.
.Cansados de blogs bem comportados feitos por gente simples, amante da natureza e blá,blá,blá, decidimos parir este blog do non sense.Excluíremos sempre a grosseria e a calúnia, o calão a preceito, o picante serão ingredientes da criatividade. O resto... é um regalo
15/09/2025
LXXXVII-MEGA MÁQUINAS
5-Ferrari 488
O título da rubrica MEGA MÁQUINAS não se conforma apenas com as enormes dimensões de algumas que temos exibido, abrange todas as que têm MEGA INFLUÊNCIA nas nossas vidas.
*
As nossas séries por episódios são editadas no mesmo dia da semana à
mesma hora, assim torna-se fácil se quiser visionar episódios
anteriores.
FONTE:
Robertoluz68
SAMY DJAVIDNIA
.
LEITURA PRIORITÁRIA
Os ecos de Srebrenica
30 anos depois
𝓟𝓸𝓻𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓪𝓼 𝓪𝓽𝓻𝓸𝓬𝓲𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓮𝓼 𝓭𝓮 𝓱𝓸𝓳𝓮 𝓷𝓪̃𝓸 𝓹𝓸𝓭𝓮𝓶 𝓼𝓮𝓻 𝓲𝓰𝓷𝓸𝓻𝓪𝓭𝓪𝓼
Defender o direito internacional humanitário,
garantir a proteção dos civis e intervir de forma decisiva quando
necessário não são ideais opcionais, mas obrigações que estruturam a
credibilidade da Europa. De Gaza à Ucrânia, estas responsabilidades
estão a ser novamente postas à prova.
𝖧𝖺́ 𝟥𝟢 𝖺𝗇𝗈𝗌, 𝖲𝗋𝖾𝖻𝗋𝖾𝗇𝗂𝖼𝖺 𝗍𝗈𝗋𝗇𝗈𝗎-𝗌𝖾 𝗈 𝗉𝗋𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗂𝗋𝗈 𝗀𝖾𝗇𝗈𝖼ı́𝖽𝗂𝗈 𝗇𝖺 𝖤𝗎𝗋𝗈𝗉𝖺 𝖺 𝗌𝖾𝗋 𝗅𝖾𝗀𝖺𝗅𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝗋𝖾𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗁𝖾𝖼𝗂𝖽𝗈 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝗎𝗆 𝗍𝗋𝗂𝖻𝗎𝗇𝖺𝗅 𝗂𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗇𝖺𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗅 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝖽𝖾 𝖺 𝖲𝖾𝗀𝗎𝗇𝖽𝖺 𝖦𝗎𝖾𝗋𝗋𝖺 𝖬𝗎𝗇𝖽𝗂𝖺𝗅. 𝖮 𝗌𝖾𝗎 𝗇𝗈𝗆𝖾 𝖾́ 𝖺𝗀𝗈𝗋𝖺 𝗌𝗂𝗇𝗈́𝗇𝗂𝗆𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖿𝖺𝗅𝗁𝖺 𝗇𝖺 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗍𝖾𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈, 𝖽𝖾 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺𝗅𝗂𝗌𝗂𝖺 𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝗂𝗇𝗌𝗍𝗂𝗍𝗎𝗂𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝗂𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗇𝖺𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝖾 𝖽𝗈 𝖼𝗎𝗌𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝖾𝗏𝖺𝗌𝗍𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗋 𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝗏𝗂𝖺𝗋 𝗈 𝗈𝗅𝗁𝖺𝗋.
𝖳𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗌𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗍𝗈 𝖾𝗆 𝗆𝗂𝗆 𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖺𝗌 𝗅𝗂𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝖿𝗈𝗋𝗆𝖺 𝗂𝗇𝖾𝗌𝗉𝖾𝗋𝖺𝖽𝖺. 𝖩𝖺́ 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖼𝗂𝗇𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺 𝖺𝗇𝗈𝗌, 𝗋𝖾𝗀𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖾𝗂 𝖺̀ 𝗎𝗇𝗂𝗏𝖾𝗋𝗌𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝖿𝖺𝗓𝖾𝗋 𝗈 𝗆𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗋𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝖾𝗆 𝖠𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖧𝗎𝗆𝖺𝗇𝗂𝗍𝖺́𝗋𝗂𝖺 𝗇𝗈 𝖨𝖲𝖢𝖳𝖤-𝖨𝖴𝖫, 𝖾𝗆 𝖫𝗂𝗌𝖻𝗈𝖺. 𝖭𝖺𝗌 𝖺𝗎𝗅𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖣𝗂𝗋𝖾𝗂𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝖧𝗎𝗆𝖺𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝖾 𝖣𝗂𝗋𝖾𝗂𝗍𝗈 𝖨𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗇𝖺𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗅 𝖧𝗎𝗆𝖺𝗇𝗂𝗍𝖺́𝗋𝗂𝗈, 𝗅𝖾𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝗉𝖾𝗅𝖺 𝗋𝖾𝗉𝗎𝗍𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝖽𝗂𝗉𝗅𝗈𝗆𝖺𝗍𝖺 𝖾 𝗆𝖾𝗆𝖻𝗋𝗈 𝖽𝖺 𝖢𝗈𝗆𝗂𝗌𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝗈 𝖣𝗂𝗋𝖾𝗂𝗍𝗈 𝖨𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗇𝖺𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗅 𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝖭𝖺𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝖴𝗇𝗂𝖽𝖺𝗌, 𝖺 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝖿𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗈𝗋𝖺 𝖯𝖺𝗍𝗋ı́𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝖦𝖺𝗅𝗏𝖺̃𝗈 𝖳𝖾𝗅𝖾𝗌, 𝖺𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗇𝖽𝗂 𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝗋𝗂𝗇𝖼ı́𝗉𝗂𝗈𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖺𝗂𝗇𝖽𝖺 𝗁𝗈𝗃𝖾 𝗆𝗈𝗅𝖽𝖺𝗆 𝖺 𝗇𝗈𝗌𝗌𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗉𝗋𝖾𝖾𝗇𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗍𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝖺𝗍𝗋𝗈𝖼𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾𝗌.
𝖭𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾𝗋𝖺𝗆 𝗋𝖾𝗀𝗋𝖺𝗌 𝖺𝖻𝗌𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗍𝖺𝗌, 𝗆𝖺𝗌 𝗎𝗆 𝗉𝗋𝗂𝗌𝗆𝖺 𝖺𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗏𝖾́𝗌 𝖽𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗅 𝖺𝗌 𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗀𝖾́𝖽𝗂𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗁𝗈𝗃𝖾 𝗉𝗈𝖽𝖾𝗆 𝗌𝖾𝗋 𝗏𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗈𝗋 𝖼𝗅𝖺𝗋𝖾𝗓𝖺. 𝖤, 𝗁𝗈𝗃𝖾, 𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖾 𝗉𝗋𝗂𝗌𝗆𝖺 𝗋𝖾𝗏𝖾𝗅𝖺-𝗌𝖾 𝖽𝗈𝗅𝗈𝗋𝗈𝗌𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝗋𝖾𝗅𝖾𝗏𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾. 𝖰𝗎𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝗈 𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗆𝗈 “𝗀𝖾𝗇𝗈𝖼ı́𝖽𝗂𝗈” 𝖾́ 𝖽𝖾𝖻𝖺𝗍𝗂𝖽𝗈 𝖾𝗆 𝗋𝖾𝗅𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖺 𝖦𝖺𝗓𝖺, 𝗈𝗎 𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝖺 𝗀𝗎𝖾𝗋𝗋𝖺 𝖽𝖺 𝖱𝗎́𝗌𝗌𝗂𝖺 𝗇𝖺 𝖴𝖼𝗋𝖺̂𝗇𝗂𝖺 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝖺𝖿𝗂𝖺 𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝗋𝗈́𝗉𝗋𝗂𝗈𝗌 𝖿𝗎𝗇𝖽𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝗈 𝖽𝗂𝗋𝖾𝗂𝗍𝗈 𝗂𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗇𝖺𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗅, 𝗈𝗌 𝖾𝖼𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖲𝗋𝖾𝖻𝗋𝖾𝗇𝗂𝖼𝖺 — 𝗈𝗌 𝗌𝖾𝗎𝗌 𝖿𝗋𝖺𝖼𝖺𝗌𝗌𝗈𝗌 𝖾 𝖺𝗌 𝗌𝗎𝖺𝗌 𝗅𝗂𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 — 𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝗂𝗆𝗉𝗈𝗌𝗌ı́𝗏𝖾𝗂𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗂𝗀𝗇𝗈𝗋𝖺𝗋.
𝖮 𝗆𝖺𝗌𝗌𝖺𝖼𝗋𝖾 𝖽𝖾 𝖲𝗋𝖾𝖻𝗋𝖾𝗇𝗂𝖼𝖺 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝖿𝗈𝗂 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝖾𝗋𝗎𝗉𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾𝗌𝗉𝗈𝗇𝗍𝖺̂𝗇𝖾𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝗈́𝖽𝗂𝗈. 𝖥𝗈𝗂 𝗆𝖾𝗍𝗂𝖼𝗎𝗅𝗈𝗌𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝗉𝗅𝖺𝗇𝖾𝖺𝖽𝗈: 𝖺 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝗎𝗆𝖺𝗇𝗂𝗓𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝗌𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖾𝗆𝖺́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝗍𝗈𝖽𝖺 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗉𝗈𝗉𝗎𝗅𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈, 𝖺 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖾𝗌𝗊𝗎𝖺𝖽𝗋𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗆𝗈𝗋𝗍𝖾, 𝖺 𝗈𝖼𝗎𝗅𝗍𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖼𝗋𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗌 𝖾, 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝗎́𝗅𝗍𝗂𝗆𝗈, 𝖺 𝗇𝖾𝗀𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖺 𝗋𝖾𝖺𝗅𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾.
𝖮 𝖳𝗋𝗂𝖻𝗎𝗇𝖺𝗅 𝖯𝖾𝗇𝖺𝗅 𝖨𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗇𝖺𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗅 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝖺 𝖾𝗑-𝖩𝗎𝗀𝗈𝗌𝗅𝖺́𝗏𝗂𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖿𝗂𝗋𝗆𝗈𝗎 𝗂𝗌𝗍𝗈 𝗆𝖾𝗌𝗆𝗈, 𝗉𝗈𝗌𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗂𝗈𝗋𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾, 𝖾𝗆 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝖼𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗈𝗌 𝗃𝗎𝖽𝗂𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝖾𝗑𝖺𝗎𝗌𝗍𝗂𝗏𝗈𝗌, 𝖽𝖾𝗆𝗈𝗇𝗌𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗈 𝗀𝖾𝗇𝗈𝖼ı́𝖽𝗂𝗈 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾́ 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝖾𝗑𝗉𝗅𝗈𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝗂𝗋𝗋𝖺𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗅 𝖽𝖾 𝗏𝗂𝗈𝗅𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺, 𝗆𝖺𝗌 𝗎𝗆 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗃𝖾𝗍𝗈 𝗈𝗋𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗋𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝗉𝖾𝗅𝗈 𝖤𝗌𝗍𝖺𝖽𝗈. 𝖮 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗂𝖽𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖱𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗏𝖺𝗇 𝖪𝖺𝗋𝖺𝖽𝗓𝗂𝖼 𝖾 𝗈 𝗀𝖾𝗇𝖾𝗋𝖺𝗅 𝖱𝖺𝗍𝗄𝗈 𝖬𝗅𝖺𝖽𝗂𝖼 𝖿𝗈𝗋𝖺𝗆 𝖿𝗂𝗇𝖺𝗅𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖽𝖾𝗇𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖺 𝗉𝗋𝗂𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝗉𝖾𝗋𝗉𝖾́𝗍𝗎𝖺, 𝖽𝖾́𝖼𝖺𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖾𝗉𝗈𝗂𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗆𝗂𝗅𝗁𝖺𝗋𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗏𝗂𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝗍𝖾𝗋𝖾𝗆 𝗌𝗂𝖽𝗈 𝖾𝗅𝗂𝗆𝗂𝗇𝖺𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝖾 𝖽𝖾 𝖺 𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗉𝗈𝗇𝗌𝖺𝖻𝗂𝗅𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝗆𝗈𝗋𝖺𝗅 𝖽𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗎𝗇𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝗂𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗇𝖺𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗅 𝗍𝖾𝗋 𝗌𝗂𝖽𝗈 𝗉𝗈𝗌𝗍𝖺 𝖾𝗆 𝖼𝖺𝗎𝗌𝖺.
𝖲𝗋𝖾𝖻𝗋𝖾𝗇𝗂𝖼𝖺 𝖾𝗇𝗌𝗂𝗇𝖺-𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖺 𝗆𝗎𝗅𝗍𝗂𝖾𝗍𝗇𝗂𝖼𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝗉𝗈𝖽𝖾 𝗌𝖾𝗋 𝗎𝗌𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝖺𝗋𝗆𝖺. 𝖠𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖺 𝗀𝗎𝖾𝗋𝗋𝖺, 𝖺 𝖡𝗈́𝗌𝗇𝗂𝖺 𝖾𝗋𝖺 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝖾𝗑𝗉𝖾𝗋𝗂𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝖾𝗎𝗋𝗈𝗉𝖾𝗂𝖺 𝗋𝖺𝗋𝖺: 𝗆𝗎𝖼̧𝗎𝗅𝗆𝖺𝗇𝗈𝗌, 𝗃𝗎𝖽𝖾𝗎𝗌, 𝖼𝖺𝗍𝗈́𝗅𝗂𝖼𝗈𝗌 𝖾 𝖼𝗋𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖺̃𝗈𝗌 𝗈𝗋𝗍𝗈𝖽𝗈𝗑𝗈𝗌 𝗏𝗂𝗏𝗂𝖺𝗆 𝗅𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝖺 𝗅𝖺𝖽𝗈, 𝖾 𝖺 𝗌𝗎𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝖾𝗑𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝖿𝗈𝗋𝗆𝖺𝗏𝖺 𝗎𝗆 𝗋𝗂𝖼𝗈 𝗍𝖾𝖼𝗂𝖽𝗈 𝗌𝗈𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗅, 𝖼𝗎𝗅𝗍𝗎𝗋𝖺𝗅 𝖾 𝖾𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗈́𝗆𝗂𝖼𝗈. 𝖤𝗌𝖼𝗈𝗅𝖺𝗌, 𝗆𝖾𝗋𝖼𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌, 𝗍𝖾𝖺𝗍𝗋𝗈𝗌 𝖾 𝖼𝖺𝖿𝖾́𝗌 𝖾𝗋𝖺𝗆 𝖾𝗌𝗉𝖺𝖼̧𝗈𝗌 𝗈𝗇𝖽𝖾 𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝗂𝖿𝖾𝗋𝖾𝗇𝖼̧𝖺𝗌 𝖾𝗋𝖺𝗆 𝖼𝖾𝗅𝖾𝖻𝗋𝖺𝖽𝖺𝗌, 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗍𝖾𝗆𝗂𝖽𝖺𝗌.
𝖳𝖺𝗅 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝗁𝗂𝗌𝗍𝗈𝗋𝗂𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗋𝖾𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝖭𝗈𝖾𝗅 𝖬𝖺𝗅𝖼𝗈𝗅𝗆 𝖽𝗈𝖼𝗎𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺𝗋𝖺𝗆, 𝖺 𝖡𝗈́𝗌𝗇𝗂𝖺 𝖾𝗋𝖺 𝗎𝗆 𝗅𝗎𝗀𝖺𝗋 𝗈𝗇𝖽𝖾 𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝖾𝗑𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝗂𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗋-𝗋𝖾𝗅𝗂𝗀𝗂𝗈𝗌𝖺 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗏𝖺 𝗍𝖺̃𝗈 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝖿𝗎𝗇𝖽𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖾𝗇𝗋𝖺𝗂𝗓𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖺𝗌 𝖿𝖺𝗆ı́𝗅𝗂𝖺𝗌 𝖼𝗋𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖺̃𝗌, 𝗆𝗎𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗌 𝗏𝖾𝗓𝖾𝗌, 𝗆𝖺𝗇𝗍𝗂𝗇𝗁𝖺𝗆 𝗎𝗆 𝗍𝖺𝖼𝗁𝗈 𝗈𝗇𝖽𝖾 𝗇𝗎𝗇𝖼𝖺 𝗁𝖺𝗏𝗂𝖺 𝗌𝗂𝖽𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗓𝗂𝗇𝗁𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝖼𝖺𝗋𝗇𝖾 𝖽𝖾 𝗉𝗈𝗋𝖼𝗈, 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗉𝗈𝖽𝖾𝗋𝖾𝗆 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝗍𝗂𝗅𝗁𝖺𝗋 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗋𝖾𝖿𝖾𝗂𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝗌𝖾 𝖺𝗌 𝗌𝗎𝖺𝗌 𝗏𝗂𝗌𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗌 𝖿𝗈𝗌𝗌𝖾𝗆 𝗃𝗎𝖽𝖾𝗎𝗌 𝗈𝗎 𝗆𝗎𝖼̧𝗎𝗅𝗆𝖺𝗇𝗈𝗌 (𝗎𝗆 𝖽𝖾𝗍𝖺𝗅𝗁𝖾 𝗍𝖺𝗆𝖻𝖾́𝗆 𝗋𝖾𝗀𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝖾𝗆 𝗁𝗂𝗌𝗍𝗈́𝗋𝗂𝖺𝗌 𝗈𝗋𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝗋𝖾𝖼𝗈𝗅𝗁𝗂𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝗉𝖾𝗅𝗈 𝖺𝗇𝗍𝗋𝗈𝗉𝗈́𝗅𝗈𝗀𝗈 𝖳𝗈𝗇𝖾 𝖡𝗋𝗂𝗇𝗀𝖺). 𝖠 𝖾𝗍𝗇𝗂𝖺 𝖾𝗋𝖺 𝗎𝗆 𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗏𝗈, 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗎𝗆 𝖿𝖺𝗋𝖽𝗈.
𝖮 𝗃𝗈𝗋𝗇𝖺𝗅𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖺 𝖾 𝖾𝗌𝖼𝗋𝗂𝗍𝗈𝗋 𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗅𝗂𝖺𝗇𝗈 𝖯𝖺𝗈𝗅𝗈 𝖱𝗎𝗆𝗂𝗓 𝗋𝖾𝖼𝗈𝗋𝖽𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝗈𝗌 𝗌𝗈𝗅𝖽𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗅𝗂𝖺𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝗇𝖺 𝖡𝗈́𝗌𝗇𝗂𝖺 𝖿𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗋𝖺𝗆 𝗌𝗎𝗋𝗉𝗋𝖾𝖾𝗇𝖽𝗂𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖺𝗈 𝗏𝖾𝗋𝖾𝗆 𝗋𝖺𝗉𝖺𝗋𝗂𝗀𝖺𝗌 𝗆𝗎𝖼̧𝗎𝗅𝗆𝖺𝗇𝖺𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖾, 𝗇𝗈 𝗏𝖾𝗋𝖺̃𝗈, 𝗎𝗌𝖺𝗏𝖺𝗆 𝗌𝖺𝗂𝖺𝗌 𝖼𝗎𝗋𝗍𝖺𝗌, 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗂𝖺𝗆 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗎𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝗌𝖾𝗆 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗈𝖼𝗎𝗉𝖺𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝖾 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝖿𝗋𝖾𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺𝗏𝖺𝗆 𝗋𝖾𝗀𝗎𝗅𝖺𝗋𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖺 𝗆𝖾𝗌𝗊𝗎𝗂𝗍𝖺, 𝖾𝗌𝗉𝖾𝗅𝗁𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝗎𝗆 𝖨𝗌𝗅𝖺̃𝗈 𝖼𝖺𝗉𝖺𝗓 𝖽𝖾 𝖺𝗍𝗎𝖺𝗋 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝗎𝗆 ‘𝖺𝗆𝗈𝗋𝗍𝖾𝖼𝖾𝖽𝗈𝗋’ 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗍𝖾𝗍𝗈𝗋, 𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗉𝖾𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝖾𝗑𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝖾𝗇𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗂𝗌𝗍𝗂𝖺 𝖺̀𝗌 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝖾𝗑𝗍𝗋𝖾𝗆𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗈𝗎𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗌 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺𝗀𝖾𝗇𝗌 𝖾 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗇𝗎𝗇𝖼𝖺 𝗊𝗎𝗂𝗌𝖾𝗆𝗈𝗌 𝗍𝖾𝗋 𝗇𝖺 𝖤𝗎𝗋𝗈𝗉𝖺.
𝖤𝗌𝗌𝖺𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗎𝗇𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾𝗌, 𝗋𝖾𝖺𝗅𝖼̧𝖺 𝖱𝗎𝗆𝗂𝗓, 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗌𝖾 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖾𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗆 𝖾𝗆 𝗇𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝗈𝗌 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖾𝗋𝖾𝗈́𝗍𝗂𝗉𝗈𝗌 𝗋𝖾𝖽𝗎𝗍𝗈𝗋𝖾𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖺 𝖤𝗎𝗋𝗈𝗉𝖺 𝗍𝗂𝗇𝗁𝖺 𝖽𝖾𝗅𝖺𝗌. 𝖠𝗍𝖾́ 𝗆𝖾𝗌𝗆𝗈 𝗈𝗌 𝗃𝗎𝖽𝖾𝗎𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖲𝖺𝗋𝖺𝗃𝖾𝗏𝗈, 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗁𝖺𝗏𝗂𝖺𝗆 𝖼𝗁𝖾𝗀𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝖼𝗂𝗇𝖼𝗈 𝗌𝖾́𝖼𝗎𝗅𝗈𝗌 𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗌 𝗀𝗋𝖺𝖼̧𝖺𝗌 𝖺̀ 𝗁𝗈𝗌𝗉𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗅𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝗈𝗍𝗈𝗆𝖺𝗇𝖺, 𝗅𝗎𝗍𝖺𝗋𝖺𝗆 𝖺𝗈 𝗅𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗆𝗎𝖼̧𝗎𝗅𝗆𝖺𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝖾 𝗍𝗂𝗏𝖾𝗋𝖺𝗆 𝖽𝗂𝖿𝗂𝖼𝗎𝗅𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖾𝗆 𝖾𝗑𝗉𝗅𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗋 𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝖾𝗑𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝖺𝗈𝗌 𝗌𝖾𝗎𝗌 𝖿𝖺𝗆𝗂𝗅𝗂𝖺𝗋𝖾𝗌 𝖾𝗆 𝖩𝖾𝗋𝗎𝗌𝖺𝗅𝖾́𝗆 𝗈𝗎 𝗇𝗈𝗎𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗌 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝗍𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖨𝗌𝗋𝖺𝖾𝗅. 𝖮 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗉𝖾𝗋𝖽𝖾𝗆𝗈𝗌, 𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝗍𝖾𝗋𝖺́ 𝖾𝗌𝖼𝖺𝗉𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝗆𝖺̃𝗈𝗌?
𝖥𝖺𝗅𝖺𝗆𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗏𝖾𝗌𝗍ı́𝗀𝗂𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝗈 𝖺𝗇𝗍𝗂𝗀𝗈 𝖨𝗆𝗉𝖾́𝗋𝗂𝗈 𝖮𝗍𝗈𝗆𝖺𝗇𝗈, 𝗎𝗆 𝗅𝖾𝗀𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝗈𝗇𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝗂𝖿𝖾𝗋𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗌 𝗇𝖺𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗅𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾𝗌 𝖾 𝗋𝖾𝗅𝗂𝗀𝗂𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝖾𝗑𝗂𝗌𝗍𝗂𝖺𝗆, 𝗈𝗇𝖽𝖾 𝖺𝗌 𝗉𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗈𝖺𝗌 𝖿𝖺𝗅𝖺𝗏𝖺𝗆 𝖺 𝗆𝖾𝗌𝗆𝖺 𝗅ı́𝗇𝗀𝗎𝖺 𝗆𝖺𝗌 𝖺𝖼𝗋𝖾𝖽𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗏𝖺𝗆 𝖾𝗆 𝖽𝖾𝗎𝗌𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝗂𝖿𝖾𝗋𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗌, 𝖾𝗌𝖼𝗋𝖾𝗏𝗂𝖺𝗆 𝖽𝖾 𝖿𝗈𝗋𝗆𝖺 𝖽𝗂𝖿𝖾𝗋𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖾 𝗏𝗂𝗏𝗂𝖺𝗆 𝖾𝗆 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗎𝗇𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾𝗌 𝗌𝗈𝖻𝗋𝖾𝗉𝗈𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗌.
𝖯𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗆 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗏𝖺 𝗁𝖺𝖻𝗂𝗍𝗎𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝖺̀ 𝖼𝗅𝖺𝗋𝖾𝗓𝖺 𝖾 𝗌𝗂𝗆𝗉𝗅𝗂𝖼𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝗈 𝖤𝗌𝗍𝖺𝖽𝗈-𝗇𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝗆𝗈𝖽𝖾𝗋𝗇𝗈, 𝗍𝖺𝗅 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗉𝗅𝖾𝗑𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖾𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝗂𝗇𝗀𝖾𝗋ı́𝗏𝖾𝗅. 𝖭𝗈 𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺𝗇𝗍𝗈, 𝖾𝗆 𝗍𝗈𝖽𝗈 𝗈 𝗆𝗎𝗇𝖽𝗈, 𝗆𝗎𝗂𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗋𝗂𝗍𝗈́𝗋𝗂𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝗈𝗌𝗌𝗎𝖾𝗆 𝖾𝗑𝖺𝗍𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺 𝗋𝗂𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗓𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝗅ı́𝗇𝗀𝗎𝖺𝗌, 𝗍𝗋𝖺𝖽𝗂𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝖾 𝗋𝖾𝗅𝗂𝗀𝗂𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 – 𝗆𝗎𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗌 𝗏𝖾𝗓𝖾𝗌, 𝗉𝗈𝗋𝖾́𝗆, 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝖿𝖾𝗋𝗂𝗆𝗈𝗌 𝗂𝗀𝗇𝗈𝗋𝖺́-𝗅𝖺.
𝖭𝖺 𝖡𝗈́𝗌𝗇𝗂𝖺-𝖧𝖾𝗋𝗓𝖾𝗀𝗈𝗏𝗂𝗇𝖺, 𝗈𝗌 𝖼𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖺̃𝗈𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗎𝗇𝗌 𝗉𝖾𝗇𝗌𝖺𝗏𝖺𝗆 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗌𝖾𝗋𝗂𝖺 𝗂𝗆𝗉𝗈𝗌𝗌ı́𝗏𝖾𝗅 𝗌𝖾𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺𝗋 𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖺𝗌 𝗉𝗈𝗉𝗎𝗅𝖺𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖾𝗅𝖺𝖼̧𝖺𝖽𝖺𝗌. 𝖭𝗈 𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺𝗇𝗍𝗈, 𝖺𝗅𝗀𝗎𝗇𝗌 𝗅ı́𝖽𝖾𝗋𝖾𝗌 𝗉𝗈𝗅ı́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖾𝖼𝗂𝖽𝗂𝗋𝖺𝗆 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗂𝗌𝗌𝗈 𝖾𝗋𝖺 𝗉𝗈𝗌𝗌ı́𝗏𝖾𝗅 𝖾 𝗉𝖾𝗋𝗌𝖾𝗀𝗎𝗂𝗋𝖺𝗆 𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖾 𝗈𝖻𝗃𝖾𝗍𝗂𝗏𝗈 𝖺𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗏𝖾́𝗌 𝖽𝗈 𝗎́𝗇𝗂𝖼𝗈 𝗆𝖾𝗂𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗁𝖾𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗆: 𝖺 𝗏𝗂𝗈𝗅𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺. 𝖥𝗈𝗂 𝖺𝗊𝗎𝗂, 𝗇𝖺 𝖡𝗈́𝗌𝗇𝗂𝖺-𝖧𝖾𝗋𝗓𝖾𝗀𝗈𝗏𝗂𝗇𝖺, 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖺 𝗀𝗎𝖾𝗋𝗋𝖺 𝖾 𝖺 𝗅𝗂𝗆𝗉𝖾𝗓𝖺 𝖾́𝗍𝗇𝗂𝖼𝖺 𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗇𝗀𝗂𝗋𝖺𝗆 𝗈 𝗌𝖾𝗎 𝗍𝗋𝖺́𝗀𝗂𝖼𝗈 𝖺𝗉𝗈𝗀𝖾𝗎.
𝖠 𝖽𝗂𝗏𝖾𝗋𝗌𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝗍𝗈𝗋𝗇𝗈𝗎-𝗌𝖾 𝗈 𝖺𝗅𝗏𝗈. 𝖠𝗍𝗈𝗋𝖾𝗌 𝗉𝗈𝗅ı́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝗈𝗌 𝖾 𝗆𝗂𝗅𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗋𝖾𝗌 𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗌𝖿𝗈𝗋𝗆𝖺𝗋𝖺𝗆 𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝖾𝗑𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝖾𝗆 𝗆𝖾𝖽𝗈 𝖾 𝗌𝗎𝗌𝗉𝖾𝗂𝗍𝖺. 𝖥𝗈𝗋𝖺𝗆 𝗍𝗋𝖺𝖼̧𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗆𝖺𝗉𝖺𝗌, 𝖽𝗂𝗏𝗂𝖽𝗂𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗋𝗂𝗍𝗈́𝗋𝗂𝗈𝗌 𝖾 𝖿𝗂𝗑𝖺𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝗂𝖽𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖿𝗈𝗋𝗆𝖺 𝗋ı́𝗀𝗂𝖽𝖺, 𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗌𝖿𝗈𝗋𝗆𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝖺 𝗏𝗂𝖽𝖺 𝗊𝗎𝗈𝗍𝗂𝖽𝗂𝖺𝗇𝖺 𝗇𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗅𝗎𝗍𝖺 𝖽𝗂𝗅𝖺𝖼𝖾𝗋𝖺𝖽𝖺.
𝖠 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗉𝗈𝗌𝗍𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝗉𝖺𝗓 𝗂𝗇𝗂𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗅 𝖽𝗈 𝗆𝗂𝗇𝗂𝗌𝗍𝗋𝗈 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖭𝖾𝗀𝗈́𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗌 𝖤𝗌𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗀𝖾𝗂𝗋𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗍𝗎𝗀𝗎𝖾̂𝗌, 𝖩𝗈𝗌𝖾́ 𝖢𝗎𝗍𝗂𝗅𝖾𝗂𝗋𝗈, 𝗂𝗇𝖼𝗅𝗎𝗂𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝗋𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗂𝗋𝗈𝗌 𝗆𝖺𝗉𝖺𝗌 𝖾́𝗍𝗇𝗂𝖼𝗈𝗌 𝗇𝖺 𝖺𝗅𝗍𝗎𝗋𝖺 𝖽𝖺 𝗀𝗎𝖾𝗋𝗋𝖺, 𝗏𝗂𝗌𝖺𝗏𝖺 𝗇𝖾𝗀𝗈𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗋 𝗎𝗆 𝖼𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖺𝗋-𝖿𝗈𝗀𝗈, 𝗆𝖺𝗌 𝖺𝖼𝖺𝖻𝗈𝗎, 𝗂𝗇𝖺𝖽𝗏𝖾𝗋𝗍𝗂𝖽𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾, 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝗋𝖾𝖺𝗅𝖼̧𝖺𝗋 𝖺 𝖿𝗋𝖺𝗀𝗂𝗅𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝖾𝗑𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝗆𝗎𝗅𝗍𝗂𝖾́𝗍𝗇𝗂𝖼𝖺. 𝖤𝗌𝗍𝖾𝗌 𝗆𝖾𝗌𝗆𝗈𝗌 𝗆𝖺𝗉𝖺𝗌 𝖿𝗈𝗋𝖺𝗆 𝖽𝖾𝗉𝗈𝗂𝗌 𝗎𝗌𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗃𝗎𝗌𝗍𝗂𝖿𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗋 𝗋𝖾𝗂𝗏𝗂𝗇𝖽𝗂𝖼𝖺𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝗌𝖾𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗌 𝖾 𝖽𝗂𝗏𝗂𝗌𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗋𝗂𝗍𝗈𝗋𝗂𝖺𝗂𝗌.
𝖮𝗌 𝖠𝖼𝗈𝗋𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖣𝖺𝗒𝗍𝗈𝗇, 𝖾𝗆𝖻𝗈𝗋𝖺 𝗍𝖾𝗇𝗁𝖺𝗆 𝗉𝗈𝗌𝗍𝗈 𝖿𝗂𝗆 𝖺𝗈 𝖽𝖾𝗋𝗋𝖺𝗆𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗌𝖺𝗇𝗀𝗎𝖾, 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗀𝖾𝗅𝖺𝗋𝖺𝗆 𝖾 𝗂𝗇𝗌𝗍𝗂𝗍𝗎𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗅𝗂𝗓𝖺𝗋𝖺𝗆 𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝗂𝗏𝗂𝗌𝗈̃𝖾𝗌. 𝖠 𝖱𝖾𝗉𝗎́𝖻𝗅𝗂𝖼𝖺 𝖽𝖺 𝖡𝗈́𝗌𝗇𝗂𝖺-𝖧𝖾𝗋𝗓𝖾𝗀𝗈𝗏𝗂𝗇𝖺 𝗍𝗈𝗋𝗇𝗈𝗎-𝗌𝖾 𝗎𝗆 𝖤𝗌𝗍𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝖿𝗋𝖺́𝗀𝗂𝗅, 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝖺𝗌 𝗌𝗎𝖺𝗌 𝗂𝗇𝗌𝗍𝗂𝗍𝗎𝗂𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝗍𝗋𝗂𝗉𝗅𝗂𝖼𝖺𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝖺𝗈 𝗅𝗈𝗇𝗀𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗅𝗂𝗇𝗁𝖺𝗌 𝖾́𝗍𝗇𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗌: 𝖾𝗌𝖼𝗈𝗅𝖺𝗌, 𝗉𝗈𝗅ı́𝖼𝗂𝖺, 𝗍𝗋𝗂𝖻𝗎𝗇𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝖾 𝗌𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖾𝗆𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗌𝖺𝗎́𝖽𝖾, 𝗍𝗈𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝗂𝗏𝗂𝖽𝗂𝖽𝗈𝗌. 𝖠𝗌 𝖼𝗋𝗂𝖺𝗇𝖼̧𝖺𝗌 𝖼𝗋𝖾𝗌𝖼𝖾𝗋𝖺𝗆 𝖺 𝖺𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗇𝖽𝖾𝗋 𝗁𝗂𝗌𝗍𝗈́𝗋𝗂𝖺𝗌 𝖾 𝗅ı́𝗇𝗀𝗎𝖺𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖺𝗌 𝗌𝖾𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺𝗏𝖺𝗆 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗌𝖾𝗎𝗌 𝗏𝗂𝗓𝗂𝗇𝗁𝗈𝗌.
𝖧𝗈𝗃𝖾, 𝗉𝖾𝗋𝗂𝗀𝗈𝗌 𝗌𝖾𝗆𝖾𝗅𝗁𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗌 𝗌𝗎𝗋𝗀𝖾𝗆 𝗇𝖺 𝖴𝖼𝗋𝖺̂𝗇𝗂𝖺, 𝗈𝗇𝖽𝖾 𝖺𝗌 𝗇𝖾𝗀𝗈𝖼𝗂𝖺𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖼𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖺𝗋-𝖿𝗈𝗀𝗈 𝖾 𝖺𝗌 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗉𝗈𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗌 𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗋𝗂𝗍𝗈𝗋𝗂𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝖽𝖺 𝖱𝗎́𝗌𝗌𝗂𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝖽𝗂𝖿𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗆 𝖽𝗂𝗏𝗂𝗌𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝖾𝗆 𝗏𝖾𝗓 𝖽𝖾 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗆𝗈𝗏𝖾𝗋𝖾𝗆 𝖺 𝗋𝖾𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖼𝗂𝗅𝗂𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈. 𝖠 𝖧𝗂𝗌𝗍𝗈́𝗋𝗂𝖺 𝖺𝗏𝗂𝗌𝖺-𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗆𝖺𝗉𝖺𝗌 𝗍𝗋𝖺𝖼̧𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝖻𝖺𝗌𝖾 𝖾𝗆 𝗅𝗂𝗇𝗁𝖺𝗌 𝖾́𝗍𝗇𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗌 𝗉𝗈𝖽𝖾𝗆 𝗍𝗈𝗋𝗇𝖺𝗋-𝗌𝖾 𝗂𝗇𝗌𝗍𝗋𝗎𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗏𝗂𝗈𝗅𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝗌𝖾 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝖿𝗈𝗋𝖾𝗆 𝖺𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗉𝖺𝗇𝗁𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝖾𝗅𝖺 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗍𝖾𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖿𝗂𝗋𝗆𝖾 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖼𝗂𝗏𝗂𝗌 𝖾 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗀𝗈𝗏𝖾𝗋𝗇𝖺𝗇𝖼̧𝖺 𝗂𝗇𝖼𝗅𝗎𝗌𝗂𝗏𝖺.
𝖮 𝖻𝗅𝗈𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗂𝗈 𝖾 𝗈 𝖻𝗈𝗆𝖻𝖺𝗋𝖽𝖾𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖦𝖺𝗓𝖺 𝖾𝗑𝖾𝗆𝗉𝗅𝗂𝖿𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗆 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝖺𝗅𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈𝗌, 𝖺́𝗀𝗎𝖺 𝖾 𝗆𝖾𝖽𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝖿𝗈𝗋𝖺𝗆 𝗎𝗌𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝖺𝗋𝗆𝖺𝗌 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝖨𝗌𝗋𝖺𝖾𝗅 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗂𝗆𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝖺 𝗋𝖾𝗇𝖽𝗂𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈. 𝖯𝖺𝖽𝖺𝗋𝗂𝖺𝗌, 𝗁𝗈𝗌𝗉𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝖻𝗈𝗂𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖺𝗃𝗎𝖽𝖺 𝗁𝗎𝗆𝖺𝗇𝗂𝗍𝖺́𝗋𝗂𝖺 𝖿𝗈𝗋𝖺𝗆 𝖽𝖾𝗅𝗂𝖻𝖾𝗋𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝖾 𝗋𝖾𝗉𝖾𝗍𝗂𝖽𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗇𝗀𝗂𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝖺𝗍𝖺𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗌 𝗂𝗌𝗋𝖺𝖾𝗅𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗌, 𝖼𝗎𝗃𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝖺𝖽𝗋𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺̃𝗈 𝖺𝗆𝗉𝗅𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖽𝗈𝖼𝗎𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌.
𝖤𝗌𝗌𝖺𝗌 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝗆𝖾𝖽𝗂𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗌𝖾𝗀𝗎𝗋𝖺𝗇𝖼̧𝖺 – 𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗍𝖾́𝗀𝗂𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗋𝗈𝗋 𝖾𝗑𝖾𝖼𝗎𝗍𝖺𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝗌𝗈𝖻 𝗈 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗍𝖾𝗑𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝖺 𝖺𝗎𝗍𝗈𝗋𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗍𝖺𝗅. 𝖠 𝗂𝗇𝖼𝖺𝗉𝖺𝖼𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗎𝗇𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝗂𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗇𝖺𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗅 𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝖾𝖿𝗂𝗇𝗂𝗋, 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖽𝖾𝗇𝖺𝗋 𝖾 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝖼𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖺𝗋 𝗍𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝖺𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝖾𝗋𝗆𝗂𝗍𝖾 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖺 𝗂𝗆𝗉𝗎𝗇𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝗉𝖾𝗋𝗌𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖺, 𝗆𝗂𝗇𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝖺 𝖼𝗋𝖾𝖽𝗂𝖻𝗂𝗅𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝖾 𝗍𝗈𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝖺𝗌 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗋𝗎𝗍𝗎𝗋𝖺𝗌 𝗁𝗎𝗆𝖺𝗇𝗂𝗍𝖺́𝗋𝗂𝖺𝗌.
𝖲𝗋𝖾𝖻𝗋𝖾𝗇𝗂𝖼𝖺 𝗍𝖺𝗆𝖻𝖾́𝗆 𝖾𝗇𝗌𝗂𝗇𝖺 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗅𝗂𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝗎𝗋𝗀𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝗌𝗈𝖻𝗋𝖾 𝖺 𝗏𝗂𝗈𝗅𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝗅𝗂𝖽𝖾𝗋𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝗉𝖾𝗅𝗈 𝖤𝗌𝗍𝖺𝖽𝗈. 𝖭𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾𝗑𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖾 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝖽𝖾𝖿𝗂𝗇𝗂𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝗅𝖾𝗀𝖺𝗅 𝖽𝖾 “𝖤𝗌𝗍𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗋𝗈𝗋𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖺”. 𝖴𝗆 𝗉𝖺ı́𝗌 𝗉𝗈𝖽𝖾 𝖺𝗌𝗌𝖺𝗌𝗌𝗂𝗇𝖺𝗋 𝖼𝗂𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗌, 𝖺𝗋𝗋𝖺𝗌𝖺𝗋 𝖼𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾𝗌, 𝖻𝗅𝗈𝗊𝗎𝖾𝖺𝗋 𝗉𝗈𝗉𝗎𝗅𝖺𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝖾 𝗉𝗋𝗂𝗏𝖺𝗋, 𝗌𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖾𝗆𝖺𝗍𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾, 𝖼𝗂𝗏𝗂𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖺𝗅𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝖾 𝗆𝖾𝖽𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈𝗌, 𝖾, 𝖺𝗂𝗇𝖽𝖺 𝖺𝗌𝗌𝗂𝗆, 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝗍𝗂𝖼𝗂𝗉𝖺𝗋 𝖾𝗆 𝗈𝗋𝗀𝖺𝗇𝗂𝗌𝗆𝗈𝗌 𝗂𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗇𝖺𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝗂𝗆𝗉𝗎𝗇𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾. 𝖠 𝖿𝗈𝗆𝖾 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾́ 𝗎𝗆 𝖽𝖺𝗇𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗅𝖺𝗍𝖾𝗋𝖺𝗅; 𝖾́ 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝖺𝗋𝗆𝖺 𝖽𝖾𝗅𝗂𝖻𝖾𝗋𝖺𝖽𝖺. 𝖰𝗎𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝖺𝗍𝗈𝗋𝖾𝗌 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈-𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗍𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝖾𝗆𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗀𝖺𝗆 𝗍𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝗍𝖺́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗌, 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗌 𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝗎𝗇𝗂𝗏𝖾𝗋𝗌𝖺𝗅𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝗋𝖾𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗁𝖾𝖼𝗂𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 “𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗋𝗈𝗋𝗂𝗌𝗆𝗈”. 𝖰𝗎𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝗈𝗌 𝖤𝗌𝗍𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖺 𝗎𝗌𝖺́-𝗅𝖺𝗌, 𝗈 𝖽𝗂𝗋𝖾𝗂𝗍𝗈 𝗂𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗇𝖺𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗅 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝗂𝗌𝗉𝗈̃𝖾 𝗇𝖾𝗆 𝖽𝖺 𝗅𝗂𝗇𝗀𝗎𝖺𝗀𝖾𝗆 𝗇𝖾𝗆 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗆𝖾𝖼𝖺𝗇𝗂𝗌𝗆𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗈 𝗇𝗈𝗆𝖾𝖺𝗋.
𝖭𝖺 𝖡𝗈́𝗌𝗇𝗂𝖺-𝖧𝖾𝗋𝗓𝖾𝗀𝗈𝗏𝗂𝗇𝖺, 𝗈 𝖿𝗋𝖺𝖼𝖺𝗌𝗌𝗈 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖼𝖺𝗉𝖺𝖼𝖾𝗍𝖾𝗌 𝖺𝗓𝗎𝗂𝗌 𝗁𝗈𝗅𝖺𝗇𝖽𝖾𝗌𝖾𝗌, 𝖺 𝗂𝗇𝖺𝖽𝖾𝗊𝗎𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖺 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗍𝖾𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖺 𝖮𝖭𝖴 𝖾 𝖺 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺𝗅𝗂𝗌𝗂𝖺 𝗉𝗈𝗅ı́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝖺 𝗉𝖾𝗋𝗆𝗂𝗍𝗂𝗋𝖺𝗆 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖺𝗍𝗋𝗈𝖼𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾𝗌 𝗌𝖾 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝖾𝗇𝗋𝗈𝗅𝖺𝗌𝗌𝖾𝗆 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗌𝖾 𝗍𝗈𝗍𝖺𝗅 𝗂𝗆𝗉𝗎𝗇𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾. 𝖭𝗈𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖿𝗅𝗂𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝖺𝗍𝗎𝖺𝗂𝗌, 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗌 𝗅𝗂𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗂𝗇𝗎𝖺𝗆 𝖺 𝗌𝖾𝗋 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗌. 𝖮𝗌 𝖼𝗂𝗏𝗂𝗌 𝖾𝗆 𝖦𝖺𝗓𝖺 𝗈𝗎 𝗇𝗈 𝗅𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖾 𝖽𝖺 𝖴𝖼𝗋𝖺̂𝗇𝗂𝖺 𝖾𝗇𝖿𝗋𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺𝗆 𝖺 𝗏𝗂𝗈𝗅𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗍𝖾𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝗅𝗂𝗆𝗂𝗍𝖺𝖽𝖺. 𝖯𝖺𝗅𝖺𝗏𝗋𝖺𝗌, 𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗈𝗅𝗎𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖽𝖾𝗇𝖺𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝗂𝗇𝗌𝗎𝖿𝗂𝖼𝗂𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗌 𝗌𝖾 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗌𝖾 𝗍𝗋𝖺𝖽𝗎𝗓𝗂𝗋𝖾𝗆 𝖾𝗆 𝗌𝖺𝗅𝗏𝖺𝗀𝗎𝖺𝗋𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝖾𝗑𝖾𝗊𝗎ı́𝗏𝖾𝗂𝗌 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝖺𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗅𝖾𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾𝗆 𝗋𝗂𝗌𝖼𝗈.
𝖠 𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗉𝗈𝗇𝗌𝖺𝖻𝗂𝗅𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝗆𝗈𝗋𝖺𝗅 𝖽𝖺 𝖤𝗎𝗋𝗈𝗉𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗂𝗇𝗎𝖺 𝖺 𝗌𝖾𝗋 𝖿𝗎𝗇𝖽𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺𝗅. 𝖲𝗋𝖾𝖻𝗋𝖾𝗇𝗂𝖼𝖺 𝖿𝗈𝗂 𝗎𝗆 𝖿𝗋𝖺𝖼𝖺𝗌𝗌𝗈 𝖾𝗎𝗋𝗈𝗉𝖾𝗎 𝖾 𝖺𝗌 𝗌𝗎𝖺𝗌 𝖼𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗍𝗋𝗂𝗓𝖾𝗌 – 𝖿ı́𝗌𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗌 𝖾 𝗉𝗌𝗂𝖼𝗈𝗅𝗈́𝗀𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗌 – 𝗉𝖾𝗋𝖽𝗎𝗋𝖺𝗆. 𝖣𝖾𝖿𝖾𝗇𝖽𝖾𝗋 𝗈 𝖽𝗂𝗋𝖾𝗂𝗍𝗈 𝗂𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗇𝖺𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗅 𝗁𝗎𝗆𝖺𝗇𝗂𝗍𝖺́𝗋𝗂𝗈, 𝗀𝖺𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗍𝗂𝗋 𝖺 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗍𝖾𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖼𝗂𝗏𝗂𝗌 𝖾 𝗂𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗏𝗂𝗋 𝖽𝖾 𝖿𝗈𝗋𝗆𝖺 𝖽𝖾𝖼𝗂𝗌𝗂𝗏𝖺 𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝗇𝖾𝖼𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖺́𝗋𝗂𝗈 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝗂𝖽𝖾𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝗈𝗉𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗂𝗌, 𝗆𝖺𝗌 𝗈𝖻𝗋𝗂𝗀𝖺𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗋𝗎𝗍𝗎𝗋𝖺𝗆 𝖺 𝖼𝗋𝖾𝖽𝗂𝖻𝗂𝗅𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝖺 𝖤𝗎𝗋𝗈𝗉𝖺. 𝖣𝖾 𝖦𝖺𝗓𝖺 𝖺̀ 𝖴𝖼𝗋𝖺̂𝗇𝗂𝖺, 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗌 𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗉𝗈𝗇𝗌𝖺𝖻𝗂𝗅𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾𝗌 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺̃𝗈 𝖺 𝗌𝖾𝗋 𝗇𝗈𝗏𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝗉𝗈𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗌 𝖺̀ 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗏𝖺. 𝖠 𝗍𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗍𝖺𝗋 𝗍𝗈𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝖺𝗌 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝗍𝖾𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝗆𝗈𝗋𝖺𝗅𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖾𝗊𝗎𝗂𝗏𝖺𝗅𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗌, 𝖽𝖾 𝗉𝖾𝗋𝗆𝗂𝗍𝗂𝗋 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗏𝖾𝗇𝗂𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝗀𝖾𝗈𝗉𝗈𝗅ı́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝖺 𝗈𝖿𝗎𝗌𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗈 𝗌𝗈𝖿𝗋𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝗁𝗎𝗆𝖺𝗇𝗈, 𝖾́ 𝗍𝖺̃𝗈 𝗉𝖾𝗋𝗂𝗀𝗈𝗌𝖺 𝗁𝗈𝗃𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝖾𝗋𝖺 𝗁𝖺́ 𝟥𝟢 𝖺𝗇𝗈𝗌.
𝖲𝗋𝖾𝖻𝗋𝖾𝗇𝗂𝖼𝖺 𝗅𝖾𝗆𝖻𝗋𝖺-𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝖺 𝖽𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝗁𝗎𝗆𝖺𝗇𝖺 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗆𝗎𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗌 𝗏𝖾𝗓𝖾𝗌 𝗌𝖾 𝗉𝖾𝗋𝖽𝖾 𝗇𝖺 𝖺𝗇𝖺́𝗅𝗂𝗌𝖾 𝗀𝖾𝗈𝗉𝗈𝗅ı́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝖺. 𝖮𝗌 𝗍𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖾𝗆𝗎𝗇𝗁𝗈𝗌 𝗋𝖾𝗏𝖾𝗅𝖺𝗆 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗌𝗈́ 𝗈𝗌 𝗁𝗈𝗋𝗋𝗈𝗋𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝗈 𝗀𝖾𝗇𝗈𝖼ı́𝖽𝗂𝗈, 𝗆𝖺𝗌 𝗍𝖺𝗆𝖻𝖾́𝗆 𝖺 𝖿𝗈𝗋𝖼̧𝖺 𝖽𝗎𝗋𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗎𝗋𝖺 𝖽𝖺 𝗆𝖾𝗆𝗈́𝗋𝗂𝖺, 𝖽𝖺 𝖼𝗎𝗅𝗍𝗎𝗋𝖺 𝖾 𝖽𝖺 𝖽𝗂𝗀𝗇𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝗉𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗈𝖺𝗅. 𝖤́ 𝖿𝗎𝗇𝖽𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺𝗅 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗌𝖾𝗋𝗏𝖺𝗋 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗌 𝗇𝖺𝗋𝗋𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗏𝖺𝗌. 𝖲𝖺̃𝗈 𝖺𝗇𝗍ı́𝖽𝗈𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝖺 𝗇𝖾𝗀𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾 𝖺 𝗂𝗇𝖽𝗂𝖿𝖾𝗋𝖾𝗇𝖼̧𝖺, 𝖾 𝗅𝖾𝗆𝖻𝗋𝖺𝗆 𝖺𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖾𝖼𝗂𝗌𝗈𝗋𝖾𝗌 𝗉𝗈𝗅ı́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝗈𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝗍𝗋𝖺́𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖼𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝗆𝖺𝗉𝖺, 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗉𝗈𝗌𝗍𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝖼𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖺𝗋-𝖿𝗈𝗀𝗈 𝗈𝗎 𝗆𝖾𝗌𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝗇𝖾𝗀𝗈𝖼𝗂𝖺𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺̃𝗈 𝗏𝗂𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝗋𝖾𝖺𝗂𝗌, 𝖿𝖺𝗆ı́𝗅𝗂𝖺𝗌 𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗎𝗇𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾𝗌 𝖾𝗆 𝗋𝗂𝗌𝖼𝗈.
𝖠𝗌 𝖺𝗍𝗋𝗈𝖼𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗌𝖾 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝖾𝗇𝗋𝗈𝗅𝖺𝗆 𝗁𝗈𝗃𝖾 𝖾𝗆 𝖦𝖺𝗓𝖺 𝖾 𝗇𝖺 𝖴𝖼𝗋𝖺̂𝗇𝗂𝖺 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗉𝗈𝖽𝖾𝗆 𝗌𝖾𝗋 𝗋𝖾𝖽𝗎𝗓𝗂𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝖺 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗍ı́𝗌𝗍𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗌 𝗈𝗎 𝖼𝖺́𝗅𝖼𝗎𝗅𝗈𝗌 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗍𝖾́𝗀𝗂𝖼𝗈𝗌. 𝖢𝗂𝗏𝗂𝗌 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺̃𝗈 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗈𝗌 𝖾𝗆 𝖼𝗂𝖼𝗅𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗏𝗂𝗈𝗅𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺, 𝖿𝗈𝗆𝖾 𝖽𝖾𝗅𝗂𝖻𝖾𝗋𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝖾 𝗉𝗋𝗂𝗏𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈, 𝖾 𝗈 𝖼𝗎𝗌𝗍𝗈 𝗁𝗎𝗆𝖺𝗇𝗈 𝖽𝖺 𝗀𝗎𝖾𝗋𝗋𝖺 𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗈𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝖿𝗈𝗋𝗆𝖺 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖿𝗈𝗋𝗍𝖺́𝗏𝖾𝗅 𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖺 𝖾𝗑𝗉𝖾𝗋𝗂𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝖻𝗈́𝗌𝗇𝗂𝖺. 𝖠 𝗂𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗏𝖾𝗇𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝖼𝗈𝖼𝖾, 𝖺𝗌𝗌𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝗇𝗈 𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗉𝖾𝗂𝗍𝗈 𝗉𝖾𝗅𝖺 𝗏𝗂𝖽𝖺 𝖼𝗂𝗏𝗂𝗅 𝖾 𝗉𝖾𝗅𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝖾𝗑𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝖾́𝗍𝗇𝗂𝖼𝖺, 𝖾́ 𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖾𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗅 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝖾𝗏𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗋 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖺 𝗁𝗂𝗌𝗍𝗈́𝗋𝗂𝖺 𝗌𝖾 𝗋𝖾𝗉𝗂𝗍𝖺.
𝖵𝗈𝗅𝗏𝗂𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝟥𝟢 𝖺𝗇𝗈𝗌, 𝖲𝗋𝖾𝖻𝗋𝖾𝗇𝗂𝖼𝖺 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾́ 𝖺𝗉𝖾𝗇𝖺𝗌 𝗎𝗆 𝖾𝗏𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝗁𝗂𝗌𝗍𝗈́𝗋𝗂𝖼𝗈 – 𝖾́ 𝗎𝗆 𝗉𝗋𝗂𝗌𝗆𝖺 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗉𝗋𝖾𝖾𝗇𝖽𝖾𝗋𝗆𝗈𝗌 𝗈 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗌𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾. 𝖠𝗌 𝗌𝗎𝖺𝗌 𝗅𝗂𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝗈𝗅𝗈𝗋𝗈𝗌𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖼𝗅𝖺𝗋𝖺𝗌: 𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝖾𝗑𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝗆𝗎𝗅𝗍𝗂𝖾́𝗍𝗇𝗂𝖼𝖺 𝖾́ 𝗎𝗆 𝗏𝖺𝗅𝗈𝗋 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗏𝖺𝗅𝖾 𝖺 𝗉𝖾𝗇𝖺 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗍𝖾𝗀𝖾𝗋; 𝖺 𝗂𝗆𝗉𝗎𝗇𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖾𝗇𝖼𝗈𝗋𝖺𝗃𝖺 𝖺 𝗋𝖾𝗉𝖾𝗍𝗂𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈; 𝖾 𝗈 𝖽𝗂𝗋𝖾𝗂𝗍𝗈 𝗂𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗇𝖺𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗅 𝖽𝖾𝗏𝖾 𝗌𝖾𝗋 𝖿𝗈𝗋𝗍𝖺𝗅𝖾𝖼𝗂𝖽𝗈 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝖾𝗇𝖿𝗋𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺𝗋 𝖺𝗌 𝗍𝖺́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗌 𝗆𝗈𝖽𝖾𝗋𝗇𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗋𝗈𝗋. 𝖩𝗎𝗌𝗍𝗂𝖼̧𝖺 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗍𝖾𝗅𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝖾́ 𝗃𝗎𝗌𝗍𝗂𝖼̧𝖺 𝗇𝖾𝗀𝖺𝖽𝖺. 𝖯𝖺𝗓 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗀𝖺𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗍𝗂𝖽𝖺 𝖾́ 𝗉𝖺𝗓 𝗍𝗋𝖺ı́𝖽𝖺. 𝖠 𝗆𝖾𝗆𝗈́𝗋𝗂𝖺 𝖾 𝖺𝗌 𝗅𝗂𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝖺𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗇𝖽𝗂𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝗌𝗈́ 𝗍𝖾̂𝗆 𝗌𝗂𝗀𝗇𝗂𝖿𝗂𝖼𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝗌𝖾 𝖿𝗎𝗇𝖽𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺𝗋𝖾𝗆 𝖺𝗌 𝖺𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗌𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗌.
𝖮 𝗌𝗈𝖿𝗋𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝖾𝗆 𝖦𝖺𝗓𝖺, 𝖺 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗋𝗎𝗂𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝗇𝖺 𝖴𝖼𝗋𝖺̂𝗇𝗂𝖺, 𝗈 𝗌𝗂𝗅𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝗈 𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗋𝗋𝖾𝖽𝗈𝗋𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝗂𝗉𝗅𝗈𝗆𝖺́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝗈𝗌 𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾𝖼𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖺 𝖡𝗈́𝗌𝗇𝗂𝖺 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖾𝗑𝗂𝗀𝖾𝗆 𝖺𝗍𝖾𝗇𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈. 𝖲𝖾 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗈𝗌 𝗈𝗎𝗏𝗂𝗋𝗆𝗈𝗌, 𝖼𝗈𝗋𝗋𝖾𝗆𝗈𝗌 𝗈 𝗋𝗂𝗌𝖼𝗈 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗌𝗈́ 𝖽𝖾 𝗋𝖾𝗉𝖾𝗍𝗂𝗋 𝖺 𝗁𝗂𝗌𝗍𝗈́𝗋𝗂𝖺, 𝗆𝖺𝗌 𝗍𝖺𝗆𝖻𝖾́𝗆 𝖽𝖾 𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗂𝗋 𝗈𝗌 𝗂𝖽𝖾𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗈𝗎𝗍𝗋𝗈𝗋𝖺 𝖿𝗂𝗓𝖾𝗋𝖺𝗆 𝖽𝖺 𝖤𝗎𝗋𝗈𝗉𝖺 𝗎𝗆 𝗅𝗎𝗀𝖺𝗋 𝗈𝗇𝖽𝖾 𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝖾𝗑𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝖾𝗋𝖺 𝗉𝗈𝗌𝗌ı́𝗏𝖾𝗅. 𝖠 𝖤𝗎𝗋𝗈𝗉𝖺 𝖽𝖾𝗏𝖾 𝖺𝗀𝗂𝗋 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝗎𝗆 𝗈𝖻𝗌𝖾𝗋𝗏𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗋 𝗉𝖺𝗌𝗌𝗂𝗏𝗈, 𝗆𝖺𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝗎𝗆 𝗀𝖺𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝗋𝖾𝗀𝗋𝖺𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖺𝗃𝗎𝖽𝗈𝗎 𝖺 𝗆𝗈𝗅𝖽𝖺𝗋. 𝖣𝖾𝖿𝖾𝗇𝖽𝖾𝗋 𝗈 𝖽𝗂𝗋𝖾𝗂𝗍𝗈 𝗂𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗇𝖺𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗅 𝗁𝗎𝗆𝖺𝗇𝗂𝗍𝖺́𝗋𝗂𝗈, 𝗂𝗇𝗌𝗂𝗌𝗍𝗂𝗋 𝗇𝖺 𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗉𝗈𝗇𝗌𝖺𝖻𝗂𝗅𝗂𝗓𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾 𝖽𝖾𝖿𝖾𝗇𝖽𝖾𝗋 𝗈𝗌 𝗏𝗎𝗅𝗇𝖾𝗋𝖺́𝗏𝖾𝗂𝗌 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾𝗑𝖾𝗋𝖼ı́𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗌 𝗂𝖽𝖾𝖺𝗅𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗌, 𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝗂𝗆𝗉𝖾𝗋𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗏𝗈𝗌 𝗇𝖺𝗌𝖼𝗂𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖿𝗋𝖺𝖼𝖺𝗌𝗌𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝗈 𝗉𝖺𝗌𝗌𝖺𝖽𝗈.
𝖠 𝖿𝗈𝗆𝖾 𝖾́ 𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗋𝗈𝗋𝗂𝗌𝗆𝗈. 𝖮 𝗌𝗂𝗅𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝗈 𝖾́ 𝖼𝗎𝗆𝗉𝗅𝗂𝖼𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾. 𝖠 𝗁𝗎𝗆𝖺𝗇𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝗆𝗎𝗅𝗍𝗂𝖾́𝗍𝗇𝗂𝖼𝖺 𝗇𝗎𝗇𝖼𝖺 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝖽𝖾𝗏𝖾 𝗌𝖾𝗋 𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗍𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝗎𝗆 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝖻𝗅𝖾𝗆𝖺 𝖺 𝗀𝖾𝗋𝗂𝗋, 𝗆𝖺𝗌 𝗌𝗂𝗆 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝗎𝗆 𝗍𝖾𝗌𝗈𝗎𝗋𝗈 𝖺 𝖽𝖾𝖿𝖾𝗇𝖽𝖾𝗋. 𝖮𝗌 𝖾𝖼𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖲𝗋𝖾𝖻𝗋𝖾𝗇𝗂𝖼𝖺 𝖺𝗌𝗌𝗂𝗆 𝗈 𝖾𝗑𝗂𝗀𝖾𝗆.
IN "O JORNAL ECONÓMICO" - 12/09/25 .
.
Portugal bem português
XXX-REPÚBLICA PORTUGUESA
5.1. OS PRESIDENTES
RAMALHO EANES
MÁRIO SOARES
JORGE SAMPAIO
CAVACO SILVA
(CONTINUA PRÓXIMA SEGUNDA)
FONTE:
Mundo em Português
** Se pensa que sabe muito da História de Portugal constate também nesta série a sua enorme ignorância, não é uma crítica, é um convite.
*** Esta é uma compilação de séries pelo nosso país não apenas pelas perspectivas histórica ou social mas pela recolha de vídeos interessantes de várias origens, actividades e sensibilidades, com diferentíssimos temas que reflectem o nosso quotidiano de modo plural.
Desejamos muito que seja do vosso agrado.
Subscrever:
Comentários (Atom)
.jpeg)




