.
400 mil euros,
10 mil inscritos e um
Estado a dormir ao volante
𝖭𝖺𝗌 𝗎́𝗅𝗍𝗂𝗆𝖺𝗌 𝗌𝖾𝗆𝖺𝗇𝖺𝗌, 𝗍𝗋𝖾̂𝗌 𝖼𝖺𝗌𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝗂𝗌𝗍𝗂𝗇𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝖾𝗑𝗉𝗎𝗌𝖾𝗋𝖺𝗆, 𝖽𝖾 𝖿𝗈𝗋𝗆𝖺 𝖼𝗋𝗎𝖺, 𝖿𝗋𝖺𝗀𝗂𝗅𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾𝗌 𝗀𝗋𝖺𝗏𝖾𝗌 𝗇𝖺 𝗀𝗈𝗏𝖾𝗋𝗇𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝗈 𝗇𝗈𝗌𝗌𝗈 𝗌𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖾𝗆𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝗌𝖺𝗎́𝖽𝖾, 𝖾𝗌𝗉𝖾𝖼𝗂𝖿𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾, 𝖽𝗈 𝗇𝗈𝗌𝗌𝗈 𝖲𝖾𝗋𝗏𝗂𝖼̧𝗈 𝖭𝖺𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗅 𝖽𝖾 𝖲𝖺𝗎́𝖽𝖾 (𝖲𝖭𝖲). 𝖣𝗎𝖺𝗌 𝖿𝗎𝗇𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺́𝗋𝗂𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗎𝗇𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝖾 𝗌𝖺𝗎́𝖽𝖾 𝖿𝖺𝗆𝗂𝗅𝗂𝖺𝗋 𝖿𝗈𝗋𝖺𝗆 𝖽𝖾𝗍𝗂𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝗉𝗈𝗋, 𝖺𝗅𝖾𝗀𝖺𝖽𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾, 𝗂𝗇𝗌𝖼𝗋𝖾𝗏𝖾𝗋𝖾𝗆 𝖼𝖾𝗋𝖼𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝟣𝟢 𝗆𝗂𝗅 𝗂𝗆𝗂𝗀𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗌 𝗇𝗈 𝖲𝖭𝖲, 𝖾𝗆 𝖺𝗇𝗈 𝖾 𝗆𝖾𝗂𝗈, 𝗌𝖾𝗆 𝖼𝗎𝗆𝗉𝗋𝗂𝗋 𝗋𝖾𝗊𝗎𝗂𝗌𝗂𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝖻𝖺́𝗌𝗂𝖼𝗈𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗏𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗏𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗆𝗈𝗋𝖺𝖽𝖺 - 𝖼𝗁𝖾𝗀𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝖺 𝗋𝖾𝗀𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗋 𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗌𝖾 𝟧𝟢𝟢 𝗉𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗈𝖺𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝖺 𝗆𝖾𝗌𝗆𝖺 𝗆𝗈𝗋𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝖾𝗆 𝖫𝗂𝗌𝖻𝗈𝖺.
𝖤𝗆 𝖫𝗂𝗌𝖻𝗈𝖺, 𝗎𝗆 𝖽𝖾𝗋𝗆𝖺𝗍𝗈𝗅𝗈𝗀𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖺 𝖽𝗈 𝖧𝗈𝗌𝗉𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗅 𝖽𝖾 𝖲𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖺 𝖬𝖺𝗋𝗂𝖺 𝗋𝖾𝖼𝖾𝖻𝖾𝗎 𝖼𝖾𝗋𝖼𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝟦𝟢𝟢 𝗆𝗂𝗅 𝖾𝗎𝗋𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝖽𝖾𝗓 𝗌𝖺́𝖻𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗍𝗋𝖺𝖻𝖺𝗅𝗁𝗈, 𝖺𝗈 𝖼𝗅𝖺𝗌𝗌𝗂𝖿𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗋 𝗉𝖾𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗇𝖺𝗌 𝖼𝗂𝗋𝗎𝗋𝗀𝗂𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖾𝗋𝗆𝖺𝗍𝗈𝗅𝗈́𝗀𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝖼𝗂𝗋𝗎𝗋𝗀𝗂𝖺𝗌 𝖾𝗆 𝖺𝗆𝖻𝗎𝗅𝖺𝗍𝗈́𝗋𝗂𝗈, 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝖻𝖾𝗆 𝗋𝖾𝗆𝗎𝗇𝖾𝗋𝖺𝖽𝖺𝗌, 𝗇𝗈 𝖺̂𝗆𝖻𝗂𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗀𝗋𝖺𝗆𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗋𝖾𝖽𝗎𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗅𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖾𝗌𝗉𝖾𝗋𝖺. 𝖮 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝗉𝖾𝗋𝗍𝗎𝗋𝖻𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗋 𝖾́ 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗈 𝗆𝖾́𝖽𝗂𝖼𝗈 𝗃𝖺́ 𝗍𝗂𝗇𝗁𝖺 𝗌𝗂𝖽𝗈 𝖺𝗅𝗏𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝗎𝖺𝗌 𝖺𝗎𝖽𝗂𝗍𝗈𝗋𝗂𝖺𝗌 𝖾𝗆 𝟤𝟢𝟤𝟦 𝗌𝖾𝗆 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖿𝗈𝗌𝗌𝖾𝗆 𝖽𝖾𝗍𝖾𝗍𝖺𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝗂𝗋𝗋𝖾𝗀𝗎𝗅𝖺𝗋𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾𝗌, 𝗈𝖻𝗋𝗂𝗀𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝖺𝗀𝗈𝗋𝖺 𝖺 𝗇𝗈𝗏𝖺𝗌 𝖺𝗎𝖽𝗂𝗍𝗈𝗋𝗂𝖺𝗌 𝗂𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗇𝖺𝗌, 𝖼𝗅ı́𝗇𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗌 𝖾 𝖽𝖺 𝖨𝗇𝗌𝗉𝖾𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈-𝖦𝖾𝗋𝖺𝗅 𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝖠𝗍𝗂𝗏𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾𝗌 𝖾𝗆 𝖲𝖺𝗎́𝖽𝖾 (𝖨𝖦𝖠𝖲) 𝖾 𝖺𝗍𝖾́ 𝖺̀ 𝗌𝗎𝗌𝗉𝖾𝗇𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝗈 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗀𝗋𝖺𝗆𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝗋𝖾𝖼𝗎𝗉𝖾𝗋𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗅𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖾𝗌𝗉𝖾𝗋𝖺.
𝖭𝗈 𝖯𝗈𝗋𝗍𝗈, 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝖾𝗇𝖽𝗈𝖼𝗋𝗂𝗇𝗈𝗅𝗈𝗀𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖺 𝖾́ 𝗌𝗎𝗌𝗉𝖾𝗂𝗍𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝗅𝗂𝖽𝖾𝗋𝖺𝗋 𝗎𝗆 𝖾𝗌𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗆𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗌𝖼𝗋𝗂𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖮𝗓𝖾𝗆𝗉𝗂𝖼 𝖾 𝗈𝗎𝗍𝗋𝗈𝗌 𝖺𝗇𝗍𝗂𝖽𝗂𝖺𝖻𝖾́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝗈𝗌 𝖺 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝟣.𝟢𝟢𝟢 𝗎𝗍𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗌 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝗂𝖺𝖻𝖾́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝗈𝗌, 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝖿𝗂𝗇𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖾𝗆𝖺𝗀𝗋𝖾𝖼𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈, 𝗅𝖾𝗌𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝗈 𝖲𝖭𝖲 𝖾𝗆 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗍𝗋𝖾̂𝗌 𝗆𝗂𝗅𝗁𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖾𝗎𝗋𝗈𝗌.
𝖤𝗌𝗍𝖾𝗌 𝖾𝗉𝗂𝗌𝗈́𝖽𝗂𝗈𝗌 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝗆𝖾𝗋𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝗏𝗂𝗈𝗌 𝗂𝗇𝖽𝗂𝗏𝗂𝖽𝗎𝖺𝗂𝗌: 𝗋𝖾𝗏𝖾𝗅𝖺𝗆 𝗎𝗆 𝗌𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖾𝗆𝖺 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖿𝖺𝗅𝗁𝖺 𝗇𝖺𝗊𝗎𝗂𝗅𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗁𝗈𝗃𝖾 𝗌𝖾𝗋𝗂𝖺 𝖻𝖺́𝗌𝗂𝖼𝗈 𝗇𝗎𝗆 𝗉𝖺ı́𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗉𝗅𝖾𝗍𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝗂𝗇𝖿𝗈𝗋𝗆𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗓𝖺𝖽𝗈. 𝖤𝗆 𝟤𝟢𝟤𝟥, 𝗈 𝗉𝗋𝗈́𝗉𝗋𝗂𝗈 𝖲𝖭𝖲 𝗋𝖾𝖼𝗈𝗋𝖽𝖺𝗏𝖺 𝖽𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖺 𝖮𝖢𝖣𝖤 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖺𝗉𝗈𝗇𝗍𝖺𝗆 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖼𝖾𝗋𝖼𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝟤𝟢% 𝖽𝖺 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝗉𝖾𝗌𝖺 𝖾𝗆 𝗌𝖺𝗎́𝖽𝖾 𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗎𝗅𝗍𝖾 𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝗉𝖾𝗋𝖽ı́𝖼𝗂𝗈 - 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝖽𝖾 𝖿𝗋𝖺𝗎𝖽𝖾𝗌 𝖺 𝗆𝖺́ 𝗀𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝖼𝖾𝖽𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝗇𝖾𝖼𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖺́𝗋𝗂𝗈𝗌. 𝖠𝗈 𝗆𝖾𝗌𝗆𝗈 𝗍𝖾𝗆𝗉𝗈, 𝖯𝗈𝗋𝗍𝗎𝗀𝖺𝗅 𝗀𝖺𝗌𝗍𝖺 𝟣𝟢,𝟤% 𝖽𝗈 𝖯𝖨𝖡 𝖾𝗆 𝗌𝖺𝗎́𝖽𝖾 𝖾 𝖺𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗌𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺𝗏𝖺 𝗎𝗆 𝖽𝖾́𝖿𝗂𝖼𝖾 𝗇𝗈 𝖲𝖭𝖲 𝖽𝖾 𝖼𝖾𝗋𝖼𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝟣.𝟥𝟩𝟪 𝗆𝗂𝗅𝗁𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖾𝗎𝗋𝗈𝗌 𝖾𝗆 𝟤𝟢𝟤𝟦, 𝖾𝗇𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗌𝖾 𝟥𝟢% 𝖽𝖺 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝗉𝖾𝗌𝖺 𝖾𝗆 𝗌𝖺𝗎́𝖽𝖾 𝖾́ 𝗉𝖺𝗀𝖺 𝖽𝗂𝗋𝖾𝗍𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝗉𝖾𝗅𝖺𝗌 𝖿𝖺𝗆ı́𝗅𝗂𝖺𝗌, 𝗏𝖺𝗅𝗈𝗋 𝗆𝗎𝗂𝗍𝗈 𝖺𝖼𝗂𝗆𝖺 𝖽𝖺 𝗆𝖾́𝖽𝗂𝖺 𝖽𝖺 𝖮𝖢𝖣𝖤.
𝖰𝗎𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝗎𝗆 𝗌𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖾𝗆𝖺 𝗂𝗇𝖿𝗈𝗋𝗆𝖺́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝗈 𝗉𝖾𝗋𝗆𝗂𝗍𝖾 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝟣𝟢 𝗆𝗂𝗅 𝗂𝗇𝗌𝖼𝗋𝗂𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝗌𝖾𝗃𝖺𝗆 𝖿𝖾𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗌 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝖽𝗎𝖺𝗌 𝗉𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗈𝖺𝗌 𝗌𝖾𝗆 𝖽𝗂𝗌𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺𝗋 𝖺𝗅𝖾𝗋𝗍𝖺𝗌; 𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝖺𝗅𝗀𝗎𝖾́𝗆 𝗉𝗈𝖽𝖾 𝖺𝖼𝗎𝗆𝗎𝗅𝖺𝗋 𝟦𝟢𝟢 𝗆𝗂𝗅 𝖾𝗎𝗋𝗈𝗌 𝖾𝗆 𝖽𝖾𝗓 𝖽𝗂𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗍𝗋𝖺𝖻𝖺𝗅𝗁𝗈 𝖺𝖽𝗂𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗅 𝗌𝖾𝗆 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖺𝗌 𝗂𝗇𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗀𝗋𝗎𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗌 𝗌𝖺𝗅𝗍𝖾𝗆 𝖺̀ 𝗏𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖺; 𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝗉𝖺𝖽𝗋𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝖺𝗇𝗈́𝗆𝖺𝗅𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗌𝖼𝗋𝗂𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗎𝗆 𝗆𝖾𝖽𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝖼𝖺𝗋𝗈 𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗉𝖺𝗋𝗍𝗂𝖼𝗂𝗉𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝗌𝖾 𝖺𝗋𝗋𝖺𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗆 𝖽𝗎𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖺𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝖺𝗍𝖾́ 𝗌𝖾𝗋𝖾𝗆 𝖿𝗂𝗇𝖺𝗅𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝗂𝗇𝗏𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗂𝗀𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌, 𝗈 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝖻𝗅𝖾𝗆𝖺 𝗃𝖺́ 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾́ 𝗌𝗈́ 𝖽𝖾 𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗆 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝖾𝗍𝖾 𝗈 𝗂𝗅ı́𝖼𝗂𝗍𝗈. 𝖤́, 𝗌𝗈𝖻𝗋𝖾𝗍𝗎𝖽𝗈, 𝖽𝖾 𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗆 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝖾𝗇𝗁𝖺, 𝗋𝖾𝗀𝗎𝗅𝖺 𝖾 𝖿𝗂𝗌𝖼𝖺𝗅𝗂𝗓𝖺 𝗈 𝗌𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖾𝗆𝖺: 𝖬𝗂𝗇𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖾́𝗋𝗂𝗈 𝖽𝖺 𝖲𝖺𝗎́𝖽𝖾, 𝖺𝖽𝗆𝗂𝗇𝗂𝗌𝗍𝗋𝖺𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝖴𝖫𝖲, 𝖠𝖢𝖲𝖲, 𝖨𝖦𝖠𝖲 𝖾 𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗌 𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾𝗌 𝗉𝗎́𝖻𝗅𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝖽𝖾𝗏𝖾𝗋 𝖽𝖾 𝗌𝗎𝗉𝖾𝗋𝗏𝗂𝗌𝖺̃𝗈.
𝖱𝖾𝗌𝗉𝗈𝗇𝗌𝖺𝖻𝗂𝗅𝗂𝗓𝖺𝗋 𝖼𝗋𝗂𝗆𝗂𝗇𝖺𝗅𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝗈𝗌 𝖾𝗇𝗏𝗈𝗅𝗏𝗂𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖾́ 𝗇𝖾𝖼𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖺́𝗋𝗂𝗈, 𝗆𝖺𝗌 𝗂𝗇𝗌𝗎𝖿𝗂𝖼𝗂𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾. 𝖠 𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗉𝗈𝗇𝗌𝖺𝖻𝗂𝗅𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝗉𝗈𝗅ı́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝖺 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗉𝗈𝖽𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗂𝗇𝗎𝖺𝗋 𝖽𝗂𝗅𝗎ı́𝖽𝖺 𝖾𝗆 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗂𝗌𝗌𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗂𝗇𝗊𝗎𝖾́𝗋𝗂𝗍𝗈, 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗎𝗇𝗂𝖼𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖾 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗆𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖾 "𝖺𝗏𝖾𝗋𝗂𝗀𝗎𝖺𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌". 𝖤́ 𝗈𝖻𝗋𝗂𝗀𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝗈 𝖤𝗌𝗍𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝗂𝗆𝗉𝗅𝖾𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺𝗋 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗋𝗈𝗅𝗈 𝗂𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗅𝗂𝗀𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖾𝗆 𝗍𝖾𝗆𝗉𝗈 𝗋𝖾𝖺𝗅, 𝖼𝗋𝗎𝗓𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝖺𝗎𝗍𝗈𝗆𝖺́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌, 𝗅𝗂𝗆𝗂𝗍𝖾𝗌 𝖾 𝖺𝗅𝖾𝗋𝗍𝖺𝗌 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗉𝖺𝖽𝗋𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗋𝗂𝗌𝖼𝗈, 𝖻𝖾𝗆 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝗋𝖾𝖿𝗈𝗋𝖼̧𝖺𝗋 𝖺 𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗌𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝗉𝗎́𝖻𝗅𝗂𝖼𝖺 𝗌𝗈𝖻𝗋𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗍𝗈𝗌, 𝖺𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝖼𝗅ı́𝗇𝗂𝖼𝗈𝗌 𝖺𝖽𝗂𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝖾 𝗉𝖾𝗋𝖿𝗂𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗌𝖼𝗋𝗂𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈.
𝖭𝗎𝗆 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗑𝗍𝗈 𝖾𝗆 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗈𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗋𝗂𝖻𝗎𝗂𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗌 𝖾𝗇𝖿𝗋𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺𝗆 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝖼𝖺𝗋𝗀𝖺 𝖿𝗂𝗌𝖼𝖺𝗅 𝖾𝗅𝖾𝗏𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝖾 𝗎𝗆 𝖲𝖭𝖲 𝖼𝗋𝗈𝗇𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝗌𝗎𝖻𝖿𝗂𝗇𝖺𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝖾 𝖽𝖾𝖿𝗂𝖼𝗂𝗍𝖺́𝗋𝗂𝗈, 𝖾́ 𝗂𝗇𝖺𝖼𝖾𝗂𝗍𝖺́𝗏𝖾𝗅 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗈 𝖼𝗎𝗌𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖾𝗌 𝖺𝖻𝗎𝗌𝗈𝗌 𝗌𝖾𝗃𝖺 𝗌𝗈𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗅𝗂𝗓𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝖾𝗇𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝖺 𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗉𝗈𝗇𝗌𝖺𝖻𝗂𝗅𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖾́ 𝗌𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖾𝗆𝖺𝗍𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝗉𝖾𝗋𝗌𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗅𝗂𝗓𝖺𝖽𝖺. 𝖠 𝖼𝗎𝗅𝗉𝖺 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗉𝗈𝖽𝖾 𝗆𝗈𝗋𝗋𝖾𝗋 𝗌𝗈𝗅𝗍𝖾𝗂𝗋𝖺: 𝗈𝗎 𝗈 𝖤𝗌𝗍𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝖺𝗌𝗌𝗎𝗆𝖾, 𝖽𝖾 𝖿𝗈𝗋𝗆𝖺 𝖼𝗅𝖺𝗋𝖺, 𝖺 𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗉𝗈𝗇𝗌𝖺𝖻𝗂𝗅𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝗉𝗈𝗅ı́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝖺 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗏𝖾𝗇𝗂𝗋 𝖾 𝖽𝖾𝗍𝖾𝗍𝖺𝗋 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖾𝗌 𝖾𝗌𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗆𝖺𝗌, 𝗈𝗎 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗂𝗇𝗎𝖺𝗋𝖺́ 𝖺 𝗌𝖾𝗋 𝖼𝗎́𝗆𝗉𝗅𝗂𝖼𝖾 𝗌𝗂𝗅𝖾𝗇𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗌𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗎𝗆 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝗉𝖾𝗋𝖽ı́𝖼𝗂𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗍𝗎𝗀𝗎𝖾𝗌𝖾𝗌 𝗉𝖺𝗀𝖺𝗆, 𝗍𝗈𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗈𝗌 𝗆𝖾𝗌𝖾𝗌, 𝗉𝖾𝗅𝗈𝗌 𝗌𝖾𝗎𝗌 𝗂𝗆𝗉𝗈𝗌𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝖾 𝗇𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝗂𝖿𝗂𝖼𝗎𝗅𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖺𝖼𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗈 𝖺𝗈𝗌 𝖼𝗎𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗌𝖺𝗎́𝖽𝖾.
* Doutorado em Ciências de Enfermagem. Investigador.
IN "JORNAL DE NOTÍCIAS" - 24/11/25 .
Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário