.
A VELHICE É UM POSTO!
.
21/11/2023
FERNANDA CÂNCIO
.
E como não
chegaríamos aqui?
"Ministério Público: como chegámos aqui?", perguntava ontem no Público
a procuradora geral adjunta Maria José Fernandes. Uma pergunta que se
responde no seu corajoso e lúcido texto de opinião: há muito que aqui
estávamos.
𝑄𝑢𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑙𝑖 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑒 𝑎𝑠 𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑠𝑐𝑟𝑖𝑐̧𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑒𝑠𝑐𝑢𝑡𝑎𝑠 𝑑𝑎 𝑂𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝐼𝑛𝑓𝑙𝑢𝑒𝑛𝑐𝑒𝑟 𝑡𝑖𝑛𝘩𝑎𝑚 𝑠𝑖𝑑𝑜 𝑑𝑒𝑡𝑒𝑡𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑣𝑎́𝑟𝑖𝑜𝑠 𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑜𝑠, 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑓𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑜 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑡𝑒𝑟 𝑎𝑐𝘩𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑠𝑢𝑟𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒. 𝐸 𝘩𝑎́ 𝑢𝑚 𝑚𝑜𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑜 𝑒𝑠𝑝𝑒𝑐𝑖́𝑓𝑖𝑐𝑜 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑎𝑝𝑒𝑛𝑎𝑠 𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑎𝑟 𝑠𝑒𝑟 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑙𝑒𝑡𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝘩𝑢𝑚𝑎𝑛𝑜; 𝑒́ 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑗𝑎́ 𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑒 𝑜 𝑔𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑜 𝑝𝑟𝑎𝑧𝑒𝑟 𝑑𝑒 𝑙𝑒𝑟 𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑠𝑐𝑟𝑖𝑐̧𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑒𝑠𝑐𝑢𝑡𝑎𝑠 𝑡𝑒𝑙𝑒𝑓𝑜́𝑛𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑠 𝑛𝑎𝑠 𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑓𝑢𝑖, 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑜 𝑠𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑠𝑡𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑙𝑒𝑟 𝑛𝑎 𝑖𝑚𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑠𝑎 𝑑𝑎 𝑒𝑠𝑝𝑒𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒, "𝑎𝑝𝑎𝑛𝘩𝑎𝑑𝑎" (𝑡𝑜𝑑𝑜 𝑢𝑚 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑔𝑟𝑎𝑚𝑎 𝑛𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎 𝑝𝑎𝑙𝑎𝑣𝑟𝑎) - 𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑑𝑖𝑧𝑒𝑟 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑓𝑢𝑖 𝑒𝑠𝑐𝑢𝑡𝑎𝑑𝑎 "𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑢𝑖𝑡𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒" 𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑙𝑖𝑔𝑢𝑒𝑖 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑛𝑢́𝑚𝑒𝑟𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑡𝑒𝑙𝑒𝑓𝑜𝑛𝑒 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑣𝑎𝑚 𝑠𝑜𝑏 𝑒𝑠𝑐𝑢𝑡𝑎 𝑝𝑜𝑟 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑡𝑒 𝑑𝑎 𝑗𝑢𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑐̧𝑎.
𝐻𝑎́ 𝑝𝑜𝑢𝑐𝑎𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑖𝑠𝑎𝑠 𝑚𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑛𝘩𝑎𝑠 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑙𝑒𝑟 𝑎 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑡𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑎𝑙𝑔𝑢𝑒́𝑚 𝑓𝑎𝑧 𝑑𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑠𝑎𝑠 𝑜𝑢 𝑑𝑒 𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑠𝑎𝑔𝑒𝑛𝑠 𝑡𝑒𝑙𝑒𝑓𝑜́𝑛𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑠 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑡𝑟𝑜𝑐𝑎́𝑚𝑜𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑜𝑢𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑠 𝑝𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑜𝑎𝑠. 𝐸 𝑑𝑖𝑔𝑜 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑡𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑝𝑜𝑟𝑞𝑢𝑒, 𝑛𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑖𝑟𝑎 𝑓𝑎𝑠𝑒 𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑐𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑜𝑠, 𝑎𝑞𝑢𝑖𝑙𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎́ 𝑛𝑎𝑠 𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑠𝑐𝑟𝑖𝑐̧𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑒́ 𝑜 𝑟𝑒𝑔𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑜 𝑒𝑥𝑎𝑡𝑜 𝑑𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑓𝑜𝑖 𝑑𝑖𝑡𝑜, 𝑚𝑎𝑠 𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑢𝑚𝑜𝑠, 𝑜𝑢 𝑠𝑒𝑗𝑎 𝑎𝑞𝑢𝑖𝑙𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑎𝑠 𝑝𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑜𝑎𝑠 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑒𝑠𝑐𝑢𝑡𝑎𝑚 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑚 "𝑜 𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑙" 𝑑𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑎𝑠 𝑝𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑜𝑎𝑠 𝑒𝑠𝑐𝑢𝑡𝑎𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑑𝑖𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑚.
𝑄𝑢𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑙𝑖 𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑠 𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑢𝑚𝑜𝑠 - 𝑚𝑢𝑖𝑡𝑜𝑠 𝑎𝑛𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑒𝑝𝑜𝑖𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑚𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑓𝑟𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑟 𝑐𝑜𝑚 "𝑛𝑜𝑡𝑖́𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑠" 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑝𝑜𝑟 𝑠𝑢𝑎 𝑣𝑒𝑧 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑡𝑎𝑣𝑎𝑚 𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑎𝑠 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑡𝑎𝑐̧𝑜̃𝑒𝑠, 𝑒 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑎𝑚 𝑝𝑢𝑏𝑙𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑜 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑐𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑜 𝑒𝑚 𝑐𝑎𝑢𝑠𝑎 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑒𝑟𝑎 𝑎𝑖𝑛𝑑𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑎𝑐𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑜 𝑝𝑢́𝑏𝑙𝑖𝑐𝑜, 𝑠𝑖𝑔𝑛𝑖𝑓𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑒𝑢 𝑝𝑟𝑜́𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑎 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑝𝑜𝑑𝑖𝑎 𝑠𝑒𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑟, 𝑛𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑎 𝑓𝑎𝑠𝑒, 𝑎𝑞𝑢𝑖𝑙𝑎𝑡𝑎𝑟 𝑑𝑎 𝑗𝑢𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑧𝑎 𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑡𝑎𝑐̧𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑗𝑜𝑟𝑛𝑎𝑙𝑖́𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑠 (𝑐𝘩𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑚𝑜𝑠-𝑙𝘩𝑒 𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑚, 𝑚𝑒𝑠𝑚𝑜 𝑠𝑒 𝑒𝑚 𝑚𝑢𝑖𝑡𝑜𝑠 𝑐𝑎𝑠𝑜𝑠 𝘩𝑎𝑣𝑖𝑎 𝑧𝑒𝑟𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑗𝑜𝑟𝑛𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑠𝑚𝑜, 𝑠𝑒 𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑖𝑑𝑜 𝑛𝑜 𝑟𝑖𝑔𝑜𝑟 𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑠𝑢𝑎𝑠 𝑟𝑒𝑔𝑟𝑎𝑠, 𝑛𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑎𝑠 "𝑛𝑜𝑡𝑖́𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑠") - 𝑚𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑣𝑖𝑙𝘩𝑒𝑖-𝑚𝑒 𝑑𝑢𝑝𝑙𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒. 𝑃𝑒𝑙𝑜 𝑓𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑠𝑎𝑠 𝑠𝑒𝑚 𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑙𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑟 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑒 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑎 𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑐𝑜𝑏𝑒𝑟𝑡𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑙𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑟 𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒 "𝑐𝑟𝑖𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑙" 𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑚 𝑠𝑖𝑑𝑜 𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑠𝑐𝑟𝑖𝑡𝑎𝑠 - 𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑖𝑚𝑝𝑙𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑣𝑎 𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑚 𝑠𝑖𝑑𝑜 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑜𝑟𝑎𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑝𝑜𝑟 𝑎𝑢𝑡𝑜𝑟𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝑗𝑢𝑑𝑖𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑜 𝑚𝑒𝑖𝑜 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑎 𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑐𝑜𝑏𝑒𝑟𝑡𝑎 𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑎 𝑚𝑒𝑠𝑚𝑎 𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒 - 𝑒 𝑝𝑒𝑙𝑎 𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑚𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑜 𝑡𝑖𝑛𝘩𝑎𝑚 𝑠𝑖𝑑𝑜 "𝑛𝑜𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑑𝑎𝑠".
𝐻𝑜𝑢𝑣𝑒 𝑝𝑜𝑟 𝑒𝑥𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑙𝑜 "𝑛𝑜𝑡𝑖́𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑠" 𝑒𝑚 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑚𝑒 𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑎𝑚 𝑎𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑏𝑢𝑖́𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑠𝑎𝑠 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑚 𝑎𝑓𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑙, 𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑐𝑒𝑏𝑖 𝑛𝑎𝑠 𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑠𝑐𝑟𝑖𝑐̧𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 (𝑒 𝑑𝑖𝑔𝑜 𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑐𝑒𝑏𝑖 𝑝𝑜𝑟𝑞𝑢𝑒, 𝑠𝑎𝑏𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑛𝑢𝑛𝑐𝑎 𝑎𝑠 𝑡𝑖𝑛𝘩𝑎 𝑡𝑖𝑑𝑜, 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝘩𝑎𝑣𝑖𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑜 𝑠𝑎𝑏𝑒𝑟 𝑝𝑜𝑟 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑟𝑎𝑖𝑜 𝑚𝑎𝑠 𝑎𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑏𝑢𝑖́𝑎𝑚), 𝑑𝑒 𝑜𝑢𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑠 𝑝𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑜𝑎𝑠 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑒𝑢; 𝘩𝑜𝑢𝑣𝑒 "𝑛𝑜𝑡𝑖́𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑠" 𝑒𝑚 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑚𝑒 𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑎𝑚 𝑖𝑚𝑝𝑢𝑡𝑎𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑐̧𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑡𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑖𝑛𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑠𝑎𝑠 𝑑𝑎𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑙𝑎𝑠 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑣𝑎𝑚 𝑒𝑚 𝑐𝑎𝑢𝑠𝑎 𝑛𝑎𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑠𝑎𝑠; 𝑒 𝘩𝑜𝑢𝑣𝑒 "𝑛𝑜𝑡𝑖́𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑠" 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑠𝑖𝑚𝑝𝑙𝑒𝑠𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑢𝑛𝑔𝑎𝑣𝑎𝑚 𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑡𝑎𝑐̧𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑡𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝑚𝑎́ 𝑓𝑒́ - 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑒́ 𝑝𝑜𝑠𝑠𝑖́𝑣𝑒𝑙 𝑐𝘩𝑎𝑚𝑎𝑟-𝑙𝘩𝑒 𝑜𝑢𝑡𝑟𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑖𝑠𝑎 - 𝑑𝑒 𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑚 𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑠𝑐𝑟𝑒𝑣𝑒𝑢.
𝐻𝑎́ 𝑚𝑢𝑖𝑡𝑜𝑠 𝑒𝑥𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑙𝑜𝑠, 𝑚𝑎𝑠 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑛𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑛𝑎 𝑒𝑠𝑝𝑎𝑐̧𝑜 𝑖𝑛𝑓𝑖𝑛𝑖𝑡𝑜, 𝑑𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑖 𝑎𝑝𝑒𝑛𝑎𝑠 𝑢𝑚: 𝑠𝑎𝑖́𝑟𝑎𝑚 "𝑛𝑜𝑡𝑖́𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑠" 𝑠𝑜𝑏𝑟𝑒 𝑎𝑞𝑢𝑖𝑙𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑠𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑎 𝑎 𝑛𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑢𝑚 𝑚𝑜𝑑𝑢𝑠 𝑜𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑖 𝑐𝑟𝑖𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑙 𝑑𝑒 𝑢𝑚 𝑎𝑟𝑔𝑢𝑖𝑑𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑜 𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑜-𝑚𝑒 𝑠𝑖𝑑𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑢𝑛𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑑𝑎 𝑝𝑜𝑟 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑝𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑜𝑎 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑣𝑖𝑟𝑖𝑎 𝑎 𝑠𝑒𝑟 𝑡𝑎𝑚𝑏𝑒́𝑚 𝑎𝑟𝑔𝑢𝑖𝑑𝑎 (𝑒 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑣𝑎 𝑗𝑎́ 𝑠𝑜𝑏 𝑒𝑠𝑐𝑢𝑡𝑎) 𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑎𝑓𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑙 𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑠𝑎 𝑒𝑚 𝑐𝑎𝑢𝑠𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑣𝑎 𝑑𝑎 𝑙𝑒𝑖𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑎 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑎 𝑝𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑜𝑎 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑣𝑎 𝑎 𝑓𝑎𝑧𝑒𝑟-𝑚𝑒 𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑗𝑜𝑟𝑛𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑟𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑛𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑒 𝑑𝑖𝑎, 𝑛𝑎 𝑠𝑒𝑞𝑢𝑒̂𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑎 𝑑𝑎 𝑑𝑒𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑡𝑟𝑒̂𝑠 𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑎𝑟𝑔𝑢𝑖𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑜 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑐𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑜. 𝐸𝑥𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑜𝑟𝑑𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒, 𝑛𝑜𝑠 𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑢𝑚𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑒𝑠𝑐𝑢𝑡𝑎𝑠, 𝑛𝑖𝑛𝑔𝑢𝑒́𝑚 𝑎𝑐𝘩𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑖𝑚𝑝𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑎𝑛𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑟 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑎𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑙𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑠𝑎 𝑒𝑟𝑎 𝑖𝑠𝑠𝑜 𝑚𝑒𝑠𝑚𝑜: 𝑎𝑙𝑔𝑢𝑒́𝑚 𝑎 𝑙𝑒𝑟 𝑛𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑎𝑠 𝑗𝑜𝑟𝑛𝑎𝑙𝑖́𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑠 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑝𝑜𝑟 𝑠𝑢𝑎 𝑣𝑒𝑧, 𝑒𝑚 𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑓𝑒𝑖𝑡𝑎 𝑝𝑒𝑠𝑐𝑎𝑑𝑖𝑛𝘩𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑟𝑎𝑏𝑜 𝑛𝑎 𝑏𝑜𝑐𝑎, 𝑠𝑒 𝑏𝑎𝑠𝑒𝑎𝑣𝑎𝑚 𝑛𝑎 𝑛𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑎 𝑑𝑎 𝑝𝑟𝑜́𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑎 𝑎𝑢𝑡𝑜𝑟𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝑗𝑢𝑑𝑖𝑐𝑖𝑎́𝑟𝑖𝑎 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑣𝑎 𝑎 𝑒𝑠𝑐𝑢𝑡𝑎𝑟 - 𝑒 𝑎 𝑚𝑖𝑛𝘩𝑎 𝑟𝑒𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑒 𝑑𝑎 𝑜𝑢𝑡𝑟𝑎 𝑝𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑜𝑎 𝑎 𝑡𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑟𝑒𝑣𝑒𝑙𝑎𝑐̧𝑜̃𝑒𝑠.
𝐶𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑚, 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑒 𝑎𝑡𝑒́ 𝑐𝑜́𝑚𝑖𝑐𝑜, 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑒́? 𝑆𝑢𝑐𝑒𝑑𝑒 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜, 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑡𝑒𝑚 𝑔𝑟𝑎𝑐̧𝑎 𝑛𝑒𝑛𝘩𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑐𝑒𝑏𝑒𝑟 𝑎 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑝𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑜 𝑠𝑒 𝑝𝑜𝑑𝑒 𝑐𝘩𝑒𝑔𝑎𝑟, 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑠𝑜́ 𝑛𝑜 𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑝𝑒𝑖𝑡𝑜 𝑝𝑒𝑙𝑎𝑠 𝑝𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑜𝑎𝑠, 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑜 (𝑡𝑎𝑙𝑣𝑒𝑧 𝑎𝑜 𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑜𝑠 𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑜 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑎 𝑚𝑎𝑖𝑜𝑟𝑖𝑎 - 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑡𝑎̃𝑜 𝑏𝑒𝑚 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑣𝑖𝑣𝑒𝑟 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑎 𝑑𝑒𝑣𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑎 𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑠 𝑣𝑒𝑧𝑒𝑠 𝑎𝑏𝑠𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑡𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑔𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑢𝑖𝑡𝑎, 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑜 𝑢́𝑛𝑖𝑐𝑜 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑢𝑖𝑡𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑎𝑐𝘩𝑖𝑛𝑐𝑎𝑙𝘩𝑎𝑟 𝑒 𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑢𝑖𝑟, 𝑑𝑎 𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑎 𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑜𝑢𝑡𝑟𝑜𝑠 - 𝑠𝑒𝑗𝑎 𝑟𝑒𝑙𝑒𝑣𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑒) 𝑛𝑜 𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑧𝑜 𝑝𝑜𝑟 𝑎𝑞𝑢𝑖𝑙𝑜 𝑎 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑠𝑡𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑐𝘩𝑎𝑚𝑎𝑟 𝑎 "𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝑚𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑙". 𝑄𝑢𝑒 𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑒 𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑧𝑜 𝑒𝑥𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑎 𝑛𝑜 𝑚𝑢𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑖𝑛𝑓𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑜 𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑡𝑎𝑏𝑙𝑜́𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑠 (𝑐𝑎𝑑𝑎 𝑣𝑒𝑧 𝑚𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝘩𝑒𝑔𝑒𝑚𝑜́𝑛𝑖𝑐𝑜 𝑛𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑢𝑛𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑠𝑜𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑙 𝑝𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑢𝑔𝑢𝑒𝑠𝑎, 𝑚𝑒𝑠𝑚𝑜 𝑛𝑜𝑠 𝑜́𝑟𝑔𝑎̃𝑜𝑠 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑠𝑒 𝑎𝑓𝑖𝑟𝑚𝑎𝑚 "𝑑𝑒 𝑟𝑒𝑓𝑒𝑟𝑒̂𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑎") 𝑒́ 𝑚𝑎𝑢 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑐𝘩𝑒𝑔𝑢𝑒; 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑡𝑎𝑟 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑎𝑠 𝑝𝑟𝑜́𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑠 𝑎𝑢𝑡𝑜𝑟𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒𝑠 𝑗𝑢𝑑𝑖𝑐𝑖𝑎́𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑠 𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑒𝑛𝘩𝑎𝑚 𝑒𝑚 𝑎𝑙𝑔𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑎 𝑔𝑟𝑎𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝑑𝑒 𝑒𝑠𝑐𝑢𝑡𝑎𝑠 𝑎 𝑠𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑒𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝑒 𝑜 𝑟𝑖𝑔𝑜𝑟 𝑑𝑒 𝑢𝑚 𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑙𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑟 𝑡𝑎𝑏𝑙𝑜𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑖𝑟𝑜 𝑒́ 𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑜𝑟𝑖𝑧𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑟 𝑒 𝑡𝑎𝑙𝑣𝑒𝑧 𝑒𝑥𝑝𝑙𝑖𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑝𝑜𝑟 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑚𝑜𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑜 𝘩𝑎́ 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑐𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑜𝑠 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑠𝑒 𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑎𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑚 𝑠𝑒𝑚 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑐𝑙𝑢𝑠𝑎̃𝑜 𝑎̀ 𝑣𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑎: 𝑐𝘩𝑎𝑚𝑎-𝑠𝑒 𝑚𝑢𝑖𝑡𝑜 𝑠𝑖𝑚𝑝𝑙𝑒𝑠𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑖𝑛𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑒𝑡𝑒̂𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑎.
𝐶𝑙𝑎𝑟𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑑𝑒𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑎, 𝑚𝑢𝑖𝑡𝑜 𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑛𝑜𝑣𝑒𝑚𝑏𝑟𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝟸𝟶𝟷𝟺 - 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑜 𝑒́ 𝑒𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒, 𝑡𝑒𝑛𝘩𝑜 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑠𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑟𝑒 𝑎 𝑓𝑎𝑙𝑎𝑟 𝑑𝑎 𝑚𝑖𝑛𝘩𝑎 𝑒𝑥𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑒̂𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑎 𝑝𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑜𝑎𝑙 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑜 𝑝𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑜𝑎 𝑒𝑠𝑐𝑢𝑡𝑎𝑑𝑎 𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑢𝑖𝑡𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑛𝑜 𝑎̂𝑚𝑏𝑖𝑡𝑜 𝑑𝑎 𝑂𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑀𝑎𝑟𝑞𝑢𝑒̂𝑠 -, 𝑠𝑎𝑏𝑒𝑟 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑎 𝑖𝑛𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑒𝑡𝑒̂𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑎 𝑚𝑎𝑙𝑒́𝑣𝑜𝑙𝑎, 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑓𝑎𝑧 𝑑𝑒 𝑖𝑛𝑞𝑢𝑒́𝑟𝑖𝑡𝑜𝑠 𝑗𝑢𝑑𝑖𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑐𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑐̧𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑜𝑠 𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑖𝑠, 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑟𝑎𝑟𝑜, 𝑠𝑒 𝑒𝑠𝑏𝑜𝑟𝑜𝑎𝑚 𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑎 𝑠𝑖𝑛𝑑𝑖𝑐𝑎̂𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑚𝑎𝑔𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑙𝑒𝑣𝑎𝑚 𝑎 𝑠𝑒́𝑟𝑖𝑜 𝑎 𝑠𝑢𝑎 𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑝𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑎𝑏𝑖𝑙𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝑑𝑒 𝑎𝑝𝑙𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑟 𝑎 𝑙𝑒𝑖 𝑠𝑒𝑚 𝑜𝑙𝘩𝑎𝑟 𝑎 𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑚, 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑒́ 𝑖𝑛𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑢𝑚 𝑛𝑎 𝑗𝑢𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑐̧𝑎 𝑝𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑢𝑔𝑢𝑒𝑠𝑎. 𝑁𝑢𝑛𝑐𝑎 𝑒𝑠𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑐𝑖 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑢𝑚 𝑑𝑜𝑠 "𝑖𝑛𝑑𝑖́𝑐𝑖𝑜𝑠" 𝑑𝑜 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑐𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑜 𝐶𝑎𝑠𝑎 𝑃𝑖𝑎 𝑎𝑝𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑒𝑚 "𝑛𝑜𝑡𝑖́𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑠" (𝑖𝑛𝑑𝑖́𝑐𝑖𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑞𝑢𝑒̂, 𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑑𝑒 𝑙𝑜𝑔𝑜?) 𝑒𝑟𝑎 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑠𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑃𝑎𝑢𝑙𝑜 𝑃𝑒𝑑𝑟𝑜𝑠𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑢𝑚 𝘩𝑜𝑚𝑒𝑚 𝑎 𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑚 𝑜 𝑒𝑥-𝑔𝑜𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑛𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑐𝘩𝑎𝑚𝑎𝑣𝑎 "𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑖𝑛𝑎" 𝑒 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑎 𝑖𝑛𝑣𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑔𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑒𝑔𝑢𝑖𝑟𝑎 𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑓𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑟 - 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑠𝑎 𝑞𝑢𝑒, 𝑣𝑖𝑒𝑚𝑜𝑠 𝑎 𝑠𝑎𝑏𝑒𝑟 𝑝𝑜𝑟𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑎 𝑝𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑜𝑎 𝑒𝑚 𝑐𝑎𝑢𝑠𝑎 𝑠𝑒 𝑟𝑒𝑣𝑒𝑙𝑜𝑢 𝑝𝑢𝑏𝑙𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒, 𝑒𝑟𝑎 𝑎𝑓𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑙 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑚𝑢𝑙𝘩𝑒𝑟 (𝑒, 𝑐𝑙𝑎𝑟𝑜, 𝑛𝑎𝑑𝑎 𝑡𝑖𝑛𝘩𝑎 𝑎 𝑣𝑒𝑟 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑜 𝑜𝑏𝑗𝑒𝑡𝑜 𝑑𝑎 𝑖𝑛𝑣𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑔𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜; 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑜 𝑒́ 𝑠𝑎𝑏𝑖𝑑𝑜, 𝑃𝑒𝑑𝑟𝑜𝑠𝑜, 𝑑𝑒𝑝𝑜𝑖𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑡𝑒𝑟 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑜 𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑣𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑚𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑠𝑒𝑖𝑠 𝑚𝑒𝑠𝑒𝑠, 𝑒 𝑑𝑒 𝑡𝑒𝑟 𝑎 𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑎 𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑢𝑖́𝑑𝑎 𝑝𝑒𝑙𝑎 𝑚𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑢𝑜𝑠𝑎 𝑠𝑢𝑠𝑝𝑒𝑖𝑡𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑎𝑏𝑢𝑠𝑜 𝑠𝑒𝑥𝑢𝑎𝑙 𝑑𝑒 𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑜𝑟𝑒𝑠, 𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑎 𝑜 𝑇𝑟𝑖𝑏𝑢𝑛𝑎𝑙 𝑑𝑒 𝐼𝑛𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑢𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝐶𝑟𝑖𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑙 𝑑𝑒𝑐𝑖𝑑𝑖𝑟, 𝑒𝑚 𝑚𝑎𝑖𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝟸𝟶𝟶𝟺, 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝘩𝑎𝑣𝑒𝑟 𝑖𝑛𝑑𝑖́𝑐𝑖𝑜𝑠 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑚𝑖𝑡𝑖𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑚 𝑙𝑒𝑣𝑎́-𝑙𝑜 𝑎 𝑗𝑢𝑙𝑔𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜, 𝑎𝑐𝑎𝑏𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑝𝑜𝑟, 𝟷𝟺 𝑎𝑛𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑒𝑝𝑜𝑖𝑠, 𝑔𝑎𝑛𝘩𝑎𝑟 𝑛𝑜 𝑇𝑟𝑖𝑏𝑢𝑛𝑎𝑙 𝐸𝑢𝑟𝑜𝑝𝑒𝑢 𝑑𝑒 𝐷𝑖𝑟𝑒𝑖𝑡𝑜𝑠 𝐻𝑢𝑚𝑎𝑛𝑜𝑠 𝑜 𝑑𝑖𝑟𝑒𝑖𝑡𝑜 𝑎 𝑠𝑒𝑟 𝑖𝑛𝑑𝑒𝑚𝑛𝑖𝑧𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑝𝑒𝑙𝑜 𝐸𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑃𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑢𝑔𝑢𝑒̂𝑠 𝑒𝑚 𝟼𝟾 𝑚𝑖𝑙 𝑒𝑢𝑟𝑜𝑠 𝑝𝑜𝑟 𝑡𝑒𝑟 𝑠𝑖𝑑𝑜 𝑣𝑖́𝑡𝑖𝑚𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑑𝑒𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑖𝑙𝑒𝑔𝑎𝑙).
𝑀𝑎𝑠 𝑚𝑒𝑠𝑚𝑜 𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑛𝑜𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑖𝑠𝑎𝑠 𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑎𝑠 𝑎𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑚, 𝑚𝑒𝑠𝑚𝑜 𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑜 𝑗𝑜𝑟𝑛𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑎 𝑟𝑒𝑝𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑠 𝑣𝑒𝑧𝑒𝑠 𝑠𝑜𝑏𝑟𝑒 𝑖𝑛𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑒𝑡𝑒̂𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑎 𝑒 𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑚𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑝𝑜𝑙𝑖́𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑠, 𝑑𝑜 𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑒́𝑟𝑖𝑜 𝑝𝑢́𝑏𝑙𝑖𝑐𝑜, 𝑑𝑒 𝑗𝑢𝑖́𝑧𝑒𝑠, 𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑠 𝑣𝑒𝑧𝑒𝑠 𝑚𝑒 𝑡𝑒𝑟 𝑑𝑒𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑠𝑖𝑡𝑢𝑎𝑐̧𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑖𝑛𝑗𝑢𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑐̧𝑎 𝑝𝑢𝑛𝑔𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑒 𝑟𝑒𝑣𝑜𝑙𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑒, 𝑛𝑢𝑛𝑐𝑎 𝑚𝑒 𝑡𝑖𝑛𝘩𝑎 𝑎𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑐𝑖𝑑𝑜 𝑎 𝑚𝑖𝑚 -- 𝑒 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝘩𝑎́ 𝑛𝑎𝑑𝑎, 𝑛𝑎 𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑚𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑜 𝑣𝑖𝑚𝑜𝑠 𝑒 𝑠𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑚𝑜𝑠 𝑎𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑖𝑠𝑎𝑠, 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑠𝑢𝑏𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑡𝑢𝑎 𝑎𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑟 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑛𝑜𝑠𝑐𝑜.
𝐸 𝑝𝑜𝑟𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑣𝑜𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑜 𝑡𝑢𝑑𝑜 𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑜? 𝑃𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑗𝑎́ 𝑝𝑜𝑟𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑜 𝑒𝑓𝑒𝑖𝑡𝑜 𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑠 "𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑜𝑠" (𝑐𝘩𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑚𝑜𝑠-𝑙𝘩𝑒𝑠 𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑚) 𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑑𝑢𝑟𝑎 𝑛𝑎 𝑚𝑖𝑛𝘩𝑎 𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑎, 𝑒 𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑑𝑢𝑟𝑎𝑟𝑎́ 𝑑𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑟𝑡𝑜 𝑎𝑡𝑒́ 𝑎𝑜 𝑠𝑒𝑢 𝑓𝑖𝑚, 𝑝𝑜𝑟 𝑚𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑎𝑐̧𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 (𝑒 𝑔𝑎𝑛𝘩𝑒) 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑎 𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑚 𝑞𝑢𝑖𝑠 𝑑𝑒𝑙𝑒𝑠 𝑓𝑎𝑧𝑒𝑟 𝑎 𝑚𝑖𝑛𝘩𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑑𝑒𝑛𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑛𝑎 𝑝𝑟𝑎𝑐̧𝑎 𝑝𝑢́𝑏𝑙𝑖𝑐𝑎 - 𝑗𝑎́ 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑓𝑢𝑖 𝑖𝑛𝑑𝑖𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑑𝑎 𝑓𝑜𝑠𝑠𝑒 𝑑𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑓𝑜𝑠𝑠𝑒, 𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑣𝑎 𝑖𝑠𝑠𝑜. 𝐸 𝑝𝑜𝑟𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑚 𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑟 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑠𝑒𝑗𝑎 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑒𝑡𝑒𝑢 𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑠 "𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑜𝑠" 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑢𝑎 𝑑𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑟𝑡𝑜 𝑎𝑙𝑒𝑔𝑟𝑒𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑎 𝑓𝑎𝑧𝑒𝑟 𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑓𝑎𝑧𝑖𝑎, 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑜 𝑓𝑎𝑧𝑖𝑎 - 𝑡𝑒𝑛𝘩𝑎-𝑠𝑒 𝑜𝑢 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑒𝑚𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑎 𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑚𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑜 "𝑖𝑛𝑣𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑔𝑎" 𝑒 𝑎𝑐𝑢𝑠𝑎 𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑢𝑙𝑡𝑎 𝑒𝑚 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑐𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑜𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑥𝑜𝑠, 𝑚𝑒𝑔𝑎𝑙𝑜́𝑚𝑎𝑛𝑜𝑠 𝑒 𝑖𝑛𝑓𝑖𝑛𝑑𝑎́𝑣𝑒𝑖𝑠 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑒𝑚𝑏𝑜𝑐𝑎𝑚 𝑒𝑚 𝑏𝑒𝑐𝑜𝑠 𝑠𝑒𝑚 𝑠𝑎𝑖́𝑑𝑎 𝑜𝑢 𝑛𝑎 𝑚𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑣𝑎́𝑣𝑒𝑙 𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑐𝑟𝑖𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜.
𝑃𝑜𝑟𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑛𝑢𝑛𝑐𝑎 𝑒𝑥𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑢 𝑎𝑞𝑢𝑖𝑙𝑜 𝑎 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑢𝑚 𝑒𝑥-𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑑𝑎 𝑅𝑒𝑝𝑢́𝑏𝑙𝑖𝑐𝑎 𝑑𝑒𝑢 𝑜 𝑛𝑜𝑚𝑒 𝑑𝑒 "𝑠𝑜𝑏𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑎𝑙𝑡𝑜 𝑐𝑖́𝑣𝑖𝑐𝑜" 𝑒𝑚 𝑟𝑒𝑙𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑎̀ 𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑚𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑟𝑟𝑢𝑝𝑡𝑎 𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑟𝑟𝑢𝑝𝑡𝑜𝑟𝑎 𝑑𝑜 𝑟𝑒𝑔𝑢𝑙𝑎𝑟 𝑓𝑢𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜 𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑖𝑛𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑡𝑢𝑖𝑐̧𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑑𝑒𝑚𝑜𝑐𝑟𝑎́𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑠 - 𝑒 𝑝𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑜 𝑑𝑎 𝑑𝑒𝑚𝑜𝑐𝑟𝑎𝑐𝑖𝑎 - 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑜 𝑜 𝑠𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑚𝑎 𝑗𝑢𝑑𝑖𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑙 𝑠𝑒 𝑡𝑒𝑚 𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑎 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑐𝑢𝑙𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑎 𝑗𝑜𝑟𝑛𝑎𝑙𝑖́𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑎 𝑡𝑎𝑏𝑙𝑜𝑖𝑑𝑒 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎, 𝑛𝑎𝑠 𝑝𝑎𝑙𝑎𝑣𝑟𝑎𝑠 𝑑𝑎 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑐𝑢𝑟𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑟𝑎 𝑔𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑙 𝑎𝑑𝑗𝑢𝑛𝑡𝑎 𝑀𝑎𝑟𝑖𝑎 𝐽𝑜𝑠𝑒́ 𝐹𝑒𝑟𝑛𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑒𝑠 𝑛𝑜 𝑠𝑒𝑢 𝑎𝑟𝑡𝑖𝑔𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑜𝑝𝑖𝑛𝑖𝑎̃𝑜 𝑛𝑜 𝑃𝑢́𝑏𝑙𝑖𝑐𝑜 ("𝑀𝑖𝑛𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑒́𝑟𝑖𝑜 𝑃𝑢́𝑏𝑙𝑖𝑐𝑜: 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑜 𝑐𝘩𝑒𝑔𝑎́𝑚𝑜𝑠 𝑎𝑞𝑢𝑖?") 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑖𝑛𝑐𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑖𝑜𝑢 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎 𝑠𝑒𝑔𝑢𝑛𝑑𝑎-𝑓𝑒𝑖𝑟𝑎, 𝑒𝑥𝑒𝑟𝑐𝑒𝑟 "𝑎 𝑖𝑛𝑣𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑔𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑐𝑟𝑖𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑙 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑜 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑒𝑥𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑠𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑝𝑜𝑑𝑒𝑟 𝑠𝑜𝑏𝑟𝑒 𝑜𝑢𝑡𝑟𝑜𝑠 𝑝𝑜𝑑𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑠, 𝑠𝑜𝑏𝑟𝑒𝑡𝑢𝑑𝑜 𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑛𝑎𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑒𝑧𝑎 𝑝𝑜𝑙𝑖́𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑎", 𝑠𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑚 𝑠𝑒 𝑜𝑝𝑜̃𝑒 𝑎 𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑎 𝑝𝑟𝑎́𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑎 "𝑟𝑜𝑡𝑢𝑙𝑎𝑑𝑜 [𝑑𝑒] 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑡𝑒𝑡𝑜𝑟 𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑟𝑟𝑢𝑝𝑡𝑜𝑠".
𝑃𝑜𝑟𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑎𝑙𝑔𝑢𝑒́𝑚 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑜 𝐴𝑛𝑡𝑜́𝑛𝑖𝑜 𝐶𝑜𝑠𝑡𝑎, 𝑚𝑎𝑙𝑔𝑟𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑡𝑒𝑟 𝑣𝑖𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑡𝑎̃𝑜 𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑡𝑜 𝑎𝑠 𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑠𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝑖𝑛𝑜𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑎́𝑣𝑒𝑖𝑠 𝑑𝑜 𝑃𝑟𝑜𝑐𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑜 𝐶𝑎𝑠𝑎 𝑃𝑖𝑎, 𝑛𝑢𝑛𝑐𝑎 𝑡𝑒𝑣𝑒 𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑟𝑎𝑔𝑒𝑚 𝑑𝑒 𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑟, 𝑚𝑒𝑠𝑚𝑜 𝑠𝑒 𝑎 𝑖𝑠𝑠𝑜 𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑎𝑓𝑖𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑝𝑜𝑟 𝑅𝑢𝑖 𝑅𝑖𝑜, 𝑝𝑒𝑛𝑠𝑎𝑟 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑚𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑓𝑎𝑧𝑒𝑟 𝑑𝑎 𝑗𝑢𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑐̧𝑎 𝑝𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑢𝑔𝑢𝑒𝑠𝑎 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑖𝑛𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑡𝑢𝑖𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑜𝑠 𝑚𝑎𝑛𝑜𝑏𝑟𝑎́𝑣𝑒𝑙 𝑝𝑜𝑟 𝑝𝑜𝑑𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑠 𝑜𝑐𝑢𝑙𝑡𝑜𝑠, 𝑚𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑒𝑓𝑖𝑐𝑖𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑒 𝑚𝑎𝑖𝑠 - 𝑝𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑒 𝑜 𝑝𝑙𝑒𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑠𝑚𝑜 - 𝑗𝑢𝑠𝑡𝑎. 𝑁𝑎̃𝑜 𝑐𝑎𝑏𝑒 𝑎𝑝𝑒𝑛𝑎𝑠 𝑎 𝐶𝑜𝑠𝑡𝑎, 𝑒𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒, 𝑜 𝑜́𝑛𝑢𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑛𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑠 𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑠𝑒 𝟻𝟶 𝑎𝑛𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑑𝑒𝑚𝑜𝑐𝑟𝑎𝑐𝑖𝑎 𝑛𝑎𝑑𝑎 𝑡𝑒𝑟 𝑠𝑖𝑑𝑜 𝑓𝑒𝑖𝑡𝑜 𝑛𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑒 𝑠𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑑𝑜, 𝑒 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑒́ 𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑝𝑖𝑐𝑖𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑒 𝑖𝑚𝑜𝑏𝑖𝑙𝑖𝑠𝑚𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑜 𝑃𝑆 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑗𝑎, 𝑣𝑎𝑖 𝑓𝑎𝑧𝑒𝑟 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑑𝑒́𝑐𝑎𝑑𝑎, 𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑜𝑚𝑏𝑟𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑝𝑒𝑙𝑎 𝑎𝑐𝑢𝑠𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑟𝑟𝑢𝑝𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑎 𝑢𝑚 𝑒𝑥-𝑠𝑒𝑐𝑟𝑒𝑡𝑎́𝑟𝑖𝑜-𝑔𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑙 𝑒 𝑒𝑥-𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑖𝑟𝑜-𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑖𝑑𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑜. 𝑀𝑎𝑠 𝑜 𝑠𝑒𝑢 - 𝑑𝑒 𝐶𝑜𝑠𝑡𝑎 𝑒 𝑑𝑜 𝑃𝑆 - 𝑡𝑎̃𝑜 𝑡𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑎 𝑞𝑢𝑎̃𝑜 𝑖𝑛𝑔𝑒́𝑛𝑢𝑜 "𝑎̀ 𝑗𝑢𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑐̧𝑎 𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑒́ 𝑑𝑎 𝑗𝑢𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑐̧𝑎, 𝑎̀ 𝑝𝑜𝑙𝑖́𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑎 𝑜𝑢 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑒́ 𝑑𝑎 𝑝𝑜𝑙𝑖́𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑎", 𝑒𝑛𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑜𝑢-𝑠𝑒 𝑎 𝟽 𝑑𝑒 𝑛𝑜𝑣𝑒𝑚𝑏𝑟𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑎 𝑠𝑎𝑟𝑐𝑎́𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑣𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑎 𝑠𝑢𝑎 𝑖𝑚𝑝𝑜𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑏𝑖𝑙𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒. 𝐴 𝑗𝑢𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑐̧𝑎 𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑜𝑚𝑏𝑜𝑢 𝑎 𝑝𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑎 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑛𝑢𝑛𝑐𝑎 𝑒𝑥𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑢.
𝐶𝑜𝑚𝑜 𝑐𝘩𝑒𝑔𝑎́𝑚𝑜𝑠 𝑎𝑞𝑢𝑖, 𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑔𝑢𝑛𝑡𝑎 𝑀𝑎𝑟𝑖𝑎 𝐽𝑜𝑠𝑒́ 𝐹𝑒𝑟𝑛𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑒𝑠 𝑛𝑜 𝑠𝑒𝑢 𝑐𝑜𝑟𝑎𝑗𝑜𝑠𝑜 𝑒 𝑙𝑢́𝑐𝑖𝑑𝑜 𝑎𝑟𝑡𝑖𝑔𝑜. 𝐶𝑜𝑚𝑜 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑐𝘩𝑒𝑔𝑎𝑟𝑖́𝑎𝑚𝑜𝑠, 𝑠𝑒 𝑗𝑎́ 𝑎𝑞𝑢𝑖 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎́𝑣𝑎𝑚𝑜𝑠 𝘩𝑎́ 𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑜 𝑡𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑜?
IN "DIÁRIO DE NOTÍCIAS" - 21/11/23 .
.
ⳲⲆⲘⲞⲊ ⲦⲞꓓⲞⲊ ⲘⲞⲄⲄⲈⲄ/10
ℌ𝔲𝔤𝔬 𝔳𝔞𝔫 𝔡𝔢𝔯 𝔇𝔦𝔫𝔤
𝔄𝔫𝔞 𝔐𝔞𝔯𝔨𝔩
𝔗𝔦𝔞𝔤𝔬 ℜ𝔦𝔟𝔢𝔦𝔯𝔬
Hυмσя є cσηнєcιмєηтσ єм ρσятυgυє̂ѕ (cσιѕα яαяα)
PASTORA IMPERIO
FONTE:
NR: A pretensão é através duma construção bem humorada diminuir a ignorância dos portugueses relativamente à vida de pessoas de bem sem ter alguma coisa a ver com o partido "que mais parece uma cloaca acústica"..
3619
Senso d'hoje
SARA TAVARES
CANTORA LUSÓFONA
DANIEL OLIVEIRA*
ENTREVISTA PARA
"SIC"
#ALTA DEFINIÇÃO#
SARA TAVARES
34 anos, sem maquilhagem,
no Alta Definição
* Director de Programas da SIC
FONTE: 
* Só por triste emoção nos atrevemos a editar uma entrevista efectuada há 12 anos. Sara Tavares distante dos palcos e das câmaras faz pairar sobre nós e ternamente, uma pacífica tristeza. Só por isso a choramos..
Subscrever:
Mensagens (Atom)