.
O que é destruído quando
se destrói uma cidade?
𝓝𝓪𝓼 𝓾́𝓵𝓽𝓲𝓶𝓪𝓼 𝓼𝓮𝓶𝓪𝓷𝓪𝓼, 𝓪𝓼 𝓷𝓸𝓽𝓲́𝓬𝓲𝓪𝓼 𝓽𝓮̂𝓶-𝓷𝓸𝓼 𝓶𝓸𝓼𝓽𝓻𝓪𝓭𝓸 𝓿𝓲́𝓭𝓮𝓸𝓼 𝓮 𝓲𝓶𝓪𝓰𝓮𝓷𝓼 𝓭𝓮 𝓪𝓽𝓪𝓺𝓾𝓮𝓼 𝓫𝓻𝓾𝓽𝓪𝓲𝓼 𝓮 𝓭𝓪 𝓼𝓾𝓫𝓼𝓮𝓺𝓾𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮 𝓭𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓻𝓾𝓲𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸 𝓭𝓮 𝓿𝓪́𝓻𝓲𝓪𝓼 𝓬𝓲𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓮𝓼 𝓾𝓬𝓻𝓪𝓷𝓲𝓪𝓷𝓪𝓼: 𝓜𝓪𝓻𝓲𝓾𝓹𝓸𝓵, 𝓚𝓲𝓮𝓿 𝓸𝓾 𝓚𝓱𝓪𝓻𝓴𝓲𝓿. 𝓐𝓽𝓪𝓺𝓾𝓮𝓼 𝓪𝓮́𝓻𝓮𝓸𝓼, 𝓶𝓲́𝓼𝓼𝓮𝓲𝓼 𝓮 𝓽𝓪𝓷𝓺𝓾𝓮𝓼 𝓹𝓮𝓵𝓪𝓼 𝓻𝓾𝓪𝓼 𝓭𝓪 𝓬𝓲𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓮, 𝓪𝓽𝓪𝓺𝓾𝓮𝓼 𝓪 𝔃𝓸𝓷𝓪𝓼 𝓻𝓮𝓼𝓲𝓭𝓮𝓷𝓬𝓲𝓪𝓲𝓼, 𝓶𝓪𝓻𝓬𝓸𝓼 𝓬𝓾𝓵𝓽𝓾𝓻𝓪𝓲𝓼 𝓮 𝓪 𝓵𝓾𝓰𝓪𝓻𝓮𝓼 𝓭𝓸 𝓭𝓲𝓪-𝓪-𝓭𝓲𝓪 𝓾𝓻𝓫𝓪𝓷𝓸. 𝓝𝓪̃𝓸 𝓮́ 𝓪 𝓹𝓻𝓲𝓶𝓮𝓲𝓻𝓪 𝓿𝓮𝔃. 𝓓𝓮𝓼𝓭𝓮 𝓪 𝓢𝓮𝓰𝓾𝓷𝓭𝓪 𝓖𝓾𝓮𝓻𝓻𝓪 𝓜𝓾𝓷𝓭𝓲𝓪𝓵 𝓮, 𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓽𝓲𝓬𝓾𝓵𝓪𝓻𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮, 𝓭𝓮𝓼𝓭𝓮 𝓪 𝓖𝓾𝓮𝓻𝓻𝓪 𝓭𝓪 𝓑𝓸́𝓼𝓷𝓲𝓪 (𝟏𝟗𝟗𝟐-𝟏𝟗𝟗𝟓) 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓿𝓪́𝓻𝓲𝓸𝓼 𝓪𝓾𝓽𝓸𝓻𝓮𝓼 𝓽𝓮̂𝓶 𝓿𝓲𝓷𝓭𝓸 𝓪 𝓾𝓽𝓲𝓵𝓲𝔃𝓪𝓻 𝓸 𝓽𝓮𝓻𝓶𝓸 𝓾𝓻𝓫𝓲𝓬𝓲́𝓭𝓲𝓸: 𝓸 𝓪𝓼𝓼𝓪𝓼𝓼𝓲𝓷𝓪𝓽𝓸 𝓫𝓻𝓾𝓽𝓪𝓵 𝓭𝓮 𝓾𝓶𝓪 𝓬𝓲𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓮, 𝓷𝓪𝓼 𝓹𝓪𝓵𝓪𝓿𝓻𝓪𝓼 𝓭𝓮 𝓐𝓵𝓮𝓴𝓼𝓪𝓷𝓭𝓻𝓪 𝓜𝓲𝓵𝓲𝓬𝓮𝓿𝓲𝓬.
𝓝𝓾𝓶 𝓪𝓻𝓽𝓲𝓰𝓸 𝓭𝓮 𝟐𝟔 𝓭𝓮 𝓶𝓪𝓻𝓬̧𝓸 𝓭𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓮 𝓪𝓷𝓸, 𝓸 𝓱𝓲𝓼𝓽𝓸𝓻𝓲𝓪𝓭𝓸𝓻 𝓐𝓭𝓪𝓶 𝓣𝓸𝓸𝔃𝓮 𝓽𝓻𝓸𝓾𝔁𝓮 𝓪𝓸 𝓭𝓮 𝓬𝓲𝓶𝓪 𝓪 𝓹𝓮𝓻𝓽𝓲𝓷𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮 𝓬𝓸𝓶𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓪𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸 𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓻𝓮 𝓪 𝓭𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓻𝓾𝓲𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸 𝓭𝓪𝓼 𝓬𝓲𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓮𝓼 𝓳𝓾𝓰𝓸𝓼𝓵𝓪𝓿𝓪𝓼 𝓭𝓾𝓻𝓪𝓷𝓽𝓮 𝓪 𝓭𝓮́𝓬𝓪𝓭𝓪 𝓭𝓮 𝟏𝟗𝟗𝟎 𝓮 𝓪𝓼 𝓲𝓶𝓪𝓰𝓮𝓷𝓼 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓱𝓸𝓳𝓮 𝓷𝓸𝓼 𝓬𝓱𝓮𝓰𝓪𝓶 𝓭𝓪𝓼 𝓬𝓲𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓮𝓼 𝓾𝓬𝓻𝓪𝓷𝓲𝓪𝓷𝓪𝓼. 𝓥𝓾𝓴𝓸𝓿𝓪𝓻, 𝓓𝓾𝓫𝓻𝓸𝓿𝓷𝓲𝓴, 𝓜𝓸𝓼𝓽𝓪𝓻 𝓮 𝓢𝓪𝓻𝓪𝓳𝓮𝓿𝓸 𝓯𝓲𝓬𝓪𝓻𝓪̃𝓸 𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓪 𝓼𝓮𝓶𝓹𝓻𝓮 𝓰𝓻𝓪𝓿𝓪𝓭𝓪𝓼 𝓷𝓸 𝓷𝓸𝓼𝓼𝓸 𝓲𝓶𝓪𝓰𝓲𝓷𝓪́𝓻𝓲𝓸 𝓬𝓸𝓵𝓮𝓽𝓲𝓿𝓸 𝓬𝓸𝓶𝓸 𝓼𝓲́𝓶𝓫𝓸𝓵𝓸𝓼 𝓭𝓪 𝓫𝓻𝓾𝓽𝓪𝓵𝓲𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓮 𝓭𝓪 𝓰𝓾𝓮𝓻𝓻𝓪 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓹𝓸̂𝓼 𝓯𝓲𝓶 𝓪𝓸 𝓹𝓻𝓸𝓳𝓮𝓽𝓸 𝓭𝓪 𝓙𝓾𝓰𝓸𝓼𝓵𝓪́𝓿𝓲𝓪. 𝓔𝓼𝓽𝓪 𝓰𝓾𝓮𝓻𝓻𝓪, 𝓶𝓸𝓿𝓲𝓭𝓪 𝓹𝓮𝓵𝓸 𝓷𝓪𝓬𝓲𝓸𝓷𝓪𝓵𝓲𝓼𝓶𝓸 𝓮𝔁𝓬𝓵𝓾𝓭𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮 𝓮 𝔁𝓮𝓷𝓸́𝓯𝓸𝓫𝓸 𝓼𝓮́𝓻𝓿𝓲𝓸 𝓮 𝓬𝓻𝓸𝓪𝓽𝓪, 𝓯𝓲𝓬𝓸𝓾 𝓹𝓪𝓾𝓽𝓪𝓭𝓪 𝓹𝓸𝓻 𝓾𝓶 𝓹𝓻𝓸𝓯𝓾𝓷𝓭𝓸 𝓼𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓲𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓸 𝓪𝓷𝓽𝓲𝓾𝓻𝓫𝓪𝓷𝓸, 𝓼𝓮𝓷𝓭𝓸 𝓪𝓼 𝓬𝓲𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓮𝓼 𝓪𝓼 𝓻𝓮𝓹𝓻𝓮𝓼𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓪𝓬̧𝓸̃𝓮𝓼 𝓶𝓪́𝔁𝓲𝓶𝓪𝓼 𝓭𝓮 𝓽𝓾𝓭𝓸 𝓪𝓺𝓾𝓲𝓵𝓸 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓬𝓸𝓶𝓫𝓪𝓽𝓲𝓪𝓶: 𝓸 𝓶𝓾𝓵𝓽𝓲𝓬𝓾𝓵𝓽𝓾𝓻𝓪𝓵𝓲𝓼𝓶𝓸 𝓮 𝓪 𝓿𝓲𝓭𝓪 𝓮𝓶 𝓬𝓸𝓶𝓾𝓶. 𝓢𝓪𝓻𝓪𝓳𝓮𝓿𝓸, 𝓬𝓲𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓮 𝓹𝓵𝓾𝓻𝓪𝓵 𝓮 𝓭𝓮 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓿𝓲́𝓿𝓲𝓸 𝓭𝓮 𝓬𝓾𝓵𝓽𝓾𝓻𝓪𝓼, 𝓯𝓸𝓲 𝓪𝓵𝓿𝓸 𝓭𝓮 𝓾𝓶 𝓬𝓮𝓻𝓬𝓸 𝓫𝓻𝓾𝓽𝓪𝓵 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓭𝓾𝓻𝓸𝓾 𝓺𝓾𝓪𝓼𝓮 𝓺𝓾𝓪𝓽𝓻𝓸 𝓪𝓷𝓸𝓼 𝓮, 𝓭𝓾𝓻𝓪𝓷𝓽𝓮 𝓸 𝓺𝓾𝓪𝓵, 𝓪 𝓑𝓲𝓫𝓵𝓲𝓸𝓽𝓮𝓬𝓪 𝓝𝓪𝓬𝓲𝓸𝓷𝓪𝓵, 𝓬𝓸𝓶𝓸 𝓼𝓲́𝓶𝓫𝓸𝓵𝓸 𝓭𝓪 𝓱𝓲𝓼𝓽𝓸́𝓻𝓲𝓪 𝓮 𝓭𝓪 𝓬𝓾𝓵𝓽𝓾𝓻𝓪𝓵 𝓫𝓸́𝓼𝓷𝓲𝓪, 𝓯𝓸𝓲 𝓫𝓻𝓾𝓽𝓪𝓵𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮 𝓻𝓮𝓭𝓾𝔃𝓲𝓭𝓪 𝓪 𝓭𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓻𝓸𝓬̧𝓸𝓼. 𝓔𝓶 𝓜𝓸𝓼𝓽𝓪𝓻, 𝓽𝓪𝓶𝓫𝓮́𝓶 𝓷𝓪 𝓑𝓸́𝓼𝓷𝓲𝓪, 𝓪𝓼 𝓯𝓸𝓻𝓬̧𝓪𝓼 𝓬𝓻𝓸𝓪𝓽𝓪𝓼 𝓭𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓻𝓾𝓲́𝓻𝓪𝓶 𝓪 𝓮𝓶𝓫𝓵𝓮𝓶𝓪́𝓽𝓲𝓬𝓪 𝓹𝓸𝓷𝓽𝓮 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓵𝓲𝓰𝓪𝓿𝓪 𝓼𝓲𝓶𝓫𝓸́𝓵𝓲𝓬𝓪 𝓮 𝓵𝓲𝓽𝓮𝓻𝓪𝓵𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮 𝓸 𝓞𝓻𝓲𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮 𝓮 𝓸 𝓞𝓬𝓲𝓭𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮 𝓷𝓪 𝓬𝓲𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓮, 𝓾𝓵𝓽𝓻𝓪𝓹𝓪𝓼𝓼𝓪𝓷𝓭𝓸 𝓭𝓲𝓿𝓲𝓼𝓸̃𝓮𝓼 𝓮́𝓽𝓷𝓲𝓬𝓪𝓼. 𝓐 𝓻𝓪𝔃𝓪̃𝓸 𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓪 𝓪 𝓼𝓾𝓪 𝓭𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓻𝓾𝓲𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸 𝓮́ 𝓬𝓵𝓪𝓻𝓪: 𝓮𝓻𝓻𝓪𝓭𝓲𝓬𝓪𝓻 𝓾𝓶 𝓼𝓲́𝓶𝓫𝓸𝓵𝓸 𝓭𝓮 𝓲𝓷𝓽𝓮𝓻𝓬𝓾𝓵𝓽𝓾𝓻𝓪𝓵𝓲𝓼𝓶𝓸 𝓮 𝓪𝓷𝓲𝓺𝓾𝓲𝓵𝓪𝓻 𝓪 𝓱𝓲𝓼𝓽𝓸́𝓻𝓲𝓪 𝓭𝓮 𝓾𝓶 𝓹𝓸𝓿𝓸. 𝓥𝓾𝓴𝓸𝓿𝓪𝓻, 𝓷𝓪 𝓒𝓻𝓸𝓪́𝓬𝓲𝓪, 𝓾𝓶𝓪 𝓬𝓲𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓮 𝓬𝓸𝓶 𝓹𝓸𝓾𝓬𝓪 𝓲𝓶𝓹𝓸𝓻𝓽𝓪̂𝓷𝓬𝓲𝓪 𝓶𝓲𝓵𝓲𝓽𝓪𝓻, 𝓯𝓸𝓲 𝓻𝓮𝓭𝓾𝔃𝓲𝓭𝓪 𝓪 𝓮𝓼𝓬𝓸𝓶𝓫𝓻𝓸𝓼, 𝓬𝓸𝓶 𝓸 𝓪𝓽𝓪𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓹𝓻𝓸𝓹𝓸𝓼𝓲𝓽𝓪𝓭𝓸 𝓪 𝓪́𝓻𝓮𝓪𝓼 𝓾𝓻𝓫𝓪𝓷𝓪𝓼 𝓮 𝓻𝓮𝓼𝓲𝓭𝓮𝓷𝓬𝓲𝓪𝓲𝓼. 𝓔𝓼𝓽𝓲𝓶𝓪-𝓼𝓮 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓬𝓪𝓭𝓪 𝓴𝓶𝟐 𝓭𝓪 𝓬𝓲𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓮 𝓽𝓮𝓷𝓱𝓪 𝓼𝓲𝓭𝓸 𝓪𝓵𝓿𝓸 𝓭𝓮 𝓬𝓮𝓻𝓬𝓪 𝓭𝓮 𝟓 𝓶𝓲𝓵 𝓹𝓻𝓸𝓳𝓮́𝓽𝓮𝓲𝓼. 𝓐𝓼𝓼𝓲𝓶, 𝓬𝓸𝓶𝓸 𝓮𝔁𝓹𝓵𝓲𝓬𝓪 𝓸 𝓬𝓲𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓲𝓼𝓽𝓪 𝓹𝓸𝓵𝓲́𝓽𝓲𝓬𝓸 𝓜𝓪𝓻𝓽𝓲𝓷 𝓒𝓸𝔀𝓪𝓻𝓭, 𝓸 𝓮𝓽𝓷𝓸𝓷𝓪𝓬𝓲𝓸𝓷𝓪𝓵𝓲𝓼𝓶𝓸 𝓯𝓮𝔃 𝓭𝓸 𝓾𝓻𝓫𝓲𝓬𝓲́𝓭𝓲𝓸 𝓾𝓶𝓪 𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓽𝓮 𝓲𝓷𝓽𝓮𝓰𝓻𝓪𝓵 𝓭𝓪 𝓬𝓪𝓶𝓹𝓪𝓷𝓱𝓪 𝓭𝓮 𝓵𝓲𝓶𝓹𝓮𝔃𝓪 𝓮 𝓱𝓸𝓶𝓸𝓰𝓮𝓷𝓮𝓲𝔃𝓪𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸 𝓮́𝓽𝓷𝓲𝓬𝓪. 𝓓𝓾𝓻𝓪𝓷𝓽𝓮 𝓪 𝓢𝓮𝓰𝓾𝓷𝓭𝓪 𝓖𝓾𝓮𝓻𝓻𝓪 𝓜𝓾𝓷𝓭𝓲𝓪𝓵, 𝓸 𝓹𝓻𝓸𝓳𝓮𝓽𝓸 𝓷𝓪𝔃𝓲 𝓪 𝓛𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓮 𝓹𝓻𝓮𝓽𝓮𝓷𝓭𝓮𝓾 𝓭𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓻𝓾𝓲𝓻 𝓪𝓼 𝓬𝓲𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓮𝓼, 𝓻𝓮𝓭𝓾𝔃𝓲𝓷𝓭𝓸 𝓪 𝓹𝓸́ 𝓸𝓼 𝓹𝓸́𝓵𝓸𝓼 𝓭𝓮 𝓲𝓷𝓽𝓮𝓻𝓬𝓪̂𝓶𝓫𝓲𝓸 𝓬𝓾𝓵𝓽𝓾𝓻𝓪𝓵 𝓮 𝓲𝓷𝓽𝓮𝓵𝓮𝓬𝓽𝓾𝓪𝓵 𝓹𝓻𝓸𝓰𝓻𝓮𝓼𝓼𝓲𝓼𝓽𝓪, 𝓮𝓶 𝓽𝓾𝓭𝓸 𝓪𝓷𝓽𝓸́𝓷𝓲𝓶𝓸𝓼 𝓭𝓸 𝓹𝓻𝓲𝓶𝓮𝓲𝓻𝓸. 𝓒𝓲𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓮𝓼 𝓹𝓸𝓵𝓪𝓬𝓪𝓼 𝓮 𝓼𝓸𝓿𝓲𝓮́𝓽𝓲𝓬𝓪𝓼 𝓯𝓸𝓻𝓪𝓶 𝓻𝓮𝓭𝓾𝔃𝓲𝓭𝓪𝓼 𝓪 𝓮𝓼𝓬𝓸𝓶𝓫𝓻𝓸𝓼 𝓷𝓾𝓶 𝓹𝓻𝓸𝓳𝓮𝓽𝓸 𝓭𝓮 𝓪𝓷𝓲𝓺𝓾𝓲𝓵𝓪𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸 𝓬𝓾𝓵𝓽𝓾𝓻𝓪𝓵 𝓮 𝓱𝓲𝓼𝓽𝓸́𝓻𝓲𝓪 𝓭𝓸𝓼 𝓹𝓸𝓿𝓸𝓼 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓼𝓲𝓭𝓮𝓻𝓪𝓭𝓸𝓼 𝓲𝓷𝓯𝓮𝓻𝓲𝓸𝓻𝓮𝓼.
𝓐𝓸 𝓵𝓸𝓷𝓰𝓸 𝓭𝓸𝓼 𝓪𝓷𝓸𝓼, 𝓿𝓪́𝓻𝓲𝓸𝓼 𝓯𝓸𝓻𝓪𝓶 𝓸𝓼 𝓪𝓾𝓽𝓸𝓻𝓮𝓼 (𝓐𝓷𝓭𝓻𝓮𝓪𝓼 𝓗𝓾𝔂𝓼𝓼𝓮𝓷, 𝓔𝓵𝓮𝓷 𝓢𝓪𝓹𝓮𝓰𝓪 𝓸𝓾 𝓓𝓮𝓻𝓮𝓴 𝓐𝓵𝓭𝓮𝓻𝓶𝓪𝓷) 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓭𝓮𝓼𝓬𝓻𝓮𝓿𝓮𝓻𝓪𝓶 𝓪𝓼 𝓬𝓲𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓮𝓼 𝓬𝓸𝓶𝓸 𝓹𝓪𝓵𝓲𝓶𝓹𝓼𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓸𝓼: 𝓬𝓸𝓶𝓹𝓸𝓼𝓽𝓪𝓼 𝓹𝓸𝓻 𝓿𝓪́𝓻𝓲𝓪𝓼 𝓬𝓪𝓶𝓪𝓭𝓪𝓼 𝓭𝓮 𝓶𝓮𝓶𝓸́𝓻𝓲𝓪𝓼, 𝓬𝓸𝓶𝓸 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓾𝓶 𝓽𝓮𝔁𝓽𝓸 𝓼𝓸𝓫𝓻𝓮 𝓸 𝓺𝓾𝓪𝓵 𝓼𝓮 𝓿𝓪̃𝓸 𝓲𝓷𝓼𝓮𝓻𝓲𝓷𝓭𝓸 𝓷𝓸𝓿𝓪𝓼 𝓬𝓪𝓶𝓪𝓭𝓪𝓼 𝓶𝓪𝓽𝓮𝓻𝓲𝓪𝓲𝓼 𝓸𝓾 𝓹𝓮𝓻𝓯𝓸𝓻𝓶𝓪𝓽𝓲𝓿𝓪𝓼. 𝓒𝓸𝓶𝓹𝓸𝓼𝓽𝓪 𝓹𝓸𝓻 𝓶𝓾𝓼𝓮𝓾𝓼, 𝓶𝓸𝓷𝓾𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓸𝓼, 𝓶𝓮𝓶𝓸𝓻𝓲𝓪𝓲𝓼 𝓮 𝓮𝓼𝓹𝓪𝓬̧𝓸𝓼 𝓬𝓸𝓶𝓾𝓷𝓼, 𝓪 𝓬𝓲𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓮 𝓮́ 𝓾𝓶 𝓬𝓸𝓻𝓹𝓸 𝓭𝓲𝓷𝓪̂𝓶𝓲𝓬𝓸 𝓮 𝓮𝓶 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓼𝓽𝓪𝓷𝓽𝓮 𝓽𝓻𝓪𝓷𝓼𝓯𝓸𝓻𝓶𝓪𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸 𝓺𝓾𝓮, 𝓫𝓮𝓫𝓮𝓷𝓭𝓸 𝓭𝓮 𝓶𝓾́𝓵𝓽𝓲𝓹𝓵𝓪𝓼 𝓲𝓷𝓯𝓵𝓾𝓮̂𝓷𝓬𝓲𝓪𝓼, 𝓯𝓸𝓻𝓶𝓪 𝓾𝓶 𝓽𝓮𝔁𝓽𝓸 𝓷𝓸 𝓺𝓾𝓪𝓵 𝓹𝓸𝓭𝓮𝓶𝓸𝓼 𝓵𝓮𝓻 𝓶𝓮𝓶𝓸́𝓻𝓲𝓪𝓼, 𝓷𝓪𝓻𝓻𝓪𝓽𝓲𝓿𝓪𝓼 𝓸𝓯𝓲𝓬𝓲𝓪𝓲𝓼, 𝓭𝓲𝓼𝓹𝓾𝓽𝓪𝓼 𝓭𝓮 𝓹𝓸𝓭𝓮𝓻 𝓮 𝓭𝓲𝓼𝓬𝓾𝓻𝓼𝓸𝓼 𝓼𝓸𝓫𝓻𝓮 𝓪 𝓲𝓭𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓲𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓮 𝓹𝓸𝓹𝓾𝓵𝓪𝓻. 𝓓𝓪 𝓶𝓮𝓼𝓶𝓪 𝓯𝓸𝓻𝓶𝓪 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓼𝓮 𝓵𝓮̂ 𝓾𝓶 𝓽𝓮𝔁𝓽𝓸, 𝓱𝓪́ 𝓺𝓾𝓮𝓶 𝓸 𝓽𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮 𝓪𝓹𝓪𝓰𝓪𝓻. 𝓓𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓮 𝓶𝓸𝓭𝓸, 𝓪 𝓭𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓻𝓾𝓲𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸 𝓭𝓮 𝓾𝓶𝓪 𝓬𝓲𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓮 𝓮́ 𝓸 𝓪𝓹𝓪𝓰𝓪𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓸 𝓭𝓮 𝓽𝓸𝓭𝓸 𝓮𝓼𝓼𝓮 𝓽𝓮𝔁𝓽𝓸 𝓬𝓾𝓵𝓽𝓾𝓻𝓪𝓵, 𝓶𝓮𝓶𝓸𝓻𝓲𝓪𝓵 𝓮 𝓱𝓲𝓼𝓽𝓸́𝓻𝓲𝓬𝓸. 𝓡𝓮𝓹𝓻𝓮𝓼𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓪 𝓪 𝓮𝓵𝓲𝓶𝓲𝓷𝓪𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸 𝓭𝓪 𝓶𝓪𝓽𝓮𝓻𝓲𝓪𝓵𝓲𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓮 𝓭𝓪 𝓱𝓲𝓼𝓽𝓸́𝓻𝓲𝓪 𝓭𝓮 𝓾𝓶𝓪 𝓬𝓸𝓶𝓾𝓷𝓲𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓮, 𝓭𝓸 𝓪𝓻𝓺𝓾𝓲𝓿𝓸 𝓯𝓲́𝓼𝓲𝓬𝓸 𝓭𝓪 𝓼𝓾𝓪 𝓶𝓮𝓶𝓸́𝓻𝓲𝓪. 𝓐𝓹𝓪𝓰𝓪𝓻 𝓾𝓶𝓪 𝓬𝓲𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓮 𝓭𝓸 𝓶𝓪𝓹𝓪 𝓮́, 𝓷𝓪𝓭𝓪 𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓸𝓼 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓮𝓵𝓲𝓶𝓲𝓷𝓪𝓻 𝓪 𝓱𝓲𝓼𝓽𝓸́𝓻𝓲𝓪, 𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓽𝓮 𝓲𝓷𝓽𝓮𝓰𝓻𝓪𝓷𝓽𝓮 𝓭𝓮 𝓺𝓾𝓪𝓵𝓺𝓾𝓮𝓻 𝓹𝓻𝓸𝓳𝓮𝓽𝓸 𝓮𝓽𝓷𝓸𝓷𝓪𝓬𝓲𝓸𝓷𝓪𝓵𝓲𝓼𝓽𝓪 𝓮 𝓰𝓮𝓷𝓸𝓬𝓲𝓭𝓪. 𝓐 𝓹𝓻𝓸𝓹𝓸́𝓼𝓲𝓽𝓸 𝓭𝓪 𝓭𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓻𝓾𝓲𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸 𝓭𝓪 𝓢𝓽𝓪𝓻𝓲 𝓜𝓸𝓼𝓽 (𝓪 𝓹𝓸𝓷𝓽𝓮 𝓭𝓮 𝓜𝓸𝓼𝓽𝓪𝓻), 𝓾𝓶𝓪 𝓮𝓼𝓬𝓻𝓲𝓽𝓸𝓻𝓪 𝓬𝓻𝓸𝓪𝓽𝓪, 𝓢𝓵𝓪𝓿𝓮𝓷𝓴𝓪 𝓓𝓻𝓪𝓴𝓾𝓵𝓲𝓴, 𝓮𝓼𝓬𝓻𝓮𝓿𝓲𝓪 𝓺𝓾𝓮 “𝓪 𝓹𝓸𝓷𝓽𝓮 𝓼𝓸𝓶𝓸𝓼 𝓽𝓸𝓭𝓸𝓼 𝓷𝓸́𝓼”, 𝓼𝓾𝓫𝓵𝓲𝓷𝓱𝓪𝓷𝓭𝓸 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓪 𝓭𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓻𝓾𝓲𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸 𝓭𝓮 𝓾𝓶 𝓮𝓭𝓲𝓯𝓲́𝓬𝓲𝓸 𝓮́ 𝓾𝓶𝓪 𝓯𝓸𝓻𝓶𝓪 𝓭𝓮 𝓭𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓻𝓾𝓲𝓻 𝓾𝓶𝓪 𝓶𝓮𝓶𝓸́𝓻𝓲𝓪 𝓬𝓸𝓵𝓮𝓽𝓲𝓿𝓪, 𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓽𝓮 𝓲𝓷𝓽𝓮𝓰𝓻𝓪𝓷𝓽𝓮 𝓭𝓪 𝓿𝓲𝓭𝓪 𝓭𝓮 𝓺𝓾𝓪𝓵𝓺𝓾𝓮𝓻 𝓹𝓸𝓿𝓸.
𝓐 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓺𝓾𝓲𝓼𝓽𝓪 𝓭𝓸 𝓛𝓮𝓫𝓮𝓷𝓼𝓻𝓪𝓾𝓶 𝓪 𝓛𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓮 𝓹𝓮𝓵𝓸 𝓮𝔁𝓮́𝓻𝓬𝓲𝓽𝓸 𝓷𝓪𝔃𝓲, 𝓸 𝓫𝓸𝓶𝓫𝓪𝓻𝓭𝓮𝓪𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓸 𝓲𝓷𝓬𝓮𝓼𝓼𝓪𝓷𝓽𝓮 𝓭𝓮 𝓖𝓪𝔃𝓪 𝓹𝓮𝓵𝓪𝓼 𝓯𝓸𝓻𝓬̧𝓪𝓼 𝓲𝓼𝓻𝓪𝓮𝓵𝓲𝓽𝓪𝓼, 𝓪 𝓬𝓪𝓶𝓹𝓪𝓷𝓱𝓪 𝓭𝓮 𝓵𝓲𝓶𝓹𝓮𝔃𝓪 𝓮́𝓽𝓷𝓲𝓬𝓪 𝓭𝓮 𝓫𝓸́𝓼𝓷𝓲𝓸𝓼 𝓶𝓾𝓬̧𝓾𝓵𝓶𝓪𝓷𝓸𝓼 𝓵𝓮𝓿𝓪𝓭𝓪 𝓪 𝓬𝓪𝓫𝓸 𝓹𝓸𝓻 𝓯𝓸𝓻𝓬̧𝓪𝓼 𝓼𝓮́𝓻𝓿𝓲𝓪𝓼 𝓮 𝓬𝓻𝓸𝓪𝓽𝓪𝓼 𝓸𝓾 𝓸 𝓪𝓽𝓪𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓫𝓻𝓾𝓽𝓪𝓵 𝓭𝓪𝓼 𝓬𝓲𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓮𝓼 𝓾𝓬𝓻𝓪𝓷𝓲𝓪𝓷𝓪𝓼. 𝓢𝓪̃𝓸 𝓮𝔁𝓮𝓶𝓹𝓵𝓸𝓼, 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓐𝓭𝓪𝓶 𝓣𝓸𝓸𝔃𝓮 𝓽𝓪𝓶𝓫𝓮́𝓶 𝓭𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓪𝓬𝓪, 𝓭𝓮 𝓰𝓾𝓮𝓻𝓻𝓪𝓼 𝓾𝓻𝓫𝓲𝓬𝓲𝓭𝓪𝓼 𝓺𝓾𝓮, 𝓼𝓮𝓷𝓭𝓸 𝓽𝓪̃𝓸 𝓭𝓲𝓯𝓮𝓻𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮𝓼 𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓻𝓮 𝓼𝓲, 𝓹𝓻𝓮𝓽𝓮𝓷𝓭𝓮𝓻𝓪𝓶 𝓽𝓸𝓭𝓪𝓼, 𝓪𝓵𝓮́𝓶 𝓭𝓪 𝓮𝔁𝓹𝓪𝓷𝓼𝓪̃𝓸 𝓲𝓶𝓹𝓮𝓻𝓲𝓪𝓵𝓲𝓼𝓽𝓪, 𝓪 𝓮𝓵𝓲𝓶𝓲𝓷𝓪𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸 𝓭𝓸 𝓲𝓷𝓽𝓮𝓻𝓬𝓪̂𝓶𝓫𝓲𝓸 𝓬𝓾𝓵𝓽𝓾𝓻𝓪𝓵 𝓮 𝓭𝓪 𝓱𝓲𝓼𝓽𝓸́𝓻𝓲𝓪 𝓮 𝓬𝓾𝓵𝓽𝓾𝓻𝓪 𝓭𝓮 𝓾𝓶 𝓹𝓸𝓿𝓸.
* Licenciada em Ciência Política e Relações Internacionais na NOVA-FCSH. Mestranda em Antropologia sobre colonialismo, memória e espaço público na FCSH
IN "GERADOR"- 04/04/22 ,
Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário