SOFIA SANTOS MACHADO

 .

O lobo

Devemos a nós e às próximas gerações um debate sobre que sociedade e contrato social desejamos. Tal envolve refletir em alternativas à tributação do trabalho, capital e heranças

𝖤𝗆 𝟤𝟢𝟤𝟥, 𝖠𝖽𝖺𝗆 𝖢𝗈𝗇𝗈𝗏𝖾𝗋 𝖺𝖿𝗂𝗋𝗆𝗈𝗎: “𝖭𝖺̃𝗈 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗍𝖾𝗇𝖽ı́𝖺𝗆𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖾𝖿𝖾𝗇𝖽𝖾𝗋-𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖺 𝖺 𝗍𝖾𝖼𝗇𝗈𝗅𝗈𝗀𝗂𝖺, 𝗆𝖺𝗌 𝗌𝗂𝗆 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖺 𝗈𝗌 𝗁𝗎𝗆𝖺𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝗇𝗈 𝗈𝗎𝗍𝗋𝗈 𝗅𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝖽𝖺 𝗆𝖾𝗌𝖺, 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗍𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺𝗆 𝗅𝗂𝗑𝖺𝗋-𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝗍𝗈𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝗂𝖺𝗌.” 𝖠 𝖿𝗋𝖺𝗌𝖾 𝖿𝗈𝗂 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝖿𝖾𝗋𝗂𝖽𝖺 𝖺𝗉𝗈́𝗌 𝗌𝖾𝗋 𝖿𝗂𝗇𝖺𝗅𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖺𝗅𝖼𝖺𝗇𝖼̧𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝗎𝗆 𝖺𝖼𝗈𝗋𝖽𝗈 𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖾 𝗈𝗌 𝖺𝗋𝗀𝗎𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗌 𝖾 𝗈𝗌 𝗋𝖾𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗌𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗎́𝖽𝗂𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖧𝗈𝗅𝗅𝗒𝗐𝗈𝗈𝖽, 𝗇𝖺 𝗌𝖾𝗊𝗎𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗀𝗋𝖾𝗏𝖾 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝗈𝗎 𝖺 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝖽𝗎𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗌𝖾́𝗋𝗂𝖾𝗌 𝖾 𝖿𝗂𝗅𝗆𝖾𝗌. 𝖮 𝗍𝖾𝗆𝖺 𝖼𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗅 𝖽𝖺 𝖽𝗂𝗌𝗉𝗎𝗍𝖺 𝖾𝗋𝖺 𝖺 𝗎𝗍𝗂𝗅𝗂𝗓𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝗌𝖾𝗆 𝗋𝖾𝗀𝗋𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝗈 𝖢𝗁𝖺𝗍𝖦𝖯𝖳 𝖾 𝖽𝖾 𝖿𝖾𝗋𝗋𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺𝗌 𝗌𝖾𝗆𝖾𝗅𝗁𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗌 𝗉𝖾𝗅𝗈𝗌 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗎́𝖽𝗂𝗈𝗌. 𝖢𝗈𝗇𝗈𝗏𝖾𝗋 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺𝖿𝗋𝖺𝗌𝖾𝗈𝗎 𝖳𝗁𝗈𝗆𝖺𝗌 𝖧𝗈𝖻𝖻𝖾𝗌: “𝖮 𝗁𝗈𝗆𝖾𝗆 𝖾́ 𝗈 𝗅𝗈𝖻𝗈 𝖽𝗈 𝗁𝗈𝗆𝖾𝗆.” 𝖮𝗎 𝗌𝖾𝗃𝖺, 𝗌𝖾𝗆 𝗅𝖾𝗂𝗌, 𝗈 𝗁𝗈𝗆𝖾𝗆 𝗏𝗂𝗏𝖾 𝖾𝗆 𝗉𝖾𝗋𝗆𝖺𝗇𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖿𝗅𝗂𝗍𝗈, 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝗎𝗆 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝖾𝗃𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗉𝗈𝖽𝖾𝗋 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗀𝖺𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗍𝗂𝗋 𝖺 𝗌𝗎𝖺 𝗉𝗋𝗈́𝗉𝗋𝗂𝖺 𝗌𝗈𝖻𝗋𝖾𝗏𝗂𝗏𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺. 𝖭𝗈 “𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗍𝗈 𝗌𝗈𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗅”, 𝗈𝗌 𝖼𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖺̃𝗈𝗌 𝖺𝖻𝖽𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗆 𝖽𝖾 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝗍𝖾 𝖽𝖺 𝗌𝗎𝖺 𝗅𝗂𝖻𝖾𝗋𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾, 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖿𝖾𝗋𝗂𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝖺𝗈 𝖤𝗌𝗍𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝗈 𝗉𝗈𝖽𝖾𝗋 𝖽𝖾 𝗅𝖾𝗀𝗂𝗌𝗅𝖺𝗋 𝖾 𝖺 𝖺𝗎𝗍𝗈𝗋𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝖿𝖺𝗓𝖾𝗋 𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗉𝖾𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗋 𝖺𝗌 𝗅𝖾𝗂𝗌

𝖬𝖺𝗌 𝖾 𝗌𝖾 𝗈𝗌 𝖼𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖺̃𝗈𝗌 𝗃𝖺́ 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖿𝗂𝖺𝗋𝖾𝗆 𝗇𝗈 “𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗍𝗈 𝗌𝗈𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗅” 𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝗌𝗈𝖼𝗂𝖾𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾𝗌 𝗆𝗈𝖽𝖾𝗋𝗇𝖺𝗌? 𝖲𝖾 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝗍𝖾 𝖼𝗋𝖾𝗌𝖼𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖽𝖺 𝗉𝗈𝗉𝗎𝗅𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗇𝖽𝖾𝗋 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗈 𝖤𝗌𝗍𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗓𝖾𝗅𝖺 𝗉𝖾𝗅𝗈𝗌 𝗌𝖾𝗎𝗌 𝗂𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖾𝗌?

𝖠 𝖼𝗋𝗂𝗌𝖾 𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝗌𝗈𝖼𝗂𝖾𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖾𝗆𝗈𝖼𝗋𝖺́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗌 𝗈𝖼𝗂𝖽𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝖾́ 𝖾𝗑𝖺𝖼𝖾𝗋𝖻𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝗉𝖾𝗅𝗈 𝖺𝗅𝗀𝗈𝗋𝗂𝗍𝗆𝗈, 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖿𝗈𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺 𝖺 𝗉𝗈𝗅𝖺𝗋𝗂𝗓𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾 𝗂𝗆𝗉𝖾𝖽𝖾 𝗈 𝖽𝗂𝖺́𝗅𝗈𝗀𝗈. 𝖬𝖺𝗌 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗆𝗈𝗍𝗂𝗏𝗈 𝖽𝗂𝗌𝖼𝗎𝗋𝗌𝗈𝗌 𝖾𝗑𝗍𝗋𝖾𝗆𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗌, 𝗏𝗂𝗈𝗅𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝖾 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝗎𝗆𝖺𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝖺𝗉𝖾𝗅𝖺𝗆 𝖺 𝗍𝖺𝗇𝗍𝗈𝗌

𝖮 𝖿𝗂𝗅𝗈𝗌𝗈𝖿𝗈 𝖬𝗂𝖼𝗁𝖺𝖾𝗅 𝖲𝖺𝗇𝖽𝖾𝗅, 𝗇𝗈 𝗅𝗂𝗏𝗋𝗈 𝖠 𝖳𝗂𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗂𝖺 𝖽𝗈 𝖬𝖾́𝗋𝗂𝗍𝗈, 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝖼𝗎𝗋𝖺 𝖾𝗇𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗋 𝖺 𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗉𝗈𝗌𝗍𝖺. 𝖤𝗆𝖻𝗈𝗋𝖺 𝖺 𝗌𝗎𝖺 𝖺𝗇𝖺́𝗅𝗂𝗌𝖾 𝗌𝖾 𝖿𝗈𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗇𝖺 𝗌𝗈𝖼𝗂𝖾𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗋𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗇𝖺, 𝗈 𝗌𝖾𝗎 𝗉𝖾𝗇𝗌𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝖾́ 𝗋𝖾𝗅𝖾𝗏𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝖺𝗌 𝗌𝗈𝖼𝗂𝖾𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾𝗌 𝗈𝖼𝗂𝖽𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝖾𝗆 𝗀𝖾𝗋𝖺𝗅 𝖾, 𝗌𝗈𝖻𝗋𝖾𝗍𝗎𝖽𝗈, 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝖺𝖿𝗂𝗈𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗈𝗋𝖺 𝗌𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗅𝗈𝖼𝖺𝗆 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝗈 𝖺𝖽𝗏𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝖺 𝖨𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗅𝗂𝗀𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝖠𝗋𝗍𝗂𝖿𝗂𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗅.

𝖠 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗆𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖺 𝗋𝗂𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗓𝖺 𝗀𝖾𝗋𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝗉𝖾𝗅𝖺 𝗀𝗅𝗈𝖻𝖺𝗅𝗂𝗓𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝗉𝖾𝗋𝗆𝗂𝗍𝗂𝗋𝗂𝖺, 𝖺 𝗍𝗈𝖽𝗈𝗌, 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗈𝗋 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖿𝗈𝗋𝗍𝗈 𝖾𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗈́𝗆𝗂𝖼𝗈 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗌𝖾 𝖼𝗎𝗆𝗉𝗋𝗂𝗎. 𝖤𝗆 𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗍𝗋𝗈 𝖽𝖾́𝖼𝖺𝖽𝖺𝗌, 𝖺 𝖢𝗁𝗂𝗇𝖺 𝖾𝗅𝖾𝗏𝗈𝗎 𝖽𝖺 𝗉𝗈𝖻𝗋𝖾𝗓𝖺 𝟪𝟢𝟢 𝗆𝗂𝗅𝗁𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗉𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗈𝖺𝗌, 𝗆𝖺𝗌 𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝖤𝖴𝖠 𝖺 𝗋𝗂𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗓𝖺 𝗀𝖾𝗋𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝖺 𝗀𝗅𝗈𝖻𝖺𝗅𝗂𝗓𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖿𝗈𝗂 𝖼𝖺𝗉𝗍𝗎𝗋𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝖺𝗉𝖾𝗇𝖺𝗌 𝟤𝟢% 𝖽𝖺 𝗉𝗈𝗉𝗎𝗅𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈. 𝖮𝗌 𝗌𝖺𝗅𝖺́𝗋𝗂𝗈𝗌 𝗆𝖺𝗇𝗍𝗂𝗏𝖾𝗋𝖺𝗆-𝗌𝖾 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗀𝗇𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖾, 𝖾𝗆 𝟤𝟢𝟤𝟢, 𝗈 𝖣𝖾𝗉𝖺𝗋𝗍𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖤𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗍ı́𝗌𝗍𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖤𝖴𝖠 𝖽𝗂𝗏𝗎𝗅𝗀𝗈𝗎 𝗎𝗆 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗎𝖽𝗈 𝖽𝖾𝗆𝗈𝗇𝗌𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖺 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝗂𝗀𝗎𝖺𝗅𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗇𝗀𝗂𝗋𝖺 𝗈 𝗇ı́𝗏𝖾𝗅 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝖾𝗅𝖾𝗏𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝖾𝗆 𝖼𝗂𝗇𝖼𝗈 𝖽𝖾́𝖼𝖺𝖽𝖺𝗌. 𝖠̀ 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝗂𝗀𝗎𝖺𝗅𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝗌𝗈𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗅 𝗌𝗈𝗆𝖺-𝗌𝖾 𝖺 𝖺𝗋𝗋𝗈𝗀𝖺̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗏𝖾𝗇𝖼𝖾𝖽𝗈𝗋𝖾𝗌. 𝖮 𝖽𝗂𝗌𝖼𝗎𝗋𝗌𝗈 𝖽𝗈𝗆𝗂𝗇𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖾́ 𝖽𝖾 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗆 𝗏𝖾𝗇𝖼𝖾𝗎 𝗈 𝖿𝖾𝗓 𝗉𝖾𝗅𝗈 𝗌𝖾𝗎 𝗆𝖾́𝗋𝗂𝗍𝗈 𝖾𝗑𝖼𝗅𝗎𝗌𝗂𝗏𝗈. 𝖰𝗎𝖾 𝗍𝗎𝖽𝗈 𝖽𝖾𝗏𝖾 𝖺̀ 𝗌𝗎𝖺 𝗂𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗅𝗂𝗀𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝖾 𝖺𝗈 𝗌𝖾𝗎 𝖾𝗌𝖿𝗈𝗋𝖼̧𝗈 𝖾, 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝗍𝖺𝗅, 𝗈𝗌 𝗌𝖾𝗎𝗌 𝗋𝖾𝗇𝖽𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗌𝗈́ 𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝗆𝖾𝗋𝖾𝖼𝗂𝖽𝗈𝗌, 𝗆𝖺𝗌 𝗃𝗎𝗌𝗍𝗈𝗌. 𝖭𝗈 𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺𝗇𝗍𝗈, 𝗍𝖺𝗅 𝗂𝗆𝗉𝗅𝗂𝖼𝖺 𝗍𝖺𝗆𝖻𝖾́𝗆 𝖺𝖿𝗂𝗋𝗆𝖺𝗋 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗈𝗌 𝗈𝗎𝗍𝗋𝗈𝗌 𝖿𝖺𝗅𝗁𝖺𝗋𝖺𝗆 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝗌𝗎𝖺 𝗎́𝗇𝗂𝖼𝖺 𝖾 𝖾𝗑𝖼𝗅𝗎𝗌𝗂𝗏𝖺 𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗉𝗈𝗇𝗌𝖺𝖻𝗂𝗅𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾, 𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗎𝖽𝖺𝗋𝖺𝗆, 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗍𝗋𝖺𝖻𝖺𝗅𝗁𝖺𝗋𝖺𝗆. 𝖠̀𝗌 𝖺𝗀𝗋𝗎𝗋𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝗂𝖿𝗂𝖼𝗎𝗅𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾𝗌 𝖾𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗈́𝗆𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗌 𝖺𝗅𝗂𝖺-𝗌𝖾 𝖺 𝗁𝗎𝗆𝗂𝗅𝗁𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈. 𝖭𝖺𝗍𝗎𝗋𝖺𝗅𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾, 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖾 𝖾́ 𝗎𝗆 𝖽𝗂𝗌𝖼𝗎𝗋𝗌𝗈 𝗉𝖾𝗋𝗏𝖾𝗋𝗌𝗈, 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗇𝖺𝗌𝖼𝖾𝗆𝗈𝗌 𝗍𝗈𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝗈𝗌 𝗆𝖾𝗌𝗆𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝗈𝗇𝗌, 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝖿𝖺𝗆ı́𝗅𝗂𝖺𝗌 𝗂𝖽𝖾̂𝗇𝗍𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗌 𝖾 𝗈𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗍𝗎𝗇𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾𝗌 𝗂𝗀𝗎𝖺𝗂𝗌. 𝖬𝖺𝗌 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾́ 𝗌𝗈𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝗈 𝖿𝖺𝖼𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝖾, 𝗇𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗋𝗋𝗂𝖽𝖺 𝖽𝖺 𝗏𝗂𝖽𝖺, 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝗍𝗂𝗋𝗆𝗈𝗌 𝗍𝗈𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖺 𝗆𝖾𝗌𝗆𝖺 𝗅𝗂𝗇𝗁𝖺 𝖾 𝖽𝖾 𝗇𝗈 𝗉𝖾𝗋𝖼𝗎𝗋𝗌𝗈 𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗆𝗈𝗌 𝖺𝗉𝗈𝗂𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝗂𝗌𝗍𝗂𝗇𝗍𝗈𝗌, 𝖾́ 𝗍𝖺𝗆𝖻𝖾́𝗆 𝗈 𝖿𝖺𝖼𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖺 𝗌𝗈𝖼𝗂𝖾𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾, 𝖾𝗆 𝖼𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝗆𝗈𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈, 𝗏𝖺𝗅𝗈𝗋𝗂𝗓𝖺 𝗍𝖺𝗅𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝗆𝗎𝗂𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝗂𝖿𝖾𝗋𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗌. 𝖥𝗂𝗇𝖺𝗅𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾, 𝖾 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗏𝖺𝗏𝖾𝗅𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝗋𝖾𝗅𝖾𝗏𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝖺 𝗉𝗈𝗅𝖺𝗋𝗂𝗓𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖺𝗍𝗎𝖺𝗅, 𝖺 𝗌𝗈𝖼𝗂𝖾𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝗈𝖼𝗂𝖽𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺𝗅 𝖿𝖺𝗓 𝖼𝗈𝗂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖽𝗂𝗋 𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗋𝗂𝖻𝗎𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖼𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝗎𝗆 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗈 𝖻𝖾𝗆 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗎𝗆 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝗈 𝗏𝖺𝗅𝗈𝗋 𝖽𝖺 𝗋𝖾𝗆𝗎𝗇𝖾𝗋𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖺𝗎𝖿𝖾𝗋𝗂𝖽𝖺, 𝗇𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗉𝖾𝗋𝗏𝖾𝗋𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝗌𝗈𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗅 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖿𝗂𝖼𝗈𝗎 𝖺 𝗇𝗎 𝗇𝖺 𝗉𝖺𝗇𝖽𝖾𝗆𝗂𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝖢𝗈𝗏𝗂𝖽-𝟣𝟫. 𝖮𝗌 𝖽𝖾𝗇𝗈𝗆𝗂𝗇𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌 “𝗍𝗋𝖺𝖻𝖺𝗅𝗁𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗋𝖾𝗌 𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖾𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗂𝗌” 𝖾𝗋𝖺𝗆 𝖺𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗅𝖾𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝖾𝗆𝗉𝖾𝗇𝗁𝖺𝗆 𝖺𝗌 𝖿𝗎𝗇𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝗆𝖺𝗅 𝗉𝖺𝗀𝖺𝗌 – 𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗆 𝗋𝖾𝖼𝗈𝗅𝗁𝖾 𝗈 𝗅𝗂𝗑𝗈, 𝖼𝗈𝗅𝗁𝖾 𝖺 𝖿𝗋𝗎𝗍𝖺, 𝖼𝗎𝗂𝖽𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝗂𝖽𝗈𝗌𝗈𝗌…

𝖮 𝗍𝗋𝖺𝖻𝖺𝗅𝗁𝗈 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾́ 𝖺𝗉𝖾𝗇𝖺𝗌 𝗎𝗆 𝗆𝖾𝗂𝗈 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝖺 𝗈𝖻𝗍𝖾𝗇𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗎𝗆 𝗋𝖾𝗇𝖽𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈. 𝖭𝖺̃𝗈 𝗌𝗈𝗆𝗈𝗌 𝗂𝗇𝖽𝗂𝖿𝖾𝗋𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗌 𝖺̀ 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗂𝗆𝖺 𝖾 𝖺𝗈 𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗉𝖾𝗂𝗍𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗀𝖾𝗋𝖺𝗆𝗈𝗌. 𝖭𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗌𝗈𝖼𝗂𝖾𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝗂𝗀𝗎𝖺𝗅 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝗏𝖺𝗅𝗈𝗋𝗂𝗓𝖺 𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗋𝗂𝖻𝗎𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗍𝖺𝗇𝗍𝗈𝗌, 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝖾𝖼̧𝖺-𝗌𝖾 𝖺 𝖺𝖽𝗂𝗏𝗂𝗇𝗁𝖺𝗋 𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗈 𝖽𝗂𝗌𝖼𝗎𝗋𝗌𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖺 𝗈𝗌 “𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗀𝖾𝗂𝗋𝗈𝗌” – 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖺𝖿𝗂𝗋𝗆𝖺𝗆 𝗏𝗂𝗋 “𝗎𝗌𝗎𝗋𝗉𝖺𝗋” 𝗍𝗋𝖺𝖻𝖺𝗅𝗁𝗈𝗌 𝖾 𝗋𝖾𝗇𝖽𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈𝗌 – 𝖾𝗇𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖺 𝗈𝗎𝗏𝗂𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗌, 𝖾 𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗌𝖾 𝖺𝖿𝗂𝗋𝗆𝖺𝗆 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖺 “𝖾𝗅𝗂𝗍𝖾𝗌”, “𝗉𝗋𝗂𝗏𝗂𝗅𝖾𝗀𝗂𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌”, “𝗉𝗈𝗅ı́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝗈 𝗌𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖾𝗆𝖺”.

𝖲𝖾 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖾 𝖿𝗈𝗂 𝗈 𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗍𝗎𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗎𝗅𝗍𝗈𝗎 𝖽𝖺 𝗀𝗅𝗈𝖻𝖺𝗅𝗂𝗓𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈, 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝗌𝖾𝗋𝖺́ 𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝗈 “𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗀𝖾𝗂𝗋𝗈” 𝖿𝗈𝗋 𝗎𝗆 𝖾𝗑𝖾́𝗋𝖼𝗂𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖺𝗀𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗌 𝖺𝗋𝗍𝗂𝖿𝗂𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗂𝗌, 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗇𝗎𝗇𝖼𝖺 𝖽𝗈𝗋𝗆𝖾𝗆 𝖾 𝗍𝗎𝖽𝗈 𝗌𝖺𝖻𝖾𝗆? 𝖰𝗎𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝖺 𝗋𝗂𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗓𝖺 𝗌𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖼𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗋 𝗇𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝖼𝗅𝗂𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖺𝗂𝗇𝖽𝖺 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝗋𝖾𝖽𝗎𝗓𝗂𝖽𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝗈𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖡𝗂𝗀 𝖳𝖾𝖼𝗁 𝖾 𝗈 𝗍𝗋𝖺𝖻𝖺𝗅𝗁𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗀𝗇𝗂𝗍𝗂𝗏𝗈 𝖽𝗂𝗆𝗂𝗇𝗎𝗂𝗋 𝖾𝗑𝗉𝗈𝗇𝖾𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗅𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾? 𝖣𝖾𝗏𝖾𝗆𝗈𝗌 𝖺 𝗇𝗈́𝗌 𝖾 𝖺̀𝗌 𝗉𝗋𝗈́𝗑𝗂𝗆𝖺𝗌 𝗀𝖾𝗋𝖺𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝗎𝗆 𝖽𝖾𝖻𝖺𝗍𝖾 𝗌𝗈𝖻𝗋𝖾 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗌𝗈𝖼𝗂𝖾𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗍𝗈 𝗌𝗈𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗅 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝖾𝗃𝖺𝗆𝗈𝗌. 𝖳𝖺𝗅 𝖾𝗇𝗏𝗈𝗅𝗏𝖾 𝗋𝖾𝖿𝗅𝖾𝗍𝗂𝗋 𝖾𝗆 𝖺𝗅𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗇𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗏𝖺𝗌 𝖺̀ 𝗍𝗋𝗂𝖻𝗎𝗍𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝗈 𝗍𝗋𝖺𝖻𝖺𝗅𝗁𝗈, 𝖼𝖺𝗉𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗅 𝖾 𝗁𝖾𝗋𝖺𝗇𝖼̧𝖺𝗌. 𝖱𝖾𝖿𝗈𝗋𝖼̧𝖺𝗋 𝖺 𝖽𝗂𝗌𝖼𝗎𝗌𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖾𝗌 𝗍𝖾𝗆𝖺𝗌 𝗇𝖺 𝖾𝗌𝖼𝗈𝗅𝖺, 𝗇𝖺 𝖽𝗂𝗌𝖼𝗂𝗉𝗅𝗂𝗇𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝖥𝗂𝗅𝗈𝗌𝗈𝖿𝗂𝖺 𝗈𝗎, 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗈𝗌 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝗃𝗈𝗏𝖾𝗇𝗌, 𝖤́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝖺, 𝖾 𝗋𝖾𝗀𝗎𝗅𝖺𝗋 𝖺 𝗂𝗇𝗍𝗋𝗈𝖽𝗎𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗌𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖾𝗆𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖨𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗅𝗂𝗀𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝖠𝗋𝗍𝗂𝖿𝗂𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗅 𝗇𝖺 𝖾𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗈𝗆𝗂𝖺.

* Jurista

IN "VISÃO" -02/08/25 .