DIANA SILVA

 .

“Engolidos” pelo sistema?

Se o Sistema Nacional de Saúde, e atividades conexas, desde a educação aos serviços sociais, têm comprovadamente falta de profissionais especializados em nutrição , será solução entregar esse vazio a profissionais de outras áreas ou a charlatães e influencers?

𝐴 𝑛𝑢𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑒́ 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑐𝑖𝑒̂𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑎 𝑑𝑎 𝑠𝑎𝑢́𝑑𝑒 𝑑𝑎 𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑙 𝑓𝑎𝑐̧𝑜 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑡𝑒 𝘩𝑎́ 𝑚𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑑𝑢𝑎𝑠 𝑑𝑒́𝑐𝑎𝑑𝑎𝑠, 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑚𝑢𝑖𝑡𝑜 𝑜𝑟𝑔𝑢𝑙𝘩𝑜 𝑒 𝘩𝑜𝑛𝑟𝑎, 𝑚𝑎𝑠 𝑒́ 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑜𝑙𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑜𝑏𝑠𝑒𝑟𝑣𝑜 𝑜 𝐸𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑑𝑎 𝐴𝑟𝑡𝑒 𝑎𝑡𝑢𝑎𝑙.

𝑉𝑎𝑚𝑜𝑠 𝑝𝑜𝑟 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑡𝑒𝑠.

𝑁𝑜́𝑠, 𝑛𝑢𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑐𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑠, 𝑠𝑜𝑚𝑜𝑠 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑐𝑙𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑒 𝑗𝑜𝑣𝑒𝑚, 𝑒 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑜𝑟𝑑𝑒𝑚 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑓𝑖𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑙 𝑚𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑗𝑜𝑣𝑒𝑚 𝑎𝑖𝑛𝑑𝑎.

𝐴𝑠 𝑜𝑟𝑑𝑒𝑛𝑠 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑓𝑖𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑡𝑒̂𝑚 𝑎 𝑓𝑢𝑛𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑟𝑒𝑔𝑢𝑙𝑎𝑟 𝑎 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑓𝑖𝑠𝑠𝑎̃𝑜, 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑏𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑟 𝑚𝑎́𝑠 𝑝𝑟𝑎́𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑠 𝑒 𝑧𝑒𝑙𝑎𝑟 𝑝𝑜𝑟 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑠𝑒𝑟𝑣𝑖𝑐̧𝑜 𝑒𝑥𝑒𝑟𝑐𝑖𝑑𝑎 𝑝𝑜𝑟 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑓𝑖𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝘩𝑎𝑏𝑖𝑙𝑖𝑡𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑡𝑎𝑙, 𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑠𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑟𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑜 𝑓𝑜𝑐𝑜, 𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑖𝑟𝑜 𝑒 𝑢́𝑙𝑡𝑖𝑚𝑜, 𝑜 𝑏𝑒𝑚-𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑟 𝑑𝑎 𝑝𝑜𝑝𝑢𝑙𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜.

𝐻𝑎́ 𝑢𝑛𝑠 𝑚𝑒𝑠𝑒𝑠, 𝑒𝑠𝑐𝑟𝑒𝑣𝑖 𝑢𝑚 𝑎𝑟𝑡𝑖𝑔𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑜𝑝𝑖𝑛𝑖𝑎̃𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑠𝑎𝑣𝑎 𝑠𝑜𝑏𝑟𝑒 𝑎 𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑢𝑠𝑢𝑟𝑝𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑜 𝐴𝑡𝑜 𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑁𝑢𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑐𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑠 𝑝𝑜𝑟 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑑𝑒𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑑𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑑𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑜 𝑑𝑎 𝑂𝑟𝑑𝑒𝑚 𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑀𝑒́𝑑𝑖𝑐𝑜𝑠, 𝑎𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑣𝑒́𝑠 𝑑𝑎 𝑐𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑒𝑡𝑒̂𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑛𝑢𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑐𝑙𝑖́𝑛𝑖𝑐𝑎, 𝑞𝑢𝑒, 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑖𝑣𝑒̂𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑎 𝑑𝑜 𝑒𝑥𝑒𝑐𝑢𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑜 𝑔𝑜𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑛𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑙, 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑔𝑟𝑎 𝑖𝑝𝑠𝑖𝑠 𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑏𝑖𝑠 𝑜 𝑛𝑜𝑠𝑠𝑜 𝐴𝑡𝑜, 𝑒 𝑐𝑢𝑗𝑜 𝑟𝑖𝑔𝑜𝑟 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑎 𝑜𝑏𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑜 𝑚𝑒𝑠𝑚𝑜 𝑑𝑒𝑖𝑥𝑎𝑣𝑎 𝑚𝑢𝑖𝑡𝑜 𝑎 𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑒𝑗𝑎𝑟.

𝑄𝑢𝑎𝑙 𝑒́ 𝑎 𝑚𝑖𝑛𝘩𝑎 𝑠𝑢𝑟𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑎 𝑒 𝑡𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑝𝑙𝑒𝑥𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒? 𝐴 𝑖𝑛𝑒́𝑟𝑐𝑖𝑎 𝑒 𝑔𝑟𝑖𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑎 𝑚𝑖𝑛𝘩𝑎 𝑝𝑟𝑜́𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑎 𝑂𝑟𝑑𝑒𝑚 𝑛𝑎 𝑑𝑒𝑓𝑒𝑠𝑎 𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑖𝑡𝑜𝑠 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑡𝑜𝑟𝑛𝑒𝑖𝑎𝑚 𝑎 𝑛𝑜𝑠𝑠𝑎 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑓𝑖𝑠𝑠𝑎̃𝑜.

𝑂 𝑡𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑜 𝑝𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑜𝑢 𝑒, 𝑎𝑝𝑜́𝑠 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑚𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑎𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑡𝑢𝑑𝑜 𝑓𝑎𝑧𝑒𝑟 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑒 𝑎𝑡𝑟𝑜𝑝𝑒𝑙𝑜, 𝑖𝑛𝑐𝑙𝑢𝑠𝑖𝑣𝑒 𝑙𝑒𝑔𝑎𝑙𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒, 𝑑𝑒 𝑟𝑒𝑢𝑛𝑖𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑜 𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑎̃𝑜 𝑏𝑎𝑠𝑡𝑜𝑛𝑎́𝑟𝑖𝑜 𝑑𝑎 𝑂𝑟𝑑𝑒𝑚 𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑀𝑒́𝑑𝑖𝑐𝑜𝑠 (𝐷𝑟. 𝑀𝑖𝑔𝑢𝑒𝑙 𝐺𝑢𝑖𝑚𝑎𝑟𝑎̃𝑒𝑠) 𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑜 𝑠𝑒𝑐𝑟𝑒𝑡𝑎́𝑟𝑖𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝐸𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑑𝑎 𝑆𝑎𝑢́𝑑𝑒 (𝐷𝑟. 𝑅𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑟𝑑𝑜 𝑀𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑒) 𝑜 𝑓𝑒𝑒𝑑𝑏𝑎𝑐𝑘 𝑓𝑜𝑖 𝑛𝑒𝑛𝘩𝑢𝑚. 𝑆𝑒 𝑓𝑜𝑠𝑠𝑒 𝑐𝑖́𝑛𝑖𝑐𝑎 𝑑𝑖𝑟𝑖𝑎 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑚 𝑚𝑎𝑛𝑜𝑏𝑟𝑎𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑒𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑐̧𝑎𝑟 𝑜𝑠 𝑚𝑒𝑚𝑏𝑟𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑎 𝑂𝑟𝑑𝑒𝑚 𝑎̀ 𝘩𝑎𝑏𝑖𝑡𝑢𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑒 𝑒𝑠𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑐𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜.

𝐴 𝑏𝑎𝑠𝑡𝑜𝑛𝑎́𝑟𝑖𝑎 𝑓𝑜𝑖 𝑚𝑢𝑖𝑡𝑜 𝑐𝑒́𝑙𝑒𝑟𝑒 𝑛𝑜𝑠 𝑎𝑛𝑢́𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑜𝑠 𝑎̀ 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑐𝑟𝑒𝑡𝑖𝑧𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑚𝑒𝑠𝑚𝑜𝑠, 𝑚𝑎𝑠, 𝑎𝑠 𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑝𝑜𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑠 𝑎𝑜 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑏𝑙𝑒𝑚𝑎 𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑑𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑚-𝑠𝑒 𝑝𝑒𝑙𝑎 𝑗𝑎́ 𝑐𝑜𝑠𝑡𝑢𝑚𝑒𝑖𝑟𝑎 𝑔𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑠𝑖𝑙𝑒̂𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑜𝑠.

𝑅𝑒𝑠𝑢𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑑𝑜, 𝑠𝑎𝑏𝑒𝑚𝑜𝑠 𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑜 𝘩𝑜𝑗𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑜 𝑠𝑎𝑏𝑖́𝑎𝑚𝑜𝑠 𝘩𝑎́ 𝟺-𝟻 𝑚𝑒𝑠𝑒𝑠.

𝐸𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑒𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑜, 𝑓𝑜𝑖 𝑝𝑢𝑏𝑙𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑢𝑚 𝑎𝑟𝑡𝑖𝑔𝑜 𝑠𝑜𝑏𝑟𝑒 𝑜 𝑅𝑎𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑒𝑖𝑜 𝑑𝑎 𝑀𝑎𝑙𝑛𝑢𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜, 𝑑𝑎 𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑝𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑎𝑏𝑖𝑙𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝑑𝑒 𝑢𝑚 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑗𝑢𝑛𝑡𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑚𝑒́𝑑𝑖𝑐𝑜𝑠, 𝑛𝑜 𝑎̂𝑚𝑏𝑖𝑡𝑜 𝑑𝑜 𝑁𝑢𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝐷𝑎𝑦. 𝑅𝑎𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑒𝑖𝑜 𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑒, 𝑟𝑒𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑧𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑠𝑒𝑚 𝑛𝑢𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑐𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑠! (?!?). 𝑅𝑖𝑠𝑖́𝑣𝑒𝑙, 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑒𝑛𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑜 𝑜𝑢𝑡𝑟𝑎 𝑒𝑥𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑎̃𝑜, 𝑒́ 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑣𝑢𝑙𝑛𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑏𝑖𝑙𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒𝑠 𝑎𝑝𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑛𝑜 𝑎𝑟𝑡𝑖𝑔𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑒 𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑖𝑠𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑛𝑎 𝑓𝑎𝑙𝑡𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑙𝑖𝑐𝑒𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑒𝑚 𝑛𝑢𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑛𝑜𝑠 𝐶𝑢𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑆𝑎𝑢́𝑑𝑒 𝑃𝑟𝑖𝑚𝑎́𝑟𝑖𝑜𝑠! 𝐴𝑔𝑜𝑟𝑎 𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑔𝑢𝑛𝑡𝑜: 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑐𝑜𝑟𝑑𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑜 𝑛𝑢́𝑚𝑒𝑟𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑓𝑖𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑛𝑢𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑛𝑜 𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑜 𝑒́ 𝑐𝑙𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑖𝑛𝑠𝑢𝑓𝑖𝑐𝑖𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒, 𝑎 𝑠𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑒́ 𝑡𝑒𝑟 𝑜𝑢𝑡𝑟𝑜𝑠 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑓𝑖𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑠𝑎𝑢́𝑑𝑒 𝑎 𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑢𝑚𝑖𝑟𝑒𝑚 𝑎 𝑓𝑢𝑛𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜? 𝐸𝑠𝑡𝑎̃𝑜 𝑎 𝑖𝑚𝑎𝑔𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑟 𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑠𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑎 𝑜𝑢𝑡𝑟𝑜𝑠 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑓𝑖𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑢𝑚𝑖𝑟𝑒𝑚 𝑎𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑒𝑡𝑒̂𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑠 𝑚𝑒́𝑑𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑠 𝑛𝑎𝑠 𝑎́𝑟𝑒𝑎𝑠 𝑑𝑒𝑓𝑖𝑐𝑖𝑡𝑎́𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑠 𝑑𝑜 𝑆𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑚𝑎 𝑁𝑎𝑐𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑙 𝑑𝑒 𝑆𝑎𝑢́𝑑𝑒? 𝑁𝑖𝑛𝑔𝑢𝑒́𝑚 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑎. 𝑂𝑢𝑡𝑟𝑎 𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑑𝑒𝑏𝑖𝑙𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒𝑠 𝑎𝑝𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑒́ 𝑎 𝑓𝑎𝑙𝑡𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑏𝑎𝑙𝘩𝑜 𝑒𝑚 𝑒𝑞𝑢𝑖𝑝𝑎. 𝐸 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑒 𝑟𝑎𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑒𝑖𝑜 𝑒́ 𝑜 𝑒𝑥𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑙𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑏𝑎𝑙𝘩𝑜 “𝑚𝑢𝑙𝑡𝑖𝑑𝑖𝑠𝑐𝑖𝑝𝑙𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑟”, 𝑟𝑒𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑧𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑒𝑥𝑐𝑙𝑢𝑠𝑖𝑣𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑝𝑜𝑟 𝑚𝑒́𝑑𝑖𝑐𝑜𝑠? 𝑃𝑜𝑠𝑠𝑜 𝑑𝑎𝑟 𝑜 𝑒𝑥𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑙𝑜 𝑑𝑎 𝑀𝑎𝑑𝑒𝑖𝑟𝑎, 𝑜𝑛𝑑𝑒 𝑡𝑎𝑚𝑏𝑒́𝑚 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑒 𝑟𝑎𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑒𝑖𝑜 𝑓𝑜𝑖 𝑎𝑝𝑙𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑑𝑜, 𝑒 𝑜𝑛𝑑𝑒 𝑎 𝑡𝑎𝑥𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑏𝑒𝑟𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑛𝑢𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑐𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑠 𝑒́ 𝑚𝑢𝑖𝑡𝑜 𝑠𝑢𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑜𝑟 𝑎𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑥𝑡𝑜 𝑛𝑎𝑐𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑙 ( 𝑠𝑜́ 