CARLOS GUIMARÃES PINTO

 .

Pró-vida e

pró-aborto legal

A posição em relação ao aborto parte de uma premissa fundamental que difere de pessoa para pessoa: a altura em que uma vida humana merece ter proteção legal.

𝖣𝗎𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖺 𝖼𝖺𝗆𝗉𝖺𝗇𝗁𝖺, 𝗈 𝗍𝖾𝗆𝖺 𝖽𝖺 𝗅𝖾𝗀𝖺𝗅𝗂𝗓𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝗈 𝖺𝖻𝗈𝗋𝗍𝗈 𝗋𝖾𝗀𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗈𝗎 𝗉𝖾𝗅𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖾𝖼𝗅𝖺𝗋𝖺𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝗈 𝖼𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗂𝖽𝖺𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝖺 𝖠𝖣 𝗇𝗎𝗆 𝖾𝗏𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝖾𝖽𝗂𝖼𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝖺𝗈 𝗍𝖾𝗆𝖺. 𝖧𝗈𝗃𝖾, 𝗈 𝖺𝖻𝗈𝗋𝗍𝗈 𝖾́ 𝗅𝖾𝗀𝖺𝗅 𝖾𝗆 𝗀𝗋𝖺𝗇𝖽𝖾 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝗍𝖾 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝖺𝗂́𝗌𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝖾𝗇𝗏𝗈𝗅𝗏𝗂𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖾, 𝖾𝗆 𝖯𝗈𝗋𝗍𝗎𝗀𝖺𝗅, 𝗇𝖾𝗆 𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝗍𝗂𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝖺̀ 𝖽𝗂𝗋𝖾𝗂𝗍𝖺 𝖿𝖺𝗓𝖾𝗆 𝖽𝗈 𝗍𝖾𝗆𝖺 𝖻𝖺𝗇𝖽𝖾𝗂𝗋𝖺. 𝖥𝗈𝗂, 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝗂𝗌𝗌𝗈, 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗁𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗋𝖾𝗀𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖺𝗌𝗌𝖾 𝖺̀ 𝖽𝗂𝗌𝖼𝗎𝗌𝗌𝖺̃𝗈. 𝖳𝖾𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝗋𝖾𝗀𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖺𝖽𝗈, 𝖽𝖾𝗂𝗑𝗈 𝖺𝗊𝗎𝗂 𝖺 𝗆𝗂𝗇𝗁𝖺 𝗉𝗈𝗌𝗂𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈, 𝗊𝗎𝖾, 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝗉𝗈𝗌𝗂𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗌𝖼𝗂𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺, 𝗌𝗈́ 𝗆𝖾 𝗏𝗂𝗇𝖼𝗎𝗅𝖺 𝖺 𝗆𝗂𝗆 𝖾 𝖺 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝗇𝗂𝗇𝗀𝗎𝖾́𝗆.

𝖮 𝗍𝖾𝗆𝖺 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾́, 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝗆𝗎𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗌 𝗏𝖾𝗓𝖾𝗌 𝖿𝖺𝗓𝖾𝗆 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖾𝖼𝖾𝗋, 𝖻𝗂𝗇𝖺́𝗋𝗂𝗈. 𝖰𝗎𝖺𝗌𝖾 𝗍𝗈𝖽𝖺 𝖺 𝗀𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖾́ 𝗌𝗂𝗆𝗎𝗅𝗍𝖺𝗇𝖾𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖺 𝖿𝖺𝗏𝗈𝗋 𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖺 𝖺 𝗅𝖾𝗀𝖺𝗅𝗂𝗓𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝗈 𝖺𝖻𝗈𝗋𝗍𝗈, 𝖽𝖾𝗉𝖾𝗇𝖽𝖾𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝖽𝗈 𝗍𝖾𝗆𝗉𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗀𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈. 𝖠𝗍𝖾́ 𝗈 𝖽𝖾𝖿𝖾𝗇𝗌𝗈𝗋 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝖿𝖾𝗋𝗏𝗈𝗋𝗈𝗌𝗈 𝖽𝖺 𝗅𝖾𝗀𝖺𝗅𝗂𝗓𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝗈 𝖺𝖻𝗈𝗋𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝗂𝖿𝗂𝖼𝗂𝗅𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖽𝖾𝖿𝖾𝗇𝖽𝖾𝗋𝗂𝖺 𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖺 𝗅𝖾𝗀𝖺𝗅𝗂𝗓𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖺𝗍𝖾́ 𝖺̀ 𝗁𝗈𝗋𝖺 𝖽𝗈 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝗍𝗈. 𝖠 𝖾𝗌𝗆𝖺𝗀𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗋𝖺 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗈𝗋𝗂𝖺 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖺𝗌 𝗉𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗈𝖺𝗌 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝖺𝖼𝖾𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗋𝗂𝖺 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗈 𝖺𝖻𝗈𝗋𝗍𝗈 𝖿𝗈𝗌𝗌𝖾 𝗉𝖾𝗋𝗆𝗂𝗍𝗂𝖽𝗈 𝖺𝗍𝖾́ 𝖺̀𝗌 𝟥𝟨 𝗌𝖾𝗆𝖺𝗇𝖺𝗌 𝗇𝖾𝗆 𝗏𝖾̂ 𝗇𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖺 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗂𝖻𝗂𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗅𝗂𝗆𝗂𝗍𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝗂𝗇𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖼𝖾𝖻𝗂́𝗏𝖾𝗅 𝖺𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝗂𝗋𝖾𝗂𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝗆𝗎𝗅𝗁𝖾𝗋𝖾𝗌. 𝖠̀ 𝗆𝖾𝖽𝗂𝖽𝖺 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗏𝖺𝗆𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝖼𝖾𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝗇𝗈 𝗍𝖾𝗆𝗉𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗀𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈, 𝗈 𝗇𝗎́𝗆𝖾𝗋𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖺𝗉𝗈𝗂𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖺 𝗅𝖾𝗀𝖺𝗅𝗂𝗓𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖺𝗎𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺 𝗀𝗋𝖺𝖽𝗎𝖺𝗅𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾.

𝖠 𝗉𝗈𝗌𝗂𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾𝗆 𝗋𝖾𝗅𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖺𝗈 𝖺𝖻𝗈𝗋𝗍𝗈 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝗍𝖾, 𝖺𝗌𝗌𝗂𝗆, 𝖽𝖾 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗆𝗂𝗌𝗌𝖺 𝖿𝗎𝗇𝖽𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺𝗅 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖽𝗂𝖿𝖾𝗋𝖾 𝖽𝖾 𝗉𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗈𝖺 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗉𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗈𝖺: 𝖺 𝖺𝗅𝗍𝗎𝗋𝖺 𝖾𝗆 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗏𝗂𝖽𝖺 𝗁𝗎𝗆𝖺𝗇𝖺 𝗆𝖾𝗋𝖾𝖼𝖾 𝗍𝖾𝗋 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗍𝖾𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝗅𝖾𝗀𝖺𝗅. 𝖠 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗆𝗂𝗌𝗌𝖺 𝖽𝖾𝗏𝖾 𝗍𝖾𝗋 𝖻𝖺𝗌𝖾 𝖼𝗂𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗂́𝖿𝗂𝖼𝖺 (𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝖾𝖼̧𝖺 𝗈 𝖿𝖾𝗍𝗈 𝖺 𝗌𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗂𝗋 𝖽𝗈𝗋, 𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝖾𝗇𝗏𝗈𝗅𝗏𝖾 𝗈 𝗌𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖾𝗆𝖺 𝗇𝖾𝗎𝗋𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗅 𝗈𝗎 𝖺 𝖼𝖺𝗉𝖺𝖼𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝖾 𝗌𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗂𝗋 𝖾𝗆𝗈𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌) 𝖾 𝖻𝖺𝗌𝖾 𝗉𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗈𝖺𝗅 𝖾 𝖿𝗂𝗅𝗈𝗌𝗈́𝖿𝗂𝖼𝖺 (𝖺𝗌 𝖼𝖺𝗋𝖺𝖼𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗂́𝗌𝗍𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗌 𝗇𝖾𝖼𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖺́𝗋𝗂𝖺𝗌 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗏𝗂𝖽𝖺 𝗁𝗎𝗆𝖺𝗇𝖺 𝗌𝖾𝗋 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗌𝗂𝖽𝖾𝗋𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝗉𝗅𝖾𝗇𝖺 𝖾 𝗆𝖾𝗋𝖾𝖼𝖾𝖽𝗈𝗋𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗍𝖾𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝗂𝗀𝗎𝖺𝗅 𝖺 𝗍𝗈𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝖺𝗌 𝗈𝗎𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗌). 𝖯𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗆 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝗍𝖾 𝖽𝖺 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗆𝗂𝗌𝗌𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖺 𝗏𝗂𝖽𝖺 𝗁𝗎𝗆𝖺𝗇𝖺 𝗌𝗈́ 𝗉𝗈𝖽𝖾 𝗌𝖾𝗋 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗌𝗂𝖽𝖾𝗋𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝗉𝗅𝖾𝗇𝖺 𝖺 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝗍𝗂𝗋 𝖽𝗈 𝗇𝖺𝗌𝖼𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈, 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗂𝖻𝗂𝗋 𝗎𝗆 𝖺𝖻𝗈𝗋𝗍𝗈 𝖺̀𝗌 𝟥𝟢 𝗌𝖾𝗆𝖺𝗇𝖺𝗌 𝖾́ 𝗍𝖺̃𝗈 𝗏𝗂𝗈𝗅𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗋 𝖽𝖺 𝖺𝗎𝗍𝗈𝗇𝗈𝗆𝗂𝖺 𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝗆𝗎𝗅𝗁𝖾𝗋𝖾𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗂𝖻𝗂-𝗅𝗈 𝖺̀𝗌 𝖽𝖾𝗓. 𝖯𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗆 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝗍𝖾 𝖽𝖺 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗆𝗂𝗌𝗌𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖺 𝗏𝗂𝖽𝖺 𝗁𝗎𝗆𝖺𝗇𝖺 𝗉𝗈𝖽𝖾 𝗌𝖾𝗋 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗌𝗂𝖽𝖾𝗋𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝗉𝗅𝖾𝗇𝖺 𝖺 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝗍𝗂𝗋 𝖽𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖼𝖾𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈, 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗂𝖻𝗂𝗋 𝗈 𝖺𝖻𝗈𝗋𝗍𝗈 𝖺̀𝗌 𝖽𝖾𝗓 𝖿𝖺𝗓 𝗍𝖺𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝗌𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗂𝖽𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗂𝖻𝗂-𝗅𝗈 𝖺̀𝗌 𝟥𝟢. 𝖤𝗌𝗍𝖾𝗌 𝗎́𝗅𝗍𝗂𝗆𝗈𝗌 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗏𝖾𝖾𝗆 𝗇𝖺 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗂𝖻𝗂𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝗈 𝖺𝖻𝗈𝗋𝗍𝗈 𝖺𝗍𝖾́ 𝖺̀𝗌 𝖽𝖾𝗓 𝗌𝖾𝗆𝖺𝗇𝖺𝗌 𝗎𝗆 𝖺𝗍𝖺𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖺̀ 𝗅𝗂𝖻𝖾𝗋𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝖺 𝗆𝗎𝗅𝗁𝖾𝗋, 𝗍𝖺𝗅 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝗋𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗂𝗋𝗈𝗌 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗏𝖾𝖾𝗆 𝗇𝖺 𝗅𝖾𝗀𝖺𝗅𝗂𝗓𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖺𝗍𝖾́ 𝖺̀𝗌 𝟥𝟢 𝗎𝗆 𝖺𝗍𝖺𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖺𝗈 𝖽𝗂𝗋𝖾𝗂𝗍𝗈 𝖺̀ 𝗏𝗂𝖽𝖺. 𝖠 𝖽𝗂𝖿𝖾𝗋𝖾𝗇𝖼̧𝖺 𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖾 𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝗈𝗂𝗌 𝗀𝗋𝗎𝗉𝗈𝗌 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾́, 𝗇𝖾𝖼𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖺𝗋𝗂𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾, 𝖽𝖾 𝗏𝖺𝗅𝗈𝗋𝖾𝗌 𝗆𝗈𝗋𝖺𝗂𝗌, 𝗆𝖺𝗌 𝗌𝗂𝗆 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝖽𝗂𝖿𝖾𝗋𝖾𝗇𝖼̧𝖺 𝗇𝖺 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗆𝗂𝗌𝗌𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝗍𝗂𝖽𝖺.

𝖤́ 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝗂𝗌𝗌𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖺 𝖽𝗂𝗌𝖼𝗎𝗌𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝗆𝖺𝗇𝗂𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗂́𝗌𝗍𝖺 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗅𝗈𝖼𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝗎𝗆 𝗅𝖺𝖽𝗈 “𝖺𝗌𝗌𝖺𝗌𝗌𝗂𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖻𝖾𝖻𝖾́𝗌” 𝖾 𝖽𝗈 𝗈𝗎𝗍𝗋𝗈 “𝗏𝗂𝗈𝗅𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗋𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖺 𝗅𝗂𝖻𝖾𝗋𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝗆𝗎𝗅𝗁𝖾𝗋𝖾𝗌” 𝖿𝖺𝗓 𝗉𝗈𝗎𝖼𝗈 𝗌𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗂𝖽𝗈 𝗇𝖺 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗈𝗋𝗂𝖺 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖼𝖺𝗌𝗈𝗌.

𝖠 𝖼𝗂𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝗉𝗈𝖽𝖾 𝖺𝗃𝗎𝖽𝖺𝗋 𝖺 𝖻𝖺𝗅𝗂𝗓𝖺𝗋 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗆𝗂𝗌𝗌𝖺, 𝗆𝖺𝗌 𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗉𝗈𝗇𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖾𝗉𝖾𝗇𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝖺 𝖼𝗂𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝗉𝗈𝖽𝖾𝗋𝖺́ 𝗏𝖺𝗋𝗂𝖺𝗋 𝖽𝖾 𝗉𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗈𝖺 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗉𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗈𝖺. 𝖲𝖾𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝗇𝖾𝖼𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖺́𝗋𝗂𝗈 𝗁𝖺𝗏𝖾𝗋 𝗅𝖾𝗀𝗂𝗌𝗅𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝗇𝖺𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗅, 𝖾́ 𝗂𝗆𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗍𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖾𝖼𝗈𝗋𝗋𝖺𝗆 𝖽𝖾 𝗎𝗆 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗌𝖾𝗇𝗌𝗈 𝖺𝗅𝖺𝗋𝗀𝖺𝖽𝗈, 𝗆𝖾𝗌𝗆𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗅𝗂𝗆𝗂𝗍𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝗇𝗈 𝖾𝗌𝗉𝖺𝖼̧𝗈 𝖾 𝗇𝗈 𝗍𝖾𝗆𝗉𝗈. 𝖤𝗆 𝖯𝗈𝗋𝗍𝗎𝗀𝖺𝗅, 𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗌𝖾𝗇𝗌𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗅𝗈𝖼𝗈𝗎 𝗈 𝗉𝖺𝗍𝖺𝗆𝖺𝗋 𝗇𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖾𝗓 𝗌𝖾𝗆𝖺𝗇𝖺𝗌 (𝖺𝖼𝗋𝖾𝖽𝗂𝗍𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗁𝗈𝗃𝖾 𝖺𝗍𝖾́ 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗋𝖺́ 𝗇𝖺𝗌 𝟣𝟤).

𝖴𝗌𝗈 𝖺 𝗉𝖺𝗅𝖺𝗏𝗋𝖺 “𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗌𝖾𝗇𝗌𝗈” 𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗆𝖾𝗌𝗆𝗈 𝖺 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗈𝗋𝗂𝖺 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗈𝗉𝗈𝗌𝗂𝗍𝗈𝗋𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖺 𝗅𝖾𝗀𝖺𝗅𝗂𝗓𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝗈 𝖺𝖻𝗈𝗋𝗍𝗈 𝗍𝖾̂𝗆 𝖽𝗂𝖿𝗂𝖼𝗎𝗅𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖾𝗆 𝖽𝖾𝖿𝖾𝗇𝖽𝖾𝗋 𝖺 𝗉𝗋𝗂𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗆𝗎𝗅𝗁𝖾𝗋𝖾𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖺𝖻𝗈𝗋𝗍𝖾𝗆 𝖺𝗍𝖾́ 𝖺̀𝗌 𝖽𝖾𝗓 𝗌𝖾𝗆𝖺𝗇𝖺𝗌 (𝖺 𝖼𝖾́𝗅𝖾𝖻𝗋𝖾 𝗉𝗈𝗌𝗂𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 “𝖾́ 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗂𝖻𝗂𝖽𝗈, 𝗆𝖺𝗌 𝗉𝗈𝖽𝖾-𝗌𝖾” 𝖽𝖺 𝖼𝖺𝗆𝗉𝖺𝗇𝗁𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝟤𝟢𝟢𝟩). 𝖤𝗌𝗌𝖺𝗌 𝗆𝖾𝗌𝗆𝖺𝗌 𝗉𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗈𝖺𝗌 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗁𝖾𝗌𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗋𝗂𝖺𝗆 𝖾𝗆 𝖽𝖾𝖿𝖾𝗇𝖽𝖾𝗋 𝖺 𝗉𝗋𝗂𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗆𝖾́𝖽𝗂𝖼𝗈𝗌 𝖾 𝗆𝗎𝗅𝗁𝖾𝗋𝖾𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖺𝖻𝗈𝗋𝗍𝖺𝗌𝗌𝖾𝗆 𝗎𝗆𝖺𝗌 𝗁𝗈𝗋𝖺𝗌 𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝗈 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝗍𝗈 𝗈𝗎 𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗅𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗋 𝗉𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗈𝖺 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗆𝖺𝗍𝖺𝗌𝗌𝖾 𝗎𝗆 𝗋𝖾𝖼𝖾́𝗆-𝗇𝖺𝗌𝖼𝗂𝖽𝗈. 𝖠𝗈 𝖿𝖺𝗓𝖾𝗋 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺 𝖽𝗂𝗌𝗍𝗂𝗇𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺̃𝗈, 𝗂𝗆𝗉𝗅𝗂𝖼𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾, 𝖺 𝖺𝖼𝖾𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗋 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗎𝗆 𝖿𝖾𝗍𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝖽𝖾𝗓 𝗌𝖾𝗆𝖺𝗇𝖺𝗌 𝗍𝖾𝗆 𝗎𝗆 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗍𝗎𝗍𝗈 𝗂𝗇𝖿𝖾𝗋𝗂𝗈𝗋 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗆𝖾𝗋𝖾𝖼𝖾 𝗈 𝗆𝖾𝗌𝗆𝗈 𝗍𝗂𝗉𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗍𝖾𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝗅𝖾𝗀𝖺𝗅. 𝖲𝖾 𝖺𝗍𝖾́ 𝗈𝗌 𝗈𝗉𝗈𝗌𝗂𝗍𝗈𝗋𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖾𝖼𝗅𝖺𝗋𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖺 𝗅𝖾𝗀𝖺𝗅𝗂𝗓𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝗈 𝖺𝖻𝗈𝗋𝗍𝗈 𝖺𝖼𝖾𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗆 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖺 𝗏𝗂𝖽𝖺 𝗁𝗎𝗆𝖺𝗇𝖺 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗍𝖾𝗆 𝗈 𝗆𝖾𝗌𝗆𝗈 𝗏𝖺𝗅𝗈𝗋 𝖺̀𝗌 𝖽𝖾𝗓 𝗌𝖾𝗆𝖺𝗇𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗀𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗍𝖾𝗆 𝖺̀𝗌 𝟥𝟢 𝗈𝗎 𝖺𝗉𝗈́𝗌 𝗈 𝗇𝖺𝗌𝖼𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈, 𝖿𝗂𝖼𝖺 𝖼𝗅𝖺𝗋𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗌𝖾𝗇𝗌𝗈 𝗌𝗈𝖻𝗋𝖾 𝗈 𝗏𝖺𝗅𝗈𝗋 𝖽𝖺 𝗏𝗂𝖽𝖺 𝗁𝗎𝗆𝖺𝗇𝖺 𝖺̀𝗌 𝖽𝖾𝗓 𝗌𝖾𝗆𝖺𝗇𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗀𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾́ 𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗌𝗏𝖾𝗋𝗌𝖺𝗅.

𝖤𝗑𝗂𝗌𝗍𝗂𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗌𝖾𝗇𝗌𝗈 𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗌𝗏𝖾𝗋𝗌𝖺𝗅, 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝖿𝖺𝗓 𝗌𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗂𝖽𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗎𝗆 𝗉𝖺𝗂́𝗌 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗂́𝖻𝖺 𝗈 𝖺𝖻𝗈𝗋𝗍𝗈 𝖺𝗍𝖾́ 𝖺̀𝗌 𝖽𝖾𝗓 𝗌𝖾𝗆𝖺𝗇𝖺𝗌. 𝖠𝗈 𝖿𝖺𝗓𝖾̂-𝗅𝗈 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗋𝖺́ 𝖺 𝗂𝗆𝗉𝖾𝖽𝗂𝗋 𝖺𝖻𝗈𝗋𝗍𝗈𝗌, 𝗆𝖺𝗌 𝖺𝗉𝖾𝗇𝖺𝗌 𝖺 𝗂𝗆𝗉𝖾𝖽𝗂𝗋 𝖺𝖻𝗈𝗋𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝗌𝖾𝗀𝗎𝗋𝗈𝗌, 𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗋𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝗆𝗎𝗅𝗁𝖾𝗋𝖾𝗌 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝗉𝗈𝖻𝗋𝖾𝗌 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗈𝗌 𝖼𝗅𝖺𝗇𝖽𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗂𝗇𝗈𝗌, 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗅𝗈𝖼𝖺𝗆 𝖾𝗆 𝗋𝗂𝗌𝖼𝗈 𝖺 𝗉𝗋𝗈́𝗉𝗋𝗂𝖺 𝗏𝗂𝖽𝖺. 𝖤𝗑𝗂𝗌𝗍𝗂𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗌𝖾𝗇𝗌𝗈, 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗂𝖻𝗂𝗋 𝗈 𝖺𝖻𝗈𝗋𝗍𝗈 𝖺𝗍𝖾́ 𝖺̀𝗌 𝖽𝖾𝗓 𝗌𝖾𝗆𝖺𝗇𝖺𝗌 (𝗈𝗎 𝖺𝗍𝖾́ 𝗈𝗇𝖽𝖾 𝖾𝗑𝗂𝗌𝗍𝗂𝗋 𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗌𝖾𝗇𝗌𝗈) 𝖾́ 𝗏𝖾𝗋𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾𝗂𝗋𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗋 𝖺 𝗅𝗂𝗆𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗋 𝗈 𝖽𝗂𝗋𝖾𝗂𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝗆𝗎𝗅𝗁𝖾𝗋𝖾𝗌.

𝖢𝗅𝖺𝗋𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗌𝖾𝗇𝗌𝗈 𝗉𝗈𝖽𝖾 𝗆𝗎𝖽𝖺𝗋 𝗎𝗆 𝖽𝗂𝖺 (𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝖼𝗂𝗆𝖺 𝗈𝗎 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝖻𝖺𝗂𝗑𝗈). 𝖤́ 𝗉𝗈𝗌𝗌𝗂́𝗏𝖾𝗅 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖿𝗎𝗍𝗎𝗋𝖺𝗌 𝗀𝖾𝗋𝖺𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝗍𝖾𝗇𝗁𝖺𝗆 𝗎𝗆 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗌𝖾𝗇𝗌𝗈 𝗆𝗈𝗋𝖺𝗅 𝖽𝗂𝗌𝗍𝗂𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝖾 𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝗃𝗎𝗅𝗀𝗎𝖾𝗆 𝗉𝖾𝗅𝖺 𝖿𝗈𝗋𝗆𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗍𝖺𝗆𝗈𝗌 𝖺 𝗏𝗂𝖽𝖺 𝗁𝗎𝗆𝖺𝗇𝖺 𝗈𝗎 𝗉𝖾𝗅𝖺 𝖿𝗈𝗋𝗆𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝗅𝗂𝗆𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗆𝗈𝗌 𝗈 𝖽𝗂𝗋𝖾𝗂𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝗆𝗎𝗅𝗁𝖾𝗋𝖾𝗌. 𝖭𝗈́𝗌, 𝗁𝗈𝗃𝖾, 𝗃𝗎𝗅𝗀𝖺𝗆𝗈𝗌, 𝗆𝗎𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗌 𝗏𝖾𝗓𝖾𝗌 𝖾𝗑𝖺𝗀𝖾𝗋𝖺𝖽𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾, 𝖺 𝖿𝗈𝗋𝗆𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝖿𝗂𝗀𝗎𝗋𝖺𝗌 𝗁𝗂𝗌𝗍𝗈́𝗋𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗌 𝗅𝗂𝖽𝖺𝗋𝖺𝗆 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝖽𝗂𝗋𝖾𝗂𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝗁𝗎𝗆𝖺𝗇𝗈𝗌, 𝗆𝖾𝗌𝗆𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖺 𝖿𝗈𝗋𝗆𝖺 𝖾𝗋𝖺 𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗌𝗏𝖾𝗋𝗌𝖺𝗅𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗌𝗂𝖽𝖾𝗋𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝗆𝗈𝗋𝖺𝗅 𝗇𝗈 𝗍𝖾𝗆𝗉𝗈 𝖾 𝗇𝗈 𝖾𝗌𝗉𝖺𝖼̧𝗈 𝖾𝗆 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖺𝗌 𝗉𝖾𝗋𝗌𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗅𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾𝗌 𝗏𝗂𝗏𝖾𝗋𝖺𝗆.

𝖣𝖺 𝗆𝗂𝗇𝗁𝖺 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝗍𝖾, 𝖾 𝗂𝗌𝗍𝗈 𝗌𝗈́ 𝗆𝖾 𝗏𝗂𝗇𝖼𝗎𝗅𝖺 𝖺 𝗆𝗂𝗆, 𝗌𝗈𝗎 𝗉𝗋𝗈́-𝗏𝗂𝖽𝖺 𝖾 𝗍𝖺𝗆𝖻𝖾́𝗆 𝗉𝖾𝗅𝗈 𝖺𝖻𝗈𝗋𝗍𝗈 𝗅𝖾𝗀𝖺𝗅. 𝖯𝗋𝗈́-𝗏𝗂𝖽𝖺 𝗇𝗈 𝗌𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗂𝖽𝗈 𝖾𝗆 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗂𝗇𝖼𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗂𝗏𝖺𝗋𝗂𝖺 𝗈𝗎 𝖺𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗌𝖾𝗅𝗁𝖺𝗋𝗂𝖺 𝗈 𝖺𝖻𝗈𝗋𝗍𝗈 𝖺 𝗇𝗂𝗇𝗀𝗎𝖾́𝗆 𝗌𝖾 𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗌𝖾𝗅𝗁𝗈 𝖺𝗅𝗀𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗏𝖾𝗓 𝗆𝖾 𝖿𝗈𝗌𝗌𝖾 𝗉𝖾𝖽𝗂𝖽𝗈. 𝖲𝗈𝗎 𝗉𝖾𝗅𝗈 𝖺𝖻𝗈𝗋𝗍𝗈 𝗅𝖾𝗀𝖺𝗅 𝗇𝗈 𝗌𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗂𝖽𝗈 𝖾𝗆 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗌𝗂𝖽𝖾𝗋𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗍𝗈𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝖺𝗌 𝗆𝗎𝗅𝗁𝖾𝗋𝖾𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗈 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝖾𝗃𝖾𝗆 𝖽𝖾𝗏𝖾𝗆 𝗍𝖾𝗋 𝖺𝖼𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗈 𝖺 𝗎𝗆 𝗆𝖾́𝗍𝗈𝖽𝗈 𝗅𝖾𝗀𝖺𝗅 𝖾 𝗌𝖾𝗀𝗎𝗋𝗈 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝖺𝖻𝗈𝗋𝗍𝖺𝗋𝖾𝗆 𝖺𝗍𝖾́ 𝖺𝗈 𝗅𝗂𝗆𝗂𝗍𝖾 𝖽𝗈 𝗉𝖾𝗋𝗂́𝗈𝖽𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗀𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾𝗆 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖾𝗑𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖾 𝗎𝗆 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗌𝖾𝗇𝗌𝗈 𝖼𝗂𝗏𝗂𝗅𝗂𝗓𝖺𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗅 𝖽𝖾 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗍𝖾𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖺 𝗏𝗂𝖽𝖺 𝗁𝗎𝗆𝖺𝗇𝖺, 𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖾𝗆 𝖯𝗈𝗋𝗍𝗎𝗀𝖺𝗅 𝗌𝖾𝗋𝖺́ 𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖾 𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖾𝗓 𝖾 𝖺𝗌 𝟣𝟤 𝗌𝖾𝗆𝖺𝗇𝖺𝗌.

* Deputado à AR pela "IL"

IN "NOVO" - 16/03/24 .