.
25/06/2023
ANYA SCHIFFRIN
.
O jornalismo
contra-ataca
𝐻𝑎́ 𝑑𝑜𝑖𝑠 𝑎𝑛𝑜𝑠, 𝑜 𝑃𝑎𝑟𝑙𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜 𝑎𝑢𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑎𝑛𝑜 𝑎𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑣𝑜𝑢 𝑜 𝑁𝑒𝑤𝑠 𝑀𝑒𝑑𝑖𝑎 𝐵𝑎𝑟𝑔𝑎𝑖𝑛𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝐶𝑜𝑑𝑒, 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑜𝑏𝑟𝑖𝑔𝑜𝑢 𝑎 𝑀𝑒𝑡𝑎 (𝐹𝑎𝑐𝑒𝑏𝑜𝑜𝑘) 𝑒 𝑎 𝐴𝑙𝑝ℎ𝑎𝑏𝑒𝑡 (𝐺𝑜𝑜𝑔𝑙𝑒) 𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑒𝑛𝑠𝑎𝑟 𝑜𝑠 𝑚𝑒𝑖𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑢𝑛𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑝𝑒𝑙𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑢́𝑑𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑛𝑜𝑡𝑖́𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑠 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑡𝑖𝑙ℎ𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑛𝑎𝑠 𝑠𝑢𝑎𝑠 𝑝𝑙𝑎𝑡𝑎𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑚𝑎𝑠. 𝐴 𝑙𝑒𝑖 𝑡𝑒𝑚 𝑠𝑖𝑑𝑜 𝑢𝑚 𝑠𝑢𝑐𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑜 𝑛𝑜𝑡𝑎́𝑣𝑒𝑙, 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑜𝑠 𝑚𝑒𝑖𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑢𝑛𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑎𝑢𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑎𝑛𝑜𝑠 𝑎 𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑏𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑚 𝑚𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝟸𝟶𝟶 𝑚𝑖𝑙ℎ𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑑𝑜́𝑙𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑠 𝑎𝑢𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑎𝑛𝑜𝑠 (𝟷𝟸𝟺 𝑚𝑖𝑙ℎ𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑒𝑢𝑟𝑜𝑠) 𝑎𝑛𝑢𝑎𝑙𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑔𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑒𝑠 𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑎𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑡𝑒𝑐𝑛𝑜𝑙𝑜𝑔𝑖𝑎.
𝐶𝑜𝑚 𝑜 𝑓𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑛𝑜𝑡𝑖́𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑠 𝑙𝑜𝑐𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑎 𝑐𝑎𝑖𝑟, 𝑜 𝑛𝑢́𝑚𝑒𝑟𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑔𝑜𝑠 𝑗𝑜𝑟𝑛𝑎𝑙𝑖́𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑜𝑠 𝑎 𝑑𝑖𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑢𝑖𝑟 𝑒 𝑎 𝑢𝑟𝑔𝑒̂𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑎 𝑑𝑎 𝑛𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝑑𝑒 𝑝𝑜𝑙𝑖́𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑠 𝑖𝑛𝑜𝑣𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑟𝑎𝑠 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑠𝑢𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑟 𝑎 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑑𝑢𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑛𝑜𝑡𝑖́𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑎𝑙𝑡𝑎 𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒, 𝑜 𝑐𝑜́𝑑𝑖𝑔𝑜 𝑑𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑢𝑛𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑠𝑜𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑙 𝑎𝑢𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑎𝑛𝑜 𝑎𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑖𝑢 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑠𝑖𝑔𝑛𝑖𝑓𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑎. 𝐺𝑜𝑜𝑔𝑙𝑒 𝑒 𝐹𝑎𝑐𝑒𝑏𝑜𝑜𝑘 𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑣𝑖𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑚 𝑔𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑒𝑠 𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒𝑠 𝑑𝑎 𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑖𝑡𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑝𝑢𝑏𝑙𝑖𝑐𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑚𝑒𝑖𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑢𝑛𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑑𝑖𝑐𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑖𝑠, 𝑒 𝑜𝑠 𝑙𝑒𝑔𝑖𝑠𝑙𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑟𝑒𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑡𝑜𝑑𝑜 𝑜 𝑚𝑢𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑜𝑛ℎ𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑚 𝑐𝑎𝑑𝑎 𝑣𝑒𝑧 𝑚𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑎𝑠 𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑝𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑝𝑙𝑎𝑡𝑎𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑚𝑎𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑡𝑒𝑐𝑛𝑜𝑙𝑜𝑔𝑖𝑎 𝑡𝑒̂𝑚 𝑎 𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑝𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑎𝑏𝑖𝑙𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝑑𝑒 𝑎𝑝𝑜𝑖𝑎𝑟 𝑜 𝑗𝑜𝑟𝑛𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑠𝑚𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑒 𝑝𝑢́𝑏𝑙𝑖𝑐𝑜.
