.
Requiem pela Justiça
É certo que, para além do mediatismo de
alguns casos, aptos a transformar qualquer cidadão num juiz de caserna,
ninguém se preocupa realmente com a Justiça, parente pobre de outros
pilares do Estado.
Com leis más e funcionários bons ainda é possível governar. Mas com funcionários maus as melhores leis não servem para nada”- Otto Von Bismarck
(𝓐𝓸 𝓯𝓲𝓶 𝓭𝓮 𝓿𝓲𝓷𝓽𝓮 𝓪𝓷𝓸𝓼 𝓭𝓮 𝓹𝓻𝓸𝓯𝓲𝓼𝓼𝓪̃𝓸, 𝓳𝓪́ 𝓶𝓮 𝓮𝔁𝓬𝓮𝓭𝓲 𝓪𝓵𝓰𝓾𝓶𝓪𝓼 𝓿𝓮𝔃𝓮𝓼 𝓮 𝓳𝓪́ 𝓪𝓽𝓾𝓻𝓮𝓲 𝓮𝔁𝓬𝓮𝓼𝓼𝓸𝓼 𝓭𝓮 𝓽𝓮𝓻𝓬𝓮𝓲𝓻𝓸𝓼 𝓹𝓸𝓻𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓽𝓮𝓷𝓱𝓸 𝓼𝓮𝓶𝓹𝓻𝓮 𝓹𝓻𝓮𝓼𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓼𝓸𝓶𝓸𝓼 𝓽𝓸𝓭𝓸𝓼 𝓹𝓮𝓼𝓼𝓸𝓪𝓼. 𝓒𝓸𝓷𝓬𝓸𝓻𝓭𝓸 𝓬𝓸𝓶 𝓪𝓵𝓰𝓾𝓶𝓪𝓼 𝓭𝓮𝓬𝓲𝓼𝓸̃𝓮𝓼 𝓮 𝓭𝓲𝓼𝓬𝓸𝓻𝓭𝓸 𝓭𝓮 𝓸𝓾𝓽𝓻𝓪𝓼 𝓮 𝓽𝓪𝓵 𝓷𝓾𝓷𝓬𝓪 𝓶𝓮 𝓯𝓮𝔃 𝓽𝓮𝓻 𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓸𝓼 𝓻𝓮𝓼𝓹𝓮𝓲𝓽𝓸 𝓹𝓸𝓻 𝓺𝓾𝓮𝓶 𝓳𝓾𝓵𝓰𝓪 𝓬𝓸𝓶 𝓱𝓸𝓷𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓲𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓮 𝓲𝓷𝓽𝓮𝓵𝓮𝓬𝓽𝓾𝓪𝓵.
𝓔𝓼𝓬𝓻𝓮𝓿𝓸 𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓮 𝓽𝓮𝔁𝓽𝓸 𝓪𝓹𝓸́𝓼 𝓪 𝓶𝓪𝓲𝓼 𝓲𝓷𝓼𝓸́𝓵𝓲𝓽𝓪 𝓮𝔁𝓹𝓮𝓻𝓲𝓮̂𝓷𝓬𝓲𝓪 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓽𝓲𝓿𝓮 𝓷𝓸 𝓙𝓾𝓲́𝔃𝓸 𝓭𝓸 𝓣𝓻𝓪𝓫𝓪𝓵𝓱𝓸 𝓭𝓮 𝓛𝓲𝓼𝓫𝓸𝓪 𝓮𝓶 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓾𝓶𝓪 𝓯𝓾𝓷𝓬𝓲𝓸𝓷𝓪́𝓻𝓲𝓪 𝓿𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓲𝓭𝓪 𝓭𝓮 𝓫𝓮𝓬𝓪, 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓼𝓮 𝓭𝓲𝔃 𝓳𝓾𝓲𝔃, 𝓹𝓻𝓮𝓽𝓮𝓷𝓭𝓮𝓾 𝓸𝓫𝓻𝓲𝓰𝓪𝓻 𝓭𝓸𝓲𝓼 𝓪𝓭𝓿𝓸𝓰𝓪𝓭𝓸𝓼 𝓮 𝓾𝓶𝓪 𝓯𝓾𝓷𝓬𝓲𝓸𝓷𝓪́𝓻𝓲𝓪 𝓪 𝓷𝓪̃𝓸 𝓬𝓸𝓶𝓮𝓻𝓮𝓶, 𝓷𝓪̃𝓸 𝓫𝓮𝓫𝓮𝓻𝓮𝓶 𝓪́𝓰𝓾𝓪 𝓸𝓾 𝓷𝓪̃𝓸 𝓲𝓻𝓮𝓶 𝓪̀ 𝓬𝓪𝓼𝓪 𝓭𝓮 𝓫𝓪𝓷𝓱𝓸, 𝓭𝓾𝓻𝓪𝓷𝓽𝓮 𝓬𝓲𝓷𝓬𝓸 𝓱𝓸𝓻𝓪𝓼, 𝓽𝓮𝓷𝓭𝓸 𝓪𝓫𝓪𝓷𝓭𝓸𝓷𝓪𝓭𝓸 𝓪 𝓼𝓪𝓵𝓪 𝓪𝓸𝓼 𝓰𝓻𝓲𝓽𝓸𝓼, 𝓪𝓹𝓸́𝓼 𝓷𝓸𝓼 𝓽𝓮𝓻 𝓸𝓻𝓭𝓮𝓷𝓪𝓭𝓸 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓯𝓲𝔃𝓮́𝓼𝓼𝓮𝓶𝓸𝓼 𝓸 𝓽𝓻𝓪𝓫𝓪𝓵𝓱𝓸 𝓭𝓮𝓵𝓪 𝓮 𝓹𝓮𝓻𝓪𝓷𝓽𝓮 𝓪 𝓶𝓮𝓻𝓪 𝓪𝓵𝓾𝓼𝓪̃𝓸 𝓪 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓭𝓮𝓿𝓲́𝓪𝓶𝓸𝓼 𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓪𝓻 𝓾𝓶 𝓹𝓸𝓾𝓬𝓸. 𝓞 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓺𝓾𝓮𝓻 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓪𝓵𝓲 𝓼𝓮 𝓽𝓮𝓷𝓱𝓪 𝓹𝓪𝓼𝓼𝓪𝓭𝓸, 𝓲𝓷𝓬𝓵𝓾𝓲𝓷𝓭𝓸 𝓪 𝓵𝓲𝓷𝓰𝓾𝓪𝓰𝓮𝓶 𝓭𝓮𝓼𝓫𝓻𝓪𝓰𝓪𝓭𝓪 𝓾𝓼𝓪𝓭𝓪 𝓹𝓮𝓵𝓪 𝓶𝓮𝓼𝓶𝓪 𝓹𝓸𝓭𝓮 𝓽𝓮𝓻 𝓸𝓬𝓸𝓻𝓻𝓲𝓭𝓸 𝓷𝓾𝓶 𝓣𝓻𝓲𝓫𝓾𝓷𝓪𝓵 𝓶𝓪𝓼 𝓷𝓪𝓭𝓪 𝓽𝓮𝓶 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓿𝓮𝓻 𝓬𝓸𝓶 𝓙𝓾𝓼𝓽𝓲𝓬̧𝓪. 𝓔 𝓲𝓼𝓽𝓸 𝓽𝓮𝓶 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓼𝓮𝓻 𝓭𝓲𝓽𝓸. 𝓔 𝓮𝓼𝓬𝓻𝓲𝓽𝓸. 𝓣𝓪𝓷𝓽𝓪𝓼 𝓿𝓮𝔃𝓮𝓼 𝓺𝓾𝓪𝓷𝓽𝓪𝓼 𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓮𝓼 𝓬𝓸𝓶𝓹𝓸𝓻𝓽𝓪𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓸𝓼 𝓼𝓮 𝓹𝓮𝓻𝓹𝓮𝓽𝓾𝓪𝓻𝓮𝓶.)
𝓐 𝓮𝓼𝓶𝓪𝓰𝓪𝓭𝓸𝓻𝓪 𝓶𝓪𝓲𝓸𝓻𝓲𝓪 𝓭𝓸𝓼 𝓬𝓲𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓪̃𝓸𝓼 𝓹𝓻𝓮𝓯𝓮𝓻𝓮 𝓶𝓪𝓷𝓽𝓮𝓻 𝓾𝓶𝓪 𝓪𝓽𝓲𝓽𝓾𝓭𝓮 𝓭𝓮 𝓹𝓮𝓻𝓶𝓪𝓷𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮 𝓶𝓪𝓼 𝓷𝓪̃𝓸 𝓲𝓷𝓽𝓮𝓲𝓻𝓪𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮 𝓯𝓾𝓷𝓭𝓪𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓪𝓭𝓪 𝓼𝓾𝓼𝓹𝓮𝓲𝓽𝓪 𝓼𝓸𝓫𝓻𝓮 𝓸𝓼 𝓽𝓻𝓲𝓫𝓾𝓷𝓪𝓲𝓼 (𝓮, 𝓳𝓪́ 𝓪𝓰𝓸𝓻𝓪, 𝓼𝓸𝓫𝓻𝓮 𝓸𝓼 𝓪𝓭𝓿𝓸𝓰𝓪𝓭𝓸𝓼 𝓮𝓶 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓬𝓻𝓮𝓽𝓸) 𝓭𝓸 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓹𝓮𝓻𝓬𝓮𝓫𝓮𝓻 𝓸 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓻𝓮𝓪𝓵𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮 𝓪𝓵𝓲 𝓼𝓮 𝓹𝓪𝓼𝓼𝓪. 𝓔́ 𝓬𝓮𝓻𝓽𝓸 𝓺𝓾𝓮, 𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓪 𝓪𝓵𝓮́𝓶 𝓭𝓸 𝓶𝓮𝓭𝓲𝓪𝓽𝓲𝓼𝓶𝓸 𝓭𝓮 𝓪𝓵𝓰𝓾𝓷𝓼 𝓬𝓪𝓼𝓸𝓼, 𝓪𝓹𝓽𝓸𝓼 𝓪 𝓽𝓻𝓪𝓷𝓼𝓯𝓸𝓻𝓶𝓪𝓻 𝓺𝓾𝓪𝓵𝓺𝓾𝓮𝓻 𝓬𝓲𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓪̃𝓸 𝓷𝓾𝓶 𝓳𝓾𝓲𝔃 𝓭𝓮 𝓬𝓪𝓼𝓮𝓻𝓷𝓪, 𝓷𝓲𝓷𝓰𝓾𝓮́𝓶 𝓼𝓮 𝓹𝓻𝓮𝓸𝓬𝓾𝓹𝓪 𝓻𝓮𝓪𝓵𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮 𝓬𝓸𝓶 𝓪 𝓙𝓾𝓼𝓽𝓲𝓬̧𝓪, 𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮 𝓹𝓸𝓫𝓻𝓮 𝓭𝓮 𝓸𝓾𝓽𝓻𝓸𝓼 𝓹𝓲𝓵𝓪𝓻𝓮𝓼 𝓭𝓸 𝓔𝓼𝓽𝓪𝓭𝓸.
𝓞 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓪 𝓶𝓪𝓲𝓸𝓻 𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓽𝓮 𝓭𝓪𝓼 𝓹𝓮𝓼𝓼𝓸𝓪𝓼 𝓭𝓮𝓼𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓱𝓮𝓬𝓮 𝓮́ 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓽𝓪𝓶𝓫𝓮́𝓶 𝓷𝓪 𝓙𝓾𝓼𝓽𝓲𝓬̧𝓪, 𝓿𝓲𝓿𝓮𝓶𝓸𝓼, 𝓱𝓪́ 𝓶𝓾𝓲𝓽𝓸, 𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓪 𝓪 𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓪𝓽𝓲́𝓼𝓽𝓲𝓬𝓪, 𝓻𝓮𝓭𝓾𝔃𝓲𝓷𝓭𝓸 𝓽𝓾𝓭𝓸 𝓪 𝓷𝓾́𝓶𝓮𝓻𝓸𝓼 𝓷𝓾𝓶𝓪 𝓯𝓸𝓵𝓱𝓪 𝓭𝓮 𝓮𝔁𝓬𝓮𝓵𝓵. 𝓞 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓹𝓪𝓼𝓼𝓸𝓾 𝓪 𝓲𝓷𝓽𝓮𝓻𝓮𝓼𝓼𝓪𝓻 𝓷𝓪̃𝓸 𝓮́ 𝓪 𝓼𝓾𝓫𝓼𝓽𝓪̂𝓷𝓬𝓲𝓪 𝓶𝓪𝓼 𝓪 𝓯𝓸𝓻𝓶𝓪, 𝓸 𝓻𝓮𝓼𝓾𝓵𝓽𝓪𝓭𝓸 𝓯𝓲𝓷𝓪𝓵 𝓷𝓪̃𝓸 𝓲𝓶𝓹𝓸𝓻𝓽𝓪 𝓸𝓼 𝓶𝓮𝓲𝓸𝓼 𝓾𝓼𝓪𝓭𝓸𝓼, 𝓸 𝓵𝓾𝓰𝓪𝓻 𝓷𝓾𝓶 𝓻𝓪𝓷𝓴𝓲𝓷𝓰 𝓺𝓾𝓪𝓵𝓺𝓾𝓮𝓻 𝓬𝓾𝓳𝓪𝓼 𝓻𝓮𝓰𝓻𝓪𝓼 𝓷𝓲𝓷𝓰𝓾𝓮́𝓶 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓽𝓻𝓸𝓵𝓪.
𝓝𝓸 𝓶𝓮𝓲𝓸 𝓭𝓲𝓼𝓽𝓸 𝓮 𝓶𝓾𝓲𝓽𝓸 𝓿𝓮𝔃𝓮𝓼 𝓬𝓸𝓶 𝓪𝓹𝓵𝓪𝓾𝓼𝓸 𝓹𝓾́𝓫𝓵𝓲𝓬𝓸, 𝓸𝓼 𝓳𝓾𝓲́𝔃𝓮𝓼 𝓼𝓪̃𝓸 𝓲𝓷𝓼𝓽𝓪𝓭𝓸𝓼 𝓪 𝓶𝓪𝓽𝓪𝓻 𝓹𝓻𝓸𝓬𝓮𝓼𝓼𝓸𝓼, 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓼𝓲𝓼𝓽𝓲𝓷𝓭𝓸 𝓪 𝓼𝓾𝓪 𝓪𝓿𝓪𝓵𝓲𝓪𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸 𝓷𝓾𝓶𝓪 𝓶𝓮́𝓽𝓻𝓲𝓬𝓪 𝓭𝓮 𝓹𝓻𝓸𝓬𝓮𝓼𝓼𝓸𝓼 𝓭𝓮𝓼𝓹𝓪𝓬𝓱𝓪𝓭𝓸𝓼 (𝓷𝓪̃𝓸 𝓲𝓷𝓽𝓮𝓻𝓮𝓼𝓼𝓪 𝓬𝓸𝓶𝓸, 𝓷𝓮𝓶 𝓹𝓸𝓻𝓺𝓾𝓮̂…) 𝓮 𝓸𝓼 𝓪𝓭𝓿𝓸𝓰𝓪𝓭𝓸𝓼 𝓼𝓪̃𝓸 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓽𝓲𝓷𝓾𝓪𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮 𝓭𝓮𝓼𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓼𝓲𝓭𝓮𝓻𝓪𝓭𝓸𝓼, 𝓫𝓪𝓼𝓽𝓪𝓼 𝓿𝓮𝔃𝓮𝓼 𝓹𝓸𝓻𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓼𝓮 𝓵𝓲𝓶𝓲𝓽𝓪𝓶 𝓪 𝓭𝓮𝓯𝓮𝓷𝓭𝓮𝓻 𝓸 𝓲𝓷𝓽𝓮𝓻𝓮𝓼𝓼𝓮 𝓭𝓸𝓼 𝓼𝓮𝓾𝓼 𝓬𝓵𝓲𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮𝓼 𝓮, 𝓬𝓸𝓶𝓸 𝓽𝓪𝓵, 𝓼𝓪̃𝓸 𝓿𝓲𝓼𝓽𝓸𝓼 𝓬𝓸𝓶𝓸 𝓾𝓶 𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓸𝓻𝓿𝓸.
𝓝𝓾𝓷𝓬𝓪 𝓮́ 𝓭𝓮𝓶𝓪𝓲𝓼 𝓻𝓮𝓪𝓵𝓬̧𝓪𝓻 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓪 𝓬𝓾𝓵𝓹𝓪 𝓭𝓸 𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓪𝓭𝓸 𝓪 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓲𝓼𝓽𝓸 𝓬𝓱𝓮𝓰𝓸𝓾 𝓮́ 𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓽𝓲𝓵𝓱𝓪𝓭𝓪 𝓬𝓸𝓶 𝓾𝓶𝓪 𝓞𝓻𝓭𝓮𝓶 𝓭𝓸𝓼 𝓐𝓭𝓿𝓸𝓰𝓪𝓭𝓸𝓼 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓷𝓾𝓷𝓬𝓪 𝓯𝓸𝓲 𝓽𝓪̃𝓸 𝓲𝓷𝓸𝓹𝓮𝓻𝓪𝓷𝓽𝓮, 𝓺𝓾𝓮𝓻 𝓷𝓪 𝓭𝓮𝓯𝓮𝓼𝓪 𝓭𝓸𝓼 𝓼𝓮𝓾𝓼 𝓻𝓮𝓹𝓻𝓮𝓼𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓪𝓭𝓸𝓼, 𝓺𝓾𝓮𝓻 𝓷𝓪 𝓭𝓸𝓼 𝓭𝓲𝓻𝓮𝓲𝓽𝓸𝓼 𝓭𝓸𝓼 𝓬𝓲𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓪̃𝓸𝓼. 𝓟𝓪𝓻𝓪 𝓪𝓵𝓮́𝓶 𝓭𝓮 𝓽𝓮𝓻𝓮𝓶 𝓼𝓲𝓭𝓸 𝓪 𝓾́𝓷𝓲𝓬𝓪 𝓬𝓵𝓪𝓼𝓼𝓮 𝓹𝓻𝓸𝓯𝓲𝓼𝓼𝓲𝓸𝓷𝓪𝓵 𝓼𝓮𝓶 𝓺𝓾𝓪𝓵𝓺𝓾𝓮𝓻 𝓪𝓹𝓸𝓲𝓸 𝓮𝓶 𝓮́𝓹𝓸𝓬𝓪 𝓭𝓮 𝓒𝓸𝓿𝓲𝓭, 𝓸𝓼 𝓪𝓭𝓿𝓸𝓰𝓪𝓭𝓸𝓼 𝓱𝓪𝓫𝓲𝓽𝓾𝓪𝓻𝓪𝓶-𝓼𝓮 (𝓮 𝓳𝓾𝓼𝓽𝓲𝓯𝓲𝓬𝓪𝓭𝓪𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮) 𝓪 𝓸𝓵𝓱𝓪𝓻 𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓪 𝓪 𝓼𝓾𝓪 𝓞𝓻𝓭𝓮𝓶 𝓬𝓸𝓶𝓸 𝓾𝓶 𝓪𝓰𝓵𝓸𝓶𝓮𝓻𝓪𝓭𝓸 𝓭𝓮 𝓹𝓮𝓼𝓼𝓸𝓪𝓼 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓼𝓮 𝓬𝓪𝓷𝓭𝓲𝓭𝓪𝓽𝓪 𝓹𝓸𝓻 𝓶𝓸𝓽𝓲𝓿𝓸𝓼 𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓻𝓪𝓷𝓱𝓸𝓼 𝓪𝓸 𝓮𝔁𝓮𝓻𝓬𝓲́𝓬𝓲𝓸 𝓭𝓸 𝓬𝓪𝓻𝓰𝓸, 𝓲𝓷𝓬𝓵𝓾𝓲𝓷𝓭𝓸 𝓪𝓳𝓾𝓼𝓽𝓮𝓼 𝓭𝓮 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓽𝓪𝓼 𝓹𝓮𝓼𝓼𝓸𝓪𝓲𝓼, 𝓮 𝓺𝓾𝓮, 𝓷𝓪 𝓹𝓻𝓪́𝓽𝓲𝓬𝓪, 𝓼𝓮 𝓷𝓪𝓭𝓪 𝓯𝓲𝔃𝓮𝓻𝓮𝓶 𝓳𝓪́ 𝓷𝓪̃𝓸 𝓮́ 𝓶𝓪𝓾.
𝓔𝓷𝓽𝓮𝓷𝓭𝓪𝓶𝓸-𝓷𝓸𝓼: 𝓪 𝓙𝓾𝓼𝓽𝓲𝓬̧𝓪 𝓮́ 𝓾𝓶 𝓭𝓸𝓼 𝓹𝓲𝓵𝓪𝓻𝓮𝓼 𝓭𝓸 𝓔𝓼𝓽𝓪𝓭𝓸 𝓭𝓮 𝓓𝓲𝓻𝓮𝓲𝓽𝓸, 𝓷𝓪̃𝓸 𝓸𝓫𝓼𝓽𝓪𝓷𝓽𝓮 𝓪 𝓶𝓪𝓲𝓸𝓻 𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓽𝓮 𝓭𝓪𝓼 𝓹𝓮𝓼𝓼𝓸𝓪𝓼 𝓭𝓲𝓼𝓼𝓸 𝓼𝓸́ 𝓼𝓮 𝓪𝓹𝓮𝓻𝓬𝓮𝓫𝓮𝓻 𝓺𝓾𝓪𝓷𝓭𝓸 𝓪 𝓶𝓮𝓼𝓶𝓪 𝓵𝓱𝓮 𝓯𝓪𝓵𝓱𝓪. 𝓔 𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮𝓷𝓭𝓪𝓶𝓸-𝓷𝓸𝓼 𝓽𝓪𝓶𝓫𝓮́𝓶: 𝓾𝓶 𝓳𝓾𝓲𝔃 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓼𝓸́ 𝓼𝓮 𝓹𝓻𝓮𝓸𝓬𝓾𝓹𝓪 𝓮𝓶 𝓳𝓾𝓵𝓰𝓪𝓻 𝓻𝓪́𝓹𝓲𝓭𝓸 𝓷𝓪̃𝓸 𝓱𝓸𝓷𝓻𝓪 𝓪 𝓫𝓮𝓬𝓪 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓮𝓷𝓿𝓮𝓻𝓰𝓪 𝓹𝓸𝓻𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓪 𝓬𝓮𝓵𝓮𝓻𝓲𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓮 𝓹𝓻𝓸𝓬𝓮𝓼𝓼𝓾𝓪𝓵 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓽𝓸𝓭𝓸𝓼 𝓺𝓾𝓮𝓻𝓮𝓶𝓸𝓼 𝓷𝓪̃𝓸 𝓼𝓮 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓯𝓾𝓷𝓭𝓮 𝓬𝓸𝓶 𝓪 𝓮𝔁𝓬𝓲𝓽𝓪𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓶𝓾𝓲𝓽𝓸𝓼 𝓭𝓮𝓶𝓸𝓷𝓼𝓽𝓻𝓪𝓶 𝓮𝓶 𝓭𝓮𝓼𝓹𝓪𝓬𝓱𝓪𝓻 𝓪 𝓽𝓸𝓭𝓸 𝓸 𝓽𝓻𝓪𝓷𝓼𝓮, 𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓪 𝓬𝓸𝓶 𝓽𝓪𝓵 𝓪𝓵𝓶𝓮𝓳𝓪𝓻𝓮𝓶 𝓪 𝓼𝓾𝓪 𝓹𝓻𝓸́𝓹𝓻𝓲𝓪 𝓹𝓻𝓸𝓶𝓸𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸.
𝓟𝓸𝓻 𝓼𝓮𝓾 𝓽𝓾𝓻𝓷𝓸, 𝓾𝓶𝓪 𝓞𝓻𝓭𝓮𝓶 𝓭𝓸𝓼 𝓐𝓭𝓿𝓸𝓰𝓪𝓭𝓸𝓼 𝓺𝓾𝓲𝓮𝓽𝓪, 𝓪𝓯𝓪𝓼𝓽𝓪𝓭𝓪 𝓭𝓸𝓼 𝓐𝓭𝓿𝓸𝓰𝓪𝓭𝓸𝓼 𝓮 𝓭𝓸𝓼 𝓬𝓲𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓪̃𝓸𝓼 𝓮́ 𝓾𝓶𝓪 𝓲𝓷𝓼𝓽𝓲𝓽𝓾𝓲𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸 𝓲𝓷𝓾́𝓽𝓲𝓵, 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓪 𝓷𝓪𝓭𝓪 𝓼𝓮𝓻𝓿𝓮 𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓪 𝓪𝓵𝓮́𝓶 𝓭𝓮 𝓷𝓸𝓼 𝓮𝓷𝓿𝓲𝓪𝓻 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓽𝓪𝓼 𝓭𝓮 𝓪𝓬𝓽𝓲𝓿𝓲𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓮𝓼 𝓭𝓸𝓼 𝓼𝓮𝓾𝓼 𝓶𝓮𝓶𝓫𝓻𝓸𝓼 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓷𝓾𝓷𝓬𝓪 𝓹𝓻𝓮𝓽𝓮𝓷𝓭𝓮𝓶𝓸𝓼 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓮𝔁𝓲𝓼𝓽𝓲𝓼𝓼𝓮𝓶.
𝓝𝓸 𝓯𝓲𝓷𝓪𝓵 𝓭𝓸 𝓭𝓲𝓪, 𝓼𝓮𝓷𝓭𝓸 𝓿𝓮𝓻𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓮 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓼𝓮 𝓹𝓮𝓻𝓭𝓮𝓶 𝓫𝓸𝓷𝓼 𝓙𝓾𝓲́𝔃𝓮𝓼 𝓹𝓸𝓻𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓷𝓪̃𝓸 𝓪𝓬𝓮𝓲𝓽𝓪𝓶 𝓸 𝓳𝓸𝓰𝓸 𝓭𝓪 𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓪𝓽𝓲́𝓼𝓽𝓲𝓬𝓪 𝓬𝓮𝓰𝓪 𝓮 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓶𝓾𝓲𝓽𝓸𝓼 𝓬𝓸𝓶𝓹𝓮𝓽𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮𝓼 𝓪𝓭𝓿𝓸𝓰𝓪𝓭𝓸𝓼 𝓭𝓮𝓼𝓲𝓼𝓽𝓮𝓶 𝓭𝓪 𝓹𝓻𝓸𝓯𝓲𝓼𝓼𝓪̃𝓸 𝓹𝓸𝓻 𝓼𝓮 𝓽𝓮𝓻 𝓽𝓸𝓻𝓷𝓪𝓭𝓸 𝓲𝓷𝓼𝓾𝓼𝓽𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓪́𝓿𝓮𝓵 𝓪 𝓿𝓪́𝓻𝓲𝓸𝓼 𝓷𝓲́𝓿𝓮𝓲𝓼, 𝓺𝓾𝓮𝓶 𝓿𝓮𝓻𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓮𝓲𝓻𝓪𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮 𝓹𝓮𝓻𝓭𝓮 𝓮́ 𝓸 𝓬𝓲𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓪̃𝓸. 𝓤𝓶 𝓹𝓪𝓲́𝓼 𝓼𝓮𝓶 𝓙𝓾𝓼𝓽𝓲𝓬̧𝓪 𝓷𝓪̃𝓸 𝓮́, 𝓼𝓮𝓺𝓾𝓮𝓻, 𝓾𝓶𝓪 𝓷𝓪𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸 𝓶𝓪𝓼 𝓪𝓹𝓮𝓷𝓪𝓼 𝓾𝓶 𝓼𝓲́𝓽𝓲𝓸 𝓶𝓪𝓵 𝓯𝓻𝓮𝓺𝓾𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓪𝓭𝓸. 𝓔, 𝓬𝓸𝓶𝓸 𝓽𝓸𝓭𝓪 𝓪 𝓰𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮 𝓼𝓪𝓫𝓮, 𝓮́ 𝓷𝓸𝓼 𝓵𝓸𝓬𝓪𝓲𝓼 𝓭𝓾𝓿𝓲𝓭𝓸𝓼𝓸𝓼 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓸𝓼 𝓭𝓲𝓻𝓮𝓲𝓽𝓸𝓼 𝓼𝓪̃𝓸 𝓶𝓪𝓲𝓼 𝓪𝓽𝓻𝓸𝓹𝓮𝓵𝓪𝓭𝓸𝓼.
𝓟𝓸𝓭𝓮𝓶𝓸𝓼 𝓪𝓬𝓱𝓪𝓻 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓷𝓾𝓷𝓬𝓪 𝓼𝓮𝓻𝓪́ 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓷𝓸𝓼𝓬𝓸 𝓪𝓽𝓮́ 𝓪𝓸 𝓭𝓲𝓪 𝓮𝓶 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓸 𝓼𝓮𝓳𝓪. 𝓔, 𝓷𝓮𝓼𝓼𝓮 𝓭𝓲𝓪, 𝓽𝓾𝓭𝓸 𝓸 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓸 𝓬𝓲𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓪̃𝓸 𝓭𝓮𝓿𝓮 𝓮𝔁𝓲𝓰𝓲𝓻 𝓼𝓪̃𝓸 𝓙𝓾𝓲́𝔃𝓮𝓼 𝓪 𝓼𝓮́𝓻𝓲𝓸 𝓮 𝓐𝓭𝓿𝓸𝓰𝓪𝓭𝓸𝓼 𝓼𝓮𝓶 𝓶𝓮𝓭𝓸, 𝓮𝓶 𝓺𝓾𝓪𝓵𝓺𝓾𝓮𝓻 𝓭𝓸𝓼 𝓬𝓪𝓼𝓸𝓼 𝓮 𝓯𝓻𝓾𝓽𝓸 𝓭𝓸 𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓪𝓭𝓸 𝓪 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓬𝓱𝓮𝓰𝓪́𝓶𝓸𝓼, 𝓮𝓼𝓹𝓮́𝓬𝓲𝓮𝓼 𝓮𝓶 𝓿𝓲𝓪𝓼 𝓭𝓮 𝓮𝔁𝓽𝓲𝓷𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓶𝓮𝓻𝓮𝓬𝓮𝓶 𝓪𝓹𝓸𝓲𝓸. 𝓢𝓮 𝓷𝓪̃𝓸 𝓭𝓪 𝓼𝓾𝓪 𝓞𝓻𝓭𝓮𝓶 𝓮, 𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓸𝓼 𝓪𝓲𝓷𝓭𝓪, 𝓭𝓸 𝓖𝓸𝓿𝓮𝓻𝓷𝓸, 𝓹𝓮𝓵𝓸 𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓸𝓼 𝓭𝓪𝓼 𝓹𝓮𝓼𝓼𝓸𝓪𝓼 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓹𝓮𝓭𝓮𝓶 𝓙𝓾𝓼𝓽𝓲𝓬̧𝓪. 𝓔𝓼𝓽𝓮 𝓮́ 𝓸 𝓶𝓮𝓾 𝓻𝓮𝓹𝓽𝓸.
* Advogada
IN "O JORNAL ECONÓMICO" - 11/05/22
.
(𝓐𝓸 𝓯𝓲𝓶 𝓭𝓮 𝓿𝓲𝓷𝓽𝓮 𝓪𝓷𝓸𝓼 𝓭𝓮 𝓹𝓻𝓸𝓯𝓲𝓼𝓼𝓪̃𝓸, 𝓳𝓪́ 𝓶𝓮 𝓮𝔁𝓬𝓮𝓭𝓲 𝓪𝓵𝓰𝓾𝓶𝓪𝓼 𝓿𝓮𝔃𝓮𝓼 𝓮 𝓳𝓪́ 𝓪𝓽𝓾𝓻𝓮𝓲 𝓮𝔁𝓬𝓮𝓼𝓼𝓸𝓼 𝓭𝓮 𝓽𝓮𝓻𝓬𝓮𝓲𝓻𝓸𝓼 𝓹𝓸𝓻𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓽𝓮𝓷𝓱𝓸 𝓼𝓮𝓶𝓹𝓻𝓮 𝓹𝓻𝓮𝓼𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓼𝓸𝓶𝓸𝓼 𝓽𝓸𝓭𝓸𝓼 𝓹𝓮𝓼𝓼𝓸𝓪𝓼. 𝓒𝓸𝓷𝓬𝓸𝓻𝓭𝓸 𝓬𝓸𝓶 𝓪𝓵𝓰𝓾𝓶𝓪𝓼 𝓭𝓮𝓬𝓲𝓼𝓸̃𝓮𝓼 𝓮 𝓭𝓲𝓼𝓬𝓸𝓻𝓭𝓸 𝓭𝓮 𝓸𝓾𝓽𝓻𝓪𝓼 𝓮 𝓽𝓪𝓵 𝓷𝓾𝓷𝓬𝓪 𝓶𝓮 𝓯𝓮𝔃 𝓽𝓮𝓻 𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓸𝓼 𝓻𝓮𝓼𝓹𝓮𝓲𝓽𝓸 𝓹𝓸𝓻 𝓺𝓾𝓮𝓶 𝓳𝓾𝓵𝓰𝓪 𝓬𝓸𝓶 𝓱𝓸𝓷𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓲𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓮 𝓲𝓷𝓽𝓮𝓵𝓮𝓬𝓽𝓾𝓪𝓵.
𝓔𝓼𝓬𝓻𝓮𝓿𝓸 𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓮 𝓽𝓮𝔁𝓽𝓸 𝓪𝓹𝓸́𝓼 𝓪 𝓶𝓪𝓲𝓼 𝓲𝓷𝓼𝓸́𝓵𝓲𝓽𝓪 𝓮𝔁𝓹𝓮𝓻𝓲𝓮̂𝓷𝓬𝓲𝓪 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓽𝓲𝓿𝓮 𝓷𝓸 𝓙𝓾𝓲́𝔃𝓸 𝓭𝓸 𝓣𝓻𝓪𝓫𝓪𝓵𝓱𝓸 𝓭𝓮 𝓛𝓲𝓼𝓫𝓸𝓪 𝓮𝓶 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓾𝓶𝓪 𝓯𝓾𝓷𝓬𝓲𝓸𝓷𝓪́𝓻𝓲𝓪 𝓿𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓲𝓭𝓪 𝓭𝓮 𝓫𝓮𝓬𝓪, 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓼𝓮 𝓭𝓲𝔃 𝓳𝓾𝓲𝔃, 𝓹𝓻𝓮𝓽𝓮𝓷𝓭𝓮𝓾 𝓸𝓫𝓻𝓲𝓰𝓪𝓻 𝓭𝓸𝓲𝓼 𝓪𝓭𝓿𝓸𝓰𝓪𝓭𝓸𝓼 𝓮 𝓾𝓶𝓪 𝓯𝓾𝓷𝓬𝓲𝓸𝓷𝓪́𝓻𝓲𝓪 𝓪 𝓷𝓪̃𝓸 𝓬𝓸𝓶𝓮𝓻𝓮𝓶, 𝓷𝓪̃𝓸 𝓫𝓮𝓫𝓮𝓻𝓮𝓶 𝓪́𝓰𝓾𝓪 𝓸𝓾 𝓷𝓪̃𝓸 𝓲𝓻𝓮𝓶 𝓪̀ 𝓬𝓪𝓼𝓪 𝓭𝓮 𝓫𝓪𝓷𝓱𝓸, 𝓭𝓾𝓻𝓪𝓷𝓽𝓮 𝓬𝓲𝓷𝓬𝓸 𝓱𝓸𝓻𝓪𝓼, 𝓽𝓮𝓷𝓭𝓸 𝓪𝓫𝓪𝓷𝓭𝓸𝓷𝓪𝓭𝓸 𝓪 𝓼𝓪𝓵𝓪 𝓪𝓸𝓼 𝓰𝓻𝓲𝓽𝓸𝓼, 𝓪𝓹𝓸́𝓼 𝓷𝓸𝓼 𝓽𝓮𝓻 𝓸𝓻𝓭𝓮𝓷𝓪𝓭𝓸 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓯𝓲𝔃𝓮́𝓼𝓼𝓮𝓶𝓸𝓼 𝓸 𝓽𝓻𝓪𝓫𝓪𝓵𝓱𝓸 𝓭𝓮𝓵𝓪 𝓮 𝓹𝓮𝓻𝓪𝓷𝓽𝓮 𝓪 𝓶𝓮𝓻𝓪 𝓪𝓵𝓾𝓼𝓪̃𝓸 𝓪 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓭𝓮𝓿𝓲́𝓪𝓶𝓸𝓼 𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓪𝓻 𝓾𝓶 𝓹𝓸𝓾𝓬𝓸. 𝓞 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓺𝓾𝓮𝓻 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓪𝓵𝓲 𝓼𝓮 𝓽𝓮𝓷𝓱𝓪 𝓹𝓪𝓼𝓼𝓪𝓭𝓸, 𝓲𝓷𝓬𝓵𝓾𝓲𝓷𝓭𝓸 𝓪 𝓵𝓲𝓷𝓰𝓾𝓪𝓰𝓮𝓶 𝓭𝓮𝓼𝓫𝓻𝓪𝓰𝓪𝓭𝓪 𝓾𝓼𝓪𝓭𝓪 𝓹𝓮𝓵𝓪 𝓶𝓮𝓼𝓶𝓪 𝓹𝓸𝓭𝓮 𝓽𝓮𝓻 𝓸𝓬𝓸𝓻𝓻𝓲𝓭𝓸 𝓷𝓾𝓶 𝓣𝓻𝓲𝓫𝓾𝓷𝓪𝓵 𝓶𝓪𝓼 𝓷𝓪𝓭𝓪 𝓽𝓮𝓶 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓿𝓮𝓻 𝓬𝓸𝓶 𝓙𝓾𝓼𝓽𝓲𝓬̧𝓪. 𝓔 𝓲𝓼𝓽𝓸 𝓽𝓮𝓶 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓼𝓮𝓻 𝓭𝓲𝓽𝓸. 𝓔 𝓮𝓼𝓬𝓻𝓲𝓽𝓸. 𝓣𝓪𝓷𝓽𝓪𝓼 𝓿𝓮𝔃𝓮𝓼 𝓺𝓾𝓪𝓷𝓽𝓪𝓼 𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓮𝓼 𝓬𝓸𝓶𝓹𝓸𝓻𝓽𝓪𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓸𝓼 𝓼𝓮 𝓹𝓮𝓻𝓹𝓮𝓽𝓾𝓪𝓻𝓮𝓶.)
𝓐 𝓮𝓼𝓶𝓪𝓰𝓪𝓭𝓸𝓻𝓪 𝓶𝓪𝓲𝓸𝓻𝓲𝓪 𝓭𝓸𝓼 𝓬𝓲𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓪̃𝓸𝓼 𝓹𝓻𝓮𝓯𝓮𝓻𝓮 𝓶𝓪𝓷𝓽𝓮𝓻 𝓾𝓶𝓪 𝓪𝓽𝓲𝓽𝓾𝓭𝓮 𝓭𝓮 𝓹𝓮𝓻𝓶𝓪𝓷𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮 𝓶𝓪𝓼 𝓷𝓪̃𝓸 𝓲𝓷𝓽𝓮𝓲𝓻𝓪𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮 𝓯𝓾𝓷𝓭𝓪𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓪𝓭𝓪 𝓼𝓾𝓼𝓹𝓮𝓲𝓽𝓪 𝓼𝓸𝓫𝓻𝓮 𝓸𝓼 𝓽𝓻𝓲𝓫𝓾𝓷𝓪𝓲𝓼 (𝓮, 𝓳𝓪́ 𝓪𝓰𝓸𝓻𝓪, 𝓼𝓸𝓫𝓻𝓮 𝓸𝓼 𝓪𝓭𝓿𝓸𝓰𝓪𝓭𝓸𝓼 𝓮𝓶 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓬𝓻𝓮𝓽𝓸) 𝓭𝓸 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓹𝓮𝓻𝓬𝓮𝓫𝓮𝓻 𝓸 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓻𝓮𝓪𝓵𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮 𝓪𝓵𝓲 𝓼𝓮 𝓹𝓪𝓼𝓼𝓪. 𝓔́ 𝓬𝓮𝓻𝓽𝓸 𝓺𝓾𝓮, 𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓪 𝓪𝓵𝓮́𝓶 𝓭𝓸 𝓶𝓮𝓭𝓲𝓪𝓽𝓲𝓼𝓶𝓸 𝓭𝓮 𝓪𝓵𝓰𝓾𝓷𝓼 𝓬𝓪𝓼𝓸𝓼, 𝓪𝓹𝓽𝓸𝓼 𝓪 𝓽𝓻𝓪𝓷𝓼𝓯𝓸𝓻𝓶𝓪𝓻 𝓺𝓾𝓪𝓵𝓺𝓾𝓮𝓻 𝓬𝓲𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓪̃𝓸 𝓷𝓾𝓶 𝓳𝓾𝓲𝔃 𝓭𝓮 𝓬𝓪𝓼𝓮𝓻𝓷𝓪, 𝓷𝓲𝓷𝓰𝓾𝓮́𝓶 𝓼𝓮 𝓹𝓻𝓮𝓸𝓬𝓾𝓹𝓪 𝓻𝓮𝓪𝓵𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮 𝓬𝓸𝓶 𝓪 𝓙𝓾𝓼𝓽𝓲𝓬̧𝓪, 𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮 𝓹𝓸𝓫𝓻𝓮 𝓭𝓮 𝓸𝓾𝓽𝓻𝓸𝓼 𝓹𝓲𝓵𝓪𝓻𝓮𝓼 𝓭𝓸 𝓔𝓼𝓽𝓪𝓭𝓸.
𝓞 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓪 𝓶𝓪𝓲𝓸𝓻 𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓽𝓮 𝓭𝓪𝓼 𝓹𝓮𝓼𝓼𝓸𝓪𝓼 𝓭𝓮𝓼𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓱𝓮𝓬𝓮 𝓮́ 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓽𝓪𝓶𝓫𝓮́𝓶 𝓷𝓪 𝓙𝓾𝓼𝓽𝓲𝓬̧𝓪, 𝓿𝓲𝓿𝓮𝓶𝓸𝓼, 𝓱𝓪́ 𝓶𝓾𝓲𝓽𝓸, 𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓪 𝓪 𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓪𝓽𝓲́𝓼𝓽𝓲𝓬𝓪, 𝓻𝓮𝓭𝓾𝔃𝓲𝓷𝓭𝓸 𝓽𝓾𝓭𝓸 𝓪 𝓷𝓾́𝓶𝓮𝓻𝓸𝓼 𝓷𝓾𝓶𝓪 𝓯𝓸𝓵𝓱𝓪 𝓭𝓮 𝓮𝔁𝓬𝓮𝓵𝓵. 𝓞 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓹𝓪𝓼𝓼𝓸𝓾 𝓪 𝓲𝓷𝓽𝓮𝓻𝓮𝓼𝓼𝓪𝓻 𝓷𝓪̃𝓸 𝓮́ 𝓪 𝓼𝓾𝓫𝓼𝓽𝓪̂𝓷𝓬𝓲𝓪 𝓶𝓪𝓼 𝓪 𝓯𝓸𝓻𝓶𝓪, 𝓸 𝓻𝓮𝓼𝓾𝓵𝓽𝓪𝓭𝓸 𝓯𝓲𝓷𝓪𝓵 𝓷𝓪̃𝓸 𝓲𝓶𝓹𝓸𝓻𝓽𝓪 𝓸𝓼 𝓶𝓮𝓲𝓸𝓼 𝓾𝓼𝓪𝓭𝓸𝓼, 𝓸 𝓵𝓾𝓰𝓪𝓻 𝓷𝓾𝓶 𝓻𝓪𝓷𝓴𝓲𝓷𝓰 𝓺𝓾𝓪𝓵𝓺𝓾𝓮𝓻 𝓬𝓾𝓳𝓪𝓼 𝓻𝓮𝓰𝓻𝓪𝓼 𝓷𝓲𝓷𝓰𝓾𝓮́𝓶 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓽𝓻𝓸𝓵𝓪.
𝓝𝓸 𝓶𝓮𝓲𝓸 𝓭𝓲𝓼𝓽𝓸 𝓮 𝓶𝓾𝓲𝓽𝓸 𝓿𝓮𝔃𝓮𝓼 𝓬𝓸𝓶 𝓪𝓹𝓵𝓪𝓾𝓼𝓸 𝓹𝓾́𝓫𝓵𝓲𝓬𝓸, 𝓸𝓼 𝓳𝓾𝓲́𝔃𝓮𝓼 𝓼𝓪̃𝓸 𝓲𝓷𝓼𝓽𝓪𝓭𝓸𝓼 𝓪 𝓶𝓪𝓽𝓪𝓻 𝓹𝓻𝓸𝓬𝓮𝓼𝓼𝓸𝓼, 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓼𝓲𝓼𝓽𝓲𝓷𝓭𝓸 𝓪 𝓼𝓾𝓪 𝓪𝓿𝓪𝓵𝓲𝓪𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸 𝓷𝓾𝓶𝓪 𝓶𝓮́𝓽𝓻𝓲𝓬𝓪 𝓭𝓮 𝓹𝓻𝓸𝓬𝓮𝓼𝓼𝓸𝓼 𝓭𝓮𝓼𝓹𝓪𝓬𝓱𝓪𝓭𝓸𝓼 (𝓷𝓪̃𝓸 𝓲𝓷𝓽𝓮𝓻𝓮𝓼𝓼𝓪 𝓬𝓸𝓶𝓸, 𝓷𝓮𝓶 𝓹𝓸𝓻𝓺𝓾𝓮̂…) 𝓮 𝓸𝓼 𝓪𝓭𝓿𝓸𝓰𝓪𝓭𝓸𝓼 𝓼𝓪̃𝓸 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓽𝓲𝓷𝓾𝓪𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮 𝓭𝓮𝓼𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓼𝓲𝓭𝓮𝓻𝓪𝓭𝓸𝓼, 𝓫𝓪𝓼𝓽𝓪𝓼 𝓿𝓮𝔃𝓮𝓼 𝓹𝓸𝓻𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓼𝓮 𝓵𝓲𝓶𝓲𝓽𝓪𝓶 𝓪 𝓭𝓮𝓯𝓮𝓷𝓭𝓮𝓻 𝓸 𝓲𝓷𝓽𝓮𝓻𝓮𝓼𝓼𝓮 𝓭𝓸𝓼 𝓼𝓮𝓾𝓼 𝓬𝓵𝓲𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮𝓼 𝓮, 𝓬𝓸𝓶𝓸 𝓽𝓪𝓵, 𝓼𝓪̃𝓸 𝓿𝓲𝓼𝓽𝓸𝓼 𝓬𝓸𝓶𝓸 𝓾𝓶 𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓸𝓻𝓿𝓸.
𝓝𝓾𝓷𝓬𝓪 𝓮́ 𝓭𝓮𝓶𝓪𝓲𝓼 𝓻𝓮𝓪𝓵𝓬̧𝓪𝓻 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓪 𝓬𝓾𝓵𝓹𝓪 𝓭𝓸 𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓪𝓭𝓸 𝓪 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓲𝓼𝓽𝓸 𝓬𝓱𝓮𝓰𝓸𝓾 𝓮́ 𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓽𝓲𝓵𝓱𝓪𝓭𝓪 𝓬𝓸𝓶 𝓾𝓶𝓪 𝓞𝓻𝓭𝓮𝓶 𝓭𝓸𝓼 𝓐𝓭𝓿𝓸𝓰𝓪𝓭𝓸𝓼 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓷𝓾𝓷𝓬𝓪 𝓯𝓸𝓲 𝓽𝓪̃𝓸 𝓲𝓷𝓸𝓹𝓮𝓻𝓪𝓷𝓽𝓮, 𝓺𝓾𝓮𝓻 𝓷𝓪 𝓭𝓮𝓯𝓮𝓼𝓪 𝓭𝓸𝓼 𝓼𝓮𝓾𝓼 𝓻𝓮𝓹𝓻𝓮𝓼𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓪𝓭𝓸𝓼, 𝓺𝓾𝓮𝓻 𝓷𝓪 𝓭𝓸𝓼 𝓭𝓲𝓻𝓮𝓲𝓽𝓸𝓼 𝓭𝓸𝓼 𝓬𝓲𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓪̃𝓸𝓼. 𝓟𝓪𝓻𝓪 𝓪𝓵𝓮́𝓶 𝓭𝓮 𝓽𝓮𝓻𝓮𝓶 𝓼𝓲𝓭𝓸 𝓪 𝓾́𝓷𝓲𝓬𝓪 𝓬𝓵𝓪𝓼𝓼𝓮 𝓹𝓻𝓸𝓯𝓲𝓼𝓼𝓲𝓸𝓷𝓪𝓵 𝓼𝓮𝓶 𝓺𝓾𝓪𝓵𝓺𝓾𝓮𝓻 𝓪𝓹𝓸𝓲𝓸 𝓮𝓶 𝓮́𝓹𝓸𝓬𝓪 𝓭𝓮 𝓒𝓸𝓿𝓲𝓭, 𝓸𝓼 𝓪𝓭𝓿𝓸𝓰𝓪𝓭𝓸𝓼 𝓱𝓪𝓫𝓲𝓽𝓾𝓪𝓻𝓪𝓶-𝓼𝓮 (𝓮 𝓳𝓾𝓼𝓽𝓲𝓯𝓲𝓬𝓪𝓭𝓪𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮) 𝓪 𝓸𝓵𝓱𝓪𝓻 𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓪 𝓪 𝓼𝓾𝓪 𝓞𝓻𝓭𝓮𝓶 𝓬𝓸𝓶𝓸 𝓾𝓶 𝓪𝓰𝓵𝓸𝓶𝓮𝓻𝓪𝓭𝓸 𝓭𝓮 𝓹𝓮𝓼𝓼𝓸𝓪𝓼 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓼𝓮 𝓬𝓪𝓷𝓭𝓲𝓭𝓪𝓽𝓪 𝓹𝓸𝓻 𝓶𝓸𝓽𝓲𝓿𝓸𝓼 𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓻𝓪𝓷𝓱𝓸𝓼 𝓪𝓸 𝓮𝔁𝓮𝓻𝓬𝓲́𝓬𝓲𝓸 𝓭𝓸 𝓬𝓪𝓻𝓰𝓸, 𝓲𝓷𝓬𝓵𝓾𝓲𝓷𝓭𝓸 𝓪𝓳𝓾𝓼𝓽𝓮𝓼 𝓭𝓮 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓽𝓪𝓼 𝓹𝓮𝓼𝓼𝓸𝓪𝓲𝓼, 𝓮 𝓺𝓾𝓮, 𝓷𝓪 𝓹𝓻𝓪́𝓽𝓲𝓬𝓪, 𝓼𝓮 𝓷𝓪𝓭𝓪 𝓯𝓲𝔃𝓮𝓻𝓮𝓶 𝓳𝓪́ 𝓷𝓪̃𝓸 𝓮́ 𝓶𝓪𝓾.
𝓔𝓷𝓽𝓮𝓷𝓭𝓪𝓶𝓸-𝓷𝓸𝓼: 𝓪 𝓙𝓾𝓼𝓽𝓲𝓬̧𝓪 𝓮́ 𝓾𝓶 𝓭𝓸𝓼 𝓹𝓲𝓵𝓪𝓻𝓮𝓼 𝓭𝓸 𝓔𝓼𝓽𝓪𝓭𝓸 𝓭𝓮 𝓓𝓲𝓻𝓮𝓲𝓽𝓸, 𝓷𝓪̃𝓸 𝓸𝓫𝓼𝓽𝓪𝓷𝓽𝓮 𝓪 𝓶𝓪𝓲𝓸𝓻 𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓽𝓮 𝓭𝓪𝓼 𝓹𝓮𝓼𝓼𝓸𝓪𝓼 𝓭𝓲𝓼𝓼𝓸 𝓼𝓸́ 𝓼𝓮 𝓪𝓹𝓮𝓻𝓬𝓮𝓫𝓮𝓻 𝓺𝓾𝓪𝓷𝓭𝓸 𝓪 𝓶𝓮𝓼𝓶𝓪 𝓵𝓱𝓮 𝓯𝓪𝓵𝓱𝓪. 𝓔 𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮𝓷𝓭𝓪𝓶𝓸-𝓷𝓸𝓼 𝓽𝓪𝓶𝓫𝓮́𝓶: 𝓾𝓶 𝓳𝓾𝓲𝔃 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓼𝓸́ 𝓼𝓮 𝓹𝓻𝓮𝓸𝓬𝓾𝓹𝓪 𝓮𝓶 𝓳𝓾𝓵𝓰𝓪𝓻 𝓻𝓪́𝓹𝓲𝓭𝓸 𝓷𝓪̃𝓸 𝓱𝓸𝓷𝓻𝓪 𝓪 𝓫𝓮𝓬𝓪 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓮𝓷𝓿𝓮𝓻𝓰𝓪 𝓹𝓸𝓻𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓪 𝓬𝓮𝓵𝓮𝓻𝓲𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓮 𝓹𝓻𝓸𝓬𝓮𝓼𝓼𝓾𝓪𝓵 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓽𝓸𝓭𝓸𝓼 𝓺𝓾𝓮𝓻𝓮𝓶𝓸𝓼 𝓷𝓪̃𝓸 𝓼𝓮 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓯𝓾𝓷𝓭𝓮 𝓬𝓸𝓶 𝓪 𝓮𝔁𝓬𝓲𝓽𝓪𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓶𝓾𝓲𝓽𝓸𝓼 𝓭𝓮𝓶𝓸𝓷𝓼𝓽𝓻𝓪𝓶 𝓮𝓶 𝓭𝓮𝓼𝓹𝓪𝓬𝓱𝓪𝓻 𝓪 𝓽𝓸𝓭𝓸 𝓸 𝓽𝓻𝓪𝓷𝓼𝓮, 𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓪 𝓬𝓸𝓶 𝓽𝓪𝓵 𝓪𝓵𝓶𝓮𝓳𝓪𝓻𝓮𝓶 𝓪 𝓼𝓾𝓪 𝓹𝓻𝓸́𝓹𝓻𝓲𝓪 𝓹𝓻𝓸𝓶𝓸𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸.
𝓟𝓸𝓻 𝓼𝓮𝓾 𝓽𝓾𝓻𝓷𝓸, 𝓾𝓶𝓪 𝓞𝓻𝓭𝓮𝓶 𝓭𝓸𝓼 𝓐𝓭𝓿𝓸𝓰𝓪𝓭𝓸𝓼 𝓺𝓾𝓲𝓮𝓽𝓪, 𝓪𝓯𝓪𝓼𝓽𝓪𝓭𝓪 𝓭𝓸𝓼 𝓐𝓭𝓿𝓸𝓰𝓪𝓭𝓸𝓼 𝓮 𝓭𝓸𝓼 𝓬𝓲𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓪̃𝓸𝓼 𝓮́ 𝓾𝓶𝓪 𝓲𝓷𝓼𝓽𝓲𝓽𝓾𝓲𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸 𝓲𝓷𝓾́𝓽𝓲𝓵, 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓪 𝓷𝓪𝓭𝓪 𝓼𝓮𝓻𝓿𝓮 𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓪 𝓪𝓵𝓮́𝓶 𝓭𝓮 𝓷𝓸𝓼 𝓮𝓷𝓿𝓲𝓪𝓻 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓽𝓪𝓼 𝓭𝓮 𝓪𝓬𝓽𝓲𝓿𝓲𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓮𝓼 𝓭𝓸𝓼 𝓼𝓮𝓾𝓼 𝓶𝓮𝓶𝓫𝓻𝓸𝓼 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓷𝓾𝓷𝓬𝓪 𝓹𝓻𝓮𝓽𝓮𝓷𝓭𝓮𝓶𝓸𝓼 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓮𝔁𝓲𝓼𝓽𝓲𝓼𝓼𝓮𝓶.
𝓝𝓸 𝓯𝓲𝓷𝓪𝓵 𝓭𝓸 𝓭𝓲𝓪, 𝓼𝓮𝓷𝓭𝓸 𝓿𝓮𝓻𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓮 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓼𝓮 𝓹𝓮𝓻𝓭𝓮𝓶 𝓫𝓸𝓷𝓼 𝓙𝓾𝓲́𝔃𝓮𝓼 𝓹𝓸𝓻𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓷𝓪̃𝓸 𝓪𝓬𝓮𝓲𝓽𝓪𝓶 𝓸 𝓳𝓸𝓰𝓸 𝓭𝓪 𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓪𝓽𝓲́𝓼𝓽𝓲𝓬𝓪 𝓬𝓮𝓰𝓪 𝓮 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓶𝓾𝓲𝓽𝓸𝓼 𝓬𝓸𝓶𝓹𝓮𝓽𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮𝓼 𝓪𝓭𝓿𝓸𝓰𝓪𝓭𝓸𝓼 𝓭𝓮𝓼𝓲𝓼𝓽𝓮𝓶 𝓭𝓪 𝓹𝓻𝓸𝓯𝓲𝓼𝓼𝓪̃𝓸 𝓹𝓸𝓻 𝓼𝓮 𝓽𝓮𝓻 𝓽𝓸𝓻𝓷𝓪𝓭𝓸 𝓲𝓷𝓼𝓾𝓼𝓽𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓪́𝓿𝓮𝓵 𝓪 𝓿𝓪́𝓻𝓲𝓸𝓼 𝓷𝓲́𝓿𝓮𝓲𝓼, 𝓺𝓾𝓮𝓶 𝓿𝓮𝓻𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓮𝓲𝓻𝓪𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮 𝓹𝓮𝓻𝓭𝓮 𝓮́ 𝓸 𝓬𝓲𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓪̃𝓸. 𝓤𝓶 𝓹𝓪𝓲́𝓼 𝓼𝓮𝓶 𝓙𝓾𝓼𝓽𝓲𝓬̧𝓪 𝓷𝓪̃𝓸 𝓮́, 𝓼𝓮𝓺𝓾𝓮𝓻, 𝓾𝓶𝓪 𝓷𝓪𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸 𝓶𝓪𝓼 𝓪𝓹𝓮𝓷𝓪𝓼 𝓾𝓶 𝓼𝓲́𝓽𝓲𝓸 𝓶𝓪𝓵 𝓯𝓻𝓮𝓺𝓾𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓪𝓭𝓸. 𝓔, 𝓬𝓸𝓶𝓸 𝓽𝓸𝓭𝓪 𝓪 𝓰𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮 𝓼𝓪𝓫𝓮, 𝓮́ 𝓷𝓸𝓼 𝓵𝓸𝓬𝓪𝓲𝓼 𝓭𝓾𝓿𝓲𝓭𝓸𝓼𝓸𝓼 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓸𝓼 𝓭𝓲𝓻𝓮𝓲𝓽𝓸𝓼 𝓼𝓪̃𝓸 𝓶𝓪𝓲𝓼 𝓪𝓽𝓻𝓸𝓹𝓮𝓵𝓪𝓭𝓸𝓼.
𝓟𝓸𝓭𝓮𝓶𝓸𝓼 𝓪𝓬𝓱𝓪𝓻 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓷𝓾𝓷𝓬𝓪 𝓼𝓮𝓻𝓪́ 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓷𝓸𝓼𝓬𝓸 𝓪𝓽𝓮́ 𝓪𝓸 𝓭𝓲𝓪 𝓮𝓶 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓸 𝓼𝓮𝓳𝓪. 𝓔, 𝓷𝓮𝓼𝓼𝓮 𝓭𝓲𝓪, 𝓽𝓾𝓭𝓸 𝓸 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓸 𝓬𝓲𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓪̃𝓸 𝓭𝓮𝓿𝓮 𝓮𝔁𝓲𝓰𝓲𝓻 𝓼𝓪̃𝓸 𝓙𝓾𝓲́𝔃𝓮𝓼 𝓪 𝓼𝓮́𝓻𝓲𝓸 𝓮 𝓐𝓭𝓿𝓸𝓰𝓪𝓭𝓸𝓼 𝓼𝓮𝓶 𝓶𝓮𝓭𝓸, 𝓮𝓶 𝓺𝓾𝓪𝓵𝓺𝓾𝓮𝓻 𝓭𝓸𝓼 𝓬𝓪𝓼𝓸𝓼 𝓮 𝓯𝓻𝓾𝓽𝓸 𝓭𝓸 𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓪𝓭𝓸 𝓪 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓬𝓱𝓮𝓰𝓪́𝓶𝓸𝓼, 𝓮𝓼𝓹𝓮́𝓬𝓲𝓮𝓼 𝓮𝓶 𝓿𝓲𝓪𝓼 𝓭𝓮 𝓮𝔁𝓽𝓲𝓷𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓶𝓮𝓻𝓮𝓬𝓮𝓶 𝓪𝓹𝓸𝓲𝓸. 𝓢𝓮 𝓷𝓪̃𝓸 𝓭𝓪 𝓼𝓾𝓪 𝓞𝓻𝓭𝓮𝓶 𝓮, 𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓸𝓼 𝓪𝓲𝓷𝓭𝓪, 𝓭𝓸 𝓖𝓸𝓿𝓮𝓻𝓷𝓸, 𝓹𝓮𝓵𝓸 𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓸𝓼 𝓭𝓪𝓼 𝓹𝓮𝓼𝓼𝓸𝓪𝓼 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓹𝓮𝓭𝓮𝓶 𝓙𝓾𝓼𝓽𝓲𝓬̧𝓪. 𝓔𝓼𝓽𝓮 𝓮́ 𝓸 𝓶𝓮𝓾 𝓻𝓮𝓹𝓽𝓸.
IN "O JORNAL ECONÓMICO" - 11/05/22 .
Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário