.
Galamba, Marcelo eo ativismo patronal
Aos patrões não lhes basta
que as margens de lucro aumentem, provocando a inflação. Mobilizam-se
contra algumas das regras que podem trazer mais exigência de respeito
nas leis do trabalho, invocando uma espécie de direito de veto que a
Constituição não lhes atribui.
𝓢𝓮 𝓺𝓾𝓲𝓼𝓮𝓻𝓶𝓸𝓼 𝓾𝓶 𝓹𝓮𝓺𝓾𝓮𝓷𝓸 𝓻𝓮𝓽𝓻𝓪𝓽𝓸 𝓭𝓸 𝓶𝓾𝓷𝓭𝓸 𝓭𝓸 𝓽𝓻𝓪𝓫𝓪𝓵𝓱𝓸 𝓮𝓶 𝓟𝓸𝓻𝓽𝓾𝓰𝓪𝓵, 𝓸𝓵𝓱𝓮𝓶𝓸𝓼 𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓪 𝓸 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓼𝓮 𝓹𝓪𝓼𝓼𝓪 𝓬𝓸𝓶 𝓸𝓼 𝓫𝓪𝓻𝓮𝓼 𝓭𝓸𝓼 𝓬𝓸𝓶𝓫𝓸𝓲𝓸𝓼 𝓭𝓪 𝓒𝓟. 𝓞 𝓔𝓼𝓽𝓪𝓭𝓸, 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓭𝓮𝓽𝓮́𝓶 𝓪 𝓮𝓶𝓹𝓻𝓮𝓼𝓪, 𝓮𝔁𝓽𝓮𝓻𝓷𝓪𝓵𝓲𝔃𝓸𝓾 𝓸 𝓼𝓮𝓻𝓿𝓲𝓬̧𝓸 𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓪 𝓾𝓶 𝓹𝓻𝓲𝓿𝓪𝓭𝓸. 𝓔𝓼𝓽𝓮, 𝓹𝓸𝓻 𝓼𝓾𝓪 𝓿𝓮𝔃, 𝓷𝓪̃𝓸 𝓬𝓾𝓶𝓹𝓻𝓮 𝓸 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓽𝓻𝓪𝓽𝓸 𝓮 𝓷𝓪̃𝓸 𝓹𝓪𝓰𝓸𝓾 𝓪𝓸𝓼 𝓽𝓻𝓪𝓫𝓪𝓵𝓱𝓪𝓭𝓸𝓻𝓮𝓼 𝓸𝓼 𝓼𝓪𝓵𝓪́𝓻𝓲𝓸𝓼 𝓭𝓮 𝓯𝓮𝓿𝓮𝓻𝓮𝓲𝓻𝓸. 𝓞𝓼 𝓬𝓵𝓲𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮𝓼 𝓷𝓪̃𝓸 𝓽𝓮̂𝓶 𝓪𝓬𝓮𝓼𝓼𝓸 𝓪𝓸 𝓼𝓮𝓻𝓿𝓲𝓬̧𝓸 𝓮 𝓸𝓼 𝓽𝓻𝓪𝓫𝓪𝓵𝓱𝓪𝓭𝓸𝓻𝓮𝓼, 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓭𝓮𝓼𝓮𝓼𝓹𝓮𝓻𝓪𝓶 𝓱𝓪́ 𝓼𝓮𝓶𝓪𝓷𝓪𝓼 𝓼𝓮𝓶 𝓽𝓻𝓪𝓫𝓪𝓵𝓱𝓸 𝓮 𝓼𝓮𝓶 𝓺𝓾𝓪𝓵𝓺𝓾𝓮𝓻 𝓻𝓮𝓷𝓭𝓲𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓸, 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓽𝓲𝓷𝓾𝓪𝓶 𝓪𝓬𝓪𝓶𝓹𝓪𝓭𝓸𝓼 𝓯𝓻𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮 𝓪̀𝓼 𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓪𝓬̧𝓸̃𝓮𝓼 𝓭𝓮 𝓢𝓪𝓷𝓽𝓪 𝓐𝓹𝓸𝓵𝓸́𝓷𝓲𝓪 𝓮 𝓭𝓮 𝓒𝓪𝓶𝓹𝓪𝓷𝓱𝓪̃. 𝓞 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓬𝓮𝓼𝓼𝓲𝓸𝓷𝓪́𝓻𝓲𝓸 𝓮𝓶𝓹𝓪𝓽𝓪 𝓮 𝓸 𝓰𝓸𝓿𝓮𝓻𝓷𝓸 𝓷𝓪̃𝓸 𝓻𝓮𝓼𝓸𝓵𝓿𝓮. 𝓗𝓪́ 𝓮𝓷𝓺𝓾𝓪𝓭𝓻𝓪𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓸 𝓵𝓮𝓰𝓪𝓵 𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓪 𝓮𝓷𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓽𝓻𝓪𝓻 𝓾𝓶𝓪 𝓼𝓸𝓵𝓾𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸, 𝓻𝓮𝓼𝓬𝓲𝓷𝓭𝓲𝓷𝓭𝓸 𝓸 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓽𝓻𝓪𝓽𝓸 𝓬𝓸𝓶 𝓪 𝓮𝓶𝓹𝓻𝓮𝓼𝓪 𝓮𝔁𝓽𝓮𝓻𝓷𝓪 𝓮 𝓲𝓷𝓬𝓸𝓻𝓹𝓸𝓻𝓪𝓷𝓭𝓸 𝓸𝓼 𝓽𝓻𝓪𝓫𝓪𝓵𝓱𝓪𝓭𝓸𝓻𝓮𝓼 𝓷𝓪 𝓒𝓟, 𝓶𝓪𝓼 𝓷𝓪̃𝓸 𝓱𝓪́ 𝓿𝓸𝓷𝓽𝓪𝓭𝓮 𝓹𝓸𝓵𝓲́𝓽𝓲𝓬𝓪. 𝓔𝔁𝓲𝓼𝓽𝓮𝓶 𝓵𝓮𝓲𝓼 𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓪 𝓹𝓻𝓸𝓽𝓮𝓰𝓮𝓻 𝓪𝓼 𝓹𝓮𝓼𝓼𝓸𝓪𝓼, 𝓶𝓪𝓼 𝓮𝓵𝓪𝓼 𝓷𝓪̃𝓸 𝓫𝓪𝓼𝓽𝓪𝓶 𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓪 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓮𝔁𝓲𝓼𝓽𝓪 𝓳𝓾𝓼𝓽𝓲𝓬̧𝓪. 𝓝𝓸 𝓟𝓪𝓻𝓵𝓪𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓸, 𝓸 𝓟𝓢 𝓬𝓱𝓾𝓶𝓫𝓸𝓾 𝓪𝓽𝓮́ 𝓪 𝓲𝓭𝓪 𝓭𝓸 𝓶𝓲𝓷𝓲𝓼𝓽𝓻𝓸 𝓖𝓪𝓵𝓪𝓶𝓫𝓪 𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓪 𝓮𝓼𝓬𝓵𝓪𝓻𝓮𝓬𝓮𝓻 𝓪 𝓼𝓲𝓽𝓾𝓪𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸, 𝓲𝓶𝓹𝓮𝓭𝓲𝓷𝓭𝓸 𝓪 𝓻𝓮𝓼𝓹𝓸𝓷𝓼𝓪𝓫𝓲𝓵𝓲𝔃𝓪𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸 𝓭𝓮 𝓺𝓾𝓮𝓶 𝓽𝓮𝓶 𝓹𝓸𝓭𝓮𝓻 𝓮 𝓭𝓮𝓼𝓹𝓻𝓮𝔃𝓪𝓷𝓭𝓸 𝓪 𝓪𝓯𝓵𝓲𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸 𝓭𝓸𝓼 𝓽𝓻𝓪𝓫𝓪𝓵𝓱𝓪𝓭𝓸𝓻𝓮𝓼.
𝓔𝓷𝓺𝓾𝓪𝓷𝓽𝓸 𝓲𝓼𝓽𝓸 𝓪𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓽𝓮𝓬𝓮, 𝓪𝓼 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓯𝓮𝓭𝓮𝓻𝓪𝓬̧𝓸̃𝓮𝓼 𝓹𝓪𝓽𝓻𝓸𝓷𝓪𝓲𝓼 𝓶𝓸𝓫𝓲𝓵𝓲𝔃𝓪𝓶-𝓼𝓮 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓽𝓻𝓪 𝓪𝓵𝓰𝓾𝓶𝓪𝓼 𝓭𝓪𝓼 𝓻𝓮𝓰𝓻𝓪𝓼 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓹𝓸𝓭𝓮𝓶 𝓽𝓻𝓪𝔃𝓮𝓻 𝓶𝓪𝓲𝓼 𝓮𝔁𝓲𝓰𝓮̂𝓷𝓬𝓲𝓪 𝓭𝓮 𝓻𝓮𝓼𝓹𝓮𝓲𝓽𝓸 𝓷𝓪𝓼 𝓵𝓮𝓲𝓼 𝓭𝓸 𝓽𝓻𝓪𝓫𝓪𝓵𝓱𝓸. 𝓘𝓷𝓿𝓸𝓬𝓪𝓷𝓭𝓸 𝓾𝓶𝓪 𝓮𝓼𝓹𝓮́𝓬𝓲𝓮 𝓭𝓮 𝓭𝓲𝓻𝓮𝓲𝓽𝓸 𝓭𝓮 𝓿𝓮𝓽𝓸 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓪 𝓒𝓸𝓷𝓼𝓽𝓲𝓽𝓾𝓲𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸 𝓷𝓪̃𝓸 𝓵𝓱𝓮𝓼 𝓪𝓽𝓻𝓲𝓫𝓾𝓲, 𝓻𝓪𝓼𝓰𝓪𝓶 𝓪𝓼 𝓿𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓮𝓼 𝓹𝓸𝓻𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓸 𝓟𝓪𝓻𝓵𝓪𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓸 𝓪𝓹𝓻𝓸𝓿𝓸𝓾 𝓪𝓵𝓰𝓾𝓶𝓪𝓼 𝓷𝓸𝓻𝓶𝓪𝓼 𝓼𝓮𝓶 𝓸 𝓪𝓬𝓸𝓻𝓭𝓸 𝓭𝓪 “𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓬𝓮𝓻𝓽𝓪𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸 𝓼𝓸𝓬𝓲𝓪𝓵”. 𝓝𝓪̃𝓸 𝓫𝓪𝓼𝓽𝓪 𝓪𝓸𝓼 𝓹𝓪𝓽𝓻𝓸̃𝓮𝓼 𝓽𝓮𝓻𝓮𝓶 𝓬𝓮𝓵𝓮𝓫𝓻𝓪𝓭𝓸 𝓬𝓸𝓶 𝓸 𝓰𝓸𝓿𝓮𝓻𝓷𝓸 𝓮 𝓪 𝓤𝓖𝓣 𝓾𝓶 “𝓪𝓬𝓸𝓻𝓭𝓸 𝓭𝓮 𝓻𝓮𝓷𝓭𝓲𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓸𝓼” 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓯𝓲𝔁𝓪 𝓾𝓶𝓪 𝓶𝓮𝓽𝓪 𝓭𝓮 𝓪𝓾𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓸𝓼 𝓼𝓪𝓵𝓪𝓻𝓲𝓪𝓲𝓼 (𝟓,𝟏%) 𝓶𝓾𝓲𝓽𝓸 𝓪𝓺𝓾𝓮́𝓶 𝓭𝓸 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓳𝓪́ 𝓼𝓮 𝓹𝓮𝓻𝓭𝓮𝓾 𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓪 𝓪 𝓲𝓷𝓯𝓵𝓪𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸 𝓮 𝓺𝓾𝓮, 𝓶𝓮𝓼𝓶𝓸 𝓪𝓼𝓼𝓲𝓶, 𝓪 𝓶𝓪𝓲𝓸𝓻𝓲𝓪 𝓭𝓪𝓼 𝓮𝓶𝓹𝓻𝓮𝓼𝓪𝓼 𝓷𝓮𝓶 𝓼𝓮𝓺𝓾𝓮𝓻 𝓬𝓾𝓶𝓹𝓻𝓮 (𝓸𝓼 𝓾́𝓵𝓽𝓲𝓶𝓸𝓼 𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓸𝓼 𝓭𝓪 𝓓𝓖𝓔𝓡𝓣 𝓻𝓮𝓿𝓮𝓵𝓪𝓶 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓸𝓼 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓽𝓻𝓪𝓽𝓸𝓼 𝓬𝓸𝓵𝓮𝓽𝓲𝓿𝓸𝓼 𝓷𝓮𝓰𝓸𝓬𝓲𝓪𝓭𝓸𝓼 𝓮𝓶 𝓳𝓪𝓷𝓮𝓲𝓻𝓸, 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓮𝓶 𝓹𝓻𝓲𝓷𝓬𝓲́𝓹𝓲𝓸 𝓹𝓻𝓮𝓿𝓮𝓻𝓲𝓪𝓶 𝓪𝓾𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓸𝓼, 𝓪𝓫𝓻𝓪𝓷𝓰𝓮𝓶 𝟒𝟔𝟕𝟕𝟔 𝓽𝓻𝓪𝓫𝓪𝓵𝓱𝓪𝓭𝓸𝓻𝓮𝓼, 𝓾𝓶𝓪 𝓹𝓮𝓻𝓬𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓪𝓰𝓮𝓶 𝓲́𝓷𝓯𝓲𝓶𝓪 𝓭𝓮 𝓺𝓾𝓮𝓶 𝓽𝓻𝓪𝓫𝓪𝓵𝓱𝓪 𝓮𝓶 𝓟𝓸𝓻𝓽𝓾𝓰𝓪𝓵). 𝓝𝓪̃𝓸 𝓵𝓱𝓮𝓼 𝓫𝓪𝓼𝓽𝓪 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓪𝓼 𝓶𝓪𝓻𝓰𝓮𝓷𝓼 𝓭𝓮 𝓵𝓾𝓬𝓻𝓸 𝓪𝓾𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮𝓶, 𝓹𝓻𝓸𝓿𝓸𝓬𝓪𝓷𝓭𝓸 𝓪 𝓲𝓷𝓯𝓵𝓪𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸. 𝓝𝓪̃𝓸 𝓵𝓱𝓮𝓼 𝓫𝓪𝓼𝓽𝓪 𝓪 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓽𝓻𝓪𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸 𝓭𝓸 𝓼𝓪𝓵𝓪́𝓻𝓲𝓸 𝓻𝓮𝓪𝓵, 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓮́ 𝓪 𝓼𝓾𝓪 𝓼𝓸𝓵𝓾𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸 𝓮 𝓽𝓪𝓶𝓫𝓮́𝓶 𝓪 𝓻𝓮𝓼𝓹𝓸𝓼𝓽𝓪 𝓻𝓮𝓬𝓮𝓼𝓼𝓲𝓿𝓪 𝓭𝓸 𝓰𝓸𝓿𝓮𝓻𝓷𝓸 𝓪𝓸 𝓪𝓾𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓸 𝓭𝓸𝓼 𝓹𝓻𝓮𝓬̧𝓸𝓼 𝓮 𝓸 𝓶𝓪𝓲𝓸𝓻 𝓯𝓪𝓽𝓸𝓻 𝓭𝓮 𝓪𝓰𝓻𝓪𝓿𝓪𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓸 𝓭𝓪𝓼 𝓭𝓮𝓼𝓲𝓰𝓾𝓪𝓵𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓮𝓼. 𝓞𝓼 𝓹𝓪𝓽𝓻𝓸̃𝓮𝓼 𝓺𝓾𝓮𝓻𝓮𝓶, 𝓪𝓲𝓷𝓭𝓪, 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓷𝓪𝓭𝓪 𝓹𝓸𝓼𝓼𝓪 𝓼𝓮𝓻 𝓭𝓮𝓬𝓲𝓭𝓲𝓭𝓸 𝓷𝓸 𝓶𝓾𝓷𝓭𝓸 𝓭𝓸 𝓽𝓻𝓪𝓫𝓪𝓵𝓱𝓸 𝓼𝓮𝓶 𝓪 𝓼𝓾𝓪 𝓸𝓾𝓽𝓸𝓻𝓰𝓪.
𝓔 𝓹𝓸𝓻 𝓲𝓼𝓼𝓸 𝓼𝓮 𝓭𝓮𝓼𝓭𝓸𝓫𝓻𝓪𝓶 𝓮𝓶 𝓪𝓹𝓮𝓵𝓸𝓼 𝓪 𝓜𝓪𝓻𝓬𝓮𝓵𝓸, 𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓪 𝓲𝓶𝓹𝓮𝓭𝓲𝓻 𝓪𝓵𝓰𝓾𝓷𝓼 𝓭𝓸𝓼 𝓪𝓿𝓪𝓷𝓬̧𝓸𝓼 𝓻𝓮𝓬𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮 𝓪𝓹𝓻𝓸𝓿𝓪𝓭𝓸𝓼 𝓷𝓸 𝓟𝓪𝓻𝓵𝓪𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓸: 𝓷𝓪 𝓮𝔁𝓲𝓰𝓮̂𝓷𝓬𝓲𝓪 𝓭𝓮 𝓻𝓮𝓼𝓹𝓸𝓷𝓼𝓪𝓫𝓲𝓵𝓲𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓮𝓼 𝓵𝓪𝓫𝓸𝓻𝓪𝓲𝓼 𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓪 𝓪𝓼 𝓹𝓵𝓪𝓽𝓪𝓯𝓸𝓻𝓶𝓪𝓼 𝓭𝓲𝓰𝓲𝓽𝓪𝓲𝓼, 𝓷𝓪 𝓹𝓻𝓸𝓲𝓫𝓲𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸 𝓭𝓮 𝓻𝓮𝓬𝓸𝓻𝓻𝓮𝓻 𝓪𝓸 𝓸𝓾𝓽𝓼𝓸𝓾𝓻𝓬𝓲𝓷𝓰 𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓪 𝓼𝓾𝓫𝓼𝓽𝓲𝓽𝓾𝓲𝓻 𝓽𝓻𝓪𝓫𝓪𝓵𝓱𝓪𝓭𝓸𝓻𝓮𝓼 𝓭𝓸𝓼 𝓺𝓾𝓪𝓭𝓻𝓸𝓼 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓯𝓸𝓻𝓪𝓶 𝓭𝓮𝓼𝓹𝓮𝓭𝓲𝓭𝓸𝓼, 𝓷𝓪 𝓸𝓫𝓻𝓲𝓰𝓪𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸 𝓭𝓮 𝓬𝓸𝓶𝓹𝓮𝓷𝓼𝓪𝓻 𝓸 𝓪𝓬𝓻𝓮́𝓼𝓬𝓲𝓶𝓸 𝓭𝓮 𝓭𝓮𝓼𝓹𝓮𝓼𝓪𝓼 𝓹𝓸𝓻 𝓽𝓮𝓵𝓮𝓽𝓻𝓪𝓫𝓪𝓵𝓱𝓸, 𝓷𝓪 𝓲𝓶𝓹𝓸𝓼𝓼𝓲𝓫𝓲𝓵𝓲𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓮 𝓭𝓮 𝓼𝓮 𝓲𝓶𝓹𝓸𝓻 𝓪𝓬𝓸𝓻𝓭𝓸𝓼 𝓮𝓶 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓸𝓼 𝓽𝓻𝓪𝓫𝓪𝓵𝓱𝓪𝓭𝓸𝓻𝓮𝓼 𝓻𝓮𝓷𝓾𝓷𝓬𝓲𝓪𝓶 𝓪𝓸𝓼 𝓬𝓻𝓮́𝓭𝓲𝓽𝓸𝓼 𝓵𝓪𝓫𝓸𝓻𝓪𝓲𝓼 𝓪 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓽𝓮̂𝓶 𝓭𝓲𝓻𝓮𝓲𝓽𝓸 𝓷𝓸 𝓯𝓲𝓶 𝓭𝓸𝓼 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓽𝓻𝓪𝓽𝓸𝓼, 𝓷𝓪 𝓮𝔁𝓽𝓮𝓷𝓼𝓪̃𝓸 𝓭𝓪 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓽𝓻𝓪𝓽𝓪𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸 𝓬𝓸𝓵𝓮𝓽𝓲𝓿𝓪 𝓪 𝓽𝓻𝓪𝓫𝓪𝓵𝓱𝓪𝓭𝓸𝓻𝓮𝓼 𝓮𝓶 𝓸𝓾𝓽𝓼𝓸𝓾𝓻𝓬𝓲𝓷𝓰 𝓸𝓾 𝓪 𝓻𝓮𝓬𝓲𝓫𝓸𝓼 𝓿𝓮𝓻𝓭𝓮𝓼, 𝓷𝓸𝓼 𝓶𝓮𝓬𝓪𝓷𝓲𝓼𝓶𝓸𝓼 𝓭𝓮 𝓼𝓲𝓷𝓭𝓲𝓬𝓪̂𝓷𝓬𝓲𝓪 𝓭𝓪 𝓬𝓪𝓭𝓾𝓬𝓲𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓮.
𝓞𝓼 𝓹𝓪𝓽𝓻𝓸̃𝓮𝓼 𝓬𝓵𝓪𝓶𝓪𝓶 𝓹𝓮𝓵𝓸 𝓿𝓮𝓽𝓸 𝓭𝓮 𝓜𝓪𝓻𝓬𝓮𝓵𝓸 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓽𝓻𝓪 𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓪𝓼 𝓪𝓵𝓽𝓮𝓻𝓪𝓬̧𝓸̃𝓮𝓼 𝓵𝓮𝓰𝓪𝓲𝓼, 𝓹𝓸𝓻 𝓼𝓲𝓷𝓰𝓮𝓵𝓪𝓼 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓼𝓮𝓳𝓪𝓶. 𝓞𝓼 𝓹𝓸𝓻𝓽𝓪-𝓿𝓸𝔃𝓮𝓼 𝓭𝓪𝓼 𝓹𝓵𝓪𝓽𝓪𝓯𝓸𝓻𝓶𝓪𝓼 𝓭𝓲𝓰𝓲𝓽𝓪𝓲𝓼 - 𝓶𝓾𝓵𝓽𝓲𝓷𝓪𝓬𝓲𝓸𝓷𝓪𝓲𝓼 𝓱𝓪𝓫𝓲𝓽𝓾𝓪𝓭𝓪𝓼 𝓪̀ 𝓲𝓶𝓹𝓾𝓷𝓲𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓮 - 𝓪𝓷𝓾𝓷𝓬𝓲𝓪𝓶 𝓪𝓽𝓮́ 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓷𝓪̃𝓸 𝓹𝓻𝓮𝓽𝓮𝓷𝓭𝓮𝓶 𝓬𝓾𝓶𝓹𝓻𝓲𝓻 𝓪 𝓵𝓮𝓲, 𝓬𝓪𝓼𝓸 𝓮𝓵𝓪 𝓿𝓮𝓷𝓱𝓪 𝓪 𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓻𝓪𝓻 𝓮𝓶 𝓿𝓲𝓰𝓸𝓻, 𝓪𝓷𝓾𝓷𝓬𝓲𝓪𝓷𝓭𝓸 𝓭𝓮 𝓯𝓸𝓻𝓶𝓪 𝓭𝓮𝓼𝓪𝓫𝓻𝓲𝓭𝓪, 𝓮𝓶 𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓻𝓮𝓿𝓲𝓼𝓽𝓪𝓼 𝓪𝓸𝓼 𝓳𝓸𝓻𝓷𝓪𝓲𝓼, 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓳𝓪́ 𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓪̃𝓸 𝓪 𝓶𝓸𝓫𝓲𝓵𝓲𝔃𝓪𝓻 𝓪 𝓬𝓻𝓲𝓪𝓽𝓲𝓿𝓲𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓮 𝓭𝓮 𝓰𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓸𝓻𝓮𝓼 𝓮 𝓪𝓭𝓿𝓸𝓰𝓪𝓭𝓸𝓼 𝓮𝓶𝓹𝓻𝓮𝓼𝓪𝓻𝓲𝓪𝓲𝓼 𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓪 𝓮𝓷𝓰𝓮𝓷𝓭𝓻𝓪𝓻 𝓮𝓼𝓺𝓾𝓮𝓶𝓪𝓼 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓹𝓮𝓻𝓶𝓲𝓽𝓪𝓶 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓽𝓸𝓻𝓷𝓪́-𝓵𝓪.
𝓗𝓪́ 𝓪𝓼𝓼𝓲𝓶 𝓾𝓶𝓪 𝓽𝓻𝓲𝓹𝓵𝓪 𝓵𝓾𝓽𝓪, 𝓾𝓻𝓰𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮, 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓽𝓻𝓪 𝓸 𝓭𝓮𝓼𝓬𝓪𝓻𝓪𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓸 𝓮 𝓪 𝓲𝓷𝓳𝓾𝓼𝓽𝓲𝓬̧𝓪 𝓷𝓸 𝓽𝓻𝓪𝓫𝓪𝓵𝓱𝓸. 𝓟𝓻𝓲𝓶𝓮𝓲𝓻𝓸, 𝓮́ 𝓹𝓻𝓮𝓬𝓲𝓼𝓸 𝓪𝓯𝓲𝓻𝓶𝓪𝓻 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓷𝓪̃𝓸 𝓮́ 𝓪̀𝓼 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓯𝓮𝓭𝓮𝓻𝓪𝓬̧𝓸̃𝓮𝓼 𝓹𝓪𝓽𝓻𝓸𝓷𝓪𝓲𝓼 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓪́ 𝓪𝓽𝓻𝓲𝓫𝓾𝓲́𝓭𝓪 𝓪 𝓬𝓸𝓶𝓹𝓮𝓽𝓮̂𝓷𝓬𝓲𝓪 𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓪 𝓵𝓮𝓰𝓲𝓼𝓵𝓪𝓻 𝓮 𝓺𝓾𝓮, 𝓼𝓲𝓶, 𝓪𝓺𝓾𝓮𝓵𝓪𝓼 𝓷𝓸𝓻𝓶𝓪𝓼 𝓹𝓸𝓼𝓲𝓽𝓲𝓿𝓪𝓼 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓽𝓻𝓪 𝓿𝓪́𝓻𝓲𝓸𝓼 𝓪𝓫𝓾𝓼𝓸𝓼 𝓭𝓮𝓿𝓮𝓶 𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓻𝓪𝓻 𝓮𝓶 𝓿𝓲𝓰𝓸𝓻 𝓺𝓾𝓪𝓷𝓽𝓸 𝓪𝓷𝓽𝓮𝓼. 𝓢𝓮𝓰𝓾𝓷𝓭𝓸, 𝓮́ 𝓹𝓻𝓮𝓬𝓲𝓼𝓸 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓷𝓸𝓼 𝓹𝓻𝓮𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓮𝓶𝓸𝓼 𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓪 𝓬𝓸𝓶𝓫𝓪𝓽𝓮𝓻 𝓪𝓼 𝓶𝓾́𝓵𝓽𝓲𝓹𝓵𝓪𝓼 𝓯𝓸𝓻𝓶𝓪𝓼 𝓭𝓮 𝓲𝓷𝓬𝓾𝓶𝓹𝓻𝓲𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓸 𝓭𝓮 𝓭𝓮𝓿𝓮𝓻𝓮𝓼 𝓫𝓪́𝓼𝓲𝓬𝓸𝓼 𝓹𝓸𝓻 𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓽𝓮 𝓭𝓪𝓼 𝓮𝓶𝓹𝓻𝓮𝓼𝓪𝓼, 𝓯𝓪𝔃𝓮𝓷𝓭𝓸 𝓿𝓪𝓵𝓮𝓻, 𝓹𝓮𝓵𝓪 𝓯𝓸𝓻𝓬̧𝓪 𝓸𝓻𝓰𝓪𝓷𝓲𝔃𝓪𝓭𝓪 𝓭𝓸 𝓽𝓻𝓪𝓫𝓪𝓵𝓱𝓸, 𝓸𝓼 𝓲𝓷𝓼𝓽𝓻𝓾𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓸𝓼 𝓵𝓮𝓰𝓪𝓲𝓼 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓮𝔁𝓲𝓼𝓽𝓮𝓶 𝓸𝓾 𝓮𝔁𝓲𝓼𝓽𝓲𝓻𝓪̃𝓸, 𝓷𝓸𝓶𝓮𝓪𝓭𝓪𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓽𝓻𝓪 𝓪 𝓹𝓻𝓮𝓬𝓪𝓻𝓲𝔃𝓪𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸 𝓻𝓪𝓭𝓲𝓬𝓪𝓵 𝓭𝓸 𝓸𝓾𝓽𝓼𝓸𝓾𝓻𝓬𝓲𝓷𝓰 𝓮 𝓭𝓪 𝓾𝓫𝓮𝓻𝓲𝔃𝓪𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸. 𝓣𝓮𝓻𝓬𝓮𝓲𝓻𝓸, 𝓮́ 𝓹𝓻𝓮𝓬𝓲𝓼𝓸 𝓪𝓶𝓹𝓵𝓲𝓪𝓻 𝓪𝓼 𝓯𝓸𝓻𝓶𝓪𝓼 𝓭𝓮 𝓻𝓮𝓹𝓻𝓮𝓼𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓪𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸 𝓬𝓸𝓵𝓮𝓽𝓲𝓿𝓪 𝓭𝓮 𝓺𝓾𝓮𝓶 𝓽𝓻𝓪𝓫𝓪𝓵𝓱𝓪. 𝓢𝓮𝓶 𝓮𝓵𝓪𝓼 𝓷𝓪̃𝓸 𝓼𝓮 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓼𝓮𝓰𝓾𝓲𝓻𝓪́ 𝓲𝓶𝓹𝓸𝓻 𝓪𝓵𝓰𝓾𝓶𝓪 𝓳𝓾𝓼𝓽𝓲𝓬̧𝓪 𝓮 𝓲𝓷𝓿𝓮𝓻𝓽𝓮𝓻 𝓸 𝓹𝓻𝓸𝓬𝓮𝓼𝓼𝓸 𝓮𝓶 𝓬𝓾𝓻𝓼𝓸, 𝓿𝓪𝓵𝓲𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓸 𝓹𝓮𝓵𝓸 𝓖𝓸𝓿𝓮𝓻𝓷𝓸, 𝓭𝓮 𝓾𝓶𝓪 𝓷𝓸𝓿𝓪 𝓮 𝓹𝓻𝓸𝓯𝓾𝓷𝓭𝓪 𝓽𝓻𝓪𝓷𝓼𝓯𝓮𝓻𝓮̂𝓷𝓬𝓲𝓪 𝓭𝓮 𝓻𝓮𝓷𝓭𝓲𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓸𝓼 𝓭𝓪𝓼 𝓬𝓵𝓪𝓼𝓼𝓮𝓼 𝓽𝓻𝓪𝓫𝓪𝓵𝓱𝓪𝓭𝓸𝓻𝓪𝓼 𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓪 𝓸𝓼 𝓭𝓸𝓷𝓸𝓼 𝓭𝓪𝓼 𝓮𝓶𝓹𝓻𝓮𝓼𝓪𝓼 𝓮 𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓪 𝓸 𝓼𝓮𝓽𝓸𝓻 𝓯𝓲𝓷𝓪𝓷𝓬𝓮𝓲𝓻𝓸. 𝓤𝓶 𝓹𝓻𝓲𝓶𝓮𝓲𝓻𝓸 𝓹𝓪𝓼𝓼𝓸 𝓮́ 𝓼𝓮𝓻𝓶𝓸𝓼 𝓼𝓸𝓵𝓲𝓭𝓪́𝓻𝓲𝓸𝓼 𝓬𝓸𝓶 𝓺𝓾𝓮𝓶, 𝓬𝓸𝓶𝓸 𝓸𝓼 𝓽𝓻𝓪𝓫𝓪𝓵𝓱𝓪𝓭𝓸𝓻𝓮𝓼 𝓪𝓬𝓪𝓶𝓹𝓪𝓭𝓸𝓼 𝓪̀ 𝓹𝓸𝓻𝓽𝓪 𝓭𝓪𝓼 𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓪𝓬̧𝓸̃𝓮𝓼 𝓭𝓮 𝓬𝓸𝓶𝓫𝓸𝓲𝓸𝓼, 𝓵𝓾𝓽𝓪 𝓹𝓮𝓵𝓸 𝓶𝓪𝓲𝓼 𝓮𝓵𝓮𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓪𝓻: 𝓻𝓮𝓼𝓹𝓮𝓲𝓽𝓸..
* Sociólogo, dirigente do Bloco de Esquerda
.
IN "EXPRESSO" - 16/03/23.
𝓢𝓮 𝓺𝓾𝓲𝓼𝓮𝓻𝓶𝓸𝓼 𝓾𝓶 𝓹𝓮𝓺𝓾𝓮𝓷𝓸 𝓻𝓮𝓽𝓻𝓪𝓽𝓸 𝓭𝓸 𝓶𝓾𝓷𝓭𝓸 𝓭𝓸 𝓽𝓻𝓪𝓫𝓪𝓵𝓱𝓸 𝓮𝓶 𝓟𝓸𝓻𝓽𝓾𝓰𝓪𝓵, 𝓸𝓵𝓱𝓮𝓶𝓸𝓼 𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓪 𝓸 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓼𝓮 𝓹𝓪𝓼𝓼𝓪 𝓬𝓸𝓶 𝓸𝓼 𝓫𝓪𝓻𝓮𝓼 𝓭𝓸𝓼 𝓬𝓸𝓶𝓫𝓸𝓲𝓸𝓼 𝓭𝓪 𝓒𝓟. 𝓞 𝓔𝓼𝓽𝓪𝓭𝓸, 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓭𝓮𝓽𝓮́𝓶 𝓪 𝓮𝓶𝓹𝓻𝓮𝓼𝓪, 𝓮𝔁𝓽𝓮𝓻𝓷𝓪𝓵𝓲𝔃𝓸𝓾 𝓸 𝓼𝓮𝓻𝓿𝓲𝓬̧𝓸 𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓪 𝓾𝓶 𝓹𝓻𝓲𝓿𝓪𝓭𝓸. 𝓔𝓼𝓽𝓮, 𝓹𝓸𝓻 𝓼𝓾𝓪 𝓿𝓮𝔃, 𝓷𝓪̃𝓸 𝓬𝓾𝓶𝓹𝓻𝓮 𝓸 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓽𝓻𝓪𝓽𝓸 𝓮 𝓷𝓪̃𝓸 𝓹𝓪𝓰𝓸𝓾 𝓪𝓸𝓼 𝓽𝓻𝓪𝓫𝓪𝓵𝓱𝓪𝓭𝓸𝓻𝓮𝓼 𝓸𝓼 𝓼𝓪𝓵𝓪́𝓻𝓲𝓸𝓼 𝓭𝓮 𝓯𝓮𝓿𝓮𝓻𝓮𝓲𝓻𝓸. 𝓞𝓼 𝓬𝓵𝓲𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮𝓼 𝓷𝓪̃𝓸 𝓽𝓮̂𝓶 𝓪𝓬𝓮𝓼𝓼𝓸 𝓪𝓸 𝓼𝓮𝓻𝓿𝓲𝓬̧𝓸 𝓮 𝓸𝓼 𝓽𝓻𝓪𝓫𝓪𝓵𝓱𝓪𝓭𝓸𝓻𝓮𝓼, 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓭𝓮𝓼𝓮𝓼𝓹𝓮𝓻𝓪𝓶 𝓱𝓪́ 𝓼𝓮𝓶𝓪𝓷𝓪𝓼 𝓼𝓮𝓶 𝓽𝓻𝓪𝓫𝓪𝓵𝓱𝓸 𝓮 𝓼𝓮𝓶 𝓺𝓾𝓪𝓵𝓺𝓾𝓮𝓻 𝓻𝓮𝓷𝓭𝓲𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓸, 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓽𝓲𝓷𝓾𝓪𝓶 𝓪𝓬𝓪𝓶𝓹𝓪𝓭𝓸𝓼 𝓯𝓻𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮 𝓪̀𝓼 𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓪𝓬̧𝓸̃𝓮𝓼 𝓭𝓮 𝓢𝓪𝓷𝓽𝓪 𝓐𝓹𝓸𝓵𝓸́𝓷𝓲𝓪 𝓮 𝓭𝓮 𝓒𝓪𝓶𝓹𝓪𝓷𝓱𝓪̃. 𝓞 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓬𝓮𝓼𝓼𝓲𝓸𝓷𝓪́𝓻𝓲𝓸 𝓮𝓶𝓹𝓪𝓽𝓪 𝓮 𝓸 𝓰𝓸𝓿𝓮𝓻𝓷𝓸 𝓷𝓪̃𝓸 𝓻𝓮𝓼𝓸𝓵𝓿𝓮. 𝓗𝓪́ 𝓮𝓷𝓺𝓾𝓪𝓭𝓻𝓪𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓸 𝓵𝓮𝓰𝓪𝓵 𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓪 𝓮𝓷𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓽𝓻𝓪𝓻 𝓾𝓶𝓪 𝓼𝓸𝓵𝓾𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸, 𝓻𝓮𝓼𝓬𝓲𝓷𝓭𝓲𝓷𝓭𝓸 𝓸 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓽𝓻𝓪𝓽𝓸 𝓬𝓸𝓶 𝓪 𝓮𝓶𝓹𝓻𝓮𝓼𝓪 𝓮𝔁𝓽𝓮𝓻𝓷𝓪 𝓮 𝓲𝓷𝓬𝓸𝓻𝓹𝓸𝓻𝓪𝓷𝓭𝓸 𝓸𝓼 𝓽𝓻𝓪𝓫𝓪𝓵𝓱𝓪𝓭𝓸𝓻𝓮𝓼 𝓷𝓪 𝓒𝓟, 𝓶𝓪𝓼 𝓷𝓪̃𝓸 𝓱𝓪́ 𝓿𝓸𝓷𝓽𝓪𝓭𝓮 𝓹𝓸𝓵𝓲́𝓽𝓲𝓬𝓪. 𝓔𝔁𝓲𝓼𝓽𝓮𝓶 𝓵𝓮𝓲𝓼 𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓪 𝓹𝓻𝓸𝓽𝓮𝓰𝓮𝓻 𝓪𝓼 𝓹𝓮𝓼𝓼𝓸𝓪𝓼, 𝓶𝓪𝓼 𝓮𝓵𝓪𝓼 𝓷𝓪̃𝓸 𝓫𝓪𝓼𝓽𝓪𝓶 𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓪 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓮𝔁𝓲𝓼𝓽𝓪 𝓳𝓾𝓼𝓽𝓲𝓬̧𝓪. 𝓝𝓸 𝓟𝓪𝓻𝓵𝓪𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓸, 𝓸 𝓟𝓢 𝓬𝓱𝓾𝓶𝓫𝓸𝓾 𝓪𝓽𝓮́ 𝓪 𝓲𝓭𝓪 𝓭𝓸 𝓶𝓲𝓷𝓲𝓼𝓽𝓻𝓸 𝓖𝓪𝓵𝓪𝓶𝓫𝓪 𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓪 𝓮𝓼𝓬𝓵𝓪𝓻𝓮𝓬𝓮𝓻 𝓪 𝓼𝓲𝓽𝓾𝓪𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸, 𝓲𝓶𝓹𝓮𝓭𝓲𝓷𝓭𝓸 𝓪 𝓻𝓮𝓼𝓹𝓸𝓷𝓼𝓪𝓫𝓲𝓵𝓲𝔃𝓪𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸 𝓭𝓮 𝓺𝓾𝓮𝓶 𝓽𝓮𝓶 𝓹𝓸𝓭𝓮𝓻 𝓮 𝓭𝓮𝓼𝓹𝓻𝓮𝔃𝓪𝓷𝓭𝓸 𝓪 𝓪𝓯𝓵𝓲𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸 𝓭𝓸𝓼 𝓽𝓻𝓪𝓫𝓪𝓵𝓱𝓪𝓭𝓸𝓻𝓮𝓼.
𝓔𝓷𝓺𝓾𝓪𝓷𝓽𝓸 𝓲𝓼𝓽𝓸 𝓪𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓽𝓮𝓬𝓮, 𝓪𝓼 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓯𝓮𝓭𝓮𝓻𝓪𝓬̧𝓸̃𝓮𝓼 𝓹𝓪𝓽𝓻𝓸𝓷𝓪𝓲𝓼 𝓶𝓸𝓫𝓲𝓵𝓲𝔃𝓪𝓶-𝓼𝓮 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓽𝓻𝓪 𝓪𝓵𝓰𝓾𝓶𝓪𝓼 𝓭𝓪𝓼 𝓻𝓮𝓰𝓻𝓪𝓼 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓹𝓸𝓭𝓮𝓶 𝓽𝓻𝓪𝔃𝓮𝓻 𝓶𝓪𝓲𝓼 𝓮𝔁𝓲𝓰𝓮̂𝓷𝓬𝓲𝓪 𝓭𝓮 𝓻𝓮𝓼𝓹𝓮𝓲𝓽𝓸 𝓷𝓪𝓼 𝓵𝓮𝓲𝓼 𝓭𝓸 𝓽𝓻𝓪𝓫𝓪𝓵𝓱𝓸. 𝓘𝓷𝓿𝓸𝓬𝓪𝓷𝓭𝓸 𝓾𝓶𝓪 𝓮𝓼𝓹𝓮́𝓬𝓲𝓮 𝓭𝓮 𝓭𝓲𝓻𝓮𝓲𝓽𝓸 𝓭𝓮 𝓿𝓮𝓽𝓸 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓪 𝓒𝓸𝓷𝓼𝓽𝓲𝓽𝓾𝓲𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸 𝓷𝓪̃𝓸 𝓵𝓱𝓮𝓼 𝓪𝓽𝓻𝓲𝓫𝓾𝓲, 𝓻𝓪𝓼𝓰𝓪𝓶 𝓪𝓼 𝓿𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓮𝓼 𝓹𝓸𝓻𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓸 𝓟𝓪𝓻𝓵𝓪𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓸 𝓪𝓹𝓻𝓸𝓿𝓸𝓾 𝓪𝓵𝓰𝓾𝓶𝓪𝓼 𝓷𝓸𝓻𝓶𝓪𝓼 𝓼𝓮𝓶 𝓸 𝓪𝓬𝓸𝓻𝓭𝓸 𝓭𝓪 “𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓬𝓮𝓻𝓽𝓪𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸 𝓼𝓸𝓬𝓲𝓪𝓵”. 𝓝𝓪̃𝓸 𝓫𝓪𝓼𝓽𝓪 𝓪𝓸𝓼 𝓹𝓪𝓽𝓻𝓸̃𝓮𝓼 𝓽𝓮𝓻𝓮𝓶 𝓬𝓮𝓵𝓮𝓫𝓻𝓪𝓭𝓸 𝓬𝓸𝓶 𝓸 𝓰𝓸𝓿𝓮𝓻𝓷𝓸 𝓮 𝓪 𝓤𝓖𝓣 𝓾𝓶 “𝓪𝓬𝓸𝓻𝓭𝓸 𝓭𝓮 𝓻𝓮𝓷𝓭𝓲𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓸𝓼” 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓯𝓲𝔁𝓪 𝓾𝓶𝓪 𝓶𝓮𝓽𝓪 𝓭𝓮 𝓪𝓾𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓸𝓼 𝓼𝓪𝓵𝓪𝓻𝓲𝓪𝓲𝓼 (𝟓,𝟏%) 𝓶𝓾𝓲𝓽𝓸 𝓪𝓺𝓾𝓮́𝓶 𝓭𝓸 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓳𝓪́ 𝓼𝓮 𝓹𝓮𝓻𝓭𝓮𝓾 𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓪 𝓪 𝓲𝓷𝓯𝓵𝓪𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸 𝓮 𝓺𝓾𝓮, 𝓶𝓮𝓼𝓶𝓸 𝓪𝓼𝓼𝓲𝓶, 𝓪 𝓶𝓪𝓲𝓸𝓻𝓲𝓪 𝓭𝓪𝓼 𝓮𝓶𝓹𝓻𝓮𝓼𝓪𝓼 𝓷𝓮𝓶 𝓼𝓮𝓺𝓾𝓮𝓻 𝓬𝓾𝓶𝓹𝓻𝓮 (𝓸𝓼 𝓾́𝓵𝓽𝓲𝓶𝓸𝓼 𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓸𝓼 𝓭𝓪 𝓓𝓖𝓔𝓡𝓣 𝓻𝓮𝓿𝓮𝓵𝓪𝓶 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓸𝓼 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓽𝓻𝓪𝓽𝓸𝓼 𝓬𝓸𝓵𝓮𝓽𝓲𝓿𝓸𝓼 𝓷𝓮𝓰𝓸𝓬𝓲𝓪𝓭𝓸𝓼 𝓮𝓶 𝓳𝓪𝓷𝓮𝓲𝓻𝓸, 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓮𝓶 𝓹𝓻𝓲𝓷𝓬𝓲́𝓹𝓲𝓸 𝓹𝓻𝓮𝓿𝓮𝓻𝓲𝓪𝓶 𝓪𝓾𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓸𝓼, 𝓪𝓫𝓻𝓪𝓷𝓰𝓮𝓶 𝟒𝟔𝟕𝟕𝟔 𝓽𝓻𝓪𝓫𝓪𝓵𝓱𝓪𝓭𝓸𝓻𝓮𝓼, 𝓾𝓶𝓪 𝓹𝓮𝓻𝓬𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓪𝓰𝓮𝓶 𝓲́𝓷𝓯𝓲𝓶𝓪 𝓭𝓮 𝓺𝓾𝓮𝓶 𝓽𝓻𝓪𝓫𝓪𝓵𝓱𝓪 𝓮𝓶 𝓟𝓸𝓻𝓽𝓾𝓰𝓪𝓵). 𝓝𝓪̃𝓸 𝓵𝓱𝓮𝓼 𝓫𝓪𝓼𝓽𝓪 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓪𝓼 𝓶𝓪𝓻𝓰𝓮𝓷𝓼 𝓭𝓮 𝓵𝓾𝓬𝓻𝓸 𝓪𝓾𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮𝓶, 𝓹𝓻𝓸𝓿𝓸𝓬𝓪𝓷𝓭𝓸 𝓪 𝓲𝓷𝓯𝓵𝓪𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸. 𝓝𝓪̃𝓸 𝓵𝓱𝓮𝓼 𝓫𝓪𝓼𝓽𝓪 𝓪 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓽𝓻𝓪𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸 𝓭𝓸 𝓼𝓪𝓵𝓪́𝓻𝓲𝓸 𝓻𝓮𝓪𝓵, 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓮́ 𝓪 𝓼𝓾𝓪 𝓼𝓸𝓵𝓾𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸 𝓮 𝓽𝓪𝓶𝓫𝓮́𝓶 𝓪 𝓻𝓮𝓼𝓹𝓸𝓼𝓽𝓪 𝓻𝓮𝓬𝓮𝓼𝓼𝓲𝓿𝓪 𝓭𝓸 𝓰𝓸𝓿𝓮𝓻𝓷𝓸 𝓪𝓸 𝓪𝓾𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓸 𝓭𝓸𝓼 𝓹𝓻𝓮𝓬̧𝓸𝓼 𝓮 𝓸 𝓶𝓪𝓲𝓸𝓻 𝓯𝓪𝓽𝓸𝓻 𝓭𝓮 𝓪𝓰𝓻𝓪𝓿𝓪𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓸 𝓭𝓪𝓼 𝓭𝓮𝓼𝓲𝓰𝓾𝓪𝓵𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓮𝓼. 𝓞𝓼 𝓹𝓪𝓽𝓻𝓸̃𝓮𝓼 𝓺𝓾𝓮𝓻𝓮𝓶, 𝓪𝓲𝓷𝓭𝓪, 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓷𝓪𝓭𝓪 𝓹𝓸𝓼𝓼𝓪 𝓼𝓮𝓻 𝓭𝓮𝓬𝓲𝓭𝓲𝓭𝓸 𝓷𝓸 𝓶𝓾𝓷𝓭𝓸 𝓭𝓸 𝓽𝓻𝓪𝓫𝓪𝓵𝓱𝓸 𝓼𝓮𝓶 𝓪 𝓼𝓾𝓪 𝓸𝓾𝓽𝓸𝓻𝓰𝓪.
𝓔 𝓹𝓸𝓻 𝓲𝓼𝓼𝓸 𝓼𝓮 𝓭𝓮𝓼𝓭𝓸𝓫𝓻𝓪𝓶 𝓮𝓶 𝓪𝓹𝓮𝓵𝓸𝓼 𝓪 𝓜𝓪𝓻𝓬𝓮𝓵𝓸, 𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓪 𝓲𝓶𝓹𝓮𝓭𝓲𝓻 𝓪𝓵𝓰𝓾𝓷𝓼 𝓭𝓸𝓼 𝓪𝓿𝓪𝓷𝓬̧𝓸𝓼 𝓻𝓮𝓬𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮 𝓪𝓹𝓻𝓸𝓿𝓪𝓭𝓸𝓼 𝓷𝓸 𝓟𝓪𝓻𝓵𝓪𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓸: 𝓷𝓪 𝓮𝔁𝓲𝓰𝓮̂𝓷𝓬𝓲𝓪 𝓭𝓮 𝓻𝓮𝓼𝓹𝓸𝓷𝓼𝓪𝓫𝓲𝓵𝓲𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓮𝓼 𝓵𝓪𝓫𝓸𝓻𝓪𝓲𝓼 𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓪 𝓪𝓼 𝓹𝓵𝓪𝓽𝓪𝓯𝓸𝓻𝓶𝓪𝓼 𝓭𝓲𝓰𝓲𝓽𝓪𝓲𝓼, 𝓷𝓪 𝓹𝓻𝓸𝓲𝓫𝓲𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸 𝓭𝓮 𝓻𝓮𝓬𝓸𝓻𝓻𝓮𝓻 𝓪𝓸 𝓸𝓾𝓽𝓼𝓸𝓾𝓻𝓬𝓲𝓷𝓰 𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓪 𝓼𝓾𝓫𝓼𝓽𝓲𝓽𝓾𝓲𝓻 𝓽𝓻𝓪𝓫𝓪𝓵𝓱𝓪𝓭𝓸𝓻𝓮𝓼 𝓭𝓸𝓼 𝓺𝓾𝓪𝓭𝓻𝓸𝓼 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓯𝓸𝓻𝓪𝓶 𝓭𝓮𝓼𝓹𝓮𝓭𝓲𝓭𝓸𝓼, 𝓷𝓪 𝓸𝓫𝓻𝓲𝓰𝓪𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸 𝓭𝓮 𝓬𝓸𝓶𝓹𝓮𝓷𝓼𝓪𝓻 𝓸 𝓪𝓬𝓻𝓮́𝓼𝓬𝓲𝓶𝓸 𝓭𝓮 𝓭𝓮𝓼𝓹𝓮𝓼𝓪𝓼 𝓹𝓸𝓻 𝓽𝓮𝓵𝓮𝓽𝓻𝓪𝓫𝓪𝓵𝓱𝓸, 𝓷𝓪 𝓲𝓶𝓹𝓸𝓼𝓼𝓲𝓫𝓲𝓵𝓲𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓮 𝓭𝓮 𝓼𝓮 𝓲𝓶𝓹𝓸𝓻 𝓪𝓬𝓸𝓻𝓭𝓸𝓼 𝓮𝓶 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓸𝓼 𝓽𝓻𝓪𝓫𝓪𝓵𝓱𝓪𝓭𝓸𝓻𝓮𝓼 𝓻𝓮𝓷𝓾𝓷𝓬𝓲𝓪𝓶 𝓪𝓸𝓼 𝓬𝓻𝓮́𝓭𝓲𝓽𝓸𝓼 𝓵𝓪𝓫𝓸𝓻𝓪𝓲𝓼 𝓪 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓽𝓮̂𝓶 𝓭𝓲𝓻𝓮𝓲𝓽𝓸 𝓷𝓸 𝓯𝓲𝓶 𝓭𝓸𝓼 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓽𝓻𝓪𝓽𝓸𝓼, 𝓷𝓪 𝓮𝔁𝓽𝓮𝓷𝓼𝓪̃𝓸 𝓭𝓪 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓽𝓻𝓪𝓽𝓪𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸 𝓬𝓸𝓵𝓮𝓽𝓲𝓿𝓪 𝓪 𝓽𝓻𝓪𝓫𝓪𝓵𝓱𝓪𝓭𝓸𝓻𝓮𝓼 𝓮𝓶 𝓸𝓾𝓽𝓼𝓸𝓾𝓻𝓬𝓲𝓷𝓰 𝓸𝓾 𝓪 𝓻𝓮𝓬𝓲𝓫𝓸𝓼 𝓿𝓮𝓻𝓭𝓮𝓼, 𝓷𝓸𝓼 𝓶𝓮𝓬𝓪𝓷𝓲𝓼𝓶𝓸𝓼 𝓭𝓮 𝓼𝓲𝓷𝓭𝓲𝓬𝓪̂𝓷𝓬𝓲𝓪 𝓭𝓪 𝓬𝓪𝓭𝓾𝓬𝓲𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓮.
𝓞𝓼 𝓹𝓪𝓽𝓻𝓸̃𝓮𝓼 𝓬𝓵𝓪𝓶𝓪𝓶 𝓹𝓮𝓵𝓸 𝓿𝓮𝓽𝓸 𝓭𝓮 𝓜𝓪𝓻𝓬𝓮𝓵𝓸 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓽𝓻𝓪 𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓪𝓼 𝓪𝓵𝓽𝓮𝓻𝓪𝓬̧𝓸̃𝓮𝓼 𝓵𝓮𝓰𝓪𝓲𝓼, 𝓹𝓸𝓻 𝓼𝓲𝓷𝓰𝓮𝓵𝓪𝓼 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓼𝓮𝓳𝓪𝓶. 𝓞𝓼 𝓹𝓸𝓻𝓽𝓪-𝓿𝓸𝔃𝓮𝓼 𝓭𝓪𝓼 𝓹𝓵𝓪𝓽𝓪𝓯𝓸𝓻𝓶𝓪𝓼 𝓭𝓲𝓰𝓲𝓽𝓪𝓲𝓼 - 𝓶𝓾𝓵𝓽𝓲𝓷𝓪𝓬𝓲𝓸𝓷𝓪𝓲𝓼 𝓱𝓪𝓫𝓲𝓽𝓾𝓪𝓭𝓪𝓼 𝓪̀ 𝓲𝓶𝓹𝓾𝓷𝓲𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓮 - 𝓪𝓷𝓾𝓷𝓬𝓲𝓪𝓶 𝓪𝓽𝓮́ 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓷𝓪̃𝓸 𝓹𝓻𝓮𝓽𝓮𝓷𝓭𝓮𝓶 𝓬𝓾𝓶𝓹𝓻𝓲𝓻 𝓪 𝓵𝓮𝓲, 𝓬𝓪𝓼𝓸 𝓮𝓵𝓪 𝓿𝓮𝓷𝓱𝓪 𝓪 𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓻𝓪𝓻 𝓮𝓶 𝓿𝓲𝓰𝓸𝓻, 𝓪𝓷𝓾𝓷𝓬𝓲𝓪𝓷𝓭𝓸 𝓭𝓮 𝓯𝓸𝓻𝓶𝓪 𝓭𝓮𝓼𝓪𝓫𝓻𝓲𝓭𝓪, 𝓮𝓶 𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓻𝓮𝓿𝓲𝓼𝓽𝓪𝓼 𝓪𝓸𝓼 𝓳𝓸𝓻𝓷𝓪𝓲𝓼, 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓳𝓪́ 𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓪̃𝓸 𝓪 𝓶𝓸𝓫𝓲𝓵𝓲𝔃𝓪𝓻 𝓪 𝓬𝓻𝓲𝓪𝓽𝓲𝓿𝓲𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓮 𝓭𝓮 𝓰𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓸𝓻𝓮𝓼 𝓮 𝓪𝓭𝓿𝓸𝓰𝓪𝓭𝓸𝓼 𝓮𝓶𝓹𝓻𝓮𝓼𝓪𝓻𝓲𝓪𝓲𝓼 𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓪 𝓮𝓷𝓰𝓮𝓷𝓭𝓻𝓪𝓻 𝓮𝓼𝓺𝓾𝓮𝓶𝓪𝓼 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓹𝓮𝓻𝓶𝓲𝓽𝓪𝓶 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓽𝓸𝓻𝓷𝓪́-𝓵𝓪.
𝓗𝓪́ 𝓪𝓼𝓼𝓲𝓶 𝓾𝓶𝓪 𝓽𝓻𝓲𝓹𝓵𝓪 𝓵𝓾𝓽𝓪, 𝓾𝓻𝓰𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮, 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓽𝓻𝓪 𝓸 𝓭𝓮𝓼𝓬𝓪𝓻𝓪𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓸 𝓮 𝓪 𝓲𝓷𝓳𝓾𝓼𝓽𝓲𝓬̧𝓪 𝓷𝓸 𝓽𝓻𝓪𝓫𝓪𝓵𝓱𝓸. 𝓟𝓻𝓲𝓶𝓮𝓲𝓻𝓸, 𝓮́ 𝓹𝓻𝓮𝓬𝓲𝓼𝓸 𝓪𝓯𝓲𝓻𝓶𝓪𝓻 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓷𝓪̃𝓸 𝓮́ 𝓪̀𝓼 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓯𝓮𝓭𝓮𝓻𝓪𝓬̧𝓸̃𝓮𝓼 𝓹𝓪𝓽𝓻𝓸𝓷𝓪𝓲𝓼 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓪́ 𝓪𝓽𝓻𝓲𝓫𝓾𝓲́𝓭𝓪 𝓪 𝓬𝓸𝓶𝓹𝓮𝓽𝓮̂𝓷𝓬𝓲𝓪 𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓪 𝓵𝓮𝓰𝓲𝓼𝓵𝓪𝓻 𝓮 𝓺𝓾𝓮, 𝓼𝓲𝓶, 𝓪𝓺𝓾𝓮𝓵𝓪𝓼 𝓷𝓸𝓻𝓶𝓪𝓼 𝓹𝓸𝓼𝓲𝓽𝓲𝓿𝓪𝓼 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓽𝓻𝓪 𝓿𝓪́𝓻𝓲𝓸𝓼 𝓪𝓫𝓾𝓼𝓸𝓼 𝓭𝓮𝓿𝓮𝓶 𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓻𝓪𝓻 𝓮𝓶 𝓿𝓲𝓰𝓸𝓻 𝓺𝓾𝓪𝓷𝓽𝓸 𝓪𝓷𝓽𝓮𝓼. 𝓢𝓮𝓰𝓾𝓷𝓭𝓸, 𝓮́ 𝓹𝓻𝓮𝓬𝓲𝓼𝓸 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓷𝓸𝓼 𝓹𝓻𝓮𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓮𝓶𝓸𝓼 𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓪 𝓬𝓸𝓶𝓫𝓪𝓽𝓮𝓻 𝓪𝓼 𝓶𝓾́𝓵𝓽𝓲𝓹𝓵𝓪𝓼 𝓯𝓸𝓻𝓶𝓪𝓼 𝓭𝓮 𝓲𝓷𝓬𝓾𝓶𝓹𝓻𝓲𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓸 𝓭𝓮 𝓭𝓮𝓿𝓮𝓻𝓮𝓼 𝓫𝓪́𝓼𝓲𝓬𝓸𝓼 𝓹𝓸𝓻 𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓽𝓮 𝓭𝓪𝓼 𝓮𝓶𝓹𝓻𝓮𝓼𝓪𝓼, 𝓯𝓪𝔃𝓮𝓷𝓭𝓸 𝓿𝓪𝓵𝓮𝓻, 𝓹𝓮𝓵𝓪 𝓯𝓸𝓻𝓬̧𝓪 𝓸𝓻𝓰𝓪𝓷𝓲𝔃𝓪𝓭𝓪 𝓭𝓸 𝓽𝓻𝓪𝓫𝓪𝓵𝓱𝓸, 𝓸𝓼 𝓲𝓷𝓼𝓽𝓻𝓾𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓸𝓼 𝓵𝓮𝓰𝓪𝓲𝓼 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓮𝔁𝓲𝓼𝓽𝓮𝓶 𝓸𝓾 𝓮𝔁𝓲𝓼𝓽𝓲𝓻𝓪̃𝓸, 𝓷𝓸𝓶𝓮𝓪𝓭𝓪𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓽𝓻𝓪 𝓪 𝓹𝓻𝓮𝓬𝓪𝓻𝓲𝔃𝓪𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸 𝓻𝓪𝓭𝓲𝓬𝓪𝓵 𝓭𝓸 𝓸𝓾𝓽𝓼𝓸𝓾𝓻𝓬𝓲𝓷𝓰 𝓮 𝓭𝓪 𝓾𝓫𝓮𝓻𝓲𝔃𝓪𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸. 𝓣𝓮𝓻𝓬𝓮𝓲𝓻𝓸, 𝓮́ 𝓹𝓻𝓮𝓬𝓲𝓼𝓸 𝓪𝓶𝓹𝓵𝓲𝓪𝓻 𝓪𝓼 𝓯𝓸𝓻𝓶𝓪𝓼 𝓭𝓮 𝓻𝓮𝓹𝓻𝓮𝓼𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓪𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸 𝓬𝓸𝓵𝓮𝓽𝓲𝓿𝓪 𝓭𝓮 𝓺𝓾𝓮𝓶 𝓽𝓻𝓪𝓫𝓪𝓵𝓱𝓪. 𝓢𝓮𝓶 𝓮𝓵𝓪𝓼 𝓷𝓪̃𝓸 𝓼𝓮 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓼𝓮𝓰𝓾𝓲𝓻𝓪́ 𝓲𝓶𝓹𝓸𝓻 𝓪𝓵𝓰𝓾𝓶𝓪 𝓳𝓾𝓼𝓽𝓲𝓬̧𝓪 𝓮 𝓲𝓷𝓿𝓮𝓻𝓽𝓮𝓻 𝓸 𝓹𝓻𝓸𝓬𝓮𝓼𝓼𝓸 𝓮𝓶 𝓬𝓾𝓻𝓼𝓸, 𝓿𝓪𝓵𝓲𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓸 𝓹𝓮𝓵𝓸 𝓖𝓸𝓿𝓮𝓻𝓷𝓸, 𝓭𝓮 𝓾𝓶𝓪 𝓷𝓸𝓿𝓪 𝓮 𝓹𝓻𝓸𝓯𝓾𝓷𝓭𝓪 𝓽𝓻𝓪𝓷𝓼𝓯𝓮𝓻𝓮̂𝓷𝓬𝓲𝓪 𝓭𝓮 𝓻𝓮𝓷𝓭𝓲𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓸𝓼 𝓭𝓪𝓼 𝓬𝓵𝓪𝓼𝓼𝓮𝓼 𝓽𝓻𝓪𝓫𝓪𝓵𝓱𝓪𝓭𝓸𝓻𝓪𝓼 𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓪 𝓸𝓼 𝓭𝓸𝓷𝓸𝓼 𝓭𝓪𝓼 𝓮𝓶𝓹𝓻𝓮𝓼𝓪𝓼 𝓮 𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓪 𝓸 𝓼𝓮𝓽𝓸𝓻 𝓯𝓲𝓷𝓪𝓷𝓬𝓮𝓲𝓻𝓸. 𝓤𝓶 𝓹𝓻𝓲𝓶𝓮𝓲𝓻𝓸 𝓹𝓪𝓼𝓼𝓸 𝓮́ 𝓼𝓮𝓻𝓶𝓸𝓼 𝓼𝓸𝓵𝓲𝓭𝓪́𝓻𝓲𝓸𝓼 𝓬𝓸𝓶 𝓺𝓾𝓮𝓶, 𝓬𝓸𝓶𝓸 𝓸𝓼 𝓽𝓻𝓪𝓫𝓪𝓵𝓱𝓪𝓭𝓸𝓻𝓮𝓼 𝓪𝓬𝓪𝓶𝓹𝓪𝓭𝓸𝓼 𝓪̀ 𝓹𝓸𝓻𝓽𝓪 𝓭𝓪𝓼 𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓪𝓬̧𝓸̃𝓮𝓼 𝓭𝓮 𝓬𝓸𝓶𝓫𝓸𝓲𝓸𝓼, 𝓵𝓾𝓽𝓪 𝓹𝓮𝓵𝓸 𝓶𝓪𝓲𝓼 𝓮𝓵𝓮𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓪𝓻: 𝓻𝓮𝓼𝓹𝓮𝓲𝓽𝓸.
.
* Sociólogo, dirigente do Bloco de Esquerda
.
IN "EXPRESSO" - 16/03/23.
Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário