PAULA CARDOSO

 .

𝐐𝐔𝐄𝐌 𝐍𝐀̃𝐎 𝐄́ 𝐑𝐀𝐂𝐈𝐒𝐓𝐀 𝐃𝐄𝐕𝐈𝐀 𝐒𝐄𝐍𝐓𝐈𝐑-𝐒𝐄

 𝐎𝐁𝐑𝐈𝐆𝐀𝐃𝐎 𝐀 𝐃𝐈𝐕𝐔𝐋𝐆𝐀𝐑 𝐄𝐒𝐓𝐄 𝐓𝐄𝐗𝐓𝐎

Tribunal dos horrores

a violência contra

Cláudia Simões continua

Qual tribunal dos horrores, durante três penosas horas de audiência, vimos e ouvimos a juíza a admoestar Cláudia Simões repetidamente. Fez-lhe um retrato como pessoa indisciplinada e desobediente, prosseguindo em tom de intimidação. Tudo isto é triste, tudo isto é racismo.

𝘖 𝘳𝘰𝘴𝘵𝘰 𝘥𝘦 𝘊𝘭𝘢́𝘶𝘥𝘪𝘢 𝘚𝘪𝘮𝘰̃𝘦𝘴, 𝘥𝘦𝘧𝘰𝘳𝘮𝘢𝘥𝘰 𝘱𝘰𝘳 𝘩𝘦𝘮𝘢𝘵𝘰𝘮𝘢𝘴 𝘦𝘹𝘵𝘦𝘯𝘴𝘰𝘴, 𝘥𝘦𝘶-𝘯𝘰𝘴, 𝘦𝘮 𝘑𝘢𝘯𝘦𝘪𝘳𝘰 𝘥𝘦 𝟤𝟢𝟤𝟢, 𝘮𝘢𝘪𝘴 𝘶𝘮 𝘨𝘳𝘢𝘷𝘦 𝘳𝘦𝘵𝘳𝘢𝘵𝘰 𝘥𝘢 𝘷𝘪𝘰𝘭𝘦̂𝘯𝘤𝘪𝘢 𝘱𝘰𝘭𝘪𝘤𝘪𝘢𝘭 𝘳𝘢𝘤𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘢 𝘦𝘮 𝘗𝘰𝘳𝘵𝘶𝘨𝘢𝘭. 𝘘𝘶𝘢𝘴𝘦 𝘲𝘶𝘢𝘵𝘳𝘰 𝘢𝘯𝘰𝘴 𝘥𝘦𝘱𝘰𝘪𝘴, 𝘰 𝘤𝘢𝘴𝘰 𝘤𝘰𝘮𝘦𝘤̧𝘰𝘶 𝘢 𝘴𝘦𝘳 𝘫𝘶𝘭𝘨𝘢𝘥𝘰 𝘯𝘰𝘴 𝘑𝘶𝘪́𝘻𝘰𝘴 𝘊𝘳𝘪𝘮𝘪𝘯𝘢𝘪𝘴 𝘥𝘦 𝘚𝘪𝘯𝘵𝘳𝘢, 𝘴𝘦𝘮 𝘲𝘶𝘦 𝘴𝘦 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘴𝘪𝘨𝘢 𝘥𝘦𝘵𝘦𝘤𝘵𝘢𝘳 𝘶𝘮 𝘷𝘪𝘴𝘭𝘶𝘮𝘣𝘳𝘦 𝘲𝘶𝘦 𝘴𝘦𝘫𝘢 𝘥𝘦 𝘑𝘶𝘴𝘵𝘪𝘤̧𝘢.

𝘈𝘧𝘪𝘯𝘢𝘭, 𝘤𝘰𝘮𝘰 𝘦𝘹𝘱𝘭𝘪𝘤𝘢𝘳 𝘲𝘶𝘦 𝘰 𝘛𝘳𝘪𝘣𝘶𝘯𝘢𝘭 𝘥𝘢 𝘙𝘦𝘭𝘢𝘤̧𝘢̃𝘰 𝘥𝘦 𝘓𝘪𝘴𝘣𝘰𝘢 𝘯𝘢̃𝘰 𝘳𝘦𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘩𝘦𝘤̧𝘢 𝘰 𝘥𝘪𝘳𝘦𝘪𝘵𝘰 𝘥𝘦 𝘭𝘦𝘨𝘪́𝘵𝘪𝘮𝘢 𝘥𝘦𝘧𝘦𝘴𝘢 𝘢 𝘶𝘮𝘢 𝘱𝘦𝘴𝘴𝘰𝘢 𝘲𝘶𝘦 𝘧𝘰𝘪 𝘷𝘪𝘰𝘭𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘢𝘥𝘢? 𝘊𝘰𝘮𝘰 𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘦𝘯𝘥𝘦𝘳 𝘲𝘶𝘦 𝘊𝘭𝘢́𝘶𝘥𝘪𝘢 𝘚𝘪𝘮𝘰̃𝘦𝘴 𝘴𝘦 𝘴𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘦 𝘯𝘰 𝘣𝘢𝘯𝘤𝘰 𝘥𝘰𝘴 𝘳𝘦́𝘶𝘴 𝘥𝘦𝘱𝘰𝘪𝘴 𝘥𝘦 𝘰 𝘔𝘪𝘯𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘦́𝘳𝘪𝘰 𝘗𝘶́𝘣𝘭𝘪𝘤𝘰 (𝘔𝘗) 𝘵𝘦𝘳 𝘳𝘦𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘩𝘦𝘤𝘪𝘥𝘰 𝘢 𝘣𝘳𝘶𝘵𝘢𝘭𝘪𝘥𝘢𝘥𝘦 𝘲𝘶𝘦 𝘷𝘪𝘷𝘦𝘶 – “𝘧𝘰𝘪 𝘪𝘭𝘦𝘨𝘢𝘭𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘦 𝘥𝘦𝘵𝘪𝘥𝘢, 𝘢𝘭𝘨𝘦𝘮𝘢𝘥𝘢, 𝘢𝘨𝘳𝘦𝘥𝘪𝘥𝘢, 𝘪𝘯𝘴𝘶𝘭𝘵𝘢𝘥𝘢 𝘦 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘥𝘶𝘻𝘪𝘥𝘢 𝘯𝘶𝘮 𝘷𝘦𝘪́𝘤𝘶𝘭𝘰 𝘥𝘢 𝘗𝘚𝘗 𝘱𝘢𝘳𝘢 𝘢 𝘦𝘴𝘲𝘶𝘢𝘥𝘳𝘢” –, 𝘦, 𝘯𝘢 𝘴𝘦𝘲𝘶𝘦̂𝘯𝘤𝘪𝘢 𝘥𝘢 𝘮𝘦𝘴𝘮𝘢, 𝘵𝘦𝘳 𝘢𝘤𝘶𝘴𝘢𝘥𝘰 𝘵𝘳𝘦̂𝘴 𝘱𝘰𝘭𝘪́𝘤𝘪𝘢𝘴 𝘥𝘦 𝘢𝘨𝘪𝘳𝘦𝘮 “𝘤𝘰𝘮 𝘷𝘪𝘰𝘭𝘢𝘤̧𝘢̃𝘰 𝘥𝘰𝘴 𝘴𝘦𝘶𝘴 𝘥𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘦𝘴 𝘧𝘶𝘯𝘤𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘢𝘪𝘴”? 𝘊𝘰𝘮𝘰 𝘤𝘰𝘮𝘱𝘳𝘦𝘦𝘯𝘥𝘦𝘳 𝘵𝘢𝘮𝘣𝘦́𝘮 𝘲𝘶𝘦 𝘊𝘭𝘢́𝘶𝘥𝘪𝘢 𝘵𝘦𝘯𝘩𝘢 𝘥𝘦 𝘵𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘦𝘮𝘶𝘯𝘩𝘢𝘳 𝘴𝘰𝘣𝘳𝘦 𝘢𝘴 𝘢𝘨𝘳𝘦𝘴𝘴𝘰̃𝘦𝘴 𝘲𝘶𝘦 𝘴𝘰𝘧𝘳𝘦𝘶, 𝘥𝘪𝘢𝘯𝘵𝘦 𝘥𝘰 𝘢𝘨𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘦 𝘲𝘶𝘦 𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘢́ 𝘢 𝘴𝘦𝘳 𝘢𝘤𝘶𝘴𝘢𝘥𝘰 𝘥𝘦 𝘢 𝘵𝘦𝘳 𝘣𝘳𝘶𝘵𝘢𝘭𝘪𝘻𝘢𝘥𝘰, 𝘯𝘰𝘮𝘦𝘢𝘥𝘢𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘦 𝘤𝘰𝘮 “𝘷𝘢́𝘳𝘪𝘰𝘴 𝘴𝘰𝘤𝘰𝘴 𝘯𝘢 𝘤𝘢𝘣𝘦𝘤̧𝘢”?

𝘚𝘦𝘨𝘶𝘯𝘥𝘰 𝘤𝘰𝘮𝘶𝘯𝘪𝘤𝘰𝘶 𝘢 𝘫𝘶𝘪́𝘻𝘢-𝘱𝘳𝘦𝘴𝘪𝘥𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘦 𝘥𝘰 𝘤𝘰𝘭𝘦𝘤𝘵𝘪𝘷𝘰, 𝘊𝘢𝘵𝘢𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘢 𝘗𝘪𝘳𝘦𝘴, “𝘯𝘢̃𝘰 𝘩𝘢́ 𝘳𝘢𝘻𝘰̃𝘦𝘴 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘤𝘳𝘦𝘵𝘢𝘴” 𝘱𝘢𝘳𝘢 𝘲𝘶𝘦 𝘢 𝘷𝘪́𝘵𝘪𝘮𝘢 𝘱𝘳𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘦 𝘥𝘦𝘤𝘭𝘢𝘳𝘢𝘤̧𝘰̃𝘦𝘴 𝘴𝘦𝘮 𝘢 𝘱𝘳𝘦𝘴𝘦𝘯𝘤̧𝘢 𝘥𝘦 𝘲𝘶𝘦𝘮 𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘢́ 𝘢𝘤𝘶𝘴𝘢𝘥𝘰 𝘥𝘦 𝘢 𝘢𝘨𝘳𝘦𝘥𝘪𝘳. 𝘗𝘰𝘳 𝘪𝘴𝘴𝘰, 𝘧𝘰𝘪 𝘱𝘦𝘳𝘢𝘯𝘵𝘦 𝘰𝘴 𝘵𝘳𝘦̂𝘴 𝘢𝘨𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘦𝘴 (𝘊𝘢𝘳𝘭𝘰𝘴 𝘊𝘢𝘯𝘩𝘢, 𝘑𝘰𝘢̃𝘰 𝘊𝘢𝘳𝘭𝘰𝘴 𝘊𝘢𝘳𝘥𝘰𝘴𝘰 𝘕𝘦𝘵𝘰 𝘎𝘰𝘶𝘷𝘦𝘪𝘢 𝘦 𝘍𝘦𝘳𝘯𝘢𝘯𝘥𝘰 𝘓𝘶𝘪́𝘴 𝘗𝘦𝘳𝘦𝘪𝘳𝘢 𝘙𝘰𝘥𝘳𝘪𝘨𝘶𝘦𝘴) 𝘲𝘶𝘦 𝘊𝘭𝘢𝘶́𝘥𝘪𝘢 𝘳𝘦𝘭𝘢𝘵𝘰𝘶 𝘤𝘰𝘮𝘰 𝘩𝘰𝘫𝘦 𝘵𝘦𝘮 𝘱𝘢̂𝘯𝘪𝘤𝘰 𝘥𝘢 𝘗𝘰𝘭𝘪́𝘤𝘪𝘢, 𝘦 𝘤𝘰𝘮𝘰 𝘢 𝘴𝘶𝘢 𝘧𝘪𝘭𝘩𝘢 – 𝘲𝘶𝘦, 𝘤𝘰𝘮 𝘢𝘱𝘦𝘯𝘢𝘴 𝟩 𝘢𝘯𝘰𝘴, 𝘵𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘦𝘮𝘶𝘯𝘩𝘰𝘶 𝘰 𝘩𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘰𝘳 𝘥𝘢𝘴 𝘢𝘨𝘳𝘦𝘴𝘴𝘰̃𝘦𝘴 – 𝘵𝘢𝘮𝘣𝘦́𝘮 𝘨𝘢𝘯𝘩𝘰𝘶 𝘢𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘴𝘢̃𝘰 𝘢 𝘦𝘴𝘴𝘢 𝘧𝘰𝘳𝘤̧𝘢.

“𝘈 𝘮𝘪𝘯𝘩𝘢 𝘧𝘪𝘭𝘩𝘢 𝘢𝘵𝘦́ 𝘩𝘰𝘫𝘦 𝘵𝘦𝘮 𝘴𝘦𝘲𝘶𝘦𝘭𝘢𝘴 𝘥𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘢 𝘴𝘪𝘵𝘶𝘢𝘤̧𝘢̃𝘰, 𝘦 𝘯𝘪𝘯𝘨𝘶𝘦́𝘮 𝘲𝘶𝘦𝘳 𝘴𝘢𝘣𝘦𝘳”, 𝘢𝘴𝘴𝘪𝘯𝘢𝘭𝘰𝘶 𝘊𝘭𝘢́𝘶𝘥𝘪𝘢 𝘯𝘢 𝘱𝘳𝘪𝘮𝘦𝘪𝘳𝘢 𝘴𝘦𝘴𝘴𝘢̃𝘰 𝘥𝘰 𝘫𝘶𝘭𝘨𝘢𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘰, 𝘳𝘦𝘢𝘭𝘪𝘻𝘢𝘥𝘢 𝘯𝘢 𝘱𝘢𝘴𝘴𝘢𝘥𝘢 𝘲𝘶𝘢𝘳𝘵𝘢-𝘧𝘦𝘪𝘳𝘢, 𝟪.

“𝘈 𝘴𝘶𝘢 𝘧𝘪𝘭𝘩𝘢 𝘯𝘢̃𝘰 𝘦́ 𝘢𝘲𝘶𝘪 𝘢𝘳𝘨𝘶𝘪𝘥𝘢”, 𝘧𝘦𝘻 𝘴𝘢𝘣𝘦𝘳 𝘢 𝘫𝘶𝘪́𝘻𝘢 𝘲𝘶𝘦, 𝘥𝘰 𝘱𝘳𝘪𝘮𝘦𝘪𝘳𝘰 𝘢𝘰 𝘶́𝘭𝘵𝘪𝘮𝘰 𝘴𝘦𝘨𝘶𝘯𝘥𝘰 𝘯𝘶𝘯𝘤𝘢 𝘢𝘣𝘢𝘯𝘥𝘰𝘯𝘰𝘶 𝘢 𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘵𝘶𝘥𝘦 𝘢𝘭𝘵𝘪𝘷𝘢, 𝘩𝘰𝘴𝘵𝘪𝘭 𝘦 𝘨𝘳𝘰𝘴𝘴𝘦𝘪𝘳𝘢.

𝘊𝘰𝘮𝘰 𝘲𝘶𝘦𝘮 𝘪𝘨𝘯𝘰𝘳𝘢 𝘲𝘶𝘦 𝘩𝘢́ 𝘷𝘢́𝘳𝘪𝘢𝘴 𝘭𝘪𝘯𝘩𝘢𝘴 𝘲𝘶𝘦 𝘴𝘦𝘱𝘢𝘳𝘢𝘮 𝘢 𝘢𝘴𝘴𝘦𝘳𝘵𝘪𝘷𝘪𝘥𝘢𝘥𝘦 𝘦 𝘥𝘪𝘴𝘤𝘪𝘱𝘭𝘪𝘯𝘢 𝘥𝘢 𝘤𝘳𝘶𝘦𝘭𝘥𝘢𝘥𝘦, 𝘥𝘦𝘴𝘳𝘦𝘴𝘱𝘦𝘪𝘵𝘰, 𝘦 𝘧𝘢𝘭𝘵𝘢 𝘥𝘦 𝘦𝘥𝘶𝘤𝘢𝘤̧𝘢̃𝘰, 𝘊𝘢𝘵𝘢𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘢 𝘗𝘪𝘳𝘦𝘴 𝘮𝘦𝘳𝘨𝘶𝘭𝘩𝘰𝘶-𝘯𝘰𝘴 𝘯𝘶𝘮 𝘪𝘯𝘤𝘰𝘮𝘱𝘳𝘦𝘦𝘯𝘴𝘪́𝘷𝘦𝘭 𝘤𝘭𝘪𝘮𝘢 𝘣𝘦𝘭𝘪𝘨𝘦𝘳𝘢𝘯𝘵𝘦.

𝘈 𝘤𝘢𝘣𝘦𝘤̧𝘢 𝘥𝘦 𝘊𝘭𝘢́𝘶𝘥𝘪𝘢, 𝘢 𝘴𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘦𝘯𝘤̧𝘢 𝘥𝘢 𝘫𝘶𝘪́𝘻𝘢

𝘘𝘶𝘢𝘭 𝘵𝘳𝘪𝘣𝘶𝘯𝘢𝘭 𝘥𝘰𝘴 𝘩𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘰𝘳𝘦𝘴, 𝘥𝘶𝘳𝘢𝘯𝘵𝘦 𝘵𝘳𝘦̂𝘴 𝘱𝘦𝘯𝘰𝘴𝘢𝘴 𝘩𝘰𝘳𝘢𝘴 𝘥𝘦 𝘢𝘶𝘥𝘪𝘦̂𝘯𝘤𝘪𝘢 – 𝘥𝘢𝘴 𝟣𝟥𝘩𝟥𝟢 𝘢̀𝘴 𝟣𝟨𝘩𝟥𝟢 –, 𝘷𝘪𝘮𝘰𝘴 𝘦 𝘰𝘶𝘷𝘪𝘮𝘰𝘴 𝘢 𝘫𝘶𝘪́𝘻𝘢 𝘢 𝘢𝘥𝘮𝘰𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘢𝘳 𝘊𝘭𝘢́𝘶𝘥𝘪𝘢 𝘚𝘪𝘮𝘰̃𝘦𝘴 𝘳𝘦𝘱𝘦𝘵𝘪𝘥𝘢𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘦. 𝘍𝘰𝘴𝘴𝘦 𝘱𝘰𝘳 𝘧𝘢𝘭𝘢𝘳 𝘢𝘯𝘵𝘦𝘴 𝘥𝘰 𝘵𝘦𝘮𝘱𝘰 –“𝘊𝘰𝘮𝘦𝘤̧𝘰 𝘢 𝘱𝘦𝘯𝘴𝘢𝘳 𝘲𝘶𝘦 𝘯𝘢̃𝘰 𝘦́ 𝘤𝘢𝘱𝘢𝘻 𝘥𝘦 𝘱𝘢𝘳𝘢𝘳”, 𝘥𝘪𝘴𝘴𝘦 –, 𝘧𝘰𝘴𝘴𝘦 𝘱𝘰𝘳 𝘯𝘢̃𝘰 𝘴𝘦 𝘦𝘹𝘱𝘳𝘦𝘴𝘴𝘢𝘳 𝘯𝘰 “𝘴𝘦𝘶” 𝘱𝘰𝘳𝘵𝘶𝘨𝘶𝘦̂𝘴: “𝘋𝘪𝘻-𝘴𝘦 𝘶𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘢𝘷𝘢 [𝘦𝘮 𝘷𝘦𝘻 𝘥𝘦 𝘮𝘪𝘫𝘢𝘷𝘢]”.

𝘌𝘯𝘵𝘳𝘦 𝘢𝘥𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘵𝘦̂𝘯𝘤𝘪𝘢𝘴, 𝘯𝘢̃𝘰 𝘧𝘢𝘭𝘵𝘰𝘶 𝘴𝘦𝘲𝘶𝘦𝘳 𝘶𝘮 𝘮𝘰𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘰 𝘢 𝘧𝘢𝘻𝘦𝘳 𝘭𝘦𝘮𝘣𝘳𝘢𝘳 𝘷𝘦𝘭𝘩𝘢𝘴 𝘱𝘳𝘢́𝘵𝘪𝘤𝘢𝘴 𝘳𝘢𝘤𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘢𝘴 𝘥𝘦 𝘮𝘦𝘥𝘪𝘤̧𝘢̃𝘰 𝘥𝘦 𝘤𝘳𝘢̂𝘯𝘪𝘰𝘴. 𝘛𝘢̃𝘰 𝘢𝘱𝘳𝘦𝘤𝘪𝘢𝘥𝘢𝘴 𝘲𝘶𝘦 𝘦𝘮 𝘵𝘳𝘪𝘣𝘶𝘯𝘢𝘭 𝘦𝘴𝘴𝘦 𝘪𝘯𝘴𝘵𝘢𝘯𝘵𝘦 𝘵𝘦𝘷𝘦 𝘥𝘪𝘳𝘦𝘪𝘵𝘰 𝘢 𝘣𝘪𝘴. 𝘊𝘰𝘮𝘦𝘤̧𝘰𝘶 𝘤𝘰𝘮 𝘊𝘭𝘢́𝘶𝘥𝘪𝘢 𝘢 𝘥𝘦𝘴𝘤𝘳𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘳 𝘤𝘰𝘮𝘰 𝘢𝘴 𝘢𝘨𝘳𝘦𝘴𝘴𝘰̃𝘦𝘴 𝘥𝘰 𝘢𝘨𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘦 𝘊𝘢𝘳𝘭𝘰𝘴 𝘊𝘢𝘯𝘩𝘢 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘵𝘪𝘯𝘶𝘢𝘮 𝘣𝘦𝘮 𝘮𝘢𝘳𝘤𝘢𝘥𝘢𝘴 𝘯𝘰 𝘴𝘦𝘶 𝘤𝘰𝘳𝘱𝘰. 𝘌𝘹𝘱𝘭𝘪𝘤𝘢𝘯𝘥𝘰 𝘲𝘶𝘦 𝘦́ 𝘰𝘣𝘳𝘪𝘨𝘢𝘥𝘢 𝘢 𝘶𝘴𝘢𝘳 𝘱𝘦𝘳𝘶𝘤𝘢 𝘱𝘰𝘳𝘲𝘶𝘦 𝘰 𝘴𝘦𝘶 𝘤𝘢𝘣𝘦𝘭𝘰 𝘧𝘰𝘪 𝘷𝘪𝘰𝘭𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘢𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘦 𝘢𝘳𝘳𝘢𝘯𝘤𝘢𝘥𝘰 𝘱𝘦𝘭𝘰 𝘢𝘨𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘦, 𝘊𝘭𝘢́𝘶𝘥𝘪𝘢 𝘥𝘪𝘴𝘱𝘰𝘯𝘪𝘣𝘪𝘭𝘪𝘻𝘰𝘶-𝘴𝘦 𝘱𝘢𝘳𝘢 𝘮𝘰𝘴𝘵𝘳𝘢𝘳 𝘦𝘴𝘴𝘢 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘴𝘦𝘲𝘶𝘦̂𝘯𝘤𝘪𝘢.

𝘚𝘦𝘮 𝘶𝘮 𝘱𝘪𝘯𝘨𝘰 𝘥𝘦 𝘩𝘶𝘮𝘢𝘯𝘪𝘥𝘢𝘥𝘦 – 𝘴𝘦 𝘣𝘦𝘮 𝘲𝘶𝘦 𝘢𝘲𝘶𝘪 𝘣𝘢𝘴𝘵𝘢𝘳𝘪𝘢 𝘰 𝘣𝘰𝘮 𝘴𝘦𝘯𝘴𝘰 –, 𝘢 𝘮𝘢𝘨𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘳𝘢𝘥𝘢 𝘯𝘢̃𝘰 𝘳𝘦𝘴𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘪𝘶 𝘢̀ 𝘤𝘶𝘳𝘪𝘰𝘴𝘪𝘥𝘢𝘥𝘦 𝘥𝘦 𝘷𝘦𝘳. 𝘋𝘦𝘱𝘰𝘪𝘴 𝘥𝘦 𝘊𝘭𝘢𝘶́𝘥𝘪𝘢 𝘵𝘪𝘳𝘢𝘳 𝘢 𝘱𝘦𝘳𝘶𝘤𝘢, 𝘥𝘦𝘪𝘹𝘢𝘯𝘥𝘰 𝘷𝘪𝘴𝘪́𝘷𝘦𝘭 𝘶𝘮𝘢 𝘳𝘦𝘥𝘦 𝘴𝘰𝘣𝘳𝘦 𝘢 𝘤𝘢𝘣𝘦𝘤̧𝘢, 𝘢 𝘫𝘶𝘪́𝘻𝘢 𝘱𝘦𝘥𝘪𝘶-𝘭𝘩𝘦 𝘵𝘢𝘮𝘣𝘦́𝘮 𝘲𝘶𝘦 𝘳𝘦𝘵𝘪𝘳𝘢𝘴𝘴𝘦 𝘢 𝘳𝘦𝘥𝘦.

𝘏𝘢́ 𝘱𝘰𝘳 𝘢𝘪́ 𝘢𝘭𝘨𝘶𝘦́𝘮 𝘲𝘶𝘦 𝘴𝘦 𝘭𝘦𝘮𝘣𝘳𝘦 𝘥𝘰𝘴 𝘻𝘰𝘰𝘴 𝘩𝘶𝘮𝘢𝘯𝘰𝘴?

𝘈𝘣𝘦𝘳𝘵𝘰 𝘰 𝘱𝘳𝘦𝘤𝘦𝘥𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘦, 𝘢 𝘢𝘥𝘷𝘰𝘨𝘢𝘥𝘢 𝘥𝘦 𝘊𝘢𝘳𝘭𝘰𝘴 𝘊𝘢𝘯𝘩𝘢 𝘥𝘦𝘴𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘧𝘪𝘰𝘶 𝘥𝘢𝘴 𝘱𝘦𝘭𝘢𝘥𝘢𝘴 𝘦, 𝘫𝘢́ 𝘥𝘦𝘱𝘰𝘪𝘴 𝘥𝘰 𝘱𝘳𝘪𝘮𝘦𝘪𝘳𝘰 𝘥𝘦𝘴𝘧𝘪𝘭𝘦 𝘤𝘢𝘱𝘪𝘭𝘢𝘳, 𝘦𝘹𝘪𝘨𝘪𝘶 𝘯𝘰𝘷𝘢 𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘪𝘧𝘪𝘤𝘢𝘤̧𝘢̃𝘰. 𝘔𝘰𝘵𝘪𝘷𝘰? 𝘍𝘪𝘤𝘰𝘶 𝘤𝘰𝘮 𝘢 𝘪𝘮𝘱𝘳𝘦𝘴𝘴𝘢̃𝘰 𝘥𝘦 𝘲𝘶𝘦 𝘊𝘭𝘢́𝘶𝘥𝘪𝘢 𝘳𝘢𝘱𝘢 𝘰 𝘤𝘢𝘣𝘦𝘭𝘰. 𝘊𝘢𝘵𝘢𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘢 𝘗𝘪𝘳𝘦𝘴 𝘢𝘶𝘵𝘰𝘳𝘪𝘻𝘰𝘶 𝘢 “𝘷𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘰𝘳𝘪𝘢” 𝘦, 𝘱𝘦𝘭𝘢 𝘴𝘦𝘨𝘶𝘯𝘥𝘢 𝘷𝘦𝘻, 𝘢 𝘩𝘶𝘮𝘪𝘭𝘩𝘢𝘤̧𝘢̃𝘰 𝘢𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘵𝘦𝘤𝘦𝘶. 𝘋𝘶𝘳𝘰𝘶 𝘶𝘯𝘴 𝘴𝘦𝘨𝘶𝘯𝘥𝘰𝘴, 𝘱𝘰𝘳𝘲𝘶𝘦 𝘢 𝘫𝘶𝘪́𝘻𝘢 𝘱𝘢𝘳𝘦𝘤𝘦 𝘵𝘦𝘳 𝘱𝘦𝘳𝘤𝘦𝘣𝘪𝘥𝘰 𝘢 𝘷𝘪𝘰𝘭𝘦̂𝘯𝘤𝘪𝘢 𝘥𝘢 𝘴𝘪𝘵𝘶𝘢𝘤̧𝘢̃𝘰 𝘦 𝘵𝘳𝘢𝘷𝘰𝘶 𝘮𝘢𝘪𝘰𝘳𝘦𝘴 𝘢𝘷𝘢𝘯𝘤̧𝘰𝘴. “𝘖 𝘲𝘶𝘦 𝘢 𝘴𝘦𝘯𝘩𝘰𝘳𝘢 𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘢́ 𝘢 𝘷𝘦𝘳 𝘦́ 𝘰 𝘲𝘶𝘦 𝘯𝘰́𝘴 𝘷𝘦𝘮𝘰𝘴. 𝘛𝘪𝘳𝘦 𝘢𝘴 𝘴𝘶𝘢𝘴 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘤𝘭𝘶𝘴𝘰̃𝘦𝘴 𝘯𝘰 𝘮𝘰𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘰 𝘰𝘱𝘰𝘳𝘵𝘶𝘯𝘰”, 𝘥𝘪𝘴𝘴𝘦 𝘢̀ 𝘳𝘦𝘱𝘳𝘦𝘴𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘢𝘯𝘵𝘦 𝘥𝘦 𝘊𝘢𝘳𝘭𝘰𝘴 𝘊𝘢𝘯𝘩𝘢.

𝘖 𝘮𝘰𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘰 𝘥𝘦 𝘵𝘳𝘦́𝘨𝘶𝘢𝘴 𝘯𝘢̃𝘰 𝘵𝘳𝘢𝘷𝘰𝘶, 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘵𝘶𝘥𝘰, 𝘰 𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘢𝘥𝘰 𝘥𝘦 𝘣𝘦𝘭𝘪𝘨𝘦𝘳𝘢̂𝘯𝘤𝘪𝘢 𝘪𝘯𝘴𝘵𝘢𝘭𝘢𝘥𝘰.

𝘈 𝘵𝘦𝘴𝘦 𝘥𝘢 𝘮𝘶𝘭𝘩𝘦𝘳 𝘯𝘦𝘨𝘳𝘢 𝘢𝘨𝘳𝘦𝘴𝘴𝘪𝘷𝘢 𝘦 𝘥𝘦𝘴𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘵𝘳𝘰𝘭𝘢𝘥𝘢

𝘊𝘰𝘮𝘰 𝘴𝘦 𝘯𝘢̃𝘰 𝘣𝘢𝘴𝘵𝘢𝘴𝘴𝘦𝘮 𝘢𝘴 𝘢𝘥𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘵𝘦̂𝘯𝘤𝘪𝘢𝘴, 𝘊𝘢𝘵𝘢𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘢 𝘗𝘪𝘳𝘦𝘴 𝘯𝘢̃𝘰 𝘴𝘦 𝘤𝘰𝘪𝘣𝘪𝘶 𝘪𝘨𝘶𝘢𝘭𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘦 𝘥𝘦 𝘥𝘦𝘮𝘰𝘯𝘴𝘵𝘳𝘢𝘳 𝘲𝘶𝘢̃𝘰 𝘳𝘢́𝘱𝘪𝘥𝘢 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘴𝘦𝘨𝘶𝘦 𝘴𝘦𝘳 𝘯𝘰𝘴 𝘫𝘶𝘭𝘨𝘢𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘰𝘴 𝘥𝘦 𝘤𝘢𝘳𝘢́𝘤𝘵𝘦𝘳. 𝘋𝘪𝘢𝘯𝘵𝘦 𝘥𝘦 𝘶𝘮𝘢 𝘊𝘭𝘢́𝘶𝘥𝘪𝘢 𝘚𝘪𝘮𝘰̃𝘦𝘴 𝘵𝘢̃𝘰 𝘢𝘯𝘴𝘪𝘰𝘴𝘢 𝘦𝘮 𝘦𝘹𝘱𝘭𝘪𝘤𝘢𝘳 𝘰 𝘲𝘶𝘦 𝘢𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘵𝘦𝘤𝘦𝘶 𝘲𝘶𝘦 𝘮𝘶𝘪𝘵𝘢𝘴 𝘷𝘦𝘻𝘦𝘴 𝘯𝘢̃𝘰 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘴𝘦𝘨𝘶𝘪𝘶 𝘰𝘶𝘷𝘪𝘳 𝘢 𝘲𝘶𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘢̃𝘰 𝘢𝘵𝘦́ 𝘢𝘰 𝘧𝘪𝘯𝘢𝘭 𝘢𝘯𝘵𝘦𝘴 𝘥𝘦 𝘤𝘰𝘮𝘦𝘤̧𝘢𝘳 𝘢 𝘳𝘦𝘴𝘱𝘰𝘯𝘥𝘦𝘳, 𝘢 𝘫𝘶𝘪́𝘻𝘢 𝘴𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘦𝘯𝘤𝘪𝘰𝘶: “𝘌𝘴𝘵𝘢́ 𝘯𝘰 𝘥𝘰𝘮𝘪́𝘯𝘪𝘰 𝘥𝘢 𝘴𝘶𝘢 𝘷𝘰𝘯𝘵𝘢𝘥𝘦. 𝘑𝘢́ 𝘯𝘢̃𝘰 𝘵𝘦𝘮 𝘲𝘶𝘦 𝘷𝘦𝘳 𝘤𝘰𝘮 𝘥𝘦𝘴𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘩𝘦𝘤𝘪𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘰 𝘥𝘦 𝘳𝘦𝘨𝘳𝘢𝘴, 𝘮𝘢𝘴 𝘤𝘰𝘮 𝘢 𝘤𝘢𝘱𝘢𝘤𝘪𝘥𝘢𝘥𝘦 𝘥𝘦 𝘢𝘴 𝘤𝘶𝘮𝘱𝘳𝘪𝘳”.

𝘖 𝘳𝘦𝘵𝘳𝘢𝘵𝘰 𝘥𝘦 𝘊𝘭𝘢́𝘶𝘥𝘪𝘢 𝘤𝘰𝘮𝘰 𝘱𝘦𝘴𝘴𝘰𝘢 𝘪𝘯𝘥𝘪𝘴𝘤𝘪𝘱𝘭𝘪𝘯𝘢𝘥𝘢 𝘦 𝘥𝘦𝘴𝘰𝘣𝘦𝘥𝘪𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘦 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘴𝘴𝘦𝘨𝘶𝘪𝘶 𝘦𝘮 𝘵𝘰𝘮 𝘥𝘦 𝘪𝘯𝘵𝘪𝘮𝘪𝘥𝘢𝘤̧𝘢̃𝘰. “𝘚𝘢𝘣𝘦 𝘰 𝘴𝘦𝘨𝘶𝘪𝘯𝘵𝘦?”, 𝘲𝘶𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘰𝘶 𝘢 𝘮𝘢𝘨𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘳𝘢𝘥𝘢, “𝘳𝘦𝘨𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘰 𝘵𝘰𝘥𝘰 𝘰 𝘤𝘰𝘮𝘱𝘰𝘳𝘵𝘢𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘰 𝘥𝘦 𝘵𝘰𝘥𝘰𝘴 𝘰𝘴 𝘢𝘳𝘨𝘶𝘪𝘥𝘰𝘴 𝘦𝘯𝘲𝘶𝘢𝘯𝘵𝘰 𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘪𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘦𝘮 𝘦𝘮 𝘢𝘶𝘥𝘪𝘦̂𝘯𝘤𝘪𝘢: 𝘰 𝘲𝘶𝘦 𝘥𝘪𝘻𝘦𝘮 𝘦 𝘰 𝘮𝘰𝘥𝘰 𝘤𝘰𝘮𝘰 𝘴𝘦 𝘤𝘰𝘮𝘱𝘰𝘳𝘵𝘢𝘮. 𝘈𝘯𝘢𝘭𝘪𝘴𝘰 𝘪𝘴𝘴𝘰 𝘯𝘰 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘵𝘦𝘹𝘵𝘰 𝘥𝘦 𝘵𝘶𝘥𝘰 𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘰, 𝘥𝘦 𝘤𝘢𝘥𝘢 𝘷𝘦𝘻 𝘲𝘶𝘦 𝘮𝘦 𝘪𝘯𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘳𝘰𝘮𝘱𝘦”.

𝘌𝘮 “𝘵𝘶𝘥𝘰 𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘰” 𝘤𝘢𝘣𝘦 𝘢 𝘥𝘦𝘴𝘤𝘳𝘪𝘤̧𝘢̃𝘰 𝘢𝘱𝘳𝘦𝘴𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘢𝘥𝘢 𝘦𝘮 𝘵𝘳𝘪𝘣𝘶𝘯𝘢𝘭 𝘱𝘦𝘭𝘰 𝘢𝘨𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘦 𝘊𝘢𝘳𝘭𝘰𝘴 𝘊𝘢𝘯𝘩𝘢, 𝘢𝘤𝘶𝘴𝘢𝘥𝘰 𝘱𝘦𝘭𝘰 𝘔𝘗 𝘥𝘦 𝘵𝘳𝘦̂𝘴 𝘤𝘳𝘪𝘮𝘦𝘴 𝘥𝘦 𝘰𝘧𝘦𝘯𝘴𝘢 𝘢̀ 𝘪𝘯𝘵𝘦𝘨𝘳𝘪𝘥𝘢𝘥𝘦 𝘧𝘪́𝘴𝘪𝘤𝘢 𝘲𝘶𝘢𝘭𝘪𝘧𝘪𝘤𝘢𝘥𝘢, 𝘵𝘳𝘦̂𝘴 𝘥𝘦 𝘴𝘦𝘲𝘶𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘳𝘰 𝘢𝘨𝘳𝘢𝘷𝘢𝘥𝘰, 𝘶𝘮 𝘥𝘦 𝘢𝘣𝘶𝘴𝘰 𝘥𝘦 𝘱𝘰𝘥𝘦𝘳 𝘦 𝘰𝘶𝘵𝘳𝘰 𝘥𝘦 𝘪𝘯𝘫𝘶́𝘳𝘪𝘢 𝘢𝘨𝘳𝘢𝘷𝘢𝘥𝘢 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘵𝘳𝘢 𝘊𝘭𝘢́𝘶𝘥𝘪𝘢 𝘚𝘪𝘮𝘰̃𝘦𝘴 𝘦 𝘮𝘢𝘪𝘴 𝘥𝘶𝘢𝘴 𝘱𝘦𝘴𝘴𝘰𝘢𝘴.

𝘚𝘦𝘨𝘶𝘯𝘥𝘰 𝘰 𝘱𝘰𝘭𝘪́𝘤𝘪𝘢, 𝘯𝘢𝘲𝘶𝘦𝘭𝘦 𝟣𝟫 𝘥𝘦 𝘑𝘢𝘯𝘦𝘪𝘳𝘰 𝘥𝘦 𝟤𝟢𝟤𝟢, 𝘊𝘭𝘢𝘶́𝘥𝘪𝘢 “𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘢𝘷𝘢 𝘢𝘰𝘴 𝘨𝘳𝘪𝘵𝘰𝘴” 𝘲𝘶𝘢𝘯𝘥𝘰 𝘤𝘩𝘦𝘨𝘰𝘶 𝘢𝘰 𝘭𝘰𝘤𝘢𝘭 𝘥𝘢 𝘰𝘤𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘦̂𝘯𝘤𝘪𝘢. “𝘜𝘴𝘦𝘪 𝘥𝘢 𝘮𝘪𝘯𝘩𝘢 𝘤𝘰𝘳𝘥𝘪𝘢𝘭𝘪𝘥𝘢𝘥𝘦”, 𝘨𝘢𝘳𝘢𝘯𝘵𝘪𝘶 𝘊𝘢𝘯𝘩𝘢, 𝘢𝘭𝘦𝘨𝘢𝘯𝘥𝘰 𝘲𝘶𝘦 𝘳𝘦𝘤𝘦𝘣𝘦𝘶 𝘦𝘮 𝘵𝘳𝘰𝘤𝘢 𝘢𝘨𝘳𝘦𝘴𝘴𝘢̃𝘰 𝘦 𝘥𝘦𝘴𝘰𝘣𝘦𝘥𝘪𝘦̂𝘯𝘤𝘪𝘢. “𝘌𝘶 𝘧𝘢𝘤̧𝘰 𝘰 𝘲𝘶𝘦 𝘲𝘶𝘦𝘳𝘰, 𝘯𝘪𝘯𝘨𝘶𝘦́𝘮 𝘮𝘢𝘯𝘥𝘢 𝘦𝘮 𝘮𝘪𝘮”, 𝘧𝘰𝘳𝘢𝘮 𝘢𝘴 𝘱𝘢𝘭𝘢𝘷𝘳𝘢𝘴 𝘥𝘦 𝘥𝘦𝘴𝘢𝘤𝘢𝘵𝘰 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘧𝘦𝘳𝘪𝘥𝘢𝘴 𝘱𝘰𝘳 𝘊𝘭𝘢́𝘶𝘥𝘪𝘢, 𝘢̀ 𝘭𝘶𝘻 𝘥𝘰 𝘵𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘦𝘮𝘶𝘯𝘩𝘰 𝘥𝘰 𝘱𝘰𝘭𝘪́𝘤𝘪𝘢. 𝘐𝘯𝘤𝘢𝘱𝘢𝘻 𝘥𝘦 𝘦𝘹𝘱𝘭𝘪𝘤𝘢𝘳 𝘢 𝘰𝘳𝘪𝘨𝘦𝘮 𝘥𝘰𝘴 𝘧𝘦𝘳𝘪𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘰𝘴 𝘲𝘶𝘦 𝘭𝘦𝘷𝘢𝘳𝘢𝘮 𝘢 𝘰𝘧𝘦𝘯𝘥𝘪𝘥𝘢 𝘢 𝘳𝘦𝘤𝘦𝘣𝘦𝘳 𝘵𝘳𝘢𝘵𝘢𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘰 𝘩𝘰𝘴𝘱𝘪𝘵𝘢𝘭𝘢𝘳, 𝘰 𝘢𝘨𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘦 𝘴𝘶𝘨𝘦𝘳𝘦 𝘲𝘶𝘦 𝘊𝘭𝘢́𝘶𝘥𝘪𝘢 𝘴𝘦 𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘳𝘰𝘶 𝘥𝘰 𝘤𝘢𝘳𝘳𝘰-𝘱𝘢𝘵𝘳𝘶𝘭𝘩𝘢 𝘲𝘶𝘢𝘯𝘥𝘰 𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘢𝘷𝘢𝘮 𝘢 𝘤𝘩𝘦𝘨𝘢𝘳 𝘢̀ 𝘦𝘴𝘲𝘶𝘢𝘥𝘳𝘢.

𝘈 𝘯𝘢𝘳𝘳𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘷𝘢 𝘥𝘢 𝘮𝘶𝘭𝘩𝘦𝘳 𝘯𝘦𝘨𝘳𝘢 𝘢𝘨𝘳𝘦𝘴𝘴𝘪𝘷𝘢 𝘦 𝘥𝘦𝘴𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘵𝘳𝘰𝘭𝘢𝘥𝘢 𝘦𝘹𝘱𝘰𝘴𝘵𝘢 𝘦𝘮 𝘵𝘳𝘪𝘣𝘶𝘯𝘢𝘭 𝘫𝘶𝘯𝘵𝘰𝘶-𝘴𝘦 𝘢𝘪𝘯𝘥𝘢 𝘢 𝘶𝘮𝘢 𝘥𝘦𝘴𝘤𝘳𝘪𝘤̧𝘢̃𝘰 𝘥𝘦 𝘧𝘪𝘴𝘪𝘤𝘢𝘭𝘪𝘥𝘢𝘥𝘦 𝘦𝘹𝘤𝘦𝘴𝘴𝘪𝘷𝘢: 𝘊𝘭𝘢́𝘶𝘥𝘪𝘢 𝘧𝘰𝘪 𝘥𝘶𝘱𝘭𝘢𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘦 𝘢𝘭𝘨𝘦𝘮𝘢𝘥𝘢, 𝘯𝘢̃𝘰 𝘤𝘰𝘮𝘰 𝘦𝘹𝘱𝘳𝘦𝘴𝘴𝘢̃𝘰 𝘥𝘦 𝘮𝘢𝘪𝘰𝘳 𝘷𝘪𝘰𝘭𝘦̂𝘯𝘤𝘪𝘢 𝘱𝘰𝘭𝘪𝘤𝘪𝘢𝘭, 𝘮𝘢𝘴 𝘤𝘰𝘮𝘰 𝘨𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘰 𝘥𝘦 𝘤𝘶𝘪𝘥𝘢𝘥𝘰, 𝘱𝘰𝘳𝘲𝘶𝘦 𝘰 𝘴𝘦𝘶 𝘤𝘰𝘳𝘱𝘰 “𝘴𝘦𝘮 𝘦𝘭𝘢𝘴𝘵𝘪𝘤𝘪𝘥𝘢𝘥𝘦”, 𝘢𝘤𝘢𝘣𝘢𝘳𝘪𝘢 𝘮𝘢𝘨𝘰𝘢𝘥𝘰 𝘴𝘦 𝘧𝘰𝘴𝘴𝘦 𝘶𝘴𝘢𝘥𝘰 𝘢𝘱𝘦𝘯𝘢𝘴 𝘶𝘮 𝘱𝘢𝘳 𝘥𝘦 𝘢𝘭𝘨𝘦𝘮𝘢𝘴.

𝘛𝘶𝘥𝘰 𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘰 𝘦́ 𝘵𝘳𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘦, 𝘵𝘶𝘥𝘰 𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘰 𝘦́ 𝘳𝘢𝘤𝘪𝘴𝘮𝘰.

*Jornalista, militante anti-racista luso-moçambicana.

 IN "SETENTA E QUATRO" - 09/11/23.. .