𝐶𝑜𝑚 𝑝𝑜𝑢𝑐𝑜 𝑎𝑙𝑎𝑟𝑑𝑒, 𝑜𝑢𝑡𝑟𝑜𝑠 𝑝𝑎𝑖́𝑠𝑒𝑠, 𝑖𝑛𝑐𝑙𝑢𝑖𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝐵𝑟𝑎𝑠𝑖𝑙, 𝐼𝑛𝑑𝑜𝑛𝑒́𝑠𝑖𝑎, 𝐶𝑎𝑛𝑎𝑑𝑎́, 𝑅𝑒𝑖𝑛𝑜 𝑈𝑛𝑖𝑑𝑜 𝑒 𝐸𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑈𝑛𝑖𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑚 𝑖𝑛𝑖́𝑐𝑖𝑜 𝑎̀𝑠 𝑠𝑢𝑎𝑠 𝑝𝑟𝑜́𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑠 𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑠𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑑𝑎 𝑙𝑒𝑔𝑖𝑠𝑙𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑎𝑢𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑎𝑛𝑎. 𝐶𝑜𝑚𝑜 𝑜𝑏𝑠𝑒𝑟𝑣𝑜𝑢 𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑃𝑖𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑖𝑐𝑘 𝐽𝑢𝑑𝑒𝑎𝑢𝑥, 𝑑𝑖𝑟𝑒𝑡𝑜𝑟 𝑑𝑒 𝑝𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑒𝑓𝑜́𝑙𝑖𝑜 𝑑𝑜 𝑛𝑜𝑣𝑜 𝐹𝑢𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝐼𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑛𝑎𝑐𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑙 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑜𝑠 𝑀𝑒𝑑𝑖𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝐼𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑒 𝑃𝑢́𝑏𝑙𝑖𝑐𝑜, 𝑜 𝑐𝑜́𝑑𝑖𝑔𝑜 𝑑𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑢𝑛𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑠𝑜𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑙 𝑡𝑜𝑟𝑛𝑜𝑢-𝑠𝑒 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑡𝑒 𝑑𝑜 "𝑝𝑜𝑑𝑒𝑟 𝑠𝑢𝑎𝑣𝑒" 𝑑𝑎 𝐴𝑢𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑎́𝑙𝑖𝑎. 𝑁𝑜𝑠 𝑢́𝑙𝑡𝑖𝑚𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑜𝑖𝑠 𝑎𝑛𝑜𝑠, 𝑎𝑠 𝑎𝑢𝑡𝑜𝑟𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒𝑠 𝑎𝑢𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑎𝑛𝑎𝑠 𝑣𝑖𝑎𝑗𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑚 𝑝𝑒𝑙𝑜 𝑚𝑢𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑜 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑚𝑜𝑣𝑒𝑟, 𝑎𝑙𝑒𝑟𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑜𝑠 𝑠𝑒𝑢𝑠 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑜 𝐺𝑜𝑜𝑔𝑙𝑒 𝑒 𝑜 𝐹𝑎𝑐𝑒𝑏𝑜𝑜𝑘 𝑓𝑎𝑟𝑎̃𝑜 𝑢𝑚 𝑙𝑜́𝑏𝑖 𝑑𝑢𝑟𝑜, 𝑔𝑎𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑟𝑎̃𝑜 𝑚𝑢𝑖𝑡𝑖́𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑚𝑜 𝑒 𝑗𝑜𝑔𝑎𝑟𝑎̃𝑜 𝑠𝑢𝑗𝑜 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑒𝑣𝑖𝑡𝑎𝑟 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑡𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑠 𝑠𝑒 𝑒𝑠𝑝𝑎𝑙ℎ𝑒𝑚.
𝑂 𝐺𝑜𝑜𝑔𝑙𝑒, 𝑒𝑚 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑢𝑙𝑎𝑟, 𝑎𝑢𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜𝑢 𝑜𝑠 𝑠𝑒𝑢𝑠 𝑒𝑠𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑐̧𝑜𝑠 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑏𝑙𝑜𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑎𝑟 𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑎𝑠 𝑙𝑒𝑖𝑠. 𝐸𝑚 𝑚𝑢𝑖𝑡𝑜𝑠 𝑝𝑎𝑖́𝑠𝑒𝑠, 𝑚𝑒𝑖𝑜𝑠 𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑜𝑟𝑒𝑠 𝑒 𝑒𝑥𝑐𝑙𝑢𝑠𝑖𝑣𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑜𝑛𝑙𝑖𝑛𝑒 𝑡𝑒𝑚𝑒𝑚 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑜 𝑐𝑜́𝑑𝑖𝑔𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑢𝑛𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑠𝑜𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑙 𝑏𝑒𝑛𝑒𝑓𝑖𝑐𝑖𝑒 𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑝𝑎𝑙𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑜𝑠 𝑔𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑒𝑠 𝑒𝑑𝑖𝑡𝑜𝑟𝑒𝑠 𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑑𝑖𝑐𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑖𝑠. 𝐴𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑣𝑒𝑖𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑒 𝑐𝑒𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑖𝑠𝑚𝑜 𝑒 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑐𝑢𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑐𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑟 𝑑𝑖𝑣𝑖𝑠𝑜̃𝑒𝑠, 𝑜 𝐺𝑜𝑜𝑔𝑙𝑒 𝑓𝑒𝑐ℎ𝑜𝑢 𝑎𝑐𝑜𝑟𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑣𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑢𝑚 𝑔𝑟𝑢𝑝𝑜 𝑠𝑒𝑙𝑒𝑐𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑒𝑑𝑖𝑡𝑜𝑟𝑒𝑠 𝑐𝑎𝑛𝑎𝑑𝑖𝑎𝑛𝑜𝑠 𝑒 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎́ 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑜 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑖𝑛𝑖𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑟 𝑛𝑒𝑔𝑜𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑐̧𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑚𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑒𝑑𝑖𝑡𝑜𝑟𝑒𝑠 𝑛𝑎 𝐴́𝑓𝑟𝑖𝑐𝑎 𝑑𝑜 𝑆𝑢𝑙 𝑛𝑎𝑠 𝑝𝑟𝑜́𝑥𝑖𝑚𝑎𝑠 𝑠𝑒𝑚𝑎𝑛𝑎𝑠. 𝑃𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑏𝑒𝑟 𝑎𝑝𝑜𝑖𝑜 𝑓𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑛𝑐𝑒𝑖𝑟𝑜 𝑑𝑎 𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑎, 𝑜𝑠 𝑒𝑑𝑖𝑡𝑜𝑟𝑒𝑠 𝑑𝑒𝑣𝑒𝑚 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑚𝑒𝑡𝑒𝑟 𝑎𝑏𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑟-𝑠𝑒 𝑑𝑒 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑐𝑢𝑟𝑎𝑟 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑒𝑛𝑠𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑎𝑑𝑖𝑐𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑙 𝑛𝑜 𝑐𝑎𝑠𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑛𝑜𝑣𝑎𝑠 𝑙𝑒𝑖𝑠 𝑠𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑚 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑚𝑢𝑙𝑔𝑎𝑑𝑎𝑠.
𝑀𝑎𝑠 𝑜 𝐺𝑜𝑜𝑔𝑙𝑒 𝑓𝑜𝑖 𝑚𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑎𝑙𝑒́𝑚, 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑚𝑜𝑣𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑎 𝑛𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑎𝑝𝑒𝑛𝑎𝑠 𝑜𝑠 𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑝𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑚𝑒𝑖𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑢𝑛𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑠𝑒 𝑏𝑒𝑛𝑒𝑓𝑖𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑚 𝑑𝑜 𝑐𝑜́𝑑𝑖𝑔𝑜 𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑚𝑒𝑑𝑖𝑎 𝑎𝑢𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑎𝑛𝑜. 𝐸𝑠𝑠𝑎 𝑎𝑙𝑒𝑔𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑒́ 𝑓𝑎𝑙𝑠𝑎: 𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑜 𝑜𝑠 𝑔𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑒𝑠 𝑚𝑒𝑖𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑒𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝑑𝑒 𝑅𝑢𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑡 𝑀𝑢𝑟𝑑𝑜𝑐ℎ 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑜 𝑎𝑠 𝑝𝑒𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑛𝑎𝑠 𝑜𝑟𝑔𝑎𝑛𝑖𝑧𝑎𝑐̧𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑢𝑛𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑠𝑜𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑙 𝑛𝑎 𝐴𝑢𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑎́𝑙𝑖𝑎 𝑙𝑢𝑐𝑟𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑚 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑎 𝑙𝑒𝑖. 𝐴 𝐶𝑜𝑢𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑦 𝑃𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑠 𝐴𝑢𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑎, 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑜𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑖𝑛𝑑𝑢𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑙 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑟𝑒𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑎 𝑚𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝟷𝟶𝟶 𝑚𝑒𝑖𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑛𝑜𝑡𝑖́𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑠 𝑙𝑜𝑐𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑒 𝑟𝑒𝑔𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑖𝑠, 𝑒 𝑎 𝐹𝑢𝑛𝑑𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑀𝑖𝑛𝑑𝑒𝑟𝑜𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑙𝑎𝑏𝑜𝑟𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑚 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑝𝑒𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑛𝑜𝑠 𝑚𝑒𝑖𝑜𝑠 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑓𝑎𝑐𝑖𝑙𝑖𝑡𝑎𝑟 𝑎 𝑛𝑒𝑔𝑜𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑙𝑒𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑎. 𝑁𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑟𝑒𝑣𝑖𝑠𝑎̃𝑜 𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑑𝑎 𝑛𝑜𝑣𝑎 𝑙𝑒𝑔𝑖𝑠𝑙𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜, 𝑜 𝑇𝑒𝑠𝑜𝑢𝑟𝑜 𝐴𝑢𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑎𝑛𝑜 𝑟𝑒𝑣𝑒𝑙𝑜𝑢 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑎𝑚 𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑎𝑡𝑒́ 𝑎𝑔𝑜𝑟𝑎 𝟹𝟶 𝑎𝑐𝑜𝑟𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑓𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜, 𝑎𝑙𝑔𝑢𝑛𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑏𝑟𝑖𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑑𝑒𝑧𝑒𝑛𝑎𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑝𝑢𝑏𝑙𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑐̧𝑜̃𝑒𝑠.
𝐸𝑚𝑏𝑜𝑟𝑎 𝑜 𝑐𝑜́𝑑𝑖𝑔𝑜 𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑚𝑒𝑑𝑖𝑎 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑠𝑒𝑗𝑎 𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑓𝑒𝑖𝑡𝑜, 𝑒́ 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑓𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑎 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑜𝑠𝑎 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑑𝑒𝑣𝑒 𝑠𝑒𝑟 𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑎𝑙𝑒𝑐𝑖𝑑𝑎 𝑒𝑚 𝑣𝑒𝑧 𝑑𝑒 𝑎𝑡𝑎𝑐𝑎𝑑𝑎. 𝑈𝑚𝑎 𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑐𝑟𝑖́𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑠 𝑓𝑒𝑖𝑡𝑎𝑠 𝑎̀ 𝑙𝑒𝑖 𝑎𝑢𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑎𝑛𝑎 𝑒́ 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑜𝑠 𝑝𝑎𝑔𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑎𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑡𝑒𝑐𝑛𝑜𝑙𝑜𝑔𝑖𝑎 𝑎𝑜𝑠 𝑚𝑒𝑖𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑢𝑛𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑠𝑎̃𝑜 𝑚𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑒𝑚 𝑠𝑒𝑔𝑟𝑒𝑑𝑜. 𝐴 𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑠𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑜 𝑐𝑜́𝑑𝑖𝑔𝑜 𝑑𝑜 𝐶𝑎𝑛𝑎𝑑𝑎́, 𝑠𝑒 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑚𝑢𝑙𝑔𝑎𝑑𝑎, 𝑚𝑒𝑙ℎ𝑜𝑟𝑎𝑟𝑖𝑎 𝑎 𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑠𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑒̂𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑎 𝑎𝑜 𝑒𝑥𝑖𝑔𝑖𝑟 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑎𝑠 𝑜𝑟𝑔𝑎𝑛𝑖𝑧𝑎𝑐̧𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑛𝑜𝑡𝑖́𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑠 𝑑𝑖𝑣𝑢𝑙𝑔𝑢𝑒𝑚 𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑎𝑠 𝑖𝑛𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑚𝑎𝑐̧𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑎𝑜𝑠 𝑟𝑒𝑔𝑢𝑙𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑟𝑒𝑠 (𝑚𝑎𝑠 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑎𝑜 𝑝𝑢́𝑏𝑙𝑖𝑐𝑜 𝑒𝑚 𝑔𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑙). 𝑂 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑗𝑒𝑡𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑙𝑒𝑖 𝑐𝑎𝑛𝑎𝑑𝑖𝑎𝑛𝑜 𝑡𝑎𝑚𝑏𝑒́𝑚 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑏𝑒𝑙𝑒𝑐𝑒 𝑐𝑟𝑖𝑡𝑒́𝑟𝑖𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑒𝑙𝑒𝑔𝑖𝑏𝑖𝑙𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒, 𝑒𝑥𝑖𝑔𝑖𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑜𝑠 𝑚𝑒𝑖𝑜𝑠 𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑎𝑚 𝑎 𝑐𝑒𝑟𝑡𝑜𝑠 𝑝𝑎𝑑𝑟𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑒𝑑𝑖𝑡𝑜𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑒 𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑔𝑢𝑒𝑚, 𝑛𝑜 𝑚𝑖́𝑛𝑖𝑚𝑜, 𝑑𝑜𝑖𝑠 𝑓𝑢𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑎́𝑟𝑖𝑜𝑠 𝑒𝑚 𝑡𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑜 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑔𝑟𝑎𝑙. 𝐴𝑙𝑒́𝑚 𝑑𝑖𝑠𝑠𝑜, 𝑜𝑠 𝑚𝑒𝑖𝑜𝑠 𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑓𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑚 𝑑𝑒 𝑎𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑟 𝑟𝑒𝑙𝑎𝑡𝑜́𝑟𝑖𝑜𝑠 𝑎𝑛𝑢𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑎𝑜 𝑜́𝑟𝑔𝑎̃𝑜 𝑟𝑒𝑔𝑢𝑙𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑟.
𝐴𝑠 𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑠𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑓𝑢𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑎𝑠 𝑑𝑜 𝑐𝑜́𝑑𝑖𝑔𝑜 𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑚𝑒𝑑𝑖𝑎 𝑑𝑒𝑣𝑒𝑚 𝑖𝑛𝑐𝑙𝑢𝑖𝑟 𝑑𝑖𝑠𝑝𝑜𝑠𝑖𝑐̧𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑒𝑥𝑖𝑗𝑎𝑚 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑜𝑠 𝑎𝑐𝑜𝑟𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑒 𝑜𝑟𝑔𝑎𝑛𝑖𝑧𝑎𝑐̧𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑢𝑛𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑠𝑜𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑙 𝑒 𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑎𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑡𝑒𝑐𝑛𝑜𝑙𝑜𝑔𝑖𝑎 𝑠𝑒𝑗𝑎𝑚 𝑡𝑜𝑟𝑛𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑝𝑢́𝑏𝑙𝑖𝑐𝑜𝑠 𝑒 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑜𝑠 𝑚𝑒𝑖𝑜𝑠 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑏𝑒𝑚 𝑓𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑔𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑒𝑠 𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑎𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑡𝑒𝑐𝑛𝑜𝑙𝑜𝑔𝑖𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑜 𝐺𝑜𝑜𝑔𝑙𝑒 𝑒 𝐹𝑎𝑐𝑒𝑏𝑜𝑜𝑘 𝑢𝑠𝑒𝑚 𝑜𝑠 𝑓𝑢𝑛𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑚𝑒𝑙ℎ𝑜𝑟𝑎𝑟 𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑏𝑒𝑟𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑛𝑜𝑡𝑖́𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑠. 𝐼𝑛𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑚𝑎𝑐̧𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑠𝑜𝑏𝑟𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑜 𝑎𝑠 𝑝𝑙𝑎𝑡𝑎𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑚𝑎𝑠 𝑑𝑖𝑔𝑖𝑡𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑐𝑎𝑙𝑐𝑢𝑙𝑎𝑚 𝑜 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑜𝑟 𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑛𝑜𝑡𝑖́𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑠 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑑𝑖𝑣𝑢𝑙𝑔𝑎𝑚 𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑜 𝑑𝑒𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑚 𝑜 𝑠𝑒𝑢 𝑐𝑟𝑜𝑛𝑜𝑔𝑟𝑎𝑚𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑝𝑎𝑔𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜 𝑡𝑎𝑚𝑏𝑒́𝑚 𝑑𝑒𝑣𝑒𝑚 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑟 𝑑𝑖𝑠𝑝𝑜𝑛𝑖́𝑣𝑒𝑖𝑠 𝑎𝑜 𝑝𝑢́𝑏𝑙𝑖𝑐𝑜. 𝐸𝑠𝑠𝑒 𝑛𝑖́𝑣𝑒𝑙 𝑑𝑒 𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑠𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑒̂𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑎 𝑒́ 𝑐𝑟𝑢𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑙 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑔𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑟 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑜𝑠 𝑒𝑑𝑖𝑡𝑜𝑟𝑒𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑛𝑜𝑡𝑖́𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑠 𝑠𝑒𝑗𝑎𝑚 𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑚𝑎 𝑗𝑢𝑠𝑡𝑎.
𝐴𝑙𝑒́𝑚 𝑑𝑖𝑠𝑠𝑜, 𝑚𝑒𝑖𝑜𝑠 𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑜𝑟𝑒𝑠 𝑑𝑒𝑣𝑒𝑚 𝑠𝑒𝑟 𝑖𝑛𝑐𝑙𝑢𝑖́𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑛𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑠 𝑐𝑜́𝑑𝑖𝑔𝑜𝑠, 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑜 𝑒𝑛𝑓𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑧𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑚 𝑜𝑟𝑔𝑎𝑛𝑖𝑧𝑎𝑐̧𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑑𝑒𝑓𝑒𝑠𝑎 𝑑𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑢𝑛𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑠𝑜𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑙, 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑜 𝑎 𝐹𝑢𝑛𝑑𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑁𝑜𝑡𝑖́𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝐼𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑒 𝑃𝑢́𝑏𝑙𝑖𝑐𝑜 𝑑𝑜 𝑅𝑒𝑖𝑛𝑜 𝑈𝑛𝑖𝑑𝑜, 𝑜 𝐹𝑜́𝑟𝑢𝑚 𝑁𝑎𝑐𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑙 𝑑𝑒 𝐸𝑑𝑖𝑡𝑜𝑟𝑒𝑠 𝑑𝑎 𝐴́𝑓𝑟𝑖𝑐𝑎 𝑑𝑜 𝑆𝑢𝑙 𝑒 𝑎 𝐴𝑠𝑠𝑜𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝐵𝑟𝑎𝑠𝑖𝑙𝑒𝑖𝑟𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝐽𝑜𝑟𝑛𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑠𝑚𝑜 𝐷𝑖𝑔𝑖𝑡𝑎𝑙. 𝑂𝑠 𝑔𝑜𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑛𝑜𝑠, 𝑝𝑜𝑟 𝑠𝑢𝑎 𝑣𝑒𝑧, 𝑑𝑒𝑣𝑒𝑚 𝑎𝑏𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑟-𝑠𝑒 𝑑𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑜𝑙𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑟 𝑜𝑠 𝑐𝑜́𝑑𝑖𝑔𝑜𝑠 𝑒𝑚 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑗𝑒𝑡𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑙𝑒𝑖 𝑎𝑏𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑔𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑠 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑖𝑚𝑝𝑜̃𝑒𝑚 𝑙𝑖𝑚𝑖𝑡𝑎𝑐̧𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑎̀ 𝑙𝑖𝑏𝑒𝑟𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝑑𝑒 𝑒𝑥𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑎̃𝑜 𝑒 𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑚𝑖𝑡𝑒𝑚 𝑎𝑜 𝐸𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑐𝑒𝑛𝑠𝑢𝑟𝑎𝑟 𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑢́𝑑𝑜 𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑛𝑜𝑡𝑖́𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑠.
𝐴𝑠 𝑡𝑎́𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑠 𝑑𝑜 𝐺𝑜𝑜𝑔𝑙𝑒, 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑜 𝑜𝑏𝑠𝑒𝑟𝑣𝑜𝑢 𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑎 𝑗𝑜𝑟𝑛𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑎 𝑏𝑟𝑎𝑠𝑖𝑙𝑒𝑖𝑟𝑎 𝑁𝑎𝑡𝑎́𝑙𝑖𝑎 𝑉𝑖𝑎𝑛𝑎, 𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑒𝑛𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑚 𝑜𝑠 𝑠𝑒𝑢𝑠 𝑎𝑝𝑜𝑖𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑠 𝑒 𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑒𝑛𝑐𝑎𝑑𝑒𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑚 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑟𝑒𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑎 𝑎 𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑎. 𝐶𝑜𝑛𝑓𝑟𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑎 𝑐𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑐𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑝𝑜𝑝𝑢𝑙𝑎𝑟𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝑑𝑜 𝑐𝑜́𝑑𝑖𝑔𝑜 𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑚𝑒𝑑𝑖𝑎 𝑎𝑢𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑎𝑛𝑜, 𝑜 𝐺𝑜𝑜𝑔𝑙𝑒 𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑜𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑢 𝑎 𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑎𝑐̧𝑎𝑠, 𝑖𝑛𝑑𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑑𝑒𝑖𝑥𝑎𝑟𝑖𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑛𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑟 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑢́𝑑𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑛𝑜𝑡𝑖́𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑠 𝑠𝑒 𝑓𝑜𝑠𝑠𝑒 𝑛𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑎́𝑟𝑖𝑜 𝑝𝑎𝑔𝑎𝑟 𝑝𝑜𝑟 𝑖𝑠𝑠𝑜 𝑒 𝑑𝑖𝑠𝑠𝑒 𝑎𝑜𝑠 𝑗𝑜𝑟𝑛𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑠 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑟𝑒𝑡𝑖𝑟𝑎𝑟𝑖𝑎 𝑜 𝑎𝑝𝑜𝑖𝑜 𝑓𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑛𝑐𝑒𝑖𝑟𝑜 𝑎𝑜𝑠 𝑚𝑒𝑖𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑢𝑛𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜. 𝐴𝑠 𝑎𝑢𝑡𝑜𝑟𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒𝑠 𝑏𝑟𝑎𝑠𝑖𝑙𝑒𝑖𝑟𝑎𝑠 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎̃𝑜 𝑎 𝑖𝑛𝑣𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑔𝑎𝑟 𝑎 𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑎 𝑝𝑜𝑟 𝑝𝑜𝑠𝑠𝑖́𝑣𝑒𝑖𝑠 "𝑝𝑟𝑎́𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑠 𝑎𝑏𝑢𝑠𝑖𝑣𝑎𝑠" 𝑟𝑒𝑙𝑎𝑐𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑜𝑠 𝑠𝑒𝑢𝑠 𝑒𝑠𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑐̧𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑙𝑜́𝑏𝑖 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑎 𝑎 𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑠𝑎̃𝑜 𝑏𝑟𝑎𝑠𝑖𝑙𝑒𝑖𝑟𝑎 𝑑𝑜 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑗𝑒𝑡𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑙𝑒𝑖. 𝑁𝑜 𝑖𝑛𝑖́𝑐𝑖𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑚𝑎𝑖𝑜, 𝑝𝑜𝑢𝑐𝑜 𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑠 𝑑𝑎 𝑣𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑝𝑙𝑎𝑛𝑒𝑎𝑑𝑎, 𝑜 𝐺𝑜𝑜𝑔𝑙𝑒 𝑚𝑢𝑑𝑜𝑢 𝑜𝑠 𝑠𝑒𝑢𝑠 𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑢𝑙𝑡𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑝𝑒𝑠𝑞𝑢𝑖𝑠𝑎 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑎𝑠 𝑝𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑜𝑎𝑠 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑓𝑖𝑧𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑚 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑢𝑙𝑡𝑎𝑠 𝑜𝑏𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑚 𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑢𝑙𝑡𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑎𝑓𝑖𝑟𝑚𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑎 𝑙𝑒𝑖 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑝𝑜𝑠𝑡𝑎 𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑢𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑟𝑖𝑎 𝑎 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑛𝑒𝑡.
𝑇𝑒𝑚 𝑠𝑖𝑑𝑜 𝑓𝑟𝑢𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑡𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑚𝑢𝑛ℎ𝑎𝑟 𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑏𝑒𝑟𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑎 𝑙𝑖𝑚𝑖𝑡𝑎𝑑𝑎 𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑡𝑎́𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑠 𝑑𝑢𝑟𝑎𝑠 𝑑𝑜 𝐺𝑜𝑜𝑔𝑙𝑒 𝑒 𝑑𝑜 𝐹𝑎𝑐𝑒𝑏𝑜𝑜𝑘. 𝐴𝑠 𝑛𝑒𝑔𝑜𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑐̧𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑠𝑒𝑐𝑟𝑒𝑡𝑎𝑠 𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑒 𝑎𝑠 𝑝𝑙𝑎𝑡𝑎𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑚𝑎𝑠 𝑒 𝑜𝑟𝑔𝑎𝑛𝑖𝑧𝑎𝑐̧𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑛𝑜𝑡𝑖́𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑠 𝑛𝑎 𝐴́𝑓𝑟𝑖𝑐𝑎 𝑑𝑜 𝑆𝑢𝑙, 𝑜𝑛𝑑𝑒 𝑒𝑑𝑖𝑡𝑜𝑟𝑒𝑠 𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑒𝑠𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎̃𝑜 𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑟 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑐ℎ𝑒𝑔𝑎𝑟 𝑎 𝑢𝑚 𝑎𝑐𝑜𝑟𝑑𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑜 𝐺𝑜𝑜𝑔𝑙𝑒 𝑝𝑜𝑟𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑝𝑜𝑑𝑒𝑚 𝑒𝑠𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑟 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑜 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑐𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑜 𝑙𝑒𝑔𝑖𝑠𝑙𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑜 𝑠𝑒 𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑒𝑛𝑟𝑜𝑙𝑒, 𝑖𝑙𝑢𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑚 𝑎 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑓𝑢𝑛𝑑𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝑑𝑎 𝑐𝑟𝑖𝑠𝑒 𝑎𝑡𝑢𝑎𝑙.
𝐹𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑟 𝑜 𝑗𝑜𝑟𝑛𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑠𝑚𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝑒𝑥𝑖𝑔𝑒 𝑢𝑚 𝑒𝑠𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑐̧𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑙𝑒𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑜, 𝑒 𝑒́ 𝑓𝑢𝑛𝑑𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑎𝑠 𝑝𝑙𝑎𝑡𝑎𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑚𝑎𝑠 𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝐺𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑒𝑠 𝑇𝑒𝑐𝑛𝑜𝑙𝑜́𝑔𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑠 𝑓𝑎𝑐̧𝑎𝑚 𝑎 𝑠𝑢𝑎 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑡𝑒. 𝐷𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑜 𝐺𝑜𝑜𝑔𝑙𝑒 𝑒 𝑜 𝐹𝑎𝑐𝑒𝑏𝑜𝑜𝑘 𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑟𝑎𝑚 𝑎𝑜 𝑝𝑎𝑔𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑑𝑖𝑟𝑒𝑖𝑡𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑎𝑢𝑡𝑜𝑟, 𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑚 𝑒𝑣𝑖𝑡𝑎𝑟 𝑜 𝑝𝑎𝑔𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑖𝑚𝑝𝑜𝑠𝑡𝑜𝑠, 𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑜𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑚 𝑑𝑒 𝑚𝑢𝑙𝑡𝑎𝑠 𝑒 𝑓𝑖𝑧𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑚 𝑢𝑚 𝑙𝑜́𝑏𝑖 𝑣𝑖𝑔𝑜𝑟𝑜𝑠𝑜 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑖𝑛𝑓𝑙𝑢𝑒𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑟 𝑙𝑒𝑔𝑖𝑠𝑙𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑟𝑒𝑠 𝑒 𝑗𝑜𝑟𝑛𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑠, 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎́ 𝑐𝑙𝑎𝑟𝑜 𝑠𝑒 𝑒𝑙𝑒𝑠 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑚 𝑑𝑖𝑠𝑝𝑜𝑠𝑡𝑜𝑠 𝑎 𝑎𝑐𝑒𝑖𝑡𝑎𝑟 𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑙𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑟 𝑒𝑠𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑚𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑓𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜. 𝑀𝑎𝑠 𝑑𝑒𝑝𝑜𝑖𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑎𝑛𝑜𝑠 𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑙ℎ𝑒𝑟 𝑒𝑛𝑜𝑟𝑚𝑒𝑠 𝑙𝑢𝑐𝑟𝑜𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑎 𝑑𝑖𝑣𝑢𝑙𝑔𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑗𝑜𝑟𝑛𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑠𝑚𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑑𝑢𝑧𝑖𝑑𝑜 𝑝𝑜𝑟 𝑜𝑢𝑡𝑟𝑜𝑠, 𝑒́ ℎ𝑜𝑟𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑒𝑙𝑒𝑠 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑚 𝑑𝑒 𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑎𝑡𝑎𝑟 𝑒 𝑝𝑎𝑔𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑚.
* Professora sénior da Escola de Relações Públicas e Internacionais da Universidade de Columbia, é a autora do recente livro Media Capture: How Money, Digital Platforms, and Governments Control the News (Columbia University Press 2021).
IN "DIÁRIO DE NOTÍCIAS" -22/06/23 .
.
.
CVI - VISITA GUIADA
Vilar Formoso: Fronteira da Paz/2
Vilar Formoso - PORTUGAL
* Viagem extraordinária pelos tesouros da História de Portugal superiormente apresentados por Paula Moura Pinheiro.
Mais uma notável produção da RTP
Mais uma notável produção da RTP
*
As nossas séries por episódios são editadas no mesmo dia da semana à
mesma hora, assim torna-se fácil se quiser visionar episódios
anteriores.
.
Subscrever:
Mensagens (Atom)