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑎𝑓𝑖𝑟𝑚𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 “𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝘩𝑎́ 𝑓𝑎𝑙𝑡𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑛𝑢𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑐𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑠” 𝑝𝑜𝑟 𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑢𝑚𝑖𝑑𝑎 𝑠𝑜𝑙𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑟𝑖𝑒𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝑑𝑒 𝑐𝑙𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑒, 𝑒 𝑝𝑜𝑟𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝘩𝑎́ 𝑠𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑟𝑒 𝑐𝑎𝑟𝑒̂𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑠 𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑙𝑚𝑎𝑡𝑎𝑟) 𝑒 𝑟𝑒𝑙𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑎𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑙 𝑠𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑟𝑒 𝑛𝑜𝑠 𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑜𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑚𝑜𝑠 𝑒𝑚 𝑎𝑛𝑜𝑠 𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑜𝑟𝑒𝑠, 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑜, 𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎 𝑣𝑒𝑧, 𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑙𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑟 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝘩𝑒𝑐𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜 𝑑𝑜 𝑚𝑒𝑠𝑚𝑜! 𝐽𝑢𝑙𝑔𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎 𝑎𝑏𝑜𝑟𝑑𝑎𝑔𝑒𝑚 𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑎 𝑑𝑒𝑣𝑒𝑟-𝑠𝑒-𝑎́ 𝑎𝑜 𝑚𝑜𝑑𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑜 𝑓𝑜𝑖 𝑑𝑒𝑓𝑖𝑛𝑖𝑑𝑜 𝑜 𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑒𝑛𝘩𝑜 𝑑𝑜 𝑟𝑎𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑒𝑖𝑜 𝑝𝑜𝑟 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑡𝑒 𝑑𝑎 𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑚𝑜𝑡𝑜𝑟𝑎, 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑒́ 𝑙𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑑𝑎 𝑝𝑒𝑙𝑜 𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑝𝑎𝑙 𝑖𝑚𝑝𝑢𝑙𝑠𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑟 𝑑𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑜 𝑑𝑎 𝑂𝑟𝑑𝑒𝑚 𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑀𝑒́𝑑𝑖𝑐𝑜𝑠 𝑛𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑒𝑡𝑒̂𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑎 𝑚𝑒𝑑𝑖𝑐𝑎 𝑒𝑚 𝑛𝑢𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑐𝑙𝑖́𝑛𝑖𝑐𝑎. 𝐻𝑎𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑎́ 𝑎𝑙𝑔𝑜 𝑚𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑟𝑖𝑑𝑖́𝑐𝑢𝑙𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑢𝑚 𝑁𝑢𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝐷𝑎𝑦 𝑠𝑒𝑚 𝑛𝑢𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑐𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑠? 𝐴𝑖𝑛𝑑𝑎 𝑚𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑜𝑠 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑓𝑖𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑟𝑒𝑑𝑖𝑔𝑒𝑚 𝑎𝑠 𝑖𝑛𝑠𝑢𝑓𝑖𝑐𝑖𝑒̂𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑠 𝑑𝑜 𝑠𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑚𝑎, 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑠𝑎̃𝑜 𝑜𝑠 𝑚𝑒𝑠𝑚𝑜𝑠 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑒𝑥𝑐𝑙𝑢𝑖́𝑟𝑎𝑚 𝑎 𝑛𝑜𝑠𝑠𝑎 𝑐𝑙𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑒 𝑛𝑢𝑚 𝑑𝑖𝑎 𝑒𝑚 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑎 𝑝𝑟𝑜́𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑎 𝑑𝑒𝑛𝑜𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑠𝑢𝑔𝑒𝑟𝑒 𝑎 𝑛𝑜𝑠𝑠𝑎 𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑒𝑛𝑐̧𝑎, 𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑢𝑚𝑒𝑚 𝑑𝑒 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑓𝑎𝑙𝑡𝑎𝑚 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑓𝑖𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑛𝑢𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑎𝑜 𝑠𝑒𝑟𝑣𝑖𝑐̧𝑜 𝑑𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑢𝑛𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒, 𝑒𝑚 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑢𝑙𝑎𝑟 𝑛𝑜 𝑠𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑜𝑟 𝑝𝑢́𝑏𝑙𝑖𝑐𝑜? 𝑃𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑒 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑎𝑛𝑒𝑑𝑜𝑡𝑎! 𝑄𝑢𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑜 𝑎𝑜 𝑒𝑠𝑝𝑖́𝑟𝑖𝑡𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑏𝑎𝑙𝘩𝑜 𝑒𝑚 𝑒𝑞𝑢𝑖𝑝𝑎, 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑚𝑜𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑠𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑠! 𝑄𝑢𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑜 𝑎 𝑑𝑖𝑙𝑖𝑔𝑒𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑠 𝑝𝑜𝑟 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑡𝑒 𝑑𝑎 𝑛𝑜𝑠𝑠𝑎 𝑂𝑟𝑑𝑒𝑚 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑛𝑜𝑠 𝑠𝑎𝑙𝑣𝑎𝑟 𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑠 𝑟𝑎́𝑏𝑢𝑙𝑎𝑠, 𝑢𝑚 𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑠𝑜 𝑛𝑎𝑑𝑎!

