24/11/2022

ANA MATIAS

 .



Minerar o quê?
Não há planeta B.

𝖯𝗈𝗋 𝗆𝗎𝗂𝗍𝗈 𝗍𝖾𝗆𝗉𝗈, 𝗉𝖾𝗇𝗌𝗈𝗎-𝗌𝖾 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗈 𝗆𝖺𝗋 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝖿𝗎𝗇𝖽𝗈 -- 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝖾𝖼̧𝖺 𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝟤𝟢𝟢 𝗆 𝖽𝖾 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝖿𝗎𝗇𝖽𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 -- 𝖾𝗋𝖺 𝗎𝗆 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝖾𝗋𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗏𝗂𝖽𝖺. 𝖤́ 𝖿𝖺́𝖼𝗂𝗅 𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗇𝖽𝖾𝗋 𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗊𝗎𝖾̂; 𝖺𝖿𝗂𝗇𝖺𝗅 𝖺𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖽𝗂𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖾𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗆 𝗂𝗇𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗉𝖺𝗍𝗂́𝗏𝖾𝗂𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝖺 𝗏𝗂𝖽𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝗌𝖾𝗆𝗉𝗋𝖾 𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗁𝖾𝖼𝖾𝗆𝗈𝗌. 𝖣𝖾𝗌𝖽𝖾 𝗅𝗈𝗀𝗈, 𝖺 𝖺𝗎𝗌𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝗍𝗈𝗍𝖺𝗅 𝖽𝖾 𝗅𝗎𝗓 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖾𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝗎𝗆 𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗏𝖾 𝗈́𝖻𝗏𝗂𝗈 𝖺𝗈 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺𝖻𝖾𝗅𝖾𝖼𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗎𝗇𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾𝗌 𝖻𝗂𝗈𝗅𝗈́𝗀𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗌 𝖾, 𝗌𝖾 𝗃𝗎𝗇𝗍𝖺́𝗌𝗌𝖾𝗆𝗈𝗌 𝖺 𝗂𝗌𝗌𝗈 𝖺𝗌 𝗍𝖾𝗆𝗉𝖾𝗋𝖺𝗍𝗎𝗋𝖺𝗌 𝗆𝗎𝗂𝗍𝗈 𝖻𝖺𝗂𝗑𝖺𝗌 𝖾 𝖺 𝖺𝗅𝗍𝗂́𝗌𝗌𝗂𝗆𝖺 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖺̃𝗈, 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖾𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝖼𝗅𝖺𝗋𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗇𝖾𝗇𝗁𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝖿𝗈𝗋𝗆𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝗏𝗂𝖽𝖺 𝗉𝗈𝖽𝖾𝗋𝗂𝖺 𝗌𝗂𝗇𝗀𝗋𝖺𝗋. 𝖭𝗈 𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺𝗇𝗍𝗈, 𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝗈 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝖾𝗇𝗏𝗈𝗅𝗏𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝗍𝖾𝖼𝗇𝗈𝗅𝗈́𝗀𝗂𝖼𝗈 𝗉𝖾𝗋𝗆𝗂𝗍𝗂𝗎 𝖺𝗅𝖼𝖺𝗇𝖼̧𝖺𝗋 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝖿𝗎𝗇𝖽𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾𝗌 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗈𝗋𝖾𝗌, 𝖽𝖾𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖺 𝗌𝖾 𝗉𝖾𝗋𝖼𝖾𝖻𝖾𝗎 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗉𝗈𝖽𝗂́𝖺𝗆𝗈𝗌 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗋 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝗅𝗈𝗇𝗀𝖾 𝖽𝖺 𝗏𝖾𝗋𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾: 𝗈 𝗆𝖺𝗋 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝖿𝗎𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝖾𝗋𝖺 𝖼𝖺𝗌𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝗆𝗂𝗅𝗁𝖺𝗋𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖾𝗌𝗉𝖾́𝖼𝗂𝖾𝗌 𝖾 𝖽𝖾 𝗍𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖺𝗌 𝗈𝗎𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖾𝗋𝖺𝗆 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝖼𝗈𝖻𝖾𝗋𝗍𝖺𝗌 𝖺 𝖼𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝖾𝗑𝗉𝖾𝖽𝗂𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈. 𝖠𝗉𝖾𝗇𝖺𝗌 𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝖺𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝟨𝟢 𝗌𝖾 𝖼𝗁𝖾𝗀𝗈𝗎 𝖺𝗈 𝗌𝖾𝗎 𝗉𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝖿𝗎𝗇𝖽𝗈, 𝖺𝗈𝗌 𝗏𝖾𝗋𝗍𝗂𝗀𝗂𝗇𝗈𝗌𝗈𝗌 𝟣𝟣 𝟢𝟢𝟢 𝗆 𝖽𝗈 𝖢𝗁𝖺𝗅𝗅𝖾𝗇𝗀𝖾𝗋 𝖣𝖾𝖾𝗉, 𝗇𝖺 𝖥𝗈𝗌𝗌𝖺 𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝖬𝖺𝗋𝗂𝖺𝗇𝖺𝗌, 𝖾 𝗌𝗈𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖾𝗆 𝟤𝟢𝟤𝟢 𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝗎𝖺𝗌 𝗉𝗋𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗂𝗋𝖺𝗌 𝗆𝗎𝗅𝗁𝖾𝗋𝖾𝗌 𝖼𝗁𝖾𝗀𝖺𝗋𝖺𝗆 𝖺𝗈 𝗆𝖾𝗌𝗆𝗈 𝗅𝗎𝗀𝖺𝗋.

𝖳𝗋𝖺𝗍𝖺-𝗌𝖾, 𝖺𝗂𝗇𝖽𝖺 𝗁𝗈𝗃𝖾 𝖾 𝖺𝗉𝖾𝗌𝖺𝗋 𝖽𝖾 𝗍𝗎𝖽𝗈, 𝖽𝗈 𝖾𝖼𝗈𝗌𝗌𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖾𝗆𝖺 𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗁𝖾𝖼𝗂𝖽𝗈 𝖽𝗈 𝗇𝗈𝗌𝗌𝗈 𝗉𝗅𝖺𝗇𝖾𝗍𝖺. 𝖮 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗌𝖾 𝗌𝖺𝖻𝖾 𝖾́ 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗉𝗈𝗎𝖼𝗈 𝗌𝖾 𝗌𝖺𝖻𝖾. 𝖤 𝗂𝗌𝗍𝗈 𝖾́ 𝗆𝗎𝗂𝗍𝗈 𝗂𝗆𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗍𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝖺 𝖺𝗉𝗅𝗂𝖼𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖺𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗅𝖺 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖾́ 𝗍𝖺𝗅𝗏𝖾𝗓 𝖺 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗆𝗂𝗌𝗌𝖺 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝖻𝖺́𝗌𝗂𝖼𝖺 𝗇𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗍𝗈𝖼𝖺 𝖺̀ (𝖻𝗈𝖺) 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗌𝖾𝗋𝗏𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖺𝗆𝖻𝗂𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺𝗅: 𝗈 𝗉𝗋𝗂𝗇𝖼𝗂́𝗉𝗂𝗈 𝖽𝖺 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝖼𝖺𝗎𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈, 𝖺𝗊𝗎𝗂𝗅𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗉𝖾𝗋𝗆𝗂𝗍𝖾 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖾𝖼𝗂𝗌𝗈𝗋𝖾𝗌 𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗍𝖾𝗆 𝗆𝖾𝖽𝗂𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝖺𝗋𝗋𝗂𝗌𝖼𝖺𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝖺 𝖾𝗏𝗂𝖽𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝖼𝗂𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗂́𝖿𝗂𝖼𝖺 𝗌𝗈𝖻𝗋𝖾 𝗎𝗆 𝖽𝖺𝗇𝗈 𝖺𝗆𝖻𝗂𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺𝗅 𝖾́ 𝗂𝗇𝗌𝗎𝖿𝗂𝖼𝗂𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖾 𝗈 𝗋𝗂𝗌𝖼𝗈 𝗌𝖾 𝖺𝖿𝗂𝗀𝗎𝗋𝖺 𝖺𝗅𝗍𝗈. 