MÁRIO JOÃO FERNANDES

 .

Direito Internacional

Público e futebol

A liberdade de opinião é um valor estimável mas nenhum de nós aceitaria apenas o uso de tal  liberdade, desacompanhada de formação, no momento de decidir da necessidade de trepanação da respectiva caixa craniana.

𝖩𝖺́ 𝖾𝗆 𝗆𝗎𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗌 𝗈𝗎𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗌 𝗆𝖺𝗍𝖾́𝗋𝗂𝖺𝗌 𝖺𝗌𝗌𝗂𝗌𝗍𝗂𝗆𝗈𝗌 𝖺 𝗎𝗆 𝖾𝗌𝗆𝖺𝗀𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗋 𝖽𝗈𝗆𝗂́𝗇𝗂𝗈 𝖽𝖺 𝗅𝗂𝖻𝖾𝗋𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝖾 𝗈𝗉𝗂𝗇𝗂𝖺̃𝗈 𝗌𝗈𝖻𝗋𝖾 𝖺 𝖿𝗈𝗋𝗆𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖼𝗂𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗂́𝖿𝗂𝖼𝖺 𝗈𝗎 𝖺𝗍𝖾́ 𝗌𝗈𝖻𝗋𝖾 𝗈 𝗆𝗂́𝗇𝗂𝗆𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗂𝗇𝖿𝗈𝗋𝗆𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝗏𝖺𝗅𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗉𝖾𝗋𝗆𝗂𝗍𝖺 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝖽𝗂𝗌𝖼𝗎𝗌𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝗋𝖺𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗅. 𝖠 𝗆𝗎𝗅𝗍𝗂𝗉𝗅𝗂𝖼𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖾 “𝗈𝗉𝗂𝗇𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗋𝖾𝗌” 𝗀𝖾𝗇𝖾𝗋𝖺𝗅𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗌 (“𝗍𝗎𝖽𝗈́𝗅𝗈𝗀𝗈𝗌”) 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖿𝖺𝗓𝖾𝗆 𝖺 𝗆𝖾𝖽𝗂𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖺 𝗂𝗇𝖿𝗈𝗋𝗆𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝗈́𝗋𝗀𝖺̃𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗎𝗇𝗂𝖼𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝗌𝗈𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗅 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺́ 𝖺 𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗇𝗀𝗂𝗋 𝖾𝗆 𝖯𝗈𝗋𝗍𝗎𝗀𝖺𝗅 𝗎𝗆 𝗇𝗂́𝗏𝖾𝗅 𝖽𝗈𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗂𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝗉𝖾𝗋𝗂𝗀𝗈𝗌𝗈.

𝖮 𝖾𝗉𝗂𝗌𝗈́𝖽𝗂𝗈 𝗋𝖾𝖼𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖽𝗈 𝖺𝗌𝗌𝖺𝗅𝗍𝗈 𝖺𝗈 𝗇𝖺𝗏𝗂𝗈 𝖬𝖲𝖢 𝖠𝗋𝗂𝖾𝗌 𝖾 𝗈 𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗉𝖾𝖼𝗍𝗂𝗏𝗈 𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗍𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝗆𝖾𝖽𝗂𝖺́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝗈 𝖾́ 𝖾𝗑𝖾𝗆𝗉𝗅𝖺𝗋 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝖾𝗋𝗂𝗀𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖾 𝗆𝖾́𝗍𝗈𝖽𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗈𝖼𝗎𝗉𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗍𝖾𝗆𝗉𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗇𝖺.

𝖵𝖺́𝗋𝗂𝗈𝗌 “𝗈𝗉𝗂𝗇𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗋𝖾𝗌” 𝗋𝖾𝖿𝖾𝗋𝗂𝗋𝖺𝗆 𝗈 𝖺𝗌𝗌𝖺𝗅𝗍𝗈 𝖺𝗈 𝗇𝖺𝗏𝗂𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝗌𝖾𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝗎𝗆 𝖺𝖼𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗉𝗂𝗋𝖺𝗍𝖺𝗋𝗂𝖺. 𝖠 𝗉𝗂𝗋𝖺𝗍𝖺𝗋𝗂𝖺 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺́ 𝖽𝖾𝖿𝗂𝗇𝗂𝖽𝖺 𝗁𝖺́ 𝗆𝗎𝗂𝗍𝗈 𝖾𝗆 𝗌𝗎𝖼𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗂𝗏𝖺𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗏𝖾𝗇𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝗂𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗇𝖺𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗂𝗌, 𝖺 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝗋𝖾𝖼𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗂𝗌, 𝖺 𝖢𝗈𝗇𝗏𝖾𝗇𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝖭𝖺𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝖴𝗇𝗂𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝗌𝗈𝖻𝗋𝖾 𝖣𝗂𝗋𝖾𝗂𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝗈 𝖬𝖺𝗋 (𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗁𝖾𝖼𝗂𝖽𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝖢𝗈𝗇𝗏𝖾𝗇𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖬𝗈𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗀𝗈 𝖡𝖺𝗒, 𝖢𝖬𝖡). 𝖮 𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗉𝖾𝖼𝗍𝗂𝗏𝗈 𝖺𝗋𝗍º 𝟣𝟢𝟣º 𝗍𝗂𝗉𝗂𝖿𝗂𝖼𝖺 𝗈𝗌 𝖺𝖼𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗉𝗂𝗋𝖺𝗍𝖺𝗋𝗂𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝗌𝖾𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝖾𝗍𝗂𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 “𝖿𝗂𝗇𝗌 𝗉𝗋𝗂𝗏𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌”. 𝖠 𝗉𝗂𝗋𝖺𝗍𝖺𝗋𝗂𝖺 𝖾𝗑𝗂𝗀𝖾 𝗎𝗆 𝖺𝗇𝗂𝗆𝗎𝗌 𝖿𝗎𝗋𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗂, 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗂𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗇𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗋𝗈𝗎𝖻𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗉𝗈́𝗌𝗂𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖾𝗇𝗋𝗂𝗊𝗎𝖾𝖼𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈. 𝖠 𝗉𝗂𝗋𝖺𝗍𝖺𝗋𝗂𝖺 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗌𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖿𝗎𝗇𝖽𝖾 𝗇𝖾𝗆 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝗈𝗌 𝖺𝖼𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗋𝗈𝗋𝗂𝗌𝗆𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝖿𝗂𝗇𝗌 𝗉𝗈𝗅𝗂́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝗈𝗌, 𝗇𝖾𝗆 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝗈𝗌 𝖺𝖼𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖿𝗂𝗌𝖼𝖺𝗅𝗂𝗓𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝗉𝗋𝖺𝗍𝗂𝖼𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝖾𝗅𝗈𝗌 𝖤𝗌𝗍𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌. 𝖠 𝗇𝖾𝖼𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝖾 𝗉𝗎𝗇𝗂𝗋 𝗈𝗌 𝖺𝖼𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝖾𝗉𝗋𝖾𝖽𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗇𝖺𝗏𝗂𝗈𝗌 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗆𝗈𝗍𝗂𝗏𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗉𝗈́𝗌𝗂𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖾𝗇𝗋𝗂𝗊𝗎𝖾𝖼𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝗅𝖾𝗏𝗈𝗎 𝖺̀ 𝗇𝖾𝗀𝗈𝖼𝗂𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾 𝖼𝖾𝗅𝖾𝖻𝗋𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖺 𝖢𝗈𝗇𝗏𝖾𝗇𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝗌𝗈𝖻𝗋𝖾 𝖺 𝗌𝗎𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖺𝖼𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝗂𝗅𝗂́𝖼𝗂𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖺 𝖺 𝗌𝖾𝗀𝗎𝗋𝖺𝗇𝖼̧𝖺 𝖽𝖺 𝗇𝖺𝗏𝖾𝗀𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝗆𝖺𝗋𝗂́𝗍𝗂𝗆𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝟣𝟫𝟪𝟪 (𝖢𝗈𝗇𝗏𝖾𝗇𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖲𝖴𝖠).

𝖳𝖺𝗆𝖻𝖾́𝗆 𝗈𝗌 𝖺𝖼𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗏𝗂𝗈𝗅𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝗉𝗋𝖺𝗍𝗂𝖼𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝗎𝗆 𝖤𝗌𝗍𝖺𝖽𝗈 (𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝗏𝗂𝖺 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗌𝖾𝗎𝗌 𝖺𝗀𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗌, 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝗈𝗌 𝖦𝗎𝖺𝗋𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝖱𝖾𝗏𝗈𝗅𝗎𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺́𝗋𝗂𝗈𝗌 𝖨𝗌𝗅𝖺̂𝗆𝗂𝖼𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝗈 𝖨𝗋𝖺̃𝗈 𝗇𝖺 𝗌𝗎𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗉𝗈𝗇𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝗇𝖺𝗏𝖺𝗅) 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖺 𝗇𝖺𝗏𝗂𝗈𝗌 𝖻𝖺𝗍𝖾𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝗈 𝗉𝖺𝗏𝗂𝗅𝗁𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗎𝗆 𝗈𝗎𝗍𝗋𝗈 𝖤𝗌𝗍𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝖺𝖼𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗉𝗂𝗋𝖺𝗍𝖺𝗋𝗂𝖺. 𝖠 𝖢𝖬𝖡 𝗉𝖾𝗋𝗆𝗂𝗍𝖾 𝖺𝗈𝗌 𝖤𝗌𝗍𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌, 𝗇𝗈 𝖺𝗅𝗍𝗈 𝗆𝖺𝗋 𝗈𝗎 𝖾𝗆 𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗅𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗋 𝗈𝗎𝗍𝗋𝗈 𝗅𝗎𝗀𝖺𝗋 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗌𝗎𝖻𝗆𝖾𝗍𝗂𝖽𝗈 𝖺̀ 𝗃𝗎𝗋𝗂𝗌𝖽𝗂𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗅𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗋 𝖤𝗌𝗍𝖺𝖽𝗈, 𝗈 𝖺𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗌𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗇𝖺𝗏𝗂𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝗂𝗋𝖺𝗍𝖺𝗌 𝗈𝗎 𝗇𝖺 𝗉𝗈𝗌𝗌𝖾 𝖽𝖾 𝗉𝗂𝗋𝖺𝗍𝖺𝗌. 𝖥𝗈𝗋𝖺 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗑𝗍𝗈 𝗈 𝖤𝗌𝗍𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗌𝗍𝖾𝗂𝗋𝗈 (𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝖾́ 𝗈 𝖼𝖺𝗌𝗈 𝖽𝗈 𝖨𝗋𝖺̃𝗈 𝗇𝗈 𝖦𝗈𝗅𝖿𝗈 𝖯𝖾́𝗋𝗌𝗂𝖼𝗈 𝖾 𝗇𝗈 𝖬𝖺𝗋 𝖽𝖺 𝖠𝗋𝖺́𝖻𝗂𝖺) 𝗉𝗈𝖽𝖾, 𝗇𝗈 𝗌𝖾𝗎 𝗆𝖺𝗋 𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗋𝗂𝗍𝗈𝗋𝗂𝖺𝗅 𝖾 𝗇𝖺 𝖹𝗈𝗇𝖺 𝖤𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗈́𝗆𝗂𝖼𝖺 𝖤𝗑𝖼𝗅𝗎𝗌𝗂𝗏𝖺, 𝖾𝗑𝖾𝗋𝖼𝖾𝗋 𝖽𝖾𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗆𝗂𝗇𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝗈𝖽𝖾𝗋𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖿𝗂𝗌𝖼𝖺𝗅𝗂𝗓𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈. 𝖭𝗈𝗌 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗋𝖾𝗂𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝗎𝗍𝗂𝗅𝗂𝗓𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝖺 𝗇𝖺𝗏𝖾𝗀𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝗂𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗇𝖺𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗅 (𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝖾́ 𝗈 𝖼𝖺𝗌𝗈 𝖽𝗈 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗋𝖾𝗂𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖮𝗋𝗆𝗎𝗓) 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗏𝖺𝗅𝖾𝖼𝖾 𝖺 𝗅𝗂𝖻𝖾𝗋𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝖾 𝗇𝖺𝗏𝖾𝗀𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈, 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖼𝗋𝖾𝗍𝗂𝗓𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝗇𝗈 𝖽𝗂𝗋𝖾𝗂𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗉𝖺𝗌𝗌𝖺𝗀𝖾𝗆 𝖾𝗆 𝗍𝗋𝖺̂𝗇𝗌𝗂𝗍𝗈, 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗂́𝗇𝗎𝗈 𝖾 𝗋𝖺́𝗉𝗂𝖽𝗈.

𝖮 𝖺𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗌𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝖾𝗆 𝖺́𝗀𝗎𝖺𝗌 𝗂𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗇𝖺𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗂𝗌, 𝗆𝖺𝗇𝗎 𝗆𝗂𝗅𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗋𝗂, 𝖽𝖾 𝗎𝗆 𝗇𝖺𝗏𝗂𝗈 𝖻𝖺𝗍𝖾𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝗉𝖺𝗏𝗂𝗅𝗁𝖺̃𝗈 𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗍𝗎𝗀𝗎𝖾̂𝗌 (𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝖾́ 𝗈 𝖬𝖲𝖢 𝖠𝗋𝗂𝖾𝗌) 𝖾́ 𝗎𝗆 𝖺𝖼𝗍𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗏𝗂𝗈𝗅𝖺 𝖿𝗅𝖺𝗀𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝗈 𝖣𝗂𝗋𝖾𝗂𝗍𝗈 𝖨𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗇𝖺𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗅, 𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗋 𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗌𝗍𝗎𝗆𝖾𝗂𝗋𝗈, 𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗋 𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝖽𝗂𝖿𝗂𝖼𝖺𝖽𝗈, 𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝗍𝖺𝗅 𝗀𝖾𝗋𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗋 𝖽𝖾 𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗉𝗈𝗇𝗌𝖺𝖻𝗂𝗅𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝗂𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗇𝖺𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗅 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝗍𝖾 𝖽𝗈 𝖤𝗌𝗍𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗈 𝗉𝗋𝖺𝗍𝗂𝖼𝗈𝗎 (𝗈 𝖨𝗋𝖺̃𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗌𝖾𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝗍𝖾 𝗇𝖺 𝖢𝖬𝖡 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺́ 𝗈𝖻𝗋𝗂𝗀𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝖺 𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗉𝖾𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗋 𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗌𝗍𝗎𝗆𝖾 𝗂𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗇𝖺𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗅 𝖾𝗆 𝗆𝖺𝗍𝖾́𝗋𝗂𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝗂𝗋𝖾𝗂𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗉𝖺𝗌𝗌𝖺𝗀𝖾𝗆 𝖾𝗆 𝗍𝗋𝖺̂𝗇𝗌𝗂𝗍𝗈).

𝖮 𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗍𝖺-𝗏𝗈𝗓 𝖽𝗈 𝖬𝗂𝗇𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖾́𝗋𝗂𝗈 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖭𝖾𝗀𝗈́𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗌 𝖤𝗌𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗀𝖾𝗂𝗋𝗈𝗌 𝗂𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗂𝖺𝗇𝗈, 𝖭𝖺𝗌𝗌𝖾𝗋 𝖪𝖺𝗇𝖺𝗇𝗂, 𝗇𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖿𝖾𝗋𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝗂𝗆𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗇𝗌𝖺, 𝗂𝗇𝖿𝗈𝗋𝗆𝗈𝗎 𝗇𝗈 𝖽𝗂𝖺 𝟣𝟧 𝖽𝖾 𝖠𝖻𝗋𝗂𝗅: "𝖮 𝗇𝖺𝗏𝗂𝗈 𝖿𝗈𝗂 𝖽𝗂𝗋𝖾𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝖺́𝗀𝗎𝖺𝗌 𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗋𝗂𝗍𝗈𝗋𝗂𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝗂𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗂𝖺𝗇𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖾𝗏𝗂𝖽𝗈 𝖺̀ 𝗏𝗂𝗈𝗅𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗋𝖾𝗀𝗎𝗅𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝗆𝖺𝗋𝗂́𝗍𝗂𝗆𝗈𝗌 𝗂𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗇𝖺𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝖾 𝖺̀ 𝖿𝖺𝗅𝗍𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗉𝗈𝗌𝗍𝖺 𝖺̀𝗌 𝖺𝗎𝗍𝗈𝗋𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾𝗌 𝗂𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗂𝖺𝗇𝖺𝗌". 𝖠 𝗋𝖾𝖿𝖾𝗋𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖾𝖼𝖾 𝗌𝖾𝗋 𝖿𝖾𝗂𝗍𝖺 𝖺̀ 𝖢𝗈𝗇𝗏𝖾𝗇𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝗌𝗈𝖻𝗋𝖾 𝗈 𝖱𝖾𝗀𝗎𝗅𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝖨𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗇𝖺𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗅 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝖤𝗏𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗋 𝖠𝖻𝖺𝗅𝗋𝗈𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝗇𝗈 𝖬𝖺𝗋, 𝖽𝖾 𝟣𝟫𝟩𝟤 (𝖢𝖮𝖫𝖱𝖤𝖦). 𝖯𝖾𝗅𝖺 𝖻𝗈𝖼𝖺 𝖽𝗈 𝖤𝗆𝖻𝖺𝗂𝗑𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗋 𝖽𝗈 𝖨𝗋𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾𝗆 𝖫𝗂𝗌𝖻𝗈𝖺, 𝖾𝗆 𝖽𝖾𝖼𝗅𝖺𝗋𝖺𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝖺̀ 𝖱𝖳𝖯, 𝗃𝖺́ 𝗌𝖾 𝗏𝗂𝗎 𝗈 𝗂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖽𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗅𝗂𝖿𝗂𝖼𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 “𝖾𝗇𝗀𝖺𝗇𝗈” 𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝗃𝗎𝗌𝗍𝗂𝖿𝗂𝖼𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝗍𝖾𝗋 𝗌𝗂𝖽𝗈 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝗅𝗂𝗀𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝗈 “𝖠𝗎𝗍𝗈𝗆𝖺𝗍𝗂𝖼 𝖨𝖽𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗂𝖿𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗈𝗇 𝖲𝗒𝗌𝗍𝖾𝗆” (𝖠𝖨𝖲) 𝖽𝗈 𝖬𝖲𝖢 𝖠𝗋𝗂𝖾𝗌. 𝖮 𝖠𝖨𝖲 𝗉𝗈𝖽𝖾 𝗌𝖾𝗋 𝖾𝗑𝗂𝗀𝗂́𝗏𝖾𝗅 𝖾𝗆 𝗓𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗌 𝗈𝗇𝖽𝖾 𝖾𝗑𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗆 “𝖵𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖾𝗅 𝖳𝗋𝖺𝖿𝖿𝗂𝖼 𝖲𝖾𝗋𝗏𝗂𝖼𝖾𝗌” (𝖵𝖳𝖲) 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗆𝗎𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝗋𝖾𝖿𝖾𝗋𝗂𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝖾𝗌𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗆𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗌𝖾𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗍𝗋𝖺́𝖿𝖾𝗀𝗈 𝗆𝖺𝗋𝗂́𝗍𝗂𝗆𝗈 (𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝖺𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝖾𝖼𝖾 𝖾𝗆 𝗏𝖺́𝗋𝗂𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗌𝗍𝖺 𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗍𝗎𝗀𝗎𝖾𝗌𝖺) 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗏𝗂𝗌𝖺𝗆 𝖾𝗏𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗋 𝖼𝗈𝗅𝗂𝗌𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝖾 𝖺𝗌𝗌𝖾𝗀𝗎𝗋𝖺𝗋 𝖺 𝖿𝗅𝗎𝗂𝖽𝖾𝗓 𝖽𝗈 𝗍𝗋𝖺́𝖿𝖾𝗀𝗈. 𝖬𝖺𝗌 𝖺𝗌 𝖺𝗎𝗍𝗈𝗋𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾𝗌 𝗂𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗂𝖺𝗇𝖺𝗌 𝗍𝖺𝗆𝖻𝖾́𝗆 𝗌𝖺𝖻𝖾𝗆 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗈 𝖠𝖨𝖲 𝖾́ 𝖺 𝗉𝗋𝗂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝗉𝖺𝗅 𝖿𝗈𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖽𝖾 𝗂𝗇𝖿𝗈𝗋𝗆𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝗂𝗋𝖺𝗍𝖺𝗌 (𝗇𝗈𝗆𝖾𝖺𝖽𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝗇𝖺 𝖲𝗈𝗆𝖺́𝗅𝗂𝖺 𝖾 𝗇𝗈 𝖦𝗈𝗅𝖿𝗈 𝖽𝖺 𝖦𝗎𝗂𝗇𝖾́), 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖧𝗈𝗎𝗍𝗁𝗂𝗌 (𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝗎𝗆 𝖦𝗈𝗏𝖾𝗋𝗇𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖿𝖺𝖼𝗍𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖽𝖾𝖼𝗅𝖺𝗋𝗈𝗎 𝗀𝗎𝖾𝗋𝗋𝖺 𝖺𝗈𝗌 𝗇𝖺𝗏𝗂𝗈𝗌 𝗆𝖾𝗋𝖼𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗌 𝖾 𝖽𝖾 𝗀𝗎𝖾𝗋𝗋𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝗏𝖺́𝗋𝗂𝗈𝗌 𝖤𝗌𝗍𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌) 𝖾 𝖽𝖾 𝗍𝗈𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗈𝗌 𝗀𝗋𝗎𝗉𝗈𝗌 𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗋𝗈𝗋𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗍𝖾𝗇𝖽𝖺𝗆 𝖺𝗍𝖺𝖼𝖺𝗋 𝗇𝖺𝗏𝗂𝗈𝗌. 𝖮 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝗅𝗂𝗀𝖺𝗋 𝗍𝖾𝗆𝗉𝗈𝗋𝖺́𝗋𝗂𝗈 𝖽𝗈 𝖠𝖨𝖲, 𝖾𝗆 𝗉𝗅𝖾𝗇𝗈 𝖽𝗂𝖺 𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝖾𝗑𝖼𝖾𝗅𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖽𝗂𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗏𝗂𝗌𝗂𝖻𝗂𝗅𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾, 𝖾́ 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗉𝗋𝖺́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗋𝗋𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖾𝗆 𝗓𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗋𝗂𝗌𝖼𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝖾́ 𝖺𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗅𝖺 𝖾𝗆 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗈 𝖬𝖲𝖢 𝖠𝗋𝗂𝖾𝗌 𝖿𝗈𝗂 𝗂𝗅𝗂𝖼𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖺𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗌𝖺𝖽𝗈.

* Advogado, especialista em Direito Público

IN "iN" - 18/04/24.