FERNANADA CÂNCIO

 .

O racismo subsumido 

dos tribunais portugueses

"Pretos do caralho" não chegou para, no caso Cova da Moura, o tribunal condenar polícias por discriminação racial; no da família Coxi versus Chega e Ventura, a primeira instância cível não viu o racismo como "o mais relevante". Porque haveriam os tribunais portugueses de ser diferentes do resto do país?

𝐶ℎ𝑒𝑔𝑎 𝑒 𝐴𝑛𝑑𝑟𝑒́ 𝑉𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑎 𝑡𝑒̂𝑚 𝑡𝑜𝑑𝑎 𝑎 𝑟𝑎𝑧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑛𝑜 𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑢𝑟𝑠𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑎𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑚 𝑎𝑜 𝑆𝑢𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑚𝑜 𝑇𝑟𝑖𝑏𝑢𝑛𝑎𝑙 𝑛𝑜 𝑐𝑎𝑠𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑙ℎ𝑒𝑠 𝑓𝑜𝑖 𝑚𝑜𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑜 𝑝𝑒𝑙𝑎 𝑓𝑎𝑚𝑖́𝑙𝑖𝑎 𝐶𝑜𝑥𝑖, 𝑒 𝑛𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑙 𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑎𝑚 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑑𝑒𝑛𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑒𝑚 𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑖𝑟𝑎 𝑖𝑛𝑠𝑡𝑎̂𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑎 𝑒 𝑛𝑎 𝑅𝑒𝑙𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜.

𝐶𝑜𝑚𝑜 𝑠𝑢𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑚 𝑜𝑠 𝑟𝑒́𝑢𝑠 𝑛𝑜 𝑑𝑖𝑡𝑜 𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑢𝑟𝑠𝑜, 𝑎 𝑗𝑢𝑖́𝑧𝑎 𝑑𝑎 𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑖𝑟𝑎 𝑖𝑛𝑠𝑡𝑎̂𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑎 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑜𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑑𝑒𝑛𝑜𝑢 (𝑒 𝑚𝑢𝑖𝑡𝑜 𝑏𝑒𝑚) 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑒𝑡𝑒𝑢 𝑎𝑞𝑢𝑖𝑙𝑜 𝑎 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑠𝑒 𝑑𝑎́ 𝑜 𝑛𝑜𝑚𝑒 𝑑𝑒 "𝑜𝑚𝑖𝑠𝑠𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑛𝑢́𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑎" 𝑎𝑜 𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑢𝑠𝑎𝑟 𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑜𝑛ℎ𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑟, 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑜 𝑜𝑠 𝐶𝑜𝑥𝑖 𝑝𝑒𝑑𝑖𝑎𝑚, 𝑎 𝑖𝑙𝑖𝑐𝑖𝑡𝑢𝑑𝑒 𝑒 𝑔𝑟𝑎𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝑒𝑙𝑒𝑣𝑎𝑑𝑎 𝑑𝑎 𝑚𝑜𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑟𝑎𝑐𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑎 - "𝑒𝑚 𝑓𝑢𝑛𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑟 𝑑𝑎 𝑝𝑒𝑙𝑒" - 𝑒 𝑠𝑜𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑙𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑑𝑖𝑠𝑐𝑟𝑖𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑡𝑜́𝑟𝑖𝑎 (𝑝𝑜𝑟 𝑠𝑒 𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑎𝑟 𝑑𝑒 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑓𝑎𝑚𝑖́𝑙𝑖𝑎 𝑝𝑜𝑏𝑟𝑒, 𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑛𝑢𝑚 𝑏𝑎𝑖𝑟𝑟𝑜 𝑑𝑒𝑔𝑟𝑎𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑜) 𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑜𝑓𝑒𝑛𝑠𝑎𝑠 𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑝𝑒𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑑𝑎𝑠.

𝐴𝑑𝑚𝑖𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑒𝑥𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑟 𝑑𝑖𝑠𝑐𝑟𝑖𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑛𝑜 𝑑𝑖𝑠𝑐𝑢𝑟𝑠𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝐶ℎ𝑒𝑔𝑎 𝑒 𝑉𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑎, 𝑎 𝑚𝑎𝑔𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑑𝑎 𝑎𝑓𝑖𝑟𝑚𝑜𝑢 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑒𝑟𝑎 "𝑛𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑎𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑑𝑒𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑑𝑎 𝑝𝑒𝑙𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑟 𝑑𝑎 𝑝𝑒𝑙𝑒 𝑜𝑢 𝑝𝑒𝑙𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑑𝑖𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑠𝑜𝑐𝑖𝑜𝑒𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑜́𝑚𝑖𝑐𝑎 𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑣𝑖𝑠𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑠" 𝑒𝑚𝑏𝑜𝑟𝑎, 𝑠𝑢𝑏𝑙𝑖𝑛ℎ𝑜𝑢, "𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑠 𝑒𝑙𝑒𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜𝑠 𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑎𝑙𝑡𝑒𝑚 𝑑𝑒 𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑑𝑖𝑎𝑡𝑜 𝑎𝑜𝑠 𝑜𝑙ℎ𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑡𝑜𝑟𝑒𝑠 𝑑𝑎 𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑠𝑎𝑔𝑒𝑚." 𝑂 𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑙, 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑐𝑙𝑢𝑖𝑢, "𝑒́ 𝑜 𝑐𝑎𝑟𝑎́𝑡𝑒𝑟 𝑖𝑙𝑖́𝑐𝑖𝑡𝑜 𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑑𝑒𝑐𝑙𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑐̧𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑟𝑒𝑓𝑒𝑟𝑒̂𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑎 𝑎̀ 𝑓𝑜𝑡𝑜𝑔𝑟𝑎𝑓𝑖𝑎 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑓𝑜𝑖 𝑒𝑥𝑖𝑏𝑖𝑑𝑎 𝑒 𝑎 𝑜𝑓𝑒𝑛𝑠𝑎 𝑎𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑖𝑟𝑒𝑖𝑡𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑠𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒".

𝑇𝑟𝑎𝑑𝑢𝑧𝑖𝑛𝑑𝑜: 𝑉𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑎 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑝𝑜𝑑𝑖𝑎 𝑡𝑒𝑟 𝑐ℎ𝑎𝑚𝑎𝑑𝑜 "𝑏𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑖𝑑𝑜𝑠" 𝑒 "𝑏𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑔𝑒𝑚" 𝑎̀𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑙𝑎𝑠 𝑝𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑜𝑎𝑠 𝑒𝑛𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑜, 𝑛𝑢𝑚 𝑑𝑒𝑏𝑎𝑡𝑒 𝑡𝑒𝑙𝑒𝑣𝑖𝑠𝑖𝑣𝑜 𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑖𝑠, 𝑚𝑜𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑣𝑎 𝑎 𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑝𝑒𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑎 𝑓𝑜𝑡𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑀𝑎𝑟𝑐𝑒𝑙𝑜, 𝑒 𝑑𝑒𝑣𝑒 𝑠𝑒𝑟 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑑𝑒𝑛𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑝𝑜𝑟 𝑖𝑠𝑠𝑜; 𝑜 𝐶ℎ𝑒𝑔𝑎 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑝𝑜𝑑𝑖𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑓𝑟𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑟 𝑎 𝑚𝑒𝑠𝑚𝑎 𝑓𝑜𝑡𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑖𝑚𝑎𝑔𝑒𝑚 𝑑𝑒 𝑉𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑎 𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑒 𝑡𝑟𝑒̂𝑠 ℎ𝑜𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑠 𝑏𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑐𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑜 𝑀𝑜𝑣𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜 𝑍𝑒𝑟𝑜 𝑒 𝑎 𝑙𝑒𝑔𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑎 "𝑒𝑢 𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑓𝑖𝑟𝑜 𝑜𝑠 𝑝𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑢𝑔𝑢𝑒𝑠𝑒𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑏𝑒𝑚", 𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑚 𝑎𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑟 𝑜𝑠 𝐶𝑜𝑥𝑖 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑜 𝑜 𝑎𝑣𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑜 𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑡𝑎𝑖𝑠 "𝑝𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑢𝑔𝑢𝑒𝑠𝑒𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑏𝑒𝑚". 𝑀𝑎𝑠 𝑎 𝑟𝑎𝑧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑝𝑒𝑙𝑎 𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑙 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑠 𝑑𝑜𝑖𝑠 𝑟𝑒́𝑢𝑠 𝑜 𝑓𝑖𝑧𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑚, 𝑜 𝑚𝑜𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑜 𝑝𝑒𝑙𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑙 𝑒𝑠𝑐𝑜𝑙ℎ𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑚 𝑎𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑙𝑎 𝑓𝑜𝑡𝑜, 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑎𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑙𝑎𝑠 𝑠𝑒𝑡𝑒 𝑝𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑜𝑎𝑠 𝑛𝑒𝑔𝑟𝑎𝑠 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑛𝑢𝑛𝑐𝑎 𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑓𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑚, 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑢 𝑡𝑎̃𝑜 𝑖𝑚𝑝𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑎 𝑗𝑢𝑖́𝑧𝑎 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑗𝑢𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑓𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑒 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑒𝑠𝑝𝑒𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑙 𝑐𝑒𝑛𝑠𝑢𝑟𝑎 - 𝑚𝑒𝑠𝑚𝑜 𝑠𝑒 𝑐𝑒𝑟𝑡𝑖𝑓𝑖𝑐𝑜𝑢 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑜𝑠 𝑢́𝑛𝑖𝑐𝑜𝑠 𝑒𝑙𝑒𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜𝑠 𝑟𝑒𝑙𝑒𝑣𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑠 𝑛𝑎 𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑠𝑎𝑔𝑒𝑚 𝑠𝑎̃𝑜 𝑟𝑒𝑎𝑙𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑟 𝑑𝑎 𝑝𝑒𝑙𝑒 𝑒 𝑜 𝑓𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑠𝑒 𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑎𝑟 𝑑𝑒 𝑝𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑜𝑎𝑠 𝑝𝑜𝑏𝑟𝑒𝑠.

