MARGARIDA REIS

 .

O que o Orçamento

reserva aos tribunais

O relatório reconhece a degradação e a inadequação de muitos edifícios da justiça, bem como a pressão sobre os tribunais. Merece ser valorizada a prioridade atribuída à recuperação das instalações e à modernização tecnológica

𝖮 𝗋𝖾𝗅𝖺𝗍𝗈́𝗋𝗂𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖺𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗉𝖺𝗇𝗁𝖺 𝖺 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗉𝗈𝗌𝗍𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝖮𝗋𝖼̧𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝗈 𝖤𝗌𝗍𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝟤𝟢𝟤𝟩, 𝖺𝗀𝗈𝗋𝖺 𝖾𝗆 𝖽𝗂𝗌𝖼𝗎𝗌𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝗇𝗈 𝖯𝖺𝗋𝗅𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈, 𝗋𝖾𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗁𝖾𝖼𝖾 𝖺 𝖽𝖾𝗀𝗋𝖺𝖽𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾 𝖺 𝗂𝗇𝖺𝖽𝖾𝗊𝗎𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗆𝗎𝗂𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝖾𝖽𝗂𝖿ı́𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖺 𝗃𝗎𝗌𝗍𝗂𝖼̧𝖺, 𝖻𝖾𝗆 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝖺 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝗌𝗈𝖻𝗋𝖾 𝗈𝗌 𝗍𝗋𝗂𝖻𝗎𝗇𝖺𝗂𝗌. 𝖬𝖾𝗋𝖾𝖼𝖾 𝗌𝖾𝗋 𝗏𝖺𝗅𝗈𝗋𝗂𝗓𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝖺 𝗉𝗋𝗂𝗈𝗋𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖺𝗍𝗋𝗂𝖻𝗎ı́𝖽𝖺 𝖺̀ 𝗋𝖾𝖼𝗎𝗉𝖾𝗋𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝗂𝗇𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗅𝖺𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝖾 𝖺̀ 𝗆𝗈𝖽𝖾𝗋𝗇𝗂𝗓𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝗍𝖾𝖼𝗇𝗈𝗅𝗈́𝗀𝗂𝖼𝖺, 𝗇𝗎𝗆 𝗈𝗋𝖼̧𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗏𝖾̂ 𝗎𝗆 𝖺𝗎𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝟫,𝟥% 𝖽𝖺 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝗉𝖾𝗌𝖺 𝖽𝖺 𝖩𝗎𝗌𝗍𝗂𝖼̧𝖺 𝖿𝖺𝖼𝖾 𝖺̀ 𝖾𝗑𝖾𝖼𝗎𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗂𝗆𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝟤𝟢𝟤𝟨 𝖾 𝗎𝗆 𝗂𝗇𝗏𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝟣𝟧𝟧,𝟩 𝗆𝗂𝗅𝗁𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖾𝗎𝗋𝗈𝗌, 𝖺𝖻𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗀𝖾𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖾𝗌 𝗏𝖺𝗅𝗈𝗋𝖾𝗌 𝗍𝖺𝗆𝖻𝖾́𝗆 𝗉𝗋𝗂𝗌𝗈̃𝖾𝗌, 𝗂𝗇𝗏𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗂𝗀𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖼𝗋𝗂𝗆𝗂𝗇𝖺𝗅 𝖾 𝗈𝗎𝗍𝗋𝗈𝗌 𝗌𝖾𝗋𝗏𝗂𝖼̧𝗈𝗌.

𝖰𝗎𝖺𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝖺𝗈𝗌 𝗆𝖾𝗂𝗈𝗌 𝗁𝗎𝗆𝖺𝗇𝗈𝗌, 𝗈 𝗋𝖾𝗅𝖺𝗍𝗈́𝗋𝗂𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗇𝗍𝗂𝖿𝗂𝖼𝖺 𝗈 𝗋𝖾𝖼𝗋𝗎𝗍𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝟤𝟢𝟢 𝗀𝗎𝖺𝗋𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝗉𝗋𝗂𝗌𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗂𝗌, 𝗆𝖺𝗌 𝖺𝗇𝗎𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝖺 𝗏𝖺𝗅𝗈𝗋𝗂𝗓𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖺 𝖼𝖺𝗋𝗋𝖾𝗂𝗋𝖺 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗈𝖿𝗂𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗃𝗎𝗌𝗍𝗂𝖼̧𝖺 𝖾 𝖺 𝖺𝖽𝖾𝗊𝗎𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖾𝖿𝖾𝗍𝗂𝗏𝗈𝗌 𝖺̀𝗌 𝗇𝖾𝖼𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾𝗌 𝗌𝖾𝗆 𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗇𝗍𝗂𝖿𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗋 𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖺𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝖾 𝗌𝖺ı́𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝗈𝗎 𝗂𝗇𝖽𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗋 𝖼𝗈𝗅𝗈𝖼𝖺𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌. 𝖥𝗂𝖼𝖺 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝖾𝗌𝖼𝗅𝖺𝗋𝖾𝖼𝖾𝗋 𝗌𝖾 𝗈𝗌 𝗍𝗋𝗂𝖻𝗎𝗇𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝗍𝖾𝗋𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾𝗊𝗎𝗂𝗉𝖺𝗌 𝗋𝖾𝖿𝗈𝗋𝖼̧𝖺𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝗈𝗎 𝗌𝖾 𝖺𝗌 𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖺𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝖺𝗉𝖾𝗇𝖺𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗉𝖾𝗇𝗌𝖺𝗋𝖺̃𝗈 𝗌𝖺ı́𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝖺𝗉𝗈𝗌𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝗈𝗎 𝗆𝗎𝖽𝖺𝗇𝖼̧𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝗌𝖾𝗋𝗏𝗂𝖼̧𝗈. 𝖳𝗋𝖺𝗍𝖺-𝗌𝖾 𝖽𝖾 𝗌𝖺𝖻𝖾𝗋 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗉𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗈𝖺𝗅 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝖺𝗋𝖺̃𝗈 𝖺𝗌 𝗌𝖾𝖼𝗋𝖾𝗍𝖺𝗋𝗂𝖺𝗌 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺𝗋 𝖺𝗌 𝖺𝗎𝖽𝗂𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗌 𝖾 𝖼𝗎𝗆𝗉𝗋𝗂𝗋 𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝗂𝗅𝗂𝗀𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖾𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗆𝗂𝗇𝖺𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝗉𝖾𝗅𝗈𝗌 𝗃𝗎ı́𝗓𝖾𝗌.

𝖮 𝖺𝗉𝗈𝗂𝗈 𝖺𝗈 𝗍𝗋𝖺𝖻𝖺𝗅𝗁𝗈 𝗃𝗎𝖽𝗂𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗅 𝖾𝗑𝗂𝗀𝖾 𝖺𝗂𝗇𝖽𝖺 𝖺𝗌𝗌𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗈𝗋𝖾𝗌 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝖺 𝗉𝖾𝗌𝗊𝗎𝗂𝗌𝖺 𝗃𝗎𝗋ı́𝖽𝗂𝖼𝖺 𝖾 𝖺 𝖺𝗇𝖺́𝗅𝗂𝗌𝖾 𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝗈𝖼𝗎𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾𝗑𝗍𝖾𝗇𝗌𝖺, 𝗉𝖾𝗅𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖺 𝖽𝗂𝗌𝖼𝗎𝗌𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝗈𝗋𝖼̧𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺𝗅 𝖽𝖾𝗏𝖾 𝖾𝗌𝖼𝗅𝖺𝗋𝖾𝖼𝖾𝗋 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗏𝖾𝗋𝖻𝖺𝗌 𝖾 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖼𝖺𝗅𝖾𝗇𝖽𝖺́𝗋𝗂𝗈 𝗉𝖾𝗋𝗆𝗂𝗍𝗂𝗋𝖺̃𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗅𝗈𝖼𝖺́-𝗅𝗈𝗌 𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝗍𝗋𝗂𝖻𝗎𝗇𝖺𝗂𝗌.

𝖳𝖺𝗆𝖻𝖾́𝗆 𝗈 𝗋𝖾𝖿𝗈𝗋𝖼̧𝗈 𝖽𝖺 𝖿𝗈𝗋𝗆𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖺𝗇𝗎𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝗇𝗈 𝗋𝖾𝗅𝖺𝗍𝗈́𝗋𝗂𝗈 𝖾𝗑𝗂𝗀𝖾 𝗆𝖾𝗂𝗈𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗉𝖾𝗋𝗆𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗆 𝖺𝗈𝗌 𝗃𝗎ı́𝗓𝖾𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖼𝗂𝗅𝗂𝖺𝗋 𝗈 𝗌𝖾𝗋𝗏𝗂𝖼̧𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗎𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖺𝗏𝖺𝗇𝖼̧𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗋𝖾𝗅𝖾𝗏𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗌 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝖺𝗌 𝗌𝗎𝖺𝗌 𝖿𝗎𝗇𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌, 𝗉𝗈𝗂𝗌 𝖺 𝗂𝗇𝗌𝗎𝖿𝗂𝖼𝗂𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝗋𝖾𝖼𝗎𝗋𝗌𝗈𝗌 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖾𝗏𝖾 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝖾𝗆 𝖼𝖺𝗎𝗌𝖺 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗅𝗂𝖿𝗂𝖼𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖾́ 𝖿𝗎𝗇𝖽𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺𝗅.

𝖭𝗈 𝖽𝗈𝗆ı́𝗇𝗂𝗈 𝖽𝖺 𝖽𝗂𝗀𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗅𝗂𝗓𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈, 𝗈 𝗈𝖻𝗃𝖾𝗍𝗂𝗏𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖺𝗎𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺𝗋 𝖺 𝖼𝖾𝗅𝖾𝗋𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝗌𝗎𝗋𝗀𝖾 𝖺𝗌𝗌𝗈𝖼𝗂𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝖺𝗈 𝗂𝗇𝗏𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝗋𝖾𝖺𝗅𝗂𝗓𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝖾 𝖺 𝗎𝗆 𝖼𝗋𝖾𝗌𝖼𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝟤𝟧% 𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝗇𝗈𝗍𝗂𝖿𝗂𝖼𝖺𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝖾𝗅𝖾𝗍𝗋𝗈́𝗇𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗌 𝖺 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝗍𝗂𝖼𝗎𝗅𝖺𝗋𝖾𝗌, 𝗂𝗇𝖽𝗂𝖼𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗋𝖾𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗉𝖾𝗋𝗆𝗂𝗍𝖾𝗆, 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝗌𝗂 𝗌𝗈́, 𝖺𝗏𝖺𝗅𝗂𝖺𝗋 𝗌𝖾 𝗈𝗌 𝗌𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖾𝗆𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖾𝗂𝗑𝖺𝗆 𝖽𝖾 𝖿𝖺𝗅𝗁𝖺𝗋 𝗈𝗎 𝗌𝖾 𝖾𝗅𝗂𝗆𝗂𝗇𝖺𝗆 𝗍𝖺𝗋𝖾𝖿𝖺𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗌𝗈𝗆𝖾𝗆 𝗍𝖾𝗆𝗉𝗈 𝖺𝗈𝗌 𝗃𝗎ı́𝗓𝖾𝗌. 𝖠 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗏𝗂𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖼𝖾𝗋𝖼𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝟧𝟤 𝗆𝗂𝗅𝗁𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖾𝗎𝗋𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝖽𝗂𝗀𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗅𝗂𝗓𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾 𝗂𝗇𝖿𝗋𝖺𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗋𝗎𝗍𝗎𝗋𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖾𝗏𝖾, 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝗂𝗌𝗌𝗈, 𝗌𝖾𝗋 𝖺𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗉𝖺𝗇𝗁𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝖽𝖺 𝗂𝖽𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗂𝖿𝗂𝖼𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝗏𝖾𝗋𝖻𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗂𝗇𝖺𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝖺̀ 𝗆𝖺𝗇𝗎𝗍𝖾𝗇𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾 𝖺̀ 𝖼𝗈𝗋𝗋𝖾𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖿𝖺𝗅𝗁𝖺𝗌, 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝗉𝗋𝖺𝗓𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗈𝗅𝗎𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾 𝖺𝗉𝗈𝗂𝗈 𝗍𝖾́𝖼𝗇𝗂𝖼𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖺𝖻𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗃𝖺 𝗈𝗌 𝗍𝗎𝗋𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝖾 𝗈 𝗌𝖾𝗋𝗏𝗂𝖼̧𝗈 𝗎𝗋𝗀𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾.

𝖠 𝖽𝖾𝖿𝗂𝗇𝗂𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾 𝖺 𝖺𝗏𝖺𝗅𝗂𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗌 𝖿𝖾𝗋𝗋𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖾𝗏𝖾𝗆 𝖾𝗇𝗏𝗈𝗅𝗏𝖾𝗋 𝗈𝗌 𝗃𝗎ı́𝗓𝖾𝗌, 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝖾𝗏𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗋 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗇𝗈𝗏𝖺𝗌 𝖺𝗉𝗅𝗂𝖼𝖺𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝖾𝗅𝗂𝗆𝗂𝗇𝖾𝗆 𝖿𝗎𝗇𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗅𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾𝗌 𝗇𝖾𝖼𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖺́𝗋𝗂𝖺𝗌 𝖺𝗈 𝗍𝗋𝖺𝖻𝖺𝗅𝗁𝗈 𝗃𝗎𝖽𝗂𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗅, 𝗂𝗆𝗉𝗈𝗇𝗁𝖺𝗆 𝖺 𝗋𝖾𝗉𝖾𝗍𝗂𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗈𝗉𝖾𝗋𝖺𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝗈𝗎 𝗅𝗁𝖾𝗌 𝖺𝖼𝗋𝖾𝗌𝖼𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗆 𝗍𝖺𝗋𝖾𝖿𝖺𝗌 𝖺𝖽𝗆𝗂𝗇𝗂𝗌𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗏𝖺𝗌.

𝖮 𝗈𝖻𝗃𝖾𝗍𝗂𝗏𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖺𝗎𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺𝗋 𝖺 𝖼𝖾𝗅𝖾𝗋𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝖼𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗎𝖺𝗅 𝖽𝖾𝗏𝖾, 𝖺𝗌𝗌𝗂𝗆, 𝗌𝖾𝗋 𝖺𝗉𝗋𝖾𝖼𝗂𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝖺̀ 𝗅𝗎𝗓 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗆𝖾𝗂𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝗂𝗌𝗉𝗈𝗇ı́𝗏𝖾𝗂𝗌. 𝖰𝗎𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝖺 𝖿𝖺𝗅𝗍𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝗉𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗈𝖺𝗅, 𝖽𝖾 𝖺𝗌𝗌𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗈𝗋𝗂𝖺 𝗈𝗎 𝖽𝖾 𝖾𝗊𝗎𝗂𝗉𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝗈𝖻𝗋𝗂𝗀𝖺 𝗈𝗌 𝗃𝗎ı́𝗓𝖾𝗌 𝖺 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗅𝗈𝗇𝗀𝖺𝗋 𝗌𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖾𝗆𝖺𝗍𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝗈 𝗍𝗋𝖺𝖻𝖺𝗅𝗁𝗈, 𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾𝗅𝖾𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗌𝗎𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗍𝖺𝗆 𝗈𝗌 𝖾𝗇𝖼𝖺𝗋𝗀𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖺𝗌 𝗂𝗇𝗌𝗎𝖿𝗂𝖼𝗂𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗌. 𝖢𝗈𝗋𝗋𝗂𝗀𝗂-𝗅𝖺𝗌 𝖾́ 𝗂𝗇𝖽𝗂𝗌𝗉𝖾𝗇𝗌𝖺́𝗏𝖾𝗅 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗆𝖾𝗅𝗁𝗈𝗋𝖺𝗋 𝖺 𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗉𝗈𝗌𝗍𝖺 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗍𝗋𝗂𝖻𝗎𝗇𝖺𝗂𝗌, 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗌𝖾𝗋𝗏𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝗈 𝗍𝖾𝗆𝗉𝗈 𝗇𝖾𝖼𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖺́𝗋𝗂𝗈 𝖺̀ 𝗉𝗈𝗇𝖽𝖾𝗋𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖾𝖼𝗂𝗌𝗈̃𝖾𝗌, 𝖺𝗌𝗌𝖾𝗀𝗎𝗋𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖽𝗂𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗈 𝖾𝗑𝖾𝗋𝖼ı́𝖼𝗂𝗈 𝖽𝗈 𝖽𝗂𝗋𝖾𝗂𝗍𝗈 𝖺̀ 𝖿𝗈𝗋𝗆𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾 𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗉𝖾𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝗂𝗋𝖾𝗂𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗃𝗎ı́𝗓𝖾𝗌 𝖺̀ 𝗌𝖺𝗎́𝖽𝖾, 𝖺𝗈 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝖼𝖺𝗇𝗌𝗈 𝖾 𝖺̀ 𝗏𝗂𝖽𝖺 𝗉𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗈𝖺𝗅 𝖾 𝖿𝖺𝗆𝗂𝗅𝗂𝖺𝗋.

* Secretária Geral sa Associação Sindical dos Juízes Portugueses

IN "SÁBADO"- 30/10/26 .