.
"Who wants to live forever?"
A𝚜𝚜𝚒𝚜𝚝𝚒 𝚑𝚊́ 𝚞𝚗𝚜 𝚍𝚒𝚊𝚜 𝚊 𝚞𝚖 𝚝𝚛𝚒𝚋𝚞𝚝𝚘 𝚊𝚘𝚜 𝚀𝚞𝚎𝚎𝚗, 𝚋𝚊𝚗𝚍𝚊 𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚗𝚊 𝚖𝚊𝚐𝚗𝚒́𝚏𝚒𝚌𝚊 𝚟𝚘𝚣 𝚍𝚎 𝙵𝚛𝚎𝚍𝚍𝚢 𝙼𝚎𝚛𝚌𝚞𝚛𝚢 𝚙𝚎𝚛𝚐𝚞𝚗𝚝𝚊𝚟𝚊 𝚊 𝚙𝚊́𝚐𝚒𝚗𝚊 𝚝𝚊𝚗𝚝𝚊𝚜 "𝚆𝚑𝚘 𝚠𝚊𝚗𝚝 𝚝𝚘 𝚕𝚒𝚟𝚎 𝚏𝚘𝚛𝚎𝚟𝚎𝚛", 𝚒𝚜𝚝𝚘 𝚎́, "𝚀𝚞𝚎𝚖 𝚚𝚞𝚎𝚛 𝚟𝚒𝚟𝚎𝚛 𝚙𝚊𝚛𝚊 𝚜𝚎𝚖𝚙𝚛𝚎?".
𝙿𝚘𝚛 𝚘𝚛𝚊 𝚊 𝚙𝚎𝚛𝚐𝚞𝚗𝚝𝚊 𝚎́ 𝚖𝚎𝚛𝚊𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚎 𝚛𝚎𝚝𝚘́𝚛𝚒𝚌𝚊, 𝚜𝚎𝚐𝚞𝚒𝚗𝚍𝚘-𝚜𝚎 𝚊 𝚖𝚘𝚛𝚝𝚎 𝚒𝚗𝚎𝚕𝚞𝚝𝚊𝚟𝚎𝚕𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚎 𝚊̀ 𝚟𝚒𝚍𝚊, 𝚖𝚊𝚜 𝚎́ 𝚒𝚗𝚍𝚒𝚜𝚙𝚞𝚝𝚊́𝚟𝚎𝚕 𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚊 𝚌𝚒𝚎̂𝚗𝚌𝚒𝚊 𝚍𝚒𝚕𝚊𝚝𝚘𝚞 𝚎 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚝𝚒𝚗𝚞𝚊 𝚊 𝚊𝚕𝚊𝚛𝚐𝚊𝚛 𝚘 𝚙𝚛𝚊𝚣𝚘 𝚍𝚎 𝚟𝚊𝚕𝚒𝚍𝚊𝚍𝚎 𝚑𝚞𝚖𝚊𝚗𝚘 𝚍𝚎 𝚏𝚘𝚛𝚖𝚊 𝚜𝚞𝚋𝚜𝚝𝚊𝚗𝚌𝚒𝚊𝚕.
𝙲𝚘𝚖 𝚋𝚊𝚜𝚎 𝚗𝚘 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚑𝚎𝚌𝚒𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚘 𝚌𝚒𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚒́𝚏𝚒𝚌𝚘 𝚍𝚒𝚜𝚙𝚘𝚗𝚒́𝚟𝚎𝚕 𝚊𝚏𝚒𝚛𝚖𝚊 𝚞𝚖 𝚎𝚜𝚝𝚞𝚍𝚘 (𝚙𝚞𝚋𝚕𝚒𝚌𝚊𝚍𝚘 𝚎𝚖 𝟸𝟶𝟸𝟷 𝚗𝚊 𝙽𝚊𝚝𝚞𝚛𝚎 𝙲𝚘𝚖𝚖𝚞𝚗𝚒𝚌𝚊𝚝𝚒𝚘𝚗𝚜) 𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚘 𝚜𝚎𝚛 𝚑𝚞𝚖𝚊𝚗𝚘 𝚙𝚘𝚍𝚎 𝚙𝚎𝚛𝚍𝚞𝚛𝚊𝚛 𝚊𝚝𝚎́ 𝚊𝚘𝚜 𝟷𝟸𝟶-𝟷𝟻𝟶 𝚊𝚗𝚘𝚜, 𝚊𝚕𝚝𝚞𝚛𝚊 𝚎𝚖 𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚜𝚎 𝚊𝚗𝚝𝚎𝚟𝚎̂ 𝚊 𝚙𝚎𝚛𝚍𝚊 𝚌𝚘𝚖𝚙𝚕𝚎𝚝𝚊 𝚍𝚊 𝚜𝚞𝚊 𝚛𝚎𝚜𝚒𝚕𝚒𝚎̂𝚗𝚌𝚒𝚊, 𝚘𝚞 𝚜𝚎𝚓𝚊, 𝚍𝚊 𝚌𝚊𝚙𝚊𝚌𝚒𝚍𝚊𝚍𝚎 𝚍𝚎 𝚛𝚎𝚌𝚞𝚙𝚎𝚛𝚊𝚌̧𝚊̃𝚘 𝚙𝚎𝚛𝚊𝚗𝚝𝚎 𝚊𝚍𝚟𝚎𝚛𝚜𝚒𝚍𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚜 𝚌𝚘𝚖𝚘 𝚍𝚘𝚎𝚗𝚌̧𝚊𝚜, 𝚏𝚎𝚛𝚒𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚘𝚜 𝚘𝚞 𝚝𝚛𝚊𝚞𝚖𝚊𝚝𝚒𝚜𝚖𝚘𝚜. 𝙾 𝚙𝚛𝚘𝚕𝚘𝚗𝚐𝚊𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚘 𝚍𝚊 𝚟𝚒𝚍𝚊 𝚙𝚊𝚛𝚊 𝚊𝚕𝚎́𝚖 𝚍𝚎𝚜𝚜𝚎 𝚙𝚘𝚗𝚝𝚘 𝚛𝚎𝚚𝚞𝚎𝚛 𝚊 𝚜𝚞𝚜𝚙𝚎𝚗𝚜𝚊̃𝚘 𝚍𝚘 𝚎𝚗𝚟𝚎𝚕𝚑𝚎𝚌𝚒𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚘 𝚌𝚎𝚕𝚞𝚕𝚊𝚛, 𝚖𝚎𝚝𝚊 𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚗𝚊̃𝚘 𝚜𝚎 𝚟𝚎𝚛𝚝𝚎 𝚎𝚖 𝚒𝚖𝚙𝚘𝚜𝚜𝚒𝚋𝚒𝚕𝚒𝚍𝚊𝚍𝚎 𝚎 𝚚𝚞𝚒𝚖𝚎𝚛𝚊 𝚊𝚝𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚊 𝚊 𝚏𝚛𝚎𝚗𝚎́𝚝𝚒𝚌𝚊 𝚊𝚌𝚝𝚒𝚟𝚒𝚍𝚊𝚍𝚎 𝚍𝚎 𝚒𝚗𝚟𝚎𝚜𝚝𝚒𝚐𝚊𝚌̧𝚊̃𝚘 𝚎 𝚍𝚎 𝚍𝚎𝚜𝚎𝚗𝚟𝚘𝚕𝚟𝚒𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚘 𝚊 𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚜𝚎 𝚊𝚜𝚜𝚒𝚜𝚝𝚎 𝚗𝚘 𝚌𝚘𝚖𝚋𝚊𝚝𝚎 𝚗𝚊̃𝚘 𝚊𝚙𝚎𝚗𝚊𝚜 𝚊𝚘 𝚎𝚗𝚟𝚎𝚕𝚑𝚎𝚌𝚒𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚘 𝚌𝚘𝚖𝚘 𝚝𝚊𝚖𝚋𝚎́𝚖 𝚊̀ 𝚖𝚘𝚛𝚝𝚎.
𝙰 𝚝𝚒́𝚝𝚞𝚕𝚘 𝚍𝚎 𝚎𝚡𝚎𝚖𝚙𝚕𝚘, 𝚎𝚖 𝙹𝚞𝚕𝚑𝚘 𝚍𝚎𝚜𝚝𝚎 𝚊𝚗𝚘 𝚏𝚘𝚒 𝚒𝚗𝚊𝚞𝚐𝚞𝚛𝚊𝚍𝚘, 𝚎𝚖 𝙲𝚊𝚖𝚋𝚛𝚒𝚍𝚐𝚎, 𝙸𝚗𝚐𝚕𝚊𝚝𝚎𝚛𝚛𝚊, 𝚞𝚖 𝚕𝚊𝚋𝚘𝚛𝚊𝚝𝚘́𝚛𝚒𝚘 𝚍𝚎 𝚋𝚒𝚘𝚝𝚎𝚌𝚗𝚘𝚕𝚘𝚐𝚒𝚊, 𝙰𝚕𝚝𝚘𝚜 𝙻𝚊𝚋𝚜, 𝚍𝚎𝚟𝚘𝚝𝚊𝚍𝚘 𝚊𝚘 𝚛𝚎𝚝𝚊𝚛𝚍𝚊𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚘 𝚍𝚘 𝚎𝚗𝚟𝚎𝚕𝚑𝚎𝚌𝚒𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚘 𝚊𝚕𝚒𝚌𝚎𝚛𝚌̧𝚊𝚍𝚘 𝚗𝚞𝚖 𝚒𝚗𝚟𝚎𝚜𝚝𝚒𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚘 𝚍𝚎 𝟹 𝚖𝚒𝚕 𝚖𝚒𝚕𝚑𝚘̃𝚎𝚜 𝚍𝚎 𝚄𝚂𝙳 𝚙𝚛𝚘𝚟𝚒𝚗𝚍𝚘 𝚍𝚎 𝚟𝚊́𝚛𝚒𝚘𝚜 𝚒𝚗𝚟𝚎𝚜𝚝𝚒𝚍𝚘𝚛𝚎𝚜, 𝚌𝚘𝚖𝚘 𝙹𝚎𝚏𝚏 𝙱𝚎𝚣𝚘𝚜 𝚘 𝚏𝚊𝚖𝚘𝚜𝚘 𝚏𝚞𝚗𝚍𝚊𝚍𝚘𝚛 𝚍𝚊 𝙰𝚖𝚊𝚣𝚘𝚗, 𝙴𝚕𝚘𝚗 𝙼𝚞𝚜𝚔 𝚎 𝙿𝚎𝚝𝚎𝚛 𝚃𝚑𝚒𝚎𝚕, 𝚌𝚘-𝚏𝚞𝚗𝚍𝚊𝚍𝚘𝚛𝚎𝚜 𝚍𝚘 𝙿𝚊𝚢𝙿𝚊𝚕 𝚎 𝚍𝚎 𝚝𝚊𝚗𝚝𝚊𝚜 𝚘𝚞𝚝𝚛𝚊𝚜 𝚎𝚖𝚙𝚛𝚎𝚜𝚊𝚜, 𝚊𝚙𝚘𝚜𝚝𝚊𝚛𝚊𝚖 𝚛𝚎𝚜𝚙𝚎𝚌𝚝𝚒𝚟𝚊𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚎 𝚗𝚊 𝙽𝚎𝚞𝚛𝚊𝚕𝚒𝚗𝚔 𝚙𝚊𝚛𝚊 𝚘 𝚍𝚎𝚜𝚎𝚗𝚟𝚘𝚕𝚟𝚒𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚘 𝚍𝚎 𝚒𝚗𝚝𝚎𝚛𝚏𝚊𝚌𝚎𝚜 𝚌𝚎́𝚛𝚎𝚋𝚛𝚘-𝚌𝚘𝚖𝚙𝚞𝚝𝚊𝚍𝚘𝚛 (𝙸𝙲𝚜) 𝚒𝚖𝚙𝚕𝚊𝚗𝚝𝚊́𝚟𝚎𝚒𝚜 𝚎 𝚗𝚊 𝙵𝚞𝚗𝚍𝚊𝚌̧𝚊̃𝚘 𝙼𝚊𝚝𝚞𝚜𝚊𝚕𝚎́𝚖 𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚝𝚎𝚖 𝚙𝚘𝚛 𝚖𝚒𝚜𝚜𝚊̃𝚘 𝚝𝚛𝚊𝚗𝚜𝚏𝚘𝚛𝚖𝚊𝚛, 𝚊𝚝𝚎́ 𝟸𝟶𝟹𝟶, "𝚘𝚜 𝟿𝟶 [𝚊𝚗𝚘𝚜 𝚍𝚎 𝚒𝚍𝚊𝚍𝚎] 𝚗𝚘𝚜 𝚗𝚘𝚟𝚘𝚜 𝟻𝟶" 𝚎 𝚘𝚜 𝚏𝚞𝚗𝚍𝚊𝚍𝚘𝚛𝚎𝚜 𝚍𝚊 𝙶𝚘𝚘𝚐𝚕𝚎 𝚙𝚛𝚘𝚜𝚜𝚎𝚐𝚞𝚎𝚖 𝚘𝚋𝚓𝚎𝚌𝚝𝚒𝚟𝚘𝚜 𝚗𝚎𝚜𝚝𝚎 𝚌𝚊𝚖𝚙𝚘 𝚊𝚝𝚛𝚊𝚟𝚎́𝚜 𝚍𝚎 𝚞𝚖𝚊 𝚜𝚝𝚊𝚛𝚝𝚞𝚙 𝚍𝚎 𝚗𝚘𝚖𝚎 𝙲𝚊𝚕𝚒𝚌𝚘 (𝚂𝚊𝚐𝚊).
𝙰𝚜 𝚊𝚋𝚘𝚛𝚍𝚊𝚐𝚎𝚗𝚜 𝚜𝚊̃𝚘 𝚍𝚒𝚟𝚎𝚛𝚜𝚊𝚜. 𝙰 𝚟𝚒𝚜𝚊̃𝚘 𝚍𝚎 𝙴𝚛𝚒𝚌 𝙳𝚛𝚎𝚡𝚕𝚎𝚛, 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚜𝚒𝚍𝚎𝚛𝚊𝚍𝚘 𝚙𝚘𝚛 𝚖𝚞𝚒𝚝𝚘𝚜 𝚌𝚘𝚖𝚘 𝚘 𝙿𝚊𝚒 𝚍𝚊 𝚗𝚊𝚗𝚘𝚝𝚎𝚌𝚗𝚘𝚕𝚘𝚐𝚒𝚊, 𝚝𝚎𝚖 𝚙𝚘𝚛 𝚋𝚊𝚜𝚎 𝚊 𝚗𝚊𝚗𝚘𝚝𝚎𝚌𝚗𝚘𝚕𝚘𝚐𝚒𝚊 𝚖𝚘𝚕𝚎𝚌𝚞𝚕𝚊𝚛. 𝙳𝚛𝚎𝚡𝚕𝚎𝚛 𝚙𝚛𝚎𝚟𝚎̂ 𝚊 𝚎𝚖𝚎𝚛𝚐𝚎̂𝚗𝚌𝚒𝚊 𝚍𝚎 𝚗𝚊𝚗𝚘-𝚍𝚒𝚜𝚙𝚘𝚜𝚒𝚝𝚒𝚟𝚘𝚜 𝚍𝚎 𝚛𝚎𝚐𝚎𝚗𝚎𝚛𝚊𝚌̧𝚊̃𝚘 𝚌𝚎𝚕𝚞𝚕𝚊𝚛 𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚙𝚎𝚛𝚖𝚒𝚝𝚒𝚛𝚊̃𝚘 𝚘 𝚎𝚟𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚞𝚊𝚕 𝚊𝚕𝚌𝚊𝚗𝚌𝚎 𝚍𝚊 𝚒𝚖𝚘𝚛𝚝𝚊𝚕𝚒𝚍𝚊𝚍𝚎. 𝙹𝚊́ 𝚊 𝚄𝚗𝚒𝚟𝚎𝚛𝚜𝚒𝚍𝚊𝚍𝚎 𝚍𝚎 𝙼𝚎𝚕𝚋𝚘𝚞𝚛𝚗𝚎, 𝙰𝚞𝚜𝚝𝚛𝚊́𝚕𝚒𝚊, 𝚛𝚎𝚜𝚜𝚊𝚕𝚟𝚊 𝚘 𝚙𝚘𝚝𝚎𝚗𝚌𝚒𝚊𝚕 𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚊 𝚗𝚊𝚗𝚘𝚝𝚎𝚌𝚗𝚘𝚕𝚘𝚐𝚒𝚊 𝚝𝚎𝚖 𝚙𝚊𝚛𝚊 𝚌𝚞𝚛𝚊𝚛 𝚌𝚎𝚛𝚝𝚊𝚜 𝚍𝚘𝚎𝚗𝚌̧𝚊𝚜, 𝚌𝚘𝚖𝚘 𝚌𝚎𝚛𝚝𝚘𝚜 𝚝𝚒𝚙𝚘𝚜 𝚍𝚎 𝚌𝚊𝚗𝚌𝚛𝚘, 𝚊𝚝𝚛𝚊𝚟𝚎́𝚜 𝚍𝚊 𝚛𝚎𝚖𝚘𝚌̧𝚊̃𝚘 𝚍𝚎 𝚌𝚎́𝚕𝚞𝚕𝚊𝚜 𝚌𝚊𝚗𝚌𝚎𝚛𝚒́𝚐𝚎𝚗𝚊𝚜.
𝚄𝚖𝚊 𝚘𝚞𝚝𝚛𝚊 𝚊𝚟𝚎𝚗𝚒𝚍𝚊 𝚊𝚜𝚜𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚊 𝚗𝚊 𝚌𝚑𝚊𝚖𝚊𝚍𝚊 𝚒𝚖𝚘𝚛𝚝𝚊𝚕𝚒𝚍𝚊𝚍𝚎 𝚟𝚒𝚛𝚝𝚞𝚊𝚕 𝚊𝚝𝚛𝚊𝚟𝚎́𝚜 𝚍𝚊 𝚎𝚡𝚎𝚌𝚞𝚌̧𝚊̃𝚘 𝚍𝚎 𝚞𝚖 𝚜𝚌𝚊𝚗 𝚌𝚎𝚛𝚎𝚋𝚛𝚊𝚕 𝚎 𝚜𝚞𝚋𝚜𝚎𝚚𝚞𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚎 𝚝𝚛𝚊𝚗𝚜𝚏𝚎𝚛𝚎̂𝚗𝚌𝚒𝚊 𝚍𝚘 𝚛𝚎𝚜𝚞𝚕𝚝𝚊𝚍𝚘 𝚊𝚜𝚜𝚒𝚖 𝚘𝚋𝚝𝚒𝚍𝚘 𝚙𝚊𝚛𝚊 𝚞𝚖 𝚌𝚘𝚖𝚙𝚞𝚝𝚊𝚍𝚘𝚛 𝚘𝚞 𝚍𝚊 𝚜𝚞𝚋𝚜𝚝𝚒𝚝𝚞𝚒𝚌̧𝚊̃𝚘 𝚐𝚛𝚊𝚍𝚞𝚊𝚕 𝚍𝚎 𝚙𝚊𝚛𝚝𝚎𝚜 𝚍𝚘 𝚌𝚎́𝚛𝚎𝚋𝚛𝚘 𝚙𝚘𝚛 𝚌𝚑𝚒𝚙𝚜. 𝙿𝚘𝚛 𝚘𝚞𝚝𝚛𝚊𝚜 𝚙𝚊𝚕𝚊𝚟𝚛𝚊𝚜, 𝚘𝚙𝚎𝚛𝚊-𝚜𝚎 𝚊𝚚𝚞𝚒 𝚞𝚖𝚊 𝚝𝚛𝚊𝚗𝚜𝚒𝚌̧𝚊̃𝚘 𝚍𝚎 𝚜𝚎𝚛 𝚑𝚞𝚖𝚊𝚗𝚘 𝚙𝚊𝚛𝚊 𝚌𝚢𝚋𝚘𝚛𝚐 𝚎𝚖 𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚘 𝚙𝚎𝚗𝚜𝚊𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚘 𝚘𝚌𝚘𝚛𝚛𝚎 𝚙𝚘𝚛 𝚖𝚎𝚒𝚘 𝚍𝚎 𝚌𝚑𝚒𝚙𝚜 𝚎 𝚗𝚊̃𝚘 𝚍𝚎 𝚗𝚎𝚞𝚛𝚘́𝚗𝚒𝚘𝚜 (𝚂𝚌𝚑𝚗𝚎𝚒𝚍𝚎𝚛, 𝙰𝚛𝚝𝚒𝚏𝚒𝚌𝚒𝚊𝚕 𝚈𝚘𝚞: 𝙰𝙸 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝙵𝚞𝚝𝚞𝚛𝚎 𝚘𝚏 𝚈𝚘𝚞𝚛 𝙼𝚒𝚗𝚍).
𝙴𝚜𝚝𝚊 𝚜𝚘𝚕𝚞𝚌̧𝚊̃𝚘 𝚌𝚘𝚕𝚘𝚌𝚊 𝚚𝚞𝚎𝚜𝚝𝚘̃𝚎𝚜 𝚌𝚘𝚖𝚙𝚕𝚎𝚡𝚊𝚜. 𝙾 𝚜𝚎𝚛 𝚑𝚞𝚖𝚊𝚗𝚘 𝚙𝚘𝚍𝚎 𝚜𝚎𝚛 𝚚𝚞𝚊𝚕𝚒𝚏𝚒𝚌𝚊𝚍𝚘 𝚌𝚘𝚖𝚘 𝚝𝚊𝚕 𝚜𝚎 𝚟𝚒𝚟𝚎 𝚒𝚗 𝚖𝚊𝚌𝚑𝚒𝚗𝚊? 𝚃𝚛𝚊𝚝𝚊-𝚜𝚎 𝚍𝚊 𝚖𝚎𝚜𝚖𝚊 𝚙𝚎𝚜𝚜𝚘𝚊 𝚘𝚞 𝚍𝚎 𝚞𝚖 𝚌𝚕𝚘𝚗𝚎 𝚜𝚎𝚖 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚑𝚎𝚌𝚒𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚘 𝚍𝚘𝚜 𝚙𝚎𝚗𝚜𝚊𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚘𝚜, 𝚜𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚒𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚘𝚜 𝚎 𝚊𝚌𝚝𝚘𝚜 𝚍𝚊 𝚙𝚎𝚜𝚜𝚘𝚊 𝚌𝚕𝚘𝚗𝚊𝚍𝚊?
𝙰 𝚛𝚎𝚜𝚙𝚘𝚜𝚝𝚊 𝚗𝚊 𝚖𝚒𝚗𝚑𝚊 𝚖𝚘𝚍𝚎𝚜𝚝𝚊 𝚘𝚙𝚒𝚗𝚒𝚊̃𝚘 𝚎́ 𝚗𝚎𝚐𝚊𝚝𝚒𝚟𝚊 𝚞𝚖𝚊 𝚟𝚎𝚣 𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚎𝚜𝚜𝚎 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚑𝚎𝚌𝚒𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚘 𝚎́ 𝚊𝚌𝚞𝚖𝚞𝚕𝚊𝚍𝚘 𝚊𝚘 𝚗𝚒́𝚟𝚎𝚕 𝚍𝚊 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚜𝚌𝚒𝚎̂𝚗𝚌𝚒𝚊 𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚗𝚘𝚜 𝚙𝚎𝚛𝚖𝚒𝚝𝚎, 𝚊𝚜𝚜𝚒𝚖 𝚗𝚘𝚜 𝚍𝚒𝚣 𝚊 𝚖𝚎𝚍𝚒𝚌𝚒𝚗𝚊, 𝚙𝚎𝚗𝚜𝚊𝚛, 𝚘𝚋𝚜𝚎𝚛𝚟𝚊𝚛 𝚎 𝚒𝚗𝚝𝚎𝚛𝚊𝚐𝚒𝚛, 𝚋𝚎𝚖 𝚌𝚘𝚖𝚘 𝚛𝚎𝚌𝚞𝚊𝚛 𝚙𝚎𝚛𝚊𝚗𝚝𝚎 𝚘𝚜 𝚗𝚘𝚜𝚜𝚘𝚜 𝚙𝚎𝚗𝚜𝚊𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚘𝚜, 𝚎𝚡𝚊𝚖𝚒𝚗𝚊́-𝚕𝚘𝚜 𝚎 𝚓𝚞𝚕𝚐𝚊́-𝚕𝚘𝚜 (𝚂𝚌𝚒𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚒𝚏𝚒𝚌 𝙰𝚖𝚎𝚛𝚒𝚌𝚊𝚗). 𝙽𝚊 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚜𝚌𝚒𝚎̂𝚗𝚌𝚒𝚊 𝚜𝚎 𝚎𝚗𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚝𝚛𝚊 𝚘 𝚜𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚒𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚘 𝚍𝚎 𝚎𝚡𝚒𝚜𝚝𝚎̂𝚗𝚌𝚒𝚊, 𝚒𝚗𝚌𝚕𝚞𝚒𝚗𝚍𝚘 𝚊 𝚗𝚘𝚌̧𝚊̃𝚘 𝚍𝚎 𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚜𝚎 𝚙𝚎𝚗𝚜𝚊, 𝚜𝚎 𝚎𝚡𝚒𝚜𝚝𝚎 𝚎 𝚜𝚎 𝚝𝚎𝚖 𝚊𝚕𝚖𝚊.
𝚄𝚖 𝚌𝚊𝚖𝚒𝚗𝚑𝚘 𝚖𝚊𝚒𝚜 𝚊𝚙𝚎𝚕𝚊𝚝𝚒𝚟𝚘 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚜𝚒𝚜𝚝𝚎 𝚎𝚖 𝚙𝚛𝚘𝚕𝚘𝚗𝚐𝚊𝚛 𝚊 𝚕𝚘𝚗𝚐𝚎𝚟𝚒𝚍𝚊𝚍𝚎 𝚙𝚘𝚛 𝚖𝚎𝚒𝚘 𝚍𝚎 𝚊𝚙𝚛𝚒𝚖𝚘𝚛𝚊𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚘𝚜 𝚋𝚒𝚘𝚕𝚘́𝚐𝚒𝚌𝚘𝚜 𝚌𝚘𝚖𝚙𝚊𝚝𝚒́𝚟𝚎𝚒𝚜 𝚌𝚘𝚖 𝚊 𝚜𝚘𝚋𝚛𝚎𝚟𝚒𝚟𝚎̂𝚗𝚌𝚒𝚊 𝚍𝚊 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚜𝚌𝚒𝚎̂𝚗𝚌𝚒𝚊, 𝚙𝚛𝚎𝚜𝚎𝚛𝚟𝚊𝚗𝚍𝚘, 𝚙𝚘𝚒𝚜, 𝚊 𝚎𝚜𝚜𝚎̂𝚗𝚌𝚒𝚊 𝚍𝚘 𝚜𝚎𝚛 𝚑𝚞𝚖𝚊𝚗𝚘, (𝚂𝚝𝚎𝚎𝚕𝚎, 𝙰𝚐𝚎𝚕𝚎𝚜𝚜: 𝚃𝚑𝚎 𝙽𝚎𝚠 𝚂𝚌𝚒𝚎𝚗𝚌𝚎 𝚘𝚏 𝙶𝚎𝚝𝚝𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝙾𝚕𝚍𝚎𝚛 𝚆𝚒𝚝𝚑𝚘𝚞𝚝 𝙶𝚎𝚝𝚝𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝙾𝚕𝚍).
𝙲𝚘𝚗𝚝𝚞𝚍𝚘 𝚗𝚊̃𝚘 𝚜𝚎 𝚙𝚛𝚎𝚝𝚎𝚗𝚍𝚎 𝚊𝚙𝚎𝚗𝚊𝚜 𝚙𝚛𝚘𝚕𝚘𝚗𝚐𝚊𝚛 𝚊 𝚕𝚘𝚗𝚐𝚎𝚟𝚒𝚍𝚊𝚍𝚎. 𝙴𝚜𝚝𝚊́ 𝚎𝚖 𝚌𝚞𝚛𝚜𝚘 𝚞𝚖𝚊 𝚌𝚘𝚛𝚛𝚒𝚍𝚊 𝚗𝚘 𝚜𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚒𝚍𝚘 𝚍𝚎 𝚌𝚛𝚒𝚊𝚛 𝚞𝚖𝚊 𝚏𝚘́𝚛𝚖𝚞𝚕𝚊 𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚙𝚘𝚜𝚜𝚒𝚋𝚒𝚕𝚒𝚝𝚎 𝚊 𝚒𝚖𝚘𝚛𝚝𝚊𝚕𝚒𝚍𝚊𝚍𝚎, 𝚎𝚖 𝚖𝚘𝚕𝚍𝚎𝚜 𝚏𝚒́𝚜𝚒𝚌𝚘𝚜 𝚘𝚞 𝚍𝚒𝚐𝚒𝚝𝚊𝚒𝚜. 𝙵𝚊𝚛𝚊́ 𝚜𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚒𝚍𝚘, 𝚝𝚘𝚍𝚊𝚟𝚒𝚊, 𝚎𝚝𝚒𝚌𝚊𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚎, 𝚟𝚒𝚟𝚎𝚛 𝚙𝚊𝚛𝚊 𝚜𝚎𝚖𝚙𝚛𝚎 𝚗𝚞𝚖 𝚙𝚕𝚊𝚗𝚎𝚝𝚊 𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚜𝚎 𝚎𝚗𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚝𝚛𝚊 𝚕𝚘𝚝𝚊𝚍𝚘 𝚎 𝚍𝚘𝚝𝚊𝚍𝚘 𝚍𝚎 𝚛𝚎𝚌𝚞𝚛𝚜𝚘𝚜 𝚕𝚒𝚖𝚒𝚝𝚊𝚍𝚘𝚜? 𝙴 𝚜𝚎𝚛𝚊́ 𝚋𝚘𝚖 𝚟𝚒𝚟𝚎𝚛 𝚙𝚎𝚛𝚙𝚎𝚝𝚞𝚊𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚎? 𝙹𝚊́ 𝚍𝚒𝚣𝚒𝚊 𝙵𝚎𝚛𝚗𝚊𝚗𝚍𝚘 𝙿𝚎𝚜𝚜𝚘𝚊 𝚚𝚞𝚎 "𝚝𝚞𝚍𝚘 𝚚𝚞𝚊𝚗𝚝𝚘 𝚟𝚒𝚟𝚎, 𝚟𝚒𝚟𝚎 𝚙𝚘𝚛𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚖𝚞𝚍𝚊, 𝚖𝚞𝚍𝚊 𝚙𝚘𝚛𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚙𝚊𝚜𝚜𝚊; 𝚎, 𝚙𝚘𝚛𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚙𝚊𝚜𝚜𝚊, 𝚖𝚘𝚛𝚛𝚎. 𝚃𝚞𝚍𝚘 𝚚𝚞𝚊𝚗𝚝𝚘 𝚟𝚒𝚟𝚎 𝚙𝚎𝚛𝚙𝚎𝚝𝚞𝚊𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚎 - 𝚜𝚎 𝚝𝚘𝚛𝚗𝚊 𝚘𝚞𝚝𝚛𝚊 𝚌𝚘𝚒𝚜𝚊, 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚜𝚝𝚊𝚗𝚝𝚎𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚎 𝚜𝚎 𝚗𝚎𝚐𝚊, 𝚜𝚎 𝚏𝚞𝚛𝚝𝚊 𝚊̀ 𝚟𝚒𝚍𝚊".
𝚂𝚘𝚏𝚘𝚌𝚕𝚎𝚝𝚘 𝚊𝚌𝚛𝚎𝚜𝚌𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚊 𝚚𝚞𝚎 "𝚊 𝚒𝚖𝚘𝚛𝚝𝚊𝚕𝚒𝚍𝚊𝚍𝚎 𝚎́ 𝚊 𝚊𝚛𝚝𝚎 𝚍𝚎 𝚜𝚎 𝚖𝚘𝚛𝚛𝚎𝚛 𝚎𝚖 𝚝𝚎𝚖𝚙𝚘". 𝙰𝚝𝚎́ 𝚕𝚊́, 𝚊𝚝𝚎́ 𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚊 𝚖𝚘𝚛𝚝𝚎 𝚗𝚘𝚜 𝚕𝚎𝚟𝚎, 𝚒𝚖𝚙𝚘𝚛𝚝𝚊𝚗𝚝𝚎 𝚎́ 𝚟𝚎𝚛 𝚊 𝚟𝚒𝚍𝚊 𝚌𝚘𝚖𝚘 𝚞𝚖𝚊 𝚍𝚊́𝚍𝚒𝚟𝚊, 𝚌𝚘𝚖𝚘 𝚞𝚖 𝚍𝚘𝚖 𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚍𝚎𝚟𝚎 𝚜𝚎𝚛 𝚋𝚎𝚖 𝚞𝚝𝚒𝚕𝚒𝚣𝚊𝚍𝚘 𝚎 𝚌𝚞𝚓𝚊 𝚙𝚛𝚎𝚌𝚒𝚘𝚜𝚒𝚍𝚊𝚍𝚎 𝚍𝚎𝚌𝚘𝚛𝚛𝚎 𝚎𝚖 𝚐𝚛𝚊𝚗𝚍𝚎 𝚙𝚊𝚛𝚝𝚎 𝚍𝚘 𝚜𝚎𝚞 𝚌𝚊𝚛𝚊́𝚌𝚝𝚎𝚛 𝚏𝚒𝚗𝚒𝚝𝚘. "𝙽𝚊̃𝚘 𝚎́ 𝚒𝚖𝚘𝚛𝚝𝚊𝚕, 𝚙𝚘𝚜𝚝𝚘 𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚎́ 𝚌𝚑𝚊𝚖𝚊, 𝚖𝚊𝚜 𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚜𝚎𝚓𝚊 𝚒𝚗𝚏𝚒𝚗𝚒𝚝𝚊 𝚎𝚗𝚚𝚞𝚊𝚗𝚝𝚘 𝚍𝚞𝚛𝚎." (𝚅𝚒𝚗𝚒́𝚌𝚒𝚞𝚜 𝚍𝚎 𝙼𝚘𝚛𝚊𝚎𝚜)
IN "DIÁRIO DE NOTÍCIAS" -29/11/22
.
Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário