.
Kamala 2024 falhou, porquê
insistir em Kamala 2028?
𝑁𝑎𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑙𝑎 𝑚𝑎𝑑𝑟𝑢𝑔𝑎𝑑𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑛𝑜𝑣𝑒𝑚𝑏𝑟𝑜, 𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑚 𝑠𝑒𝑔𝑢𝑖𝑎 𝑎 𝑛𝑜𝑖𝑡𝑒 𝑒𝑙𝑒𝑖𝑡𝑜𝑟𝑎𝑙 𝑛𝑜𝑠 𝐸𝑈𝐴, 𝑎 𝑚𝑒𝑖𝑜 𝑑𝑎 𝑚𝑎𝑑𝑟𝑢𝑔𝑎𝑑𝑎 𝑎𝑞𝑢𝑖 𝑑𝑒 𝐿𝑖𝑠𝑏𝑜𝑎 𝑗𝑎́ 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑒𝑐̧𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑎 𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑐𝑒𝑏𝑒𝑟 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑜 𝑟𝑒𝑔𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝐷𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑙𝑑 𝑇𝑟𝑢𝑚𝑝 𝑎̀ 𝐶𝑎𝑠𝑎 𝐵𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑐𝑎 𝑒𝑟𝑎 𝑖𝑛𝑒𝑣𝑖𝑡𝑎́𝑣𝑒𝑙. 𝑀𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑑𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑜𝑠 𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑢𝑙𝑡𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑖𝑟𝑜𝑠 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑠, 𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑎𝑚 𝑎𝑠 𝑠𝑜𝑛𝑑𝑎𝑔𝑒𝑛𝑠 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑑𝑖𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑐𝑎𝑣𝑎𝑚 𝑎 𝑣𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑛𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑠 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑑𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑚 𝑝𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑠. 𝐸𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑠 𝑚𝑜𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑣𝑎𝑚 𝐾𝑎𝑚𝑎𝑙𝑎 𝐻𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑖𝑠 𝑎 𝑓𝑎𝑧𝑒𝑟 𝑝𝑖𝑜𝑟 𝑑𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝐽𝑜𝑒 𝐵𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑛 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑡𝑟𝑒̂𝑠 𝑔𝑟𝑢𝑝𝑜𝑠 𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑖𝑠 - 𝑛𝑒𝑔𝑟𝑜𝑠, 𝑙𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑜𝑠 𝑒 𝑗𝑜𝑣𝑒𝑛𝑠. 𝐸 𝑛𝑒𝑚 𝑛𝑎𝑠 𝑚𝑢𝑙𝘩𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑠 𝑎 𝑣𝑖𝑐𝑒-𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑒𝑔𝑢𝑖𝑎 𝑚𝑒𝑙𝘩𝑜𝑟 𝑑𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑜𝑢𝑡𝑟𝑜𝑠 𝑐𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑡𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑒𝑚𝑜𝑐𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑎𝑠 𝑛𝑎𝑠 𝑒𝑙𝑒𝑖𝑐̧𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑜𝑟𝑒𝑠. 𝐶𝑜𝑛𝘩𝑒𝑐𝑖𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑜𝑠 𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑢𝑙𝑡𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑓𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑖𝑠, 𝑎 𝑣𝑖𝑡𝑜́𝑟𝑖𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑇𝑟𝑢𝑚𝑝 𝑓𝑜𝑖 𝑖𝑛𝑒𝑞𝑢𝜄́𝑣𝑜𝑐𝑎 - 𝑔𝑎𝑛𝘩𝑜𝑢 𝑛𝑜 𝑣𝑜𝑡𝑜 𝑝𝑜𝑝𝑢𝑙𝑎𝑟, 𝑣𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑢 𝑜𝑠 𝑠𝑒𝑡𝑒 𝑠𝑤𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑠 𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑞𝑢𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑜𝑢 𝟹𝟷𝟸 𝑣𝑜𝑡𝑜𝑠 𝑛𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑙𝑒́𝑔𝑖𝑜 𝑒𝑙𝑒𝑖𝑡𝑜𝑟𝑎𝑙, 𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑏𝑎𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑚 𝟸𝟽𝟶 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑣𝑒𝑛𝑐𝑒𝑟.
𝑃𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑛𝑜𝑣𝑒 𝑚𝑒𝑠𝑒𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑑𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑜𝑡𝑎 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑑𝑒𝑖𝑥𝑜𝑢 𝑜 𝑃𝑎𝑟𝑡𝑖𝑑𝑜 𝐷𝑒𝑚𝑜𝑐𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑎 𝑠𝑒𝑚 𝑙𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑐̧𝑎 𝑐𝑙𝑎𝑟𝑎, 𝐾𝑎𝑚𝑎𝑙𝑎 𝐻𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑖𝑠 𝑎𝑛𝑢𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑜𝑢 𝑎𝑔𝑜𝑟𝑎 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑠𝑒𝑟𝑎́ 𝑐𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑡𝑎 𝑎 𝑔𝑜𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑛𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑟𝑎 𝑑𝑎 𝐶𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑓𝑜́𝑟𝑛𝑖𝑎 𝑒𝑚 𝟸𝟶𝟸𝟼. 𝑈𝑚 𝑓𝑒𝑐𝘩𝑎𝑟 𝑑𝑒 𝑝𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑎 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑚𝑢𝑖𝑡𝑜𝑠 𝑣𝑒𝑒𝑚 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑜 𝑜 𝑎𝑏𝑟𝑖𝑟 𝑑𝑒 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑗𝑎𝑛𝑒𝑙𝑎 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑎𝑠 𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝟸𝟶𝟸𝟾. 𝑀𝑎𝑠 𝑠𝑒 𝐾𝑎𝑚𝑎𝑙𝑎 𝐻𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑖𝑠 𝟸𝟶𝟸𝟺 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑣𝑒𝑛𝑐𝑒𝑢 𝑜𝑠 𝑒𝑙𝑒𝑖𝑡𝑜𝑟𝑒𝑠, 𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑔𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑜 𝑓𝑎𝑟𝑎́ 𝑒𝑚 𝟸𝟶𝟸𝟾.ᐣ
𝑁𝑎̃𝑜 𝑓𝑎𝑙𝑡𝑎, 𝑐𝑙𝑎𝑟𝑜, 𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑚 𝑝𝑜𝑛𝘩𝑎 𝑎 𝑐𝑢𝑙𝑝𝑎 𝑑𝑎 𝑑𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑜𝑡𝑎 𝑑𝑎 𝑣𝑖𝑐𝑒 𝑑𝑒 𝐵𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑛 𝑛𝑎 𝑑𝑒𝑚𝑜𝑟𝑎 𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑒 𝑒𝑚 𝑠𝑎𝑖𝑟 𝑑𝑒 𝑐𝑒𝑛𝑎. 𝐴𝑜𝑠 𝟾𝟷 𝑎𝑛𝑜𝑠 𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑏𝑙𝑒𝑚𝑎𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑠𝑎𝑢́𝑑𝑒, 𝑜 𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑠𝑜́ 𝑑𝑒𝑖𝑥𝑜𝑢 𝑡𝑟𝑒̂𝑠 𝑚𝑒𝑠𝑒𝑠 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝐾𝑎𝑚𝑎𝑙𝑎 𝐻𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑖𝑠 𝑜𝑟𝑔𝑎𝑛𝑖𝑧𝑎𝑟 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑐𝑎𝑚𝑝𝑎𝑛𝘩𝑎. 𝑁𝑢𝑛𝑐𝑎 𝑠𝑎𝑏𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑚𝑜𝑠 𝑠𝑒 𝑜 𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑢𝑙𝑡𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑎 𝑠𝑖𝑑𝑜 𝑑𝑖𝑓𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑠𝑒 𝑎 𝑑𝑒𝑚𝑜𝑐𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑎 𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑒 𝑡𝑖𝑑𝑜 𝑚𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑡𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑜. 𝑀𝑎𝑠 𝑗𝑎́ 𝑒𝑚 𝟸𝟶𝟸𝟶 𝑎 𝑓𝑖𝑙𝘩𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑢𝑚 𝑗𝑎𝑚𝑎𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑛𝑜 𝑒 𝑑𝑒 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑖𝑛𝑑𝑖𝑎𝑛𝑎 𝑠𝑒 𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑡𝑜𝑟𝑛𝑎𝑟 𝑛𝑎 𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑖𝑟𝑎 𝑚𝑢𝑙𝘩𝑒𝑟 𝑎 𝑐𝘩𝑒𝑔𝑎𝑟 𝑎̀ 𝐶𝑎𝑠𝑎 𝐵𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑐𝑎. 𝑁𝑎 𝑎𝑙𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑎, 𝑎𝑐𝑎𝑏𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑝𝑜𝑟 𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑟 𝑎𝑖𝑛𝑑𝑎 𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑠 𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑚𝑎́𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑠, 𝑎𝑝𝑜𝑖𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝐵𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑛, 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑑𝑒𝑝𝑜𝑖𝑠 𝑎 𝑒𝑠𝑐𝑜𝑙𝘩𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑎 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑣𝑖𝑐𝑒.
𝐴𝑜𝑠 𝟼𝟶 𝑎𝑛𝑜𝑠, 𝑎 𝑚𝑢𝑙𝘩𝑒𝑟 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑎𝑐𝑎𝑏𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑙𝑎𝑛𝑐̧𝑎𝑟 𝑜 𝑙𝑖𝑣𝑟𝑜 𝟷𝟶𝟽 𝐷𝑎𝑦𝑠 (𝑠𝑜𝑏𝑟𝑒 𝑜𝑠 𝟷𝟶𝟽 𝑑𝑖𝑎𝑠 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑑𝑢𝑟𝑜𝑢 𝑎 𝑠𝑢𝑎 𝑐𝑎𝑚𝑝𝑎𝑛𝘩𝑎) 𝑒́ 𝑠𝑒𝑚 𝑑𝑢́𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑎 𝑜 𝑛𝑜𝑚𝑒 𝑑𝑒𝑚𝑜𝑐𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑚𝑎𝑖𝑜𝑟 𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑜𝑛𝘩𝑒𝑐𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜 𝑛𝑎𝑐𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑙. 𝑀𝑎𝑠 𝑛𝑢𝑚 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑡𝑖𝑑𝑜 𝑎̀ 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑐𝑢𝑟𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑢𝑚 𝑙𝜄́𝑑𝑒𝑟 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑜 𝑓𝑢𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑜 𝑚𝑢𝑖𝑡𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑓𝑖𝑎𝑚 𝑑𝑒 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑐𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑡𝑎 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑧 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑒𝑙𝑎 𝑎 𝑏𝑎𝑔𝑎𝑔𝑒𝑚 𝑑𝑎 𝑒𝑟𝑎 𝐵𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑛. 𝐸́ 𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑚𝑢𝑖𝑡𝑎 𝑑𝑜 𝑚𝑜𝑟𝑎𝑙 𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑒𝑚𝑜𝑐𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑎𝑠 𝑣𝑎𝑖 𝑑𝑒𝑝𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑒𝑟 𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑐𝑎𝑙𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑠 𝑑𝑜 𝑝𝑟𝑜́𝑥𝑖𝑚𝑜 𝑎𝑛𝑜, 𝑜𝑛𝑑𝑒 𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑖𝑠𝑎𝑚 𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑢𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑟 𝑝𝑒𝑙𝑜 𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑜𝑠 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑐𝑎̂𝑚𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑠 𝑑𝑜 𝐶𝑜𝑛𝑔𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑜. 𝐸 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑓𝑎𝑙𝑡𝑎𝑚 𝑗𝑎́ (𝑝𝑟𝑒́)𝑐𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑡𝑜𝑠 𝑎̀𝑠 𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑖𝑠 - 𝑑𝑜 𝑒𝑥-𝑠𝑒𝑐𝑟𝑒𝑡𝑎́𝑟𝑖𝑜 𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑇𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑠𝑝𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑒𝑠 𝑃𝑒𝑡𝑒 𝐵𝑢𝑡𝑡𝑖𝑔𝑖𝑒𝑔 𝑎𝑜 𝑔𝑜𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑛𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑟 𝑑𝑎 𝐶𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑓𝑜́𝑟𝑛𝑖𝑎 𝐺𝑎𝑣𝑖𝑛 𝑁𝑒𝑤𝑠𝑜𝑚, 𝑝𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑝𝑒𝑙𝑎 𝑝𝑟𝑜́𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑎 𝐾𝑎𝑚𝑎𝑙𝑎 𝐻𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑖𝑠. 𝐼𝑠𝑡𝑜 𝑠𝑜́ 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑓𝑎𝑙𝑎𝑟 𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑚𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑚𝑎𝑖𝑛𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑒𝑎𝑚, 𝑝𝑜𝑟𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑎𝑙𝑎 𝑚𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑎̀ 𝑒𝑠𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑟𝑑𝑎 𝑠𝑜𝑛𝘩𝑎 𝑖𝑠𝑠𝑜 𝑠𝑖𝑚 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑐𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝐴𝑙𝑒𝑥𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑟𝑖𝑎 𝑂𝑐𝑎𝑠𝑖𝑜-𝐶𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑒𝑧, 𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑔𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑁𝑜𝑣𝑎 𝐼𝑜𝑟𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑡𝑒𝑚 𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑐𝑜𝑟𝑟𝑖𝑑𝑜 𝑜 𝑝𝑎𝜄́𝑠 𝑎𝑜 𝑙𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑑𝑜 𝑠𝑒𝑛𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑟 (𝑒 𝑒𝑥-𝑐𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑡𝑜 𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑙) 𝐵𝑒𝑟𝑛𝑖𝑒 𝑆𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑒𝑟𝑠 𝑛𝑢𝑚 𝑡𝑜𝑢𝑟 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑣𝑖𝑠𝑎 𝑚𝑜𝑏𝑖𝑙𝑖𝑧𝑎𝑟 𝑎𝑠 𝑏𝑎𝑠𝑒𝑠 𝑑𝑒𝑚𝑜𝑐𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑎𝑠.
𝑂𝑟𝑎 𝑛𝑢𝑚𝑎𝑠 𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑒𝑚 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑇𝑟𝑢𝑚𝑝 𝑗𝑎́ 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑟𝑎́ 𝑛𝑎 𝑒𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑒 𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑎 𝑖𝑛𝑐𝑒𝑟𝑡𝑒𝑧𝑎 𝑡𝑎𝑚𝑏𝑒́𝑚 𝑑𝑜 𝑙𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑟𝑒𝑝𝑢𝑏𝑙𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑛𝑜 (𝐽𝐷 𝑉𝑎𝑛𝑐𝑒 𝑐𝘩𝑒𝑔𝑎𝑟𝑎́ 𝑎 𝟸𝟶𝟸𝟾 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑜 𝑜 𝘩𝑒𝑟𝑑𝑒𝑖𝑟𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑇𝑟𝑢𝑚𝑝.ᐣ) 𝑚𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑑𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑣𝑜𝑙𝑡𝑎𝑟 𝑎𝑜 𝑝𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑜𝑢 𝑣𝑖𝑟𝑎𝑟 𝑎̀ 𝑒𝑠𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑟𝑑𝑎, 𝑜 𝑃𝑎𝑟𝑡𝑖𝑑𝑜 𝐷𝑒𝑚𝑜𝑐𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑢𝑎 𝑎̀ 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑐𝑢𝑟𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑓𝑖𝑔𝑢𝑟𝑎 “𝑜𝑏𝑎𝑚𝑖𝑎𝑛𝑎” 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑜 𝑖𝑛𝑠𝑝𝑖𝑟𝑎𝑟. 𝐸 𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑞𝑢𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑟 𝑎 𝐴𝑚𝑒́𝑟𝑖𝑐𝑎.
𝑁𝑎𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑙𝑎 𝑚𝑎𝑑𝑟𝑢𝑔𝑎𝑑𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑛𝑜𝑣𝑒𝑚𝑏𝑟𝑜, 𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑚 𝑠𝑒𝑔𝑢𝑖𝑎 𝑎 𝑛𝑜𝑖𝑡𝑒 𝑒𝑙𝑒𝑖𝑡𝑜𝑟𝑎𝑙 𝑛𝑜𝑠 𝐸𝑈𝐴, 𝑎 𝑚𝑒𝑖𝑜 𝑑𝑎 𝑚𝑎𝑑𝑟𝑢𝑔𝑎𝑑𝑎 𝑎𝑞𝑢𝑖 𝑑𝑒 𝐿𝑖𝑠𝑏𝑜𝑎 𝑗𝑎́ 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑒𝑐̧𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑎 𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑐𝑒𝑏𝑒𝑟 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑜 𝑟𝑒𝑔𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝐷𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑙𝑑 𝑇𝑟𝑢𝑚𝑝 𝑎̀ 𝐶𝑎𝑠𝑎 𝐵𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑐𝑎 𝑒𝑟𝑎 𝑖𝑛𝑒𝑣𝑖𝑡𝑎́𝑣𝑒𝑙. 𝑀𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑑𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑜𝑠 𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑢𝑙𝑡𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑖𝑟𝑜𝑠 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑠, 𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑎𝑚 𝑎𝑠 𝑠𝑜𝑛𝑑𝑎𝑔𝑒𝑛𝑠 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑑𝑖𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑐𝑎𝑣𝑎𝑚 𝑎 𝑣𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑛𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑠 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑑𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑚 𝑝𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑠. 𝐸𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑠 𝑚𝑜𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑣𝑎𝑚 𝐾𝑎𝑚𝑎𝑙𝑎 𝐻𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑖𝑠 𝑎 𝑓𝑎𝑧𝑒𝑟 𝑝𝑖𝑜𝑟 𝑑𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝐽𝑜𝑒 𝐵𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑛 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑡𝑟𝑒̂𝑠 𝑔𝑟𝑢𝑝𝑜𝑠 𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑖𝑠 - 𝑛𝑒𝑔𝑟𝑜𝑠, 𝑙𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑜𝑠 𝑒 𝑗𝑜𝑣𝑒𝑛𝑠. 𝐸 𝑛𝑒𝑚 𝑛𝑎𝑠 𝑚𝑢𝑙𝘩𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑠 𝑎 𝑣𝑖𝑐𝑒-𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑒𝑔𝑢𝑖𝑎 𝑚𝑒𝑙𝘩𝑜𝑟 𝑑𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑜𝑢𝑡𝑟𝑜𝑠 𝑐𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑡𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑒𝑚𝑜𝑐𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑎𝑠 𝑛𝑎𝑠 𝑒𝑙𝑒𝑖𝑐̧𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑜𝑟𝑒𝑠. 𝐶𝑜𝑛𝘩𝑒𝑐𝑖𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑜𝑠 𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑢𝑙𝑡𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑓𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑖𝑠, 𝑎 𝑣𝑖𝑡𝑜́𝑟𝑖𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑇𝑟𝑢𝑚𝑝 𝑓𝑜𝑖 𝑖𝑛𝑒𝑞𝑢𝜄́𝑣𝑜𝑐𝑎 - 𝑔𝑎𝑛𝘩𝑜𝑢 𝑛𝑜 𝑣𝑜𝑡𝑜 𝑝𝑜𝑝𝑢𝑙𝑎𝑟, 𝑣𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑢 𝑜𝑠 𝑠𝑒𝑡𝑒 𝑠𝑤𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑠 𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑞𝑢𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑜𝑢 𝟹𝟷𝟸 𝑣𝑜𝑡𝑜𝑠 𝑛𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑙𝑒́𝑔𝑖𝑜 𝑒𝑙𝑒𝑖𝑡𝑜𝑟𝑎𝑙, 𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑏𝑎𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑚 𝟸𝟽𝟶 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑣𝑒𝑛𝑐𝑒𝑟.
* Editora executiva do "DN"
IN "DIÁRIO DE NOTÍCIAS" -08/08/25