.
O que desajustou
o mercado do amor?
O desencontro de expectativas no amor é um dos desajustes mais marcantes
da nossa época, e compreender as suas causas é mais útil do que
procurar culpados.
𝖣𝖾𝗌𝖽𝖾 𝗃𝖺́, 𝖾 𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖺𝗅𝗀𝗎𝖾́𝗆 𝗌𝖾 𝖺𝗌𝗌𝗎𝗌𝗍𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝖺 𝗉𝖺𝗅𝖺𝗏𝗋𝖺 “𝗆𝖾𝗋𝖼𝖺𝖽𝗈” 𝖺𝗉𝗅𝗂𝖼𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝖺𝗈𝗌 𝗋𝖾𝗅𝖺𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝖺𝗆𝗈𝗋𝗈𝗌𝗈𝗌 𝖾 𝖺̀ 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗃𝗎𝗀𝖺𝗅𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾, 𝗋𝖾𝖿𝗂𝗋𝖺-𝗌𝖾 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗈 𝖺𝗆𝗈𝗋 𝗌𝖾𝗆𝗉𝗋𝖾 𝖿𝗈𝗂, 𝖾𝗆 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝗍𝖾, 𝗎𝗆 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝖼𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖾𝗌𝖼𝗈𝗅𝗁𝖺 𝗆𝗎́𝗍𝗎𝖺 𝗇𝗎𝗆 𝖺𝗆𝖻𝗂𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝗈𝖿𝖾𝗋𝗍𝖺 𝗅𝗂𝗆𝗂𝗍𝖺𝖽𝖺, 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝖿𝖾𝗋𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗌 𝖺𝗌𝗌𝗂𝗆𝖾́𝗍𝗋𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗌 𝖾 𝖼𝗎𝗌𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗈𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗍𝗎𝗇𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾. 𝖠 𝗉𝖺𝗅𝖺𝗏𝗋𝖺 “𝗆𝖾𝗋𝖼𝖺𝖽𝗈” 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝗎𝗆𝖺𝗇𝗂𝗓𝖺 𝖺 𝖽𝗂𝗇𝖺̂𝗆𝗂𝖼𝖺 𝖾𝗆 𝗌𝗂, 𝗇𝖾𝗆 𝗂𝗇𝗏𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺 𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗉𝖾𝗍𝗂𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈, 𝖺 𝗌𝖾𝗅𝖾𝖼𝗍𝗂𝗏𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝗈𝗎 𝖺 𝖾𝗌𝖼𝖺𝗌𝗌𝖾𝗓, 𝖾𝗅𝖺 𝖺𝗉𝖾𝗇𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝖼𝗋𝖾𝗏𝖾 𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗃𝖺́ 𝖾𝗑𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖾. 𝖤𝗌𝗌𝖾 “𝗆𝖾𝗋𝖼𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝖽𝗈 𝖺𝗆𝗈𝗋” 𝖾𝗑𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖾 𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗈 𝖿𝖾𝗇𝗈́𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗈 𝖾𝗇𝗏𝗈𝗅𝗏𝖾 𝗈𝖿𝖾𝗋𝗍𝖺 𝖾 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝖼𝗎𝗋𝖺, 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝖿𝖾𝗋𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝗂𝖿𝖾𝗋𝖾𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺𝖽𝖺𝗌, 𝖾𝗌𝖼𝖺𝗌𝗌𝖾𝗓 (𝖽𝖾 𝗍𝖾𝗆𝗉𝗈, 𝖺𝗍𝖾𝗇𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈, 𝖿𝖾𝗋𝗍𝗂𝗅𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾, 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗉𝖺𝗍𝗂𝖻𝗂𝗅𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾𝗌 𝗏𝖺́𝗋𝗂𝖺𝗌…), 𝖼𝗎𝗌𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗈𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗍𝗎𝗇𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 (𝗈𝗎𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗌 𝗉𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗈𝖺𝗌 𝗉𝗈𝗌𝗌ı́𝗏𝖾𝗂𝗌, 𝗍𝖾𝗆𝗉𝗈 𝖾 𝖾𝗇𝖾𝗋𝗀𝗂𝖺…) 𝖾 𝗏𝖺𝗅𝗈𝗋 𝗉𝖾𝗋𝖼𝖾𝖻𝗂𝖽𝗈 (𝖺𝗍𝗋𝖺𝖼𝗍𝗂𝗏𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾, 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗉𝖺𝗍𝗂𝖻𝗂𝗅𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖾𝗆𝗈𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗅, 𝖿ı́𝗌𝗂𝖼𝖺 𝖾 𝗌𝗈𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗅, 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗍ı́𝗀𝗂𝗈, 𝖾𝗍𝖼).
𝖴𝗆 𝗉𝗋𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗂𝗋𝗈 𝗉𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖽𝖾𝗏𝖾 𝖿𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗋 𝖼𝗅𝖺𝗋𝗈 𝖾́ 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗈 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝖻𝗅𝖾𝗆𝖺 𝖺𝖼𝗍𝗎𝖺𝗅 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾́ 𝖺 𝖾𝗌𝖼𝖺𝗌𝗌𝖾𝗓 𝖽𝖾 𝗈𝗉𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌, 𝗆𝖺𝗌 𝗈 𝖾𝗑𝖼𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖾𝗌𝖼𝗈𝗅𝗁𝖺, 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝗆𝗎𝗂𝗍𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖺-𝗂𝗇𝗍𝗎𝗂𝗍𝗂𝗏𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗂𝗌𝗍𝗈 𝗉𝗈𝗌𝗌𝖺 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖾𝖼𝖾𝗋 𝖽𝖺 𝗉𝖾𝗋𝗌𝗉𝖾𝖼𝗍𝗂𝗏𝖺 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗂𝗑𝗈𝗌𝗈𝗌. 𝖰𝗎𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝗍𝖾𝗆𝗈𝗌 𝗆𝗎𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗌 𝖺𝗅𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗇𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗏𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝗂𝗌𝗉𝗈𝗇ı́𝗏𝖾𝗂𝗌, 𝖺𝗎𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺 𝖺 𝖽𝗂𝖿𝗂𝖼𝗎𝗅𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖾𝗆 𝖽𝖾𝖼𝗂𝖽𝗂𝗋 𝖾 𝖼𝗋𝖾𝗌𝖼𝖾 𝖺 𝗍𝖾𝗇𝖽𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝖺𝖽𝗂𝖺𝗋 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗆𝗂𝗌𝗌𝗈𝗌. 𝖯𝗈𝗋 𝗌𝗎𝖺 𝗏𝖾𝗓, 𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝖺 𝗉𝖾𝗋𝖼𝖾𝗉𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖺𝗅𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗇𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗏𝖺𝗌 𝖾́ 𝖾𝗅𝖾𝗏𝖺𝖽𝖺, 𝗍𝖾𝗇𝖽𝖾 𝖺 𝖽𝗂𝗆𝗂𝗇𝗎𝗂𝗋 𝖺 𝗎𝗋𝗀𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝖾𝖼𝗂𝗌𝖺̃𝗈.
𝖠 𝗏𝗂𝖽𝖺 𝖺𝗆𝗈𝗋𝗈𝗌𝖺 𝗉𝖺𝗌𝗌𝖺 𝖺 𝗌𝖾𝗋 𝗏𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝗎𝗆 𝖼𝖺𝗆𝗉𝗈 𝖺𝖻𝖾𝗋𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗉𝗈𝗌𝗌𝗂𝖻𝗂𝗅𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾𝗌 𝗌𝗎𝖼𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗂𝗏𝖺𝗌, 𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗉𝗈𝖽𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗋𝗂𝖻𝗎𝗂𝗋 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗈 𝖺𝖽𝗂𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗆𝗂𝗌𝗌𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝗎𝗋𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗎𝗋𝗈𝗌. 𝖤𝗇𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗆𝗈𝗌 𝖺𝗊𝗎𝗂 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝖼𝖺𝗎𝗌𝖺𝗌 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝖻𝖺́𝗌𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗋𝗂𝖻𝗎𝗂 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗈 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝖺𝗃𝗎𝗌𝗍𝖾 𝗇𝗈 𝗆𝖾𝗋𝖼𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝖽𝗈 𝖺𝗆𝗈𝗋. 𝖤𝗇𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝗈𝗌 𝗇𝗈𝗌𝗌𝗈𝗌 𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗉𝖺𝗌𝗌𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖿𝗈𝗋𝗆𝖺𝗏𝖺𝗆 𝖿𝖺𝗆ı́𝗅𝗂𝖺𝗌 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗑𝗂𝗆𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝗌𝗈𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗅 𝖾 𝖾𝗑𝗂𝗌𝗍𝗂𝖺 𝖺𝗅𝗀𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝖿𝗂𝗅𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗀𝖾𝗆 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝗆𝖾𝗂𝗈 𝖽𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗎𝗇𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾, 𝗁𝗈𝗃𝖾 𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖺 𝖾𝗌𝖼𝗈𝗅𝗁𝖺 𝖾́ 𝗀𝖾𝗋𝗂𝖽𝖺 𝗂𝗇𝖽𝗂𝗏𝗂𝖽𝗎𝖺𝗅𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝗉𝗈𝗎𝖼𝖺 𝗂𝗇𝖿𝗈𝗋𝗆𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈. 𝖢𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝗎𝗆 𝗇𝖺𝗏𝖾𝗀𝖺 𝗌𝗈𝗓𝗂𝗇𝗁𝗈 𝗇𝗎𝗆 𝗆𝖾𝗋𝖼𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝗀𝗅𝗈𝖻𝖺𝗅 𝖾 𝗂𝗆𝗉𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗈𝖺𝗅, 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗍𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗈-𝗌𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝖼𝗋𝗂𝖺𝗇𝖼̧𝖺 𝗌𝗈𝗅𝗍𝖺 𝗇𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗅𝗈𝗃𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝖼𝗁𝗈𝖼𝗈𝗅𝖺𝗍𝖾𝗌, 𝖿𝖺𝗌𝖼𝗂𝗇𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝗉𝖾𝗅𝖺 𝗏𝖺𝗋𝗂𝖾𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾, 𝗆𝖺𝗌 𝗂𝗇𝖼𝖺𝗉𝖺𝗓 𝖽𝖾 𝗍𝗈𝗆𝖺𝗋 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝖽𝖾𝖼𝗂𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗉𝗈𝗇𝗌𝖺́𝗏𝖾𝗅.
𝖤𝗌𝗍𝖺 𝖺𝖻𝗎𝗇𝖽𝖺̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝗂𝗅𝗎𝗌𝗈́𝗋𝗂𝖺 𝖺𝗅𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺 𝖺 𝗂𝗇𝖽𝖾𝖼𝗂𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝖼𝗋𝗈́𝗇𝗂𝖼𝖺, 𝖺𝗅𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝗍𝖺𝗆𝖻𝖾́𝗆 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝖿𝗋𝖺𝖼𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗌𝖼𝗂𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝖽𝖺 𝖿𝗂𝗇𝗂𝗍𝗎𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝖺 𝗏𝗂𝖽𝖺. 𝖵𝗂𝗏𝖾-𝗌𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝗌𝖾 𝗈 𝗍𝖾𝗆𝗉𝗈 𝖿𝗈𝗌𝗌𝖾 𝗂𝗇𝖿𝗂𝗇𝗂𝗍𝗈, 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝗌𝖾 𝖺 𝗃𝗎𝗏𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗎𝖽𝖾, 𝖺 𝖿𝖾𝗋𝗍𝗂𝗅𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖾 𝖺𝗌 𝗈𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗍𝗎𝗇𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾𝗌 𝗋𝗈𝗆𝖺̂𝗇𝗍𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗌 𝖿𝗈𝗌𝗌𝖾𝗆 𝗋𝖾𝖼𝗎𝗋𝗌𝗈𝗌 𝗂𝗅𝗂𝗆𝗂𝗍𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌. 𝖠𝖼𝗋𝖾𝗌𝖼𝖾 𝖺𝗂𝗇𝖽𝖺 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝖿𝗋𝖾𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝗌𝗈𝖻𝗋𝖾𝗏𝖺𝗅𝗈𝗋𝗂𝗓𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝗉𝗋𝗈́𝗉𝗋𝗂𝖺 𝖾 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝗏𝖺𝗅𝗈𝗋𝗂𝗓𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗈𝗎𝗍𝗋𝗈𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝖺𝗉𝗅𝗂𝖼𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖼𝗋𝗂𝗍𝖾́𝗋𝗂𝗈𝗌 𝖺𝗅𝗍𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖾𝗑𝖼𝗅𝗎𝖽𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗌. 𝖠𝗌 𝗋𝖾𝖽𝖾𝗌 𝗌𝗈𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝖾𝗆𝗉𝖾𝗇𝗁𝖺𝗆 𝖺𝗊𝗎𝗂 𝗎𝗆 𝗉𝖺𝗉𝖾𝗅 𝗋𝖾𝗅𝖾𝗏𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾, 𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖺𝗆𝗉𝗅𝗂𝖿𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗆 𝗉𝖾𝗋𝖼𝖾𝗉𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝗂𝗇𝖿𝗅𝖺𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗏𝖺𝗅𝗈𝗋 𝖾 𝖽𝗂𝗌𝗍𝗈𝗋𝖼𝖾𝗆 𝖺 𝗉𝖾𝗋𝖼𝖾𝗉𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖾́ 𝖺𝗅𝖼𝖺𝗇𝖼̧𝖺́𝗏𝖾𝗅.
