗌 𝖺𝗊𝗎𝗂𝗅𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖺𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝖾𝖼𝖾𝗎. 𝖮𝗋𝖺, 𝖺 𝗆𝖾𝗎 𝗏𝖾𝗋, 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖾 𝖾́ 𝗈 𝗍𝗂𝗉𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝖾𝗍𝖺𝗅𝗁𝖾 𝗌𝗈𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗅 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗏𝖺𝗅𝖾𝗋𝗂𝖺 𝖺 𝗉𝖾𝗇𝖺 𝖾𝗌𝖼𝖺𝗅𝗉𝖾𝗅𝗂𝗓𝖺𝗋 𝖺 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝗍𝗂𝗋 𝖽𝖾 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗉𝖾𝗋𝗌𝗉𝖾𝗍𝗂𝗏𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗉𝗅𝖾𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺𝗋, 𝖾𝗇𝗏𝗈𝗅𝗏𝖾𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝖽𝗈𝗂𝗌 𝖽𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗆𝗎𝗂𝗍𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖼𝗋𝖾𝗍𝗈𝗌: 𝗉𝗋𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗂𝗋𝗈, 𝗁𝖺́ 𝗎𝗆 𝗉𝗎́𝖻𝗅𝗂𝖼𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗆𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾́𝗆 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗋𝖾𝗅𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖻𝖺𝗇𝖺𝗅𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝗂𝗇𝗌𝗍𝗋𝗎𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺𝗅 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝗈𝗌 𝗈𝖻𝗃𝖾𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝖺𝗋𝗍ı́𝗌𝗍𝗂𝖼𝗈𝗌; 𝗌𝖾𝗀𝗎𝗇𝖽𝗈, 𝗈 𝗇𝗎́𝖼𝗅𝖾𝗈 𝗉𝗋𝖺́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝗈 𝖾 𝗌𝗂𝗆𝖻𝗈́𝗅𝗂𝖼𝗈 𝖽𝗈 𝗌𝖾𝗎 𝗈𝗅𝗁𝖺𝗋 𝗌𝗈𝖻𝗋𝖾 𝗈 𝗆𝗎𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝖾𝗌𝗀𝗈𝗍𝖺-𝗌𝖾 𝗇𝖺 𝗉𝗈𝗌𝗌𝗂𝖻𝗂𝗅𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝖾 𝗈𝖻𝗍𝖾𝗋 𝖺𝗅𝗀𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗂𝗆𝖺𝗀𝖾𝗆 𝗊𝗎𝖾 “𝗍𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖾𝗆𝗎𝗇𝗁𝖾” 𝗈 𝗏𝖺𝗓𝗂𝗈 𝖽𝖺𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗅𝖺 𝗋𝖾𝗅𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈.
𝖤𝗆 𝖻𝗈𝖺 𝗏𝖾𝗋𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾, 𝗈𝖻𝗌𝖾𝗋𝗏𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝖺𝗍𝖾𝗇𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝗈𝗌 𝟤𝟩 𝗌𝖾𝗀𝗎𝗇𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝗈 𝗏ı́𝖽𝖾𝗈 𝖽𝗂𝗏𝗎𝗅𝗀𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝗉𝖾𝗅𝗈 𝗆𝗎𝗌𝖾𝗎, 𝗉𝖾𝗋𝖼𝖾𝖻𝖾𝗆𝗈𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖾, 𝗇𝗈 𝗂𝗇ı́𝖼𝗂𝗈, 𝖾́ 𝗃𝖺́ 𝖺 𝗆𝗎𝗅𝗁𝖾𝗋 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗌𝗂𝗆𝗎𝗅𝖺 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗋 𝗌𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝗇𝖺 𝖼𝖺𝖽𝖾𝗂𝗋𝖺 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗈 𝗁𝗈𝗆𝖾𝗆 𝖺 𝖿𝗈𝗍𝗈𝗀𝗋𝖺𝖿𝖾. 𝖣𝗂𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗈𝗎𝗍𝗋𝗈 𝗆𝗈𝖽𝗈: 𝖺 𝗎́𝗇𝗂𝖼𝖺 𝗆𝗈𝗍𝗂𝗏𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝗉𝖺𝗅𝗉𝖺́𝗏𝖾𝗅 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝖺 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗌𝖾𝗇𝖼̧𝖺 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝗈𝗂𝗌 𝗇𝖺𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗅𝖾 𝖾𝗌𝗉𝖺𝖼̧𝗈 𝖾́ 𝖺 𝗈𝖻𝗍𝖾𝗇𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗂𝗆𝖺𝗀𝖾𝗆 𝗈𝗎 𝗂𝗆𝖺𝗀𝖾𝗇𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗉𝗈𝗌𝗌𝖺𝗆 “𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗏𝖺𝗋” 𝖺 𝗌𝗎𝖺 𝗉𝖺𝗌𝗌𝖺𝗀𝖾𝗆.
𝖭𝗈 𝗌𝖾𝗎 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗎𝗇𝗂𝖼𝖺𝖽𝗈, 𝗈 𝗆𝗎𝗌𝖾𝗎 𝗉𝖾𝖽𝖾 𝗍𝖺𝗆𝖻𝖾́𝗆 𝖺𝗈𝗌 𝗏𝗂𝗌𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖾 “𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗉𝖾𝗂𝗍𝖾𝗆 𝖺 𝖺𝗋𝗍𝖾”. 𝖮 𝗉𝖾𝖽𝗂𝖽𝗈 𝗉𝗈𝗌𝗌𝗎𝗂 𝖺𝗌 𝗅𝗈𝗎𝗏𝖺́𝗏𝖾𝗂𝗌 𝗏𝗂𝗋𝗍𝗎𝖽𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖺 𝗅𝗈́𝗀𝗂𝖼𝖺 𝖾 𝖽𝖺 𝗌𝖾𝗇𝗌𝖺𝗍𝖾𝗓, 𝗆𝖺𝗌 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗉𝗈𝖽𝖾, 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝗌𝗂 𝗌𝗈́, 𝖺𝗇𝗎𝗅𝖺𝗋 𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺́ 𝖾𝗆 𝗃𝗈𝗀𝗈. 𝖠 𝗌𝖺𝖻𝖾𝗋: 𝗁𝖺́ 𝗎𝗆 𝗉𝗎́𝖻𝗅𝗂𝖼𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗆𝗉𝗈𝗋𝖺̂𝗇𝖾𝗈, 𝖼𝖾𝗋𝗍𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗌𝗍𝗂𝗍𝗎ı́𝖽𝗈 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝖽𝗂𝗏𝖾𝗋𝗌𝖺𝗌 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖼𝖾𝗅𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗉𝗎́𝖻𝗅𝗂𝖼𝗈𝗌, 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖿𝗈𝗂 (𝖽𝖾𝗌)𝖾𝖽𝗎𝖼𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗍𝖾𝗋 𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗅𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗋 𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗉𝖾𝗂𝗍𝗈 𝗉𝖾𝗅𝖺 𝖺𝗋𝗍𝖾. 𝖤 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗋𝖺𝗓𝖺̃𝗈 𝗆𝗎𝗂𝗍𝗈 𝗌𝗂𝗆𝗉𝗅𝖾𝗌: 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗁𝖾𝖼𝖾 𝗇𝖾𝗆 𝗋𝖾𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗁𝖾𝖼𝖾 𝖺 𝖾𝗌𝗉𝖾𝖼𝗂𝖿𝗂𝖼𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝖺 𝖺𝗋𝗍𝖾 𝖾 𝖽𝗈 𝗍𝗋𝖺𝖻𝖺𝗅𝗁𝗈 𝖺𝗋𝗍ı́𝗌𝗍𝗂𝖼𝗈 - 𝗈𝗅𝗁𝖺 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗈 𝗆𝗎𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝖺̀ 𝗌𝗎𝖺 𝗏𝗈𝗅𝗍𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝗌𝖾 𝖿𝗈𝗌𝗌𝖾 𝗎𝗆 𝖼𝗅𝗂𝗉, 𝗍𝖾𝗅𝖾𝗏𝗂𝗌𝗂𝗏𝗈 𝖾 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝖼𝖺𝗋𝗍𝖺́𝗏𝖾𝗅, 𝖾𝗆 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗇𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝖾́ 𝗋𝖾𝖺𝗅𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝗉𝖾𝗋𝗍𝗂𝗇𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝗈𝗎 𝗆𝖾𝗋𝖾𝖼𝖾𝖽𝗈𝗋 𝖽𝖾 𝖺𝗅𝗀𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺𝗀𝖾𝗆 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗋 𝖺𝗍𝖾𝗇𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈.
Há um público contemporâneo que não tem qualquer respeito pela arte: a sua arma de eleição é o telemóvel.
𝖯𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗈 𝖼𝖺𝗌𝖺𝗅 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗂𝖽𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗂𝖿𝗂𝖼𝖺𝖽𝗈, 𝖺 𝖼𝖺𝖽𝖾𝗂𝗋𝖺 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾𝗑𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝗈𝖻𝗃𝖾𝗍𝗈 𝗌𝗂𝗇𝗀𝗎𝗅𝖺𝗋, 𝗆𝖺𝗌 𝖺𝗉𝖾𝗇𝖺𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝗏𝖾ı́𝖼𝗎𝗅𝗈 𝗆𝖺𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗂𝖺𝗅 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝖺 𝗈𝖻𝗍𝖾𝗇𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖾 (𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗌) 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗂𝗆𝖺𝗀𝖾𝗆. 𝖮 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗋 𝖽𝗂𝗓𝖾𝗋 𝗍𝖺𝗆𝖻𝖾́𝗆 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖺𝗌 𝗉𝗋𝗈́𝗉𝗋𝗂𝖺𝗌 𝗂𝗆𝖺𝗀𝖾𝗇𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝖽𝗎𝗓𝖾𝗆 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾𝗇𝗏𝗈𝗅𝗏𝖾𝗆 𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗅𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗋 𝗏𝖺𝗅𝗈𝗋, 𝗅𝗂𝗆𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗈-𝗌𝖾 𝖺 𝖿𝗎𝗇𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗋 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝖻𝖺𝗇𝖽𝖾𝗂𝗋𝖺 𝗉𝗎𝖾𝗋𝗂𝗅 𝖽𝗈 𝗍𝗎𝗋𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖺 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗀𝗈𝗌𝗍𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝗋𝖾𝖽𝗎𝗓𝗂𝗋 𝖺𝗌 𝗌𝗎𝖺𝗌 𝗏𝗂𝖺𝗀𝖾𝗇𝗌 𝖺 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗌𝖺𝗀𝖾𝗆 𝗆𝖾𝖼𝖺̂𝗇𝗂𝖼𝖺: “𝖤𝗎 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗂𝗏𝖾 𝗅𝖺́.” 𝖮𝗇𝖽𝖾? 𝖳𝖺𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝖿𝖺𝗓, 𝗆𝖺𝗌 “𝖾𝗎 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗂𝗏𝖾 𝗅𝖺́” 𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖺 𝗆𝗂𝗇𝗁𝖺 𝖿𝗈𝗍𝗈𝗀𝗋𝖺𝖿𝗂𝖺 𝖺𝗌𝗌𝗂𝗆 𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗏𝖺.
𝖨𝗇𝖿𝖾𝗅𝗂𝗓𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾, 𝖺 𝖼𝗎𝗅𝗍𝗎𝗋𝖺 𝗆𝖾𝖽𝗂𝖺́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝖺 𝖾𝗆 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗏𝗂𝗏𝖾𝗆𝗈𝗌, 𝗉𝗈𝗏𝗈𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝗋𝖾𝖽𝗎𝗇𝖽𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗌 “𝖺𝗇𝖺́𝗅𝗂𝗌𝖾𝗌” 𝗉𝗈𝗅ı́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗌 𝖾 𝖿𝗎𝗍𝖾𝖻𝗈𝗅ı́𝗌𝗍𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗌, 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗋𝗂𝖻𝗎𝗂 𝗍𝗈𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝗂𝖺𝗌 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗈 𝖽𝗈𝗆ı́𝗇𝗂𝗈 𝖺𝗋𝗍ı́𝗌𝗍𝗂𝖼𝗈 𝗌𝖾 𝗍𝖾𝗇𝗁𝖺 𝖾𝗌𝗏𝖺𝗓𝗂𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝖽𝖺 𝖽𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝗌𝖺𝗀𝗋𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖾𝗇𝖼𝖺𝗋𝗇𝗈𝗎 - 𝖾 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝗍𝗂𝗅𝗁𝗈𝗎 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗇𝗈𝗌𝖼𝗈 - 𝖽𝗎𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝗌𝖾́𝖼𝗎𝗅𝗈𝗌. 𝖠𝗀𝗈𝗋𝖺, 𝗈 𝗁𝗈𝗆𝖾𝗆 𝖺 𝖾𝗌𝗆𝖺𝗀𝖺𝗋 𝖺 𝖼𝖺𝖽𝖾𝗂𝗋𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝖵𝖺𝗇 𝖦𝗈𝗀𝗁 𝖾𝗇𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖺-𝗌𝖾 𝗆𝗎𝗅𝗍𝗂𝗉𝗅𝗂𝖼𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝖾𝗆 𝖽𝖾𝗓𝖾𝗇𝖺𝗌 (𝗍𝖺𝗅𝗏𝖾𝗓 𝖼𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗇𝖺𝗌) 𝖽𝖾 𝗏ı́𝖽𝖾𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝗈 𝖳𝗂𝗄𝖳𝗈𝗄. 𝖭𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾́ 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝖼𝗂𝗌𝗈 𝗆𝗎𝗂𝗍𝖺 𝗉𝖾𝗋𝗏𝖾𝗋𝗌𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗂𝗆𝖺𝗀𝗂𝗇𝖺𝗋 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖺𝗅𝗀𝗎𝗆 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖾𝗌 𝗏ı́𝖽𝖾𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝗈𝗌𝗌𝖺 𝗍𝖾𝗋 𝗌𝗂𝖽𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗅𝗈𝖼𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝖾𝗆 𝗋𝖾𝖽𝖾 𝗉𝖾𝗅𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝗋𝗈́𝗉𝗋𝗂𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗍𝖺𝗀𝗈𝗇𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗌 - 𝖽𝗂𝗓𝖾𝗆 𝗈𝗌 𝗌𝖾𝗇𝗁𝗈𝗋𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖾 𝗆𝗎𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖾́ 𝗂𝗌𝗌𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖿𝖺𝗓 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗋𝖾𝖽𝖾 “𝗌𝗈𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗅”.