NELSON PERALTA

 .

Na crise climática 

não estamos todos 

na mesma nave

Os efeitos são mais severos para quem menos contribuiu para as alterações climáticas. Já os principais responsáveis tentam criar a sua escapatória ou vendem a ilusão de uma solução tecnológica que permita continuar o negócio como se nada se passasse.

𝓝𝓸 𝓻𝓮𝓬𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮 “𝓓𝓸𝓷’𝓽 𝓛𝓸𝓸𝓴 𝓤𝓹”, 𝓸𝓼 𝓶𝓲𝓵𝓲𝓸𝓷𝓪́𝓻𝓲𝓸𝓼 𝓽𝓮̂𝓶 𝓾𝓶𝓪 𝓷𝓪𝓿𝓮 𝓮𝓼𝓹𝓪𝓬𝓲𝓪𝓵 𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓪 𝓯𝓾𝓰𝓲𝓻 𝓪 𝓾𝓶 𝓮𝓿𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓾𝓪𝓵 𝓯𝓲𝓶 𝓭𝓸 𝓶𝓾𝓷𝓭𝓸. 𝓝𝓪 𝓻𝓮𝓪𝓵𝓲𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓮, 𝓱𝓪́ 𝓾𝓶 𝓪𝓷𝓸, 𝓸 𝓼𝓮𝓷𝓪𝓭𝓸𝓻 𝓣𝓮𝓭 𝓒𝓻𝓾𝔃 𝓯𝓸𝓲 𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓪 𝓾𝓶𝓪 𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓪̂𝓷𝓬𝓲𝓪 𝓭𝓮 𝓯𝓮́𝓻𝓲𝓪𝓼 𝓮𝓶 𝓒𝓪𝓷𝓬𝓾𝓷 (𝓜𝓮́𝔁𝓲𝓬𝓸) 𝓮𝓷𝓺𝓾𝓪𝓷𝓽𝓸 𝓷𝓸 𝓣𝓮𝔁𝓪𝓼 𝓼𝓮 𝓿𝓲𝓿𝓲𝓪 𝓾𝓶𝓪 𝓬𝓻𝓲𝓼𝓮 𝓮𝓷𝓮𝓻𝓰𝓮́𝓽𝓲𝓬𝓪 𝓮𝓶 𝓻𝓮𝓼𝓾𝓵𝓽𝓪𝓭𝓸 𝓭𝓮 𝓯𝓮𝓷𝓸́𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓸𝓼 𝓬𝓵𝓲𝓶𝓪́𝓽𝓲𝓬𝓸𝓼 𝓮𝔁𝓽𝓻𝓮𝓶𝓸𝓼. 𝓝𝓸𝓼 𝓯𝓸𝓰𝓸𝓼 𝓯𝓵𝓸𝓻𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓪𝓲𝓼 𝓭𝓪 𝓒𝓪𝓵𝓲𝓯𝓸́𝓻𝓷𝓲𝓪 𝓮𝓶 𝟐𝟎𝟏𝟗, 𝓶𝓲𝓵𝓲𝓸𝓷𝓪́𝓻𝓲𝓸𝓼 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓽𝓻𝓪𝓽𝓪𝓻𝓪𝓶 𝓫𝓸𝓶𝓫𝓮𝓲𝓻𝓸𝓼 𝓹𝓻𝓲𝓿𝓪𝓭𝓸𝓼 𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓪 𝓼𝓲 𝓹𝓻𝓸́𝓹𝓻𝓲𝓸𝓼. 𝓐 𝓬𝓻𝓲𝓼𝓮 𝓬𝓵𝓲𝓶𝓪́𝓽𝓲𝓬𝓪 𝓮́ 𝓽𝓪̃𝓸 𝓬𝓮𝓻𝓽𝓪 𝓬𝓸𝓶𝓸 𝓷𝓪̃𝓸 𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓪𝓻𝓶𝓸𝓼 𝓽𝓸𝓭𝓸𝓼 𝓷𝓪 𝓶𝓮𝓼𝓶𝓪 𝓷𝓪𝓿𝓮 𝓮𝓼𝓹𝓪𝓬𝓲𝓪𝓵.

𝓞𝓼 𝓮𝓯𝓮𝓲𝓽𝓸𝓼 𝓼𝓪̃𝓸 𝓶𝓪𝓲𝓼 𝓼𝓮𝓿𝓮𝓻𝓸𝓼 𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓪 𝓺𝓾𝓮𝓶 𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓸𝓼 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓽𝓻𝓲𝓫𝓾𝓲𝓾 𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓪 𝓪𝓼 𝓪𝓵𝓽𝓮𝓻𝓪𝓬̧𝓸̃𝓮𝓼 𝓬𝓵𝓲𝓶𝓪́𝓽𝓲𝓬𝓪𝓼. 𝓙𝓪́ 𝓸𝓼 𝓹𝓻𝓲𝓷𝓬𝓲𝓹𝓪𝓲𝓼 𝓻𝓮𝓼𝓹𝓸𝓷𝓼𝓪́𝓿𝓮𝓲𝓼 𝓽𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓪𝓶 𝓬𝓻𝓲𝓪𝓻 𝓪 𝓼𝓾𝓪 𝓮𝓼𝓬𝓪𝓹𝓪𝓽𝓸́𝓻𝓲𝓪 𝓸𝓾 𝓿𝓮𝓷𝓭𝓮𝓶 𝓪 𝓲𝓵𝓾𝓼𝓪̃𝓸 𝓭𝓮 𝓾𝓶𝓪 𝓼𝓸𝓵𝓾𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸 𝓽𝓮𝓬𝓷𝓸𝓵𝓸́𝓰𝓲𝓬𝓪 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓹𝓮𝓻𝓶𝓲𝓽𝓪 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓽𝓲𝓷𝓾𝓪𝓻 𝓸 𝓷𝓮𝓰𝓸́𝓬𝓲𝓸 𝓬𝓸𝓶𝓸 𝓼𝓮 𝓷𝓪𝓭𝓪 𝓼𝓮 𝓹𝓪𝓼𝓼𝓪𝓼𝓼𝓮. 𝓞 𝓹𝓻𝓸𝓫𝓵𝓮𝓶𝓪 𝓮́ 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓯𝓸𝓲 𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓮 𝓶𝓸𝓭𝓮𝓵𝓸 𝓭𝓮 𝓮𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓸𝓶𝓲𝓪 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓷𝓸𝓼 𝓽𝓻𝓸𝓾𝔁𝓮 𝓪 𝓬𝓻𝓲𝓼𝓮 𝓬𝓵𝓲𝓶𝓪́𝓽𝓲𝓬𝓪 𝓪𝓸 𝓶𝓮𝓼𝓶𝓸 𝓽𝓮𝓶𝓹𝓸 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓪𝓰𝓻𝓪𝓿𝓸𝓾 𝓪𝓼 𝓭𝓮𝓼𝓲𝓰𝓾𝓪𝓵𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓮𝓼 𝓼𝓸𝓬𝓲𝓪𝓲𝓼.

𝓔𝓵𝓸𝓷 𝓜𝓾𝓼𝓴 𝓳𝓪́ 𝓸𝓯𝓮𝓻𝓮𝓬𝓮𝓾 𝓾𝓶 𝓹𝓻𝓮́𝓶𝓲𝓸 𝓭𝓮 𝟏𝟎𝟎 𝓶𝓲𝓵𝓱𝓸̃𝓮𝓼 𝓭𝓮 𝓮𝓾𝓻𝓸𝓼 𝓪 𝓺𝓾𝓮𝓶 𝓬𝓻𝓲𝓮 𝓽𝓮𝓬𝓷𝓸𝓵𝓸𝓰𝓲𝓪𝓼 𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓪 𝓻𝓮𝓶𝓸𝓿𝓮𝓻 𝓭𝓲𝓸́𝔁𝓲𝓭𝓸 𝓭𝓮 𝓬𝓪𝓻𝓫𝓸𝓷𝓸 𝓭𝓪 𝓪𝓽𝓶𝓸𝓼𝓯𝓮𝓻𝓪. 𝓔́ 𝓪 𝓬𝓻𝓮𝓷𝓬̧𝓪 𝓷𝓪 𝓽𝓮𝓬𝓷𝓸𝓵𝓸𝓰𝓲𝓪 𝓭𝓮 𝓺𝓾𝓮𝓶 𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓪́ 𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓻𝓮𝓽𝓲𝓭𝓸 𝓷𝓾𝓶𝓪 𝓬𝓸𝓻𝓻𝓲𝓭𝓪 𝓮𝓼𝓹𝓪𝓬𝓲𝓪𝓵 𝓭𝓮 𝓶𝓲𝓵𝓲𝓸𝓷𝓪́𝓻𝓲𝓸𝓼, 𝓪𝓽𝓮́ 𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓪 𝓽𝓾𝓻𝓲𝓼𝓶𝓸, 𝓸𝓷𝓭𝓮 𝓾𝓶𝓪 𝓼𝓸́ 𝓿𝓲𝓪𝓰𝓮𝓶 𝓮𝓶𝓲𝓽𝓮 𝓶𝓪𝓲𝓼 𝓒𝓞𝟐 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝟏𝟐% 𝓭𝓪 𝓹𝓸𝓹𝓾𝓵𝓪𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸 𝓶𝓾𝓷𝓭𝓲𝓪𝓵 𝓶𝓪𝓲𝓼 𝓹𝓸𝓫𝓻𝓮 𝓭𝓾𝓻𝓪𝓷𝓽𝓮 𝓽𝓸𝓭𝓪 𝓪 𝓼𝓾𝓪 𝓿𝓲𝓭𝓪. 𝓐𝓽𝓮́ 𝓸 “𝓶𝓲𝓵𝓲𝓸𝓷𝓪́𝓻𝓲𝓸 𝓭𝓸 𝓶𝓸𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓸” 𝓮 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓼𝓮 𝓭𝓲𝔃 𝓽𝓪̃𝓸 𝓭𝓲𝓼𝓻𝓾𝓹𝓽𝓸𝓻 𝓹𝓮𝓷𝓼𝓪 𝓭𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓻𝓸 𝓭𝓪 𝓬𝓪𝓲𝔁𝓪 𝓮 𝓻𝓮𝓬𝓸𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓭𝓪 𝓬𝓸𝓶𝓸 𝓼𝓸𝓵𝓾𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸 𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓪 𝓪 𝓬𝓻𝓲𝓼𝓮 𝓬𝓵𝓲𝓶𝓪́𝓽𝓲𝓬𝓪 𝓪 𝓰𝓮𝓷𝓮𝓻𝓪𝓵𝓲𝔃𝓪𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸 𝓭𝓮 𝓾𝓶𝓪 𝓽𝓪𝔁𝓪 𝓭𝓮 𝓬𝓪𝓻𝓫𝓸𝓷𝓸. 𝓑𝓪𝓼𝓲𝓬𝓪𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮, 𝓸 𝓶𝓮𝓻𝓬𝓪𝓭𝓸 𝓽𝓮𝓻𝓲𝓪 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓪𝓽𝓻𝓲𝓫𝓾𝓲𝓻 𝓾𝓶 𝓹𝓻𝓮𝓬̧𝓸 𝓪̀𝓼 𝓮𝓶𝓲𝓼𝓼𝓸̃𝓮𝓼.

𝓐 𝓹𝓸𝓵𝓲́𝓽𝓲𝓬𝓪 𝓹𝓾́𝓫𝓵𝓲𝓬𝓪 𝓭𝓸𝓶𝓲𝓷𝓪𝓷𝓽𝓮 𝓽𝓮𝓶 𝓭𝓮 𝓯𝓪𝓬𝓽𝓸 𝓲𝓭𝓸 𝓷𝓮𝓼𝓼𝓮 𝓼𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓲𝓭𝓸: 𝓸 𝓶𝓮𝓻𝓬𝓪𝓭𝓸 𝓭𝓮 𝓬𝓪𝓻𝓫𝓸𝓷𝓸 𝓮𝓾𝓻𝓸𝓹𝓮𝓾, 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓪 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓯𝓮𝓻𝓮̂𝓷𝓬𝓲𝓪 𝓭𝓪𝓼 𝓷𝓪𝓬̧𝓸̃𝓮𝓼 𝓾𝓷𝓲𝓭𝓪𝓼 𝓽𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓪 𝓰𝓵𝓸𝓫𝓪𝓵𝓲𝔃𝓪𝓻; 𝓪𝓼 𝓽𝓪𝔁𝓪𝓼 𝓭𝓮 𝓬𝓪𝓻𝓫𝓸𝓷𝓸; 𝓪 𝓼𝓾𝓫𝓼𝓽𝓲𝓽𝓾𝓲𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸 𝓭𝓸𝓼 𝓲𝓶𝓹𝓸𝓼𝓽𝓸𝓼 𝓼𝓸𝓫𝓻𝓮 𝓸 𝓽𝓻𝓪𝓫𝓪𝓵𝓱𝓸 𝓹𝓸𝓻 𝓽𝓪𝔁𝓪𝓼 𝓼𝓸𝓫𝓻𝓮 𝓬𝓸𝓶𝓹𝓸𝓻𝓽𝓪𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓸𝓼 𝓪𝓶𝓫𝓲𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓪𝓲𝓼 𝓲𝓷𝓭𝓮𝓼𝓮𝓳𝓪𝓭𝓸𝓼 𝓮, 𝓮𝓶 𝓼𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓲𝓭𝓸 𝓲𝓷𝓿𝓮𝓻𝓼𝓸, 𝓪 𝓶𝓲𝓻𝓲́𝓪𝓭𝓮 𝓭𝓮 𝓫𝓮𝓷𝓮𝓯𝓲́𝓬𝓲𝓸𝓼 𝓯𝓲𝓼𝓬𝓪𝓲𝓼. 𝓝𝓸 𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓪𝓷𝓽𝓸, 𝓪 𝓯𝓲𝓼𝓬𝓪𝓵𝓲𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓮 𝓿𝓮𝓻𝓭𝓮 𝓶𝓪𝓷𝓽𝓮́𝓶 𝓽𝓾𝓭𝓸 𝓲𝓰𝓾𝓪𝓵 𝓪 𝓷𝓲́𝓿𝓮𝓵 𝓭𝓪 𝓹𝓻𝓸𝓭𝓾𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸 𝓮 𝓪𝓰𝓻𝓪𝓿𝓪 𝓪𝓼 𝓭𝓮𝓼𝓲𝓰𝓾𝓪𝓵𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓮𝓼 𝓼𝓸𝓬𝓲𝓪𝓲𝓼. 𝓔́ 𝓪 𝓹𝓸𝓵𝓲́𝓽𝓲𝓬𝓪 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓭𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓻𝓸́𝓲 𝓪 𝓹𝓻𝓸𝓰𝓻𝓮𝓼𝓼𝓲𝓿𝓲𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓮 𝓮 𝓪 𝓳𝓾𝓼𝓽𝓲𝓬̧𝓪 𝓯𝓲𝓼𝓬𝓪𝓵, 𝓪𝓰𝓻𝓪𝓿𝓪 𝓸𝓼 𝓬𝓾𝓼𝓽𝓸𝓼 𝓭𝓮 𝓿𝓲𝓭𝓪 𝓭𝓮 𝓺𝓾𝓮𝓶 𝓽𝓮𝓶 𝓹𝓸𝓾𝓬𝓸𝓼 𝓻𝓮𝓷𝓭𝓲𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓸𝓼 𝓮 𝓹𝓮𝓻𝓶𝓲𝓽𝓮 𝓪̀ 𝓮𝓵𝓲𝓽𝓮 𝓶𝓾𝓷𝓭𝓲𝓪𝓵 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓽𝓲𝓷𝓾𝓪𝓻 𝓸 𝓷𝓮𝓰𝓸́𝓬𝓲𝓸 𝓵𝓾𝓬𝓻𝓪𝓽𝓲𝓿𝓸 𝓪̀ 𝓬𝓾𝓼𝓽𝓪 𝓭𝓸 𝓹𝓵𝓪𝓷𝓮𝓽𝓪.

𝓞𝓾𝓽𝓻𝓸 𝓮𝔁𝓮𝓶𝓹𝓵𝓸: 𝓪 𝓹𝓮𝓽𝓻𝓸𝓵𝓲́𝓯𝓮𝓻𝓪 𝓑𝓟. 𝓐𝓷𝓾𝓷𝓬𝓲𝓪 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓪́ 𝓪 𝓬𝓪𝓶𝓲𝓷𝓱𝓸 𝓭𝓪 𝓷𝓮𝓾𝓽𝓻𝓪𝓵𝓲𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓮. 𝓜𝓪𝓼 𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓪́ 𝓪 𝓭𝓲𝔃𝓮𝓻 𝓶𝓮𝓼𝓶𝓸 𝓸 𝓺𝓾𝓮̂? 𝓠𝓾𝓮 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓽𝓲𝓷𝓾𝓪 𝓪 𝓿𝓮𝓷𝓭𝓮𝓻 𝓰𝓪𝓼𝓸𝓵𝓲𝓷𝓪 𝓮 𝓭𝓮𝓼𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓽𝓪 𝓭𝓮𝓼𝓼𝓪𝓼 𝓮𝓶𝓲𝓼𝓼𝓸̃𝓮𝓼 𝓭𝓮 𝓬𝓪𝓻𝓫𝓸𝓷𝓸 𝓪𝓵𝓰𝓾𝓷𝓼 𝓹𝓻𝓸𝓳𝓮𝓽𝓸𝓼 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓯𝓲𝓷𝓪𝓷𝓬𝓲𝓪, 𝓹𝓸𝓻 𝓮𝔁𝓮𝓶𝓹𝓵𝓸, 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓼𝓽𝓻𝓾𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸 𝓭𝓮 𝓯𝓸𝓻𝓷𝓸𝓼 𝓶𝓪𝓲𝓼 𝓮𝓯𝓲𝓬𝓲𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮𝓼 𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓪 𝓬𝓸𝓶𝓾𝓷𝓲𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓮𝓼 𝓻𝓾𝓻𝓪𝓲𝓼 𝓷𝓸 𝓜𝓮́𝔁𝓲𝓬𝓸 𝓸𝓾 𝓪 𝓹𝓻𝓸𝓽𝓮𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸 𝓯𝓵𝓸𝓻𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓪𝓵 𝓷𝓪 𝓩𝓪̂𝓶𝓫𝓲𝓪. 𝓟𝓮𝓺𝓾𝓮𝓷𝓪𝓼 𝓶𝓮𝓵𝓱𝓸𝓻𝓲𝓪𝓼 𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓪 𝓰𝓪𝓻𝓪𝓷𝓽𝓲𝓻 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓽𝓾𝓭𝓸 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓽𝓲𝓷𝓾𝓪 𝓬𝓸𝓶𝓸 𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓪́. 𝓝𝓸𝓿𝓪𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮, 𝓪𝓼 𝓬𝓸𝓶𝓹𝓮𝓷𝓼𝓪𝓬̧𝓸̃𝓮𝓼 𝓭𝓮 𝓮𝓶𝓲𝓼𝓼𝓸̃𝓮𝓼 𝓿𝓲𝓼𝓪𝓶 𝓰𝓪𝓻𝓪𝓷𝓽𝓲𝓻 𝓸 𝓷𝓮𝓰𝓸́𝓬𝓲𝓸 𝓭𝓮 𝓺𝓾𝓮𝓶 𝓷𝓸𝓼 𝓽𝓻𝓸𝓾𝔁𝓮 𝓸 𝓭𝓮𝓼𝓪𝓼𝓽𝓻𝓮 𝓮 𝓻𝓮𝓯𝓸𝓻𝓬̧𝓪𝓶 𝓪𝓲𝓷𝓭𝓪 𝓪𝓼 𝓻𝓮𝓵𝓪𝓬̧𝓸̃𝓮𝓼 𝓭𝓮 𝓹𝓸𝓭𝓮𝓻 𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓻𝓮 𝓸 𝓷𝓸𝓻𝓽𝓮 𝓮 𝓸 𝓼𝓾𝓵.

𝓔𝓶 𝓽𝓸𝓭𝓸 𝓪 𝓵𝓮𝓷𝓰𝓪𝓵𝓮𝓷𝓰𝓪 𝓮𝓶𝓹𝓻𝓮𝓮𝓷𝓭𝓮𝓭𝓸𝓻𝓪 𝓷𝓪̃𝓸 𝓱𝓪́ 𝓹𝓻𝓮𝓸𝓬𝓾𝓹𝓪𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸 𝓬𝓸𝓶 𝓸𝓼 𝓹𝓻𝓸𝓫𝓵𝓮𝓶𝓪𝓼 𝓻𝓮𝓪𝓲𝓼 𝓭𝓪𝓼 𝓹𝓮𝓼𝓼𝓸𝓪𝓼 𝓻𝓮𝓪𝓲𝓼. 𝓔𝓶 𝓟𝓸𝓻𝓽𝓾𝓰𝓪𝓵 𝓺𝓾𝓪𝓼𝓮 𝓭𝓸𝓲𝓼 𝓶𝓲𝓵𝓱𝓸̃𝓮𝓼 𝓭𝓮 𝓹𝓮𝓼𝓼𝓸𝓪𝓼 𝓿𝓲𝓿𝓮 𝓬𝓸𝓶 𝓯𝓻𝓲𝓸 𝓮𝓶 𝓬𝓪𝓼𝓪 𝓹𝓸𝓻 𝓲𝓷𝓼𝓾𝓯𝓲𝓬𝓲𝓮̂𝓷𝓬𝓲𝓪 𝓮𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓸́𝓶𝓲𝓬𝓪. 𝓢𝓸𝓶𝓸𝓼 𝓾𝓶 𝓭𝓸𝓼 𝓹𝓪𝓲́𝓼𝓮𝓼 𝓮𝓾𝓻𝓸𝓹𝓮𝓾𝓼 𝓬𝓸𝓶 𝓶𝓪𝓲𝓸𝓻 𝓹𝓸𝓫𝓻𝓮𝔃𝓪 𝓮𝓷𝓮𝓻𝓰𝓮́𝓽𝓲𝓬𝓪 𝓪𝓹𝓮𝓼𝓪𝓻 𝓭𝓸 𝓷𝓸𝓼𝓼𝓸 𝓬𝓵𝓲𝓶𝓪 𝓶𝓪𝓲𝓼 𝓪𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓸. 𝓐𝓾𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓪𝓻 𝓸 𝓹𝓻𝓮𝓬̧𝓸 𝓸𝓾 𝓽𝓪𝔁𝓪𝓻 𝓪 𝓮𝓷𝓮𝓻𝓰𝓲𝓪 𝓻𝓮𝓼𝓾𝓵𝓽𝓪𝓻𝓲𝓪 𝓪𝓺𝓾𝓲 𝓮𝓶 𝓪𝓹𝓮𝓷𝓪𝓼 𝓶𝓪𝓲𝓼 𝓹𝓸𝓫𝓻𝓮𝔃𝓪. 𝓐 𝓪𝓽𝓻𝓲𝓫𝓾𝓲𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸 𝓭𝓮 𝓫𝓮𝓷𝓮𝓯𝓲́𝓬𝓲𝓸𝓼 𝓯𝓲𝓼𝓬𝓪𝓲𝓼 𝓼𝓮𝓻𝓲𝓪 𝓭𝓮 𝓬𝓾𝓻𝓽𝓸 𝓪𝓵𝓬𝓪𝓷𝓬𝓮, 𝓫𝓮𝓷𝓮𝓯𝓲𝓬𝓲𝓪𝓷𝓭𝓸 𝓮𝓼𝓹𝓮𝓬𝓲𝓪𝓵𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮 𝓺𝓾𝓮𝓶 𝓽𝓮𝓶 𝓻𝓮𝓷𝓭𝓲𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓸𝓼 𝓪𝓬𝓲𝓶𝓪 𝓭𝓪 𝓶𝓮́𝓭𝓲𝓪 𝓮 𝓮𝓼𝓺𝓾𝓮𝓬𝓮𝓷𝓭𝓸 𝓽𝓸𝓭𝓸𝓼 𝓸𝓼 𝓸𝓾𝓽𝓻𝓸𝓼.

𝓐 𝓼𝓸𝓵𝓾𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸 𝓷𝓪̃𝓸 𝓹𝓪𝓼𝓼𝓪 𝓹𝓸𝓻 𝓮𝓷𝓬𝓪𝓻𝓮𝓬𝓮𝓻 𝓫𝓮𝓷𝓼 𝓮𝓼𝓼𝓮𝓷𝓬𝓲𝓪𝓲𝓼, 𝓮𝓼𝓹𝓮𝓬𝓲𝓪𝓵𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮 𝓺𝓾𝓪𝓷𝓭𝓸 𝓷𝓪̃𝓸 𝓱𝓪́ 𝓪𝓵𝓽𝓮𝓻𝓷𝓪𝓽𝓲𝓿𝓪𝓼. 𝓔́ 𝓷𝓮𝓬𝓮𝓼𝓼𝓪́𝓻𝓲𝓸 𝓾𝓶 𝓹𝓵𝓪𝓷𝓸 𝓪𝓶𝓫𝓲𝓬𝓲𝓸𝓼𝓸 𝓭𝓮 𝓲𝓷𝓽𝓮𝓻𝓿𝓮𝓷𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸 𝓷𝓪𝓼 𝓱𝓪𝓫𝓲𝓽𝓪𝓬̧𝓸̃𝓮𝓼 𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓪 𝓶𝓮𝓵𝓱𝓸𝓻𝓪𝓻 𝓪 𝓼𝓾𝓪 𝓮𝓯𝓲𝓬𝓲𝓮̂𝓷𝓬𝓲𝓪, 𝓻𝓮𝓭𝓾𝔃𝓲𝓻 𝓸 𝓰𝓪𝓼𝓽𝓸 𝓮𝓷𝓮𝓻𝓰𝓮́𝓽𝓲𝓬𝓸, 𝓰𝓪𝓻𝓪𝓷𝓽𝓲𝓻 𝓻𝓮𝓷𝓸𝓿𝓪́𝓿𝓮𝓲𝓼 𝓮 𝓬𝓸𝓶 𝓲𝓼𝓼𝓸 𝓮𝓵𝓲𝓶𝓲𝓷𝓪𝓻 𝓪 𝓹𝓸𝓫𝓻𝓮𝔃𝓪 𝓮𝓷𝓮𝓻𝓰𝓮́𝓽𝓲𝓬𝓪. 𝓓𝓮 𝓲𝓰𝓾𝓪𝓵 𝓶𝓸𝓭𝓸, 𝓷𝓪̃𝓸 𝓮́ 𝓪 𝓸𝓷𝓮𝓻𝓪𝓻 𝓶𝓪𝓲𝓼 𝓸𝓼 𝓬𝓸𝓶𝓫𝓾𝓼𝓽𝓲́𝓿𝓮𝓲𝓼 𝓭𝓮 𝓺𝓾𝓮𝓶 𝓷𝓪̃𝓸 𝓽𝓮𝓶 𝓸𝓾𝓽𝓻𝓪 𝓪𝓵𝓽𝓮𝓻𝓷𝓪𝓽𝓲𝓿𝓪 𝓭𝓮 𝓭𝓮𝓼𝓵𝓸𝓬𝓪𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸 𝓬𝓪𝓼𝓪-𝓽𝓻𝓪𝓫𝓪𝓵𝓱𝓸 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓸 𝓼𝓮𝓾 𝓪𝓾𝓽𝓸𝓶𝓸́𝓿𝓮𝓵. 𝓔́ 𝓷𝓮𝓬𝓮𝓼𝓼𝓪́𝓻𝓲𝓪 𝓪 𝓭𝓮𝓷𝓼𝓲𝓯𝓲𝓬𝓪𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸 𝓭𝓮 𝓽𝓻𝓪𝓷𝓼𝓹𝓸𝓻𝓽𝓮𝓼 𝓹𝓾́𝓫𝓵𝓲𝓬𝓸𝓼, 𝓪𝓹𝓸𝓼𝓽𝓪𝓻 𝓷𝓾𝓶𝓪 𝓰𝓻𝓪𝓷𝓭𝓮 𝓻𝓮𝓭𝓮 𝓯𝓮𝓻𝓻𝓸𝓿𝓲𝓪́𝓻𝓲𝓪, 𝓭𝓮𝓼𝓬𝓪𝓻𝓫𝓸𝓷𝓲𝔃𝓪𝓻 𝓸𝓼 𝓽𝓻𝓪𝓷𝓼𝓹𝓸𝓻𝓽𝓮𝓼, 𝓹𝓻𝓸𝓶𝓸𝓿𝓮𝓻 𝓸𝓼 𝓶𝓮𝓲𝓸𝓼 𝓼𝓾𝓪𝓿𝓮𝓼 𝓮 𝓪𝓽𝓲𝓿𝓸𝓼 𝓮 𝓬𝓪𝓶𝓲𝓷𝓱𝓪𝓻 𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓪 𝓪 𝓰𝓻𝓪𝓽𝓾𝓲𝓽𝓲𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓮 𝓭𝓸𝓼 𝓽𝓻𝓪𝓷𝓼𝓹𝓸𝓻𝓽𝓮𝓼 𝓹𝓾́𝓫𝓵𝓲𝓬𝓸𝓼. 𝓐𝓵𝓽𝓮𝓻𝓪𝓻 𝓭𝓮 𝓽𝓪𝓵 𝓯𝓸𝓻𝓶𝓪 𝓪 𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓻𝓾𝓽𝓾𝓻𝓪 𝓭𝓪 𝓮𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓸𝓶𝓲𝓪 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓪𝓺𝓾𝓲𝓵𝓸 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓱𝓸𝓳𝓮 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓼𝓲𝓭𝓮𝓻𝓪𝓶𝓸𝓼 𝓮𝓼𝓼𝓮𝓷𝓬𝓲𝓪𝓵, 𝓬𝓸𝓶𝓸 𝓸𝓼 𝓬𝓸𝓶𝓫𝓾𝓼𝓽𝓲́𝓿𝓮𝓲𝓼 𝓯𝓸́𝓼𝓼𝓮𝓲𝓼, 𝓹𝓪𝓼𝓼𝓮𝓶 𝓪 𝓼𝓮𝓻 𝓪𝓵𝓰𝓸 𝓭𝓸 𝓹𝓪𝓼𝓼𝓪𝓭𝓸 𝓮 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓯𝓲𝓬𝓪 𝓷𝓸 𝓼𝓸𝓵𝓸, 𝓲𝓷𝓮𝔁𝓹𝓵𝓸𝓻𝓪𝓭𝓸.

𝓔𝓶 𝓽𝓸𝓭𝓪𝓼 𝓪𝓼 𝓮𝓼𝓯𝓮𝓻𝓪𝓼 𝓭𝓪 𝓷𝓸𝓼𝓼𝓪 𝓿𝓲𝓭𝓪 𝓬𝓸𝓵𝓮𝓽𝓲𝓿𝓪 𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓪 𝓽𝓻𝓪𝓷𝓼𝓯𝓸𝓻𝓶𝓪𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸 𝓹𝓻𝓮𝓬𝓲𝓼𝓪 𝓭𝓮 𝓲𝓷𝓿𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓲𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓸 𝓹𝓾́𝓫𝓵𝓲𝓬𝓸, 𝓭𝓮 𝓬𝓻𝓲𝓪𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸 𝓭𝓮 𝓮𝓶𝓹𝓻𝓮𝓰𝓸 𝓮 𝓭𝓮 𝓾𝓶𝓪 𝓶𝓪𝓲𝓼 𝓳𝓾𝓼𝓽𝓪 𝓻𝓮𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓽𝓲𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸 𝓭𝓪 𝓻𝓲𝓺𝓾𝓮𝔃𝓪. 𝓔́ 𝓾𝓶𝓪 𝓽𝓻𝓪𝓷𝓼𝓯𝓸𝓻𝓶𝓪𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸 𝓬𝓸𝓵𝓸𝓼𝓼𝓪𝓵 𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓪 𝓸 𝓹𝓵𝓪𝓷𝓮𝓽𝓪 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓼𝓸́ 𝓪 𝓼𝓸𝓬𝓲𝓮𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓮 𝓭𝓮𝓶𝓸𝓬𝓻𝓪́𝓽𝓲𝓬𝓪 𝓮 𝓼𝓸𝓵𝓲𝓭𝓪́𝓻𝓲𝓪 𝓹𝓸𝓭𝓮 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓼𝓮𝓰𝓾𝓲𝓻. 𝓑𝓪𝓼𝓽𝓪 𝓿𝓮𝓻 𝓪 𝓶𝓪𝓲𝓸𝓻 𝓽𝓻𝓪𝓷𝓼𝓯𝓸𝓻𝓶𝓪𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸 𝓷𝓪 𝓶𝓸𝓫𝓲𝓵𝓲𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓮 𝓷𝓪𝓼 𝓾́𝓵𝓽𝓲𝓶𝓪𝓼 𝓭𝓮́𝓬𝓪𝓭𝓪𝓼: 𝓸 𝓬𝓪𝓻𝓻𝓸 𝓢𝓤𝓥 (𝓶𝓪𝓲𝓼 𝓹𝓮𝓼𝓪𝓭𝓸 𝓮 𝓶𝓪𝓲𝓸𝓻) 𝓼𝓾𝓫𝓼𝓽𝓲𝓽𝓾𝓲𝓾 𝓸 𝓪𝓾𝓽𝓸𝓶𝓸́𝓿𝓮𝓵 𝓽𝓻𝓪𝓭𝓲𝓬𝓲𝓸𝓷𝓪𝓵 𝓪̀ 𝓬𝓾𝓼𝓽𝓪 𝓭𝓮 𝓾𝓶𝓪 𝓼𝓾𝓫𝓲𝓭𝓪 𝓭𝓻𝓪́𝓼𝓽𝓲𝓬𝓪 𝓭𝓪𝓼 𝓮𝓶𝓲𝓼𝓼𝓸̃𝓮𝓼 𝓮 𝓭𝓮 𝓮𝓼𝓹𝓪𝓬̧𝓸𝓼 𝓹𝓾́𝓫𝓵𝓲𝓬𝓸 𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓸𝓼 𝓼𝓮𝓰𝓾𝓻𝓸𝓼. 𝓕𝓸𝓲 𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓪 𝓪 𝓻𝓮𝓼𝓹𝓸𝓼𝓽𝓪 𝓭𝓸 𝓶𝓮𝓻𝓬𝓪𝓭𝓸 𝓮 𝓪𝓰𝓸𝓻𝓪 𝓼𝓸𝓷𝓱𝓪 𝓬𝓸𝓶 𝓸𝓼 𝓽𝓾́𝓷𝓮𝓲𝓼 𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓪 𝓬𝓪𝓻𝓻𝓸𝓼 𝓭𝓮 𝓜𝓾𝓼𝓴. 𝓟𝓻𝓮𝓬𝓲𝓼𝓪𝓶𝓸𝓼 𝓶𝓮𝓼𝓶𝓸 𝓭𝓮 𝓶𝓪𝓲𝓼 𝓪𝓶𝓫𝓲𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸, 𝓹𝓮𝓷𝓼𝓪𝓻 𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓪 𝓵𝓪́ 𝓭𝓪 𝓮𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓸𝓶𝓲𝓪 𝓪𝓽𝓾𝓪𝓵 𝓮 𝓻𝓮𝓸𝓻𝓰𝓪𝓷𝓲𝔃𝓪𝓻 𝓪 𝓼𝓸𝓬𝓲𝓮𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓮 𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓪 𝓻𝓮𝓼𝓹𝓸𝓷𝓭𝓮𝓻 𝓪 𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓪 𝓮𝓶𝓮𝓻𝓰𝓮̂𝓷𝓬𝓲𝓪.

* Biólogo

IN "ESQUERDA" - 10/01/22 .