.
.
21/03/2023
FRANCISCO LOUÇÃ
.
QUER SABER DOS FANFARRÕES QUE NOS ENGANAM?
Três truquesmal contados na TAP
A TAP deu €110 milhões de lucro no verão passado, está a começar a poder
pagar o adiantamento público e o Governo vai disso abdicar vendendo-a a
uma empresa alemã, espanhola ou inglesa.
𝑉𝑎𝑖 𝑝𝑜𝑟 𝑎𝑖́ 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑓𝑎𝑛𝑓𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑎 𝑠𝑜𝑛𝑜𝑟𝑎: 𝑝𝑜𝑟 “𝑜𝑏𝑠𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑎̃𝑜 𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑜𝑙𝑜́𝑔𝑖𝑐𝑎”, 𝑜 𝐺𝑜𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑛𝑜 𝑛𝑎𝑐𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑧𝑜𝑢 𝑎 𝑇𝐴𝑃 𝑒 𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑏𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑜𝑢 €𝟹 𝑚𝑖𝑙 𝑚𝑖𝑙ℎ𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑛𝑜𝑠𝑠𝑜𝑠 𝑖𝑚𝑝𝑜𝑠𝑡𝑜𝑠, 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑣𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑜-𝑠𝑒 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑠𝑜́ 𝑜 𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑣𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑠𝑎𝑏𝑒 𝑔𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑟 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑖𝑠𝑎𝑠, 𝑎𝑏𝑒𝑛𝑐̧𝑜𝑎𝑑𝑎 𝑠𝑒𝑗𝑎 𝑎 𝑑𝑒𝑐𝑖𝑠𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑎 𝑛𝑜𝑣𝑎 𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑣𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑧𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜. 𝑁𝑒𝑚 𝑎𝑐𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑐𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜 𝑛𝑎𝑑𝑎 𝑎̀ 𝑙𝑖𝑔𝑒𝑖𝑟𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑑𝑖𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎 𝑑𝑜𝑢𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑛𝑎 𝑣𝑖𝑟 𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑚𝑒𝑠𝑚𝑜𝑠 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑓𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑗𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑚 𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑎 𝑣𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑚𝑎𝑖𝑜𝑟𝑒𝑠 𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑎𝑠 𝑛𝑎𝑐𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑓𝑜𝑖 𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑑𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑢𝑚 𝑚𝑒𝑚𝑏𝑟𝑜 𝑑𝑜 𝐶𝑜𝑚𝑖𝑡𝑒́ 𝐶𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑙 𝑑𝑜 𝑃𝑎𝑟𝑡𝑖𝑑𝑜 𝐶𝑜𝑚𝑢𝑛𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑎 𝐶ℎ𝑖𝑛𝑒̂𝑠 (𝑠𝑜́ 𝑜𝑠 𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑣𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑒́ 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑠𝑎𝑏𝑒𝑚 𝑔𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑟?) 𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑢𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑚 𝑓𝑒𝑙𝑖𝑧𝑒𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑜 𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑗𝑜. 𝑀𝑎𝑠 𝑠𝑒 ℎ𝑎́ 𝑎𝑙𝑔𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑠𝑜́ 𝑝𝑜𝑑𝑒 𝑠𝑒𝑟 𝑖𝑛𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑜𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑠𝑜 𝑒́ 𝑞𝑢𝑒 ℎ𝑜𝑢𝑣𝑒 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑝𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑒𝑚𝑖𝑎, 𝑜𝑠 𝑎𝑣𝑖𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑓𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑚 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑠, 𝑎𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑎𝑛ℎ𝑖𝑎𝑠 𝑎𝑒́𝑟𝑒𝑎𝑠 𝑎𝑓𝑢𝑛𝑑𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑚-𝑠𝑒 𝑒, 𝑝𝑢́𝑏𝑙𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑠 𝑒 𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑣𝑎𝑑𝑎𝑠, 𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑎𝑚 𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑔𝑎𝑡𝑎𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑝𝑒𝑙𝑜 𝑑𝑖𝑛ℎ𝑒𝑖𝑟𝑜 𝑝𝑢́𝑏𝑙𝑖𝑐𝑜 𝑒𝑚 𝑡𝑜𝑑𝑎 𝑎 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑡𝑒. 𝑆𝑒 𝑁𝑒𝑒𝑙𝑒𝑚𝑎𝑛 𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑢𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑛𝑎 𝑇𝐴𝑃, 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑖́𝑎𝑚𝑜𝑠 𝑜𝑢𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑜 𝑀𝑎𝑟𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑠 𝑀𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑒𝑠 𝑒 𝑜𝑠 𝑙𝑖𝑏𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑎 𝑟𝑒𝑧𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑚 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑜 𝐺𝑜𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑛𝑜 𝑝𝑎𝑔𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑒 𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑎 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑓𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑠𝑠𝑒? 𝑁𝑎̃𝑜 𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑚 𝑑𝑖𝑡𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑠𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑎 𝑢𝑚𝑎 “𝑜𝑏𝑠𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑎̃𝑜 𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑜𝑙𝑜́𝑔𝑖𝑐𝑎” 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑡𝑒𝑔𝑒𝑟 𝑎 𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑎 𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑣𝑎𝑑𝑎? 𝑂𝑟𝑎, 𝑁𝑒𝑒𝑙𝑒𝑚𝑎𝑛, 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑜 𝑒́ 𝑠𝑎𝑏𝑖𝑑𝑜, 𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑢𝑠𝑎𝑣𝑎-𝑠𝑒 𝑎 𝑝𝑜̂𝑟 𝑑𝑖𝑛ℎ𝑒𝑖𝑟𝑜 𝑛𝑎 𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑎 𝑒, 𝑝𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑜, 𝑜 𝑠𝑒𝑢 𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑜 𝑒𝑟𝑎 𝑎 𝑓𝑎𝑙𝑒̂𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑎, 𝑑𝑎 𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑙 𝑓𝑜𝑖 𝑠𝑎𝑙𝑣𝑎 𝑝𝑒𝑙𝑎 𝑛𝑎𝑐𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑧𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜, 𝑎 𝑢́𝑛𝑖𝑐𝑎 𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑚𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑡𝑒𝑔𝑒𝑟 𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑎𝑛ℎ𝑖𝑎 𝑑𝑒𝑝𝑜𝑖𝑠 𝑑𝑎 𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑒̂𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑎 𝑑𝑜 𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑣𝑎𝑑𝑜. 𝑃𝑜𝑟 𝑖𝑠𝑠𝑜 𝑓𝑖𝑛𝑔𝑖𝑟 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑓𝑜𝑖 𝑎 “𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑜𝑙𝑜𝑔𝑖𝑎” (“𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑢𝑛𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑎”, 𝑑𝑖𝑟𝑎́ 𝑀𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑒𝑔𝑟𝑜) 𝑎 𝑑𝑒𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑟 𝑎 𝑝𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑒𝑚𝑖𝑎 𝑒 𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑒𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑐𝑟𝑖𝑠𝑒 𝑑𝑎 𝑎𝑣𝑖𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑒́ 𝑢𝑚 𝑑𝑖𝑠𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑒 𝑙𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑎́𝑣𝑒𝑙. 𝑅𝑒𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑢𝑖𝑟 𝑜 𝑝𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑓𝑖𝑛𝑔𝑖𝑟 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑎 𝑇𝐴𝑃 𝑝𝑜𝑑𝑖𝑎 𝑡𝑒𝑟 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑢𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑠𝑒𝑚 𝑎 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑣𝑒𝑛𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑜 𝐸𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑒́ 𝑢𝑚 𝑎𝑟𝑔𝑢𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑑𝑎́ 𝑝𝑒𝑛𝑎 𝑎𝑙ℎ𝑒𝑖𝑎. 𝐸𝑚 𝑡𝑜𝑑𝑜 𝑜 𝑐𝑎𝑠𝑜, 𝑒́ 𝑢𝑚 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑣𝑖𝑡𝑒 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑠𝑒 𝑓𝑎𝑐̧𝑎 𝑢𝑚 𝑙𝑒𝑣𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜 𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑡𝑟𝑒̂𝑠 𝑡𝑟𝑢𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑠 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎̃𝑜 𝑎 𝑒𝑛𝑠𝑜𝑚𝑏𝑟𝑎𝑟 𝑎 𝑇𝐴𝑃, 𝑏𝑎𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑜 𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑜𝑟𝑑𝑎𝑟 𝑎𝑠 𝑖𝑛𝑣𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑔𝑎𝑐̧𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑝𝑢𝑏𝑙𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑛𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑒 𝑗𝑜𝑟𝑛𝑎𝑙.
𝑃𝑟𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑖𝑟𝑜 𝑡𝑟𝑢𝑞𝑢𝑒: 𝐶𝑎𝑠𝑖𝑚𝑖𝑟𝑜
𝐴 ℎ𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑜́𝑟𝑖𝑎 𝑑𝑎 𝑣𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑎 𝑑𝑎 𝐺𝑟𝑜𝑢𝑛𝑑𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑐𝑒 𝑒́ 𝑚𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑣𝑖𝑙ℎ𝑜𝑠𝑎. 𝐴 𝑇𝐴𝑃 𝑝𝑎𝑔𝑜𝑢 €𝟹𝟷,𝟼 𝑚𝑖𝑙ℎ𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑎 𝑎𝑑𝑞𝑢𝑖𝑟𝑖𝑟 𝑒, 𝑛𝑎𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑎𝑙𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒, 𝑎 𝑠𝑢𝑎 𝑜𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑒́ 𝑓𝑢𝑛𝑑𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑜𝑠 𝑎𝑒𝑟𝑜𝑝𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑜𝑠 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑠𝑎̃𝑜 𝑎 𝑏𝑎𝑠𝑒 𝑑𝑎 𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑎. 𝐸𝑚 𝟸𝟶𝟷𝟸, 𝑝𝑜𝑢𝑐𝑜 𝑑𝑒𝑝𝑜𝑖𝑠 𝑑𝑜 𝑖𝑛𝑖́𝑐𝑖𝑜 𝑑𝑜 𝐺𝑜𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑛𝑜 𝑃𝑆𝐷-𝐶𝐷𝑆, 𝑎 𝐺𝑟𝑜𝑢𝑛𝑑𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑐𝑒 𝑓𝑜𝑖 𝑣𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑖𝑑𝑎 𝑎 𝐴𝑙𝑓𝑟𝑒𝑑𝑜 𝐶𝑎𝑠𝑖𝑚𝑖𝑟𝑜, 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑜 𝑒𝑓𝑒𝑖𝑡𝑜 𝑢𝑡𝑖𝑙𝑖𝑧𝑜𝑢 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑐𝑎𝑠𝑐𝑎𝑡𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑎𝑠, 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑚𝑒𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑜-𝑠𝑒 𝑎 𝑝𝑎𝑔𝑎𝑟 €𝟹,𝟽 𝑚𝑖𝑙ℎ𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑝𝑜𝑟 𝟻𝟶,𝟷% 𝑑𝑜 𝑛𝑒𝑔𝑜́𝑐𝑖𝑜, 𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑠𝑜́ 𝑓𝑎𝑟𝑖𝑎 𝑠𝑒𝑖𝑠 𝑎𝑛𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑒𝑝𝑜𝑖𝑠. 𝐸𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑒𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑜, 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑜 𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑏𝑒𝑢 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑖𝑠𝑠𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑔𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎̃𝑜 𝑠𝑢𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑜𝑟𝑒𝑠 𝑎 €𝟽 𝑚𝑖𝑙ℎ𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 (𝑜𝑢, 𝑛𝑎 𝑠𝑢𝑎 𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑠𝑎̃𝑜, 𝑐𝑖𝑛𝑐𝑜), 𝑓𝑜𝑖 𝑑𝑒 𝑓𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑜 𝑓𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎 𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑣𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑧𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜. 𝑂𝑢, 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑜 𝑑𝑖𝑠𝑠𝑒 𝑑𝑒𝑝𝑜𝑖𝑠 𝑜 𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑜 𝑑𝑜 𝐺𝑜𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑛𝑜 𝑠𝑒𝑔𝑢𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒, 𝑓𝑜𝑖 𝑝𝑎𝑔𝑜 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑟𝑎𝑟 𝑎 𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑎 𝑒 𝑎𝑖𝑛𝑑𝑎 𝑓𝑖𝑐𝑜𝑢 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑜 𝑡𝑟𝑜𝑐𝑜. 𝐴𝑜 𝑙𝑜𝑛𝑔𝑜 𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑎𝑛𝑜𝑠, 𝑎 𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑎 𝑑𝑒𝑔𝑟𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑢-𝑠𝑒 𝑒 𝑑𝑒𝑖𝑥𝑜𝑢 𝑑𝑒 𝑝𝑎𝑔𝑎𝑟 𝑠𝑎𝑙𝑎́𝑟𝑖𝑜𝑠. 𝐼𝑚𝑝𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑎-𝑠𝑒 𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑟𝑒𝑝𝑒𝑡𝑖𝑟 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑜 𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑣𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑔𝑒𝑟𝑒 𝑚𝑒𝑙ℎ𝑜𝑟? 𝑆𝑖𝑚, 𝑓𝑖𝑐𝑜𝑢 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑣𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑛𝑜 𝑐𝑎𝑠𝑜 𝑑𝑎 𝐺𝑟𝑜𝑢𝑛𝑑𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑐𝑒 𝑞𝑢𝑒, 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑜 𝑑𝑖𝑛ℎ𝑒𝑖𝑟𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑒́ 𝑠𝑒𝑢, 𝑎 𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑣𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑧𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑝𝑜𝑑𝑒 𝑠𝑒𝑟 𝑢𝑚 𝑏𝑜𝑚 𝑛𝑒𝑔𝑜́𝑐𝑖𝑜 — 𝑎𝑡𝑒́ 𝑓𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑟.
𝑆𝑒𝑔𝑢𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑡𝑟𝑢𝑞𝑢𝑒: 𝑁𝑒𝑒𝑙𝑒𝑚𝑎𝑛
𝑂 𝑐𝑎𝑠𝑜 𝑑𝑎 𝑣𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑎 𝑑𝑎 𝑇𝐴𝑃 𝑎 𝑁𝑒𝑒𝑙𝑒𝑚𝑎𝑛 𝑒 𝑃𝑒𝑑𝑟𝑜𝑠𝑎 𝑒́ 𝑎𝑖𝑛𝑑𝑎 𝑚𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑝𝑎𝑙𝑝𝑖𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑒. 𝐴 𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑎 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑚𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑚 𝑓𝑜𝑖 𝑠𝑒𝑙𝑒𝑐𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑑𝑎 𝑛𝑜𝑠 𝑚𝑒𝑠𝑒𝑠 𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑜𝑟𝑒𝑠 𝑎̀𝑠 𝑒𝑙𝑒𝑖𝑐̧𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑒 𝑡𝑜𝑚𝑜𝑢 𝑝𝑜𝑠𝑠𝑒 𝑑𝑎 𝑇𝐴𝑃 𝑑𝑜𝑖𝑠 𝑑𝑖𝑎𝑠 𝑑𝑒𝑝𝑜𝑖𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑜 𝑛𝑜𝑣𝑜 𝐺𝑜𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑛𝑜 𝑃𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑜𝑠 𝐶𝑜𝑒𝑙ℎ𝑜 𝑐ℎ𝑢𝑚𝑏𝑎𝑟 𝑛𝑜 𝑃𝑎𝑟𝑙𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜. 𝑆𝑒 𝑎 𝐺𝑟𝑜𝑢𝑛𝑑𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑐𝑒 𝑓𝑜𝑖 𝑎 𝑜𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑜 𝑖𝑛𝑖́𝑐𝑖𝑜 𝑑𝑜 𝐺𝑜𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑛𝑜 𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑑𝑖𝑟𝑒𝑖𝑡𝑎𝑠, 𝑎 𝑑𝑎 𝑇𝐴𝑃 𝑓𝑜𝑖 𝑎 𝑓𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑙, 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑢𝑚𝑎𝑟 𝑎 𝑐𝑎𝑠𝑎. 𝐹𝑜𝑖 𝑡𝑎𝑚𝑏𝑒́𝑚 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑑𝑒𝑐𝑖𝑠𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑔𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑒 𝑔𝑎𝑏𝑎𝑟𝑖𝑡𝑜 𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑎 𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑎 𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑛𝑒𝑔𝑜́𝑐𝑖𝑜𝑠: 𝑛𝑜 𝑚𝑒𝑠𝑚𝑜 𝑑𝑖𝑎 𝑒𝑚 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑓𝑜𝑖 𝑎𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑣𝑎𝑑𝑎 𝑎 𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑣𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑧𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑒𝑚 𝐶𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑒𝑙ℎ𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑀𝑖𝑛𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑜𝑠 𝑓𝑜𝑖 𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑜 𝑎𝑐𝑜𝑟𝑑𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑣𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑎. 𝑂 𝐸𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑏𝑖𝑎 𝑛𝑎𝑑𝑎, 𝑒𝑟𝑎 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑣𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑎 𝑎 𝑧𝑒𝑟𝑜, 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑜𝑠 𝑛𝑜𝑣𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑜𝑛𝑜𝑠 𝑎 𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑢𝑚𝑖𝑟𝑒𝑚 𝑜 𝑐𝑢𝑠𝑡𝑜 𝑑𝑎 𝑐𝑎𝑝𝑖𝑡𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑧𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑛𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑎́𝑟𝑖𝑎 — 𝑒 𝑒́ 𝑎𝑞𝑢𝑖 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑟𝑎́ 𝑜 𝑡𝑟𝑢𝑞𝑢𝑒.
𝐶𝑜𝑚𝑜 𝑓𝑜𝑖 𝑛𝑜𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑑𝑜, 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎́ 𝑎 𝑠𝑒𝑟 𝑖𝑛𝑣𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑔𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑠𝑒 𝑁𝑒𝑒𝑙𝑒𝑚𝑎𝑛 𝑔𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑢 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎 𝑜𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑜 𝑑𝑖𝑛ℎ𝑒𝑖𝑟𝑜 𝑎𝑑𝑖𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑝𝑒𝑙𝑎 𝐴𝑖𝑟𝑏𝑢𝑠, 𝑎 𝑡𝑟𝑜𝑐𝑜 𝑑𝑎 𝑑𝑒𝑐𝑖𝑠𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑎𝑏𝑑𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑟 𝑑𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑟𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝟷𝟸 𝑎𝑣𝑖𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑎 𝑠𝑢𝑏𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑡𝑢𝑖𝑟 𝑝𝑜𝑟 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑒𝑛𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝟻𝟹, 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑚 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑜𝑟𝑖𝑧𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑎𝑐𝑖𝑚𝑎 𝑑𝑜 𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑐̧𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑚𝑒𝑟𝑐𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑒𝑚 𝑚𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝟸𝟻𝟶 𝑚𝑖𝑙ℎ𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑑𝑜́𝑙𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑠. 𝑂𝑠 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑜𝑟𝑒𝑠 𝑡𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑑𝑎 𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑑𝑎 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑎 𝑇𝐴𝑃 𝑝𝑜𝑑𝑒𝑟𝑎̃𝑜 𝑠𝑒𝑟 𝑑𝑒 𝟺𝟺𝟺 𝑚𝑖𝑙ℎ𝑜̃𝑒𝑠. 𝑂𝑢 𝑠𝑒𝑗𝑎, 𝑎 𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑣𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑧𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑎́ 𝑠𝑖𝑑𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑑𝑢𝑧𝑖𝑑𝑎 𝑝𝑜𝑟 𝑢𝑚 𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑎́𝑟𝑖𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑙𝑜𝑐𝑜𝑢 𝑐𝑎𝑝𝑖𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝑒 𝑔𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑑𝑎 𝑝𝑒𝑙𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑚𝑖𝑠𝑠𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑐𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑟 𝑢𝑚 𝑏𝑢𝑟𝑎𝑐𝑜 𝑛𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑎𝑛ℎ𝑖𝑎. 𝐼𝑚𝑝𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑎-𝑠𝑒 𝑑𝑒 𝑟𝑒𝑝𝑒𝑡𝑖𝑟, 𝑜 𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑣𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑒́ 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑔𝑒𝑟𝑒 𝑏𝑒𝑚?
𝑇𝑒𝑟𝑐𝑒𝑖𝑟𝑜 𝑡𝑟𝑢𝑞𝑢𝑒: 𝑟𝑒𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑣𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑧𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜
𝐶ℎ𝑒𝑔𝑎-𝑠𝑒 𝑑𝑒𝑝𝑜𝑖𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑡𝑢𝑑𝑜 𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑜 𝑎𝑜 𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑐𝑒𝑖𝑟𝑜 𝑡𝑟𝑢𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑒𝑚 𝑐𝑢𝑟𝑠𝑜 𝑛𝑎 𝑇𝐴𝑃, 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑒 𝑠𝑒𝑟 𝑜 𝑐𝑎𝑚𝑝𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑒𝑥𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑚𝑎𝑖𝑜𝑟𝑒𝑠 𝑎𝑣𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑎𝑠 𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑎𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑛𝑜 𝑛𝑜𝑠𝑠𝑜 𝑝𝑎𝑖́𝑠 (𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑎 𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑒𝑔𝑎 𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑣𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑧𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑑𝑜 𝑠𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑜𝑟 𝑑𝑎 𝑒𝑙𝑒𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑐𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝑎𝑜 𝐸𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑐ℎ𝑖𝑛𝑒̂𝑠). 𝑂 𝐺𝑜𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑛𝑜 𝑎𝑑𝑖𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑜𝑢 𝑜𝑠 €𝟹 𝑚𝑖𝑙 𝑚𝑖𝑙ℎ𝑜̃𝑒𝑠, 𝑎 𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑎 𝑠𝑜𝑏𝑟𝑒𝑣𝑖𝑣𝑒𝑢, 𝑎𝑝𝑙𝑖𝑐𝑜𝑢 𝑢𝑚 𝑑𝑢𝑟𝑜 𝑝𝑙𝑎𝑛𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑟𝑒𝑑𝑢𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑠𝑎𝑙𝑎́𝑟𝑖𝑜𝑠, 𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑢𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑜𝑢 𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑒𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑜 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑡𝑒 𝑑𝑜 𝑠𝑒𝑢 𝑚𝑒𝑟𝑐𝑎𝑑𝑜, 𝑎 𝐶𝑜𝑚𝑖𝑠𝑠𝑎̃𝑜 𝐸𝑢𝑟𝑜𝑝𝑒𝑖𝑎 𝑜𝑏𝑟𝑖𝑔𝑜𝑢-𝑎 𝑎 𝑟𝑒𝑑𝑢𝑧𝑖𝑟-𝑠𝑒 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑓𝑎𝑐𝑖𝑙𝑖𝑡𝑎𝑟 𝑎 𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑎 𝑎𝑜𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑐𝑜𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑠 𝑒 𝑒𝑖𝑠 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑣𝑎𝑖 𝑠𝑒𝑟 𝑣𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑖𝑑𝑎. 𝐷𝑒 𝑓𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑜, 𝑒́ 𝑎𝑞𝑢𝑖 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎́ 𝑜 𝑟𝑜𝑚𝑏𝑜 𝑛𝑎𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑠 𝑝𝑢́𝑏𝑙𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑠, 𝑎𝑠 𝑡𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑑𝑒𝑣𝑖𝑎𝑚 𝑠𝑒𝑟 𝑐𝑒𝑟𝑡𝑎𝑠: 𝑎 𝑇𝐴𝑃 𝑑𝑒𝑢 €𝟷𝟷𝟶 𝑚𝑖𝑙ℎ𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑙𝑢𝑐𝑟𝑜 𝑛𝑜 𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑎̃𝑜 𝑝𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑎𝑑𝑜, 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎́ 𝑎𝑔𝑜𝑟𝑎 𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑒𝑐̧𝑎𝑟 𝑎 𝑝𝑜𝑑𝑒𝑟 𝑝𝑎𝑔𝑎𝑟 𝑜 𝑎𝑑𝑖𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜 𝑝𝑢́𝑏𝑙𝑖𝑐𝑜 𝑒 𝑜 𝐺𝑜𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑛𝑜 𝑣𝑎𝑖 𝑑𝑖𝑠𝑠𝑜 𝑎𝑏𝑑𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑟 𝑣𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑜-𝑎 𝑎 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑎 𝑎𝑙𝑒𝑚𝑎̃, 𝑒𝑠𝑝𝑎𝑛ℎ𝑜𝑙𝑎 𝑜𝑢 𝑖𝑛𝑔𝑙𝑒𝑠𝑎. 𝑆𝑒 𝑠𝑒 𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑔𝑢𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑟, 𝑒́ 𝑎𝑓𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑙 𝑝𝑒𝑙𝑎 𝑚𝑒𝑠𝑚𝑎 𝑑𝑜𝑢𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑛𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑠𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑟𝑒: 𝑜 𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑣𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑔𝑒𝑟𝑒 𝑚𝑒𝑙ℎ𝑜𝑟.
𝑁𝑜 𝑐𝑎𝑠𝑜 𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑎𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑎𝑣𝑖𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜, 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎 𝑎𝑙𝑒𝑔𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑒́ 𝑝𝑒𝑙𝑜 𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑜𝑠 𝑚𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑜𝑠𝑎 𝑑𝑒𝑝𝑜𝑖𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝐶𝑎𝑠𝑖𝑚𝑖𝑟𝑜 𝑒 𝑁𝑒𝑒𝑙𝑒𝑚𝑎𝑛. 𝐽𝑎́ 𝑙𝑎́ 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑚 𝑒 𝑠𝑜́ 𝑠𝑖𝑛𝑔𝑟𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑚 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑑𝑖𝑛ℎ𝑒𝑖𝑟𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑒𝑟𝑎 𝑑𝑒𝑙𝑒𝑠 𝑒 𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑢𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑒 𝑜𝑢𝑡𝑟𝑎 𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑎. 𝐴𝑓𝑖𝑟𝑚𝑎𝑟 𝑎𝑔𝑜𝑟𝑎, 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑜 𝑝𝑒𝑠𝑜 𝑑𝑎 𝑒𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑒̂𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑎, 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑒𝑟𝑎 𝑚𝑒𝑙ℎ𝑜𝑟 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑚 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑢𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑒́ 𝑝𝑒𝑙𝑜 𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑜𝑠 𝑒𝑠𝑝𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑜𝑠𝑜. 𝑃𝑜𝑟 𝑖𝑠𝑠𝑜 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑎𝑐𝑢𝑠𝑜 𝑜𝑠 𝑐𝑎𝑠𝑖𝑚𝑖𝑟𝑜-𝑛𝑒𝑒𝑙𝑒𝑚𝑎𝑛𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑠𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑚 𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑜𝑙𝑜́𝑔𝑖𝑐𝑜𝑠. 𝐿𝑒𝑚𝑏𝑟𝑜 𝑠𝑜́ 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑗𝑎́ 𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑚 𝑎 𝑠𝑢𝑎 𝑜𝑝𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑢𝑛𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝑒 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑎𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑎́-𝑙𝑜𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑜 𝑚𝑜𝑑𝑒𝑙𝑜𝑠, 𝑚𝑒𝑠𝑚𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑡𝑒𝑔𝑒𝑟 𝑐𝑙𝑖𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑠 𝑒 𝑎𝑚𝑖𝑔𝑜𝑠 𝑝𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑜𝑢 𝑓𝑢𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑜𝑠, 𝑠𝑜́ 𝑒́ 𝑝𝑜𝑠𝑠𝑖́𝑣𝑒𝑙 𝑡𝑜𝑚𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑜𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑏𝑢𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑠 𝑝𝑜𝑟 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑢́𝑝𝑖𝑑𝑜𝑠.
𝑁𝑜 𝑐𝑎𝑠𝑜 𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑎𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑎𝑣𝑖𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜, 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎 𝑎𝑙𝑒𝑔𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑒́ 𝑝𝑒𝑙𝑜 𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑜𝑠 𝑚𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑜𝑠𝑎 𝑑𝑒𝑝𝑜𝑖𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝐶𝑎𝑠𝑖𝑚𝑖𝑟𝑜 𝑒 𝑁𝑒𝑒𝑙𝑒𝑚𝑎𝑛. 𝐽𝑎́ 𝑙𝑎́ 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑚 𝑒 𝑠𝑜́ 𝑠𝑖𝑛𝑔𝑟𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑚 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑑𝑖𝑛ℎ𝑒𝑖𝑟𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑒𝑟𝑎 𝑑𝑒𝑙𝑒𝑠 𝑒 𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑢𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑒 𝑜𝑢𝑡𝑟𝑎 𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑎. 𝐴𝑓𝑖𝑟𝑚𝑎𝑟 𝑎𝑔𝑜𝑟𝑎, 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑜 𝑝𝑒𝑠𝑜 𝑑𝑎 𝑒𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑒̂𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑎, 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑒𝑟𝑎 𝑚𝑒𝑙ℎ𝑜𝑟 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑚 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑢𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑒́ 𝑝𝑒𝑙𝑜 𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑜𝑠 𝑒𝑠𝑝𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑜𝑠𝑜. 𝑃𝑜𝑟 𝑖𝑠𝑠𝑜 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑎𝑐𝑢𝑠𝑜 𝑜𝑠 𝑐𝑎𝑠𝑖𝑚𝑖𝑟𝑜-𝑛𝑒𝑒𝑙𝑒𝑚𝑎𝑛𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑠𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑚 𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑜𝑙𝑜́𝑔𝑖𝑐𝑜𝑠. 𝐿𝑒𝑚𝑏𝑟𝑜 𝑠𝑜́ 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑗𝑎́ 𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑚 𝑎 𝑠𝑢𝑎 𝑜𝑝𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑢𝑛𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝑒 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑎𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑎́-𝑙𝑜𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑜 𝑚𝑜𝑑𝑒𝑙𝑜𝑠, 𝑚𝑒𝑠𝑚𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑡𝑒𝑔𝑒𝑟 𝑐𝑙𝑖𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑠 𝑒 𝑎𝑚𝑖𝑔𝑜𝑠 𝑝𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑜𝑢 𝑓𝑢𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑜𝑠, 𝑠𝑜́ 𝑒́ 𝑝𝑜𝑠𝑠𝑖́𝑣𝑒𝑙 𝑡𝑜𝑚𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑜𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑏𝑢𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑠 𝑝𝑜𝑟 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑢́𝑝𝑖𝑑𝑜𝑠..
* Professor universitário, activista do BE
.
IN "EXPRESSO"- 10/03/23
.
𝑉𝑎𝑖 𝑝𝑜𝑟 𝑎𝑖́ 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑓𝑎𝑛𝑓𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑎 𝑠𝑜𝑛𝑜𝑟𝑎: 𝑝𝑜𝑟 “𝑜𝑏𝑠𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑎̃𝑜 𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑜𝑙𝑜́𝑔𝑖𝑐𝑎”, 𝑜 𝐺𝑜𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑛𝑜 𝑛𝑎𝑐𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑧𝑜𝑢 𝑎 𝑇𝐴𝑃 𝑒 𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑏𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑜𝑢 €𝟹 𝑚𝑖𝑙 𝑚𝑖𝑙ℎ𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑛𝑜𝑠𝑠𝑜𝑠 𝑖𝑚𝑝𝑜𝑠𝑡𝑜𝑠, 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑣𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑜-𝑠𝑒 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑠𝑜́ 𝑜 𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑣𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑠𝑎𝑏𝑒 𝑔𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑟 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑖𝑠𝑎𝑠, 𝑎𝑏𝑒𝑛𝑐̧𝑜𝑎𝑑𝑎 𝑠𝑒𝑗𝑎 𝑎 𝑑𝑒𝑐𝑖𝑠𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑎 𝑛𝑜𝑣𝑎 𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑣𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑧𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜. 𝑁𝑒𝑚 𝑎𝑐𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑐𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜 𝑛𝑎𝑑𝑎 𝑎̀ 𝑙𝑖𝑔𝑒𝑖𝑟𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑑𝑖𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎 𝑑𝑜𝑢𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑛𝑎 𝑣𝑖𝑟 𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑚𝑒𝑠𝑚𝑜𝑠 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑓𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑗𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑚 𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑎 𝑣𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑚𝑎𝑖𝑜𝑟𝑒𝑠 𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑎𝑠 𝑛𝑎𝑐𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑓𝑜𝑖 𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑑𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑢𝑚 𝑚𝑒𝑚𝑏𝑟𝑜 𝑑𝑜 𝐶𝑜𝑚𝑖𝑡𝑒́ 𝐶𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑙 𝑑𝑜 𝑃𝑎𝑟𝑡𝑖𝑑𝑜 𝐶𝑜𝑚𝑢𝑛𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑎 𝐶ℎ𝑖𝑛𝑒̂𝑠 (𝑠𝑜́ 𝑜𝑠 𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑣𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑒́ 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑠𝑎𝑏𝑒𝑚 𝑔𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑟?) 𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑢𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑚 𝑓𝑒𝑙𝑖𝑧𝑒𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑜 𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑗𝑜. 𝑀𝑎𝑠 𝑠𝑒 ℎ𝑎́ 𝑎𝑙𝑔𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑠𝑜́ 𝑝𝑜𝑑𝑒 𝑠𝑒𝑟 𝑖𝑛𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑜𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑠𝑜 𝑒́ 𝑞𝑢𝑒 ℎ𝑜𝑢𝑣𝑒 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑝𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑒𝑚𝑖𝑎, 𝑜𝑠 𝑎𝑣𝑖𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑓𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑚 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑠, 𝑎𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑎𝑛ℎ𝑖𝑎𝑠 𝑎𝑒́𝑟𝑒𝑎𝑠 𝑎𝑓𝑢𝑛𝑑𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑚-𝑠𝑒 𝑒, 𝑝𝑢́𝑏𝑙𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑠 𝑒 𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑣𝑎𝑑𝑎𝑠, 𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑎𝑚 𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑔𝑎𝑡𝑎𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑝𝑒𝑙𝑜 𝑑𝑖𝑛ℎ𝑒𝑖𝑟𝑜 𝑝𝑢́𝑏𝑙𝑖𝑐𝑜 𝑒𝑚 𝑡𝑜𝑑𝑎 𝑎 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑡𝑒. 𝑆𝑒 𝑁𝑒𝑒𝑙𝑒𝑚𝑎𝑛 𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑢𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑛𝑎 𝑇𝐴𝑃, 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑖́𝑎𝑚𝑜𝑠 𝑜𝑢𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑜 𝑀𝑎𝑟𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑠 𝑀𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑒𝑠 𝑒 𝑜𝑠 𝑙𝑖𝑏𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑎 𝑟𝑒𝑧𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑚 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑜 𝐺𝑜𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑛𝑜 𝑝𝑎𝑔𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑒 𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑎 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑓𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑠𝑠𝑒? 𝑁𝑎̃𝑜 𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑚 𝑑𝑖𝑡𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑠𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑎 𝑢𝑚𝑎 “𝑜𝑏𝑠𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑎̃𝑜 𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑜𝑙𝑜́𝑔𝑖𝑐𝑎” 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑡𝑒𝑔𝑒𝑟 𝑎 𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑎 𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑣𝑎𝑑𝑎? 𝑂𝑟𝑎, 𝑁𝑒𝑒𝑙𝑒𝑚𝑎𝑛, 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑜 𝑒́ 𝑠𝑎𝑏𝑖𝑑𝑜, 𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑢𝑠𝑎𝑣𝑎-𝑠𝑒 𝑎 𝑝𝑜̂𝑟 𝑑𝑖𝑛ℎ𝑒𝑖𝑟𝑜 𝑛𝑎 𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑎 𝑒, 𝑝𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑜, 𝑜 𝑠𝑒𝑢 𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑜 𝑒𝑟𝑎 𝑎 𝑓𝑎𝑙𝑒̂𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑎, 𝑑𝑎 𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑙 𝑓𝑜𝑖 𝑠𝑎𝑙𝑣𝑎 𝑝𝑒𝑙𝑎 𝑛𝑎𝑐𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑧𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜, 𝑎 𝑢́𝑛𝑖𝑐𝑎 𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑚𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑡𝑒𝑔𝑒𝑟 𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑎𝑛ℎ𝑖𝑎 𝑑𝑒𝑝𝑜𝑖𝑠 𝑑𝑎 𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑒̂𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑎 𝑑𝑜 𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑣𝑎𝑑𝑜. 𝑃𝑜𝑟 𝑖𝑠𝑠𝑜 𝑓𝑖𝑛𝑔𝑖𝑟 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑓𝑜𝑖 𝑎 “𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑜𝑙𝑜𝑔𝑖𝑎” (“𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑢𝑛𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑎”, 𝑑𝑖𝑟𝑎́ 𝑀𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑒𝑔𝑟𝑜) 𝑎 𝑑𝑒𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑟 𝑎 𝑝𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑒𝑚𝑖𝑎 𝑒 𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑒𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑐𝑟𝑖𝑠𝑒 𝑑𝑎 𝑎𝑣𝑖𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑒́ 𝑢𝑚 𝑑𝑖𝑠𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑒 𝑙𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑎́𝑣𝑒𝑙. 𝑅𝑒𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑢𝑖𝑟 𝑜 𝑝𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑓𝑖𝑛𝑔𝑖𝑟 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑎 𝑇𝐴𝑃 𝑝𝑜𝑑𝑖𝑎 𝑡𝑒𝑟 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑢𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑠𝑒𝑚 𝑎 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑣𝑒𝑛𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑜 𝐸𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑒́ 𝑢𝑚 𝑎𝑟𝑔𝑢𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑑𝑎́ 𝑝𝑒𝑛𝑎 𝑎𝑙ℎ𝑒𝑖𝑎. 𝐸𝑚 𝑡𝑜𝑑𝑜 𝑜 𝑐𝑎𝑠𝑜, 𝑒́ 𝑢𝑚 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑣𝑖𝑡𝑒 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑠𝑒 𝑓𝑎𝑐̧𝑎 𝑢𝑚 𝑙𝑒𝑣𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜 𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑡𝑟𝑒̂𝑠 𝑡𝑟𝑢𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑠 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎̃𝑜 𝑎 𝑒𝑛𝑠𝑜𝑚𝑏𝑟𝑎𝑟 𝑎 𝑇𝐴𝑃, 𝑏𝑎𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑜 𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑜𝑟𝑑𝑎𝑟 𝑎𝑠 𝑖𝑛𝑣𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑔𝑎𝑐̧𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑝𝑢𝑏𝑙𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑛𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑒 𝑗𝑜𝑟𝑛𝑎𝑙.
𝑃𝑟𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑖𝑟𝑜 𝑡𝑟𝑢𝑞𝑢𝑒: 𝐶𝑎𝑠𝑖𝑚𝑖𝑟𝑜
𝐴 ℎ𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑜́𝑟𝑖𝑎 𝑑𝑎 𝑣𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑎 𝑑𝑎 𝐺𝑟𝑜𝑢𝑛𝑑𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑐𝑒 𝑒́ 𝑚𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑣𝑖𝑙ℎ𝑜𝑠𝑎. 𝐴 𝑇𝐴𝑃 𝑝𝑎𝑔𝑜𝑢 €𝟹𝟷,𝟼 𝑚𝑖𝑙ℎ𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑎 𝑎𝑑𝑞𝑢𝑖𝑟𝑖𝑟 𝑒, 𝑛𝑎𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑎𝑙𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒, 𝑎 𝑠𝑢𝑎 𝑜𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑒́ 𝑓𝑢𝑛𝑑𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑜𝑠 𝑎𝑒𝑟𝑜𝑝𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑜𝑠 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑠𝑎̃𝑜 𝑎 𝑏𝑎𝑠𝑒 𝑑𝑎 𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑎. 𝐸𝑚 𝟸𝟶𝟷𝟸, 𝑝𝑜𝑢𝑐𝑜 𝑑𝑒𝑝𝑜𝑖𝑠 𝑑𝑜 𝑖𝑛𝑖́𝑐𝑖𝑜 𝑑𝑜 𝐺𝑜𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑛𝑜 𝑃𝑆𝐷-𝐶𝐷𝑆, 𝑎 𝐺𝑟𝑜𝑢𝑛𝑑𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑐𝑒 𝑓𝑜𝑖 𝑣𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑖𝑑𝑎 𝑎 𝐴𝑙𝑓𝑟𝑒𝑑𝑜 𝐶𝑎𝑠𝑖𝑚𝑖𝑟𝑜, 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑜 𝑒𝑓𝑒𝑖𝑡𝑜 𝑢𝑡𝑖𝑙𝑖𝑧𝑜𝑢 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑐𝑎𝑠𝑐𝑎𝑡𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑎𝑠, 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑚𝑒𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑜-𝑠𝑒 𝑎 𝑝𝑎𝑔𝑎𝑟 €𝟹,𝟽 𝑚𝑖𝑙ℎ𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑝𝑜𝑟 𝟻𝟶,𝟷% 𝑑𝑜 𝑛𝑒𝑔𝑜́𝑐𝑖𝑜, 𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑠𝑜́ 𝑓𝑎𝑟𝑖𝑎 𝑠𝑒𝑖𝑠 𝑎𝑛𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑒𝑝𝑜𝑖𝑠. 𝐸𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑒𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑜, 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑜 𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑏𝑒𝑢 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑖𝑠𝑠𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑔𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎̃𝑜 𝑠𝑢𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑜𝑟𝑒𝑠 𝑎 €𝟽 𝑚𝑖𝑙ℎ𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 (𝑜𝑢, 𝑛𝑎 𝑠𝑢𝑎 𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑠𝑎̃𝑜, 𝑐𝑖𝑛𝑐𝑜), 𝑓𝑜𝑖 𝑑𝑒 𝑓𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑜 𝑓𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎 𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑣𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑧𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜. 𝑂𝑢, 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑜 𝑑𝑖𝑠𝑠𝑒 𝑑𝑒𝑝𝑜𝑖𝑠 𝑜 𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑜 𝑑𝑜 𝐺𝑜𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑛𝑜 𝑠𝑒𝑔𝑢𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒, 𝑓𝑜𝑖 𝑝𝑎𝑔𝑜 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑟𝑎𝑟 𝑎 𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑎 𝑒 𝑎𝑖𝑛𝑑𝑎 𝑓𝑖𝑐𝑜𝑢 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑜 𝑡𝑟𝑜𝑐𝑜. 𝐴𝑜 𝑙𝑜𝑛𝑔𝑜 𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑎𝑛𝑜𝑠, 𝑎 𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑎 𝑑𝑒𝑔𝑟𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑢-𝑠𝑒 𝑒 𝑑𝑒𝑖𝑥𝑜𝑢 𝑑𝑒 𝑝𝑎𝑔𝑎𝑟 𝑠𝑎𝑙𝑎́𝑟𝑖𝑜𝑠. 𝐼𝑚𝑝𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑎-𝑠𝑒 𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑟𝑒𝑝𝑒𝑡𝑖𝑟 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑜 𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑣𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑔𝑒𝑟𝑒 𝑚𝑒𝑙ℎ𝑜𝑟? 𝑆𝑖𝑚, 𝑓𝑖𝑐𝑜𝑢 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑣𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑛𝑜 𝑐𝑎𝑠𝑜 𝑑𝑎 𝐺𝑟𝑜𝑢𝑛𝑑𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑐𝑒 𝑞𝑢𝑒, 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑜 𝑑𝑖𝑛ℎ𝑒𝑖𝑟𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑒́ 𝑠𝑒𝑢, 𝑎 𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑣𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑧𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑝𝑜𝑑𝑒 𝑠𝑒𝑟 𝑢𝑚 𝑏𝑜𝑚 𝑛𝑒𝑔𝑜́𝑐𝑖𝑜 — 𝑎𝑡𝑒́ 𝑓𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑟.
𝑆𝑒𝑔𝑢𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑡𝑟𝑢𝑞𝑢𝑒: 𝑁𝑒𝑒𝑙𝑒𝑚𝑎𝑛
𝑂 𝑐𝑎𝑠𝑜 𝑑𝑎 𝑣𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑎 𝑑𝑎 𝑇𝐴𝑃 𝑎 𝑁𝑒𝑒𝑙𝑒𝑚𝑎𝑛 𝑒 𝑃𝑒𝑑𝑟𝑜𝑠𝑎 𝑒́ 𝑎𝑖𝑛𝑑𝑎 𝑚𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑝𝑎𝑙𝑝𝑖𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑒. 𝐴 𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑎 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑚𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑚 𝑓𝑜𝑖 𝑠𝑒𝑙𝑒𝑐𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑑𝑎 𝑛𝑜𝑠 𝑚𝑒𝑠𝑒𝑠 𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑜𝑟𝑒𝑠 𝑎̀𝑠 𝑒𝑙𝑒𝑖𝑐̧𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑒 𝑡𝑜𝑚𝑜𝑢 𝑝𝑜𝑠𝑠𝑒 𝑑𝑎 𝑇𝐴𝑃 𝑑𝑜𝑖𝑠 𝑑𝑖𝑎𝑠 𝑑𝑒𝑝𝑜𝑖𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑜 𝑛𝑜𝑣𝑜 𝐺𝑜𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑛𝑜 𝑃𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑜𝑠 𝐶𝑜𝑒𝑙ℎ𝑜 𝑐ℎ𝑢𝑚𝑏𝑎𝑟 𝑛𝑜 𝑃𝑎𝑟𝑙𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜. 𝑆𝑒 𝑎 𝐺𝑟𝑜𝑢𝑛𝑑𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑐𝑒 𝑓𝑜𝑖 𝑎 𝑜𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑜 𝑖𝑛𝑖́𝑐𝑖𝑜 𝑑𝑜 𝐺𝑜𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑛𝑜 𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑑𝑖𝑟𝑒𝑖𝑡𝑎𝑠, 𝑎 𝑑𝑎 𝑇𝐴𝑃 𝑓𝑜𝑖 𝑎 𝑓𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑙, 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑢𝑚𝑎𝑟 𝑎 𝑐𝑎𝑠𝑎. 𝐹𝑜𝑖 𝑡𝑎𝑚𝑏𝑒́𝑚 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑑𝑒𝑐𝑖𝑠𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑔𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑒 𝑔𝑎𝑏𝑎𝑟𝑖𝑡𝑜 𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑎 𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑎 𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑛𝑒𝑔𝑜́𝑐𝑖𝑜𝑠: 𝑛𝑜 𝑚𝑒𝑠𝑚𝑜 𝑑𝑖𝑎 𝑒𝑚 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑓𝑜𝑖 𝑎𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑣𝑎𝑑𝑎 𝑎 𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑣𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑧𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑒𝑚 𝐶𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑒𝑙ℎ𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑀𝑖𝑛𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑜𝑠 𝑓𝑜𝑖 𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑜 𝑎𝑐𝑜𝑟𝑑𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑣𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑎. 𝑂 𝐸𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑏𝑖𝑎 𝑛𝑎𝑑𝑎, 𝑒𝑟𝑎 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑣𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑎 𝑎 𝑧𝑒𝑟𝑜, 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑜𝑠 𝑛𝑜𝑣𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑜𝑛𝑜𝑠 𝑎 𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑢𝑚𝑖𝑟𝑒𝑚 𝑜 𝑐𝑢𝑠𝑡𝑜 𝑑𝑎 𝑐𝑎𝑝𝑖𝑡𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑧𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑛𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑎́𝑟𝑖𝑎 — 𝑒 𝑒́ 𝑎𝑞𝑢𝑖 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑟𝑎́ 𝑜 𝑡𝑟𝑢𝑞𝑢𝑒.
𝐶𝑜𝑚𝑜 𝑓𝑜𝑖 𝑛𝑜𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑑𝑜, 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎́ 𝑎 𝑠𝑒𝑟 𝑖𝑛𝑣𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑔𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑠𝑒 𝑁𝑒𝑒𝑙𝑒𝑚𝑎𝑛 𝑔𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑢 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎 𝑜𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑜 𝑑𝑖𝑛ℎ𝑒𝑖𝑟𝑜 𝑎𝑑𝑖𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑝𝑒𝑙𝑎 𝐴𝑖𝑟𝑏𝑢𝑠, 𝑎 𝑡𝑟𝑜𝑐𝑜 𝑑𝑎 𝑑𝑒𝑐𝑖𝑠𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑎𝑏𝑑𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑟 𝑑𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑟𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝟷𝟸 𝑎𝑣𝑖𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑎 𝑠𝑢𝑏𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑡𝑢𝑖𝑟 𝑝𝑜𝑟 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑒𝑛𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝟻𝟹, 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑚 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑜𝑟𝑖𝑧𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑎𝑐𝑖𝑚𝑎 𝑑𝑜 𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑐̧𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑚𝑒𝑟𝑐𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑒𝑚 𝑚𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝟸𝟻𝟶 𝑚𝑖𝑙ℎ𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑑𝑜́𝑙𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑠. 𝑂𝑠 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑜𝑟𝑒𝑠 𝑡𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑑𝑎 𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑑𝑎 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑎 𝑇𝐴𝑃 𝑝𝑜𝑑𝑒𝑟𝑎̃𝑜 𝑠𝑒𝑟 𝑑𝑒 𝟺𝟺𝟺 𝑚𝑖𝑙ℎ𝑜̃𝑒𝑠. 𝑂𝑢 𝑠𝑒𝑗𝑎, 𝑎 𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑣𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑧𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑎́ 𝑠𝑖𝑑𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑑𝑢𝑧𝑖𝑑𝑎 𝑝𝑜𝑟 𝑢𝑚 𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑎́𝑟𝑖𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑙𝑜𝑐𝑜𝑢 𝑐𝑎𝑝𝑖𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝑒 𝑔𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑑𝑎 𝑝𝑒𝑙𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑚𝑖𝑠𝑠𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑐𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑟 𝑢𝑚 𝑏𝑢𝑟𝑎𝑐𝑜 𝑛𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑎𝑛ℎ𝑖𝑎. 𝐼𝑚𝑝𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑎-𝑠𝑒 𝑑𝑒 𝑟𝑒𝑝𝑒𝑡𝑖𝑟, 𝑜 𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑣𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑒́ 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑔𝑒𝑟𝑒 𝑏𝑒𝑚?
𝑇𝑒𝑟𝑐𝑒𝑖𝑟𝑜 𝑡𝑟𝑢𝑞𝑢𝑒: 𝑟𝑒𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑣𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑧𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜
𝐶ℎ𝑒𝑔𝑎-𝑠𝑒 𝑑𝑒𝑝𝑜𝑖𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑡𝑢𝑑𝑜 𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑜 𝑎𝑜 𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑐𝑒𝑖𝑟𝑜 𝑡𝑟𝑢𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑒𝑚 𝑐𝑢𝑟𝑠𝑜 𝑛𝑎 𝑇𝐴𝑃, 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑒 𝑠𝑒𝑟 𝑜 𝑐𝑎𝑚𝑝𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑒𝑥𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑚𝑎𝑖𝑜𝑟𝑒𝑠 𝑎𝑣𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑎𝑠 𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑎𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑛𝑜 𝑛𝑜𝑠𝑠𝑜 𝑝𝑎𝑖́𝑠 (𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑎 𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑒𝑔𝑎 𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑣𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑧𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑑𝑜 𝑠𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑜𝑟 𝑑𝑎 𝑒𝑙𝑒𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑐𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝑎𝑜 𝐸𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑐ℎ𝑖𝑛𝑒̂𝑠). 𝑂 𝐺𝑜𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑛𝑜 𝑎𝑑𝑖𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑜𝑢 𝑜𝑠 €𝟹 𝑚𝑖𝑙 𝑚𝑖𝑙ℎ𝑜̃𝑒𝑠, 𝑎 𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑎 𝑠𝑜𝑏𝑟𝑒𝑣𝑖𝑣𝑒𝑢, 𝑎𝑝𝑙𝑖𝑐𝑜𝑢 𝑢𝑚 𝑑𝑢𝑟𝑜 𝑝𝑙𝑎𝑛𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑟𝑒𝑑𝑢𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑠𝑎𝑙𝑎́𝑟𝑖𝑜𝑠, 𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑢𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑜𝑢 𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑒𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑜 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑡𝑒 𝑑𝑜 𝑠𝑒𝑢 𝑚𝑒𝑟𝑐𝑎𝑑𝑜, 𝑎 𝐶𝑜𝑚𝑖𝑠𝑠𝑎̃𝑜 𝐸𝑢𝑟𝑜𝑝𝑒𝑖𝑎 𝑜𝑏𝑟𝑖𝑔𝑜𝑢-𝑎 𝑎 𝑟𝑒𝑑𝑢𝑧𝑖𝑟-𝑠𝑒 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑓𝑎𝑐𝑖𝑙𝑖𝑡𝑎𝑟 𝑎 𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑎 𝑎𝑜𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑐𝑜𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑠 𝑒 𝑒𝑖𝑠 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑣𝑎𝑖 𝑠𝑒𝑟 𝑣𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑖𝑑𝑎. 𝐷𝑒 𝑓𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑜, 𝑒́ 𝑎𝑞𝑢𝑖 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎́ 𝑜 𝑟𝑜𝑚𝑏𝑜 𝑛𝑎𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑠 𝑝𝑢́𝑏𝑙𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑠, 𝑎𝑠 𝑡𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑑𝑒𝑣𝑖𝑎𝑚 𝑠𝑒𝑟 𝑐𝑒𝑟𝑡𝑎𝑠: 𝑎 𝑇𝐴𝑃 𝑑𝑒𝑢 €𝟷𝟷𝟶 𝑚𝑖𝑙ℎ𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑙𝑢𝑐𝑟𝑜 𝑛𝑜 𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑎̃𝑜 𝑝𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑎𝑑𝑜, 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎́ 𝑎𝑔𝑜𝑟𝑎 𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑒𝑐̧𝑎𝑟 𝑎 𝑝𝑜𝑑𝑒𝑟 𝑝𝑎𝑔𝑎𝑟 𝑜 𝑎𝑑𝑖𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜 𝑝𝑢́𝑏𝑙𝑖𝑐𝑜 𝑒 𝑜 𝐺𝑜𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑛𝑜 𝑣𝑎𝑖 𝑑𝑖𝑠𝑠𝑜 𝑎𝑏𝑑𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑟 𝑣𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑜-𝑎 𝑎 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑎 𝑎𝑙𝑒𝑚𝑎̃, 𝑒𝑠𝑝𝑎𝑛ℎ𝑜𝑙𝑎 𝑜𝑢 𝑖𝑛𝑔𝑙𝑒𝑠𝑎. 𝑆𝑒 𝑠𝑒 𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑔𝑢𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑟, 𝑒́ 𝑎𝑓𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑙 𝑝𝑒𝑙𝑎 𝑚𝑒𝑠𝑚𝑎 𝑑𝑜𝑢𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑛𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑠𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑟𝑒: 𝑜 𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑣𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑔𝑒𝑟𝑒 𝑚𝑒𝑙ℎ𝑜𝑟.
𝑁𝑜 𝑐𝑎𝑠𝑜 𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑎𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑎𝑣𝑖𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜, 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎 𝑎𝑙𝑒𝑔𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑒́ 𝑝𝑒𝑙𝑜 𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑜𝑠 𝑚𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑜𝑠𝑎 𝑑𝑒𝑝𝑜𝑖𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝐶𝑎𝑠𝑖𝑚𝑖𝑟𝑜 𝑒 𝑁𝑒𝑒𝑙𝑒𝑚𝑎𝑛. 𝐽𝑎́ 𝑙𝑎́ 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑚 𝑒 𝑠𝑜́ 𝑠𝑖𝑛𝑔𝑟𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑚 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑑𝑖𝑛ℎ𝑒𝑖𝑟𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑒𝑟𝑎 𝑑𝑒𝑙𝑒𝑠 𝑒 𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑢𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑒 𝑜𝑢𝑡𝑟𝑎 𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑎. 𝐴𝑓𝑖𝑟𝑚𝑎𝑟 𝑎𝑔𝑜𝑟𝑎, 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑜 𝑝𝑒𝑠𝑜 𝑑𝑎 𝑒𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑒̂𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑎, 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑒𝑟𝑎 𝑚𝑒𝑙ℎ𝑜𝑟 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑚 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑢𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑒́ 𝑝𝑒𝑙𝑜 𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑜𝑠 𝑒𝑠𝑝𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑜𝑠𝑜. 𝑃𝑜𝑟 𝑖𝑠𝑠𝑜 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑎𝑐𝑢𝑠𝑜 𝑜𝑠 𝑐𝑎𝑠𝑖𝑚𝑖𝑟𝑜-𝑛𝑒𝑒𝑙𝑒𝑚𝑎𝑛𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑠𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑚 𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑜𝑙𝑜́𝑔𝑖𝑐𝑜𝑠. 𝐿𝑒𝑚𝑏𝑟𝑜 𝑠𝑜́ 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑗𝑎́ 𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑚 𝑎 𝑠𝑢𝑎 𝑜𝑝𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑢𝑛𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝑒 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑎𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑎́-𝑙𝑜𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑜 𝑚𝑜𝑑𝑒𝑙𝑜𝑠, 𝑚𝑒𝑠𝑚𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑡𝑒𝑔𝑒𝑟 𝑐𝑙𝑖𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑠 𝑒 𝑎𝑚𝑖𝑔𝑜𝑠 𝑝𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑜𝑢 𝑓𝑢𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑜𝑠, 𝑠𝑜́ 𝑒́ 𝑝𝑜𝑠𝑠𝑖́𝑣𝑒𝑙 𝑡𝑜𝑚𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑜𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑏𝑢𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑠 𝑝𝑜𝑟 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑢́𝑝𝑖𝑑𝑜𝑠.
𝑁𝑜 𝑐𝑎𝑠𝑜 𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑎𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑎𝑣𝑖𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜, 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎 𝑎𝑙𝑒𝑔𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑒́ 𝑝𝑒𝑙𝑜 𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑜𝑠 𝑚𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑜𝑠𝑎 𝑑𝑒𝑝𝑜𝑖𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝐶𝑎𝑠𝑖𝑚𝑖𝑟𝑜 𝑒 𝑁𝑒𝑒𝑙𝑒𝑚𝑎𝑛. 𝐽𝑎́ 𝑙𝑎́ 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑚 𝑒 𝑠𝑜́ 𝑠𝑖𝑛𝑔𝑟𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑚 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑑𝑖𝑛ℎ𝑒𝑖𝑟𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑒𝑟𝑎 𝑑𝑒𝑙𝑒𝑠 𝑒 𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑢𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑒 𝑜𝑢𝑡𝑟𝑎 𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑎. 𝐴𝑓𝑖𝑟𝑚𝑎𝑟 𝑎𝑔𝑜𝑟𝑎, 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑜 𝑝𝑒𝑠𝑜 𝑑𝑎 𝑒𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑒̂𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑎, 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑒𝑟𝑎 𝑚𝑒𝑙ℎ𝑜𝑟 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑚 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑢𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑒́ 𝑝𝑒𝑙𝑜 𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑜𝑠 𝑒𝑠𝑝𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑜𝑠𝑜. 𝑃𝑜𝑟 𝑖𝑠𝑠𝑜 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑎𝑐𝑢𝑠𝑜 𝑜𝑠 𝑐𝑎𝑠𝑖𝑚𝑖𝑟𝑜-𝑛𝑒𝑒𝑙𝑒𝑚𝑎𝑛𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑠𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑚 𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑜𝑙𝑜́𝑔𝑖𝑐𝑜𝑠. 𝐿𝑒𝑚𝑏𝑟𝑜 𝑠𝑜́ 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑗𝑎́ 𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑚 𝑎 𝑠𝑢𝑎 𝑜𝑝𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑢𝑛𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝑒 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑎𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑎́-𝑙𝑜𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑜 𝑚𝑜𝑑𝑒𝑙𝑜𝑠, 𝑚𝑒𝑠𝑚𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑡𝑒𝑔𝑒𝑟 𝑐𝑙𝑖𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑠 𝑒 𝑎𝑚𝑖𝑔𝑜𝑠 𝑝𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑜𝑢 𝑓𝑢𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑜𝑠, 𝑠𝑜́ 𝑒́ 𝑝𝑜𝑠𝑠𝑖́𝑣𝑒𝑙 𝑡𝑜𝑚𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑜𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑏𝑢𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑠 𝑝𝑜𝑟 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑢́𝑝𝑖𝑑𝑜𝑠.
.
* Professor universitário, activista do BE
. IN "EXPRESSO"- 10/03/23 .
.
XXVI-OBSERVATÓRIO DE QUASE TUDO
5-TECLA TÓNICA
Sobre a alquímia da electrónica
na música em Portugal
* A música electrónica tem o dobro da idade do Rock’n’Roll, e em Portugal, antes da sua emancipação comercial, vários foram os intervenientes que pintavam a contemporaneidade tentando estender o seu léxico musical com a modernização existente.
“Tecla Tónica” explora a alquimia da electrónica na música em Portugal e dos seus reprodutores, desenhando a própria génese de uma maquina como o sintetizador. Documentando a cronologia da evolução tecnológica do género, presente desde as primeiras peças de electroacústica da década de 60 até ao panorama actual, este documentário viaja pela pop electrónica da década de 80, pela emersão do sampling, culminando na liberdade da pista de dança.
Realizado e produzido por Eduardo Morais (“Meio Metro de Pedra”/ “Música em Pó” / “Uivo”), este documentário surge de uma sinergia entre o próprio e a Jameson Irish Whiskey, levada a cabo durante o ano de 2015, sobre este género tão fresco como quando por cá surgiu.
FONTE: 
Subscrever:
Mensagens (Atom)