.
28/08/2025
CARLOS BRANCO
.
As cimeiras de
Anchorage e de Washington
Zelensky e os europeus, que há um ano se preparavam afanosamente para
organizar uma conferência de paz na Suíça, sem a presença da Federação
Russa, desesperaram agora por um convite para se sentarem à mesa das
negociações, apesar de se desconhecer qualquer proposta de paz da sua
parte
𝑂𝑠 𝑢́𝑙𝑡𝑖𝑚𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑒𝑛𝑣𝑜𝑙𝑣𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜𝑠 𝑝𝑜𝑙𝜄́𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑜𝑠 𝑟𝑒𝑙𝑎𝑐𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑎 𝑔𝑢𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑎 𝑛𝑎 𝑈𝑐𝑟𝑎̂𝑛𝑖𝑎 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎̃𝑜 𝑎 𝑠𝑒𝑟 𝑚𝑎𝑟𝑐𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑝𝑒𝑙𝑎 𝑐𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑖𝑟𝑎 𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑒 𝑜𝑠 𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑠 𝐷𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑙𝑑 𝑇𝑟𝑢𝑚𝑝 𝑒 𝑉𝑙𝑎𝑑𝑖𝑚𝑖𝑟 𝑃𝑢𝑡𝑖𝑛 (𝟷𝟻 𝑑𝑒 𝑎𝑔𝑜𝑠𝑡𝑜), 𝑒𝑚 𝐴𝑛𝑐ℎ𝑜𝑟𝑎𝑔𝑒, 𝑛𝑜 𝐴𝑙𝑎𝑠𝑐𝑎, 𝑒 𝑝𝑒𝑙𝑎𝑠 𝑟𝑒𝑢𝑛𝑖𝑜̃𝑒𝑠, 𝑒𝑚 𝑊𝑎𝑠ℎ𝑖𝑛𝑔𝑡𝑜𝑛, 𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑒 𝑜𝑠 𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑠 𝑇𝑟𝑢𝑚𝑝, 𝑉𝑜𝑙𝑜𝑑𝑖𝑚𝑦𝑟 𝑍𝑒𝑙𝑒𝑛𝑠𝑘𝑦 𝑒 𝑣𝑎́𝑟𝑖𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑖𝑟𝑖𝑔𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑠 𝑒𝑢𝑟𝑜𝑝𝑒𝑢𝑠, 𝑎 𝑝𝑒𝑑𝑖𝑑𝑜 𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑠. 𝐴𝑝𝑒𝑠𝑎𝑟 𝑑𝑎 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑙𝑖𝑔𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑒 𝑜𝑠 𝑒𝑣𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜𝑠 – 𝑜𝑠 𝑠𝑒𝑔𝑢𝑛𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑒𝑐𝑜𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑚 𝑑𝑜 𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑖𝑟𝑜 – 𝑚𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑚 𝑠𝑒𝑟 𝑎𝑛𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑠𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑠𝑒𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑑𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒.
𝑂 𝑎𝑚𝑏𝑖𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑎𝑜 𝑟𝑒𝑑𝑜𝑟 𝑑𝑎 𝑐𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑖𝑟𝑎 𝑛𝑜 𝐴𝑙𝑎𝑠𝑐𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑠𝑡𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑜 𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑡𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑂𝑏𝑎𝑚𝑎 𝑒 𝑑𝑒 𝐵𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑛. 𝐴𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑚𝑜𝑠 𝑎̀𝑠 𝑑𝑢𝑎𝑠 𝑚𝑎𝑖𝑜𝑟𝑒𝑠 𝑝𝑜𝑡𝑒̂𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑠 𝑛𝑢𝑐𝑙𝑒𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑠 𝑑𝑜 𝑚𝑢𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑎 𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑚 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑏𝑒𝑙𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑟 𝑢𝑚 𝑐𝑙𝑖𝑚𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑓𝑖𝑎𝑛𝑐̧𝑎 𝑚𝑢́𝑡𝑢𝑎. 𝐴 𝑅𝑢́𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑎 𝑓𝑜𝑖 𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑜𝑛ℎ𝑒𝑐𝑖𝑑𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑜 𝑢𝑚 𝑝𝑎𝑟 𝑝𝑒𝑙𝑜𝑠 𝐸𝑈𝐴, 𝑎𝑏𝑟𝑖𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑎𝑠 𝑝𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑎𝑠 𝑎 𝑢𝑚 𝑛𝑜𝑣𝑜 𝑐𝑖𝑐𝑙𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑑𝑖𝑎́𝑙𝑜𝑔𝑜 𝑒 𝑑𝑒 𝑛𝑜𝑟𝑚𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑧𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑟𝑒𝑙𝑎𝑐̧𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑑𝑖𝑝𝑙𝑜𝑚𝑎́𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑠 𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑒 𝑜𝑠 𝐸𝑈𝐴 𝑒 𝑎 𝑅𝑢́𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑎 𝑏𝑎𝑠𝑒𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑒𝑚 𝑟𝑒𝑢𝑛𝑖𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑎𝑙𝑡𝑜 𝑛𝜄́𝑣𝑒𝑙, 𝑒𝑚 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑃𝑢𝑡𝑖𝑛 𝑓𝑜𝑖 𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑏𝑖𝑑𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑜 𝑢𝑚 𝑖𝑔𝑢𝑎𝑙.
𝑂 𝐴𝑙𝑎𝑠𝑐𝑎 𝑝𝑜𝑑𝑒𝑟𝑎́ 𝑡𝑒𝑟 𝑠𝑖𝑑𝑜 𝑜 𝑖𝑛𝜄́𝑐𝑖𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑛𝑜𝑣𝑎 𝑎𝑏𝑜𝑟𝑑𝑎𝑔𝑒𝑚 𝑎𝑜 𝑑𝑒𝑏𝑎𝑡𝑒 𝑠𝑜𝑏𝑟𝑒 𝑎 “𝑖𝑛𝑑𝑖𝑣𝑖𝑠𝑖𝑏𝑖𝑙𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝑑𝑎 𝑠𝑒𝑔𝑢𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑐̧𝑎”. 𝑃𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑔𝑜𝑠𝑡𝑜 𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑒𝑢𝑟𝑜𝑝𝑒𝑢𝑠, 𝑇𝑟𝑢𝑚𝑝 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑛ℎ𝑜𝑢 𝑛𝑎 𝑝𝑜𝑙𝜄́𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑜𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑐𝑖𝑧𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑀𝑜𝑠𝑐𝑜𝑣𝑜 𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑑𝑎 𝑝𝑒𝑙𝑜 𝑠𝑒𝑢 𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑜𝑟. 𝑁𝑎̃𝑜 𝑝𝑜𝑟 𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑐𝑒𝑖𝑡𝑜, 𝑚𝑎𝑠 𝑝𝑜𝑟 𝑛𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒.