𝖠 𝗋𝖾𝗅𝖾𝗏𝖺̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖾 𝖿𝖾𝗇𝗈́𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗈 𝗍𝗈𝗋𝗇𝖺-𝗌𝖾 𝖾𝗏𝗂𝖽𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖾𝗆 𝗏𝖺́𝗋𝗂𝗈𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗑𝗍𝗈𝗌, 𝗂𝗇𝖼𝗅𝗎𝗂𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝖼𝖺𝗌𝗈𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝗈 𝖺𝗎𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝗈 𝖼𝖾𝗅𝗂𝖻𝖺𝗍𝗈 𝖾 𝖺 𝗋𝖾𝗍𝗋𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝗋𝖾𝗅𝖺𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝗋𝗈𝗆𝖺̂𝗇𝗍𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗌 𝖾𝗆 𝗉𝖺ı́𝗌𝖾𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝗈 𝖩𝖺𝗉𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾 𝖺 𝖢𝗈𝗋𝖾𝗂𝖺 𝖽𝗈 𝖲𝗎𝗅. 𝖤𝗌𝗍𝖾 𝗉𝖺𝖽𝗋𝖺̃𝗈 𝗍𝖾𝗆 𝗌𝗂𝖽𝗈 𝖺𝗌𝗌𝗈𝖼𝗂𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝖺 𝗏𝖺́𝗋𝗂𝗈𝗌 𝖿𝖺𝖼𝗍𝗈𝗋𝖾𝗌, 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝗈 𝖾𝗑𝖼𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗍𝗋𝖺𝖻𝖺𝗅𝗁𝗈, 𝖺 𝖾𝗑𝖺𝗎𝗌𝗍𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖺ı́ 𝖽𝖾𝖼𝗈𝗋𝗋𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖾 𝖺 𝗆𝗎𝖽𝖺𝗇𝖼̧𝖺 𝗇𝖺𝗌 𝖾𝗑𝗉𝖾𝖼𝗍𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗏𝖺𝗌 𝖾𝗆 𝗋𝖾𝗅𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖺̀𝗌 𝗋𝖾𝗅𝖺𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝖺𝗆𝗈𝗋𝗈𝗌𝖺𝗌, 𝗇𝗎𝗆 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗑𝗍𝗈 𝖾𝗆 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗈 𝖺𝗎𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗅𝗂𝖿𝗂𝖼𝖺𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝖾 𝖽𝖺 𝖺𝗎𝗍𝗈𝗇𝗈𝗆𝗂𝖺 𝖾𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗈́𝗆𝗂𝖼𝖺 𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝗆𝗎𝗅𝗁𝖾𝗋𝖾𝗌 𝗍𝖺𝗆𝖻𝖾́𝗆 𝗍𝖾𝗆 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗋𝗂𝖻𝗎ı́𝖽𝗈 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗋𝖾𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖿𝗂𝗀𝗎𝗋𝖺𝗋 𝗈𝗌 𝖼𝗋𝗂𝗍𝖾́𝗋𝗂𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖾𝗌𝖼𝗈𝗅𝗁𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖼𝖾𝗂𝗋𝗈𝗌, 𝖽𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝗈𝗋𝗂𝗀𝖾𝗆 𝖺 𝖽𝗂𝗇𝖺̂𝗆𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗌 𝖿𝗋𝖾𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝖼𝗋𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝗁𝗂𝗉𝖾𝗋𝗀𝖺𝗆𝗂𝖺 𝖾𝖽𝗎𝖼𝖺𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗅.
𝖠 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝗈 𝗍𝗋𝖺𝖻𝖺𝗅𝗁𝗈 𝖾́ 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝖼𝖺𝗎𝗌𝖺 𝖽𝖾𝖼𝗂𝗌𝗂𝗏𝖺 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗉𝗈𝖽𝖾 𝗌𝖾𝗋 𝗂𝗀𝗇𝗈𝗋𝖺𝖽𝖺, 𝗇𝖺 𝗆𝖾𝖽𝗂𝖽𝖺 𝖾𝗆 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝖽𝗎𝗓 𝗎𝗆 𝖾𝗌𝗀𝗈𝗍𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝖼ı́𝖼𝗅𝗂𝖼𝗈 𝖾 𝖿𝗎𝗇𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺, 𝗌𝗈𝖻𝗋𝖾𝗍𝗎𝖽𝗈 𝗇𝗈 𝖼𝖺𝗌𝗈 𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝗆𝗎𝗅𝗁𝖾𝗋𝖾𝗌, 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝖺𝗅𝗂𝖾𝗇𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗌𝗈𝗆𝖾 𝗍𝖾𝗆𝗉𝗈 𝖾 𝗍𝖾𝗇𝖽𝖾 𝖺 𝗌𝖾𝖼𝗎𝗇𝖽𝖺𝗋𝗂𝗓𝖺𝗋 𝖺 𝖾𝗌𝖿𝖾𝗋𝖺 𝖿𝖺𝗆𝗂𝗅𝗂𝖺𝗋.
𝖭𝖺 𝖤𝗎𝗋𝗈𝗉𝖺, 𝗈 𝖿𝖾𝗇𝗈́𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗈 𝗆𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾́𝗆-𝗌𝖾 𝖾𝗆 𝖼𝗋𝖾𝗌𝖼𝖾𝗇𝖽𝗈, 𝖺𝗂𝗇𝖽𝖺 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝗋𝖺𝗆𝖺́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝗈 𝖾 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝗀𝗋𝖺𝖽𝗎𝖺𝗅. 𝖮 𝗇𝗎́𝗆𝖾𝗋𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖺𝖽𝗎𝗅𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝗌𝖾𝗆 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖼𝖾𝗂𝗋𝗈 𝗋𝗈𝗆𝖺̂𝗇𝗍𝗂𝖼𝗈 𝗍𝖾𝗆 𝖺𝗎𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺𝖽𝗈, 𝖾𝗌𝗉𝖾𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗅𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖾 𝗈𝗌 𝗃𝗈𝗏𝖾𝗇𝗌, 𝗆𝖺𝗌 𝗁𝖺́ 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝖺𝖻𝗂𝗍𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝗌𝖾𝗆 𝖼𝖺𝗌𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝖾 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝗇𝖺𝗌𝖼𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝖿𝗈𝗋𝖺 𝖽𝗈 𝖼𝖺𝗌𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖺𝗊𝗎𝗂𝗅𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗌𝖾 𝗏𝖾𝗋𝗂𝖿𝗂𝖼𝖺 𝗇𝗈 𝖩𝖺𝗉𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾 𝗇𝖺 𝖢𝗈𝗋𝖾𝗂𝖺 𝖽𝗈 𝖲𝗎𝗅. 𝖤𝗆 𝖭𝗈𝗏𝖾𝗆𝖻𝗋𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝟤𝟢𝟤𝟧, 𝖺 𝗋𝖾𝗏𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖺 𝖳𝗁𝖾 𝖤𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗈𝗆𝗂𝗌𝗍 𝖽𝖾𝖽𝗂𝖼𝗈𝗎 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝖾𝖽𝗂𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖺𝗈 𝗍𝖾𝗆𝖺, 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝖼𝗋𝖾𝗏𝖾𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗀𝖾𝗋𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖼𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝗏𝖾𝗓 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗌 “𝗌𝗈𝗅𝗍𝖾𝗂𝗋𝖺” 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖺𝗅𝗍𝖾𝗋𝖺 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝖿𝗎𝗇𝖽𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖺 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗋𝗎𝗍𝗎𝗋𝖺 𝖽𝖺 𝗌𝗈𝖼𝗂𝖾𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾, 𝗋𝖾𝖽𝖾𝖿𝗂𝗇𝗂𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝖺 𝖽𝖾𝗆𝗈𝗀𝗋𝖺𝖿𝗂𝖺, 𝗈𝗌 𝗌𝖾𝗋𝗏𝗂𝖼̧𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝗎́𝖻𝗅𝗂𝖼𝗈𝗌, 𝗈𝗌 𝗋𝗂𝗍𝗆𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗍𝗋𝖺𝖻𝖺𝗅𝗁𝗈 𝖾 𝖽𝖾 𝗌𝗈𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗅𝗂𝗓𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈, 𝖺𝗌 𝗈𝗉𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗌𝗎𝗆𝗈, 𝖺𝗌 𝗇𝖾𝖼𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗁𝖺𝖻𝗂𝗍𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝖺ı́ 𝖺𝖽𝗂𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾. 𝖭𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾𝗌𝗊𝗎𝖾𝖼̧𝖺𝗆𝗈𝗌 𝗍𝖺𝗆𝖻𝖾́𝗆 𝖺𝗌 𝗋𝖾𝗉𝖾𝗋𝖼𝗎𝗌𝗌𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺 𝗏𝗂𝖽𝖺 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝗌𝗈𝗅𝗂𝗍𝖺́𝗋𝗂𝖺 𝗍𝖾𝗆 𝗇𝗈 𝖻𝖾𝗆-𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗋 𝗂𝗇𝖽𝗂𝗏𝗂𝖽𝗎𝖺𝗅 𝖺̀ 𝗆𝖾𝖽𝗂𝖽𝖺 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗌 𝗉𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗈𝖺𝗌 𝖾𝗇𝗏𝖾𝗅𝗁𝖾𝖼𝖾𝗆.
𝖠̀ 𝗆𝖾𝖽𝗂𝖽𝖺 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗀𝖺𝗇𝗁𝖺 𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗋𝖾𝗇𝗈 𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖾 𝗆𝗈𝖽𝖾𝗅𝗈 𝗎𝗇𝗂𝗉𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗈𝖺𝗅 𝖽𝖾 𝗏𝗂𝖽𝖺 𝖺𝗎𝗍𝗈́𝗇𝗈𝗆𝖺, 𝖿𝗅𝖾𝗑ı́𝗏𝖾𝗅 𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗌𝗆𝗈𝗉𝗈𝗅𝗂𝗍𝖺, 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗆𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗅𝗂𝖻𝖾𝗋𝗍𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗀𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗈 𝗂𝗇𝖽𝗂𝗏𝗂𝖽𝗎𝖺𝗅, 𝗈𝖻𝗌𝖾𝗋𝗏𝖺-𝗌𝖾 𝗈 𝖺𝗎𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗌𝗎𝗆𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖺𝗇𝗌𝗂𝗈𝗅ı́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝗈𝗌 𝖾 𝖺 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝖼𝗎𝗋𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝗋𝖾𝗅𝖺𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝗆𝖾𝖽𝗂𝖺𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝗂𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗅𝗂𝗀𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝖺𝗋𝗍𝗂𝖿𝗂𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗅, 𝗍𝖺𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝖺𝗉𝗈𝗂𝗈 𝖾𝗆𝗈𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗅 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗂𝗇𝗍𝗂𝗆𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝗌𝗂𝗆𝗎𝗅𝖺𝖽𝖺. 𝖭𝗎𝗆 𝗋𝖾𝗀𝗂𝗌𝗍𝗈 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝗅𝖾𝗏𝖾, 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖾𝗂𝗑𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝗌𝖾𝗋 𝗋𝖾𝗏𝖾𝗅𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗋 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗌𝗈𝖼𝗂𝖾𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾𝗌 𝗈𝖻𝖼𝖾𝖼𝖺𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝖺 𝗅𝗂𝖻𝖾𝗋𝗍𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝗂𝗇𝖽𝗂𝗏𝗂𝖽𝗎𝖺𝗅 𝗌𝖾𝗃𝖺𝗆 𝗎𝗆 𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗋𝖾𝗇𝗈 𝖿𝖾́𝗋𝗍𝗂𝗅 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝖺 𝗈𝖿𝖾𝗋𝗍𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝗋𝖾𝗅𝖺𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 “𝖺𝗋𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗃𝖺𝖽𝖺𝗌” 𝖾𝗆 𝖿𝗈𝗋𝗆𝖺𝗍𝗈 𝗍𝖾𝗅𝖾𝗏𝗂𝗌𝗂𝗏𝗈.
𝖠 𝖿𝗋𝗎𝗌𝗍𝗋𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝗋𝖾𝗅𝖺𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗅 𝖾𝗑𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖾 𝖽𝖾 𝖺𝗆𝖻𝖺𝗌 𝖺𝗌 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝗍𝖾𝗌. 𝖴𝗆 𝗋𝖾𝖼𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝗋𝖾𝗅𝖺𝗍𝗈́𝗋𝗂𝗈 𝖽𝗈 𝖨𝗇𝗌𝗍𝗂𝗍𝗎𝗍𝖾 𝖿𝗈𝗋 𝖥𝖺𝗆𝗂𝗅𝗒 𝖲𝗍𝗎𝖽𝗂𝖾𝗌, 𝗋𝖾𝗅𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗏𝗈 𝖺̀ 𝖾𝗑𝗉𝖾𝗋𝗂𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝗃𝗈𝗏𝖾𝗇𝗌 𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝖤𝖴𝖠 𝗋𝖾𝗏𝖾𝗅𝖺 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖺 𝗂𝗇𝖺𝖼𝗍𝗂𝗏𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝗇𝗈 𝗇𝖺𝗆𝗈𝗋𝗈 𝖾́ 𝖾𝗅𝖾𝗏𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝖾𝗆 𝖺𝗆𝖻𝗈𝗌 𝗈𝗌 𝗌𝖾𝗑𝗈𝗌: 𝟩𝟦% 𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝗆𝗎𝗅𝗁𝖾𝗋𝖾𝗌 𝖾 𝟨𝟦% 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗁𝗈𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗌 𝗍𝗂𝗏𝖾𝗋𝖺𝗆 𝗉𝗈𝗎𝖼𝗈𝗌 𝗈𝗎 𝗇𝖾𝗇𝗁𝗎𝗆 𝖾𝗇𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗋𝗈 𝗇𝗈 𝗎́𝗅𝗍𝗂𝗆𝗈 𝖺𝗇𝗈. 𝖠 𝗉𝗋𝗂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝗉𝖺𝗅 𝖻𝖺𝗋𝗋𝖾𝗂𝗋𝖺 𝖼𝗂𝗍𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝖾́ 𝖺 𝖿𝖺𝗅𝗍𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝗂𝗇𝗁𝖾𝗂𝗋𝗈 (𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝗌𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗂𝖽𝖺 𝗉𝖾𝗅𝗈𝗌 𝗁𝗈𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗌), 𝗌𝖾𝗀𝗎𝗂𝖽𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝖿𝖺𝗅𝗍𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖿𝗂𝖺𝗇𝖼̧𝖺 𝖾 𝗆𝖺́𝗌 𝖾𝗑𝗉𝖾𝗋𝗂𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗌 𝗉𝖺𝗌𝗌𝖺𝖽𝖺𝗌. 𝖤𝗇𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝖺𝗌 𝗆𝗎𝗅𝗁𝖾𝗋𝖾𝗌 𝗏𝖺𝗅𝗈𝗋𝗂𝗓𝖺𝗆 𝖿𝗈𝗋𝗍𝖾𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗉𝖺𝗍𝗂𝖻𝗂𝗅𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖾𝗆𝗈𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗅 𝖾 𝗌𝗈𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗅, 𝗆𝗎𝗂𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝗁𝗈𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗌 𝗌𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗆-𝗌𝖾 𝗅𝗂𝗆𝗂𝗍𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗌𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗀𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝖿𝗂𝗇𝖺𝗇𝖼𝖾𝗂𝗋𝗈𝗌 𝖾 𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗈𝗋 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖿𝗂𝖺𝗇𝖼̧𝖺 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝖺𝖻𝗈𝗋𝖽𝖺𝗋 𝗉𝗈𝗍𝖾𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖼𝖾𝗂𝗋𝖺𝗌. 𝖭𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾𝗌𝗊𝗎𝖾𝖼̧𝖺𝗆𝗈𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖾𝗆 𝖺𝗉𝗅𝗂𝖼𝖺𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝖾 𝖽𝗂𝗇𝖺̂𝗆𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗌 𝗆𝗈𝖽𝖾𝗋𝗇𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖾𝗇𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗋𝗈𝗌, 𝗁𝖺́ 𝖾𝗏𝗂𝖽𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝖿𝗈𝗋𝗍𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖼𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖺𝗍𝖾𝗇𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖿𝖾𝗆𝗂𝗇𝗂𝗇𝖺 𝖾𝗆 𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝗁𝗈𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗌 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗌 “𝖽𝖾𝗌𝖾𝗃𝖺́𝗏𝖾𝗂𝗌”, 𝖿𝖺𝗓𝖾𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗆𝗎𝗂𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝗁𝗈𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗌 𝗌𝖾 𝖽𝖾𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖾𝗆 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝗍𝖺𝗑𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗋𝖾𝗃𝖾𝗂𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝖾𝗅𝖾𝗏𝖺𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖺𝗌 𝗆𝗎𝗅𝗁𝖾𝗋𝖾𝗌.
𝖮 𝗋𝗂𝗌𝖼𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗋𝖾𝖼𝗎𝗈 𝗆𝖺𝗌𝖼𝗎𝗅𝗂𝗇𝗈, 𝖺 𝗉𝖺𝗋 𝖽𝖾 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗈𝗋 𝗌𝖾𝗅𝖾𝖼𝗍𝗂𝗏𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖿𝖾𝗆𝗂𝗇𝗂𝗇𝖺, 𝖺𝗅𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺 𝗎𝗆 𝖼𝗂𝖼𝗅𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖺𝗀𝗋𝖺𝗏𝖺 𝗈 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝖾𝗇𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗋𝗈 𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖾 𝖺𝗆𝖻𝗈𝗌. 𝖲𝖾 𝗉𝖾𝗇𝗌𝖺𝗋𝗆𝗈𝗌 𝖺𝗀𝗈𝗋𝖺 𝗇𝖺𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗌𝖾𝗊𝗎𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗅𝖾𝖼𝗍𝗂𝗏𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗅𝗈𝗇𝗀𝗈 𝗉𝗋𝖺𝗓𝗈, 𝗍𝖾𝗋𝖾𝗆𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖺𝖽𝗆𝗂𝗍𝗂𝗋 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺 𝖺𝗏𝖺𝗅𝖺𝗇𝖼𝗁𝖾 𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝖾𝖼𝗂𝗌𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝗂𝗇𝖽𝗂𝗏𝗂𝖽𝗎𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝖾 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝖾𝗇𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗋𝗈𝗌 𝗋𝗈𝗆𝖺̂𝗇𝗍𝗂𝖼𝗈𝗌 𝗍𝖾𝗆 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝖿𝗈𝗋𝖼̧𝖺 𝖾𝗌𝗆𝖺𝗀𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗋𝖺 𝖿𝖺𝖼𝖾 𝖺̀𝗌 𝗋𝗂𝗌ı́𝗏𝖾𝗂𝗌 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗉𝗈𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗌 𝗆𝖺𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗂𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗂𝗇𝖼𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗂𝗏𝗈 𝖺̀ 𝗇𝖺𝗍𝖺𝗅𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗌𝖾 𝖽𝗂𝗌𝖼𝗎𝗍𝖾𝗆 𝖽𝖾 𝖿𝗈𝗋𝗆𝖺 𝗂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝗉𝗂𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝗇𝗈 𝗆𝗎𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝗈𝖼𝗂𝖽𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺𝗅.
𝖮 𝖺𝗎𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝖺 𝖺𝗎𝗍𝗈𝗇𝗈𝗆𝗂𝖺 𝖾 𝖾𝖽𝗎𝖼𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝗆𝗎𝗅𝗁𝖾𝗋𝖾𝗌 𝖾𝗅𝖾𝗏𝖺 𝖺𝗌 𝖾𝗑𝗉𝖾𝖼𝗍𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗏𝖺𝗌 𝖾 𝖺 𝗌𝖾𝗅𝖾𝖼𝗍𝗂𝗏𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾. 𝖠𝗌 𝗆𝗎𝗅𝗁𝖾𝗋𝖾𝗌 𝗍𝗈𝗋𝗇𝖺𝗆-𝗌𝖾 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝖾𝗑𝗂𝗀𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗌 𝖾𝗑𝖺𝖼𝗍𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝗈 “𝗆𝖾𝗋𝖼𝖺𝖽𝗈” 𝖽𝖾 𝗁𝗈𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗌 𝖽𝖺́ 𝗌𝗂𝗇𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖼𝖺𝗇𝗌𝖺𝖼̧𝗈 𝖾 𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝗂𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖾 𝗉𝖾𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝗎𝗆 𝗆𝗎𝗋𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖾𝗑𝗂𝗀𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗌 𝖾 𝖽𝖾 𝖺𝗋𝖻𝗂𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗋𝗂𝖾𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾𝗌 𝖿𝖾𝗆𝗂𝗇𝗂𝗇𝖺𝗌. 𝖭𝖺𝗍𝗎𝗋𝖺𝗅𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾, 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺 𝗍𝖾𝗇𝖽𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝖺𝖿𝗎𝗇𝗂𝗅𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗈𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗍𝗎𝗇𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾𝗌 𝗏𝖺𝗂 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗆𝖾𝗍𝖾𝗋 𝖻𝗋𝗎𝗍𝖺𝗅𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖺 𝗃𝖺𝗇𝖾𝗅𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝖿𝖾𝗋𝗍𝗂𝗅𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾: 𝖺 𝗈𝖿𝖾𝗋𝗍𝖺 𝖾𝗇𝖼𝗈𝗅𝗁𝖾 𝖾 𝖺 𝖿𝖾𝗋𝗍𝗂𝗅𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝗂𝗆𝗂𝗇𝗎𝗂.
𝖯𝖾𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝗍𝗈𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗌 𝖼𝖺𝗎𝗌𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝖾𝗇𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗋𝗈 𝖾 𝗂𝗇𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗉𝖺𝗍𝗂𝖻𝗂𝗅𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾, 𝖾́ 𝖽𝗂𝖿ı́𝖼𝗂𝗅 𝖽𝖾𝖿𝗂𝗇𝗂𝗋 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝗈𝗇𝖽𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝖾𝖼̧𝖺𝗋 𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗋𝗋𝗂𝗀𝗂𝗋 𝗈 𝖿𝖾𝗇𝗈́𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗈. 𝖳𝖺𝗅𝗏𝖾𝗓 𝗈 𝗉𝗋𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗂𝗋𝗈 𝗉𝖺𝗌𝗌𝗈 𝗉𝖺𝗌𝗌𝖾 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝗏𝗈𝗅𝗍𝖺𝗋 𝖺 𝖾𝗇𝖼𝖺𝗋𝖺𝗋 𝗈 𝖺𝗆𝗈𝗋 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝗎𝗆 𝗌𝗎𝗉𝖾𝗋𝗆𝖾𝗋𝖼𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝗂𝗇𝖿𝗂𝗇𝗂𝗍𝗈, 𝗆𝖺𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝗎𝗆 𝖻𝖾𝗆 𝖾𝗌𝖼𝖺𝗌𝗌𝗈, 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖾𝗑𝗂𝗀𝖾 𝖽𝖾𝖼𝗂𝗌𝖺̃𝗈, 𝗌𝖺𝖼𝗋𝗂𝖿ı́𝖼𝗂𝗈, 𝖽𝖾𝗏𝗈𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈, 𝖼𝗈𝗋𝖺𝗀𝖾𝗆 𝖾 𝖻𝖺𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝗁𝗎𝗆𝗂𝗅𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝗉𝖾𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖺 𝗌𝗎𝖺 𝗇𝖺𝗍𝗎𝗋𝖾𝗓𝖺.
* Investigadora do Instituto de Estudos Políticos da Universidade Católica Portuguesa
IN "O JORNAL ECONÓMICO" -22/04/26 .
Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário