RUI PATRÍCIO

 .

Calma!

    O enriquecimento ilícito

               já é crime (parte II)

E a confusão, já se sabe, é a melhor amiga do ‘princípio de Lampedusa’, que ensina que é preciso mudar para que tudo fique na mesma.

𝖤𝗌𝖼𝗋𝖾𝗏𝗂 𝖺𝗊𝗎𝗂 𝗁𝖺́ 𝗎𝗆 𝗆𝖾̂𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗏𝖺 𝗈𝗎𝗍𝗋𝖺 𝗏𝖾𝗓 𝗇𝖺 𝖼𝗋𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖺 𝖽𝖺 𝗈𝗇𝖽𝖺 𝗈 𝖾𝗇𝗋𝗂𝗊𝗎𝖾𝖼𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝗂𝗅𝗂́𝖼𝗂𝗍𝗈, 𝗆𝖺𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗏𝖺𝗅𝗂𝖺 𝖺 𝗉𝖾𝗇𝖺, 𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗃𝖺́ 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗏𝖺 𝖼𝗋𝗂𝗆𝗂𝗇𝖺𝗅𝗂𝗓𝖺𝖽𝗈, 𝗌𝗈𝖻 𝖺 𝖿𝗈𝗋𝗆𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝗈𝖻𝖾𝖽𝗂𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗅𝗂𝖿𝗂𝖼𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝖾 𝗈𝖼𝗎𝗅𝗍𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝗂𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗇𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗅 𝖽𝖾 𝗉𝖺𝗍𝗋𝗂𝗆𝗈́𝗇𝗂𝗈. 𝖤𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖾𝗍𝖺𝗇𝗍𝗈, 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗍𝖾𝗂 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗍𝖺𝗅𝗏𝖾𝗓 𝗍𝖾𝗇𝗁𝖺 𝗋𝖺𝗓𝖺̃𝗈, 𝗉𝗈𝗂𝗌 𝖺 𝖼𝗁𝖺𝗆𝖺𝖽𝖺 ‘𝖺𝗀𝖾𝗇𝖽𝖺 𝖺𝗇𝗍𝗂𝖼𝗈𝗋𝗋𝗎𝗉𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈’ 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗉𝗈̃𝖾 𝗇𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝖽𝗂𝗋𝖾𝗍𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝗇𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺 𝗆𝖺𝗍𝖾́𝗋𝗂𝖺 (𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗉𝗈̃𝖾 𝗇𝗈𝗎𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗌, 𝗆𝖺𝗌 𝖺𝖻𝗌𝗍𝖾𝗇𝗁𝗈-𝗆𝖾 𝗁𝗈𝗃𝖾 𝖾 𝖺𝗊𝗎𝗂 𝖽𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺𝗋, 𝗇𝗈𝗆𝖾𝖺𝖽𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖺 ‘𝗋𝖾𝖿𝗈𝗋𝗆𝗎𝗅𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈’ 𝖽𝗈 𝗋𝖾𝗀𝗂𝗆𝖾 𝖽𝖺 𝗉𝖾𝗋𝖽𝖺 𝖺𝗅𝖺𝗋𝗀𝖺𝖽𝖺 – 𝖻𝖺𝗌𝖾𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝗇𝗈 ‘𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗏𝖾𝗇𝖼𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈’ 𝖽𝗈 𝖳𝗋𝗂𝖻𝗎𝗇𝖺𝗅… –, 𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖺𝗂𝗇𝖽𝖺 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗈𝗎 𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝖺 𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖾 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝗍𝗂𝖼𝗎𝗅𝖺𝗋 𝖽𝖾 𝖻𝗈𝖼𝖺 𝖺𝖻𝖾𝗋𝗍𝖺 𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝖽𝗂𝖿𝗂𝖼𝗎𝗅𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖾𝗆 𝖺𝗋𝗍𝗂𝖼𝗎𝗅𝖺𝗋 𝗉𝖺𝗅𝖺𝗏𝗋𝖺𝗌). 𝖤𝗌𝖼𝗋𝖾𝗏𝗂 𝖾𝗎 𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺̃𝗈 𝗍𝖺𝗆𝖻𝖾́𝗆, 𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝖺̀𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗅𝖾 𝖼𝗋𝗂𝗆𝖾, 𝗊𝗎𝖾, 𝗇𝖺 𝗏𝖾𝗋𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝗈𝗋𝗂𝗀𝗂𝗇𝖺𝗅, 𝖺 𝖫𝖾𝗂 𝗉𝗎𝗇𝗂𝖺 𝖼𝗋𝗂𝗆𝗂𝗇𝖺𝗅𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖺 𝗈𝗆𝗂𝗌𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝖾𝖼𝗅𝖺𝗋𝖺𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝗉𝖺𝗍𝗋𝗂𝗆𝗈𝗇𝗂𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗍𝗂𝗍𝗎𝗅𝖺𝗋𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖼𝖺𝗋𝗀𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝗈𝗅𝗂́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝗈𝗌 𝖾 𝖽𝖾 𝖺𝗅𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝖼𝖺𝗋𝗀𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝗎́𝖻𝗅𝗂𝖼𝗈𝗌, 𝖺̀ 𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝖾 𝖺̀ 𝗌𝖺𝗂́𝖽𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝖿𝗎𝗇𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌, 𝖾 𝗉𝖾𝗅𝗈 𝗆𝖾𝗂𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝗁𝗈𝗎𝗏𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖾 𝖺𝖼𝗋𝖾́𝗌𝖼𝗂𝗆𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝖺𝗍𝗋𝗂𝗆𝗈𝗇𝗂𝖺𝗂𝗌. 𝖣𝖾𝗉𝗈𝗂𝗌, 𝗉𝖺𝗌𝗌𝗈𝗎 𝖺 𝗉𝗎𝗇𝗂𝗋 𝗍𝖺𝗆𝖻𝖾́𝗆 𝖺 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗂𝖽𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗂𝖿𝗂𝖼𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖿𝖺𝖼𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗈𝗋𝗂𝗀𝗂𝗇𝖺𝗋𝖺𝗆 𝖺𝗌 𝖺𝗅𝗍𝖾𝗋𝖺𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝗉𝖺𝗍𝗋𝗂𝗆𝗈𝗇𝗂𝖺𝗂𝗌. 𝖮𝗋𝖺, 𝖾́ 𝗋𝖾𝖼𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖺 𝖫𝖾𝗂, 𝖽𝖾 𝟤𝟢𝟣𝟫, 𝖾 𝖺𝗂𝗇𝖽𝖺 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝗋𝖾𝖼𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖺 𝗌𝗎𝖺 𝖺𝗅𝗍𝖾𝗋𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝗁𝖺𝖻𝗂𝗅𝗂𝖽𝗈𝗌𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝟤𝟢𝟤𝟤. 𝖤́ 𝖼𝖺𝗉𝖺𝗓 𝖽𝖾 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗍𝖾𝗋 𝗁𝖺𝗏𝗂𝖽𝗈 𝖺𝗂𝗇𝖽𝖺 𝗍𝖾𝗆𝗉𝗈 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗈𝗅𝗁𝖺𝗋 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝖻𝗅𝖾𝗆𝖺𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗍𝖺𝗅𝗏𝖾𝗓 𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖺 𝗂𝗇𝖼𝗋𝗂𝗆𝗂𝗇𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝗅𝖾𝗏𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾, 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖾𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗅𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖽𝗈𝗂𝗌 – 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝖺𝗅𝖾́𝗆 𝖽𝖾 𝗎𝗆 𝗈𝗎𝗍𝗋𝗈, 𝖼𝗅𝖺́𝗌𝗌𝗂𝖼𝗈, 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖾́ 𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗌𝖾 𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗍𝖺𝗋 𝖽𝖾 𝗎𝗆 𝖼𝗋𝗂𝗆𝖾 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗌𝖾𝗋𝗏𝖾 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗇𝖺𝖽𝖺, 𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗆 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝖾𝗍𝖺 𝖼𝗋𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗌 𝖾 𝗍𝖾𝗇𝗁𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝖾𝗅𝖾𝗌 𝖺𝖼𝗋𝖾́𝗌𝖼𝗂𝗆𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝖺𝗍𝗋𝗂𝗆𝗈𝗇𝗂𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗏𝖺𝗂 𝖼𝗈𝗅𝗈𝖼𝖺́-𝗅𝗈𝗌 𝗇𝖺 𝗌𝗎𝖺 𝖾𝗌𝖿𝖾𝗋𝖺 𝖾, 𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗍𝖺𝗇𝗍𝗈, 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗍𝖾𝗆 𝗇𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝖺 𝖽𝖾𝖼𝗅𝖺𝗋𝖺𝗋. 𝖬𝖺𝗌 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗈, 𝖾𝗌𝗊𝗎𝖾𝖼̧𝖺𝗆𝗈𝗌 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺 𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺̃𝗈; 𝖼𝗈𝗂𝗌𝖺 𝖺𝗅𝗂𝖺́𝗌 𝗉𝖾𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗇𝖺, 𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝖺 𝗌𝖾𝗇𝗌𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖼𝖺𝗅𝗆𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖽𝖾 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗌𝖾 𝗅𝖾𝗀𝗂𝗌𝗅𝗈𝗎 𝖾, 𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗍𝖺𝗇𝗍𝗈, 𝗌𝖾 𝖿𝖾𝗓 𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗌𝗈, 𝖾 𝖺𝗂𝗇𝖽𝖺 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝖼𝗂𝗆𝖺 𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗌𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖺 𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗂𝗌𝖺 𝗊𝗎𝖾, 𝖺 𝖺𝗏𝖺𝗅𝗂𝖺𝗋 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝖺𝗅𝗀𝗎𝗇𝗌 𝖽𝗂𝗌𝖼𝗎𝗋𝗌𝗈𝗌 𝖾 𝗎𝗆 𝖼𝖾𝗋𝗍𝗈 𝖼𝗅𝗂𝗆𝖺, 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖾𝖼𝖾 𝗌𝖾𝗋 𝗈 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗈𝗋 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝖻𝗅𝖾𝗆𝖺 𝗇𝖺𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗅, 𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗋𝗋𝗎𝗉𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 (𝗉𝖺𝗂́𝗌 𝖿𝖾𝗅𝗂𝗓, 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖾 𝗇𝗈𝗌𝗌𝗈, 𝗇𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗅 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺̃𝗈 𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝗆𝖺𝗅 𝖺 𝖾𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗈𝗆𝗂𝖺, 𝖺 𝗌𝖺𝗎́𝖽𝖾, 𝖺 𝗁𝖺𝖻𝗂𝗍𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈, 𝖺 𝖾𝖽𝗎𝖼𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈, 𝖾𝗍 𝖼𝖾𝗍𝖾𝗋𝖺, 𝖾 𝗈𝗇𝖽𝖾 𝗈 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝖻𝗅𝖾𝗆𝖺 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝖻𝗅𝖾𝗆𝖺𝗌 𝖾́ 𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗋𝗋𝗎𝗉𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈).

𝖢𝗈𝗇𝖼𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖾𝗆𝗈-𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝗈𝗂𝗌 𝗈𝗎𝗍𝗋𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝖻𝗅𝖾𝗆𝖺𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗍𝖺𝗅𝗏𝖾𝗓 𝗈 𝖼𝗋𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗓𝗂𝗇𝗁𝗈 𝗌𝖺𝗅𝗏𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗋 𝗍𝖾𝗇𝗁𝖺 – 𝖽𝗂𝗀𝗈 𝖾𝗎, 𝖺𝗀𝖺𝗋𝗋𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗂𝗌𝖺𝗌 𝗃𝗎𝗋𝗂́𝖽𝗂𝖼𝗈-𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗌𝗍𝗂𝗍𝗎𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗂𝗌, 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖾́ 𝗆𝖺𝗍𝖾́𝗋𝗂𝖺 𝖾𝗆 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝗎𝗌𝗈, 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝗌𝖾 𝗏𝖾̂ 𝖿𝗋𝖾𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾, 𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝖾𝖼̧𝖺𝗋 𝗉𝖾𝗅𝖺 𝖼𝖺𝗌𝖺 𝗈𝗇𝖽𝖾 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺́ 𝗌𝖾𝖽𝗂𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝗈 𝗉𝗈𝖽𝖾𝗋 (𝖾 𝗈 𝖽𝖾𝗏𝖾𝗋) 𝖽𝖾 𝖿𝖺𝗓𝖾𝗋 𝖺𝗌 𝖫𝖾𝗂𝗌 (𝖾 𝖽𝖾 𝖺𝗌 𝖼𝗎𝗆𝗉𝗋𝗂𝗋, 𝗃𝖺́ 𝖺𝗀𝗈𝗋𝖺). 𝖯𝗋𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗂𝗋𝗈 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝖻𝗅𝖾𝗆𝖺: 𝖺𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗅𝖾 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗈 𝖳𝗋𝗂𝖻𝗎𝗇𝖺𝗅 𝖢𝗈𝗇𝗌𝗍𝗂𝗍𝗎𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗅 𝗃𝖺́ 𝗂𝖽𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗂𝖿𝗂𝖼𝗈𝗎 𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝖺 𝗍𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗏𝖺𝗌 𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗂𝗈𝗋𝖾𝗌, 𝗈𝗎 𝗌𝖾𝗃𝖺, 𝗈 𝗉𝗋𝗂𝗇𝖼𝗂́𝗉𝗂𝗈 𝖽𝖺 𝗇𝖾𝖼𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝖺 𝗉𝖾𝗇𝖺, 𝗌𝗈𝖻 𝖺 𝖽𝗎𝗉𝗅𝖺 𝖾𝗑𝗂𝗀𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝗂𝗀𝗇𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖾 𝖽𝖾 𝖼𝖺𝗋𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝗍𝗎𝗍𝖾𝗅𝖺 𝗉𝖾𝗇𝖺𝗅 (𝖽𝗂𝗓𝖾𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗈𝗌 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗃𝗎𝗋𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗌: 𝗍𝖾𝗆 𝗈 𝖼𝗋𝗂𝗆𝖾, 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗌𝖾𝗋 𝗅𝖾𝗀𝗂́𝗍𝗂𝗆𝗈, 𝖽𝖾 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗍𝖾𝗀𝖾𝗋 𝗎𝗆 𝖻𝖾𝗆 𝗃𝗎𝗋𝗂́𝖽𝗂𝖼𝗈 𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖾𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗅 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖺 𝗎𝗆 𝖺𝗍𝖺𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗀𝗋𝖺𝗏𝖾 𝖾 𝗍𝖾𝗆 𝖽𝖾 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗁𝖺𝗏𝖾𝗋 𝗈𝗎𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗌 𝖿𝗈𝗋𝗆𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗂𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗏𝖾𝗇𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾𝖿𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗓 𝖽𝗈 𝖣𝗂𝗋𝖾𝗂𝗍𝗈). 𝖤𝗑𝗂𝗀𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗌 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖾́ 𝗆𝗎𝗂𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝗎𝗏𝗂𝖽𝗈𝗌𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗎𝗆 𝖼𝗋𝗂𝗆𝖾 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗌𝖾 𝖻𝖺𝗌𝖾𝗂𝖺 𝗇𝗈 𝗆𝖾𝗋𝗈 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝖼𝗎𝗆𝗉𝗋𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗈𝖻𝗋𝗂𝗀𝖺𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖾𝖼𝗅𝖺𝗋𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗏𝖺𝗌 𝖼𝗎𝗆𝗉𝗋𝖺. 𝖬𝖺𝗌 𝖾́ 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝖽𝗎́𝗏𝗂𝖽𝖺 𝗆𝗂𝗇𝗁𝖺, 𝗎𝗆 𝖽𝗂𝖺 𝖺𝗅𝗀𝗎𝖾́𝗆 𝖽𝗂𝗋𝖺́ 𝗌𝖾 𝖼𝗎𝗆𝗉𝗋𝖾 𝗈𝗎 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝖺 𝖢𝗈𝗇𝗌𝗍𝗂𝗍𝗎𝗂𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 – 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖺𝗂𝗇𝖽𝖺 𝗍𝖾𝗆𝗈𝗌, 𝗌𝖾 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺 𝖺𝗂𝗇𝖽𝖺 𝖾𝗑𝗂𝗌𝗍𝗂𝗋. 𝖮𝗎𝗍𝗋𝗈 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝖻𝗅𝖾𝗆𝖺: 𝖺 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗂𝖻𝗂𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖺 𝖺𝗎𝗍𝗈𝗂𝗇𝖼𝗋𝗂𝗆𝗂𝗇𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈, 𝗉𝗈𝗂𝗌 𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗌𝖾 𝖼𝗋𝗂𝗆𝗂𝗇𝖺𝗅𝗂𝗓𝖺, 𝗇𝖺 𝗏𝖾𝗋𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾, 𝖾́ 𝖺 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖿𝗂𝗌𝗌𝖺̃𝗈, 𝗌𝗈𝖻 𝖺 𝖿𝗈𝗋𝗆𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖾𝖼𝗅𝖺𝗋𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖺 𝗈𝗋𝗂𝗀𝖾𝗆 𝖽𝗈 𝖺𝗎𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝗉𝖺𝗍𝗋𝗂𝗆𝗈𝗇𝗂𝖺𝗅, 𝖽𝖺 𝗇𝖺𝗍𝗎𝗋𝖾𝗓𝖺 𝗂𝗅𝗂́𝖼𝗂𝗍𝖺 𝖽𝗈 𝖾𝗇𝗋𝗂𝗊𝗎𝖾𝖼𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈. 𝖮𝗎 𝗌𝖾𝗃𝖺, 𝗈 𝖺𝗀𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖽𝗈 𝖼𝗋𝗂𝗆𝖾 𝖾́ 𝗌𝖺𝗇𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗌𝖾 𝖺𝗎𝗍𝗈 𝗂𝗇𝖼𝗋𝗂𝗆𝗂𝗇𝖺𝗋. 𝖯𝖺𝗋𝖾𝖼𝖾-𝗆𝖾, 𝖺 𝗆𝗂𝗆, 𝗎𝗆 𝖻𝗈𝗍𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝖾𝗅𝖺́𝗌𝗍𝗂𝖼𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗏𝖾̂ 𝗇𝗈 𝗆𝗂𝗈𝗅𝗈 𝖽𝗈 𝖤𝗌𝗍𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖣𝗂𝗋𝖾𝗂𝗍𝗈 𝖺 𝖽𝖾𝖿𝖾𝗌𝖺 𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝗅𝗂𝖻𝖾𝗋𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝗈 𝗂𝗇𝖽𝗂𝗏𝗂𝖽𝗎𝗈, 𝖾 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖾𝖼𝖾-𝗆𝖾 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗂𝗌𝗌𝗈 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗉𝗈𝖽𝖾 𝗌𝖾𝗋; 𝗆𝖺𝗌, 𝗇𝖺𝗍𝗎𝗋𝖺𝗅𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾, 𝗌𝖾𝗆𝗉𝗋𝖾 𝗌𝖺𝗅𝗏𝗈 𝗆𝖾𝗅𝗁𝗈𝗋 𝗈𝗉𝗂𝗇𝗂𝖺̃𝗈 – 𝖿𝗈́𝗋𝗆𝗎𝗅𝖺 𝗌𝖺𝗀𝗋𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝗇𝗈 𝗆𝗎𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝗋𝗂𝗍𝗎𝖺𝗅𝗂𝗓𝖺𝖽𝗈 (𝖾 𝖺𝗅𝗀𝗈 𝖻𝖺𝗋𝗋𝗈𝖼𝗈, 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝖺𝗀𝗈𝗋𝖺 𝗌𝖾 𝖽𝗂𝗓) 𝖽𝗈 𝖣𝗂𝗋𝖾𝗂𝗍𝗈.

𝖢𝖺𝗅𝗆𝖺, 𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗍𝖺𝗇𝗍𝗈, 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗌𝗈́ 𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗆𝗎𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗌 𝗏𝖾𝗓𝖾𝗌 𝗃𝖺́ 𝖾𝗑𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖾 𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗌𝖾 𝖺𝗇𝗎𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝗇𝖾𝖼𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖺́𝗋𝗂𝗈, 𝖻𝗈𝗆 𝖾 𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗋𝗂𝖽𝗈, 𝗆𝖺𝗌 𝗍𝖺𝗆𝖻𝖾́𝗆 𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗏𝖾́𝗆 𝗈𝗅𝗁𝖺𝗋 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝗈𝗅𝗁𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗏𝖾𝗋 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗃𝖺́ 𝗍𝖾𝗆𝗈𝗌 (𝖾 𝖽𝖺𝗋 𝗍𝖾𝗆𝗉𝗈 𝖺𝗈 𝗍𝖾𝗆𝗉𝗈, 𝗃𝖺́ 𝖺𝗀𝗈𝗋𝖺), 𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝖺𝗍𝖺𝗋 𝖺 𝖾́𝗉𝖺𝗍𝖾𝗋 𝗅𝖺 𝖻𝗈𝗎𝗋𝗀𝖾𝗈𝗂𝗌𝗂𝖾 𝖾 𝖺 𝗌𝗈𝗆𝖺𝗋 𝗇𝗈 𝗉𝖺𝗉𝖾𝗅 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝗅𝖾𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗌, 𝗉𝖺𝗅𝖺𝗏𝗋𝖺𝗌 𝖾 𝗅𝗂𝗇𝗁𝖺𝗌, 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗌𝗈́ 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗈𝗅𝗏𝖾𝗆 𝗇𝖺𝖽𝖺, 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝖺𝖼𝗋𝖾𝗌𝖼𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺𝗆 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝖻𝗅𝖾𝗆𝖺𝗌 𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖿𝗎𝗌𝖺̃𝗈. 𝖤 𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖿𝗎𝗌𝖺̃𝗈, 𝗃𝖺́ 𝗌𝖾 𝗌𝖺𝖻𝖾, 𝖾́ 𝖺 𝗆𝖾𝗅𝗁𝗈𝗋 𝖺𝗆𝗂𝗀𝖺 𝖽𝗈 ‘𝗉𝗋𝗂𝗇𝖼𝗂́𝗉𝗂𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖫𝖺𝗆𝗉𝖾𝖽𝗎𝗌𝖺’, 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖾𝗇𝗌𝗂𝗇𝖺 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖾́ 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝖼𝗂𝗌𝗈 𝗆𝗎𝖽𝖺𝗋 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗍𝗎𝖽𝗈 𝖿𝗂𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗇𝖺 𝗆𝖾𝗌𝗆𝖺. 𝖢𝗈𝗂𝗌𝖺𝗌 𝖺̀𝗌 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖺𝗌 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝖾𝗇𝖼𝗁𝖾𝗋 𝗈 𝗉𝖺𝗉𝖾𝗅, 𝖾 𝖾𝗇𝖼𝗁𝖾𝗋 𝖺 𝖻𝗈𝖼𝖺, 𝖼𝗈𝗌𝗍𝗎𝗆𝖺𝗆 𝖽𝖺𝗋 𝗆𝖺𝗎 𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗎𝗅𝗍𝖺𝖽𝗈, 𝗌𝖾𝗃𝖺 𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖾𝗌𝖻𝖺𝗋𝗋𝖺𝗆 𝗇𝖺 𝖼𝗂𝗏𝗂𝗅𝗂𝗓𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈, 𝗌𝖾𝗃𝖺 𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖼𝗋𝗂𝖺𝗆 𝗎𝗆𝖺 (𝗉𝗈𝗎𝖼𝗈) 𝖺𝖽𝗆𝗂𝗋𝖺́𝗏𝖾𝗅 ‘𝖼𝗂𝗏𝗂𝗅𝗂𝗓𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈’ 𝗇𝗈𝗏𝖺.

* Advogado com grande experiência em contencioso, tendo desenvolvido a área do contencioso criminal e contraordenacional.

IN "NASCER DO SOL" - 07/07/24 .