.
O herói improvável da
guerra na Ucrânia
.
"𝓐 𝓮́𝓽𝓲𝓬𝓪 𝓮́ 𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓪𝓻 𝓪̀ 𝓪𝓵𝓽𝓾𝓻𝓪 𝓭𝓪𝓺𝓾𝓲𝓵𝓸 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓷𝓸𝓼 𝓪𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓽𝓮𝓬𝓮", 𝓮𝓼𝓬𝓻𝓮𝓿𝓮𝓾 𝓖𝓲𝓵𝓵𝓮𝓼 𝓓𝓮𝓵𝓮𝓾𝔃𝓮. 𝓔𝓶 𝓽𝓮𝓶𝓹𝓸 𝓭𝓮 𝓰𝓾𝓮𝓻𝓻𝓪, 𝓪𝓵𝓰𝓸 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓷𝓪̃𝓸 𝓳𝓾𝓵𝓰𝓪́𝓶𝓸𝓼 𝓼𝓮𝓻 𝓹𝓸𝓼𝓼𝓲́𝓿𝓮𝓵 𝓿𝓮𝓻 𝓪̀𝓼 𝓹𝓸𝓻𝓽𝓪𝓼 𝓭𝓪 𝓔𝓾𝓻𝓸𝓹𝓪, 𝓮́𝓽𝓲𝓬𝓪 𝓮 𝓬𝓸𝓻𝓪𝓰𝓮𝓶 𝓷𝓪̃𝓸 𝓮𝓻𝓪 𝓸 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓮𝓼𝓹𝓮𝓻𝓪́𝓿𝓪𝓶𝓸𝓼 𝓭𝓸 𝓬𝓸𝓶𝓮𝓭𝓲𝓪𝓷𝓽𝓮-𝓽𝓸𝓻𝓷𝓪𝓭𝓸-𝓹𝓸𝓵𝓲́𝓽𝓲𝓬𝓸 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓵𝓲𝓭𝓮𝓻𝓪 𝓪 𝓤𝓬𝓻𝓪̂𝓷𝓲𝓪.
𝓜𝓪𝓼 𝓯𝓸𝓲 𝓹𝓻𝓮𝓬𝓲𝓼𝓪𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮 𝓲𝓼𝓼𝓸 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓽𝓲𝓿𝓮𝓶𝓸𝓼. 𝓥𝓸𝓵𝓸𝓭𝔂𝓶𝔂𝓻 𝓩𝓮𝓵𝓮𝓷𝓼𝓴𝔂, 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓬𝓱𝓮𝓰𝓸𝓾 𝓪𝓸 𝓹𝓸𝓭𝓮𝓻 𝓮𝓶 𝟐𝟎𝟏𝟗 𝓮 𝓼𝓮 𝓿𝓲𝓾 𝓺𝓾𝓪𝓼𝓮 𝓭𝓮 𝓲𝓶𝓮𝓭𝓲𝓪𝓽𝓸 𝓮𝓶𝓫𝓻𝓾𝓵𝓱𝓪𝓭𝓸 𝓷𝓸 𝓫𝓻𝓪𝓬̧𝓸-𝓭𝓮-𝓯𝓮𝓻𝓻𝓸 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓵𝓮𝓿𝓸𝓾 𝓪𝓸 𝓹𝓻𝓲𝓶𝓮𝓲𝓻𝓸 𝓲𝓶𝓹𝓮𝓪𝓬𝓱𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽 𝓭𝓮 𝓓𝓸𝓷𝓪𝓵𝓭 𝓣𝓻𝓾𝓶𝓹 𝓷𝓸 𝓔𝓼𝓽𝓪𝓭𝓸𝓼 𝓤𝓷𝓲𝓭𝓸𝓼, 𝓪𝓼𝓬𝓮𝓷𝓭𝓮𝓾 𝓬𝓸𝓶𝓸 𝓱𝓮𝓻𝓸́𝓲 𝓲𝓶𝓹𝓻𝓸𝓿𝓪́𝓿𝓮𝓵 𝓭𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓪 𝓰𝓾𝓮𝓻𝓻𝓪 𝓲𝓶𝓹𝓮𝓷𝓼𝓪́𝓿𝓮𝓵.
𝓐 𝓼𝓾𝓪 𝓻𝓮𝓬𝓾𝓼𝓪 𝓮𝓶 𝓼𝓮𝓻 𝓮𝓿𝓪𝓬𝓾𝓪𝓭𝓸 𝓭𝓪 𝓬𝓪𝓹𝓲𝓽𝓪𝓵 𝓚𝓲𝓮𝓿, 𝓭𝓲𝔃𝓮𝓷𝓭𝓸 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓹𝓻𝓮𝓬𝓲𝓼𝓪𝓿𝓪 𝓭𝓮 𝓶𝓾𝓷𝓲𝓬̧𝓸̃𝓮𝓼, 𝓷𝓪̃𝓸 𝓭𝓮 𝓾𝓶𝓪 𝓫𝓸𝓵𝓮𝓲𝓪, 𝓯𝓸𝓲 𝓾𝓶 𝓪𝓼𝓼𝓸𝓶𝓸 𝓮𝓼𝓹𝓪𝓷𝓽𝓸𝓼𝓸 𝓭𝓮 𝓬𝓸𝓻𝓪𝓰𝓮𝓶. 𝓐 𝓯𝓸𝓻𝓶𝓪 𝓱𝓪́𝓫𝓲𝓵 𝓬𝓸𝓶𝓸 𝓽𝓮𝓶 𝓾𝓼𝓪𝓭𝓸 𝓪𝓼 𝓻𝓮𝓭𝓮𝓼 𝓼𝓸𝓬𝓲𝓪𝓲𝓼 𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓪́ 𝓼𝓲𝓶𝓾𝓵𝓽𝓪𝓷𝓮𝓪𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮 𝓪 𝓰𝓪𝓵𝓿𝓪𝓷𝓲𝔃𝓪𝓻 𝓪𝓼 𝓱𝓸𝓼𝓽𝓮𝓼 𝓾𝓬𝓻𝓪𝓷𝓲𝓪𝓷𝓪𝓼 𝓮 𝓪 𝓹𝓻𝓮𝓳𝓾𝓭𝓲𝓬𝓪𝓻 𝓸 𝓮𝓼𝓯𝓸𝓻𝓬̧𝓸 𝓭𝓮 𝓭𝓮𝓼𝓲𝓷𝓯𝓸𝓻𝓶𝓪𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸 𝓻𝓾𝓼𝓼𝓸, 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓹𝓻𝓮𝓽𝓮𝓷𝓭𝓲𝓪 "𝓿𝓮𝓷𝓭𝓮𝓻" 𝓸 𝓰𝓸𝓿𝓮𝓻𝓷𝓸 𝓭𝓸 𝓳𝓾𝓭𝓮𝓾 𝓩𝓮𝓵𝓮𝓷𝓼𝓴𝔂 𝓬𝓸𝓶𝓸 𝓾𝓶 𝓪𝓷𝓽𝓻𝓸 𝓭𝓮 𝓷𝓮𝓸-𝓯𝓪𝓼𝓬𝓲𝓼𝓽𝓪𝓼 𝓰𝓮𝓷𝓸𝓬𝓲𝓭𝓪𝓼.
𝓔́ 𝓼𝓾𝓻𝓹𝓻𝓮𝓮𝓷𝓭𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮 𝓪 𝓯𝓸𝓻𝓶𝓪 𝓬𝓸𝓶𝓸 𝓸 𝓹𝓻𝓮𝓼𝓲𝓭𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮 𝓾𝓬𝓻𝓪𝓷𝓲𝓪𝓷𝓸 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓼𝓮𝓰𝓾𝓲𝓾 𝓽𝓸𝓻𝓬𝓮𝓻 𝓪 "𝓭𝓮𝓼𝓲𝓷𝓯𝓸𝓻𝓶𝓪𝓽𝓲𝓪" 𝓮 𝓷𝓪̃𝓸 𝓼𝓮 𝓭𝓮𝓲𝔁𝓸𝓾 𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓻𝓪𝓻 𝓷𝓸 𝓹𝓪𝓹𝓮𝓵 𝓭𝓮 𝓫𝓲𝓬𝓱𝓸 𝓹𝓪𝓹𝓪̃𝓸 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓵𝓱𝓮 𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓪𝓿𝓪 𝓪𝓽𝓻𝓲𝓫𝓾𝓲́𝓭𝓸 𝓬𝓸𝓶𝓸 𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓽𝓮 𝓭𝓪 𝓷𝓪𝓻𝓻𝓪𝓽𝓲𝓿𝓪 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓲𝓪 𝓳𝓾𝓼𝓽𝓲𝓯𝓲𝓬𝓪𝓻 𝓪 𝓲𝓷𝓿𝓪𝓼𝓪̃𝓸. 𝓐𝓸 𝓲𝓷𝓿𝓮́𝓼 𝓭𝓲𝓼𝓼𝓸, 𝓩𝓮𝓵𝓮𝓷𝓼𝓴𝔂 𝓪𝓼𝓼𝓾𝓶𝓲𝓾 𝓸 𝓹𝓪𝓹𝓮𝓵 𝓭𝓮 𝓱𝓮𝓻𝓸́𝓲. 𝓢𝓮 𝓭𝓮𝓼𝓪𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓮𝓬𝓮𝓻, 𝓯𝓸𝓻 𝓬𝓪𝓹𝓽𝓾𝓻𝓪𝓭𝓸 𝓸𝓾 𝓪𝓼𝓼𝓪𝓼𝓼𝓲𝓷𝓪𝓭𝓸, 𝓽𝓸𝓻𝓷𝓪𝓻-𝓼𝓮-𝓪́ 𝓾𝓶 𝓶𝓪́𝓻𝓽𝓲𝓻. 𝓔 𝓬𝓸𝓶𝓸 𝓶𝓮 𝓭𝓲𝓼𝓼𝓮 𝓪 𝓫𝓻𝓲𝓵𝓱𝓪𝓷𝓽𝓮 𝓬𝓲𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓲𝓼𝓽𝓪 𝓹𝓸𝓵𝓲́𝓽𝓲𝓬𝓪 𝓵𝓾𝓼𝓸-𝓪𝓶𝓮𝓻𝓲𝓬𝓪𝓷𝓪 𝓓𝓪𝓷𝓲𝓮𝓵𝓪 𝓜𝓮𝓵𝓸, 𝓹𝓻𝓸𝓯𝓮𝓼𝓼𝓸𝓻𝓪 𝓷𝓪 𝓤𝓷𝓲𝓿𝓮𝓻𝓼𝓲𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓮 𝓭𝓮 𝓑𝓸𝓼𝓽𝓸𝓷, 𝓽𝓾𝓭𝓸 𝓸 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓾𝓶𝓪 𝓲𝓷𝓼𝓾𝓻𝓻𝓮𝓲𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸 𝓹𝓻𝓮𝓬𝓲𝓼𝓪 𝓮́ 𝓭𝓮 𝓾𝓶 𝓶𝓪́𝓻𝓽𝓲𝓻. 𝓔́ 𝓪𝓵𝓰𝓸 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓥𝓵𝓪𝓭𝓲𝓶𝓲𝓻 𝓟𝓾𝓽𝓲𝓷 𝓷𝓪̃𝓸 𝓺𝓾𝓮𝓻𝓮𝓻𝓪́ 𝓿𝓮𝓻 𝓪𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓽𝓮𝓬𝓮𝓻.
𝓐 𝓯𝓸𝓻𝓶𝓪 𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓻𝓪𝓽𝓮́𝓰𝓲𝓬𝓪 𝓬𝓸𝓶𝓸 𝓩𝓮𝓵𝓮𝓷𝓼𝓴𝔂 𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓪́ 𝓪 𝓾𝓼𝓪𝓻 𝓪𝓼 𝓻𝓮𝓭𝓮𝓼 𝓼𝓸𝓬𝓲𝓪𝓲𝓼 𝓮 𝓪 𝓪𝓽𝓮𝓷𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸 𝓭𝓸𝓼 𝓶𝓮𝓲𝓸𝓼 𝓭𝓮 𝓬𝓸𝓶𝓾𝓷𝓲𝓬𝓪𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸 𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓮𝓬𝓮 𝓪𝓽𝓮́ 𝓽𝓮𝓻 𝓲𝓷𝓯𝓵𝓾𝓮𝓷𝓬𝓲𝓪𝓭𝓸 𝓪 𝓻𝓪𝓹𝓲𝓭𝓮𝔃 𝓭𝓪 𝓻𝓮𝓼𝓹𝓸𝓼𝓽𝓪 𝓭𝓸 𝓞𝓬𝓲𝓭𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮 𝓪̀ 𝓲𝓷𝓿𝓪𝓼𝓪̃𝓸. 𝓣𝓸𝓻𝓷𝓸𝓾-𝓼𝓮 𝓲𝓶𝓹𝓸𝓼𝓼𝓲́𝓿𝓮𝓵 𝓮𝓼𝓬𝓪𝓹𝓪𝓻 𝓪̀𝓼 𝓲𝓶𝓪𝓰𝓮𝓷𝓼 𝓭𝓮 𝓾𝓶 𝓹𝓻𝓮𝓼𝓲𝓭𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮 𝓪𝓬𝓸𝓼𝓼𝓪𝓭𝓸, 𝓹𝓮𝓰𝓪𝓷𝓭𝓸 𝓮𝓶 𝓪𝓻𝓶𝓪𝓼, 𝓭𝓲𝔃𝓮𝓷𝓭𝓸 𝓪𝓸𝓼 𝓪𝓵𝓲𝓪𝓭𝓸𝓼 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓽𝓪𝓵𝓿𝓮𝔃 𝓷𝓪̃𝓸 𝓿𝓸𝓵𝓽𝓪𝓻𝓲𝓪𝓶 𝓪 𝓿𝓮̂-𝓵𝓸 𝓿𝓲𝓿𝓸.
𝓣𝓸𝓻𝓷𝓸𝓾-𝓼𝓮 𝓶𝓾𝓲𝓽𝓸 𝓭𝓲𝓯𝓲́𝓬𝓲𝓵 𝓯𝓲𝓷𝓰𝓲𝓻 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓲𝓼𝓽𝓸 𝓷𝓪̃𝓸 𝓮́ 𝓷𝓪𝓭𝓪 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓷𝓸𝓼𝓬𝓸 𝓮 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓹𝓸𝓭𝓮𝓶𝓸𝓼 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓽𝓲𝓷𝓾𝓪𝓻 𝓬𝓸𝓶𝓸 𝓼𝓮 𝓷𝓪𝓭𝓪 𝓯𝓸𝓼𝓼𝓮, 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓽𝓲𝓷𝓾𝓪𝓷𝓭𝓸 𝓪 𝓽𝓻𝓪𝓽𝓪𝓻 𝓪 𝓡𝓾́𝓼𝓼𝓲𝓪 𝓬𝓸𝓶𝓸 𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓽𝓮 𝓭𝓸 𝓶𝓾𝓷𝓭𝓸 𝓬𝓲𝓿𝓲𝓵𝓲𝔃𝓪𝓭𝓸 𝓮 𝓷𝓪̃𝓸 𝓬𝓸𝓶𝓸 𝓾𝓶 𝓹𝓪𝓲́𝓼 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓲𝓷𝓿𝓪𝓭𝓲𝓾, 𝓼𝓮𝓶 𝓹𝓻𝓸𝓿𝓸𝓬𝓪𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸, 𝓾𝓶 𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓪𝓭𝓸 𝓼𝓸𝓫𝓮𝓻𝓪𝓷𝓸.
𝓐𝓷𝓽𝓮𝓼 𝓭𝓪 𝓮𝓬𝓵𝓸𝓼𝓪̃𝓸 𝓻𝓮𝓪𝓵 𝓭𝓪 𝓰𝓾𝓮𝓻𝓻𝓪, 𝓸𝓾𝓿𝓲 𝓬𝓸𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓪𝓭𝓸𝓻𝓮𝓼 𝓪 𝓭𝓲𝔃𝓮𝓻𝓮𝓶 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓪 𝓤𝓬𝓻𝓪̂𝓷𝓲𝓪 𝓽𝓮𝓶 𝓾𝓶 𝓰𝓸𝓿𝓮𝓻𝓷𝓸 𝓬𝓸𝓻𝓻𝓾𝓹𝓽𝓸 𝓮 𝓷𝓪̃𝓸 𝓮́ 𝓹𝓻𝓸𝓹𝓻𝓲𝓪𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮 𝓸 𝓹𝓪𝓵𝓪𝓭𝓲𝓷𝓸 𝓭𝓪 𝓭𝓮𝓶𝓸𝓬𝓻𝓪𝓬𝓲𝓪 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓸 𝓞𝓬𝓲𝓭𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮 𝓿𝓪𝓲 𝓺𝓾𝓮𝓻𝓮𝓻 𝓭𝓮𝓯𝓮𝓷𝓭𝓮𝓻. 𝓘𝓼𝓽𝓸 𝓹𝓸𝓭𝓲𝓪 𝓪𝓽𝓮́ 𝓼𝓮𝓻 𝓾𝓶𝓪 𝓬𝓪𝓻𝓪𝓬𝓽𝓮𝓻𝓲𝔃𝓪𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸 𝓿𝓮𝓻𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓮𝓲𝓻𝓪 𝓭𝓸 𝓹𝓪𝓲́𝓼 (𝓸𝓾 𝓷𝓪̃𝓸!), 𝓶𝓪𝓼 𝓮𝓻𝓪 𝓲𝓻𝓻𝓮𝓵𝓮𝓿𝓪𝓷𝓽𝓮 𝓮 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓽𝓲𝓷𝓾𝓪 𝓪 𝓼𝓮𝓻. 𝓞 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓺𝓾𝓮𝓻𝓲𝓪𝓶 𝓭𝓲𝔃𝓮𝓻 𝓮𝓼𝓼𝓮𝓼 𝓬𝓸𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓪𝓭𝓸𝓻𝓮𝓼? 𝓠𝓾𝓮 𝓼𝓸́ 𝓼𝓮 𝓭𝓮𝓯𝓮𝓷𝓭𝓮𝓶 𝓪𝓼 𝓿𝓲́𝓽𝓲𝓶𝓪𝓼 𝓹𝓮𝓻𝓯𝓮𝓲𝓽𝓪𝓼?
𝓠𝓾𝓮 𝓼𝓮 𝓸 𝓰𝓸𝓿𝓮𝓻𝓷𝓸 𝓭𝓸 𝓹𝓪𝓲́𝓼 𝓲𝓷𝓿𝓪𝓭𝓲𝓭𝓸 𝓷𝓪̃𝓸 𝓯𝓸𝓻 𝓯𝓵𝓸𝓻 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓼𝓮 𝓬𝓱𝓮𝓲𝓻𝓮, 𝓹𝓸𝓭𝓮𝓶𝓸𝓼 𝓭𝓮𝓲𝔁𝓪́-𝓵𝓸 𝓪𝓻𝓭𝓮𝓻? 𝓠𝓾𝓮 𝓪𝓼 𝓪𝓬𝓬̧𝓸̃𝓮𝓼 𝓭𝓮 𝓾𝓶 𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓪𝓭𝓸 𝓲𝓷𝓿𝓪𝓼𝓸𝓻 𝓭𝓮𝓿𝓮𝓶 𝓼𝓮𝓻 𝓪𝓿𝓪𝓵𝓲𝓪𝓭𝓪𝓼 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓯𝓸𝓻𝓶𝓮 𝓸 𝓰𝓻𝓪𝓾 𝓭𝓮 𝓺𝓾𝓪𝓵𝓲𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓮 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓪𝓽𝓻𝓲𝓫𝓾𝓲́𝓶𝓸𝓼 𝓪̀ 𝓭𝓮𝓶𝓸𝓬𝓻𝓪𝓬𝓲𝓪 𝓿𝓲𝓽𝓲𝓶𝓲𝔃𝓪𝓭𝓪?
𝓝𝓪𝓭𝓪 𝓭𝓲𝓼𝓽𝓸 𝓯𝓪𝔃 𝓼𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓲𝓭𝓸, 𝓮 𝓯𝓸𝓲 𝓲𝓼𝓼𝓸 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓪 𝓹𝓮𝓻𝓼𝓸𝓷𝓪𝓵𝓲𝔃𝓪𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸 𝓭𝓸 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓯𝓵𝓲𝓽𝓸 𝓪𝓽𝓻𝓪𝓿𝓮́𝓼 𝓭𝓮 𝓥𝓸𝓵𝓸𝓭𝔂𝓶𝔂𝓻 𝓩𝓮𝓵𝓮𝓷𝓼𝓴𝔂 𝓷𝓸𝓼 𝓶𝓸𝓼𝓽𝓻𝓸𝓾, 𝓬𝓸𝓶𝓸 𝓾𝓶𝓪 𝓬𝓱𝓪𝓹𝓪𝓭𝓪 𝓿𝓲𝓸𝓵𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓪 𝓹𝓮𝓻𝓪𝓷𝓽𝓮 𝓪 𝓭𝓸𝓻𝓶𝓮̂𝓷𝓬𝓲𝓪 𝓸𝓬𝓲𝓭𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓪𝓵. 𝓐 𝓱𝓾𝓶𝓪𝓷𝓲𝔃𝓪𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸 𝓭𝓪𝓺𝓾𝓮𝓵𝓪𝓼 𝓹𝓮𝓼𝓼𝓸𝓪𝓼, 𝓭𝓮𝓲𝔁𝓪𝓭𝓪𝓼 𝓪̀ 𝓼𝓾𝓪 𝓼𝓸𝓻𝓽𝓮 𝓹𝓮𝓻𝓪𝓷𝓽𝓮 𝓾𝓶 𝓲𝓷𝓿𝓪𝓼𝓸𝓻 𝓶𝓾𝓲𝓽𝓸 𝓶𝓪𝓲𝓼 𝓹𝓸𝓭𝓮𝓻𝓸𝓼𝓸, 𝓪𝓬𝓽𝓲𝓿𝓸𝓾 𝓮𝓶 𝓷𝓸́𝓼 𝓾𝓶 𝓼𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓲𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓸 𝓭𝓮 𝓮𝓶𝓹𝓪𝓽𝓲𝓪 𝓮 𝓼𝓸𝓵𝓲𝓭𝓪𝓻𝓲𝓮𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓮 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓷𝓸𝓼 𝓭𝓮𝓲𝔁𝓪 𝓪 𝓹𝓮𝓷𝓼𝓪𝓻 - 𝓪𝓺𝓾𝓲𝓵𝓸 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓷𝓸𝓼 𝓼𝓮𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓪 𝓭𝓮𝓵𝓮𝓼 𝓮́ 𝓪 𝓼𝓸𝓻𝓽𝓮.
𝓢𝓸𝓻𝓽𝓮 𝓭𝓮 𝓽𝓮𝓻𝓶𝓸𝓼 𝓷𝓪𝓼𝓬𝓲𝓭𝓸 𝓷𝓸𝓾𝓽𝓻𝓪 𝓰𝓮𝓸𝓰𝓻𝓪𝓯𝓲𝓪, 𝓼𝓸𝓻𝓽𝓮 𝓭𝓮 𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓪𝓻𝓶𝓸𝓼 𝓷𝓪 𝓝𝓐𝓣𝓞, 𝓼𝓸𝓻𝓽𝓮 𝓭𝓮 𝓯𝓪𝔃𝓮𝓻𝓶𝓸𝓼 𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓽𝓮 𝓭𝓪 𝓤𝓷𝓲𝓪̃𝓸 𝓔𝓾𝓻𝓸𝓹𝓮𝓲𝓪, 𝓼𝓸𝓻𝓽𝓮 𝓭𝓮 𝓷𝓪̃𝓸 𝓽𝓮𝓻𝓶𝓸𝓼 𝓿𝓲𝔃𝓲𝓷𝓱𝓸𝓼 𝓶𝓮𝓰𝓪𝓵𝓸𝓶𝓪𝓷𝓲́𝓪𝓬𝓸𝓼.
𝓔𝓼𝓽𝓪 𝓮́, 𝓽𝓪𝓵𝓿𝓮𝔃, 𝓪 𝓹𝓻𝓲𝓶𝓮𝓲𝓻𝓪 𝓰𝓾𝓮𝓻𝓻𝓪 𝓪 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓿𝓮𝓻𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓮𝓲𝓻𝓪𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮 𝓪𝓼𝓼𝓲𝓼𝓽𝓲𝓶𝓸𝓼 𝓮𝓶 𝓭𝓲𝓻𝓮𝓬𝓽𝓸, 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓷𝓸𝓼 𝓬𝓱𝓮𝓰𝓪 𝓪𝓸𝓼 𝓸𝓵𝓱𝓸𝓼 𝓮 𝓸𝓾𝓿𝓲𝓭𝓸𝓼 𝓹𝓮𝓵𝓸 𝓭𝓲𝓼𝓹𝓸𝓼𝓲𝓽𝓲𝓿𝓸 𝓶𝓪𝓲𝓼 𝓹𝓮𝓼𝓼𝓸𝓪𝓵 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓽𝓮𝓶𝓸𝓼, 𝓸 𝓼𝓶𝓪𝓻𝓽𝓹𝓱𝓸𝓷𝓮. 𝓝𝓪̃𝓸 𝓮́ 𝓸 𝓾́𝓷𝓲𝓬𝓸 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓯𝓵𝓲𝓽𝓸 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓪́ 𝓪 𝓪𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓽𝓮𝓬𝓮𝓻 𝓷𝓸 𝓶𝓾𝓷𝓭𝓸 𝓮 𝓸𝓾𝓽𝓻𝓸𝓼, 𝓲𝓷𝓯𝓮𝓵𝓲𝔃𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮, 𝓷𝓪̃𝓸 𝓽𝓮̂𝓶 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓼𝓮𝓰𝓾𝓲𝓭𝓸 𝓪 𝓶𝓮𝓼𝓶𝓪 𝓪𝓽𝓮𝓷𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸 𝓮 𝓼𝓲𝓶𝓹𝓪𝓽𝓲𝓪 𝓶𝓾𝓷𝓭𝓲𝓪𝓵. 𝓜𝓪𝓼 𝓲𝓼𝓼𝓸 𝓷𝓪̃𝓸 𝓮́ 𝓳𝓾𝓼𝓽𝓲𝓯𝓲𝓬𝓪𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸 𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓪 𝓬𝓻𝓾𝔃𝓪𝓻 𝓸𝓼 𝓫𝓻𝓪𝓬̧𝓸𝓼.
𝓝𝓪̃𝓸 𝓼𝓮 𝓬𝓸𝓻𝓻𝓲𝓰𝓮 𝓾𝓶 𝓮𝓻𝓻𝓸 𝓭𝓮𝓲𝔁𝓪𝓷𝓭𝓸 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓽𝓸𝓭𝓸𝓼 𝓸𝓼 𝓸𝓾𝓽𝓻𝓸𝓼 𝓪𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓽𝓮𝓬̧𝓪𝓶. 𝓜𝓮𝓼𝓶𝓸 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓱𝓪𝓳𝓪 𝓾𝓶𝓪 𝓱𝓲𝓼𝓽𝓸́𝓻𝓲𝓪 𝓶𝓾𝓲𝓽𝓸 𝓹𝓻𝓸𝓫𝓵𝓮𝓶𝓪́𝓽𝓲𝓬𝓪 𝓬𝓸𝓶 𝓪𝓼 𝓪𝓬𝓬̧𝓸̃𝓮𝓼 𝓶𝓲𝓵𝓲𝓽𝓪𝓻𝓮𝓼 𝓭𝓸𝓼 𝓔𝓼𝓽𝓪𝓭𝓸𝓼 𝓤𝓷𝓲𝓭𝓸𝓼 𝓮 𝓭𝓪 𝓝𝓐𝓣𝓞, 𝓶𝓮𝓼𝓶𝓸 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓸 𝓯𝓾𝓷𝓭𝓪𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓸 𝓭𝓪 𝓲𝓷𝓿𝓪𝓼𝓪̃𝓸 𝓭𝓸 𝓘𝓻𝓪𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓽𝓮𝓷𝓱𝓪 𝓼𝓲𝓭𝓸 𝓯𝓪𝓵𝓼𝓸, 𝓲𝓼𝓼𝓸 𝓷𝓪̃𝓸 𝓪𝓫𝓼𝓸𝓵𝓿𝓮 𝓸 𝓞𝓬𝓲𝓭𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮 𝓭𝓮 𝓯𝓪𝔃𝓮𝓻 𝓸 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓹𝓾𝓭𝓮𝓻 𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓪 𝓪𝓳𝓾𝓭𝓪𝓻 𝓪 𝓤𝓬𝓻𝓪̂𝓷𝓲𝓪 𝓪 𝓶𝓪𝓷𝓽𝓮𝓻 𝓪 𝓼𝓾𝓪 𝓼𝓸𝓫𝓮𝓻𝓪𝓷𝓲𝓪 𝓽𝓮𝓻𝓻𝓲𝓽𝓸𝓻𝓲𝓪𝓵. 𝓐𝓺𝓾𝓲 𝓷𝓪̃𝓸 𝓱𝓪́ 𝓭𝓸𝓲𝓼 𝓵𝓪𝓭𝓸𝓼.
* Jornalista
IN "DINHEIRO VIVO" - 01/03/22 .
Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário