.
Ciberataques, ciberguerra
e ciberpandemia
A China fomenta um ecossistema de hackers que executam cibercrimes
com o patrocínio do Governo Chinês" (Antony J. Blinken, Secretário de
Estado norte-americano)
𝖣𝖾𝗌𝖽𝖾 𝗈 𝗂𝗇𝗂́𝖼𝗂𝗈 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗍𝖾𝗆𝗉𝗈𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗁𝖺́ 𝗀𝗎𝖾𝗋𝗋𝖺, 𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖾 𝗉𝖺𝗂́𝗌𝖾𝗌 𝗈𝗎 𝖿𝖺𝖼𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌, 𝗍𝗋𝗂𝖻𝗈𝗌 𝗈𝗎 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝗍𝗂𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗋𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗎𝗆 𝗉𝖺𝗂́𝗌, 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝗆𝗈𝗍𝗂𝗏𝗈𝗌 𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗋𝗂𝗍𝗈𝗋𝗂𝖺𝗂𝗌, 𝗋𝖾𝗅𝗂𝗀𝗂𝗈𝗌𝗈𝗌, 𝗂𝖽𝖾𝗈𝗅𝗈́𝗀𝗂𝖼𝗈𝗌, 𝖾́𝗍𝗇𝗂𝖼𝗈𝗌, 𝖾𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗈́𝗆𝗂𝖼𝗈𝗌 𝗈𝗎 𝗈𝗎𝗍𝗋𝗈𝗌. 𝖮 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖿𝗅𝗂𝗍𝗈 𝗍𝗈𝗆𝖺 𝗍𝗋𝖺𝖽𝗂𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗅𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖺 𝖿𝗈𝗋𝗆𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝗂𝗌𝗉𝗎𝗍𝖺 𝖺𝗋𝗆𝖺𝖽𝖺, 𝖺𝗌𝗌𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝗇𝗈 𝗋𝖾𝖼𝗎𝗋𝗌𝗈 𝖺 𝖺𝗋𝗆𝖺𝗌 𝗏𝖺𝗋𝗂𝖺𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖾𝗆 𝖿𝗎𝗇𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖺 𝗏𝗈𝗇𝗍𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖺𝖼𝗍𝗈𝗋𝖾𝗌 𝖻𝖾́𝗅𝗂𝖼𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝗈𝖽𝖾𝗆 𝗂𝗋 𝖽𝖾 𝖺𝗋𝗆𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖿𝗈𝗀𝗈 𝖾 𝖽𝗋𝗈𝗇𝖾𝗌 𝖺 𝖺𝗋𝗆𝖺𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝗂́𝗆𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗌 𝖾 𝖻𝗂𝗈𝗅𝗈́𝗀𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗌. 𝖠 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗌 𝖺𝗋𝗆𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗋𝗎𝗂𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗏𝖾𝗇𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝖺𝖼𝗋𝖾𝗌𝖼𝖾𝗆, 𝗁𝗈𝗃𝖾, 𝖺𝗋𝗆𝖺𝗌 𝗏𝗂𝗋𝗍𝗎𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝖾𝗆𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗀𝗎𝖾𝗌 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝖾𝖿𝖾𝗂𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖼𝗂𝖻𝖾𝗋𝖺𝗍𝖺𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗌.
𝖮𝗌 𝖼𝗂𝖻𝖾𝗋𝖺𝗍𝖺𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗌 𝗉𝗈𝖽𝖾𝗆 𝗍𝖾𝗋 𝗇𝖺 𝗌𝗎𝖺 𝗈𝗋𝗂𝗀𝖾𝗆 𝗋𝖺𝗓𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗇𝖺𝗍𝗎𝗋𝖾𝗓𝖺 𝗏𝖺𝗋𝗂𝖺𝖽𝖺, 𝗈𝗌 𝗌𝖾𝗎𝗌 𝖺𝗎𝗍𝗈𝗋𝖾𝗌 𝗉𝗈𝖽𝖾𝗆 𝗌𝖾𝗋 𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗋𝗈𝗋𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗌, 𝖼𝗋𝗂𝗆𝗂𝗇𝗈𝗌𝗈𝗌, 𝖺𝖼𝗍𝗂𝗏𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗌 𝗈𝗎 𝗇𝖺𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗀𝖾𝗂𝗋𝖺𝗌 𝖾 𝖺𝗌 𝗌𝗎𝖺𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗌𝖾𝗊𝗎𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗌 𝗉𝗈𝖽𝖾𝗆 𝖺𝖻𝖺𝗋𝖼𝖺𝗋, 𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖾 𝗈𝗎𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗂𝗌𝖺𝗌, 𝖺 𝗂𝗇𝖽𝗂𝗌𝗉𝗈𝗇𝗂𝖻𝗂𝗅𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝖾 𝗎𝗆 𝗐𝖾𝖻𝗌𝗂𝗍𝖾 𝗂𝗇𝗌𝗍𝗂𝗍𝗎𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗅 (𝖺𝗌𝗌𝗂𝗆 𝖺𝖻𝖺𝗅𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝖺 𝗋𝖾𝗉𝗎𝗍𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖺 𝗂𝗇𝗌𝗍𝗂𝗍𝗎𝗂𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾𝗆 𝖼𝖺𝗎𝗌𝖺), 𝖽𝖺𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖿𝗈𝗋𝗈 𝖿𝗂𝗇𝖺𝗇𝖼𝖾𝗂𝗋𝗈, 𝗅𝗂𝗆𝗂𝗍𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗂𝗇𝗌𝗍𝗋𝗎𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝖾𝖿𝖾𝗌𝖺 𝗇𝖺𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗅 𝖾 𝖺𝗍𝖾́ 𝖺 𝗉𝖾𝗋𝖽𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝗏𝗂𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝗁𝗎𝗆𝖺𝗇𝖺𝗌.
𝖰𝗎𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝖾𝗑𝖾𝖼𝗎𝗍𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝖿𝗂𝗇𝗌 𝗉𝗈𝗅𝗂́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝗈𝗌 𝖾 𝗆𝗂𝗅𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗋𝖾𝗌, 𝗈𝗌 𝖼𝗂𝖻𝖾𝗋𝖺𝗍𝖺𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖿𝗂𝗀𝗎𝗋𝖺𝗆-𝗌𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝖺𝖼𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖼𝗂𝖻𝖾𝗋𝗀𝗎𝖾𝗋𝗋𝖺, 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗍𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝗆𝗎́𝗅𝗍𝗂𝗉𝗅𝖺𝗌 𝗍𝖺́𝖼𝗍𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 (𝗂) 𝗉𝗁𝗂𝗌𝗁𝗂𝗇𝗀, 𝗏𝗂́𝗋𝗎𝗌 𝗈𝗎 𝗆𝖺𝗅𝗐𝖺𝗋𝖾 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖽𝖾𝗆 𝗌𝗈𝖻𝗋𝖾 𝗂𝗇𝖿𝗋𝖺𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗋𝗎𝗍𝗎𝗋𝖺𝗌 𝖼𝗋𝗂́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗌 (𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝗌𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖾𝗆𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗌𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗍𝖾, 𝖺́𝗀𝗎𝖺, 𝖾𝗅𝖾𝖼𝗍𝗋𝗂𝖼𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾, 𝖻𝖺𝗇𝖼𝖺́𝗋𝗂𝗈𝗌 𝖾 𝗁𝗈𝗌𝗉𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗅𝖺𝗋𝖾𝗌), (𝗂𝗂) 𝖺𝗍𝖺𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗌 𝖣𝖣𝗈𝖲 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗂𝗆𝗉𝖾𝖽𝖾𝗆 𝗈 𝖺𝖼𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗈 𝖺 𝖽𝗂𝗌𝗉𝗈𝗌𝗂𝗍𝗂𝗏𝗈𝗌 𝗈𝗎 𝗋𝖾𝖽𝖾𝗌 𝗉𝖾𝗅𝗈𝗌 𝗌𝖾𝗎𝗌 𝗅𝖾𝗀𝗂́𝗍𝗂𝗆𝗈𝗌 𝗎𝗍𝗂𝗅𝗂𝗓𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗋𝖾𝗌, (𝗂𝗂𝗂) 𝖾𝗑𝗍𝗋𝖺𝖼𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖼𝗋𝗂́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝖾𝗋𝗍𝖾𝗇𝖼𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗌 𝖺 𝖤𝗌𝗍𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌, 𝖾𝗆𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗌𝖺𝗌 𝗈𝗎 𝗈𝗎𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗌 𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾𝗌, (𝗂𝗏) 𝖼𝗂𝖻𝖾𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗉𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗀𝖾𝗆 𝗏𝗂𝗌𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗆𝖾𝗍𝖾𝗋 𝖺 𝗌𝖾𝗀𝗎𝗋𝖺𝗇𝖼̧𝖺 𝗇𝖺𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗅, (𝗏) 𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗌𝗈𝗆𝗐𝖺𝗋𝖾 𝖾𝗆 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖾́ 𝗏𝖾𝖽𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝗈 𝖺𝖼𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗈 𝖺 𝖽𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖺𝗍𝖾́ 𝖺𝗈 𝗉𝖺𝗀𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗎𝗆 𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗀𝖺𝗍𝖾 𝖾 (𝗏𝗂) 𝖼𝖺𝗆𝗉𝖺𝗇𝗁𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝗂𝗇𝖿𝗈𝗋𝗆𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈. 𝖠 𝗂𝖽𝖾𝗂𝖺 𝖻𝖺́𝗌𝗂𝖼𝖺 𝖾́ 𝗂𝗇𝖿𝗂𝗅𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗋, 𝗋𝗈𝗎𝖻𝖺𝗋, 𝗌𝖺𝖻𝗈𝗍𝖺𝗋 𝖾 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺𝖻𝗂𝗅𝗂𝗓𝖺𝗋 𝗇𝗈 𝖼𝖺𝗆𝗉𝗈 𝖽𝗂𝗀𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗅, 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝗋𝖾𝗉𝖾𝗋𝖼𝗎𝗌𝗌𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝗆𝗎𝗂𝗍𝗈 𝗍𝖺𝗇𝗀𝗂́𝗏𝖾𝗂𝗌 𝗇𝗈 𝗆𝗎𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝖿𝗂́𝗌𝗂𝖼𝗈. 𝖠 𝗍𝗂́𝗍𝗎𝗅𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖾𝗑𝖾𝗆𝗉𝗅𝗈, 𝖾𝗆 𝟤𝟢𝟣𝟩, 𝗈 𝖲𝖾𝗋𝗏𝗂𝖼̧𝗈 𝖭𝖺𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗅 𝖽𝖾 𝖲𝖺𝗎́𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝗈 𝖱𝖾𝗂𝗇𝗈 𝖴𝗇𝗂𝖽𝗈 𝖿𝗈𝗂 𝖺𝗅𝗏𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗎𝗆 𝖼𝗋𝗒𝗉𝗍𝗈-𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗌𝗈𝗆𝗐𝖺𝗋𝖾 𝖽𝖾𝗇𝗈𝗆𝗂𝗇𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝖶𝖺𝗇𝗇𝖺𝖢𝗋𝗒, 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗅𝖾𝗏𝗈𝗎 𝖺𝗈 𝖼𝖺𝗇𝖼𝖾𝗅𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝟣𝟫 𝗆𝗂𝗅 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗌𝗎𝗅𝗍𝖺𝗌 𝖾 𝖺 𝖽𝖺𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝗇𝗈 𝗏𝖺𝗅𝗈𝗋 𝖽𝖾 𝟫𝟤 𝗆𝗂𝗅𝗁𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝖦𝖡𝖯 (𝖳𝗁𝖾 𝖦𝗎𝖺𝗋𝖽𝗂𝖺𝗇, 𝖢𝗒𝖻𝖾𝗋𝗀𝗒𝗆). 𝖴𝗆 𝖺𝗍𝖺𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗌𝖾𝗆 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝖼𝖾𝖽𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗌 𝖺𝖿𝗂𝗋𝗆𝗈𝗎, 𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺̃𝗈, 𝖺 𝖤𝗎𝗋𝗈𝗉𝗈𝗅 (𝖡𝖡𝖢 𝖭𝖾𝗐𝗌).
𝖳𝖾𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝖺 𝖼𝗂𝖻𝖾𝗋𝗌𝖾𝗀𝗎𝗋𝖺𝗇𝖼̧𝖺 𝗌𝗂𝖽𝗈 𝗂𝖽𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗂𝖿𝗂𝖼𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝗎𝗆 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗈𝗋𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝖺𝖿𝗂𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖺 𝖺𝖼𝗍𝗎𝖺𝗅𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾, 𝗈𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗈𝗋𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝗆𝖺𝗇𝗂𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗂́𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗌 𝖾 𝖽𝗎𝖺𝗅𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝗈 𝖼𝗂𝖻𝖾𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗉𝖺𝖼̧𝗈 𝖺𝖼𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗎𝖺𝗋𝖺𝗆-𝗌𝖾 𝖾𝗆 𝗍𝖾𝗆𝗉𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗉𝖺𝗇𝖽𝖾𝗆𝗂𝖺. 𝖯𝗈𝗋 𝗎𝗆 𝗅𝖺𝖽𝗈, 𝗇𝖺 𝗌𝖾𝗊𝗎𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝖽𝖺 𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗉𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗋𝖾𝗀𝗋𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝗌𝗈𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗅, 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝖽𝗂𝗆𝗂𝗇𝗎𝗂𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖼𝖺𝖽𝖾𝗂𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝖺́𝗀𝗂𝗈, 𝖺 𝖨𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗇𝖾𝗍 𝖿𝗈𝗋𝗇𝖾𝖼𝖾𝗎 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗍𝖺́𝖻𝗎𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝗌𝖺𝗅𝗏𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈, 𝗉𝖾𝗋𝗆𝗂𝗍𝗂𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝗈 𝗍𝗋𝖺𝖻𝖺𝗅𝗁𝗈 𝖺̀ 𝖽𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖺̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝖾 𝖺 𝗆𝖺𝗇𝗎𝗍𝖾𝗇𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝖺𝖼𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝖼𝗈𝗅𝖾𝗀𝖺𝗌, 𝖺𝗆𝗂𝗀𝗈𝗌 𝖾 𝖿𝖺𝗆𝗂𝗅𝗂𝖺𝗋𝖾𝗌. 𝖯𝗈𝗋 𝗈𝗎𝗍𝗋𝗈 𝗅𝖺𝖽𝗈, 𝗎𝗆 𝗇𝗎́𝗆𝖾𝗋𝗈 𝖾𝗅𝖾𝗏𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗍𝗋𝖺𝖻𝖺𝗅𝗁𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗋𝖾𝗌 𝗉𝖺𝗌𝗌𝗈𝗎 𝖺 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝖾𝗆𝗉𝖾𝗇𝗁𝖺𝗋 𝖺𝗌 𝗌𝗎𝖺𝗌 𝖿𝗎𝗇𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝖺̀ 𝖽𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖺̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺, 𝖺𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗏𝖾́𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝗂𝗌𝗉𝗈𝗌𝗂𝗍𝗂𝗏𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝗈𝗍𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗉𝖺𝗍𝖺𝗆𝖺𝗋𝖾𝗌 𝗆𝗂́𝗇𝗂𝗆𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗉𝗋𝗂𝗏𝖺𝖼𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖾 𝖽𝖾 𝖼𝗂𝖻𝖾𝗋𝗌𝖾𝗀𝗎𝗋𝖺𝗇𝖼̧𝖺. 𝖲𝗎𝗋𝗀𝗂𝗎 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗎𝗆 𝖼𝖺𝗏𝖺𝗅𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖳𝗋𝗈́𝗂𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗅𝖾𝖼𝗍𝗂𝗏𝗈 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗈𝗌 𝗁𝖺𝖼𝗄𝖾𝗋𝗌, 𝖼𝗎𝗃𝖺 𝖺𝖼𝗍𝗂𝗏𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝗂𝗅𝗂́𝖼𝗂𝗍𝖺 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗅𝗂𝖿𝖾𝗋𝗈𝗎 𝗇𝗈 𝖺̂𝗆𝖻𝗂𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝖼𝗂𝖻𝖾𝗋𝗉𝖺𝗇𝖽𝖾𝗆𝗂𝖺. 𝖯𝗈𝗋 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗌𝖾𝗀𝗎𝗂𝗇𝗍𝖾, 𝖾𝗇𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝗈 𝗆𝗎𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝖾𝗆 𝗀𝖾𝗋𝖺𝗅 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝖻𝖺𝗍𝗂𝖺 𝗈 𝗏𝗂́𝗋𝗎𝗌, 𝖺𝗎𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺𝗋𝖺𝗆 𝗈𝗌 𝖼𝗂𝖻𝖾𝗋𝖺𝗍𝖺𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗌. 𝖭𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺 𝗌𝖾𝗊𝗎𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺, 𝖺 𝖮𝗋𝗀𝖺𝗇𝗂𝗓𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖬𝗎𝗇𝖽𝗂𝖺𝗅 𝖽𝖾 𝖲𝖺𝗎́𝖽𝖾 𝗋𝖾𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗍𝗈𝗎 𝗍𝖾𝗋 𝗌𝗈𝖿𝗋𝗂𝖽𝗈 𝟧 𝗏𝖾𝗓𝖾𝗌 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝖺𝗍𝖺𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗌 𝖾𝗆 𝟤𝟢𝟤𝟢 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖾𝗆 𝖺𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝗋𝖾́𝗏𝗂𝗈𝗌. 𝖳𝖺𝗆𝖻𝖾́𝗆 𝖾𝗆 𝟤𝟢𝟤𝟢, 𝖡𝗋𝖺𝖽 𝖲𝗆𝗂𝗍𝗁, 𝖯𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗂𝖽𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖽𝖺 𝖬𝗂𝖼𝗋𝗈𝗌𝗈𝖿𝗍, 𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗅𝗂𝖿𝗂𝖼𝗈𝗎 𝗈 𝖺𝗍𝖺𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖺̀ 𝖲𝗈𝗅𝖺𝗋𝖶𝗂𝗇𝖽𝗌, 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝗈 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗈𝗋 𝖾 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝗌𝗈𝖿𝗂𝗌𝗍𝗂𝖼𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝖺𝗍𝖺𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗈 𝗆𝗎𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝗃𝖺́ 𝗍𝗂𝗇𝗁𝖺 𝗏𝗂𝗌𝗍𝗈. 𝖲𝖾𝗀𝗎𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝗈 𝖶𝖺𝗌𝗁𝗂𝗇𝗀𝗍𝗈𝗇 𝖯𝗈𝗌𝗍 𝗈 𝖺𝗍𝖺𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗏𝖾𝗂𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗎𝗆 𝗀𝗋𝗎𝗉𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗁𝖺𝖼𝗄𝖾𝗋𝗌 𝗅𝗂𝗀𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝖺𝗈 𝖦𝗈𝗏𝖾𝗋𝗇𝗈 𝗋𝗎𝗌𝗌𝗈, 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗈 𝗍𝖾𝗋𝖺́ 𝗅𝖾𝗏𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝖺 𝖼𝖺𝖻𝗈 𝖺𝗈 𝗅𝗈𝗇𝗀𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝟫 𝗆𝖾𝗌𝖾𝗌, 𝗌𝖾𝗆 𝖽𝖾𝗍𝖾𝖼𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈, 𝗍𝖾𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝖺𝖿𝖾𝖼𝗍𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝗆𝗂𝗅𝗁𝖺𝗋𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖼𝗅𝗂𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖺 𝖲𝗈𝗅𝖺𝗋𝖶𝗂𝗇𝖽𝗌, 𝗂𝗇𝖼𝗅𝗎𝗂𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝗈 𝖦𝗈𝗏𝖾𝗋𝗇𝗈 𝗇𝗈𝗋𝗍𝖾-𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗋𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗇𝗈 𝖾 𝖺 𝖬𝗂𝖼𝗋𝗈𝗌𝗈𝖿𝗍 (𝖱𝖾𝗎𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗌, 𝖯𝗈𝗅𝗂𝗍𝗂𝖼𝗈). 𝖤 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝖼𝖺́, 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝗌𝖺𝖻𝖾𝗆𝗈𝗌, 𝖾𝗆 𝖩𝖺𝗇𝖾𝗂𝗋𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝟤𝟢𝟤𝟤 𝗈 𝗀𝗋𝗎𝗉𝗈 𝖨𝗆𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗌𝖺, 𝖺𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗅 𝗉𝖾𝗋𝗍𝖾𝗇𝖼𝖾 𝗈 𝖤𝗑𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗈 𝖾 𝖺 𝖲𝖨𝖢, 𝖿𝗈𝗂 𝗏𝗂́𝗍𝗂𝗆𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝗎𝗆 𝖼𝗂𝖻𝖾𝗋𝖺𝗍𝖺𝗊𝗎𝖾 "𝗎𝗆 𝖺𝗍𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝗇𝗎𝗇𝖼𝖺 𝗏𝗂𝗌𝗍𝗈 𝖺̀ 𝗅𝗂𝖻𝖾𝗋𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝖾 𝗂𝗆𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗇𝗌𝖺 𝖾𝗆 𝖯𝗈𝗋𝗍𝗎𝗀𝖺𝗅 𝗇𝖺 𝖾𝗋𝖺 𝖽𝗂𝗀𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗅", 𝖺𝗇𝗎𝗇𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗎 𝗈 𝗀𝗋𝗎𝗉𝗈.
𝖠 𝗏𝖾𝗋𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖾́ 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗈 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺𝖽𝗂𝗀𝗆𝖺 𝖻𝖾́𝗅𝗂𝖼𝗈 𝗆𝗎𝖽𝗈𝗎, 𝗍𝖾𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝖺𝗌 𝖼𝗂𝖻𝖾𝗋𝖺𝗋𝗆𝖺𝗌 𝖾 𝖺 𝖼𝗂𝖻𝖾𝗋𝗀𝗎𝖾𝗋𝗋𝖺 𝗍𝗈𝗆𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝗈 𝗅𝗎𝗀𝖺𝗋 𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝖺𝗋𝗆𝖺𝗌 𝖾 𝖽𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖿𝗅𝗂𝗍𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗏𝖾𝗇𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝖾 𝗍𝖾𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝗈 𝖾𝗌𝗉𝖺𝖼̧𝗈 𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗋𝖾, 𝗆𝖺𝗋𝗂́𝗍𝗂𝗆𝗈 𝖾 𝖺𝖾́𝗋𝖾𝗈 𝗌𝗂𝖽𝗈 𝗌𝗎𝖻𝗌𝗍𝗂𝗍𝗎𝗂́𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝖾𝗅𝗈 𝖼𝗂𝖻𝖾𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗉𝖺𝖼̧𝗈. 𝖠𝗌 𝗏𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖺𝗀𝖾𝗇𝗌 𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝗆𝗎𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗌. 𝖯𝗈𝗋 𝖾𝗑𝖾𝗆𝗉𝗅𝗈, (𝗂) 𝖺𝗌 𝖺𝗋𝗆𝖺𝗌 𝖾𝗆 𝖼𝖺𝗎𝗌𝖺, 𝗏𝗂𝗋𝗍𝗎𝖺𝗂𝗌, 𝗂𝗇𝖼𝗈𝗋𝗉𝗈́𝗋𝖾𝖺𝗌 𝖾 𝗂𝗆𝖺𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗂𝖺𝗂𝗌, 𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝖺𝖼𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗂́𝗏𝖾𝗂𝗌 𝖾𝗆 𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗆𝗈𝗌 𝖿𝗂𝗇𝖺𝗇𝖼𝖾𝗂𝗋𝗈𝗌, (𝗂𝗂) 𝗌𝖾𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝖽𝗂𝖿𝗂́𝖼𝗂𝗅 𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗉𝗈𝗇𝗌𝖺𝖻𝗂𝗅𝗂𝗓𝖺𝗋 𝗈𝗌 𝖺𝗎𝗍𝗈𝗋𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖺𝗍𝖺𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗌, 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗍𝖾𝗇𝖽𝖾𝗆, 𝗉𝗈𝗂𝗌, 𝖺 𝗌𝖾𝗋 𝖺𝗅𝗏𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗌𝖺𝗇𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌. 𝖢𝗈𝗇𝗌𝖾𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾, 𝖺𝗌𝗌𝗂𝗌𝗍𝗂𝗆𝗈𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗌𝗍𝖺̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺 (𝖻𝖺𝗌𝗍𝖺 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗋𝗆𝗈𝗌 𝖺𝗍𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈𝗌) 𝖺 𝗍𝖾𝗇𝗌𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝗇𝗈 𝗉𝗅𝖺𝗇𝗈 𝗏𝗂𝗋𝗍𝗎𝖺𝗅. 𝖵𝗂𝗏𝖾𝗆𝗈𝗌 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗀𝗎𝖾𝗋𝗋𝖺 𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗏𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝗇𝗈 𝖼𝗂𝖻𝖾𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗉𝖺𝖼̧𝗈 𝖾𝗆 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗀𝗈𝗏𝖾𝗋𝗇𝗈𝗌, 𝖾𝗆𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗌𝖺𝗌 𝖾 𝖺𝗍𝖾́ 𝗂𝗇𝖽𝗂𝗏𝗂́𝖽𝗎𝗈𝗌 𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝗏𝗂́𝗍𝗂𝗆𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖺𝗍𝖺𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗌 𝗏𝗂𝗋𝗍𝗎𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝖽𝖺𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝖻𝖾𝗆 𝗋𝖾𝖺𝗂𝗌. 𝖤 𝖺̀ 𝗆𝖾𝖽𝗂𝖽𝖺 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖺 𝗍𝖾𝖼𝗇𝗈𝗅𝗈𝗀𝗂𝖺 𝖺𝗏𝖺𝗇𝖼̧𝖺 (𝗅𝖾𝗆𝖻𝗋𝖾𝗆𝗈𝗌, 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝖾𝗑𝖾𝗆𝗉𝗅𝗈, 𝖺 𝗂𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗅𝗂𝗀𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝖺𝗋𝗍𝗂𝖿𝗂𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗅 (𝖨𝖠), 𝖺 𝖨𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗇𝖾𝗍 𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝖢𝗈𝗂𝗌𝖺𝗌 (𝖨𝗈𝖳), 𝟧𝖦 𝖾 𝖼𝗅𝗈𝗎𝖽 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗉𝗎𝗍𝗂𝗇𝗀) 𝖺𝗎𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺 𝗈 𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗋𝗂𝗍𝗈́𝗋𝗂𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗏𝗎𝗅𝗇𝖾𝗋𝖺𝖻𝗂𝗅𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾𝗌, 𝖽𝖾 𝗉𝗈𝗌𝗌𝗂𝖻𝗂𝗅𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾𝗌 𝖾 𝖽𝖾 𝗈𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗍𝗎𝗇𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖼𝗂𝖻𝖾𝗋𝖺𝗍𝖺𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗌. 𝖤́ 𝗂𝗆𝗉𝖾𝗋𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗏𝗈, 𝗉𝗈𝗂𝗌, 𝗃𝗈𝗀𝖺𝗋 𝖺̀ 𝖽𝖾𝖿𝖾𝗌𝖺, 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗉𝗈𝖽𝖾 𝗌𝖾𝗋 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝖼𝗎𝗋𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝗇𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺 𝖾 𝗇𝗈𝗎𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗌 𝗉𝖺𝗇𝖽𝖾𝗆𝗂𝖺𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗏𝖾𝗇𝗁𝖺𝗆 𝖺 𝗌𝗎𝗋𝗀𝗂𝗋, 𝖽𝖾𝖿𝗂𝗇𝗂𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗍𝖾́𝗀𝗂𝖺 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗀𝖾𝗋𝗂𝗋 𝗈 𝗋𝗂𝗌𝖼𝗈 𝖾 𝗆𝗂𝗍𝗂𝗀𝖺𝗋 𝗈 𝗂𝗆𝗉𝖺𝖼𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖽𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖼𝗂𝖻𝖾𝗋𝗌𝖾𝗀𝗎𝗋𝖺𝗇𝖼̧𝖺 - 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗍𝖾́𝗀𝗂𝖺 𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖺 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗉𝖺𝗌𝗌𝖺, 𝖼𝖺́ 𝖾𝗆 𝖯𝗈𝗋𝗍𝗎𝗀𝖺𝗅, 𝗉𝖾𝗅𝖺 𝗂𝗆𝗉𝗅𝖾𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝗆𝖾𝖽𝗂𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝗋𝖾𝖼𝗈𝗆𝖾𝗇𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝗉𝖾𝗅𝗈 𝖢𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗋𝗈 𝖭𝖺𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗅 𝖽𝖾 𝖲𝖾𝗀𝗎𝗋𝖺𝗇𝖼̧𝖺. 𝖬𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗇𝗎𝗇𝖼𝖺, "𝗌𝖾𝗋 𝗏𝗂𝗍𝗈𝗋𝗂𝗈𝗌𝗈 𝖾𝗑𝗂𝗀𝖾 𝗏𝖾𝗋 𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺́ 𝗏𝗂𝗌𝗂́𝗏𝖾𝗅" (𝖲𝗎𝗇 𝖳𝗓𝗎, 𝖠 𝖠𝗋𝗍𝖾 𝖽𝖺 𝖦𝗎𝖾𝗋𝗋𝖺).
* Fundadora de GPI/IPO, Gabinete de Jurisconsultoria
IN "DINHEIRO VIVO" - 01/02/22 .
Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário