DIANA SANTOS

.

 

Setúbal: por um 

distrito com mais saúde

A saúde tem sido negligenciada pelos sucessivos governos PS/PSD, onde o distrito de Setúbal não foi exceção. Durante décadas, as populações da Península de Setúbal estiverem dependentes da oferta existente no concelho de Lisboa.

𝓐 𝓹𝓪𝓷𝓭𝓮𝓶𝓲𝓪 𝓮𝔁𝓹𝓸̂𝓼 𝓪 𝓯𝓻𝓪𝓰𝓲𝓵𝓲𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓮 𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓻𝓾𝓽𝓾𝓻𝓪𝓵 𝓭𝓸 𝓢𝓮𝓻𝓿𝓲𝓬̧𝓸 𝓝𝓪𝓬𝓲𝓸𝓷𝓪𝓵 𝓭𝓮 𝓢𝓪𝓾́𝓭𝓮 (𝓢𝓝𝓢) 𝓮 𝓪𝓰𝓻𝓪𝓿𝓸𝓾 𝓪𝓼 𝓭𝓲𝓯𝓲𝓬𝓾𝓵𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓮𝓼 𝓹𝓻𝓮́-𝓮𝔁𝓲𝓼𝓽𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮𝓼, 𝓶𝓪𝓼 𝓽𝓪𝓶𝓫𝓮́𝓶 𝓽𝓸𝓻𝓷𝓸𝓾 𝓬𝓵𝓪𝓻𝓪 𝓪 𝓲𝓶𝓹𝓻𝓮𝓼𝓬𝓲𝓷𝓭𝓲𝓫𝓲𝓵𝓲𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓮 𝓭𝓪 𝓻𝓮𝓼𝓹𝓸𝓼𝓽𝓪 𝓹𝓾́𝓫𝓵𝓲𝓬𝓪 𝓮𝓶 𝓼𝓪𝓾́𝓭𝓮. 𝓢𝓮𝓶 𝓸 𝓼𝓮𝓻𝓿𝓲𝓬̧𝓸 𝓹𝓾́𝓫𝓵𝓲𝓬𝓸 𝓭𝓮 𝓼𝓪𝓾́𝓭𝓮, 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓷𝓪̃𝓸 𝓭𝓮𝓲𝔁𝓪 𝓷𝓲𝓷𝓰𝓾𝓮́𝓶 𝓭𝓮 𝓯𝓸𝓻𝓪, 𝓶𝓲𝓵𝓱𝓪𝓻𝓮𝓼 𝓭𝓮 𝓹𝓮𝓼𝓼𝓸𝓪𝓼 𝓽𝓮𝓻𝓲𝓪𝓶 𝓯𝓲𝓬𝓪𝓭𝓸 𝓼𝓮𝓶 𝓪𝓹𝓸𝓲𝓸 𝓮 𝓸𝓼 𝓮𝓯𝓮𝓲𝓽𝓸𝓼 𝓭𝓸 𝓢𝓐𝓡𝓢-𝓒𝓸𝓿𝟐 𝓽𝓮𝓻𝓲𝓪𝓶 𝓼𝓲𝓭𝓸 𝓪𝓲𝓷𝓭𝓪 𝓶𝓪𝓲𝓼 𝓭𝓮𝓿𝓪𝓼𝓽𝓪𝓭𝓸𝓻𝓮𝓼. 𝓡𝓮𝓬𝓸𝓻𝓭𝓮-𝓼𝓮 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓭𝓾𝓻𝓪𝓷𝓽𝓮 𝓸 𝓹𝓮𝓻𝓲́𝓸𝓭𝓸 𝓶𝓪𝓲𝓼 𝓬𝓻𝓲́𝓽𝓲𝓬𝓸 𝓭𝓪 𝓹𝓪𝓷𝓭𝓮𝓶𝓲𝓪, 𝓸 𝓼𝓮𝓬𝓽𝓸𝓻 𝓹𝓻𝓲𝓿𝓪𝓭𝓸. 𝓠𝓾𝓪𝓷𝓭𝓸 𝓼𝓮 𝓽𝓻𝓪𝓽𝓪 𝓭𝓮 𝓹𝓻𝓸𝓽𝓮𝓰𝓮𝓻 𝓽𝓸𝓭𝓸𝓼, 𝓼𝓸́ 𝓹𝓸𝓭𝓮𝓶𝓸𝓼 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓽𝓪𝓻 𝓬𝓸𝓶 𝓸 𝓢𝓝𝓢. 𝓓𝓸 𝓼𝓮𝓽𝓸𝓻 𝓹𝓻𝓲𝓿𝓪𝓭𝓸 𝓷𝓪̃𝓸 𝓼𝓮 𝓹𝓸𝓭𝓮 𝓮𝓼𝓹𝓮𝓻𝓪𝓻 𝓷𝓪𝓭𝓪 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓷𝓪̃𝓸 𝓼𝓮𝓳𝓪 𝓪 𝓫𝓾𝓼𝓬𝓪 𝓲𝓷𝓽𝓻𝓲́𝓷𝓼𝓮𝓬𝓪 𝓭𝓸 𝓵𝓾𝓬𝓻𝓸 𝓮 𝓭𝓸 𝓷𝓮𝓰𝓸́𝓬𝓲𝓸, 𝓬𝓸𝓶𝓸 𝓯𝓲𝓬𝓸𝓾 𝓮𝓿𝓲𝓭𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮 𝓷𝓪 𝓯𝓸𝓻𝓶𝓪 𝓬𝓸𝓶𝓸 𝓯𝓮𝓬𝓱𝓸𝓾 𝓹𝓸𝓻𝓽𝓪𝓼 𝓸𝓾 𝓮𝔁𝓲𝓰𝓲𝓾 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓸 𝓔𝓼𝓽𝓪𝓭𝓸 𝓯𝓲𝓷𝓪𝓷𝓬𝓲𝓪𝓼𝓼𝓮 𝓪𝓼 𝓼𝓾𝓪𝓼 𝓹𝓮𝓻𝓭𝓪𝓼 𝓯𝓲𝓷𝓪𝓷𝓬𝓮𝓲𝓻𝓪𝓼, 𝓼𝓮𝓶 𝓮𝓼𝓺𝓾𝓮𝓬𝓮𝓻 𝓪 𝓮𝓼𝓬𝓾𝓼𝓪 𝓭𝓪𝓼 𝓼𝓮𝓰𝓾𝓻𝓪𝓭𝓸𝓻𝓪𝓼 𝓮𝓶 𝓬𝓸𝓫𝓻𝓲𝓻 𝓮𝓹𝓲𝓭𝓮𝓶𝓲𝓪𝓼. 𝓐 𝓫𝓾𝓼𝓬𝓪 𝓭𝓸 𝓵𝓾𝓬𝓻𝓸 𝓷𝓪̃𝓸 𝓼𝓮𝓻𝓿𝓮 𝓪 𝓼𝓪𝓾́𝓭𝓮 𝓷𝓮𝓶 𝓹𝓻𝓸𝓽𝓮𝓰𝓮 𝓸𝓼 𝓭𝓲𝓻𝓮𝓲𝓽𝓸𝓼 𝓭𝓪 𝓹𝓸𝓹𝓾𝓵𝓪𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸.

𝓞 𝓭𝓮𝓼𝓲𝓷𝓿𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓲𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓸 𝓷𝓸 𝓢𝓝𝓢, 𝓪𝓰𝓻𝓪𝓿𝓪𝓭𝓸 𝓹𝓮𝓵𝓪 𝓪𝓾𝓼𝓽𝓮𝓻𝓲𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓮 𝓲𝓶𝓹𝓸𝓼𝓽𝓪 𝓹𝓮𝓵𝓪 𝓣𝓻𝓸𝓲𝓴𝓪 𝓮, 𝓪𝓽𝓮́ 𝓱𝓸𝓳𝓮, 𝓷𝓪̃𝓸 𝓻𝓮𝓿𝓮𝓻𝓽𝓲𝓭𝓸 𝓷𝓪 𝓽𝓸𝓽𝓪𝓵𝓲𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓮, 𝓽𝓻𝓪𝓭𝓾𝔃𝓲𝓾-𝓼𝓮 𝓮𝓶 𝓲𝓷𝓼𝓾𝓯𝓲𝓬𝓲𝓮̂𝓷𝓬𝓲𝓪 𝓭𝓮 𝓻𝓮𝓬𝓾𝓻𝓼𝓸𝓼 (𝓶𝓪𝓽𝓮𝓻𝓲𝓪𝓲𝓼, 𝓱𝓾𝓶𝓪𝓷𝓸𝓼 𝓮 𝓽𝓮́𝓬𝓷𝓲𝓬𝓸𝓼), 𝓼𝓸𝓫𝓻𝓮𝓬𝓪𝓻𝓰𝓪 𝓮 𝓭𝓮𝓼𝓰𝓪𝓼𝓽𝓮 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓼𝓮 𝓪𝓻𝓻𝓪𝓼𝓽𝓪𝓶 𝓷𝓸 𝓽𝓮𝓶𝓹𝓸. 𝓔, 𝓪𝓹𝓮𝓼𝓪𝓻 𝓭𝓮 𝓽𝓸𝓭𝓪𝓼 𝓪𝓼 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓭𝓲𝓬𝓲𝓸𝓷𝓪𝓷𝓽𝓮𝓼 𝓭𝓮 𝓾𝓶 𝓼𝓮𝓬𝓽𝓸𝓻 𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓻𝓪𝓷𝓰𝓾𝓵𝓪𝓭𝓸, 𝓪𝓼 𝓭𝓲𝓿𝓮𝓻𝓼𝓪𝓼 𝓬𝓪𝓽𝓮𝓰𝓸𝓻𝓲𝓪𝓲𝓼 𝓹𝓻𝓸𝓯𝓲𝓼𝓼𝓲𝓸𝓷𝓪𝓲𝓼 𝓻𝓮𝓼𝓹𝓸𝓷𝓭𝓮𝓻𝓪𝓶 𝓭𝓮 𝓯𝓸𝓻𝓶𝓪 𝓮𝔁𝓲́𝓶𝓲𝓪 𝓪𝓸𝓼 𝓭𝓮𝓼𝓪𝓯𝓲𝓸𝓼 𝓽𝓻𝓪𝔃𝓲𝓭𝓸𝓼 𝓹𝓮𝓵𝓪 𝓒𝓞𝓥𝓘𝓓-𝟏𝟗. 𝓔́ 𝓲𝓶𝓹𝓮𝓻𝓪𝓽𝓲𝓿𝓸 𝓻𝓮𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓱𝓮𝓬𝓮𝓻 𝓸 𝓹𝓪𝓹𝓮𝓵 𝓭𝓮𝓽𝓮𝓻𝓶𝓲𝓷𝓪𝓷𝓽𝓮 𝓭𝓮 𝓽𝓸𝓭𝓪𝓼 𝓪𝓼 𝓬𝓵𝓪𝓼𝓼𝓮𝓼 𝓹𝓻𝓸𝓯𝓲𝓼𝓼𝓲𝓸𝓷𝓪𝓲𝓼 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓼𝓮 𝓭𝓮𝓭𝓲𝓬𝓪𝓶 𝓪𝓸 𝓢𝓝𝓢, 𝓿𝓪𝓵𝓸𝓻𝓲𝔃𝓪𝓷𝓭𝓸-𝓪𝓼 𝓭𝓮 𝓯𝓪𝓬𝓽𝓸, 𝓷𝓸𝓶𝓮𝓪𝓭𝓪𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮 𝓪𝓽𝓻𝓪𝓿𝓮́𝓼 𝓭𝓮 𝓬𝓪𝓻𝓻𝓮𝓲𝓻𝓪𝓼 𝓭𝓲𝓰𝓷𝓪𝓼, 𝓼𝓪𝓵𝓪́𝓻𝓲𝓸𝓼 𝓳𝓾𝓼𝓽𝓸𝓼 𝓮 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓭𝓲𝓬̧𝓸̃𝓮𝓼 𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓪 𝓸 𝓮𝔁𝓮𝓻𝓬𝓲́𝓬𝓲𝓸 𝓭𝓪𝓼 𝓼𝓾𝓪𝓼 𝓯𝓾𝓷𝓬̧𝓸̃𝓮𝓼 𝓮𝓶 𝓼𝓮𝓰𝓾𝓻𝓪𝓷𝓬̧𝓪 𝓮 𝓬𝓸𝓶 𝓺𝓾𝓪𝓵𝓲𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓮.

𝓐 𝓼𝓪𝓾́𝓭𝓮 𝓽𝓮𝓶 𝓼𝓲𝓭𝓸 𝓷𝓮𝓰𝓵𝓲𝓰𝓮𝓷𝓬𝓲𝓪𝓭𝓪 𝓹𝓮𝓵𝓸𝓼 𝓼𝓾𝓬𝓮𝓼𝓼𝓲𝓿𝓸𝓼 𝓰𝓸𝓿𝓮𝓻𝓷𝓸𝓼 𝓟𝓢/𝓟𝓢𝓓, 𝓸𝓷𝓭𝓮 𝓸 𝓭𝓲𝓼𝓽𝓻𝓲𝓽𝓸 𝓭𝓮 𝓢𝓮𝓽𝓾́𝓫𝓪𝓵 𝓷𝓪̃𝓸 𝓯𝓸𝓲 𝓮𝔁𝓬𝓮𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸. 𝓓𝓾𝓻𝓪𝓷𝓽𝓮 𝓭𝓮́𝓬𝓪𝓭𝓪𝓼, 𝓪𝓼 𝓹𝓸𝓹𝓾𝓵𝓪𝓬̧𝓸̃𝓮𝓼 𝓭𝓪 𝓟𝓮𝓷𝓲́𝓷𝓼𝓾𝓵𝓪 𝓭𝓮 𝓢𝓮𝓽𝓾́𝓫𝓪𝓵 𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓲𝓿𝓮𝓻𝓮𝓶 𝓭𝓮𝓹𝓮𝓷𝓭𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮𝓼 𝓭𝓪 𝓸𝓯𝓮𝓻𝓽𝓪 𝓮𝔁𝓲𝓼𝓽𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮 𝓷𝓸 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓬𝓮𝓵𝓱𝓸 𝓭𝓮 𝓛𝓲𝓼𝓫𝓸𝓪, 𝓶𝓮𝓼𝓶𝓸 𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓪 𝓼𝓲𝓽𝓾𝓪𝓬̧𝓸̃𝓮𝓼 𝓭𝓮 𝓾𝓻𝓰𝓮̂𝓷𝓬𝓲𝓪 𝓮 𝓮𝓶𝓮𝓻𝓰𝓮̂𝓷𝓬𝓲𝓪, 𝓬𝓲𝓻𝓬𝓾𝓷𝓼𝓽𝓪̂𝓷𝓬𝓲𝓪 𝓪𝓲𝓷𝓭𝓪 𝓶𝓪𝓲𝓼 𝓰𝓻𝓪𝓿𝓮 𝓪 𝓼𝓾𝓵 𝓭𝓸 𝓭𝓲𝓼𝓽𝓻𝓲𝓽𝓸, 𝓸𝓷𝓭𝓮 𝓪 𝓯𝓪𝓵𝓽𝓪 𝓭𝓮 𝓻𝓮𝓼𝓹𝓸𝓼𝓽𝓪𝓼 𝓮𝓶 𝓼𝓪𝓾́𝓭𝓮 𝓻𝓮𝓼𝓾𝓵𝓽𝓪 𝓮𝓶 𝓭𝓮𝓼𝓵𝓸𝓬𝓪𝓬̧𝓸̃𝓮𝓼 𝓼𝓾𝓹𝓮𝓻𝓲𝓸𝓻𝓮𝓼 𝓪 𝟒𝟎𝓴𝓶 𝓪𝓽𝓮́ 𝓾𝓶𝓪 𝓾𝓷𝓲𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓮 𝓱𝓸𝓼𝓹𝓲𝓽𝓪𝓵𝓪𝓻.

𝓐 𝓼𝓲𝓽𝓾𝓪𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸 𝓭𝓸 𝓷𝓸𝓼𝓼𝓸 𝓭𝓲𝓼𝓽𝓻𝓲𝓽𝓸 𝓮́ 𝓪𝓵𝓪𝓻𝓶𝓪𝓷𝓽𝓮, 𝓸𝓷𝓭𝓮 𝓪𝓼 𝓸𝓯𝓮𝓻𝓽𝓪𝓼 𝓮𝓶 𝓼𝓪𝓾́𝓭𝓮 𝓮𝓼𝓬𝓪𝓼𝓼𝓮𝓲𝓪𝓶 𝓮 𝓭𝓮𝓲𝔁𝓪𝓶 𝓶𝓲𝓵𝓱𝓪𝓻𝓮𝓼 𝓭𝓮 𝓬𝓲𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓪̃𝓸𝓼 𝓮 𝓬𝓲𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓪̃𝓼 𝓼𝓮𝓶 𝓺𝓾𝓪𝓵𝓺𝓾𝓮𝓻 𝓪𝓹𝓸𝓲𝓸. 𝓞 𝓪𝓬𝓮𝓼𝓼𝓸 𝓪𝓸𝓼 𝓬𝓾𝓲𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓸𝓼 𝓭𝓮 𝓼𝓪𝓾́𝓭𝓮, 𝓪𝓼 𝓭𝓲𝓼𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓲𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓮𝓼 𝓷𝓸𝓼 𝓭𝓮𝓽𝓮𝓻𝓶𝓲𝓷𝓪𝓷𝓽𝓮𝓼 𝓪𝓶𝓫𝓲𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓪𝓲𝓼 𝓮 𝓼𝓸𝓬𝓲𝓪𝓲𝓼 𝓭𝓪 𝓼𝓪𝓾́𝓭𝓮, 𝓪𝓼 𝓭𝓮𝓼𝓲𝓰𝓾𝓪𝓵𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓮𝓼 𝓷𝓸 𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓪𝓭𝓸 𝓭𝓮 𝓼𝓪𝓾́𝓭𝓮 𝓭𝓪𝓼 𝓬𝓸𝓶𝓾𝓷𝓲𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓮𝓼 𝓮 𝓪 𝓻𝓮𝓵𝓪𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸 𝓬𝓸𝓶 𝓸 𝓢𝓝𝓢 𝓯𝓸𝓻𝓪𝓶 𝓭𝓪𝓼 𝓭𝓲𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓼𝓸̃𝓮𝓼 𝓶𝓪𝓲𝓼 𝓪𝓯𝓮𝓽𝓪𝓭𝓪𝓼, 𝓬𝓾𝓳𝓸 𝓲𝓶𝓹𝓪𝓬𝓽𝓸 𝓮𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓸́𝓶𝓲𝓬𝓸 𝓮 𝓼𝓸𝓬𝓲𝓪𝓵 𝓷𝓪̃𝓸 𝓹𝓸𝓭𝓮 𝓼𝓮𝓻 𝓮𝓼𝓬𝓪𝓶𝓸𝓽𝓮𝓪𝓭𝓸.

𝓝𝓾𝓶 𝓭𝓲𝓼𝓽𝓻𝓲𝓽𝓸 𝓶𝓪𝓻𝓬𝓪𝓭𝓸 𝓹𝓮𝓵𝓪 𝓭𝓲𝓯𝓲𝓬𝓾𝓵𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓮 𝓷𝓸 𝓪𝓬𝓮𝓼𝓼𝓸 𝓪𝓸𝓼 𝓬𝓾𝓲𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓸𝓼 𝓭𝓮 𝓼𝓪𝓾́𝓭𝓮, 𝓸 𝓹𝓻𝓲𝓷𝓬𝓲𝓹𝓪𝓵 𝓮𝓯𝓮𝓲𝓽𝓸 𝓬𝓸𝓵𝓪𝓽𝓮𝓻𝓪𝓵 𝓭𝓲𝓻𝓮𝓽𝓸 𝓭𝓪 𝓹𝓪𝓷𝓭𝓮𝓶𝓲𝓪 – 𝓪 𝓼𝓾𝓼𝓹𝓮𝓷𝓼𝓪̃𝓸 𝓭𝓪 𝓪𝓽𝓲𝓿𝓲𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓮 𝓹𝓻𝓸𝓰𝓻𝓪𝓶𝓪𝓭𝓪 – 𝓪𝓼𝓼𝓾𝓶𝓮-𝓼𝓮 𝓬𝓸𝓶𝓸 𝓾𝓶𝓪 𝓿𝓮𝓻𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓮𝓲𝓻𝓪 𝓫𝓸𝓶𝓫𝓪-𝓻𝓮𝓵𝓸́𝓰𝓲𝓸 𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓪 𝓪 𝓺𝓾𝓪𝓵 𝓼𝓪̃𝓸 𝓷𝓮𝓬𝓮𝓼𝓼𝓪́𝓻𝓲𝓪𝓼 𝓼𝓸𝓵𝓾𝓬̧𝓸̃𝓮𝓼 𝓾𝓻𝓰𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮𝓼. 𝓞𝓼 𝓶𝓮́𝓭𝓲𝓬𝓸𝓼 𝓳𝓪́ 𝓭𝓲𝓼𝓼𝓮𝓻𝓪𝓶 “𝓫𝓪𝓼𝓽𝓪” 𝓮 𝓪 𝓹𝓸𝓹𝓾𝓵𝓪𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸, 𝓯𝓪𝓻𝓽𝓪 𝓭𝓮 𝓹𝓻𝓸𝓶𝓮𝓼𝓼𝓪𝓼 𝓭𝓮 𝓾𝓶 𝓖𝓸𝓿𝓮𝓻𝓷𝓸 𝓷𝓪̃𝓸 𝓬𝓾𝓶𝓹𝓻𝓲𝓭𝓪𝓼, 𝓳𝓪́ 𝓬𝓸𝓶𝓮𝓬̧𝓪 𝓪 𝓶𝓸𝓫𝓲𝓵𝓲𝔃𝓪𝓻-𝓼𝓮 𝓷𝓸 𝓼𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓲𝓭𝓸 𝓭𝓮 𝓮𝔁𝓲𝓰𝓲𝓻 𝓸 𝓼𝓮𝓾 𝓭𝓲𝓻𝓮𝓲𝓽𝓸 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓼𝓽𝓲𝓽𝓾𝓬𝓲𝓸𝓷𝓪𝓵 𝓭𝓮 𝓪𝓬𝓮𝓼𝓼𝓸 𝓪̀ 𝓼𝓪𝓾́𝓭𝓮.

𝓜𝓪𝓲𝓼 𝓭𝓸 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓷𝓾𝓷𝓬𝓪 𝓲𝓶𝓹𝓸𝓻𝓽𝓪 𝓭𝓪𝓻 𝓸 𝓼𝓪𝓵𝓽𝓸 𝓺𝓾𝓪𝓵𝓲𝓽𝓪𝓽𝓲𝓿𝓸 𝓷𝓪𝓼 𝓹𝓸𝓵𝓲́𝓽𝓲𝓬𝓪𝓼 𝓭𝓮 𝓼𝓪𝓾́𝓭𝓮 𝓮 𝓭𝓮 𝓮𝓭𝓾𝓬𝓪𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸 𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓪 𝓪 𝓼𝓪𝓾́𝓭𝓮, 𝓲𝓷𝓿𝓮𝓻𝓽𝓮𝓷𝓭𝓸, 𝓷𝓮𝓬𝓮𝓼𝓼𝓪𝓻𝓲𝓪𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮, 𝓸 𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓪𝓭𝓲𝓰𝓶𝓪 𝓿𝓲𝓰𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮 𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓪 𝓸 𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓪𝓭𝓲𝓰𝓶𝓪 𝓼𝓪𝓵𝓾𝓽𝓸𝓰𝓮́𝓷𝓲𝓬𝓸. 𝓓𝓮 𝓾𝓶 𝓼𝓲𝓼𝓽𝓮𝓶𝓪 𝓭𝓮 𝓼𝓪𝓾́𝓭𝓮 𝓮𝓼𝓼𝓮𝓷𝓬𝓲𝓪𝓵𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮, 𝓮 𝓪𝓲𝓷𝓭𝓪, 𝓸𝓻𝓰𝓪𝓷𝓲𝔃𝓪𝓭𝓸 𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓪 𝓻𝓮𝓼𝓹𝓸𝓼𝓽𝓪 𝓼𝓮𝓬𝓾𝓷𝓭𝓪́𝓻𝓲𝓪 𝓮 𝓽𝓮𝓻𝓬𝓲𝓪́𝓻𝓲𝓪, 𝓲𝓶𝓹𝓸𝓻𝓽𝓪 𝓲𝓷𝓿𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓲𝓻 𝓷𝓾𝓶 𝓼𝓲𝓼𝓽𝓮𝓶𝓪 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓬𝓪𝓹𝓪𝓬𝓲𝓽𝓪 𝓪𝓼/𝓸𝓼 𝓾𝓽𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮𝓼 𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓪 𝓸 𝓪𝓾𝓽𝓸𝓬𝓾𝓲𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓸 𝓮 𝓪𝓼𝓼𝓾𝓶𝓲𝓻 𝓾𝓶 𝓹𝓪𝓹𝓮𝓵 𝓪𝓽𝓲𝓿𝓸 𝓷𝓸𝓼 𝓼𝓮𝓾𝓼 𝓹𝓻𝓸𝓬𝓮𝓼𝓼𝓸𝓼 𝓭𝓮 𝓼𝓪𝓾́𝓭𝓮 𝓲𝓷𝓭𝓲𝓿𝓲𝓭𝓾𝓪𝓵, 𝓯𝓪𝓶𝓲𝓵𝓲𝓪𝓻 𝓮 𝓼𝓸𝓬𝓲𝓪𝓵.

𝓟𝓪𝓻𝓪 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓽𝓸𝓭𝓪𝓼 𝓪𝓼 𝓹𝓮𝓼𝓼𝓸𝓪𝓼 𝓽𝓮𝓷𝓱𝓪𝓶 𝓪𝓬𝓮𝓼𝓼𝓸 𝓪𝓸𝓼 𝓼𝓮𝓻𝓿𝓲𝓬̧𝓸𝓼 𝓭𝓮 𝓼𝓪𝓾́𝓭𝓮 𝓮́ 𝓹𝓻𝓮𝓬𝓲𝓼𝓸 𝓮𝓵𝓲𝓶𝓲𝓷𝓪𝓻 𝓭𝓾𝓪𝓼 𝓫𝓪𝓻𝓻𝓮𝓲𝓻𝓪𝓼 𝓮𝓼𝓼𝓮𝓷𝓬𝓲𝓪𝓲𝓼: 𝓽𝓮𝓶𝓹𝓸𝓼 𝓭𝓮 𝓮𝓼𝓹𝓮𝓻𝓪 𝓮 𝓬𝓾𝓼𝓽𝓸𝓼 𝓪𝓼𝓼𝓸𝓬𝓲𝓪𝓭𝓸𝓼 (𝓽𝓪𝔁𝓪𝓼 𝓶𝓸𝓭𝓮𝓻𝓪𝓭𝓸𝓻𝓪𝓼, 𝓽𝓻𝓪𝓷𝓼𝓹𝓸𝓻𝓽𝓮 𝓭𝓮 𝓾𝓽𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮𝓼, 𝓶𝓮𝓭𝓲𝓬𝓪𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓸𝓼, 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓬𝓮𝓼𝓼𝓪̃𝓸 𝓹𝓻𝓲𝓿𝓪𝓭𝓪, 𝓮𝓽𝓬.). 𝓟𝓸𝓻 𝓸𝓾𝓽𝓻𝓸 𝓵𝓪𝓭𝓸, 𝓭𝓮𝓼𝓬𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓻𝓪𝓵𝓲𝔃𝓪𝓻 𝓪𝓵𝓰𝓾𝓷𝓼 𝓼𝓮𝓻𝓿𝓲𝓬̧𝓸𝓼 𝓮 𝓻𝓮𝓯𝓸𝓻𝓬̧𝓪𝓻 𝓪𝓼 𝓻𝓮𝓼𝓹𝓸𝓼𝓽𝓪𝓼 𝓮𝓶 𝓼𝓪𝓾́𝓭𝓮 𝓼𝓪̃𝓸 𝓭𝓮𝓽𝓮𝓻𝓶𝓲𝓷𝓪𝓷𝓽𝓮𝓼 𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓪 𝓰𝓪𝓻𝓪𝓷𝓽𝓲𝓻 𝓶𝓪𝓲𝓼 𝓿𝓲𝓰𝓲𝓵𝓪̂𝓷𝓬𝓲𝓪 𝓮 𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓸𝓼 𝓭𝓸𝓮𝓷𝓬̧𝓪.

𝓟𝓪𝓻𝓪 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓽𝓸𝓭𝓪𝓼 𝓪𝓼 𝓹𝓮𝓼𝓼𝓸𝓪𝓼 𝓽𝓮𝓷𝓱𝓪𝓶 𝓪𝓬𝓮𝓼𝓼𝓸 𝓪𝓸𝓼 𝓼𝓮𝓻𝓿𝓲𝓬̧𝓸𝓼 𝓭𝓮 𝓼𝓪𝓾́𝓭𝓮 𝓮́ 𝓹𝓻𝓮𝓬𝓲𝓼𝓸 𝓮𝓵𝓲𝓶𝓲𝓷𝓪𝓻 𝓭𝓾𝓪𝓼 𝓫𝓪𝓻𝓻𝓮𝓲𝓻𝓪𝓼 𝓮𝓼𝓼𝓮𝓷𝓬𝓲𝓪𝓲𝓼: 𝓽𝓮𝓶𝓹𝓸𝓼 𝓭𝓮 𝓮𝓼𝓹𝓮𝓻𝓪 𝓮 𝓬𝓾𝓼𝓽𝓸𝓼 𝓪𝓼𝓼𝓸𝓬𝓲𝓪𝓭𝓸𝓼

𝓝𝓸 𝓷𝓸𝓼𝓼𝓸 𝓭𝓲𝓼𝓽𝓻𝓲𝓽𝓸, 𝓬𝓸𝓶𝓸 𝓮𝓶 𝓽𝓸𝓭𝓸 𝓸 𝓹𝓪𝓲́𝓼, 𝓮́ 𝓮𝓼𝓼𝓮𝓷𝓬𝓲𝓪𝓵 𝓬𝓻𝓲𝓪𝓻 𝓸𝓼 𝓢𝓲𝓼𝓽𝓮𝓶𝓪𝓼 𝓛𝓸𝓬𝓪𝓲𝓼 𝓭𝓮 𝓢𝓪𝓾́𝓭𝓮, 𝓳𝓪́ 𝓹𝓻𝓮𝓿𝓲𝓼𝓽𝓸𝓼 𝓷𝓪 𝓷𝓸𝓿𝓪 𝓛𝓮𝓲 𝓭𝓮 𝓑𝓪𝓼𝓮𝓼 𝓭𝓪 𝓢𝓪𝓾́𝓭𝓮 𝓮 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓹𝓮𝓻𝓶𝓲𝓽𝓮 𝓪𝓼𝓼𝓮𝓰𝓾𝓻𝓪𝓻, 𝓮𝓶 𝓬𝓪𝓭𝓪 𝓪́𝓻𝓮𝓪 𝓰𝓮𝓸𝓰𝓻𝓪́𝓯𝓲𝓬𝓪, 𝓪 𝓹𝓻𝓸𝓶𝓸𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸 𝓭𝓪 𝓼𝓪𝓾́𝓭𝓮, 𝓪 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓽𝓲𝓷𝓾𝓲𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓮 𝓭𝓮 𝓬𝓾𝓲𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓸𝓼 𝓮 𝓾𝓶𝓪 𝓶𝓮𝓵𝓱𝓸𝓻 𝓾𝓽𝓲𝓵𝓲𝔃𝓪𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸 𝓭𝓸𝓼 𝓻𝓮𝓬𝓾𝓻𝓼𝓸𝓼.

𝓟𝓪𝓻𝓪 𝓸 𝓑𝓵𝓸𝓬𝓸 𝓭𝓮 𝓔𝓼𝓺𝓾𝓮𝓻𝓭𝓪 𝓮́ 𝓾𝓻𝓰𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮, 𝓬𝓸𝓶𝓸 𝓽𝓪𝓷𝓽𝓪𝓼 𝓿𝓮𝔃𝓮𝓼 𝓽𝓮𝓶𝓸𝓼 𝓻𝓮𝓯𝓸𝓻𝓬̧𝓪𝓭𝓸, 𝓪𝓶𝓹𝓵𝓲𝓯𝓲𝓬𝓪𝓻 𝓪 𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓻𝓾𝓽𝓾𝓻𝓪 𝓭𝓸 𝓗𝓸𝓼𝓹𝓲𝓽𝓪𝓵 𝓭𝓮 𝓢𝓪̃𝓸 𝓑𝓮𝓻𝓷𝓪𝓻𝓭𝓸 (𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓬𝓮𝓵𝓱𝓸 𝓭𝓮 𝓢𝓮𝓽𝓾́𝓫𝓪𝓵), 𝓻𝓮𝓺𝓾𝓪𝓵𝓲𝓯𝓲𝓬𝓪𝓻 𝓸 𝓗𝓸𝓼𝓹𝓲𝓽𝓪𝓵 𝓝𝓸𝓼𝓼𝓪 𝓢𝓮𝓷𝓱𝓸𝓻𝓪 𝓭𝓸 𝓡𝓸𝓼𝓪́𝓻𝓲𝓸 (𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓬𝓮𝓵𝓱𝓸 𝓭𝓸 𝓑𝓪𝓻𝓻𝓮𝓲𝓻𝓸), 𝓗𝓸𝓼𝓹𝓲𝓽𝓪𝓵 𝓭𝓸 𝓜𝓸𝓷𝓽𝓲𝓳𝓸 (𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓬𝓮𝓵𝓱𝓸 𝓭𝓸 𝓜𝓸𝓷𝓽𝓲𝓳𝓸) 𝓮 𝓭𝓸 𝓗𝓸𝓼𝓹𝓲𝓽𝓪𝓵 𝓞𝓻𝓽𝓸𝓹𝓮́𝓭𝓲𝓬𝓸 𝓭𝓸 𝓞𝓾𝓽𝓪̃𝓸 (𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓬𝓮𝓵𝓱𝓸 𝓭𝓮 𝓢𝓮𝓽𝓾́𝓫𝓪𝓵), 𝓫𝓮𝓶 𝓬𝓸𝓶𝓸 𝓭𝓪 𝓮𝔁𝓽𝓮𝓷𝓼𝓪̃𝓸 𝓭𝓮 𝓼𝓪𝓾́𝓭𝓮 𝓭𝓮 𝓥𝓲𝓵𝓪 𝓝𝓸𝓿𝓪 𝓭𝓮 𝓢𝓪𝓷𝓽𝓸 𝓐𝓷𝓭𝓻𝓮́ (𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓬𝓮𝓵𝓱𝓸 𝓭𝓮 𝓢𝓪𝓷𝓽𝓲𝓪𝓰𝓸 𝓭𝓸 𝓒𝓪𝓬𝓮́𝓶), 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓼𝓽𝓻𝓾𝓲𝓻 𝓸 𝓗𝓸𝓼𝓹𝓲𝓽𝓪𝓵 𝓭𝓸 𝓢𝓮𝓲𝔁𝓪𝓵 (𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓬𝓮𝓵𝓱𝓸 𝓭𝓸 𝓢𝓮𝓲𝔁𝓪𝓵) 𝓮 𝓭𝓪𝓼 𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓻𝓾𝓽𝓾𝓻𝓪𝓼 𝓭𝓮 𝓗𝓸𝓼𝓹𝓲𝓽𝓪𝓵 𝓭𝓮 𝓓𝓲𝓪 𝓮 𝓒𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓻𝓸 𝓭𝓮 𝓓𝓮𝓼𝓮𝓷𝓿𝓸𝓵𝓿𝓲𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓸 𝓭𝓸 𝓗𝓸𝓼𝓹𝓲𝓽𝓪𝓵 𝓖𝓪𝓻𝓬𝓲𝓪 𝓭𝓮 𝓞𝓻𝓽𝓪 (𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓬𝓮𝓵𝓱𝓸 𝓭𝓮 𝓐𝓵𝓶𝓪𝓭𝓪), 𝓪𝓫𝓻𝓲𝓻 𝓸 𝓷𝓸𝓿𝓸 𝓢𝓮𝓻𝓿𝓲𝓬̧𝓸 𝓭𝓮 𝓤𝓻𝓰𝓮̂𝓷𝓬𝓲𝓪 𝓭𝓸 𝓗𝓸𝓼𝓹𝓲𝓽𝓪𝓵 𝓭𝓸 𝓛𝓲𝓽𝓸𝓻𝓪𝓵 𝓐𝓵𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮𝓳𝓪𝓷𝓸, 𝓻𝓮𝓪𝓫𝓻𝓲𝓻 𝓪 𝓤𝓷𝓲𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓮 𝓭𝓮 𝓒𝓸𝓷𝓿𝓪𝓵𝓮𝓼𝓬𝓮𝓷𝓬̧𝓪 𝓭𝓸 𝓗𝓸𝓼𝓹𝓲𝓽𝓪𝓵 𝓭𝓸 𝓛𝓲𝓽𝓸𝓻𝓪𝓵 𝓐𝓵𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮𝓳𝓪𝓷𝓸 (𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓬𝓮𝓵𝓱𝓸 𝓭𝓮 𝓢𝓪𝓷𝓽𝓲𝓪𝓰𝓸 𝓭𝓸 𝓒𝓪𝓬𝓮́𝓶), 𝓸 𝓢𝓮𝓻𝓿𝓲𝓬̧𝓸 𝓭𝓮 𝓐𝓽𝓮𝓷𝓭𝓲𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓸 𝓟𝓮𝓻𝓶𝓪𝓷𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮 𝓭𝓸 𝓒𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓻𝓸 𝓭𝓮 𝓢𝓪𝓾́𝓭𝓮 𝓭𝓮 𝓖𝓻𝓪̂𝓷𝓭𝓸𝓵𝓪 (𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓬𝓮𝓵𝓱𝓸 𝓭𝓮 𝓖𝓻𝓪̂𝓷𝓭𝓸𝓵𝓪) 𝓮 𝓪𝓼 𝓮𝔁𝓽𝓮𝓷𝓼𝓸̃𝓮𝓼 𝓭𝓮 𝓼𝓪𝓾́𝓭𝓮 𝓭𝓮 𝓒𝓪𝓷𝓪𝓵 𝓒𝓪𝓿𝓮𝓲𝓻𝓪 (𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓬𝓮𝓵𝓱𝓸 𝓭𝓮 𝓖𝓻𝓪̂𝓷𝓭𝓸𝓵𝓪), 𝓭𝓪𝓼 𝓯𝓻𝓮𝓰𝓾𝓮𝓼𝓲𝓪𝓼 𝓭𝓮 𝓢𝓪̃𝓸 𝓑𝓪𝓻𝓽𝓸𝓵𝓸𝓶𝓮𝓾 𝓭𝓪 𝓢𝓮𝓻𝓻𝓪, 𝓢𝓪̃𝓸 𝓕𝓻𝓪𝓷𝓬𝓲𝓼𝓬𝓸 𝓭𝓪 𝓢𝓮𝓻𝓻𝓪 𝓮 𝓭𝓮 𝓓𝓮𝓲𝔁𝓪-𝓸-𝓡𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓸 𝓷𝓪 𝓯𝓻𝓮𝓰𝓾𝓮𝓼𝓲𝓪 𝓭𝓮 𝓥𝓲𝓵𝓪 𝓝𝓸𝓿𝓪 𝓭𝓮 𝓢𝓪𝓷𝓽𝓸 𝓐𝓷𝓭𝓻𝓮́ (𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓬𝓮𝓵𝓱𝓸 𝓭𝓮 𝓢𝓪𝓷𝓽𝓲𝓪𝓰𝓸 𝓭𝓸 𝓒𝓪𝓬𝓮́𝓶).

𝓢𝓮𝓶𝓹𝓻𝓮 𝓭𝓮𝓲𝔁𝓪́𝓶𝓸𝓼 𝓶𝓾𝓲𝓽𝓸 𝓬𝓵𝓪𝓻𝓸 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓪 𝓼𝓪𝓾́𝓭𝓮 𝓮́ 𝓾𝓶𝓪 𝓭𝓪𝓼 𝓶𝓪𝓲𝓸𝓻𝓮𝓼 𝓹𝓻𝓲𝓸𝓻𝓲𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓮𝓼 𝓭𝓸 𝓑𝓵𝓸𝓬𝓸 𝓭𝓮 𝓔𝓼𝓺𝓾𝓮𝓻𝓭𝓪. 𝓠𝓾𝓮 𝓭𝓲𝓪 𝟑𝟎 𝓷𝓸𝓼 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓬𝓮𝓭𝓪𝓶 𝓯𝓸𝓻𝓬̧𝓪 𝓹𝓸𝓵𝓲́𝓽𝓲𝓬𝓪 𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓪 𝓭𝓮𝓲𝔁𝓪𝓻 𝓭𝓮 𝓹𝓻𝓸𝓶𝓮𝓽𝓮𝓻 𝓮 𝓹𝓪𝓼𝓼𝓪𝓻 𝓪 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓬𝓻𝓮𝓽𝓲𝔃𝓪𝓻!

Nota – Artigo redigido em co-autoria com o Grupo de Trabalho da Saúde do Bloco de Esquerda no distrito de Setúbal

* Deputada do Bloco de Esquerda, eleita pelo distrito de Setúbal. Psicóloga clínica. Ativista pelos direitos humanos e civis das pessoas com deficiência

IN "O SETUBALENSE"- 13/01/22 .

 ..