.
IMPERDÍVEL MESMO QUE NÃO CONCORDE
A entrevista do presidente
do Supremo e a
25ª aparição da Virgem
Costa, um governante refratário à verdade.
𝖭𝗎𝗇𝖼𝖺 𝗏𝗂 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖾𝗏𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖺 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝗈 𝖽𝖾𝖼𝗈𝗋𝗋𝖾𝗋 𝖽𝗈 𝗍𝖾𝗆𝗉𝗈 𝖿𝗂𝗓𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖾 𝖼𝖺𝗆𝗂𝗇𝗁𝗈𝗌 𝗍𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝗂𝖿𝖾𝗋𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗌, 𝗀𝖺𝗇𝗁𝖺𝗌𝗌𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗋𝗉𝗈, 𝖿𝗈𝗌𝗌𝖾 𝗂𝗇𝗈𝖼𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖾 𝖼𝗎𝗅𝗉𝖺𝖽𝖺, 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝖺 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗈 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗂𝖽𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖽𝗈 𝖲𝗎𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗆𝗈 𝖳𝗋𝗂𝖻𝗎𝗇𝖺𝗅 𝖽𝖾 𝖩𝗎𝗌𝗍𝗂𝖼̧𝖺, 𝖧𝖾𝗇𝗋𝗂𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖠𝗋𝖺𝗎́𝗃𝗈, 𝖽𝖾𝗎 𝖺𝗈 𝖭𝖺𝗌𝖼𝖾𝗋 𝖽𝗈 𝖲𝗈𝗅 𝗁𝖺́ 𝖼𝖾𝗋𝖼𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝗎𝖺𝗌 𝗌𝖾𝗆𝖺𝗇𝖺𝗌. 𝖠 𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖾𝗏𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖺 𝖽𝖾𝗂𝗑𝗈𝗎 𝖽𝖾 𝗌𝖾𝗋 𝖽𝖾 𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗆 𝖺 𝖽𝖾𝗎, 𝖽𝖾 𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗆 𝖺 𝖿𝖾𝗓, 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗉𝖺𝗌𝗌𝖺𝗋 𝖺 𝗌𝖾𝗋 𝗋𝖾𝖿𝖾́𝗆 𝖽𝗈 𝗇𝗈𝗏𝗈 𝖾𝗌𝖼𝖺̂𝗇𝖽𝖺𝗅𝗈 𝗃𝗎𝖽𝗂𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗅 𝖾 𝗉𝗈𝗅𝗂́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗈 𝖻𝗎𝗋𝗀𝗈, 𝖺𝗉𝖾𝗌𝖺𝗋 𝖽𝖾 𝖾𝗌𝖼𝖺𝗅𝖽𝖺𝖽𝗈, 𝗍𝖾𝗆 𝖽𝗂𝖿𝗂𝖼𝗎𝗅𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖾𝗆 𝖽𝗂𝗀𝖾𝗋𝗂𝗋.
𝖰𝗎𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝖿𝗈𝗂 𝗉𝗎𝖻𝗅𝗂𝖼𝖺𝖽𝖺, 𝖺 𝟥 𝖽𝖾 𝗇𝗈𝗏𝖾𝗆𝖻𝗋𝗈, 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗌𝖾𝗑𝗍𝖺-𝖿𝖾𝗂𝗋𝖺, 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗏𝖺-𝗌𝖾 𝗅𝗈𝗇𝗀𝖾 𝖽𝖾 𝗂𝗆𝖺𝗀𝗂𝗇𝖺𝗋 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗇𝗈𝗏𝗈 𝗌𝗂𝗌𝗆𝗈 𝖿𝖺𝗋𝗂𝖺 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗋𝖾𝗆𝖾𝖼𝖾𝗋 𝗈 𝗍𝗋𝗂𝗉𝖾́ 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺 𝖼𝗂𝗇𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗇𝖺́𝗋𝗂𝖺 𝖽𝖾𝗆𝗈𝖼𝗋𝖺𝖼𝗂𝖺, 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖾𝖼𝖾 𝗆𝗈𝗇𝗍𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝗌𝗈𝖻𝗋𝖾 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝖼𝖺𝗅𝖽𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝗅𝖺𝗆𝖺. 𝖠𝗌 𝖺𝖿𝗂𝗋𝗆𝖺𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖧𝖾𝗇𝗋𝗂𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖠𝗋𝖺𝗎́𝗃𝗈, 𝗃𝗎𝗂𝗓 𝖽𝖾 𝗅𝗈𝗇𝗀𝖺 𝖼𝖺𝗋𝗋𝖾𝗂𝗋𝖺 𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗋𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗉𝗈𝗇𝖽𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖾𝗑𝗉𝖾𝗋𝗂𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺, 𝗏𝗂𝗋𝗂𝖺𝗆 𝖺 𝗀𝖺𝗇𝗁𝖺𝗋 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝖽𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾𝗌𝗈𝗍𝖾́𝗋𝗂𝖼𝖺: «𝖠 𝖼𝗈𝗋𝗋𝗎𝗉𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺́ 𝗂𝗇𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗅𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝖾𝗆 𝖯𝗈𝗋𝗍𝗎𝗀𝖺𝗅 𝖾 𝗍𝖾𝗆 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝖾𝗑𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝗆𝗎𝗂𝗍𝗈 𝖿𝗈𝗋𝗍𝖾 𝗇𝖺 𝖺𝖽𝗆𝗂𝗇𝗂𝗌𝗍𝗋𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝗉𝗎́𝖻𝗅𝗂𝖼𝖺. 𝖨𝗌𝗍𝗈 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾́ 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗌𝗂𝗆𝗉𝗅𝖾𝗌 𝗉𝖾𝗋𝖼𝖾𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈, 𝖾́ 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝖼𝖾𝗋𝗍𝖾𝗓𝖺!»
𝖩𝗈𝗋𝗇𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝖾 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗍𝖾𝗅𝖾𝗏𝗂𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝗆𝖺𝗍𝖺𝖻𝗂𝖼𝗁𝖺𝗋𝖺𝗆-𝗇𝖺 𝗇𝖺𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗅𝖾 𝖿𝗂𝗆 𝖽𝖾 𝗃𝗈𝗋𝗇𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝗍𝗋𝖺𝖻𝖺𝗅𝗁𝗈 𝖾 𝖼𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗋𝖺𝗆 𝖾𝗆 𝗎𝗇𝗂́𝗌𝗌𝗈𝗇𝗈 𝖺𝗌 𝗉𝖺𝗅𝖺𝗏𝗋𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝗈 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗂𝖽𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾. 𝖰𝗎𝖾 𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗋𝗋𝗎𝗉𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗏𝖺 𝗂𝗇𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗅𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝗇𝗈 𝗉𝖺𝗂́𝗌 𝗇𝗂𝗇𝗀𝗎𝖾́𝗆 𝗍𝗂𝗇𝗁𝖺 𝖽𝗎́𝗏𝗂𝖽𝖺𝗌, 𝗆𝖺𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖺 𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗋𝗍𝖺 𝖿𝗂𝗀𝗎𝗋𝖺 𝖽𝗈 𝖤𝗌𝗍𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝗏𝗂𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖾 𝖺𝖿𝗂𝗋𝗆𝖺́-𝗅𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝗍𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖺 𝖼𝗅𝖺𝗋𝖾𝗓𝖺 𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗋𝖺𝗀𝖾𝗆 𝗆𝖾𝗋𝖾𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝖺 𝖽𝖾𝗀𝗎𝗌𝗍𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈.
𝖬𝖺𝗌, 𝗇𝖺 𝗍𝖾𝗋𝖼̧𝖺-𝖿𝖾𝗂𝗋𝖺 𝗌𝖾𝗀𝗎𝗂𝗇𝗍𝖾, 𝖻𝗎𝗌𝖼𝖺𝗌 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝗍𝗈𝖽𝗈 𝗈 𝗉𝖺𝗂́𝗌 𝖾 𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗎𝗇𝗂𝖼𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝖾𝗆𝗂𝗍𝗂𝖽𝗈 𝗉𝖾𝗅𝖺 𝖯𝖦𝖱 (𝖺 𝗏𝗂́𝗍𝗂𝗆𝖺 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗌𝖾 𝗌𝖾𝗀𝗎𝗂𝗋𝗂𝖺) 𝖽𝖾𝗂𝗑𝖺𝗆 𝖼𝗅𝖺𝗋𝗈, 𝖺 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗌𝖾𝗋 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗈𝗌 𝖿𝖺𝗅𝗌𝗈𝗌 𝖼𝖾𝗀𝗈𝗌, 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗈 𝗉𝗋𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗂𝗋𝗈-𝗆𝗂𝗇𝗂𝗌𝗍𝗋𝗈 𝗉𝗈𝖽𝖾𝗋𝖺́ 𝗌𝖾𝗋 𝗌𝗎𝗌𝗉𝖾𝗂𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖼𝗋𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗍𝗋𝖺́𝖿𝗂𝖼𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗂𝗇𝖿𝗅𝗎𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝖻𝖾𝗇𝖾𝖿𝗂𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗋 𝗈𝗌 𝗇𝖾𝗀𝗈́𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗉𝖾𝗅𝗈 𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝗎𝗆 𝗀𝗋𝗎𝗉𝗈 𝖾𝗆𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗌𝖺𝗋𝗂𝖺𝗅 – 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗍𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝖣𝗂𝗈𝗀𝗈 𝖫𝖺𝖼𝖾𝗋𝖽𝖺 𝖬𝖺𝖼𝗁𝖺𝖽𝗈 (𝗈 𝗌𝖾𝗎 “𝗆𝖾𝗅𝗁𝗈𝗋 𝖺𝗆𝗂𝗀𝗈”) 𝗌𝗎𝗉𝗈𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗈 𝗋𝖾𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗌𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺𝗋 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝖺𝖽𝗏𝗈𝗀𝖺𝖽𝗈, 𝗆𝖺𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗏𝖾𝗋𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾𝗂𝗋𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖺𝗍𝗎𝖺𝗏𝖺 𝗇𝖺 𝗌𝗈𝗆𝖻𝗋𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗌𝗎𝗅𝗍𝗈𝗋 𝖾 𝗂𝗇𝖿𝗅𝗎𝖾𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗋 – 𝗏𝗈𝗅𝗍𝖺𝗋𝖺𝗆 𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗅𝗈𝖼𝖺𝗋 𝖾𝗆 𝖿𝗈𝖼𝗈 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝖺 𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖾𝗏𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖺 𝖾 𝗌𝗂𝗆 𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗋𝗉𝗈 𝖾 𝖺 𝖼𝖺𝖻𝖾𝖼̧𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝖧𝖾𝗇𝗋𝗂𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖠𝗋𝖺𝗎́𝗃𝗈. 𝖢𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝗁𝖺́ 𝗃𝗈𝗋𝗇𝖺𝗅𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗌 𝗆𝗎𝗂𝗍𝗈 𝗏𝖾𝗋𝗌𝖺́𝗍𝖾𝗂𝗌, 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗆𝖾𝗌𝗆𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝗇𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝗌𝖺𝖻𝖾𝗆 𝖽𝖺 𝗆𝖺𝗍𝖾́𝗋𝗂𝖺 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗍𝖾̂𝗆 𝗈 𝗍𝖺𝗅𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖿𝖾𝖼𝗁𝖺𝗋 𝖺 𝖻𝖾𝗂𝖼̧𝗈𝗅𝖺, 𝗅𝗈𝗀𝗈 𝖺𝗍𝗈𝗎𝖼𝗂𝗇𝗁𝖺𝗋𝖺𝗆 𝖺 𝖿𝖾𝖻𝗋𝖺, 𝗌𝗎𝗀𝖾𝗋𝗂𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗈 𝖽𝗂𝗌𝖼𝗎𝗋𝗌𝗈 𝖽𝗈 𝗃𝗎𝗂𝗓 𝖾𝗋𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗆 𝗃𝖺́ 𝗌𝖺𝖻𝗂𝖺 𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗏𝖺 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝖺𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝖾𝖼𝖾𝗋 𝖾 𝗆𝖾𝗌𝗆𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖺 𝗌𝗎𝖺 𝗂𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗏𝖾𝗇𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝖼𝗂𝗉𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝖺 𝗈𝗉𝖾𝗋𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈.
𝖤 𝗁𝖺́ 𝗇𝗈𝗍𝗂́𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝗇𝗈𝗍𝗂́𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗌, 𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝖺𝗉𝖾𝗇𝖺𝗌 𝗆𝖺𝗇𝗂𝖿𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖺𝗅𝖾𝗀𝗋𝗂𝖺. 𝖠 𝗋𝗎𝖿𝖺𝗋 𝗇𝗈 𝗉𝗋𝖺𝗍𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝖽𝗎𝖺𝗌 𝖿𝖺𝖼𝖺𝗌 𝖾 𝖺 𝗉𝖺𝗅𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗋 𝗈 𝖼𝖾́𝗋𝖾𝖻𝗋𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝖾𝗌𝗆𝖾𝗋𝗈 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗈 𝗍𝗋𝗂𝗅𝗁𝖺𝗋, 𝗃𝗎𝗇𝗍𝖺-𝗌𝖾 𝖺̀ 𝗋𝖾𝖿𝖾𝗂𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝗈 𝗀𝗋𝖺𝗇𝖽𝖾 𝗉𝗋𝗂́𝗇𝖼𝗂𝗉𝖾 𝖽𝖺 𝖺𝖽𝗏𝗈𝖼𝖺𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝖿𝗈𝗅𝗁𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝗌𝖾𝗋𝗏𝗂𝖼̧𝗈 𝖾𝗆 𝖬𝖺𝖼𝖺𝗎, 𝖬𝖺𝗇𝗎𝖾𝗅 𝖬𝖺𝗀𝖺𝗅𝗁𝖺̃𝖾𝗌 𝖾 𝖲𝗂𝗅𝗏𝖺, 𝗊𝗎𝖾, 𝗇𝗈 𝗍𝗈𝗆 𝖼𝗈𝗌𝗍𝗎𝗆𝖾𝗂𝗋𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖼𝗁𝖺𝗅𝖺𝖼̧𝖺, 𝖼𝗅𝖺𝗌𝗌𝗂𝖿𝗂𝖼𝖺 𝖺 𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖾𝗏𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗏𝖾𝗋𝗌𝖺 𝖽𝖾 “𝗍𝖺𝗌𝖼𝖺”.
𝖤𝗇𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝗌𝖾 𝖾𝗌𝖼𝗎𝗍𝖺𝗏𝖺 𝗈 𝗋𝗎𝗀𝗂𝖽𝗈 𝖽𝖺 𝖽𝖾𝗀𝗅𝗎𝗍𝗂𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖺 𝖽𝖾𝖿𝖾𝗌𝖺 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖾𝗍𝗂𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖾 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗌𝖾𝗎𝗌 𝖺𝗉𝖺𝗇𝗂𝗀𝗎𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌, 𝖿𝗈𝗋𝗃𝖺-𝗌𝖾 𝗈𝗎𝗍𝗋𝖺 𝗏𝗂́𝗍𝗂𝗆𝖺: 𝖫𝗎𝖼𝗂́𝗅𝗂𝖺 𝖦𝖺𝗀𝗈. 𝖤 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗍𝖺𝗅 𝗌𝖾 𝗈 𝗉𝗋𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗂𝗋𝗈 𝗌𝖾 𝗏𝗂𝗋𝖺𝗌𝗌𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖺 𝖺 𝗌𝖾𝗀𝗎𝗇𝖽𝖺?
𝖭𝖺 𝗆𝖺𝗇𝗁𝖺̃ 𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝖻𝗎𝗌𝖼𝖺𝗌, 𝖺 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝖼𝗎𝗋𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗋𝖺-𝗀𝖾𝗋𝖺𝗅 𝖽𝖺 𝖱𝖾𝗉𝗎́𝖻𝗅𝗂𝖼𝖺, 𝖺 𝗉𝖾𝖽𝗂𝖽𝗈 𝖽𝗈 𝗉𝗋𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗂𝗋𝗈-𝗆𝗂𝗇𝗂𝗌𝗍𝗋𝗈, 𝖾́ 𝖼𝗁𝖺𝗆𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝖺 𝖡𝖾𝗅𝖾́𝗆 𝗉𝖾𝗅𝗈 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗂𝖽𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾. 𝖠𝗇𝗍𝗈́𝗇𝗂𝗈 𝖢𝗈𝗌𝗍𝖺, 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝖻𝗎𝗌𝖼𝖺𝗌 𝖾𝗆 𝖲. 𝖡𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝖺𝗈 𝗌𝖾𝗎 𝖼𝗁𝖾𝖿𝖾 𝖽𝖾 𝗀𝖺𝖻𝗂𝗇𝖾𝗍𝖾, 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝖼𝗂𝗌𝖺𝗏𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝗌𝖺𝖻𝖾𝗋 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗅𝗂𝗇𝗁𝖺𝗌 𝗌𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗌𝗂𝖺 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗋𝖾𝗍𝗂𝗋𝖺𝗋 𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖾𝗏𝗂𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗌𝖾𝗊𝗎𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗌 𝗉𝗈𝗅𝗂́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗌. 𝖠 𝗂𝗇𝗏𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗂𝗀𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝗍𝗂𝗇𝗁𝖺 𝖽𝖾𝖼𝗈𝗋𝗋𝗂𝖽𝗈 𝗇𝗎𝗆 𝖻𝗎𝗇𝗄𝖾𝗋. 𝖭𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗌𝗉𝗂𝗋𝖺𝗋𝖺. 𝖤𝗇𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝖾𝖼𝗈𝗋𝗋𝖾 𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗏𝖾𝗋𝗌𝖺 𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖾 𝖬𝖺𝗋𝖼𝖾𝗅𝗈 𝖾 𝖫𝗎𝖼𝗂́𝗅𝗂𝖺 𝖦𝖺𝗀𝗈, 𝗌𝖺𝗂 𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗎𝗇𝗂𝖼𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖾𝗇𝗏𝗈𝗅𝗏𝖾 𝗈 𝗉𝗋𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗂𝗋𝗈-𝗆𝗂𝗇𝗂𝗌𝗍𝗋𝗈. 𝖢𝗈𝗌𝗍𝖺 𝖽𝖾𝗆𝗂𝗍𝖾-𝗌𝖾. 𝖬𝖺𝗌, 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝖽𝗂𝗌𝗌𝖾 𝖺𝗅𝗀𝗎𝖾́𝗆, 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝖿𝗈𝗂 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝗆𝗈𝗋 𝖽𝖺 𝗇𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗈 𝖿𝖺𝗓𝗂𝖺, 𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖾́ 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝖾𝖼̧𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝗆𝗈𝗋 𝖽𝗈 𝖤𝗌𝗍𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗆𝗂𝗇𝖺 𝖿𝗋𝖾𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖾𝗆 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗃𝗎𝗂́𝗓𝗈 𝖽𝗈 𝗆𝗎𝗇𝖽𝗈.
𝖮 𝗉𝗋𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗂𝗋𝗈-𝗆𝗂𝗇𝗂𝗌𝗍𝗋𝗈, 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝖽𝖾𝗆𝗈𝗇𝗌𝗍𝗋𝖺 𝖺 𝗁𝗂𝗌𝗍𝗈́𝗋𝗂𝖺 𝗋𝖾𝖼𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾, 𝗇𝗎𝗇𝖼𝖺 𝗌𝖾 𝖽𝖾𝗂𝗑𝖺 𝗂𝗋 𝖺𝗈 𝖿𝗎𝗇𝖽𝗈, 𝗁𝖺́ 𝖽𝖾 𝗌𝖾𝗆𝗉𝗋𝖾 𝗍𝗋𝖾𝗉𝖺𝗋 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝖺𝗂́ 𝖺𝖼𝗂𝗆𝖺 𝖾 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝖾𝗇𝗋𝖺𝗌𝖼𝖺𝗋-𝗌𝖾. 𝖭𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗆𝖺𝗇𝗈𝖻𝗋𝖺 𝖽𝗂𝗀𝗇𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝖼𝗂𝗋𝖼𝗈, 𝗂𝗇𝗌𝗂𝗇𝗎𝖺 𝗇𝗈 𝗉𝖺𝗌𝗌𝖾𝗂𝗈 𝗉𝗎́𝖻𝗅𝗂𝖼𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖿𝗈𝗋𝖺 𝖬𝖺𝗋𝖼𝖾𝗅𝗈 𝖱𝖾𝖻𝖾𝗅𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖲𝗈𝗎𝗌𝖺 𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗆 𝖼𝗁𝖺𝗆𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝖺 𝖯𝖦𝖱. 𝖠𝖿𝗈𝗎𝗍𝗈, 𝗈 𝗀𝗈𝗏𝖾𝗋𝗇𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝗅𝗂𝗆𝗉𝖺𝗏𝖺 𝖺𝗌 𝗆𝖺̃𝗈𝗌, 𝗇𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝗍𝗂𝗏𝖾𝗋𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝗈 𝗌𝗎𝗂 𝗀𝖾𝗇𝖾𝗋𝗂𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗏𝗂𝗍𝖾.
𝖯𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗌𝖾 𝖽𝗂𝗌𝖼𝗎𝗍𝗂𝗋 𝖺 𝖽𝗂𝗌𝗌𝗈𝗅𝗎𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝗈𝗎 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖺 𝖠𝗌𝗌𝖾𝗆𝖻𝗅𝖾𝗂𝖺 𝖽𝖺 𝖱𝖾𝗉𝗎́𝖻𝗅𝗂𝖼𝖺, 𝖬𝖺𝗋𝖼𝖾𝗅𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗏𝗈𝖼𝖺 𝗈 𝖢𝗈𝗇𝗌𝖾𝗅𝗁𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖤𝗌𝗍𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝖽𝖺𝗅𝗂 𝖺 𝖽𝗈𝗂𝗌 𝖽𝗂𝖺𝗌, 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗊𝗎𝗂𝗇𝗍𝖺-𝖿𝖾𝗂𝗋𝖺. 𝖠̀𝗌 𝗏𝖾𝗓𝖾𝗌, 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾́ 𝖽𝗂𝖿𝗂́𝖼𝗂𝗅 𝗂𝗆𝖺𝗀𝗂𝗇𝖺𝗋 𝖽𝖾 𝗈𝗇𝖽𝖾 𝖺𝗌 𝗇𝗈𝗍𝗂́𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗌 𝗌𝗎𝗋𝗀𝖾𝗆. 𝖭𝖺 𝖾𝖽𝗂𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗌𝖾𝗑𝗍𝖺, 𝗈 𝖤𝗑𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗈 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺𝖼𝖺 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗈𝗋𝗂𝗀𝗂𝗇𝖺𝗅𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾: 𝗈 𝗎́𝗅𝗍𝗂𝗆𝗈 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺́𝗀𝗋𝖺𝖿𝗈 𝖽𝗈 𝖿𝖺𝗆𝗂𝗀𝖾𝗋𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝗈𝖿𝗂́𝖼𝗂𝗈, 𝖺𝗉𝖾𝗇𝖺𝗌 𝗆𝖾𝗌𝗆𝗈 𝖺𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗅𝖾 ‘𝗇𝖺𝗊𝗎𝗂𝗇𝗁𝗈’, 𝖿𝗈𝗋𝖺 𝗋𝖾𝖽𝗂𝗀𝗂𝖽𝗈 𝗉𝖾𝗅𝖺 𝖯𝖦𝖱. 𝖲𝖾𝗆 𝗇𝗂𝗇𝗀𝗎𝖾́𝗆 𝖺𝗌𝗌𝗎𝗆𝗂𝗋 𝖺 𝖺𝗎𝗍𝗈𝗋𝗂𝖺, 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝖾𝖼̧𝖺 𝖺 𝖼𝗂𝗋𝖼𝗎𝗅𝖺𝗋 𝖺 𝗂𝗇𝖿𝗈𝗋𝗆𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗂𝖺 𝗌𝗂𝖽𝗈 𝗆𝖾𝗌𝗆𝗈 𝖾𝗌𝖼𝗋𝗂𝗍𝗈 𝗉𝖾𝗅a 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗂𝖽𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾! 𝖠𝗁, 𝗏𝖺𝗅𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗌! 𝖴𝗆 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗌𝖾𝗅𝗁𝖾𝗂𝗋𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖤𝗌𝗍𝖺𝖽𝗈, 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝖺 𝗉𝖺𝗉𝖺 𝗇𝗈 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗈̂𝗆𝖺𝗀𝗈 𝖺 𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗋𝖾𝗋 𝗌𝖺𝗅𝗍𝖺𝗋 𝗇𝗎𝗆 𝗏𝗈́𝗆𝗂𝗍𝗈 𝗏𝖾𝗆 𝗋𝖾𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝖺 𝗈𝗋𝖽𝖾𝗆 𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗂𝗌𝖺𝗌. 𝖠𝖿𝗂𝗇𝖺𝗅 𝖢𝗈𝗌𝗍𝖺, 𝗀𝗈𝗏𝖾𝗋𝗇𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝗋𝖾𝖿𝗋𝖺𝗍𝖺́𝗋𝗂𝗈 𝖺̀ 𝗏𝖾𝗋𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾, 𝖺𝗌𝗌𝗎𝗆𝗂𝗋𝖺 𝗉𝖾𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝗈𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗌𝖾𝗅𝗁𝖾𝗂𝗋𝗈𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖿𝗈𝗋𝖺 𝖾𝗅𝖾 𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗆 𝗍𝗈𝗆𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝖺 𝗂𝗇𝗂𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗏𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝖼𝗁𝖺𝗆𝖺𝗋 𝖺 𝖯𝖦𝖱 𝖺 𝖡𝖾𝗅𝖾́𝗆.
𝖤 𝖺𝗌𝗌𝗂𝗆 𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗎𝗇𝗂𝖼𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝖽𝖺 𝖯𝖦𝖱 𝗉𝖺𝗌𝗌𝖺 𝖺 𝗌𝖾𝗋 𝗈 𝗇𝗈𝗏𝗈 𝗋𝖾𝗉𝖺𝗌𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗏𝗂𝗏𝖺𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖾, 𝖾𝗆 𝗏𝖾𝗓 𝖽𝖾 𝗅𝗁𝖾 𝗍𝖾𝖼𝖾𝗋𝖾𝗆 𝖾𝗅𝗈𝗀𝗂𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝖾𝗅𝖺 𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗌𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺, 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗍𝖾𝗋 𝗌𝗂𝖽𝗈 𝖾𝗇𝖼𝖺𝗋𝖼𝖾𝗋𝖺𝖽𝗈 – 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝖺𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝖾𝖼𝖾𝗎 𝗇𝗈 𝖼𝖺𝗌𝗈 𝖥𝖺𝖼𝖾 𝖮𝖼𝗎𝗅𝗍𝖺, 𝗇𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗈𝗋𝗂𝗀𝗂𝗇𝖺𝗅𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝗃𝗎𝗋𝗂́𝖽𝗂𝖼𝖺 𝖼𝗁𝖺𝗆𝖺𝖽𝖺 ‘𝖾𝗑𝗍𝖾𝗇𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝖼𝖾𝖽𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺𝗅’, 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝗍𝖺𝗋𝖽𝖾 𝗌𝖾𝗋 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗌𝗎𝗆𝗂𝖽𝖺 𝗉𝖾𝗅𝖺𝗌 𝖼𝗁𝖺𝗆𝖺𝗌 –, 𝖾́ 𝗏𝗂𝗌𝗍𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝗎𝗆 𝗀𝗈𝗅𝗉𝖾 𝖽𝖾 𝖤𝗌𝗍𝖺𝖽𝗈. 𝖤, 𝗇𝖺 𝗆𝖾𝗌𝗆𝖺 𝗆𝖾𝗌𝖺-𝗋𝖾𝖽𝗈𝗇𝖽𝖺, 𝗈𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗏𝗂𝗏𝖺𝗌, 𝖾𝗇𝗏𝖾𝗋𝗀𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝗈 𝗈𝗅𝗁𝗈 𝖿𝖺𝗆𝖾́𝗅𝗂𝖼𝗈 𝗌𝗈𝖻𝗋𝖾 𝖺 𝗂𝗀𝗎𝖺𝗋𝗂𝖺, 𝗍𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺𝗆 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗋𝖺𝖼̧𝖺𝗅𝗁𝖺́-𝗅𝖺 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗏𝖾𝗇𝗁𝖺 𝖺 𝗉𝗎́𝖻𝗅𝗂𝖼𝗈 𝖾𝗌𝖼𝗅𝖺𝗋𝖾𝖼𝖾𝗋 𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖺𝗍𝖾́ 𝖠𝗇𝗍𝗈́𝗇𝗂𝗈 𝖢𝗈𝗌𝗍𝖺 𝗉𝖾𝗋𝖼𝖾𝖻𝖾𝗋𝖺: «𝖤𝗌𝗍𝗈𝗎 𝖺 𝗌𝖾𝗋 𝗂𝗇𝗏𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗂𝗀𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝗇𝗎𝗆 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝖼𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗈-𝖼𝗋𝗂𝗆𝖾”.
𝖤 𝖾𝗂𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗌𝗎𝗋𝗀𝖾 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗂𝗇𝖽𝗂𝗌𝖼𝗋𝖾𝗍𝖺 𝗂𝗇𝖿𝗈𝗋𝗆𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗈𝗋𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗌𝖾𝗀𝗋𝖾𝖽𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖤𝗌𝗍𝖺𝖽𝗈: 𝖺𝗍𝖾́ 𝗈 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗂𝖽𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖽𝗈 𝖲𝗎𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗆𝗈 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝖿𝗈𝗋𝖺 𝗂𝗇𝖿𝗈𝗋𝗆𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗁𝖺𝗏𝗂𝖺 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗂𝗇𝗏𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗂𝗀𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖺𝗈 𝗉𝗋𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗂𝗋𝗈-𝗆𝗂𝗇𝗂𝗌𝗍𝗋𝗈 𝖾𝗆 𝖼𝗎𝗋𝗌𝗈. 𝖭𝖾𝗆 𝗍𝗂𝗇𝗁𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝗌𝖺𝖻𝖾𝗋, 𝗌𝖾𝗇𝗁𝗈𝗋𝖾𝗌! 𝖮 𝗂𝗇𝗊𝗎𝖾́𝗋𝗂𝗍𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗋𝗋𝖾 𝗇𝗈 𝖬𝖯 𝗃𝗎𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝖺𝗈 𝖲𝗎𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗆𝗈. 𝖠 𝖧𝖾𝗇𝗋𝗂𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖠𝗋𝖺𝗎́𝗃𝗈 𝖺𝗉𝖾𝗇𝖺𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗉𝖾𝗍𝖾 𝗏𝖺𝗅𝗂𝖽𝖺𝗋 𝖾𝗌𝖼𝗎𝗍𝖺𝗌, 𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖿𝗈𝗂 𝖿𝖺𝗓𝖾𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝖺𝗈 𝗅𝗈𝗇𝗀𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝗈𝗂𝗌 𝖺𝗇𝗈𝗌. 𝖢𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗁𝖺́ 𝗇𝗈𝗏𝖺𝗌 𝖾𝗌𝖼𝗎𝗍𝖺𝗌 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝖾𝗅𝖾 𝗌𝖾𝗋𝖾𝗆 𝖺𝗉𝗋𝖾𝖼𝗂𝖺𝖽𝖺𝗌, 𝗈 𝖺𝗌𝗌𝗎𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝗌𝗈́ 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺́ 𝗇𝖺𝗌 𝗆𝖺̃𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗆 𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝗂𝗋𝖾𝗂𝗍𝗈. 𝖬𝖺𝗌, 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗏𝖾𝗓, 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗌𝗂𝗍𝗎𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝗇𝗈𝗋𝗆𝖺𝗅 𝗀𝖺𝗇𝗁𝗈𝗎 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗈𝗋𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗌𝗉𝗂𝗋𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗏𝗈𝗌.
𝖴𝗇𝗌 𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗋𝖺𝗋𝖺𝗆-𝗌𝖾 𝖺𝗈 𝗉𝗎𝖽𝗂𝗆, 𝗈𝗎𝗍𝗋𝗈𝗌 𝖻𝗋𝗂𝗇𝖽𝖺𝗋𝖺𝗆. 𝖠𝗊𝗎𝗂 𝖽’ 𝖾𝗅 𝖱𝖾𝗂! 𝖠 𝖯𝖦𝖱 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖾𝗋𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝖺 𝖽𝖺 𝗂𝗇𝗏𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗂𝗀𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖺𝗈 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗂𝖽𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾! 𝖤𝗋𝖺 𝗆𝖾𝗌𝗆𝗈 𝗎𝗆 𝗀𝗈𝗅𝗉𝖾, 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾𝗋𝖺?
𝖤 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗁𝖺́ 𝗇𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝗇𝗈 𝖽𝖾𝖼𝗈𝗋𝗋𝖾𝗋 𝖽𝗈 𝗉𝗈𝗎𝖼𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖺𝗂𝗇𝖽𝖺 𝗌𝖾 𝗌𝖺𝖻𝖾 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺 𝗂𝗇𝗏𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗂𝗀𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗍𝖾𝗇𝗁𝖺 𝗌𝖾𝗀𝗎𝗂𝖽𝗈 𝗂𝗀𝗎𝖺𝗅 𝗉𝖾𝗋𝖼𝗎𝗋𝗌𝗈 𝖽𝖺 𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖾𝗏𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝖧𝖾𝗇𝗋𝗂𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖠𝗋𝖺𝗎́𝗃𝗈. 𝖮 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖺𝗀𝗈𝗋𝖺 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝗂𝗆𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗍𝖺̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝗍𝖾𝗆 𝖾́ 𝖺𝗊𝗎𝗂𝗅𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖺𝗀𝗈𝗋𝖺 𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝗂𝗆𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗍𝖺 – 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝗈𝗌 𝖿𝖺𝗆𝗈𝗌𝗈𝗌 𝖾𝗋𝗋𝗈𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗈 𝖬𝖯 𝗍𝖾𝗋𝖺́ 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝖾𝗍𝗂𝖽𝗈. 𝖧𝖺́ 𝗆𝖾𝗌𝗆𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗆 𝖿𝖺𝗅𝖾 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖼𝗋𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗌 𝖾𝗆 𝖼𝖺𝗎𝗌𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝗎𝗆 𝗆𝗈𝖽𝗈 𝗌𝗂𝗆𝗉𝖺́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝗈: 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝖾́ 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗌𝖾 𝗉𝗈𝖽𝖾 𝖿𝖺𝗅𝖺𝗋 𝖾𝗆 𝖼𝗈𝗋𝗋𝗎𝗉𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝗈𝗎 𝗍𝗋𝖺́𝖿𝗂𝖼𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗂𝗇𝖿𝗅𝗎𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗌 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗉𝖺𝗋𝗍𝗂𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝗍𝖺̃𝗈 𝗆𝗈𝖽𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗌? 𝖮 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗂𝖽𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖽𝖺 𝖢𝖺̂𝗆𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝖲𝗂𝗇𝖾𝗌, 𝗌𝗎𝗌𝗉𝖾𝗂𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗋𝗋𝗎𝗉𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝗉𝖾𝗅𝗈 𝖬𝖯, 𝗆𝖺𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖾, 𝖺𝗍𝖾́ 𝗏𝖾𝗋, 𝗌𝖺𝗂𝗎 𝗂𝗅𝖾𝗌𝗈 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝖽𝖾𝖼𝗂𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝗈 𝗃𝗎𝗂𝗓 𝖽𝖾 𝗂𝗇𝗌𝗍𝗋𝗎𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈, 𝖺𝗍𝖾́ 𝖾́ 𝗏𝗂𝗌𝗍𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝗈 𝖱𝗈𝖻𝗂𝗇 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖡𝗈𝗌𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝗈 𝖻𝖾𝗋𝖼̧𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖵𝖺𝗌𝖼𝗈 𝖽𝖺 𝖦𝖺𝗆𝖺, 𝗎𝗆 𝗁𝗈𝗆𝖾𝗆 𝖽𝖾 𝗏𝗂𝖺𝗀𝖾𝗇𝗌 𝗌𝖾𝗆 𝖺𝗍𝖺𝗅𝗁𝗈𝗌. 𝖠𝖿𝗂𝗇𝖺𝗅, 𝗈 𝖺𝗎𝗍𝖺𝗋𝖼𝖺 𝖺𝗉𝖾𝗇𝖺𝗌 𝗉𝖾𝖽𝗂𝗋𝖺 𝖺𝗈𝗌 𝖼𝖺𝗉𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗅𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗌 𝗎𝗇𝗌 “𝗋𝖾𝗀𝖺𝗅𝗈𝗌” 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗎𝗇𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾. 𝖤 𝗈 𝗆𝖾𝗋𝖼𝖺𝖽𝖾𝗃𝖺𝗋 𝖽𝖾 𝖼𝖺𝗋𝗀𝗈? 𝖵𝗂𝖺𝗃𝗈𝗎 𝗇𝖺 𝗇𝖺𝗎? 𝖭𝗎𝗇𝗈 𝖬𝖺𝗌𝖼𝖺𝗋𝖾𝗇𝗁𝖺𝗌, 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝗏𝖺𝗋𝗂𝖺𝖽𝗂́𝗌𝗌𝗂𝗆𝖺𝗌 𝗏𝖾𝗓𝖾𝗌 𝖻𝖺𝗍𝖾𝗎 𝗈 𝗉𝖾́ 𝖺𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗅𝗁𝖾 𝖾𝗋𝖺 𝗉𝖾𝖽𝗂𝖽𝗈 𝖺𝗋𝗀𝗎𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗋𝗂𝖺𝗆 𝖾𝗋𝖺 «𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗉𝗅𝖾𝗍𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝗂𝗋𝗋𝖺𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗅», 𝗌𝗈́ 𝗏𝖾𝗋𝗀𝗈𝗎 𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝖿𝗈𝗂 𝖺𝗆𝖾𝖺𝖼̧𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖿𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗋 𝗌𝖾𝗆 𝗈 𝖺𝗉𝗈𝗂𝗈 𝗉𝗈𝗅𝗂́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝗈 𝖽𝗈 𝖯𝖲 𝗇𝖺𝗌 𝗉𝗋𝗈́𝗑𝗂𝗆𝖺𝗌 𝖾𝗅𝖾𝗂𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝖺𝗎𝗍𝖺́𝗋𝗊𝗎𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗌. 𝖤 𝖺 𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗍𝗎́𝗅𝗂𝖺 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗌𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝖽𝖾𝖿𝖾𝗇𝖽𝖾 𝗆𝖾𝗌𝗆𝗈 𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗂𝗇𝗎𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖺 𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗏𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖼𝗋𝗂𝗆𝗂𝗇𝗈𝗌𝖺. 𝖤 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝖿𝗎𝗋𝖺𝗋 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝖼𝖾𝖽𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗉𝗈̂𝗋 𝖺 𝖺𝗇𝖽𝖺𝗋 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗃𝖾𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗓𝖾𝗆 𝗂𝗇𝗏𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝖺𝗈 𝗉𝖺𝗂́𝗌? 𝖠 𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺̃𝗈, 𝗌𝖾𝗇𝗁𝗈𝗋𝖾𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗌𝖺𝗂𝗌, 𝖾́ 𝗌𝖺𝖻𝖾𝗋 𝗌𝖾 𝖾𝗅𝖾𝗌 𝖿𝗈𝗋𝖺𝗆 𝖿𝖾𝗂𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖿𝗈𝗋𝗆𝖺 𝖾𝗊𝗎𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗏𝖺, 𝗂𝗆𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗅 𝖾 𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗌𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖾 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾𝗆 𝖻𝖾𝗇𝖾𝖿𝗂́𝖼𝗂𝗈 𝗉𝗋𝗈́𝗉𝗋𝗂𝗈 𝖾 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖺𝗆𝗂𝗀𝗈𝗌. 𝖭𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝗆𝗎𝖽𝗈𝗎 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝖽𝖾 𝖩𝗈𝗌𝖾́ 𝖲𝗈́𝖼𝗋𝖺𝗍𝖾𝗌, 𝖺 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗌𝖾𝗋 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖺𝗀𝗈𝗋𝖺 𝖾́ 𝗉𝖾𝗋𝗆𝗂𝗍𝗂𝖽𝗈 𝖽𝗂𝗓𝖾̂-𝗅𝗈.
* Jornalista
IN "NASCER DO SOL" - 24/11/23 .
Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário