MAFALDA ANJOS

 .

Os erros do

nadador-salvador

Montenegro

A escassez de ideias, e sobretudo de propostas alternativas para o País, ficou clara em alguns momentos relevantes. E, em vários temas, tem feito opções questionáveis e mesmo criticáveis

𝑄𝑢𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑒𝑟𝑎 𝑗𝑜𝑣𝑒𝑚, 𝐿𝑢𝑖́𝑠 𝑀𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑒𝑔𝑟𝑜 𝑓𝑜𝑖 𝑛𝑎𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑟-𝑠𝑎𝑙𝑣𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑟 𝑛𝑎𝑠 𝑝𝑟𝑎𝑖𝑎𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝐸𝑠𝑝𝑖𝑛ℎ𝑜. 𝑇𝑒𝑟𝑎́ 𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑎̃𝑜 𝑎𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑖𝑑𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒, 𝑠𝑒𝑔𝑢𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑜 𝑎𝑙𝑔𝑜𝑟𝑖𝑡𝑚𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑠𝑎𝑙𝑣𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑢𝑚 𝑏𝑎𝑛ℎ𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑎 𝑒𝑚 𝑎𝑝𝑢𝑟𝑜𝑠, ℎ𝑎́ 𝑡𝑟𝑒̂𝑠 𝑓𝑎𝑠𝑒𝑠 𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑎 𝑎𝑐𝑎𝑢𝑡𝑒𝑙𝑎𝑟: 𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑜𝑛ℎ𝑒𝑐𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜, 𝑝𝑙𝑎𝑛𝑒𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜 𝑒 𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜.

𝐻𝑎́ 𝑒𝑥𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑒̂𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑠 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑒𝑚 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑎 𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑎. 𝑁𝑎 𝑜𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑠𝑎𝑙𝑣𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑢𝑚 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑡𝑖𝑑𝑜, 𝑒́ 𝑚𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑜𝑢 𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑜𝑠 𝑎 𝑚𝑒𝑠𝑚𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑖𝑠𝑎. 𝐸𝑚 𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑖𝑟𝑜 𝑙𝑢𝑔𝑎𝑟, ℎ𝑎́ 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑐𝑢𝑚𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑟 𝑜 𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑜𝑛ℎ𝑒𝑐𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜 𝑑𝑎 𝑠𝑖𝑡𝑢𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑛𝑎𝑢𝑓𝑟𝑎𝑔𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑑𝑜 𝑃𝑆𝐷 𝑑𝑒𝑝𝑜𝑖𝑠 𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑡𝑟𝑜 𝑎𝑛𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑟𝑖𝑜𝑖́𝑠𝑚𝑜: 𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝐿𝑢𝑖́𝑠 𝑀𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑒𝑔𝑟𝑜 𝑐ℎ𝑒𝑔𝑜𝑢, 𝑐𝑢𝑚𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑚-𝑠𝑒 𝑎𝑔𝑜𝑟𝑎 𝑠𝑒𝑖𝑠 𝑚𝑒𝑠𝑒𝑠, 𝑝𝑒𝑔𝑜𝑢 𝑛𝑢𝑚 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑡𝑖𝑑𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑒𝑔𝑢𝑖𝑢 𝑚𝑜𝑏𝑖𝑙𝑖𝑧𝑎𝑟 𝑜 𝑣𝑜𝑡𝑜 𝑢́𝑡𝑖𝑙 𝑒 𝑑𝑒𝑢 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑚𝑎𝑖𝑜𝑟𝑖𝑎 𝑎𝑏𝑠𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑡𝑎 𝑎 𝐴𝑛𝑡𝑜́𝑛𝑖𝑜 𝐶𝑜𝑠𝑡𝑎, 𝑎𝑝𝑒𝑠𝑎𝑟 𝑑𝑜 𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑔𝑎𝑠𝑡𝑒 𝑑𝑒 𝑠𝑒𝑖𝑠 𝑎𝑛𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑔𝑜𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑛𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑠𝑜𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑎. 𝑈𝑚 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑡𝑖𝑑𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑢𝑚𝑖𝑑𝑜 𝑝𝑜𝑟 𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑐̧𝑎𝑠 𝑑𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑠 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑜 𝑝𝑢𝑥𝑎𝑣𝑎𝑚 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑏𝑎𝑖𝑥𝑜: 𝟷. 𝐴𝑠 𝑐𝑢𝑙𝑝𝑎𝑠 𝑝𝑟𝑜́𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑜𝑝𝑜𝑠𝑖𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑚𝑎𝑙 𝑓𝑒𝑖𝑡𝑎, 𝑐𝑜𝑙𝑎𝑏𝑜𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑒 𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑎́𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑎, 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑠𝑒 𝑖𝑚𝑝𝑜̂𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑜 𝑎𝑙𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑛𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑎; 𝟸. 𝑈𝑚 𝑝𝑜𝑠𝑖𝑐𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜 𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑜𝑙𝑜́𝑔𝑖𝑐𝑜 𝑝𝑜𝑢𝑐𝑜 𝑐𝑙𝑎𝑟𝑜, 𝑢𝑚 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑏𝑙𝑒𝑚𝑎 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑣𝑒𝑚 𝑑𝑒 𝑜𝑟𝑖𝑔𝑒𝑚, 𝑚𝑎𝑠 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑎𝑢𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜𝑢 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑎 𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑢𝑠𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑅𝑢𝑖 𝑅𝑖𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑢𝑚𝑖𝑟 𝑜 𝑒𝑠𝑝𝑎𝑐̧𝑜 𝑑𝑎 𝑑𝑖𝑟𝑒𝑖𝑡𝑎; 𝟹. 𝑂 𝑐𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑐𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜 𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑖𝑠𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑑𝑒 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑡𝑖𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑎̀ 𝑠𝑢𝑎 𝑑𝑖𝑟𝑒𝑖𝑡𝑎 – 𝑛𝑜 𝑒𝑠𝑝𝑎𝑐̧𝑜 𝑙𝑖𝑏𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑙 𝑒 𝑛𝑜 𝑒𝑥𝑡𝑟𝑒𝑚𝑜 𝑝𝑜𝑝𝑢𝑙𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑎 – 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑠𝑒 𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑚 𝑡𝑎𝑚𝑏𝑒́𝑚 𝑑𝑜 𝑠𝑒𝑢 𝑒𝑙𝑒𝑖𝑡𝑜𝑟𝑎𝑑𝑜, 𝑒 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑗𝑢𝑛𝑡𝑜𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑞𝑢𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑚 𝑚𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝟼𝟻𝟶 𝑚𝑖𝑙 𝑣𝑜𝑡𝑜𝑠 𝑒 𝟸𝟶 𝑑𝑒𝑝𝑢𝑡𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑠.

𝐶𝑜𝑚𝑜 𝑝𝑜𝑙𝑖́𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑜 𝑒𝑥𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑒 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑙𝑖𝑔𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑒́, 𝐿𝑢𝑖́𝑠 𝑀𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑒𝑔𝑟𝑜 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑎́ 𝑓𝑒𝑖𝑡𝑜 𝑑𝑖𝑎𝑔𝑛𝑜́𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑜 𝑚𝑢𝑖𝑡𝑜 𝑑𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑜. 𝐹𝑒𝑖𝑡𝑜 𝑜 𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑜𝑛ℎ𝑒𝑐𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜, 𝑓𝑜𝑖 𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑖𝑠𝑜 𝑝𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑎𝑟 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑜 𝑝𝑙𝑎𝑛𝑒𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜. 𝐸, 𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑑𝑒 𝑜 𝑖𝑛𝑖́𝑐𝑖𝑜, 𝑀𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑒𝑔𝑟𝑜 𝑚𝑜𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑜𝑢 𝑎𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑣𝑖𝑛ℎ𝑎: 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑜 𝑛𝑜𝑣𝑜 𝑙𝑖́𝑑𝑒𝑟, 𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑢𝑚𝑖𝑟𝑖𝑎 𝑎 𝑝𝑜𝑠𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑜𝑝𝑜𝑠𝑖𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑒𝑥𝑖𝑔𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒, 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑡𝑟𝑒́𝑔𝑢𝑎𝑠 𝑎̀𝑠 𝑒𝑠𝑐𝑜𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑔𝑎𝑑𝑒𝑙𝑎𝑠, 𝑎𝑜𝑠 𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑜𝑠 𝑒 𝑎̀𝑠 𝑜𝑝𝑐̧𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑝𝑜𝑢𝑐𝑜 𝑐𝑙𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝐴𝑛𝑡𝑜́𝑛𝑖𝑜 𝐶𝑜𝑠𝑡𝑎. 𝐷𝑒𝑝𝑜𝑖𝑠 𝑑𝑎 𝑜𝑝𝑜𝑠𝑖𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑙𝑎𝑏𝑜𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑑𝑒 𝑅𝑖𝑜, 𝑎𝑝𝑜𝑠𝑡𝑜𝑢-𝑠𝑒 𝑎 𝑓𝑎𝑧𝑒𝑟, 𝑎𝑜 𝑠𝑒𝑢 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑙𝑜, 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑜𝑝𝑜𝑠𝑖𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑓𝑟𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑐𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑙. 𝐹𝑎𝑧 𝑠𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑑𝑜 𝑒 𝑡𝑒𝑚 𝑐𝑢𝑚𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑑𝑜: 𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑐𝑜𝑟𝑟𝑒 𝑜 𝑃𝑎𝑖́𝑠 𝑒𝑚 𝑎𝑐̧𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑛𝑜 𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑛𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑒 𝑎 𝑠𝑢𝑙, 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑎𝑔𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑎 𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑒𝑛𝑐ℎ𝑖𝑑𝑖́𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑚𝑎, 𝑒 𝑓𝑎𝑙𝑎 𝑠𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑟𝑒 𝑠𝑜𝑏𝑟𝑒 𝑡𝑜𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑜𝑠 𝑡𝑒𝑚𝑎𝑠 𝑛𝑎 𝑎𝑔𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑎, 𝑐𝑟𝑖𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑒 𝑎𝑝𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑎𝑠 𝑓𝑎𝑙ℎ𝑎𝑠.

𝑃𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑙𝑎́ 𝑑𝑜 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑙𝑜, 𝑒́ 𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑖𝑠𝑜 𝑜𝑙ℎ𝑎𝑟 𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑢́𝑑𝑜. 𝐸 𝑎𝑞𝑢𝑖 𝑒́ 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑜𝑠 𝑝𝑙𝑎𝑛𝑜𝑠, 𝑠𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑚𝑢𝑖𝑡𝑜 𝑚𝑒𝑙ℎ𝑜𝑟𝑒𝑠 𝑑𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑜 𝑠𝑒𝑢 𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑜𝑟, 𝑎𝑝𝑒𝑠𝑎𝑟 𝑑𝑒 𝑡𝑢𝑑𝑜 𝑑𝑒𝑖𝑥𝑎𝑚 𝑎 𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑒𝑗𝑎𝑟 – 𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑒𝑐̧𝑎𝑚 𝑜𝑠 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑏𝑙𝑒𝑚𝑎𝑠. 𝑁𝑎̃𝑜 𝑠𝑒 𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑐𝑒𝑏𝑒𝑢 (𝑛𝑒𝑚 𝑠𝑒 𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑐𝑒𝑏𝑒) 𝑏𝑒𝑚 𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑟, 𝑡𝑎̃𝑜-𝑝𝑜𝑢𝑐𝑜 𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑟. 𝑂 𝑃𝑆𝐷, 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑗𝑎́ 𝑓𝑜𝑖 𝑣𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑜 “𝑜 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑡𝑖𝑑𝑜 𝑚𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑝𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑢𝑔𝑢𝑒̂𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑃𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑢𝑔𝑎𝑙”, 𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑑𝑒𝑢, 𝑎𝑙𝑒́𝑚 𝑑𝑒 𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑑𝑟𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑟𝑒𝑓𝑒𝑟𝑒̂𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑎, 𝑑𝑖𝑛𝑎̂𝑚𝑖𝑐𝑎 𝑒 𝑟𝑒𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝑠𝑜𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑙, 𝑝𝑜𝑠𝑖𝑐𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜 𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑜𝑙𝑜́𝑔𝑖𝑐𝑜, 𝑎𝑚𝑏𝑖𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜. 𝑃𝑖𝑜𝑟: 𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑑𝑒𝑢, 𝑠𝑜𝑏𝑟𝑒𝑡𝑢𝑑𝑜, 𝑎 𝑐𝑎𝑝𝑎𝑐𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝑑𝑒 𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑧𝑒𝑟 𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑖𝑎𝑠 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑜 𝑃𝑎𝑖́𝑠. 𝐸, 𝑠𝑒𝑖𝑠 𝑚𝑒𝑠𝑒𝑠 𝑣𝑜𝑙𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑜𝑠, 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑒́ 𝑐𝑙𝑎𝑟𝑜 𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑟 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑒 𝑃𝑆𝐷, 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑠𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑐̧𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑡𝑒𝑚 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑜𝑙𝑣𝑒𝑟 𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑎𝑓𝑖𝑜𝑠 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑒́𝑔𝑖𝑐𝑜𝑠 𝑛𝑎𝑐𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑖𝑠, 𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑙 𝑜 𝑐𝑎𝑚𝑖𝑛ℎ𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑔𝑜𝑛𝑖𝑧𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑜 𝑎𝑙𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑛𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑎.

𝐹𝑎𝑙ℎ𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑒 𝑝𝑙𝑎𝑛𝑒𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜, 𝑎 𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 – 𝑎 𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑐𝑒𝑖𝑟𝑎 𝑒 𝑑𝑒𝑐𝑖𝑠𝑖𝑣𝑎 𝑓𝑎𝑠𝑒 𝑑𝑜 𝑠𝑎𝑙𝑣𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜 – 𝑓𝑖𝑐𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑚𝑒𝑡𝑖𝑑𝑎. 𝐴 𝑒𝑠𝑐𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑧 𝑑𝑒 𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑖𝑎𝑠, 𝑒 𝑠𝑜𝑏𝑟𝑒𝑡𝑢𝑑𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑝𝑜𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑠 𝑎𝑙𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑛𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑎𝑠, 𝑓𝑖𝑐𝑜𝑢 𝑐𝑙𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑒𝑚 𝑑𝑜𝑖𝑠 𝑚𝑜𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜𝑠 𝑟𝑒𝑙𝑒𝑣𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑠 𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑒 𝑚𝑒𝑖𝑜 𝑎𝑛𝑜: 𝑛𝑜 𝑝𝑙𝑎𝑛𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑎𝑝𝑜𝑖𝑜 𝑎̀𝑠 𝑓𝑎𝑚𝑖́𝑙𝑖𝑎𝑠 𝑒 𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑎𝑠 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑓𝑎𝑧𝑒𝑟 𝑓𝑎𝑐𝑒 𝑎̀ 𝑖𝑛𝑓𝑙𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑒 𝑛𝑜 𝑂𝑟𝑐̧𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜 𝑑𝑜 𝐸𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝟸𝟶𝟸𝟹. 𝑄𝑢𝑒 𝑠𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑐̧𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑑𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑎𝑠 𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑠 𝑎𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜𝑢 𝑜 𝑃𝑆𝐷 𝑛𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑜𝑖𝑠 𝑚𝑜𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜𝑠? 𝑁𝑒𝑛ℎ𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑡𝑒𝑛ℎ𝑎 𝑓𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑛𝑎 𝑚𝑒𝑚𝑜́𝑟𝑖𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑙𝑒𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑎. 𝐻𝑎́ 𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑚 𝑝𝑒𝑛𝑠𝑒 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑒́ 𝑎 𝑎𝑙𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑎 𝑐𝑒𝑟𝑡𝑎 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑠𝑒 𝑐ℎ𝑒𝑔𝑎𝑟 𝑎̀ 𝑓𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑝𝑜𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑠 – 𝑠𝑒𝑚 𝑒𝑙𝑒𝑖𝑐̧𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑎̀ 𝑝𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑎. 𝐸́ 𝑢𝑚 𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑜. 𝐷𝑒𝑝𝑜𝑖𝑠 𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑎𝑝𝑢𝑟𝑜𝑠 𝑒𝑚 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑠𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑙𝑜𝑐𝑜𝑢, 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 ℎ𝑎́ 𝑜𝑝𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑢𝑛𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒𝑠 𝑎 𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑑𝑖𝑐̧𝑎𝑟 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑟𝑒𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑐̧𝑎𝑟 𝑎 𝑠𝑢𝑎 𝑖𝑚𝑎𝑔𝑒𝑚.

𝑁𝑜𝑢𝑡𝑟𝑜𝑠 𝑡𝑒𝑚𝑎𝑠, 𝑡𝑒𝑚 𝑓𝑒𝑖𝑡𝑜 𝑜𝑝𝑐̧𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑎́𝑣𝑒𝑖𝑠 𝑒 𝑚𝑒𝑠𝑚𝑜 𝑐𝑟𝑖𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑎́𝑣𝑒𝑖𝑠. 𝐴𝑖𝑛𝑑𝑎 𝑛𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎 𝑠𝑒𝑚𝑎𝑛𝑎, 𝑎𝑛𝑢𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑜𝑢 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑝𝑜𝑠𝑡𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑟𝑒𝑓𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑎̀ 𝑒𝑢𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑎́𝑠𝑖𝑎. 𝐷𝑒𝑝𝑜𝑖𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑐𝑖𝑛𝑐𝑜 𝑎𝑛𝑜𝑠 𝑎 𝑑𝑖𝑠𝑐𝑢𝑡𝑖𝑟 𝑜 𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑢𝑛𝑡𝑜 𝑛𝑜 𝑃𝑎𝑟𝑙𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜, 𝑣𝑜𝑙𝑡𝑎𝑟 𝑎𝑔𝑜𝑟𝑎, 𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑛ℎ𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑜 𝐶ℎ𝑒𝑔𝑎, 𝑎 𝑝𝑒𝑑𝑖𝑟 𝑢𝑚 𝑟𝑒𝑓𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑛𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑒 𝑡𝑒𝑚𝑎 𝑡𝑎̃𝑜 𝑠𝑒𝑛𝑠𝑖́𝑣𝑒𝑙 𝑒 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑒́ 𝑑𝑎 𝑜𝑟𝑑𝑒𝑚 𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑖𝑟𝑒𝑖𝑡𝑜𝑠 𝑓𝑢𝑛𝑑𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑓𝑎𝑧 𝑠𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑑𝑜 𝑛𝑒𝑛ℎ𝑢𝑚 𝑒 𝑣𝑎𝑖 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑎 𝑎 𝑚𝑒𝑙ℎ𝑜𝑟 𝑑𝑜𝑢𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑛𝑎 𝑗𝑢𝑟𝑖́𝑑𝑖𝑐𝑎. 𝑅𝑒𝑐𝑜𝑟𝑑𝑒-𝑠𝑒 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑜 𝑃𝑆𝐷 𝑗𝑎́ 𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜𝑢 𝑟𝑒𝑓𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑎𝑟 𝑎 𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑝𝑜𝑟 𝑐𝑎𝑠𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑑𝑜 𝑚𝑒𝑠𝑚𝑜 𝑠𝑒𝑥𝑜, 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑝𝑜𝑠𝑡𝑎 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑜 𝑇𝑟𝑖𝑏𝑢𝑛𝑎𝑙 𝐶𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑡𝑢𝑐𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑙 𝑐ℎ𝑢𝑚𝑏𝑜𝑢 𝑒𝑚 𝟸𝟶𝟷𝟺. 𝑁𝑜 𝑡𝑒𝑚𝑎 𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑝𝑒𝑛𝑠𝑜̃𝑒𝑠, 𝑜 𝑝𝑜𝑝𝑢𝑙𝑖𝑠𝑚𝑜 𝑡𝑎𝑚𝑏𝑒́𝑚 𝑓𝑎𝑙𝑜𝑢 𝑚𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑎𝑙𝑡𝑜. 𝑂 𝑐𝑎𝑟𝑡𝑎𝑧 𝑒𝑚 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑚𝑒𝑡𝑒𝑢 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑓𝑎𝑟𝑎́ 𝑐𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑒𝑠 𝑛𝑎𝑠 𝑝𝑒𝑛𝑠𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑒́ 𝑚𝑒𝑠𝑚𝑜 𝑖𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑝𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑎́𝑣𝑒𝑙, 𝑝𝑢𝑟𝑎 𝑑𝑒𝑚𝑎𝑔𝑜𝑔𝑖𝑎 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑓𝑖𝑐𝑎 𝑏𝑒𝑚 𝑎 𝑢𝑚 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑡𝑖𝑑𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑜 ℎ𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑜́𝑟𝑖𝑐𝑜 𝑑𝑜 𝑃𝑆𝐷. 𝑁𝑜 𝑡𝑒𝑚𝑎 𝑑𝑎 𝑟𝑒𝑣𝑖𝑠𝑎̃𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑡𝑢𝑐𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑙, 𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑛ℎ𝑜𝑢 𝑛𝑎 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑝𝑜𝑠𝑡𝑎 𝑑𝑜 𝐶ℎ𝑒𝑔𝑎, 𝑑𝑒𝑝𝑜𝑖𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑜 𝑝𝑟𝑜́𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑜 𝑀𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑒𝑔𝑟𝑜 𝑎 𝑡𝑒𝑟 𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑢𝑠𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑐𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑡𝑜 𝑎 𝑙𝑖́𝑑𝑒𝑟.

𝑂 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑛𝑜𝑠 𝑙𝑒𝑣𝑎 𝑎𝑜 𝑝𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑜 𝑚𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑙𝑒𝑥𝑜 𝑜𝑛𝑑𝑒 𝑎 𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑡𝑒𝑚 𝑓𝑎𝑙ℎ𝑎𝑑𝑜, 𝑝𝑜𝑟 𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑏𝑖𝑙𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝑜𝑢 𝑓𝑎𝑙𝑡𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑝𝑙𝑎𝑛𝑒𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑒́𝑔𝑖𝑐𝑜, 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑒́ 𝑛𝑎 𝑑𝑒𝑚𝑎𝑟𝑐𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑐𝑙𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑑𝑎 𝑑𝑖𝑟𝑒𝑖𝑡𝑎 𝑟𝑎𝑑𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑙 𝑑𝑜 𝐶ℎ𝑒𝑔𝑎 – 𝑢𝑚 𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑜 𝑓𝑎𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝑑𝑒 𝑅𝑢𝑖 𝑅𝑖𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑎𝑗𝑢𝑑𝑜𝑢 𝑐𝑙𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑜 𝑃𝑆 𝑎 𝑐𝑎𝑝𝑡𝑎𝑟 𝑜 𝑣𝑜𝑡𝑜 𝑓𝑙𝑢𝑡𝑢𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑎𝑜 𝑐𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑜 𝑒 𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑒𝑔𝑢𝑖𝑟 𝑎 𝑚𝑎𝑖𝑜𝑟𝑖𝑎 𝑎𝑏𝑠𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑡𝑎. 𝐷𝑒𝑠𝑑𝑒 𝑜 𝑑𝑖𝑠𝑐𝑢𝑟𝑠𝑜 𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑢𝑔𝑢𝑟𝑎𝑙 𝑑𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑎𝑔𝑟𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑀𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑒𝑔𝑟𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑎 𝑎𝑚𝑏𝑖𝑔𝑢𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎́ 𝑛𝑜 𝑎𝑟: 𝑑𝑒𝑚𝑎𝑟𝑐𝑜𝑢-𝑠𝑒 𝑑𝑒 “𝑝𝑜𝑙𝑖́𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑠 𝑥𝑒𝑛𝑜́𝑓𝑜𝑏𝑎𝑠 𝑒 𝑟𝑎𝑐𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑠” 𝑒 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑡𝑖𝑑𝑜𝑠. 𝑄𝑢𝑒 𝑒́ 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑚 𝑑𝑖𝑧, 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎́ 𝑡𝑢𝑑𝑜 𝑒𝑚 𝑎𝑏𝑒𝑟𝑡𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑜 𝑎 𝑝𝑜𝑠𝑠𝑖́𝑣𝑒𝑖𝑠 𝑎𝑐𝑜𝑟𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑓𝑢𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑜𝑠. 𝐽𝑜𝑔𝑎, 𝑒́ 𝑐𝑙𝑎𝑟𝑜, 𝑛𝑎 𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑐𝑖𝑝𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜, 𝑝𝑜𝑟𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑐𝑒𝑏𝑒 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑠𝑒𝑚 𝑜 𝐶ℎ𝑒𝑔𝑎 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑣𝑎𝑖 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑒𝑔𝑢𝑖𝑟 𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑚𝑎𝑟 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑎𝑙𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑛𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑔𝑜𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑛𝑜 𝑎̀ 𝑑𝑖𝑟𝑒𝑖𝑡𝑎 – 𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑒𝑔𝑢𝑖𝑟 𝑜 𝑠𝑎𝑙𝑣𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜 𝑑𝑜 𝑃𝑆𝐷 𝑎 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑠𝑒 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑝𝑜̂𝑠. 𝐴𝑞𝑢𝑖 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎́ 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑓𝑒𝑐𝑖𝑎 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑠𝑒 𝑎𝑢𝑡𝑜𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑎: 𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑢𝑎𝑟 𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑚, 𝑑𝑒 𝑓𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑜, 𝑛𝑢𝑛𝑐𝑎 𝑙𝑎́ 𝑐ℎ𝑒𝑔𝑎𝑟𝑎́.

* Jornalista, directora da revista "VISÃO"

IN "VISÃO" - 07/12/22

NR: Não vai demorar muito tempo que esta senhora seja apelidada de perigosa comunista pelos democratas populares. .