FERNANDA CÂNCIO

 .

𝗗𝗘𝗗𝗜𝗖𝗔𝗠𝗢𝗦 𝗔𝗢𝗦 𝗣𝗔𝗧𝗘𝗧𝗔𝗦 𝗔𝗗𝗘𝗣𝗧𝗢𝗦 𝗗𝗢 𝗣𝗢𝗗𝗘𝗥 𝗡𝗔 𝗥𝗨𝗔

Bem-vindos

à fake democracia

Primeiro nos EUA e depois no Brasil, o assalto aos símbolos do poder democrático por quem recusa, em nome do "povo", o resultado de escrutínios eleitorais coloca-nos perante a evidência de que democracia, justiça e bem são noções que variam de acordo com quem ganha ou perde - como no futebol.

𝓝𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓮 𝓭𝓸𝓶𝓲𝓷𝓰𝓸 (08/01)23, 𝓮𝓶 𝓑𝓻𝓪𝓼𝓲́𝓵𝓲𝓪, 𝓬𝓸𝓶𝓸 𝓪 𝟔 𝓭𝓮 𝓳𝓪𝓷𝓮𝓲𝓻𝓸 𝓭𝓮 𝟐𝟎𝟐𝟏 𝓷𝓸 𝓪𝓼𝓼𝓪𝓵𝓽𝓸 𝓪𝓸 𝓒𝓪𝓹𝓲𝓽𝓸́𝓵𝓲𝓸, 𝓹𝓾𝓭𝓮𝓶𝓸𝓼 𝓿𝓮𝓻 𝓮𝓶 𝓭𝓲𝓻𝓮𝓽𝓸, 𝓸𝓾 𝓺𝓾𝓪𝓼𝓮 𝓮𝓶 𝓭𝓲𝓻𝓮𝓽𝓸, 𝓪𝓼 𝓲𝓶𝓪𝓰𝓮𝓷𝓼 𝓭𝓸𝓼 𝓪𝓼𝓼𝓪𝓵𝓽𝓪𝓷𝓽𝓮𝓼 𝓹𝓸𝓻 𝓼𝓲 𝓹𝓻𝓸́𝓹𝓻𝓲𝓸𝓼, 𝓯𝓲𝓵𝓶𝓪𝓷𝓭𝓸 𝓽𝓾𝓭𝓸 𝓮 𝓯𝓲𝓵𝓶𝓪𝓷𝓭𝓸-𝓼𝓮, 𝓪𝓽𝓻𝓪𝓿𝓮́𝓼 𝓭𝓪 𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓽𝓲𝓵𝓱𝓪 𝓸𝓻𝓰𝓾𝓵𝓱𝓸𝓼𝓪 𝓷𝓪𝓼 𝓻𝓮𝓭𝓮𝓼 𝓼𝓸𝓬𝓲𝓪𝓲𝓼 - 𝓬𝓸𝓶𝓸 𝓺𝓾𝓮𝓶 𝓷𝓪̃𝓸 𝓬𝓸𝓵𝓸𝓬𝓪 𝓼𝓮𝓺𝓾𝓮𝓻 𝓪 𝓱𝓲𝓹𝓸́𝓽𝓮𝓼𝓮 𝓭𝓮 𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓪𝓻 𝓪 𝓬𝓸𝓶𝓮𝓽𝓮𝓻 𝓾𝓶 𝓬𝓻𝓲𝓶𝓮 𝓮 𝓹𝓸𝓻𝓽𝓪𝓷𝓽𝓸 𝓪 𝓸𝓯𝓮𝓻𝓮𝓬𝓮𝓻 𝓪̀𝓼 𝓪𝓾𝓽𝓸𝓻𝓲𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓮𝓼 𝓪𝓼 𝓹𝓻𝓸𝓿𝓪𝓼 𝓮 𝓲𝓭𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓲𝓯𝓲𝓬𝓪𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸 𝓷𝓮𝓬𝓮𝓼𝓼𝓪́𝓻𝓲𝓪𝓼 𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓪 𝓸𝓼 𝓮𝓷𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓽𝓻𝓪𝓻𝓮𝓶 𝓮 𝓹𝓻𝓸𝓬𝓮𝓼𝓼𝓪𝓻𝓮𝓶.

𝓟𝓸𝓭𝓮𝓶𝓸𝓼, 𝓮́ 𝓬𝓵𝓪𝓻𝓸, 𝓮𝔁𝓹𝓵𝓲𝓬𝓪𝓻 𝓲𝓼𝓼𝓸 𝓬𝓸𝓶 𝓪 𝓮𝔁𝓬𝓲𝓽𝓪𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸, 𝓪𝓵𝓲𝓪𝓭𝓪 𝓪̀ 𝓯𝓪𝓵𝓽𝓪 𝓭𝓮 𝓲𝓷𝓽𝓮𝓵𝓲𝓰𝓮̂𝓷𝓬𝓲𝓪 - 𝓸𝓾 𝓲𝓷𝓰𝓮𝓷𝓾𝓲𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓮, 𝓼𝓮 𝓺𝓾𝓲𝓼𝓮𝓻𝓶𝓸𝓼 𝓼𝓮𝓻 𝓬𝓪𝓻𝓲𝓭𝓸𝓼𝓸𝓼. 𝓜𝓪𝓼 𝓼𝓮𝓷𝓭𝓸 𝓭𝓸 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓱𝓮𝓬𝓲𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓸 𝓰𝓮𝓻𝓪𝓵 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓶𝓾𝓲𝓽𝓸𝓼 𝓭𝓸𝓼 𝓪𝓼𝓼𝓪𝓵𝓽𝓪𝓷𝓽𝓮𝓼 𝓭𝓸 𝓒𝓪𝓹𝓲𝓽𝓸́𝓵𝓲𝓸 𝓯𝓸𝓻𝓪𝓶 𝓲𝓭𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓲𝓯𝓲𝓬𝓪𝓭𝓸𝓼 𝓮 𝓪𝓬𝓾𝓼𝓪𝓭𝓸𝓼 𝓬𝓸𝓶 𝓫𝓪𝓼𝓮 𝓷𝓪𝓼 𝓲𝓶𝓪𝓰𝓮𝓷𝓼 𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓽𝓲𝓵𝓱𝓪𝓭𝓪𝓼 𝓹𝓮𝓵𝓸𝓼 𝓹𝓻𝓸́𝓹𝓻𝓲𝓸𝓼 𝓸𝓾 𝓹𝓸𝓻 𝓬𝓸𝓶𝓹𝓪𝓷𝓱𝓮𝓲𝓻𝓸𝓼 𝓭𝓮 𝓪𝓼𝓼𝓪𝓵𝓽𝓸, 𝓽𝓪𝓵𝓿𝓮𝔃 𝓼𝓮𝓳𝓪 𝓪𝓿𝓲𝓼𝓪𝓭𝓸 𝓹𝓮𝓷𝓼𝓪𝓻 𝓷𝓸𝓾𝓽𝓻𝓪𝓼 𝓮𝔁𝓹𝓵𝓲𝓬𝓪𝓬̧𝓸̃𝓮𝓼.

