GUILHERME TRINDADE

 .

UMA OPINIÃO A PONDERAR

Israel-Palestina

não é complicado

.

Se queremos paz, se queremos o fim do terrorismo, se somos contra a ocupação ilegal, contra a limpeza étnica, contra o apartheid, contra o genocídio então não é complicado. Não interessa quantos vídeos de propaganda israelita mostrem, quantos argumentos históricos, religiosos ou de conveniência geopolítica.

“Então, não é uma situação complexa. Isso é o importante a reter. É super simples. Há um grupo que tem um poder enorme, é o país mais poderoso do Médio Oriente, apoiado pelos Estados Unidos da América. Age sobre outra população com total impunidade, sem nunca ser responsabilizado por nada.

Portanto, não há simetria nenhuma na relação.”

Michael Brooks, Lafayette College, 27/02/2020

𝐶𝑜𝑚𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑖 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎 𝑐𝑖𝑡𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑀𝑖𝑐𝘩𝑎𝑒𝑙 𝐵𝑟𝑜𝑜𝑘𝑠 𝑝𝑜𝑟𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑠𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑒́ 𝑜 𝑎𝑟𝑔𝑢𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜 𝑚𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑠𝑖𝑚𝑝𝑙𝑒𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑎 𝑜 𝑒𝑛𝑐𝑜𝑙𝘩𝑒𝑟 𝑑𝑒 𝑜𝑚𝑏𝑟𝑜𝑠 𝑐𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑚 “𝑠𝑖𝑚𝑝𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑧𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑜𝑠 𝑝𝑎𝑙𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑖𝑎𝑛𝑜𝑠” 𝑚𝑎𝑠 𝑎𝑐𝘩𝑎 𝑎 𝑠𝑖𝑡𝑢𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 “𝑚𝑢𝑖𝑡𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑙𝑒𝑥𝑎”. 𝐻𝑎́ 𝑢𝑚 𝑙𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑜 𝑝𝑜𝑑𝑒𝑟 𝑡𝑜𝑑𝑜 𝑒 𝑢𝑚 𝑙𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑝𝑜𝑑𝑒𝑟 𝑛𝑒𝑛𝘩𝑢𝑚.

𝐸𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑛𝘩𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑎 𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑝𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑎𝑏𝑖𝑙𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝑝𝑜̃𝑒-𝑠𝑒 𝑡𝑜𝑑𝑎 𝑑𝑜 𝑙𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑚 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑡𝑒𝑚 𝑝𝑜𝑑𝑒𝑟 𝑑𝑒 “𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑟 𝑎 𝑔𝑢𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑎”, 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑜 𝑠𝑒 𝑑𝑖𝑠𝑠𝑒́𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑚𝑜𝑠 𝑎̀ 𝑃𝑎𝑙𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑎 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑒́ 𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑝𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑎́𝑣𝑒𝑙 𝑝𝑒𝑙𝑜 𝑠𝑒𝑢 𝑝𝑟𝑜́𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑜 𝑠𝑜𝑓𝑟𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜 𝑒 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑑𝑒𝑣𝑒 𝑠𝑜𝑓𝑟𝑒𝑟 𝑠𝑢𝑐𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑣𝑎𝑠 𝑎𝑛𝑒𝑥𝑎𝑐̧𝑜̃𝑒𝑠, 𝘩𝑢𝑚𝑖𝑙𝘩𝑎𝑐̧𝑜̃𝑒𝑠, 𝑚𝑖𝑠𝑒́𝑟𝑖𝑎, 𝑎𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑡𝘩𝑒𝑖𝑑, 𝑙𝑖𝑚𝑝𝑒𝑧𝑎 𝑒́𝑡𝑛𝑖𝑐𝑎, 𝑚𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑒𝑠, 𝑓𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜𝑠 𝑒𝑚 𝑠𝑖𝑙𝑒̂𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑜 𝑒 “𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑡𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑜 𝑝𝑎𝑐𝑖́𝑓𝑖𝑐𝑜”.

𝑁𝑢𝑛𝑐𝑎 𝑠𝑒 𝑝𝑒𝑑𝑒 𝑎 𝐼𝑠𝑟𝑎𝑒𝑙 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑒 𝑎 𝑔𝑢𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑎.

𝑀𝑎𝑠 𝐼𝑠𝑟𝑎𝑒𝑙 𝑑𝑒 𝑓𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑜 𝑡𝑒𝑚 𝑜 𝑝𝑜𝑑𝑒𝑟 𝑑𝑒 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑟 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑡𝑢𝑑𝑜. 𝑃𝑜𝑑𝑒 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑟 𝑜𝑠 𝑏𝑜𝑚𝑏𝑎𝑟𝑑𝑒𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜𝑠, 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑟 𝑑𝑒 𝑚𝑎𝑡𝑎𝑟 𝑐𝑖𝑣𝑖𝑠, 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑟 𝑜𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑙𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑡𝑜𝑠, 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑎𝑠 𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑠𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑎𝑟𝑏𝑖𝑡𝑟𝑎́𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑠, 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑎𝑠 𝑒𝑥𝑒𝑐𝑢𝑐̧𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑎 𝑝𝑎𝑙𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑖𝑎𝑛𝑜𝑠. 𝑇𝑢𝑑𝑜 𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑜 𝑠𝑎̃𝑜 𝑒𝑠𝑐𝑜𝑙𝘩𝑎𝑠 𝑝𝑜𝑙𝑖́𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑠 𝑑𝑜 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝐼𝑠𝑟𝑎𝑒𝑙. 𝑁𝑖𝑛𝑔𝑢𝑒́𝑚 𝑜𝑠 𝑜𝑏𝑟𝑖𝑔𝑎.

𝐴𝑜 𝑜𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑜𝑟 𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑚𝑖𝑡𝑒-𝑠𝑒 𝑡𝑜𝑑𝑎 𝑎 𝑣𝑖𝑜𝑙𝑒̂𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑎, 𝑎𝑜 𝑜𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑚𝑖𝑑𝑜 𝑛𝑒𝑛𝘩𝑢𝑚𝑎.

𝑆𝑒 𝑑𝑒𝑝𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑒𝑟𝑚𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑜 𝑛𝑜𝑠𝑠𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑎𝑛𝑎́𝑙𝑖𝑠𝑒 𝑑𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑡𝑒𝑚 𝑠𝑖𝑑𝑜 𝑎 𝑎𝑡𝑢𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑜 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝐼𝑠𝑟𝑎𝑒𝑙 𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑑𝑒 𝑜 𝑎𝑡𝑎𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑜𝑟𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝟽 𝑑𝑒 𝑂𝑢𝑡𝑢𝑏𝑟𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝟸𝟶𝟸𝟹, 𝘩𝑎́ 𝑢𝑚 𝑎𝑝𝑎𝑛𝘩𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑑𝑒𝑐𝑙𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑐̧𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑟𝑎𝑠. 𝐷𝑒𝑠𝑑𝑒 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑝𝑎𝑔𝑎𝑟 𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑖𝑛𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑚𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑖𝑠𝑟𝑎𝑒𝑙𝑖𝑡𝑎 𝑎𝑐𝑟𝑖𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑎 𝑓𝑎𝑧𝑒𝑟 𝑎𝑟𝑔𝑢𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜𝑠 𝑞𝑢𝑒, 𝑠𝑒 𝑎𝑝𝑙𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑎 𝐼𝑠𝑟𝑎𝑒𝑙, 𝑗𝑢𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑓𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑚 𝑜 𝑟𝑎𝑐𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑙 𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑜 𝐻𝑎𝑚𝑎𝑠. 𝑃𝑜𝑟 𝑒𝑥𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑙𝑜, 𝑠𝑒 𝑎𝑐𝑒𝑖𝑡𝑎𝑚𝑜𝑠, 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑜 𝑠𝑒 𝑑𝑖𝑠𝑠𝑒 𝑚𝑢𝑖𝑡𝑎𝑠 𝑣𝑒𝑧𝑒𝑠, 𝑞𝑢𝑒 “𝑎 𝑚𝑎𝑖𝑜𝑟 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑡𝑒 𝑑𝑎 𝑝𝑜𝑝𝑢𝑙𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝐺𝑎𝑧𝑎 𝑎𝑝𝑜𝑖𝑎 𝑜 𝐻𝑎𝑚𝑎𝑠” 𝑒 𝑖𝑠𝑠𝑜 𝑒́ 𝑗𝑢𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑓𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑐𝑖𝑣𝑖𝑠 𝑠𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑚 𝑏𝑜𝑚𝑏𝑎𝑟𝑑𝑒𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑠, 𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑎̃𝑜 𝑜𝑠 𝑖𝑠𝑟𝑎𝑒𝑙𝑖𝑡𝑎𝑠 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑒𝑙𝑒𝑔𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑚 𝑜 𝐿𝑖𝑘𝑢𝑑 𝑒 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑡𝑖𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑒𝑥𝑡𝑟𝑒𝑚𝑎-𝑑𝑖𝑟𝑒𝑖𝑡𝑎 𝑠𝑎̃𝑜 𝑎𝑙𝑣𝑜𝑠 𝑙𝑒𝑔𝑖́𝑡𝑖𝑚𝑜𝑠? 𝑆𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑒𝑥𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑒 𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑟𝑢𝑡𝑎 𝑜𝑏𝑟𝑖𝑔𝑎𝑡𝑜́𝑟𝑖𝑎 𝑒𝑚 𝐼𝑠𝑟𝑎𝑒𝑙, 𝘩𝑎́ 𝑠𝑒𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑟 𝑎𝑙𝑣𝑜𝑠 𝑐𝑖𝑣𝑖𝑠 𝑒𝑚 𝐼𝑠𝑟𝑎𝑒𝑙?

𝐸𝑠𝑡𝑎 𝑙𝑜́𝑔𝑖𝑐𝑎 𝑒́ 𝑜𝑏𝑣𝑖𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑜𝑏𝑠𝑐𝑒𝑛𝑎 𝑒 𝑟𝑒𝑝𝑒𝑙𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑎𝑝𝑙𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑑𝑎 𝑎 𝐼𝑠𝑟𝑎𝑒𝑙, 𝑝𝑜𝑟𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑜𝑏𝑣𝑖𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑎𝑏𝑗𝑒𝑡𝑎 𝑒́ 𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑎𝑝𝑙𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑑𝑎 𝑎 𝑝𝑎𝑙𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑖𝑎𝑛𝑜𝑠? 𝐸́, 𝑒 𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑜 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑒𝑣𝑒 𝑠𝑢𝑟𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑒𝑟 𝑚𝑢𝑖𝑡𝑜, 𝑎 𝑙𝑜́𝑔𝑖𝑐𝑎 𝑛𝑜𝑗𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑐𝑢𝑙𝑝𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑙𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑎 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑂𝑠𝑎𝑚𝑎 𝐵𝑖𝑛 𝐿𝑎𝑑𝑒𝑛 𝑢𝑠𝑜𝑢 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑗𝑢𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑓𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑟 𝑜 𝟷𝟷 𝑑𝑒 𝑆𝑒𝑡𝑒𝑚𝑏𝑟𝑜. 𝑆𝑒𝑔𝑢𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝐵𝑖𝑛 𝐿𝑎𝑑𝑒𝑛, 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑜 𝑜𝑠 𝑒𝑙𝑒𝑖𝑡𝑜𝑟𝑒𝑠 𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑛𝑜𝑠 𝑡𝑖𝑛𝘩𝑎𝑚 𝑒𝑙𝑒𝑖𝑡𝑜 𝑙𝑖́𝑑𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑠 𝑒 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑡𝑖𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑎𝑝𝑜𝑖𝑎𝑣𝑎𝑚 𝑎 𝑝𝑜𝑙𝑖́𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑎 𝑒𝑥𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑛𝑎 𝑖𝑚𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑎 𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝐸𝑈𝐴, 𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑚 𝑚𝑜𝑟𝑎𝑙𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑝𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑎́𝑣𝑒𝑖𝑠 𝑝𝑒𝑙𝑜𝑠 𝑏𝑜𝑚𝑏𝑎𝑟𝑑𝑒𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜𝑠, 𝑠𝑎𝑛𝑐̧𝑜̃𝑒𝑠, 𝑔𝑜𝑙𝑝𝑒𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝐸𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑓𝑒𝑖𝑡𝑜𝑠 𝑝𝑒𝑙𝑜𝑠 𝐸𝑈𝐴 𝑝𝑒𝑙𝑜 𝑚𝑢𝑛𝑑𝑜.

𝐶𝑜𝑚𝑜 𝑠𝑒 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑐𝘩𝑒𝑔𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑒, 𝑒́ 𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑟𝑎. 𝟻𝟶% 𝑑𝑎 𝑝𝑜𝑝𝑢𝑙𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝐺𝑎𝑧𝑎 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑡𝑖𝑛𝘩𝑎 𝑛𝑎𝑠𝑐𝑖𝑑𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑎𝑚 𝑎𝑠 𝑢́𝑙𝑡𝑖𝑚𝑎𝑠 𝑒𝑙𝑒𝑖𝑐̧𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑒𝑚 𝐺𝑎𝑧𝑎. 𝑆𝑒 𝑗𝑢𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑟𝑚𝑜𝑠 𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑚 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑡𝑖𝑛𝘩𝑎 𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑣𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑟 𝑒𝑚 𝟸𝟶𝟶𝟼 𝑠𝑎̃𝑜 𝟽𝟼%. 𝑆𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑟𝑚𝑜𝑠 𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑠 𝑝𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑜𝑎𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑓𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑜 𝑣𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑚 𝑛𝑜 𝐻𝑎𝑚𝑎𝑠 𝑒𝑚 𝐺𝑎𝑧𝑎 𝑒 𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑢𝑚𝑖𝑟𝑚𝑜𝑠 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑎𝑖𝑛𝑑𝑎 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎̃𝑜 𝑣𝑖𝑣𝑎𝑠 𝑠𝑎̃𝑜 𝟾.𝟷𝟸%.

𝐶𝑟𝑖𝑜𝑢-𝑠𝑒 𝑢𝑚 𝑐𝑢́𝑝𝑢𝑙𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑓𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑜 𝑟𝑒𝑡𝑜́𝑟𝑖𝑐𝑎 𝑎̀ 𝑣𝑜𝑙𝑡𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝐼𝑠𝑟𝑎𝑒𝑙, 𝑠𝑒𝑗𝑎 𝑎𝑐𝑢𝑠𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑚 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑑𝑒𝑛𝑎 𝑜𝑠 𝑠𝑒𝑢𝑠 𝑐𝑟𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑖-𝑠𝑒𝑚𝑖𝑡𝑎, 𝑠𝑒𝑗𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑎𝑝𝑜𝑖𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑑𝑜 𝐻𝑎𝑚𝑎𝑠. 𝑀𝑢𝑖𝑡𝑎𝑠 𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑝𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑜𝑎𝑠 𝑠𝑎̃𝑜 𝑎𝑠 𝑚𝑒𝑠𝑚𝑎𝑠 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝘩𝑎́ 𝑢𝑛𝑠 𝑚𝑒𝑠𝑒𝑠 𝑎𝑐𝑢𝑠𝑎𝑣𝑎𝑚 𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑚 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑠𝑒𝑔𝑢𝑖𝑎 𝑎 𝑙𝑖𝑛𝘩𝑎 𝑑𝑎 𝑁𝐴𝑇𝑂 𝑜𝑢 𝑡𝑖𝑛𝘩𝑎 𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑙𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑟 𝑐𝑟𝑖́𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑎 𝑎𝑜 𝑎𝑢𝑡𝑜𝑟𝑖𝑡𝑎𝑟𝑖𝑠𝑚𝑜 𝑐𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑐𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑟𝑟𝑢𝑝𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑍𝑒𝑙𝑒𝑛𝑠𝑘𝑦 𝑑𝑒 “𝑃𝑢𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑎”. 𝑄𝑢𝑒𝑚 𝑝𝑒𝑑𝑖𝑢 𝑝𝑎𝑧 𝑒 𝑛𝑒𝑔𝑜𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑒𝑣𝑖𝑡𝑎𝑟 𝑚𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑚𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑒𝑠 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑣𝑎 𝑐𝑙𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑑𝑜 𝑙𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑃𝑢𝑡𝑖𝑛. 𝐻𝑜𝑗𝑒 𝑎𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑜𝑠 𝐸𝑈𝐴 𝑠𝑎̃𝑜 “𝑝𝑢𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑠” 𝑎𝑜 𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑟 𝑍𝑒𝑙𝑒𝑛𝑠𝑘𝑦 𝑎 𝑛𝑒𝑔𝑜𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑟, 𝑎𝑔𝑜𝑟𝑎 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑎 𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑒 𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑢𝑟𝑠𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑜 𝑜𝑐𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑠𝑒 𝑣𝑖𝑟𝑎𝑚 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑑𝑒𝑓𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑒𝑟 𝐼𝑠𝑟𝑎𝑒𝑙.

𝐻𝑜𝑢𝑣𝑒 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑔𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑒 𝑐𝑙𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑧𝑎 𝑖𝑛𝑖𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑙 𝑒 𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑒𝑠 𝑎𝑟𝑔𝑢𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜𝑠 𝑚𝑜𝑟𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑟 𝑑𝑜 𝑙𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑑𝑎 𝑈𝑐𝑟𝑎̂𝑛𝑖𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑎 𝑎 𝑖𝑛𝑣𝑎𝑠𝑎̃𝑜. 𝑃𝑜𝑟 𝑚𝑢𝑖𝑡𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑠𝑒 𝑓𝑎𝑙𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑒 𝑑𝑒 𝑏𝑎𝑡𝑎𝑙𝘩𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝐴𝑧𝑜𝑣, 𝑑𝑜 𝐸𝑢𝑟𝑜𝑚𝑎𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑛, 𝑑𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑟𝑟𝑢𝑝𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜, 𝑑𝑒 𝑒𝑥𝑝𝑎𝑛𝑠𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑖𝑠𝑚𝑜 𝑑𝑎 𝑁𝐴𝑇𝑂, 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑜 𝐷𝑎𝑛𝑖𝑒𝑙 𝑂𝑙𝑖𝑣𝑒𝑖𝑟𝑎 𝑠𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑡𝑖𝑧𝑜𝑢: “𝑇𝑢𝑑𝑜 𝑒́ 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑙𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑚𝑎𝑠 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑖𝑠𝑎 𝑒́ 𝑠𝑖𝑚𝑝𝑙𝑒𝑠, 𝘩𝑎́ 𝑢𝑚 𝑜𝑐𝑢𝑝𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑒 𝑢𝑚 𝑜𝑐𝑢𝑝𝑎𝑑𝑜”.

𝑂 𝑙𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑝𝑟𝑜́-𝐼𝑠𝑟𝑎𝑒𝑙𝑖𝑡𝑎 𝑢𝑡𝑖𝑙𝑖𝑧𝑎𝑟𝑎́ 𝑡𝑜𝑑𝑜 𝑜 𝑡𝑖𝑝𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑎𝑟𝑔𝑢𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜𝑠, 𝑓𝑎𝑙𝑎𝑟 𝑑𝑜 𝐻𝑎𝑚𝑎𝑠, 𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑚𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑜𝑠, 𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑐𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑛𝑐̧𝑎𝑠, 𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑔𝑢𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑎𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑜𝑢𝑡𝑟𝑜𝑠 𝑝𝑎𝑖́𝑠𝑒𝑠 𝑎́𝑟𝑎𝑏𝑒𝑠, 𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑓𝑎𝑑𝑎𝑠, 𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑢𝑠𝑎𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑛𝑒𝑔𝑜𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑡𝑒 𝑎 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑡𝑒 𝑒 𝑐𝘩𝑒𝑔𝑎𝑟 𝑎̀ 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑐𝑙𝑢𝑠𝑎̃𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑡𝑢𝑑𝑜 𝑠𝑒 𝑗𝑢𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑓𝑖𝑐𝑎 𝑑𝑜 𝑙𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝐼𝑠𝑟𝑎𝑒𝑙.

𝐷𝑒𝑝𝑜𝑖𝑠 𝘩𝑎́ 𝑜𝑠 “𝑚𝑜𝑑𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑠”, 𝑞𝑢𝑒, 𝑡𝑎𝑚𝑏𝑒́𝑚 𝑏𝑎𝑠𝑒𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑛𝑜𝑠 𝑚𝑒𝑠𝑚𝑜𝑠 𝑎𝑟𝑔𝑢𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜𝑠, 𝑙𝑎𝑣𝑎𝑚 𝑎𝑠 𝑚𝑎̃𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑖𝑧𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 “𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝘩𝑎́ 𝑏𝑜𝑛𝑠 𝑛𝑒𝑚 𝑚𝑎𝑢𝑠” 𝑒 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑛𝑜 𝑓𝑖𝑚 𝑒́ “𝑚𝑢𝑖𝑡𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑙𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑑𝑜”.

𝐶𝑜𝑚𝑜 𝑑𝑖𝑠𝑠𝑒 𝑀𝑖𝑐𝘩𝑎𝑒𝑙 𝐵𝑟𝑜𝑜𝑘𝑠, 𝑛𝑜 𝑓𝑖𝑚 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑒́. 𝐸́ 𝑠𝑖𝑚𝑝𝑙𝑒𝑠. 𝐻𝑎́ 𝑢𝑚 𝑜𝑐𝑢𝑝𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑒, 𝐼𝑠𝑟𝑎𝑒𝑙 𝑒 𝑜 𝑜𝑐𝑢𝑝𝑎𝑑𝑜, 𝑎 𝑃𝑎𝑙𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑎.

𝑁𝑎̃𝑜 𝑝𝑜𝑑𝑒𝑚 𝑑𝑖𝑧𝑒𝑟 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑠𝑎̃𝑜 𝑎 𝑓𝑎𝑣𝑜𝑟 𝑑𝑎 𝑠𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑑𝑜𝑖𝑠 𝐸𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑒𝑛𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑜 𝑎𝑝𝑜𝑖𝑎𝑚 𝐼𝑠𝑟𝑎𝑒𝑙 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑠𝑎𝑏𝑜𝑡𝑎 𝑜𝑟𝑔𝑢𝑙𝘩𝑜𝑠𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑎 𝑚𝑒𝑠𝑚𝑎. 𝑈𝑚𝑎 𝑙𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑒𝑥𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑙𝑜𝑠:

1-𝑂 𝑎𝑝𝑜𝑖𝑜, 𝑓𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑛𝑐𝑒𝑖𝑟𝑜 𝑒 𝑝𝑜𝑙𝑖́𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑜 𝑎̀ 𝑙𝑒𝑔𝑖𝑡𝑖𝑚𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑒 𝑎𝑠𝑐𝑒𝑛𝑠𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑜 𝐻𝑎𝑚𝑎𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑜 𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑚𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑑𝑖𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑖𝑟 𝑎 𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑒̂𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑎 𝑝𝑎𝑙𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑖𝑎𝑛𝑎. 𝑈𝑚 𝑖𝑛𝑖𝑚𝑖𝑔𝑜 𝑒𝑥𝑡𝑟𝑒𝑚𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑙 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑠𝑒 𝑝𝑜𝑑𝑒 𝑛𝑒𝑔𝑜𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑟 𝑒́ 𝑜 𝑏𝑖𝑐𝘩𝑜-𝑝𝑎𝑝𝑎̃𝑜 𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑓𝑒𝑖𝑡𝑜 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑠𝑒 𝑗𝑢𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑓𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑟 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑎𝑣𝑎𝑛𝑐̧𝑎𝑟 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑜 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑐𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑝𝑎𝑧. 

2-𝑂 𝑎𝑝𝑜𝑖𝑜 𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑐𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑎𝑜𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑙𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑡𝑜𝑠 𝑖𝑙𝑒𝑔𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑒𝑥𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑠 𝑒 𝑎̀ 𝑠𝑢𝑎 𝑒𝑥𝑝𝑎𝑛𝑠𝑎̃𝑜. 𝐸́ 𝑐𝑖́𝑛𝑖𝑐𝑜 𝑑𝑖𝑧𝑒𝑟 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑠𝑎̃𝑜 𝑜𝑠 𝑝𝑎𝑙𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑖𝑎𝑛𝑜𝑠 𝑎 𝑖𝑚𝑝𝑒𝑑𝑖𝑟 𝑜 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑐𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑝𝑎𝑧 𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑜 𝑔𝑜𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑛𝑜 𝐼𝑠𝑟𝑎𝑒𝑙𝑖𝑡𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑢𝑎 𝑎 𝑎𝑔𝑟𝑒𝑑𝑖𝑟 𝑝𝑎𝑙𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑖𝑎𝑛𝑜𝑠, 𝑎 𝑎𝑛𝑒𝑥𝑎𝑟 𝑜 𝑠𝑒𝑢 𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑖𝑡𝑜́𝑟𝑖𝑜 𝑒𝑚 𝐽𝑒𝑟𝑢𝑠𝑎𝑙𝑒́𝑚 𝑂𝑟𝑖𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝑒 𝑛𝑎 𝐶𝑖𝑠𝑗𝑜𝑟𝑑𝑎̂𝑛𝑖𝑎. 𝑄𝑢𝑒𝑚 𝑑𝑒𝑖𝑥𝑎 𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑜 𝑎𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑟 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑒́ 𝑎 𝑓𝑎𝑣𝑜𝑟 𝑑𝑎 𝑠𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑑𝑜𝑖𝑠 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑠. 

3-𝑁𝑒𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑦𝑎𝘩𝑢 𝑒 𝑜 𝐿𝑖𝑘𝑢𝑑 𝑎𝑓𝑖𝑟𝑚𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑚 𝑚𝑢́𝑙𝑡𝑖𝑝𝑙𝑎𝑠 𝑣𝑒𝑧𝑒𝑠 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑠𝑜́ 𝑠𝑎̃𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑎 𝑎 𝑠𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑑𝑜𝑖𝑠 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑜 𝑠𝑒 𝑔𝑎𝑏𝑎𝑚 𝑑𝑒 𝑎 𝑡𝑒𝑟 𝑠𝑎𝑏𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑑𝑜. 𝐴 𝑐𝑎𝑟𝑡𝑎 𝑓𝑢𝑛𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑟𝑎 𝑑𝑜 𝐿𝑖𝑘𝑢𝑑 𝑑𝑒𝑓𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑒 𝑎 𝑎𝑛𝑒𝑥𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑎 𝑃𝑎𝑙𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑎. 𝐴𝑖𝑛𝑑𝑎 𝑎𝑔𝑜𝑟𝑎, 𝑎𝑟𝑔𝑢𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜𝑢 𝑎𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑒𝑝𝑢𝑡𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑜 𝐿𝑖𝑘𝑢𝑑: “𝐸𝑢 𝑠𝑜𝑢 𝑜 𝑢́𝑛𝑖𝑐𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑣𝑎𝑖 𝑖𝑚𝑝𝑒𝑑𝑖𝑟 𝑎 𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑚𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑢𝑚 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑝𝑎𝑙𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑖𝑎𝑛𝑜 𝑒𝑚 𝐺𝑎𝑧𝑎 𝑒 (𝐶𝑖𝑠𝑗𝑜𝑟𝑑𝑎̂𝑛𝑖𝑎) 𝑑𝑒𝑝𝑜𝑖𝑠 𝑑𝑎 𝐺𝑢𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑎.”

𝑁𝑎̃𝑜 𝑛𝑜𝑠 𝑐𝑎𝑏𝑒 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑓𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑟 𝑛𝑎 𝑝𝑜𝑙𝑖́𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑎 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑛𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝐼𝑠𝑟𝑎𝑒𝑙. 𝑆𝑒 𝑝𝑜𝑟 𝑎𝑐𝑎𝑠𝑜 𝑎𝑙𝑔𝑢𝑚 𝑒𝑙𝑒𝑖𝑡𝑜𝑟 𝑖𝑠𝑟𝑎𝑒𝑙𝑖𝑡𝑎 𝑚𝑒 𝑙𝑒̂, 𝑝𝑒𝑐̧𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑣𝑜𝑡𝑒 𝑛𝑜𝑠 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑡𝑖𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎̃𝑜 𝑎 𝑖𝑚𝑝𝑒𝑑𝑖𝑟 𝑎 𝑝𝑎𝑧 𝑛𝑎 𝑃𝑎𝑙𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑎. “𝑀𝑎𝑠 𝑒 𝑜 𝐻𝑎𝑚𝑎𝑠? 𝐶𝑜𝑚𝑜 𝑠𝑒 𝑑𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑜𝑡𝑎 𝑜 𝐻𝑎𝑚𝑎𝑠?”

𝑁𝑎̃𝑜 𝑒́ 𝑏𝑜𝑚𝑏𝑎𝑟𝑑𝑒𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑜. 𝐼𝑠𝑟𝑎𝑒𝑙 𝑗𝑎́ 𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑙𝑜𝑐𝑜𝑢 𝟽𝟺% 𝑑𝑎 𝑝𝑜𝑝𝑢𝑙𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝐺𝑎𝑧𝑎, 𝑚𝑎𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑚𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑣𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑚𝑖𝑙 𝑖𝑛𝑐𝑙𝑢𝑖𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑜𝑖𝑡𝑜 𝑚𝑖𝑙 𝑐𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑛𝑐̧𝑎𝑠, 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎, 𝑠𝑒𝑔𝑢𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑜𝑠 𝑠𝑒𝑢𝑠 𝑝𝑟𝑜́𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑠, 𝑚𝑎𝑡𝑎𝑟 𝟹% 𝑑𝑜 𝐻𝑎𝑚𝑎𝑠. 𝐼𝑛𝑐𝑙𝑢𝑖𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑜𝑠 𝑟𝑒𝑓𝑒́𝑛𝑠 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝐼𝑠𝑟𝑎𝑒𝑙 𝑑𝑖𝑧 𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑟 𝑠𝑎𝑙𝑣𝑎𝑟. 𝑂 𝐻𝑎𝑚𝑎𝑠 𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑟 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑣𝑜𝑐𝑎𝑟 𝑟𝑒𝑎𝑐̧𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑣𝑖𝑜𝑙𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝐼𝑠𝑟𝑎𝑒𝑙 𝑝𝑜𝑟𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑓𝑖𝑟𝑚𝑎𝑚 𝑎 𝑠𝑢𝑎 𝑛𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑎: 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑎𝑝𝑒𝑛𝑎𝑠 𝑎 𝑣𝑖𝑜𝑙𝑒̂𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑎 𝑒́ 𝑠𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜. 𝐴𝑠 𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑝𝑜𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑠 𝑣𝑖𝑜𝑙𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑠 𝑒 𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑝𝑜𝑟𝑐𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝐼𝑠𝑟𝑎𝑒𝑙 𝑎𝑗𝑢𝑑𝑎𝑚 𝑜 𝐻𝑎𝑚𝑎𝑠 𝑎 𝑐𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑐𝑒𝑟, 𝑎 𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑟𝑢𝑡𝑎𝑟 𝑒 𝑎 𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑏𝑒𝑟 𝑚𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑎𝑝𝑜𝑖𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑜 𝑚𝑢𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑎́𝑟𝑎𝑏𝑒 𝑒 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑠𝑜́. 𝑆𝑎̃𝑜 𝑜 𝑒𝑠𝑝𝑒𝑙𝘩𝑜 𝑢𝑚 𝑑𝑜 𝑜𝑢𝑡𝑟𝑜. 𝐼𝑠𝑟𝑎𝑒𝑙 𝑡𝑎𝑚𝑏𝑒́𝑚 𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑟 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑜 𝐻𝑎𝑚𝑎𝑠 𝑠𝑒𝑗𝑎 𝑣𝑖𝑜𝑙𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑗𝑢𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑓𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑟 𝑚𝑎𝑡𝑎𝑟 𝑚𝑖𝑙𝘩𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑠, 𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑙𝑜𝑐𝑎𝑟 𝑚𝑖𝑙𝘩𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑒 𝑎𝑛𝑒𝑥𝑎𝑟 𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑖𝑡𝑜́𝑟𝑖𝑜.

𝐶𝑜𝑚𝑜 𝑠𝑒 𝑒𝑛𝑓𝑟𝑎𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑐𝑒 𝑜 𝐻𝑎𝑚𝑎𝑠? 𝑃𝑟𝑜𝑣𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑜 𝑠𝑒𝑢 𝑐𝑎𝑚𝑖𝑛𝘩𝑜 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑟𝑎́ 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑎 𝑚𝑒𝑙𝘩𝑜𝑟. 𝑄𝑢𝑒 𝑎 𝑝𝑎𝑧 𝑒 𝑎 𝑛𝑒𝑔𝑜𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑠𝑒𝑗𝑎𝑚 𝑣𝑖𝑎́𝑣𝑒𝑖𝑠. 𝐸 𝑖𝑠𝑠𝑜 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑠𝑒 𝑝𝑜𝑑𝑒 𝑓𝑎𝑧𝑒𝑟 𝑎𝑝𝑜𝑖𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑜 𝑎𝑡𝑢𝑎𝑙 𝑐𝑎𝑚𝑖𝑛𝘩𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑠𝑎𝑏𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑔𝑒𝑚 𝑑𝑎 𝑝𝑎𝑧 𝑑𝑒 𝐼𝑠𝑟𝑎𝑒𝑙. 𝐴𝑖́, 𝑃𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑢𝑔𝑎𝑙 𝑡𝑒𝑚 𝑢𝑚 𝑝𝑎𝑝𝑒𝑙 𝑒 𝑛𝑜́𝑠, 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑜 𝑒𝑙𝑒𝑖𝑡𝑜𝑟𝑒𝑠 𝑝𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑢𝑔𝑢𝑒𝑠𝑒𝑠, 𝑡𝑒𝑚𝑜𝑠 𝑡𝑎𝑚𝑏𝑒́𝑚 𝑢𝑚 𝑝𝑎𝑝𝑒𝑙. 𝑃𝑜𝑑𝑒𝑚𝑜𝑠 𝑒𝑥𝑖𝑔𝑖𝑟 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑢𝑚 𝑔𝑜𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑛𝑜 𝑃𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑢𝑔𝑢𝑒̂𝑠 𝑓𝑎𝑐̧𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑜 𝑜 𝐸𝑠𝑝𝑎𝑛𝘩𝑜𝑙 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑚𝑒𝑡𝑒 𝑒 𝑜 𝑆𝑢𝑒𝑐𝑜 𝑗𝑎́ 𝑝𝑜̂𝑠 𝑒𝑚 𝑝𝑟𝑎́𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑎 𝑒 𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑜𝑛𝘩𝑒𝑐̧𝑎 𝑜 𝐸𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑑𝑎 𝑃𝑎𝑙𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑎. 𝑃𝑜𝑑𝑒𝑚𝑜𝑠 𝑏𝑜𝑖𝑐𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑟 𝐼𝑠𝑟𝑎𝑒𝑙 𝑎𝑡𝑒́ 𝐼𝑠𝑟𝑎𝑒𝑙 𝑎𝑐𝑒𝑖𝑡𝑎𝑟 𝑢𝑚 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑐𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑝𝑎𝑧. 𝑃𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑢𝑔𝑎𝑙 𝑝𝑜𝑑𝑒 𝑗𝑢𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑟-𝑠𝑒 𝑎 𝑢𝑚 𝑛𝑢́𝑚𝑒𝑟𝑜 𝑐𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑐𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑑𝑒 𝑣𝑜𝑧𝑒𝑠 𝑛𝑜 𝑚𝑢𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑖𝑠𝑜𝑙𝑎𝑟 𝐼𝑠𝑟𝑎𝑒𝑙 𝑒 𝑜𝑏𝑟𝑖𝑔𝑎𝑟 𝐼𝑠𝑟𝑎𝑒𝑙 𝑎 𝑠𝑎𝑖𝑟 𝑑𝑎 𝑖𝑙𝑒𝑔𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒.

𝑃𝑒𝑟𝑔𝑢𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑚-𝑚𝑒 𝑚𝑢𝑖𝑡𝑎𝑠 𝑣𝑒𝑧𝑒𝑠: 𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑙 𝑎 𝑡𝑢𝑎 𝑠𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑎̃𝑜? 𝐸 𝑑𝑖𝑔𝑜:

1)𝑂𝑠 𝐸𝑈𝐴 𝑒 𝑈𝐸 𝑡𝑒̂𝑚 𝑑𝑒 𝑎𝑝𝑜𝑖𝑎𝑟 𝑎𝑠 𝑎𝑙𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑛𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑎𝑠 𝑑𝑒𝑚𝑜𝑐𝑟𝑎́𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑠 𝑎𝑜 𝐻𝑎𝑚𝑎𝑠, 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑜 𝑎 𝐹𝑎𝑡𝑎𝘩. 

2)𝑂𝑠 𝐸𝑈𝐴 𝑒 𝑈𝐸 𝑡𝑒̂𝑚 𝑑𝑒 𝑡𝑜𝑟𝑛𝑎𝑟 𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑙𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑟 𝑎𝑝𝑜𝑖𝑜 𝑎 𝐼𝑠𝑟𝑎𝑒𝑙 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑑𝑖𝑐𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑙 𝑎: 

2.1-𝑅𝑒𝑐𝑜𝑛𝘩𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑟 𝑎 𝑃𝑎𝑙𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑎, 

2.2-𝑆𝑎𝑖𝑟 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑙𝑒𝑡𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑑𝑒 𝐺𝑎𝑧𝑎, 𝐽𝑒𝑟𝑢𝑠𝑎𝑙𝑒́𝑚 𝑂𝑟𝑖𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝑒 𝐶𝑖𝑠𝑗𝑜𝑟𝑑𝑎̂𝑛𝑖𝑎, 

2.3-𝐹𝑜𝑟𝑐̧𝑎𝑟 𝑎 𝑟𝑒𝑡𝑖𝑟𝑎𝑑𝑎 𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑙𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑡𝑜𝑠 𝑖𝑙𝑒𝑔𝑎𝑖𝑠, 

2.4-𝑃𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑟 𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑙𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑟 𝑏𝑙𝑜𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑖𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑒𝑟𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑙 𝑎̀ 𝑃𝑎𝑙𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑎, 

2.5-𝑃𝑒𝑟𝑚𝑖𝑡𝑖𝑟 𝑜 𝑑𝑖𝑟𝑒𝑖𝑡𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑟𝑒𝑔𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑝𝑎𝑙𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑖𝑎𝑛𝑜𝑠 𝑎̀ 𝑃𝑎𝑙𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑎.

3)𝑂𝑠 𝐸𝑈𝐴, 𝑈𝐸 𝑒 𝐼𝑠𝑟𝑎𝑒𝑙 𝑑𝑒𝑣𝑒𝑚 𝑎𝑝𝑜𝑖𝑎𝑟 𝑓𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑛𝑐𝑒𝑖𝑟𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑚𝑒𝑖𝑜𝑠 𝘩𝑢𝑚𝑎𝑛𝑜𝑠 𝑎 𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑢𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑎 𝑃𝑎𝑙𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑎, 𝑎 𝑐𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑖𝑛𝑓𝑟𝑎𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑢𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑎 𝑒 𝑠𝑢𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑏𝑖𝑙𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝑒𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑜́𝑚𝑖𝑐𝑎.

𝑁𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑒 𝑢́𝑙𝑡𝑖𝑚𝑜 𝑒𝑥𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑙𝑜, 𝑝𝑜𝑠𝑠𝑜 𝑑𝑎𝑟 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑠𝑢𝑔𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎̃𝑜 𝑎𝑚𝑏𝑖𝑐𝑖𝑜𝑠𝑎. 𝑃𝑜𝑟𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑡𝑜𝑟𝑛𝑎𝑟 𝑜 𝐶𝑎𝑛𝑎𝑙 𝐵𝑒𝑛 𝐺𝑢𝑟𝑖𝑜𝑛 (𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑎𝑙𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑛𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑎 𝑎𝑜 𝐶𝑎𝑛𝑎𝑙 𝑑𝑜 𝑆𝑢𝑒𝑧) 𝑟𝑒𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝑒 𝑑𝑎𝑟 𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑜𝑙𝑜 𝑒 𝑏𝑒𝑛𝑒𝑓𝑖́𝑐𝑖𝑜𝑠 𝑎𝑜 𝑛𝑜𝑣𝑜 𝐸𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑃𝑎𝑙𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑖𝑎𝑛𝑜? 𝑂 𝐶𝑎𝑛𝑎𝑙 𝑑𝑜 𝑆𝑢𝑒𝑧 𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑒 𝟿.𝟺 𝑚𝑖𝑙𝘩𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑚𝑖𝑙𝘩𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑑𝑜́𝑙𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑠 𝑝𝑜𝑟 𝑎𝑛𝑜 𝑎𝑜 𝐸𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝐸𝑔𝑖́𝑝𝑐𝑖𝑜. 𝐸𝑟𝑎 𝑢𝑚 𝑏𝑜𝑚 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑒𝑐̧𝑜 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑝𝑎𝑧 𝑑𝑢𝑟𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑢𝑟𝑎 𝑛𝑜 𝑀𝑒́𝑑𝑖𝑜 𝑂𝑟𝑖𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒.

𝑈𝑚 𝑓𝑒𝑛𝑜́𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑡𝑒𝑛𝘩𝑜 𝑟𝑒𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑒́ 𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑜 𝑜𝑠 𝑔𝑜𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑛𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑠 𝑡𝑒̂𝑚 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑛𝘩𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑜𝑠 𝑔𝑜𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑛𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑒𝑚 𝑟𝑒𝑙𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑎 𝐼𝑠𝑟𝑎𝑒𝑙. 𝐸𝑛𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑜 𝑔𝑜𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑛𝑜𝑠 - 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑜 𝑜 𝑔𝑜𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑛𝑜 𝑃𝑆 - 𝑡𝑒̂𝑚 𝑒𝑥𝑐𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑣𝑎𝑠 𝑑𝑖𝑓𝑖𝑐𝑢𝑙𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒𝑠 𝑒𝑚 𝑝𝑒𝑑𝑖𝑟 𝑠𝑒𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑟 𝑢𝑚 𝑐𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑎𝑟-𝑓𝑜𝑔𝑜, 𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑠𝑒 𝑜𝑝𝑜̃𝑒𝑚 𝑎𝑏𝑒𝑟𝑡𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑎 𝑢𝑚 𝑐𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑎𝑟-𝑓𝑜𝑔𝑜, 𝘩𝑎́ 𝑠𝑜𝑛𝑑𝑎𝑔𝑒𝑛𝑠 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑟𝑒𝑣𝑒𝑙𝑎𝑚 𝑚𝑎𝑖𝑜𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑠 𝑛𝑜𝑠 𝐸𝑈𝐴, 𝑅𝑒𝑖𝑛𝑜 𝑈𝑛𝑖𝑑𝑜 𝑒 𝐶𝑎𝑛𝑎𝑑𝑎́ 𝑎 𝑓𝑎𝑣𝑜𝑟 𝑑𝑜 𝑚𝑒𝑠𝑚𝑜. 𝑈𝑚 𝑔𝑜𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑛𝑜 𝑑𝑒𝑣𝑒 𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑝𝑒𝑖𝑡𝑎𝑟 𝑎 𝑣𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑒𝑙𝑒𝑖𝑡𝑜𝑟𝑒𝑠. 𝐸𝑠𝑡𝑎̃𝑜 𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑟 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑎𝑠 𝑝𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑜𝑎𝑠 𝑠𝑒 𝑒𝑠𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑐̧𝑎𝑚 𝑑𝑎 𝑃𝑎𝑙𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑎 𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑠 𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑒𝑙𝑒𝑖𝑐̧𝑜̃𝑒𝑠. 𝑀𝑎𝑠 𝑎 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑝𝑎𝑔𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑎 𝑖𝑠𝑟𝑎𝑒𝑙𝑖𝑡𝑎 𝑡𝑒𝑚 𝑓𝑎𝑙𝘩𝑎𝑑𝑜, 𝑒𝑠𝑝𝑒𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑙𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑎𝑠 𝑛𝑜𝑣𝑎𝑠 𝑔𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑐̧𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑏𝑒𝑚 𝑎𝑝𝑒𝑛𝑎𝑠 𝑜 𝑒𝑛𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑑𝑟𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜 𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑝𝑒𝑙𝑜𝑠 𝑂𝐶𝑆 - 𝑎𝑙𝑔𝑢𝑛𝑠 𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑝𝑎𝑔𝑎𝑚 𝑎𝑟𝑔𝑢𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜𝑠 𝑛𝑒𝑔𝑎𝑐𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑠 𝑑𝑜 𝑔𝑒𝑛𝑜𝑐𝑖́𝑑𝑖𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑣𝑎́𝑟𝑖𝑜𝑠 𝑎𝑐𝑎𝑑𝑒́𝑚𝑖𝑐𝑜𝑠 𝑒 𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑡𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑎 𝑂𝑁𝑈 𝑛𝑜𝑠 𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑎 𝑎𝑣𝑖𝑠𝑎𝑟.

𝑆𝑒 𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑚𝑜𝑠 𝑝𝑎𝑧, 𝑠𝑒 𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑚𝑜𝑠 𝑜 𝑓𝑖𝑚 𝑑𝑜 𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑜𝑟𝑖𝑠𝑚𝑜, 𝑠𝑒 𝑠𝑜𝑚𝑜𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑎 𝑎 𝑜𝑐𝑢𝑝𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑖𝑙𝑒𝑔𝑎𝑙, 𝑎𝑛𝑒𝑥𝑎𝑐̧𝑜̃𝑒𝑠, 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑎 𝑎 𝑙𝑖𝑚𝑝𝑒𝑧𝑎 𝑒́𝑡𝑛𝑖𝑐𝑎, 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑎 𝑜 𝑎𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑡𝘩𝑒𝑖𝑑, 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑎 𝑜 𝑔𝑒𝑛𝑜𝑐𝑖́𝑑𝑖𝑜 𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑎̃𝑜 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑒́ 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑙𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑑𝑜. 𝑁𝑎̃𝑜 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑎 𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑜𝑠 𝑣𝑖́𝑑𝑒𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑝𝑎𝑔𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑎 𝑖𝑠𝑟𝑎𝑒𝑙𝑖𝑡𝑎 𝑚𝑜𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑒𝑚, 𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑜𝑠 𝑎𝑟𝑔𝑢𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜𝑠 𝘩𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑜́𝑟𝑖𝑐𝑜𝑠, 𝑟𝑒𝑙𝑖𝑔𝑖𝑜𝑠𝑜𝑠 𝑜𝑢 𝑑𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑣𝑒𝑛𝑖𝑒̂𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑎 𝑔𝑒𝑜𝑝𝑜𝑙𝑖́𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑎, 𝑠𝑜́ 𝘩𝑎́ 𝑡𝑟𝑒̂𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑖𝑠𝑎𝑠 𝑎 𝑑𝑒𝑓𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑒𝑟, 𝑠𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑟𝑒:

𝐹𝑖𝑚 𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑏𝑜𝑚𝑏𝑎𝑟𝑑𝑒𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜𝑠 𝑒 𝑎𝑔𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑎̃𝑜 𝑖𝑠𝑟𝑎𝑒𝑙𝑖𝑡𝑎.

𝐹𝑖𝑚 𝑑𝑎 𝑜𝑐𝑢𝑝𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑖𝑙𝑒𝑔𝑎𝑙 𝑑𝑎 𝑃𝑎𝑙𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑎.

𝑈𝑚 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑝𝑎𝑙𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑖𝑎𝑛𝑜 𝑙𝑖𝑣𝑟𝑒, 𝑑𝑒𝑚𝑜𝑐𝑟𝑎́𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑜 𝑒 𝑠𝑒𝑐𝑢𝑙𝑎𝑟.

* Escritor, realizador e game designer que passa demasiado tempo no Twitter.

IN "SETENTA E QUATRO"- 30/11/23 .