𝖠 𝗌𝗎𝖺 𝗂𝗆𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗍𝖺̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝖾́ 𝗍𝖺𝗅 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖺𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖾𝖼𝖾 𝖾𝗆 𝗉𝗋𝖺𝗍𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝗍𝗈𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗈𝗌 𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗍𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖾 𝖺𝖼𝗈𝗋𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗌𝗈𝖻𝗋𝖾 𝖻𝗂𝗈𝖽𝗂𝗏𝖾𝗋𝗌𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖾 𝖺𝗆𝖻𝗂𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖾𝗑𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗌. 𝖧𝖺́, 𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗍𝖺𝗇𝗍𝗈, 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗌𝖾𝗇𝗌𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖺 𝖺𝗉𝗅𝗂𝖼𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝗀𝖾𝗋𝖺𝗅 𝖽𝗈 𝗉𝗋𝗂𝗇𝖼𝗂́𝗉𝗂𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝖻𝖺𝗌𝖾 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗈 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝖾𝗇𝗏𝗈𝗅𝗏𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝗌𝗎𝗌𝗍𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺́𝗏𝖾𝗅 𝖾́ 𝖿𝗎𝗇𝖽𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺𝗅.

𝖠 𝖽𝗂𝗌𝖼𝗎𝗌𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝗌𝗈𝖻𝗋𝖾 𝖿𝗈𝗋𝗆𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖾𝗑𝗉𝗅𝗈𝗋𝖺𝗋 𝖺𝗌 𝗀𝗋𝖺𝗇𝖽𝖾𝗌 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝖿𝗎𝗇𝖽𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾𝗌 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾́ 𝗇𝗈𝗏𝖺, 𝗆𝖺𝗌 𝗍𝖾𝗆 𝗌𝗂𝖽𝗈 𝗌𝗎𝖼𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗂𝗏𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖺𝖽𝗂𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝗏𝖺́𝗋𝗂𝖺𝗌 𝗋𝖺𝗓𝗈̃𝖾𝗌: 𝖺𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖽𝗂𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝖺𝖽𝗏𝖾𝗋𝗌𝖺𝗌, 𝗈 𝖿𝗋𝖺𝗇𝖼𝗈 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗁𝖾𝖼𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝗈 𝗆𝖾𝗂𝗈, 𝖺 𝖽𝗂𝖿𝗂𝖼𝗎𝗅𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖾𝗆 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝖾𝗇𝗏𝗈𝗅𝗏𝖾𝗋 𝗍𝖾𝖼𝗇𝗈𝗅𝗈𝗀𝗂𝖺 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗉𝖾𝗋𝗆𝗂𝗍𝖺 𝖺𝗅𝖼𝖺𝗇𝖼̧𝖺́-𝗅𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖿𝗈𝗋𝗆𝖺 𝗌𝖾𝗀𝗎𝗋𝖺 𝖾 𝖺 𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝖾𝗆 𝖿𝗂𝗇𝖺𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗋 𝖺𝗅𝗀𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗉𝗈𝗎𝖼𝖺 𝗈𝗎 𝗇𝖾𝗇𝗁𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗋𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺𝖻𝗂𝗅𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝗉𝗈𝖽𝖾 𝗍𝖾𝗋.

𝖠 𝗆𝗂𝗇𝖾𝗋𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾𝗆 𝗆𝖺𝗋 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝖿𝗎𝗇𝖽𝗈 -- 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖺𝗂𝗇𝖽𝖺 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾𝗑𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖾 𝖽𝖾 𝖿𝗈𝗋𝗆𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝖾𝗋𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗅 -- 𝖾́, 𝗌𝖾𝗆 𝖽𝗎́𝗏𝗂𝖽𝖺, 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗏𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝗂𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖾 𝗍𝖾𝗆 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝗉𝖾𝗋𝗍𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝗇𝖺 𝗂𝗇𝖽𝗎́𝗌𝗍𝗋𝗂𝖺 𝖾𝗑𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗏𝖺, 𝖺𝗅𝗂𝖼𝖾𝗋𝖼̧𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝗇𝖺 𝗂𝖽𝖾𝗂𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖺 𝖾𝗑𝗍𝗋𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝖾𝗉𝗈́𝗌𝗂𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝗆𝗂𝗇𝖾𝗋𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝖾 𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗋𝖺𝗌 𝗋𝖺𝗋𝖺𝗌 𝖾́ 𝖿𝗎𝗇𝖽𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺𝗅 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗆𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗋 𝗈 𝗉𝖺𝖽𝗋𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗏𝗂𝖽𝖺 𝖽𝗈 𝗇𝗈𝗋𝗍𝖾 𝗀𝗅𝗈𝖻𝖺𝗅, 𝖺𝗀𝗈𝗋𝖺 𝗊𝗎𝖾 (𝖿𝗂𝗇𝖺𝗅𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾) 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗁𝖺́ 𝖽𝗎́𝗏𝗂𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖺 𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗂𝗆𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝖻𝗎𝗌𝗍𝗂́𝗏𝖾𝗂𝗌 𝖿𝗈́𝗌𝗌𝖾𝗂𝗌 𝗃𝖺́ 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗍𝖾𝗆 𝗅𝗎𝗀𝖺𝗋 𝗇𝖺 𝗇𝗈𝗌𝗌𝖺 𝗌𝗈𝖼𝗂𝖾𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾. 𝖠 𝗋𝖾𝖺𝗅𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖾́ 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖺𝗅𝖺𝗋𝗀𝖺𝗋 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺 𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗏𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖺𝗈𝗌 𝖾𝖼𝗈𝗌𝗌𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖾𝗆𝖺𝗌 𝗆𝖺𝗋𝗂𝗇𝗁𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝖾𝗋𝗉𝖾𝗍𝗎𝖺𝗋𝖺́ 𝖺 𝗇𝗈𝗌𝗌𝖺 𝖽𝖾𝗉𝖾𝗇𝖽𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝗆𝖺𝗍𝖾́𝗋𝗂𝖺𝗌 𝗋𝖺𝗋𝖺𝗌 𝖾 𝖿𝗂𝗇𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗌. 𝖠 𝖿𝗈𝗋𝗆𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝖺𝗋 𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗉𝗈𝗌𝗍𝖺 𝖺̀𝗌 𝗇𝖾𝖼𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾𝗌 𝖾𝗇𝖾𝗋𝗀𝖾́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝗈 𝗌𝖾́𝖼𝗎𝗅𝗈 𝖷𝖷𝖨 𝖾́ 𝖺 𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗌𝗂𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝖾𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗈𝗆𝗂𝖺 𝖼𝗂𝗋𝖼𝗎𝗅𝖺𝗋 𝖽𝖾 𝖺𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗏𝖾𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝖾 𝗏𝖺𝗅𝗈𝗋𝗂𝗓𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗋𝖾𝖼𝗎𝗋𝗌𝗈𝗌.

𝖠𝗌 𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗏𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾𝗌 𝗇𝗈 𝖿𝗎𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝖽𝗈 𝗆𝖺𝗋 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗅𝖺́ 𝖽𝖺 𝗃𝗎𝗋𝗂𝗌𝖽𝗂𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝖺𝗂́𝗌𝖾𝗌 𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝗋𝖾𝗀𝗎𝗅𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝗉𝖾𝗅𝖺 𝖠𝗎𝗍𝗈𝗋𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖨𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗇𝖺𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗅 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗈𝗌 𝖥𝗎𝗇𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖬𝖺𝗋𝗂𝗇𝗁𝗈𝗌 (𝖨𝖲𝖠). 𝖮𝗌 𝟣𝟨𝟩 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗆𝖾𝗆𝖻𝗋𝗈𝗌 𝖾 𝖺 𝖴𝖤 𝗋𝖾𝗀𝗎𝗅𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺𝗆 𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗋𝗈𝗅𝖺𝗆 𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗌𝖾 𝗉𝖺𝗌𝗌𝖺 𝗇𝗈 𝗌𝗈𝗅𝗈 𝖾 𝗌𝗎𝖻𝗌𝗈𝗅𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝟧𝟢% 𝖽𝗈 𝗉𝗅𝖺𝗇𝖾𝗍𝖺, 𝗆𝖺𝗌 𝗉𝗈𝗎𝖼𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗇𝗈́𝗌 𝗃𝖺́ 𝗈𝗎𝗏𝗂𝗋𝖺𝗆 𝖿𝖺𝗅𝖺𝗋 𝖽𝖺 𝖨𝖲𝖠. 𝖠 𝗆𝗂𝗇𝖾𝗋𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾𝗆 𝗆𝖺𝗋 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝖿𝗎𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝗍𝖾𝗆 𝗌𝗂𝖽𝗈 𝗈 𝗍𝖾𝗆𝖺 𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗎́𝗅𝗍𝗂𝗆𝗈𝗌 𝖺𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝖾 𝗉𝗈𝖽𝖾 𝗆𝖾𝗌𝗆𝗈 𝗏𝗂𝗋 𝖺 𝗆𝖺𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗂𝖺𝗅𝗂𝗓𝖺𝗋-𝗌𝖾 𝖺 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝗍𝗂𝗋 𝖽𝖾 𝗃𝗎𝗅𝗁𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝟤𝟢𝟤𝟥. 𝖠𝗊𝗎𝗂𝗅𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾, 𝖺𝗍𝖾́ 𝖺𝗀𝗈𝗋𝖺, 𝖾𝗋𝖺 𝖿𝗂𝖼𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖼𝗂𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗂́𝖿𝗂𝖼𝖺 𝗉𝗈𝖽𝖾 𝖺𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝖾𝖼𝖾𝗋 𝗇𝗈 𝖿𝗂𝗆 𝖽𝗈 𝗉𝗋𝖺𝗓𝗈 𝖽𝖺 "𝗋𝖾𝗀𝗋𝖺 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝟤 𝖺𝗇𝗈𝗌", 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗏𝗂𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝗅𝖾𝗀𝖺𝗅 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗉𝖾𝗋𝗆𝗂𝗍𝖾 𝗊𝗎𝖾, 𝗇𝖺 𝖺𝗎𝗌𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝗋𝖾𝗀𝗎𝗅𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝗋𝗈𝖻𝗎𝗌𝗍𝗈𝗌, 𝖾 𝖺𝗉𝗈́𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗎𝗇𝗂𝖼𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝗍𝖾 𝖽𝖾 𝗎𝗆 𝖤𝗌𝗍𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝖽𝖺 𝗂𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗇𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖺𝗏𝖺𝗇𝖼̧𝖺𝗋 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝖺 𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗏𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾, 𝗂𝗌𝗍𝗈 𝗉𝗈𝗌𝗌𝖺 𝖿𝗂𝗇𝖺𝗅𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖺𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝖾𝖼𝖾𝗋 𝖺𝗈 𝖿𝗂𝗆 𝖽𝖾 𝟤 𝖺𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝖺𝗌 𝗋𝖾𝗀𝗋𝖺𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗂𝗏𝖾𝗋𝖾𝗆 𝖾𝗆 𝗏𝗂𝗀𝗈𝗋 𝗇𝖺 𝖺𝗅𝗍𝗎𝗋𝖺.

𝖮𝗋𝖺, 𝖾𝗆 𝟤 𝖺𝗇𝗈𝗌, 𝗉𝗈𝗎𝖼𝖺𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗂𝗌𝖺𝗌 𝗆𝗎𝖽𝖺𝗆 𝗇𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗉𝖾𝗂𝗍𝖺 𝖺𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗁𝖾𝖼𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝗈 𝗆𝖺𝗋 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝖿𝗎𝗇𝖽𝗈. 𝖠 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗎𝗇𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖼𝗂𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗂́𝖿𝗂𝖼𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗌𝗂𝖽𝖾𝗋𝖺 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗌𝖾 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺́ 𝖺, 𝗉𝖾𝗅𝗈 𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗈𝗌, 𝟣𝟢 𝖺𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗎𝗆 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗁𝖾𝖼𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖻𝖺𝗌𝖾 𝗌𝗈𝖻𝗋𝖾 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖾 𝖾𝖼𝗈𝗌𝗌𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖾𝗆𝖺 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝖾𝗋𝗆𝗂𝗍𝖺 𝗍𝗈𝗆𝖺𝗋 𝖽𝖾𝖼𝗂𝗌𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗌𝖼𝗂𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗌 𝖾 𝗂𝗇𝖿𝗈𝗋𝗆𝖺𝖽𝖺𝗌. 𝖳𝖺𝗆𝖻𝖾́𝗆 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝗂𝗌𝗌𝗈, 𝟨𝟧𝟢 𝖼𝗂𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝟦𝟦 𝗉𝖺𝗂́𝗌𝖾𝗌 𝖺𝗌𝗌𝗂𝗇𝖺𝗋𝖺𝗆 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝖼𝖺𝗋𝗍𝖺 𝖺 𝗉𝖾𝖽𝗂𝗋 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗆𝗈𝗋𝖺𝗍𝗈́𝗋𝗂𝖺 𝖺̀ 𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗏𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾.

𝖭𝖺𝗌 𝗎́𝗅𝗍𝗂𝗆𝖺𝗌 𝗌𝖾𝗆𝖺𝗇𝖺𝗌, 𝗉𝖺𝗂́𝗌𝖾𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝖺 𝖠𝗅𝖾𝗆𝖺𝗇𝗁𝖺, 𝖥𝗋𝖺𝗇𝖼̧𝖺, 𝖤𝗌𝗉𝖺𝗇𝗁𝖺 𝖾 𝖭𝗈𝗏𝖺 𝖹𝖾𝗅𝖺̂𝗇𝖽𝗂𝖺 𝗃𝗎𝗇𝗍𝖺𝗋𝖺𝗆 𝖺 𝗌𝗎𝖺 𝗏𝗈𝗓 𝖺̀𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗅𝖾𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗃𝖺́ 𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗂𝗈𝗋𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝗍𝗂𝗇𝗁𝖺𝗆 𝗉𝖾𝖽𝗂𝖽𝗈 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗉𝖺𝗎𝗌𝖺 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝖼𝖺𝗎𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺́𝗋𝗂𝖺 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗉𝖾𝗋𝗆𝗂𝗍𝗂𝗋 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗁𝖾𝖼𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝖼𝗂𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗂́𝖿𝗂𝖼𝗈 𝗌𝖾𝗃𝖺 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝖽𝗎𝗓𝗂𝖽𝗈 𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖺 𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗏𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝖾𝗋𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗅 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗁𝖾𝖼𝖾𝗋 𝗈 𝗌𝖾𝗎 𝗂𝗇𝗂́𝖼𝗂𝗈 𝗉𝖾𝗅𝖺 𝗉𝗋𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗂𝗋𝖺 𝗏𝖾𝗓.

𝖠 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗎𝗇𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝗂𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗇𝖺𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗅 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖾𝖼𝖾 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗋 𝖺 𝗉𝗈𝗌𝗂𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗋-𝗌𝖾 𝗇𝖺 𝖽𝖾𝖿𝖾𝗌𝖺 𝖽𝗈 𝗆𝖺𝗋 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝖿𝗎𝗇𝖽𝗈; 𝖯𝗈𝗋𝗍𝗎𝗀𝖺𝗅 (𝗋𝖾𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗌𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝗉𝖾𝗅𝗈 𝖬𝗂𝗇𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖾́𝗋𝗂𝗈 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖭𝖾𝗀𝗈́𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗌 𝖤𝗌𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗀𝖾𝗂𝗋𝗈𝗌), 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗋𝗂𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖺 𝗍𝗈𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝖺𝗌 𝗌𝗎𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖾𝖼𝗅𝖺𝗋𝖺𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝗋𝖾𝖼𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗌 𝗇𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗍𝗈𝖼𝖺 𝖺̀ 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗌𝖾𝗋𝗏𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝗆𝖺𝗋𝗂𝗇𝗁𝖺, 𝖾𝗑𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗈𝗎 𝗇𝖺 𝖨𝖲𝖠 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗌𝗂𝖽𝖾𝗋𝖺 𝗎𝗋𝗀𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝗀𝖺𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗍𝗂𝗋 𝖺 𝖺𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗏𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝗈 𝖼𝗈́𝖽𝗂𝗀𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗏𝖺𝗂 𝖿𝖺𝖼𝗂𝗅𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗋 𝗈 𝗂𝗇𝗂́𝖼𝗂𝗈 𝖽𝖺 𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗏𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾. 𝖠𝗍𝖾́ 𝗃𝗎𝗅𝗁𝗈, 𝖯𝗈𝗋𝗍𝗎𝗀𝖺𝗅 𝗉𝗈𝖽𝖾 𝖺𝗂𝗇𝖽𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗅𝗈𝖼𝖺𝗋-𝗌𝖾 𝖽𝗈 𝗅𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗉𝖾𝖽𝖾𝗆 𝗉𝗈𝗇𝖽𝖾𝗋𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝖼𝖺𝗎𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈. 𝖠𝗍𝖾́ 𝖺𝗀𝗈𝗋𝖺, 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖾𝖼𝖾 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝖿𝖾𝗋𝗂𝗋 𝗂𝗇𝗏𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗂𝗋 𝗈 𝗌𝖾𝗎 𝖼𝖺𝗉𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗅 𝗉𝗈𝗅𝗂́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝗈 𝖺 𝗀𝖺𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗍𝗂𝗋 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖺 𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗏𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝗉𝗈𝖽𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝖾𝖼̧𝖺𝗋 𝗇𝗈 𝗉𝗋𝗈́𝗑𝗂𝗆𝗈 𝖺𝗇𝗈 𝗌𝗈𝖻 𝖿𝖺𝗅𝗌𝖺𝗌 𝗀𝖺𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗍𝗂𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗍𝖾𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖺 𝖻𝗂𝗈𝖽𝗂𝗏𝖾𝗋𝗌𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖾 𝖾𝖼𝗈𝗌𝗌𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖾𝗆𝖺𝗌 𝖾 𝖺 𝗂𝗇𝖾𝗑𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝖺𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝗌𝖾́𝗋𝗂𝗈𝗌 𝗇𝗈 𝗆𝖾𝗂𝗈. 𝖠 𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾́ 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗂𝗌𝗍𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗅𝗈𝖼𝖺-𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝖾𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝗎𝗆 𝗈𝗑𝗂𝗆𝗈𝗋𝗈: 𝗈𝗎 𝗌𝖾 𝖾𝗌𝖼𝗈𝗅𝗁𝖾 𝗆𝗂𝗇𝖾𝗋𝖺𝗋 𝖾 𝖼𝖺𝗎𝗌𝖺𝗋 𝖽𝖺𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝗏𝗂𝗋𝗍𝗎𝖺𝗅𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝗂𝗋𝗋𝖾𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺́𝗏𝖾𝗂𝗌 𝖺𝗈 𝗆𝖺𝗋 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝖿𝗎𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝗈𝗎 𝗌𝖾 𝖾𝗌𝖼𝗈𝗅𝗁𝖾 𝖾𝗌𝗉𝖾𝗋𝖺𝗋 𝖾 𝗀𝖺𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗍𝗂𝗋 𝗊𝗎𝖾, 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗃𝖺́, 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺 𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗏𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝖺𝗏𝖺𝗇𝖼̧𝖺. 𝖠̀ 𝗅𝗎𝗓 𝖽𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗁𝖾𝖼𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝖺𝗍𝗎𝖺𝗅, 𝗈𝗇𝖽𝖾 𝖾𝗑𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖾 𝗎𝗆, 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾𝗑𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖾 𝗈 𝗈𝗎𝗍𝗋𝗈.
* Técnica de políticas de pescas da associação Sciaena– Oceanos, Conservação e Sensibilização
.
IN "DIÁRIO DE NOTÍCIAS" - 21/11/22 .

Sem comentários: