PEDRO COELHO

 .

OS MESTRES DA ILUSÃO

O jornalista de investigação precisa do privilégio do tempo para poder escavar a verdade oculta, mas precisa, igualmente, da enxada da paciência para destapar o manto de silêncio e a névoa impostos pelas fontes oficiais. Jornalismo de investigação é construir, não é reproduzir verdades pré-fabricadas no laboratório de interesses ocultos.

𝑫𝒂𝒗𝒊𝒅 𝑹𝒂𝒏𝒅𝒂𝒍𝒍 𝒅𝒊𝒛𝒊𝒂-𝒏𝒐𝒔 𝒒𝒖𝒆 “𝒐 𝒋𝒐𝒓𝒏𝒂𝒍𝒊𝒔𝒎𝒐 𝒅𝒆 𝒊𝒏𝒗𝒆𝒔𝒕𝒊𝒈𝒂𝒄̧𝒂̃𝒐 𝒄𝒐𝒎𝒆𝒄̧𝒂 𝒐𝒏𝒅𝒆 𝒕𝒆𝒓𝒎𝒊𝒏𝒂 𝒐 𝒋𝒐𝒓𝒏𝒂𝒍𝒊𝒔𝒎𝒐 𝒒𝒖𝒐𝒕𝒊𝒅𝒊𝒂𝒏𝒐”; 𝒐 𝒋𝒐𝒓𝒏𝒂𝒍𝒊𝒔𝒎𝒐 𝒅𝒆 𝒊𝒏𝒗𝒆𝒔𝒕𝒊𝒈𝒂𝒄̧𝒂̃𝒐, 𝒂𝒄𝒓𝒆𝒔𝒄𝒆𝒏𝒕𝒂𝒗𝒂 𝒐 𝒂𝒏𝒕𝒊𝒈𝒐 𝒋𝒐𝒓𝒏𝒂𝒍𝒊𝒔𝒕𝒂 𝒃𝒓𝒊𝒕𝒂̂𝒏𝒊𝒄𝒐, 𝒇𝒂𝒍𝒆𝒄𝒊𝒅𝒐 𝒆𝒎 𝟐𝟎𝟐𝟏, “𝒏𝒂̃𝒐 𝒔𝒆 𝒓𝒆𝒏𝒅𝒆 𝒂𝒐 𝒔𝒊𝒍𝒆̂𝒏𝒄𝒊𝒐 𝒅𝒐 𝒋𝒐𝒓𝒏𝒂𝒍𝒊𝒔𝒎𝒐 𝒒𝒖𝒐𝒕𝒊𝒅𝒊𝒂𝒏𝒐”.

𝑬𝒔𝒕𝒂 𝒊𝒅𝒆𝒊𝒂 𝒆́, 𝒅𝒆 𝒕𝒐𝒅𝒂𝒔 𝒂𝒔 𝒒𝒖𝒆 𝒍𝒊 𝒔𝒐𝒃𝒓𝒆 𝒋𝒐𝒓𝒏𝒂𝒍𝒊𝒔𝒎𝒐 𝒅𝒆 𝒊𝒏𝒗𝒆𝒔𝒕𝒊𝒈𝒂𝒄̧𝒂̃𝒐, 𝒂 𝒒𝒖𝒆 𝒎𝒆𝒍𝒉𝒐𝒓 𝒄𝒂𝒓𝒂𝒕𝒆𝒓𝒊𝒛𝒂 𝒆𝒔𝒔𝒂 𝒇𝒐𝒓𝒎𝒂 𝒔𝒖𝒑𝒆𝒓𝒊𝒐𝒓 𝒅𝒆 𝒋𝒐𝒓𝒏𝒂𝒍𝒊𝒔𝒎𝒐. 𝑶 𝒋𝒐𝒓𝒏𝒂𝒍𝒊𝒔𝒕𝒂 𝒅𝒆 𝒊𝒏𝒗𝒆𝒔𝒕𝒊𝒈𝒂𝒄̧𝒂̃𝒐 𝒑𝒓𝒆𝒄𝒊𝒔𝒂 𝒅𝒐 𝒑𝒓𝒊𝒗𝒊𝒍𝒆́𝒈𝒊𝒐 𝒅𝒐 𝒕𝒆𝒎𝒑𝒐 𝒑𝒂𝒓𝒂 𝒑𝒐𝒅𝒆𝒓 𝒆𝒔𝒄𝒂𝒗𝒂𝒓 𝒂 𝒗𝒆𝒓𝒅𝒂𝒅𝒆 𝒐𝒄𝒖𝒍𝒕𝒂, 𝒎𝒂𝒔 𝒑𝒓𝒆𝒄𝒊𝒔𝒂, 𝒊𝒈𝒖𝒂𝒍𝒎𝒆𝒏𝒕𝒆, 𝒅𝒂 𝒆𝒏𝒙𝒂𝒅𝒂 𝒅𝒂 𝒑𝒂𝒄𝒊𝒆̂𝒏𝒄𝒊𝒂 𝒑𝒂𝒓𝒂 𝒅𝒆𝒔𝒕𝒂𝒑𝒂𝒓 𝒐 𝒎𝒂𝒏𝒕𝒐 𝒅𝒆 𝒔𝒊𝒍𝒆̂𝒏𝒄𝒊𝒐 𝒆 𝒂 𝒏𝒆́𝒗𝒐𝒂 𝒊𝒎𝒑𝒐𝒔𝒕𝒐𝒔 𝒑𝒆𝒍𝒂𝒔 𝒇𝒐𝒏𝒕𝒆𝒔 𝒐𝒇𝒊𝒄𝒊𝒂𝒊𝒔.

𝑷𝒐𝒓𝒕𝒖𝒈𝒂𝒍, 𝒔𝒆𝒋𝒂𝒎𝒐𝒔 𝒋𝒖𝒔𝒕𝒐𝒔, 𝒊𝒏𝒗𝒆𝒔𝒕𝒆 𝒑𝒐𝒖𝒄𝒐 𝒆𝒎 𝒋𝒐𝒓𝒏𝒂𝒍𝒊𝒔𝒎𝒐 𝒅𝒆 𝒊𝒏𝒗𝒆𝒔𝒕𝒊𝒈𝒂𝒄̧𝒂̃𝒐. 𝑻𝒐𝒅𝒐𝒔 𝒔𝒂𝒃𝒆𝒎𝒐𝒔 𝒊𝒔𝒔𝒐, 𝒎𝒂𝒔 𝒂𝒍𝒈𝒖𝒏𝒔 𝒋𝒐𝒓𝒏𝒂𝒍𝒊𝒔𝒕𝒂𝒔, 𝒎𝒖𝒊𝒕𝒐𝒔 𝒅𝒊𝒓𝒆𝒕𝒐𝒓𝒆𝒔 𝒅𝒆 𝒊𝒏𝒇𝒐𝒓𝒎𝒂𝒄̧𝒂̃𝒐 𝒆 𝒗𝒂́𝒓𝒊𝒐𝒔 𝒑𝒓𝒐𝒑𝒓𝒊𝒆𝒕𝒂́𝒓𝒊𝒐𝒔 𝒅𝒆 𝒎𝒆𝒊𝒐𝒔 𝒅𝒆 𝒄𝒐𝒎𝒖𝒏𝒊𝒄𝒂𝒄̧𝒂̃𝒐 𝒋𝒐𝒈𝒂𝒎 𝒄𝒖́𝒎𝒑𝒍𝒊𝒄𝒆𝒔 𝒐 𝒋𝒐𝒈𝒐 𝒅𝒂 𝒊𝒍𝒖𝒔𝒂̃𝒐. 𝑰𝒍𝒖𝒅𝒆𝒎-𝒏𝒐𝒔, 𝒂 𝒏𝒐́𝒔 𝒍𝒆𝒊𝒕𝒐𝒓𝒆𝒔, 𝒆𝒔𝒑𝒆𝒄𝒕𝒂𝒅𝒐𝒓𝒆𝒔, 𝒐𝒖𝒗𝒊𝒏𝒕𝒆𝒔, 𝒑𝒓𝒐𝒅𝒖𝒛𝒊𝒏𝒅𝒐 𝒇𝒐𝒓𝒎𝒂𝒔 𝒕𝒓𝒂𝒗𝒆𝒔𝒕𝒊𝒅𝒂𝒔 𝒅𝒆 𝒋𝒐𝒓𝒏𝒂𝒍𝒊𝒔𝒎𝒐 𝒅𝒆 𝒊𝒏𝒗𝒆𝒔𝒕𝒊𝒈𝒂𝒄̧𝒂̃𝒐:

- 𝑹𝒆𝒄𝒆𝒃𝒆𝒓 𝒅𝒆𝒛𝒆𝒏𝒂𝒔 𝒐𝒖 𝒄𝒆𝒏𝒕𝒆𝒏𝒂𝒔 𝒅𝒆 𝒑𝒂́𝒈𝒊𝒏𝒂𝒔 𝒅𝒆 𝒖𝒎 𝒊𝒏𝒒𝒖𝒆́𝒓𝒊𝒕𝒐 𝒆𝒎 𝒄𝒖𝒓𝒔𝒐 𝒅𝒐 𝑴𝒊𝒏𝒊𝒔𝒕𝒆́𝒓𝒊𝒐 𝑷𝒖́𝒃𝒍𝒊𝒄𝒐 𝒆 𝒓𝒆𝒑𝒓𝒐𝒅𝒖𝒛𝒊𝒓 𝒖𝒎𝒂 𝒔𝒊́𝒏𝒕𝒆𝒔𝒆 𝒅𝒆𝒔𝒔𝒂 𝒎𝒂𝒕𝒆́𝒓𝒊𝒂, 𝒑𝒖𝒃𝒍𝒊𝒄𝒂𝒏𝒅𝒐-𝒂 𝒏𝒐𝒔 𝒋𝒐𝒓𝒏𝒂𝒊𝒔, 𝒏𝒐𝒔 𝒔𝒊𝒕𝒆𝒔 𝒊𝒏𝒇𝒐𝒓𝒎𝒂𝒕𝒊𝒗𝒐𝒔, 𝒐𝒖 𝒅𝒂𝒏𝒅𝒐-𝒍𝒉𝒆 𝒗𝒐𝒛 𝒏𝒂 𝒓𝒂́𝒅𝒊𝒐, 𝒐𝒖 𝒋𝒖𝒏𝒕𝒂𝒏𝒅𝒐 𝒊𝒎𝒂𝒈𝒆𝒏𝒔 𝒈𝒆𝒓𝒂𝒊𝒔 𝒏𝒂 𝒕𝒆𝒍𝒆𝒗𝒊𝒔𝒂̃𝒐, 𝒊𝒏𝒅𝒊𝒓𝒆𝒕𝒂𝒎𝒆𝒏𝒕𝒆 𝒍𝒊𝒈𝒂𝒅𝒂𝒔 𝒂𝒐 𝒕𝒆𝒎𝒂 𝒆𝒎 𝒄𝒂𝒖𝒔𝒂, 𝒕𝒖𝒅𝒐 𝒊𝒔𝒔𝒐 𝒆́ - 𝒋𝒐𝒓𝒏𝒂𝒍𝒊𝒔𝒕𝒊𝒄𝒂𝒎𝒆𝒏𝒕𝒆 - 𝒏𝒂𝒅𝒂. 𝑰𝒔𝒔𝒐 𝒆́, 𝒕𝒂̃𝒐 𝒔𝒐́, 𝒇𝒂𝒛𝒆𝒓 𝒖𝒎 𝒇𝒂𝒗𝒐𝒓 𝒂̀ 𝒇𝒐𝒏𝒕𝒆 𝒒𝒖𝒆 𝒍𝒊𝒃𝒆𝒓𝒕𝒐𝒖 𝒆𝒔𝒔𝒂𝒔 𝒑𝒂́𝒈𝒊𝒏𝒂𝒔 𝒆𝒎 𝒔𝒆𝒈𝒓𝒆𝒅𝒐 𝒅𝒆 𝒋𝒖𝒔𝒕𝒊𝒄̧𝒂. 𝑷𝒖𝒃𝒍𝒊𝒄𝒂𝒓 𝒖𝒎𝒂 𝒊𝒏𝒗𝒆𝒔𝒕𝒊𝒈𝒂𝒄̧𝒂̃𝒐 𝒆𝒎 𝒄𝒖𝒓𝒔𝒐 𝒅𝒐 𝑴𝒊𝒏𝒊𝒔𝒕𝒆́𝒓𝒊𝒐 𝑷𝒖́𝒃𝒍𝒊𝒄𝒐, 𝒔𝒆𝒎 𝒄𝒐𝒏𝒕𝒓𝒂𝒅𝒊𝒕𝒐́𝒓𝒊𝒐, 𝒆́ 𝒄𝒐𝒏𝒅𝒆𝒏𝒂𝒓 𝒂𝒏𝒕𝒆𝒄𝒊𝒑𝒂𝒅𝒂𝒎𝒆𝒏𝒕𝒆; 𝒆́ 𝒅𝒆𝒕𝒖𝒓𝒑𝒂𝒓 𝒂 𝒗𝒆𝒓𝒅𝒂𝒅𝒆;

- 𝑹𝒆𝒄𝒆𝒃𝒆𝒓 𝒖𝒎𝒂 𝒒𝒖𝒆𝒊𝒙𝒂 𝒅𝒆 𝒖𝒎 𝒒𝒖𝒂𝒍𝒒𝒖𝒆𝒓 𝒄𝒊𝒅𝒂𝒅𝒂̃𝒐 𝒒𝒖𝒆 𝒔𝒆 𝒔𝒊𝒏𝒕𝒂 𝒍𝒆𝒔𝒂𝒅𝒐 𝒑𝒐𝒓 𝒖𝒎𝒂 𝒂𝒍𝒆𝒈𝒂𝒅𝒂 𝒎𝒂́ 𝒑𝒓𝒂́𝒕𝒊𝒄𝒂 𝒅𝒆 𝒖𝒎 𝒒𝒖𝒂𝒍𝒒𝒖𝒆𝒓 𝒔𝒆𝒓𝒗𝒊𝒅𝒐𝒓 𝒅𝒐 𝑬𝒔𝒕𝒂𝒅𝒐 𝒐𝒖 𝒐𝒓𝒈𝒂𝒏𝒊𝒔𝒎𝒐 𝒑𝒖́𝒃𝒍𝒊𝒄𝒐 𝒆 𝒅𝒂𝒓 𝒗𝒐𝒛 𝒂 𝒆𝒔𝒔𝒂 𝒒𝒖𝒆𝒊𝒙𝒂, 𝒔𝒆𝒎 𝒄𝒖𝒊𝒅𝒂𝒓𝒎𝒐𝒔 𝒅𝒆 𝒑𝒆𝒓𝒄𝒆𝒃𝒆𝒓 𝒔𝒆 𝒆𝒍𝒂 𝒆́ 𝒗𝒆𝒓𝒅𝒂𝒅𝒆𝒊𝒓𝒂, 𝒊𝒏𝒗𝒆𝒔𝒕𝒊𝒈𝒂𝒏𝒅𝒐 𝒑𝒐𝒓 𝒏𝒐𝒔𝒔𝒂 𝒄𝒐𝒏𝒕𝒂 𝒆 𝒓𝒊𝒔𝒄𝒐 𝒐𝒔 𝒎𝒆𝒂𝒏𝒅𝒓𝒐𝒔 𝒒𝒖𝒆 𝒂 𝒄𝒐𝒏𝒕𝒐𝒓𝒏𝒂𝒎, 𝒇𝒂𝒛𝒆𝒏𝒅𝒐 𝒖𝒎 𝒆𝒔𝒇𝒐𝒓𝒄̧𝒐 𝒆𝒇𝒆𝒕𝒊𝒗𝒐 𝒑𝒂𝒓𝒂 𝒐𝒖𝒗𝒊𝒓 𝒐 𝒐𝒖𝒕𝒓𝒐 𝒍𝒂𝒅𝒐; 𝒔𝒆𝒎 𝒊𝒔𝒔𝒐 𝒔𝒐𝒎𝒐𝒔 𝒎𝒆𝒓𝒂𝒔 𝒄𝒂𝒊𝒙𝒂𝒔 𝒅𝒆 𝒓𝒆𝒔𝒔𝒐𝒏𝒂̂𝒏𝒄𝒊𝒂;

- 𝑭𝒊𝒙𝒂𝒓𝒎𝒐-𝒏𝒐𝒔 𝒂̀ 𝒑𝒂𝒓𝒕𝒊𝒅𝒂 𝒏𝒖𝒎𝒂 𝒖́𝒏𝒊𝒄𝒂 “𝒗𝒆𝒓𝒅𝒂𝒅𝒆”, 𝒑𝒐𝒓 𝒂𝒕𝒓𝒂𝒆𝒏𝒕𝒆 𝒐𝒖 𝒄𝒐𝒏𝒔𝒆𝒏𝒔𝒖𝒂𝒍 𝒒𝒖𝒆 𝒆𝒍𝒂 𝒔𝒆𝒋𝒂, 𝒄𝒐𝒍𝒐𝒄𝒂𝒏𝒅𝒐 𝒑𝒂𝒍𝒂𝒔 𝒏𝒐𝒔 𝒐𝒍𝒉𝒐𝒔 𝒒𝒖𝒆 𝒏𝒐𝒔 𝒊𝒎𝒑𝒆𝒄̧𝒂𝒎 𝒂 𝒗𝒊𝒔𝒂̃𝒐 𝒑𝒆𝒓𝒊𝒇𝒆́𝒓𝒊𝒄𝒂 𝒆 𝒑𝒖𝒃𝒍𝒊𝒄𝒂𝒓 𝒅𝒊𝒓𝒆𝒕𝒂𝒎𝒆𝒏𝒕𝒆 𝒐 𝒓𝒆𝒇𝒍𝒆𝒙𝒐 𝒅𝒆𝒔𝒔𝒂 “𝒗𝒆𝒓𝒅𝒂𝒅𝒆” 𝒔𝒐𝒍𝒆𝒏𝒆, 𝒕𝒂𝒎𝒃𝒆́𝒎 𝒏𝒂̃𝒐 𝒆́ 𝒋𝒐𝒓𝒏𝒂𝒍𝒊𝒔𝒎𝒐 𝒅𝒆 𝒊𝒏𝒗𝒆𝒔𝒕𝒊𝒈𝒂𝒄̧𝒂̃𝒐. 𝑷𝒂𝒕 𝑺𝒕𝒊𝒕𝒉, 𝒖𝒎 𝒃𝒓𝒊𝒍𝒉𝒂𝒏𝒕𝒆 𝒋𝒐𝒓𝒏𝒂𝒍𝒊𝒔𝒕𝒂 𝒅𝒆 𝒊𝒏𝒗𝒆𝒔𝒕𝒊𝒈𝒂𝒄̧𝒂̃𝒐 𝒏𝒐𝒓𝒕𝒆-𝒂𝒎𝒆𝒓𝒊𝒄𝒂𝒏𝒐, 𝒅𝒊𝒛𝒊𝒂-𝒏𝒐𝒔 𝒒𝒖𝒆 “𝒂 𝒅𝒖́𝒗𝒊𝒅𝒂” 𝒆𝒓𝒂 𝒐 𝒔𝒆𝒖 “𝒎𝒂𝒏𝒕𝒓𝒂”, 𝒆𝒓𝒂 𝒂 𝒍𝒖𝒛 𝒐𝒓𝒊𝒆𝒏𝒕𝒂𝒅𝒐𝒓𝒂 𝒒𝒖𝒆 𝒍𝒉𝒆 𝒊𝒍𝒖𝒎𝒊𝒏𝒂𝒗𝒂 𝒐 𝒂́𝒓𝒅𝒖𝒐 𝒄𝒂𝒎𝒊𝒏𝒉𝒐 𝒆𝒎 𝒅𝒊𝒓𝒆𝒄̧𝒂̃𝒐 𝒂̀ 𝒅𝒆𝒔𝒄𝒐𝒃𝒆𝒓𝒕𝒂 𝒅𝒂 𝒗𝒆𝒓𝒅𝒂𝒅𝒆 𝒋𝒐𝒓𝒏𝒂𝒍𝒊́𝒔𝒕𝒊𝒄𝒂. 𝑯𝒐𝒎𝒆𝒓 𝑩𝒊𝒈𝒂𝒓𝒕, 𝒐𝒖𝒕𝒓𝒐 𝒋𝒐𝒓𝒏𝒂𝒍𝒊𝒔𝒕𝒂 𝒏𝒐𝒓𝒕𝒆 𝒂𝒎𝒆𝒓𝒊𝒄𝒂𝒏𝒐, 𝒄𝒖𝒍𝒕𝒊𝒗𝒂𝒗𝒂, 𝒊𝒈𝒖𝒂𝒍𝒎𝒆𝒏𝒕𝒆, 𝒖𝒎 “𝒄𝒐𝒏𝒉𝒆𝒄𝒊𝒎𝒆𝒏𝒕𝒐 𝒄𝒆́𝒕𝒊𝒄𝒐”, 𝒕𝒓𝒂𝒏𝒔𝒑𝒐𝒓𝒕𝒂𝒗𝒂 𝒖𝒎𝒂 “𝒊𝒈𝒏𝒐𝒓𝒂̂𝒏𝒄𝒊𝒂 𝒅𝒆 𝒃𝒐𝒍𝒔𝒐” 𝒒𝒖𝒆 𝒐 𝒐𝒃𝒓𝒊𝒈𝒂𝒗𝒂, 𝒔𝒆𝒎𝒑𝒓𝒆, 𝒂 “𝒂𝒄𝒆𝒅𝒆𝒓 𝒆𝒎𝒑𝒊𝒓𝒊𝒄𝒂𝒎𝒆𝒏𝒕𝒆 𝒂̀ 𝒑𝒓𝒐𝒗𝒂”, 𝒏𝒖𝒏𝒄𝒂 𝒂𝒄𝒆𝒊𝒕𝒂𝒏𝒅𝒐 𝒗𝒆𝒓𝒔𝒐̃𝒆𝒔 𝒅𝒆 𝒐𝒖𝒕𝒓𝒂𝒔 𝒑𝒆𝒔𝒔𝒐𝒂𝒔. 𝑽𝒆𝒓𝒅𝒂𝒅𝒆𝒔 𝒑𝒓𝒆́-𝒆𝒎𝒃𝒂𝒍𝒂𝒅𝒂𝒔 𝒂𝒕𝒓𝒂𝒊𝒄̧𝒐𝒂𝒎 𝒐 𝒋𝒐𝒓𝒏𝒂𝒍𝒊𝒔𝒎𝒐 𝒆, 𝒎𝒖𝒊𝒕𝒐 𝒎𝒂𝒊𝒔, 𝒐 𝒋𝒐𝒓𝒏𝒂𝒍𝒊𝒔𝒎𝒐 𝒅𝒆 𝒊𝒏𝒗𝒆𝒔𝒕𝒊𝒈𝒂𝒄̧𝒂̃𝒐.

𝑺𝒆𝒎𝒑𝒓𝒆 𝒒𝒖𝒆 𝒅𝒊𝒔𝒇𝒂𝒓𝒄̧𝒂𝒎𝒐𝒔 𝒂 𝒓𝒆𝒂𝒍𝒊𝒅𝒂𝒅𝒆 𝒋𝒐𝒓𝒏𝒂𝒍𝒊́𝒔𝒕𝒊𝒄𝒂, 𝒂𝒕𝒓𝒊𝒃𝒖𝒊𝒏𝒅𝒐-𝒍𝒉𝒆 𝒓𝒐́𝒕𝒖𝒍𝒐𝒔 𝒒𝒖𝒆 𝒏𝒂̃𝒐 𝒂 𝒆𝒏𝒒𝒖𝒂𝒅𝒓𝒂𝒎, 𝒕𝒓𝒂𝒗𝒆𝒔𝒕𝒊𝒏𝒅𝒐 𝒅𝒆 𝒊𝒏𝒗𝒆𝒔𝒕𝒊𝒈𝒂𝒄̧𝒂̃𝒐 - 𝒂̀ 𝒇𝒐𝒓𝒄̧𝒂 𝒅𝒂 𝒑𝒓𝒐𝒎𝒐𝒄̧𝒂̃𝒐 - 𝒖𝒎 𝒕𝒓𝒂𝒃𝒂𝒍𝒉𝒐 𝒋𝒐𝒓𝒏𝒂𝒍𝒊́𝒔𝒕𝒊𝒄𝒐 𝒊𝒏𝒄𝒐𝒎𝒑𝒍𝒆𝒕𝒐, 𝒆𝒏𝒗𝒊𝒆𝒔𝒂𝒅𝒐, 𝒅𝒂𝒎𝒐𝒔 𝒏𝒐𝒗𝒐 𝒓𝒐𝒎𝒃𝒐 𝒏𝒂 𝒋𝒂́ 𝒇𝒓𝒂́𝒈𝒊𝒍 𝒆𝒔𝒕𝒓𝒖𝒕𝒖𝒓𝒂 𝒅𝒐 𝒋𝒐𝒓𝒏𝒂𝒍𝒊𝒔𝒎𝒐 𝒅𝒆 𝒊𝒏𝒗𝒆𝒔𝒕𝒊𝒈𝒂𝒄̧𝒂̃𝒐 𝒑𝒐𝒓𝒕𝒖𝒈𝒖𝒆̂𝒔.

𝑨 𝑮𝒓𝒂𝒏𝒅𝒆 𝑹𝒆𝒑𝒐𝒓𝒕𝒂𝒈𝒆𝒎 𝑻𝒆𝒔𝒕𝒂 𝒅𝒆 𝑭𝒆𝒓𝒓𝒐, 𝒒𝒖𝒆 𝒆𝒏𝒕𝒓𝒆 𝒏𝒐𝒗𝒆𝒎𝒃𝒓𝒐 𝒅𝒆 𝟐𝟎𝟐𝟏 𝒆 𝒂𝒃𝒓𝒊𝒍 𝒅𝒆 𝟐𝟎𝟐𝟐 𝒆𝒎𝒊𝒕𝒊𝒎𝒐𝒔 𝒏𝒂 𝑺𝑰𝑪 𝒆 𝒑𝒖𝒃𝒍𝒊𝒄𝒂́𝒎𝒐𝒔 𝒏𝒐 𝑺𝒆𝒕𝒆𝒏𝒕𝒂 𝒆 𝑸𝒖𝒂𝒕𝒓𝒐, 𝒆́ 𝒖𝒎 𝒕𝒓𝒂𝒃𝒂𝒍𝒉𝒐 𝒅𝒆 𝒊𝒏𝒗𝒆𝒔𝒕𝒊𝒈𝒂𝒄̧𝒂̃𝒐 𝒋𝒐𝒓𝒏𝒂𝒍𝒊́𝒔𝒕𝒊𝒄𝒂.

𝑵𝒂̃𝒐 𝒏𝒐𝒔 𝒍𝒊𝒎𝒊𝒕𝒂́𝒎𝒐𝒔 𝒂 𝒑𝒖𝒃𝒍𝒊𝒄𝒂𝒓 𝒖𝒎𝒂 𝒔𝒊́𝒏𝒕𝒆𝒔𝒆 𝒅𝒐𝒔 𝒎𝒊𝒍𝒉𝒂𝒓𝒆𝒔 𝒅𝒆 𝒑𝒂́𝒈𝒊𝒏𝒂𝒔 𝒑𝒓𝒐𝒅𝒖𝒛𝒊𝒅𝒂𝒔 𝒑𝒆𝒍𝒂 𝒆𝒒𝒖𝒊𝒑𝒂 𝒅𝒐 𝑴𝒊𝒏𝒊𝒔𝒕𝒆́𝒓𝒊𝒐 𝑷𝒖́𝒃𝒍𝒊𝒄𝒐, 𝒒𝒖𝒆 𝒊𝒏𝒗𝒆𝒔𝒕𝒊𝒈𝒂 𝒂 “𝑶𝒑𝒆𝒓𝒂𝒄̧𝒂̃𝒐 𝑪𝒂𝒓𝒕𝒂̃𝒐 𝑽𝒆𝒓𝒎𝒆𝒍𝒉𝒐”, 𝒎𝒂𝒕𝒆𝒓𝒊𝒂𝒍 𝒒𝒖𝒆 𝒄𝒂𝒊𝒖 𝒏𝒐 𝒄𝒐𝒍𝒐 𝒅𝒆 𝒅𝒊𝒗𝒆𝒓𝒔𝒐𝒔 𝒋𝒐𝒓𝒏𝒂𝒍𝒊𝒔𝒕𝒂𝒔 𝒑𝒐𝒓𝒕𝒖𝒈𝒖𝒆𝒔𝒆𝒔, 𝒆𝒎 𝒋𝒂𝒏𝒆𝒊𝒓𝒐 𝒅𝒆 𝟐𝟎𝟐𝟐. 𝑵𝒐́𝒔 𝒑𝒆𝒈𝒂́𝒎𝒐𝒔 𝒏𝒆𝒔𝒔𝒂 𝒄𝒐𝒓𝒓𝒆𝒏𝒕𝒆 𝒅𝒆 𝒊𝒏𝒇𝒐𝒓𝒎𝒂𝒄̧𝒂̃𝒐 𝒆 𝒊𝒏𝒗𝒆𝒔𝒕𝒊𝒈𝒂́𝒎𝒐𝒔 𝒑𝒐𝒓 𝒄𝒐𝒏𝒕𝒂 𝒑𝒓𝒐́𝒑𝒓𝒊𝒂. 𝑭𝒐𝒎𝒐𝒔 𝒑𝒂𝒓𝒂 𝒍𝒂́ 𝒅𝒆𝒍𝒂.

𝑵𝒐 𝑻𝒆𝒔𝒕𝒂 𝒅𝒆 𝑭𝒆𝒓𝒓𝒐 𝒖𝒔𝒂́𝒎𝒐𝒔, 𝒊𝒈𝒖𝒂𝒍𝒎𝒆𝒏𝒕𝒆, 𝒎𝒂𝒊𝒔 𝒅𝒆 𝟒𝟎 𝒎𝒊𝒍 𝒇𝒊𝒄𝒉𝒆𝒊𝒓𝒐𝒔 (𝟓𝟎 𝒈𝒊𝒈𝒂𝒔 𝒅𝒆 𝒊𝒏𝒇𝒐𝒓𝒎𝒂𝒄̧𝒂̃𝒐), 𝒒𝒖𝒆 𝒏𝒐𝒔 𝒇𝒊𝒛𝒆𝒓𝒂𝒎 𝒄𝒉𝒆𝒈𝒂𝒓 𝒆𝒎 𝒅𝒖𝒂𝒔 𝒇𝒂𝒔𝒆𝒔. 𝑬𝒔𝒔𝒂 𝒎𝒐𝒏𝒕𝒂𝒏𝒉𝒂 𝒅𝒆 𝒊𝒏𝒇𝒐𝒓𝒎𝒂𝒄̧𝒂̃𝒐 𝒇𝒐𝒊 𝒂 𝒏𝒐𝒔𝒔𝒂 𝒃𝒂𝒔𝒆, 𝒎𝒂𝒔 𝒑𝒓𝒆𝒄𝒊𝒔𝒂́𝒎𝒐𝒔 𝒅𝒆 𝒅𝒆𝒕𝒆𝒕𝒂𝒓, 𝒖𝒎 𝒂 𝒖𝒎, 𝒐𝒔 𝒇𝒂𝒄𝒕𝒐𝒔 𝒒𝒖𝒆 𝒆𝒔𝒔𝒆 𝒄𝒂𝒖𝒅𝒂𝒍 𝒐𝒄𝒖𝒍𝒕𝒂𝒗𝒂.

𝑫𝒖𝒓𝒂𝒏𝒕𝒆 𝒅𝒆𝒛 𝒎𝒆𝒔𝒆𝒔 𝒆 𝒂 𝒕𝒆𝒎𝒑𝒐 𝒊𝒏𝒕𝒆𝒊𝒓𝒐, 𝒅𝒐𝒊𝒔 𝒋𝒐𝒓𝒏𝒂𝒍𝒊𝒔𝒕𝒂𝒔, 𝒕𝒓𝒆̂𝒔 𝒂𝒍𝒖𝒏𝒐𝒔 (𝒅𝒐𝒊𝒔 𝒅𝒆 𝒋𝒐𝒓𝒏𝒂𝒍𝒊𝒔𝒎𝒐 𝒆 𝒖𝒎 𝒅𝒆 𝒆𝒄𝒐𝒏𝒐𝒎𝒊𝒂), 𝒖𝒎 𝒓𝒆𝒑𝒐́𝒓𝒕𝒆𝒓 𝒅𝒆 𝒊𝒎𝒂𝒈𝒆𝒎, 𝒖𝒎 𝒆𝒅𝒊𝒕𝒐𝒓 𝒅𝒆 𝒊𝒎𝒂𝒈𝒆𝒎 𝒆, 𝒏𝒖𝒎𝒂 𝒇𝒂𝒔𝒆 𝒇𝒊𝒏𝒂𝒍, 𝒖𝒎 𝒄𝒐𝒏𝒋𝒖𝒏𝒕𝒐 𝒅𝒆 𝒕𝒆́𝒄𝒏𝒊𝒄𝒐𝒔 𝒅𝒆 𝒂́𝒖𝒅𝒊𝒐 𝒆 𝒊𝒎𝒂𝒈𝒆𝒎, 𝒅𝒊𝒔𝒄𝒖𝒕𝒊𝒎𝒐𝒔, 𝒗𝒆𝒓𝒊𝒇𝒊𝒄𝒂́𝒎𝒐𝒔, 𝒄𝒐𝒏𝒇𝒊𝒓𝒎𝒂́𝒎𝒐𝒔 𝒆, 𝒇𝒊𝒏𝒂𝒍𝒎𝒆𝒏𝒕𝒆, 𝒑𝒖𝒃𝒍𝒊𝒄𝒂́𝒎𝒐𝒔. 𝑷𝒂𝒔𝒔𝒐 𝒂 𝒑𝒂𝒔𝒔𝒐 - 𝒆 𝒔𝒆𝒎 𝒒𝒖𝒆𝒊𝒎𝒂𝒓 𝒆𝒕𝒂𝒑𝒂𝒔 - 𝒄𝒐𝒏𝒕𝒂𝒄𝒕𝒂́𝒎𝒐𝒔 𝒐𝒔 𝒂𝒍𝒆𝒈𝒂𝒅𝒂𝒎𝒆𝒏𝒕𝒆 𝒗𝒊𝒔𝒂𝒅𝒐𝒔, 𝒇𝒂𝒍𝒂́𝒎𝒐𝒔 𝒄𝒐𝒎 𝒈𝒆𝒏𝒕𝒆 𝒑𝒓𝒐́𝒙𝒊𝒎𝒂 𝒒𝒖𝒆 𝒕𝒓𝒂𝒃𝒂𝒍𝒉𝒐𝒖 𝒅𝒊𝒓𝒆𝒕𝒂𝒎𝒆𝒏𝒕𝒆 𝒄𝒐𝒎 𝒆𝒍𝒆𝒔, 𝒃𝒂𝒕𝒆𝒎𝒐𝒔 𝒂̀ 𝒑𝒐𝒓𝒕𝒂 𝒅𝒂𝒔 𝒆𝒎𝒑𝒓𝒆𝒔𝒂𝒔 𝒒𝒖𝒆 𝒄𝒐𝒎 𝒐𝒔 𝒗𝒊𝒔𝒂𝒅𝒐𝒔, 𝒂𝒍𝒆𝒈𝒂𝒅𝒂𝒎𝒆𝒏𝒕𝒆, 𝒄𝒐𝒍𝒂𝒃𝒐𝒓𝒂𝒓𝒂𝒎, 𝒄𝒓𝒖𝒛𝒂́𝒎𝒐𝒔 𝒅𝒂𝒅𝒐𝒔, 𝒓𝒆𝒄𝒐𝒓𝒓𝒆𝒎𝒐𝒔 𝒂̀ 𝒂𝒋𝒖𝒅𝒂 𝒅𝒆 𝒑𝒆𝒓𝒊𝒕𝒐𝒔 𝒒𝒖𝒆 𝒏𝒐𝒔 𝒂𝒋𝒖𝒅𝒂𝒓𝒂𝒎 𝒂 𝒅𝒆𝒔𝒄𝒐𝒅𝒊𝒇𝒊𝒄𝒂𝒓 𝒎𝒂𝒕𝒆́𝒓𝒊𝒂𝒔 𝒆𝒔𝒑𝒆𝒄𝒊́𝒇𝒊𝒄𝒂𝒔 𝒆, 𝒎𝒂𝒊𝒔 𝒓𝒆𝒍𝒆𝒗𝒂𝒏𝒕𝒆 𝒅𝒐 𝒒𝒖𝒆 𝒕𝒖𝒅𝒐 𝒊𝒔𝒔𝒐, 𝒂𝒍𝒊𝒎𝒆𝒏𝒕𝒂𝒅𝒐𝒔 𝒑𝒆𝒍𝒂 𝒅𝒖́𝒗𝒊𝒅𝒂 𝒑𝒆𝒓𝒎𝒂𝒏𝒆𝒏𝒕𝒆, 𝒇𝒐𝒎𝒐𝒔 𝒂𝒐𝒔 𝒍𝒖𝒈𝒂𝒓𝒆𝒔 𝒅𝒂 𝒉𝒊𝒔𝒕𝒐́𝒓𝒊𝒂 𝒆 𝒂𝒊́, 𝒔𝒊𝒎, 𝒎𝒖𝒊𝒕𝒐 𝒑𝒓𝒐́𝒙𝒊𝒎𝒐𝒔 𝒅𝒂 𝒐𝒓𝒊𝒈𝒆𝒎 𝒅𝒐 𝒂𝒄𝒐𝒏𝒕𝒆𝒄𝒊𝒎𝒆𝒏𝒕𝒐, 𝒇𝒊𝒛𝒆𝒎𝒐𝒔 𝒑𝒆𝒓𝒈𝒖𝒏𝒕𝒂𝒔, 𝒑𝒆𝒓𝒄𝒐𝒓𝒓𝒆𝒎𝒐𝒔 𝒄𝒂𝒎𝒊𝒏𝒉𝒐𝒔 𝒎𝒆𝒕𝒂𝒇𝒐𝒓𝒊𝒄𝒂𝒎𝒆𝒏𝒕𝒆 𝒆𝒔𝒕𝒓𝒆𝒊𝒕𝒐𝒔 𝒆 𝒆𝒔𝒕𝒊𝒗𝒆𝒎𝒐𝒔 𝒇𝒂𝒄𝒆 𝒂 𝒇𝒂𝒄𝒆 𝒄𝒐𝒎 𝒂𝒒𝒖𝒊𝒍𝒐 𝒒𝒖𝒆 𝒂𝒑𝒆𝒏𝒂𝒔 𝒕𝒊́𝒏𝒉𝒂𝒎𝒐𝒔 𝒍𝒊𝒅𝒐. 𝑺𝒐́ 𝒏𝒐 𝒍𝒖𝒈𝒂𝒓 𝒅𝒂 𝒉𝒊𝒔𝒕𝒐́𝒓𝒊𝒂, 𝒓𝒆𝒗𝒐𝒍𝒗𝒆𝒏𝒅𝒐 𝒂 𝒎𝒂𝒕𝒆́𝒓𝒊𝒂, 𝒂 𝒉𝒊𝒔𝒕𝒐́𝒓𝒊𝒂 𝒔𝒆 𝒅𝒆𝒔𝒗𝒆𝒏𝒅𝒂 𝒆 𝒂 𝒑𝒓𝒐𝒗𝒂 𝒔𝒆 𝒔𝒐𝒍𝒊𝒅𝒊𝒇𝒊𝒄𝒂.

𝑱𝒐𝒓𝒏𝒂𝒍𝒊𝒔𝒎𝒐 𝒅𝒆 𝒊𝒏𝒗𝒆𝒔𝒕𝒊𝒈𝒂𝒄̧𝒂̃𝒐 𝒆́ 𝒄𝒐𝒏𝒔𝒕𝒓𝒖𝒊𝒓, 𝒏𝒂̃𝒐 𝒆́ 𝒓𝒆𝒑𝒓𝒐𝒅𝒖𝒛𝒊𝒓 𝒗𝒆𝒓𝒅𝒂𝒅𝒆𝒔 𝒑𝒓𝒆́-𝒇𝒂𝒃𝒓𝒊𝒄𝒂𝒅𝒂𝒔 𝒏𝒐 𝒍𝒂𝒃𝒐𝒓𝒂𝒕𝒐́𝒓𝒊𝒐 𝒅𝒆 𝒊𝒏𝒕𝒆𝒓𝒆𝒔𝒔𝒆𝒔 𝒐𝒄𝒖𝒍𝒕𝒐𝒔.

𝑺𝒆 𝒂𝒐𝒔 𝒅𝒊𝒓𝒆𝒕𝒐𝒓𝒆𝒔 𝒆 𝒂𝒐𝒔 𝒑𝒓𝒐𝒑𝒓𝒊𝒆𝒕𝒂́𝒓𝒊𝒐𝒔 𝒅𝒐𝒔 𝒎𝒆𝒊𝒐𝒔 𝒅𝒂́ 𝒑𝒐𝒖𝒄𝒐 𝒋𝒆𝒊𝒕𝒐 𝒑𝒆𝒓𝒄𝒆𝒃𝒆𝒓𝒆𝒎 𝒂 𝒅𝒊𝒇𝒆𝒓𝒆𝒏𝒄̧𝒂 𝒆𝒏𝒕𝒓𝒆 𝒋𝒐𝒓𝒏𝒂𝒍𝒊𝒔𝒎𝒐 𝒒𝒖𝒐𝒕𝒊𝒅𝒊𝒂𝒏𝒐 𝒆 𝒋𝒐𝒓𝒏𝒂𝒍𝒊𝒔𝒎𝒐 𝒅𝒆 𝒊𝒏𝒗𝒆𝒔𝒕𝒊𝒈𝒂𝒄̧𝒂̃𝒐, 𝒏𝒂̃𝒐 𝒉𝒂́ 𝒅𝒆𝒔𝒄𝒖𝒍𝒑𝒂 𝒑𝒂𝒓𝒂 𝒒𝒖𝒆, 𝒕𝒂𝒏𝒕𝒂𝒔 𝒗𝒆𝒛𝒆𝒔, 𝒔𝒆𝒋𝒂𝒎 𝒐𝒔 𝒋𝒐𝒓𝒏𝒂𝒍𝒊𝒔𝒕𝒂𝒔 𝒂 𝒑𝒓𝒆𝒎𝒊𝒓 𝒐 𝒈𝒂𝒕𝒊𝒍𝒉𝒐 𝒅𝒆𝒔𝒔𝒂 𝒊𝒍𝒖𝒔𝒂̃𝒐.

* Jornalista de Investigação

IN "SETENTA E QUATRO" - 26/04/22 . .