,
Relevâncias de um currículo
O currículo de Vítor Fernandes na Caixa deveria ter sido suficiente para
afastá-lo de qualquer nomeação pública, logo em fevereiro. Que a
pressão pública contribua para que o Governo trate depressa de encontrar
para o Banco de Fomento quem ofereça melhores referências.
𝙰 𝚌𝚛𝚒𝚊𝚌̧𝚊̃𝚘 𝚍𝚘 𝙱𝚊𝚗𝚌𝚘 𝚍𝚎 𝙵𝚘𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚘 𝚏𝚘𝚒 𝚊𝚗𝚞𝚗𝚌𝚒𝚊𝚍𝚊 𝚑𝚊́ 𝚖𝚞𝚒𝚝𝚘 𝚎 𝚌𝚘𝚖 𝚙𝚘𝚖𝚙𝚊. 𝙿𝚘𝚛𝚎́𝚖, 𝚊 𝚏𝚞𝚜𝚊̃𝚘 𝚍𝚎 𝚍𝚒𝚟𝚎𝚛𝚜𝚘𝚜 𝚒𝚗𝚜𝚝𝚒𝚝𝚞𝚝𝚘𝚜 𝚙𝚞́𝚋𝚕𝚒𝚌𝚘𝚜 𝚗𝚞𝚖𝚊 𝚞́𝚗𝚒𝚌𝚊 𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚒𝚍𝚊𝚍𝚎 𝚍𝚎 𝚊𝚙𝚘𝚒𝚘 𝚊𝚘 𝚝𝚎𝚌𝚒𝚍𝚘 𝚎𝚖𝚙𝚛𝚎𝚜𝚊𝚛𝚒𝚊𝚕 𝚙𝚘𝚛𝚝𝚞𝚐𝚞𝚎̂𝚜 𝚝𝚊𝚛𝚍𝚊 𝚎𝚖 𝚝𝚛𝚊𝚍𝚞𝚣𝚒𝚛-𝚜𝚎 𝚎𝚖 𝚚𝚞𝚊𝚕𝚚𝚞𝚎𝚛 𝚌𝚘𝚒𝚜𝚊 𝚏𝚞𝚗𝚌𝚒𝚘𝚗𝚊𝚕.
𝚂𝚘𝚋 𝚊 𝚙𝚊𝚗𝚍𝚎𝚖𝚒𝚊, 𝚘 𝚙𝚛𝚘𝚓𝚎𝚝𝚘 𝚟𝚘𝚕𝚝𝚘𝚞 𝚊𝚘𝚜 𝚊𝚗𝚞́𝚗𝚌𝚒𝚘𝚜 𝚒𝚖𝚙𝚘𝚛𝚝𝚊𝚗𝚝𝚎𝚜: 𝚘 𝙱𝚊𝚗𝚌𝚘 𝚍𝚎 𝙵𝚘𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚘 𝚎́ 𝚘 𝚟𝚎𝚒́𝚌𝚞𝚕𝚘 𝚙𝚎𝚕𝚘 𝚚𝚞𝚊𝚕 𝚍𝚎𝚟𝚎𝚛𝚊̃𝚘 𝚌𝚑𝚎𝚐𝚊𝚛 𝚊̀𝚜 𝚎𝚖𝚙𝚛𝚎𝚜𝚊𝚜 𝟷𝟼𝟶𝟶 𝚖𝚒𝚕𝚑𝚘̃𝚎𝚜 𝚍𝚎 𝚎𝚞𝚛𝚘𝚜 𝚍𝚎 𝚏𝚞𝚗𝚍𝚘𝚜 𝚎𝚞𝚛𝚘𝚙𝚎𝚞𝚜, 𝚗𝚊𝚍𝚊 𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚘𝚜 𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝟷𝟶% 𝚍𝚎 𝚝𝚘𝚍𝚘 𝚘 𝙿𝚕𝚊𝚗𝚘 𝚍𝚎 𝚁𝚎𝚌𝚞𝚙𝚎𝚛𝚊𝚌̧𝚊̃𝚘 𝚎 𝚁𝚎𝚜𝚒𝚕𝚒𝚎̂𝚗𝚌𝚒𝚊 𝚙𝚘𝚛𝚝𝚞𝚐𝚞𝚎̂𝚜.
𝙽𝚊̃𝚘 𝚎𝚜𝚙𝚊𝚗𝚝𝚊 𝚙𝚘𝚛 𝚒𝚜𝚜𝚘 𝚚𝚞𝚎, 𝚚𝚞𝚊𝚗𝚍𝚘 𝚘 𝙶𝚘𝚟𝚎𝚛𝚗𝚘 𝚗𝚘𝚖𝚎𝚘𝚞 𝚅𝚒́𝚝𝚘𝚛 𝙵𝚎𝚛𝚗𝚊𝚗𝚍𝚎𝚜 𝚙𝚊𝚛𝚊 𝚙𝚛𝚎𝚜𝚒𝚍𝚒𝚛 𝚊𝚘 𝙲𝚘𝚗𝚜𝚎𝚕𝚑𝚘 𝚍𝚎 𝙰𝚍𝚖𝚒𝚗𝚒𝚜𝚝𝚛𝚊𝚌̧𝚊̃𝚘 𝚍𝚘 𝙱𝚊𝚗𝚌𝚘 𝚍𝚎 𝙵𝚘𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚘, 𝚜𝚎 𝚝𝚒𝚟𝚎𝚜𝚜𝚎𝚖 𝚖𝚞𝚕𝚝𝚒𝚙𝚕𝚒𝚌𝚊𝚍𝚘 𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚌̧𝚘̃𝚎𝚜 𝚊𝚍𝚟𝚎𝚛𝚜𝚊𝚜. 𝙽𝚊 𝚛𝚎𝚜𝚙𝚘𝚜𝚝𝚊, 𝚘 𝚖𝚒𝚗𝚒𝚜𝚝𝚛𝚘 𝚍𝚊𝚜 𝙵𝚒𝚗𝚊𝚗𝚌̧𝚊𝚜 𝚊𝚝𝚛𝚊𝚟𝚎𝚜𝚜𝚘𝚞-𝚜𝚎 𝚙𝚎𝚕𝚘 "𝚌𝚞𝚛𝚛𝚒́𝚌𝚞𝚕𝚘 𝚛𝚎𝚕𝚎𝚟𝚊𝚗𝚝𝚎" 𝚍𝚘 𝚗𝚘𝚖𝚎𝚊𝚍𝚘. 𝙾𝚛𝚊, 𝚘 𝚙𝚛𝚘𝚋𝚕𝚎𝚖𝚊 𝚎𝚜𝚝𝚊́ 𝚖𝚎𝚜𝚖𝚘 𝚗𝚘 𝚌𝚞𝚛𝚛𝚒́𝚌𝚞𝚕𝚘.
𝙾 𝙿𝚊𝚛𝚕𝚊𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚘 𝚒𝚗𝚟𝚎𝚜𝚝𝚒𝚐𝚘𝚞 𝚎𝚖 𝚌𝚘𝚖𝚒𝚜𝚜𝚊̃𝚘 𝚍𝚎 𝚒𝚗𝚚𝚞𝚎́𝚛𝚒𝚝𝚘 𝚞𝚖 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚓𝚞𝚗𝚝𝚘 𝚍𝚎 𝚌𝚛𝚎́𝚍𝚒𝚝𝚘𝚜 𝚛𝚞𝚒𝚗𝚘𝚜𝚘𝚜 𝚊𝚙𝚛𝚘𝚟𝚊𝚍𝚘𝚜 𝚙𝚎𝚕𝚊 𝚊𝚍𝚖𝚒𝚗𝚒𝚜𝚝𝚛𝚊𝚌̧𝚊̃𝚘 𝚍𝚊 𝙲𝚊𝚒𝚡𝚊 𝙶𝚎𝚛𝚊𝚕 𝚍𝚎 𝙳𝚎𝚙𝚘́𝚜𝚒𝚝𝚘𝚜 𝚑𝚊́ 𝚌𝚎𝚛𝚌𝚊 𝚍𝚎 𝚍𝚎𝚣 𝚊𝚗𝚘𝚜 - 𝚅𝚊𝚕𝚎 𝚍𝚘 𝙻𝚘𝚋𝚘, 𝙹𝚘𝚜𝚎́ 𝙱𝚎𝚛𝚊𝚛𝚍𝚘, 𝙶𝚛𝚞𝚙𝚘 𝙻𝚎𝚗𝚊. 𝙽𝚎𝚜𝚜𝚎 𝚌𝚎́𝚕𝚎𝚋𝚛𝚎 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚜𝚎𝚕𝚑𝚘 𝚍𝚎 𝚊𝚍𝚖𝚒𝚗𝚒𝚜𝚝𝚛𝚊𝚌̧𝚊̃𝚘, 𝚊𝚘 𝚕𝚊𝚍𝚘 𝚍𝚎 𝙲𝚊𝚛𝚕𝚘𝚜 𝚂𝚊𝚗𝚝𝚘𝚜 𝙵𝚎𝚛𝚛𝚎𝚒𝚛𝚊 𝚎 𝙰𝚛𝚖𝚊𝚗𝚍𝚘 𝚅𝚊𝚛𝚊, 𝚝𝚒𝚗𝚑𝚊 𝚊𝚜𝚜𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚘 𝚅𝚒́𝚝𝚘𝚛 𝙵𝚎𝚛𝚗𝚊𝚗𝚍𝚎𝚜. 𝙰 𝚙𝚊𝚛 𝚍𝚊𝚚𝚞𝚎𝚕𝚎𝚜 𝚌𝚛𝚎́𝚍𝚒𝚝𝚘𝚜 𝚙𝚛𝚘𝚋𝚕𝚎𝚖𝚊́𝚝𝚒𝚌𝚘𝚜, 𝚎𝚜𝚝𝚊𝚟𝚊𝚖 𝚘𝚞𝚝𝚛𝚘𝚜, 𝚝𝚊𝚖𝚋𝚎́𝚖 𝚘𝚜 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚌𝚎𝚍𝚒𝚍𝚘𝚜 𝚊 𝚊𝚌𝚒𝚘𝚗𝚒𝚜𝚝𝚊𝚜 𝚍𝚘 𝙱𝙲𝙿 𝚙𝚊𝚛𝚊 𝚌𝚘𝚖𝚙𝚛𝚊𝚛𝚎𝚖 𝚖𝚊𝚒𝚜 𝚊𝚌̧𝚘̃𝚎𝚜 𝚍𝚘 𝚋𝚊𝚗𝚌𝚘 𝚎 𝚊𝚜𝚜𝚞𝚖𝚒𝚛𝚎𝚖 𝚘 𝚜𝚎𝚞 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚝𝚛𝚘𝚕𝚘. 𝚀𝚞𝚊𝚗𝚍𝚘 𝚘 𝚊𝚜𝚜𝚊𝚕𝚝𝚘 𝚊𝚘 𝙱𝙲𝙿 𝚜𝚎 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚜𝚞𝚖𝚘𝚞, 𝚂𝚊𝚗𝚝𝚘𝚜 𝙵𝚎𝚛𝚛𝚎𝚒𝚛𝚊 𝚎 𝙰𝚛𝚖𝚊𝚗𝚍𝚘 𝚅𝚊𝚛𝚊 𝚜𝚎𝚐𝚞𝚒𝚛𝚊𝚖 𝚙𝚊𝚛𝚊 𝚊 𝚊𝚍𝚖𝚒𝚗𝚒𝚜𝚝𝚛𝚊𝚌̧𝚊̃𝚘 𝚍𝚘 𝚋𝚊𝚗𝚌𝚘 𝚙𝚛𝚒𝚟𝚊𝚍𝚘. 𝙴, 𝚌𝚘𝚖 𝚎𝚕𝚎𝚜, 𝚜𝚎𝚐𝚞𝚒𝚞 𝚅𝚒́𝚝𝚘𝚛 𝙵𝚎𝚛𝚗𝚊𝚗𝚍𝚎𝚜. 𝙾 𝚛𝚎𝚕𝚊𝚝𝚘́𝚛𝚒𝚘 𝚏𝚒𝚗𝚊𝚕 𝚍𝚘 𝚒𝚗𝚚𝚞𝚎́𝚛𝚒𝚝𝚘 𝚙𝚊𝚛𝚕𝚊𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚊𝚛 𝚊𝚌𝚊𝚋𝚘𝚞 𝚙𝚘𝚛 𝚜𝚎𝚛 𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚘𝚜 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚝𝚞𝚗𝚍𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚎 𝚍𝚘 𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚙𝚛𝚘𝚙𝚘̂𝚜 𝚘 𝚙𝚛𝚘́𝚙𝚛𝚒𝚘 𝙿𝚊𝚛𝚝𝚒𝚍𝚘 𝚂𝚘𝚌𝚒𝚊𝚕𝚒𝚜𝚝𝚊, 𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚙𝚛𝚎𝚝𝚎𝚗𝚍𝚎𝚞 𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚅𝚒́𝚝𝚘𝚛 𝙵𝚎𝚛𝚗𝚊𝚗𝚍𝚎𝚜 𝚏𝚒𝚐𝚞𝚛𝚊𝚜𝚜𝚎 𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚛𝚎 𝚘𝚜 𝚊𝚍𝚖𝚒𝚗𝚒𝚜𝚝𝚛𝚊𝚍𝚘𝚛𝚎𝚜 𝚌𝚘𝚖 "𝚒𝚗𝚝𝚎𝚛𝚟𝚎𝚗𝚌̧𝚊̃𝚘 𝚍𝚒𝚛𝚎𝚝𝚊 𝚗𝚘𝚜 𝚌𝚛𝚎́𝚍𝚒𝚝𝚘𝚜 𝚖𝚊𝚒𝚜 𝚙𝚛𝚘𝚋𝚕𝚎𝚖𝚊́𝚝𝚒𝚌𝚘𝚜" - 𝚘 𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚜𝚎𝚛𝚒𝚊 𝚞𝚖 𝚎𝚕𝚎𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚘 𝚌𝚎𝚛𝚝𝚊𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚎 𝚛𝚎𝚕𝚎𝚟𝚊𝚗𝚝𝚎 𝚍𝚘 𝚙𝚎𝚛𝚌𝚞𝚛𝚜𝚘 𝚍𝚘 𝚋𝚊𝚗𝚚𝚞𝚎𝚒𝚛𝚘.
𝚃𝚞𝚍𝚘 𝚒𝚜𝚝𝚘 𝚎𝚛𝚊 𝚍𝚘 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚑𝚎𝚌𝚒𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚘 𝚍𝚘 𝙶𝚘𝚟𝚎𝚛𝚗𝚘 𝚗𝚘 𝚖𝚘𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚘 𝚍𝚊 𝚗𝚘𝚖𝚎𝚊𝚌̧𝚊̃𝚘. 𝙲𝚘𝚖𝚘 𝚜𝚎 𝚗𝚊̃𝚘 𝚋𝚊𝚜𝚝𝚊𝚜𝚜𝚎, 𝚗𝚘𝚟𝚘𝚜 𝚎𝚕𝚎𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚘𝚜 𝚍𝚘 𝚌𝚞𝚛𝚛𝚒́𝚌𝚞𝚕𝚘 𝚍𝚎 𝙵𝚎𝚛𝚗𝚊𝚗𝚍𝚎𝚜 𝚝𝚎̂𝚖 𝚟𝚒𝚗𝚍𝚘 𝚊 𝚙𝚞́𝚋𝚕𝚒𝚌𝚘. 𝚂𝚊𝚋𝚎-𝚜𝚎 𝚊𝚐𝚘𝚛𝚊 𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚘 𝙼𝚒𝚗𝚒𝚜𝚝𝚎́𝚛𝚒𝚘 𝙿𝚞́𝚋𝚕𝚒𝚌𝚘 𝚜𝚞𝚜𝚙𝚎𝚒𝚝𝚊 𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚘 𝚊𝚍𝚖𝚒𝚗𝚒𝚜𝚝𝚛𝚊𝚍𝚘𝚛 𝚍𝚘 𝙽𝚘𝚟𝚘 𝙱𝚊𝚗𝚌𝚘 𝚊𝚓𝚞𝚍𝚘𝚞 𝙻𝚞𝚒́𝚜 𝙵𝚒𝚕𝚒𝚙𝚎 𝚅𝚒𝚎𝚒𝚛𝚊 𝚊 𝚌𝚘𝚖𝚙𝚛𝚊𝚛 𝚞𝚖𝚊 𝚍𝚒́𝚟𝚒𝚍𝚊 𝚍𝚎 𝟻𝟺,𝟹 𝚖𝚒𝚕𝚑𝚘̃𝚎𝚜 𝚍𝚎 𝚎𝚞𝚛𝚘𝚜 𝚍𝚎 𝚞𝚖𝚊 𝚎𝚖𝚙𝚛𝚎𝚜𝚊 𝚜𝚞𝚊 𝚊 𝚎𝚜𝚜𝚎 𝚋𝚊𝚗𝚌𝚘 𝚙𝚘𝚛 𝚊𝚙𝚎𝚗𝚊𝚜 𝟿,𝟷 𝚖𝚒𝚕𝚑𝚘̃𝚎𝚜 𝚍𝚎 𝚎𝚞𝚛𝚘𝚜. 𝙵𝚎𝚛𝚗𝚊𝚗𝚍𝚎𝚜 𝚝𝚎𝚛𝚊́ 𝚊𝚕𝚎𝚛𝚝𝚊𝚍𝚘 𝙻𝚞𝚒́𝚜 𝙵𝚒𝚕𝚒𝚙𝚎 𝚅𝚒𝚎𝚒𝚛𝚊 𝚙𝚊𝚛𝚊 𝚊 𝚒𝚖𝚙𝚘𝚜𝚜𝚒𝚋𝚒𝚕𝚒𝚍𝚊𝚍𝚎 𝚍𝚎 𝚊 𝚘𝚙𝚎𝚛𝚊𝚌̧𝚊̃𝚘 𝚜𝚎𝚛 𝚊𝚙𝚛𝚘𝚟𝚊𝚍𝚊 𝚙𝚎𝚕𝚘 𝙵𝚞𝚗𝚍𝚘 𝚍𝚎 𝚁𝚎𝚜𝚘𝚕𝚞𝚌̧𝚊̃𝚘, 𝚙𝚘𝚛 𝚐𝚎𝚛𝚊𝚛 𝚙𝚎𝚛𝚍𝚊𝚜 𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚟𝚒𝚛𝚒𝚊𝚖 𝚊 𝚌𝚊𝚒𝚛 𝚜𝚘𝚋𝚛𝚎 𝚘𝚜 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚝𝚛𝚒𝚋𝚞𝚒𝚗𝚝𝚎𝚜. 𝙴𝚖 𝚊𝚕𝚝𝚎𝚛𝚗𝚊𝚝𝚒𝚟𝚊, 𝚊 𝚍𝚒́𝚟𝚒𝚍𝚊 𝚍𝚊 𝙸𝚖𝚘𝚜𝚝𝚎𝚙𝚜 𝚏𝚘𝚒 𝚒𝚗𝚝𝚎𝚐𝚛𝚊𝚍𝚊 𝚗𝚘 𝚙𝚊𝚌𝚘𝚝𝚎 𝙽𝚊𝚝𝚊 𝙸𝙸 𝚎 𝚍𝚎𝚙𝚘𝚒𝚜 𝚟𝚎𝚗𝚍𝚒𝚍𝚊 𝚊𝚘 𝚏𝚞𝚗𝚍𝚘 𝙳𝚊𝚟𝚒𝚍𝚜𝚘𝚗 𝙺𝚎𝚖𝚙𝚗𝚎𝚛 𝚙𝚘𝚛 𝟼,𝟼 𝚖𝚒𝚕𝚑𝚘̃𝚎𝚜 𝚍𝚎 𝚎𝚞𝚛𝚘𝚜. 𝙿𝚘𝚛 𝚎𝚜𝚜𝚊 𝚊𝚕𝚝𝚞𝚛𝚊, 𝚓𝚊́ 𝚎𝚜𝚝𝚊𝚛𝚒𝚊 𝚌𝚘𝚖𝚋𝚒𝚗𝚊𝚍𝚘 𝚌𝚘𝚖 𝚅𝚒𝚎𝚒𝚛𝚊 𝚚𝚞𝚎, 𝚎𝚖 𝚜𝚎𝚐𝚞𝚒𝚍𝚊, 𝚊 𝚖𝚎𝚜𝚖𝚊 𝚍𝚒́𝚟𝚒𝚍𝚊 𝚜𝚎𝚛𝚒𝚊 𝚟𝚎𝚗𝚍𝚒𝚍𝚊 𝚊 𝚞𝚖 𝚜𝚎𝚞 𝚊𝚜𝚜𝚘𝚌𝚒𝚊𝚍𝚘 𝚙𝚘𝚛 𝟿,𝟷 𝚖𝚒𝚕𝚑𝚘̃𝚎𝚜 𝚍𝚎 𝚎𝚞𝚛𝚘𝚜, 𝚘 𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚊𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚝𝚎𝚌𝚎𝚞. 𝙴𝚜𝚝𝚎 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚝𝚊𝚌𝚝𝚘 𝚎 𝚊 𝚙𝚛𝚘́𝚙𝚛𝚒𝚊 𝚜𝚘𝚕𝚞𝚌̧𝚊̃𝚘 𝚙𝚊𝚛𝚊 𝙻𝚞𝚒́𝚜 𝙵𝚒𝚕𝚒𝚙𝚎 𝚅𝚒𝚎𝚒𝚛𝚊 𝚝𝚎𝚛𝚊̃𝚘 𝚜𝚒𝚍𝚘 𝚏𝚊𝚌𝚒𝚕𝚒𝚝𝚊𝚍𝚘𝚜 𝚙𝚘𝚛 𝚅𝚒́𝚝𝚘𝚛 𝙵𝚎𝚛𝚗𝚊𝚗𝚍𝚎𝚜.
