HELGA CALÇADA

 .

Pobre da nossa Constituição 

A proposta de atribuir total arbitrariedade aos juízes criminais de, caso considerem algum expediente da defesa como desnecessário ou dilatório, aplicarem multas, que poderão ascender a 10 mil euros – sim, 10 mil! -, podendo aumentar 50% se não forem pagas no prazo de 10 dias, é absurda e inadmissível.

𝘌𝘴𝘵𝘦 𝘎𝘰𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘯𝘰 𝘯𝘢̃𝘰 𝘱𝘢́𝘳𝘢 𝘥𝘦 𝘯𝘰𝘴 𝘴𝘶𝘳𝘱𝘳𝘦𝘦𝘯𝘥𝘦𝘳. 𝘓𝘢𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘢́𝘷𝘦𝘭 𝘦́ 𝘲𝘶𝘦 𝘴𝘦𝘫𝘢 𝘴𝘦𝘮𝘱𝘳𝘦 𝘱𝘦𝘭𝘢 𝘯𝘦𝘨𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘷𝘢. 𝘖𝘶 𝘢𝘵𝘦́ 𝘯𝘢̃𝘰 𝘴𝘶𝘳𝘱𝘳𝘦𝘦𝘯𝘥𝘦, 𝘰 𝘲𝘶𝘦 𝘦́ 𝘢𝘪𝘯𝘥𝘢 𝘮𝘢𝘪𝘴 𝘨𝘳𝘢𝘷𝘦. 𝘕𝘢̃𝘰 𝘣𝘢𝘴𝘵𝘢𝘷𝘢 𝘰 𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘨𝘰𝘯𝘩𝘰𝘴𝘰 𝘦 𝘪𝘯𝘢𝘤𝘦𝘪𝘵𝘢́𝘷𝘦𝘭 𝘱𝘢𝘤𝘰𝘵𝘦 𝘭𝘢𝘣𝘰𝘳𝘢𝘭, 𝘱𝘳𝘦𝘵𝘦𝘯𝘥𝘦 𝘢𝘨𝘰𝘳𝘢 𝘪𝘮𝘱𝘭𝘦𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘢𝘳 𝘳𝘦𝘧𝘰𝘳𝘮𝘢𝘴 𝘯𝘢 𝘫𝘶𝘴𝘵𝘪𝘤̧𝘢, 𝘦𝘮 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘭 𝘥𝘦 “𝘮𝘢𝘪𝘰𝘳 𝘤𝘦𝘭𝘦𝘳𝘪𝘥𝘢𝘥𝘦”, 𝘲𝘶𝘦 𝘴𝘦𝘳𝘪𝘢 𝘶𝘮 𝘰𝘣𝘫𝘦𝘵𝘪𝘷𝘰 𝘣𝘰𝘯𝘥𝘰𝘴𝘰 𝘦 𝘯𝘦𝘤𝘦𝘴𝘴𝘢́𝘳𝘪𝘰, 𝘴𝘦 𝘢𝘭𝘨𝘶𝘯𝘴 𝘱𝘰𝘯𝘵𝘰𝘴 𝘯𝘢̃𝘰 𝘤𝘰𝘭𝘪𝘥𝘪𝘴𝘴𝘦𝘮 𝘤𝘰𝘮 𝘱𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘤𝜄́𝘱𝘪𝘰𝘴 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘴𝘵𝘪𝘵𝘶𝘤𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘢𝘪𝘴.

𝘈 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘱𝘰𝘴𝘵𝘢 𝘥𝘦 𝘢𝘵𝘳𝘪𝘣𝘶𝘪𝘳 𝘵𝘰𝘵𝘢𝘭 𝘢𝘳𝘣𝘪𝘵𝘳𝘢𝘳𝘪𝘦𝘥𝘢𝘥𝘦 𝘢𝘰𝘴 𝘫𝘶𝜄́𝘻𝘦𝘴 𝘤𝘳𝘪𝘮𝘪𝘯𝘢𝘪𝘴 𝘥𝘦, 𝘤𝘢𝘴𝘰 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘴𝘪𝘥𝘦𝘳𝘦𝘮 𝘢𝘭𝘨𝘶𝘮 𝘦𝘹𝘱𝘦𝘥𝘪𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘦 𝘥𝘢 𝘥𝘦𝘧𝘦𝘴𝘢 𝘤𝘰𝘮𝘰 𝘥𝘦𝘴𝘯𝘦𝘤𝘦𝘴𝘴𝘢́𝘳𝘪𝘰 𝘰𝘶 𝘥𝘪𝘭𝘢𝘵𝘰́𝘳𝘪𝘰, 𝘢𝘱𝘭𝘪𝘤𝘢𝘳𝘦𝘮 𝘮𝘶𝘭𝘵𝘢𝘴, 𝘲𝘶𝘦 𝘱𝘰𝘥𝘦𝘳𝘢̃𝘰 𝘢𝘴𝘤𝘦𝘯𝘥𝘦𝘳 𝘢 𝟣𝟢 𝘮𝘪𝘭 𝘦𝘶𝘳𝘰𝘴 – 𝘴𝘪𝘮, 𝟣𝟢 𝘮𝘪𝘭.ᐟ -, 𝘱𝘰𝘥𝘦𝘯𝘥𝘰 𝘢𝘶𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘢𝘳 𝟧𝟢% 𝘴𝘦 𝘯𝘢̃𝘰 𝘧𝘰𝘳𝘦𝘮 𝘱𝘢𝘨𝘢𝘴 𝘯𝘰 𝘱𝘳𝘢𝘻𝘰 𝘥𝘦 𝟣𝟢 𝘥𝘪𝘢𝘴, 𝘦́ 𝘢𝘣𝘴𝘶𝘳𝘥𝘢 𝘦 𝘪𝘯𝘢𝘥𝘮𝘪𝘴𝘴𝜄́𝘷𝘦𝘭. 𝘈 𝘢𝘵𝘶𝘢𝘭 𝘔𝘪𝘯𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘳𝘢 𝘥𝘢 𝘑𝘶𝘴𝘵𝘪𝘤̧𝘢 𝘦 𝘰 𝘎𝘰𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘯𝘰 𝘲𝘶𝘦 𝘢 𝘢𝘷𝘢𝘭𝘪𝘻𝘢, 𝘴𝘢𝘣𝘦𝘳𝘢̃𝘰 𝘢 𝘦𝘯𝘰𝘳𝘮𝘦 𝘥𝘪𝘧𝘦𝘳𝘦𝘯𝘤̧𝘢 𝘲𝘶𝘦 𝘦𝘹𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘦 𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘳𝘦 𝘶𝘮 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘤𝘦𝘴𝘴𝘰 𝘤𝘪𝘷𝘪𝘭 𝘦 𝘶𝘮 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘤𝘦𝘴𝘴𝘰 𝘱𝘦𝘯𝘢𝘭.ᐣ 𝘚𝘢𝘣𝘦𝘳𝘢̃𝘰 𝘲𝘶𝘦 𝘯𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘦 𝘶́𝘭𝘵𝘪𝘮𝘰 𝘰 𝘲𝘶𝘦 𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘢́ 𝘦𝘮 𝘫𝘰𝘨𝘰, 𝘯𝘢 𝘦𝘴𝘮𝘢𝘨𝘢𝘥𝘰𝘳𝘢 𝘮𝘢𝘪𝘰𝘳𝘪𝘢 𝘥𝘰𝘴 𝘤𝘢𝘴𝘰𝘴, 𝘦́ 𝘢 𝘭𝘪𝘣𝘦𝘳𝘥𝘢𝘥𝘦 𝘥𝘢𝘴 𝘱𝘦𝘴𝘴𝘰𝘢𝘴, 𝘦 𝘯𝘢̃𝘰 𝘳𝘢𝘳𝘢𝘴 𝘷𝘦𝘻𝘦𝘴 𝘢𝘴 𝘮𝘢𝘪𝘴 𝘷𝘶𝘭𝘯𝘦𝘳𝘢́𝘷𝘦𝘪𝘴 𝘴𝘰𝘤𝘪𝘢𝘭 𝘦 𝘦𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘰𝘮𝘪𝘤𝘢𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘦.ᐣ 𝘚𝘢𝘣𝘦𝘳𝘢̃𝘰 𝘲𝘶𝘢𝘯𝘵𝘢𝘴 𝘱𝘦𝘴𝘴𝘰𝘢𝘴, 𝘤𝘦𝘳𝘵𝘢𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘦 𝘮𝘶𝘪𝘵𝘢𝘴, 𝘰𝘱𝘵𝘢𝘳𝘢̃𝘰 𝘱𝘰𝘳 𝘯𝘢̃𝘰 𝘴𝘦 𝘥𝘦𝘧𝘦𝘯𝘥𝘦𝘳 𝘯𝘶𝘮 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘤𝘦𝘴𝘴𝘰 𝘤𝘳𝘪𝘮𝘪𝘯𝘢𝘭 𝘱𝘦𝘭𝘰 𝘳𝘦𝘤𝘦𝘪𝘰 𝘥𝘦 𝘭𝘩𝘦𝘴 𝘴𝘦𝘳 𝘢𝘱𝘭𝘪𝘤𝘢𝘥𝘢 𝘶𝘮𝘢 𝘮𝘶𝘭𝘵𝘢 𝘥𝘦 𝟣𝟢 𝘮𝘪𝘭 𝘦𝘶𝘳𝘰𝘴, 𝘥𝘪𝘯𝘩𝘦𝘪𝘳𝘰 𝘲𝘶𝘦 𝘯𝘢̃𝘰 𝘵𝘦̂𝘮.ᐣ 𝘚𝘢𝘣𝘦𝘳𝘢̃𝘰 𝘲𝘶𝘦 𝘰 𝘱𝘦𝘳𝘧𝘪𝘭 𝘮𝘦́𝘥𝘪𝘰 𝘥𝘦 𝘶𝘮 𝘢𝘳𝘨𝘶𝘪𝘥𝘰 𝘯𝘢̃𝘰 𝘤𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘦𝘴𝘱𝘰𝘯𝘥𝘦 𝘮𝘪𝘯𝘪𝘮𝘢𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘦 𝘢𝘰 𝘥𝘰𝘴 𝘤𝘭𝘪𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘦𝘴 𝘲𝘶𝘦 𝘢𝘴 𝘴𝘰𝘤𝘪𝘦𝘥𝘢𝘥𝘦𝘴 𝘥𝘦 𝘢𝘥𝘷𝘰𝘨𝘢𝘥𝘰𝘴 𝘥𝘦 𝘲𝘶𝘦 𝘮𝘶𝘪𝘵𝘰𝘴 (𝘦𝘹)𝘮𝘪𝘯𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘳𝘰𝘴 𝘦 (𝘦𝘹)𝘥𝘦𝘱𝘶𝘵𝘢𝘥𝘰𝘴 𝘢𝘶𝘧𝘦𝘳𝘦𝘮 𝘭𝘶𝘤𝘳𝘰𝘴.ᐣ

𝘌́ 𝘤𝘭𝘢𝘳𝘰 𝘲𝘶𝘦 𝘢 𝘔𝘪𝘯𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘳𝘢 𝘴𝘢𝘣𝘦 𝘵𝘶𝘥𝘰 𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘰, 𝘦 𝘰 𝘎𝘰𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘯𝘰 𝘵𝘢𝘮𝘣𝘦́𝘮, 𝘮𝘢𝘴 𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘢̃𝘰-𝘴𝘦 𝘯𝘢𝘴 𝘵𝘪𝘯𝘵𝘢𝘴. 𝘖𝘴 𝘱𝘰𝘣𝘳𝘦𝘴 𝘦 𝘰𝘴 𝘳𝘦𝘮𝘦𝘥𝘪𝘢𝘥𝘰𝘴 𝘯𝘢̃𝘰 𝘪𝘯𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘦𝘴𝘴𝘢𝘮 𝘱𝘢𝘳𝘢 𝘰 𝘗𝘰𝘳𝘵𝘶𝘨𝘢𝘭 𝘲𝘶𝘦 𝘷𝘪𝘴𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘢𝘮 𝘤𝘰𝘮 𝘢 𝘴𝘶𝘢 𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘢𝘭𝘪𝘥𝘢𝘥𝘦 𝘥𝘦 𝘊𝘙.

𝘈 𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘦 𝘢𝘵𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘢𝘥𝘰 𝘪𝘯𝘢𝘥𝘮𝘪𝘴𝘴𝜄́𝘷𝘦𝘭 𝘢𝘰 𝘥𝘪𝘳𝘦𝘪𝘵𝘰 𝘥𝘦 𝘥𝘦𝘧𝘦𝘴𝘢 𝘦𝘮 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘤𝘦𝘴𝘴𝘰 𝘤𝘳𝘪𝘮𝘪𝘯𝘢𝘭 𝘢𝘤𝘳𝘦𝘴𝘤𝘦 𝘶𝘮𝘢 𝘭𝘪𝘮𝘪𝘵𝘢𝘤̧𝘢̃𝘰, 𝘯𝘢𝘥𝘢 𝘴𝘶𝘣𝘭𝘪𝘮𝘪𝘯𝘢𝘳, 𝘢𝘰 𝘱𝘢𝘱𝘦𝘭 𝘥𝘢 𝘢𝘥𝘷𝘰𝘤𝘢𝘤𝘪𝘢 𝘯𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘦 𝘳𝘢𝘮𝘰 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘤𝘦𝘴𝘴𝘶𝘢𝘭. 𝘖𝘴/𝘢𝘴 𝘢𝘥𝘷𝘰𝘨𝘢𝘥𝘰𝘴/𝘢𝘴 𝘱𝘰𝘥𝘦𝘮 𝘴𝘦𝘳 𝘢𝘭𝘷𝘰 𝘥𝘦 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘤𝘦𝘴𝘴𝘰𝘴 𝘥𝘪𝘴𝘤𝘪𝘱𝘭𝘪𝘯𝘢𝘳𝘦𝘴 𝘴𝘦 𝘦 𝘲𝘶𝘢𝘯𝘥𝘰 𝘰 𝘫𝘶𝜄́𝘻 𝘥𝘰 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘤𝘦𝘴𝘴𝘰 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘴𝘪𝘥𝘦𝘳𝘢𝘳, 𝘢 𝘴𝘦𝘶 𝘣𝘦𝘭-𝘱𝘳𝘢𝘻𝘦𝘳, 𝘲𝘶𝘦 𝘢𝘴 𝘥𝘪𝘭𝘪𝘨𝘦̂𝘯𝘤𝘪𝘢𝘴 𝘳𝘦𝘲𝘶𝘦𝘳𝘪𝘥𝘢𝘴 𝘱𝘦𝘭𝘢 𝘥𝘦𝘧𝘦𝘴𝘢 𝘧𝘰𝘳𝘦𝘮 𝘥𝘦𝘴𝘯𝘦𝘤𝘦𝘴𝘴𝘢́𝘳𝘪𝘢𝘴 𝘰𝘶 𝘥𝘪𝘭𝘢𝘵𝘰́𝘳𝘪𝘢𝘴. 𝘘𝘶𝘦 𝘢𝘥𝘷𝘰𝘨𝘢𝘥𝘰, 𝘮𝘶𝘪𝘵𝘢𝘴 𝘷𝘦𝘻𝘦𝘴 𝘰𝘧𝘪𝘤𝘪𝘰𝘴𝘰, 𝘷𝘢𝘪 𝘢𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘴𝘤𝘢𝘳 𝘶𝘮 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘤𝘦𝘴𝘴𝘰 𝘥𝘪𝘴𝘤𝘪𝘱𝘭𝘪𝘯𝘢𝘳 𝘯𝘢 𝘴𝘶𝘢 𝘰𝘳𝘥𝘦𝘮 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘧𝘪𝘴𝘴𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘢𝘭 𝘦𝘮 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘭 𝘥𝘦 𝘶𝘮𝘢 𝘥𝘦𝘧𝘦𝘴𝘢 𝘤𝘢𝘣𝘢𝘭 𝘥𝘰 𝘴𝘦𝘶 𝘤𝘭𝘪𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘦 𝘢𝘳𝘨𝘶𝘪𝘥𝘰, 𝘲𝘶𝘦 𝘯𝘰𝘳𝘮𝘢𝘭𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘦 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘩𝘦𝘤𝘦 𝘯𝘰 𝘱𝘳𝘰́𝘱𝘳𝘪𝘰 𝘥𝘪𝘢 𝘦𝘮 𝘲𝘶𝘦 𝘦́ 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘴𝘵𝘪𝘵𝘶𝜄́𝘥𝘰 𝘴𝘦𝘶 𝘥𝘦𝘧𝘦𝘯𝘴𝘰𝘳.ᐣ 𝘋𝘪𝘳𝘪𝘢 𝘲𝘶𝘦 𝘯𝘦𝘯𝘩𝘶𝘮. 𝘘𝘶𝘦 𝘢𝘥𝘷𝘰𝘨𝘢𝘥𝘰 𝘦𝘮 𝘱𝘳𝘢́𝘵𝘪𝘤𝘢 𝘪𝘯𝘥𝘪𝘷𝘪𝘥𝘶𝘢𝘭, 𝘪𝘯𝘶́𝘮𝘦𝘳𝘢𝘴 𝘷𝘦𝘻𝘦𝘴 𝘢𝘧𝘭𝘪𝘵𝘰 𝘤𝘰𝘮 𝘰 𝘱𝘦𝘴𝘰 𝘧𝘪𝘯𝘢𝘯𝘤𝘦𝘪𝘳𝘰 𝘦 𝘥𝘦𝘴𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘱𝘰𝘳𝘤𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘢𝘭 – 𝘢 𝘮𝘦𝘶 𝘷𝘦𝘳, 𝘪𝘨𝘶𝘢𝘭𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘦 𝘪𝘯𝘴𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘴𝘵𝘪𝘵𝘶𝘤𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘢𝘭 – 𝘥𝘢 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘵𝘳𝘪𝘣𝘶𝘪𝘤̧𝘢̃𝘰 𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘴𝘢𝘭 𝘢̀ 𝘊𝘗𝘈𝘚, 𝘷𝘢𝘪 𝘢𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘴𝘤𝘢𝘳 𝘶𝘮𝘢 𝘤𝘰𝘪𝘮𝘢 𝘢𝘴𝘴𝘰𝘤𝘪𝘢𝘥𝘢 𝘢 𝘶𝘮 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘤𝘦𝘴𝘴𝘰 𝘥𝘪𝘴𝘤𝘪𝘱𝘭𝘪𝘯𝘢𝘳, 𝘱𝘰𝘳 𝘱𝘳𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘢𝘳 𝘢 𝘮𝘦𝘭𝘩𝘰𝘳 𝘥𝘦𝘧𝘦𝘴𝘢 𝘱𝘰𝘴𝘴𝜄́𝘷𝘦𝘭 𝘢𝘰 𝘴𝘦𝘶 𝘤𝘭𝘪𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘦.ᐣ 𝘝𝘰𝘭𝘵𝘢𝘳𝘪𝘢 𝘢 𝘥𝘪𝘻𝘦𝘳 𝘲𝘶𝘦 𝘯𝘦𝘯𝘩𝘶𝘮. 𝘌 𝘦́ 𝘤𝘰𝘮𝘱𝘳𝘦𝘦𝘯𝘴𝜄́𝘷𝘦𝘭 𝘲𝘶𝘦 𝘯𝘪𝘯𝘨𝘶𝘦́𝘮 𝘲𝘶𝘦𝘪𝘳𝘢 𝘤𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘦𝘳 𝘦𝘴𝘴𝘦 𝘳𝘪𝘴𝘤𝘰. 𝘖 𝘲𝘶𝘦 𝘯𝘢̃𝘰 𝘴𝘦 𝘤𝘰𝘮𝘱𝘳𝘦𝘦𝘯𝘥𝘦, 𝘵𝘢𝘮𝘱𝘰𝘶𝘤𝘰 𝘱𝘰𝘥𝘦 𝘢𝘤𝘦𝘪𝘵𝘢𝘳-𝘴𝘦, 𝘦́ 𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘢 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘱𝘰𝘴𝘵𝘢.

𝘚𝘦𝘮 𝘫𝘶𝘴𝘵𝘪𝘤̧𝘢 𝘱𝘦𝘯𝘢𝘭 𝘯𝘢̃𝘰 𝘩𝘢́ 𝘫𝘶𝘴𝘵𝘪𝘤̧𝘢 𝘢𝘭𝘨𝘶𝘮𝘢. 𝘈 𝘔𝘪𝘯𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘳𝘢 𝘥𝘢 𝘑𝘶𝘴𝘵𝘪𝘤̧𝘢 𝘦 𝘥𝘰 𝘎𝘰𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘯𝘰 𝘵𝘢𝘮𝘣𝘦́𝘮 𝘴𝘢𝘣𝘦𝘮 𝘥𝘪𝘴𝘴𝘰, 𝘮𝘢𝘴 𝘢𝘥𝘷𝘰𝘤𝘢𝘤𝘪𝘢 𝘱𝘢𝘳𝘢 𝘱𝘰𝘣𝘳𝘦𝘴 𝘧𝘦𝘪𝘵𝘢 𝘱𝘰𝘳 𝘳𝘦𝘮𝘦𝘥𝘪𝘢𝘥𝘰𝘴 𝘯𝘢̃𝘰 𝘰𝘴 𝘪𝘯𝘤𝘰𝘮𝘰𝘥𝘢. 𝘗𝘰𝘣𝘳𝘦 𝘥𝘢 𝘯𝘰𝘴𝘴𝘢 𝘊𝘰𝘯𝘴𝘵𝘪𝘵𝘶𝘪𝘤̧𝘢̃𝘰 𝘤𝘰𝘮 𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘢 𝘱𝘰𝘥𝘳𝘦 𝘨𝘰𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘯𝘢𝘤̧𝘢̃𝘰.ᐟ

* Jurista e dirigente do Bloco de Esquerda.

IN "ESQUERDA"-26/01/26 .