.
23/10/2023
.
丅乇尺尺卂/6
ƈօოթձռհﻨձ օlցձ гօгﻨ২
FICHA TÉCNICA
Direção, Espaço Cénico e Figurinos | Olga Roriz
Intérpretes | Maria Cerveira, Marta Lobato Faria, Patrícia Henriques, Bruno Alexandre, Bruno Alves
Seleção Musical | Olga Roriz e João Raposo
Música | Tcaikosky, Ólafur Arnolds, Autechre, Senking, Henry Torgue, Laibach
Desenho de Luz | Cristina Piedade
Assistente da direção e dramaturgia | Paulo Reis
Assistente de Cenografia e Figurinos | Maria Ribeiro
Pós-produção Áudio | João Raposo
Técnico de Som | Sérgio Milhano
Técnico de Luz | Manuel Alão
FONTE:
LXXII- MEGA MÁQUINAS
3-O Primeiro Computador do Mundo
O título da rubrica MEGA MÁQUINAS não se conforma apenas com as enormes dimensões de algumas que temos exibido, abrange todas as que têm MEGA INFLUÊNCIA nas nossas vidas.
*
As nossas séries por episódios são editadas no mesmo dia da semana à
mesma hora, assim torna-se fácil se quiser visionar episódios
anteriores.
FONTE:
Canal Só História
Canal Só História
NUNO TORRES
.
𝗨𝗠 𝗔𝗥𝗧𝗜𝗚𝗢 𝗗𝗘𝗡𝗦𝗢, 𝗘𝗦𝗖𝗟𝗘𝗥𝗘𝗖𝗘𝗗𝗢𝗥, 𝗣𝗥𝗢́𝗣𝗥𝗜𝗢 𝗗𝗘 𝗤𝗨𝗘𝗠 𝗦𝗔𝗕𝗘
O Vampiro Fiscal
𝑈𝑚 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑢𝑑𝑜 𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑑𝑎 𝐹𝑎𝑐𝑢𝑙𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝑑𝑒 𝐸𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑜𝑚𝑖𝑎 𝑑𝑜 𝑃𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑜 (𝐹𝐸𝑃), 𝑑𝑖𝑣𝑢𝑙𝑔𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑛𝑜 𝑖𝑛𝑖́𝑐𝑖𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑜𝑢𝑡𝑢𝑏𝑟𝑜, 𝑒𝑚𝑏𝑜𝑟𝑎 𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑐𝑎𝑟𝑖𝑧 𝑎𝑐𝑎𝑑𝑒́𝑚𝑖𝑐𝑜, 𝑔𝑒𝑟𝑜𝑢 𝑎𝑙𝑔𝑢𝑚 𝑚𝑒𝑑𝑖𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑠𝑚𝑜 𝑒 𝑑𝑢𝑎𝑠 𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑠𝑢𝑎𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑐𝑙𝑢𝑠𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑑𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑚 𝑎𝑧𝑜 𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑎́𝑟𝑖𝑜 𝑝𝑜𝑙𝑖́𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑜-𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑡𝑖𝑑𝑎́𝑟𝑖𝑜 𝑒𝑛𝑣𝑖𝑒𝑠𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑒 𝑑𝑒𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑝𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑟, 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑎𝑞𝑢𝑖 𝑠𝑒 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑐𝑢𝑟𝑎 𝑟𝑒𝑏𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑟 𝑑𝑒 𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑚𝑎 𝑝𝑒𝑑𝑎𝑔𝑜́𝑔𝑖𝑐𝑎.
𝐴 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑣𝑎́𝑣𝑒𝑙 𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑐𝑖𝑑𝑎 𝑑𝑜 𝑛𝑖́𝑣𝑒𝑙 𝑑𝑒 𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑃𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑢𝑔𝑎𝑙 𝑎𝑏𝑎𝑖𝑥𝑜 𝑑𝑎 𝑅𝑜𝑚𝑒́𝑛𝑖𝑎 𝑗𝑎́ 𝑒𝑚 𝟸𝟶𝟸𝟸 - 𝑝𝑒𝑙𝑎 𝑒𝑥𝑝𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑎́𝑣𝑒𝑙 𝑖𝑛𝑐𝑜𝑟𝑝𝑜𝑟𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑝𝑒𝑙𝑜 𝐸𝑢𝑟𝑜𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑡 𝑑𝑒 𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑎 𝑝𝑜𝑝𝑢𝑙𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑝𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑢𝑔𝑢𝑒𝑠𝑎 𝑟𝑒𝑣𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑜𝑠 𝑒𝑚 𝑎𝑙𝑡𝑎 𝑝𝑒𝑙𝑜 𝐼𝑁𝐸 -, 𝑓𝑜𝑖 𝑢𝑚 𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑎𝑠𝑝𝑒𝑡𝑜𝑠 𝑚𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑓𝑜𝑐𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑝𝑒𝑙𝑜𝑠 𝑚𝑒𝑑𝑖𝑎, 𝑎𝑝𝑒𝑠𝑎𝑟 𝑑𝑜 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑢𝑑𝑜 𝑡𝑒𝑟 𝑎𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑚𝑢𝑖𝑡𝑜 𝑚𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑐𝑙𝑢𝑠𝑜̃𝑒𝑠.
𝐴 𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑑𝑒𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑝𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑜 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑢𝑑𝑜 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑎𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑣𝑒𝑖𝑡𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜 𝑝𝑜𝑙𝑖́𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑜 𝑓𝑜𝑖 𝑔𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑑𝑎 𝑝𝑒𝑙𝑎 𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑜𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑎𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑙𝑒 𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑢𝑙𝑡𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑑𝑜 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑢𝑑𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑜𝑢𝑡𝑟𝑜 𝑎𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑠𝑒𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑑𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒, 𝑟𝑒𝑙𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑜 𝑎𝑜 𝑒𝑙𝑒𝑣𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑒𝑠𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑐̧𝑜 𝑓𝑖𝑠𝑐𝑎𝑙 𝑑𝑒 𝑃𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑢𝑔𝑎𝑙 𝑛𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑥𝑡𝑜 𝑒𝑢𝑟𝑜𝑝𝑒𝑢 𝑒 𝑜 𝑖𝑚𝑝𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑜 𝑎𝑑𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑠𝑜 𝑛𝑎 𝑔𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑟𝑖𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑧𝑎 𝑒 𝑛𝑖́𝑣𝑒𝑙 𝑑𝑒 𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑎 𝑒𝑚 𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑚𝑜𝑠 𝑟𝑒𝑙𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑜𝑠.
𝐴 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑡𝑖𝑟 𝑑𝑎𝑞𝑢𝑖 𝑓𝑜𝑖 𝑔𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑑𝑎 𝑎 𝑓𝑎𝑙𝑠𝑎 𝑛𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑜 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑢𝑑𝑜 𝑣𝑖𝑠𝑎 𝑎 𝑑𝑒𝑓𝑒𝑠𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑢𝑚 𝑠𝑢𝑝𝑜𝑠𝑡𝑜 "𝑚𝑜𝑑𝑒𝑙𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑒𝑛𝑣𝑜𝑙𝑣𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜" 𝑑𝑎 𝑅𝑜𝑚𝑒́𝑛𝑖𝑎 - 𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑒𝑚 𝑏𝑎𝑖𝑥𝑜𝑠 𝑠𝑎𝑙𝑎́𝑟𝑖𝑜𝑠 𝑒 𝑏𝑎𝑖𝑥𝑜𝑠 𝑖𝑚𝑝𝑜𝑠𝑡𝑜𝑠 - 𝑒 𝑜 𝑟𝑒𝑡𝑟𝑜𝑐𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑜 𝑛𝑢𝑚 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑗𝑢𝑛𝑡𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑖𝑛𝑑𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑟𝑒𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑠𝑢𝑝𝑜𝑠𝑡𝑜 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑔𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑜 𝑠𝑜𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑙 𝑒𝑚 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑎𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑒 𝑚𝑢𝑖𝑡𝑜 𝑎𝑏𝑎𝑖𝑥𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑃𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑢𝑔𝑎𝑙, 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑐̧𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑎𝑠 𝑚𝑎𝑖𝑜𝑟𝑖𝑡𝑎𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑎𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑒𝑚 𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑚𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑎𝑛𝑎́𝑙𝑖𝑠𝑒 𝑒 𝑑𝑒 𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑠, 𝑏𝑒𝑚 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑜 𝑡𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑎 𝑑𝑜 𝑎̂𝑚𝑏𝑖𝑡𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑎𝑛𝑎́𝑙𝑖𝑠𝑒 𝑑𝑜 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑢𝑑𝑜, 𝑚𝑎𝑠 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑑𝑒𝑣𝑒𝑚 𝑠𝑒𝑟 𝑟𝑒𝑓𝑢𝑡𝑎𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑚𝑎 𝑝𝑒𝑑𝑎𝑔𝑜́𝑔𝑖𝑐𝑎 𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑢𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑎.
𝑃𝑖𝑜𝑟 𝑎𝑖𝑛𝑑𝑎 𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑎𝑚 𝑎𝑠 𝑔𝑟𝑎𝑣𝑒𝑠 𝑖𝑛𝑠𝑖𝑛𝑢𝑎𝑐̧𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑓𝑎𝑙𝑡𝑎 𝑑𝑒 "𝑑𝑖𝑠𝑐𝑒𝑟𝑛𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜", 𝑑𝑒 "𝑚𝑎𝑛𝑖𝑝𝑢𝑙𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜", "𝑖𝑚𝑝𝑜𝑠𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑎" 𝑒 𝑚𝑒𝑠𝑚𝑜 "𝑡𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑡𝑎𝑟𝑖𝑠𝑚𝑜", 𝑜𝑠 𝑠𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑜𝑚𝑎𝑠 𝑑𝑒 "𝑟𝑖𝑛𝑜𝑐𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑡𝑒" 𝑑𝑒 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑓𝑎́𝑏𝑢𝑙𝑎 𝑑𝑜 𝑑𝑟𝑎𝑚𝑎𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑔𝑜 𝑟𝑜𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑜 𝐼𝑜𝑛𝑒𝑠𝑐𝑜 𝑒𝑚 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑎𝑠 𝑝𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑜𝑎𝑠 𝑠𝑒 𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑠𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑚𝑎𝑚 𝑛𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑒 𝑎𝑛𝑖𝑚𝑎𝑙, 𝑡𝑜𝑙𝑑𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑜 𝑠𝑒𝑢 𝑗𝑢𝑖́𝑧𝑜.
𝑇𝑜𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑜𝑛ℎ𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑟𝑎̃𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑎𝑟𝑡𝑖𝑔𝑜𝑠 𝑎𝑐𝑎𝑑𝑒́𝑚𝑖𝑐𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑒𝑣𝑒𝑚 𝑠𝑒𝑟 𝑎𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑛ℎ𝑒𝑐𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜 𝑛𝑎 𝑎́𝑟𝑒𝑎 𝑒𝑠𝑝𝑒𝑐𝑖́𝑓𝑖𝑐𝑎 𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑚𝑒𝑠𝑚𝑜𝑠, 𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑒́ 𝑚𝑎𝑛𝑖𝑓𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑜 𝑐𝑎𝑠𝑜, 𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝑒́ 𝑎 𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝑑𝑒 𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑜𝑠 𝑛𝑎 𝑎́𝑟𝑒𝑎 𝑒𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑜́𝑚𝑖𝑐𝑎, 𝑜𝑛𝑑𝑒 𝑠𝑒 𝑖𝑛𝑠𝑒𝑟𝑒 𝑜 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑢𝑑𝑜, 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑠𝑒 𝑒𝑛𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑎 𝑛𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑎́𝑟𝑖𝑜𝑠. 𝐴 𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑢𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑎𝑞𝑢𝑖 𝑓𝑒𝑖𝑡𝑎 𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑎 𝑓𝑎𝑙𝑠𝑎 𝑛𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑎, 𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑛𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑎𝑛𝑎́𝑙𝑖𝑠𝑒 𝑐𝑖𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑖́𝑓𝑖𝑐𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑝𝑢́𝑏𝑙𝑖𝑐𝑜𝑠 𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑠 𝑒 𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑓𝑖𝑐𝑎́𝑣𝑒𝑖𝑠, 𝑒́ 𝑎 𝑚𝑒𝑙ℎ𝑜𝑟 𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑝𝑜𝑠𝑡𝑎 𝑎̀𝑠 𝑔𝑟𝑎𝑣𝑒𝑠 𝑖𝑛𝑠𝑖𝑛𝑢𝑎𝑐̧𝑜̃𝑒𝑠, 𝑑𝑒𝑚𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑎 𝑟𝑒𝑎𝑙 "𝑟𝑖𝑛𝑜𝑐𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑡𝑒" 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑡𝑜𝑙𝑑𝑎 𝑜 𝑗𝑢𝑖́𝑧𝑜 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑣𝑒́𝑚 𝑑𝑎 𝑜𝑟𝑖𝑔𝑒𝑚 𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑚𝑒𝑠𝑚𝑎𝑠, 𝑒𝑚 𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑢𝑙𝑡𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑑𝑎 𝑖𝑛𝑠𝑢𝑓𝑖𝑐𝑖𝑒̂𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑛ℎ𝑒𝑐𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜 𝑛𝑎 𝑎́𝑟𝑒𝑎 𝑒𝑚 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑠𝑒 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑐𝑢𝑟𝑜𝑢 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑢𝑖𝑟 𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑎́𝑟𝑖𝑜 𝑝𝑜𝑙𝑖́𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑜.
𝐶𝑜𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑎́𝑟𝑖𝑜 𝑝𝑜𝑙𝑖́𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑜-𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑡𝑖𝑑𝑎́𝑟𝑖𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑎𝑟𝑡𝑖𝑔𝑜𝑠 𝑎𝑐𝑎𝑑𝑒́𝑚𝑖𝑐𝑜𝑠 𝑠𝑒𝑚 𝑐𝑜𝑛ℎ𝑒𝑐𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜 (𝑜𝑢 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑐𝑜) 𝑛𝑎 𝑎́𝑟𝑒𝑎 𝑎𝑏𝑟𝑒 𝑢𝑚 𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑑𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑛𝑜 𝑚𝑖́𝑛𝑖𝑚𝑜 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑛ℎ𝑜, 𝑝𝑜𝑖𝑠 𝑛𝑜 𝑙𝑖𝑚𝑖𝑡𝑒, 𝑝𝑜𝑟 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑒𝑞𝑢𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒, 𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑚 𝑑𝑒 𝑠𝑒𝑟 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑡𝑜𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑜𝑠 𝑎𝑟𝑡𝑖𝑔𝑜𝑠 𝑎𝑐𝑎𝑑𝑒́𝑚𝑖𝑐𝑜𝑠 𝑟𝑒𝑙𝑒𝑣𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑠, 𝑜𝑠 𝑚𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑒 𝑜𝑠 𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑜𝑠 𝑢́𝑡𝑒𝑖𝑠 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑎𝑛𝑎́𝑙𝑖𝑠𝑒 𝑝𝑜𝑙𝑖́𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑎.
𝑆𝑢𝑏𝑙𝑖𝑛ℎ𝑎-𝑠𝑒, 𝑝𝑜𝑟 𝑖𝑠𝑠𝑜, 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑜 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑢𝑑𝑜 𝑡𝑒𝑚 𝑐𝑎𝑟𝑎́𝑡𝑒𝑟 𝑎𝑐𝑎𝑑𝑒́𝑚𝑖𝑐𝑜 𝑒 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑝𝑜𝑙𝑖́𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑜-𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑡𝑖𝑑𝑎́𝑟𝑖𝑜, 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑐𝑒𝑑𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑎 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑎𝑛𝑎́𝑙𝑖𝑠𝑒 𝑑𝑜 𝑛𝑖́𝑣𝑒𝑙 𝑑𝑒 𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑎 𝑟𝑒𝑙𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑃𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑢𝑔𝑎𝑙 𝑓𝑎𝑐𝑒 𝑎̀ 𝑚𝑒́𝑑𝑖𝑎 𝑑𝑎 𝑈𝑛𝑖𝑎̃𝑜 𝐸𝑢𝑟𝑜𝑝𝑒𝑖𝑎 (𝑈𝐸) 𝑒 𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑘𝑖𝑛𝑔 - 𝑖𝑛𝑐𝑙𝑢𝑖𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑛𝑎𝑠 𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑝𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑜𝑛𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑠 -, 𝑒𝑚 𝑛𝑖́𝑣𝑒𝑙 𝑒 𝑣𝑎𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜, 𝑑𝑒 𝟷𝟿𝟿𝟿 𝑎 𝟸𝟶𝟸𝟸. 𝐴 𝑅𝑜𝑚𝑒́𝑛𝑖𝑎 𝑎𝑝𝑒𝑛𝑎𝑠 𝑒́ 𝑟𝑒𝑓𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑑𝑎 𝑝𝑜𝑟𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑒́ 𝑜 𝑝𝑎𝑖́𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑛𝑖́𝑣𝑒𝑙 𝑑𝑒 𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑎 𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑑𝑖𝑎𝑡𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑎𝑏𝑎𝑖𝑥𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑃𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑢𝑔𝑎𝑙, 𝑚𝑎𝑠 𝑛𝑜 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑢𝑑𝑜 𝑠𝑎̃𝑜 𝑎𝑝𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑣𝑎́𝑟𝑖𝑜𝑠 𝑟𝑖𝑠𝑐𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑢𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑜 𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑜𝑏𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜 𝑟𝑒𝑙𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑜 𝑓𝑎𝑐𝑒 𝑎̀ 𝑈𝐸 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑑𝑒𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑚 𝑠𝑒𝑟 𝑡𝑖𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑒𝑚 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑎 𝑝𝑒𝑙𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑒𝑐𝑖𝑠𝑜𝑟𝑒𝑠 𝑝𝑜𝑙𝑖́𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑜𝑠, 𝑠𝑒 (𝑝𝑒𝑙𝑜 𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑜𝑠) 𝑙𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑚 𝑜 𝑠𝑢𝑚𝑎́𝑟𝑖𝑜 𝑒𝑥𝑒𝑐𝑢𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑜 𝑎𝑡𝑒́ 𝑎𝑜 𝑓𝑖𝑚.
I𝑔𝑢𝑎𝑙𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑟𝑒𝑙𝑒𝑣𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑒, 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑓𝑜𝑖 𝑑𝑒𝑓𝑖𝑛𝑖𝑑𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑜 𝑎̂𝑚𝑏𝑖𝑡𝑜 𝑑𝑜 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑢𝑑𝑜 𝑎 𝑎𝑛𝑎́𝑙𝑖𝑠𝑒 𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑛𝑖́𝑣𝑒𝑖𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑒𝑛𝑣𝑜𝑙𝑣𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜 𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑝𝑎𝑖́𝑠𝑒𝑠 𝑑𝑎 𝑈𝐸 - 𝑚𝑢𝑖𝑡𝑜 𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑜𝑠 𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑜 𝑔𝑟𝑎𝑢 𝑑𝑒 𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑒𝑛𝑣𝑜𝑙𝑣𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑃𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑢𝑔𝑎𝑙 𝑒 𝑑𝑎 𝑅𝑜𝑚𝑒́𝑛𝑖𝑎 -, 𝑚𝑎𝑠 𝑠𝑖𝑚 𝑜 𝑛𝑖́𝑣𝑒𝑙 𝑑𝑒 𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑎 𝑟𝑒𝑙𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑜, 𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑒́ 𝑎 𝑚𝑒𝑠𝑚𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑖𝑠𝑎.
𝑂 𝑛𝑖́𝑣𝑒𝑙 𝑑𝑒 𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑎 𝑒́ 𝑢𝑚 𝑖𝑛𝑑𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑟 𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑡𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑜 𝑖𝑚𝑝𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑒, 𝑚𝑎𝑠 𝑑𝑒𝑣𝑒 𝑠𝑒𝑟 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑙𝑒𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑝𝑜𝑟 𝑖𝑛𝑑𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑟𝑒𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑔𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑜 𝑠𝑜𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑙 𝑠𝑒 𝑜 𝑜𝑏𝑗𝑒𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑜 𝑓𝑜𝑟 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑎𝑛𝑎́𝑙𝑖𝑠𝑒 𝑑𝑒 𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑒𝑛𝑣𝑜𝑙𝑣𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜 (𝑎𝑓𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑑𝑜, 𝑝𝑜𝑟 𝑒𝑥𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑙𝑜, 𝑝𝑒𝑙𝑜 𝐼́𝑛𝑑𝑖𝑐𝑒 𝑑𝑒 𝐷𝑒𝑠𝑒𝑛𝑣𝑜𝑙𝑣𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜 𝐻𝑢𝑚𝑎𝑛𝑜 𝑑𝑎 𝑂𝑁𝑈, 𝐼𝐷𝐻), 𝑒𝑚𝑏𝑜𝑟𝑎 𝑎𝑠 𝑑𝑢𝑎𝑠 𝑟𝑒𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒𝑠 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑗𝑎𝑚 𝑚𝑢𝑖𝑡𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑙𝑎𝑐𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑑𝑎𝑠, 𝑝𝑜𝑖𝑠 𝑢𝑚 𝑚𝑎𝑖𝑜𝑟 𝑛𝑖́𝑣𝑒𝑙 𝑑𝑒 𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑎 𝑔𝑒𝑟𝑎 𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑖𝑡𝑎𝑠 𝑝𝑢́𝑏𝑙𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑠 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑝𝑜𝑑𝑒𝑚 𝑠𝑒𝑟 𝑖𝑛𝑣𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑛𝑜 𝐸𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑠𝑜𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑙.
𝐶𝑜𝑚𝑜 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑒 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑜 𝑜𝑏𝑗𝑒𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑜 𝑑𝑎 𝑟𝑒𝑓𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑑𝑎 𝑛𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑎 𝑝𝑜𝑙𝑖́𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑎 𝑒́ 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑎𝑛𝑎́𝑙𝑖𝑠𝑒 𝑑𝑒 𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑒𝑛𝑣𝑜𝑙𝑣𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑑𝑜, 𝑑𝑒𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑎 𝑡𝑒𝑟 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑒𝑐̧𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑝𝑒𝑙𝑜 𝐼𝐷𝐻, 𝑜 𝑖𝑛𝑑𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑟 𝑠𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒́𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑒𝑛𝑣𝑜𝑙𝑣𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜 𝑚𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑢𝑠𝑎𝑑𝑜, 𝑒 𝑎𝑖́ 𝑜 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑜𝑟 𝑑𝑎 𝑅𝑜𝑚𝑒́𝑛𝑖𝑎 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎́ 𝑗𝑎́ 𝑟𝑒𝑙𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑡𝑜 𝑑𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑃𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑢𝑔𝑎𝑙 - 𝟶,𝟾𝟸𝟷 𝑒 𝟶,𝟾𝟼𝟼 𝑝𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑜𝑠 𝑒𝑚 𝟸𝟶𝟸𝟷 (𝑣𝑒𝑟 𝐹𝑖𝑔𝑢𝑟𝑎 𝟷), 𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑝𝑒𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒, 𝑛𝑎𝑠 𝑝𝑜𝑠𝑖𝑐̧𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝟻𝟹.ª 𝑒 𝟹𝟾.ª 𝑒𝑚 𝟷𝟿𝟷 𝑝𝑎𝑖́𝑠𝑒𝑠 -, 𝑒𝑚 𝑎𝑚𝑏𝑜𝑠 𝑜𝑠 𝑐𝑎𝑠𝑜𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑝𝑜𝑛𝑑𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑎 𝑛𝑖́𝑣𝑒𝑖𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑒𝑛𝑣𝑜𝑙𝑣𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜 ℎ𝑢𝑚𝑎𝑛𝑜 "𝑚𝑢𝑖𝑡𝑜 𝑒𝑙𝑒𝑣𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑠" (𝑎𝑐𝑖𝑚𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝟶,𝟾 𝑝𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑜𝑠), 𝑠𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑎 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑥𝑖𝑚𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝑒𝑟𝑎 𝑚𝑎𝑖𝑜𝑟 𝑒𝑚 𝟸𝟶𝟷𝟿 (𝟶,𝟾𝟹𝟸 𝑣𝑠. 𝟶,𝟾𝟼𝟽), 𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑠 𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑑𝑢𝑎𝑠 𝑐𝑟𝑖𝑠𝑒𝑠 𝑚𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑠 (𝑝𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑒𝑚𝑖𝑎 𝑒 𝑔𝑢𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑎 𝑛𝑎 𝑈𝑐𝑟𝑎̂𝑛𝑖𝑎), 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑎̃𝑜 𝑎𝑓𝑒𝑡𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑟𝑒𝑙𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑚𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑎 𝑅𝑜𝑚𝑒́𝑛𝑖𝑎.
𝑇𝑎𝑙 𝑐𝑜𝑙𝑜𝑐𝑎 𝑒𝑚 𝑐𝑎𝑢𝑠𝑎 𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑒 𝑠𝑒𝑟 𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑐𝑙𝑢𝑠𝑎̃𝑜 𝑔𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑙 𝑑𝑎 𝑟𝑒𝑓𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑑𝑎 𝑛𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑎, 𝑑𝑒 𝑞𝑢𝑒 ℎ𝑎́ 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑔𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑒 𝑑𝑖𝑠𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑒 𝑜 𝑛𝑖́𝑣𝑒𝑙 𝑑𝑒 𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑎 𝑟𝑒𝑙𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑜 𝑑𝑎 𝑅𝑜𝑚𝑒́𝑛𝑖𝑎, 𝑗𝑎́ 𝑖𝑔𝑢𝑎𝑙 𝑜𝑢 𝑠𝑢𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑜𝑟 𝑎𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑃𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑢𝑔𝑎𝑙, 𝑒 𝑜 𝑠𝑒𝑢 𝑛𝑖́𝑣𝑒𝑙 𝑑𝑒 𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑒𝑛𝑣𝑜𝑙𝑣𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜, 𝑠𝑢𝑝𝑜𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑚𝑢𝑖𝑡𝑜 𝑖𝑛𝑓𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑜𝑟 𝑎𝑜 𝑛𝑜𝑠𝑠𝑜.
𝑁𝑎𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑎𝑙𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒, ℎ𝑎́ 𝑖𝑛𝑑𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑟𝑒𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑔𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑜 𝑒𝑠𝑝𝑒𝑐𝑖́𝑓𝑖𝑐𝑜𝑠 𝑒𝑚 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑎 𝑅𝑜𝑚𝑒́𝑛𝑖𝑎 𝑡𝑒𝑚 𝑎𝑖𝑛𝑑𝑎 𝑚𝑢𝑖𝑡𝑜 𝑎 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑔𝑟𝑒𝑑𝑖𝑟 𝑒 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎́ 𝑎𝑏𝑎𝑖𝑥𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑃𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑢𝑔𝑎𝑙 (𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑚 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑜 𝑃𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑢𝑔𝑎𝑙 𝑎𝑖𝑛𝑑𝑎 𝑡𝑒𝑚 𝑑𝑒 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑔𝑟𝑒𝑑𝑖𝑟 𝑒𝑚 𝑣𝑎́𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑠 𝑎́𝑟𝑒𝑎𝑠 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑠𝑒 𝑎𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑥𝑖𝑚𝑎𝑟 𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑝𝑜𝑠𝑖𝑐̧𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑚𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑐𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑖𝑟𝑎𝑠 𝑑𝑜 𝐼𝐷𝐻). 𝑇𝑎𝑙 𝑒́ 𝑜 𝑐𝑎𝑠𝑜 𝑑𝑎 𝑚𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝑖𝑛𝑓𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑙, 𝑢𝑚 𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑝𝑜𝑢𝑐𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑒𝑚 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑎́𝑟𝑖𝑜 𝑝𝑜𝑙𝑖́𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑜 𝑎𝑐𝑒𝑟𝑡𝑜𝑢, 𝑠𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑜, 𝑑𝑒 𝑓𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑜, 𝑐𝑒𝑟𝑐𝑎 𝑑𝑜 "𝑑𝑜𝑏𝑟𝑜" 𝑑𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑃𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑢𝑔𝑎𝑙 (𝟸,𝟸 𝑣𝑒𝑧𝑒𝑠 𝑒𝑚 𝟸𝟶𝟸𝟷, 𝑠𝑒𝑔𝑢𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑜 𝐸𝑢𝑟𝑜𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑡), 𝑚𝑎𝑠 𝑓𝑎𝑐𝑒 𝑎̀ 𝑚𝑒́𝑑𝑖𝑎 𝑑𝑎 𝑈𝐸 𝑎 𝑑𝑖𝑓𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑐̧𝑎 𝑒́ 𝑏𝑒𝑚 𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑜𝑟 (𝟷,𝟼 𝑣𝑒𝑧𝑒𝑠), 𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑒́ 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑚𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑗𝑢𝑠𝑡𝑎, 𝑝𝑜𝑖𝑠 𝑃𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑢𝑔𝑎𝑙 𝑒́ 𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑝𝑎𝑖́𝑠𝑒𝑠 𝑑𝑎 𝑈𝐸 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑚𝑒𝑙ℎ𝑜𝑟 𝑟𝑒𝑔𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑜 𝑛𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑒 𝑖𝑛𝑑𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑟, 𝑠𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑎𝑖𝑛𝑑𝑎 𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑖𝑠𝑜 𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑒𝑟 𝑎𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑥𝑡𝑜 ℎ𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑜́𝑟𝑖𝑐𝑜 𝑑𝑎 𝑅𝑜𝑚𝑒́𝑛𝑖𝑎, 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑣𝑒 𝑎𝑡𝑒́ 𝑚𝑢𝑖𝑡𝑜 𝑚𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑡𝑎𝑟𝑑𝑒 𝑒𝑚 𝑑𝑖𝑡𝑎𝑑𝑢𝑟𝑎 (𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑢𝑛𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑎, 𝑛𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑒 𝑐𝑎𝑠𝑜) 𝑒 𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑜𝑢 𝑚𝑢𝑖𝑡𝑜 𝑑𝑒𝑝𝑜𝑖𝑠 𝑛𝑎 𝑈𝐸 (𝟸𝟶𝟶𝟽, 𝑓𝑎𝑐𝑒 𝑎 𝟷𝟿𝟾𝟼 𝑛𝑜 𝑐𝑎𝑠𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑃𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑢𝑔𝑎𝑙).
𝐷𝑒 𝑠𝑢𝑏𝑙𝑖𝑛ℎ𝑎𝑟 𝑡𝑎𝑚𝑏𝑒́𝑚 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑒́ 𝑜𝑏𝑗𝑒𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑜 𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑒 𝑎𝑟𝑡𝑖𝑔𝑜 𝑑𝑖𝑧𝑒𝑟 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑎 𝑅𝑜𝑚𝑒́𝑛𝑖𝑎 𝑒́ 𝑢𝑚 𝑝𝑎𝑖́𝑠 "𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑓𝑒𝑖𝑡𝑜 𝑒 𝑢𝑚 "𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑖́𝑠𝑜 𝑛𝑎 𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑎", 𝑜𝑢 𝑚𝑢𝑖𝑡𝑜 𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑠𝑒𝑔𝑢𝑖𝑟 𝑢𝑚 𝑐𝑒𝑟𝑡𝑜 "𝑚𝑜𝑑𝑒𝑙𝑜" - 𝑎𝑡𝑒́ 𝑝𝑜𝑟𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑜𝑠 𝑝𝑎𝑖́𝑠𝑒𝑠 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑝𝑜𝑑𝑒𝑚 𝑖𝑚𝑝𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑎𝑟 𝑑𝑖𝑟𝑒𝑡𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑚𝑜𝑑𝑒𝑙𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑥𝑡𝑢𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑧𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑠, 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑜 𝑠𝑒 𝑠𝑎𝑏𝑒 𝑑𝑎 𝐸𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑜𝑚𝑖𝑎 𝑑𝑜 𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑒𝑛𝑣𝑜𝑙𝑣𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜 -, 𝑚𝑎𝑠 𝑠𝑖𝑚 𝑟𝑒𝑓𝑢𝑡𝑎𝑟 𝑗𝑢𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑓𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑑𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒, 𝑑𝑒 𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑚𝑎 𝑝𝑒𝑑𝑎𝑔𝑜́𝑔𝑖𝑐𝑎 𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑢𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑎, 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑛𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑎 𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑎𝑑𝑎 𝑣𝑖𝑠𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑎𝑡𝑎𝑐𝑎𝑟 𝑢𝑚 𝑎𝑟𝑡𝑖𝑔𝑜 𝑎𝑐𝑎𝑑𝑒́𝑚𝑖𝑐𝑜 𝑠𝑒𝑚 𝑓𝑢𝑛𝑑𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜𝑠 𝑐𝑖𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑖́𝑓𝑖𝑐𝑜𝑠 𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑢𝑖𝑡𝑜𝑠 𝑚𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑝𝑜𝑙𝑖́𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑜-𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑡𝑖𝑑𝑎́𝑟𝑖𝑜𝑠.
𝑈𝑚 𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑝𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑒𝑞𝑢𝑖́𝑣𝑜𝑐𝑜𝑠 𝑒́ 𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑛𝑎 𝑅𝑜𝑚𝑒́𝑛𝑖𝑎 "𝑜 𝑠𝑎𝑙𝑎́𝑟𝑖𝑜 𝑚𝑒́𝑑𝑖𝑜 𝑒́ 𝑚𝑒𝑡𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝑑𝑜 𝑝𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑢𝑔𝑢𝑒̂𝑠", 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑎𝑓𝑖𝑟𝑚𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑚𝑎𝑛𝑖𝑓𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑎𝑑𝑎, 𝑠𝑒𝑗𝑎 𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑙 𝑓𝑜𝑟 𝑜 𝑐𝑟𝑖𝑡𝑒́𝑟𝑖𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜, 𝑢𝑠𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑝𝑢́𝑏𝑙𝑖𝑐𝑜𝑠 𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑠 𝑒 𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑓𝑖𝑐𝑎́𝑣𝑒𝑖𝑠. 𝑀𝑒𝑠𝑚𝑜 𝑠𝑒𝑚 𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑝𝑒𝑙𝑜𝑠 𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑐̧𝑜𝑠 𝑟𝑒𝑓𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑑𝑎 𝑎𝑏𝑎𝑖𝑥𝑜, 𝑜𝑠 𝑠𝑎𝑙𝑎́𝑟𝑖𝑜𝑠 𝑒𝑚 𝑒𝑢𝑟𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑎 𝑅𝑜𝑚𝑒́𝑛𝑖𝑎 𝑛𝑢𝑛𝑐𝑎 𝑠𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑚 𝑚𝑒𝑡𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑃𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑢𝑔𝑎𝑙 - 𝑒𝑚 𝟸𝟶𝟸𝟷, 𝑜 𝑠𝑎𝑙𝑎́𝑟𝑖𝑜 𝑚𝑒́𝑑𝑖𝑜 𝑑𝑎 𝑅𝑜𝑚𝑒́𝑛𝑖𝑎 𝑓𝑜𝑖 𝑑𝑒 𝟷𝟹 𝟶𝟶𝟶 𝑒𝑢𝑟𝑜𝑠, 𝑐𝑜𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑝𝑜𝑛𝑑𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑎 𝟼𝟽% 𝑑𝑜 𝑝𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑢𝑔𝑢𝑒̂𝑠 (𝟷𝟿 𝟹𝟶𝟷 𝑒𝑢𝑟𝑜𝑠; 𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑜 𝐸𝑢𝑟𝑜𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑡), 𝑚𝑎𝑠 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑒́ 𝑎𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑑𝑎. 𝑆𝑒𝑔𝑢𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑎 𝑃𝑜𝑟𝑑𝑎𝑡𝑎 (𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑏𝑎𝑠𝑒 𝑛𝑜 𝐸𝑢𝑟𝑜𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑡), 𝑒𝑚 𝟸𝟶𝟸𝟸, 𝑜 𝑠𝑎𝑙𝑎́𝑟𝑖𝑜 𝑚𝑒́𝑑𝑖𝑜 𝑎𝑛𝑢𝑎𝑙 𝑐𝑜𝑟𝑟𝑖𝑔𝑖𝑑𝑜 𝑝𝑒𝑙𝑎 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝑑𝑒 𝑝𝑜𝑑𝑒𝑟 𝑑𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑟𝑎 (𝑃𝑃𝐶) - 𝑖.𝑒., 𝑢𝑠𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑜 𝑚𝑒𝑠𝑚𝑜 𝑟𝑒𝑓𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑙 𝑑𝑒 𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑐̧𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑎 𝑈𝐸 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑠𝑒𝑟 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎́𝑣𝑒𝑙, 𝑝𝑜𝑖𝑠 𝑜𝑠 𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑐̧𝑜𝑠 𝑛𝑎 𝑅𝑜𝑚𝑒́𝑛𝑖𝑎 𝑠𝑎̃𝑜 𝑏𝑎𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑚𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑏𝑎𝑖𝑥𝑜𝑠 - 𝑓𝑜𝑖 𝑑𝑒 𝟸𝟼 𝟻𝟾𝟹 𝑒𝑢𝑟𝑜𝑠 𝑛𝑎 𝑅𝑜𝑚𝑒́𝑛𝑖𝑎 𝑒 𝟸𝟿 𝟾𝟶𝟿 𝑒𝑢𝑟𝑜𝑠 𝑒𝑚 𝑃𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑢𝑔𝑎𝑙. 𝑂𝑢 𝑠𝑒𝑗𝑎, 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑚𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑎𝑑𝑒𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑜 𝑝𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑣𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑎 𝑐𝑖𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑖́𝑓𝑖𝑐𝑜, 𝑜 𝑠𝑎𝑙𝑎́𝑟𝑖𝑜 𝑚𝑒́𝑑𝑖𝑜 𝑑𝑎 𝑅𝑜𝑚𝑒́𝑛𝑖𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑝𝑜𝑛𝑑𝑒 𝑎 𝟾𝟿% 𝑑𝑜 𝑝𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑢𝑔𝑢𝑒̂𝑠.
𝐶𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑢𝑑𝑜, 𝑓𝑎𝑙𝑡𝑎 𝑎𝑖𝑛𝑑𝑎 𝑎𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑎𝑟 𝑜 𝑒𝑓𝑒𝑖𝑡𝑜 𝑑𝑎 𝑓𝑖𝑠𝑐𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝑠𝑜𝑏𝑟𝑒 𝑜𝑠 𝑠𝑎𝑙𝑎́𝑟𝑖𝑜𝑠 𝑒 𝑑𝑒𝑚𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑐𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑎̃𝑜𝑠 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑚𝑜𝑠 𝑢𝑚 𝑟𝑒𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑜 𝑐𝑎𝑏𝑎𝑙 𝑑𝑜 𝑜𝑟𝑐̧𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜 𝑖𝑛𝑑𝑖𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑢𝑎𝑙 𝑒𝑚 𝑐𝑎𝑑𝑎 𝑝𝑎𝑖́𝑠, 𝑒 𝑎𝑖́ 𝑎 𝑅𝑜𝑚𝑒́𝑛𝑖𝑎 𝑔𝑎𝑛ℎ𝑎 𝑐𝑙𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒.
𝑂𝑠 𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑑𝑒𝑐𝑙𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑐̧𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑓𝑖𝑠𝑐𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑝𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑜𝑎𝑠 𝑠𝑖𝑛𝑔𝑢𝑙𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑠 (𝐸𝑢𝑟𝑜𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑡) - 𝑜𝑛𝑑𝑒 𝑝𝑒𝑠𝑎𝑚 𝑠𝑜𝑏𝑟𝑒𝑡𝑢𝑑𝑜 𝑜𝑠 𝑠𝑎𝑙𝑎́𝑟𝑖𝑜𝑠, 𝑒𝑚 𝑚𝑒́𝑑𝑖𝑎 -, 𝑟𝑒𝑣𝑒𝑙𝑎𝑚 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑜 𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜 𝑏𝑟𝑢𝑡𝑜 𝑎𝑛𝑢𝑎𝑙 𝑚𝑒́𝑑𝑖𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑢𝑚 𝑠𝑜𝑙𝑡𝑒𝑖𝑟𝑜 𝑠𝑒𝑚 𝑓𝑖𝑙ℎ𝑜𝑠 (𝑜 𝑟𝑒𝑓𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑙 𝑚𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑢𝑠𝑎𝑑𝑜) 𝑒𝑚 𝟸𝟶𝟸𝟸 𝑓𝑜𝑖𝑑𝑒 𝟸𝟷 𝟼𝟶𝟼 𝑒𝑢𝑟𝑜𝑠 𝑒𝑚 𝑃𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑢𝑔𝑎𝑙 𝑒 𝟷𝟺 𝟷𝟾𝟷 𝑒𝑢𝑟𝑜𝑠 𝑛𝑎 𝑅𝑜𝑚𝑒́𝑛𝑖𝑎. 𝑃𝑜𝑟𝑒́𝑚, 𝑎𝑠 𝑡𝑎𝑥𝑎𝑠 𝑚𝑎𝑟𝑔𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝐼𝑅𝑆 𝑠𝑎̃𝑜 𝑚𝑢𝑖𝑡𝑜 𝑚𝑎𝑖𝑜𝑟𝑒𝑠 𝑒𝑚 𝑃𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑢𝑔𝑎𝑙 - 𝑑𝑒 𝟷𝟺,𝟻% 𝑎𝑡𝑒́ 𝟺𝟾%, 𝑚𝑎𝑠 𝑠𝑢𝑏𝑖𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑎𝑡𝑒́ 𝟻𝟹% 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑎 𝑡𝑎𝑥𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑠𝑜𝑙𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑟𝑖𝑒𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒, 𝑒𝑛𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑜 𝑛𝑎 𝑅𝑜𝑚𝑒́𝑛𝑖𝑎 ℎ𝑎́ 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑡𝑎𝑥𝑎 𝑚𝑎𝑟𝑔𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑙 𝑢́𝑛𝑖𝑐𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝟷𝟶% -, 𝑝𝑒𝑙𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑜 𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜 𝑙𝑖́𝑞𝑢𝑖𝑑𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑖𝑚𝑝𝑜𝑠𝑡𝑜 𝑓𝑜𝑖 𝑑𝑒 𝟷𝟽 𝟿𝟶𝟹 𝑒 𝟷𝟹 𝟷𝟾𝟽, 𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑝𝑒𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒, 𝑖.𝑒., 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑑𝑖𝑓𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑐̧𝑎 𝑏𝑒𝑚 𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑜𝑟 - 𝐹𝑖𝑔𝑢𝑟𝑎 𝟸.
𝐶𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑢𝑑𝑜, 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑜 𝑜𝑠 𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑐̧𝑜𝑠 𝑠𝑎̃𝑜 𝑚𝑢𝑖𝑡𝑜 𝑚𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑏𝑎𝑖𝑥𝑜𝑠 𝑛𝑎 𝑅𝑜𝑚𝑒́𝑛𝑖𝑎, 𝑜 𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜 𝑙𝑖́𝑞𝑢𝑖𝑑𝑜 𝑙𝑎́ 𝑒́ 𝑚𝑢𝑖𝑡𝑜 𝑚𝑎𝑖𝑜𝑟 𝑛𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑏𝑎𝑠𝑒 𝑃𝑃𝐶 (𝟸𝟺 𝟶𝟺𝟿 𝑒𝑢𝑟𝑜𝑠 𝑓𝑎𝑐𝑒 𝑎 𝟷𝟿 𝟿𝟹𝟿 𝑒𝑢𝑟𝑜𝑠 𝑒𝑚 𝑃𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑢𝑔𝑎𝑙) 𝑒 𝑚𝑒𝑠𝑚𝑜 𝑜 𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜 𝑏𝑟𝑢𝑡𝑜 𝑒́ 𝑚𝑎𝑖𝑜𝑟 𝑒𝑚 𝑃𝑃𝐶 (𝟸𝟻 𝟾𝟼𝟸 𝑣𝑠. 𝟸𝟺 𝟶𝟼𝟹 𝑒𝑢𝑟𝑜𝑠 𝑒𝑚 𝑃𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑢𝑔𝑎𝑙). 𝑁𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑣𝑎 𝑐𝑒𝑔𝑎 𝑠𝑜𝑏𝑟𝑒 𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑔𝑜 𝑠𝑒𝑚 𝑚𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑠, 𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑢𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑠𝑒 𝑔𝑎𝑛ℎ𝑎𝑣𝑎 𝑜 𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜 𝑚𝑒́𝑑𝑖𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑢𝑚 𝑠𝑜𝑙𝑡𝑒𝑖𝑟𝑜 𝑠𝑒𝑚 𝑓𝑖𝑙ℎ𝑜𝑠, 𝑝𝑒𝑛𝑠𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑙𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑟 𝑢𝑚 𝑒𝑠𝑐𝑜𝑙ℎ𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑎 𝑎 𝑅𝑜𝑚𝑒́𝑛𝑖𝑎.
𝑁𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑎́𝑟𝑖𝑜 𝑝𝑜𝑙𝑖́𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑜 𝑓𝑎𝑙𝑡𝑜𝑢 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑎𝑛𝑎́𝑙𝑖𝑠𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑑𝑎 𝑑𝑜 𝑛𝑖́𝑣𝑒𝑙 𝑑𝑒 𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑎 - 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑜𝑛𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑖𝑚𝑝𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑑𝑜 𝑔𝑟𝑎𝑢 𝑑𝑒 𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑒𝑛𝑣𝑜𝑙𝑣𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜, 𝑚𝑎𝑠 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑎 𝑢́𝑛𝑖𝑐𝑎, 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑜 𝑗𝑎́ 𝑟𝑒𝑓𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑑𝑜 -, 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑒𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑎 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑔𝑒̂𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑎 𝑑𝑎 𝑅𝑜𝑚𝑒́𝑛𝑖𝑎 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑎 𝑚𝑒́𝑑𝑖𝑎 𝑑𝑎 𝑈𝐸 𝑒 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑑𝑖𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑔𝑒̂𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑃𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑢𝑔𝑎𝑙 - 𝐹𝑖𝑔𝑢𝑟𝑎 𝟹.
𝐸𝑛𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑜 𝑎 𝑅𝑜𝑚𝑒́𝑛𝑖𝑎 𝑝𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑜𝑢 𝑑𝑒 𝟺𝟺,𝟷% 𝑑𝑎 𝑚𝑒́𝑑𝑖𝑎 𝑑𝑎 𝑈𝐸 𝑒𝑚 𝟸𝟶𝟶𝟽, 𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑎𝑑𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑢, 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝟽𝟽,𝟷% 𝑒𝑚 𝟸𝟶𝟸𝟸, 𝑃𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑢𝑔𝑎𝑙 𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑢𝑜𝑢 𝑑𝑒 𝟾𝟸,𝟽% 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝟽𝟽,𝟷% - 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑜𝑟 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑝𝑜𝑑𝑒𝑟𝑎́ 𝑣𝑖𝑟 𝑎 𝑠𝑒𝑟 𝑟𝑒𝑣𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑜 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝟽𝟻,𝟿% 𝑢𝑠𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑚𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑠 𝑑𝑜 𝐼𝑁𝐸 𝑠𝑜𝑏𝑟𝑒 𝑎 𝑝𝑜𝑝𝑢𝑙𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜, 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑜 𝑎𝑝𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑎 𝑜 𝑠𝑢𝑚𝑎́𝑟𝑖𝑜 𝑒𝑥𝑒𝑐𝑢𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑜 𝑑𝑜 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑢𝑑𝑜 𝑑𝑎 𝐹𝐸𝑃 -, 𝑜𝑢 𝑠𝑒𝑗𝑎, 𝑟𝑒𝑡𝑟𝑜𝑐𝑒𝑑𝑒𝑚𝑜𝑠. 𝐶𝑜𝑚𝑜 𝑒𝑠𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑑𝑜, 𝑜 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑔𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑜 𝑑𝑜 𝑛𝑖́𝑣𝑒𝑙 𝑑𝑒 𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑎 𝑑𝑎 𝑅𝑜𝑚𝑒́𝑛𝑖𝑎 𝑓𝑜𝑖 𝑎𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑎𝑛ℎ𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑠𝑢𝑏𝑖𝑑𝑎 𝑑𝑜 𝑠𝑒𝑢 𝑛𝑖́𝑣𝑒𝑙 𝑑𝑒 𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑒𝑛𝑣𝑜𝑙𝑣𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜 𝑚𝑒𝑑𝑖𝑑𝑜 𝑝𝑒𝑙𝑜 𝐼𝐷𝐻 (𝑣𝑒𝑟 𝐹𝑖𝑔𝑢𝑟𝑎 𝟷), 𝑝𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝟶,𝟽𝟾𝟼 𝑒𝑚 𝟸𝟶𝟷𝟽, 𝑛𝑜 𝑎𝑛𝑜 𝑑𝑎 𝑎𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑎̃𝑜 𝑎̀ 𝑈𝐸, 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝟶,𝟾𝟶𝟼 𝑒𝑚 𝟸𝟶𝟸𝟷 (𝑗𝑎́ 𝑢𝑚 𝑛𝑖́𝑣𝑒𝑙 𝑑𝑒 𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑒𝑛𝑣𝑜𝑙𝑣𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜 𝑚𝑢𝑖𝑡𝑜 𝑒𝑙𝑒𝑣𝑎𝑑𝑜) 𝑛𝑜 𝑎𝑛𝑜 𝑠𝑒𝑔𝑢𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑒 𝟶,𝟾𝟹𝟸 𝑒𝑚 𝟸𝟶𝟷𝟿, 𝑒𝑚 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑔𝑖𝑢 𝑢𝑚 𝑚𝑎́𝑥𝑖𝑚𝑜, 𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑢𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑑𝑒𝑝𝑜𝑖𝑠 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝟶,𝟾𝟸𝟷 𝑒𝑚 𝟸𝟶𝟷𝟿 𝑑𝑒𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑜 𝑎̀𝑠 𝑐𝑟𝑖𝑠𝑒𝑠 𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑠.
𝑃𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑎 𝑐𝑎𝑚𝑖𝑛ℎ𝑎𝑑𝑎 𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑚𝑒́𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑐𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑛𝑖́𝑣𝑒𝑙 𝑑𝑒 𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑎 𝑟𝑒𝑙𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑜 𝑓𝑎𝑐𝑒 𝑎̀ 𝑈𝐸 𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑜𝑖𝑠 𝑝𝑎𝑖́𝑠𝑒𝑠, 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑒́ 𝑚𝑢𝑖𝑡𝑜 𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑜𝑐𝑢𝑝𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑃𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑢𝑔𝑎𝑙 𝑒 𝑛𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑒𝑣𝑒 𝑓𝑎𝑧𝑒𝑟 𝑟𝑒𝑓𝑙𝑒𝑡𝑖𝑟 𝑠𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒, 𝑚𝑢𝑖𝑡𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑏𝑢𝑖𝑢 𝑎 𝑟𝑒𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑚𝑎 𝑓𝑖𝑠𝑐𝑎𝑙, 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑒 𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑎𝑔𝑟𝑎𝑣𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜 𝑑𝑎 𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑏𝑢𝑡𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜, 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑎 𝑅𝑜𝑚𝑒́𝑛𝑖𝑎 𝑓𝑒𝑧 𝑎𝑖𝑛𝑑𝑎 𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑠 𝑑𝑎 𝑎𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑎̃𝑜, 𝑒𝑠𝑝𝑒𝑐𝑖𝑓𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑑𝑎 𝑎 𝑎𝑢𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑟 𝑎 𝑠𝑢𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑒𝑡𝑖𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝑓𝑖𝑠𝑐𝑎𝑙 𝑒 𝑒𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑜́𝑚𝑖𝑐𝑎, 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑟𝑒𝑓𝑙𝑒𝑥𝑜 𝑛𝑜 𝑐𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑐𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜 𝑑𝑜 𝑃𝐼𝐵.
𝑃𝑒𝑙𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑎́𝑟𝑖𝑜, 𝑒𝑚 𝑃𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑢𝑔𝑎𝑙, 𝑎 𝑐𝑎𝑟𝑔𝑎 𝑓𝑖𝑠𝑐𝑎𝑙 𝑡𝑒𝑚 𝑠𝑢𝑏𝑖𝑑𝑜 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑠𝑢𝑐𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑣𝑜𝑠 𝑚𝑎́𝑥𝑖𝑚𝑜𝑠 (𝟹𝟼,𝟺% 𝑑𝑜 𝑃𝐼𝐵 𝑒𝑚 𝟸𝟶𝟸𝟸), 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑑𝑢𝑧𝑖𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑎 𝑢𝑚 𝑒𝑠𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑐̧𝑜 𝑓𝑖𝑠𝑐𝑎𝑙 𝑚𝑢𝑖𝑡𝑜 𝑎𝑐𝑖𝑚𝑎 𝑑𝑎 𝑚𝑒́𝑑𝑖𝑎 𝑑𝑎 𝑈𝐸 (𝟷𝟷𝟼,𝟾% 𝑑𝑎 𝑈𝐸 𝑒𝑚 𝟸𝟶𝟸𝟸, 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝟿𝟾,𝟹% 𝑒𝑚 𝟸𝟶𝟶𝟽 𝑒 𝟿𝟻,𝟸% 𝑒𝑚 𝟸𝟶𝟶𝟸 - 𝐹𝑖𝑔𝑢𝑟𝑎 𝟺), 𝑢𝑚 𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑐𝑢𝑟𝑠𝑜 𝑖𝑛𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑠𝑜 𝑎𝑜 𝑑𝑎 𝑅𝑜𝑚𝑒́𝑛𝑖𝑎, 𝑐𝑢𝑗𝑜 𝑒𝑠𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑐̧𝑜 𝑓𝑖𝑠𝑐𝑎𝑙 𝑒𝑟𝑎 𝑚𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑑𝑜 𝑑𝑜𝑏𝑟𝑜 𝑑𝑎 𝑈𝐸 𝑒 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎́ ℎ𝑜𝑗𝑒 𝑏𝑒𝑚 𝑎𝑏𝑎𝑖𝑥𝑜 𝑑𝑎 𝑚𝑒́𝑑𝑖𝑎 (𝟾𝟻,𝟺% 𝑒𝑚 𝟸𝟶𝟸𝟸, 𝑎𝑝𝑜́𝑠 𝟷𝟼𝟺,𝟿% 𝑒𝑚 𝟸𝟶𝟶𝟽 𝑒 𝟸𝟺𝟻,𝟸% 𝑒𝑚 𝟸𝟶𝟶𝟸, 𝑜 𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑖𝑟𝑜 𝑎𝑛𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑜 𝑛𝑖́𝑣𝑒𝑙 𝑑𝑒 𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑎 𝑛𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑒 𝑝𝑎𝑖́𝑠, 𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑎 𝑐𝑎𝑟𝑔𝑎 𝑓𝑖𝑠𝑐𝑎𝑙 𝑏𝑎𝑖𝑥𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝟸𝟼,𝟼% 𝑒𝑚 𝟸𝟶𝟸𝟸, 𝑎𝑝𝑜́𝑠 𝟸𝟾,𝟺% 𝑒𝑚 𝟸𝟶𝟶𝟽 𝑒 𝟸𝟾,𝟷% 𝑒𝑚 𝟸𝟶𝟶𝟸). 𝑂 𝑒𝑠𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑐̧𝑜 𝑓𝑖𝑠𝑐𝑎𝑙 𝑟𝑒𝑙𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑖𝑧𝑎 𝑎 𝑐𝑎𝑟𝑔𝑎 𝑓𝑖𝑠𝑐𝑎𝑙 (𝑒𝑚 % 𝑑𝑜 𝑃𝐼𝐵) 𝑝𝑒𝑙𝑜 𝑛𝑖́𝑣𝑒𝑙 𝑑𝑒 𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑎 𝑟𝑒𝑙𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑜 (𝑃𝐼𝐵 𝑝𝑒𝑟 𝑐𝑎𝑝𝑖𝑡𝑎 𝑒𝑚 𝑃𝑃𝐶 𝑓𝑎𝑐𝑒 𝑎̀ 𝑈𝐸) 𝑒𝑛𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑜 𝑚𝑒𝑑𝑖𝑑𝑎 𝑑𝑎 𝑐𝑎𝑝𝑎𝑐𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑏𝑢𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑎 𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑝𝑎𝑖́𝑠𝑒𝑠, 𝑠𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑝𝑜𝑟 𝑖𝑠𝑠𝑜 𝑜 𝑖𝑛𝑑𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑟 𝑟𝑒𝑙𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑛𝑖́𝑣𝑒𝑙 𝑑𝑒 𝑓𝑖𝑠𝑐𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝑚𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑎𝑑𝑒𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑛𝑎𝑐𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑙, 𝑝𝑜𝑖𝑠 𝑡𝑒𝑚 𝑡𝑎𝑚𝑏𝑒́𝑚 𝑒𝑚 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑎 𝑎 𝑟𝑒𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝑒𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑜́𝑚𝑖𝑐𝑎 𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑝𝑎𝑖́𝑠𝑒𝑠.
𝐶𝑜𝑛𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑚𝑒 𝑟𝑒𝑓𝑒𝑟𝑒 𝑜 𝑠𝑢𝑚𝑎́𝑟𝑖𝑜 𝑒𝑥𝑒𝑐𝑢𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑜 𝑑𝑜 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑢𝑑𝑜, 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑏𝑎𝑠𝑒 𝑛𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑎𝑛𝑎́𝑙𝑖𝑠𝑒 𝑑𝑎 𝑟𝑒𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑡𝑖𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑜 𝑃𝐼𝐵 𝑛𝑎 𝑜́𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑎 𝑑𝑜 𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜, 𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑒 𝟷𝟿𝟿𝟿 𝑒 𝟸𝟶𝟸𝟸, "𝑜 𝑝𝑒𝑠𝑜 𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑓𝑎𝑡𝑜𝑟𝑒𝑠 𝑔𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑟𝑒𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑟𝑖𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑧𝑎 𝑒𝑛𝑐𝑜𝑙ℎ𝑒𝑢 𝑒𝑚 𝑓𝑎𝑣𝑜𝑟 𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑖𝑚𝑝𝑜𝑠𝑡𝑜𝑠 𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑏𝑢𝑖𝑐̧𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 - 𝑓𝑢𝑛𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑟𝑒𝑑𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑏𝑢𝑖𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 -, 𝑎𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑎́𝑟𝑖𝑜 𝑑𝑎 𝑈𝐸, 𝑎𝑗𝑢𝑑𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑡𝑎𝑚𝑏𝑒́𝑚 𝑎 𝑒𝑥𝑝𝑙𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑟 𝑜 𝑛𝑜𝑠𝑠𝑜 𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑜𝑟 𝑐𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑐𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜 𝑒𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑜́𝑚𝑖𝑐𝑜, 𝑝𝑜𝑖𝑠 𝑒́ 𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑖𝑠𝑜 𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑖𝑟𝑜 𝑔𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑟 𝑟𝑖𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑧𝑎 𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑎 𝑟𝑒𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑡𝑖𝑟". 𝑂𝑢 𝑠𝑒𝑗𝑎, 𝑒𝑚 𝑃𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑢𝑔𝑎𝑙, 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑚𝑜𝑠 𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑢𝑚 𝑚𝑜𝑑𝑒𝑙𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑟𝑒𝑑𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑏𝑢𝑖𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜 𝑠𝑒𝑚 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑏𝑎𝑠𝑒 𝑒𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑜́𝑚𝑖𝑐𝑎 𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑒 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑠𝑢𝑝𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑒 𝑎 𝑠𝑢𝑎 𝑔𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜. 𝑁𝑜 𝑓𝑢𝑛𝑑𝑜, 𝑛𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑙𝑖𝑛𝑔𝑢𝑎𝑔𝑒𝑚 𝑚𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑎𝑐𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑖́𝑣𝑒𝑙, 𝑒́ 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑜 "𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑢𝑖𝑟 𝑎 𝑐𝑎𝑠𝑎 𝑝𝑒𝑙𝑜 𝑡𝑒𝑙ℎ𝑎𝑑𝑜".
𝐴 𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑜𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑒 𝑒𝑥𝑐𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑐𝑎𝑟𝑔𝑎 𝑓𝑖𝑠𝑐𝑎𝑙 𝑒𝑚 𝑃𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑢𝑔𝑎𝑙 𝑒 𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑜𝑟 𝑐𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑐𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜 𝑒𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑜́𝑚𝑖𝑐𝑜 𝑒 𝑛𝑖́𝑣𝑒𝑙 𝑑𝑒 𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑎 𝑛𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑥𝑡𝑜 𝑑𝑎 𝑈𝑛𝑖𝑎̃𝑜 𝐸𝑢𝑟𝑜𝑝𝑒𝑖𝑎 (𝑈𝐸), 𝑒𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑑𝑎 𝑛𝑜 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑢𝑑𝑜, 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑓𝑖𝑟𝑚𝑎-𝑠𝑒 𝑎𝑞𝑢𝑖 𝑛𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑒 𝑃𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑢𝑔𝑎𝑙 𝑒 𝑎 𝑅𝑜𝑚𝑒́𝑛𝑖𝑎 𝑠𝑢𝑠𝑐𝑖𝑡𝑎𝑑𝑎 𝑝𝑒𝑙𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑎́𝑟𝑖𝑜 𝑝𝑜𝑙𝑖́𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑚𝑜𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑜𝑢 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑒 𝑎𝑟𝑡𝑖𝑔𝑜.
𝑃𝑜𝑟 𝑖𝑠𝑠𝑜, 𝑒́ 𝑐𝑎𝑠𝑜 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑔𝑢𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑟 𝑠𝑒 𝑜 "𝑣𝑎𝑚𝑝𝑖𝑟𝑜 𝑓𝑖𝑠𝑐𝑎𝑙" 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑠𝑒 𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑎́ 𝑚𝑢𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑑𝑎 𝑅𝑜𝑚𝑒́𝑛𝑖𝑎 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑃𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑢𝑔𝑎𝑙.
𝐹𝑎𝑙𝑡𝑎 𝑎𝑖𝑛𝑑𝑎 𝑟𝑒𝑏𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑟 𝑑𝑒 𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑚𝑎 𝑝𝑒𝑑𝑎𝑔𝑜́𝑔𝑖𝑐𝑎 𝑚𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑎𝑙𝑔𝑢𝑚𝑎𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑐̧𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑛ℎ𝑎𝑠 𝑜𝑢 𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑎𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑑𝑎 𝑛𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑎:
- 𝑂𝑠 𝑝𝑎𝑖́𝑠𝑒𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑙𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑒 "𝑐𝑜𝑛ℎ𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑚 ℎ𝑜𝑗𝑒 𝑑𝑖𝑛𝑎̂𝑚𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑠 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑜𝑠 𝑓𝑎𝑣𝑜𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑚 𝑝𝑜𝑟 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑜𝑠 𝑝𝑎𝑖́𝑠𝑒𝑠 𝑑𝑜 𝑆𝑢𝑙."
𝐶𝑜𝑚 𝑟𝑒𝑓𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑑𝑜, 𝑎 𝑅𝑜𝑚𝑒́𝑛𝑖𝑎 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑣𝑒 𝑎𝑡𝑒́ 𝑏𝑎𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑚𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑡𝑎𝑟𝑑𝑒 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑃𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑢𝑔𝑎𝑙 𝑒𝑚 𝑑𝑖𝑡𝑎𝑑𝑢𝑟𝑎 (𝑒, 𝑛𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑒 𝑐𝑎𝑠𝑜, 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑢𝑛𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑎, 𝑑𝑒𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑒𝑛𝑜𝑟𝑚𝑒𝑠 𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑣𝑒𝑠 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑢𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑎𝑖𝑠), 𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑚𝑢𝑖𝑡𝑜𝑠 𝑎𝑛𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑒𝑝𝑜𝑖𝑠 𝑛𝑎 𝑈𝐸 𝑒 𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑏𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑜, 𝑝𝑜𝑟 𝑖𝑠𝑠𝑜, 𝑚𝑢𝑖𝑡𝑜 𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑜𝑠 𝑓𝑢𝑛𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑢𝑛𝑖𝑡𝑎́𝑟𝑖𝑜𝑠 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑜 𝑛𝑜𝑠𝑠𝑜 𝑝𝑎𝑖́𝑠, 𝑚𝑎𝑠 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑒 𝑡𝑒̂-𝑙𝑜𝑠 𝑎𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑣𝑒𝑖𝑡𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑚𝑒𝑙ℎ𝑜𝑟, 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑜 𝑠𝑒 𝑣𝑒̂ 𝑛𝑜 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑔𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑜 𝑒𝑚 𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑚𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑖𝑛𝑑𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑟 𝑑𝑒 𝑛𝑖́𝑣𝑒𝑙 𝑑𝑒 𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑎 𝑒𝑚 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑢𝑙𝑎𝑟.
𝑀𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒, 𝑜𝑠 𝑝𝑎𝑖́𝑠𝑒𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑙𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑒 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎̃𝑜 𝑎 𝑠𝑒𝑟 𝑚𝑢𝑖𝑡𝑜 𝑚𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑎𝑓𝑒𝑡𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑝𝑒𝑙𝑎 𝑔𝑢𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑎 𝑛𝑎 𝑈𝑐𝑟𝑎̂𝑛𝑖𝑎, 𝑒𝑛𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑜 𝑃𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑢𝑔𝑎𝑙 𝑡𝑒𝑚 𝑏𝑒𝑛𝑒𝑓𝑖𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑢𝑚 𝑏𝑜𝑜𝑚 𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑖́𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑜 - 𝑓𝑎𝑣𝑜𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑖𝑑𝑜 𝑝𝑒𝑙𝑎 𝑖𝑚𝑎𝑔𝑒𝑚 𝑑𝑒 𝑝𝑎𝑖́𝑠 𝑏𝑜𝑛𝑖𝑡𝑜 𝑒 𝑠𝑒𝑔𝑢𝑟𝑜, 𝑙𝑜𝑛𝑔𝑒 𝑑𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑓𝑙𝑖𝑡𝑜 -, 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑒𝑥𝑝𝑙𝑖𝑐𝑎 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑏𝑜𝑎 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑡𝑒 𝑑𝑜 𝑛𝑜𝑠𝑠𝑜 𝑐𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑐𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜 𝑒𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑜́𝑚𝑖𝑐𝑜 𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒, 𝑚𝑎𝑠 𝑚𝑒𝑠𝑚𝑜 𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑚 𝑎 𝑅𝑜𝑚𝑒́𝑛𝑖𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑢𝑜𝑢 𝑎 𝑎𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑥𝑖𝑚𝑎𝑟-𝑠𝑒 𝑑𝑜 𝑛𝑜𝑠𝑠𝑜 𝑛𝑖́𝑣𝑒𝑙 𝑑𝑒 𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑎 𝑎𝑡𝑒́ 𝑜 𝑎𝑙𝑐𝑎𝑛𝑐̧𝑎𝑟 (𝑜𝑢 𝑚𝑒𝑠𝑚𝑜 𝑢𝑙𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑝𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑎𝑟) 𝑒𝑚 𝟸𝟶𝟸𝟸, 𝑒𝑚𝑏𝑜𝑟𝑎 𝑜𝑢𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑠 𝑑𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑠𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑑𝑜 𝐼𝐷𝐻 𝑠𝑒 𝑡𝑒𝑛ℎ𝑎𝑚 𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑑𝑜, 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑜 𝑟𝑒𝑓𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑑𝑜. 𝑄𝑢𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑎𝑠 𝑣𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑔𝑒𝑛𝑠 𝑟𝑒𝑙𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑎𝑠 𝑡𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑜𝑟𝑎́𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑃𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑢𝑔𝑎𝑙 𝑛𝑜 𝑎𝑡𝑢𝑎𝑙 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑥𝑡𝑜 𝑠𝑒 𝑑𝑖𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑚 (𝑜 𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑖𝑠𝑚𝑜 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎́ 𝑗𝑎́ 𝑒𝑚 𝑎𝑏𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜 ℎ𝑎́ 𝑣𝑎́𝑟𝑖𝑜𝑠 𝑚𝑒𝑠𝑒𝑠), 𝑜 𝑐𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑐𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜 𝑒 𝑜 𝑛𝑖́𝑣𝑒𝑙 𝑑𝑒 𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑃𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑢𝑔𝑎𝑙 𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑟-𝑠𝑒-𝑎̃𝑜 𝑒𝑚 𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑚𝑜𝑠 𝑟𝑒𝑙𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑜𝑠 𝑛𝑎 𝑈𝐸.
- "𝐸𝑚 𝑚𝑒́𝑑𝑖𝑎, 𝑜𝑠 𝑟𝑜𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑜𝑠 𝑣𝑖𝑣𝑒𝑚 𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑠𝑒 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑑𝑒́𝑐𝑎𝑑𝑎 𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑛𝑜́𝑠".
𝐸𝑚 𝟸𝟶𝟸𝟸, 𝑠𝑒𝑔𝑢𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑎 𝑃𝑜𝑟𝑑𝑎𝑡𝑎 (𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑜 𝑓𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑚𝑎́𝑟𝑖𝑎 𝑜 𝐸𝑢𝑟𝑜𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑡), 𝑎 𝑒𝑠𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑐̧𝑎 𝑚𝑒́𝑑𝑖𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑎 𝑎̀ 𝑛𝑎𝑠𝑐𝑒𝑛𝑐̧𝑎 𝑓𝑜𝑖 𝑑𝑒 𝟾𝟺,𝟻 𝑎𝑛𝑜𝑠 𝑒𝑚 𝑃𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑢𝑔𝑎𝑙 𝑒 𝟽𝟿,𝟹 𝑎𝑛𝑜𝑠 𝑛𝑎 𝑅𝑜𝑚𝑒́𝑛𝑖𝑎, 𝑜𝑢 𝑠𝑒𝑗𝑎, 𝑜𝑠 𝑟𝑜𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑜𝑠 𝑣𝑖𝑣𝑒𝑚 𝑒𝑚 𝑚𝑒́𝑑𝑖𝑎 𝑐𝑒𝑟𝑐𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑐𝑖𝑛𝑐𝑜 𝑎𝑛𝑜𝑠 𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑜𝑠 𝑝𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑢𝑔𝑢𝑒𝑠𝑒𝑠, 𝑚𝑒𝑡𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝑑𝑎 𝑑𝑖𝑓𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑐̧𝑎 𝑟𝑒𝑓𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑑𝑎.
- "𝐻𝑎́ 𝑐𝑒𝑟𝑐𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝟻 𝑚𝑖𝑙ℎ𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑟𝑜𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑜𝑠 𝑎 𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑏𝑎𝑙ℎ𝑎𝑟 𝑛𝑜𝑢𝑡𝑟𝑜𝑠 𝑝𝑎𝑖́𝑠𝑒𝑠 𝑒𝑢𝑟𝑜𝑝𝑒𝑢𝑠".
𝐴 𝑎𝑓𝑖𝑟𝑚𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑎𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑒 𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑥𝑡𝑢𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑧𝑎𝑑𝑎. 𝐶𝑜𝑚 𝑎 𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑑𝑎 𝑛𝑎 𝑈𝐸 𝑒𝑚 𝟸𝟶𝟶𝟽 𝑒 𝑎 𝑙𝑖𝑣𝑟𝑒 𝑐𝑖𝑟𝑐𝑢𝑙𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑝𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑜𝑎𝑠 𝑛𝑜 𝐸𝑠𝑝𝑎𝑐̧𝑜 𝐸𝑢𝑟𝑜𝑝𝑒𝑢, 𝑒𝑟𝑎 𝑒𝑥𝑝𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑎́𝑣𝑒𝑙 𝑞𝑢𝑒 ℎ𝑜𝑢𝑣𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑒 𝑟𝑜𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑜𝑠 𝑎 𝑒𝑚𝑖𝑔𝑟𝑎𝑟 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑝𝑎𝑖́𝑠𝑒𝑠 𝑚𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑟𝑖𝑐𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑜 𝑐𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑜 𝑑𝑎 𝐸𝑢𝑟𝑜𝑝𝑎, 𝑛𝑜𝑚𝑒𝑎𝑑𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑎 𝐴𝑙𝑒𝑚𝑎𝑛ℎ𝑎, 𝑜 𝑚𝑒𝑠𝑚𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑠𝑢𝑐𝑒𝑑𝑒𝑢 𝑎 𝑃𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑢𝑔𝑎𝑙 𝑎𝑝𝑜́𝑠 𝑎 𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑑𝑎 𝑛𝑎 𝐶𝐸𝐸. 𝐴 𝑎𝑛𝑎́𝑙𝑖𝑠𝑒 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑠𝑒 𝑎𝑓𝑖𝑔𝑢𝑟𝑎 𝑚𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑎𝑑𝑒𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑑𝑎 𝑒́, 𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑚, 𝑎 𝑒𝑣𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑎 𝑑𝑖𝑛𝑎̂𝑚𝑖𝑐𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑑𝑎 𝑒 𝑠𝑎𝑖́𝑑𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑝𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑜𝑎𝑠 𝑛𝑎 𝑅𝑜𝑚𝑒́𝑛𝑖𝑎. 𝑉𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑓𝑖𝑐𝑎-𝑠𝑒 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑎 𝑡𝑎𝑥𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑐𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑐𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜 𝑚𝑖𝑔𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑜́𝑟𝑖𝑜 𝑟𝑜𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑎 (𝑎 𝑑𝑖𝑓𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑐̧𝑎 𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑒 𝑖𝑚𝑖𝑔𝑟𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑒 𝑒𝑚𝑖𝑔𝑟𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑎𝑛𝑢𝑎𝑙 𝑠𝑜𝑏𝑟𝑒 𝑎 𝑝𝑜𝑝𝑢𝑙𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜) 𝑟𝑒𝑣𝑒𝑙𝑜𝑢 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑒̂𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑎𝑔𝑟𝑎𝑣𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜, 𝑝𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑑𝑒 -𝟶,𝟽𝟿% 𝑒𝑚 𝟸𝟶𝟶𝟾 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 -𝟶,𝟷𝟸% 𝑒𝑚 𝟸𝟶𝟸𝟷, 𝑎 𝑟𝑒𝑓𝑙𝑒𝑡𝑖𝑟 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑠𝑢𝑏𝑖𝑑𝑎 𝑑𝑎 𝑡𝑎𝑥𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑖𝑚𝑖𝑔𝑟𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 (𝑖𝑚𝑖𝑔𝑟𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑎 𝑑𝑖𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑖𝑟 𝑝𝑒𝑙𝑎 𝑝𝑜𝑝𝑢𝑙𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑛𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑒 𝑎𝑛𝑜), 𝑑𝑒 𝟶,𝟼𝟽% 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝟷,𝟶𝟷%, 𝑒 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑟𝑒𝑑𝑢𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑎 𝑡𝑎𝑥𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑒𝑚𝑖𝑔𝑟𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜, 𝑑𝑒 𝟷,𝟺𝟽% 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝟷,𝟷𝟹% (𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑜 𝐸𝑢𝑟𝑜𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑡).
𝑀𝑎𝑖𝑠 ℎ𝑎𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑎 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑟𝑒𝑏𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑟, 𝑚𝑎𝑠 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑒 𝑎 𝑝𝑒𝑛𝑎 𝑎𝑔𝑜𝑟𝑎 𝑓𝑜𝑐𝑎𝑟 𝑛𝑢𝑚 𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑑𝑎 𝑛𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑎 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑠𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑓𝑖𝑟𝑚𝑎, 𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑎 𝑅𝑜𝑚𝑒́𝑛𝑖𝑎 𝑎𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑎 𝑜 𝑚𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑏𝑎𝑖𝑥𝑜 𝑝𝑒𝑠𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑝𝑜𝑝𝑢𝑙𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑢𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑠𝑢𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑜𝑟𝑒𝑠 𝑛𝑎 𝑈𝐸. 𝑆𝑒𝑔𝑢𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑎 𝑃𝑜𝑟𝑑𝑎𝑡𝑎 (𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑏𝑎𝑠𝑒 𝑛𝑜 𝐸𝑢𝑟𝑜𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑡), 𝑎𝑝𝑒𝑛𝑎𝑠 𝟷𝟿,𝟽% 𝑑𝑎 𝑝𝑜𝑝𝑢𝑙𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑟𝑜𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑎 𝑡𝑖𝑛ℎ𝑎 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑢𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑠𝑢𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑜𝑟𝑒𝑠 𝑒𝑚 𝟸𝟶𝟸𝟸, 𝑛𝑎 𝑢́𝑙𝑡𝑖𝑚𝑎 𝑝𝑜𝑠𝑖𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑎 𝑈𝐸, 𝑒𝑛𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑜 𝑒𝑚 𝑃𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑢𝑔𝑎𝑙 𝑎 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑝𝑜𝑟𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑒𝑟𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝟹𝟷,𝟻%, 𝑛𝑎 𝟷𝟿.ª 𝑝𝑜𝑠𝑖𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜, 𝑜𝑢 𝑠𝑒𝑗𝑎, 𝑎 𝑛𝑜𝑛𝑎 𝑝𝑖𝑜𝑟. 𝑁𝑎𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑎𝑙𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒, 𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑎𝑡𝑒́ 𝑚𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑡𝑎𝑟𝑑𝑒 𝑛𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑑𝑖𝑡𝑎𝑑𝑢𝑟𝑎, 𝑒́ 𝑛𝑎𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑎𝑙 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑒 𝑖𝑛𝑑𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑟 𝑠𝑒𝑗𝑎 𝑎𝑖𝑛𝑑𝑎 𝑝𝑖𝑜𝑟 𝑑𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑃𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑢𝑔𝑎𝑙, 𝑠𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑎𝑠 𝑓𝑎𝑖𝑥𝑎𝑠 𝑒𝑡𝑎́𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑠 𝑎 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑡𝑖𝑟 𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝟺𝟻 𝑎𝑛𝑜𝑠 𝑎𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑙𝑎𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑜𝑟𝑒𝑠 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑜𝑟𝑒𝑠. 𝐶𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑢𝑑𝑜, 𝑒 𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑜 𝑒́ 𝑚𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑔𝑟𝑎𝑣𝑜𝑠𝑜 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑎 𝑅𝑜𝑚𝑒́𝑛𝑖𝑎, 𝑛𝑎 𝑓𝑎𝑖𝑥𝑎 𝑒𝑡𝑎́𝑟𝑖𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝟸𝟻 𝑎 𝟹𝟺 𝑎𝑛𝑜𝑠 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎́ 𝑡𝑎𝑚𝑏𝑒́𝑚 𝑛𝑎 𝑢́𝑙𝑡𝑖𝑚𝑎 𝑝𝑜𝑠𝑖𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑛𝑎 𝑈𝐸 (𝟸𝟺,𝟽%, 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝟺𝟺,𝟺% 𝑒𝑚 𝑃𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑢𝑔𝑎𝑙, 𝑠𝑒𝑛𝑠𝑖𝑣𝑒𝑙𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑎 𝑚𝑒𝑖𝑜 𝑑𝑎 𝑡𝑎𝑏𝑒𝑙𝑎, 𝑛𝑎 𝟷𝟺.ª 𝑝𝑜𝑠𝑖𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜).
𝐴 𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑒 𝑠𝑢𝑏𝑖𝑑𝑎 𝑑𝑜 𝑛𝑖́𝑣𝑒𝑙 𝑑𝑒 𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑎 𝑑𝑎 𝑅𝑜𝑚𝑒́𝑛𝑖𝑎, 𝑎𝑙𝑐𝑎𝑛𝑐̧𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑜𝑢 𝑚𝑒𝑠𝑚𝑜 𝑠𝑢𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑃𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑢𝑔𝑎𝑙, 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑠𝑡𝑎 𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑚 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑜 𝑏𝑎𝑖𝑥𝑜 𝑝𝑒𝑠𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑒𝑑𝑢𝑐𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑠𝑢𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑜𝑟 (𝑎𝑝𝑒𝑠𝑎𝑟 𝑑𝑒 𝑎𝑙𝑔𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑚𝑒𝑙ℎ𝑜𝑟𝑖𝑎 𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑑𝑒 𝑎 𝑎𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑎̃𝑜 𝑎̀ 𝑈𝐸, 𝑚𝑎𝑠 𝑖𝑛𝑓𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑜𝑟 𝑎̀ 𝑑𝑎 𝑚𝑎𝑖𝑜𝑟𝑖𝑎 𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑝𝑎𝑖́𝑠𝑒𝑠), 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑑𝑖𝑧𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑜 𝑎𝑟𝑔𝑢𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜 𝑢𝑠𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑝𝑒𝑙𝑜 𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑖𝑟𝑜-𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑜 𝑒𝑚 𝑐𝑎𝑚𝑝𝑎𝑛ℎ𝑎 𝑒𝑙𝑒𝑖𝑡𝑜𝑟𝑎𝑙 𝑑𝑒 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑜𝑠 𝑝𝑎𝑖́𝑠𝑒𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑙𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑒 𝑛𝑜𝑠 𝑡𝑒̂𝑚 𝑢𝑙𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑝𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑒𝑚 𝑛𝑖́𝑣𝑒𝑙 𝑑𝑒 𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑎 𝑝𝑜𝑟𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑡𝑖𝑟𝑎𝑚 𝑑𝑒 "𝑛𝑖́𝑣𝑒𝑖𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑒𝑑𝑢𝑐𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑚𝑢𝑖𝑡𝑜 𝑠𝑢𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑜𝑟𝑒𝑠", 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑔𝑒𝑛𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑧𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑠𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑣𝑎 𝑎𝑏𝑢𝑠𝑖𝑣𝑎 𝑒 𝑟𝑒𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑟, 𝑝𝑜𝑟 𝑖𝑠𝑠𝑜, 𝑚𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑒𝑥𝑝𝑙𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑐̧𝑜̃𝑒𝑠.
𝑃𝑜𝑟 𝑜𝑢𝑡𝑟𝑜 𝑙𝑎𝑑𝑜, 𝑜 𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑒 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑔𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑒𝑑𝑢𝑐𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑓𝑒𝑖𝑡𝑜 𝑝𝑜𝑟 𝑃𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑢𝑔𝑎𝑙 (𝑑𝑒 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑝𝑜𝑟𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑎 𝑝𝑜𝑝𝑢𝑙𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑒𝑛𝑠𝑖𝑛𝑜 𝑠𝑢𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑜𝑟 𝑛𝑎 𝑓𝑎𝑖𝑥𝑎 𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝟸𝟻 𝑎𝑜𝑠 𝟹𝟺 𝑎𝑛𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝟷𝟸,𝟺%, 𝑒𝑚 𝟷𝟿𝟿𝟿, 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝟺𝟺,𝟺%, 𝑒𝑚 𝟸𝟶𝟸𝟸) 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑡𝑒𝑚 𝑐𝑜𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑝𝑜𝑛𝑑𝑖𝑑𝑜 𝑎 𝑢𝑚 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑔𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑜 𝑟𝑒𝑙𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑜 𝑒𝑚 𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑚𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑑𝑢𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝑝𝑜𝑟 𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑔𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒, 𝑠𝑒𝑔𝑢𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑜 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑢𝑑𝑜 𝑑𝑎 𝐹𝐸𝑃, 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑏𝑎𝑠𝑒 𝑒𝑚 𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑜 𝐸𝑢𝑟𝑜𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑡, 𝑝𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑜𝑢 𝑑𝑒 𝟽𝟼,𝟸% 𝑑𝑎 𝑚𝑒́𝑑𝑖𝑎 𝑑𝑎 𝑈𝐸 𝑒𝑚 𝟷𝟿𝟿𝟿 (𝟷𝟽.ª 𝑝𝑜𝑠𝑖𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜) 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝟽𝟺,𝟽% 𝑒𝑚 𝟸𝟶𝟸𝟸 (𝟸𝟺.ª 𝑝𝑜𝑠𝑖𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜, 𝑜𝑢 𝑠𝑒𝑗𝑎, 𝑎 𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑟𝑡𝑎 𝑝𝑖𝑜𝑟), 𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑒𝑚 𝑃𝑃𝐶.
𝑂𝑢 𝑠𝑒𝑗𝑎, 𝑒𝑚𝑏𝑜𝑟𝑎 𝑜 𝑎𝑣𝑎𝑛𝑐̧𝑜 𝑛𝑎 𝑒𝑑𝑢𝑐𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑠𝑒𝑗𝑎 𝑐𝑟𝑢𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑙 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑎 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑑𝑢𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒, 𝑜 𝑐𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑐𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜 𝑒𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑜́𝑚𝑖𝑐𝑜 𝑒 𝑜 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑔𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑜 𝑑𝑜 𝑛𝑖́𝑣𝑒𝑙 𝑑𝑒 𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑎 𝑒 𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑒𝑛𝑣𝑜𝑙𝑣𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜, 𝑒𝑚 𝑃𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑢𝑔𝑎𝑙 𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑡𝑒𝑚 𝑎𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑐𝑖𝑑𝑜 𝑎𝑜 𝑟𝑖𝑡𝑚𝑜 𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑜𝑢𝑡𝑟𝑜𝑠 𝑝𝑎𝑖́𝑠𝑒𝑠 𝑑𝑎 𝑈𝐸, 𝑓𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑡𝑟𝑎́𝑠 𝑓𝑎𝑐𝑒 𝑎̀ 𝑚𝑒́𝑑𝑖𝑎, 𝑝𝑒𝑙𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 ℎ𝑎𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑎́ 𝑚𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑓𝑎𝑡𝑜𝑟𝑒𝑠 𝑎 𝑒𝑥𝑝𝑙𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑟 𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑒 𝑎𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑥𝑜. 𝐴 𝑒𝑙𝑒𝑣𝑎𝑑𝑎 𝑓𝑖𝑠𝑐𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝑠𝑒𝑟𝑎́ 𝑢𝑚 𝑑𝑒𝑙𝑒𝑠 - 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑏𝑢𝑖𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑎 𝑒𝑚𝑖𝑔𝑟𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑏𝑜𝑎 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑡𝑒 𝑑𝑜 𝑡𝑎𝑙𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜 𝑐𝑎́ 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑑𝑢𝑧𝑖𝑑𝑜 -, 𝑚𝑎𝑠 ℎ𝑎́ 𝑜𝑢𝑡𝑟𝑜𝑠, 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑜 𝑎 𝑎𝑖𝑛𝑑𝑎 𝑖𝑛𝑠𝑢𝑓𝑖𝑐𝑖𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑙𝑖𝑔𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑒 𝑎 𝐴𝑐𝑎𝑑𝑒𝑚𝑖𝑎 𝑒 𝑜 𝑚𝑒𝑖𝑜 𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑎𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑙, 𝑏𝑒𝑚 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑜 𝑎 𝑏𝑎𝑖𝑥𝑎 𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑝𝑜𝑙𝑖́𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑠 𝑒 𝑖𝑛𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑡𝑢𝑖𝑐̧𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑒𝑚 𝑔𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑙.
𝐴 𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑒 𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑝𝑒𝑖𝑡𝑜, 𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑎́𝑟𝑖𝑜 𝑝𝑜𝑙𝑖́𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑜 𝑎𝑡𝑎𝑐𝑎 𝑝𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑜𝑎𝑙𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑜 𝑑𝑖𝑟𝑒𝑡𝑜𝑟 𝑑𝑎 𝐹𝐸𝑃, 𝑎𝑙𝑒𝑔𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑜 (𝑑𝑒 𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑚𝑎 𝑝𝑜𝑢𝑐𝑜 𝑒𝑙𝑒𝑔𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑒) 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑟 𝑒𝑛𝑣𝑜𝑙𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑜 𝑒𝑛𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑜 𝑒𝑠𝑝𝑒𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑎 𝑒𝑚 𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑏𝑎𝑙ℎ𝑜𝑠 𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑜́𝑟𝑖𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑜 𝑃𝑆𝐷 𝑛𝑜 𝑎̂𝑚𝑏𝑖𝑡𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑟𝑒𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑚𝑎 𝑓𝑖𝑠𝑐𝑎𝑙, 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑜 𝑠𝑒 𝑖𝑠𝑠𝑜 𝑓𝑜𝑠𝑠𝑒 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑒𝑠𝑝𝑒́𝑐𝑖𝑒 𝑑𝑒 "𝑝𝑒𝑐𝑎𝑑𝑜" 𝑒 𝑜𝑠 𝑎𝑐𝑎𝑑𝑒́𝑚𝑖𝑐𝑜𝑠 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑒𝑣𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑚 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑏𝑢𝑖𝑟 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑜 𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑒𝑛ℎ𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑝𝑜𝑙𝑖́𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑠 𝑝𝑢́𝑏𝑙𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑠 𝑒 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑐𝑢𝑟𝑎𝑟 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑟 - 𝑜𝑢 𝑠𝑒𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑟 𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑓𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑟 - 𝑎 𝑓𝑟𝑎𝑐𝑎 𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑝𝑜𝑙𝑖́𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑠 𝑒 𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑖𝑛𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑡𝑢𝑖𝑐̧𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑒𝑚 𝑃𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑢𝑔𝑎𝑙, 𝑢𝑚 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑏𝑙𝑒𝑚𝑎 𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑓𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑒𝑚 𝑟𝑒𝑙𝑎𝑡𝑜́𝑟𝑖𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑜𝑟𝑔𝑎𝑛𝑖𝑧𝑎𝑐̧𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑛𝑎𝑐𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑖𝑠, 𝑝𝑒𝑛𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑧𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑜 𝑛𝑜𝑠𝑠𝑜 𝑐𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑐𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜 𝑒𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑜́𝑚𝑖𝑐𝑜 𝑒 𝑛𝑖́𝑣𝑒𝑙 𝑑𝑒 𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑎 𝑟𝑒𝑙𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑜.
𝑃𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑓𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑧𝑎𝑟, 𝑢𝑠𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑎 𝑚𝑒𝑠𝑚𝑎 𝑎𝑛𝑎𝑙𝑜𝑔𝑖𝑎 𝑑𝑎 𝑛𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑎 𝑝𝑜𝑙𝑖́𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑜-𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑡𝑖𝑑𝑎́𝑟𝑖𝑎, 𝑑𝑒 𝑞𝑢𝑒 "𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑠𝑒 𝑝𝑜𝑑𝑒 𝑠𝑖𝑚𝑝𝑙𝑒𝑠𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑟 𝑃𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑢𝑔𝑎𝑙 𝑒 𝑎 𝑅𝑜𝑚𝑒́𝑛𝑖𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑚 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑠𝑎𝑝𝑎𝑡𝑜𝑠", 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑒 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑓𝑜𝑖 𝑎 𝑝𝑟𝑜́𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑎 𝑛𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑎 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑎 𝑑𝑒𝑏𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑟 "𝑠𝑎𝑝𝑎𝑡𝑜𝑠", 𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑠 𝑎𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑐̧𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑎𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑒 𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑙𝑜𝑐𝑎𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑑𝑜 𝑎̂𝑚𝑏𝑖𝑡𝑜 𝑑𝑜 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑢𝑑𝑜, 𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑒𝑛𝑣𝑖𝑒𝑠𝑜𝑢 𝑛𝑎𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑎𝑙𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑎𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑐𝑙𝑢𝑠𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑎𝑑𝑢𝑧𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑠, 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑎𝑞𝑢𝑖 𝑝𝑒𝑑𝑎𝑔𝑜𝑔𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑠𝑒 𝑟𝑒𝑏𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑢.
* Doutorado em Economia pela Faculdade de Economia Universidade do Porto
IN "DINHEIRO VIVO" -19/10/23 .
.
Portugal bem português
XIX - O IMPÉRIO PORTUGUÊS
6- Nunca tão poucos fizeram tanto
.
* O "IMPÉRIO PORTUGUÊS" nα̃o é um documentάrıo mαs é umα montαgem de vάrıos αrquıvos hıstórıcos, nem tudo é perfeıto mαs αcredıtαmos nα serıedαde do αutor deste trαbαlho.
** Se pensa que sabe muito da História de Portugal constate também nesta série a sua enorme ignorância, não é uma crítica, é um convite.
*** Esta é uma compilação de séries pelo nosso país não apenas pelas perspectivas histórica ou social mas pela recolha de vídeos interessantes de várias origens, actividades e sensibilidades, com diferentíssimos temas que reflectem o nosso quotidiano de modo plural.
Desejamos muito que seja do vosso agrado.
..
É A ALTURA IDEAL
F4M!́1!4 83CH731
Coɴнeçα α ғαмίlια ѕecreтα
qυe eɴrιqυece cαdα dια мαιѕ,
coм ɢυerrαѕ e тrαɢédιαѕ
* 𝖤́ 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗏𝖺́𝗏𝖾𝗅 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗇𝗎𝗇𝖼𝖺 𝗍𝖾𝗇𝗁𝖺 𝗈𝗎𝗏𝗂𝖽𝗈 𝖿𝖺𝗅𝖺𝗋 𝖣𝖤𝖲𝖳𝖠 𝖥𝖠𝖬𝖨́𝖫𝖨𝖠 𝖾 𝖾𝗅𝖾𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗋𝖾𝗆 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗌𝖾𝗃𝖺 𝖤𝖷𝖠𝖳𝖠𝖬𝖤𝖭𝖳𝖤 𝖠𝖲𝖲𝖨𝖬, 𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝗍𝗋𝖺́𝗌 𝖽𝗈 𝗌𝗎𝖼𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗈 𝖾𝗑𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖾 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗁𝗂𝗌𝗍𝗈́𝗋𝗂𝖺 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝖻𝗂𝗇𝖺 𝖺 𝗂𝖽𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗂𝖿𝗂𝖼𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗈𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗍𝗎𝗇𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾𝗌, 𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗅𝖺𝖻𝗈𝗋𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝗈 𝗀𝗈𝗏𝖾𝗋𝗇𝗈 𝖾 𝖺 𝖤𝖷𝖯𝖫𝖮𝖱𝖠𝖢̧𝖠̃𝖮 𝖣𝖤 𝖦𝖴𝖤𝖱𝖱𝖠𝖲 𝖾 𝖳𝖱𝖠𝖦𝖤́𝖣𝖨𝖠𝖲 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝖺𝗎𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺𝗋 𝖺 𝖿𝗈𝗋𝗍𝗎𝗇𝖺 𝖿𝖺𝗆𝗂𝗅𝗂𝖺𝗋.
𝖰𝗎𝖾𝗆 𝖾́ 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺 𝖿𝖺𝗆𝗂́𝗅𝗂𝖺?
𝖤 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝖾𝗅𝖾𝗌 𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗌𝖿𝗈𝗋𝗆𝖺𝗋𝖺𝗆 𝗈𝗌 𝖾𝗌𝖿𝗈𝗋𝖼̧𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗎𝗆 𝗍𝗋𝖺𝖻𝖺𝗅𝗁𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗋 𝖻𝗋𝖺𝖼̧𝖺𝗅 𝖾 𝖽𝗎𝖺𝗌 𝗆𝗎𝗅𝖺𝗌, 𝖾𝗆 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗈𝗋𝖾𝗌 𝖾𝗆𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗌𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗌𝗍𝗋𝗎𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝗈 𝗆𝗎𝗇𝖽𝗈? 𝖲𝖾 𝗊𝗎𝗂𝗌𝖾𝗋 𝗌𝖺𝖻𝖾𝗋 𝖳𝖴𝖣𝖮 𝗌𝗈𝖻𝗋𝖾 𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖺 𝖥𝖠𝖲𝖢𝖨𝖭𝖠𝖭𝖳𝖤 𝗁𝗂𝗌𝗍𝗈́𝗋𝗂𝖺 𝖾 𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗇𝖽𝖾𝗋 𝖺 𝗂𝗆𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗍𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾, 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝗂𝗓𝖾𝗋 𝖲𝖴𝖲𝖯𝖤𝖨𝖳𝖠 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝗍𝗂𝖼𝗂𝗉𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝗈 𝖦𝗈𝗏𝖾𝗋𝗇𝗈 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖤𝗌𝗍𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖴𝗇𝗂𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖺 𝖿𝖺𝗆𝗂́𝗅𝗂𝖺 𝖡𝖺𝖼𝗁𝗍𝖾𝗅 𝖺𝗅𝖼𝖺𝗇𝖼̧𝖺𝗌𝗌𝖾 𝗍𝗈𝖽𝗈 𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖾 𝗌𝗎𝖼𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗈, 𝖺𝗌𝗌𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖺 𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖾 𝗏𝗂́𝖽𝖾𝗈 𝖺𝗍𝖾́ 𝗈 𝖿𝗂𝗇𝖺𝗅.
FONTE: 
.
.
.
357-NO GINÁSIO
DESAFIO ABS E AERÓBICO DE 21 DIAS
OBTENHA UMA CINTURA PEQUENA E
UMA BARRIGA CHAPADA RAPIDAMENTE
* Para quem tem boa capacidade física o exercício não é difícil, pouco menos de 20 minutos é dose 'qb' e faz suar, talvez consiga fazê-lo na totalidade, se não conseguir não tem mal nenhum, faça-o por partes.
Para obter resultados não chega uma vez, insista diariamente.
FONTE: 
Subscrever:
Mensagens (Atom)