𝙾 𝚌𝚞𝚛𝚛𝚒́𝚌𝚞𝚕𝚘 𝚍𝚎 𝚅𝚒́𝚝𝚘𝚛 𝙵𝚎𝚛𝚗𝚊𝚗𝚍𝚎𝚜 𝚗𝚊 𝙲𝚊𝚒𝚡𝚊 𝚍𝚎𝚟𝚎𝚛𝚒𝚊 𝚝𝚎𝚛 𝚜𝚒𝚍𝚘 𝚜𝚞𝚏𝚒𝚌𝚒𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚎 𝚙𝚊𝚛𝚊 𝚊𝚏𝚊𝚜𝚝𝚊́-𝚕𝚘 𝚍𝚎 𝚚𝚞𝚊𝚕𝚚𝚞𝚎𝚛 𝚗𝚘𝚖𝚎𝚊𝚌̧𝚊̃𝚘 𝚙𝚞́𝚋𝚕𝚒𝚌𝚊, 𝚕𝚘𝚐𝚘 𝚎𝚖 𝚏𝚎𝚟𝚎𝚛𝚎𝚒𝚛𝚘. 𝙰𝚐𝚘𝚛𝚊, 𝚘 𝙱𝚊𝚗𝚌𝚘 𝚍𝚎 𝙿𝚘𝚛𝚝𝚞𝚐𝚊𝚕 𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚟𝚊𝚕𝚒𝚊𝚛𝚊́ 𝚊 𝚜𝚞𝚊 𝚒𝚍𝚘𝚗𝚎𝚒𝚍𝚊𝚍𝚎 𝚎 𝚂𝚒𝚣𝚊 𝚅𝚒𝚎𝚒𝚛𝚊 𝚍𝚒𝚣 𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚜𝚞𝚜𝚙𝚎𝚗𝚍𝚎 𝚊 𝚗𝚘𝚖𝚎𝚊𝚌̧𝚊̃𝚘. 𝚀𝚞𝚎 𝚊 𝚙𝚛𝚎𝚜𝚜𝚊̃𝚘 𝚙𝚞́𝚋𝚕𝚒𝚌𝚊 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚝𝚛𝚒𝚋𝚞𝚊 𝚙𝚊𝚛𝚊 𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚘 𝙶𝚘𝚟𝚎𝚛𝚗𝚘 𝚝𝚛𝚊𝚝𝚎 𝚍𝚎𝚙𝚛𝚎𝚜𝚜𝚊 𝚍𝚎 𝚎𝚗𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚝𝚛𝚊𝚛 𝚙𝚊𝚛𝚊 𝚘 𝙱𝚊𝚗𝚌𝚘 𝚍𝚎 𝙵𝚘𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚘 𝚚𝚞𝚎𝚖 𝚘𝚏𝚎𝚛𝚎𝚌̧𝚊 𝚖𝚎𝚕𝚑𝚘𝚛𝚎𝚜 𝚛𝚎𝚏𝚎𝚛𝚎̂𝚗𝚌𝚒𝚊𝚜.
* Deputada à Assembleia da República pelo Bloco de Esquerda.
IN "JORNAL DE NOTÍCIAS" - 13/07/21
.
Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário