JOÃO RODIGUES

 .

MUITO BEM ESCRITO

“O professor Marcelo”,

o escorpião

Qual é a natureza deste nosso escorpião? Para lá de todos os trajes mediáticos que vestiu ao longo da vida, Marcelo é produto das suas origens familiares e ligações políticas de classe, do amigo Ricardo Salgado à CUF. Marcelo é inimigo. Sempre foi. E nem é dos melhores, longe disso.

𝖴𝗆 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗆𝗎𝗂𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝗅𝖾𝗀𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗍𝗈́𝗑𝗂𝖼𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖬𝖺𝗋𝖼𝖾𝗅𝗈 𝖱𝖾𝖻𝖾𝗅𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖲𝗈𝗎𝗌𝖺 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝖺 𝖼𝗎𝗅𝗍𝗎𝗋𝖺 𝗉𝗈𝗅𝗂́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝖺 𝗇𝖺𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗅 𝖾́ 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺 𝗆𝖺𝗇𝗂𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝗁𝖺𝗏𝖾𝗋 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝖼𝗁𝗎𝗌𝗆𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗋𝖾𝗌 𝖺𝗋𝗆𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝖾𝗆 𝖺𝗏𝖺𝗅𝗂𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗋𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝗎𝖾𝗅𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝗈𝗅𝗂́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝗈𝗌 𝗇𝖺 𝗍𝖾𝗅𝖾𝗏𝗂𝗌𝖺̃𝗈: 𝖽𝖾𝖻𝖺𝗍𝖾𝗌 𝗉𝗈𝗅𝗂́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝗈𝗌 𝖼𝗎𝗋𝗍𝗈𝗌, 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺́𝗋𝗂𝗈𝗌 𝗂𝖽𝖾𝗈𝗅𝗈́𝗀𝗂𝖼𝗈𝗌 𝗅𝗈𝗇𝗀𝗈𝗌. 𝖮 𝖾𝗇𝗏𝗂𝖾𝗌𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝖺 𝖽𝗂𝗋𝖾𝗂𝗍𝖺 𝖾́ 𝗇𝖺𝗍𝗎𝗋𝖺𝗅 𝗇𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖾𝗌 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗉𝖺𝗋𝗈𝗌, 𝖻𝖾𝗆 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝖺 𝗆𝗂𝗌𝗈𝗀𝗂𝗇𝗂𝖺, 𝗃𝖺́ 𝖺𝗀𝗈𝗋𝖺. 𝖥𝗈𝗂 𝗈 “𝗉𝗋𝗈𝖿𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗈𝗋 𝖬𝖺𝗋𝖼𝖾𝗅𝗈” 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝖾𝖼̧𝗈𝗎 𝖺 𝖽𝖺𝗋 𝗇𝗈𝗍𝖺𝗌 𝗇𝗈 𝖿𝗂𝗆 𝖽𝖺 𝗁𝗂𝗌𝗍𝗈́𝗋𝗂𝖺, 𝖺𝗅𝗂 𝗉𝖾𝗅𝗈𝗌 𝖺𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝟣𝟫𝟫𝟢, 𝗇𝖺 𝖳𝖲𝖥. 𝖦𝗋𝖺𝖼̧𝖺𝗌 𝖺 𝗎𝗆 𝖾𝗌𝗉𝖺𝖼̧𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺́𝗋𝗂𝗈 𝗌𝖾𝗆𝖺𝗇𝖺𝗅, “𝗈 𝖬𝖺𝗋𝖼𝖾𝗅𝗈” 𝖿𝗈𝗂 𝗏𝖾𝗇𝖽𝗂𝖽𝗈 𝗉𝖾𝗅𝖺 𝗍𝖾𝗅𝖾𝗏𝗂𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝖺̀ 𝖯𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗂𝖽𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝖽𝖺 𝖱𝖾𝗉𝗎́𝖻𝗅𝗂𝖼𝖺.

𝖭𝖺̃𝗈 𝗉𝗈𝖽𝗂𝖺 𝗌𝖾𝗋 𝖽𝖾 𝗈𝗎𝗍𝗋𝖺 𝖿𝗈𝗋𝗆𝖺, 𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝖺𝗌 𝗋𝖾𝗅𝖺𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗉𝗋𝗂𝖾𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝗌𝗎𝖻𝗃𝖺𝖼𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗌 𝖺𝗈𝗌 𝖺𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖾𝗅𝗁𝗈𝗌 𝗂𝖽𝖾𝗈𝗅𝗈́𝗀𝗂𝖼𝗈𝗌 𝗍𝖾𝗅𝖾𝗏𝗂𝗌𝗂𝗏𝗈𝗌. 𝖠𝖿𝗂𝗇𝖺𝗅 𝖽𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝖺𝗌, 𝗁𝗈𝗃𝖾, 𝖺 𝖢𝗁𝖾𝗀𝖺 𝖭𝖾𝗐𝗌 𝖭𝖾𝗍𝗐𝗈𝗋𝗄 (𝖢𝖭𝖭) 𝖾́ 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗋𝗈𝗅𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝗎𝗆 “𝖾𝗌𝖼𝗋𝗈𝗊𝗎𝖾”, 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗌𝖾𝗀𝗎𝗂𝗋 𝖺 𝗅𝖾𝗀𝖺𝗅 𝖿𝗈́𝗋𝗆𝗎𝗅𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝖠𝗇𝖺 𝖦𝗈𝗆𝖾𝗌, 𝖾 𝖺 𝖲𝗈𝖼𝗂𝖾𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖨𝗇𝖽𝗂𝗀𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖽𝖾 𝖢𝗈𝗆𝗎𝗇𝗂𝖼𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 (𝖲𝖨𝖢𝖭) 𝖾́ 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗋𝗈𝗅𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝗎𝗆 𝖡𝖺𝗅𝗌𝖾𝗆𝖺̃𝗈, 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖾𝗇𝖼𝖺𝗋𝗇𝖺 𝗈 𝖼𝖺𝗉𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗅𝗂𝗌𝗆𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗁𝖾𝗋𝖽𝖾𝗂𝗋𝗈𝗌 𝗌𝖾𝗆 𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗅𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗋 𝗆𝖾́𝗋𝗂𝗍𝗈. 𝖤𝗌𝗍𝖾𝗌 𝗂𝗆𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗋𝖺𝗆 𝗈 𝗀𝗋𝗎𝗉𝗈 𝖢𝗈𝖿𝗂𝗇𝖺 (𝖢𝖬𝖳𝖵-𝖲𝖺́𝖻𝖺𝖽𝗈), 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺 𝖿𝖾𝗂𝗍𝖺 𝗇𝖺 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗆𝗈𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝖼𝖺𝗋𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝖽𝗈 𝗇𝗈𝗏𝗈 𝗋𝗈𝗌𝗍𝗈 𝗅𝗎𝗌𝗈 𝖽𝗈 𝖿𝖺𝗌𝖼𝗂𝗌𝗆𝗈.

𝖤𝗆 𝖼𝖺𝗇𝖺𝗅 𝖺𝖻𝖾𝗋𝗍𝗈, 𝖺 𝗌𝗂𝗍𝗎𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾́ 𝖺𝗂𝗇𝖽𝖺 𝗉𝗂𝗈𝗋: 𝗆𝖺𝗆𝗈𝗇𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗌, 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝖯𝖺𝗎𝗅𝗈 𝖯𝗈𝗋𝗍𝖺𝗌 𝖾 𝖬𝖺𝗋𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗌 𝖬𝖾𝗇𝖽𝖾𝗌, 𝖿𝖺𝗓𝖾𝗆 𝗉𝗈𝗅𝗂́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝗂𝗋𝖾𝗂𝗍𝖺 𝖽𝗎𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝗁𝗈𝗋𝖺𝗌, 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝗍𝗈𝗍𝖺𝗅 𝖺𝗎𝗌𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝗉𝗅𝗎𝗋𝖺𝗅𝗂𝗌𝗆𝗈 𝗂𝖽𝖾𝗈𝗅𝗈́𝗀𝗂𝖼𝗈. 𝖨𝗆𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗆 “𝗈 𝖬𝖺𝗋𝖼𝖾𝗅𝗈” 𝗇𝖺 𝗌𝗎𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗏𝗂𝖼𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗇𝖺 𝗍𝖾𝗅𝖾𝗏𝗂𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗆𝗂𝗅𝗁𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝗏𝗂𝗀𝗈𝗋𝖺 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗏𝖾𝗋𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖺 𝖼𝗁𝖺𝗆𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝖫𝖾𝗂 𝖽𝖾 𝖲𝖺𝗒, 𝗂𝗇𝖺𝗉𝗅𝗂𝖼𝖺́𝗏𝖾𝗅 𝖺𝗈 𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝖺 𝖾𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗈𝗆𝗂𝖺: 𝖺 𝗈𝖿𝖾𝗋𝗍𝖺 𝗉𝗈𝗅𝗂́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝖺 𝖼𝗋𝗂𝖺 𝖺𝗂́ 𝖺 𝗌𝗎𝖺 𝗉𝗋𝗈́𝗉𝗋𝗂𝖺 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝖼𝗎𝗋𝖺 𝗉𝗈𝗅𝗂́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝖺, 𝖺𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗏𝖾́𝗌 𝖽𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖽𝗂𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝗂𝖽𝖾𝗈𝗅𝗈́𝗀𝗂𝖼𝗈. 𝖯𝗈𝖽𝖾𝗆 𝗍𝖾𝗋 𝗋𝖺𝗓𝖺̃𝗈, 𝖾𝗆 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝗍𝖾.

𝖤𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖾𝗍𝖺𝗇𝗍𝗈, “𝗈 𝖬𝖺𝗋𝖼𝖾𝗅𝗈” 𝖾́ 𝖺 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝗉𝗈𝖽𝖾𝗋𝗈𝗌𝖺 𝖾𝗑𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝗆𝖾𝖽𝗂𝖺́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝖺 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺 𝗉𝗈𝗅𝗂́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝗉 𝗉𝖾𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗇𝗈, 𝖺 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖺𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝗌𝗈́ 𝗀𝗈𝗏𝖾𝗋𝗇𝖺 𝗈 𝗏𝖺𝗓𝗂𝗈 𝗆𝖾𝖽𝗂𝖺́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝗈. 𝖮 𝗍𝖾𝗈́𝗋𝗂𝖼𝗈 𝗉𝗈𝗅𝗂́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝗈 𝖯𝖾𝗍𝖾𝗋 𝖬𝖺𝗂𝗋 𝖾𝗌𝖼𝗋𝖾𝗏𝖾𝗎 𝗌𝗈𝖻𝗋𝖾 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖾 “𝗀𝗈𝗏𝖾𝗋𝗇𝗈 𝖽𝗈 𝗏𝖺𝗓𝗂𝗈”, 𝗌𝗈𝖻𝗋𝖾 𝗈 𝖽𝖾́𝖿𝗂𝖼𝖾 𝖽𝖾 𝗌𝗈𝖻𝖾𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗂𝖺 𝗇𝖺𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗅, 𝗌𝖾𝗆 𝖺 𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗅 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗁𝖺́ 𝖽𝖾𝗆𝗈𝖼𝗋𝖺𝖼𝗂𝖺. 𝖠 𝗌𝗈𝖻𝖾𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗂𝖺 𝖿𝗈𝗂 𝗉𝖾𝗋𝖿𝗎𝗋𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝗉𝖾𝗅𝖺 𝗅𝗈́𝗀𝗂𝖼𝖺 𝗇𝖾𝗈𝗅𝗂𝖻𝖾𝗋𝖺𝗅 𝖽𝖺 𝗂𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗀𝗋𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾𝗎𝗋𝗈𝗉𝖾𝗂𝖺. 𝖤𝗌𝖼𝗋𝖾𝗏𝖾𝗎 𝗍𝖺𝗆𝖻𝖾́𝗆 𝗌𝗈𝖻𝗋𝖾 𝗍𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖺 𝗀𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝗌𝖾𝗆 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝗍𝗂𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖾 𝗍𝖺𝗇𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝗍𝗂𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗌𝖾𝗆 𝗀𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾, 𝗌𝗈𝖻𝗋𝖾 𝖺𝗅𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗇𝖺̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗌 𝗌𝖾𝗆 𝖺𝗅𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗇𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗏𝖺𝗌. 𝖭𝗈 𝗆𝖾𝗂𝗈 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺 𝖿𝖺𝗅𝗍𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝖺𝗎𝗍𝗈𝗋𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝗉𝗈𝗅𝗂́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝖺 𝖽𝖾𝗆𝗈𝖼𝗋𝖺́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝖺, 𝖿𝗅𝗈𝗋𝖾𝗌𝖼𝖾 𝗈 𝗇𝗈𝗏𝗈 𝖿𝖺𝗌𝖼𝗂𝗌𝗆𝗈, 𝗀𝖾𝗋𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝗉𝖾𝗅𝗈 𝗇𝖾𝗈𝗅𝗂𝖻𝖾𝗋𝖺𝗅𝗂𝗌𝗆𝗈, 𝖼𝗅𝖺𝗋𝗈.

𝖤, 𝗇𝖺 𝖯𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗂𝖽𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝖽𝖺 𝖱𝖾𝗉𝗎́𝖻𝗅𝗂𝖼𝖺, “𝗈 𝖬𝖺𝗋𝖼𝖾𝗅𝗈” 𝖼𝖺𝗎𝗌𝖺 𝖽𝖺𝗇𝗈 𝖺̀ 𝖢𝗈𝗇𝗌𝗍𝗂𝗍𝗎𝗂𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈: 𝖽𝖺 𝗂𝗇𝗃𝗎𝗌𝗍𝗂𝖿𝗂𝖼𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝖽𝗂𝗌𝗌𝗈𝗅𝗎𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖺 𝖠𝗌𝗌𝖾𝗆𝖻𝗅𝖾𝗂𝖺 𝖽𝖺 𝖱𝖾𝗉𝗎́𝖻𝗅𝗂𝖼𝖺 𝖺̀ 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗉𝗅𝖺𝖼𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝖾𝗆 𝗋𝖾𝗅𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖺̀ 𝖾𝗑𝗍𝗋𝖾𝗆𝖺-𝖽𝗂𝗋𝖾𝗂𝗍𝖺 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗈𝗉𝖾𝗋𝖺 𝖺̀ 𝗆𝖺𝗋𝗀𝖾𝗆 𝖽𝖺 𝗈𝗋𝖽𝖾𝗆 𝖽𝖾𝗆𝗈𝖼𝗋𝖺́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝖺, 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝗌𝖾 𝗏𝗂𝗎 𝗇𝖺𝗌 𝗀𝗈𝗅𝗉𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖾𝖼𝗅𝖺𝗋𝖺𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗎𝗆 𝗉𝗈𝗅𝗂́𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗌𝖾 𝖽𝗂𝗓 𝗌𝗂𝗇𝖽𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗅𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖺, 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝖾𝗑𝖾𝗆𝗉𝗅𝗈.

𝖭𝗈𝗌 𝗍𝖾𝗆𝗉𝗈𝗌 𝗅𝗂𝗏𝗋𝖾𝗌, “𝗈 𝖬𝖺𝗋𝖼𝖾𝗅𝗈” 𝖺𝗂𝗇𝖽𝖺 𝗍𝖾𝗆 𝗍𝖾𝗆𝗉𝗈 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝖺𝗌 𝗌𝗎𝖺𝗌 𝗆𝖺𝗇𝗈𝖻𝗋𝖺𝗌, 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝖺𝗌𝗌𝗂𝗇𝖺𝗅𝗈𝗎 𝗈 𝗃𝗈𝗋𝗇𝖺𝗅𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖺 𝖬𝗂𝗀𝗎𝖾𝗅 𝖢𝖺𝗋𝗏𝖺𝗅𝗁𝗈 𝗇𝗈 𝖳𝗐𝗂𝗍𝗍𝖾𝗋: “𝖠𝗈 𝖯𝗎́𝖻𝗅𝗂𝖼𝗈, 𝖬𝖺𝗋𝖼𝗈 𝖦𝖺𝗅𝗂𝗇𝗁𝖺 𝗋𝖾𝗏𝖾𝗅𝖺 𝖺𝗅𝗀𝗈 𝗁𝖺́ 𝗆𝗎𝗂𝗍𝗈 𝗌𝖺𝖻𝗂𝖽𝗈 𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝖻𝖺𝗌𝗍𝗂𝖽𝗈𝗋𝖾𝗌: 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗈 𝖯𝖱 [𝖯𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗂𝖽𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖽𝖺 𝖱𝖾𝗉𝗎́𝖻𝗅𝗂𝖼𝖺] 𝗈 𝗂𝗇𝖼𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗂𝗏𝗈𝗎 𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗉𝗋𝖺𝗋 𝖺 𝖦𝗅𝗈𝖻𝖺𝗅 𝖬𝖾𝖽𝗂𝖺. 𝖰𝗎𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗈, 𝖾𝗆 𝖽𝖾𝗏𝗂𝖽𝗈 𝗍𝖾𝗆𝗉𝗈, 𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖾𝗂 𝖡𝖾𝗅𝖾́𝗆, 𝖺 𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗉𝗈𝗌𝗍𝖺 𝗈𝖿𝗂𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗅 𝖿𝗈𝗂 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺: 𝖬𝖺𝗋𝖼𝖾𝗅𝗈 𝗋𝖾𝖼𝖾𝖻𝖾𝗋𝖺 𝖦𝖺𝗅𝗂𝗇𝗁𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝗈𝗎𝗍𝗋𝗈𝗌 𝖾𝗆𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗌𝖺́𝗋𝗂𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝗈 𝗌𝖾𝗍𝗈𝗋, 𝗇𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝗇𝗈𝗏𝗈.”

𝖩𝖺́ 𝖺𝗅𝗀𝗎𝖾́𝗆 𝖽𝗂𝗌𝗌𝖾 𝗊𝗎𝖾 “𝗈 𝖬𝖺𝗋𝖼𝖾𝗅𝗈” 𝖾́ 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝗎𝗆 𝖾𝗌𝖼𝗈𝗋𝗉𝗂𝖺̃𝗈: 𝖺 𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗏𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗂𝖺 𝖽𝗈 𝗋𝗂𝗈 𝗍𝗂𝗇𝗁𝖺 𝗌𝗂𝖽𝗈 𝗅𝗈𝗇𝗀𝖺 𝖾 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖾 𝖺𝖼𝖺𝖻𝗈𝗎 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾𝗌𝖼𝖺𝗉𝖺𝗋 𝖺̀ 𝗌𝗎𝖺 𝗇𝖺𝗍𝗎𝗋𝖾𝗓𝖺. 𝖴𝗆𝖺 𝗆𝖾𝗍𝖺́𝖿𝗈𝗋𝖺 𝖻𝖺𝗍𝗂𝖽𝖺 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗌𝖾𝗋𝗏𝖾 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗌𝗎𝖻𝗅𝗂𝗇𝗁𝖺𝗋 𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗉𝗅𝖺𝖼𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝗉𝗈𝗅𝗂́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝗈-𝗂𝖽𝖾𝗈𝗅𝗈́𝗀𝗂𝖼𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝖠𝗇𝗍𝗈́𝗇𝗂𝗈 𝖢𝗈𝗌𝗍𝖺 𝖾𝗆 𝗋𝖾𝗅𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖺𝗈 𝖯𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗂𝖽𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖽𝖾 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗆𝗂𝗇𝗈𝗋𝗂𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗍𝗎𝗀𝗎𝖾𝗌𝖾𝗌. 𝖢𝗈𝗌𝗍𝖺 𝖿𝗈𝗂 𝖺𝗏𝗂𝗌𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝖺 𝗍𝖾𝗆𝗉𝗈.

𝖬𝖺𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗅 𝖾́ 𝖺𝖿𝗂𝗇𝖺𝗅 𝖺 𝗇𝖺𝗍𝗎𝗋𝖾𝗓𝖺 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖾 𝗇𝗈𝗌𝗌𝗈 𝖾𝗌𝖼𝗈𝗋𝗉𝗂𝖺̃𝗈? 𝖯𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗅𝖺́ 𝖽𝖾 𝗍𝗈𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗈𝗌 𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗃𝖾𝗌 𝗆𝖾𝖽𝗂𝖺́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝗈𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗏𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗂𝗎 𝖺𝗈 𝗅𝗈𝗇𝗀𝗈 𝖽𝖺 𝗏𝗂𝖽𝖺, 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗅𝖺́ 𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗌𝖺𝗎́𝖽𝖾 𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺𝗅, 𝗍𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖺𝗌 𝗏𝖾𝗓𝖾𝗌 𝖿𝗈𝗅𝖼𝗅𝗈𝗋𝗂𝗓𝖺𝖽𝖺𝗌, 𝖬𝖺𝗋𝖼𝖾𝗅𝗈 𝖾́ 𝗎𝗆 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝖽𝗎𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝗌𝗎𝖺𝗌 𝗈𝗋𝗂𝗀𝖾𝗇𝗌 𝖿𝖺𝗆𝗂𝗅𝗂𝖺𝗋𝖾𝗌 𝖾 𝗅𝗂𝗀𝖺𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝗉𝗈𝗅𝗂́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖼𝗅𝖺𝗌𝗌𝖾, 𝖽𝗈 𝖺𝗆𝗂𝗀𝗈 𝖱𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗋𝖽𝗈 𝖲𝖺𝗅𝗀𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝖺̀ 𝖢𝖴𝖥, 𝖼𝗎𝗃𝗈 𝗁𝗈𝗌𝗉𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗅 𝗆𝖾𝗋𝖾𝖼𝖾𝗎 𝖺 𝗉𝗋𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗂𝗋𝖺 𝗏𝗂𝗌𝗂𝗍𝖺 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗂𝖽𝖾𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗅, 𝗉𝖺𝗌𝗌𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝗉𝖾𝗅𝗈 𝗌𝗈𝗆𝖻𝗋𝗂𝗈 𝖬𝖺𝗋𝖼𝗈 𝖦𝖺𝗅𝗂𝗇𝗁𝖺.

𝖮 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗆𝗂𝗌𝗌𝗈 𝖾́ 𝗆𝖾𝗌𝗆𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝗈 “𝗌𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖾𝗆𝖺 𝗇𝖺𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗅 𝖽𝖾 𝗌𝖺𝗎́𝖽𝖾”, 𝖺𝗈 𝗂𝗇𝗏𝖾́𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖲𝖾𝗋𝗏𝗂𝖼̧𝗈 𝖭𝖺𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗅 𝖽𝖾 𝖲𝖺𝗎́𝖽𝖾 (𝖲𝖭𝖲), 𝖽𝗂𝗌𝖿𝖺𝗋𝖼̧𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝗆𝖺𝗅 𝖺 𝖺𝗉𝗈𝗌𝗍𝖺 𝗇𝗈 𝖼𝖺𝗉𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗅𝗂𝗌𝗆𝗈 𝖽𝖺 𝖽𝗈𝖾𝗇𝖼̧𝖺. 𝖭𝗈𝗍𝖾-𝗌𝖾 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗈𝗌 𝖬𝖾𝗅𝗅𝗈 𝖺𝗅𝗂𝖾𝗇𝖺𝗋𝖺𝗆 𝖺 𝗌𝗎𝖺 𝗅𝗎𝖼𝗋𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗏𝖺 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝗍𝗂𝖼𝗂𝗉𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝗇𝖺 𝗋𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖺 𝖡𝗋𝗂𝗌𝖺 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗌𝖾 𝖿𝗈𝖼𝖺𝗋𝖾𝗆 𝖾𝗆 𝖼𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗇𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗆𝗂𝗅𝗁𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗂𝗇𝗏𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝗁𝗈𝗌𝗉𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗂𝗌, 𝖺𝗃𝗎𝖽𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗌𝖾 𝗆𝖾𝗍𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝗈 𝖮𝗋𝖼̧𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝗈 𝖤𝗌𝗍𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗏𝖺𝗂 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝖺 𝗌𝖺𝗎́𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝗂𝗍𝖺 𝗉𝗋𝗂𝗏𝖺𝖽𝖺. 𝖲𝗈𝖻𝗋𝖺𝗆 𝗌𝖾𝗆𝗉𝗋𝖾 𝖺𝗅𝗀𝗎𝗇𝗌 𝗆𝗂𝗅𝗁𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝖿𝗂𝗇𝖺𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗋 𝖼𝖺𝗆𝗉𝖺𝗇𝗁𝖺𝗌 𝗆𝖾𝖽𝗂𝖺́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖺 𝗈 𝖲𝖭𝖲 𝖾 “𝗈 𝖬𝖺𝗋𝖼𝖾𝗅𝗈” 𝗌𝖺𝖻𝖾 𝗍𝗎𝖽𝗈 𝗌𝗈𝖻𝗋𝖾 𝖼𝖺𝗆𝗉𝖺𝗇𝗁𝖺𝗌 𝗆𝖾𝖽𝗂𝖺́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗌. 𝖳𝖾𝗆 𝗃𝗈𝗋𝗇𝖺𝗅𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗌, 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝖠̂𝗇𝗀𝖾𝗅𝖺 𝖲𝗂𝗅𝗏𝖺 𝖽𝗈 𝖤𝗑𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗈, 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗈𝗎𝗏𝖾𝗆 𝗏𝗈𝗓𝖾𝗌 𝗇𝗈𝗌 “𝖼𝗈𝗋𝗋𝖾𝖽𝗈𝗋𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖡𝖾𝗅𝖾́𝗆” 𝖾 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺̃𝗈 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗋𝖾𝗉𝗋𝗈𝖽𝗎𝗓𝗂𝗋 𝗍𝗈𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗈𝗌 𝖿𝖺𝖼𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝗈𝗅𝗂́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝗈𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖺𝗂́ 𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝖼𝗋𝗂𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌.

“𝖮 𝖬𝖺𝗋𝖼𝖾𝗅𝗈” 𝖿𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗋𝖺́ 𝗇𝖺 𝗁𝗂𝗌𝗍𝗈́𝗋𝗂𝖺 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝗆𝖾𝗂𝖺 𝖽𝗎́𝗓𝗂𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝖾𝗉𝗂𝗌𝗈́𝖽𝗂𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗋𝖾𝗌𝖼𝗈𝗌 𝖾 𝗉𝖾𝗅𝖺 𝗌𝗎𝖺 𝗉𝗈𝗅𝗂́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝖼𝗅𝖺𝗌𝗌𝖾, 𝖺𝗉𝗈𝗌𝗍𝗈. 𝖤́ 𝗈 𝗏𝖺𝗓𝗂𝗈 𝖺𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖾𝗇𝖼𝖺𝗋𝗇𝖺𝖽𝗈. 𝖭𝖺 𝖽𝗂𝗋𝖾𝗂𝗍𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝗌𝖾𝗆𝗉𝗋𝖾, 𝖢𝖺𝗏𝖺𝖼𝗈 𝗍𝖾𝗆 𝗈𝗎𝗍𝗋𝗈 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗈𝖿𝗈, 𝗌𝖾𝗆𝗉𝗋𝖾 𝗍𝖾𝗏𝖾. 𝖵𝖾𝗂𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖡𝗈𝗅𝗂𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗂𝗆𝖾, 𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖾́ 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗏𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖺𝗀𝖾𝗆. 𝖰𝗎𝖾𝗆 𝗆𝖺𝗋𝖼𝖺 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖾 𝗉𝖺𝗂́𝗌 𝗍𝖾𝗇𝖽𝖾 𝖺 𝗇𝖺𝗌𝖼𝖾𝗋 𝖿𝗈𝗋𝖺 𝖽𝖺 𝖾𝗅𝗂𝗍𝖾 𝖽𝗈 𝖺𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗌𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖫𝗂𝗌𝖻𝗈𝖺, 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗈 𝖻𝖾𝗆 𝗈𝗎 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗈 𝗆𝖺𝗅. 𝖮 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝖻𝗅𝖾𝗆𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝖢𝗈𝗌𝗍𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝖬𝖺𝗋𝖼𝖾𝗅𝗈 𝖿𝗈𝗂 𝗅𝗂𝗌𝖻𝗈𝖾𝗍𝖺 𝖾 𝗌𝗈𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗅 𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗍𝗎𝖽𝗈: 𝖺𝗌 𝖾𝗅𝗂𝗍𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝗈 𝗉𝗈𝖽𝖾𝗋, 𝖽𝖾 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝗍𝖾 𝖽𝖺 𝖾𝗌𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗋𝖽𝖺 𝖾 𝖽𝖺 𝖽𝗂𝗋𝖾𝗂𝗍𝖺, 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗏𝗂𝗏𝖾𝗆 𝖺𝗂́ 𝖽𝖾 𝖿𝗈𝗋𝗆𝖺 𝖽𝖾𝗆𝖺𝗌𝗂𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝗉𝗋𝗈́𝗑𝗂𝗆𝖺, 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗃𝗎𝗂́𝗓𝗈 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖼𝗁𝖾𝗀𝖺𝗋𝖺𝗆 𝖺 𝗃𝗎𝗅𝗀𝖺𝗋 𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝗂𝗋𝖾𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗌 𝗉𝗈𝗅𝗂𝗍𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖼𝗂𝗏𝗂𝗅𝗂𝗓𝖺𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝗇𝗈 𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖾𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗅. 𝖮𝗌 𝖿𝗂𝗅𝗁𝗈𝗌 𝖺𝗇𝖽𝖺𝗆 𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝗆𝖾𝗌𝗆𝗈𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗅𝖾́𝗀𝗂𝗈𝗌 𝖾 𝗍𝗎𝖽𝗈. 𝖤́ 𝗍𝗈𝖽𝗈 𝗎𝗆 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗉𝗅𝖺𝖼𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖼𝖺𝗅𝖽𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖼𝗅𝖺𝗌𝗌𝖾.

𝖠𝗆𝗂𝗀𝗈𝗌, 𝖺𝗆𝗂𝗀𝗈𝗌, 𝗉𝗈𝗅𝗂́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝖺 𝗌𝖾𝗆𝗉𝗋𝖾 𝖺̀ 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝗍𝖾. 𝖭𝖺 𝗉𝗈𝗅𝗂́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝖺 𝗏𝖺𝗅𝖾𝗆 𝗈𝗌 𝖼𝖺𝗆𝖺𝗋𝖺𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝖺̀ 𝗇𝗈𝗌𝗌𝖺 𝖾𝗌𝗉𝖾𝗋𝖺, 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝖾𝗑𝗂𝗀𝖾𝗆 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗌𝖾𝗇𝖼̧𝖺 𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗌𝗍𝖺̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺. 𝖤 𝗈𝗌 𝖺𝗅𝗂𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌, 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖾𝗑𝗂𝗀𝖾𝗆 𝗉𝖺𝖼𝗂𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺. 𝖬𝖺𝗋𝖼𝖾𝗅𝗈 𝖾́ 𝗂𝗇𝗂𝗆𝗂𝗀𝗈. 𝖲𝖾𝗆𝗉𝗋𝖾 𝖿𝗈𝗂. 𝖤 𝗇𝖾𝗆 𝖾́ 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗆𝖾𝗅𝗁𝗈𝗋𝖾𝗌, 𝗅𝗈𝗇𝗀𝖾 𝖽𝗂𝗌𝗌𝗈. 

* Professor universitário, coautor do blogue Ladrões de Bicicletas e membro do Conselho Editorial do Le Monde diplomatique – edição portuguesa.

IN "setenta e quatro" -15/02/23 .  .