.
.
02/06/2026
.
Ꮲꭱꮻғꭼꮪꮪꮻꭱ ᎬᎠᏌᎪᎡᎠᏫ ᏚᎪ́
𝕯𝖔𝖈𝖊𝖓𝖙𝖊 𝖚𝖓𝖎𝖛𝖊𝖗𝖘𝖎𝖙𝖆́𝖗𝖎𝖔
𝕻𝖘𝖎𝖈𝖔́𝖑𝖔𝖌𝖔 𝖈𝖑𝝸́𝖓𝖎𝖈𝖔
* Bem haja ZZ, não são precisas muitas palavras para definir o modo como NÃO OLHAMOS para as crianças.
JOÃO CONDE
.
Bem-vindos à política pública
da distração: pedagogia ou
gestão do ruído?
𝘉𝘦𝘮-𝘷𝘪𝘯𝘥𝘰𝘴 𝘢̀ 𝘱𝘰𝘭𝜄́𝘵𝘪𝘤𝘢 𝘱𝘶́𝘣𝘭𝘪𝘤𝘢 𝘥𝘢 𝘥𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘳𝘢𝘤̧𝘢̃𝘰, 𝘰 𝘮𝘰𝘥𝘦𝘭𝘰 𝘥𝘦 𝘨𝘰𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘯𝘢𝘤̧𝘢̃𝘰 𝘲𝘶𝘦 𝘳𝘦𝘴𝘱𝘰𝘯𝘥𝘦 𝘤𝘰𝘮 𝘴𝘰𝘭𝘦𝘯𝘪𝘥𝘢𝘥𝘦 𝘢𝘰 𝘴𝘪𝘯𝘵𝘰𝘮𝘢 𝘷𝘪𝘴𝜄́𝘷𝘦𝘭, 𝘮𝘶𝘭𝘵𝘪𝘱𝘭𝘪𝘤𝘢 𝘱𝘰𝘭𝘦́𝘮𝘪𝘤𝘢𝘴 𝘥𝘦 𝘴𝘶𝘱𝘦𝘳𝘧𝜄́𝘤𝘪𝘦 𝘦 𝘢𝘥𝘪𝘢, 𝘮𝘢𝘪𝘴 𝘶𝘮𝘢 𝘷𝘦𝘻, 𝘢 𝘢𝘳𝘲𝘶𝘪𝘵𝘦𝘵𝘶𝘳𝘢 𝘲𝘶𝘦 𝘳𝘦𝘢𝘭𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘦 𝘥𝘦𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘮𝘪𝘯𝘢 𝘰 𝘲𝘶𝘦 𝘰𝘴 𝘢𝘭𝘶𝘯𝘰𝘴 𝘢𝘱𝘳𝘦𝘯𝘥𝘦𝘮. 𝘕𝘰𝘴 𝘶́𝘭𝘵𝘪𝘮𝘰𝘴 𝘥𝘰𝘪𝘴 𝘢𝘯𝘰𝘴, 𝘢 𝘌𝘥𝘶𝘤𝘢𝘤̧𝘢̃𝘰 𝘦𝘮 𝘗𝘰𝘳𝘵𝘶𝘨𝘢𝘭 𝘧𝘰𝘪 𝘢𝘳𝘳𝘢𝘴𝘵𝘢𝘥𝘢 𝘱𝘢𝘳𝘢 𝘶𝘮𝘢 𝘴𝘶𝘤𝘦𝘴𝘴𝘢̃𝘰 𝘥𝘦 𝘥𝘦𝘣𝘢𝘵𝘦𝘴 𝘢𝘭𝘵𝘢𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘦 𝘮𝘦𝘥𝘪𝘢́𝘵𝘪𝘤𝘰𝘴, 𝘲𝘶𝘢𝘴𝘦 𝘴𝘦𝘮𝘱𝘳𝘦 𝘧𝘢́𝘤𝘦𝘪𝘴 𝘥𝘦 𝘧𝘰𝘵𝘰𝘨𝘳𝘢𝘧𝘢𝘳, 𝘦𝘯𝘲𝘶𝘢𝘯𝘵𝘰 𝘰𝘴 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘣𝘭𝘦𝘮𝘢𝘴 𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘳𝘶𝘵𝘶𝘳𝘢𝘪𝘴 𝘱𝘦𝘳𝘮𝘢𝘯𝘦𝘤𝘦𝘮 𝘪𝘯𝘵𝘢𝘤𝘵𝘰𝘴, 𝘰𝘶 𝘴𝘦𝘫𝘢, 𝘢𝘭𝘶𝘯𝘰𝘴 𝘴𝘦𝘮 𝘢𝘶𝘭𝘢𝘴, 𝘤𝘶𝘳𝘳𝜄́𝘤𝘶𝘭𝘰𝘴 𝘰𝘣𝘦𝘴𝘰𝘴 𝘲𝘶𝘦 𝘯𝘢̃𝘰 𝘱𝘳𝘦𝘱𝘢𝘳𝘢𝘮 𝘯𝘪𝘯𝘨𝘶𝘦́𝘮, 𝘢𝘷𝘢𝘭𝘪𝘢𝘤̧𝘢̃𝘰 𝘧𝘳𝘢𝘨𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘢𝘥𝘢 𝘦 𝘶𝘮 𝘤𝘰𝘳𝘱𝘰 𝘥𝘰𝘤𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘦 𝘦𝘹𝘢𝘶𝘴𝘵𝘰 𝘱𝘦𝘭𝘰 𝘵𝘳𝘢𝘣𝘢𝘭𝘩𝘰 𝘣𝘶𝘳𝘰𝘤𝘳𝘢́𝘵𝘪𝘤𝘰-𝘢𝘥𝘮𝘪𝘯𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘳𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘷𝘰 𝘥𝘪𝘴𝘧𝘢𝘳𝘤̧𝘢𝘥𝘰 𝘥𝘦 𝘱𝘦𝘥𝘢𝘨𝘰𝘨𝘪𝘢. 𝘐𝘴𝘵𝘰 𝘱𝘢𝘳𝘢 𝘯𝘢̃𝘰 𝘧𝘢𝘭𝘢𝘳 𝘥𝘦 𝘶𝘮 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘣𝘭𝘦𝘮𝘢 𝘴𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘦́𝘮𝘪𝘤𝘰 𝘥𝘦 𝘱𝘳𝘦𝘤𝘢𝘳𝘪𝘦𝘥𝘢𝘥𝘦 𝘯𝘰𝘴 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘤𝘶𝘳𝘴𝘰𝘴 𝘦 𝘤𝘰𝘭𝘰𝘤𝘢𝘤̧𝘰̃𝘦𝘴 𝘲𝘶𝘦 𝘵𝘳𝘢𝘯𝘴𝘧𝘰𝘳𝘮𝘰𝘶 𝘢 𝘤𝘢𝘳𝘳𝘦𝘪𝘳𝘢 𝘥𝘰𝘤𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘦 𝘯𝘶𝘮𝘢 𝘦𝘴𝘱𝘦́𝘤𝘪𝘦 𝘥𝘦 𝘭𝘰𝘵𝘢𝘳𝘪𝘢 𝘥𝘦 𝘴𝘰𝘣𝘳𝘦𝘷𝘪𝘷𝘦̂𝘯𝘤𝘪𝘢.
𝘕𝘢̃𝘰 𝘦́ 𝘪𝘳𝘳𝘦𝘭𝘦𝘷𝘢𝘯𝘵𝘦 𝘲𝘶𝘦, 𝘦𝘮 𝘫𝘶𝘭𝘩𝘰 𝘥𝘦 𝟤𝟢𝟤𝟧, 𝘰 𝘮𝘪𝘯𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘦́𝘳𝘪𝘰 𝘵𝘦𝘯𝘩𝘢 𝘢𝘱𝘳𝘦𝘴𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘢𝘥𝘰, 𝘯𝘰 𝘮𝘦𝘴𝘮𝘰 𝘱𝘢𝘤𝘰𝘵𝘦 𝘱𝘰𝘭𝜄́𝘵𝘪𝘤𝘰-𝘤𝘰𝘮𝘶𝘯𝘪𝘤𝘢𝘤𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘢𝘭, 𝘲𝘶𝘢𝘵𝘳𝘰 𝘵𝘦𝘮𝘢𝘴 𝘥𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘪𝘯𝘵𝘰𝘴: 𝘴𝘮𝘢𝘳𝘵𝘱𝘩𝘰𝘯𝘦𝘴, 𝘮𝘢𝘯𝘶𝘢𝘪𝘴 𝘥𝘪𝘨𝘪𝘵𝘢𝘪𝘴, 𝘢𝘱𝘳𝘦𝘯𝘥𝘪𝘻𝘢𝘨𝘦𝘯𝘴 𝘦𝘴𝘴𝘦𝘯𝘤𝘪𝘢𝘪𝘴 𝘦 𝘤𝘪𝘥𝘢𝘥𝘢𝘯𝘪𝘢. 𝘖 𝘵𝜄́𝘵𝘶𝘭𝘰 𝘰𝘧𝘪𝘤𝘪𝘢𝘭 𝘥𝘢 𝘢𝘱𝘳𝘦𝘴𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘢𝘤̧𝘢̃𝘰 𝘫𝘶𝘯𝘵𝘢𝘷𝘢 𝘵𝘶𝘥𝘰, 𝘯𝘶𝘮 𝘦𝘹𝘦𝘳𝘤𝜄́𝘤𝘪𝘰 𝘥𝘦 ‘𝘢𝘳𝘳𝘶𝘮𝘢𝘤̧𝘢̃𝘰 𝘤𝘰𝘴𝘮𝘦́𝘵𝘪𝘤𝘢’ 𝘥𝘪𝘨𝘯𝘰 𝘥𝘦 𝘯𝘰𝘵𝘢. 𝘈 𝘪𝘮𝘢𝘨𝘦𝘮 𝘦́ 𝘲𝘶𝘢𝘴𝘦 𝘱𝘦𝘳𝘧𝘦𝘪𝘵𝘢, 𝘶𝘮𝘢 𝘵𝘶𝘵𝘦𝘭𝘢 𝘲𝘶𝘦 𝘢𝘨𝘳𝘦𝘨𝘢 𝘰𝘣𝘫𝘦𝘵𝘰𝘴 𝘴𝘪𝘮𝘣𝘰́𝘭𝘪𝘤𝘰𝘴 𝘦 𝘵𝘦𝘮𝘢𝘴 𝘤𝘶𝘭𝘵𝘶𝘳𝘢𝘭𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘦 𝘪𝘯𝘧𝘭𝘢𝘮𝘢́𝘷𝘦𝘪𝘴 𝘱𝘢𝘳𝘢 𝘤𝘳𝘪𝘢𝘳 𝘶𝘮𝘢 𝘴𝘦𝘯𝘴𝘢𝘤̧𝘢̃𝘰 𝘥𝘦 𝘮𝘰𝘷𝘪𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘰. 𝘖 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘣𝘭𝘦𝘮𝘢 𝘦́ 𝘲𝘶𝘦, 𝘯𝘢 𝘦𝘴𝘤𝘰𝘭𝘢 𝘳𝘦𝘢𝘭, 𝘦𝘴𝘴𝘦 𝘮𝘰𝘷𝘪𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘰 𝘳𝘢𝘳𝘢𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘦 𝘴𝘢𝘪 𝘥𝘰 𝘱𝘢𝘱𝘦𝘭 𝘦 𝘥𝘰𝘴 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘤𝘶𝘳𝘴𝘰𝘴 𝘱𝘶́𝘣𝘭𝘪𝘤𝘰𝘴 𝘥𝘪𝘴𝘧𝘢𝘳𝘤̧𝘢𝘥𝘰𝘴 𝘥𝘦 𝘢𝘤̧𝘰̃𝘦𝘴 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘤𝘳𝘦𝘵𝘢𝘴 𝘲𝘶𝘦 𝘯𝘶𝘯𝘤𝘢 𝘤𝘩𝘦𝘨𝘢𝘮 𝘢 𝘷𝘦𝘳 𝘢 𝘭𝘶𝘻 𝘥𝘰 𝘥𝘪𝘢.
𝘖 𝘤𝘢𝘴𝘰 𝘮𝘢𝘪𝘴 𝘰́𝘣𝘷𝘪𝘰 𝘧𝘰𝘪 𝘰 𝘥𝘰𝘴 𝘴𝘮𝘢𝘳𝘵𝘱𝘩𝘰𝘯𝘦𝘴. 𝘛𝘳𝘢𝘯𝘴𝘧𝘰𝘳𝘮𝘢𝘳 𝘢 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘪𝘣𝘪𝘤̧𝘢̃𝘰 𝘥𝘦 𝘶𝘮 𝘥𝘪𝘴𝘱𝘰𝘴𝘪𝘵𝘪𝘷𝘰 𝘯𝘰 𝘨𝘳𝘢𝘯𝘥𝘦 𝘴𝘪𝘯𝘢𝘭 𝘳𝘦𝘧𝘰𝘳𝘮𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘢 𝘥𝘢 𝘦𝘴𝘤𝘰𝘭𝘢 𝘦́ 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘧𝘶𝘯𝘥𝘪𝘳 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘵𝘦𝘯𝘤̧𝘢̃𝘰 𝘤𝘰𝘮 𝘵𝘳𝘢𝘯𝘴𝘧𝘰𝘳𝘮𝘢𝘤̧𝘢̃𝘰. 𝘙𝘦𝘥𝘶𝘻𝘪𝘳 𝘥𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘳𝘢𝘤̧𝘰̃𝘦𝘴 𝘦́ 𝘶́𝘵𝘪𝘭, 𝘮𝘢𝘴 𝘦𝘭𝘦𝘷𝘢𝘳 𝘰 𝘵𝘦𝘭𝘦𝘮𝘰́𝘷𝘦𝘭 𝘢𝘰 𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘢𝘵𝘶𝘵𝘰 𝘥𝘦 ‘𝘪𝘯𝘪𝘮𝘪𝘨𝘰 𝘱𝘶́𝘣𝘭𝘪𝘤𝘰 𝘯𝘶́𝘮𝘦𝘳𝘰 𝘶𝘮’ 𝘱𝘦𝘳𝘮𝘪𝘵𝘦 𝘦𝘷𝘪𝘵𝘢𝘳 𝘢 𝘥𝘪𝘴𝘤𝘶𝘴𝘴𝘢̃𝘰 𝘴𝘰𝘣𝘳𝘦 𝘰 𝘲𝘶𝘦 𝘴𝘦 𝘧𝘢𝘻 (𝘰𝘶 𝘯𝘢̃𝘰 𝘴𝘦 𝘧𝘢𝘻) 𝘲𝘶𝘢𝘯𝘥𝘰 𝘰𝘴 𝘢𝘭𝘶𝘯𝘰𝘴 𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘢̃𝘰, 𝘧𝘪𝘯𝘢𝘭𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘦, 𝘢 𝘰𝘭𝘩𝘢𝘳 𝘱𝘢𝘳𝘢 𝘰 𝘲𝘶𝘢𝘥𝘳𝘰. 𝘌́ 𝘢 𝘳𝘦𝘧𝘰𝘳𝘮𝘢 𝘥𝘰 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘪𝘣𝘪𝘥𝘰 𝘱𝘢𝘳𝘢 𝘦𝘴𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘥𝘦𝘳 𝘢 𝘷𝘢𝘤𝘶𝘪𝘥𝘢𝘥𝘦 𝘥𝘰 𝘦𝘯𝘴𝘪𝘯𝘰.
𝘈 𝘮𝘦𝘴𝘮𝘢 𝘭𝘰́𝘨𝘪𝘤𝘢 𝘱𝘳𝘦𝘴𝘪𝘥𝘦 𝘢̀ 𝘳𝘦𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘧𝘪𝘨𝘶𝘳𝘢𝘤̧𝘢̃𝘰 𝘥𝘰𝘴 𝘮𝘢𝘯𝘶𝘢𝘪𝘴 𝘥𝘪𝘨𝘪𝘵𝘢𝘪𝘴. 𝘘𝘶𝘢𝘯𝘥𝘰 𝘰 𝘥𝘦𝘣𝘢𝘵𝘦 𝘴𝘦 𝘧𝘪𝘹𝘢 𝘦𝘮 𝘴𝘶𝘱𝘰𝘳𝘵𝘦𝘴 𝘦 𝘱𝘭𝘢𝘵𝘢𝘧𝘰𝘳𝘮𝘢𝘴, 𝘰 𝘱𝘢𝜄́𝘴 𝘤𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘦 𝘰 𝘳𝘪𝘴𝘤𝘰 𝘥𝘦 𝘱𝘢𝘳𝘦𝘤𝘦𝘳 𝘮𝘰𝘥𝘦𝘳𝘯𝘰 𝘦𝘯𝘲𝘶𝘢𝘯𝘵𝘰 𝘢 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘧𝘶𝘯𝘥𝘪𝘥𝘢𝘥𝘦 𝘤𝘰𝘨𝘯𝘪𝘵𝘪𝘷𝘢 𝘥𝘰𝘴 𝘢𝘭𝘶𝘯𝘰𝘴 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘵𝘪𝘯𝘶𝘢 𝘦𝘮 𝘲𝘶𝘦𝘥𝘢 𝘭𝘪𝘷𝘳𝘦. 𝘖 𝘎𝘰𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘯𝘰 𝘧𝘦𝘻 𝘶𝘮 𝘣𝘢𝘭𝘢𝘯𝘤̧𝘰 “𝘨𝘭𝘰𝘣𝘢𝘭𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘦 𝘱𝘰𝘴𝘪𝘵𝘪𝘷𝘰” 𝘥𝘢𝘴 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘷𝘢𝘴 𝘥𝘪𝘨𝘪𝘵𝘢𝘪𝘴, 𝘢𝘱𝘦𝘴𝘢𝘳 𝘥𝘰𝘴 𝘱𝘳𝘦𝘷𝘪𝘴𝜄́𝘷𝘦𝘪𝘴 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘣𝘭𝘦𝘮𝘢𝘴 𝘵𝘦́𝘤𝘯𝘪𝘤𝘰𝘴 𝘯𝘢 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘷𝘢 𝘥𝘦 𝘔𝘢𝘵𝘦𝘮𝘢́𝘵𝘪𝘤𝘢. 𝘌́ 𝘰 𝘰𝘵𝘪𝘮𝘪𝘴𝘮𝘰 𝘰𝘧𝘪𝘤𝘪𝘢𝘭 𝘥𝘦 𝘲𝘶𝘦𝘮 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘧𝘶𝘯𝘥𝘦 𝘢 𝘦𝘧𝘪𝘤𝘢́𝘤𝘪𝘢 𝘥𝘰 𝘴𝘰𝘧𝘵𝘸𝘢𝘳𝘦 𝘤𝘰𝘮 𝘢 𝘭𝘪𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘢𝘤𝘪𝘢 𝘥𝘦 𝘲𝘶𝘦𝘮 𝘰 𝘶𝘵𝘪𝘭𝘪𝘻𝘢.
𝘋𝘦𝘱𝘰𝘪𝘴 𝘷𝘦𝘪𝘰 𝘢 𝘥𝘪𝘴𝘤𝘪𝘱𝘭𝘪𝘯𝘢 𝘥𝘦 𝘊𝘪𝘥𝘢𝘥𝘢𝘯𝘪𝘢 𝘦 𝘋𝘦𝘴𝘦𝘯𝘷𝘰𝘭𝘷𝘪𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘰, 𝘤𝘰𝘮 𝘰 𝘪𝘯𝘦𝘷𝘪𝘵𝘢́𝘷𝘦𝘭 𝘳𝘶𝜄́𝘥𝘰 𝘴𝘰𝘣𝘳𝘦 𝘢 𝘦𝘥𝘶𝘤𝘢𝘤̧𝘢̃𝘰 𝘴𝘦𝘹𝘶𝘢𝘭. 𝘖 𝘳𝘦𝘴𝘶𝘭𝘵𝘢𝘥𝘰 𝘧𝘰𝘪 𝘶𝘮𝘢 𝘨𝘶𝘦𝘳𝘳𝘢 𝘤𝘶𝘭𝘵𝘶𝘳𝘢𝘭 𝘥𝘦 𝘪𝘯𝘧𝘢𝘯𝘵𝘢́𝘳𝘪𝘰, 𝘳𝘶𝘪𝘥𝘰𝘴𝘢 𝘦 𝘵𝘳𝘪𝘣𝘢𝘭, 𝘰𝘯𝘥𝘦 𝘶𝘯𝘴 𝘨𝘳𝘪𝘵𝘢𝘮 ‘𝘳𝘦𝘵𝘳𝘰𝘤𝘦𝘴𝘴𝘰’ 𝘦 𝘰𝘶𝘵𝘳𝘰𝘴 ‘𝘥𝘰𝘶𝘵𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘢𝘤̧𝘢̃𝘰’. 𝘌𝘯𝘲𝘶𝘢𝘯𝘵𝘰 𝘴𝘦 𝘦𝘴𝘨𝘳𝘪𝘮𝘦𝘮 𝘢𝘳𝘨𝘶𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘰𝘴 𝘪𝘥𝘦𝘰𝘭𝘰́𝘨𝘪𝘤𝘰𝘴, 𝘯𝘪𝘯𝘨𝘶𝘦́𝘮 𝘱𝘦𝘳𝘨𝘶𝘯𝘵𝘢 𝘤𝘰𝘮𝘰 𝘴𝘦 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘴𝘵𝘳𝘰́𝘪 𝘶𝘮𝘢 𝘤𝘪𝘥𝘢𝘥𝘢𝘯𝘪𝘢 𝘥𝘦𝘮𝘰𝘤𝘳𝘢́𝘵𝘪𝘤𝘢 𝘴𝘦́𝘳𝘪𝘢 𝘯𝘶𝘮 𝘴𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘦𝘮𝘢 𝘰𝘯𝘥𝘦 𝘰𝘴 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘧𝘦𝘴𝘴𝘰𝘳𝘦𝘴 𝘯𝘢̃𝘰 𝘵𝘦̂𝘮 𝘵𝘦𝘮𝘱𝘰 𝘱𝘢𝘳𝘢 𝘳𝘦𝘴𝘱𝘪𝘳𝘢𝘳, 𝘲𝘶𝘢𝘯𝘵𝘰 𝘮𝘢𝘪𝘴 𝘱𝘢𝘳𝘢 𝘧𝘰𝘳𝘮𝘢𝘳 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘴𝘤𝘪𝘦̂𝘯𝘤𝘪𝘢𝘴.ᐣ 𝘗𝘢𝘳𝘢 𝘯𝘢̃𝘰 𝘧𝘢𝘭𝘢𝘳 𝘥𝘰 𝘧𝘢𝘤𝘵𝘰 𝘥𝘦 𝘰𝘴 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘧𝘦𝘴𝘴𝘰𝘳𝘦𝘴 𝘥𝘦 𝘊𝘪𝘥𝘢𝘥𝘢𝘯𝘪𝘢 𝘥𝘢𝘳𝘦𝘮 𝘢𝘰 𝘮𝘦𝘴𝘮𝘰 𝘵𝘦𝘮𝘱𝘰, 𝘱𝘰𝘳 𝘦𝘹𝘦𝘮𝘱𝘭𝘰, 𝘌𝘥𝘶𝘤𝘢𝘤̧𝘢̃𝘰 𝘛𝘦𝘤𝘯𝘰𝘭𝘰́𝘨𝘪𝘤𝘢 𝘰𝘶 𝘏𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘰́𝘳𝘪𝘢. 𝘙𝘦𝘦𝘴𝘤𝘳𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘳 𝘵𝘰́𝘱𝘪𝘤𝘰𝘴 𝘯𝘶𝘮 𝘥𝘰𝘤𝘶𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘰 𝘦́ 𝘧𝘢́𝘤𝘪𝘭, 𝘰 𝘥𝘪𝘧𝜄́𝘤𝘪𝘭 𝘦́ 𝘨𝘢𝘳𝘢𝘯𝘵𝘪𝘳 𝘲𝘶𝘦 𝘢 𝘤𝘪𝘥𝘢𝘥𝘢𝘯𝘪𝘢 𝘯𝘢̃𝘰 𝘴𝘦𝘫𝘢 𝘢𝘱𝘦𝘯𝘢𝘴 𝘮𝘢𝘪𝘴 𝘶𝘮𝘢 𝘤𝘳𝘶𝘻 𝘯𝘶𝘮 𝘨𝘳𝘦𝘭𝘩𝘢𝘥𝘰 𝘥𝘦 𝘢𝘷𝘢𝘭𝘪𝘢𝘤̧𝘢̃𝘰 𝘱𝘳𝘦𝘦𝘯𝘤𝘩𝘪𝘥𝘰 𝘢̀ 𝘱𝘳𝘦𝘴𝘴𝘢 𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘳𝘦 𝘥𝘶𝘢𝘴 𝘳𝘦𝘶𝘯𝘪𝘰̃𝘦𝘴 𝘪𝘯𝘶́𝘵𝘦𝘪𝘴.
𝘌 𝘤𝘩𝘦𝘨𝘢́𝘮𝘰𝘴 𝘢𝘨𝘰𝘳𝘢 𝘢𝘰 ‘𝘦𝘱𝘪𝘴𝘰́𝘥𝘪𝘰 𝘚𝘢𝘳𝘢𝘮𝘢𝘨𝘰’, 𝘶𝘮 𝘤𝘭𝘢́𝘴𝘴𝘪𝘤𝘰 𝘥𝘰 𝘰𝘱𝘰𝘳𝘵𝘶𝘯𝘪𝘴𝘮𝘰 𝘪𝘥𝘦𝘰𝘭𝘰́𝘨𝘪𝘤𝘰. 𝘌𝘮 𝘮𝘢𝘳𝘤̧𝘰 𝘥𝘦 𝟤𝟢𝟤𝟨, 𝘢𝘣𝘳𝘪𝘶-𝘴𝘦 𝘢 𝘱𝘰𝘴𝘴𝘪𝘣𝘪𝘭𝘪𝘥𝘢𝘥𝘦 𝘥𝘦 𝘰 𝘶́𝘯𝘪𝘤𝘰 𝘕𝘰𝘣𝘦𝘭 𝘱𝘰𝘳𝘵𝘶𝘨𝘶𝘦̂𝘴 𝘥𝘦𝘪𝘹𝘢𝘳 𝘥𝘦 𝘴𝘦𝘳 𝘭𝘦𝘪𝘵𝘶𝘳𝘢 𝘰𝘣𝘳𝘪𝘨𝘢𝘵𝘰́𝘳𝘪𝘢. 𝘖 𝘮𝘪𝘯𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘦́𝘳𝘪𝘰 𝘢𝘱𝘳𝘦𝘴𝘴𝘰𝘶-𝘴𝘦 𝘢 𝘥𝘪𝘻𝘦𝘳 𝘲𝘶𝘦 𝘦𝘳𝘢 𝘶𝘮𝘢 𝘲𝘶𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘢̃𝘰 ‘𝘢𝘣𝘴𝘰𝘭𝘶𝘵𝘢𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘦 𝘵𝘦́𝘤𝘯𝘪𝘤𝘢’. 𝘔𝘢𝘴 𝘢 𝘲𝘶𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘢̃𝘰 𝘤𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘳𝘢𝘭 𝘯𝘢̃𝘰 𝘦́ 𝘰 𝘤𝘢𝘵𝘢́𝘭𝘰𝘨𝘰, 𝘦́ 𝘰 𝘮𝘦́𝘵𝘰𝘥𝘰. 𝘖 𝘱𝘢𝜄́𝘴 𝘱𝘰𝘥𝘦 𝘥𝘪𝘴𝘤𝘶𝘵𝘪𝘳 𝘴𝘦 𝘲𝘶𝘦𝘳 𝘚𝘢𝘳𝘢𝘮𝘢𝘨𝘰, 𝘊𝘢𝘮𝘰̃𝘦𝘴 𝘰𝘶 𝘰 𝘢𝘶𝘵𝘰𝘳 𝘥𝘢 𝘮𝘰𝘥𝘢. 𝘕𝘰 𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘢𝘯𝘵𝘰, 𝘴𝘦 𝘢 𝘦𝘴𝘤𝘰𝘭𝘢 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘵𝘪𝘯𝘶𝘢𝘳 𝘢 𝘧𝘢𝘭𝘩𝘢𝘳 𝘯𝘢 𝘤𝘳𝘪𝘢𝘤̧𝘢̃𝘰 𝘥𝘦 𝘭𝘦𝘪𝘵𝘰𝘳𝘦𝘴 𝘤𝘰𝘮𝘱𝘦𝘵𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘦𝘴 𝘦 𝘥𝘪𝘴𝘤𝘪𝘱𝘭𝘪𝘯𝘢𝘥𝘰𝘴, 𝘢 𝘣𝘢𝘵𝘢𝘭𝘩𝘢 𝘴𝘰𝘣𝘳𝘦 𝘲𝘶𝘦𝘮 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘴𝘵𝘢 𝘥𝘢 𝘭𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘢 𝘦́ 𝘢𝘱𝘦𝘯𝘢𝘴 𝘧𝘦𝘵𝘪𝘤𝘩𝘪𝘴𝘮𝘰 𝘭𝘪𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘢́𝘳𝘪𝘰. 𝘋𝘪𝘴𝘤𝘶𝘵𝘪𝘮𝘰𝘴 𝘰 𝘢𝘶𝘵𝘰𝘳 𝘱𝘢𝘳𝘢 𝘯𝘢̃𝘰 𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘮𝘰𝘴 𝘥𝘦 𝘥𝘪𝘴𝘤𝘶𝘵𝘪𝘳 𝘢 𝘪𝘯𝘤𝘢𝘱𝘢𝘤𝘪𝘥𝘢𝘥𝘦 𝘥𝘦 𝘪𝘯𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘱𝘳𝘦𝘵𝘢𝘤̧𝘢̃𝘰 𝘥𝘰𝘴 𝘢𝘭𝘶𝘯𝘰𝘴. 𝘌́ 𝘰 𝘵𝘳𝘪𝘶𝘯𝘧𝘰 𝘥𝘢 𝘤𝘶𝘳𝘢𝘥𝘰𝘳𝘪𝘢 𝘴𝘰𝘣𝘳𝘦 𝘢 𝘤𝘰𝘮𝘱𝘦𝘵𝘦̂𝘯𝘤𝘪𝘢. 𝘌𝘯𝘲𝘶𝘢𝘯𝘵𝘰 𝘢 𝘦𝘴𝘧𝘦𝘳𝘢 𝘱𝘶́𝘣𝘭𝘪𝘤𝘢 𝘴𝘦 𝘪𝘯𝘤𝘦𝘯𝘥𝘦𝘪𝘢 𝘦𝘮 𝘥𝘦𝘧𝘦𝘴𝘢𝘴 𝘢𝘱𝘢𝘪𝘹𝘰𝘯𝘢𝘥𝘢𝘴 𝘥𝘢 ‘𝘰𝘣𝘳𝘪𝘨𝘢𝘵𝘰𝘳𝘪𝘦𝘥𝘢𝘥𝘦’ 𝘥𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘦 𝘰𝘶 𝘥𝘢𝘲𝘶𝘦𝘭𝘦 𝘷𝘶𝘭𝘵𝘰 𝘥𝘰 𝘤𝘢̂𝘯𝘰𝘯𝘦, 𝘢𝘴 𝘦𝘴𝘤𝘰𝘭𝘢𝘴 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘵𝘪𝘯𝘶𝘢𝘮 𝘢 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘥𝘶𝘻𝘪𝘳 𝘥𝘪𝘱𝘭𝘰𝘮𝘢𝘥𝘰𝘴 𝘲𝘶𝘦, 𝘦𝘮𝘣𝘰𝘳𝘢 𝘴𝘢𝘪𝘣𝘢𝘮 𝘪𝘥𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘪𝘧𝘪𝘤𝘢𝘳 𝘰 𝘯𝘰𝘮𝘦 𝘥𝘦 𝘚𝘢𝘳𝘢𝘮𝘢𝘨𝘰 𝘯𝘢 𝘤𝘢𝘱𝘢 𝘥𝘦 𝘶𝘮 𝘭𝘪𝘷𝘳𝘰, 𝘴𝘢̃𝘰 𝘪𝘯𝘤𝘢𝘱𝘢𝘻𝘦𝘴 𝘥𝘦 𝘥𝘦𝘴𝘤𝘰𝘥𝘪𝘧𝘪𝘤𝘢𝘳 𝘶𝘮𝘢 𝘰𝘳𝘢𝘤̧𝘢̃𝘰 𝘴𝘶𝘣𝘰𝘳𝘥𝘪𝘯𝘢𝘥𝘢 𝘤𝘰𝘮𝘱𝘭𝘦𝘹𝘢 𝘰𝘶 𝘥𝘦 𝘥𝘦𝘵𝘦𝘵𝘢𝘳 𝘶𝘮𝘢 𝘪𝘳𝘰𝘯𝘪𝘢 𝘦𝘭𝘦𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘢𝘳 𝘯𝘶𝘮 𝘵𝘦𝘹𝘵𝘰 𝘥𝘦 𝘰𝘱𝘪𝘯𝘪𝘢̃𝘰.
𝘌𝘯𝘵𝘳𝘦𝘵𝘢𝘯𝘵𝘰, 𝘰 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘣𝘭𝘦𝘮𝘢 𝘮𝘢𝘪𝘴 𝘴𝘦́𝘳𝘪𝘰 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘵𝘪𝘯𝘶𝘢 𝘢 𝘴𝘦𝘳 𝘰 𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘰𝘴 𝘨𝘭𝘢𝘮𝘰𝘳𝘰𝘴𝘰. 𝘌𝘮 𝟤𝟢𝟤𝟦, 𝘭𝘢𝘯𝘤̧𝘰𝘶-𝘴𝘦 𝘰 𝘱𝘭𝘢𝘯𝘰 ‘+𝘈𝘶𝘭𝘢𝘴 +𝘚𝘶𝘤𝘦𝘴𝘴𝘰’. 𝘌𝘮 𝘯𝘰𝘷𝘦𝘮𝘣𝘳𝘰, 𝘰 𝘱𝘳𝘰́𝘱𝘳𝘪𝘰 𝘔𝘪𝘯𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘦́𝘳𝘪𝘰 𝘱𝘦𝘥𝘪𝘶 𝘶𝘮𝘢 𝘢𝘶𝘥𝘪𝘵𝘰𝘳𝘪𝘢 𝘦𝘹𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘯𝘢 𝘢𝘰𝘴 𝘴𝘦𝘶𝘴 𝘱𝘳𝘰́𝘱𝘳𝘪𝘰𝘴 𝘯𝘶́𝘮𝘦𝘳𝘰𝘴, 𝘳𝘦𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘩𝘦𝘤𝘦𝘯𝘥𝘰 𝘲𝘶𝘦 𝘯𝘦𝘮 𝘴𝘦𝘲𝘶𝘦𝘳 𝘴𝘢𝘣𝘦 𝘢𝘰 𝘤𝘦𝘳𝘵𝘰 𝘲𝘶𝘢𝘯𝘵𝘰𝘴 𝘢𝘭𝘶𝘯𝘰𝘴 𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘢̃𝘰 𝘴𝘦𝘮 𝘢𝘶𝘭𝘢𝘴. 𝘌𝘴𝘵𝘦 𝘦́ 𝘰 𝘳𝘦𝘵𝘳𝘢𝘵𝘰 𝘮𝘢𝘪𝘴 𝘤𝘳𝘶𝘦𝘭 𝘥𝘢 𝘱𝘰𝘭𝜄́𝘵𝘪𝘤𝘢 𝘥𝘢 𝘥𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘳𝘢𝘤̧𝘢̃𝘰, 𝘶𝘮 𝘴𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘦𝘮𝘢 𝘲𝘶𝘦 𝘥𝘪𝘴𝘤𝘶𝘵𝘦 𝘰 𝘴𝘦𝘹𝘰 𝘥𝘰𝘴 𝘢𝘯𝘫𝘰𝘴 (𝘦 𝘥𝘰𝘴 𝘮𝘢𝘯𝘶𝘢𝘪𝘴) 𝘦𝘯𝘲𝘶𝘢𝘯𝘵𝘰 𝘥𝘦𝘮𝘰𝘯𝘴𝘵𝘳𝘢 𝘶𝘮𝘢 𝘪𝘯𝘤𝘢𝘱𝘢𝘤𝘪𝘥𝘢𝘥𝘦 𝘨𝘳𝘪𝘵𝘢𝘯𝘵𝘦 𝘦𝘮 𝘨𝘢𝘳𝘢𝘯𝘵𝘪𝘳 𝘶𝘮 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘧𝘦𝘴𝘴𝘰𝘳 𝘢̀ 𝘧𝘳𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘦 𝘥𝘦 𝘤𝘢𝘥𝘢 𝘵𝘶𝘳𝘮𝘢. 𝘚𝘦𝘮 𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘦 𝘮𝜄́𝘯𝘪𝘮𝘰, 𝘵𝘶𝘥𝘰 𝘰 𝘳𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘰 𝘦́ 𝘵𝘦𝘢𝘵𝘳𝘰 𝘳𝘦𝘨𝘶𝘭𝘢𝘵𝘰́𝘳𝘪𝘰 𝘥𝘦 𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘤𝘦𝘪𝘳𝘢 𝘤𝘢𝘵𝘦𝘨𝘰𝘳𝘪𝘢.
𝘌 𝘢𝘤𝘢𝘣𝘢𝘮𝘰𝘴 𝘤𝘰𝘮 𝘰 𝘤𝘢𝘴𝘰 𝘥𝘢𝘴 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘷𝘢𝘴 𝘥𝘦 𝘔𝘰𝘯𝘪𝘵𝘰𝘳𝘪𝘻𝘢𝘤̧𝘢̃𝘰 𝘥𝘢 𝘈𝘱𝘳𝘦𝘯𝘥𝘪𝘻𝘢𝘨𝘦𝘮 (𝘔𝘰𝘥𝘈) 𝘲𝘶𝘦 𝘴𝘢̃𝘰 𝘰 𝘦𝘹𝘱𝘰𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘦 𝘮𝘢́𝘹𝘪𝘮𝘰 𝘥𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘢 𝘦𝘴𝘲𝘶𝘪𝘻𝘰𝘧𝘳𝘦𝘯𝘪𝘢 𝘮𝘪𝘯𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘪𝘢𝘭. 𝘋𝘶𝘳𝘢𝘯𝘵𝘦 𝘵𝘰𝘥𝘰 𝘰 𝘢𝘯𝘰 𝘭𝘦𝘵𝘪𝘷𝘰, 𝘰 ‘𝘥𝘪𝘨𝘪𝘵𝘢𝘭’ 𝘦́ 𝘶𝘮𝘢 𝘮𝘪𝘳𝘢𝘨𝘦𝘮, 𝘧𝘢𝘭𝘵𝘢𝘮 𝘤𝘰𝘮𝘱𝘶𝘵𝘢𝘥𝘰𝘳𝘦𝘴, 𝘢 𝘳𝘦𝘥𝘦 𝘸𝘪-𝘧𝘪 𝘥𝘢𝘴 𝘦𝘴𝘤𝘰𝘭𝘢𝘴 𝘦́ 𝘶𝘮𝘢 𝘳𝘦𝘭𝜄́𝘲𝘶𝘪𝘢 𝘥𝘰 𝘴𝘦́𝘤𝘶𝘭𝘰 𝘱𝘢𝘴𝘴𝘢𝘥𝘰 𝘦 𝘰𝘴 𝘢𝘭𝘶𝘯𝘰𝘴 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘵𝘪𝘯𝘶𝘢𝘮 𝘢 𝘵𝘳𝘢𝘣𝘢𝘭𝘩𝘢𝘳 𝘯𝘰 𝘴𝘶𝘱𝘰𝘳𝘵𝘦 𝘲𝘶𝘦 𝘳𝘦𝘢𝘭𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘦 𝘧𝘶𝘯𝘤𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘢, 𝘰 𝘱𝘢𝘱𝘦𝘭. 𝘔𝘢𝘴, 𝘱𝘰𝘳 𝘢𝘳𝘵𝘦𝘴 𝘮𝘢́𝘨𝘪𝘤𝘢𝘴, 𝘯𝘰 𝘥𝘪𝘢 𝘥𝘢𝘴 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘷𝘢𝘴 𝘔𝘰𝘥𝘈, 𝘢𝘴 𝘦𝘴𝘤𝘰𝘭𝘢𝘴 𝘴𝘢̃𝘰 𝘪𝘯𝘷𝘢𝘥𝘪𝘥𝘢𝘴 𝘱𝘰𝘳 𝘤𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘦𝘯𝘢𝘴 𝘥𝘦 𝘱𝘰𝘳𝘵𝘢́𝘵𝘦𝘪𝘴. 𝘌́ 𝘰 𝘮𝘪𝘭𝘢𝘨𝘳𝘦 𝘥𝘢 𝘮𝘶𝘭𝘵𝘪𝘱𝘭𝘪𝘤𝘢𝘤̧𝘢̃𝘰 𝘥𝘰𝘴 𝘤𝘰𝘮𝘱𝘶𝘵𝘢𝘥𝘰𝘳𝘦𝘴, 𝘲𝘶𝘦 𝘢𝘱𝘢𝘳𝘦𝘤𝘦𝘮 𝘱𝘢𝘳𝘢 𝘢 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘷𝘢 𝘦 𝘥𝘦𝘴𝘢𝘱𝘢𝘳𝘦𝘤𝘦𝘮 𝘮𝘢𝘭 𝘰 𝘢𝘭𝘶𝘯𝘰 𝘤𝘭𝘪𝘤𝘢 𝘦𝘮 ‘𝘴𝘶𝘣𝘮𝘦𝘵𝘦𝘳’. 𝘌́ 𝘯𝘰𝘷𝘢𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘦 𝘢 𝘱𝘦𝘥𝘢𝘨𝘰𝘨𝘪𝘢 𝘥𝘰 𝘧𝘢𝘻-𝘥𝘦-𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘵𝘢, 𝘰𝘯𝘥𝘦 𝘰 𝘮𝘪𝘯𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘦́𝘳𝘪𝘰 𝘨𝘢𝘳𝘢𝘯𝘵𝘦 𝘰 𝘩𝘢𝘳𝘥𝘸𝘢𝘳𝘦 𝘱𝘢𝘳𝘢 𝘢 𝘧𝘰𝘵𝘰𝘨𝘳𝘢𝘧𝘪𝘢 𝘥𝘰 𝘦𝘹𝘢𝘮𝘦, 𝘮𝘢𝘴 𝘥𝘦𝘮𝘪𝘵𝘦-𝘴𝘦 𝘥𝘦 𝘨𝘢𝘳𝘢𝘯𝘵𝘪𝘳 𝘰 𝘢𝘤𝘦𝘴𝘴𝘰 𝘢𝘰 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘩𝘦𝘤𝘪𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘰 𝘥𝘶𝘳𝘢𝘯𝘵𝘦 𝘰𝘴 𝘳𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘢𝘯𝘵𝘦𝘴 𝟥𝟢𝟢 𝘥𝘪𝘢𝘴 𝘥𝘰 𝘢𝘯𝘰.
𝘈 𝘖𝘊𝘋𝘌 𝘫𝘢́ 𝘯𝘰𝘴 𝘢𝘷𝘪𝘴𝘰𝘶, 𝘗𝘰𝘳𝘵𝘶𝘨𝘢𝘭 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘵𝘪𝘯𝘶𝘢 𝘢𝘣𝘢𝘪𝘹𝘰 𝘥𝘢 𝘮𝘦́𝘥𝘪𝘢 𝘦𝘮 𝘭𝘪𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘢𝘤𝘪𝘢 𝘦 𝘯𝘶𝘮𝘦𝘳𝘢𝘤𝘪𝘢. 𝘘𝘶𝘢𝘴𝘦 𝘮𝘦𝘵𝘢𝘥𝘦 𝘥𝘰𝘴 𝘢𝘥𝘶𝘭𝘵𝘰𝘴 𝘱𝘰𝘳𝘵𝘶𝘨𝘶𝘦𝘴𝘦𝘴 𝘮𝘢𝘭 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘴𝘦𝘨𝘶𝘦 𝘪𝘯𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘱𝘳𝘦𝘵𝘢𝘳 𝘶𝘮 𝘵𝘦𝘹𝘵𝘰 𝘴𝘪𝘮𝘱𝘭𝘦𝘴, 𝘶𝘮 𝘥𝘢𝘥𝘰 𝘢𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘳𝘢𝘥𝘰𝘳 𝘲𝘶𝘦 𝘯𝘦𝘯𝘩𝘶𝘮 𝘗𝘰𝘸𝘦𝘳𝘗𝘰𝘪𝘯𝘵 𝘮𝘪𝘯𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘪𝘢𝘭 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘴𝘦𝘨𝘶𝘦 𝘤𝘢𝘮𝘶𝘧𝘭𝘢𝘳. 𝘌𝘴𝘵𝘦𝘴 𝘯𝘶́𝘮𝘦𝘳𝘰𝘴 𝘯𝘢̃𝘰 𝘴𝘦 𝘳𝘦𝘴𝘰𝘭𝘷𝘦𝘮 𝘤𝘰𝘮 𝘶𝘮𝘢 𝘯𝘰𝘷𝘢 𝘱𝘰𝘭𝘦́𝘮𝘪𝘤𝘢 𝘱𝘰𝘳 𝘵𝘳𝘪𝘮𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘳𝘦 𝘱𝘢𝘳𝘢 𝘢𝘭𝘪𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘢𝘳 𝘰 𝘧𝘰𝘭𝘤𝘭𝘰𝘳𝘦 𝘵𝘦𝘭𝘦𝘷𝘪𝘴𝘪𝘷𝘰 𝘦 𝘰 𝘦𝘹𝘦́𝘳𝘤𝘪𝘵𝘰 𝘥𝘦 𝘤𝘰𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘢𝘥𝘦𝘪𝘳𝘢𝘴. 𝘙𝘦𝘴𝘰𝘭𝘷𝘦𝘮-𝘴𝘦 𝘤𝘰𝘮 𝘦𝘴𝘤𝘰𝘭𝘩𝘢𝘴 𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘳𝘶𝘵𝘶𝘳𝘢𝘪𝘴, 𝘰𝘶 𝘴𝘦𝘫𝘢, 𝘦𝘮𝘢𝘨𝘳𝘦𝘤𝘦𝘳 𝘰 𝘤𝘶𝘳𝘳𝜄́𝘤𝘶𝘭𝘰 𝘱𝘢𝘳𝘢 𝘮𝘦𝘭𝘩𝘰𝘳 𝘱𝘳𝘦𝘱𝘢𝘳𝘢𝘳 𝘰𝘴 𝘢𝘭𝘶𝘯𝘰𝘴 𝘱𝘢𝘳𝘢 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘣𝘭𝘦𝘮𝘢𝘴 𝘳𝘦𝘢𝘪𝘴, 𝘳𝘦𝘰𝘳𝘨𝘢𝘯𝘪𝘻𝘢𝘳 𝘰 𝘵𝘦𝘮𝘱𝘰 𝘦𝘴𝘤𝘰𝘭𝘢𝘳 𝘦 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘵𝘦𝘨𝘦𝘳 𝘰 𝘵𝘦𝘮𝘱𝘰 𝘥𝘰𝘤𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘦.
𝘙𝘦𝘨𝘶𝘭𝘢𝘳 𝘴𝘮𝘢𝘳𝘵𝘱𝘩𝘰𝘯𝘦𝘴 𝘥𝘢́ 𝘮𝘢𝘯𝘤𝘩𝘦𝘵𝘦𝘴. 𝘔𝘦𝘹𝘦𝘳 𝘦𝘮 𝘚𝘢𝘳𝘢𝘮𝘢𝘨𝘰 𝘨𝘦𝘳𝘢 𝘪𝘯𝘥𝘪𝘨𝘯𝘢𝘤̧𝘢̃𝘰 𝘪𝘯𝘴𝘵𝘢𝘯𝘵𝘢̂𝘯𝘦𝘢. 𝘍𝘢𝘭𝘢𝘳 𝘥𝘦 𝘥𝘪𝘨𝘪𝘵𝘢𝘭𝘪𝘻𝘢𝘤̧𝘢̃𝘰 𝘱𝘦𝘳𝘮𝘪𝘵𝘦 𝘶𝘴𝘢𝘳 𝘰 𝘭𝘦́𝘹𝘪𝘤𝘰 𝘥𝘢 𝘮𝘰𝘥𝘦𝘳𝘯𝘪𝘥𝘢𝘥𝘦. 𝘛𝘶𝘥𝘰 𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘰 𝘰𝘤𝘶𝘱𝘢 𝘰 𝘦𝘴𝘱𝘢𝘤̧𝘰 𝘴𝘪𝘮𝘣𝘰́𝘭𝘪𝘤𝘰. 𝘛𝘶𝘥𝘰 𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘰 𝘱𝘦𝘳𝘮𝘪𝘵𝘦 𝘱𝘢𝘳𝘦𝘤𝘦𝘳 𝘥𝘦𝘤𝘪𝘥𝘪𝘥𝘰 𝘦𝘯𝘲𝘶𝘢𝘯𝘵𝘰 𝘴𝘦 𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘢́ 𝘱𝘢𝘳𝘢𝘥𝘰. 𝘜𝘮𝘢 𝘱𝘰𝘭𝜄́𝘵𝘪𝘤𝘢 𝘦𝘥𝘶𝘤𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘷𝘢 𝘴𝘦́𝘳𝘪𝘢 𝘯𝘢̃𝘰 𝘱𝘰𝘥𝘦 𝘨𝘰𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘯𝘢𝘳 𝘢𝘰 𝘳𝘪𝘵𝘮𝘰 𝘥𝘢 𝘱𝘳𝘰́𝘹𝘪𝘮𝘢 𝘵𝘦𝘯𝘥𝘦̂𝘯𝘤𝘪𝘢 𝘥𝘢𝘴 𝘳𝘦𝘥𝘦𝘴 𝘴𝘰𝘤𝘪𝘢𝘪𝘴. 𝘖 𝘤𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘳𝘰 𝘥𝘢 𝘳𝘦𝘧𝘰𝘳𝘮𝘢 𝘯𝘢̃𝘰 𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘢́ 𝘯𝘰 𝘰𝘣𝘫𝘦𝘵𝘰 𝘮𝘦𝘥𝘪𝘢́𝘵𝘪𝘤𝘰 𝘥𝘢 𝘴𝘦𝘮𝘢𝘯𝘢, 𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘢́ 𝘦𝘮 𝘨𝘢𝘳𝘢𝘯𝘵𝘪𝘳 𝘢𝘶𝘭𝘢𝘴, 𝘧𝘰𝘤𝘰 𝘦 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘧𝘶𝘯𝘥𝘪𝘥𝘢𝘥𝘦 𝘪𝘯𝘵𝘦𝘭𝘦𝘤𝘵𝘶𝘢𝘭. 𝘚𝘦𝘮 𝘤𝘰𝘳𝘢𝘨𝘦𝘮 𝘱𝘢𝘳𝘢 𝘦𝘯𝘧𝘳𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘢𝘳 𝘰 𝘦𝘴𝘴𝘦𝘯𝘤𝘪𝘢𝘭, 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘵𝘪𝘯𝘶𝘢𝘳𝘦𝘮𝘰𝘴 𝘢 𝘵𝘦𝘳 𝘶𝘮𝘢 𝘵𝘶𝘵𝘦𝘭𝘢 𝘩𝘪𝘱𝘦𝘳𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘷𝘢 𝘯𝘢 𝘨𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘢̃𝘰 𝘥𝘦 𝘴𝘪𝘯𝘢𝘪𝘴 𝘦 𝘵𝘳𝘢𝘨𝘪𝘤𝘢𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘦 𝘵𝜄́𝘮𝘪𝘥𝘢 𝘯𝘢 𝘳𝘦𝘧𝘰𝘳𝘮𝘢 𝘥𝘰 𝘴𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘦𝘮𝘢. 𝘈 𝘦𝘥𝘶𝘤𝘢𝘤̧𝘢̃𝘰 𝘱𝘰𝘳𝘵𝘶𝘨𝘶𝘦𝘴𝘢 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘵𝘪𝘯𝘶𝘢𝘳𝘢́ 𝘢 𝘴𝘦𝘳 𝘨𝘰𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘯𝘢𝘥𝘢 𝘤𝘰𝘮𝘰 𝘶𝘮𝘢 𝘢𝘨𝘦̂𝘯𝘤𝘪𝘢 𝘥𝘦 𝘱𝘶𝘣𝘭𝘪𝘤𝘪𝘥𝘢𝘥𝘦, 𝘤𝘰𝘮 𝘮𝘶𝘪𝘵𝘢 𝘥𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘳𝘢𝘤̧𝘢̃𝘰 𝘱𝘢𝘳𝘢 𝘥𝘪𝘴𝘴𝘪𝘮𝘶𝘭𝘢𝘳 𝘢 𝘵𝘰𝘵𝘢𝘭 𝘢𝘶𝘴𝘦̂𝘯𝘤𝘪𝘢 𝘥𝘦 𝘵𝘳𝘢𝘯𝘴𝘧𝘰𝘳𝘮𝘢𝘤̧𝘢̃𝘰.
* Líder do grupo de investigação em Nanomedicina, professor e subdirector de Investigação na Faculdade de Ciências Médicas da Universidade Nova de Lisboa
IN "DIÁRIO DE NOTÍCIAS" -02/06/26 .
ꓦᚣᛖᛜᛢ ꓦᛁᚣⳖᚣᚱ ᚢᚣ ᛖᚣᛁᛜᚢᛊᛢᛊ/21
ℌ𝔲𝔤𝔬 𝔳𝔞𝔫 𝔡𝔢𝔯 𝔇𝔦𝔫𝔤
𝔗𝔦𝔞𝔤𝔬 ℜ𝔦𝔟𝔢𝔦𝔯𝔬
Hυмσя є cσηнєcιмєηтσ єм ρσятυgυє̂ѕ (cσιѕα яαяα)
ASSIM NÃO TRBALHAMOS
FONTE:
NR: Depois de #Vamos Todos Morrer# apresentamos o novo podcast de HUGO e do TIAGO, a mesma inteligência, o mesmo humor e também a mesma sedução.
A pretensão é através duma construção bem humorada diminuir a ignorância dos portugueses relativamente à vida de pessoas de bem ou de mal.
Ao ℌ𝔲𝔤𝔬 𝔳𝔞𝔫 𝔡𝔢𝔯 𝔇𝔦𝔫𝔤 e ao 𝔗𝔦𝔞𝔤𝔬 ℜ𝔦𝔟𝔢𝔦𝔯𝔬, grandes responsáveis por o sucesso anterior desejamos o melhor da vida, ainda mais sucesso, o país precisa!
NR/2: Estamos a pensar se à actual ministra do Trabalho e às confrarias dos patrões não conviria uma jornada de trabalho de sete dias.
Subscrever:
Mensagens (Atom)