𝑃𝑒𝑟𝑐𝑒𝑏𝑒𝑢 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑎 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑒́𝑔𝑖𝑎 𝑑𝑎 𝐴𝑑𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑜𝑟 𝑠𝑒 𝑡𝑖𝑛ℎ𝑎 𝑡𝑜𝑟𝑛𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑖𝑛𝑠𝑢𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑎́𝑣𝑒𝑙. 𝑁𝑎̃𝑜 𝑠𝑜́ 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑑𝑢𝑧𝑖𝑢 𝑎̀ 𝑡𝑎̃𝑜 𝑎𝑙𝑚𝑒𝑗𝑎𝑑𝑎 𝑑𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑜𝑡𝑎 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑒́𝑔𝑖𝑐𝑎 𝑑𝑎 𝑅𝑢́𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑎, 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑜 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎́ 𝑙𝑜𝑛𝑔𝑒 𝑑𝑒 𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑒𝑔𝑢𝑖𝑟, 𝑠𝑜𝑛ℎ𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑜𝑠 𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑐𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑖𝑟𝑖𝑔𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑠 𝑒𝑢𝑟𝑜𝑝𝑒𝑢𝑠 𝑎𝑖𝑛𝑑𝑎 𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑚, 𝑑𝑒𝑝𝑜𝑖𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝟷𝟾 𝑖𝑛𝑒𝑓𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑧𝑒𝑠 𝑝𝑎𝑐𝑜𝑡𝑒𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑠𝑎𝑛𝑐̧𝑜̃𝑒𝑠. 𝐸́ 𝑑𝑜 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑒 𝑑𝑎 𝐴𝑚𝑒́𝑟𝑖𝑐𝑎 𝑜𝑏𝑡𝑒𝑟 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑠𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑓𝑙𝑖𝑡𝑜. 𝑁𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑒 𝑐𝑎́𝑙𝑐𝑢𝑙𝑜, 𝑇𝑟𝑢𝑚𝑝 𝑠𝑎𝑏𝑒, 𝑒𝑚𝑏𝑜𝑟𝑎 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑜 𝑑𝑖𝑔𝑎, 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑜𝑠 𝐸𝑈𝐴 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑖𝑠𝑝𝑜̃𝑒𝑚 𝑑𝑎 𝑐𝑎𝑝𝑎𝑐𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝑒 𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑢𝑟𝑠𝑜𝑠 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑚 𝑛𝑜 𝑝𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑎𝑑𝑜. 𝑃𝑜𝑟 𝑖𝑠𝑠𝑜, 𝑎 𝐴𝑚𝑒́𝑟𝑖𝑐𝑎 𝑡𝑒𝑚 𝑑𝑒 𝑣𝑜𝑙𝑡𝑎𝑟 𝑎 𝑠𝑒𝑟 𝑔𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑒 𝑜𝑢𝑡𝑟𝑎 𝑣𝑒𝑧, 𝑝𝑜𝑟𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑑𝑒𝑖𝑥𝑜𝑢 𝑑𝑒 𝑜 𝑠𝑒𝑟, 𝑝𝑜𝑟 𝑒𝑛𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑜. 𝑇𝑟𝑢𝑚𝑝 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎́ 𝑐𝑖𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑑𝑒 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑒́ 𝑡𝑎̃𝑜 𝑝𝑜𝑑𝑒𝑟𝑜𝑠𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑜 𝑎𝑙𝑎𝑟𝑑𝑒𝑖𝑎 𝑝𝑢𝑏𝑙𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒.
𝑆𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑎 𝑖𝑛𝑔𝑒𝑛𝑢𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑐𝑙𝑢𝑖𝑟 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑜𝑠 𝐸𝑈𝐴 𝑎𝑏𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑚 𝑜 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑗𝑒𝑡𝑜 𝑑𝑎 𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑚𝑎𝑧𝑖𝑎 𝑔𝑙𝑜𝑏𝑎𝑙. 𝐶𝑜𝑚𝑜 𝑎𝑙𝑔𝑢𝑒́𝑚 𝑎𝑓𝑖𝑟𝑚𝑜𝑢, “𝑜 𝑠𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑚𝑎 𝑓𝑢𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑎, 𝑙𝑒𝑖𝑎-𝑠𝑒 𝑜 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑓𝑢𝑛𝑑𝑜, 𝑖𝑛𝑑𝑒𝑝𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑑𝑒 𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑚 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎́ 𝑛𝑎 𝐶𝑎𝑠𝑎 𝐵𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑐𝑎”. 𝑃𝑒𝑟𝑚𝑎𝑛𝑒𝑐𝑒 𝑛𝑜 𝑎𝑟 𝑎𝑡𝑒́ 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑝𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑜 𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑒 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑗𝑒𝑡𝑜 𝑓𝑜𝑖 𝑎𝑏𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑑𝑒𝑝𝑜𝑖𝑠 𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑠 𝑎𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑐𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜𝑠 𝑛𝑜 𝐶𝑎́𝑢𝑐𝑎𝑠𝑜 𝑑𝑜 𝑆𝑢𝑙, 𝑒 𝑑𝑎 𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑢𝑚 𝑎𝑐𝑜𝑟𝑑𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑛𝑐𝜄́𝑝𝑖𝑜𝑠, 𝑟𝑒𝑙𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑎𝑜 𝑓𝑢𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑜 𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑟𝑒𝑙𝑎𝑐̧𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑒 𝑎 𝐴𝑟𝑚𝑒́𝑛𝑖𝑎 𝑒 𝑜 𝐴𝑧𝑒𝑟𝑏𝑎𝑖𝑗𝑎̃𝑜, 𝑚𝑒𝑑𝑖𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑝𝑜𝑟 𝑇𝑟𝑢𝑚𝑝.
𝑇𝑟𝑢𝑚𝑝 𝑠𝑎𝑏𝑖𝑎 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑎 𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑎𝑐̧𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑡𝑎𝑟𝑖𝑓𝑎𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑎 𝑎 𝑅𝑢́𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑎 𝑒 𝑜𝑠 𝑝𝑎𝜄́𝑠𝑒𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑀𝑜𝑠𝑐𝑜𝑣𝑜 𝑚𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑒́𝑚 𝑟𝑒𝑙𝑎𝑐̧𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑒𝑟𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑖𝑠, 𝑢𝑡𝑖𝑙𝑖𝑧𝑎𝑑𝑎 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑐𝑎𝑙𝑎𝑟 𝑜𝑠 𝑛𝑒𝑜𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠 𝑟𝑒𝑝𝑢𝑏𝑙𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑛𝑜𝑠, 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑒𝑟𝑎 𝑒𝑥𝑒𝑞𝑢𝜄́𝑣𝑒𝑙. 𝐴 𝑚𝑎𝑟𝑐𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑎 𝑐𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑖𝑟𝑎 𝑛𝑜 𝐴𝑙𝑎𝑠𝑐𝑎 𝑓𝑜𝑖 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑓𝑢𝑔𝑎 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑎 𝑓𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑙𝑖𝑔𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒, 𝑓𝑢𝑟𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑜-𝑠𝑒 𝑎 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑑𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑜𝑡𝑎 ℎ𝑢𝑚𝑖𝑙ℎ𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑒. 𝑇𝑟𝑢𝑚𝑝 𝑠𝑎𝑏𝑖𝑎 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑀𝑜𝑠𝑐𝑜𝑣𝑜 𝑖𝑎 𝑓𝑎𝑧𝑒𝑟 𝑜𝑢𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑚𝑒𝑟𝑐𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑟 𝑎̀𝑠 𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑎𝑐̧𝑎𝑠, 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑜 𝑜 𝑓𝑒𝑧. 𝑃𝑢𝑡𝑖𝑛 𝑒𝑛𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑣𝑎-𝑠𝑒 𝑛𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑠𝑖𝑡𝑢𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑓𝑎𝑣𝑜𝑟𝑎́𝑣𝑒𝑙.
𝐸𝑠𝑡𝑎̃𝑜 𝑎𝑖𝑛𝑑𝑎 𝑝𝑜𝑟 𝑐𝑜𝑛ℎ𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑟 𝑜𝑠 𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑢𝑛𝑡𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑖𝑠𝑐𝑢𝑡𝑖𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑛𝑎 𝑐𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑖𝑟𝑎. 𝐴 𝑔𝑢𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑎 𝑛𝑎 𝑈𝑐𝑟𝑎̂𝑛𝑖𝑎 𝑓𝑜𝑖 𝑎𝑝𝑒𝑛𝑎𝑠 𝑢𝑚 𝑑𝑒𝑙𝑒𝑠. 𝑁𝑎̃𝑜 𝑠𝑒 𝑠𝑎𝑏𝑒 𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑙 𝑓𝑜𝑖 𝑜 𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑒𝑛ℎ𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑇𝑟𝑢𝑚𝑝 𝑛𝑎 𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑒𝑔𝑜𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑜 𝑁𝑜𝑣𝑜 𝑇𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑆𝑇𝐴𝑅𝑇 𝑒 𝑑𝑒 𝑜𝑢𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑠 𝑎𝑐̧𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑛𝑜 𝑎̂𝑚𝑏𝑖𝑡𝑜 𝑑𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑜𝑙𝑜 𝑑𝑜 𝑎𝑟𝑚𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜 𝑛𝑢𝑐𝑙𝑒𝑎𝑟, 𝑜𝑢 𝑎 𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑝𝑜𝑠𝑡𝑎 𝑎̀ 𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑙𝑜𝑐𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑎𝑟𝑚𝑎𝑠 𝑛𝑢𝑐𝑙𝑒𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑠 𝑛𝑎 𝐸𝑢𝑟𝑜𝑝𝑎, 𝑒𝑚 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑢𝑙𝑎𝑟 𝑛𝑜 𝑅𝑒𝑖𝑛𝑜 𝑈𝑛𝑖𝑑𝑜, 𝑑𝑒 𝑜𝑛𝑑𝑒 𝑡𝑖𝑛ℎ𝑎𝑚 𝑠𝑖𝑑𝑜 𝑟𝑒𝑡𝑖𝑟𝑎𝑑𝑎𝑠 ℎ𝑎́ 𝟷𝟻 𝑎𝑛𝑜𝑠.
𝐴𝑖𝑛𝑑𝑎 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑎𝑚 𝑢𝑙𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑝𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑜𝑠 𝑣𝑎́𝑟𝑖𝑜𝑠 𝑖𝑟𝑟𝑖𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑠 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑡𝑒̂𝑚 𝑣𝑖𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑎 𝑖𝑛𝑞𝑢𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑟 𝑎𝑠 𝑟𝑒𝑙𝑎𝑐̧𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑒 𝑎𝑠 𝑑𝑢𝑎𝑠 𝑝𝑜𝑡𝑒̂𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑠, 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑜 𝑠𝑒𝑗𝑎 𝑎 𝑗𝑎́ 𝑎𝑐𝑜𝑟𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑎 𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑡𝑢𝑖𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑜 𝑖𝑚𝑜𝑏𝑖𝑙𝑖𝑎́𝑟𝑖𝑜 𝑟𝑢𝑠𝑠𝑜 𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑝𝑒𝑙𝑎 𝐴𝑑𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝐵𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑛. 𝐸 𝑡𝑎𝑚𝑏𝑒́𝑚 𝑜 𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑛𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑎́𝑟𝑖𝑜 𝑒 𝑖𝑛𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑣𝑒𝑛𝑖𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑎𝑛𝑢́𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑜 𝑑𝑜 𝑔𝑒𝑛𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑙 𝐶ℎ𝑟𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑜𝑝ℎ𝑒𝑟 𝐷𝑜𝑛𝑎ℎ𝑢𝑒, 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑑𝑜 𝐸𝑥𝑒́𝑟𝑐𝑖𝑡𝑜 𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝐸𝑈𝐴 𝑛𝑎 𝐸𝑢𝑟𝑜𝑝𝑎 𝑒 𝐴́𝑓𝑟𝑖𝑐𝑎, 𝑑𝑎 𝑒𝑥𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑒̂𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑢𝑚 𝑝𝑙𝑎𝑛𝑜 𝑑𝑎 𝑁𝐴𝑇𝑂 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑡𝑜𝑚𝑎𝑟 𝑟𝑎𝑝𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑜 𝑒𝑥𝑐𝑙𝑎𝑣𝑒 𝑟𝑢𝑠𝑠𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝐾𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑛𝑖𝑛𝑔𝑟𝑎𝑑𝑜, 𝑛𝑜 𝑚𝑜𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜 𝑒𝑚 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑠𝑒 𝑒𝑛𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑚 𝑒𝑚 𝑐𝑢𝑟𝑠𝑜 𝑖𝑛𝑖𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑎𝑠 𝑑𝑖𝑝𝑙𝑜𝑚𝑎́𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑠 𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑎𝑛𝑢𝑣𝑖𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑟𝑎𝑠 𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑟𝑒𝑙𝑎𝑐̧𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑝𝑜𝑙𝜄́𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑠 𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑒 𝑎𝑠 𝑑𝑢𝑎𝑠 𝑚𝑎𝑖𝑜𝑟𝑒𝑠 𝑝𝑜𝑡𝑒̂𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑠 𝑛𝑢𝑐𝑙𝑒𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑠 𝑑𝑜 𝑝𝑙𝑎𝑛𝑒𝑡𝑎.
𝐷𝑎 𝑐𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑖𝑟𝑎 𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑎𝑙𝑡𝑜𝑢 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑐𝑙𝑎𝑟𝑖𝑓𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑎 𝑝𝑜𝑠𝑖𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑇𝑟𝑢𝑚𝑝 𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑜 𝑎𝑜 𝑓𝑢𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑜 𝑑𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑓𝑙𝑖𝑡𝑜: 𝑜 𝑎𝑐𝑜𝑟𝑑𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑝𝑎𝑧 𝑑𝑒𝑣𝑒 𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑑𝑒𝑟 𝑜 𝑐𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑎𝑟-𝑓𝑜𝑔𝑜; 𝑎𝑐𝑒𝑖𝑡𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑙𝑖𝑛ℎ𝑎𝑠 𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑚𝑒𝑙ℎ𝑎𝑠 𝑟𝑢𝑠𝑠𝑎𝑠, 𝑒𝑚 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑢𝑙𝑎𝑟, 𝑎𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑙𝑎𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑖𝑚𝑝𝑙𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑐̧𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑠𝑒𝑐𝑢𝑟𝑖𝑡𝑎́𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑠. 𝐸𝑚 𝑓𝑢𝑛𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑖𝑠𝑠𝑜, 𝑇𝑟𝑢𝑚𝑝 𝑐𝑜𝑙𝑜𝑐𝑜𝑢 𝑒𝑚 𝑍𝑒𝑙𝑒𝑛𝑠𝑘𝑦 𝑜 𝑜́𝑛𝑢𝑠 𝑑𝑎 𝑝𝑎𝑧, 𝑐𝑎𝑠𝑜 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑐𝑒𝑑𝑎 𝑎̀𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑑𝑖𝑐̧𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑟𝑢𝑠𝑠𝑎𝑠. 𝐴 𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑖𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑢𝑎 𝑣𝑎́𝑙𝑖𝑑𝑎 𝑚𝑒𝑠𝑚𝑜 𝑑𝑒𝑝𝑜𝑖𝑠 𝑑𝑎 𝑟𝑒𝑢𝑛𝑖𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑇𝑟𝑢𝑚𝑝 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑍𝑒𝑙𝑒𝑛𝑠𝑘𝑦, 𝑛𝑎 𝐶𝑎𝑠𝑎 𝐵𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑐𝑎 (𝟷𝟾 𝑑𝑒 𝑎𝑔𝑜𝑠𝑡𝑜). 𝑇𝑟𝑢𝑚𝑝 𝑎𝑏𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑜𝑛𝑜𝑢 𝑜 𝑝𝑙𝑎𝑛𝑜 𝑑𝑜 𝑔𝑒𝑛𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑙 𝐾𝑒𝑖𝑡ℎ 𝐾𝑒𝑙𝑙𝑜𝑔𝑔 𝑒 𝑎𝑠 𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑎𝑐̧𝑎𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑠𝑎𝑛𝑐̧𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑎 𝑀𝑜𝑠𝑐𝑜𝑣𝑜.
𝐴𝑙𝑔𝑢𝑛𝑠 𝑎𝑛𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑠 𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑜𝑟𝑖𝑧𝑎𝑚 𝑎 𝑖𝑚𝑝𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑎̂𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑎 𝑑𝑎 𝑐𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑖𝑟𝑎 𝑑𝑒𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑜 𝑎̀ 𝑎𝑢𝑠𝑒̂𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑢𝑚 𝑎𝑐𝑜𝑟𝑑𝑜 𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑚𝑎𝑙, 𝑓𝑎𝑧𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑣𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑎 𝑔𝑟𝑜𝑠𝑠𝑎 𝑎̀𝑠 𝑑𝑒𝑐𝑙𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑐̧𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑇𝑟𝑢𝑚𝑝 𝑟𝑒𝑙𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑎̀ 𝑎𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑎 𝑈𝑐𝑟𝑎̂𝑛𝑖𝑎 𝑎̀ 𝑁𝐴𝑇𝑂, 𝑎𝑜 𝑎𝑏𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑜𝑛𝑜 𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑖𝑙𝑢𝑠𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝐾𝑖𝑒𝑣 𝑎𝑖𝑛𝑑𝑎 𝑚𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑒́𝑚 𝑟𝑒𝑙𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑎̀ 𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑢𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑎 𝐶𝑟𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑖𝑎 𝑒 𝑑𝑒 𝑜𝑢𝑡𝑟𝑜𝑠 𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑖𝑡𝑜́𝑟𝑖𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑜 𝐷𝑜𝑛𝑏𝑎𝑠𝑠, 𝑒𝑚 𝑙𝑖𝑛ℎ𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑜𝑠 𝑜𝑏𝑗𝑒𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑀𝑜𝑠𝑐𝑜𝑣𝑜, 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑝𝑜𝑑𝑒𝑚, 𝑑𝑒 𝑚𝑜𝑑𝑜 𝑎𝑙𝑔𝑢𝑚, 𝑠𝑒𝑟 𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑑𝑎𝑠. 𝐺𝑎𝑛ℎ𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑚 𝑎𝑖𝑛𝑑𝑎 𝑚𝑎𝑖𝑜𝑟 𝑟𝑒𝑙𝑒𝑣𝑎̂𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑎 𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑎𝑚 𝑟𝑒𝑝𝑒𝑡𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑠𝑒𝑚𝑎𝑛𝑎 𝑚𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑡𝑎𝑟𝑑𝑒 𝑒𝑚 𝑊𝑎𝑠ℎ𝑖𝑛𝑔𝑡𝑜𝑛, 𝑎 𝑍𝑒𝑙𝑒𝑛𝑠𝑘𝑦 𝑒 𝑎𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑖𝑟𝑖𝑔𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑠 𝑒𝑢𝑟𝑜𝑝𝑒𝑢𝑠 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑜 𝑎𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑎𝑛ℎ𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑚, 𝑎𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑇𝑟𝑢𝑚𝑝 𝑠𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑒𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝑛𝑎𝑠 𝑠𝑢𝑎𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑣𝑖𝑐𝑐̧𝑜̃𝑒𝑠.
𝐷𝑒𝑝𝑜𝑖𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑟𝑒𝑢𝑛𝑖𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑒𝑚𝑏𝑎𝑖𝑥𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑟𝑒𝑠 𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝟸𝟽 𝑝𝑎𝜄́𝑠𝑒𝑠 𝑑𝑎 𝑈𝑛𝑖𝑎̃𝑜 𝐸𝑢𝑟𝑜𝑝𝑒𝑖𝑎 (𝑈𝐸), 𝑛𝑜 𝑖𝑛𝜄́𝑐𝑖𝑜 𝑑𝑎 𝑚𝑎𝑛ℎ𝑎̃ 𝑑𝑒 𝟷𝟼 𝑑𝑒 𝑎𝑔𝑜𝑠𝑡𝑜, 𝑎 𝑈𝐸 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑓𝑜𝑖 𝑐𝑎𝑝𝑎𝑧 𝑑𝑒 𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑟 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑑𝑒𝑐𝑙𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑗𝑢𝑛𝑡𝑎 𝑠𝑜𝑏𝑟𝑒 𝑎 𝑐𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑖𝑟𝑎. 𝐸𝑚 𝑣𝑒𝑧 𝑑𝑖𝑠𝑠𝑜, 𝑜𝑠 𝑙𝜄́𝑑𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑐𝑖𝑛𝑐𝑜 𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝟸𝟽 𝐸𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑠-𝑚𝑒𝑚𝑏𝑟𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑎 𝑈𝐸 𝑒 𝑑𝑜 𝑅𝑒𝑖𝑛𝑜 𝑈𝑛𝑖𝑑𝑜 – 𝑒𝑚𝑖𝑡𝑖𝑟𝑎𝑚 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑑𝑒𝑐𝑙𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜, 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑎 𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑑𝑎 𝐶𝑜𝑚𝑖𝑠𝑠𝑎̃𝑜 𝐸𝑢𝑟𝑜𝑝𝑒𝑖𝑎 𝑈𝑟𝑠𝑢𝑙𝑎 𝑣𝑜𝑛 𝑑𝑒𝑟 𝐿𝑒𝑦𝑒𝑛 𝑝𝑢𝑏𝑙𝑖𝑐𝑜𝑢 𝑛𝑜 𝑋, 𝑒𝑚 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑟𝑒𝑖𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑣𝑎 𝑜 𝑑𝑖𝑠𝑐𝑢𝑟𝑠𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑛ℎ𝑒𝑐𝑖𝑑𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝐵𝑟𝑢𝑥𝑒𝑙𝑎𝑠 𝑠𝑒𝑚 𝑎𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑟 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑝𝑜𝑠𝑡𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑝𝑎𝑧.
𝐴 𝑐𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑖𝑟𝑎 𝑣𝑒𝑖𝑜 𝑖𝑔𝑢𝑎𝑙𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑒𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑟 𝑜 𝑐𝑎𝑚𝑖𝑛ℎ𝑜 𝑑𝑎 𝑗𝑢𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑐̧𝑎 𝑝𝑒𝑛𝑎𝑙 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑛𝑎𝑐𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑙 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑎 𝑖𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑙𝑒𝑣𝑎̂𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑎. 𝐸𝑠𝑡𝑎́ 𝑎 𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑑𝑒𝑟 𝑒𝑓𝑖𝑐𝑎́𝑐𝑖𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑜 𝑓𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑚𝑎𝑛𝑜𝑏𝑟𝑎 𝑝𝑜𝑙𝜄́𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑎 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑝𝑒𝑛𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑧𝑎𝑟 𝑙𝜄́𝑑𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑠 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑛ℎ𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑎𝑠 𝑝𝑜𝑙𝜄́𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑠 𝑑𝑜 𝑂𝑐𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒. 𝐴𝑝𝑒𝑠𝑎𝑟 𝑑𝑒 𝑎 𝑅𝑢́𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑎 𝑒 𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝐸𝑈𝐴 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑠𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑚 𝑠𝑖𝑔𝑛𝑎𝑡𝑎́𝑟𝑖𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑜 𝐴𝑐𝑜𝑟𝑑𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑅𝑜𝑚𝑎, 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑒𝑖𝑥𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑠𝑒𝑟 𝑠𝑖𝑔𝑛𝑖𝑓𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑜 𝑜 𝑓𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑚𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑢𝑚 𝑙𝜄́𝑑𝑒𝑟 𝑖𝑛𝑑𝑖𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑢𝑚 𝑚𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑐𝑎𝑝𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑎 𝑑𝑜 𝑇𝑃𝐼 𝑠𝑒𝑟 𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑏𝑖𝑑𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑚 ℎ𝑜𝑛𝑟𝑎𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑒 𝑝𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑎𝑑𝑒𝑖𝑟𝑎 𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑚𝑒𝑙ℎ𝑎.
𝐴𝑠 𝑟𝑒𝑢𝑛𝑖𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑛𝑎 𝐶𝑎𝑠𝑎 𝐵𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑐𝑎
𝑍𝑒𝑙𝑒𝑛𝑠𝑘𝑦 𝑒 𝑜𝑠 𝑒𝑢𝑟𝑜𝑝𝑒𝑢𝑠, 𝑞𝑢𝑒 ℎ𝑎́ 𝑢𝑚 𝑎𝑛𝑜 𝑠𝑒 𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑣𝑎𝑚 𝑎𝑓𝑎𝑛𝑜𝑠𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑜𝑟𝑔𝑎𝑛𝑖𝑧𝑎𝑟 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑓𝑒𝑟𝑒̂𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑝𝑎𝑧 𝑛𝑎 𝑆𝑢𝜄́𝑐̧𝑎, 𝑠𝑒𝑚 𝑎 𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑒𝑛𝑐̧𝑎 𝑑𝑎 𝐹𝑒𝑑𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑅𝑢𝑠𝑠𝑎, 𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑒𝑠𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑚 𝑎𝑔𝑜𝑟𝑎 𝑝𝑜𝑟 𝑢𝑚 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑣𝑖𝑡𝑒 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑠𝑒 𝑠𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑚 𝑎̀ 𝑚𝑒𝑠𝑎 𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑛𝑒𝑔𝑜𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑐̧𝑜̃𝑒𝑠, 𝑎𝑝𝑒𝑠𝑎𝑟 𝑑𝑒 𝑠𝑒 𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑐𝑜𝑛ℎ𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑟 𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑙𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑟 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑝𝑜𝑠𝑡𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑝𝑎𝑧 𝑑𝑎 𝑠𝑢𝑎 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑡𝑒, 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑜 𝑎𝑐𝑖𝑚𝑎 𝑟𝑒𝑓𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑑𝑜, 𝑚𝑒𝑠𝑚𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑎 𝑎𝑣𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑎 𝑝𝑢𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑒 𝑒𝑛𝑣𝑜𝑙𝑣𝑒𝑟 𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑐̧𝑜̃𝑒𝑠.
𝑂 𝑚𝑜𝑑𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑜 𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑎𝑚 𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑏𝑖𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑠𝑡𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑎 𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑎 𝑎 𝑃𝑢𝑡𝑖𝑛. 𝑇𝑟𝑢𝑚𝑝 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑐𝑢𝑚𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜𝑢 𝑝𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑜𝑎𝑙𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑛𝑒𝑛ℎ𝑢𝑚 𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑖𝑟𝑖𝑔𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑠 𝑒𝑢𝑟𝑜𝑝𝑒𝑢𝑠 𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑐ℎ𝑒𝑔𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑚 𝑎̀ 𝐶𝑎𝑠𝑎 𝐵𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑐𝑎. 𝑁𝑎̃𝑜 𝑠𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑠𝑓𝑒𝑖𝑡𝑜𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑜 𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑏𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑚 𝑒𝑚 𝑃𝑒𝑞𝑢𝑖𝑚, 𝑠𝑢𝑏𝑚𝑒𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑚-𝑠𝑒 𝑣𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑎 𝑢𝑚 𝑛𝑜𝑣𝑜 𝑒𝑛𝑥𝑜𝑣𝑎𝑙ℎ𝑜. 𝐹𝑜𝑟𝑎𝑚 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑝𝑜𝑠𝑖𝑡𝑎𝑑𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑏𝑖𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑝𝑜𝑟 𝑢𝑚 𝑚𝑒𝑚𝑏𝑟𝑜 𝑑𝑜 𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑓𝑓 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑙ℎ𝑒𝑠 𝑚𝑜𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑟 𝑜 𝑠𝑒𝑢 𝑝𝑎𝑝𝑒𝑙 𝑠𝑢𝑏𝑎𝑙𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑛𝑜 𝑛𝑎 𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑟𝑒𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑢𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑒𝑚 𝑐𝑢𝑟𝑠𝑜 𝑑𝑎 𝑜𝑟𝑑𝑒𝑚 𝑚𝑢𝑛𝑑𝑖𝑎𝑙.
𝑁𝑎̃𝑜 𝑠𝑒 𝑟𝑒𝑔𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑚 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑔𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑜𝑠 𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑔𝜄́𝑣𝑒𝑖𝑠 𝑛𝑎 𝑟𝑒𝑢𝑛𝑖𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑇𝑟𝑢𝑚𝑝 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑍𝑒𝑙𝑒𝑛𝑠𝑘𝑦 𝑛𝑎 𝐶𝑎𝑠𝑎 𝐵𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑐𝑎 𝑒 𝑛𝑎𝑠 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑠𝑒 𝑠𝑒𝑔𝑢𝑖𝑟𝑎𝑚 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑎 𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑒𝑛𝑐̧𝑎 𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑖𝑟𝑖𝑔𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑠 𝑒𝑢𝑟𝑜𝑝𝑒𝑢𝑠. 𝐴 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑠𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑇𝑟𝑢𝑚𝑝 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑜𝑠 𝑠𝑒𝑢𝑠 ℎ𝑜𝑚𝑜́𝑙𝑜𝑔𝑜𝑠, 𝑎𝑜 𝑣𝑖𝑣𝑜 𝑒 𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑟𝑒𝑠 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑜 𝑚𝑢𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑟, 𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑢𝑚𝑖𝑢 𝑎𝑠𝑝𝑒𝑡𝑜𝑠 𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒𝑖𝑟𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑏𝑖𝑧𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑜𝑠 𝑒 𝑝𝑎𝑡𝑒́𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑜𝑠. 𝐸𝑛𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑜 𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑖𝑟𝑖𝑔𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑠 𝑒𝑢𝑟𝑜𝑝𝑒𝑢𝑠 𝑟𝑒𝑔𝑢𝑟𝑔𝑖𝑡𝑎𝑣𝑎𝑚 𝑎𝑠 “𝑙𝑖𝑛𝑒𝑠” 𝑎𝑐𝑜𝑟𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑛𝑎𝑠 𝑟𝑒𝑢𝑛𝑖𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑜́𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑍𝑒𝑙𝑒𝑛𝑠𝑘𝑦, 𝑑𝑖𝑎𝑠 𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑠 𝑛𝑎 𝐸𝑢𝑟𝑜𝑝𝑎, 𝑇𝑟𝑢𝑚𝑝 𝑖𝑎-𝑜𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑑𝑖𝑧𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑜. 𝑂 𝑐ℎ𝑎𝑛𝑐𝑒𝑙𝑒𝑟 𝑎𝑙𝑒𝑚𝑎̃𝑜 𝐹𝑟𝑖𝑒𝑑𝑟𝑖𝑐ℎ 𝑀𝑒𝑟𝑧 𝑓𝑎𝑙𝑎𝑣𝑎 𝑛𝑎 𝑛𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝑑𝑒 𝑢𝑚 𝑐𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑎𝑟-𝑓𝑜𝑔𝑜 𝑒 𝑇𝑟𝑢𝑚𝑝 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑣𝑎-𝑜 𝑑𝑖𝑧𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑠𝑒 𝑑𝑒𝑣𝑖𝑎 𝑎𝑣𝑎𝑛𝑐̧𝑎𝑟 𝑑𝑒 𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑑𝑖𝑎𝑡𝑜 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑢𝑚 𝑎𝑐𝑜𝑟𝑑𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑝𝑎𝑧, 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑑𝑖𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑛𝑒𝑔𝑜𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑐̧𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑓𝑢𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑎𝑠. 𝐸𝑛𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑜 𝑎 𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑑𝑎 𝐶𝑜𝑚𝑖𝑠𝑠𝑎̃𝑜 𝐸𝑢𝑟𝑜𝑝𝑒𝑖𝑎 𝑈𝑟𝑠𝑢𝑙𝑎 𝑉𝑜𝑛 𝐷𝑒𝑟 𝐿𝑒𝑦𝑒𝑛 𝑚𝑜𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑣𝑎 𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑜𝑐𝑢𝑝𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑎𝑠 𝑐𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑛𝑐̧𝑎𝑠 𝑢𝑐𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑖𝑎𝑛𝑎𝑠, 𝑇𝑟𝑢𝑚𝑝 𝑖𝑛𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑚𝑎𝑣𝑎-𝑎 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑣𝑎𝑚 𝑎𝑙𝑖 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑑𝑖𝑠𝑐𝑢𝑡𝑖𝑟 𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑒 𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑢𝑛𝑡𝑜.
𝐴𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑔𝑖𝑢-𝑠𝑒 𝑜 𝑐𝑙𝜄́𝑚𝑎𝑥 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑎𝑠 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑣𝑒𝑛𝑐̧𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑑𝑜 𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑓𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑐𝑒̂𝑠 𝐸𝑚𝑚𝑎𝑛𝑢𝑒𝑙 𝑀𝑎𝑐𝑟𝑜𝑛 𝑒 𝑑𝑜 𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑓𝑖𝑛𝑙𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑒̂𝑠 𝐴𝑙𝑒𝑥𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑒𝑟 𝑆𝑡𝑢𝑏𝑏. 𝑂 𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑖𝑟𝑜 𝑜𝑏𝑐𝑒𝑐𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑝𝑜𝑟 𝑢𝑚𝑎𝑠 𝑖𝑛𝑒𝑥𝑒𝑞𝑢𝜄́𝑣𝑒𝑖𝑠 𝑔𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑎𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑠𝑒𝑔𝑢𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑐̧𝑎, 𝑎𝑑𝑣𝑜𝑔𝑎𝑣𝑎 𝑎 𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑒𝑛𝑐̧𝑎 𝑑𝑒 “𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑐̧𝑎𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑑𝑖𝑠𝑠𝑢𝑎𝑠𝑎̃𝑜” 𝑒𝑚 𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑖𝑡𝑜́𝑟𝑖𝑜 𝑢𝑐𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑖𝑎𝑛𝑜, 𝑟𝑒𝑖𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑑𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑣𝑒𝑡𝑎𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑝𝑒𝑙𝑎 𝑅𝑢́𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑎. 𝐶𝑜𝑚𝑜 𝑑𝑖𝑠𝑠𝑒 𝑜 𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑑𝑜 𝐶𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑒𝑙ℎ𝑜 𝐸𝑢𝑟𝑜𝑝𝑒𝑢 𝐴𝑛𝑡𝑜𝑛𝑖𝑜 𝐶𝑜𝑠𝑡𝑎 𝑠𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑎 𝑎𝑙𝑔𝑜 “𝑠𝑖𝑚𝑖𝑙𝑎𝑟 𝑎𝑜 𝐴𝑟𝑡.º 𝟻.º 𝑑𝑎 𝑁𝐴𝑇𝑂” 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑗𝑢𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑜𝑠 𝐸𝑈𝐴 𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑢𝑎𝑟 𝑜 𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑛𝑒𝑐𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑎𝑟𝑚𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜 𝑎 𝐾𝑖𝑒𝑣 𝑒 𝑎 𝑡𝑟𝑒𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑟 𝑎𝑠 𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑐̧𝑎𝑠 𝑎𝑟𝑚𝑎𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑢𝑐𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑖𝑎𝑛𝑎𝑠.” 𝐴 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑡𝑒 𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑛𝑎 𝑒𝑠𝑐𝑙𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑢, 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑣𝑒𝑧 𝑚𝑎𝑖𝑠, 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑛𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑟𝑎́ 𝑎𝑟𝑚𝑎𝑠 𝑛𝑒𝑚 𝑑𝑖𝑛ℎ𝑒𝑖𝑟𝑜 𝑎̀ 𝑈𝑐𝑟𝑎̂𝑛𝑖𝑎. “𝐴𝑔𝑜𝑟𝑎 𝑣𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑒𝑚𝑜𝑠-𝑙ℎ𝑒 𝑎𝑟𝑚𝑎𝑠, 𝑒 𝑜𝑠 𝑝𝑎𝜄́𝑠𝑒𝑠 𝑒𝑢𝑟𝑜𝑝𝑒𝑢𝑠 𝑝𝑎𝑔𝑎𝑚-𝑛𝑎𝑠.” 𝑆𝑒𝑔𝑢𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑎 𝑝𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑎-𝑣𝑜𝑧 𝑑𝑎 𝐶𝑎𝑠𝑎 𝐵𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑐𝑎, “𝑜𝑠 𝐸𝑈𝐴 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑒𝑛𝑣𝑖𝑎𝑟𝑎̃𝑜 𝑡𝑟𝑜𝑝𝑎𝑠 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑎 𝑈𝑐𝑟𝑎̂𝑛𝑖𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑜 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑡𝑒 𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑔𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑎𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑠𝑒𝑔𝑢𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑐̧𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑐𝑒𝑑𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑎𝑜 𝑝𝑎𝜄́𝑠.”
𝑃𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑓𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑟 𝑎𝑡𝑟𝑎́𝑠 𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑠𝑒𝑢𝑠 ℎ𝑜𝑚𝑜́𝑙𝑜𝑔𝑜𝑠, 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑑𝑖𝑧𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑡𝑢𝑑𝑜 𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑡𝑒𝑚 𝑣𝑖𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑎 𝑑𝑖𝑧𝑒𝑟 𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑠 𝑒 𝑑𝑒𝑝𝑜𝑖𝑠 𝑑𝑎 𝑟𝑒𝑢𝑛𝑖𝑎̃𝑜, 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑣𝑎𝑣𝑒𝑙𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑠𝑒𝑚 𝑡𝑒𝑟 𝑎 𝑛𝑜𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑜 𝑎𝑙𝑐𝑎𝑛𝑐𝑒 𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑠𝑢𝑎𝑠 𝑝𝑎𝑙𝑎𝑣𝑟𝑎𝑠, 𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑏𝑎𝑠𝑒 𝑛𝑎 𝑙𝑜𝑛𝑔𝑎 𝑒𝑥𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑒̂𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑟𝑒𝑙𝑎𝑐̧𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑑𝑎 𝐹𝑖𝑛𝑙𝑎̂𝑛𝑑𝑖𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑎 𝑅𝑢́𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑎, 𝑆𝑡𝑢𝑏𝑏 𝑎𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑒𝑙ℎ𝑜𝑢 𝑎 𝑈𝑐𝑟𝑎̂𝑛𝑖𝑎 𝑎 𝑠𝑒𝑔𝑢𝑖𝑟 𝑜 𝑒𝑥𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑙𝑜 𝑑𝑎 𝐹𝑖𝑛𝑙𝑎̂𝑛𝑑𝑖𝑎. 𝑆𝑒𝑚 𝑜 𝑣𝑜𝑐𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑧𝑎𝑟, 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑣𝑎 𝑎 𝑠𝑢𝑔𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑟 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑎 𝑈𝑐𝑟𝑎̂𝑛𝑖𝑎, 𝑎̀ 𝑠𝑒𝑚𝑒𝑙ℎ𝑎𝑛𝑐̧𝑎 𝑑𝑎 𝐹𝑖𝑛𝑙𝑎̂𝑛𝑑𝑖𝑎, 𝑑𝑒𝑐𝑙𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑒 𝑛𝑒𝑢𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝑒 𝑐𝑒𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑒 𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑖𝑡𝑜́𝑟𝑖𝑜𝑠, 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑜 𝑡𝑒𝑣𝑒 𝑑𝑒 𝑓𝑎𝑧𝑒𝑟 𝑒𝑚 𝟷𝟿𝟺𝟺 𝑟𝑒𝑙𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑎̀ 𝑈𝑅𝑆𝑆, 𝑑𝑒𝑝𝑜𝑖𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑡𝑒𝑟 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑏𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑑𝑜 𝑑𝑢𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑎 𝑠𝑒𝑔𝑢𝑛𝑑𝑎 𝑔𝑢𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑎 𝑚𝑢𝑛𝑑𝑖𝑎𝑙 𝑎𝑜 𝑙𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑐̧𝑎𝑠 ℎ𝑖𝑡𝑙𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑛𝑎𝑠.
𝐶𝑜𝑚𝑜 𝑜𝑏𝑠𝑒𝑟𝑣𝑜𝑢 𝑜 𝑊𝑎𝑠ℎ𝑖𝑛𝑔𝑡𝑜𝑛 𝑃𝑜𝑠𝑡, “𝑎 𝑟𝑒𝑢𝑛𝑖𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑣𝑎́𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑠 ℎ𝑜𝑟𝑎𝑠 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑒𝑙𝑖𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑜𝑢 𝑎𝑠 𝑒𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑠 𝑑𝑖𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑔𝑒̂𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑠 𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑒 𝑜𝑠 𝑙𝜄́𝑑𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑠 𝑒𝑢𝑟𝑜𝑝𝑒𝑢𝑠 𝑒 𝑇𝑟𝑢𝑚𝑝, 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑎𝑓𝑖𝑟𝑚𝑜𝑢 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑟 𝑃𝑢𝑡𝑖𝑛 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑜 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑎 𝑝𝑎𝑧 𝑒 𝑒𝑥𝑖𝑔𝑖𝑢 𝑎 𝐾𝑖𝑒𝑣 𝑎𝑚𝑝𝑙𝑎𝑠 𝑒 𝑑𝑜𝑙𝑜𝑟𝑜𝑠𝑎𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑐𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑎𝑐𝑎𝑏𝑎𝑟 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑎 𝑔𝑢𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑎”. 𝐴 𝑈𝑐𝑟𝑎̂𝑛𝑖𝑎 𝑒 𝑜𝑠 𝑠𝑒𝑢𝑠 𝑎𝑝𝑜𝑖𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑠 𝑒𝑢𝑟𝑜𝑝𝑒𝑢𝑠 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑚𝑜𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑚 𝑢𝑚 𝑚𝑖𝑙𝜄́𝑚𝑒𝑡𝑟𝑜 𝑑𝑎 𝑠𝑢𝑎 𝑝𝑜𝑠𝑖𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑖𝑛𝑖𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑙, 𝑑𝑒𝑚𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑐𝑙𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑜𝑠 𝑙𝑖𝑚𝑖𝑡𝑒𝑠 𝑑𝑎 𝑖𝑛𝑓𝑙𝑢𝑒̂𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑇𝑟𝑢𝑚𝑝.
𝑁𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑓𝑒𝑟𝑒̂𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑖𝑚𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑠𝑎, 𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑑𝑖𝑎𝑡𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑎𝑝𝑜́𝑠 𝑎𝑠 𝑟𝑒𝑢𝑛𝑖𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑜𝑠 𝑠𝑒𝑢𝑠 ℎ𝑜𝑚𝑜́𝑙𝑜𝑔𝑜𝑠, 𝑑𝑒𝑓𝑟𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑑𝑎 𝐶𝑎𝑠𝑎 𝐵𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑐𝑎, 𝑍𝑒𝑙𝑒𝑛𝑠𝑘𝑦 𝑎𝑑𝑚𝑖𝑡𝑖𝑢 𝑑𝑒𝑖𝑥𝑎𝑟 𝑐𝑎𝑖𝑟 𝑎 𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑖𝑎 𝑑𝑜 𝑐𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑎𝑟-𝑓𝑜𝑔𝑜. 𝑇𝑒𝑟𝑎́ 𝑠𝑖𝑑𝑜 𝑎 𝑢́𝑛𝑖𝑐𝑎 𝑒𝑣𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑔𝜄́𝑣𝑒𝑙. 𝐹𝑜𝑖 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑠𝑖𝑔𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑛𝑜 𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑒, 𝑛𝑜𝑚𝑒𝑎𝑑𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑒𝑚 𝑟𝑒𝑙𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑎̀ 𝑐𝑒𝑑𝑒̂𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑎 𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑖𝑡𝑜́𝑟𝑖𝑜𝑠.
𝑇𝑟𝑢𝑚𝑝 𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑟 𝑟𝑒𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑧𝑎𝑟 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑟𝑒𝑢𝑛𝑖𝑎̃𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑃𝑢𝑡𝑖𝑛 𝑒 𝑍𝑒𝑙𝑒𝑛𝑠𝑘𝑦, 𝑒𝑚 𝟸𝟸 𝑑𝑒 𝑎𝑔𝑜𝑠𝑡𝑜, 𝑚𝑎𝑠 𝑃𝑢𝑡𝑖𝑛 𝑑𝑒𝑖𝑥𝑜𝑢 𝑏𝑒𝑚 𝑐𝑙𝑎𝑟𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑠𝑜́ 𝑠𝑒 𝑟𝑒𝑢𝑛𝑖𝑟𝑎́ 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑍𝑒𝑙𝑒𝑛𝑠𝑘𝑦 𝑑𝑒𝑝𝑜𝑖𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑒𝑡𝑎𝑙ℎ𝑒𝑠 𝑑𝑎 𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑖𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑢𝑐𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑖𝑎𝑛𝑎 𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑚 𝑠𝑖𝑑𝑜 𝑎𝑐𝑜𝑟𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑠, 𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎́ 𝑙𝑜𝑛𝑔𝑒 𝑑𝑒 𝑎𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑟. 𝐴𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑑𝑖𝑐̧𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑠𝑒 𝑒𝑛𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑚 𝑎𝑖𝑛𝑑𝑎 𝑚𝑎𝑑𝑢𝑟𝑎𝑠 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝑝𝑜𝑠𝑠𝑎 𝑎𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑟. 𝑇𝑟𝑢𝑚𝑝 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎́ 𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑎𝑑𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑣𝑒𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑑𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑏𝑎𝑠𝑡𝑎 𝑟𝑒𝑢𝑛𝑖𝑟 𝑃𝑢𝑡𝑖𝑛 𝑒 𝑍𝑒𝑙𝑒𝑛𝑠𝑘𝑦 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑠𝑒 𝑐ℎ𝑒𝑔𝑎𝑟 𝑎 𝑢𝑚 𝑎𝑐𝑜𝑟𝑑𝑜,
𝑀𝑜𝑠𝑐𝑜𝑣𝑜 𝑟𝑒𝑓𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑢 𝑎 𝑝𝑜𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑏𝑖𝑙𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝑑𝑒 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑢𝑑𝑎𝑟 𝑎 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑝𝑜𝑠𝑡𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑟𝑒𝑢𝑛𝑖𝑎̃𝑜 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑞𝑢𝑒, 𝑗𝑜𝑔𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑎 𝑎𝑚𝑏𝑖𝑔𝑢𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑒́𝑔𝑖𝑐𝑎, 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑓𝑖𝑟𝑎 𝑒𝑠𝑝𝑎𝑐̧𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑚𝑎𝑛𝑜𝑏𝑟𝑎 𝑎 𝑇𝑟𝑢𝑚𝑝 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 «𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑏𝑎𝑙ℎ𝑎𝑟» 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑜𝑠 𝑒𝑢𝑟𝑜𝑝𝑒𝑢𝑠 𝑒 𝑍𝑒𝑙𝑒𝑛𝑠𝑘𝑦.
𝑃𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑜, 𝑎 𝑔𝑢𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑢𝑎𝑟𝑎́ 𝑎𝑡𝑒́ 𝑎̀ 𝑒𝑥𝑎𝑢𝑠𝑡𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑜𝑢 𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑑𝑢𝑎𝑠 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑡𝑒𝑠. 𝐸𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑒𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑜, 𝑎 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑝𝑎𝑔𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑢𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑜𝑠 𝑚𝑒𝑠𝑚𝑜𝑠 𝑎𝑟𝑔𝑢𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑒 ℎ𝑎́ 𝑡𝑟𝑒̂𝑠 𝑎𝑛𝑜𝑠. 𝐴 𝑒𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑜𝑚𝑖𝑎 𝑑𝑎 𝑅𝑢́𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑎 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎́ 𝑒𝑚 𝑑𝑖𝑓𝑖𝑐𝑢𝑙𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒𝑠, 𝑎 𝑣𝑖𝑡𝑜́𝑟𝑖𝑎 𝑒́ 𝑝𝑜𝑠𝑠𝜄́𝑣𝑒𝑙 𝑝𝑜𝑟𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑎 𝑒𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑜𝑚𝑖𝑎 𝑟𝑢𝑠𝑠𝑎 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎́ 𝑛𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑠𝑖𝑡𝑢𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑒𝑠𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑑𝑎, 𝑎̀ 𝑏𝑒𝑖𝑟𝑎 𝑑𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑙𝑎𝑝𝑠𝑜; 𝑎𝑠 𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑐̧𝑎𝑠 𝑎𝑟𝑚𝑎𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑟𝑢𝑠𝑠𝑎𝑠 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑒𝑔𝑢𝑒𝑚 𝑑𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑟 𝑜𝑠 𝑠𝑜𝑙𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑢𝑐𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑖𝑎𝑛𝑜𝑠, 𝑜𝑠 𝑠𝑜𝑙𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑟𝑢𝑠𝑠𝑜𝑠 𝑚𝑜𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑚 𝑑𝑖𝑎𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑎𝑜𝑠 𝑚𝑖𝑙ℎ𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑠, 𝑒 𝑎 𝑠𝑖𝑡𝑢𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑚𝑖𝑙𝑖𝑡𝑎𝑟 𝑒𝑛𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑎-𝑠𝑒 𝑛𝑢𝑚 𝑖𝑚𝑝𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑒, 𝑒𝑡𝑐. 𝑂𝑠 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑝𝑎𝑔𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑠 𝑠𝑜́ 𝑑𝑒𝑣𝑒𝑚 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑒𝑔𝑢𝑖𝑟 𝑑𝑜𝑟𝑚𝑖𝑟 𝑚𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑟𝑒𝑙𝑎𝑥𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑒𝑝𝑜𝑖𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑟𝑒𝑔𝑢𝑟𝑔𝑖𝑡𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑚 𝑎𝑠 𝑠𝑢𝑎𝑠 𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒𝑠. 𝐸𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑒𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑜, 𝑜𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑏𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑠 𝑢𝑐𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑖𝑎𝑛𝑜𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑢𝑎𝑟𝑎̃𝑜 𝑎𝑡𝑒́ 𝑎𝑜 𝑢́𝑙𝑡𝑖𝑚𝑜 𝑢𝑐𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑖𝑎𝑛𝑜. 𝑃𝑜𝑟 𝑓𝑢𝑔𝑎𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑖𝑛𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑚𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑣𝑒𝑛𝑖𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑠 𝑑𝑜 𝑙𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑢𝑐𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑖𝑎𝑛𝑜, 𝑗𝑎́ 𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑎̃𝑜 𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑖𝑑𝑜, 𝑠𝑒𝑔𝑢𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑓𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑠 𝑢𝑐𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑖𝑎𝑛𝑎𝑠, 𝑐𝑒𝑟𝑐𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝟷,𝟽 𝑚𝑖𝑙ℎ𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑢𝑐𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑖𝑎𝑛𝑜𝑠. 𝐸𝑥𝑐𝑙𝑢𝑒𝑚-𝑠𝑒 𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑒 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑜𝑟 𝑚𝑒𝑟𝑐𝑒𝑛𝑎́𝑟𝑖𝑜𝑠 𝑒 𝑎𝑚𝑝𝑢𝑡𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑠.
* Major general na reserva
IN "O JORNAL ECONÓMICO" - 22/08/25 ..
4162-UNIÃO
EUROPEIA
MOLDOVA NÃO TE 'PIRES'
Porque é que a UE tem
medo de perder a Moldova
FONTE: 
Euronews em Português-28/08/25
Euronews em Português-28/08/25NR: A UE tem medo de tudo, devia chamar-se UCE, (união da cobardia europeia). Ajoelha-se no kremlin, na casa branca, na casa do chinês e da coreia do norte e em tantas outras palhotas de ditadores. Trump também é um grande cobardolas, diz Amen a putin.
putin HUYLO
putin é um canalha
trump is also a killer
of innocent people Ukrainians
Subscrever:
Comentários (Atom)