.
.
26/03/2023
LEONOR ROSAS
.
As coisas queas mulheres explicam
O nosso conhecimento é
persistentemente masculino e branco, patriarcal e colonial.
Epistemologicamente, continuamos a reproduzir uma mensagem óbvia: os
saberes das mulheres, das pessoas racializadas e do Sul global não
merecem ser colocados no mesmo patamar que os supracitados..𝑅𝑒𝑏𝑒𝑐𝑐𝑎 𝑆𝑜𝑙𝑛𝑖𝑡, 𝑛𝑜 𝑙𝑖𝑣𝑟𝑜 𝑀𝑒𝑛 𝐸𝑥𝑝𝑙𝑎𝑖𝑛 𝑇𝘩𝑖𝑛𝑔𝑠 𝑡𝑜 𝑀𝑒 (𝟸𝟶𝟷𝟺), 𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑐𝑟𝑒𝑣𝑒 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑠𝑒́𝑟𝑖𝑒 𝑑𝑒 𝘩𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑜́𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑠 𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑔𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑐𝑎𝑟𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑡𝑎𝑠 - 𝑒, 𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒, 𝑓𝑎𝑚𝑖𝑙𝑖𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑠 𝑎 𝑡𝑜𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑛𝑜́𝑠 - 𝑑𝑒 𝘩𝑜𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑠 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑠𝑒 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑝𝑜̃𝑒𝑚 𝑎 𝑒𝑥𝑝𝑙𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑟-𝑙𝘩𝑒 𝑡𝑢𝑑𝑜, 𝑖𝑛𝑐𝑙𝑢𝑠𝑖𝑣𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑜 𝑡𝑒𝑚𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑢𝑚 𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑠𝑒𝑢𝑠 𝑙𝑖𝑣𝑟𝑜𝑠. 𝑆𝑒 𝑜 𝑡𝑜𝑚 𝑐𝑜́𝑚𝑖𝑐𝑜 𝑛𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑒𝑖𝑥𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑢𝑚 𝑠𝑜𝑟𝑟𝑖𝑠𝑜, 𝑎𝑜 𝑙𝑒𝑟 𝑎 𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑐𝑟𝑖𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑒 𝑎𝑏𝑠𝑢𝑟𝑑𝑜 𝑚𝑎𝑛𝑠𝑝𝑙𝑎𝑖𝑛𝑖𝑛𝑔, 𝑎 𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝑒́ 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑛𝑜𝑠 𝑟𝑖𝑚𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑒𝑙𝑒 𝑝𝑜𝑟𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝘩𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑚𝑜𝑠 𝑏𝑒𝑚 𝑑𝑒𝑚𝑎𝑖𝑠: 𝑡𝑜𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑖𝑎𝑠 𝑓𝑎𝑚𝑖𝑙𝑖𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑠, 𝑐𝑜𝑙𝑒𝑔𝑎𝑠, 𝑎𝑚𝑖𝑔𝑜𝑠 𝑒 𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑐𝑜𝑛𝘩𝑒𝑐𝑖𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑠𝑒 𝑜𝑓𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑚 “𝑠𝑖𝑚𝑝𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒” 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑛𝑜𝑠 𝑒𝑥𝑝𝑙𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑟 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑜 𝑓𝑢𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑎 𝑜 𝑛𝑜𝑠𝑠𝑜 𝑚𝑢𝑛𝑑𝑜, 𝑎𝑡𝑒́ 𝑚𝑒𝑠𝑚𝑜 𝑜𝑠 𝑡𝑒𝑚𝑎𝑠 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑢𝑑𝑎𝑚𝑜𝑠. 𝑁𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑒 𝑚𝑒̂𝑠 𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑚𝑢𝑙𝘩𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑠, 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑒 𝑎𝑟𝑡𝑖𝑔𝑜 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑐𝑢𝑟𝑎𝑟𝑎́ 𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑎𝑟 𝑏𝑟𝑒𝑣𝑒𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑎 𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑠𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑏𝑙𝑒𝑚𝑎́𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑎 𝑟𝑒𝑙𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑒 𝑎𝑠 𝑚𝑢𝑙𝘩𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑠 𝑒 𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝘩𝑒𝑐𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜. 𝑄𝑢𝑎𝑙 𝑒́ 𝑜 𝑛𝑜𝑠𝑠𝑜 𝑙𝑢𝑔𝑎𝑟 𝑛𝑜 𝑒𝑛𝑠𝑖𝑛𝑜 𝑒 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑑𝑢𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝘩𝑒𝑐𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜? 𝑂𝑛𝑑𝑒 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑚𝑜𝑠 𝑛𝑜𝑠 𝑐𝑢𝑟𝑟𝑖́𝑐𝑢𝑙𝑜𝑠 𝑒𝑠𝑐𝑜𝑙𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑠? 𝑂 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑝𝑜𝑑𝑒𝑚𝑜𝑠 𝑓𝑎𝑧𝑒𝑟 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑚𝑢𝑑𝑎𝑟 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑒 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑑𝑖𝑔𝑚𝑎?
𝐶𝑜𝑚𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑚𝑜𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑎𝑙𝑔𝑢𝑛𝑠 𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑠𝑖𝑚𝑝𝑙𝑒𝑠 𝑠𝑜𝑏𝑟𝑒 𝑎𝑠 𝑚𝑢𝑙𝘩𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑠 𝑛𝑜 𝐸𝑛𝑠𝑖𝑛𝑜 𝑆𝑢𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑜𝑟 𝑒𝑚 𝑃𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑢𝑔𝑎𝑙. 𝐷𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝟸𝟶𝟸𝟶 𝑖𝑛𝑑𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑚 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑒 𝑜𝑠 𝟹𝟷 𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑠 𝑜𝑢 𝑟𝑒𝑖𝑡𝑜𝑟𝑒𝑠 𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑢𝑛𝑖𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑠𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒𝑠 𝑒 𝑝𝑜𝑙𝑖𝑡𝑒́𝑐𝑛𝑖𝑐𝑜𝑠 𝑝𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑢𝑔𝑢𝑒𝑠𝑒𝑠, 𝑎𝑝𝑒𝑛𝑎𝑠 𝑐𝑖𝑛𝑐𝑜 𝑠𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑚 𝑚𝑢𝑙𝘩𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑠. 𝑁𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑡𝑜𝑐𝑎 𝑎𝑜𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑟𝑝𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑜𝑐𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑠, 𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑝𝑜𝑑𝑒𝑚 𝑠𝑒𝑟 𝑒𝑛𝑔𝑎𝑛𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑟𝑒𝑠: 𝑠𝑒 𝑒𝑥𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑒 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑟𝑒𝑙𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑎 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑒 𝘩𝑜𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑠 𝑒 𝑚𝑢𝑙𝘩𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑠 𝑛𝑎 𝑏𝑎𝑠𝑒 𝑑𝑎 𝑐𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑖𝑟𝑎 — 𝑒𝑚 𝟸𝟶𝟷𝟾, 𝟻𝟻% 𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑜𝑐𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑠 𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑚 𝑑𝑜 𝑠𝑒𝑥𝑜 𝑚𝑎𝑠𝑐𝑢𝑙𝑖𝑛𝑜 𝑒 𝟺𝟻% 𝑑𝑜 𝑓𝑒𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑖𝑛𝑜 —, 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎 𝑒𝑠𝑔𝑜𝑡𝑎-𝑠𝑒 𝑎̀ 𝑚𝑒𝑑𝑖𝑑𝑎 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑠𝑒 𝑠𝑜𝑏𝑒 𝑛𝑎 𝑐𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑖𝑟𝑎. 𝑁𝑜 𝑡𝑜𝑝𝑜 𝑑𝑎 𝑚𝑒𝑠𝑚𝑎, 𝑎 𝑠𝑖𝑡𝑢𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑒́ 𝑏𝑒𝑚 𝑑𝑖𝑓𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒: 𝑎𝑝𝑒𝑛𝑎𝑠 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑒𝑚 𝑐𝑎𝑑𝑎 𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑡𝑟𝑜 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑓𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑜𝑟𝑒𝑠 𝑐𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑑𝑟𝑎́𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑜𝑠 (𝟸𝟻%) 𝑒́ 𝑑𝑜 𝑠𝑒𝑥𝑜 𝑓𝑒𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑖𝑛𝑜. 𝑃𝑎𝑟𝑡𝑖𝑚𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑝𝑜𝑠𝑖𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑖𝑔𝑢𝑎𝑙𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝑛𝑜 𝑠𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑚𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑒𝑛𝑠𝑖𝑛𝑜 𝑒 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑑𝑢𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝘩𝑒𝑐𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜. 𝐴 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑠 𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑡𝑎̃𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑐𝑟𝑒𝑡𝑜𝑠, 𝑗𝑢𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑚-𝑠𝑒 𝑎𝑠 𝑑𝑖𝑓𝑖𝑐𝑢𝑙𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑎 𝑑𝑢𝑝𝑙𝑎 𝑒 𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑝𝑙𝑎 𝑗𝑜𝑟𝑛𝑎𝑑𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑏𝑎𝑙𝘩𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑎𝑒𝑚 𝑠𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑚𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑠𝑜𝑏𝑟𝑒 𝑎𝑠 𝑚𝑢𝑙𝘩𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑠, 𝑜𝑏𝑟𝑖𝑔𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑜-𝑎𝑠 𝑎 𝑒𝑠𝑐𝑜𝑙𝘩𝑒𝑟 𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑒 𝑎 𝑚𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑛𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝑒 𝑎 𝑒𝑥𝑐𝑒𝑙𝑒̂𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑎 𝑎𝑐𝑎𝑑𝑒́𝑚𝑖𝑐𝑎 𝑒 𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑝𝑒𝑡𝑢𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑑𝑖𝑣𝑖𝑠𝑎̃𝑜 𝑝𝑎𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑟𝑐𝑎𝑙 𝑑𝑜 𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑏𝑎𝑙𝘩𝑜 𝑑𝑜𝑚𝑒́𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑜. 𝐴 𝑡𝑢𝑑𝑜 𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑜, 𝑠𝑜𝑚𝑎𝑚𝑜𝑠 𝑎𝑖𝑛𝑑𝑎 𝑜𝑢𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑜𝑛𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑠 𝑚𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑑𝑖𝑓𝑖𝑐𝑖𝑙𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑓𝑖𝑐𝑎́𝑣𝑒𝑖𝑠 𝑒𝑚 𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑡𝑖́𝑡𝑖𝑠𝑐𝑜𝑠 𝑡𝑎̃𝑜 𝑠𝑖𝑚𝑝𝑙𝑒𝑠: 𝑜 𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑐𝑒𝑖𝑡𝑜 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑢𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑎𝑙 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑎 𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝑑𝑜 𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑏𝑎𝑙𝘩𝑜 𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑚𝑢𝑙𝘩𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑠, 𝑎 𝑖𝑚𝑝𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑢𝑛𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑒 𝑣𝑖𝑜𝑙𝑒̂𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑎 𝑠𝑒𝑥𝑢𝑎𝑙 𝑛𝑜𝑠 𝑒𝑠𝑝𝑎𝑐̧𝑜𝑠 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑑𝑒𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑚 𝑠𝑒𝑟 𝑑𝑒 𝑓𝑟𝑢𝑖𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑙𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑢𝑎𝑙 𝑜𝑢 𝑜𝑠 𝑓𝑎𝑚𝑜𝑠𝑜𝑠 𝑚𝑎𝑛𝑠𝑝𝑙𝑎𝑖𝑛𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑒 𝑚𝑎𝑛𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑢𝑝𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑔.
𝑂𝑙𝘩𝑒𝑚𝑜𝑠, 𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑎̃𝑜, 𝑏𝑟𝑒𝑣𝑒𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒, 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑜𝑠 𝑐𝑢𝑟𝑟𝑖́𝑐𝑢𝑙𝑜𝑠 𝑎𝑐𝑎𝑑𝑒́𝑚𝑖𝑐𝑜𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑜𝑠 𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑛𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑒𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑚𝑜𝑠 𝑚𝑎𝑙 𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑚𝑜𝑠 𝑛𝑜 𝐸𝑛𝑠𝑖𝑛𝑜 𝑆𝑢𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑜𝑟. 𝑄𝑢𝑒𝑚 𝑠𝑎̃𝑜 𝑜𝑠 𝑓𝑢𝑛𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑟𝑒𝑠 𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑐𝑖𝑒̂𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑠 𝑠𝑜𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑖𝑠? 𝑊𝑒𝑏𝑒𝑟, 𝐷𝑢𝑟𝑘𝘩𝑒𝑖𝑚 𝑒 𝑀𝑎𝑟𝑥: 𝑡𝑟𝑒̂𝑠 𝘩𝑜𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑠 𝑏𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑐𝑜𝑠 𝑒𝑢𝑟𝑜𝑝𝑒𝑢𝑠. 𝑄𝑢𝑒𝑚 𝑠𝑎̃𝑜 𝑜𝑠 𝑓𝑖𝑙𝑜́𝑠𝑜𝑓𝑜𝑠 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑢𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑎𝑚 𝑜 𝑛𝑜𝑠𝑠𝑜 𝑝𝑒𝑛𝑠𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜? 𝐴𝑟𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑜́𝑡𝑒𝑙𝑒𝑠, 𝑃𝑙𝑎𝑡𝑎̃𝑜, 𝑇𝑜𝑚𝑎́𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝐴𝑞𝑢𝑖𝑛𝑜, 𝐻𝑢𝑚𝑒, 𝐿𝑜𝑐𝑘𝑒, 𝑆𝑡𝑢𝑎𝑟𝑡 𝑀𝑖𝑙𝑙: 𝑠𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑟𝑒 𝘩𝑜𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑠 𝑏𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑐𝑜𝑠. 𝑄𝑢𝑒𝑚 𝑠𝑎̃𝑜 𝑜𝑠 𝑔𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑒𝑠 𝑐𝑖𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑠 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑎𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑚 𝑛𝑜𝑠 𝑛𝑜𝑠𝑠𝑜𝑠 𝑚𝑎𝑛𝑢𝑎𝑖𝑠? 𝐸𝑖𝑛𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑖𝑛, 𝐺𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑙𝑒𝑢 𝑜𝑢 𝐷𝑎𝑟𝑤𝑖𝑛? 𝑈𝑚𝑎 𝑣𝑒𝑧 𝑚𝑎𝑖𝑠, 𝑜 𝑚𝑒𝑠𝑚𝑜. 𝑇𝑎𝑙𝑣𝑒𝑧 𝑀𝑎𝑟𝑖𝑒 𝐶𝑢𝑟𝑖𝑒 𝑒 𝑆𝑖𝑚𝑜𝑛𝑒 𝑑𝑒 𝐵𝑒𝑎𝑢𝑣𝑜𝑖𝑟 𝑝𝑜𝑠𝑠𝑎𝑚 𝑠𝑒𝑟 𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑝𝑜𝑢𝑐𝑎𝑠 𝑒𝑥𝑐𝑒𝑐̧𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑎𝑠 𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑛𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑒𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑚𝑜𝑠 𝑎𝑜 𝑙𝑜𝑛𝑔𝑜 𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑛𝑜𝑠𝑠𝑜𝑠 𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑐𝑢𝑟𝑠𝑜𝑠 𝑎𝑐𝑎𝑑𝑒́𝑚𝑖𝑐𝑜𝑠. 𝑂 𝑛𝑜𝑠𝑠𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝘩𝑒𝑐𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜 𝑒́ 𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑠𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑚𝑎𝑠𝑐𝑢𝑙𝑖𝑛𝑜 𝑒 𝑏𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑐𝑜, 𝑝𝑎𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑟𝑐𝑎𝑙 𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑙𝑜𝑛𝑖𝑎𝑙. 𝐸𝑝𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑚𝑜𝑙𝑜𝑔𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒, 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑢𝑎𝑚𝑜𝑠 𝑎 𝑟𝑒𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑑𝑢𝑧𝑖𝑟 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑠𝑎𝑔𝑒𝑚 𝑜́𝑏𝑣𝑖𝑎: 𝑜𝑠 𝑠𝑎𝑏𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑠 𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑚𝑢𝑙𝘩𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑠, 𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑝𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑜𝑎𝑠 𝑟𝑎𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑧𝑎𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑒 𝑑𝑜 𝑆𝑢𝑙 𝑔𝑙𝑜𝑏𝑎𝑙 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑚𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑚 𝑠𝑒𝑟 𝑐𝑜𝑙𝑜𝑐𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑛𝑜 𝑚𝑒𝑠𝑚𝑜 𝑝𝑎𝑡𝑎𝑚𝑎𝑟 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑜𝑠 𝑠𝑢𝑝𝑟𝑎𝑐𝑖𝑡𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑠.
𝐷𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑎 𝑈𝑁𝐸𝑆𝐶𝑂 𝑑𝑖𝑧𝑒𝑚-𝑛𝑜𝑠 𝑞𝑢𝑒, 𝑚𝑢𝑛𝑑𝑖𝑎𝑙𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒, 𝑎𝑝𝑒𝑛𝑎𝑠 𝟹𝟶% 𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑐𝑖𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑠 𝑠𝑎̃𝑜 𝑚𝑢𝑙𝘩𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑠. 𝑂 𝑐𝑎𝑚𝑖𝑛𝘩𝑜 𝑎𝑖𝑛𝑑𝑎 𝑒́ 𝑙𝑜𝑛𝑔𝑜 𝑒 𝑎𝑠 𝑚𝑢𝑑𝑎𝑛𝑐̧𝑎𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑖𝑠𝑎𝑚𝑜𝑠 𝑠𝑎̃𝑜 𝑛𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑎𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑢𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑎𝑖𝑠. 𝑁𝑎̃𝑜 𝑜𝑏𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑒, 𝘩𝑎́ 𝑝𝑒𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑛𝑎𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑖𝑠𝑎𝑠 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑡𝑜𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑒 𝑡𝑜𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑝𝑜𝑑𝑒𝑚𝑜𝑠 𝑓𝑎𝑧𝑒𝑟 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑏𝑢𝑖𝑟 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑚𝑢𝑑𝑎𝑛𝑐̧𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑑𝑖𝑔𝑚𝑎. 𝑁𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑒 𝑚𝑒̂𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑚𝑎𝑟𝑐̧𝑜, 𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑜 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑒 𝑎𝑟𝑡𝑖𝑔𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑎𝑙𝑔𝑢𝑚𝑎𝑠 𝑠𝑢𝑔𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑜𝑟𝑖𝑧𝑎𝑟 𝑎 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑑𝑢𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑙𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑢𝑎𝑙 𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑚𝑢𝑙𝘩𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑠. 𝑁𝑎 𝑓𝑖𝑐𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑒 𝑛𝑎 𝑐𝑖𝑒̂𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑎, 𝑒𝑠𝑐𝑜𝑙𝘩𝑎𝑚 𝑙𝑒𝑟 𝑚𝑢𝑙𝘩𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑠 𝑒 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑐𝑢𝑟𝑒𝑚 𝑐𝑖𝑡𝑎́-𝑙𝑎𝑠 𝑛𝑜𝑠 𝑣𝑜𝑠𝑠𝑜𝑠 𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑏𝑎𝑙𝘩𝑜𝑠. 𝑁𝑎̃𝑜 𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑢𝑚𝑎𝑚 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑢𝑚 𝑎𝑢𝑡𝑜𝑟 𝑒́ 𝑢𝑚 𝘩𝑜𝑚𝑒𝑚 𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑎𝑝𝑒𝑛𝑎𝑠 𝑙𝑒̂𝑒𝑚 𝑢𝑚 𝑎𝑝𝑒𝑙𝑖𝑑𝑜. 𝑁𝑎̃𝑜 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑎𝑚 𝑚𝑢𝑙𝘩𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑠, 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑙𝘩𝑒𝑠 𝑒𝑥𝑝𝑙𝑖𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑚 𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑒𝑙𝑎𝑠 𝑗𝑎́ 𝑠𝑎𝑏𝑒𝑚 𝑒 𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑝𝑒𝑖𝑡𝑒𝑚 𝑜 𝑠𝑒𝑢 𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑏𝑎𝑙𝘩𝑜..* Licenciada em Ciência Política e Relações Internacionais na NOVA-FCSH. Mestranda em Antropologia sobre colonialismo, memória e espaço público na FCSH. Deputada na AM de Lisboa pelo Bloco de Esquerda. Activista estudantil e feminista.
IN "gerador.eu" -18/03/23
.
.
𝑅𝑒𝑏𝑒𝑐𝑐𝑎 𝑆𝑜𝑙𝑛𝑖𝑡, 𝑛𝑜 𝑙𝑖𝑣𝑟𝑜 𝑀𝑒𝑛 𝐸𝑥𝑝𝑙𝑎𝑖𝑛 𝑇𝘩𝑖𝑛𝑔𝑠 𝑡𝑜 𝑀𝑒 (𝟸𝟶𝟷𝟺), 𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑐𝑟𝑒𝑣𝑒 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑠𝑒́𝑟𝑖𝑒 𝑑𝑒 𝘩𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑜́𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑠 𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑔𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑐𝑎𝑟𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑡𝑎𝑠 - 𝑒, 𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒, 𝑓𝑎𝑚𝑖𝑙𝑖𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑠 𝑎 𝑡𝑜𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑛𝑜́𝑠 - 𝑑𝑒 𝘩𝑜𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑠 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑠𝑒 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑝𝑜̃𝑒𝑚 𝑎 𝑒𝑥𝑝𝑙𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑟-𝑙𝘩𝑒 𝑡𝑢𝑑𝑜, 𝑖𝑛𝑐𝑙𝑢𝑠𝑖𝑣𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑜 𝑡𝑒𝑚𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑢𝑚 𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑠𝑒𝑢𝑠 𝑙𝑖𝑣𝑟𝑜𝑠. 𝑆𝑒 𝑜 𝑡𝑜𝑚 𝑐𝑜́𝑚𝑖𝑐𝑜 𝑛𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑒𝑖𝑥𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑢𝑚 𝑠𝑜𝑟𝑟𝑖𝑠𝑜, 𝑎𝑜 𝑙𝑒𝑟 𝑎 𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑐𝑟𝑖𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑒 𝑎𝑏𝑠𝑢𝑟𝑑𝑜 𝑚𝑎𝑛𝑠𝑝𝑙𝑎𝑖𝑛𝑖𝑛𝑔, 𝑎 𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝑒́ 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑛𝑜𝑠 𝑟𝑖𝑚𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑒𝑙𝑒 𝑝𝑜𝑟𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝘩𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑚𝑜𝑠 𝑏𝑒𝑚 𝑑𝑒𝑚𝑎𝑖𝑠: 𝑡𝑜𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑖𝑎𝑠 𝑓𝑎𝑚𝑖𝑙𝑖𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑠, 𝑐𝑜𝑙𝑒𝑔𝑎𝑠, 𝑎𝑚𝑖𝑔𝑜𝑠 𝑒 𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑐𝑜𝑛𝘩𝑒𝑐𝑖𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑠𝑒 𝑜𝑓𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑚 “𝑠𝑖𝑚𝑝𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒” 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑛𝑜𝑠 𝑒𝑥𝑝𝑙𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑟 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑜 𝑓𝑢𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑎 𝑜 𝑛𝑜𝑠𝑠𝑜 𝑚𝑢𝑛𝑑𝑜, 𝑎𝑡𝑒́ 𝑚𝑒𝑠𝑚𝑜 𝑜𝑠 𝑡𝑒𝑚𝑎𝑠 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑢𝑑𝑎𝑚𝑜𝑠. 𝑁𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑒 𝑚𝑒̂𝑠 𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑚𝑢𝑙𝘩𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑠, 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑒 𝑎𝑟𝑡𝑖𝑔𝑜 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑐𝑢𝑟𝑎𝑟𝑎́ 𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑎𝑟 𝑏𝑟𝑒𝑣𝑒𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑎 𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑠𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑏𝑙𝑒𝑚𝑎́𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑎 𝑟𝑒𝑙𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑒 𝑎𝑠 𝑚𝑢𝑙𝘩𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑠 𝑒 𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝘩𝑒𝑐𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜. 𝑄𝑢𝑎𝑙 𝑒́ 𝑜 𝑛𝑜𝑠𝑠𝑜 𝑙𝑢𝑔𝑎𝑟 𝑛𝑜 𝑒𝑛𝑠𝑖𝑛𝑜 𝑒 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑑𝑢𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝘩𝑒𝑐𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜? 𝑂𝑛𝑑𝑒 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑚𝑜𝑠 𝑛𝑜𝑠 𝑐𝑢𝑟𝑟𝑖́𝑐𝑢𝑙𝑜𝑠 𝑒𝑠𝑐𝑜𝑙𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑠? 𝑂 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑝𝑜𝑑𝑒𝑚𝑜𝑠 𝑓𝑎𝑧𝑒𝑟 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑚𝑢𝑑𝑎𝑟 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑒 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑑𝑖𝑔𝑚𝑎?
𝐶𝑜𝑚𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑚𝑜𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑎𝑙𝑔𝑢𝑛𝑠 𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑠𝑖𝑚𝑝𝑙𝑒𝑠 𝑠𝑜𝑏𝑟𝑒 𝑎𝑠 𝑚𝑢𝑙𝘩𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑠 𝑛𝑜 𝐸𝑛𝑠𝑖𝑛𝑜 𝑆𝑢𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑜𝑟 𝑒𝑚 𝑃𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑢𝑔𝑎𝑙. 𝐷𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝟸𝟶𝟸𝟶 𝑖𝑛𝑑𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑚 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑒 𝑜𝑠 𝟹𝟷 𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑠 𝑜𝑢 𝑟𝑒𝑖𝑡𝑜𝑟𝑒𝑠 𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑢𝑛𝑖𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑠𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒𝑠 𝑒 𝑝𝑜𝑙𝑖𝑡𝑒́𝑐𝑛𝑖𝑐𝑜𝑠 𝑝𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑢𝑔𝑢𝑒𝑠𝑒𝑠, 𝑎𝑝𝑒𝑛𝑎𝑠 𝑐𝑖𝑛𝑐𝑜 𝑠𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑚 𝑚𝑢𝑙𝘩𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑠. 𝑁𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑡𝑜𝑐𝑎 𝑎𝑜𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑟𝑝𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑜𝑐𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑠, 𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑝𝑜𝑑𝑒𝑚 𝑠𝑒𝑟 𝑒𝑛𝑔𝑎𝑛𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑟𝑒𝑠: 𝑠𝑒 𝑒𝑥𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑒 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑟𝑒𝑙𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑎 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑒 𝘩𝑜𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑠 𝑒 𝑚𝑢𝑙𝘩𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑠 𝑛𝑎 𝑏𝑎𝑠𝑒 𝑑𝑎 𝑐𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑖𝑟𝑎 — 𝑒𝑚 𝟸𝟶𝟷𝟾, 𝟻𝟻% 𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑜𝑐𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑠 𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑚 𝑑𝑜 𝑠𝑒𝑥𝑜 𝑚𝑎𝑠𝑐𝑢𝑙𝑖𝑛𝑜 𝑒 𝟺𝟻% 𝑑𝑜 𝑓𝑒𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑖𝑛𝑜 —, 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎 𝑒𝑠𝑔𝑜𝑡𝑎-𝑠𝑒 𝑎̀ 𝑚𝑒𝑑𝑖𝑑𝑎 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑠𝑒 𝑠𝑜𝑏𝑒 𝑛𝑎 𝑐𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑖𝑟𝑎. 𝑁𝑜 𝑡𝑜𝑝𝑜 𝑑𝑎 𝑚𝑒𝑠𝑚𝑎, 𝑎 𝑠𝑖𝑡𝑢𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑒́ 𝑏𝑒𝑚 𝑑𝑖𝑓𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒: 𝑎𝑝𝑒𝑛𝑎𝑠 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑒𝑚 𝑐𝑎𝑑𝑎 𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑡𝑟𝑜 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑓𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑜𝑟𝑒𝑠 𝑐𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑑𝑟𝑎́𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑜𝑠 (𝟸𝟻%) 𝑒́ 𝑑𝑜 𝑠𝑒𝑥𝑜 𝑓𝑒𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑖𝑛𝑜. 𝑃𝑎𝑟𝑡𝑖𝑚𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑝𝑜𝑠𝑖𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑖𝑔𝑢𝑎𝑙𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝑛𝑜 𝑠𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑚𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑒𝑛𝑠𝑖𝑛𝑜 𝑒 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑑𝑢𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝘩𝑒𝑐𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜. 𝐴 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑠 𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑡𝑎̃𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑐𝑟𝑒𝑡𝑜𝑠, 𝑗𝑢𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑚-𝑠𝑒 𝑎𝑠 𝑑𝑖𝑓𝑖𝑐𝑢𝑙𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑎 𝑑𝑢𝑝𝑙𝑎 𝑒 𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑝𝑙𝑎 𝑗𝑜𝑟𝑛𝑎𝑑𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑏𝑎𝑙𝘩𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑎𝑒𝑚 𝑠𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑚𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑠𝑜𝑏𝑟𝑒 𝑎𝑠 𝑚𝑢𝑙𝘩𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑠, 𝑜𝑏𝑟𝑖𝑔𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑜-𝑎𝑠 𝑎 𝑒𝑠𝑐𝑜𝑙𝘩𝑒𝑟 𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑒 𝑎 𝑚𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑛𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝑒 𝑎 𝑒𝑥𝑐𝑒𝑙𝑒̂𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑎 𝑎𝑐𝑎𝑑𝑒́𝑚𝑖𝑐𝑎 𝑒 𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑝𝑒𝑡𝑢𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑑𝑖𝑣𝑖𝑠𝑎̃𝑜 𝑝𝑎𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑟𝑐𝑎𝑙 𝑑𝑜 𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑏𝑎𝑙𝘩𝑜 𝑑𝑜𝑚𝑒́𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑜. 𝐴 𝑡𝑢𝑑𝑜 𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑜, 𝑠𝑜𝑚𝑎𝑚𝑜𝑠 𝑎𝑖𝑛𝑑𝑎 𝑜𝑢𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑜𝑛𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑠 𝑚𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑑𝑖𝑓𝑖𝑐𝑖𝑙𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑓𝑖𝑐𝑎́𝑣𝑒𝑖𝑠 𝑒𝑚 𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑡𝑖́𝑡𝑖𝑠𝑐𝑜𝑠 𝑡𝑎̃𝑜 𝑠𝑖𝑚𝑝𝑙𝑒𝑠: 𝑜 𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑐𝑒𝑖𝑡𝑜 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑢𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑎𝑙 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑎 𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝑑𝑜 𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑏𝑎𝑙𝘩𝑜 𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑚𝑢𝑙𝘩𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑠, 𝑎 𝑖𝑚𝑝𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑢𝑛𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑒 𝑣𝑖𝑜𝑙𝑒̂𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑎 𝑠𝑒𝑥𝑢𝑎𝑙 𝑛𝑜𝑠 𝑒𝑠𝑝𝑎𝑐̧𝑜𝑠 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑑𝑒𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑚 𝑠𝑒𝑟 𝑑𝑒 𝑓𝑟𝑢𝑖𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑙𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑢𝑎𝑙 𝑜𝑢 𝑜𝑠 𝑓𝑎𝑚𝑜𝑠𝑜𝑠 𝑚𝑎𝑛𝑠𝑝𝑙𝑎𝑖𝑛𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑒 𝑚𝑎𝑛𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑢𝑝𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑔.
𝑂𝑙𝘩𝑒𝑚𝑜𝑠, 𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑎̃𝑜, 𝑏𝑟𝑒𝑣𝑒𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒, 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑜𝑠 𝑐𝑢𝑟𝑟𝑖́𝑐𝑢𝑙𝑜𝑠 𝑎𝑐𝑎𝑑𝑒́𝑚𝑖𝑐𝑜𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑜𝑠 𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑛𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑒𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑚𝑜𝑠 𝑚𝑎𝑙 𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑚𝑜𝑠 𝑛𝑜 𝐸𝑛𝑠𝑖𝑛𝑜 𝑆𝑢𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑜𝑟. 𝑄𝑢𝑒𝑚 𝑠𝑎̃𝑜 𝑜𝑠 𝑓𝑢𝑛𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑟𝑒𝑠 𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑐𝑖𝑒̂𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑠 𝑠𝑜𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑖𝑠? 𝑊𝑒𝑏𝑒𝑟, 𝐷𝑢𝑟𝑘𝘩𝑒𝑖𝑚 𝑒 𝑀𝑎𝑟𝑥: 𝑡𝑟𝑒̂𝑠 𝘩𝑜𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑠 𝑏𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑐𝑜𝑠 𝑒𝑢𝑟𝑜𝑝𝑒𝑢𝑠. 𝑄𝑢𝑒𝑚 𝑠𝑎̃𝑜 𝑜𝑠 𝑓𝑖𝑙𝑜́𝑠𝑜𝑓𝑜𝑠 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑢𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑎𝑚 𝑜 𝑛𝑜𝑠𝑠𝑜 𝑝𝑒𝑛𝑠𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜? 𝐴𝑟𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑜́𝑡𝑒𝑙𝑒𝑠, 𝑃𝑙𝑎𝑡𝑎̃𝑜, 𝑇𝑜𝑚𝑎́𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝐴𝑞𝑢𝑖𝑛𝑜, 𝐻𝑢𝑚𝑒, 𝐿𝑜𝑐𝑘𝑒, 𝑆𝑡𝑢𝑎𝑟𝑡 𝑀𝑖𝑙𝑙: 𝑠𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑟𝑒 𝘩𝑜𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑠 𝑏𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑐𝑜𝑠. 𝑄𝑢𝑒𝑚 𝑠𝑎̃𝑜 𝑜𝑠 𝑔𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑒𝑠 𝑐𝑖𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑠 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑎𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑚 𝑛𝑜𝑠 𝑛𝑜𝑠𝑠𝑜𝑠 𝑚𝑎𝑛𝑢𝑎𝑖𝑠? 𝐸𝑖𝑛𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑖𝑛, 𝐺𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑙𝑒𝑢 𝑜𝑢 𝐷𝑎𝑟𝑤𝑖𝑛? 𝑈𝑚𝑎 𝑣𝑒𝑧 𝑚𝑎𝑖𝑠, 𝑜 𝑚𝑒𝑠𝑚𝑜. 𝑇𝑎𝑙𝑣𝑒𝑧 𝑀𝑎𝑟𝑖𝑒 𝐶𝑢𝑟𝑖𝑒 𝑒 𝑆𝑖𝑚𝑜𝑛𝑒 𝑑𝑒 𝐵𝑒𝑎𝑢𝑣𝑜𝑖𝑟 𝑝𝑜𝑠𝑠𝑎𝑚 𝑠𝑒𝑟 𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑝𝑜𝑢𝑐𝑎𝑠 𝑒𝑥𝑐𝑒𝑐̧𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑎𝑠 𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑛𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑒𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑚𝑜𝑠 𝑎𝑜 𝑙𝑜𝑛𝑔𝑜 𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑛𝑜𝑠𝑠𝑜𝑠 𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑐𝑢𝑟𝑠𝑜𝑠 𝑎𝑐𝑎𝑑𝑒́𝑚𝑖𝑐𝑜𝑠. 𝑂 𝑛𝑜𝑠𝑠𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝘩𝑒𝑐𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜 𝑒́ 𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑠𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑚𝑎𝑠𝑐𝑢𝑙𝑖𝑛𝑜 𝑒 𝑏𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑐𝑜, 𝑝𝑎𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑟𝑐𝑎𝑙 𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑙𝑜𝑛𝑖𝑎𝑙. 𝐸𝑝𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑚𝑜𝑙𝑜𝑔𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒, 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑢𝑎𝑚𝑜𝑠 𝑎 𝑟𝑒𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑑𝑢𝑧𝑖𝑟 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑠𝑎𝑔𝑒𝑚 𝑜́𝑏𝑣𝑖𝑎: 𝑜𝑠 𝑠𝑎𝑏𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑠 𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑚𝑢𝑙𝘩𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑠, 𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑝𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑜𝑎𝑠 𝑟𝑎𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑧𝑎𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑒 𝑑𝑜 𝑆𝑢𝑙 𝑔𝑙𝑜𝑏𝑎𝑙 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑚𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑚 𝑠𝑒𝑟 𝑐𝑜𝑙𝑜𝑐𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑛𝑜 𝑚𝑒𝑠𝑚𝑜 𝑝𝑎𝑡𝑎𝑚𝑎𝑟 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑜𝑠 𝑠𝑢𝑝𝑟𝑎𝑐𝑖𝑡𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑠.
𝐷𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑎 𝑈𝑁𝐸𝑆𝐶𝑂 𝑑𝑖𝑧𝑒𝑚-𝑛𝑜𝑠 𝑞𝑢𝑒, 𝑚𝑢𝑛𝑑𝑖𝑎𝑙𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒, 𝑎𝑝𝑒𝑛𝑎𝑠 𝟹𝟶% 𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑐𝑖𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑠 𝑠𝑎̃𝑜 𝑚𝑢𝑙𝘩𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑠. 𝑂 𝑐𝑎𝑚𝑖𝑛𝘩𝑜 𝑎𝑖𝑛𝑑𝑎 𝑒́ 𝑙𝑜𝑛𝑔𝑜 𝑒 𝑎𝑠 𝑚𝑢𝑑𝑎𝑛𝑐̧𝑎𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑖𝑠𝑎𝑚𝑜𝑠 𝑠𝑎̃𝑜 𝑛𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑎𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑢𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑎𝑖𝑠. 𝑁𝑎̃𝑜 𝑜𝑏𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑒, 𝘩𝑎́ 𝑝𝑒𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑛𝑎𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑖𝑠𝑎𝑠 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑡𝑜𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑒 𝑡𝑜𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑝𝑜𝑑𝑒𝑚𝑜𝑠 𝑓𝑎𝑧𝑒𝑟 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑏𝑢𝑖𝑟 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑚𝑢𝑑𝑎𝑛𝑐̧𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑑𝑖𝑔𝑚𝑎. 𝑁𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑒 𝑚𝑒̂𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑚𝑎𝑟𝑐̧𝑜, 𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑜 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑒 𝑎𝑟𝑡𝑖𝑔𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑎𝑙𝑔𝑢𝑚𝑎𝑠 𝑠𝑢𝑔𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑜𝑟𝑖𝑧𝑎𝑟 𝑎 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑑𝑢𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑙𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑢𝑎𝑙 𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑚𝑢𝑙𝘩𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑠. 𝑁𝑎 𝑓𝑖𝑐𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑒 𝑛𝑎 𝑐𝑖𝑒̂𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑎, 𝑒𝑠𝑐𝑜𝑙𝘩𝑎𝑚 𝑙𝑒𝑟 𝑚𝑢𝑙𝘩𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑠 𝑒 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑐𝑢𝑟𝑒𝑚 𝑐𝑖𝑡𝑎́-𝑙𝑎𝑠 𝑛𝑜𝑠 𝑣𝑜𝑠𝑠𝑜𝑠 𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑏𝑎𝑙𝘩𝑜𝑠. 𝑁𝑎̃𝑜 𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑢𝑚𝑎𝑚 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑢𝑚 𝑎𝑢𝑡𝑜𝑟 𝑒́ 𝑢𝑚 𝘩𝑜𝑚𝑒𝑚 𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑎𝑝𝑒𝑛𝑎𝑠 𝑙𝑒̂𝑒𝑚 𝑢𝑚 𝑎𝑝𝑒𝑙𝑖𝑑𝑜. 𝑁𝑎̃𝑜 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑎𝑚 𝑚𝑢𝑙𝘩𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑠, 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑙𝘩𝑒𝑠 𝑒𝑥𝑝𝑙𝑖𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑚 𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑒𝑙𝑎𝑠 𝑗𝑎́ 𝑠𝑎𝑏𝑒𝑚 𝑒 𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑝𝑒𝑖𝑡𝑒𝑚 𝑜 𝑠𝑒𝑢 𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑏𝑎𝑙𝘩𝑜.
.
* Licenciada em Ciência Política e Relações Internacionais na NOVA-FCSH. Mestranda em Antropologia sobre colonialismo, memória e espaço público na FCSH. Deputada na AM de Lisboa pelo Bloco de Esquerda. Activista estudantil e feminista
IN "gerador.eu" -18/03/23 .
.
.
CIII - VISITA GUIADA
Trilobites de Canelas/2
Arouca - PORTUGAL
* Viagem extraordinária pelos tesouros da História de Portugal superiormente apresentados por Paula Moura Pinheiro.
Mais uma notável produção da RTP
Mais uma notável produção da RTP
*
As nossas séries por episódios são editadas no mesmo dia da semana à
mesma hora, assim torna-se fácil se quiser visionar episódios
anteriores.
.
Subscrever:
Mensagens (Atom)