𝑀𝑎𝑠 𝑠𝑒 𝑜 𝑆𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑚𝑎 𝑁𝑎𝑐𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑙 𝑑𝑒 𝑆𝑎𝑢́𝑑𝑒, 𝑒 𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑒𝑥𝑎𝑠, 𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑑𝑒 𝑎 𝑒𝑑𝑢𝑐𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑎𝑜𝑠 𝑠𝑒𝑟𝑣𝑖𝑐̧𝑜𝑠 𝑠𝑜𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑖𝑠, 𝑡𝑒̂𝑚 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑣𝑎𝑑𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑓𝑎𝑙𝑡𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑓𝑖𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑒𝑠𝑝𝑒𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑧𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑒𝑚 𝑛𝑢𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 , 𝑠𝑒𝑟𝑎́ 𝑠𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑒𝑔𝑎𝑟 𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑒 𝑣𝑎𝑧𝑖𝑜 𝑎 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑓𝑖𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑜𝑢𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑠 𝑎́𝑟𝑒𝑎𝑠 𝑜𝑢 𝑎 𝑐𝘩𝑎𝑟𝑙𝑎𝑡𝑎̃𝑒𝑠 𝑒 𝑖𝑛𝑓𝑙𝑢𝑒𝑛𝑐𝑒𝑟𝑠?

𝐸𝑛𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑜 𝑠𝑒 𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑒, 𝑛𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑥𝑡𝑜 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑛𝑎𝑐𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑙, 𝑎 𝑖𝑛𝑖𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑎𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑟𝑒𝑔𝑢𝑙𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑛𝑜 𝑜𝑐𝑒𝑎𝑛𝑜 𝑎𝑢𝑑𝑖𝑜𝑣𝑖𝑠𝑢𝑎𝑙 𝑒 𝑜𝑛𝑙𝑖𝑛𝑒, 𝑜𝑛𝑑𝑒 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑙𝑖𝑓𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑚 “𝑏𝑜𝑑𝑦, 𝘩𝑒𝑎𝑙𝑡𝘩 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑡𝑖𝑐 𝑎𝑑𝑣𝑖𝑠𝑒𝑟𝑠”, 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑒𝑡𝑒𝑚 𝑒𝑚 𝑛𝑢́𝑚𝑒𝑟𝑜 𝑒 𝑒𝑚 𝑐𝑟𝑒𝑑𝑖𝑏𝑖𝑙𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑐𝑎𝑟𝑡𝑜𝑚𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑠 𝑒 𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑠, 𝑝𝑎𝑖́𝑠𝑒𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑜 𝑎 𝐹𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑐̧𝑎 𝑐𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑚 𝑚𝑒𝑐𝑎𝑛𝑖𝑠𝑚𝑜𝑠 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑡𝑒𝑔𝑒𝑟 𝑜𝑠 𝑐𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑎̃𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑝𝑟𝑎́𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑒𝑟𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑒𝑛𝑔𝑎𝑛𝑜𝑠𝑎𝑠, 𝑛𝑎𝑠 𝑟𝑒𝑑𝑒𝑠 𝑠𝑜𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑖𝑠, 𝑙𝑖𝑚𝑖𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑒 𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑝𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑎𝑏𝑖𝑙𝑖𝑧𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑎 𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑖𝑛𝑓𝑙𝑢𝑒𝑛𝑐𝑒𝑟𝑠. 𝑁𝑎 𝑁𝑜𝑟𝑢𝑒𝑔𝑎, 𝑎𝑠 𝑝𝑢𝑏𝑙𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑐̧𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑓𝑖𝑠 𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑓𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑎𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑚 𝑎𝑙𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑐̧𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑟𝑝𝑜𝑟𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑒 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑒́𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑠 𝑝𝑜𝑟 𝑣𝑖𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑓𝑖𝑙𝑡𝑟𝑜𝑠 𝑡𝑒̂𝑚 𝑑𝑒 𝑎𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑟 𝑢𝑚 𝑑𝑖𝑠𝑐𝑙𝑎𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑟 𝑎 𝑖𝑛𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑚𝑎𝑟 𝑜 𝑣𝑖𝑠𝑢𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑧𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑟 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑎𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑙𝑎 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑒́ 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑖𝑚𝑎𝑔𝑒𝑚 𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒𝑖𝑟𝑎, 𝑒 𝑒𝑚 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑎𝑡𝑒́ 𝑜 𝐵𝑟𝑎𝑠𝑖𝑙 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑒𝑐̧𝑎 𝑎 𝑡𝑜𝑚𝑎𝑟 𝑚𝑒𝑑𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑑𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑔𝑢𝑒𝑚 𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑒́ 𝑎 𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑑𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑝𝑒𝑠𝑜 𝑎 𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑙𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑟 𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑐̧𝑜 𝑑𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑒́ 𝑜 𝑎𝑡𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑠𝑎𝑢́𝑑𝑒, 𝑜 𝑛𝑜𝑠𝑠𝑜 𝑝𝑎𝑖́𝑠 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎́ 𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑜𝑐𝑢𝑝𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑒𝑚 𝑡𝑜𝑟𝑛𝑎𝑟 𝑎 𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑓𝑖𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝘩𝑎𝑏𝑖𝑙𝑖𝑡𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑛𝑢𝑚 𝑐𝑎𝑚𝑝𝑜 𝑝𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑜𝑠𝑜, 𝑒𝑛𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑜 𝑡𝑜𝑙𝑒𝑟𝑎 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑡𝑜𝑑𝑜 𝑜 𝑡𝑖𝑝𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑣𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑒𝑑𝑜𝑟𝑒𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑏𝑎𝑛𝘩𝑎 𝑑𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑏𝑟𝑎 𝑛𝑎𝑠 𝑟𝑒𝑑𝑒𝑠 𝑒 𝑛𝑎 𝑇𝑉, 𝑛𝑜𝑚𝑒𝑎𝑑𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑒𝑚 𝘩𝑜𝑟𝑎́𝑟𝑖𝑜𝑠 𝑐𝑢𝑗𝑎 𝑎 𝑎𝑢𝑑𝑖𝑒̂𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑎 𝑒́ 𝑚𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑓𝑟𝑎́𝑔𝑖𝑙 𝑒 𝑠𝑢𝑔𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑎́𝑣𝑒𝑙.

𝐸, 𝑣𝑜𝑙𝑡𝑜 𝑎 𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑔𝑢𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑟, 𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑓𝑒𝑧 𝑎 𝑂𝑟𝑑𝑒𝑚 𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑁𝑢𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑐𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑠, 𝑠𝑜𝑏𝑟𝑒 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎 𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎̃𝑜?

𝑁𝑢𝑛𝑐𝑎 𝑒́ 𝑑𝑒𝑚𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑟𝑒𝑓𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑟 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑠𝑜𝑚𝑜𝑠 𝑎 𝑢́𝑛𝑖𝑐𝑎 𝑂𝑟𝑑𝑒𝑚 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑎𝑟𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑢𝑙𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑠𝑒𝑐𝑟𝑒𝑡𝑎𝑟𝑖𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑑𝑜, 𝑎𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑎́𝑟𝑖𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑡𝑜𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑎𝑠 𝑜𝑢𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑠 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑟𝑒𝑚𝑒𝑡𝑒𝑚 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑜 𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑜 𝑑𝑎 𝑆𝑎𝑢́𝑑𝑒. 𝐸𝑠𝑡𝑎 𝑐𝑖𝑟𝑐𝑢𝑛𝑠𝑡𝑎̂𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑎 𝑑𝑒𝑣𝑒-𝑠𝑒 𝑎𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑓𝑙𝑖𝑡𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑠 𝑒𝑥𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑒 𝑜 𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑜 𝑒 𝑎 𝑏𝑎𝑠𝑡𝑜𝑛𝑎́𝑟𝑖𝑎 (𝑐𝑜̂𝑛𝑗𝑢𝑔𝑒𝑠) 𝑒 𝑎̀ 𝑖𝑛𝑐𝑎𝑝𝑎𝑐𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝑑𝑎 𝐷𝑟𝑎. 𝐴𝑙𝑒𝑥𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑟𝑎 𝐵𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜, 𝑒𝑚 𝑡𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑜 𝑝𝑟𝑜́𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑜, 𝑑𝑒 𝑎𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑎𝑟 𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑠𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑎 𝑚𝑒𝑙𝘩𝑜𝑟 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑜𝑠 𝑠𝑒𝑢𝑠 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑠, 𝑐𝑜𝑙𝑜𝑐𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑜-𝑛𝑜𝑠 𝑛𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑠𝑖𝑡𝑢𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑒𝑥𝑡𝑟𝑒𝑚𝑎 𝑓𝑟𝑎𝑔𝑖𝑙𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒.

𝐸 𝑠𝑒 𝘩𝑎́ 𝑎𝑙𝑔𝑢𝑛𝑠 𝑎𝑛𝑜𝑠 𝑎𝑖𝑛𝑑𝑎 𝑠𝑒 𝑟𝑒𝑔𝑜𝑧𝑖𝑗𝑎𝑣𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑎 𝑎𝑑𝑚𝑖𝑠𝑠𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝟷𝟻 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑓𝑖𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑛𝑎 𝐸𝑑𝑢𝑐𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜, 𝑒 𝟺𝟶 𝑛𝑎 𝑆𝑎𝑢́𝑑𝑒, 𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑑𝑒 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑜𝑢 𝑒𝑚 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑓𝑙𝑖𝑡𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑒, 𝑎 𝑠𝑢𝑎 𝑏𝑜𝑐𝑎 𝑐𝑎𝑙𝑜𝑢 -𝑠𝑒 𝑑𝑒𝑓𝑖𝑛𝑖𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒.

𝐶𝑜𝑚𝑜 𝑠𝑒 𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑥𝑡𝑜 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑓𝑜𝑠𝑠𝑒 𝑗𝑎́ 𝑚𝑎𝑢 𝑠𝑢𝑓𝑖𝑐𝑖𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒, 𝑡𝑜𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑎𝑠 𝑂𝑟𝑑𝑒𝑛𝑠 𝑣𝑖𝑟𝑎𝑚-𝑠𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑓𝑟𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑝𝑜𝑠𝑡𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑙𝑒𝑖 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑟𝑒𝑔𝑢𝑙𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑙𝑒𝑡𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑜 𝑓𝑢𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜 𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑚𝑒𝑠𝑚𝑎𝑠, 𝑎 𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑡𝑒𝑥𝑡𝑜 𝑑𝑜 𝑃𝑙𝑎𝑛𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑅𝑒𝑐𝑢𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑒 𝑅𝑒𝑠𝑖𝑙𝑖𝑒̂𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑎, 𝑑𝑎 𝑈𝑛𝑖𝑎̃𝑜 𝐸𝑢𝑟𝑜𝑝𝑒𝑖𝑎, 𝑑𝑎 𝐴𝑢𝑡𝑜𝑟𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝑑𝑎 𝐶𝑜𝑛𝑐𝑜𝑟𝑟𝑒̂𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑎 - 𝑎 𝑠𝑜𝑙𝑑𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑚𝑒𝑙𝘩𝑜𝑟 𝑐𝑎𝑝𝑎𝑐𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝑑𝑒 𝑎𝑐𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑜 𝑎̀𝑠 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑓𝑖𝑠𝑠𝑜̃𝑒𝑠, 𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑣𝑖𝑟𝑡𝑢𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑎𝑠 𝑓𝑢𝑛𝑐̧𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑜𝑟𝑑𝑒𝑛𝑠 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑓𝑖𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑖𝑠.

𝑂 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑒́ 𝑎 𝑛𝑜𝑠𝑠𝑎 𝑂𝑟𝑑𝑒𝑚 𝑓𝑒𝑧, 𝑖𝑛𝑐𝑙𝑢𝑖𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑎 𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑑𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑒𝑙𝘩𝑜 𝑔𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑙, 𝐵𝑎́𝑟𝑏𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝐵𝑒𝑙𝑒𝑧𝑎? 𝑁𝑎𝑑𝑎!

𝑅𝑒𝑐𝑜𝑟𝑑𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑎 𝑡𝑎𝑚𝑏𝑒́𝑚 “𝑐𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑡𝑎 𝑑𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑢𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒” 𝑎𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑎 𝑂𝑟𝑑𝑒𝑚 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑒𝑔𝑢𝑖𝑢 𝑠𝑒𝑟 𝑚𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑝𝑎𝑝𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑎 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑜 𝑝𝑎𝑝𝑎 (𝑛𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑒 𝑐𝑎𝑠𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑎 “𝑝𝑎𝑝𝑖𝑠𝑎 𝐴𝑙𝑒𝑥𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑟𝑎”) 𝑎𝑜 𝑚𝑜𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑟 -𝑠𝑒 𝑣𝑎𝑔𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑠𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑠𝑓𝑒𝑖𝑡𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑎𝑠 𝑎𝑙𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑐̧𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑎𝑜 𝐸𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑡𝑢𝑡𝑜 𝑒 𝑎̀ 𝑎𝑟𝑞𝑢𝑖𝑡𝑒𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑎 𝑑𝑜 𝐴𝑡𝑜 𝑑𝑜 𝑁𝑢𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑐𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑎, 𝑒𝑚 𝑎𝑟𝑡𝑖𝑔𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝟸𝟾 𝑑𝑒 𝑚𝑎𝑖𝑜 𝑝𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑎𝑑𝑜, 𝑑𝑒𝑓𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑣𝑎𝑐𝑢𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑜 “𝑜 𝑜́𝑡𝑖𝑚𝑜 𝑒́ 𝑖𝑛𝑖𝑚𝑖𝑔𝑜 𝑑𝑜 𝑏𝑜𝑚” 𝑒 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑒́ 𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑖𝑠𝑜 𝑡𝑒𝑟 𝑢𝑚𝑎 “𝑣𝑖𝑠𝑎̃𝑜 𝘩𝑜𝑙𝑖́𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑎” 𝑑𝑜 𝑑𝑜𝑐𝑢𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜.

𝐸𝑛𝑠𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑚-𝑚𝑒, 𝑐𝑒𝑟𝑡𝑎 𝑣𝑒𝑧, 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑢𝑚 𝑑𝑒𝑐𝑖𝑠𝑜𝑟 𝑜𝑢 𝑙𝑒𝑔𝑖𝑠𝑙𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑟 𝑓𝑎𝑧 𝑎𝑠𝑛𝑒𝑖𝑟𝑎, 𝑎𝑓𝑖𝑟𝑚𝑎 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑒́ 𝑛𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑎́𝑟𝑖𝑜 𝑡𝑒𝑟 𝑢𝑚𝑎 “𝑣𝑖𝑠𝑎̃𝑜 𝘩𝑜𝑙𝑖́𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑎” 𝑠𝑜𝑏𝑟𝑒 𝑜 𝑡𝑒𝑚𝑎. 𝑂 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑙𝑜𝑐𝑢𝑡𝑜𝑟 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑒 𝑏𝑒𝑚 𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑒́ 𝑑𝑖𝑡𝑜, 𝑒 𝑠𝑒𝑔𝑢𝑒𝑚 𝑡𝑜𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑓𝑒𝑙𝑖𝑧𝑒𝑠 𝑎𝑑𝑖𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑒!

𝑁𝑎̃𝑜 𝑠𝑒𝑟𝑎́ 𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑚. 𝑃𝑜𝑟𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑎 𝑐𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑡𝑎/𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑑𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑒𝑙𝘩𝑜 𝑔𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑙, 𝑑𝑒𝑝𝑜𝑖𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑎𝑐𝑢𝑠𝑎𝑑𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑐𝑢𝑚𝑝𝑙𝑖𝑐𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝑒 𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜, 𝑑𝑒 𝑛𝑎𝑑𝑎 𝑡𝑒𝑟 𝑓𝑒𝑖𝑡𝑜 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑜𝑏𝑟𝑖𝑔𝑎𝑟 𝑎 𝑑𝑖𝑟𝑒𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑎 𝑜𝑢𝑣𝑖𝑟 𝑜𝑠 𝑚𝑒𝑚𝑏𝑟𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑎 𝑂𝑟𝑑𝑒𝑚, 𝑑𝑒𝑐𝑖𝑑𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑣𝑜𝑐𝑎𝑟 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑟𝑒𝑢𝑛𝑖𝑎̃𝑜 𝑚𝑎𝑔𝑛𝑎 𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑡𝑢𝑑𝑜 𝑗𝑎́ 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑣𝑎 𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑜𝑙𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑜, 𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑣𝑜𝑐𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑜-𝑎 𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑑𝑖𝑎𝑡𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑎 𝑠𝑒𝑔𝑢𝑖𝑟, 𝑛𝑎𝑞𝑢𝑖𝑙𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑝𝑜𝑑𝑒 𝑠𝑒𝑟 𝑣𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑜 𝑢𝑚 𝑚𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑜𝑟𝑖𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑒 𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑒𝑠𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑜.

𝐷𝑒 𝑎𝑙𝑔𝑜 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑡𝑒𝑛𝘩𝑜 𝑑𝑢́𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑠: 𝑒𝑛𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑜 𝑎𝑠 𝑜𝑢𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑠 𝑜𝑟𝑑𝑒𝑛𝑠 𝑖𝑛𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑚𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑚 𝑜𝑠 𝑠𝑒𝑢𝑠 𝑚𝑒𝑚𝑏𝑟𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑠𝑒 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑣𝑎 𝑎 𝑝𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑎𝑟, 𝑎𝑏𝑟𝑖𝑟𝑎𝑚 𝑒𝑠𝑝𝑎𝑐̧𝑜 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑏𝑢𝑡𝑜𝑠 𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑢𝑛𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑚 𝑎𝑠 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑝𝑜𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑠 𝑓𝑒𝑖𝑡𝑎𝑠 𝑎𝑜 𝐺𝑜𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑛𝑜, 𝑎 𝑛𝑜𝑠𝑠𝑎 𝑒𝑠𝑐𝑢𝑑𝑜𝑢-𝑠𝑒 𝑛𝑜 𝑑𝑒𝑣𝑒𝑟 𝑑𝑒 𝑧𝑒𝑙𝑜!

𝑀𝑎𝑠 𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑎 𝑜𝑏𝑟𝑖𝑔𝑎𝑡𝑜𝑟𝑖𝑒𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝑑𝑒 𝑧𝑒𝑙𝑜 𝑒́ 𝑑𝑒𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑎 𝑝𝑒𝑙𝑎 𝑂𝑟𝑑𝑒𝑚 𝑎 𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑚? 𝐴𝑜 𝑔𝑜𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑛𝑜, 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑜 𝑜𝑏𝑒𝑑𝑖𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑑𝑒𝑚𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑜𝑢, 𝑜𝑢 𝑎𝑜𝑠 𝑠𝑒𝑢𝑠 𝑚𝑒𝑚𝑏𝑟𝑜𝑠, 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑣𝑒𝑧 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑒́ 𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑚 𝑜𝑠 𝑟𝑒𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑎?

𝐴𝑑𝑖𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑒, 𝑎 𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝑒́ 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑡𝑜𝑑𝑜 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑒 𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑔𝑜𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑛𝑜, 𝑒𝑚 𝑣𝑒𝑧 𝑑𝑒 𝑒𝑣𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑖𝑟𝑚𝑜𝑠, 𝑟𝑒𝑡𝑟𝑜𝑐𝑒𝑑𝑒𝑚𝑜𝑠, 𝑑𝑒 𝑓𝑖𝑟𝑚𝑎𝑟𝑚𝑜𝑠 𝑜 𝑛𝑜𝑠𝑠𝑜 𝑝𝑎𝑝𝑒𝑙 𝑛𝑎𝑠 𝑑𝑖𝑓𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑠 𝑎́𝑟𝑒𝑎𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑣𝑒𝑛𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑓𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑚𝑜𝑠 𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑜𝑟𝑖𝑧𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑒 𝑎̀ 𝑚𝑒𝑟𝑐𝑒̂ 𝑑𝑒 𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑙𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑟 𝑢𝑚 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑠𝑜́ 𝑝𝑒𝑙𝑜 𝑠𝑖𝑚𝑝𝑙𝑒𝑠 𝑓𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑜 𝑑𝑒 “ 𝑢𝑠𝑎𝑟 𝑓𝑎𝑐𝑎 𝑒 𝑔𝑎𝑟𝑓𝑜”, 𝑒 “ 𝑠𝑎𝑏𝑒𝑟 𝑖𝑛𝑔𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑟 𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜𝑠” , 𝑡𝑜𝑟𝑛𝑎-𝑠𝑒 𝑖𝑛𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑒𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑛𝑢𝑚 𝑒𝑠𝑝𝑒𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑎 𝑒𝑚 𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜.

𝐴𝑜 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑎 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑐𝘩𝑒𝑔𝑎𝑚𝑜𝑠! 𝑂𝑠 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑓𝑖𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑝𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑢𝑔𝑢𝑒𝑠𝑒𝑠 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑠𝑎̃𝑜 𝑐𝑎𝑑𝑎 𝑣𝑒𝑧 𝑚𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑓𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑠, 𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑜𝑛𝘩𝑒𝑐𝑖𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑒 𝑟𝑒𝑞𝑢𝑖𝑠𝑖𝑡𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑛𝑜 𝑒𝑥𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑜𝑟, 𝑠𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑖𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑢𝑖́𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑝𝑒𝑙𝑜 𝑝𝑟𝑜́𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑜 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑑𝑖𝑟𝑒𝑖𝑡𝑜, 𝑠𝑒𝑚 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑎 𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝑐𝑖𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑖́𝑓𝑖𝑐𝑎 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑒𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑎 𝑟𝑒𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑟 𝑚𝑒𝑥𝑎 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑝𝑎𝑙𝘩𝑎.

𝑄𝑢𝑎𝑙 𝑒́ 𝑜 𝑓𝑢𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑛𝑜́𝑠 𝑝𝑜𝑑𝑒𝑚𝑜𝑠 𝑎𝑙𝑚𝑒𝑗𝑎𝑟?

𝑆𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑚𝑜𝑠 “𝑒𝑛𝑔𝑜𝑙𝑖𝑑𝑜𝑠” 𝑝𝑜𝑟 𝑜𝑢𝑡𝑟𝑜𝑠 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑓𝑖𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑒 𝑝𝑜𝑟 𝑐𝘩𝑎𝑟𝑙𝑎𝑡𝑎̃𝑒𝑠?

* Nutricionista

* IN "NOVO semanário" - 20/07/23 .

NR: Estranhámos que a autora  se  tivesse "esquecido" duma classe mais antiga na área da  alimentação científica, os/as DIETISTAS, profissionais muito qualificados e que nos merecem o maior respeito