𝚄𝚖𝚊 𝚍𝚊𝚜 𝚌𝚘𝚒𝚜𝚊𝚜 𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚊𝚙𝚛𝚎𝚗𝚍𝚎𝚖𝚘𝚜 𝚗𝚊 𝚎𝚜𝚌𝚘𝚕𝚊 𝚎́ 𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚘 𝙷𝚘𝚖𝚎𝚖 𝚍𝚘 𝚁𝚎𝚗𝚊𝚜𝚌𝚒𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚘, 𝚊 𝚎𝚙𝚒́𝚝𝚘𝚖𝚎 𝚍𝚊𝚚𝚞𝚒𝚕𝚘 𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚖𝚊𝚒𝚜 𝚙𝚛𝚘𝚖𝚒𝚜𝚜𝚘𝚛 𝚙𝚘𝚍𝚎 𝚜𝚎𝚛 𝚘 𝚂𝚎𝚛 𝙷𝚞𝚖𝚊𝚗𝚘: 𝚊 𝚌𝚊𝚙𝚊𝚌𝚒𝚍𝚊𝚍𝚎 𝚍𝚎 𝚜𝚎 𝚜𝚎𝚛 𝚖𝚊𝚒𝚜 𝚌𝚘𝚖𝚙𝚕𝚎𝚝𝚘, 𝚍𝚎 𝚗𝚊̃𝚘 𝚜𝚎 𝚍𝚎𝚍𝚒𝚌𝚊𝚛 𝚊𝚙𝚎𝚗𝚊𝚜 𝚊 𝚞𝚖 𝚒𝚗𝚝𝚎𝚛𝚎𝚜𝚜𝚎, 𝚍𝚎 𝚍𝚎𝚜𝚎𝚗𝚟𝚘𝚕𝚟𝚎𝚛 𝚖𝚞𝚒𝚝𝚊𝚜 𝚒𝚍𝚎𝚒𝚊𝚜 𝚍𝚎 𝚟𝚊𝚛𝚒𝚊𝚍𝚊𝚜 𝚙𝚎𝚛𝚜𝚙𝚎𝚌𝚝𝚒𝚟𝚊𝚜, 𝚎́ 𝚖𝚞𝚒𝚝𝚊𝚜 𝚟𝚎𝚣𝚎𝚜 𝚒𝚍𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚒𝚏𝚒𝚌𝚊𝚍𝚘 𝚌𝚘𝚖 𝚘 𝚊 𝚏𝚒𝚐𝚞𝚛𝚊 𝚍𝚎 𝙻𝚎𝚘𝚗𝚊𝚛𝚍𝚘 𝙳𝚊 𝚅𝚒𝚗𝚌𝚒.
𝙳𝚊 𝚅𝚒𝚗𝚌𝚒 𝚏𝚘𝚒 𝚌𝚒𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚒𝚜𝚝𝚊, 𝚖𝚊𝚝𝚎𝚖𝚊́𝚝𝚒𝚌𝚘, 𝚎𝚗𝚐𝚎𝚗𝚑𝚎𝚒𝚛𝚘, 𝚒𝚗𝚟𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚘𝚛, 𝚙𝚒𝚗𝚝𝚘𝚛, 𝚊𝚛𝚚𝚞𝚒𝚝𝚎𝚌𝚝𝚘, 𝚙𝚘𝚎𝚝𝚊, 𝚖𝚞́𝚜𝚒𝚌𝚘, 𝚎𝚜𝚌𝚞𝚕𝚝𝚘𝚛, 𝚊𝚋𝚛𝚊𝚌̧𝚘𝚞 𝚘 𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚝𝚎𝚟𝚎 𝚒𝚗𝚝𝚎𝚛𝚎𝚜𝚜𝚎, 𝚝𝚞𝚍𝚘 𝚜𝚎𝚖 𝚎𝚍𝚞𝚌𝚊𝚌̧𝚊̃𝚘 𝚏𝚘𝚛𝚖𝚊𝚕: 𝚘𝚜 𝚝𝚎𝚖𝚙𝚘𝚜 𝚎𝚛𝚊𝚖 𝚘𝚞𝚝𝚛𝚘𝚜 𝚎 𝚘 𝚝𝚎𝚖𝚙𝚘 𝚝𝚊𝚖𝚋𝚎́𝚖. 𝙿𝚛𝚘𝚕𝚒́𝚏𝚒𝚌𝚘 𝚌𝚘𝚖𝚘 𝚏𝚘𝚒, 𝚊 𝚖𝚊𝚒𝚘𝚛𝚒𝚊 𝚍𝚊𝚜 𝚜𝚞𝚊𝚜 𝚒𝚍𝚎𝚒𝚊𝚜 𝚗𝚞𝚗𝚌𝚊 𝚌𝚑𝚎𝚐𝚊𝚛𝚊𝚖 𝚊 𝚜𝚎𝚛 𝚖𝚊𝚝𝚎𝚛𝚒𝚊𝚕𝚒𝚣𝚊𝚍𝚊𝚜. 𝙵𝚘𝚛𝚊𝚖 𝚙𝚛𝚘𝚓𝚎𝚌𝚝𝚘𝚜 𝚎 𝚖𝚊𝚒𝚜 𝚙𝚛𝚘𝚓𝚎𝚌𝚝𝚘𝚜 𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚏𝚒𝚌𝚊𝚛𝚊𝚖 𝚗𝚊𝚜 𝚐𝚊𝚟𝚎𝚝𝚊𝚜, 𝚗𝚘𝚜 𝚎𝚜𝚋𝚘𝚌̧𝚘𝚜 𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚏𝚎𝚣, 𝚗𝚊 𝚜𝚞𝚊 𝚖𝚎𝚖𝚘́𝚛𝚒𝚊 𝚎 𝚒𝚖𝚊𝚐𝚒𝚗𝚊𝚌̧𝚊̃𝚘.
𝙳𝚊 𝚅𝚒𝚗𝚌𝚒 𝚎́ 𝚚𝚞𝚊𝚜𝚎 𝚘 𝚘𝚙𝚘𝚜𝚝𝚘 𝚍𝚊 𝚎𝚏𝚒𝚌𝚒𝚎̂𝚗𝚌𝚒𝚊 𝚎 𝚎𝚜𝚙𝚎𝚌𝚒𝚊𝚕𝚒𝚣𝚊𝚌̧𝚊̃𝚘 𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚑𝚘𝚓𝚎 𝚎𝚖 𝚍𝚒𝚊 𝚘 𝚖𝚎𝚛𝚌𝚊𝚍𝚘 𝚍𝚎 𝚝𝚛𝚊𝚋𝚊𝚕𝚑𝚘 𝚙𝚎𝚍𝚎. 𝙰𝚕𝚒𝚊́𝚜, 𝚗𝚊 𝚄𝚗𝚒𝚟𝚎𝚛𝚜𝚒𝚍𝚊𝚍𝚎 𝚍𝚘𝚜 𝚗𝚘𝚜𝚜𝚘𝚜 𝚍𝚒𝚊𝚜 𝚗𝚊̃𝚘 𝚝𝚎𝚛𝚒𝚊 𝚎𝚖𝚙𝚛𝚎𝚐𝚘, 𝚌𝚎𝚛𝚝𝚊𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚎: 𝚚𝚞𝚊𝚕 𝚜𝚎𝚛𝚒𝚊 𝚊 𝚜𝚞𝚊 𝚕𝚒𝚗𝚑𝚊 𝚍𝚎 𝚒𝚗𝚟𝚎𝚜𝚝𝚒𝚐𝚊𝚌̧𝚊̃𝚘 𝚙𝚊𝚛𝚊 𝚝𝚎𝚛 𝚞𝚖 𝙲𝚅 𝚌𝚘𝚎𝚛𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚎? 𝙴𝚖 𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚜𝚞𝚋𝚊́𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚜 𝚜𝚎 𝚎𝚜𝚙𝚎𝚌𝚒𝚊𝚕𝚒𝚣𝚊𝚛𝚒𝚊? 𝙸𝚛𝚒𝚊 𝚊 𝚞𝚖𝚊 𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚛𝚎𝚟𝚒𝚜𝚝𝚊 𝚍𝚎 𝚎𝚖𝚙𝚛𝚎𝚐𝚘 𝚙𝚊𝚛𝚊 𝚍𝚒𝚣𝚎𝚛 𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚜𝚎 𝚒𝚗𝚝𝚎𝚛𝚎𝚜𝚜𝚊𝚟𝚊 𝚙𝚘𝚛 𝚙𝚒𝚗𝚝𝚞𝚛𝚊, 𝚙𝚎𝚕𝚘 𝚌𝚘𝚛𝚙𝚘 𝚑𝚞𝚖𝚊𝚗𝚘, 𝚙𝚘𝚛 𝚖𝚊́𝚚𝚞𝚒𝚗𝚊𝚜 𝚎 𝚎𝚍𝚒𝚏𝚒́𝚌𝚒𝚘𝚜? 𝙴𝚗𝚝𝚊̃𝚘 𝚎 𝚊 𝚜𝚞𝚊 𝚟𝚒𝚜𝚊̃𝚘 𝚙𝚊𝚛𝚊 “𝚍𝚊𝚚𝚞𝚒 𝚊 𝚌𝚒𝚗𝚌𝚘 𝚊𝚗𝚘𝚜”?
𝙾𝚋𝚟𝚒𝚊𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚎 𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚚𝚞𝚊𝚕𝚚𝚞𝚎𝚛 𝚌𝚘𝚖𝚒𝚜𝚜𝚊̃𝚘 𝚍𝚎 𝚛𝚎𝚌𝚛𝚞𝚝𝚊𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚘 𝚟𝚎𝚛𝚒𝚊 𝚎𝚖 𝚝𝚊𝚗𝚝𝚘𝚜 𝚒𝚗𝚝𝚎𝚛𝚎𝚜𝚜𝚎𝚜 𝚊𝚙𝚎𝚗𝚊𝚜 𝚛𝚊𝚣𝚘̃𝚎𝚜 𝚙𝚊𝚛𝚊 𝚘 𝚊𝚟𝚊𝚕𝚒𝚊𝚛 𝚌𝚘𝚖𝚘 𝚗𝚊̃𝚘 𝚏𝚘𝚌𝚊𝚍𝚘, 𝚍𝚎𝚜𝚗𝚎𝚌𝚎𝚜𝚜𝚊́𝚛𝚒𝚘, 𝚕𝚘𝚐𝚘, 𝚒𝚗𝚌𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚒𝚟𝚊𝚍𝚘𝚛 𝚍𝚎 𝚝𝚎́𝚛𝚖𝚒𝚗𝚘 𝚍𝚎 𝚑𝚒𝚎𝚛𝚊𝚛𝚚𝚞𝚒𝚊𝚜, 𝚎 𝚙𝚘𝚛 𝚊𝚒́ 𝚏𝚘𝚛𝚊. 𝙾𝚜 𝚍𝚒𝚊𝚜 𝚍𝚎 𝚑𝚘𝚓𝚎 𝚎𝚡𝚒𝚐𝚎𝚖 𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚗𝚘𝚜 𝚏𝚘𝚚𝚞𝚎𝚖𝚘𝚜, 𝚏𝚊𝚌̧𝚊𝚖𝚘𝚜 𝚜𝚎𝚖 𝚚𝚞𝚎𝚜𝚝𝚒𝚘𝚗𝚊𝚛, 𝚊𝚟𝚊𝚗𝚌𝚎𝚖𝚘𝚜 𝚙𝚊𝚛𝚊 𝚘 𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚍𝚊́ 𝚛𝚎𝚜𝚞𝚕𝚝𝚊𝚍𝚘𝚜 𝚒𝚖𝚎𝚍𝚒𝚊𝚝𝚘𝚜 𝚎 𝚗𝚘𝚜 𝚌𝚒𝚗𝚓𝚊𝚖𝚘𝚜 𝚊 𝚜𝚎𝚛 𝚊𝚚𝚞𝚒𝚕𝚘 𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚍𝚎𝚟𝚎𝚖𝚘𝚜 𝚜𝚎𝚛: 𝚙𝚛𝚎𝚟𝚒𝚜𝚒́𝚟𝚎𝚒𝚜 𝚎 𝚊𝚝𝚒𝚗𝚊𝚍𝚘𝚜.
𝚃𝚊𝚖𝚋𝚎́𝚖 𝚑𝚘𝚓𝚎 𝚊 𝚟𝚒𝚜𝚊̃𝚘 𝚍𝚎 𝚆𝚒𝚕𝚑𝚎𝚕𝚖 𝚟𝚘𝚗 𝙷𝚞𝚖𝚋𝚘𝚕𝚍𝚝, 𝚌𝚘𝚖 𝚊 𝚜𝚞𝚊 𝚗𝚘𝚌̧𝚊̃𝚘 𝚍𝚎 𝚞𝚖𝚊 𝚎𝚍𝚞𝚌𝚊𝚌̧𝚊̃𝚘 𝚑𝚘𝚕𝚒́𝚜𝚝𝚒𝚌𝚊, 𝚊 𝚜𝚞𝚊 𝙱𝚒𝚕𝚍𝚞𝚗𝚐 – 𝚗𝚞𝚖 𝚊𝚞𝚝𝚘-𝚍𝚎𝚜𝚎𝚗𝚟𝚘𝚕𝚟𝚒𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚘 𝚚𝚞𝚎𝚛 𝚎𝚖 𝚝𝚎𝚛𝚖𝚘𝚜 𝚍𝚘 𝚜𝚎𝚞 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚑𝚎𝚌𝚒𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚘 𝚌𝚘𝚖𝚘 𝚍𝚊 𝚜𝚞𝚊 𝚌𝚞𝚕𝚝𝚞𝚛𝚊, 𝚘𝚗𝚍𝚎 𝚘 𝚎𝚜𝚙𝚒́𝚛𝚒𝚝𝚘, 𝚊 𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚎, 𝚘 𝚌𝚘𝚛𝚊𝚌̧𝚊̃𝚘 𝚎 𝚊 𝚊𝚕𝚖𝚊 𝚜𝚎 𝚊𝚕𝚒𝚗𝚑𝚊𝚖 – 𝚋𝚊𝚜𝚎𝚊𝚍𝚊 𝚎𝚖 𝚙𝚛𝚒𝚗𝚌𝚒́𝚙𝚒𝚘𝚜 𝚑𝚞𝚖𝚊𝚗𝚒𝚜𝚝𝚊𝚜, 𝚎𝚜𝚝𝚊𝚛𝚊́ 𝚌𝚘𝚖𝚙𝚕𝚎𝚝𝚊𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚎 𝚍𝚎𝚜𝚊𝚌𝚝𝚞𝚊𝚕𝚒𝚣𝚊𝚍𝚊. 𝙰𝚕𝚒𝚊́𝚜, 𝚊 𝚒𝚍𝚎𝚒𝚊 𝚛𝚘𝚖𝚊𝚗𝚊 𝚍𝚎 𝚌𝚘𝚛𝚙𝚘 𝚜𝚊̃𝚘 𝚎𝚖 𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚎 𝚜𝚊̃ 𝚊𝚕𝚒 𝚜𝚎 𝚊𝚕𝚒𝚗𝚑𝚊, 𝚌𝚘𝚖𝚘 𝚜𝚎 𝚊𝚕𝚒𝚗𝚑𝚊 𝚊 𝚒𝚍𝚎𝚒𝚊 𝚝𝚎𝚕𝚑𝚊𝚛𝚍𝚒𝚊𝚗𝚊 𝚍𝚎 𝚌𝚘𝚖𝚙𝚕𝚎𝚡𝚒𝚍𝚊𝚍𝚎 𝚌𝚛𝚎𝚜𝚌𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚎 𝚎 𝚌𝚛𝚎𝚜𝚌𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚎 𝚍𝚎𝚜𝚎𝚗𝚟𝚘𝚕𝚟𝚒𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚘 𝚒𝚗𝚝𝚎𝚛𝚒𝚘𝚛 𝚎, 𝚏𝚒𝚗𝚊𝚕𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚎, 𝚊 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚌𝚎𝚙𝚌̧𝚊̃𝚘 𝚐𝚛𝚎𝚐𝚊 𝚍𝚘 𝙷𝚘𝚖𝚎𝚖 𝚎𝚗𝚚𝚞𝚊𝚗𝚝𝚘 𝚖𝚎𝚍𝚒𝚍𝚊 𝚍𝚘 𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚎́ 𝚎 𝚍𝚘 𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚗𝚊̃𝚘 𝚎́.
𝙽𝚊̃𝚘 𝚝𝚎𝚘𝚛𝚒𝚌𝚊𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚎 𝚖𝚊𝚜 𝚗𝚊 𝚙𝚛𝚊́𝚝𝚒𝚌𝚊, 𝚘 𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚑𝚘𝚓𝚎 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚝𝚊 𝚙𝚊𝚛𝚊 𝚘 𝚖𝚎𝚛𝚌𝚊𝚍𝚘 𝚍𝚎 𝚝𝚛𝚊𝚋𝚊𝚕𝚑𝚘 𝚗𝚊 𝚄𝚗𝚒𝚟𝚎𝚛𝚜𝚒𝚍𝚊𝚍𝚎, 𝚖𝚊𝚜 𝚗𝚊̃𝚘 𝚜𝚘́, 𝚎́ 𝚊 𝚎𝚜𝚙𝚎𝚌𝚒𝚊𝚕𝚒𝚣𝚊𝚌̧𝚊̃𝚘. 𝙴, 𝚌𝚕𝚊𝚛𝚘, 𝚊 𝚚𝚞𝚊𝚗𝚝𝚒𝚍𝚊𝚍𝚎. 𝙰 𝚚𝚞𝚊𝚗𝚝𝚒𝚍𝚊𝚍𝚎 𝚗𝚊 𝚙𝚛𝚘𝚍𝚞𝚌̧𝚊̃𝚘 𝚍𝚎 𝚊𝚛𝚝𝚒𝚐𝚘𝚜, 𝚕𝚒𝚟𝚛𝚘𝚜 𝚎 𝚘𝚞𝚝𝚛𝚘𝚜 𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚝𝚊𝚒𝚜, 𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚗𝚊̃𝚘 𝚛𝚎𝚏𝚕𝚎𝚌𝚝𝚎𝚖, 𝚗𝚊 𝚜𝚞𝚊 𝚐𝚛𝚊𝚗𝚍𝚎 𝚖𝚊𝚒𝚘𝚛𝚒𝚊, 𝚞𝚖 𝚙𝚎𝚗𝚜𝚊𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚘 𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚗𝚊̃𝚘 𝚜𝚎𝚓𝚊 𝚊𝚕𝚒𝚗𝚑𝚊𝚍𝚘, 𝚌𝚘𝚙𝚒𝚊𝚍𝚘, 𝚋𝚊𝚜𝚎𝚊𝚍𝚘 𝚎𝚖 𝚊𝚕𝚐𝚘 𝚓𝚊́ 𝚎𝚡𝚒𝚜𝚝𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚎. 𝙴 𝚗𝚊̃𝚘, 𝚗𝚊̃𝚘 𝚎𝚜𝚝𝚘𝚞 𝚊 𝚏𝚊𝚕𝚊𝚛 𝚗𝚊 𝚌𝚒𝚎̂𝚗𝚌𝚒𝚊 𝚎𝚗𝚚𝚞𝚊𝚗𝚝𝚘 𝚙𝚛𝚘𝚌𝚎𝚜𝚜𝚘 𝚌𝚞𝚖𝚞𝚕𝚊𝚝𝚒𝚟𝚘. 𝙰 𝚑𝚒𝚜𝚝𝚘́𝚛𝚒𝚊 𝚍𝚎 𝚎𝚜𝚝𝚊𝚛𝚖𝚘𝚜 “𝚊𝚘𝚜 𝚘𝚖𝚋𝚛𝚘𝚜 𝚍𝚎 𝚐𝚒𝚐𝚊𝚗𝚝𝚎𝚜”.
𝙴𝚟𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚞𝚊𝚕𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚎 𝚙𝚘𝚛 𝚌𝚊𝚞𝚜𝚊 𝚍𝚘 𝚊𝚗𝚝𝚎𝚛𝚒𝚘𝚛, 𝚗𝚎𝚖 𝚘 𝚖𝚎́𝚝𝚘𝚍𝚘 𝚑𝚒𝚜𝚝𝚘́𝚛𝚒𝚌𝚘, 𝚗𝚎𝚖 𝚊𝚜 𝚌𝚒𝚎̂𝚗𝚌𝚒𝚊𝚜 𝚜𝚘𝚌𝚒𝚊𝚒𝚜, 𝚎 𝚖𝚞𝚒𝚝𝚘 𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚘𝚜 𝚊𝚜 𝚊𝚛𝚝𝚎𝚜, 𝚙𝚘𝚍𝚎𝚛𝚊̃𝚘 𝚜𝚎𝚛 𝚒𝚗𝚌𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚒𝚟𝚊𝚍𝚘𝚜 𝚎 𝚍𝚎𝚒𝚡𝚊𝚍𝚘𝚜 𝚕𝚒𝚟𝚛𝚎𝚜. 𝙴𝚜𝚜𝚊𝚜 𝚊́𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚜 𝚍𝚘 𝚜𝚊𝚋𝚎𝚛 𝚘𝚋𝚛𝚒𝚐𝚊𝚖-𝚗𝚘𝚜 𝚊 𝚒𝚛 𝚙𝚘𝚛 𝚘𝚞𝚝𝚛𝚘𝚜 𝚌𝚊𝚖𝚒𝚗𝚑𝚘𝚜, 𝚘𝚜 𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚙𝚎𝚛𝚖𝚒𝚝𝚎𝚖 𝚊 𝚙𝚎𝚛𝚜𝚙𝚎𝚌𝚝𝚒𝚟𝚊 𝚑𝚞𝚖𝚋𝚘𝚕𝚍𝚝𝚒𝚊𝚗𝚊 𝚍𝚘𝚜 𝚒𝚗𝚍𝚒𝚟𝚒́𝚍𝚞𝚘𝚜 𝚎𝚗𝚚𝚞𝚊𝚗𝚝𝚘 𝚜𝚎𝚛𝚎𝚜 𝚊𝚞𝚝𝚘́𝚗𝚘𝚖𝚘𝚜, 𝚌𝚒𝚍𝚊𝚍𝚊̃𝚘𝚜 𝚌𝚊𝚙𝚊𝚣𝚎𝚜 𝚍𝚎 𝚙𝚎𝚗𝚜𝚊𝚛 𝚙𝚘𝚛 𝚜𝚒, 𝚍𝚎 𝚌𝚛𝚒𝚊𝚛𝚎𝚖 𝚘 𝚜𝚎𝚞 𝚙𝚛𝚘́𝚙𝚛𝚒𝚘 𝚙𝚎𝚗𝚜𝚊𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚘. 𝙴, 𝚎𝚞 𝚍𝚒𝚛𝚒𝚊 𝚖𝚎𝚜𝚖𝚘, 𝚍𝚎 𝚜𝚎𝚛𝚎𝚖 𝚌𝚊𝚙𝚊𝚣𝚎𝚜 𝚍𝚎 𝚜𝚎 𝚍𝚎𝚍𝚒𝚌𝚊𝚛 𝚊 𝚟𝚊́𝚛𝚒𝚘𝚜 𝚒𝚗𝚝𝚎𝚛𝚎𝚜𝚜𝚎𝚜, 𝚎, 𝚙𝚘𝚛𝚝𝚊𝚗𝚝𝚘, 𝚊 𝚊𝚙𝚛𝚎𝚜𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚊𝚛𝚎𝚖 𝚘𝚞𝚝𝚛𝚊𝚜 𝚜𝚘𝚕𝚞𝚌̧𝚘̃𝚎𝚜 𝚙𝚊𝚛𝚊 𝚊𝚚𝚞𝚒𝚕𝚘 𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚜𝚊̃𝚘 𝚘𝚞𝚝𝚛𝚊𝚜 𝚚𝚞𝚎𝚜𝚝𝚘̃𝚎𝚜.
𝙴𝚜𝚜𝚊 𝚙𝚊𝚛𝚝𝚎 𝚗𝚎𝚌𝚎𝚜𝚜𝚊́𝚛𝚒𝚊 𝚍𝚊 𝚌𝚛𝚒𝚊𝚝𝚒𝚟𝚒𝚍𝚊𝚍𝚎, 𝚊 𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚝𝚎𝚖 𝚙𝚎𝚛𝚖𝚒𝚝𝚒𝚍𝚘 𝚊𝚘 𝚂𝚎𝚛 𝙷𝚞𝚖𝚊𝚗𝚘 𝚜𝚎̂-𝚕𝚘, 𝚝𝚎𝚛𝚊́ 𝚑𝚘𝚓𝚎 𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚘𝚜 𝚒𝚗𝚝𝚎𝚛𝚎𝚜𝚜𝚎, 𝚙𝚘𝚛 𝚒𝚜𝚜𝚘, 𝙳𝚊 𝚅𝚒𝚗𝚌𝚒 𝚌𝚎𝚛𝚝𝚊𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚎 𝚎𝚜𝚝𝚊𝚛𝚒𝚊 𝚍𝚎𝚜𝚎𝚖𝚙𝚛𝚎𝚐𝚊𝚍𝚘 𝚜𝚎 𝚙𝚘𝚛 𝚊𝚚𝚞𝚒 𝚊𝚗𝚍𝚊𝚜𝚜𝚎 𝚗𝚘𝚜 𝚍𝚒𝚊𝚜 𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚌𝚘𝚛𝚛𝚎𝚖.