𝐸𝑠𝑡𝑎 (𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑛ℎ𝑎) 𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑢𝑠𝑎 𝑑𝑎 𝑚𝑎𝑔𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑑𝑎 𝑒𝑚 𝑟𝑒𝑡𝑖𝑟𝑎𝑟 𝑎 𝑖𝑙𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑜́𝑏𝑣𝑖𝑎 𝑑𝑎𝑞𝑢𝑖𝑙𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑒𝑥𝑝𝑜̃𝑒 - 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑜𝑢𝑡𝑟𝑜 𝑚𝑜𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑜 ℎ𝑎𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑎 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑜𝑠 𝑟𝑒́𝑢𝑠 𝑐𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑛𝑖𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑚 𝑎𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑙𝑎𝑠 𝑝𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑜𝑎𝑠 𝑠𝑒𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑎𝑠 𝑑𝑢𝑎𝑠 𝑐𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑖́𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑠? - 𝑑𝑒𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑎 𝑖𝑚𝑝𝑙𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑟 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑜 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑐𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑜 𝑙ℎ𝑒 𝑟𝑒𝑔𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑒 𝑎̀𝑠 𝑚𝑎̃𝑜𝑠 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑞𝑢𝑒, 𝑟𝑒𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑚𝑢𝑙𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑎 𝑠𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑐̧𝑎, 𝑑𝑖𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑒 𝑠𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑟𝑎 𝑜𝑢 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑒𝑥𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑟 𝑜 𝑐𝑎𝑟𝑖𝑧 𝑑𝑖𝑠𝑐𝑟𝑖𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑡𝑜́𝑟𝑖𝑜 𝑟𝑒𝑓𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑑𝑜 𝑝𝑒𝑙𝑜𝑠 𝐶𝑜𝑥𝑖.

𝑃𝑜𝑟𝑒́𝑚 𝑜 𝑇𝑟𝑖𝑏𝑢𝑛𝑎𝑙 𝑑𝑎 𝑅𝑒𝑙𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜, 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑙 𝑉𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑎 𝑒 𝐶ℎ𝑒𝑔𝑎 𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑜𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑚 𝑒𝑚 𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑖𝑟𝑜 𝑙𝑢𝑔𝑎𝑟, 𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑜𝑙𝑣𝑒𝑢 𝑜 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑏𝑙𝑒𝑚𝑎 𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑜𝑛ℎ𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑒𝑥𝑝𝑙𝑖𝑐𝑖𝑡𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 "𝑎 𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑑𝑖𝑠𝑐𝑟𝑖𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑡𝑜́𝑟𝑖𝑎 𝑒𝑚 𝑓𝑢𝑛𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑟 𝑑𝑎 𝑝𝑒𝑙𝑒 𝑒 𝑑𝑎 𝑠𝑖𝑡𝑢𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑠𝑜𝑐𝑖𝑜𝑒𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑜́𝑚𝑖𝑐𝑎 (...) 𝑒𝑥𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑛𝑎𝑠 𝑜𝑓𝑒𝑛𝑠𝑎𝑠 𝑒 𝑑𝑒𝑐𝑟𝑒𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 "𝑎 𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎̃𝑜 (...) 𝑓𝑜𝑖 𝑒𝑥𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑎𝑛𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑠𝑎𝑑𝑎" 𝑝𝑒𝑙𝑜 𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑏𝑢𝑛𝑎𝑙 𝑖𝑛𝑓𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑜𝑟 "𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑜 𝑚𝑒𝑠𝑚𝑜 𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑖𝑑𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑒𝑟𝑎 𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑙/𝑛𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑎́𝑟𝑖𝑎 𝑎 𝑖𝑛𝑐𝑙𝑢𝑠𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎̃𝑜/𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑓𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑜 𝑛𝑜 𝑑𝑖𝑠𝑝𝑜𝑠𝑖𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑜".

𝑃𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑠 𝑗𝑢𝑖́𝑧𝑒𝑠 𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑒𝑚𝑏𝑎𝑟𝑔𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑟𝑒𝑠, 𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑑𝑒𝑛𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑝𝑜𝑟 𝑜𝑓𝑒𝑛𝑠𝑎𝑠 𝑎𝑜 𝑑𝑖𝑟𝑒𝑖𝑡𝑜 𝑎𝑜 𝑏𝑜𝑚 𝑛𝑜𝑚𝑒 𝑒 𝑎̀ 𝑖𝑚𝑎𝑔𝑒𝑚 𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑣𝑖́𝑡𝑖𝑚𝑎𝑠 "𝑎𝑏𝑠𝑜𝑟𝑣𝑒" 𝑜 𝑟𝑎𝑐𝑖𝑠𝑚𝑜 𝑒 𝑜 𝑐𝑙𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑠𝑚𝑜, 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑓𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑚 𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑚 "𝑠𝑢𝑏𝑠𝑢𝑚𝑖𝑑𝑜𝑠" (𝑖𝑛𝑐𝑙𝑢𝑖́𝑑𝑜𝑠, 𝑑𝑖𝑙𝑢𝑖́𝑑𝑜𝑠) 𝑛𝑜 𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑜𝑛ℎ𝑒𝑐𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜 𝑑𝑎 𝑔𝑟𝑎𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑜𝑓𝑒𝑛𝑠𝑎𝑠.

𝐼𝑟𝑜𝑛𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 (𝑒, 𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑢𝑚𝑒-𝑠𝑒, 𝑎 𝑟𝑖𝑟 𝑎̀ 𝑔𝑎𝑟𝑔𝑎𝑙ℎ𝑎𝑑𝑎) 𝑉𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑎 𝑒 𝐶ℎ𝑒𝑔𝑎 𝑚𝑎𝑛𝑖𝑓𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑚, 𝑒𝑚 𝑝𝑒𝑑𝑖𝑑𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑟𝑒𝑣𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑎 𝑒𝑥𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑜𝑟𝑑𝑖𝑛𝑎́𝑟𝑖𝑎 - 𝑒𝑥𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑜𝑟𝑑𝑖𝑛𝑎́𝑟𝑖𝑎 𝑝𝑜𝑟𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑗𝑎́ 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑝𝑜𝑑𝑖𝑎𝑚 𝑛𝑜𝑟𝑚𝑎𝑙𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑜𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑟 𝑑𝑒 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑑𝑒𝑛𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑓𝑖𝑟𝑚𝑎𝑑𝑎 𝑝𝑒𝑙𝑎 𝑅𝑒𝑙𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 - 𝑎𝑜 𝑆𝑢𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑚𝑜, 𝑎 𝑠𝑢𝑎 𝑣𝑒𝑒𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑖𝑛𝑑𝑖𝑔𝑛𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑝𝑒𝑙𝑎 𝑖𝑚𝑝𝑢𝑡𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑑𝑖𝑠𝑐𝑟𝑖𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑒𝑚 𝑓𝑢𝑛𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑟 𝑑𝑒 𝑝𝑒𝑙𝑒 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑎 𝑅𝑒𝑙𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑙ℎ𝑒𝑠 𝑓𝑒𝑧. "𝑇𝑒𝑚 𝑑𝑒 𝑠𝑒𝑟 𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑖𝑑𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑜 𝑚𝑢𝑖𝑡𝑜 𝑔𝑟𝑎𝑣𝑒", 𝑙𝑒̂-𝑠𝑒 𝑛𝑜 𝑠𝑒𝑢 𝑝𝑒𝑑𝑖𝑑𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑟𝑒𝑣𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑎, "𝑛𝑎 𝑚𝑒𝑑𝑖𝑑𝑎 𝑒𝑚 𝑞𝑢𝑒, 𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑓𝑎𝑙𝑎𝑚𝑜𝑠, 𝑒𝑠𝑝𝑒𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑙𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒, 𝑒𝑚 "𝑐𝑜𝑟 𝑑𝑒 𝑝𝑒𝑙𝑒" 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑜 𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑑𝑖𝑠𝑐𝑟𝑖𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑡𝑜́𝑟𝑖𝑎, 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑚𝑜𝑠, 𝑛𝑎 𝑟𝑒𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒, 𝑎 𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑢𝑚𝑖𝑟 𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑒 𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜 𝑑𝑖𝑠𝑐𝑟𝑖𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑡𝑜́𝑟𝑖𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑜 𝑥𝑒𝑛𝑜́𝑓𝑜𝑏𝑜". 𝐸 𝑝𝑒𝑑𝑖𝑎𝑚 𝑎𝑜 𝑆𝑢𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑚𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑒𝑥𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑒 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑑𝑒𝑐𝑖𝑠𝑎̃𝑜 "𝑎𝑏𝑠𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑡𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑖𝑛𝑒𝑞𝑢𝑖́𝑣𝑜𝑐𝑎 𝑒 𝑒𝑠𝑐𝑙𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑑𝑜𝑟𝑎 𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑜 𝑎𝑜 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑜𝑟 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑒́ 𝑎𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑏𝑢𝑖́𝑑𝑜 𝑎̀ 𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑖𝑠𝑐𝑟𝑖𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑡𝑜́𝑟𝑖𝑎 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑠𝑢𝑏𝑗𝑎𝑧 𝑎̀𝑠 𝑎𝑙𝑒𝑔𝑎𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑜𝑓𝑒𝑛𝑠𝑎𝑠 𝑎̀ ℎ𝑜𝑛𝑟𝑎 𝑒 𝑎𝑜 𝑑𝑖𝑟𝑒𝑖𝑡𝑜 𝑎̀ 𝑖𝑚𝑎𝑔𝑒𝑚".

𝐴𝑛𝑜𝑡𝑒-𝑠𝑒 𝑞𝑢𝑒, 𝑒 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑑𝑜-𝑠𝑒 𝑑𝑜 𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑛𝑐𝑖́𝑝𝑖𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑡𝑒̂𝑚 𝑎𝑐𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑜 𝑎 𝑑𝑖𝑐𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑎́𝑟𝑖𝑜𝑠, 𝑜 𝑓𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑜𝑠 𝑟𝑒́𝑢𝑠 𝑓𝑎𝑙𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑚 𝑑𝑒 𝑥𝑒𝑛𝑜𝑓𝑜𝑏𝑖𝑎 (𝑎𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑠𝑎̃𝑜, 𝑜́𝑑𝑖𝑜 𝑎 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑔𝑒𝑖𝑟𝑜𝑠) 𝑎 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑝𝑜́𝑠𝑖𝑡𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑑𝑖𝑠𝑐𝑟𝑖𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑒𝑚 𝑓𝑢𝑛𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑟 𝑑𝑎 𝑝𝑒𝑙𝑒 𝑒́ 𝑒𝑚 𝑠𝑖 𝑟𝑎𝑐𝑖𝑠𝑚𝑜: 𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑟 𝑑𝑖𝑧𝑒𝑟 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑐𝑒𝑏𝑒𝑚 𝑞𝑢𝑒 ℎ𝑎𝑗𝑎 𝑝𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑜𝑎𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑑𝑒𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑑𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑟 𝑑𝑒 𝑝𝑒𝑙𝑒 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑠𝑒𝑗𝑎𝑚 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑔𝑒𝑖𝑟𝑎𝑠, 𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑎́𝑠 𝑏𝑎𝑡𝑒 𝑐𝑒𝑟𝑡𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑎𝑠 𝑎𝑓𝑖𝑟𝑚𝑎𝑐̧𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑉𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑎 𝑛𝑜 𝑑𝑒𝑏𝑎𝑡𝑒 𝑒𝑚 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑢𝑠𝑜𝑢 𝑎 𝑓𝑜𝑡𝑜, 𝑛𝑎𝑠 𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑡𝑖𝑢 𝑑𝑜 𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑛𝑐𝑖́𝑝𝑖𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑛𝑒𝑛ℎ𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑟𝑒𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑒𝑟𝑎 𝑝𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑢𝑔𝑢𝑒̂𝑠.

𝐴 𝑜́𝑏𝑣𝑖𝑎 𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑠𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑎𝑙𝑒𝑔𝑎𝑐̧𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑑𝑜 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑡𝑖𝑑𝑜 𝑒 𝑑𝑜 𝑠𝑒𝑢 𝑙𝑖́𝑑𝑒𝑟 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑝𝑜𝑑𝑒 𝑝𝑜𝑟𝑒́𝑚 𝑑𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑖𝑟-𝑛𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑜 𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑙: 𝑡𝑒̂𝑚 𝑡𝑜𝑑𝑎 𝑎 𝑟𝑎𝑧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑒𝑚 𝑑𝑖𝑧𝑒𝑟 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑎 𝑑𝑖𝑠𝑐𝑟𝑖𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑒𝑚 𝑓𝑢𝑛𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑟 𝑑𝑎 𝑝𝑒𝑙𝑒 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑝𝑜𝑑𝑒 𝑠𝑒𝑟 𝑎𝑙𝑔𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑓𝑖𝑐𝑎 "𝑠𝑢𝑏𝑠𝑢𝑚𝑖𝑑𝑜" 𝑛𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑠𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑐̧𝑎. 𝐸 𝑡𝑖𝑛ℎ𝑎𝑚 𝑡𝑜𝑑𝑎 𝑎 𝑟𝑎𝑧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑒𝑚 𝑎𝑝𝑜𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑟 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑜 𝑆𝑢𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑚𝑜 𝑝𝑜𝑑𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑎 𝑑𝑒𝑐𝑖𝑑𝑖𝑟 𝑎 𝑠𝑒𝑢 𝑓𝑎𝑣𝑜𝑟: 𝑒́ 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑎𝑖́ 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑎𝑝𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑎 𝑜 ℎ𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑜𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑙 𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑏𝑢𝑛𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑝𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑢𝑔𝑢𝑒𝑠𝑒𝑠.

𝐸́ 𝑙𝑒𝑚𝑏𝑟𝑎𝑟 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑜 𝑛𝑢𝑚 𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑚𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑖𝑚𝑝𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑠 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑐𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑣𝑖𝑜𝑙𝑒̂𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑎 𝑝𝑜𝑙𝑖𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑙 𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑢́𝑙𝑡𝑖𝑚𝑜𝑠 𝑎𝑛𝑜𝑠, 𝑜 𝑑𝑎 𝑒𝑠𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑑𝑟𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝐴𝑙𝑓𝑟𝑎𝑔𝑖𝑑𝑒, 𝑛𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑙 𝑡𝑜𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑎𝑠 𝑣𝑖́𝑡𝑖𝑚𝑎𝑠 𝑠𝑎̃𝑜 𝑛𝑒𝑔𝑟𝑎𝑠, 𝑎𝑝𝑒𝑠𝑎𝑟 𝑑𝑒 𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑚 𝑠𝑖𝑑𝑜 𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑜 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑣𝑎𝑑𝑎𝑠, 𝑛𝑜 𝑚𝑜𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜 𝑑𝑜 𝑠𝑒𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑜 𝑒 𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑎𝑔𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑜̃𝑒𝑠, 𝑎𝑠 𝑖𝑛𝑗𝑢́𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑠 "𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑡𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑜 𝑐𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑙ℎ𝑜 𝑣𝑎̃𝑜 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑣𝑜𝑠𝑠𝑎 𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑎" 𝑒 "𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑡𝑢𝑔𝑢𝑒̂𝑠", 𝑜 𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑏𝑢𝑛𝑎𝑙 𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑐𝑎𝑟𝑡𝑜𝑢 𝑎 𝑚𝑜𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑜́𝑑𝑖𝑜 𝑟𝑎𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑙 𝑛𝑎𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑙𝑒𝑠 𝑐𝑟𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑠, 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑓𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑣𝑎𝑑𝑎. 𝐸́ 𝑐𝑎𝑠𝑜 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑔𝑢𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑟 𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑟𝑖𝑎 𝑜 𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑏𝑢𝑛𝑎𝑙 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑣𝑎𝑟𝑖𝑎 𝑚𝑜𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑜́𝑑𝑖𝑜 𝑟𝑎𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑙: 𝑢𝑚 𝑝𝑎𝑝𝑒𝑙 𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑝𝑒𝑙𝑜𝑠 𝑝𝑜𝑙𝑖́𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑠 𝑎 𝑑𝑖𝑧𝑒𝑟 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑠𝑒 𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑢𝑚𝑒𝑚 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑜 𝑟𝑎𝑐𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑠?

𝑃𝑜𝑑𝑒 𝑠𝑒𝑟 𝑞𝑢𝑒, 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑜 𝑖𝑛𝑑𝑖𝑐𝑖𝑎 𝑜 𝑐𝑎𝑠𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝐵𝑟𝑢𝑛𝑜 𝐶𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑒́, 𝑛𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑙 𝑜𝑠 𝑚𝑒𝑠𝑚𝑜𝑠 𝑖𝑛𝑠𝑢𝑙𝑡𝑜𝑠 𝑟𝑎𝑐𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑠 - "𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑡𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑚𝑒𝑟𝑑𝑎 𝑣𝑎𝑖 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑎 𝑡𝑢𝑎 𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑎" - 𝑠𝑒𝑟𝑣𝑖𝑟𝑎𝑚, 𝑡𝑟𝑒̂𝑠 𝑎𝑛𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑒𝑝𝑜𝑖𝑠 𝑑𝑜 𝑎𝑐𝑜́𝑟𝑑𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑎 𝐶𝑜𝑣𝑎 𝑑𝑎 𝑀𝑜𝑢𝑟𝑎, 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑐𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑧𝑎𝑟 𝑎 𝑚𝑜𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑜́𝑑𝑖𝑜 𝑟𝑎𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑙 𝑑𝑜 ℎ𝑜𝑚𝑖𝑐𝑖́𝑑𝑖𝑜, 𝑎𝑙𝑔𝑜 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑗𝑎 𝑓𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑙𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑎 𝑚𝑢𝑑𝑎𝑟 𝑛𝑜𝑠 𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑏𝑢𝑛𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑝𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑢𝑔𝑢𝑒𝑠𝑒𝑠. 𝑀𝑎𝑠 𝑎 𝑟𝑒𝑏𝑜𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑑𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑠𝑒 𝑝𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑎 𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑎 𝑑𝑒𝑙𝑒𝑠, 𝑒 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜, 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑜 𝑒́ 𝑠𝑢𝑎 𝑜𝑏𝑟𝑖𝑔𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜, 𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑢𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑑𝑜 "𝑜 𝑝𝑎𝑝𝑒𝑙 𝑑𝑒 𝑔𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑑𝑎 𝑖𝑔𝑢𝑎𝑙𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝑒 𝑑𝑎 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑖𝑠𝑐𝑟𝑖𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑎𝑔𝑟𝑎𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑛𝑎 𝑙𝑒𝑖 𝑒 𝑛𝑜𝑠 𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑛𝑎𝑐𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑖𝑠" 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑜 𝑔𝑟𝑢𝑝𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑏𝑎𝑙ℎ𝑜 𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑁𝑎𝑐̧𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑈𝑛𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑠𝑜𝑏𝑟𝑒 𝑃𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑜𝑎𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝐴𝑠𝑐𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑒̂𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑎 𝐴𝑓𝑟𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑛𝑎 𝑙ℎ𝑒𝑠 𝑙𝑒𝑚𝑏𝑟𝑎, 𝑛𝑜 𝑟𝑒𝑙𝑎𝑡𝑜́𝑟𝑖𝑜 𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑙𝑖𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑟 𝑠𝑜𝑏𝑟𝑒 𝑃𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑢𝑔𝑎𝑙, 𝑠𝑒𝑟 𝑜 𝑑𝑎 𝑗𝑢𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑐̧𝑎.

"𝐸𝑚 𝑚𝑢𝑖𝑡𝑜𝑠 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑠, 𝑜𝑠 𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑏𝑢𝑛𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑙𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑚 𝑎𝑠 𝑟𝑒𝑣𝑖𝑠𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑒 𝑎𝑠 𝑟𝑒𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑚𝑎𝑠 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑚𝑖𝑡𝑒𝑚 𝑎𝑜𝑠 𝑠𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑚𝑎𝑠 𝑗𝑢𝑑𝑖𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑔𝑢𝑟𝑎𝑟 𝑎 𝑗𝑢𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑐̧𝑎 𝑟𝑎𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑙", 𝑠𝑢𝑏𝑙𝑖𝑛ℎ𝑎 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑒 𝑔𝑟𝑢𝑝𝑜 𝑑𝑎 𝑂𝑁𝑈. 𝑃𝑜𝑟 𝑐𝑎́, 𝑓𝑎𝑧𝑒𝑚 𝑜 𝑒𝑥𝑎𝑡𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑎́𝑟𝑖𝑜: 𝑠𝑎𝑙𝑣𝑜 𝑟𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑠 𝑒𝑥𝑐𝑒𝑝𝑐̧𝑜̃𝑒𝑠, 𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑢𝑠𝑎𝑚 𝑣𝑒𝑟 𝑟𝑎𝑐𝑖𝑠𝑚𝑜. 𝑇𝑎𝑙𝑣𝑒𝑧 𝑎𝑐𝑟𝑒𝑑𝑖𝑡𝑒𝑚, 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑜 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑒 𝑠𝑒𝑟 𝑎𝑝𝑎𝑛𝑎́𝑔𝑖𝑜 𝑑𝑎 𝑚𝑎𝑖𝑜𝑟𝑖𝑎 𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑝𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑢𝑔𝑢𝑒𝑠𝑒𝑠 𝑒 𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑔𝑜𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑛𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑠 𝑒 𝑝𝑜𝑙𝑖́𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑜𝑠 𝑒𝑚 𝑔𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑙, 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑠𝑒 𝑛𝑒𝑔𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑚 𝑜𝑢 𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑜𝑟𝑖𝑧𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑚 𝑎 𝑠𝑢𝑎 𝑒𝑥𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑒̂𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑎 𝑒𝑙𝑒 𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑎𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑒; 𝑡𝑎𝑙𝑣𝑒𝑧 𝑠𝑒𝑗𝑎𝑚 𝑠𝑖𝑚𝑝𝑙𝑒𝑠𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑖𝑛𝑐𝑎𝑝𝑎𝑧𝑒𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑣𝑒𝑟 𝑒 𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑧𝑎𝑟; 𝑜𝑢, 𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑣𝑎𝑖 𝑑𝑎𝑟 𝑛𝑜 𝑚𝑒𝑠𝑚𝑜, 𝑠𝑖𝑚𝑝𝑙𝑒𝑠𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑟𝑎𝑐𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑠. 𝑂 𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑢𝑙𝑡𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑒́ 𝑖𝑔𝑢𝑎𝑙: 𝑛𝑒𝑔𝑎𝑟 𝑜𝑢 "𝑠𝑢𝑏𝑠𝑢𝑚𝑖𝑟" 𝑎 𝑑𝑖𝑠𝑐𝑟𝑖𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑒́ 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑎 𝑝𝑢𝑛𝑖𝑟, 𝑙𝑜𝑔𝑜 𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑝𝑒𝑡𝑢𝑎́-𝑙𝑎 𝑒 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑑𝑎́-𝑙𝑎; 𝑒́ 𝑑𝑖𝑧𝑒𝑟 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑡𝑒𝑚 𝑖𝑚𝑝𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑎̂𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑎; 𝑒́ 𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑢𝑠𝑎𝑟 𝑎̀𝑠 𝑣𝑖́𝑡𝑖𝑚𝑎𝑠 𝑎 𝑑𝑖𝑔𝑛𝑎 𝑟𝑒𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜. 𝐸́ 𝑓𝑎𝑧𝑒𝑟 𝑖𝑛𝑗𝑢𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑐̧𝑎. 𝐽𝑢𝑠𝑡𝑎 𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑎̃𝑜 𝑎 𝑣𝑖𝑙𝑒𝑧𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑠𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑚 𝑉𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑎𝑠 𝑒 𝐶ℎ𝑒𝑔𝑎𝑠 𝑎 𝑎𝑏𝑟𝑖𝑟-𝑙ℎ𝑒𝑠, 𝑎 𝑎𝑏𝑟𝑖𝑟-𝑛𝑜𝑠,𝑜𝑠 𝑜𝑙ℎ𝑜𝑠.

* Jornalista

IN "DIÁRIO DE NOTÍCIAS" - 14/12/21 

.