.
.
16/03/2022
.
III - ᚺᛁᛢᚾᛜ́ᚱᛁᚣ ᚧᚣ ᛖᚣᚾᛊᛖᚣ́ᚾᛁᛈᚣ ᚹᚣᚱᚣ ᚹᚱᛜᚪᛊᛢᛢᛜᚱᛊᛢ
ᛊ ᚾᚣᛖᛒᛊ́ᛖ ᚹᚣᚱᚣ ᛈⳘᚱᛁᛜᛢᛜᛢ
1 - Matemática pré-Euclidiana
* Professor: Tatiana Roque
FONTE: 
.
NR: Temos de novo a excelente professora que palestrou o capítulo I. O capítulo III mexe muito com os miolos por ser mais arrevesado mas se o seu interesse estiver de acordo com a sua inteligência vai ver todos os episódios mesmo que tenha de ver os últimos minutos do episódio anterior, é muita fumaça!
.
FERNANDA CÂNCIO
.
O partido dos fuzilados
𝖲𝖺̃𝗈 𝟤𝟢 𝖽𝗂𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗂𝗇𝗏𝖺𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺 𝗍𝖾𝗋𝖼̧𝖺-𝖿𝖾𝗂𝗋𝖺. 𝖠 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗈𝗋𝗂𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝗇𝗈́𝗌, 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗉𝖾𝗋𝖼𝖾𝖻𝖾 𝗇𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗍𝖾́𝗀𝗂𝖺 𝗆𝗂𝗅𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗋 𝗇𝖾𝗆 𝗌𝖺𝖻𝖾 𝖽𝖺 𝖽𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝖿𝗈𝗋𝖼̧𝖺𝗌 𝗇𝖾𝗆 𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝖼𝖺𝗋𝖺𝖼𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗂́𝗌𝗍𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝗈 𝖺𝗋𝗆𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝗂𝗌𝗉𝗈𝗇𝗂́𝗏𝖾𝗅 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝗈𝗂𝗌 𝗅𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌, 𝖾 𝗌𝗈𝖻𝗋𝖾 𝗂𝗌𝗌𝗈 𝗌𝖾 𝗅𝗂𝗆𝗂𝗍𝖺 𝖺 𝗅𝖾𝗋 𝖾 𝗈𝗎𝗏𝗂𝗋 𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗆 𝗌𝗎𝗉𝗈𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝗌𝖺𝖻𝖾 - 𝖾 𝗊𝗎𝖾, 𝖺 𝖺𝗍𝖾𝗇𝖽𝖾𝗋 𝖺 𝗆𝗎𝗂𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝗈𝗌 "𝗉𝖾𝗋𝗂𝗍𝗈𝗌" 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗏𝗈𝖼𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝖾𝗅𝖺𝗌 𝖳𝖵, 𝗇𝖾𝗆 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝗂𝗌𝗌𝗈 -, 𝖺𝖼𝗁𝖺𝗏𝖺, 𝗇𝗈 𝗂𝗇𝗂́𝖼𝗂𝗈, 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖺 𝖴𝖼𝗋𝖺̂𝗇𝗂𝖺 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝖺𝗀𝗎𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺𝗋𝗂𝖺 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗌𝖾𝗆𝖺𝗇𝖺. 𝖰𝗎𝖾 𝗂́𝖺𝗆𝗈𝗌 𝖺𝗌𝗌𝗂𝗌𝗍𝗂𝗋 𝖺 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗀𝖾́𝖽𝗂𝖺 𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗌𝖾 𝗂𝗇𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖺̂𝗇𝖾𝖺; 𝖺 𝗉𝗈𝗍𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝗆𝗂𝗅𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗋 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖺𝖼𝗋𝖾𝖽𝗂𝗍𝖺́𝗏𝖺𝗆𝗈𝗌 (𝖾 𝖺𝖼𝗋𝖾𝖽𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗆𝗈𝗌, 𝗍𝖾𝗆 𝗈 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗈𝗋 𝗉𝗈𝖽𝖾𝗋𝗂𝗈 𝗇𝗎𝖼𝗅𝖾𝖺𝗋 𝖽𝗈 𝗆𝗎𝗇𝖽𝗈, 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝖯𝗎𝗍𝗂𝗇 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗌𝖾 𝖼𝖺𝗇𝗌𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝗅𝖾𝗆𝖻𝗋𝖺𝗋) 𝗌𝖾𝗋 𝖺 𝖱𝗎́𝗌𝗌𝗂𝖺 𝖾𝗌𝗆𝖺𝗀𝖺𝗋𝗂𝖺 𝗌𝖾𝗆 𝖽𝗂𝖿𝗂𝖼𝗎𝗅𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝗈 𝗉𝖺𝗂́𝗌 𝗂𝗇𝗏𝖺𝖽𝗂𝖽𝗈, 𝖽𝖾𝗋𝗋𝗎𝖻𝖺𝗋𝗂𝖺 𝗌𝖾𝗆 𝗍𝖺𝗋𝖽𝖺𝗋 𝗈 𝗀𝗈𝗏𝖾𝗋𝗇𝗈 𝖾 𝖿𝖺𝗋𝗂𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝗌𝖾𝗀𝗎𝗂𝖽𝖺 𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗋𝖺𝗂𝗈 𝗉𝗅𝖺𝗇𝖾𝗈𝗎 𝖯𝗎𝗍𝗂𝗇 𝖿𝖺𝗓𝖾𝗋 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝖴𝖼𝗋𝖺̂𝗇𝗂𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗊𝗎𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖺𝖽𝖺 - 𝖾 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗇𝗂𝗇𝗀𝗎𝖾́𝗆, 𝖺𝗉𝗈́𝗌 𝗈 𝖿𝖺𝗅𝗁𝖺𝗇𝖼̧𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗍𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖺 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗏𝗂𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾 𝖺𝗇𝖺́𝗅𝗂𝗌𝖾, 𝗌𝖾 𝖺𝗍𝗋𝖾𝗏𝖾 𝖺 𝖺𝖽𝗂𝗏𝗂𝗇𝗁𝖺𝗋.
𝖯𝗈𝗂𝗌 𝖾𝗇𝗀𝖺𝗇𝖺́𝗆𝗈-𝗇𝗈𝗌. 𝖤, 𝖺̀ 𝗆𝖾𝖽𝗂𝖽𝖺 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖺 𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝗌𝖾 𝗏𝖺𝗂 𝖺𝗀𝗎𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝖾 𝖺𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗌𝖾𝗊𝗎𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺 𝗀𝗎𝖾𝗋𝗋𝖺, 𝖽𝗈 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝖺𝗌𝗍𝗋𝖾 𝗁𝗎𝗆𝖺𝗇𝗂𝗍𝖺́𝗋𝗂𝗈 𝖺̀𝗌 𝗈𝗇𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖼𝗁𝗈𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖾𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗈́𝗆𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗌, 𝗌𝖾 𝗏𝖺̃𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝖾𝖼̧𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝖺 𝖿𝖺𝗓𝖾𝗋 𝗌𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗂𝗋, 𝖼𝗋𝖾𝗌𝖼𝖾 𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗋𝗈 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖺𝖼𝗎𝗌𝖺𝗆 𝗈 𝗀𝗈𝗏𝖾𝗋𝗇𝗈 𝗎𝖼𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗂𝖺𝗇𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗋𝖾𝗋 𝗈 𝗆𝖾𝗅𝗁𝗈𝗋 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗈 𝗌𝖾𝗎 𝗉𝖺𝗂́𝗌, 𝖽𝖾 "𝖻𝗋𝖺𝗏𝖺𝗍𝖺", 𝖽𝖾 "𝖿𝖺𝗅𝗌𝗈𝗌 𝗁𝖾𝗋𝗈𝗂́𝗌𝗆𝗈𝗌", 𝖽𝖾 𝗎𝗌𝖺𝗋 𝗈 𝗉𝗈𝗏𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 "𝖾𝗌𝖼𝗎𝖽𝗈 𝗁𝗎𝗆𝖺𝗇𝗈", 𝖽𝖾 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗋 𝗌𝗈́ 𝖺𝗀𝗈𝗋𝖺 𝖺 𝖺𝖼𝖾𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗋 "𝗇𝖾𝗀𝗈𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗋" 𝖺𝗊𝗎𝗂𝗅𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝖺𝖼𝖾𝗂𝗍𝗈𝗎 𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝗈 𝖺𝗍𝖺𝗊𝗎𝖾. 𝖯𝗈𝗋𝗊𝗎𝖾, 𝖺𝖼𝖾𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗈, 𝗉𝗈𝖽𝖾𝗋𝗂𝖺 𝖾𝗏𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗋 𝖺 𝗆𝗈𝗋𝗍𝖺𝗇𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾, 𝗈 𝖾̂𝗑𝗈𝖽𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗋𝖾𝖿𝗎𝗀𝗂𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌, 𝗍𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖺 𝖽𝗈𝗋 𝖾 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝖾𝗌𝗉𝖾𝗋𝗈.
𝖤́ 𝗎𝗆 𝗋𝖺𝖼𝗂𝗈𝖼𝗂́𝗇𝗂𝗈 𝗂𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖾 𝗊𝗎𝖾, 𝗉𝖾𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝗈 𝗎𝗌𝗈 𝗂𝗅𝖾𝗀𝗂́𝗍𝗂𝗆𝗈 𝖽𝖺 𝖿𝗈𝗋𝖼̧𝖺, 𝗉𝖾𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖺 𝗂𝗇𝗏𝖺𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗎𝗆 𝗉𝖺𝗂́𝗌 𝗌𝗈𝖻𝖾𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗈 (𝗌𝖾 𝖼𝖺𝗅𝗁𝖺𝗋 𝖺 𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾́ 𝗆𝖾𝗌𝗆𝗈 𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖺: 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗏𝖾𝖾𝗆 𝖺 𝖴𝖼𝗋𝖺̂𝗇𝗂𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝗎𝗆 𝗉𝖺𝗂́𝗌 𝗌𝗈𝖻𝖾𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗈, 𝗈𝗎 𝗎𝗆 𝗏𝖾𝗋𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾𝗂𝗋𝗈 𝗉𝖺𝗂́𝗌, 𝖾 𝗇𝗂𝗌𝗌𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝗌𝖾 𝗌𝖺𝖻𝖾 𝗍𝖾̂𝗆 𝖾𝗆 𝖯𝗎𝗍𝗂𝗇 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗉𝖺𝗇𝗁𝗂𝖺), 𝖼𝗎𝗅𝗉𝖺 𝗈 𝗂𝗇𝗏𝖺𝖽𝗂𝖽𝗈 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗍𝖾𝗋 𝖺𝖼𝖾𝗂𝗍𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝖺𝗌 𝗂𝗆𝗉𝗈𝗌𝗂𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝗈 𝗂𝗇𝗏𝖺𝗌𝗈𝗋, 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗍𝖾𝗋 𝖽𝗂𝗍𝗈: "𝖤𝗁 𝗉𝖺́, 𝗌𝗂𝗆, 𝖼𝗅𝖺𝗋𝗈, 𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝗈 𝗇𝗈𝗌𝗌𝗈 𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗋𝗂𝗍𝗈́𝗋𝗂𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗋𝖾𝗆, 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝖺 𝗀𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖾𝗆𝖻𝗋𝗎𝗅𝗁𝖺𝗋? 𝖣𝖺́ 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗆𝗈𝗌 𝖿𝗈𝗋𝖼̧𝖺𝗌 𝖺𝗋𝗆𝖺𝖽𝖺𝗌, 𝗈𝗎 𝖾́ 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝖺𝖼𝖺𝖻𝖺𝗋 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝗍𝗎𝖽𝗈? 𝖥𝖺𝖼̧𝖺𝗆 𝖺𝗂́ 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗅𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖺 𝖽𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖽𝗈𝗋𝖺𝗏𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝗉𝗈𝖽𝖾𝗆𝗈𝗌 𝖾 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗉𝗈𝖽𝖾𝗆𝗈𝗌 𝖿𝖺𝗓𝖾𝗋, 𝗉𝗈𝖽𝖾𝗆𝗈𝗌 𝖾 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗉𝗈𝖽𝖾𝗆𝗈𝗌 𝗌𝖾𝗋, 𝖾 𝗇𝗈́𝗌 𝗈𝖻𝖾𝖽𝖾𝖼𝖾𝗆𝗈𝗌, 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖾́ 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗂𝗌𝗌𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖺𝗊𝗎𝗂 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗆𝗈𝗌."
𝖲𝖾 𝖼𝖺𝗅𝗁𝖺𝗋 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗈𝗎 𝖾𝗇𝗀𝖺𝗇𝖺𝖽𝖺, 𝗆𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗆𝖾 𝗅𝖾𝗆𝖻𝗋𝗈 𝖾́ 𝖽𝖾 𝗏𝖾𝗋 𝗆𝗎𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗌 𝗉𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗈𝖺𝗌, 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖺𝗀𝗈𝗋𝖺 𝗌𝖾 𝖾𝗇𝖿𝖺𝗌𝗍𝗂𝖺𝗆 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝖹𝖾𝗅𝖾𝗇𝗌𝗄𝗒 𝖾 𝗈 𝖺𝖼𝗎𝗌𝖺𝗆 𝖽𝖾 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗋 𝗇𝗎𝗆 𝖻𝗎𝗇𝗄𝖾𝗋 𝖺 𝖿𝖺𝗓𝖾𝗋 𝗏𝗂́𝖽𝖾𝗈𝗌 𝖾 𝗍𝗎𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗋, 𝖺 𝗍𝖾𝖼𝖾𝗋 𝗅𝗈𝖺𝗌 𝖺̀ 𝖼𝗈𝗋𝖺𝗀𝖾𝗆 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖾, 𝗆𝖾𝗌𝗆𝗈 𝗉𝖾𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝖽𝗂𝗌𝖼𝗋𝖾𝗉𝖺̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝖿𝗈𝗋𝖼̧𝖺𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝖺 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖾𝗑𝗂𝗌𝗍𝗂𝖺 𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖾 𝗈𝗌 𝗍𝗂𝗆𝗈𝗋𝖾𝗇𝗌𝖾𝗌 𝖾 𝗈𝗌 𝗂𝗇𝖽𝗈𝗇𝖾́𝗌𝗂𝗈𝗌, 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗂𝗇𝗎𝖺𝗋𝖺𝗆 𝖺 𝗅𝗎𝗍𝖺𝗋 - 𝗇𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖺 𝖺𝗅𝗍𝗎𝗋𝖺, 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗌𝖾 𝗋𝖾𝖼𝗈𝗆𝖾𝗇𝖽𝗈𝗎 𝖺𝖼𝖾𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗋 𝖺𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖽𝗂𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝗈 𝗂𝗇𝗏𝖺𝗌𝗈𝗋 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗉𝗈𝗎𝗉𝖺𝗋 𝗏𝗂𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝖾 𝗆𝖺𝖼̧𝖺𝖽𝖺𝗌, 𝗈𝗎 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗈𝗎 𝖾𝗊𝗎𝗂𝗏𝗈𝖼𝖺𝖽𝖺? 𝖭𝖾𝗆 𝗌𝖾 𝖿𝖾𝗓 𝗈 𝖾𝗅𝗈𝗀𝗂𝗈 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖾, 𝗋𝖾𝖺𝗅𝗉𝗈𝗅𝗂𝗍𝗂𝗄𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾, 𝗉𝗎𝗀𝗇𝖺𝗏𝖺𝗆 𝗉𝖾𝗅𝖺 "𝗉𝖺𝗓" 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝖺 𝖨𝗇𝖽𝗈𝗇𝖾́𝗌𝗂𝖺 - 𝗉𝖾𝗅𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖺́𝗋𝗂𝗈, 𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖾𝗌 𝖾𝗋𝖺𝗆 𝖺𝗉𝗈𝖽𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖼𝗎́𝗆𝗉𝗅𝗂𝖼𝖾𝗌 𝖾 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗓𝗂́𝗏𝖾𝗂𝗌.
𝖤́, 𝖾́ 𝗆𝖾𝗌𝗆𝗈 𝗂𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗍𝖺𝗋 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝗈𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗇𝗎𝗆𝖺𝗌 𝗌𝗂𝗍𝗎𝖺𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝗍𝖺𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝖾𝖿𝖾𝗇𝖽𝖾𝗆 𝖺 𝗉𝖺𝗓 𝗇𝗈𝗎𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗌 𝗀𝗅𝗈𝗋𝗂𝖿𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗆 𝖺 𝗀𝗎𝖾𝗋𝗋𝖺 - 𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗊𝗎𝖾, 𝗂𝗇𝖼𝗋𝗂𝗏𝖾𝗅𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾, 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖾𝖼𝖾 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗁𝖺́ 𝗀𝗎𝖾𝗋𝗋𝖺𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗌𝗂𝖽𝖾𝗋𝖺𝗆 𝗃𝗎𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗌.
𝖵𝖾𝗃𝖺-𝗌𝖾 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝖾𝗑𝖾𝗆𝗉𝗅𝗈 𝗈 𝖯𝖢𝖯, 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗍𝖺𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗉𝖺𝗅𝖺 𝗈 𝗌𝖾𝗎 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝖾𝗃𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗉𝖺𝗓 𝗇𝗈 𝖼𝖺𝗌𝗈 𝖽𝖺 𝗂𝗇𝗏𝖺𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖺 𝖴𝖼𝗋𝖺̂𝗇𝗂𝖺 𝗉𝖾𝗅𝖺 𝖱𝗎́𝗌𝗌𝗂𝖺 - 𝗌𝖾𝗆, 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗁𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾, 𝗃𝖺𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝖾𝗑𝗂𝗀𝗂𝗋 𝖺̀ 𝖱𝗎́𝗌𝗌𝗂𝖺 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖼𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖾 𝖺 𝗌𝗎𝖺 𝗂𝗇𝗏𝖺𝗌𝖺̃𝗈, 𝗉𝖺𝗅𝖺𝗏𝗋𝖺 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖺𝗅𝗂𝖺́𝗌 𝗈 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝗍𝗂𝖽𝗈 𝗋𝖾𝖼𝗎𝗌𝖺 𝗎𝗌𝖺𝗋 - 𝖾 𝗇𝗎𝗇𝖼𝖺 𝗉𝖾𝗋𝖽𝖾 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗈𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗍𝗎𝗇𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝖾 𝗋𝖾𝖼𝗈𝗋𝖽𝖺𝗋 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝖺 𝖴𝖱𝖲𝖲 𝗂𝗇𝗏𝖺𝖽𝗂𝖽𝖺 𝗅𝗎𝗍𝗈𝗎 𝖻𝗋𝖺𝗏𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖺 𝗈 𝖺𝗏𝖺𝗇𝖼̧𝗈 𝗇𝖺𝗓𝗂, 𝖾𝗆 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗌𝗍𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝗈 "𝖺𝗉𝖺𝗓𝗂𝗀𝗎𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈" 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖼𝖺𝗋𝖺𝖼𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗂𝗓𝗈𝗎 𝖺 𝗋𝖾𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖺𝗌 "𝖽𝖾𝗆𝗈𝖼𝗋𝖺𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗌 𝖻𝗎𝗋𝗀𝗎𝖾𝗌𝖺𝗌" 𝖺̀𝗌 𝗉𝗋𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗂𝗋𝖺𝗌 𝖺𝗀𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖧𝗂𝗍𝗅𝖾𝗋 (𝖾𝗌𝗊𝗎𝖾𝖼𝖾𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝗌𝖾𝗆𝗉𝗋𝖾, 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗌𝖾 𝗉𝖾𝗋𝖼𝖾𝖻𝖾 𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗊𝗎𝖾̂, 𝗈 𝗉𝖺𝖼𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖤𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗅𝗂𝗇𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝖺 𝖠𝗅𝖾𝗆𝖺𝗇𝗁𝖺 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝖺 𝗂𝗇𝗏𝖺𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗃𝗎𝗇𝗍𝖺 𝖾 𝗉𝗈𝗌𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗂𝗈𝗋 𝖽𝗂𝗏𝗂𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖺 𝖯𝗈𝗅𝗈́𝗇𝗂𝖺, 𝖾𝗆 𝟣𝟫𝟥𝟫).
"𝖬𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝟤𝟢 𝗆𝗂𝗅𝗁𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗆𝗈𝗋𝗍𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖺 𝖴𝗇𝗂𝖺̃𝗈 𝖲𝗈𝗏𝗂𝖾́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝖺", 𝖼𝗅𝖺𝗆𝖺 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝖾𝗑𝖾𝗆𝗉𝗅𝗈 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗇𝗈𝗍𝖺 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖾 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝗍𝗂𝖽𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝟥𝟣 𝖽𝖾 𝖺𝗀𝗈𝗌𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝟤𝟢𝟣𝟫, 𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝟪𝟢 𝖺𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝗈 𝗂𝗇𝗂́𝖼𝗂𝗈 𝖽𝖺 𝖲𝖾𝗀𝗎𝗇𝖽𝖺 𝖦𝗋𝖺𝗇𝖽𝖾 𝖦𝗎𝖾𝗋𝗋𝖺. "𝖭𝖾𝗇𝗁𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗋𝖾𝖾𝗌𝖼𝗋𝗂𝗍𝖺 𝗈𝗎 𝖿𝖺𝗅𝗌𝗂𝖿𝗂𝖼𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖺 𝖧𝗂𝗌𝗍𝗈́𝗋𝗂𝖺 𝗉𝗈𝖽𝖾 𝖾𝗌𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖽𝖾𝗋 𝖺 𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝗁𝖾𝗋𝗈𝗂𝖼𝖺 𝖽𝖺 𝖴𝖱𝖲𝖲, 𝖽𝗈 𝗉𝗈𝗏𝗈 𝗌𝗈𝗏𝗂𝖾́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝗈, (...) 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗌𝗍𝗈𝗎 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝖺 𝖺𝖼𝖾𝗂𝗍𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾 𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗅𝖺𝖻𝗈𝗋𝖺𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇𝗂𝗌𝗆𝗈 𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝖼𝗅𝖺𝗌𝗌𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝗂𝗋𝗂𝗀𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗆𝗎𝗂𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝖺𝗂́𝗌𝖾𝗌."
𝖠𝗅𝖻𝖺𝗇𝗈 𝖭𝗎𝗇𝖾𝗌, 𝗎𝗆 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗂𝖽𝖾𝗈́𝗅𝗈𝗀𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝗈 𝖯𝖢𝖯, 𝖼𝗁𝖾𝗀𝖺𝗏𝖺 𝖺𝗍𝖾́ 𝖾𝗆 𝟤𝟢𝟢𝟧, 𝗇𝗈 𝗍𝖾𝗑𝗍𝗈 𝖠 𝖱𝖾𝗌𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝖾 𝗈 𝖥𝖺𝗍𝗈𝗋 𝖯𝗈𝗉𝗎𝗅𝖺𝗋 𝗇𝖺 𝖵𝗂𝗍𝗈́𝗋𝗂𝖺, 𝖺 𝗈𝗌𝗍𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺𝗋 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝗆𝖾𝖽𝖺𝗅𝗁𝖺 𝗈 𝗇𝗎́𝗆𝖾𝗋𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗎𝗇𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗌 𝗆𝗈𝗋𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝗇𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖺 𝗅𝗎𝗍𝖺 𝗌𝖾𝗆 𝗍𝗋𝖾́𝗀𝗎𝖺𝗌: "𝖭𝖾𝗆 𝖺𝗌 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝖿𝖾𝗋𝗈𝗓𝖾𝗌 𝗋𝖾𝗍𝖺𝗅𝗂𝖺𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗌𝖾𝗀𝗎𝗂𝗋𝖺𝗆 𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗏𝖺𝗋 𝗎𝗆 𝗆𝗈𝗏𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖼𝗁𝖾𝗀𝗈𝗎 𝖺 𝗂𝗆𝗈𝖻𝗂𝗅𝗂𝗓𝖺𝗋 𝖾𝗇𝗈𝗋𝗆𝖾𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗂𝗇𝗀𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝖿𝗈𝗋𝖼̧𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗈𝖼𝗎𝗉𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖺𝖽𝗊𝗎𝗂𝗋𝗂𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝗍𝖺𝗆𝖻𝖾́𝗆 𝗎𝗆 𝖿𝗈𝗋𝗍𝖾 𝗉𝖾𝗌𝗈 𝗆𝗂𝗅𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗋. 𝖬𝗂𝗅𝗁𝖺𝗋𝖾𝗌 𝖾 𝗆𝗂𝗅𝗁𝖺𝗋𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗍𝗋𝖺𝖻𝖺𝗅𝗁𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗋𝖾𝗌 𝖾 𝖽𝖾 𝗉𝖺𝗍𝗋𝗂𝗈𝗍𝖺𝗌 𝖿𝗈𝗋𝖺𝗆 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗈𝗌, 𝖺𝗌𝗌𝖺𝗌𝗌𝗂𝗇𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌, 𝖽𝖾𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗍𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌 (...) 𝖬𝖺𝗌 𝖺 𝗋𝖾𝖽𝖾 𝖼𝗅𝖺𝗇𝖽𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗂𝗇𝖺 𝖽𝖺 𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝖿𝗈𝗂 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺𝗅𝗂𝗌𝖺𝖽𝖺 (...). 𝖮 𝖯𝖺𝗋𝗍𝗂𝖽𝗈 𝖢𝗈𝗆𝗎𝗇𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖺 𝖥𝗋𝖺𝗇𝖼𝖾̂𝗌, 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝖼𝖾𝗋𝖼𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝟩𝟧.𝟢𝟢𝟢 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗌𝖾𝗎𝗌 𝗆𝖾𝗆𝖻𝗋𝗈𝗌 𝗆𝗈𝗋𝗍𝗈𝗌, 𝗀𝖺𝗇𝗁𝗈𝗎 𝗈 𝗁𝗈𝗇𝗋𝗈𝗌𝗈 𝗍𝗂́𝗍𝗎𝗅𝗈 𝖽𝖾 "𝗈 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝗍𝗂𝖽𝗈 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖿𝗎𝗓𝗂𝗅𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌"."
𝖮 𝗆𝖾𝗌𝗆𝗈 𝖠𝗅𝖻𝖺𝗇𝗈 𝖭𝗎𝗇𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖾 𝗍𝖺̃𝗈 𝗉𝖺𝖼𝗂́𝖿𝗂𝖼𝗈 𝖯𝖢𝖯 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗍𝖺̃𝗈 𝗋𝖾𝖼𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 - 𝖾𝗆 𝟤𝟢𝟤𝟢 - 𝗉𝗎𝗀𝗇𝖺𝗏𝖺, 𝗇𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗀𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗈 𝖽𝗈 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝗍𝗂𝖽𝗈, 𝗉𝖾𝗅𝗈 "𝖽𝖾𝗋𝗋𝗎𝖻𝖺𝗋 𝖽𝗈 𝖼𝖺𝗉𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗅𝗂𝗌𝗆𝗈 𝗉𝖾𝗅𝖺 𝖿𝗈𝗋𝖼̧𝖺". 𝖭𝖺̃𝗈 𝖺 𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝗂𝖽𝖾𝗂𝖺𝗌, 𝖺 𝗈𝗎𝗍𝗋𝖺: "𝖢𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝖾𝗌𝖼𝗋𝖾𝗏𝖾𝗎 𝖬𝖺𝗋𝗑, 𝖺 𝖺𝗋𝗆𝖺 𝖽𝖺 𝖼𝗋𝗂́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝖺 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗉𝗈𝖽𝖾 𝗌𝗎𝖻𝗌𝗍𝗂𝗍𝗎𝗂𝗋 𝖺 𝖼𝗋𝗂́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝖺 𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝖺𝗋𝗆𝖺𝗌. 𝖮 𝗉𝗈𝖽𝖾𝗋 𝗆𝖺𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗂𝖺𝗅 𝗍𝖾𝗆 𝖽𝖾 𝗌𝖾𝗋 𝖽𝖾𝗋𝗋𝗎𝖻𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝗉𝗈𝖽𝖾𝗋 𝗆𝖺𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗂𝖺𝗅".
𝖧𝖺́ 𝗉𝖺𝖼𝗂𝖿𝗂𝗌𝗆𝗈𝗌 𝖺𝗌𝗌𝗂𝗆, 𝗍𝖺̃𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖿𝗈𝗋𝗆𝖾. 𝖲𝖾 𝖼𝖺𝗅𝗁𝖺𝗋 𝖾́ 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝗁𝗈𝗇𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗈 𝖺𝖽𝗆𝗂𝗍𝗂𝗋 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾́ 𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝖾𝖿𝖾𝗌𝖺 𝖽𝖺 𝗉𝖺𝗓 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗌𝖾 𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗍𝖺, 𝗆𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝖾𝖿𝖾𝗌𝖺 𝖽𝖺𝗊𝗎𝗂𝗅𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗌𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗌𝗂𝖽𝖾𝗋𝖺 𝗃𝗎𝗌𝗍𝗈 - 𝖾 𝖼𝗅𝖺𝗋𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗈 𝖯𝖢𝖯, 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗈𝗎𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗌 𝗏𝗈𝗓𝖾𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗏𝖾𝗋𝖻𝖾𝗋𝖺𝗆 𝖺 𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝗎𝖼𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗂𝖺𝗇𝖺, 𝖺 𝖴𝖼𝗋𝖺̂𝗇𝗂𝖺 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗆𝖾𝗋𝖾𝖼𝖾 𝖺 𝖼𝗁𝖺𝗍𝗂𝖼𝖾, 𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗌. 𝖤́ 𝗍𝗎𝖽𝗈, 𝗌𝖾𝗆𝗉𝗋𝖾, 𝗍𝖺̃𝗈 𝗌𝗂𝗆𝗉𝗅𝖾𝗌: 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗆 𝗌𝖾 𝗍𝗈𝗆𝖺 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝗍𝗂𝖽𝗈.
IN "DIÁRIO DE NOTÍCIAS" - 15/03/22 .
Subscrever:
Mensagens (Atom)