ANTÓNIO CLUNY

 .

O debate político a

que não temos direito

Mais do que discutir ideias e soluções, o debate político é, atualmente, apresentado aos cidadãos como se fosse um conjunto de assaltos num jogo de boxe.

𝖭𝗈 𝖡𝗋𝖺𝗌𝗂𝗅, 𝗏𝖺𝗂 𝗌𝗎𝖼𝖾𝖽𝖾𝗋 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗌𝖾𝗀𝗎𝗇𝖽𝖺 𝗏𝗈𝗅𝗍𝖺 𝗇𝖺𝗌 𝖾𝗅𝖾𝗂𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗂𝖽𝖾𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗂𝗌.

𝖤́ 𝖽𝖾 𝖾𝗌𝗉𝖾𝗋𝖺𝗋 𝗊𝗎𝖾, 𝗇𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺 𝗌𝖾𝗀𝗎𝗇𝖽𝖺 𝖿𝖺𝗌𝖾 𝖽𝖺 𝖼𝖺𝗆𝗉𝖺𝗇𝗁𝖺 𝖾𝗅𝖾𝗂𝗍𝗈𝗋𝖺𝗅, 𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝗈𝗂𝗌 𝖼𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗂𝖽𝖺𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝖾𝗆 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖿𝗋𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝗌𝖾 𝗉𝗈𝗌𝗌𝖺𝗆 𝖽𝖾𝖻𝗋𝗎𝖼̧𝖺𝗋 𝗎𝗆 𝗉𝗈𝗎𝖼𝗈 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝗌𝗈𝖻𝗋𝖾 𝖺𝗌 𝗌𝗈𝗅𝗎𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗈𝗅𝗏𝖾𝗋 𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝖻𝗅𝖾𝗆𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖺 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗈𝗋𝗂𝖺 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖻𝗋𝖺𝗌𝗂𝗅𝖾𝗂𝗋𝗈𝗌 𝖾 𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝖾𝗆 𝗈𝖿𝖾𝗇𝖽𝖾𝗋-𝗌𝖾 𝖾 𝗋𝖾𝖺𝗏𝗂𝗏𝖺𝗋 𝖾𝗉𝗂𝗌𝗈́𝖽𝗂𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝗈𝗎𝖼𝗈 𝖾𝖽𝗂𝖿𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗎𝗆 𝖾 𝖽𝖾 𝗈𝗎𝗍𝗋𝗈.

𝖳𝖾𝗆𝗈𝗌, 𝗉𝗈𝗋𝖾́𝗆, 𝖽𝖾 𝗉𝖾𝗋𝖼𝖾𝖻𝖾𝗋 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗌𝗎𝖼𝖾𝖽𝖾 𝗇𝗈 𝖡𝗋𝖺𝗌𝗂𝗅 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾́ 𝗌𝗈́ 𝖽𝖺 𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗉𝗈𝗇𝗌𝖺𝖻𝗂𝗅𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖼𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗂𝖽𝖺𝗍𝗈𝗌.

𝖮 𝖼𝗅𝗂𝗆𝖺 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖿𝗈𝗂 𝖼𝗋𝗂𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝗇𝖺 𝗉𝗋𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗂𝗋𝖺 𝗏𝗈𝗅𝗍𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝗍𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝖾𝗅𝖾𝗂𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗎𝗅𝗍𝖺, 𝗍𝖺𝗆𝖻𝖾́𝗆, 𝖽𝗈 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗂𝗅𝗈 𝗆𝖾𝖽𝗂𝖺́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝗈, 𝗁𝗈𝗃𝖾 𝖾𝗆 𝗏𝗈𝗀𝖺, 𝖽𝖾 𝖺𝖻𝗈𝗋𝖽𝖺𝗋 𝗈 𝖽𝖾𝖻𝖺𝗍𝖾 𝗉𝗈𝗅𝗂́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝗈.

𝖬𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝖽𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖽𝗂𝗌𝖼𝗎𝗍𝗂𝗋 𝗂𝖽𝖾𝗂𝖺𝗌 𝖾 𝗌𝗈𝗅𝗎𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌, 𝗈 𝖽𝖾𝖻𝖺𝗍𝖾 𝗉𝗈𝗅𝗂́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝗈 𝖾́, 𝖺𝗍𝗎𝖺𝗅𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾, 𝖺𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗌𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝖺𝗈𝗌 𝖼𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖺̃𝗈𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝗌𝖾 𝖿𝗈𝗌𝗌𝖾 𝗎𝗆 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗃𝗎𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖺𝗌𝗌𝖺𝗅𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝗇𝗎𝗆 𝗃𝗈𝗀𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖻𝗈𝗑𝖾.

𝖭𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗑𝗍𝗈, 𝗈𝗌 𝗂𝗇𝗌𝗎𝗅𝗍𝗈𝗌, 𝖺𝗆𝖾𝖺𝖼̧𝖺𝗌 𝖾 𝖿𝖺𝗅𝗌𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾𝗌 𝗍𝖾̂𝗆 𝗎𝗆 𝖾𝖿𝖾𝗂𝗍𝗈 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝖾𝖿𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗓 𝗇𝖺 𝖽𝖾𝖿𝗂𝗇𝗂𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝗈 𝗏𝖾𝗇𝖼𝖾𝖽𝗈𝗋 𝖽𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝖾𝗑𝗉𝗈𝗌𝗂𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝗋𝖺𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗅 𝖾 𝗉𝗈𝗇𝖽𝖾𝗋𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝗂𝖽𝖾𝗂𝖺𝗌 𝖾 𝖺𝗋𝗀𝗎𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈𝗌.

𝖦𝖺𝗇𝗁𝖺 𝗌𝖾𝗆𝗉𝗋𝖾 𝗈 𝖼𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗂𝖽𝖺𝗍𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗆𝖾𝗅𝗁𝗈𝗋 𝖾𝗌𝗆𝗎𝗋𝗋𝖺𝗋 𝗈 𝗈𝗎𝗍𝗋𝗈.

𝖬𝖾𝗌𝗆𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝗋𝖺𝗓𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝖾𝗌𝖼𝗅𝖺𝗋𝖾𝖼𝖾𝖽𝗈𝗋, 𝗉𝖾𝗋𝖽𝖾 𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝗌𝖾 𝖽𝖾𝗂𝗑𝖺𝗋 𝗌𝖺𝗇𝗀𝗋𝖺𝗋 𝖾𝗆 𝗉𝗎́𝖻𝗅𝗂𝖼𝗈.

𝖤𝗌𝗍𝖾 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗂𝗅𝗈 – 𝖺𝗉𝖾𝗌𝖺𝗋 𝖽𝖾 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝖾𝗑𝖺𝗀𝖾𝗋𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝗇𝖺 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝗍𝖾 𝖽𝗈 𝗆𝗎𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝗈𝗇𝖽𝖾 𝗈 𝖡𝗋𝖺𝗌𝗂𝗅 𝗌𝖾 𝗌𝗂𝗍𝗎𝖺 – 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾́ 𝖽𝖾𝗅𝖺, 𝗉𝗈𝗋𝖾́𝗆, 𝖾𝗑𝖼𝗅𝗎𝗌𝗂𝗏𝗈.

𝖤𝗅𝖾 𝗏𝖺𝗂, 𝗍𝖺𝗆𝖻𝖾́𝗆, 𝖿𝖺𝗓𝖾𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝖼𝖺𝗆𝗂𝗇𝗁𝗈 𝗇𝖺 𝖤𝗎𝗋𝗈𝗉𝖺.

𝖯𝖺𝗋𝖾𝖼𝖾, 𝗍𝖺𝗆𝖻𝖾́𝗆 𝖺𝗊𝗎𝗂, 𝗊𝗎𝖾, 𝗆𝖾𝗌𝗆𝗈 𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗍𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗂𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝗈 𝗉𝖺𝗂́𝗌 𝖾 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗌𝖾𝗎𝗌 𝖼𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖺̃𝗈𝗌, 𝗇𝗎𝗇𝖼𝖺 𝗌𝖺𝗂́𝗆𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝗈 𝗆𝗈𝖽𝖾𝗅𝗈 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖼𝗎𝗋𝗌𝗈𝗌 𝗍𝖾𝗅𝖾𝗏𝗂𝗌𝗂𝗏𝗈𝗌 𝗈𝗎 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗃𝗈𝗀𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗉𝗎𝗍𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗋.

𝖰𝗎𝖾𝗆, 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝖾𝗑𝖾𝗆𝗉𝗅𝗈, 𝗈𝗎𝗏𝗂𝗋 𝗈𝗌 𝗇𝗈𝗌𝗌𝗈𝗌 𝗃𝗈𝗋𝗇𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝗍𝖾𝗅𝖾𝗏𝗂𝗌𝗂𝗏𝗈𝗌, 𝖾 𝗈 𝗍𝗂𝗉𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖾𝗏𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗌 𝖾 𝗋𝖾𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗍𝖺𝗀𝖾𝗇𝗌 𝗇𝖾𝗅𝖾𝗌 𝖾𝗑𝗂𝖻𝗂𝖽𝖺𝗌, 𝖿𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗋𝖺́ 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗏𝖾𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖽𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗉𝗈𝗎𝖼𝗈 𝖿𝖺𝗅𝗍𝖺 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝖾𝖼̧𝖺𝗋𝖾𝗆 𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖾𝖿𝖾𝗇𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗋𝖺𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌, 𝗈𝗌 𝖺𝗉𝖾𝖽𝗋𝖾𝗃𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝗎́𝖻𝗅𝗂𝖼𝗈𝗌; 𝖾𝗇𝖿𝗂𝗆 𝖺 𝗀𝗎𝖾𝗋𝗋𝖺 𝖼𝗂𝗏𝗂𝗅.

𝖭𝖺̃𝗈 𝗁𝖺́ 𝖽𝗂𝖺, 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗁𝖺́ 𝗁𝗈𝗋𝖺 𝖾𝗆 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗌𝖾 𝗇𝗈𝗍𝗂𝖼𝗂𝖾 𝗎𝗆 𝖾𝗌𝖼𝖺̂𝗇𝖽𝖺𝗅𝗈 𝗋𝖾𝖺𝗅 𝗈𝗎 𝖺𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾, 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗂𝗑𝖺 𝖼𝗋𝗂𝗆𝖾, 𝖼𝗎𝗃𝗈 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝖿𝖾𝖼𝗁𝗈 𝖿𝗂𝗇𝖺𝗅 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗌𝖾 𝗉𝗈𝖽𝖾, 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝖽𝖾 𝗅𝗈𝗀𝗈, 𝖺𝖽𝗂𝗏𝗂𝗇𝗁𝖺𝗋, 𝗎𝗆 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝖺𝗌𝗍𝗋𝖾 𝖼𝗎𝗃𝖺 𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗉𝗈𝗇𝗌𝖺𝖻𝗂𝗅𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖾́, 𝗇𝖺 𝖺𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺, 𝖽𝖾 𝗂𝗆𝖾𝖽𝗂𝖺𝗍𝗈 𝗂𝖽𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗂𝖿𝗂𝖼𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝖽𝖺 𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗉𝗈𝗇𝗌𝖺𝖻𝗂𝗅𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝖾 𝗎𝗆 𝗀𝗈𝗏𝖾𝗋𝗇𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝗈𝗎 𝖽𝗂𝗋𝗂𝗀𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖽𝖺 𝖺𝖽𝗆𝗂𝗇𝗂𝗌𝗍𝗋𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝗉𝗎́𝖻𝗅𝗂𝖼𝖺 𝗈𝗎 𝗅𝗈𝖼𝖺𝗅, 𝗈𝗎 𝗆𝖾𝗌𝗆𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗎𝗆 𝖢𝖤𝖮 𝖽𝖾 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝖾𝗆𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗌𝖺 𝗉𝗋𝗂𝗏𝖺𝖽𝖺.

𝖯𝗈𝗎𝖼𝗈𝗌 𝖺𝗌𝗌𝗎𝗆𝖾𝗆, 𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖾𝗍𝖺𝗇𝗍𝗈, 𝖾 𝖾𝗆 𝗍𝖾𝗆𝗉𝗈 𝗎́𝗍𝗂𝗅, 𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗉𝗈𝗇𝗌𝖺𝖻𝗂𝗅𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾𝗌 𝗉𝗋𝗈́𝗉𝗋𝗂𝖺𝗌, 𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗅𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗋 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗌𝖾𝗃𝖺 𝖺 𝗇𝖺𝗍𝗎𝗋𝖾𝗓𝖺 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗌.

𝖤𝗆 𝗍𝗋𝗈𝖼𝖺, 𝗇𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖾 𝗃𝗈𝗀𝗈, 𝗉𝖺𝗅𝗉𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗆 𝖺𝗌 𝗂𝗇𝗌𝗂𝗇𝗎𝖺𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌, 𝗈𝗌 𝗋𝖾𝗆𝗈𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗌, 𝗈𝗌 𝗋𝖾𝖼𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗏𝗂𝗇𝖽𝗈𝗌, 𝗂𝗇𝖼𝗅𝗎𝗌𝗂𝗏𝖾, 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗅𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖾 𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝗉𝖾𝗋𝗌𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗀𝖾𝗇𝗌 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝗂𝗇𝗏𝖾𝗋𝗈𝗌𝗂́𝗆𝖾𝗂𝗌.

𝖯𝖾𝗋𝖼𝖾𝖻𝖾̂-𝗅𝗈𝗌, 𝗍𝗈𝗋𝗇𝗈𝗎-𝗌𝖾 𝗇𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝖺𝗋𝗍𝖾 𝖽𝖾 𝖺𝖽𝗂𝗏𝗂𝗇𝗁𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖺𝗅𝗍𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝗌𝗈𝖿𝗂𝗌𝗍𝗂𝖼𝖺𝖽𝖺, 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗌𝗈́ 𝖺𝗅𝗀𝗎𝗇𝗌 𝖾𝗌𝗉𝖾𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗅𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝖺𝗌𝗌𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝗉𝖾𝗋𝗆𝖺𝗇𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝗆𝖾𝖽𝗂𝖺 𝗈𝗎𝗌𝖺𝗆 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝖾𝗇𝗏𝗈𝗅𝗏𝖾𝗋.

𝖯𝗈𝗋 𝗈𝗎𝗍𝗋𝗈 𝗅𝖺𝖽𝗈, 𝖺 𝗍𝗋𝖺𝖽𝗂𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗅 𝗇𝖾𝗎𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗅𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝗂𝗏𝗈𝗍𝗌 𝗍𝖾𝗅𝖾𝗏𝗂𝗌𝗂𝗏𝗈𝗌 𝖾𝗇𝖼𝖺𝗋𝗋𝖾𝗀𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝖺𝗋 𝗇𝗈𝗍𝗂́𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗌 𝖿𝗈𝗂, 𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝗇𝗈𝗌𝗌𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝗂𝖺𝗌, 𝗌𝗎𝖻𝗌𝗍𝗂𝗍𝗎𝗂́𝖽𝖺 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺́𝗋𝗂𝗈𝗌 𝖾𝗆𝗉𝖾𝗇𝗁𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌, 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗂𝗇𝖽𝗂𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗆, 𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗌𝖾 𝗌𝖾𝗆𝗉𝗋𝖾, 𝗈 𝗅𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝖾𝗆 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗌𝖾 𝗉𝗈𝗌𝗂𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗆 𝖾 𝖺 𝗏𝖾𝗋𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖾𝗌𝖼𝗈𝗅𝗁𝖾𝗋𝖺𝗆 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝖻𝗈𝖺 𝖾 𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗋𝖾𝗆 𝖿𝖺𝗓𝖾𝗋 𝖺𝖼𝖾𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗋 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝗍𝖺𝗅.

𝖯𝗈𝗋 𝗏𝖾𝗓𝖾𝗌, 𝗂𝗇𝖽𝗂𝗀𝗇𝖺𝗆-𝗌𝖾 𝖾 𝗁𝗎𝗆𝗂𝗅𝗁𝖺𝗆 𝗆𝖾𝗌𝗆𝗈 𝗈 𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖾𝗏𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 – 𝗂𝗇𝖼𝖺𝗎𝗍𝗈 – 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗌𝖾𝗀𝗎𝖾 𝖺 𝗉𝖺𝗎𝗍𝖺 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖺𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗅𝖾𝗌 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺𝖻𝖾𝗅𝖾𝖼𝖾𝗋𝖺𝗆.

𝖮𝗌 𝖺𝗀𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗌 𝗉𝗈𝗅𝗂́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝗈𝗌 𝖺𝖼𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗍𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌, 𝖺𝗌𝗌𝗂𝗆, 𝗉𝖾𝗅𝗈𝗌 𝗆𝖾𝖽𝗂𝖺, 𝗆𝗂𝗆𝗈𝗌𝖾𝗂𝖺𝗆-𝗌𝖾, 𝖾𝗆 𝗉𝗎́𝖻𝗅𝗂𝖼𝗈, 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝗈𝗌 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝗏𝖺𝗋𝗂𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖾𝗉𝗂́𝗍𝖾𝗍𝗈𝗌, 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖾𝖼𝖾𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝗂𝗀𝗇𝗈𝗋𝖺𝗋 𝗊𝗎𝖾, 𝗇𝗈 𝖿𝗂𝗇𝖺𝗅, 𝗍𝗈𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖾𝗅𝖾𝗌 𝗌𝖺𝗂𝗋𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾𝗇𝗅𝖺𝗆𝖾𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌.

𝖤𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖾𝗍𝖺𝗇𝗍𝗈, 𝗉𝗈𝗎𝖼𝗈 𝗌𝖾 𝗉𝖾𝗌𝗊𝗎𝗂𝗌𝖺 𝖾 𝗌𝖾 𝖾𝗌𝖼𝗅𝖺𝗋𝖾𝖼𝖾, 𝗏𝖾𝗋𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾𝗂𝗋𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾, 𝖺 𝗈𝗉𝗂𝗇𝗂𝖺̃𝗈 𝗉𝗎́𝖻𝗅𝗂𝖼𝖺 𝗌𝗈𝖻𝗋𝖾 𝖺 𝗋𝖾𝖺𝗅𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖿𝖺𝖼𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝖺𝗅𝗏𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗂𝗑𝖺𝗌 𝖾 𝗇𝗈𝗍𝗂́𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗌, 𝖾 𝗌𝗈𝖻𝗋𝖾 𝖺𝗌 𝗌𝗎𝖺𝗌 𝗂𝗆𝗉𝗅𝗂𝖼𝖺𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝗅𝖾𝗀𝖺𝗂𝗌, 𝗉𝗈𝗅𝗂́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗌 𝖾 𝖾́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗌.

𝖠 𝗇𝗈𝗍𝗂́𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝖽𝖺 𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗂𝗑𝖺 𝖾́ 𝗃𝖺́ 𝖺 𝗇𝗈𝗍𝗂́𝖼𝗂𝖺.

𝖵𝖾𝗋𝗂𝖿𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗋 𝖺 𝗌𝗎𝖺 𝗏𝖾𝗋𝗈𝗌𝗂𝗆𝗂𝗅𝗁𝖺𝗇𝖼̧𝖺 𝖾́, 𝗉𝗈𝗂𝗌, 𝗂𝗇𝗎́𝗍𝗂𝗅 𝖾 𝖼𝗁𝖾𝗀𝖺 𝗆𝖾𝗌𝗆𝗈 𝖺 𝗌𝖾𝗋 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗃𝗎𝖽𝗂𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗅 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗇𝖽𝖾𝗋 𝖺 𝖺𝗍𝖾𝗇𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝗈 𝗉𝗎́𝖻𝗅𝗂𝖼𝗈.

𝖯𝗈𝗋 𝗂𝗌𝗌𝗈, 𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗈𝗌, 𝗆𝗎𝗂𝗍𝗈 𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝖺𝗂𝗇𝖽𝖺, 𝗌𝖾 𝖺𝗇𝖺𝗅𝗂𝗌𝖺𝗆 𝖺𝗌 𝖼𝖺𝗎𝗌𝖺𝗌 𝗉𝗈𝗅𝗂́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗌, 𝗌𝗈𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝖾 𝖾𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗈́𝗆𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗆𝗈𝗍𝗂𝗏𝖺𝗋𝖺𝗆 𝗍𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝗌𝗂𝗍𝗎𝖺𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖾𝗌𝖼𝖺̂𝗇𝖽𝖺𝗅𝗈.

𝖭𝗈 𝖿𝗂𝗇𝖺𝗅, 𝗍𝗎𝖽𝗈 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖾𝖼𝖾 𝖿𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗋 𝖺 𝖽𝖾𝗏𝖾𝗋-𝗌𝖾, 𝖺𝗉𝖾𝗇𝖺𝗌, 𝖺𝗈 𝖿𝗎𝗇𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈, 𝗌𝖾𝗆𝗉𝗋𝖾 𝖽𝖾𝖿𝗂𝖼𝗂𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾, 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝗈𝖽𝖾𝗋𝖾𝗌 𝗉𝗎́𝖻𝗅𝗂𝖼𝗈𝗌 𝖾 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗆𝖾𝖼𝖺𝗇𝗂𝗌𝗆𝗈𝗌 𝗂𝗇𝗌𝗍𝗂𝗍𝗎𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝖽𝖺 𝖽𝖾𝗆𝗈𝖼𝗋𝖺𝖼𝗂𝖺: 𝖺 𝗆𝖾𝗌𝗆𝖺 𝗊𝗎𝖾, 𝖽𝖾 𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗈, 𝗉𝖾𝗋𝗆𝗂𝗍𝖾 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗍𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝖿𝖺𝖼𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝖾 𝖽𝖾𝗇𝗎́𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗌 𝗌𝖾𝗃𝖺𝗆 𝗇𝗈𝗍𝗂𝖼𝗂𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖾 𝗂𝗇𝗏𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗂𝗀𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌.

𝖠 𝗌𝗈𝖼𝗂𝖾𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖼𝖺𝗇𝗌𝖺-𝗌𝖾 𝖾 𝖺𝗀𝗈𝗇𝗂𝖺-𝗌𝖾 𝖽𝖾 𝗍𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖺 𝗉𝗈𝗎𝖼𝖺-𝗏𝖾𝗋𝗀𝗈𝗇𝗁𝖺: 𝗋𝖾𝖺𝗅, 𝗂𝗇𝗌𝗂𝗇𝗎𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝗈𝗎, 𝗉𝗎𝗋𝖺 𝖾 𝗌𝗂𝗆𝗉𝗅𝖾𝗌𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾, 𝗂𝗇𝗏𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺𝖽𝖺.

𝖭𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖾 𝖼𝖺𝗇𝗌𝖺𝖼̧𝗈 𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗂𝖽𝖾𝗆 𝖺𝗅𝗀𝗎𝗆𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝗋𝖺𝗓𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖺 𝖺𝖻𝗌𝗍𝖾𝗇𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾𝗅𝖾𝗂𝗍𝗈𝗋𝖺𝗅 𝖾 𝖺 𝖼𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝗏𝖾𝗓 𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗈𝗋 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝗍𝗂𝖼𝗂𝗉𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝗉𝗈𝗅𝗂́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝖺 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖼𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖺̃𝗈𝗌.

𝖰𝗎𝖾𝗆 𝗌𝖾 𝗋𝗂 𝖾 𝖻𝖾𝗇𝖾𝖿𝗂𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝗍𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗉𝖺𝗅𝗁𝖺𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗏𝗈𝖼𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗋𝖾𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗌𝖾 𝗌𝖾𝗋𝗏𝖾𝗆 𝖽𝗈 𝗌𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖾𝗆𝖺 𝖽𝖾𝗆𝗈𝖼𝗋𝖺́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝗈 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗈 𝖽𝖾𝗇𝖾𝗀𝗋𝗂𝗋 𝖾 𝖽𝖾𝗇𝖾𝗀𝗋𝗂𝗋𝖾𝗆 𝖺 𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗅𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗌𝖾𝗎𝗌 𝗉𝗈𝗅𝗂́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝗈𝗌.

𝖮𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗇𝖾𝗀𝖺𝗆 𝗈𝗎 𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗈𝗋𝗂𝗓𝖺𝗆 𝖺𝗌 𝗋𝖾𝗀𝗋𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝗈 𝗌𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖾𝗆𝖺 𝖽𝖾𝗆𝗈𝖼𝗋𝖺́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝗈 𝗉𝗈𝗎𝖼𝗈 𝗍𝖾̂𝗆, 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝗂𝗌𝗌𝗈, 𝖽𝖾 𝖾𝗌𝖿𝗈𝗋𝖼̧𝖺𝗋-𝗌𝖾.

𝖡𝖺𝗌𝗍𝖺-𝗅𝗁𝖾𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗅𝗁𝖾𝗋 𝗈𝗌 𝖿𝗋𝗎𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝖾 𝖺𝗉𝖾𝗅𝖺𝗋 𝖺̀ 𝗈𝗋𝖽𝖾𝗆; 𝖺 𝗏𝖾𝗅𝗁𝖺 𝗈𝗋𝖽𝖾𝗆 𝗇𝗈𝗏𝖺 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗋𝖾𝗆 𝗏𝖾𝗋 𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺𝖻𝖾𝗅𝖾𝖼𝗂𝖽𝖺 𝖾𝗆 𝗆𝗈𝗅𝖽𝖾𝗌 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝗈𝗎 𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝖺𝗍𝗎𝖺𝗅𝗂𝗓𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌.

𝖤, 𝗍𝗈𝖽𝖺𝗏𝗂𝖺, 𝗁𝖺́ 𝗀𝗋𝖺𝗏𝖾𝗌 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝖻𝗅𝖾𝗆𝖺𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗆𝖾𝗋𝖾𝖼𝖾𝗋𝗂𝖺𝗆 𝗌𝖾𝗋 𝖽𝗂𝗌𝖼𝗎𝗍𝗂𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝗌𝖾𝗋𝗂𝖾𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾: 𝖺 𝗉𝗈𝖻𝗋𝖾𝗓𝖺 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖺𝖻𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗀𝖾 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗆𝖺𝗋𝗀𝖾𝗆 𝗀𝗋𝖺𝗇𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝖾 𝖼𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖺̃𝗈𝗌, 𝗆𝖾𝗌𝗆𝗈 𝗈𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾𝗆𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗀𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖾 𝗀𝖺𝗇𝗁𝖺𝗆 𝗎𝗆 𝗉𝗈𝗎𝖼𝗈 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗈 𝗌𝖺𝗅𝖺́𝗋𝗂𝗈 𝗆𝗂́𝗇𝗂𝗆𝗈; 𝗈 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝖼̧𝗈 𝖽𝖺 𝗁𝖺𝖻𝗂𝗍𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾 𝖺 𝖼𝗋𝖾𝗌𝖼𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖽𝖾𝗉𝖾𝗇𝖽𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗃𝗈𝗏𝖾𝗇𝗌 𝗃𝖺́ 𝗅𝗂𝖼𝖾𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖺 𝖾𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗈𝗆𝗂𝖺 𝗉𝖺𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗇𝖺; 𝖺 𝗌𝗂𝗍𝗎𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖺 𝗏𝖾𝗅𝗁𝗂𝖼𝖾 𝖾 𝖺 𝖿𝖺𝗅𝗍𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝖺𝗉𝗈𝗂𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗅𝗁𝖾 𝖾́ 𝖽𝖾𝗏𝗂𝖽𝖺; 𝖺 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝗂𝗀𝗎𝖺𝗅𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖼𝗋𝖾𝗌𝖼𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖾 𝗈𝗌 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝗋𝗂𝖼𝗈𝗌 𝖾 𝗈𝗌 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝗉𝗈𝖻𝗋𝖾𝗌; 𝖾𝗇𝖿𝗂𝗆, 𝗈 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝖼𝖺𝗆𝗂𝗇𝗁𝗈 𝖽𝖺 𝗌𝗈𝖼𝗂𝖾𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗆𝗈𝗌 𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗌𝗍𝗋𝗎𝗂𝗋 𝖾 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗏𝖾𝗇𝖽𝖾𝗆𝗈𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝖾𝗑𝖾𝗆𝗉𝗅𝖺𝗋.

𝖮𝗋𝖺, 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖾𝗌 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝖻𝗅𝖾𝗆𝖺𝗌, 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖾𝖼𝖾 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖺 𝗈𝗋𝖽𝖾𝗆 𝗇𝗈𝗏𝖺, 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗎𝗇𝗌 𝗂𝗇𝗌𝗂𝗇𝗎𝖺𝗆, 𝗈𝗎𝗍𝗋𝗈𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗌𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗆 𝖾 𝗈𝗎𝗍𝗋𝗈𝗌 𝖺𝖻𝖾𝗋𝗍𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖽𝖾𝖿𝖾𝗇𝖽𝖾𝗆 𝗍𝖾𝗇𝗁𝖺 𝗌𝗈𝗅𝗎𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝗂𝗇𝗈𝗏𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗋𝖺𝗌 𝖾 𝗃𝗎𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗌.

* Magistrado do Ministério Público

IN

11/10/22..