SANDRA CUNHA

 .

Só o sim é sim

Uma em cada três mulheres e raparigas sofre de violência física ou sexual no mundo. Portugal não é exceção e a violação, uma das formas mais abjetas de violência contra as mulheres, tem aumentando consistentemente ao longo dos anos.

𝖮𝗌 𝖽𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝖺𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗋𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗋𝖾𝗌. 𝖴𝗆𝖺 𝖾𝗆 𝖼𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝗍𝗋𝖾̂𝗌 𝗆𝗎𝗅𝗁𝖾𝗋𝖾𝗌 𝖾 𝗋𝖺𝗉𝖺𝗋𝗂𝗀𝖺𝗌 𝗌𝗈𝖿𝗋𝖾 𝖽𝖾 𝗏𝗂𝗈𝗅𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝖿𝗂́𝗌𝗂𝖼𝖺 𝗈𝗎 𝗌𝖾𝗑𝗎𝖺𝗅 𝗇𝗈 𝗆𝗎𝗇𝖽𝗈. 𝖯𝗈𝗋𝗍𝗎𝗀𝖺𝗅 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾́ 𝖾𝗑𝖼𝖾𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾 𝖺 𝗏𝗂𝗈𝗅𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈, 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝖿𝗈𝗋𝗆𝖺𝗌 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝖺𝖻𝗃𝖾𝗍𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗏𝗂𝗈𝗅𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖺 𝖺𝗌 𝗆𝗎𝗅𝗁𝖾𝗋𝖾𝗌, 𝗍𝖾𝗆 𝖺𝗎𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗌𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖺𝗈 𝗅𝗈𝗇𝗀𝗈 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖺𝗇𝗈𝗌.

𝖮 𝖺𝗇𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝟤𝟢𝟤𝟤 𝖻𝖺𝗍𝖾𝗎 𝗈 𝗋𝖾𝖼𝗈𝗋𝖽 𝖽𝖾 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝗍𝗂𝖼𝗂𝗉𝖺𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗏𝗂𝗈𝗅𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾𝗆 𝖯𝗈𝗋𝗍𝗎𝗀𝖺𝗅: 𝟧𝟣𝟫𝟣 𝗇𝗎𝗆 𝖺𝗇𝗈, 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝟥𝟣% 𝖽𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗇𝗈 𝖺𝗇𝗈 𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗂𝗈𝗋. 𝖤𝗆 𝗆𝖾́𝖽𝗂𝖺 𝟣,𝟧 𝗏𝗂𝗈𝗅𝖺𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝖽𝗂𝖺. 𝖠 𝖾𝗌𝗆𝖺𝗀𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗋𝖺 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗈𝗋𝗂𝖺 𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝗏𝗂́𝗍𝗂𝗆𝖺𝗌 𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝗆𝗎𝗅𝗁𝖾𝗋𝖾𝗌 (𝟫𝟥,𝟨%) 𝖾 𝖺 𝖾𝗌𝗆𝖺𝗀𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗋𝖺 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗈𝗋𝗂𝖺 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗏𝗂𝗈𝗅𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗋𝖾𝗌 𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝗁𝗈𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗌 (𝟫𝟩,𝟩%). 𝖤́ 𝗎𝗆 𝖼𝗋𝗂𝗆𝖾, 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖺𝗉𝖾𝗌𝖺𝗋 𝖽𝖺 𝗇𝖾𝗎𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗅𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝖾 𝗀𝖾́𝗇𝖾𝗋𝗈 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗏𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖺 𝗇𝗈 𝖼𝗈́𝖽𝗂𝗀𝗈 𝗉𝖾𝗇𝖺𝗅, 𝖼𝖺𝗋𝗋𝖾𝗀𝖺 𝗈𝗌𝗍𝖾𝗇𝗌𝗂𝗏𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖺 𝗆𝖺𝗋𝖼𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝗀𝖾́𝗇𝖾𝗋𝗈.

𝖬𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝖺𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗋𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗋 𝖺𝗂𝗇𝖽𝖺 𝖾́ 𝗌𝖺𝖻𝖾𝗆𝗈𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗆𝗈𝗌𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗆 𝖺𝗉𝖾𝗇𝖺𝗌 𝖺 𝗉𝗈𝗇𝗍𝖺 𝖽𝗈 𝗂𝖼𝖾𝖻𝖾𝗋𝗀. 𝖭𝖺 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗈𝗋 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝗍𝖾 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖼𝖺𝗌𝗈𝗌 𝖺𝗌 𝗏𝗂𝗈𝗅𝖺𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖾𝗇𝗎𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺𝖽𝖺𝗌. 𝖠 𝗏𝖾𝗋𝗀𝗈𝗇𝗁𝖺, 𝖺 𝗇𝖾𝗀𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈, 𝖺 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖿𝗂𝖺𝗇𝖼̧𝖺 𝗇𝖺𝗌 𝗂𝗇𝗌𝗍𝗂𝗍𝗎𝗂𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌, 𝗈 𝗆𝖾𝖽𝗈 𝖾 𝖺 𝖽𝖾𝗉𝖾𝗇𝖽𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝗁𝗂𝖾𝗋𝖺́𝗋𝗊𝗎𝗂𝖼𝖺, 𝖾𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗈́𝗆𝗂𝖼𝖺 𝗈𝗎 𝖾𝗆𝗈𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗅 𝖽𝗈 𝖺𝗀𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗈𝗋, 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗇𝖺 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗈𝗋𝗂𝖺 𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝗏𝖾𝗓𝖾𝗌 𝖾́ 𝗎𝗆 𝖿𝖺𝗆𝗂𝗅𝗂𝖺𝗋 𝗈𝗎 𝗉𝖾𝗋𝗍𝖾𝗇𝖼𝖾 𝖺𝗈 𝖼𝗂́𝗋𝖼𝗎𝗅𝗈 𝗉𝗋𝗈́𝗑𝗂𝗆𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗁𝖾𝖼𝗂𝖽𝗈𝗌, 𝗂𝗆𝗉𝖾𝖽𝖾 𝗆𝗎𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗌 𝗆𝗎𝗅𝗁𝖾𝗋𝖾𝗌 𝖾 𝗋𝖺𝗉𝖺𝗋𝗂𝗀𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝖾𝗇𝗎𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗋𝖾𝗆 𝗈 𝖼𝗋𝗂𝗆𝖾.

𝖮𝗌 𝖽𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌𝟤 𝖽𝗂𝗓𝖾𝗆-𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝗍𝖺𝗆𝖻𝖾́𝗆 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖼𝖾𝗋𝖼𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝟥𝟢% 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖽𝖾𝗇𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝗏𝗂𝗈𝗅𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖿𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗆 𝖿𝗈𝗋𝖺 𝖽𝖺 𝗉𝗋𝗂𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝗌𝖾𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝗈 𝖼𝗋𝗂𝗆𝖾 𝖽𝖾 𝖺𝖻𝗎𝗌𝗈 𝗌𝖾𝗑𝗎𝖺𝗅 𝗈 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝗏𝖺𝗅𝗈𝗋𝗂𝗓𝖺𝖽𝗈 (𝟧𝟣% 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝗉𝖾𝗇𝖺 𝗌𝗎𝗌𝗉𝖾𝗇𝗌𝖺). 𝖠 𝗂𝗆𝗉𝗎𝗇𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝗏𝖺𝗅𝗈𝗋𝗂𝗓𝖺 𝗈 𝖼𝗋𝗂𝗆𝖾 𝗃𝖺́ 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗈 𝖺𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝗂𝗌𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝖽𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗉𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗈𝗎𝗍𝗋𝖾𝗆 𝗌𝖾𝗆 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗌𝖾𝗊𝗎𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗌 𝗋𝖾𝖿𝗈𝗋𝖼̧𝖺 𝗇𝗈 𝖺𝗀𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗈𝗋 𝗈 𝗌𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗉𝗈𝗌𝗌𝖾 𝗌𝗈𝖻𝗋𝖾 𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗋𝗉𝗈 𝖺𝗈 𝗆𝖾𝗌𝗆𝗈 𝗍𝖾𝗆𝗉𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗋𝖾𝗆𝖾𝗍𝖾 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝖺𝗌 𝗏𝗂́𝗍𝗂𝗆𝖺𝗌 𝗈 𝗌𝗂𝗅𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝗈, 𝗈 𝗌𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖼𝗎𝗅𝗉𝖺, 𝖺 𝖼𝗈-𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗉𝗈𝗇𝗌𝖺𝖻𝗂𝗅𝗂𝗓𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈.

𝖤𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗌 𝗌𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗇𝖼̧𝖺𝗌 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝖺𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝖾𝖼𝖾𝗆 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝖺𝖼𝖺𝗌𝗈. 𝖭𝖺 𝗌𝗎𝖺 𝖻𝖺𝗌𝖾 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺́ 𝖺 𝗂𝖽𝖾𝗂𝖺 𝗌𝖾𝖼𝗎𝗅𝖺𝗋 𝖽𝖾 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗈𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗋𝗉𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝗆𝗎𝗅𝗁𝖾𝗋𝖾𝗌 𝖾𝗑𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖾𝗆 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗌𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗌𝖿𝖺𝗓𝖾𝗋 𝗈𝗌 𝗁𝗈𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗌 𝖾 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗈 𝗌𝗂𝗅𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝗈 𝗌𝗂𝗀𝗇𝗂𝖿𝗂𝖼𝖺 𝗌𝖾𝗆𝗉𝗋𝖾 𝗎𝗆 𝗌𝗂𝗆. 𝖤 𝖽𝖾 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖾𝗅𝖺𝗌, 𝗇𝗈 𝖿𝗎𝗇𝖽𝗈, 𝖺𝗍𝖾́ 𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗋𝖾𝗆 𝗈𝗎 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗏𝖺𝗆 𝖺 𝗉𝖾𝖽𝗂-𝗅𝖺𝗌.

𝖭𝖺̃𝗈 𝗌𝖾 𝗇𝖾𝗀𝖺 𝖺 𝖾𝗏𝗈𝗅𝗎𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖺 𝗅𝖾𝗀𝗂𝗌𝗅𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗍𝗎𝗀𝗎𝖾𝗌𝖺, 𝗆𝖺𝗌 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝖼𝗁𝖾𝗀𝖺. 𝖤𝗅𝗂𝗆𝗂𝗇𝗈𝗎-𝗌𝖾 𝖺 𝖺𝖻𝖾𝗋𝗋𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖺 𝗇𝖾𝖼𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝖺 𝖾𝗑𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝗏𝗂𝗈𝗅𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝖺 𝖽𝖾𝖿𝗂𝗇𝗂𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗏𝗂𝗈𝗅𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈, 𝗆𝖺𝗌 𝗈 𝖼𝗈́𝖽𝗂𝗀𝗈 𝗉𝖾𝗇𝖺𝗅 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗂𝗇𝗎𝖺 𝖺 𝗉𝗈𝗌𝗌𝗂𝖻𝗂𝗅𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗋 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗌𝖾 𝗆𝖺𝗌𝖼𝖺𝗋𝖾𝗆 𝗏𝗂𝗈𝗅𝖺𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝖺𝖻𝗎𝗌𝗈𝗌 𝗌𝖾𝗑𝗎𝖺𝗂𝗌, 𝖼𝗋𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗈𝗍𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝗌𝗈𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗅 𝖻𝖾𝗆 “𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝗋𝖾𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗏𝖺́𝗏𝖾𝗅”. 𝖯𝖾𝗋𝗌𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖾 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗋𝖾𝖽𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖺𝖻𝗋𝖾 𝖺 𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗍𝖺 𝖺̀ 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝗏𝖺𝗅𝗈𝗋𝗂𝗓𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝗈 𝖼𝗋𝗂𝗆𝖾 𝖾 𝖺̀ 𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗉𝗈𝗇𝗌𝖺𝖻𝗂𝗅𝗂𝗓𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝗏𝗂́𝗍𝗂𝗆𝖺𝗌. 𝖠 𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝗈 𝗈́𝗇𝗎𝗌 𝖽𝖺 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗏𝖺 𝖾 𝖽𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗌𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗂𝗇𝗎𝖺 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗈𝗅𝗏𝖾𝗋 𝖺𝗍𝖾́ 𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖺𝗆𝖻𝗈𝗌 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺̃𝗈 𝗂𝗇𝗍𝗂𝗆𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝗅𝗂𝗀𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌. 𝖭𝖺 𝗉𝗋𝖺́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝖺, 𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝖺𝗌 𝗏𝗂́𝗍𝗂𝗆𝖺𝗌, 𝗆𝗎𝗅𝗁𝖾𝗋𝖾𝗌 𝖾 𝖼𝗋𝗂𝖺𝗇𝖼̧𝖺𝗌, 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗂𝗇𝗎𝖺𝗆 𝖺 𝗍𝖾𝗋 𝖽𝖾 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗏𝖺𝗋 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗌𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗂𝗋𝖺𝗆. 𝖮𝗌 𝖼𝗋𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝗆𝖺𝗋𝖼𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝗀𝖾́𝗇𝖾𝗋𝗈, 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖺 𝖺𝗌 𝗆𝗎𝗅𝗁𝖾𝗋𝖾𝗌, 𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝗈𝗌 𝗎́𝗇𝗂𝖼𝗈𝗌 𝖾𝗆 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗌𝖾 𝖾𝗑𝗂𝗀𝖾 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖺 𝗏𝗂́𝗍𝗂𝗆𝖺 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗏𝖾 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗌𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗂𝗎. 𝖭𝗂𝗇𝗀𝗎𝖾́𝗆 𝗌𝖾 𝗅𝖾𝗆𝖻𝗋𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝖾𝗑𝗂𝗀𝗂𝗋 𝖺 𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗆 𝖿𝗈𝗂 𝖺𝗌𝗌𝖺𝗅𝗍𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝗇𝖺 𝗋𝗎𝖺 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗏𝖾 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗌𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗂𝗎 𝗈 𝖺𝗌𝗌𝖺𝗅𝗍𝗈. 𝖭𝖾𝗆 𝖺𝗌𝗌𝗎𝗆𝗂𝗆𝗈𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗈 𝗌𝖾𝗎 𝗌𝗂𝗅𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝗈 𝗌𝗂𝗀𝗇𝗂𝖿𝗂𝖼𝗈𝗎 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗌𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈.

𝖠 𝖾𝗑𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗌𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝗅𝗂𝗏𝗋𝖾, 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖿𝗈𝗋𝗆𝖾 𝖽𝖾𝖿𝗂𝗇𝗂𝖽𝖺 𝗇𝗈 𝖺𝗋𝗍𝗂𝗀𝗈 𝟥𝟨º 𝖽𝖺 𝖢𝗈𝗇𝗏𝖾𝗇𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖨𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗆𝖻𝗎𝗅, 𝗍𝖾𝗆 𝖽𝖾 𝗌𝖾𝗋 𝖼𝗅𝖺𝗋𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝗂𝗇𝗌𝖼𝗋𝗂𝗍𝖺 𝗇𝖺 𝗍𝗂𝗉𝗂𝖿𝗂𝖼𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝗈 𝖼𝗋𝗂𝗆𝖾 𝖽𝖾 𝗏𝗂𝗈𝗅𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈, 𝗉𝗈𝗂𝗌 𝖾́ 𝗇𝖺 𝖺𝗎𝗌𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗌𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗋𝖺𝖽𝗂𝖼𝖺 𝖺 𝗏𝗂𝗈𝗅𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝖽𝗈 𝖺𝗍𝗈 𝖾 𝖺 𝗇𝖺𝗍𝗎𝗋𝖾𝗓𝖺 𝖽𝗈 𝖼𝗋𝗂𝗆𝖾. 𝖲𝗈́ 𝖺𝗌𝗌𝗂𝗆 𝗌𝖾 𝗉𝗈𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝖾𝗂𝗑𝖺𝗋 𝖽𝖾 𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗉𝗈𝗇𝗌𝖺𝖻𝗂𝗅𝗂𝗓𝖺𝗋 𝖺𝗌 𝗏𝗂́𝗍𝗂𝗆𝖺𝗌, 𝖽𝖾 𝗅𝗁𝖾𝗌 𝗂𝗆𝗉𝗎𝗍𝖺𝗋 𝗈 𝗈́𝗇𝗎𝗌 𝖽𝖺 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗏𝖺, 𝖽𝖾 𝗅𝗁𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝗂𝗓𝖾𝗋, 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗇𝗈 𝖿𝗎𝗇𝖽𝗈, 𝗇𝗈 𝖿𝗎𝗇𝖽𝗈, 𝖾𝗅𝖺𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝗂𝗌𝖾𝗋𝖺𝗆 𝖾 𝗏𝖺𝗂-𝗌𝖾 𝖺 𝗏𝖾𝗋, 𝖺𝗍𝖾́ 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗏𝗈𝖼𝖺𝗋𝖺𝗆. 𝖲𝗈́ 𝖺𝗌𝗌𝗂𝗆 𝗌𝖾 𝗉𝗈𝖽𝖾𝗆 𝖾𝗅𝗂𝗆𝗂𝗇𝖺𝗋 𝗌𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗇𝖼̧𝖺𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖺𝖼𝗈́𝗋𝖽𝖺̃𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖺 «𝖼𝗈𝗎𝗍𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝖽𝗈 𝗆𝖺𝖼𝗁𝗈 𝖨𝖻𝖾́𝗋𝗂𝖼𝗈», 𝖽𝖺 «𝗌𝖾𝖽𝗎𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝗆𝗎́𝗍𝗎𝖺» 𝗈𝗎 𝖺 𝗌𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗇𝖼̧𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝖦𝖺𝗂𝖺 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗆𝖺𝗌𝖼𝖺𝗋𝗈𝗎 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗏𝗂𝗈𝗅𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖺𝖻𝗎𝗌𝗈 𝗌𝖾𝗑𝗎𝖺𝗅.

𝖬𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖾𝗏𝖾-𝗌𝖾 𝗂𝗋 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝗅𝗈𝗇𝗀𝖾 𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗌𝖺𝗀𝗋𝖺𝗋 𝗈 𝖼𝖺𝗋𝖺́𝖼𝗍𝖾𝗋 𝗉𝗎́𝖻𝗅𝗂𝖼𝗈 𝖺𝗈 𝖼𝗋𝗂𝗆𝖾 𝖽𝖾 𝗏𝗂𝗈𝗅𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈, 𝗋𝖾𝖿𝗈𝗋𝖼̧𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝖺 𝗂𝖽𝖾𝗂𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖾 𝖾́ 𝗎𝗆 𝖼𝗋𝗂𝗆𝖾 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗉𝗈𝖽𝖾 𝖿𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗋 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝗂𝗇𝗏𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗂𝗀𝖺𝗋 𝖾 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖺 𝗏𝗂́𝗍𝗂𝗆𝖺 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗉𝗈𝖽𝖾 𝖿𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗋 𝗌𝗈𝗓𝗂𝗇𝗁𝖺. 𝖭𝖺̃𝗈 𝗌𝖾 𝗉𝗈𝖽𝖾 𝖺𝖼𝖾𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗋 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗆 𝗍𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖾𝗆𝗎𝗇𝗁𝖾 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗏𝗂𝗈𝗅𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝗈𝗎 𝖽𝖾𝗅𝖺 𝗍𝖾𝗇𝗁𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗁𝖾𝖼𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗍𝖾𝗇𝗁𝖺 𝗈 𝖽𝖾𝗏𝖾𝗋 𝖾 𝗈 𝖽𝗂𝗋𝖾𝗂𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝖾𝗇𝗎𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗋 𝗈 𝖼𝗋𝗂𝗆𝖾. 𝖭𝖺̃𝗈 𝗌𝖾 𝗉𝗈𝖽𝖾 𝗌𝗈𝖻𝗋𝖾𝗍𝗎𝖽𝗈 𝖺𝖼𝖾𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗋 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖺 𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗉𝗈𝗇𝗌𝖺𝖻𝗂𝗅𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝗌𝖾𝗃𝖺 𝗂𝗆𝗉𝗎𝗍𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝖾𝗑𝖼𝗅𝗎𝗌𝗂𝗏𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖺̀ 𝗏𝗂́𝗍𝗂𝗆𝖺 𝖾 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖺𝗂𝗇𝖽𝖺 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝖼𝗂𝗆𝖺 𝗌𝖾 𝗅𝗁𝖾 𝖽𝗂𝗀𝖺 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗍𝖾𝗆 𝖺𝗉𝖾𝗇𝖺𝗌 𝗌𝖾𝗂𝗌 𝗆𝖾𝗌𝖾𝗌 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗈 𝖿𝖺𝗓𝖾𝗋. 𝖥𝗂𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖾 𝗉𝗋𝖺𝗓𝗈, 𝗉𝖺𝖼𝗂𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺. 𝖭𝖺̃𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗌𝖺𝗀𝗋𝖺𝗋 𝗈 𝖼𝖺𝗋𝖺́𝖼𝗍𝖾𝗋 𝗉𝗎́𝖻𝗅𝗂𝖼𝗈 𝖺̀ 𝗏𝗂𝗈𝗅𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾́ 𝗉𝖾𝗋𝗉𝖾𝗍𝗎𝖺𝗋 𝖺 𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗌𝖺𝗀𝖾𝗆 𝖽𝖾 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖺 𝖼𝗎𝗅𝗉𝖺 𝖾́ 𝖽𝖺 𝗏𝗂́𝗍𝗂𝗆𝖺, 𝖾́ 𝖽𝖾𝗂𝗑𝖺́-𝗅𝖺 𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗈𝗅𝗏𝖾𝗋 𝗈 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝖻𝗅𝖾𝗆𝖺 𝗌𝗈𝗓𝗂𝗇𝗁𝖺.

𝖳𝖺𝗅 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝗇𝗈 𝖼𝖺𝗌𝗈 𝖽𝖺 𝗏𝗂𝗈𝗅𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝖽𝗈𝗆𝖾́𝗌𝗍𝗂𝖼𝖺, 𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗌𝖺𝗀𝗋𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝗈 𝖼𝖺𝗋𝖺́𝗍𝖾𝗋 𝗉𝗎́𝖻𝗅𝗂𝖼𝗈 𝖺𝗈 𝖼𝗋𝗂𝗆𝖾, 𝖽𝗂𝗓 𝖺̀ 𝗌𝗈𝖼𝗂𝖾𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾́ 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗆𝖺𝗍𝖾́𝗋𝗂𝖺 𝖽𝗈 𝖿𝗈𝗋𝗈 𝗉𝗋𝗂𝗏𝖺𝖽𝗈, 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖺 𝗏𝗂́𝗍𝗂𝗆𝖺 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗍𝖾𝗆 𝖽𝖾 𝖿𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗋 𝗌𝗈𝗓𝗂𝗇𝗁𝖺, 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖾 𝖾́ 𝗎𝗆 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝖻𝗅𝖾𝗆𝖺 𝖾 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗉𝗈𝗇𝗌𝖺𝖻𝗂𝗅𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗅𝖾𝗍𝗂𝗏𝖺.

𝖠 𝗏𝗂𝗈𝗅𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 - 𝖺 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝖿𝖺𝗇𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗋𝗉𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗈𝗎𝗍𝗋𝖾𝗆 𝗌𝖾𝗆 𝗈 𝗌𝖾𝗎 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗌𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈 - 𝖾́ 𝗎𝗆 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖼𝗋𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗌 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝗋𝖾𝗉𝗎𝗀𝗇𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖺 𝖺𝗌 𝗆𝗎𝗅𝗁𝖾𝗋𝖾𝗌. 𝖧𝖺́ 𝗌𝖾́𝖼𝗎𝗅𝗈𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖺𝗌 𝗆𝗎𝗅𝗁𝖾𝗋𝖾𝗌, 𝗌𝖾𝗆𝗉𝗋𝖾 𝖺𝗌 𝗆𝗎𝗅𝗁𝖾𝗋𝖾𝗌, 𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖾𝗅𝖾 𝗏𝗂́𝗍𝗂𝗆𝖺𝗌. 𝖮𝗎 𝖾𝗑𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖾 𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗋𝖺𝗀𝖾𝗆 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗆𝗎𝖽𝖺𝗇𝖼̧𝖺𝗌 𝖾𝖿𝖾𝗍𝗂𝗏𝖺𝗌 𝗈𝗎 𝗈𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗋𝗉𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝗆𝗎𝗅𝗁𝖾𝗋𝖾𝗌 𝗏𝖺̃𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗂𝗇𝗎𝖺𝗋 𝖺 𝗌𝖾𝗋 𝗆𝖾𝗋𝗈𝗌 𝗌𝖺𝖼𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗋𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝖾 𝖽𝖾 𝗀𝗈𝗓𝗈 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗆 𝖽𝖾𝗅𝖾𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝗂𝗌𝖾𝗋 𝖽𝗂𝗌𝗉𝗈𝗋. 𝖤𝗌𝗍𝖺 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾́ 𝖺 𝗌𝗈𝖼𝗂𝖾𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝗇𝖾𝗆 𝗈 𝗆𝗎𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗋𝖾𝗆𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝖺𝗌 𝗀𝖾𝗋𝖺𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝖿𝗎𝗍𝗎𝗋𝖺𝗌. 𝖧𝖺𝗃𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗋𝖺𝗀𝖾𝗆 𝗉𝗈𝗅𝗂́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝖺.

𝖳𝖾𝗑𝗍𝗈 𝗇𝗈 𝖺̂𝗆𝖻𝗂𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝟣𝟨 𝖽𝗂𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗏𝗂𝗌𝗆𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗏𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝖺 𝖥𝖤𝖬 – 𝖥𝖾𝗆𝗂𝗇𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗌 𝖾𝗆 𝖬𝗈𝗏𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈

𝗡𝗼𝘁𝗮: 

𝟭 𝗥𝗲𝗹𝗮𝘁𝗼́𝗿𝗶𝗼 𝗔𝗻𝘂𝗮𝗹 𝗱𝗲 𝗦𝗲𝗴𝘂𝗿𝗮𝗻𝗰̧𝗮 𝗜𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗿𝗻𝗮, 𝟮𝟬𝟮𝟮. 

𝟮 𝗘𝘀𝘁𝗮𝘁𝗶́𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗰𝗮𝘀 𝗱𝗼 𝗠𝗶𝗻𝗶𝘀𝘁𝗲́𝗿𝗶𝗼 𝗱𝗮 𝗝𝘂𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗰̧𝗮 (𝟮𝟬𝟭𝟬 𝗲 𝟮𝟬𝟭𝟲).

* Feminista e ativista. Socióloga.

IN "ESQUERDA" -14/12/23 .