.
Terra plana, cromossomas,professores demitidos e a demais ciência.
𝓝𝓪 𝓾́𝓵𝓽𝓲𝓶𝓪 𝓼𝓮𝓶𝓪𝓷𝓪 𝓯𝓸𝓲 𝓭𝓲𝓿𝓾𝓵𝓰𝓪𝓭𝓪 𝓾𝓶𝓪 𝓷𝓸𝓽𝓲́𝓬𝓲𝓪 𝓪𝓽𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓪𝓷𝓭𝓸 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓾𝓶 𝓹𝓻𝓸𝓯𝓮𝓼𝓼𝓸𝓻, 𝓷𝓸𝓼 𝓔𝓼𝓽𝓪𝓭𝓸𝓼 𝓤𝓷𝓲𝓭𝓸𝓼 𝓭𝓪 𝓐𝓶𝓮́𝓻𝓲𝓬𝓪, 𝓷𝓾𝓶𝓪 𝓮𝓼𝓬𝓸𝓵𝓪 𝓭𝓸 𝓣𝓮𝔁𝓪𝓼, 𝓱𝓪𝓿𝓲𝓪 𝓼𝓲𝓭𝓸 𝓭𝓮𝓶𝓲𝓽𝓲𝓭𝓸 𝓭𝓪 𝓼𝓾𝓪 𝓲𝓷𝓼𝓽𝓲𝓽𝓾𝓲𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸 𝓭𝓮 𝓮𝓷𝓼𝓲𝓷𝓸, 𝓸𝓷𝓭𝓮 𝓵𝓮𝓬𝓲𝓸𝓷𝓪𝓿𝓪 𝓱𝓪́ 𝓶𝓪𝓲𝓼 𝓭𝓮 𝓭𝓾𝓪𝓼 𝓭𝓮́𝓬𝓪𝓭𝓪𝓼, 𝓪𝓹𝓸́𝓼 𝓺𝓾𝓮𝓲𝔁𝓪𝓼 𝓭𝓪 𝓪𝓵𝓰𝓾𝓷𝓼 𝓭𝓸𝓼 𝓼𝓮𝓾𝓼 𝓪𝓵𝓾𝓷𝓸𝓼 𝓲𝓷𝓭𝓲𝓬𝓪𝓷𝓭𝓸 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓮 𝓭𝓸𝓬𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮, 𝓭𝓮 𝓑𝓲𝓸𝓵𝓸𝓰𝓲𝓪, 𝓮𝓷𝓼𝓲𝓷𝓪𝓻𝓪 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓪𝓼 𝓶𝓾𝓵𝓱𝓮𝓻𝓮𝓼 𝓽𝓮̂𝓶 𝓭𝓸𝓲𝓼 𝓬𝓻𝓸𝓶𝓸𝓼𝓼𝓸𝓶𝓪𝓼 𝔁 𝓮 𝓸𝓼 𝓱𝓸𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓼 𝓾𝓶 𝓬𝓻𝓸𝓶𝓸𝓼𝓼𝓸𝓶𝓪 𝔁 𝓮 𝓾𝓶 𝓬𝓻𝓸𝓶𝓸𝓼𝓼𝓸𝓶𝓪 𝔂, 𝓸 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓿𝓲𝓻𝓲𝓪 𝓪 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓭𝓲𝓬𝓲𝓸𝓷𝓪𝓻 𝓸 𝓼𝓮𝓾 𝓼𝓮𝔁𝓸, 𝓯𝓮𝓶𝓲𝓷𝓲𝓷𝓸 𝓸𝓾 𝓶𝓪𝓼𝓬𝓾𝓵𝓲𝓷𝓸.
𝓔𝓼𝓽𝓮 𝓹𝓻𝓸𝓯𝓮𝓼𝓼𝓸𝓻, 𝓺𝓾𝓮, 𝓬𝓪𝓼𝓸 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓿𝓮𝓷𝓲𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮, 𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓮𝓬𝓮 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓮́ 𝓽𝓪𝓶𝓫𝓮́𝓶 𝓹𝓪𝓼𝓽𝓸𝓻 𝓷𝓾𝓶𝓪 𝓲𝓰𝓻𝓮𝓳𝓪, 𝓷𝓾𝓶𝓪 𝓭𝓪𝓺𝓾𝓮𝓵𝓪𝓼 𝓲𝓰𝓻𝓮𝓳𝓪𝓼 𝓮𝓶 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓸𝓼 𝓔𝓤𝓐 𝓼𝓪̃𝓸 𝓹𝓻𝓸́𝓭𝓲𝓰𝓸𝓼, 𝓯𝓸𝓲 𝓪𝓼𝓼𝓲𝓶 𝓪𝓹𝓮𝓵𝓲𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓸 𝓭𝓮 𝓲𝓷𝓼𝓽𝓲𝓰𝓪𝓭𝓸𝓻 𝓭𝓮 𝓾𝓶 𝓹𝓻𝓸𝓼𝓮𝓵𝓲𝓽𝓲𝓼𝓶𝓸 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓲𝓿𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮, 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓼𝓮𝓻𝓿𝓪𝓭𝓸𝓻, 𝓭𝓮 𝓹𝓮𝓷𝓭𝓸𝓻 𝓻𝓮𝓵𝓲𝓰𝓲𝓸𝓼𝓸 𝓮, 𝓪𝓽𝓮𝓷𝓭𝓮𝓷𝓭𝓸 𝓪 𝓲𝓼𝓼𝓸, 𝓭𝓮𝓼𝓹𝓮𝓭𝓲𝓭𝓸 𝓭𝓸 𝓼𝓮𝓾 𝓮𝓶𝓹𝓻𝓮𝓰𝓸.
𝓔𝓶 𝓶𝓲𝓶, 𝓷𝓪𝓭𝓪 𝓶𝓮 𝓻𝓮𝓬𝓸𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓭𝓪 𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓪 𝓪𝓾𝓽𝓸𝓻 𝓸𝓾 𝓬𝓾́𝓶𝓹𝓵𝓲𝓬𝓮 𝓭𝓮 𝓾𝓶 𝓹𝓻𝓸𝓼𝓮𝓵𝓲𝓽𝓲𝓼𝓶𝓸 𝓯𝓾𝓷𝓭𝓪𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓪𝓵𝓲𝓼𝓽𝓪 𝓸𝓾, 𝓼𝓮𝓺𝓾𝓮𝓻, 𝓭𝓮 𝓪𝓭𝓲𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸 𝓲𝓷𝓬𝓪𝓾𝓽𝓪 𝓪 𝓷𝓸𝓿𝓲𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓮𝓼 𝓪𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮𝓼 𝓭𝓪 𝓬𝓲𝓮̂𝓷𝓬𝓲𝓪. 𝓝𝓪𝓭𝓪 𝓼𝓮𝓲 𝓭𝓮 𝓬𝓻𝓸𝓶𝓸𝓼𝓼𝓸𝓶𝓪𝓼, 𝓷𝓪 𝓿𝓮𝓻𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓮, 𝓪 𝓷𝓪̃𝓸 𝓼𝓮𝓻 𝓮𝓼𝓼𝓪 𝓲𝓷𝓭𝓲𝓬𝓪𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸, 𝓫𝓪́𝓼𝓲𝓬𝓪, 𝓪𝓬𝓲𝓶𝓪 𝓮𝔁𝓹𝓸𝓼𝓽𝓪, 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓶𝓮 𝓯𝓸𝓲 𝓮𝔁𝓹𝓵𝓲𝓬𝓪𝓭𝓪 𝓱𝓪́ 𝓭𝓾𝓪𝓼 𝓭𝓮́𝓬𝓪𝓭𝓪𝓼 𝓸𝓾 𝓶𝓪𝓲𝓼, 𝓽𝓪𝓶𝓫𝓮́𝓶 𝓷𝓪𝓼 𝓪𝓾𝓵𝓪𝓼 𝓭𝓮 𝓑𝓲𝓸𝓵𝓸𝓰𝓲𝓪, 𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓪̃𝓸 𝓹𝓮𝓵𝓸𝓼 𝓿𝓲𝓼𝓽𝓸𝓼 𝓶𝓪𝓲𝓼 𝓽𝓻𝓪𝓷𝓺𝓾𝓲𝓵𝓪𝓼.
𝓜𝓪𝓼 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓯𝓮𝓼𝓼𝓸 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓯𝓲𝓺𝓾𝓮𝓲 𝓬𝓾𝓻𝓲𝓸𝓼𝓸 𝓬𝓸𝓶 𝓸 𝓽𝓮𝓶𝓪 𝓮 𝓯𝓾𝓲 𝓲𝓷𝓿𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓲𝓰𝓪𝓻 𝓾𝓶 𝓹𝓸𝓾𝓬𝓸. 𝓓𝓮𝓼𝓬𝓸𝓫𝓻𝓲 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓱𝓪́ 𝓪𝓯𝓲𝓻𝓶𝓪𝓬̧𝓸̃𝓮𝓼 𝓹𝓾́𝓫𝓵𝓲𝓬𝓪𝓼 𝓪𝓲𝓷𝓭𝓪 𝓱𝓸𝓳𝓮, 𝓭𝓮 𝓬𝓪𝓻𝓪́𝓬𝓽𝓮𝓻 𝓬𝓲𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓲́𝓯𝓲𝓬𝓸, 𝓬𝓸𝓶𝓸 𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓪: "𝓐 𝓼𝓮𝔁 𝓬𝓱𝓻𝓸𝓶𝓸𝓼𝓸𝓶𝓮 𝓲𝓼 𝓪 𝓽𝔂𝓹𝓮 𝓸𝓯 𝓬𝓱𝓻𝓸𝓶𝓸𝓼𝓸𝓶𝓮 𝓲𝓷𝓿𝓸𝓵𝓿𝓮𝓭 𝓲𝓷 𝓼𝓮𝔁 𝓭𝓮𝓽𝓮𝓻𝓶𝓲𝓷𝓪𝓽𝓲𝓸𝓷. 𝓗𝓾𝓶𝓪𝓷𝓼 𝓪𝓷𝓭 𝓶𝓸𝓼𝓽 𝓸𝓽𝓱𝓮𝓻 𝓶𝓪𝓶𝓶𝓪𝓵𝓼 𝓱𝓪𝓿𝓮 𝓽𝔀𝓸 𝓼𝓮𝔁 𝓬𝓱𝓻𝓸𝓶𝓸𝓼𝓸𝓶𝓮𝓼, 𝓧 𝓪𝓷𝓭 𝓨, 𝓽𝓱𝓪𝓽 𝓲𝓷 𝓬𝓸𝓶𝓫𝓲𝓷𝓪𝓽𝓲𝓸𝓷 𝓭𝓮𝓽𝓮𝓻𝓶𝓲𝓷𝓮 𝓽𝓱𝓮 𝓼𝓮𝔁 𝓸𝓯 𝓪𝓷 𝓲𝓷𝓭𝓲𝓿𝓲𝓭𝓾𝓪𝓵. 𝓕𝓮𝓶𝓪𝓵𝓮𝓼 𝓱𝓪𝓿𝓮 𝓽𝔀𝓸 𝓧 𝓬𝓱𝓻𝓸𝓶𝓸𝓼𝓸𝓶𝓮𝓼 𝓲𝓷 𝓽𝓱𝓮𝓲𝓻 𝓬𝓮𝓵𝓵𝓼, 𝔀𝓱𝓲𝓵𝓮 𝓶𝓪𝓵𝓮𝓼 𝓱𝓪𝓿𝓮 𝓸𝓷𝓮 𝓧 𝓪𝓷𝓭 𝓸𝓷𝓮 𝓨". 𝓐𝓼𝓼𝓲𝓶 𝓼𝓮 𝓵𝓮̂, 𝓼𝓸𝓫𝓻𝓮 𝓬𝓻𝓸𝓶𝓸𝓼𝓼𝓸𝓶𝓪𝓼, 𝓷𝓸 𝓰𝓵𝓸𝓼𝓼𝓪́𝓻𝓲𝓸 𝓭𝓸 𝓝𝓪𝓽𝓲𝓸𝓷𝓪𝓵 𝓗𝓾𝓶𝓪𝓷 𝓖𝓮𝓷𝓸𝓶𝓮 𝓡𝓮𝓼𝓮𝓪𝓻𝓬𝓱 𝓘𝓷𝓼𝓽𝓲𝓽𝓾𝓽𝓮, 𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓽𝓮 𝓭𝓸𝓼 𝓝𝓪𝓽𝓲𝓸𝓷𝓪𝓵 𝓘𝓷𝓼𝓽𝓲𝓽𝓾𝓽𝓮𝓼 𝓸𝓯 𝓗𝓮𝓪𝓵𝓽𝓱 𝓷𝓸𝓻𝓽𝓮-𝓪𝓶𝓮𝓻𝓲𝓬𝓪𝓷𝓸𝓼, 𝓾𝓶𝓪 𝓭𝓪𝓼 𝓲𝓷𝓼𝓽𝓲𝓽𝓾𝓲𝓬̧𝓸̃𝓮𝓼 𝓶𝓪𝓲𝓼 𝓻𝓮𝓹𝓾𝓽𝓪𝓭𝓪𝓼 𝓮𝓶 𝓽𝓮𝓻𝓶𝓸𝓼 𝓭𝓮 𝓲𝓷𝓿𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓲𝓰𝓪𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸 𝓮 𝓼𝓪𝓾́𝓭𝓮 𝓹𝓾́𝓫𝓵𝓲𝓬𝓪 𝓭𝓸 𝓷𝓸𝓼𝓼𝓸 𝓮𝓼𝓹𝓮𝓬𝓽𝓻𝓸 𝓬𝓲𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓲́𝓯𝓲𝓬𝓸 𝓷𝓪 𝓪́𝓻𝓮𝓪 𝓭𝓪 𝓼𝓪𝓾́𝓭𝓮.
𝓢𝓮𝓰𝓾𝓷𝓭𝓸 𝓪 𝓲𝓷𝓯𝓸𝓻𝓶𝓪𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸 𝓭𝓲𝓿𝓾𝓵𝓰𝓪𝓭𝓪, 𝓯𝓸𝓲 𝓲𝓼𝓽𝓸 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓸 𝓹𝓻𝓸𝓯𝓮𝓼𝓼𝓸𝓻 𝓮𝓶 𝓬𝓪𝓾𝓼𝓪 𝓮𝓷𝓼𝓲𝓷𝓸𝓾 𝓷𝓪𝓼 𝓼𝓾𝓪𝓼 𝓪𝓾𝓵𝓪𝓼. 𝓔𝓼𝓽𝓪́ 𝓲𝓼𝓽𝓸 𝓬𝓸𝓻𝓻𝓮𝓽𝓸? 𝓔́ 𝓾𝓶 𝓮𝓻𝓻𝓸 𝓻𝓮𝓹𝓵𝓲𝓬𝓪𝓭𝓸 𝓭𝓮𝓼𝓭𝓮 𝓱𝓪́ 𝓭𝓮́𝓬𝓪𝓭𝓪𝓼? 𝓝𝓪̃𝓸 𝓯𝓪𝓬̧𝓸 𝓲𝓭𝓮𝓲𝓪. 𝓢𝓮𝓲 𝓪𝓹𝓮𝓷𝓪𝓼 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓸 𝓹𝓻𝓸𝓯𝓮𝓼𝓼𝓸𝓻 𝓼𝓮 𝓭𝓮𝓯𝓮𝓷𝓭𝓮, 𝓭𝓲𝔃𝓮𝓷𝓭𝓸 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓱𝓪́ 𝓭𝓾𝓪𝓼 𝓭𝓮́𝓬𝓪𝓭𝓪𝓼 𝓮𝓷𝓼𝓲𝓷𝓪 𝓸 𝓶𝓮𝓼𝓶𝓸, 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓻𝓮𝓹𝓾𝓽𝓪 𝓹𝓸𝓻 𝓬𝓸𝓻𝓻𝓮𝓽𝓸 𝓮, 𝓹𝓮𝓵𝓸𝓼 𝓿𝓲𝓼𝓽𝓸𝓼, 𝓬𝓸𝓶 𝓮𝓵𝓮 𝓪 𝓬𝓸𝓶𝓾𝓷𝓲𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓮 𝓬𝓲𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓲́𝓯𝓲𝓬𝓪, 𝓮 𝓼𝓸́ 𝓪𝓰𝓸𝓻𝓪 𝓽𝓮𝓿𝓮 𝓾𝓶𝓪 𝓻𝓮𝓪𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸 𝓼𝓾𝓹𝓸𝓼𝓽𝓪𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮 𝓭𝓮 𝓪𝓵𝓾𝓷𝓸𝓼 𝓼𝓮𝓾𝓼, 𝓼𝓾𝓹𝓸𝓼𝓽𝓪𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮 𝓪̀ 𝓼𝓾𝓪 𝓮𝔁𝓹𝓸𝓼𝓲𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸 𝓭𝓮 𝓬𝓪𝓻𝓲𝔃 𝓬𝓲𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓲́𝓯𝓲𝓬𝓸, 𝓪𝓰𝓸𝓻𝓪 𝓻𝓮𝓹𝓾𝓭𝓲𝓪𝓭𝓪 𝓹𝓸𝓻 𝓹𝓸𝓵𝓲𝓽𝓲𝓬𝓪𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮 𝓲𝓷𝓬𝓸𝓻𝓻𝓮𝓽𝓪 𝓸𝓾 𝓪𝓽𝓮́ 𝓮𝓻𝓻𝓪𝓭𝓪. 𝓔 𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓮𝓬𝓮, 𝓹𝓮𝓵𝓸𝓼 𝓿𝓲𝓼𝓽𝓸𝓼, 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓸𝓼 𝓝𝓪𝓽𝓲𝓸𝓷𝓪𝓵 𝓘𝓷𝓼𝓽𝓲𝓽𝓾𝓽𝓮𝓼 𝓸𝓯 𝓗𝓮𝓪𝓵𝓽𝓱 𝓷𝓸𝓻𝓽𝓮-𝓪𝓶𝓮𝓻𝓲𝓬𝓪𝓷𝓸𝓼 𝓪𝓽𝓮́ 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓬𝓸𝓻𝓭𝓪𝓶 𝓬𝓸𝓶 𝓮𝓵𝓮 - 𝓮 𝓮𝓵𝓮 𝓬𝓸𝓶 𝓮𝓵𝓮𝓼. 𝓔 𝓲𝓼𝓼𝓸 𝓭𝓮𝓿𝓮𝓻𝓲𝓪 𝓼𝓮𝓻 𝓻𝓮𝓵𝓮𝓿𝓪𝓷𝓽𝓮, 𝓳𝓪́ 𝓪𝓰𝓸𝓻𝓪.
𝓒𝓸𝓷𝓯𝓮𝓼𝓼𝓸 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓷𝓪𝓭𝓪 𝓼𝓮𝓲 𝓭𝓮 𝓬𝓻𝓸𝓶𝓸𝓼𝓼𝓸𝓶𝓪𝓼. 𝓜𝓪𝓼 𝓪𝓽𝓮́ 𝓪 𝓶𝓲𝓶 𝓶𝓮 𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓮𝓬𝓮 𝓭𝓲𝓼𝓽𝓲𝓷𝓽𝓪 𝓪 𝓭𝓮𝓯𝓮𝓼𝓪 𝓭𝓮 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓪 𝓣𝓮𝓻𝓻𝓪 𝓮́ 𝓹𝓵𝓪𝓷𝓪, 𝓷𝓪̃𝓸 𝓸 𝓼𝓮𝓷𝓭𝓸, 𝓮 𝓪 𝓲𝓭𝓮𝓲𝓪 𝓭𝓮 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓮𝔁𝓲𝓼𝓽𝓮𝓶 𝓬𝓻𝓸𝓶𝓸𝓼𝓼𝓸𝓶𝓪𝓼 𝔁 𝓮 𝔂, 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓭𝓲𝓬𝓲𝓸𝓷𝓪𝓷𝓭𝓸 𝓸 𝓼𝓮𝔁𝓸 𝓬𝓸𝓶 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓼𝓮 𝓷𝓪𝓼𝓬𝓮, 𝓲𝓷𝓭𝓮𝓹𝓮𝓷𝓭𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮 𝓭𝓸 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓼𝓮𝓳𝓪 𝓸 𝓯𝓾𝓽𝓾𝓻𝓸 𝓮 𝓪 𝓭𝓮𝓬𝓲𝓼𝓪̃𝓸 𝓭𝓮 𝓬𝓪𝓭𝓪 𝓼𝓮𝓻 𝓮 𝓮𝓿𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓾𝓪𝓲𝓼 𝓭𝓾́𝓿𝓲𝓭𝓪𝓼 𝓮 𝓹𝓻𝓸𝓫𝓵𝓮𝓶𝓪𝓼 𝓰𝓮𝓷𝓮́𝓽𝓲𝓬𝓸𝓼, 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓽𝓪𝓶𝓫𝓮́𝓶 𝓮𝔁𝓲𝓼𝓽𝓮𝓶.
𝓠𝓾𝓪𝓷𝓽𝓸𝓼 𝓹𝓻𝓸𝓯𝓮𝓼𝓼𝓸𝓻𝓮𝓼 𝓮𝔁𝓲𝓼𝓽𝓮𝓶 𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓪̃𝓸 𝓮𝓶 𝓟𝓸𝓻𝓽𝓾𝓰𝓪𝓵 𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓪 𝓼𝓮𝓻𝓮𝓶 𝓭𝓮𝓼𝓹𝓮𝓭𝓲𝓭𝓸𝓼, 𝓪𝓽𝓮𝓷𝓭𝓮𝓷𝓭𝓸 𝓪 𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓮 𝓽𝓮𝓶𝓪? 𝓠𝓾𝓮𝓶 𝓮𝓷𝓼𝓲𝓷𝓪 𝓑𝓲𝓸𝓵𝓸𝓰𝓲𝓪, 𝓭𝓮𝓿𝓮𝓷𝓭𝓸 𝓮𝓷𝓼𝓲𝓷𝓪𝓻 𝓾𝓶𝓪 𝓑𝓲𝓸𝓵𝓸𝓰𝓲𝓪 𝓹𝓸𝓵𝓲𝓽𝓲𝓬𝓪𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮 𝓸𝓻𝓲𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓪𝓭𝓪, 𝓷𝓸 𝓼𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓲𝓭𝓸, 𝓹𝓮𝓵𝓸𝓼 𝓿𝓲𝓼𝓽𝓸𝓼, 𝓭𝓮 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓪 𝓺𝓾𝓪𝓵𝓺𝓾𝓮𝓻 𝓹𝓮𝓼𝓼𝓸𝓪 𝓹𝓮𝓻𝓽𝓮𝓷𝓬𝓮 𝓸𝓻𝓲𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓪𝓻 𝓮 𝓭𝓮𝓬𝓲𝓭𝓲𝓻 𝓼𝓸𝓫𝓻𝓮 𝓪 𝓼𝓾𝓪 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓯𝓸𝓻𝓶𝓪𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸 𝓫𝓲𝓸𝓵𝓸́𝓰𝓲𝓬𝓪 𝓭𝓮 𝓫𝓪𝓼𝓮, 𝓲𝓷𝓭𝓮𝓹𝓮𝓷𝓭𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮 𝓭𝓪 𝓻𝓮𝓪𝓵𝓲𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓮 𝓬𝓲𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓲́𝓯𝓲𝓬𝓪?
𝓐𝓬𝓮𝓲𝓽𝓸 𝓲𝓷𝓽𝓮𝓲𝓻𝓪𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮 𝓭𝓮𝓼𝓪𝓯𝓲𝓪𝓻-𝓼𝓮 𝓪 𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓪𝓫𝓲𝓵𝓲𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓮 𝓮 𝓪𝓼 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓿𝓲𝓬𝓬̧𝓸̃𝓮𝓼 𝓪𝓼𝓼𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮𝓼 𝓮𝓶 𝓽𝓮𝓶𝓪𝓼 𝓭𝓮 𝓫𝓲𝓸𝓵𝓸𝓰𝓲𝓪 𝓪𝓹𝓵𝓲𝓬𝓪𝓭𝓪 𝓪̀𝓼 𝓹𝓮𝓼𝓼𝓸𝓪𝓼. 𝓞 𝓼𝓮́𝓬𝓾𝓵𝓸 𝓧𝓧, 𝓪𝓵𝓲𝓪́𝓼, 𝓯𝓸𝓲 𝓹𝓻𝓸́𝓭𝓲𝓰𝓸 𝓷𝓪 𝓹𝓻𝓸𝓭𝓾𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸 𝓭𝓮 𝓿𝓮𝓻𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓮𝓼 𝓪𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮𝓼, 𝓭𝓮𝓼𝓭𝓮 𝓵𝓸𝓰𝓸 𝓻𝓪𝓬𝓲𝓼𝓽𝓪𝓼, 𝓲𝓭𝓮𝓸𝓵𝓸𝓰𝓲𝓬𝓪𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮 𝓸𝓻𝓲𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓪𝓭𝓪𝓼, 𝓮 𝓪𝓽𝓮́ 𝓷𝓸 𝓼𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓲𝓭𝓸 𝓭𝓮 𝓾𝓶𝓪 𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓲𝓻𝓪 𝓹𝓾𝓻𝓪, 𝓸𝓾 𝓶𝓪𝓵 𝓯𝓾𝓷𝓭𝓪𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓪𝓭𝓪𝓼, 𝓮𝓶 𝓷𝓸𝓶𝓮 𝓭𝓪 𝓬𝓲𝓮̂𝓷𝓬𝓲𝓪 𝓫𝓲𝓸𝓵𝓸́𝓰𝓲𝓬𝓪 𝓮 𝓭𝓪𝓼 𝓼𝓾𝓪𝓼 𝓼𝓾𝓹𝓸𝓼𝓽𝓪𝓼 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓿𝓲𝓬𝓬̧𝓸̃𝓮𝓼 𝓪𝓫𝓼𝓸𝓵𝓾𝓽𝓪𝓼. 𝓙𝓾𝓭𝓮𝓾𝓼, 𝓬𝓲𝓰𝓪𝓷𝓸𝓼, 𝓷𝓮𝓰𝓻𝓸𝓼 𝓮 𝓽𝓪𝓷𝓽𝓸𝓼 𝓸𝓾𝓽𝓻𝓸𝓼 𝓼𝓾𝓹𝓸𝓼𝓽𝓸𝓼 𝓰𝓻𝓾𝓹𝓸𝓼 𝓭𝓮 𝓹𝓮𝓼𝓼𝓸𝓪𝓼 𝓯𝓸𝓻𝓪𝓶 𝓬𝓵𝓪𝓼𝓼𝓲𝓯𝓲𝓬𝓪𝓭𝓸𝓼 "𝓬𝓲𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓲𝓯𝓲𝓬𝓪𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮" - 𝓮 𝓹𝓪𝓭𝓮𝓬𝓮𝓻𝓪𝓶 𝓭𝓮𝓼𝓼𝓪 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓭𝓲𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸. 𝓔 𝓷𝓪̃𝓸 𝓪𝓹𝓮𝓷𝓪𝓼 𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓮𝓼 𝓰𝓻𝓾𝓹𝓸𝓼 𝓶𝓪𝓲𝓼 𝓪𝓾𝓭𝓲́𝓿𝓮𝓲𝓼 𝓯𝓸𝓻𝓪𝓶 𝓪𝓵𝓿𝓸𝓼 𝓯𝓪́𝓬𝓮𝓲𝓼, 𝓭𝓮𝓿𝓮 𝓭𝓲𝔃𝓮𝓻-𝓼𝓮: 𝓮𝓶 𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓪𝓭𝓸𝓼 𝓷𝓸𝓻𝓽𝓮-𝓪𝓶𝓮𝓻𝓲𝓬𝓪𝓷𝓸𝓼 𝓮 𝓷𝓪 𝓔𝓼𝓬𝓪𝓷𝓭𝓲𝓷𝓪́𝓿𝓲𝓪, 𝓷𝓸 𝓲𝓷𝓲́𝓬𝓲𝓸 𝓭𝓸 𝓼𝓮́𝓬𝓾𝓵𝓸 𝓧𝓧, 𝓮𝓼𝓼𝓮𝓼 𝓫𝓪𝓼𝓽𝓲𝓸̃𝓮𝓼 𝓭𝓪 𝓿𝓪𝓷𝓰𝓾𝓪𝓻𝓭𝓪 𝓭𝓪 𝓬𝓲𝓮̂𝓷𝓬𝓲𝓪, 𝓯𝓸𝓻𝓪𝓶 𝓹𝓸𝓻 𝓮𝔁𝓮𝓶𝓹𝓵𝓸 𝓸𝓫𝓻𝓲𝓰𝓪𝓽𝓸𝓻𝓲𝓪𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮 𝓵𝓪𝓺𝓾𝓮𝓪𝓭𝓪𝓼 𝓪𝓼 𝓶𝓾𝓵𝓱𝓮𝓻𝓮𝓼 𝓹𝓻𝓸𝓼𝓽𝓲𝓽𝓾𝓽𝓪𝓼, 𝓬𝓸𝓶𝓸 𝓹𝓸𝓵𝓲́𝓽𝓲𝓬𝓪 𝓭𝓮 𝓼𝓪𝓾́𝓭𝓮 𝓹𝓾́𝓫𝓵𝓲𝓬𝓪, 𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓪 𝓼𝓮 𝓮𝓿𝓲𝓽𝓪𝓻 𝓾𝓶𝓪 𝓶𝓪́ 𝓰𝓮𝓻𝓪𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓷𝓮𝓬𝓮𝓼𝓼𝓪𝓻𝓲𝓪𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮 𝓼𝓮 𝓼𝓮𝓰𝓾𝓲𝓻𝓲𝓪, 𝓮𝓶 𝓿𝓲𝓻𝓽𝓾𝓭𝓮 𝓭𝓸 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓱𝓮𝓬𝓲𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓸 𝓬𝓲𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓲́𝓯𝓲𝓬𝓸 𝓭𝓪 𝓮́𝓹𝓸𝓬𝓪.
𝓔𝓼𝓽𝓪𝓶𝓸𝓼 𝓷𝓸́𝓼 𝓪 𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓻𝓪𝓻 𝓷𝓾𝓶𝓪 𝓷𝓸𝓿𝓪 𝓰𝓮𝓻𝓪𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸 𝓭𝓮 𝓹𝓸𝓵𝓲́𝓽𝓲𝓬𝓪𝓼 𝓹𝓾́𝓫𝓵𝓲𝓬𝓪𝓼, 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓽𝓻𝓪 𝓬𝓲𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓲́𝓯𝓲𝓬𝓪𝓼, 𝓸𝓻𝓭𝓮𝓷𝓪𝓭𝓪𝓼 𝓮𝓶 𝓯𝓾𝓷𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸 𝓭𝓮 𝓾𝓶 𝓹𝓮𝓷𝓼𝓪𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓸 𝓰𝓮𝓷𝓮𝓻𝓸𝓼𝓸, 𝓶𝓪𝓼 𝓽𝓪𝓶𝓫𝓮́𝓶 𝓼𝓮𝓰𝓻𝓮𝓰𝓪𝓭𝓸𝓻 𝓮 𝓿𝓲𝓸𝓵𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓸? 𝓘𝓼𝓽𝓸 𝓭𝓮𝓿𝓮 𝓶𝓮𝓻𝓮𝓬𝓮𝓻 𝓭𝓮𝓫𝓪𝓽𝓮, 𝓹𝓸𝓷𝓭𝓮𝓻𝓪𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸, 𝓭𝓲𝓼𝓬𝓾𝓼𝓼𝓪̃𝓸 𝓹𝓾́𝓫𝓵𝓲𝓬𝓪. 𝓝𝓪̃𝓸 𝓮́ 𝓹𝓸𝓼𝓼𝓲́𝓿𝓮𝓵 𝓭𝓮𝓲𝔁𝓪𝓻 𝓷𝓮𝓶 𝓪𝓹𝓮𝓷𝓪𝓼 𝓪𝓸𝓼 𝓬𝓲𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓲𝓼𝓽𝓪𝓼 𝓷𝓮𝓶 𝓪𝓸𝓼 𝓭𝓮𝓬𝓵𝓪𝓶𝓪𝓭𝓸𝓻𝓮𝓼 𝓲𝓭𝓮𝓸𝓵𝓸́𝓰𝓲𝓬𝓸𝓼 𝓭𝓪𝓼 𝓷𝓸𝓿𝓪𝓼 𝓿𝓮𝓻𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓮𝓼 𝓪 𝓭𝓮𝓯𝓲𝓷𝓲𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸 𝓭𝓪𝓺𝓾𝓲𝓵𝓸 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓼𝓮𝓳𝓪 𝓪 𝓻𝓮𝓪𝓵𝓲𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓮. 𝓔𝓼𝓽𝓪 𝓹𝓸𝓭𝓮 𝓪𝓽𝓮́ 𝓷𝓪̃𝓸 𝓮𝔁𝓲𝓼𝓽𝓲𝓻... 𝓜𝓪𝓼 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓯𝓻𝓸𝓷𝓽𝓪𝓻 𝓮𝓼𝓼𝓪 𝓼𝓾𝓹𝓸𝓼𝓽𝓪 𝓻𝓮𝓪𝓵𝓲𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓮 𝓶𝓮𝓻𝓮𝓬𝓮 𝓶𝓪𝓲𝓼 𝓭𝓸 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓾𝓶 𝓭𝓮𝓼𝓹𝓮𝓭𝓲𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓸 𝓸𝓾 𝓾𝓶𝓪 𝓫𝓻𝓮𝓿𝓮 𝓷𝓾𝓶 𝓳𝓸𝓻𝓷𝓪𝓵. 𝓘𝓼𝓽𝓸 𝓮́ 𝓸 𝓷𝓸𝓼𝓼𝓸 𝓶𝓾𝓷𝓭𝓸 𝓮 𝓸 𝓷𝓸𝓼𝓼𝓸 𝓯𝓾𝓽𝓾𝓻𝓸 𝓽𝓪𝓶𝓫𝓮́𝓶. 𝓐𝓵𝓰𝓾𝓮́𝓶, 𝓶𝓪𝓲𝓼, 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓹𝓮𝓰𝓾𝓮 𝓷𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓮𝓼 𝓮 𝓸𝓼 𝓺𝓾𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓲𝓸𝓷𝓮 𝓬𝓸𝓶 𝓸 𝓼𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓲𝓭𝓸 𝓭𝓮 𝓭𝓮𝓿𝓮𝓻 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓷𝓸𝓼 𝓶𝓮𝓻𝓮𝓬𝓮𝓶..
* Professor da Faculdade de Direito da Universidade de Lisboa
.
IN "DIÁRIO DE NOTÍCIAS" - 30/06/23
𝓝𝓪 𝓾́𝓵𝓽𝓲𝓶𝓪 𝓼𝓮𝓶𝓪𝓷𝓪 𝓯𝓸𝓲 𝓭𝓲𝓿𝓾𝓵𝓰𝓪𝓭𝓪 𝓾𝓶𝓪 𝓷𝓸𝓽𝓲́𝓬𝓲𝓪 𝓪𝓽𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓪𝓷𝓭𝓸 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓾𝓶 𝓹𝓻𝓸𝓯𝓮𝓼𝓼𝓸𝓻, 𝓷𝓸𝓼 𝓔𝓼𝓽𝓪𝓭𝓸𝓼 𝓤𝓷𝓲𝓭𝓸𝓼 𝓭𝓪 𝓐𝓶𝓮́𝓻𝓲𝓬𝓪, 𝓷𝓾𝓶𝓪 𝓮𝓼𝓬𝓸𝓵𝓪 𝓭𝓸 𝓣𝓮𝔁𝓪𝓼, 𝓱𝓪𝓿𝓲𝓪 𝓼𝓲𝓭𝓸 𝓭𝓮𝓶𝓲𝓽𝓲𝓭𝓸 𝓭𝓪 𝓼𝓾𝓪 𝓲𝓷𝓼𝓽𝓲𝓽𝓾𝓲𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸 𝓭𝓮 𝓮𝓷𝓼𝓲𝓷𝓸, 𝓸𝓷𝓭𝓮 𝓵𝓮𝓬𝓲𝓸𝓷𝓪𝓿𝓪 𝓱𝓪́ 𝓶𝓪𝓲𝓼 𝓭𝓮 𝓭𝓾𝓪𝓼 𝓭𝓮́𝓬𝓪𝓭𝓪𝓼, 𝓪𝓹𝓸́𝓼 𝓺𝓾𝓮𝓲𝔁𝓪𝓼 𝓭𝓪 𝓪𝓵𝓰𝓾𝓷𝓼 𝓭𝓸𝓼 𝓼𝓮𝓾𝓼 𝓪𝓵𝓾𝓷𝓸𝓼 𝓲𝓷𝓭𝓲𝓬𝓪𝓷𝓭𝓸 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓮 𝓭𝓸𝓬𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮, 𝓭𝓮 𝓑𝓲𝓸𝓵𝓸𝓰𝓲𝓪, 𝓮𝓷𝓼𝓲𝓷𝓪𝓻𝓪 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓪𝓼 𝓶𝓾𝓵𝓱𝓮𝓻𝓮𝓼 𝓽𝓮̂𝓶 𝓭𝓸𝓲𝓼 𝓬𝓻𝓸𝓶𝓸𝓼𝓼𝓸𝓶𝓪𝓼 𝔁 𝓮 𝓸𝓼 𝓱𝓸𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓼 𝓾𝓶 𝓬𝓻𝓸𝓶𝓸𝓼𝓼𝓸𝓶𝓪 𝔁 𝓮 𝓾𝓶 𝓬𝓻𝓸𝓶𝓸𝓼𝓼𝓸𝓶𝓪 𝔂, 𝓸 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓿𝓲𝓻𝓲𝓪 𝓪 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓭𝓲𝓬𝓲𝓸𝓷𝓪𝓻 𝓸 𝓼𝓮𝓾 𝓼𝓮𝔁𝓸, 𝓯𝓮𝓶𝓲𝓷𝓲𝓷𝓸 𝓸𝓾 𝓶𝓪𝓼𝓬𝓾𝓵𝓲𝓷𝓸.
𝓔𝓼𝓽𝓮 𝓹𝓻𝓸𝓯𝓮𝓼𝓼𝓸𝓻, 𝓺𝓾𝓮, 𝓬𝓪𝓼𝓸 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓿𝓮𝓷𝓲𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮, 𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓮𝓬𝓮 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓮́ 𝓽𝓪𝓶𝓫𝓮́𝓶 𝓹𝓪𝓼𝓽𝓸𝓻 𝓷𝓾𝓶𝓪 𝓲𝓰𝓻𝓮𝓳𝓪, 𝓷𝓾𝓶𝓪 𝓭𝓪𝓺𝓾𝓮𝓵𝓪𝓼 𝓲𝓰𝓻𝓮𝓳𝓪𝓼 𝓮𝓶 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓸𝓼 𝓔𝓤𝓐 𝓼𝓪̃𝓸 𝓹𝓻𝓸́𝓭𝓲𝓰𝓸𝓼, 𝓯𝓸𝓲 𝓪𝓼𝓼𝓲𝓶 𝓪𝓹𝓮𝓵𝓲𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓸 𝓭𝓮 𝓲𝓷𝓼𝓽𝓲𝓰𝓪𝓭𝓸𝓻 𝓭𝓮 𝓾𝓶 𝓹𝓻𝓸𝓼𝓮𝓵𝓲𝓽𝓲𝓼𝓶𝓸 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓲𝓿𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮, 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓼𝓮𝓻𝓿𝓪𝓭𝓸𝓻, 𝓭𝓮 𝓹𝓮𝓷𝓭𝓸𝓻 𝓻𝓮𝓵𝓲𝓰𝓲𝓸𝓼𝓸 𝓮, 𝓪𝓽𝓮𝓷𝓭𝓮𝓷𝓭𝓸 𝓪 𝓲𝓼𝓼𝓸, 𝓭𝓮𝓼𝓹𝓮𝓭𝓲𝓭𝓸 𝓭𝓸 𝓼𝓮𝓾 𝓮𝓶𝓹𝓻𝓮𝓰𝓸.
𝓔𝓶 𝓶𝓲𝓶, 𝓷𝓪𝓭𝓪 𝓶𝓮 𝓻𝓮𝓬𝓸𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓭𝓪 𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓪 𝓪𝓾𝓽𝓸𝓻 𝓸𝓾 𝓬𝓾́𝓶𝓹𝓵𝓲𝓬𝓮 𝓭𝓮 𝓾𝓶 𝓹𝓻𝓸𝓼𝓮𝓵𝓲𝓽𝓲𝓼𝓶𝓸 𝓯𝓾𝓷𝓭𝓪𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓪𝓵𝓲𝓼𝓽𝓪 𝓸𝓾, 𝓼𝓮𝓺𝓾𝓮𝓻, 𝓭𝓮 𝓪𝓭𝓲𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸 𝓲𝓷𝓬𝓪𝓾𝓽𝓪 𝓪 𝓷𝓸𝓿𝓲𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓮𝓼 𝓪𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮𝓼 𝓭𝓪 𝓬𝓲𝓮̂𝓷𝓬𝓲𝓪. 𝓝𝓪𝓭𝓪 𝓼𝓮𝓲 𝓭𝓮 𝓬𝓻𝓸𝓶𝓸𝓼𝓼𝓸𝓶𝓪𝓼, 𝓷𝓪 𝓿𝓮𝓻𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓮, 𝓪 𝓷𝓪̃𝓸 𝓼𝓮𝓻 𝓮𝓼𝓼𝓪 𝓲𝓷𝓭𝓲𝓬𝓪𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸, 𝓫𝓪́𝓼𝓲𝓬𝓪, 𝓪𝓬𝓲𝓶𝓪 𝓮𝔁𝓹𝓸𝓼𝓽𝓪, 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓶𝓮 𝓯𝓸𝓲 𝓮𝔁𝓹𝓵𝓲𝓬𝓪𝓭𝓪 𝓱𝓪́ 𝓭𝓾𝓪𝓼 𝓭𝓮́𝓬𝓪𝓭𝓪𝓼 𝓸𝓾 𝓶𝓪𝓲𝓼, 𝓽𝓪𝓶𝓫𝓮́𝓶 𝓷𝓪𝓼 𝓪𝓾𝓵𝓪𝓼 𝓭𝓮 𝓑𝓲𝓸𝓵𝓸𝓰𝓲𝓪, 𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓪̃𝓸 𝓹𝓮𝓵𝓸𝓼 𝓿𝓲𝓼𝓽𝓸𝓼 𝓶𝓪𝓲𝓼 𝓽𝓻𝓪𝓷𝓺𝓾𝓲𝓵𝓪𝓼.
𝓜𝓪𝓼 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓯𝓮𝓼𝓼𝓸 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓯𝓲𝓺𝓾𝓮𝓲 𝓬𝓾𝓻𝓲𝓸𝓼𝓸 𝓬𝓸𝓶 𝓸 𝓽𝓮𝓶𝓪 𝓮 𝓯𝓾𝓲 𝓲𝓷𝓿𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓲𝓰𝓪𝓻 𝓾𝓶 𝓹𝓸𝓾𝓬𝓸. 𝓓𝓮𝓼𝓬𝓸𝓫𝓻𝓲 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓱𝓪́ 𝓪𝓯𝓲𝓻𝓶𝓪𝓬̧𝓸̃𝓮𝓼 𝓹𝓾́𝓫𝓵𝓲𝓬𝓪𝓼 𝓪𝓲𝓷𝓭𝓪 𝓱𝓸𝓳𝓮, 𝓭𝓮 𝓬𝓪𝓻𝓪́𝓬𝓽𝓮𝓻 𝓬𝓲𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓲́𝓯𝓲𝓬𝓸, 𝓬𝓸𝓶𝓸 𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓪: "𝓐 𝓼𝓮𝔁 𝓬𝓱𝓻𝓸𝓶𝓸𝓼𝓸𝓶𝓮 𝓲𝓼 𝓪 𝓽𝔂𝓹𝓮 𝓸𝓯 𝓬𝓱𝓻𝓸𝓶𝓸𝓼𝓸𝓶𝓮 𝓲𝓷𝓿𝓸𝓵𝓿𝓮𝓭 𝓲𝓷 𝓼𝓮𝔁 𝓭𝓮𝓽𝓮𝓻𝓶𝓲𝓷𝓪𝓽𝓲𝓸𝓷. 𝓗𝓾𝓶𝓪𝓷𝓼 𝓪𝓷𝓭 𝓶𝓸𝓼𝓽 𝓸𝓽𝓱𝓮𝓻 𝓶𝓪𝓶𝓶𝓪𝓵𝓼 𝓱𝓪𝓿𝓮 𝓽𝔀𝓸 𝓼𝓮𝔁 𝓬𝓱𝓻𝓸𝓶𝓸𝓼𝓸𝓶𝓮𝓼, 𝓧 𝓪𝓷𝓭 𝓨, 𝓽𝓱𝓪𝓽 𝓲𝓷 𝓬𝓸𝓶𝓫𝓲𝓷𝓪𝓽𝓲𝓸𝓷 𝓭𝓮𝓽𝓮𝓻𝓶𝓲𝓷𝓮 𝓽𝓱𝓮 𝓼𝓮𝔁 𝓸𝓯 𝓪𝓷 𝓲𝓷𝓭𝓲𝓿𝓲𝓭𝓾𝓪𝓵. 𝓕𝓮𝓶𝓪𝓵𝓮𝓼 𝓱𝓪𝓿𝓮 𝓽𝔀𝓸 𝓧 𝓬𝓱𝓻𝓸𝓶𝓸𝓼𝓸𝓶𝓮𝓼 𝓲𝓷 𝓽𝓱𝓮𝓲𝓻 𝓬𝓮𝓵𝓵𝓼, 𝔀𝓱𝓲𝓵𝓮 𝓶𝓪𝓵𝓮𝓼 𝓱𝓪𝓿𝓮 𝓸𝓷𝓮 𝓧 𝓪𝓷𝓭 𝓸𝓷𝓮 𝓨". 𝓐𝓼𝓼𝓲𝓶 𝓼𝓮 𝓵𝓮̂, 𝓼𝓸𝓫𝓻𝓮 𝓬𝓻𝓸𝓶𝓸𝓼𝓼𝓸𝓶𝓪𝓼, 𝓷𝓸 𝓰𝓵𝓸𝓼𝓼𝓪́𝓻𝓲𝓸 𝓭𝓸 𝓝𝓪𝓽𝓲𝓸𝓷𝓪𝓵 𝓗𝓾𝓶𝓪𝓷 𝓖𝓮𝓷𝓸𝓶𝓮 𝓡𝓮𝓼𝓮𝓪𝓻𝓬𝓱 𝓘𝓷𝓼𝓽𝓲𝓽𝓾𝓽𝓮, 𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓽𝓮 𝓭𝓸𝓼 𝓝𝓪𝓽𝓲𝓸𝓷𝓪𝓵 𝓘𝓷𝓼𝓽𝓲𝓽𝓾𝓽𝓮𝓼 𝓸𝓯 𝓗𝓮𝓪𝓵𝓽𝓱 𝓷𝓸𝓻𝓽𝓮-𝓪𝓶𝓮𝓻𝓲𝓬𝓪𝓷𝓸𝓼, 𝓾𝓶𝓪 𝓭𝓪𝓼 𝓲𝓷𝓼𝓽𝓲𝓽𝓾𝓲𝓬̧𝓸̃𝓮𝓼 𝓶𝓪𝓲𝓼 𝓻𝓮𝓹𝓾𝓽𝓪𝓭𝓪𝓼 𝓮𝓶 𝓽𝓮𝓻𝓶𝓸𝓼 𝓭𝓮 𝓲𝓷𝓿𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓲𝓰𝓪𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸 𝓮 𝓼𝓪𝓾́𝓭𝓮 𝓹𝓾́𝓫𝓵𝓲𝓬𝓪 𝓭𝓸 𝓷𝓸𝓼𝓼𝓸 𝓮𝓼𝓹𝓮𝓬𝓽𝓻𝓸 𝓬𝓲𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓲́𝓯𝓲𝓬𝓸 𝓷𝓪 𝓪́𝓻𝓮𝓪 𝓭𝓪 𝓼𝓪𝓾́𝓭𝓮.
𝓢𝓮𝓰𝓾𝓷𝓭𝓸 𝓪 𝓲𝓷𝓯𝓸𝓻𝓶𝓪𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸 𝓭𝓲𝓿𝓾𝓵𝓰𝓪𝓭𝓪, 𝓯𝓸𝓲 𝓲𝓼𝓽𝓸 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓸 𝓹𝓻𝓸𝓯𝓮𝓼𝓼𝓸𝓻 𝓮𝓶 𝓬𝓪𝓾𝓼𝓪 𝓮𝓷𝓼𝓲𝓷𝓸𝓾 𝓷𝓪𝓼 𝓼𝓾𝓪𝓼 𝓪𝓾𝓵𝓪𝓼. 𝓔𝓼𝓽𝓪́ 𝓲𝓼𝓽𝓸 𝓬𝓸𝓻𝓻𝓮𝓽𝓸? 𝓔́ 𝓾𝓶 𝓮𝓻𝓻𝓸 𝓻𝓮𝓹𝓵𝓲𝓬𝓪𝓭𝓸 𝓭𝓮𝓼𝓭𝓮 𝓱𝓪́ 𝓭𝓮́𝓬𝓪𝓭𝓪𝓼? 𝓝𝓪̃𝓸 𝓯𝓪𝓬̧𝓸 𝓲𝓭𝓮𝓲𝓪. 𝓢𝓮𝓲 𝓪𝓹𝓮𝓷𝓪𝓼 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓸 𝓹𝓻𝓸𝓯𝓮𝓼𝓼𝓸𝓻 𝓼𝓮 𝓭𝓮𝓯𝓮𝓷𝓭𝓮, 𝓭𝓲𝔃𝓮𝓷𝓭𝓸 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓱𝓪́ 𝓭𝓾𝓪𝓼 𝓭𝓮́𝓬𝓪𝓭𝓪𝓼 𝓮𝓷𝓼𝓲𝓷𝓪 𝓸 𝓶𝓮𝓼𝓶𝓸, 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓻𝓮𝓹𝓾𝓽𝓪 𝓹𝓸𝓻 𝓬𝓸𝓻𝓻𝓮𝓽𝓸 𝓮, 𝓹𝓮𝓵𝓸𝓼 𝓿𝓲𝓼𝓽𝓸𝓼, 𝓬𝓸𝓶 𝓮𝓵𝓮 𝓪 𝓬𝓸𝓶𝓾𝓷𝓲𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓮 𝓬𝓲𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓲́𝓯𝓲𝓬𝓪, 𝓮 𝓼𝓸́ 𝓪𝓰𝓸𝓻𝓪 𝓽𝓮𝓿𝓮 𝓾𝓶𝓪 𝓻𝓮𝓪𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸 𝓼𝓾𝓹𝓸𝓼𝓽𝓪𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮 𝓭𝓮 𝓪𝓵𝓾𝓷𝓸𝓼 𝓼𝓮𝓾𝓼, 𝓼𝓾𝓹𝓸𝓼𝓽𝓪𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮 𝓪̀ 𝓼𝓾𝓪 𝓮𝔁𝓹𝓸𝓼𝓲𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸 𝓭𝓮 𝓬𝓪𝓻𝓲𝔃 𝓬𝓲𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓲́𝓯𝓲𝓬𝓸, 𝓪𝓰𝓸𝓻𝓪 𝓻𝓮𝓹𝓾𝓭𝓲𝓪𝓭𝓪 𝓹𝓸𝓻 𝓹𝓸𝓵𝓲𝓽𝓲𝓬𝓪𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮 𝓲𝓷𝓬𝓸𝓻𝓻𝓮𝓽𝓪 𝓸𝓾 𝓪𝓽𝓮́ 𝓮𝓻𝓻𝓪𝓭𝓪. 𝓔 𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓮𝓬𝓮, 𝓹𝓮𝓵𝓸𝓼 𝓿𝓲𝓼𝓽𝓸𝓼, 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓸𝓼 𝓝𝓪𝓽𝓲𝓸𝓷𝓪𝓵 𝓘𝓷𝓼𝓽𝓲𝓽𝓾𝓽𝓮𝓼 𝓸𝓯 𝓗𝓮𝓪𝓵𝓽𝓱 𝓷𝓸𝓻𝓽𝓮-𝓪𝓶𝓮𝓻𝓲𝓬𝓪𝓷𝓸𝓼 𝓪𝓽𝓮́ 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓬𝓸𝓻𝓭𝓪𝓶 𝓬𝓸𝓶 𝓮𝓵𝓮 - 𝓮 𝓮𝓵𝓮 𝓬𝓸𝓶 𝓮𝓵𝓮𝓼. 𝓔 𝓲𝓼𝓼𝓸 𝓭𝓮𝓿𝓮𝓻𝓲𝓪 𝓼𝓮𝓻 𝓻𝓮𝓵𝓮𝓿𝓪𝓷𝓽𝓮, 𝓳𝓪́ 𝓪𝓰𝓸𝓻𝓪.
𝓒𝓸𝓷𝓯𝓮𝓼𝓼𝓸 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓷𝓪𝓭𝓪 𝓼𝓮𝓲 𝓭𝓮 𝓬𝓻𝓸𝓶𝓸𝓼𝓼𝓸𝓶𝓪𝓼. 𝓜𝓪𝓼 𝓪𝓽𝓮́ 𝓪 𝓶𝓲𝓶 𝓶𝓮 𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓮𝓬𝓮 𝓭𝓲𝓼𝓽𝓲𝓷𝓽𝓪 𝓪 𝓭𝓮𝓯𝓮𝓼𝓪 𝓭𝓮 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓪 𝓣𝓮𝓻𝓻𝓪 𝓮́ 𝓹𝓵𝓪𝓷𝓪, 𝓷𝓪̃𝓸 𝓸 𝓼𝓮𝓷𝓭𝓸, 𝓮 𝓪 𝓲𝓭𝓮𝓲𝓪 𝓭𝓮 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓮𝔁𝓲𝓼𝓽𝓮𝓶 𝓬𝓻𝓸𝓶𝓸𝓼𝓼𝓸𝓶𝓪𝓼 𝔁 𝓮 𝔂, 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓭𝓲𝓬𝓲𝓸𝓷𝓪𝓷𝓭𝓸 𝓸 𝓼𝓮𝔁𝓸 𝓬𝓸𝓶 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓼𝓮 𝓷𝓪𝓼𝓬𝓮, 𝓲𝓷𝓭𝓮𝓹𝓮𝓷𝓭𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮 𝓭𝓸 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓼𝓮𝓳𝓪 𝓸 𝓯𝓾𝓽𝓾𝓻𝓸 𝓮 𝓪 𝓭𝓮𝓬𝓲𝓼𝓪̃𝓸 𝓭𝓮 𝓬𝓪𝓭𝓪 𝓼𝓮𝓻 𝓮 𝓮𝓿𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓾𝓪𝓲𝓼 𝓭𝓾́𝓿𝓲𝓭𝓪𝓼 𝓮 𝓹𝓻𝓸𝓫𝓵𝓮𝓶𝓪𝓼 𝓰𝓮𝓷𝓮́𝓽𝓲𝓬𝓸𝓼, 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓽𝓪𝓶𝓫𝓮́𝓶 𝓮𝔁𝓲𝓼𝓽𝓮𝓶.
𝓠𝓾𝓪𝓷𝓽𝓸𝓼 𝓹𝓻𝓸𝓯𝓮𝓼𝓼𝓸𝓻𝓮𝓼 𝓮𝔁𝓲𝓼𝓽𝓮𝓶 𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓪̃𝓸 𝓮𝓶 𝓟𝓸𝓻𝓽𝓾𝓰𝓪𝓵 𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓪 𝓼𝓮𝓻𝓮𝓶 𝓭𝓮𝓼𝓹𝓮𝓭𝓲𝓭𝓸𝓼, 𝓪𝓽𝓮𝓷𝓭𝓮𝓷𝓭𝓸 𝓪 𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓮 𝓽𝓮𝓶𝓪? 𝓠𝓾𝓮𝓶 𝓮𝓷𝓼𝓲𝓷𝓪 𝓑𝓲𝓸𝓵𝓸𝓰𝓲𝓪, 𝓭𝓮𝓿𝓮𝓷𝓭𝓸 𝓮𝓷𝓼𝓲𝓷𝓪𝓻 𝓾𝓶𝓪 𝓑𝓲𝓸𝓵𝓸𝓰𝓲𝓪 𝓹𝓸𝓵𝓲𝓽𝓲𝓬𝓪𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮 𝓸𝓻𝓲𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓪𝓭𝓪, 𝓷𝓸 𝓼𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓲𝓭𝓸, 𝓹𝓮𝓵𝓸𝓼 𝓿𝓲𝓼𝓽𝓸𝓼, 𝓭𝓮 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓪 𝓺𝓾𝓪𝓵𝓺𝓾𝓮𝓻 𝓹𝓮𝓼𝓼𝓸𝓪 𝓹𝓮𝓻𝓽𝓮𝓷𝓬𝓮 𝓸𝓻𝓲𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓪𝓻 𝓮 𝓭𝓮𝓬𝓲𝓭𝓲𝓻 𝓼𝓸𝓫𝓻𝓮 𝓪 𝓼𝓾𝓪 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓯𝓸𝓻𝓶𝓪𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸 𝓫𝓲𝓸𝓵𝓸́𝓰𝓲𝓬𝓪 𝓭𝓮 𝓫𝓪𝓼𝓮, 𝓲𝓷𝓭𝓮𝓹𝓮𝓷𝓭𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮 𝓭𝓪 𝓻𝓮𝓪𝓵𝓲𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓮 𝓬𝓲𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓲́𝓯𝓲𝓬𝓪?
𝓐𝓬𝓮𝓲𝓽𝓸 𝓲𝓷𝓽𝓮𝓲𝓻𝓪𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮 𝓭𝓮𝓼𝓪𝓯𝓲𝓪𝓻-𝓼𝓮 𝓪 𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓪𝓫𝓲𝓵𝓲𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓮 𝓮 𝓪𝓼 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓿𝓲𝓬𝓬̧𝓸̃𝓮𝓼 𝓪𝓼𝓼𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮𝓼 𝓮𝓶 𝓽𝓮𝓶𝓪𝓼 𝓭𝓮 𝓫𝓲𝓸𝓵𝓸𝓰𝓲𝓪 𝓪𝓹𝓵𝓲𝓬𝓪𝓭𝓪 𝓪̀𝓼 𝓹𝓮𝓼𝓼𝓸𝓪𝓼. 𝓞 𝓼𝓮́𝓬𝓾𝓵𝓸 𝓧𝓧, 𝓪𝓵𝓲𝓪́𝓼, 𝓯𝓸𝓲 𝓹𝓻𝓸́𝓭𝓲𝓰𝓸 𝓷𝓪 𝓹𝓻𝓸𝓭𝓾𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸 𝓭𝓮 𝓿𝓮𝓻𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓮𝓼 𝓪𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮𝓼, 𝓭𝓮𝓼𝓭𝓮 𝓵𝓸𝓰𝓸 𝓻𝓪𝓬𝓲𝓼𝓽𝓪𝓼, 𝓲𝓭𝓮𝓸𝓵𝓸𝓰𝓲𝓬𝓪𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮 𝓸𝓻𝓲𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓪𝓭𝓪𝓼, 𝓮 𝓪𝓽𝓮́ 𝓷𝓸 𝓼𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓲𝓭𝓸 𝓭𝓮 𝓾𝓶𝓪 𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓲𝓻𝓪 𝓹𝓾𝓻𝓪, 𝓸𝓾 𝓶𝓪𝓵 𝓯𝓾𝓷𝓭𝓪𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓪𝓭𝓪𝓼, 𝓮𝓶 𝓷𝓸𝓶𝓮 𝓭𝓪 𝓬𝓲𝓮̂𝓷𝓬𝓲𝓪 𝓫𝓲𝓸𝓵𝓸́𝓰𝓲𝓬𝓪 𝓮 𝓭𝓪𝓼 𝓼𝓾𝓪𝓼 𝓼𝓾𝓹𝓸𝓼𝓽𝓪𝓼 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓿𝓲𝓬𝓬̧𝓸̃𝓮𝓼 𝓪𝓫𝓼𝓸𝓵𝓾𝓽𝓪𝓼. 𝓙𝓾𝓭𝓮𝓾𝓼, 𝓬𝓲𝓰𝓪𝓷𝓸𝓼, 𝓷𝓮𝓰𝓻𝓸𝓼 𝓮 𝓽𝓪𝓷𝓽𝓸𝓼 𝓸𝓾𝓽𝓻𝓸𝓼 𝓼𝓾𝓹𝓸𝓼𝓽𝓸𝓼 𝓰𝓻𝓾𝓹𝓸𝓼 𝓭𝓮 𝓹𝓮𝓼𝓼𝓸𝓪𝓼 𝓯𝓸𝓻𝓪𝓶 𝓬𝓵𝓪𝓼𝓼𝓲𝓯𝓲𝓬𝓪𝓭𝓸𝓼 "𝓬𝓲𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓲𝓯𝓲𝓬𝓪𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮" - 𝓮 𝓹𝓪𝓭𝓮𝓬𝓮𝓻𝓪𝓶 𝓭𝓮𝓼𝓼𝓪 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓭𝓲𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸. 𝓔 𝓷𝓪̃𝓸 𝓪𝓹𝓮𝓷𝓪𝓼 𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓮𝓼 𝓰𝓻𝓾𝓹𝓸𝓼 𝓶𝓪𝓲𝓼 𝓪𝓾𝓭𝓲́𝓿𝓮𝓲𝓼 𝓯𝓸𝓻𝓪𝓶 𝓪𝓵𝓿𝓸𝓼 𝓯𝓪́𝓬𝓮𝓲𝓼, 𝓭𝓮𝓿𝓮 𝓭𝓲𝔃𝓮𝓻-𝓼𝓮: 𝓮𝓶 𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓪𝓭𝓸𝓼 𝓷𝓸𝓻𝓽𝓮-𝓪𝓶𝓮𝓻𝓲𝓬𝓪𝓷𝓸𝓼 𝓮 𝓷𝓪 𝓔𝓼𝓬𝓪𝓷𝓭𝓲𝓷𝓪́𝓿𝓲𝓪, 𝓷𝓸 𝓲𝓷𝓲́𝓬𝓲𝓸 𝓭𝓸 𝓼𝓮́𝓬𝓾𝓵𝓸 𝓧𝓧, 𝓮𝓼𝓼𝓮𝓼 𝓫𝓪𝓼𝓽𝓲𝓸̃𝓮𝓼 𝓭𝓪 𝓿𝓪𝓷𝓰𝓾𝓪𝓻𝓭𝓪 𝓭𝓪 𝓬𝓲𝓮̂𝓷𝓬𝓲𝓪, 𝓯𝓸𝓻𝓪𝓶 𝓹𝓸𝓻 𝓮𝔁𝓮𝓶𝓹𝓵𝓸 𝓸𝓫𝓻𝓲𝓰𝓪𝓽𝓸𝓻𝓲𝓪𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮 𝓵𝓪𝓺𝓾𝓮𝓪𝓭𝓪𝓼 𝓪𝓼 𝓶𝓾𝓵𝓱𝓮𝓻𝓮𝓼 𝓹𝓻𝓸𝓼𝓽𝓲𝓽𝓾𝓽𝓪𝓼, 𝓬𝓸𝓶𝓸 𝓹𝓸𝓵𝓲́𝓽𝓲𝓬𝓪 𝓭𝓮 𝓼𝓪𝓾́𝓭𝓮 𝓹𝓾́𝓫𝓵𝓲𝓬𝓪, 𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓪 𝓼𝓮 𝓮𝓿𝓲𝓽𝓪𝓻 𝓾𝓶𝓪 𝓶𝓪́ 𝓰𝓮𝓻𝓪𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓷𝓮𝓬𝓮𝓼𝓼𝓪𝓻𝓲𝓪𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮 𝓼𝓮 𝓼𝓮𝓰𝓾𝓲𝓻𝓲𝓪, 𝓮𝓶 𝓿𝓲𝓻𝓽𝓾𝓭𝓮 𝓭𝓸 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓱𝓮𝓬𝓲𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓸 𝓬𝓲𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓲́𝓯𝓲𝓬𝓸 𝓭𝓪 𝓮́𝓹𝓸𝓬𝓪.
𝓔𝓼𝓽𝓪𝓶𝓸𝓼 𝓷𝓸́𝓼 𝓪 𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓻𝓪𝓻 𝓷𝓾𝓶𝓪 𝓷𝓸𝓿𝓪 𝓰𝓮𝓻𝓪𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸 𝓭𝓮 𝓹𝓸𝓵𝓲́𝓽𝓲𝓬𝓪𝓼 𝓹𝓾́𝓫𝓵𝓲𝓬𝓪𝓼, 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓽𝓻𝓪 𝓬𝓲𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓲́𝓯𝓲𝓬𝓪𝓼, 𝓸𝓻𝓭𝓮𝓷𝓪𝓭𝓪𝓼 𝓮𝓶 𝓯𝓾𝓷𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸 𝓭𝓮 𝓾𝓶 𝓹𝓮𝓷𝓼𝓪𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓸 𝓰𝓮𝓷𝓮𝓻𝓸𝓼𝓸, 𝓶𝓪𝓼 𝓽𝓪𝓶𝓫𝓮́𝓶 𝓼𝓮𝓰𝓻𝓮𝓰𝓪𝓭𝓸𝓻 𝓮 𝓿𝓲𝓸𝓵𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓸? 𝓘𝓼𝓽𝓸 𝓭𝓮𝓿𝓮 𝓶𝓮𝓻𝓮𝓬𝓮𝓻 𝓭𝓮𝓫𝓪𝓽𝓮, 𝓹𝓸𝓷𝓭𝓮𝓻𝓪𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸, 𝓭𝓲𝓼𝓬𝓾𝓼𝓼𝓪̃𝓸 𝓹𝓾́𝓫𝓵𝓲𝓬𝓪. 𝓝𝓪̃𝓸 𝓮́ 𝓹𝓸𝓼𝓼𝓲́𝓿𝓮𝓵 𝓭𝓮𝓲𝔁𝓪𝓻 𝓷𝓮𝓶 𝓪𝓹𝓮𝓷𝓪𝓼 𝓪𝓸𝓼 𝓬𝓲𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓲𝓼𝓽𝓪𝓼 𝓷𝓮𝓶 𝓪𝓸𝓼 𝓭𝓮𝓬𝓵𝓪𝓶𝓪𝓭𝓸𝓻𝓮𝓼 𝓲𝓭𝓮𝓸𝓵𝓸́𝓰𝓲𝓬𝓸𝓼 𝓭𝓪𝓼 𝓷𝓸𝓿𝓪𝓼 𝓿𝓮𝓻𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓮𝓼 𝓪 𝓭𝓮𝓯𝓲𝓷𝓲𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸 𝓭𝓪𝓺𝓾𝓲𝓵𝓸 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓼𝓮𝓳𝓪 𝓪 𝓻𝓮𝓪𝓵𝓲𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓮. 𝓔𝓼𝓽𝓪 𝓹𝓸𝓭𝓮 𝓪𝓽𝓮́ 𝓷𝓪̃𝓸 𝓮𝔁𝓲𝓼𝓽𝓲𝓻... 𝓜𝓪𝓼 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓯𝓻𝓸𝓷𝓽𝓪𝓻 𝓮𝓼𝓼𝓪 𝓼𝓾𝓹𝓸𝓼𝓽𝓪 𝓻𝓮𝓪𝓵𝓲𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓮 𝓶𝓮𝓻𝓮𝓬𝓮 𝓶𝓪𝓲𝓼 𝓭𝓸 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓾𝓶 𝓭𝓮𝓼𝓹𝓮𝓭𝓲𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓸 𝓸𝓾 𝓾𝓶𝓪 𝓫𝓻𝓮𝓿𝓮 𝓷𝓾𝓶 𝓳𝓸𝓻𝓷𝓪𝓵. 𝓘𝓼𝓽𝓸 𝓮́ 𝓸 𝓷𝓸𝓼𝓼𝓸 𝓶𝓾𝓷𝓭𝓸 𝓮 𝓸 𝓷𝓸𝓼𝓼𝓸 𝓯𝓾𝓽𝓾𝓻𝓸 𝓽𝓪𝓶𝓫𝓮́𝓶. 𝓐𝓵𝓰𝓾𝓮́𝓶, 𝓶𝓪𝓲𝓼, 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓹𝓮𝓰𝓾𝓮 𝓷𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓮𝓼 𝓮 𝓸𝓼 𝓺𝓾𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓲𝓸𝓷𝓮 𝓬𝓸𝓶 𝓸 𝓼𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓲𝓭𝓸 𝓭𝓮 𝓭𝓮𝓿𝓮𝓻 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓷𝓸𝓼 𝓶𝓮𝓻𝓮𝓬𝓮𝓶.
.* Professor da Faculdade de Direito da Universidade de Lisboa
.
IN "DIÁRIO DE NOTÍCIAS" - 30/06/23
Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário