trumpista e o seu
principal promotor
Um recente artigo na publicação digital The Conversation, assinado por
Arnaud Miranda, doutorado em Ciência política e especialista em história
das ideias políticas, fornece dados reveladores sobre a designada
“ideologia trumpista” e sobre Curtis Yarvin, o seu principal ideólogo.
𝖣𝖾𝖿𝗂𝗇𝗂𝖽𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 “𝖿𝗂𝗀𝗎𝗋𝖺 𝗂𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗅𝖾𝖼𝗍𝗎𝖺𝗅 𝖾𝗆𝖾𝗋𝗀𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾” 𝖽𝖺 “𝗀𝖺𝗅𝖺́𝗑𝗂𝖺 𝗍𝗋𝗎𝗆𝗉𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖺”, 𝖢𝗎𝗋𝗍𝗂𝗌 𝖸𝖺𝗋𝗏𝗂𝗇 𝖾𝗅𝖺𝖻𝗈𝗋𝗈𝗎 𝗎𝗆 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗃𝖾𝗍𝗈 𝗉𝗈𝗅𝗂́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝗈 𝖽𝖾𝖿𝗂𝗇𝗂𝖽𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 “𝗇𝖾𝗈-𝗋𝖾𝖺𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺́𝗋𝗂𝗈” 𝗇𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗅 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗉𝗈̃𝖾 𝗈 “𝖿𝗂𝗆 𝖽𝖺 𝗂𝖽𝖾𝗂𝖺 𝖽𝖾𝗆𝗈𝖼𝗋𝖺́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝖺 𝖺 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗋𝗎𝗍𝗎𝗋𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗎𝗆 𝗀𝗈𝗏𝖾𝗋𝗇𝗈 𝖺̀ 𝗌𝖾𝗆𝖾𝗅𝗁𝖺𝗇𝖼̧𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝖾𝗆𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗌𝖺 𝖽𝗂𝗋𝗂𝗀𝗂𝖽𝖺 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝗎𝗆 𝗆𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗋𝖼𝖺 𝖺𝖻𝗌𝗈𝗅𝗎𝗍𝗈”.
𝖭𝖺 𝗌𝖾𝗊𝗎𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝖽𝖺 𝗉𝗋𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗂𝗋𝖺 𝖾𝗅𝖾𝗂𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖣𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗅𝖽 𝖳𝗋𝗎𝗆𝗉, 𝖾𝗑𝗉𝗅𝗂𝖼𝖺 𝖠𝗋𝗇𝖺𝗎𝖽 𝖬𝗂𝗋𝖺𝗇𝖽𝖺, 𝖾𝗆𝖾𝗋𝗀𝗂𝗎 𝖺 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝗂𝗀𝗇𝖺𝖽𝖺 “𝗇𝖾𝗈𝗋𝖾𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈”, 𝗍𝖺𝗆𝖻𝖾́𝗆 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝗂𝗀𝗇𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝗉𝖾𝗅𝖺 𝖾𝗑𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 “𝖣𝖺𝗋𝗄 𝖤𝗇𝗅𝗂𝗀𝗁𝗍𝖾𝗇𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍” (𝖫𝗎𝗓𝖾𝗌 𝖲𝗈𝗆𝖻𝗋𝗂𝖺𝗌), 𝗎𝗆 𝗆𝗈𝗏𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝗂𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗅𝖾𝖼𝗍𝗎𝖺𝗅 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗌𝖾𝗋𝗂𝖺 𝖺 𝗂𝗇𝗌𝗉𝗂𝗋𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝗌𝖾𝖼𝗋𝖾𝗍𝖺 𝖽𝖺 𝗇𝗈𝗏𝖺 𝖺𝖽𝗆𝗂𝗇𝗂𝗌𝗍𝗋𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈.
𝖭𝖺 𝗅𝗂𝖽𝖾𝗋𝖺𝗇𝖼̧𝖺 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖾 𝗆𝗈𝗏𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝗈 𝖻𝗅𝗈𝗀𝗎𝖾𝗋 𝖢𝗎𝗋𝗍𝗂𝗌 𝖸𝖺𝗋𝗏𝗂𝗇, 𝗉𝗋𝗈́𝗑𝗂𝗆𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖯𝖾𝗍𝖾𝗋 𝖳𝗁𝗂𝖾𝗅, 𝖽𝖾 𝖬𝖺𝗋𝖼 𝖠𝗇𝖽𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖾𝗇 (𝖻𝗂𝗅𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺́𝗋𝗂𝗈 𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗌𝖾𝗅𝗁𝖾𝗂𝗋𝗈 𝗂𝗇𝖿𝗈𝗋𝗆𝖺𝗅 𝖽𝗈 𝖯𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗂𝖽𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾), 𝖾 𝖽𝖾 𝗊𝗎𝖺𝖽𝗋𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝗈𝗅𝗂́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝗈𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝖩. 𝖣. 𝖵𝖺𝗇𝖼𝖾 𝖾 𝖬𝗂𝖼𝗁𝖺𝖾𝗅 𝖠𝗇𝗍𝗈𝗇.
“𝖣𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺 𝖿𝗈𝗋𝗆𝖺”, 𝗋𝖾𝗏𝖾𝗅𝖺 𝗈 𝖺𝗎𝗍𝗈𝗋, “𝖸𝖺𝗋𝗏𝗂𝗇 𝗍𝖾𝗋𝖺́ 𝖿𝖺𝗏𝗈𝗋𝖾𝖼𝗂𝖽𝗈 𝖺 𝖺𝗌𝖼𝖾𝗇𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝗉𝗈𝗅𝗂́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝖤𝗅𝗈𝗇 𝖬𝗎𝗌𝗄 𝖾 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗋𝖺́ 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝗂𝗀𝗇𝖺𝖽𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝗇𝖺 𝗈𝗋𝗂𝗀𝖾𝗆 𝖽𝗈 ‘𝗉𝗅𝖺𝗇𝗈 𝖦𝖺𝗓𝖺’”.
𝖴𝗆𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗋𝗋𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖽𝖾𝗏𝖾𝗋𝖺́ 𝗌𝖾𝗋 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗌𝗂𝖽𝖾𝗋𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝖾𝖿𝖾𝗍𝗂𝗏𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖺𝖼𝗎𝗅𝗍𝗎𝗋𝖺 𝗂𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗅𝖾𝖼𝗍𝗎𝖺𝗅, 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗌𝗌𝖾𝗀𝗎𝖾 𝗈 𝖺𝗎𝗍𝗈𝗋 𝖽𝗈 𝗍𝖾𝗑𝗍𝗈. 𝖠 𝗌𝗎𝖺 𝗈𝗋𝗂𝗀𝖾𝗆 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗏𝖾́𝗆 𝖽𝖺 𝗂𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗇𝖾𝗍 𝖺𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗏𝖾́𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖻𝗅𝗈𝗀𝗌 𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗅𝗈́𝗊𝗎𝗂𝗈𝗌, 𝖾 𝗉𝖾𝗅𝗈 “𝖾𝗇𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗋𝗈 𝗏𝗂𝗋𝗍𝗎𝖺𝗅 𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖾 “𝖽𝗎𝖺𝗌 𝖿𝗂𝗀𝗎𝗋𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖾𝖼𝗂𝗌𝗂𝗏𝖺𝗌”, 𝖢𝗎𝗋𝗍𝗂𝗌 𝖸𝖺𝗋𝗏𝗂𝗇 𝖾 𝗈 𝖻𝗋𝗂𝗍𝖺̂𝗇𝗂𝖼𝗈 𝖭𝗂𝖼𝗄 𝖫𝖺𝗇𝖽 (𝗇𝖺𝗌𝖼𝖾𝗎 𝖾𝗆 𝟣𝟫𝟨𝟤), 𝗈 “𝗉𝖺𝗂 𝖽𝗈 𝖺𝖼𝖾𝗅𝖾𝗋𝖺𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇𝗂𝗌𝗆𝗈” (𝖺𝖼𝖼𝖾𝗅𝖾𝗋𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗈𝗇𝗂𝗌𝗆).
𝖠𝗌𝗌𝗂𝗆, 𝖾𝗆 𝖺𝖻𝗋𝗂𝗅 𝖽𝖾 𝟤𝟢𝟢𝟩, 𝖸𝖺𝗋𝗏𝗂𝗇, 𝗎𝗆 𝖾𝗇𝗀𝖾𝗇𝗁𝖾𝗂𝗋𝗈 𝗇𝗈𝗋𝗍𝖾-𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗋𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗇𝗈 𝗁𝗈𝗃𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝟧𝟤 𝖺𝗇𝗈𝗌, 𝗅𝖺𝗇𝖼̧𝗈𝗎 𝗈 𝖻𝗅𝗈𝗀𝗎𝖾 𝖴𝗇𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗅𝗂𝖿𝗂𝖾𝖽 𝖱𝖾𝗌𝖾𝗋𝗏𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗈𝗇𝗌 𝗌𝗈𝖻 𝗈 𝗉𝗌𝖾𝗎𝖽𝗈́𝗇𝗂𝗆𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖬𝖾𝗇𝖼𝗂𝗎𝗌 𝖬𝗈𝗅𝖽𝖻𝗎𝗀. 𝖮 𝗌𝖾𝗎 𝗉𝗋𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗂𝗋𝗈 𝗍𝖾𝗑𝗍𝗈, “𝖴𝗆 𝖬𝖺𝗇𝗂𝖿𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗈 𝖥𝗈𝗋𝗆𝖺𝗅𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖺”, 𝗏𝖺𝗂 𝖺𝗇𝗎𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗋 𝗎𝗆 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗀𝗋𝖺𝗆𝖺 𝗉𝗈𝗅𝗂́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝗈. 𝖠𝖿𝗂𝗋𝗆𝖺-𝗌𝖾 𝗎𝗆 “𝗅𝗂𝖻𝖾𝗋𝗍𝖺́𝗋𝗂𝗈” 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝗂𝗅𝗎𝖽𝗂𝖽𝗈, 𝖽𝖾𝖿𝖾𝗇𝖽𝖾 𝖺 𝗅𝗂𝗆𝗂𝗍𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝗈𝗎 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗋𝗎𝗂𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝗈 𝖤𝗌𝗍𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝖾𝗆 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗅 𝖽𝖾 𝗎𝗆 𝗅𝗂𝖻𝖾𝗋𝖺𝗅𝗂𝗌𝗆𝗈 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝗋𝖾𝗀𝗎𝗅𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗌𝗂𝖽𝖾𝗋𝖺 𝖺 𝖽𝖾𝗆𝗈𝖼𝗋𝖺𝖼𝗂𝖺 “𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖾𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗅𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝗂𝗇𝖾𝖿𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗓 𝖾 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗋𝗎𝗍𝗂𝗏𝖺”.
𝖣𝖾𝖿𝗂𝗇𝖾-𝗌𝖾 𝖺𝗂𝗇𝖽𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 “𝗇𝖾𝗈, 𝗉𝗈́𝗌 𝗈𝗎 𝗎𝗅𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗋𝗋𝖾𝖺𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺́𝗋𝗂𝗈”. 𝖤 𝖺 𝗇𝖾𝗈𝗋𝖾𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈, 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝖼𝗂𝗌𝖺 𝖠𝗋𝗇𝖺𝗎𝗍 𝖬𝗂𝗋𝖺𝗇𝖽𝖺, 𝗍𝗈𝗋𝗇𝖺-𝗌𝖾 𝗎𝗆 𝗆𝗈𝗏𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝗂𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗅𝖾𝖼𝗍𝗎𝖺𝗅 𝖺 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝗍𝗂𝗋 𝖽𝖾 𝟤𝟢𝟣𝟢.
𝖣𝖾𝖼𝗂𝗌𝗂𝗏𝗈 𝗇𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗌𝗈𝗅𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖺 𝗌𝗎𝖺 “𝗇𝗈𝗏𝖺 𝗂𝖽𝖾𝗈𝗅𝗈𝗀𝗂𝖺” 𝗍𝖾𝗋𝖺́ 𝗌𝗂𝖽𝗈 𝗈 𝖾𝗇𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗋𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝖺𝗌 𝗂𝖽𝖾𝗂𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖭𝗂𝖼𝗄 𝖫𝖺𝗇𝖽, 𝖺𝗇𝗍𝗂𝗀𝗈 𝖿𝗂𝗅𝗈́𝗌𝗈𝖿𝗈 𝖽𝖺 𝗎𝗇𝗂𝗏𝖾𝗋𝗌𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝖾 𝖶𝖺𝗋𝗐𝗂𝖼𝗄, 𝗎𝗆 𝖺𝖼𝖾́𝗋𝗋𝗂𝗆𝗈 𝖼𝗋𝗂́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝗈 𝖽𝗈 “𝗆𝗂𝗌𝖾𝗋𝖺𝖻𝗂𝗅𝗂𝗌𝗆𝗈” 𝖽𝖾 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝖾𝗌𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗋𝖽𝖺 𝗊𝗎𝖾 “𝗍𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺 𝗌𝖾𝗆 𝗌𝗎𝖼𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗋 𝗈𝗌 𝖾𝖿𝖾𝗂𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝗇𝖾𝖿𝖺𝗌𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝗈 𝖼𝖺𝗉𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗅𝗂𝗌𝗆𝗈, 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖽𝖾𝗏𝖾𝗋𝖺́ 𝗌𝖾𝗋 𝖺𝖼𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗎𝖺𝖽𝗈”.
𝖮 𝗌𝖾𝗎 “𝖺𝖼𝖾𝗅𝖾𝗋𝖺𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇𝗂𝗌𝗆𝗈” 𝗂𝗇𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖽𝗂𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗅 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖽𝗎-𝗅𝗈 𝖺 𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗍𝖺𝗋 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗉𝗈𝗌𝗂𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝗉𝗋𝗈́-𝖼𝖺𝗉𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗅𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖺 𝖾 𝗂𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖺𝗋-𝗌𝖾 𝗉𝖾𝗅𝗈 𝗉𝖾𝗇𝗌𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖸𝖺𝗋𝗏𝗂𝗇, 𝖾𝗑𝗉𝗅𝖺𝗇𝖺 𝗈 𝖺𝗋𝗍𝗂𝗀𝗈.
𝖭𝖺 𝗌𝗎𝖺 𝖺𝗉𝗈𝗌𝗍𝖺 𝖾𝗆 “𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗌𝗍𝗋𝗎𝗂𝗋 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗇𝗈𝗏𝖺 𝗂𝖽𝖾𝗈𝗅𝗈𝗀𝗂𝖺” 𝖸𝖺𝗋𝗏𝗂𝗇 𝖽𝖾𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺-𝗌𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺̃𝗈 𝖿𝗎𝗇𝖽𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺𝗅, 𝖺 𝖾𝖿𝗂𝖼𝖺́𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗌𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖾𝗆𝖺𝗌 𝗉𝗈𝗅𝗂́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝗈𝗌. 𝖤 𝗏𝖺𝗂 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖼𝗅𝗎𝗂𝗋 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖺 𝗉𝗈𝗅𝗂́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝖺 “𝖾́ 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗅𝗎𝗍𝖺 𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖾 𝖺 𝗈𝗋𝖽𝖾𝗆 𝖾 𝗈 𝖼𝖺𝗈𝗌 𝖾 𝗈𝗇𝖽𝖾 ‘𝗈 𝖻𝖾𝗆 𝖾́ 𝖺 𝗈𝗋𝖽𝖾𝗆’”.
𝖯𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖾𝗌 𝗇𝗈𝗏𝗈𝗌 𝗍𝖾𝗈́𝗋𝗂𝖼𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖺 𝖽𝗂𝗋𝖾𝗂𝗍𝖺 𝖾𝗑𝗍𝗋𝖾𝗆𝖺, 𝗉𝗈𝖻𝗋𝖾𝗓𝖺 𝗈𝗎 𝖺𝗊𝗎𝖾𝖼𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝗈 𝗉𝗅𝖺𝗇𝖾𝗍𝖺 𝗉𝖾𝗋𝗆𝖺𝗇𝖾𝖼𝖾𝗆 𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝗂𝗇𝗌𝗂𝗀𝗇𝗂𝖿𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗌. 𝖮 𝗉𝗋𝗂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝗉𝖺𝗅 𝗈𝖻𝗃𝖾𝗍𝗂𝗏𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗌𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖾 𝖾𝗆 “𝖿𝗈𝗋𝗍𝖺𝗅𝖾𝖼𝖾𝗋 𝖺 𝗈𝗋𝖽𝖾𝗆 𝖾𝗑𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾”.
𝖭𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺 𝗉𝖾𝗋𝗌𝗉𝖾𝗍𝗂𝗏𝖺 𝖿𝗈𝗋𝗆𝖺𝗅𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖺, 𝖸𝖺𝗋𝗏𝗂𝗇 𝖽𝖾𝖿𝗂𝗇𝖾 𝗈𝗌 𝖤𝖴𝖠 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 “𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗀𝗂𝗀𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗌𝖼𝖺 𝖾𝗆𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗌𝖺 𝖺𝖻𝗌𝗈𝗋𝗏𝗂𝖽𝖺 𝗉𝖾𝗅𝖺 𝗌𝗎𝖺 𝗂𝗇𝖾𝖿𝗂𝖼𝖺́𝖼𝗂𝖺, 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝖺𝗀𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗌 𝗉𝗈𝗅𝗂́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝗈𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖽𝗂𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗆𝗂́𝗌𝗍𝗂𝖼𝖺 𝖽𝖾𝗆𝗈𝖼𝗋𝖺́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝖺 𝖾 𝗈𝖻𝗌𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗃𝗎𝗌𝗍𝗂𝖼̧𝖺 𝗌𝗈𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗅”.
𝖤𝗆 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗌𝗈𝗇𝖺̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺, 𝗌𝗎𝗀𝖾𝗋𝖾 𝗈 𝖿𝗂𝗆 𝖽𝖺 𝗂𝖽𝖾𝗂𝖺 𝖽𝖾𝗆𝗈𝖼𝗋𝖺́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝖺 𝖾 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗋𝖾𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗋𝗎𝗍𝗎𝗋𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝗈 𝗀𝗈𝗏𝖾𝗋𝗇𝗈 𝖺̀ 𝗌𝖾𝗆𝖾𝗅𝗁𝖺𝗇𝖼̧𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝖾𝗆𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗌𝖺 𝖽𝗂𝗋𝗂𝗀𝗂𝖽𝖺 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝗎𝗆 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗂𝖽𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖽𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗌𝖾𝗅𝗁𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖺𝖽𝗆𝗂𝗇𝗂𝗌𝗍𝗋𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 (𝖯𝖢𝖠), 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗉𝗈𝖽𝖾𝗋𝖺́ 𝗌𝖾𝗋 𝗌𝗎𝖻𝗌𝗍𝗂𝗍𝗎𝗂́𝖽𝗈 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝗈𝗎𝗍𝗋𝗈 𝖼𝖺𝗌𝗈 𝖽𝖾𝗆𝗈𝗇𝗌𝗍𝗋𝖾 𝗂𝗇𝖾𝖿𝗂𝖼𝖺́𝖼𝗂𝖺. 𝖴𝗆𝖺 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗉𝗈𝗌𝗍𝖺 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗌𝗎𝗀𝖾𝗋𝖾 𝗈 𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺𝖻𝖾𝗅𝖾𝖼𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝖺 𝗆𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗋𝗊𝗎𝗂𝖺 𝖺𝖻𝗌𝗈𝗅𝗎𝗍𝖺, 𝖺𝗅𝖾𝗋𝗍𝖺 𝖠𝗋𝗇𝖺𝗎𝖽 𝖬𝗂𝗋𝖺𝗇𝖽𝖺. 𝖸𝖺𝗋𝗏𝗂𝗇 𝗏𝖺𝗂 𝖺𝗌𝗌𝗎𝗆𝗂𝗋-𝗌𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 “𝗋𝖾𝖺𝗅𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖺” 𝗈𝗎 “𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗎𝗋𝖺𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖺” 𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗌𝗂𝖽𝖾𝗋𝖺𝗋 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗈 𝖯𝖢𝖠 𝗀𝗈𝗏𝖾𝗋𝗇𝗈-𝖾𝗆𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗌𝖺 𝖽𝖾𝗏𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗍𝖺𝗋-𝗌𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝗎𝗆 𝗆𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗋𝖼𝖺.
𝖤𝗌𝗍𝖺 𝖺𝖻𝗈𝗋𝖽𝖺𝗀𝖾𝗆 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗏𝖾́𝗆 𝖽𝖺 𝖺𝖽𝗆𝗂𝗋𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝗈 𝗍𝖾𝗈́𝗋𝗂𝖼𝗈 𝖽𝗈 𝗍𝗋𝗎𝗆𝗉𝗂𝗌𝗆𝗈 𝖿𝖺𝖼𝖾 𝖺𝗈 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝗂𝗀𝗇𝖺𝖽𝗈 “𝖼𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗋𝖺𝗅𝗂𝗌𝗆𝗈”, 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗍𝖾𝗈𝗋𝗂𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝗀𝗈𝗏𝖾𝗋𝗇𝗈 𝖾 𝖺𝖽𝗆𝗂𝗇𝗂𝗌𝗍𝗋𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝗉𝗎́𝖻𝗅𝗂𝖼𝖺 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗁𝖾𝖼𝖾𝗎 𝗈 𝖺𝗎𝗀𝖾 𝗇𝗈 𝗋𝖾𝗂𝗇𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖥𝗋𝖾𝖽𝖾𝗋𝗂𝖼𝗈 𝖨𝖨 𝖽𝖺 𝖯𝗋𝗎́𝗌𝗌𝗂𝖺 (𝗌𝖾𝗀𝗎𝗇𝖽𝖺 𝗆𝖾𝗍𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝗈 𝗌𝖾́𝖼𝗎𝗅𝗈 𝖷𝖵𝖨𝖨𝖨) 𝖾 𝖿𝗈𝖼𝖺𝗅𝗂𝗓𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝗇𝗈 𝖺𝗎𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝖺 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗌𝗉𝖾𝗋𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖾𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗈́𝗆𝗂𝖼𝖺 𝖽𝗈 𝖤𝗌𝗍𝖺𝖽𝗈.
𝖠𝗌𝗌𝗂𝗆, 𝖸𝖺𝗋𝗏𝗂𝗇 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗌𝗂𝖽𝖾𝗋𝖺 𝖺 𝗆𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗋𝗊𝗎𝗂𝖺 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝖿𝗈𝗋𝗆𝖺 𝗉𝗈𝗅𝗂́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝖺 𝖾𝗑𝗍𝗋𝖾𝗆𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺́𝗏𝖾𝗅, 𝖺𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖺́𝗋𝗂𝗈 𝖽𝖺 𝖽𝖾𝗆𝗈𝖼𝗋𝖺𝖼𝗂𝖺, 𝖾 𝖾𝗅𝖾𝗀𝖾 𝖺𝗌 𝖼𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾𝗌-𝖤𝗌𝗍𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝖣𝗎𝖻𝖺𝗂 𝗈𝗎 𝖲𝗂𝗇𝗀𝖺𝗉𝗎𝗋𝖺 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗍𝗈́𝗍𝗂𝗉𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖿𝗎𝗍𝗎𝗋𝗈𝗌 𝖤𝗌𝗍𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌 “𝗇𝖾𝗈𝖼𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗋𝖺𝗅𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗌”.
𝖭𝗈 𝗌𝖾𝗎 𝖾𝗌𝖼𝗅𝖺𝗋𝖾𝖼𝖾𝖽𝗈𝗋 𝖺𝗋𝗍𝗂𝗀𝗈, 𝖠𝗋𝗇𝖺𝗎𝖽 𝖬𝗂𝗋𝖺𝗇𝖽𝖺 𝖺𝗅𝖾𝗋𝗍𝖺 𝖺𝗂𝗇𝖽𝖺 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝖺 𝗇𝖾𝖼𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝖾 𝖾𝗏𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗋 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖿𝗎𝗇𝖽𝗂𝗋 𝗈𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖼𝖾𝗂𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗇𝖾𝗈𝗋𝖾𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈, 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗌𝖾𝗋𝗏𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗋𝗂𝗌𝗆𝗈, “𝖺𝗅𝗍-𝗋𝗂𝗀𝗁𝗍” 𝖾 “𝖺𝖼𝖾𝗅𝖾𝗋𝖺𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇𝗂𝗌𝗆𝗈”
𝖠𝗉𝖾𝗌𝖺𝗋 𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝖾𝖿𝖾𝗇𝗌𝗈𝗋 𝖽𝖺 𝗈𝗋𝖽𝖾𝗆, 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝖼𝗂𝗌𝖺 𝗈 𝖺𝖼𝖺𝖽𝖾́𝗆𝗂𝖼𝗈 𝖿𝗋𝖺𝗇𝖼𝖾̂𝗌, 𝗈 𝗉𝖾𝗇𝗌𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖸𝖺𝗋𝗏𝗂𝗇 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾́ 𝗎𝗆 𝗌𝗂𝗆𝗉𝗅𝖾𝗌 𝗉𝖾𝗇𝗌𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗌𝖾𝗋𝗏𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗋 “𝖺𝗈 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗆𝗈𝗏𝖾𝗋 𝖺 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗌𝖾𝗋𝗏𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗏𝖺𝗅𝗈𝗋𝖾𝗌 𝗆𝗈𝗋𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝗈𝗎 𝗋𝖾𝗅𝗂𝗀𝗂𝗈𝗌𝗈𝗌 (𝖺𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗌𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺-𝗌𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝖺𝗍𝖾𝗎 𝗈𝗎 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗍𝖾𝗂́𝗌𝗍𝖺)”.
𝖮 𝗂𝖽𝖾𝗈́𝗅𝗈𝗀𝗈 𝗍𝗋𝗎𝗆𝗉𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖺 𝗍𝖺𝗆𝖻𝖾́𝗆 𝖿𝗎𝗌𝗍𝗂𝗀𝖺 𝗈𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗌𝖾𝗋𝗏𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗋𝖾𝗌, 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖺̀ 𝗌𝖾𝗆𝖾𝗅𝗁𝖺𝗇𝖼̧𝖺 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗀𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗌 𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 “𝗂𝗇𝖼𝖺𝗉𝖺𝗓𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗉𝖾𝗇𝗌𝖺𝗋 𝗈 𝗉𝗈𝖽𝖾𝗋 𝗍𝖺𝗅 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝖾́” 𝖾 𝗉𝖾𝗋𝗆𝖺𝗇𝖾𝖼𝖾𝗆 “𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗌𝗎𝖻𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗅𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗈𝗌 𝖺̀ 𝖽𝖾𝗆𝗈𝖼𝗋𝖺𝖼𝗂𝖺”. 𝖯𝖾𝗅𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖺́𝗋𝗂𝗈, 𝗈 𝗌𝖾𝗎 𝗉𝖾𝗇𝗌𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝗍𝗋𝖺𝖽𝗎𝗓-𝗌𝖾 𝗇𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗏𝗈𝗇𝗍𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝖾 “𝖽𝗂𝗌𝗌𝗈𝗅𝗏𝖾𝗋 𝖺 𝗉𝗈𝗅𝗂́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝖺 𝗇𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝖾𝗇𝗀𝖾𝗇𝗁𝖺𝗋𝗂𝖺 𝖾𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗈́𝗆𝗂𝖼𝖺 𝖺𝗎𝗍𝗈𝗋𝗂𝗍𝖺́𝗋𝗂𝖺” (𝖾 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖾𝗑𝗉𝗅𝗂𝖼𝖺 𝗈 𝗌𝖾𝗎 𝖾𝗅𝗈𝗀𝗂𝗈 𝖺̀ 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗌𝗉𝖾𝗋𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖾 𝖺̀ ‘𝖺𝗎𝗌𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝗉𝗈𝗅𝗂́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝖺’ 𝖾𝗆 𝖲𝗂𝗇𝗀𝖺𝗉𝗎𝗋𝖺, 𝖣𝗎𝖻𝖺𝗂 𝗈𝗎 𝖧𝗈𝗇𝗀 𝖪𝗈𝗇𝗀).
𝖮 𝖺𝖼𝖺𝖽𝖾́𝗆𝗂𝖼𝗈 𝖠𝗋𝗇𝖺𝗎𝗍 𝖬𝗂𝗋𝖺𝗇𝖽𝖺, 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗉𝖺𝗋𝗈𝗎 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗍𝖾𝗌𝖾 𝗌𝗈𝖻𝗋𝖾 “𝗉𝖾𝗇𝗌𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗆𝗉𝗈𝗋𝖺̂𝗇𝖾𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖺 𝖽𝖾𝖼𝖺𝖽𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺”, 𝗌𝗎𝖻𝗅𝗂𝗇𝗁𝖺 𝗊𝗎𝖾, 𝖺𝗉𝖾𝗌𝖺𝗋 𝖽𝖾 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝗍𝗂𝗅𝗁𝖺𝗋𝖾𝗆 𝖺 𝗋𝖾𝖼𝗎𝗌𝖺 𝖽𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗌𝖾𝗋𝗏𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗋𝗂𝗌𝗆𝗈 𝗍𝗋𝖺𝖽𝗂𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗅, 𝗇𝖾𝗈𝗋𝖾𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾 𝖺𝗅𝗍-𝗋𝗂𝗀𝗁𝗍 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖾𝗏𝖾𝗆 𝗌𝖾𝗋 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖿𝗎𝗇𝖽𝗂𝖽𝖺𝗌.
“𝖠 𝖺𝗅𝗍-𝗋𝗂𝗀𝗁𝗍 𝖾́ 𝗉𝗈𝗉𝗎𝗅𝖺𝗋, 𝖽𝖾 𝗍𝖾𝗇𝖽𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝗌𝗎𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗆𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖺, 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝖺 𝗂𝖽𝖾𝗂𝖺 𝖼𝗅𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗌𝗎𝗉𝖾𝗋𝗂𝗈𝗋𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝗋𝖺𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗅 𝖻𝗋𝖺𝗇𝖼𝖺. 𝖠 𝗇𝖾𝗈𝗋𝖾𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾́ 𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖾𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗅𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖿𝗈𝗋𝗆𝖺𝗅𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖺 𝖾 𝖾𝗅𝗂𝗍𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖺. 𝖮𝗌 𝗇𝖾𝗈𝗋𝖾𝖺𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺́𝗋𝗂𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗓𝖺𝗆 𝗈 𝗉𝗈𝗉𝗎𝗅𝗂𝗌𝗆𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝗌𝖾𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝖿𝗎𝗇𝖽𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺𝗅𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖽𝖾𝗆𝗈𝖼𝗋𝖺́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝗈: 𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗅𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗋 𝖺𝗅𝗍𝖾𝗋𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝗉𝗈𝗅𝗂́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝖺 𝗍𝖾𝗋𝖺́ 𝖽𝖾 𝗏𝗂𝗋 𝖽𝖾 𝖼𝗂𝗆𝖺”. 𝖬𝖺𝗌 𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝗎𝖺𝗌 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗍𝖾́𝗀𝗂𝖺𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗉𝗈𝖽𝖾𝗆 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗏𝖾𝗋𝗀𝗂𝗋 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗍𝖾𝗀𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾, 𝗌𝗎𝗌𝗍𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺. “𝖸𝖺𝗋𝗏𝗂𝗇 𝖽𝖾𝗆𝖺𝗋𝖼𝖺-𝗌𝖾 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗌𝗎𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗆𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗌, 𝗆𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝗂𝗓 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗈𝗌 𝗅𝖾̂ 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝖺𝗍𝖾𝗇𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈”.
𝖯𝗈𝗋 𝗌𝗎𝖺 𝗏𝖾𝗓, 𝖺 𝗇𝖾𝗈𝗋𝖾𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾́ 𝖺𝗌𝗌𝗂𝗆𝗂𝗅𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝗏𝖾𝗓𝖾𝗌 𝖺𝗈 “𝖺𝖼𝖾𝗅𝖾𝗋𝖺𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇𝗂𝗌𝗆𝗈” 𝖽𝖾𝗏𝗂𝖽𝗈 𝖺̀𝗌 𝗅𝗂𝗀𝖺𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝖭𝗂𝖼𝗄 𝖫𝖺𝗇𝖽, “𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖾́ 𝗎𝗆 𝖺𝖼𝖾𝗅𝖾𝗋𝖺𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖺 𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗌𝖾𝗋 𝗇𝖾𝗈𝗋𝖾𝖺𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺́𝗋𝗂𝗈”. 𝖲𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗌𝗂𝖽𝖾𝗋𝖺 𝖺 𝗇𝖾𝗈𝗋𝖾𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝗎𝗆 𝗂𝗇𝗌𝗍𝗋𝗎𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝖾𝖿𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗓 𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗋𝗎𝗂𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝗈 “𝗀𝗋𝖺𝗇𝖽𝖾 𝗆𝖾𝖼𝖺𝗇𝗂𝗌𝗆𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗏𝖺𝗀𝖾𝗆” 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖾́ 𝗈 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗀𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗈 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺 𝗂𝗋𝖺́, 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗎𝖽𝗈, 𝗉𝖾𝗋𝗆𝖺𝗇𝖾𝖼𝖾𝗋 𝗎𝗆 “𝖺𝖼𝖾𝗅𝖾𝗋𝖺𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇𝗂𝗌𝗆𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝗎𝗆 𝗉𝗇𝖾𝗎 𝖿𝗎𝗋𝖺𝖽𝗈”.
𝖠𝗉𝖾𝗌𝖺𝗋 𝖽𝖾 𝗌𝖾 𝗍𝖾𝗋 𝗍𝗈𝗋𝗇𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝗉𝗈𝗉𝗎𝗅𝖺𝗋 𝖽𝖾𝗏𝗂𝖽𝗈 𝖺̀ 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗋𝗂𝖻𝗎𝗂𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖫𝖺𝗇𝖽, 𝗈 𝗍𝖾𝗈́𝗋𝗂𝖼𝗈 𝖽𝗈 𝗍𝗋𝗎𝗆𝗉𝗂𝗌𝗆𝗈 𝗆𝖺𝗌 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗈 𝖼𝗂𝗍𝖺 “𝖾 𝗉𝖾𝗋𝗆𝖺𝗇𝖾𝖼𝖾 𝗉𝖾𝗋𝗆𝖾𝖺́𝗏𝖾𝗅 𝖺 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗉𝖾𝗋𝗌𝗉𝖾𝗍𝗂𝗏𝖺 𝖺𝖼𝖾𝗅𝖾𝗋𝖺𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖺”. 𝖠𝗋𝗇𝖺𝗎𝖽 𝖬𝗂𝗋𝖺𝗇𝖽𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖼𝗅𝗎𝗂: “𝖮 𝗉𝖾𝗇𝗌𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝗇𝖾𝗈𝗋𝖾𝖺𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺́𝗋𝗂𝗈 𝖾́ 𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗍𝗎𝖽𝗈 𝗎𝗆 𝗉𝖾𝗇𝗌𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝖺 𝗈𝗋𝖽𝖾𝗆”.