𝓐𝓵𝓮́𝓶 𝓭𝓮 𝓽𝓸𝓭𝓸𝓼 𝓸𝓼 𝓶𝓸𝓽𝓲𝓿𝓸𝓼 𝓽𝓸𝓷𝓽𝓸𝓼, 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓽𝓪𝓶𝓫𝓮́𝓶 𝓮𝔁𝓲𝓼𝓽𝓮𝓶, 𝓬𝓸𝓶𝓸 𝓸 𝓭𝓪 𝓬𝓸𝓶𝓹𝓾𝓵𝓼𝓪̃𝓸 𝓭𝓪 𝓼𝓮𝓵𝓯𝓲𝓮, 𝓪𝓺𝓾𝓮𝓵𝓪𝓼 𝓹𝓮𝓼𝓼𝓸𝓪𝓼 𝓺𝓾𝓮𝓻𝓮𝓶 𝓶𝓸𝓼𝓽𝓻𝓪𝓻-𝓼𝓮 𝓷𝓪𝓺𝓾𝓮𝓵𝓮 𝓪𝓼𝓼𝓪𝓵𝓽𝓸 𝓹𝓸𝓻𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓼𝓲𝓭𝓮𝓻𝓪𝓶 𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓪𝓻 𝓪 𝓯𝓪𝔃𝓮𝓻 𝓪𝓵𝓰𝓸 𝓱𝓮𝓻𝓸𝓲𝓬𝓸, 𝓹𝓮𝓵𝓸 𝓫𝓮𝓶, 𝓮 𝓽𝓮𝓻 𝓬𝓸𝓶 𝓮𝓵𝓪𝓼, 𝓹𝓸𝓻 𝓮𝓵𝓪𝓼, 𝓶𝓾𝓲𝓽𝓪 𝓰𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮, 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓹𝓮𝓷𝓼𝓪𝓶 𝓹𝓸𝓭𝓮𝓻 "𝓵𝓮𝓿𝓪𝓷𝓽𝓪𝓻", 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓽𝓪𝓰𝓲𝓪𝓻, 𝓰𝓪𝓷𝓱𝓪𝓻, 𝓬𝓸𝓶 𝓪 𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓽𝓲𝓵𝓱𝓪. 𝓝𝓪̃𝓸 𝓮́ 𝓼𝓸́ 𝓸 𝓪𝓼𝓼𝓪𝓵𝓽𝓸 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓮́ 𝓾𝓶𝓪 𝓪𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸 𝓹𝓸𝓵𝓲́𝓽𝓲𝓬𝓪 - 𝓪 𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓽𝓲𝓵𝓱𝓪 𝓯𝓪𝔃 𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓽𝓮 𝓭𝓪 𝓪𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸, 𝓬𝓸𝓶𝓸 𝓶𝓸𝓭𝓸 𝓸𝓼𝓽𝓮𝓷𝓼𝓲𝓿𝓸 𝓭𝓮 𝓭𝓮𝓶𝓸𝓷𝓼𝓽𝓻𝓪𝓻 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓷𝓪̃𝓸 𝓼𝓸́ 𝓺𝓾𝓮𝓶 𝓹𝓻𝓸𝓽𝓪𝓰𝓸𝓷𝓲𝔃𝓪 𝓷𝓪̃𝓸 𝓪𝓬𝓮𝓲𝓽𝓪 𝓪 𝓲𝓭𝓮𝓲𝓪 𝓭𝓮 𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓪𝓻 𝓪 𝓬𝓸𝓶𝓮𝓽𝓮𝓻 𝓾𝓶 𝓬𝓻𝓲𝓶𝓮 𝓬𝓸𝓶𝓸 𝓭𝓮𝓼𝓹𝓻𝓮𝔃𝓪 𝓺𝓾𝓮𝓶 𝓪𝓼𝓼𝓲𝓶 𝓸 𝓹𝓸𝓼𝓼𝓪 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓼𝓲𝓭𝓮𝓻𝓪𝓻. 𝓟𝓸𝓻𝓺𝓾𝓮, 𝓮 𝓸 𝓼𝓮𝓺𝓾𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓻𝓸 𝓭𝓪𝓼 𝓬𝓸𝓻𝓮𝓼 𝓭𝓸 𝓹𝓪𝓲́𝓼 𝓮 𝓭𝓪 𝓼𝓾𝓪 𝓫𝓪𝓷𝓭𝓮𝓲𝓻𝓪 𝓬𝓸𝓶𝓸 𝓼𝓲́𝓶𝓫𝓸𝓵𝓸𝓼 𝓭𝓸 𝓶𝓸𝓿𝓲𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓸 𝓼𝓲𝓰𝓷𝓲𝓯𝓲𝓬𝓪𝓶 𝓲𝓼𝓼𝓸, 𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓪 𝓺𝓾𝓮𝓶 𝓪𝓵𝓲 𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓪́, 𝓪𝓺𝓾𝓮𝓵𝓮 𝓮́ "𝓸 𝓿𝓮𝓻𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓮𝓲𝓻𝓸 𝓑𝓻𝓪𝓼𝓲𝓵", 𝓸 𝓿𝓮𝓻𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓮𝓲𝓻𝓸 "𝓹𝓸𝓿𝓸".

𝓙𝓾𝓼𝓽𝓪𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮, 𝓷𝓪 𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓻𝓪𝓭𝓪 𝓭𝓮 𝓾𝓶 𝓭𝓸𝓼 𝓮𝓭𝓲𝓯𝓲́𝓬𝓲𝓸𝓼, 𝓸𝓾𝓿𝓮-𝓼𝓮 𝓾𝓶 𝓭𝓸𝓼 𝓪𝓼𝓼𝓪𝓵𝓽𝓪𝓷𝓽𝓮𝓼 𝓭𝓲𝔃𝓮𝓻: "𝓙𝓪́ 𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓪́ 𝓽𝓸𝓶𝓪𝓭𝓸, 𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓪𝓶𝓸𝓼 𝓷𝓪 𝓬𝓪𝓼𝓪 𝓭𝓸 𝓹𝓸𝓿𝓸." 𝓢𝓮 𝓪 𝓬𝓪𝓼𝓪 𝓮́ 𝓭𝓸 𝓹𝓸𝓿𝓸, 𝓮 𝓼𝓮 𝓪𝓺𝓾𝓮𝓵𝓮 𝓮́ 𝓸 𝓹𝓸𝓿𝓸, 𝓷𝓪̃𝓸 𝓱𝓪́ 𝓬𝓻𝓲𝓶𝓮, 𝓹𝓮𝓵𝓸 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓽𝓻𝓪́𝓻𝓲𝓸; 𝓽𝓻𝓪𝓽𝓪-𝓼𝓮 𝓭𝓮 𝓻𝓮𝓽𝓸𝓶𝓪𝓻 𝓵𝓮𝓰𝓲𝓽𝓲𝓶𝓪𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮 𝓸 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓯𝓸𝓲 𝓻𝓸𝓾𝓫𝓪𝓭𝓸, 𝓼𝓮𝓰𝓾𝓷𝓭𝓸 𝓸 𝓹𝓻𝓲𝓷𝓬𝓲́𝓹𝓲𝓸 𝓫𝓪́𝓼𝓲𝓬𝓸 𝓭𝓪 𝓭𝓮𝓶𝓸𝓬𝓻𝓪𝓬𝓲𝓪 - 𝓾𝓶 𝓰𝓸𝓿𝓮𝓻𝓷𝓸 𝓭𝓸 𝓹𝓸𝓿𝓸, 𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓪 𝓸 𝓹𝓸𝓿𝓸 𝓮 𝓹𝓮𝓵𝓸 𝓹𝓸𝓿𝓸.

𝓔 𝓷𝓮𝓼𝓼𝓮 𝓼𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓲𝓭𝓸 𝓷𝓪̃𝓸 𝓱𝓪́ 𝓷𝓪𝓭𝓪 𝓶𝓪𝓲𝓼 𝓼𝓲𝓶𝓫𝓸́𝓵𝓲𝓬𝓸 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓪𝓼 𝓯𝓲𝓵𝓶𝓪𝓰𝓮𝓷𝓼 𝓭𝓪 𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓻𝓪𝓭𝓪 𝓷𝓸 𝓢𝓾𝓹𝓻𝓮𝓶𝓸 𝓣𝓻𝓲𝓫𝓾𝓷𝓪𝓵 𝓮 𝓭𝓪 𝓼𝓾𝓪 𝓭𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓻𝓾𝓲𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸, 𝓬𝓸𝓶𝓸 𝓸 𝓮𝓶𝓹𝓾𝓷𝓱𝓪𝓻 𝓪𝓷𝓽𝓮 𝓪 𝓶𝓾𝓵𝓽𝓲𝓭𝓪̃𝓸, 𝓹𝓸𝓻 𝓾𝓶 𝓭𝓸𝓼 𝓪𝓼𝓼𝓪𝓵𝓽𝓪𝓷𝓽𝓮𝓼, 𝓭𝓪𝓺𝓾𝓲𝓵𝓸 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓼𝓪𝓫𝓮𝓶𝓸𝓼 𝓪𝓰𝓸𝓻𝓪 𝓼𝓮𝓻 𝓾𝓶𝓪 𝓬𝓸́𝓹𝓲𝓪 𝓭𝓪 𝓒𝓸𝓷𝓼𝓽𝓲𝓽𝓾𝓲𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸 𝓭𝓮 𝟏𝟗𝟖𝟖 (𝓪 𝓯𝓲𝓵𝓶𝓪𝓰𝓮𝓶 𝓬𝓸𝓶𝓮𝓬̧𝓸𝓾 𝓹𝓸𝓻 𝓼𝓮𝓻 𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓽𝓲𝓵𝓱𝓪𝓭𝓪 𝓻𝓮𝓯𝓮𝓻𝓲𝓷𝓭𝓸 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓼𝓮 𝓽𝓻𝓪𝓽𝓪𝓿𝓪 𝓭𝓸 𝓸𝓻𝓲𝓰𝓲𝓷𝓪𝓵).

𝓠𝓾𝓮 𝓿𝓮𝓶𝓸𝓼 𝓪𝓵𝓲? 𝓤𝓶𝓪 𝓭𝓮𝓼𝓵𝓮𝓰𝓲𝓽𝓲𝓶𝓪𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸 𝓭𝓸 𝓻𝓮𝓰𝓲𝓶𝓮 𝓪𝓽𝓻𝓪𝓿𝓮́𝓼 𝓭𝓪 𝓭𝓮𝓼𝓼𝓪𝓬𝓻𝓪𝓵𝓲𝔃𝓪𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸 𝓭𝓪 𝓼𝓾𝓪 𝓵𝓮𝓲 𝓯𝓾𝓷𝓭𝓪𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓪𝓵 𝓮 𝓭𝓸 𝓽𝓻𝓲𝓫𝓾𝓷𝓪𝓵 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓽𝓮𝓶 𝓹𝓸𝓻 𝓯𝓾𝓷𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸 𝓲𝓷𝓽𝓮𝓻𝓹𝓻𝓮𝓽𝓪́-𝓵𝓪 𝓮 𝓪𝓯𝓮𝓻𝓲𝓻 𝓹𝓸𝓻 𝓮𝓵𝓪 𝓺𝓾𝓪𝓲𝓼𝓺𝓾𝓮𝓻 𝓵𝓮𝓲𝓼 𝓮 𝓹𝓻𝓪́𝓽𝓲𝓬𝓪𝓼, 𝓸𝓾 𝓾𝓶𝓪 𝓹𝓻𝓮𝓽𝓮𝓷𝓼𝓪 𝓻𝓮𝓬𝓾𝓹𝓮𝓻𝓪𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸, 𝓹𝓮𝓵𝓸 "𝓹𝓸𝓿𝓸" 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓸𝓼 𝓪𝓼𝓼𝓪𝓵𝓽𝓪𝓷𝓽𝓮𝓼 𝓬𝓻𝓮𝓮𝓶 𝓻𝓮𝓹𝓻𝓮𝓼𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓪𝓻, 𝓭𝓸𝓼 𝓹𝓻𝓲𝓷𝓬𝓲́𝓹𝓲𝓸𝓼 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓼𝓽𝓲𝓽𝓾𝓬𝓲𝓸𝓷𝓪𝓲𝓼 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓹𝓻𝓸𝓬𝓵𝓪𝓶𝓪𝓶 𝓭𝓪𝓻-𝓵𝓱𝓮𝓼 𝓻𝓪𝔃𝓪̃𝓸 (𝓾𝓶 𝓭𝓸𝓼 𝓪𝓻𝓽𝓲𝓰𝓸𝓼 𝓭𝓪 𝓒𝓸𝓷𝓼𝓽𝓲𝓽𝓾𝓲𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸 𝓽𝓮𝓶 𝓼𝓲𝓭𝓸 𝓼𝓲𝓼𝓽𝓮𝓶𝓪𝓽𝓲𝓬𝓪𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮 𝓲𝓷𝓿𝓸𝓬𝓪𝓭𝓸 𝓹𝓮𝓵𝓸𝓼 𝓫𝓸𝓵𝓼𝓸𝓷𝓪𝓻𝓲𝓼𝓽𝓪𝓼 𝓬𝓸𝓶𝓸 𝓯𝓾𝓷𝓭𝓪𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓸 𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓪 𝓾𝓶 𝓰𝓸𝓵𝓹𝓮 𝓶𝓲𝓵𝓲𝓽𝓪𝓻)?

𝓝𝓪 𝓿𝓮𝓻𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓮, 𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓪 𝓪𝓺𝓾𝓮𝓵𝓪𝓼 𝓹𝓮𝓼𝓼𝓸𝓪𝓼, 𝓬𝓸𝓶𝓸 𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓪 𝓸𝓼 𝓪𝓼𝓼𝓪𝓵𝓽𝓪𝓷𝓽𝓮𝓼 𝓭𝓸 𝓒𝓪𝓹𝓲𝓽𝓸́𝓵𝓲𝓸, 𝓪 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓿𝓲𝓬𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸 𝓭𝓮 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓪̃𝓸 𝓹𝓮𝓻𝓪𝓷𝓽𝓮 𝓾𝓶 𝓻𝓸𝓾𝓫𝓸 𝓷𝓪̃𝓸 𝓽𝓮𝓶 𝓼𝓮𝓺𝓾𝓮𝓻 𝓭𝓮 𝓼𝓮 𝓯𝓾𝓷𝓭𝓪𝓻 𝓷𝓪 𝓲𝓭𝓮𝓲𝓪, 𝓪𝓵𝓮𝓰𝓪𝓭𝓪 𝓺𝓾𝓮𝓻 𝓹𝓸𝓻 𝓣𝓻𝓾𝓶𝓹 𝓮 𝓽𝓻𝓾𝓶𝓹𝓲𝓼𝓽𝓪𝓼 𝓺𝓾𝓮𝓻 𝓹𝓸𝓻 𝓑𝓸𝓵𝓼𝓸𝓷𝓪𝓻𝓸 𝓮 𝓫𝓸𝓵𝓼𝓸𝓷𝓪𝓻𝓲𝓼𝓽𝓪𝓼, 𝓭𝓮 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓱𝓸𝓾𝓿𝓮 𝓾𝓶𝓪 𝓯𝓻𝓪𝓾𝓭𝓮 𝓮𝓵𝓮𝓲𝓽𝓸𝓻𝓪𝓵. 𝓗𝓪́ 𝓾𝓶𝓪 𝓮𝓼𝓹𝓮́𝓬𝓲𝓮 𝓭𝓮 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓬𝓵𝓾𝓼𝓪̃𝓸 𝓽𝓪𝓾𝓽𝓸𝓵𝓸́𝓰𝓲𝓬𝓪: 𝓼𝓮 𝓷𝓪̃𝓸 𝓯𝓸𝓲 𝓪𝓸 𝓼𝓮𝓾 𝓵𝓪𝓭𝓸, 𝓪𝓸 𝓼𝓮𝓾 𝓬𝓪𝓷𝓭𝓲𝓭𝓪𝓽𝓸, 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓯𝓸𝓲 𝓻𝓮𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓱𝓮𝓬𝓲𝓭𝓪 𝓪 𝓿𝓲𝓽𝓸́𝓻𝓲𝓪, 𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓪̃𝓸 𝓪 𝓮𝓵𝓮𝓲𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸 𝓷𝓪̃𝓸 𝓯𝓸𝓲 𝓳𝓾𝓼𝓽𝓪. 𝓒𝓸𝓶𝓸 𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓪 𝓸𝓼 𝓯𝓪𝓷𝓪́𝓽𝓲𝓬𝓸𝓼 𝓯𝓾𝓽𝓮𝓫𝓸𝓵𝓮𝓲𝓻𝓸𝓼, 𝓺𝓾𝓪𝓵𝓺𝓾𝓮𝓻 𝓭𝓮𝓻𝓻𝓸𝓽𝓪 𝓼𝓸́ 𝓹𝓸𝓭𝓮 𝓮𝔁𝓹𝓵𝓲𝓬𝓪𝓻-𝓼𝓮 𝓹𝓸𝓻 "𝓻𝓸𝓾𝓫𝓸", 𝓺𝓾𝓪𝓵𝓺𝓾𝓮𝓻 𝓻𝓮𝓼𝓾𝓵𝓽𝓪𝓭𝓸 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓷𝓪̃𝓸 𝓸 𝓭𝓮𝓼𝓮𝓳𝓪𝓭𝓸 𝓼𝓸́ 𝓹𝓸𝓭𝓮 𝓼𝓮𝓻 𝓲𝓵𝓮𝓰𝓲́𝓽𝓲𝓶𝓸.

𝓐𝓼𝓼𝓲𝓶, 𝓪𝓼 𝓶𝓮𝓼𝓶𝓪𝓼 𝓻𝓮𝓰𝓻𝓪𝓼 𝓮 𝓲𝓷𝓼𝓽𝓲𝓽𝓾𝓲𝓬̧𝓸̃𝓮𝓼 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓼𝓮𝓻𝓿𝓲𝓻𝓪𝓶 𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓪 𝓭𝓪𝓻 𝓪 𝓿𝓲𝓽𝓸́𝓻𝓲𝓪 𝓪 𝓣𝓻𝓾𝓶𝓹 𝓮 𝓑𝓸𝓵𝓼𝓸𝓷𝓪𝓻𝓸 𝓭𝓮𝓲𝔁𝓪𝓶 𝓭𝓮 𝓼𝓮𝓻 𝓬𝓻𝓮𝓭𝓲́𝓿𝓮𝓲𝓼 𝓺𝓾𝓪𝓷𝓭𝓸 𝓼𝓪̃𝓸 𝓭𝓮𝓻𝓻𝓸𝓽𝓪𝓭𝓸𝓼. 𝓐 𝓭𝓮𝓶𝓸𝓬𝓻𝓪𝓬𝓲𝓪 𝓼𝓸́ 𝓮́ 𝓭𝓮𝓶𝓸𝓬𝓻𝓪𝓬𝓲𝓪 𝓼𝓮 𝓰𝓪𝓷𝓱𝓪𝓻𝓮𝓶; 𝓪𝓼 𝓵𝓮𝓲𝓼 𝓮 𝓸𝓼 𝓽𝓻𝓲𝓫𝓾𝓷𝓪𝓲𝓼 𝓼𝓸́ 𝓼𝓪̃𝓸 𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓪 𝓻𝓮𝓼𝓹𝓮𝓲𝓽𝓪𝓻 𝓼𝓮 𝓹𝓻𝓮𝓷𝓭𝓮𝓻𝓮𝓶 𝓛𝓾𝓵𝓪; 𝓺𝓾𝓪𝓷𝓭𝓸 𝓸 𝓼𝓸𝓵𝓽𝓪𝓶 𝓹𝓪𝓼𝓼𝓪𝓶 𝓪 𝓷𝓪̃𝓸 𝓿𝓪𝓵𝓮𝓻 𝓷𝓪𝓭𝓪.

𝓞𝓼 𝓶𝓮𝓼𝓶𝓸𝓼 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓮𝔁𝓲𝓰𝓲𝓪𝓶 "𝓵𝓮𝓲 𝓮 𝓸𝓻𝓭𝓮𝓶" 𝓮 𝓾𝓶𝓪 "𝓲𝓷𝓽𝓮𝓻𝓿𝓮𝓷𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸 𝓶𝓲𝓵𝓲𝓽𝓪𝓻" 𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓪 "𝓻𝓮𝓹𝓸𝓻 𝓪 𝓵𝓮𝓰𝓪𝓵𝓲𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓮" 𝓹𝓸𝓭𝓮𝓶 𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓪̃𝓸 𝓮𝓼𝓬𝓪𝓿𝓪𝓬𝓪𝓻 𝓮𝓭𝓲𝓯𝓲́𝓬𝓲𝓸𝓼 𝓹𝓾́𝓫𝓵𝓲𝓬𝓸𝓼, 𝓻𝓸𝓾𝓫𝓪𝓻 𝓪𝓻𝓽𝓮𝓯𝓪𝓬𝓽𝓸𝓼 𝓿𝓪𝓵𝓲𝓸𝓼𝓸𝓼, 𝓮𝓼𝓯𝓪𝓺𝓾𝓮𝓪𝓻 𝓺𝓾𝓪𝓭𝓻𝓸𝓼, 𝓭𝓮𝓯𝓮𝓬𝓪𝓻 𝓷𝓸𝓼 𝓰𝓪𝓫𝓲𝓷𝓮𝓽𝓮𝓼, 𝓮𝓼𝓹𝓪𝓷𝓬𝓪𝓻 𝓹𝓸𝓵𝓲́𝓬𝓲𝓪𝓼 (𝓸𝓼 𝓹𝓸𝓵𝓲́𝓬𝓲𝓪𝓼 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓸𝓼 𝓮𝓷𝓯𝓻𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓪𝓻𝓪𝓶; 𝓽𝓪𝓶𝓫𝓮́𝓶 𝓸𝓼 𝓱𝓸𝓾𝓿𝓮) 𝓮 𝓸𝓼 𝓼𝓮𝓾𝓼 𝓬𝓪𝓿𝓪𝓵𝓸𝓼, 𝓷𝓾𝓶 𝓯𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓲𝓶 𝓭𝓮 𝓸́𝓭𝓲𝓸 𝓮 𝓪𝓫𝓼𝓾𝓻𝓭𝓸.

𝓠𝓾𝓮𝓻𝓮𝓶𝓸𝓼 𝓪𝓬𝓻𝓮𝓭𝓲𝓽𝓪𝓻 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓮 𝓮𝓼𝓹𝓮𝓬𝓽𝓪́𝓬𝓾𝓵𝓸 𝓲𝓷𝓭𝓮𝓬𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮 𝓽𝓮𝓻𝓪́ 𝓸 𝓮𝓯𝓮𝓲𝓽𝓸 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓽𝓻𝓪́𝓻𝓲𝓸 𝓭𝓸 𝓹𝓻𝓮𝓽𝓮𝓷𝓭𝓲𝓭𝓸; 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓷𝓸𝓼 𝓶𝓾𝓲𝓽𝓸𝓼 𝓶𝓲𝓵𝓱𝓸̃𝓮𝓼 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓿𝓸𝓽𝓪𝓻𝓪𝓶 𝓮𝓶 𝓣𝓻𝓾𝓶𝓹 𝓮 𝓑𝓸𝓵𝓼𝓸𝓷𝓪𝓻𝓸 - 𝓵𝓮𝓶𝓫𝓻𝓮𝓶𝓸𝓼 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓹𝓮𝓻𝓭𝓮𝓻𝓪𝓶 𝓹𝓸𝓻 𝓶𝓾𝓲𝓽𝓸 𝓹𝓸𝓾𝓬𝓸 - 𝓱𝓪́ 𝓾𝓶𝓪 𝓶𝓪𝓲𝓸𝓻𝓲𝓪 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓷𝓪̃𝓸 𝓼𝓮 𝓻𝓮𝓿𝓮̂ 𝓷𝓸𝓼 𝓪𝓼𝓼𝓪𝓵𝓽𝓸𝓼 𝓭𝓮 𝓳𝓪𝓷𝓮𝓲𝓻𝓸 𝓭𝓮 𝟐𝟎𝟐𝟏 𝓮 𝟐𝟎𝟐𝟑. 𝓠𝓾𝓮 𝓪𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓽𝓮𝓬𝓲𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓸𝓼 𝓬𝓸𝓶𝓸 𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓮𝓼 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓽𝓻𝓲𝓫𝓾𝓮𝓶 𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓪 𝓮𝓷𝓯𝓻𝓪𝓺𝓾𝓮𝓬𝓮𝓻 𝓪 𝓻𝓮𝓼𝓹𝓮𝓽𝓲𝓿𝓪 𝓫𝓪𝓼𝓮 𝓭𝓮 𝓪𝓹𝓸𝓲𝓸, 𝓪𝓵𝓲𝓮𝓷𝓪𝓷𝓭𝓸 𝓶𝓾𝓲𝓽𝓪 𝓰𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮, 𝓮 𝓼𝓪̃𝓸 𝓹𝓸𝓻 𝓲𝓼𝓼𝓸 𝓮𝓻𝓻𝓸𝓼 𝓹𝓸𝓵𝓲́𝓽𝓲𝓬𝓸𝓼 - 𝓮 𝓛𝓾𝓵𝓪, 𝓭𝓮𝓹𝓸𝓲𝓼 𝓭𝓮 𝓾𝓶𝓪 𝓹𝓻𝓲𝓶𝓮𝓲𝓻𝓪 𝓻𝓮𝓪𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸 𝓭𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓮𝓶𝓹𝓮𝓻𝓪𝓭𝓪 𝓷𝓸 𝓭𝓸𝓶𝓲𝓷𝓰𝓸, 𝓼𝓸𝓾𝓫𝓮 𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓪 𝓼𝓮𝓰𝓾𝓷𝓭𝓪-𝓯𝓮𝓲𝓻𝓪 𝓬𝓸𝓻𝓻𝓲𝓰𝓲𝓻 𝓸 𝓽𝓸𝓶 𝓮 𝓸 𝓭𝓲𝓼𝓬𝓾𝓻𝓼𝓸 𝓭𝓮 𝓶𝓸𝓭𝓸 𝓪 𝓲𝓻 𝓪𝓸 𝓮𝓷𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓽𝓻𝓸 𝓭𝓮 𝓺𝓾𝓮𝓶, 𝓷𝓪̃𝓸 𝓽𝓮𝓷𝓭𝓸 𝓿𝓸𝓽𝓪𝓭𝓸 𝓷𝓮𝓵𝓮, 𝓼𝓮 𝓺𝓾𝓮𝓲𝓻𝓪 𝓭𝓮𝓶𝓪𝓻𝓬𝓪𝓻 𝓭𝓸 𝓸𝓬𝓸𝓻𝓻𝓲𝓭𝓸.

𝓐𝓵𝓲𝓪́𝓼, 𝓭𝓮 𝓽𝓪𝓵 𝓶𝓸𝓭𝓸 𝓸 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓪𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓽𝓮𝓬𝓮𝓾 𝓹𝓸𝓭𝓮 𝓻𝓮𝓿𝓮𝓵𝓪𝓻-𝓼𝓮 𝓭𝓪𝓷𝓸𝓼𝓸 𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓪 𝓸 𝓫𝓸𝓵𝓼𝓸𝓷𝓪𝓻𝓲𝓼𝓶𝓸 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓱𝓪́ 𝓺𝓾𝓮𝓶 𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓮𝓳𝓪 𝓳𝓪́ 𝓪 𝓹𝓸̂𝓻 𝓪 𝓱𝓲𝓹𝓸́𝓽𝓮𝓼𝓮 𝓭𝓮 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓪 𝓪𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓪𝓽𝓸𝓼𝓪 𝓪𝓾𝓼𝓮̂𝓷𝓬𝓲𝓪 𝓭𝓮 𝓻𝓮𝓪𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸 𝓹𝓸𝓵𝓲𝓬𝓲𝓪𝓵 𝓮𝓶 𝓑𝓻𝓪𝓼𝓲́𝓵𝓲𝓪 𝓯𝓸𝓲 𝓯𝓻𝓾𝓽𝓸 𝓭𝓮 𝓾𝓶 𝓶𝓪𝓺𝓾𝓲𝓪𝓿𝓮𝓵𝓲𝓼𝓶𝓸 - 𝓸 𝓭𝓮 𝓹𝓮𝓻𝓶𝓲𝓽𝓲𝓻 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓸𝓼 𝓿𝓪̂𝓷𝓭𝓪𝓵𝓸𝓼 𝓪𝓰𝓲𝓼𝓼𝓮𝓶 𝓪̀ 𝓿𝓸𝓷𝓽𝓪𝓭𝓮, 𝓭𝓮 𝓶𝓸𝓭𝓸 𝓪 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓑𝓸𝓵𝓼𝓸𝓷𝓪𝓻𝓸 𝓮 𝓸 𝓼𝓮𝓾 𝓶𝓸𝓿𝓲𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓸 𝓬𝓪𝓲́𝓼𝓼𝓮𝓶 𝓮𝓶 𝓭𝓮𝓼𝓰𝓻𝓪𝓬̧𝓪, 𝓹𝓮𝓻𝓭𝓮𝓷𝓭𝓸 𝓪𝓹𝓸𝓲𝓸 𝓷𝓪𝓬𝓲𝓸𝓷𝓪𝓵 𝓮 𝓲𝓷𝓽𝓮𝓻𝓷𝓪𝓬𝓲𝓸𝓷𝓪𝓵.

𝓔́ 𝓿𝓮𝓻𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓮 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓲𝓷𝓽𝓮𝓻𝓷𝓪𝓬𝓲𝓸𝓷𝓪𝓵𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮 𝓑𝓸𝓵𝓼𝓸𝓷𝓪𝓻𝓸 𝓿𝓲𝓾 𝓪𝓽𝓮́ 𝓵𝓲́𝓭𝓮𝓻𝓮𝓼 𝓭𝓮 𝓮𝔁𝓽𝓻𝓮𝓶𝓪-𝓭𝓲𝓻𝓮𝓲𝓽𝓪 𝓬𝓸𝓶𝓸 𝓪 𝓹𝓻𝓲𝓶𝓮𝓲𝓻𝓪-𝓶𝓲𝓷𝓲𝓼𝓽𝓻𝓪 𝓲𝓽𝓪𝓵𝓲𝓪𝓷𝓪 𝓖𝓲𝓸𝓻𝓰𝓲𝓪 𝓜𝓮𝓵𝓸𝓷𝓲 𝓭𝓮𝓶𝓪𝓻𝓬𝓪𝓻𝓮𝓶-𝓼𝓮 𝓭𝓮 𝓶𝓸𝓭𝓸 𝓲𝓷𝓮𝓺𝓾𝓲́𝓿𝓸𝓬𝓸 𝓭𝓸 𝓼𝓾𝓬𝓮𝓭𝓲𝓭𝓸 (𝓺𝓾𝓲𝓬̧𝓪́ 𝓿𝓮̂𝓶 𝓭𝓪𝓲́ 𝓪𝓼 𝓯𝓸𝓻𝓽𝓮𝓼 𝓭𝓸𝓻𝓮𝓼 𝓭𝓮 𝓫𝓪𝓻𝓻𝓲𝓰𝓪 𝓺𝓾𝓮, 𝓭𝓲𝔃𝓮𝓶-𝓷𝓸𝓼, 𝓸 𝓪𝓬𝓸𝓶𝓮𝓽𝓮𝓻𝓪𝓶 𝓷𝓪 𝓕𝓵𝓸𝓻𝓲𝓭𝓪), 𝓮 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓸 𝓹𝓻𝓸́𝓹𝓻𝓲𝓸, 𝓲𝓼𝓸𝓵𝓪𝓭𝓸, 𝓪𝓶𝓮𝓭𝓻𝓸𝓷𝓽𝓪𝓭𝓸 𝓮 𝓼𝓸𝓷𝓼𝓸, 𝓪𝓬𝓪𝓫𝓸𝓾 𝓹𝓸𝓻 𝓯𝓪𝔃𝓮𝓻 𝓸 𝓶𝓮𝓼𝓶𝓸. 𝓜𝓪𝓼 𝓪𝓺𝓾𝓲𝓵𝓸 𝓪 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓪𝓼𝓼𝓲𝓼𝓽𝓲𝓶𝓸𝓼 𝓷𝓸𝓼 𝓔𝓤𝓐 𝓮 𝓪𝓰𝓸𝓻𝓪 𝓷𝓸 𝓑𝓻𝓪𝓼𝓲𝓵 (𝓮 𝓶𝓪𝓲𝓼 𝓪𝓲𝓷𝓭𝓪 𝓹𝓸𝓻𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓼𝓮 𝓻𝓮𝓹𝓮𝓽𝓲𝓾 𝓷𝓸 𝓑𝓻𝓪𝓼𝓲𝓵 𝓭𝓮𝓹𝓸𝓲𝓼 𝓭𝓮 𝓪𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓽𝓮𝓬𝓮𝓻 𝓷𝓸𝓼 𝓔𝓤𝓐, 𝓮𝓶 𝓸́𝓫𝓿𝓲𝓪 𝓻𝓮𝓶𝓪𝓴𝓮 𝓭𝓸 𝓯𝓲𝓵𝓶𝓮 𝓪𝓶𝓮𝓻𝓲𝓬𝓪𝓷𝓸) 𝓷𝓪̃𝓸 𝓮́ 𝓪𝓹𝓮𝓷𝓪𝓼 𝓾𝓶 𝓼𝓲𝓷𝓪𝓵 𝓭𝓪𝓺𝓾𝓲𝓵𝓸 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓳𝓪́ 𝓼𝓪𝓫𝓮𝓶𝓸𝓼 - 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓷𝓸 𝓼𝓮𝓲𝓸 𝓭𝓪𝓼 𝓭𝓮𝓶𝓸𝓬𝓻𝓪𝓬𝓲𝓪𝓼 𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓪̃𝓸 𝓪 𝓬𝓻𝓮𝓼𝓬𝓮𝓻 𝓮𝔁𝓹𝓸𝓷𝓮𝓷𝓬𝓲𝓪𝓵𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮 𝓶𝓸𝓿𝓲𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓸𝓼 𝓬𝓾𝓳𝓸 𝓲𝓷𝓽𝓾𝓲𝓽𝓸, 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓼𝓬𝓲𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮 𝓸𝓾 𝓲𝓷𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓼𝓬𝓲𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮, 𝓮́ 𝓭𝓮𝓻𝓻𝓾𝓫𝓪́-𝓵𝓪𝓼, 𝓬𝓱𝓮𝓰𝓪𝓷𝓭𝓸 𝓪𝓸 𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓪𝓭𝓸𝔁𝓸 𝓭𝓮 𝓮𝔁𝓲𝓰𝓲𝓻, 𝓬𝓸𝓶𝓸 𝓸 𝓯𝓪𝔃𝓮𝓶 𝓸𝓼 𝓫𝓸𝓵𝓼𝓸𝓷𝓪𝓻𝓲𝓼𝓽𝓪𝓼, 𝓪 𝓲𝓶𝓹𝓵𝓪𝓷𝓽𝓪𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸 𝓭𝓮 𝓭𝓲𝓽𝓪𝓭𝓾𝓻𝓪𝓼 𝓶𝓲𝓵𝓲𝓽𝓪𝓻𝓮𝓼 𝓬𝓸𝓶𝓸 "𝓼𝓪𝓵𝓿𝓪𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸" 𝓭𝓸 𝓹𝓪𝓲́𝓼 𝓮 𝓭𝓸 𝓹𝓻𝓸́𝓹𝓻𝓲𝓸 𝓻𝓮𝓰𝓲𝓶𝓮 𝓭𝓮𝓶𝓸𝓬𝓻𝓪́𝓽𝓲𝓬𝓸.

𝓔𝓼𝓽𝓮𝓼 𝓪𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓽𝓮𝓬𝓲𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓸𝓼 𝓶𝓮𝓭𝓸𝓷𝓱𝓸𝓼 𝓭𝓮𝓶𝓸𝓷𝓼𝓽𝓻𝓪𝓶 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓪 𝓲𝓭𝓮𝓲𝓪 𝓭𝓮 𝓭𝓮𝓶𝓸𝓬𝓻𝓪𝓬𝓲𝓪 𝓼𝓮 𝓽𝓻𝓪𝓷𝓼𝓯𝓸𝓻𝓶𝓸𝓾, 𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓪 𝓶𝓾𝓲𝓽𝓪 𝓰𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮, 𝓷𝓾𝓶 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓬𝓮𝓲𝓽𝓸 𝓹𝓵𝓪́𝓼𝓽𝓲𝓬𝓸, 𝓿𝓪𝔃𝓲𝓸, 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓷𝓪̃𝓸 𝓬𝓸𝓻𝓻𝓮𝓼𝓹𝓸𝓷𝓭𝓮 𝓪 𝓺𝓾𝓪𝓵𝓺𝓾𝓮𝓻 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓳𝓾𝓷𝓽𝓸 𝓭𝓮 𝓹𝓻𝓲𝓷𝓬𝓲́𝓹𝓲𝓸𝓼. 𝓤𝓶𝓪 𝓮𝓼𝓹𝓮́𝓬𝓲𝓮 𝓭𝓮 𝓯𝓪𝓴𝓮𝓭𝓮𝓶𝓸𝓬𝓻𝓪𝓬𝓲𝓪, 𝓸𝓾 𝓭𝓮𝓶𝓸𝓬𝓻𝓪𝓬𝓲𝓪 𝓪𝓵𝓽𝓮𝓻𝓷𝓪𝓽𝓲𝓿𝓪 - 𝓬𝓸𝓶𝓸 𝓪𝓼 𝓯𝓪𝓴𝓮 𝓷𝓮𝔀𝓼 𝓮 𝓸𝓼 𝓯𝓪𝓬𝓽𝓸𝓼 𝓪𝓵𝓽𝓮𝓻𝓷𝓪𝓽𝓲𝓿𝓸𝓼, 𝓮́ 𝓸 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓭𝓮𝓻 𝓳𝓮𝓲𝓽𝓸 𝓷𝓸 𝓶𝓸𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓸.

* Jornalista

IN "DIÁRIO DE NOTÍCIAS" -10/01/23 .