.
Em defesa de quem defende
os Direitos Humanos
𝖠𝗊𝗎𝗂, 𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗋𝗋𝖾𝖽𝗈𝗋𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝗈𝗋𝗀𝖺𝗇𝗂𝗓𝖺𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖣𝗂𝗋𝖾𝗂𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝖧𝗎𝗆𝖺𝗇𝗈𝗌, 𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗎𝗇𝗂𝖼𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖺 𝖮𝖭𝖴 𝖣𝗂𝗋𝖾𝗂𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝖧𝗎𝗆𝖺𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝖾 𝖽𝖾 𝗋𝖾𝗅𝖺𝗍𝗈𝗋𝖺𝗌 𝖾𝗌𝗉𝖾𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝖭𝖺𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝖴𝗇𝗂𝖽𝖺𝗌, 𝗁𝖺́ 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗂𝖽𝖾𝗂𝖺 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗌𝖾 𝗋𝖾𝗉𝖾𝗍𝖾: 𝖾́ 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝖼𝗂𝗌𝗈 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗍𝖾𝗀𝖾𝗋 𝗈 𝖾𝗌𝗉𝖺𝖼̧𝗈 𝖼ı́𝗏𝗂𝖼𝗈 𝖾 𝖺𝗌 𝗉𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗈𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖾𝖿𝖾𝗇𝗌𝗈𝗋𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖣𝗂𝗋𝖾𝗂𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝗁𝗎𝗆𝖺𝗇𝗈𝗌.
𝖢𝗈𝗆𝖾𝖼𝖾𝗆𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝖾𝗅𝗈 𝖾𝗌𝗉𝖺𝖼̧𝗈 𝖼ı́𝗏𝗂𝖼𝗈. 𝖤𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝗎𝖺𝗌 𝗉𝖺𝗅𝖺𝗏𝗋𝖺𝗌, 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗃𝗎𝗇𝗍𝖺𝗌 𝗉𝗈𝖽𝖾𝗆 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖾𝖼𝖾𝗋 𝖺𝗅𝗀𝗈 𝖺𝖻𝗌𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗍𝖺𝗌, 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝗂𝗀𝗇𝖺𝗆 𝗈 𝖺𝗆𝖻𝗂𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖺𝖻𝖾𝗋𝗍𝗈 𝖾 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗉ı́𝖼𝗂𝗈 𝖺̀ 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝗍𝗂𝖼𝗂𝗉𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖼𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖺̃𝗈𝗌 𝖾 𝗀𝗋𝗎𝗉𝗈𝗌 𝗇𝖺 𝗏𝗂𝖽𝖺 𝗉𝗈𝗅ı́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝖺, 𝖾𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗈́𝗆𝗂𝖼𝖺, 𝗌𝗈𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗅 𝖾 𝖼𝗎𝗅𝗍𝗎𝗋𝖺𝗅 𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝗌𝗎𝖺𝗌 𝗌𝗈𝖼𝗂𝖾𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾𝗌. 𝖤́, 𝗇𝗈 𝖿𝗎𝗇𝖽𝗈, 𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗍𝗈𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝗇𝗈́𝗌, 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖿𝖺𝗓𝖾𝗆𝗈𝗌 𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗏𝗂𝗌𝗆𝗈, 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗂𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗀𝗋𝖺𝗆𝗈𝗌 𝗆𝗈𝗏𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝗌𝗈𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗂𝗌, 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗍𝗋𝖺𝖻𝖺𝗅𝗁𝖺𝗆𝗈𝗌 𝖾𝗆 𝗈𝗋𝗀𝖺𝗇𝗂𝗓𝖺𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈-𝗀𝗈𝗏𝖾𝗋𝗇𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺𝗂𝗌 (𝖮𝖭𝖦) 𝗈𝗎 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗌𝗈𝗆𝗈𝗌 𝗍𝗋𝖺𝖻𝖺𝗅𝗁𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗋𝖺𝗌 𝗌𝗂𝗇𝖽𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗅𝗂𝗓𝖺𝖽𝖺𝗌, 𝗍𝖺𝗆𝖻𝖾́𝗆 𝗋𝖾𝗂𝗏𝗂𝗇𝖽𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗆𝗈𝗌. 𝖤𝗆 𝗌𝗎𝗆𝖺, 𝗌𝗂𝗀𝗇𝗂𝖿𝗂𝖼𝖺 𝗅𝗂𝖻𝖾𝗋𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝖾 𝖺𝗌𝗌𝗈𝖼𝗂𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾 𝖽𝖾 𝗋𝖾𝗎𝗇𝗂𝖺̃𝗈, 𝗅𝗂𝖻𝖾𝗋𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝖾 𝖾𝗑𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾 𝖽𝖾 𝗂𝗆𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗇𝗌𝖺, 𝖽𝗂𝗋𝖾𝗂𝗍𝗈 𝖺̀ 𝗉𝗋𝗂𝗏𝖺𝖼𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖾, 𝖺𝖼𝗂𝗆𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝗍𝗎𝖽𝗈, 𝗈 𝖽𝗂𝗋𝖾𝗂𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝖾𝖿𝖾𝗇𝖽𝖾𝗋 𝗈𝗌 𝖣𝗂𝗋𝖾𝗂𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝖧𝗎𝗆𝖺𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖿𝗈𝗋𝗆𝖺 𝗌𝖾𝗀𝗎𝗋𝖺, 𝖺𝖻𝖾𝗋𝗍𝖺 𝖾 𝗅𝗂𝗏𝗋𝖾 𝖽𝖾 𝗋𝖾𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗌𝖺́𝗅𝗂𝖺𝗌.
𝖩𝖺́ 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗉𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗈𝖺 𝖽𝖾𝖿𝖾𝗇𝗌𝗈𝗋𝖺 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖣𝗂𝗋𝖾𝗂𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝖧𝗎𝗆𝖺𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝖾́ 𝖺𝗅𝗀𝗎𝖾́𝗆 𝗊𝗎𝖾, 𝗂𝗇𝖽𝗂𝗏𝗂𝖽𝗎𝖺𝗅 𝗈𝗎 𝖼𝗈𝗅𝖾𝗍𝗂𝗏𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾, 𝖺𝗍𝗎𝖺 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗆𝗈𝗏𝖾𝗋 𝗈𝗎 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗍𝖾𝗀𝖾𝗋 𝖺𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗏𝖾́𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗆𝖾𝗂𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝖺𝖼ı́𝖿𝗂𝖼𝗈𝗌. 𝖲𝖺̃𝗈 𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗏𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗌, 𝗌𝗂𝗇𝖽𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗅𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗌, 𝖺𝖽𝗏𝗈𝗀𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖾 𝗃𝗎𝗋𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗌, 𝗃𝗈𝗋𝗇𝖺𝗅𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗌, 𝖽𝖾𝖿𝖾𝗇𝗌𝗈𝗋𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖺 𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗋𝖺 𝖾 𝖽𝗈 𝖺𝗆𝖻𝗂𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾, 𝗅ı́𝖽𝖾𝗋𝖾𝗌 𝗂𝗇𝖽ı́𝗀𝖾𝗇𝖺𝗌, 𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗏𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗌 𝖿𝖾𝗆𝗂𝗇𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗌 𝖾 𝗉𝖾𝗅𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝗂𝗋𝖾𝗂𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝖫𝖦𝖡𝖳𝖰𝖨𝖠+, 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗎𝖽𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗌, 𝖺𝖼𝖺𝖽𝖾́𝗆𝗂𝖼𝗈𝗌. 𝖭𝗈 𝖿𝗎𝗇𝖽𝗈, 𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗅𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗋 𝖼𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖺̃𝗈 𝗉𝗈𝖽𝖾 𝗌𝖾𝗋 𝗎𝗆 𝖽𝖾𝖿𝖾𝗇𝗌𝗈𝗋 𝖽𝖾 𝖣𝗂𝗋𝖾𝗂𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝖧𝗎𝗆𝖺𝗇𝗈𝗌. 𝖢𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗎𝖽𝗈, 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺 𝖽𝖾𝖿𝗂𝗇𝗂𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈, 𝗋𝖾𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗁𝖾𝖼𝗂𝖽𝖺 𝗉𝖾𝗅𝖺 𝖣𝖾𝖼𝗅𝖺𝗋𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖺 𝖮𝖭𝖴 𝗌𝗈𝖻𝗋𝖾 𝖺𝗌 𝖯𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗈𝖺𝗌 𝖣𝖾𝖿𝖾𝗇𝗌𝗈𝗋𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖣𝗂𝗋𝖾𝗂𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝖧𝗎𝗆𝖺𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝟣𝟫𝟫𝟪 𝖾 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝗈𝗎𝗍𝗋𝗈𝗌 𝗆𝖾𝖼𝖺𝗇𝗂𝗌𝗆𝗈𝗌, 𝗍𝖾𝗆 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝗉𝗋𝗂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝗉𝖺𝗅 𝗈𝖻𝗃𝖾𝗍𝗂𝗏𝗈 𝗀𝖺𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗍𝗂𝗋 𝖺 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗍𝖾𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗆 𝖺𝗍𝗎𝖺 𝗇𝖺 𝖽𝖾𝖿𝖾𝗌𝖺 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝗂𝗋𝖾𝗂𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝖾 𝖾𝗇𝖿𝗋𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺 𝗋𝖾𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗌𝖺́𝗅𝗂𝖺𝗌 𝖾𝗆 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗌𝖾𝗊𝗎𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖾 𝗍𝗋𝖺𝖻𝖺𝗅𝗁𝗈.
𝖠 𝗋𝖾𝖺𝗅𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖺𝗍𝗎𝖺𝗅 𝖽𝖾𝗆𝗈𝗇𝗌𝗍𝗋𝖺, 𝖺 𝖼𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝖽𝗂𝖺, 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖽𝗂𝗋𝖾𝗂𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖽𝖾𝗏𝖾𝗋𝗂𝖺𝗆 𝗌𝖾𝗋 𝗎𝗇𝗂𝗏𝖾𝗋𝗌𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝖾 𝗀𝖺𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗍𝗂𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗍𝗈𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝖺𝗌 𝗉𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗈𝖺𝗌 𝖾𝗇𝖿𝗋𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺𝗆 𝗁𝗈𝗃𝖾 𝖺𝗆𝖾𝖺𝖼̧𝖺𝗌 𝖼𝗋𝖾𝗌𝖼𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗌. 𝖮 𝖾𝗌𝗉𝖺𝖼̧𝗈 𝖼ı́𝗏𝗂𝖼𝗈 𝗀𝗅𝗈𝖻𝖺𝗅 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺́ 𝗇𝗎𝗆 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝖼𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗋𝖾𝗍𝗋𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾 𝖺𝗌 𝗉𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗈𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖾𝖿𝖾𝗇𝗌𝗈𝗋𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖣𝗂𝗋𝖾𝗂𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝖧𝗎𝗆𝖺𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝖾𝗇𝖿𝗋𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺𝗆 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗋𝖾𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝖼𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝗏𝖾𝗓 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝗂𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗇𝗌𝖺.
𝖤𝗆 𝟤𝟢𝟤𝟧, 𝖣𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗅𝖽 𝖳𝗋𝗎𝗆𝗉 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝗆𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗅𝗈𝗎 𝖺 𝖠𝗀𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖤𝗌𝗍𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖴𝗇𝗂𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗈 𝖣𝖾𝗌𝖾𝗇𝗏𝗈𝗅𝗏𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝖨𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗇𝖺𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗅 (𝖴𝖲𝖠𝖨𝖣) 𝗊𝗎𝖾, 𝗉𝖾𝗌𝖾 𝖾𝗆𝖻𝗈𝗋𝖺 𝖺𝗌 𝖼𝗋ı́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗌, 𝖾𝗋𝖺 𝗈 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗈𝗋 𝖽𝗈𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗋 𝗆𝗎𝗇𝖽𝗂𝖺𝗅 𝖽𝖾 𝖺𝗃𝗎𝖽𝖺 𝗁𝗎𝗆𝖺𝗇𝗂𝗍𝖺́𝗋𝗂𝖺 𝖾 𝖺𝗈 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝖾𝗇𝗏𝗈𝗅𝗏𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈. 𝖤𝗌𝗍𝖺 𝖽𝖾𝖼𝗂𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝗋𝖺́𝗌𝗍𝗂𝖼𝖺 𝖾𝗇𝗏𝗂𝗈𝗎 𝗎𝗆 𝗌𝗂𝗇𝖺𝗅 𝗉𝗈𝗅ı́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝗈 𝖺𝗈 𝗆𝗎𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝖾 𝖺 𝗈𝗎𝗍𝗋𝗈𝗌 𝖤𝗌𝗍𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝗈𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗋𝖾𝗌 (𝗂𝗇𝖼𝗅𝗎𝗂𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝖾𝗎𝗋𝗈𝗉𝖾𝗎𝗌): 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗋𝖾𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗁𝖾𝖼𝖾𝗋 𝖺 𝗉𝗋𝗂𝗈𝗋𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖺 𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖾𝗌 𝗍𝖾𝗆𝖺𝗌 𝗌𝖾𝗋𝗂𝖺 𝗉𝗈𝗅𝗂𝗍𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖺𝖼𝖾𝗂𝗍𝖺́𝗏𝖾𝗅, 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗋𝗂𝖻𝗎𝗂𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗋𝖾𝖽𝗎𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝗈 𝖿𝗂𝗇𝖺𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝗂𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗇𝖺𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗅 𝖺 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗌 𝖺́𝗋𝖾𝖺𝗌. 𝖤𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖾𝖼𝗂𝗌𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝗍𝖾̂𝗆 𝗍𝗂𝖽𝗈 𝖾𝖿𝖾𝗂𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝗋𝖺𝗆𝖺́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝗈𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖼𝗋𝖾𝗍𝗈𝗌, 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝖽𝖾 𝗆𝗂𝗅𝗁𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗉𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗈𝖺𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖽𝖾𝗂𝗑𝖺𝗋𝖺𝗆 𝖽𝖾 𝗋𝖾𝖼𝖾𝖻𝖾𝗋 𝖺𝗃𝗎𝖽𝖺 𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖾𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗅 𝖺 𝗏𝗂𝗈𝗅𝖺𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖣𝗂𝗋𝖾𝗂𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝖧𝗎𝗆𝖺𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖿𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗆 𝗇𝖺 𝗂𝗆𝗉𝗎𝗇𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾, 𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗁𝖺́ 𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝖼𝖺𝗉𝖺𝖼𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝗈𝖼𝗎𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺𝗋 𝖾 𝖽𝖾𝗇𝗎𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗋.
𝖴𝗆 𝗉𝗈𝗎𝖼𝗈 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝗍𝗈𝖽𝗈 𝗈 𝗆𝗎𝗇𝖽𝗈, 𝗀𝗈𝗏𝖾𝗋𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝗇𝖺𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝖼𝗎𝗋𝖺𝗆 𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗋𝗂𝗇𝗀𝗂𝗋 𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗏𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝗈 𝖾𝗌𝗉𝖺𝖼̧𝗈 𝖼ı́𝗏𝗂𝖼𝗈, 𝗋𝖾𝖼𝗈𝗋𝗋𝖾𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝖺 𝖾𝗇𝗊𝗎𝖺𝖽𝗋𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝗅𝖾𝗀𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝗈𝗋𝖺 𝗂𝗇𝗈𝗏𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗋𝖾𝗌, 𝗈𝗋𝖺 𝗂𝗇𝗌𝗉𝗂𝗋𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗈𝗎 𝗋𝖾𝗉𝗅𝗂𝖼𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖺 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝗍𝗂𝗋 𝖽𝖾 𝗉𝖺ı́𝗌𝖾𝗌 𝖺𝗅𝗂𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌. 𝖬𝗎𝗅𝗍𝗂𝗉𝗅𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗆-𝗌𝖾, 𝖾𝗆 𝗉𝖺ı́𝗌𝖾𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝖤𝗅 𝖲𝖺𝗅𝗏𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗋, 𝖦𝖾𝗈́𝗋𝗀𝗂𝖺 𝖾 𝖯𝖾𝗋𝗎, 𝖺𝗌 𝖼𝗁𝖺𝗆𝖺𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝖫𝖾𝗂𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖠𝗀𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗌 𝖤𝗌𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗀𝖾𝗂𝗋𝗈𝗌, 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝖼𝗎𝗋𝖺𝗆 𝗅𝗂𝗆𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗋 𝗈𝗎 𝗂𝗆𝗉𝖾𝖽𝗂𝗋 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖺𝗌 𝖮𝖭𝖦 𝗍𝗋𝖺𝖻𝖺𝗅𝗁𝖾𝗆 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝖿𝗂𝗇𝖺𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗏𝖾𝗇𝗂𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝗈𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗋𝖾𝗌 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗀𝖾𝗂𝗋𝗈𝗌.
𝖮 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝖼𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗉𝗈𝗌𝗍𝖺 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗌 𝗅𝖾𝗂𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝖾𝖼̧𝖺, 𝖿𝗋𝖾𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾, 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝖽𝗂𝗌𝖼𝗎𝗋𝗌𝗈𝗌 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗂𝗀𝗆𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗓𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝗂𝗋𝗂𝗀𝗂𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖺𝗈 𝗍𝗋𝖺𝖻𝖺𝗅𝗁𝗈 𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝗈𝗋𝗀𝖺𝗇𝗂𝗓𝖺𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖣𝗂𝗋𝖾𝗂𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝖧𝗎𝗆𝖺𝗇𝗈𝗌, 𝖺𝖼𝗎𝗌𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗈-𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗌𝖾𝗋𝖾𝗆 "𝖺𝗀𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗌 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗀𝖾𝗂𝗋𝗈𝗌" – 𝗎𝗆 𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗆𝗈 𝖺𝗆𝗉𝗅𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝗎𝗍𝗂𝗅𝗂𝗓𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝗇𝖺 𝗀𝖾𝗈𝗉𝗈𝗅ı́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝖺 𝖽𝗈 𝗌𝖾́𝖼𝗎𝗅𝗈 𝖷𝖷 𝖾 𝖺𝗌𝗌𝗈𝖼𝗂𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝖺̀ 𝖾𝗌𝗉𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗀𝖾𝗆. 𝖤𝗌𝗍𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝗂𝗌𝖼𝗎𝗋𝗌𝗈𝗌 𝗍𝖾̂𝗆 𝗉𝖾𝗋𝗆𝖾𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝗍𝖺𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝖺 𝗏𝗂𝖽𝖺 𝗉𝗈𝗅ı́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝖺 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗎́𝗅𝗍𝗂𝗆𝗈𝗌 𝖺𝗇𝗈𝗌, 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖺 𝗉𝗋𝗈́𝗉𝗋𝗂𝖺 𝖢𝗈𝗆𝗂𝗌𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝖤𝗎𝗋𝗈𝗉𝖾𝗂𝖺 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗉𝗈̂𝗌, 𝖾𝗆 𝟤𝟢𝟤𝟥, 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝖣𝗂𝗋𝖾𝗍𝗂𝗏𝖺 𝗌𝗈𝖻𝗋𝖾 𝗂𝗇𝗀𝖾𝗋𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗀𝖾𝗂𝗋𝖺. 𝖲𝖾𝗀𝗎𝗂𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝖺 𝗈𝗇𝖽𝖺 𝖺𝗇𝗍𝗂𝖽𝗂𝗋𝖾𝗂𝗍𝗈𝗌, 𝗈𝗌 𝗀𝗋𝗎𝗉𝗈𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗌𝖾𝗋𝗏𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗋𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝗈 𝖯𝖺𝗋𝗅𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝖤𝗎𝗋𝗈𝗉𝖾𝗎 𝖼𝗋𝗂𝖺𝗋𝖺𝗆 𝖾𝗆 𝟤𝟢𝟤𝟧 𝗎𝗆 𝗀𝗋𝗎𝗉𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖾𝗌𝖼𝗋𝗎𝗍ı́𝗇𝗂𝗈 𝖺̀𝗌 𝖮𝖭𝖦, 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗍𝖾𝗆 𝗌𝗂𝖽𝗈 𝖺𝗅𝗏𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖿𝗈𝗋𝗍𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖽𝖾𝗇𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾 𝗉𝖾𝖽𝗂𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖻𝗈𝗂𝖼𝗈𝗍𝖾 𝗉𝖾𝗅𝖺𝗌 𝗈𝗋𝗀𝖺𝗇𝗂𝗓𝖺𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖣𝗂𝗋𝖾𝗂𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝖧𝗎𝗆𝖺𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝖾 𝗀𝗋𝗎𝗉𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗀𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗌.
𝖭𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖽𝗂𝗓 𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗉𝖾𝗂𝗍𝗈 𝖺̀𝗌 𝗉𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗈𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖾𝖿𝖾𝗇𝗌𝗈𝗋𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖣𝗂𝗋𝖾𝗂𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝖧𝗎𝗆𝖺𝗇𝗈𝗌, 𝗈 𝗉𝖺𝗇𝗈𝗋𝖺𝗆𝖺 𝖾́ 𝗂𝗀𝗎𝖺𝗅𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗈𝖼𝗎𝗉𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾. 𝖰𝗎𝖾𝗆 𝖽𝖾𝖿𝖾𝗇𝖽𝖾 𝖣𝗂𝗋𝖾𝗂𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝖧𝗎𝗆𝖺𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝖾́, 𝖾𝗆 𝗆𝗎𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗌 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝗍𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝗈 𝗉𝗅𝖺𝗇𝖾𝗍𝖺, 𝗏ı́𝗍𝗂𝗆𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝗋𝖾𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗌𝖺́𝗅𝗂𝖺𝗌, 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗂𝗀𝗆𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗓𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈, 𝗋𝖾𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝗉𝗈𝗅𝗂𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗅, 𝗍𝗈𝗋𝗍𝗎𝗋𝖺 𝖾 𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗍𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝖼𝗋𝗎𝖾́𝗂𝗌, 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝗎𝗆𝖺𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝗈𝗎 𝖽𝖾𝗀𝗋𝖺𝖽𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗌, 𝖼𝗋𝗂𝗆𝗂𝗇𝖺𝗅𝗂𝗓𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝗂𝗇𝖽𝖾𝗏𝗂𝖽𝖺, 𝖽𝖾𝗍𝖾𝗇𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖺𝗋𝖻𝗂𝗍𝗋𝖺́𝗋𝗂𝖺 𝖾, 𝖾𝗆 𝖺𝗅𝗀𝗎𝗇𝗌 𝖼𝖺𝗌𝗈𝗌, 𝖺𝗌𝗌𝖺𝗌𝗌𝗂𝗇𝖺𝗍𝗈. 𝖴𝗆 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖼𝖺𝗌𝗈𝗌 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗁𝖾𝖼𝗂𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗂𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗇𝖺𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗅𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖾́ 𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖡𝖾𝗋𝗍𝖺 𝖢𝖺́𝖼𝖾𝗋𝖾𝗌, 𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗏𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖺 𝖺𝗆𝖻𝗂𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺𝗅 𝖾 𝗂𝗇𝖽ı́𝗀𝖾𝗇𝖺 𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝖧𝗈𝗇𝖽𝗎𝗋𝖺𝗌, 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗅𝗂𝖽𝖾𝗋𝗈𝗎 𝖺 𝗈𝗉𝗈𝗌𝗂𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖺𝗈 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗃𝖾𝗍𝗈 𝗁𝗂𝖽𝗋𝗈𝖾𝗅𝖾́𝗍𝗋𝗂𝖼𝗈 𝖠𝗀𝗎𝖺 𝖹𝖺𝗋𝖼𝖺, 𝖺𝗌𝗌𝖺𝗌𝗌𝗂𝗇𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝖾𝗆 𝟤𝟢𝟣𝟨. 𝖮 𝗌𝖾𝗎 𝗁𝗈𝗆𝗂𝖼ı́𝖽𝗂𝗈 𝖾𝗑𝗉𝗈̂𝗌 𝖺𝗌 𝗅𝗂𝗀𝖺𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖾 𝗂𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖾𝗌 𝖾𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗈́𝗆𝗂𝖼𝗈𝗌, 𝗏𝗂𝗈𝗅𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗋𝗎𝗍𝗎𝗋𝖺𝗅 𝖾 𝗈𝗌 𝖺𝗍𝖺𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗌 𝗉𝖾𝗋𝗉𝖾𝗍𝗋𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖺 𝖽𝖾𝖿𝖾𝗇𝗌𝗈𝗋𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖣𝗂𝗋𝖾𝗂𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝖧𝗎𝗆𝖺𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝖾 𝖽𝗈 𝖺𝗆𝖻𝗂𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾.
𝖳𝖺𝗆𝖻𝖾́𝗆 𝗇𝖺 𝖠𝗆𝖾́𝗋𝗂𝖼𝖺 𝖫𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗇𝖺, 𝖺 𝖢𝗈𝗅𝗈̂𝗆𝖻𝗂𝖺 𝖾́ 𝗋𝖾𝖼𝗈𝗋𝗋𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝗂𝖽𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗂𝖿𝗂𝖼𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝗈 𝗉𝖺ı́𝗌 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝗉𝖾𝗋𝗂𝗀𝗈𝗌𝗈 𝖽𝗈 𝗆𝗎𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝖺𝗌 𝗉𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗈𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖾𝖿𝖾𝗇𝗌𝗈𝗋𝖺𝗌, 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝟫𝟩𝟤 𝖺𝗌𝗌𝖺𝗌𝗌𝗂𝗇𝖺𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗏𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗌 𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖾 𝟤𝟢𝟣𝟨 𝖾 𝟤𝟢𝟤𝟧 𝗋𝖾𝗀𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝖾𝗅𝖺 𝖮𝖭𝖴 𝖣𝗂𝗋𝖾𝗂𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝖧𝗎𝗆𝖺𝗇𝗈𝗌. 𝖭𝖺𝗌 𝖥𝗂𝗅𝗂𝗉𝗂𝗇𝖺𝗌, 𝗈 𝖺𝗌𝗌𝖾́𝖽𝗂𝗈, 𝖾𝗆 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝗍𝗂𝖼𝗎𝗅𝖺𝗋 𝖺𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗏𝖾́𝗌 𝖽𝖺 𝗉𝗋𝖺́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝗋𝖾𝖽-𝗍𝖺𝗀𝗀𝗂𝗇𝗀, 𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖾𝗍𝖾𝗇𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝖺𝗋𝖻𝗂𝗍𝗋𝖺́𝗋𝗂𝖺𝗌, 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝖺𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖾𝖼𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝖿𝗈𝗋𝖼̧𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖾 𝖾𝗑𝖾𝖼𝗎𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝖾𝗑𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗃𝗎𝖽𝗂𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝗎𝗌𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗋𝖾𝖼𝗈𝗋𝗋𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾, 𝖾𝗆 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗃𝗎𝗀𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝖺 𝗅𝖾𝗀𝗂𝗌𝗅𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖺𝗇𝗍𝗂𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗋𝗈𝗋𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖺 𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗂𝗇𝗌𝗎𝗋𝗀𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺, 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗋𝖾𝗉𝗋𝗂𝗆𝗂𝗋 𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗏𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗌 𝖾 𝗌𝖾𝗍𝗈𝗋𝖾𝗌 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗀𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗌. 𝖭𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗑𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝗈 𝗀𝖾𝗇𝗈𝖼ı́𝖽𝗂𝗈 𝖾 𝖽𝖺 𝗈𝖼𝗎𝗉𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗋𝗂𝗍𝗈́𝗋𝗂𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝖺𝗅𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗂𝗇𝗂𝖺𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝖨𝗌𝗋𝖺𝖾𝗅, 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺́ 𝖺𝗆𝗉𝗅𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖽𝗈𝖼𝗎𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝖺𝗌 𝖺𝗎𝗍𝗈𝗋𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾𝗌 𝗂𝗌𝗋𝖺𝖾𝗅𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗌 𝗍𝖾̂𝗆 𝗉𝖾𝗋𝗌𝖾𝗀𝗎𝗂𝖽𝗈, 𝖽𝖾𝗍𝗂𝖽𝗈, 𝗍𝗈𝗋𝗍𝗎𝗋𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝖾 𝖺𝗌𝗌𝖺𝗌𝗌𝗂𝗇𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗏𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗌 𝗉𝖺𝗅𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗂𝗇𝗂𝖺𝗇𝗈𝗌, 𝗃𝗈𝗋𝗇𝖺𝗅𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗌 𝖾 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝖿𝗂𝗌𝗌𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗌𝖺𝗎́𝖽𝖾 – 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝗈 𝗂𝗇𝗍𝗎𝗂𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗌𝗌𝖾𝗀𝗎𝗂𝗋 𝗈 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗃𝖾𝗍𝗈 𝗀𝖾𝗇𝗈𝖼𝗂𝖽𝖺 𝖾 𝖽𝖾 𝖼𝖺𝗅𝖺𝗋 𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗅𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗋 𝗍𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗏𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝖾𝗇𝗎́𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝗉𝗎́𝖻𝗅𝗂𝖼𝖺 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗌𝖾𝗎𝗌 𝖼𝗋𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗌.
𝖳𝖺𝗆𝖻𝖾́𝗆 𝗇𝖺 𝖤𝗎𝗋𝗈𝗉𝖺 𝗁𝖺́ 𝗆𝗈𝗍𝗂𝗏𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗈𝖼𝗎𝗉𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈. 𝖴𝗆 𝗋𝖾𝗅𝖺𝗍𝗈́𝗋𝗂𝗈 𝗉𝗎𝖻𝗅𝗂𝖼𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝖾𝗆 𝗌𝖾𝗍𝖾𝗆𝖻𝗋𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝟤𝟢𝟤𝟧 𝗉𝖾𝗅𝗈 𝖮𝖻𝗌𝖾𝗋𝗏𝖺𝗍𝗈́𝗋𝗂𝗈 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝖺 𝖯𝗋𝗈𝗍𝖾𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝖯𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗈𝖺𝗌 𝖣𝖾𝖿𝖾𝗇𝗌𝗈𝗋𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖣𝗂𝗋𝖾𝗂𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝖧𝗎𝗆𝖺𝗇𝗈𝗌, 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗅 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗋𝗂𝖻𝗎ı́, 𝖽𝖾𝗇𝗎𝗇𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗎 𝗊𝗎𝖾, 𝖾𝗆 𝖥𝗋𝖺𝗇𝖼̧𝖺, 𝖺𝗌 𝗅𝗂𝖻𝖾𝗋𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾𝗌 𝗉𝗎́𝖻𝗅𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗌 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺̃𝗈 𝖺 𝗌𝗈𝖿𝗋𝖾𝗋 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗋𝖾𝗀𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝖿𝗎𝗇𝖽𝖺, 𝗆𝖺𝗋𝖼𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝗇𝖺𝗋𝗋𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗏𝖺𝗌 𝗁𝗈𝗌𝗍𝗂𝗌, 𝗉𝖾𝗅𝖺 𝖽𝗂𝗌𝗌𝗈𝗅𝗎𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖺𝖽𝗆𝗂𝗇𝗂𝗌𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗏𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝗈𝗋𝗀𝖺𝗇𝗂𝗓𝖺𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌, 𝖼𝗈𝗋𝗍𝖾𝗌 𝗇𝗈 𝖿𝗂𝗇𝖺𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝗉𝗎́𝖻𝗅𝗂𝖼𝗈, 𝗋𝖾𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝗉𝗈𝗅𝗂𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗅 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖺 𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗏𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗌, 𝖻𝖾𝗆 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝗉𝖾𝗅𝖺 𝗂𝗇𝗌𝗍𝗋𝗎𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺𝗅𝗂𝗓𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖺 𝗅𝗎𝗍𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖺 𝗈 𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗋𝗈𝗋𝗂𝗌𝗆𝗈 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗌𝗂𝗅𝖾𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗋 𝗏𝗈𝗓𝖾𝗌 𝖼𝗋ı́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗌.
𝖤𝗆 𝖯𝗈𝗋𝗍𝗎𝗀𝖺𝗅, 𝖾𝗆𝖻𝗈𝗋𝖺 𝗈 𝖾𝗌𝗉𝖺𝖼̧𝗈 𝖼ı́𝗏𝗂𝖼𝗈 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖾𝗃𝖺 𝖼𝗅𝖺𝗌𝗌𝗂𝖿𝗂𝖼𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 “𝖠𝖻𝖾𝗋𝗍𝗈” 𝗉𝖾𝗅𝗈 𝖢𝗂𝗏𝗂𝖼𝗎𝗌 𝖬𝗈𝗇𝗂𝗍𝗈𝗋, 𝗈 𝖥𝗈́𝗋𝗎𝗆 𝖢ı́𝗏𝗂𝖼𝗈 𝖤𝗎𝗋𝗈𝗉𝖾𝗎 𝖺𝗅𝖾𝗋𝗍𝖺 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝖽𝖾𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗂𝗈𝗋𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝗌𝗂𝗀𝗇𝗂𝖿𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗏𝖺 𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝗅𝗂𝖻𝖾𝗋𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾𝗌 𝖼ı́𝗏𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗌 𝗇𝗈 𝗉𝖺ı́𝗌. 𝖢𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝖾𝗑𝖾𝗆𝗉𝗅𝗈, 𝗂𝗇𝖼𝗅𝗎𝖾𝗆-𝗌𝖾, 𝗆𝗎𝗂𝗍𝗈 𝗋𝖾𝖼𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾, 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗈𝖼𝗎𝗉𝖺𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝗋𝖾𝗅𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗏𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖺̀ 𝖺𝗍𝗎𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖺 𝗉𝗈𝗅ı́𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝖾𝗆 𝗆𝖺𝗇𝗂𝖿𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝗉𝖺𝖼ı́𝖿𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗌 𝗈𝗎 𝖼𝗋ı́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝖺𝗈 𝖼𝖺𝗋𝖺́𝗍𝖾𝗋 𝖺𝗅𝖾𝗀𝖺𝖽𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖺𝗋𝖻𝗂𝗍𝗋𝖺́𝗋𝗂𝗈, 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗉𝗈𝗋𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗅 𝖾 𝗂𝗇𝗃𝗎𝗌𝗍𝗂𝖿𝗂𝖼𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖻𝗎𝗌𝖼𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝗈𝗆𝗂𝖼𝗂𝗅𝗂𝖺́𝗋𝗂𝖺𝗌 𝖺 𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗏𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗌 𝗉𝖾𝗅𝖺 𝖼𝖺𝗎𝗌𝖺 𝗉𝖺𝗅𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗂𝗇𝗂𝖺𝗇𝖺,
𝖤𝗌𝗍𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖾𝗏𝖾𝗆 𝗌𝖾𝗋𝗏𝗂𝗋 𝖽𝖾 𝖺𝗅𝖾𝗋𝗍𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖺𝗌 𝗇𝗈𝗌𝗌𝖺𝗌 𝗅𝗂𝖻𝖾𝗋𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾𝗌 𝖼ı́𝗏𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗌 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗀𝖺𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗍𝗂𝖺 𝖾 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖾𝗑𝗂𝗀𝖾𝗆 𝗏𝗂𝗀𝗂𝗅𝖺̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝖾 𝖽𝖾𝖿𝖾𝗌𝖺 𝗉𝖾𝗋𝗆𝖺𝗇𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗌. 𝖮 𝗉𝖺𝗉𝖾𝗅 𝖽𝖺 𝗌𝗈𝖼𝗂𝖾𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖼𝗂𝗏𝗂𝗅 𝖾́ 𝗂𝗇𝖽𝗂𝗌𝗉𝖾𝗇𝗌𝖺́𝗏𝖾𝗅 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝖺 𝗌𝖺𝗎́𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝖺 𝖽𝖾𝗆𝗈𝖼𝗋𝖺𝖼𝗂𝖺, 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗌𝖾𝗋𝗏𝖺𝗋 𝗈 𝖤𝗌𝗍𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖣𝗂𝗋𝖾𝗂𝗍𝗈, 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗍𝖾𝗀𝖾𝗋 𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝗂𝗋𝖾𝗂𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗌𝖺𝗀𝗋𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖺 𝗇ı́𝗏𝖾𝗅 𝗇𝖺𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗅, 𝗋𝖾𝗀𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗅 𝖾 𝗂𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗇𝖺𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗅, 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝖻𝖺𝗍𝖾𝗋 𝖺 𝗂𝗆𝗉𝗎𝗇𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾, 𝖾𝗑𝗂𝗀𝗂𝗋 𝖺 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝖺𝗌 𝖾 𝗋𝖾𝖼𝗈𝗋𝖽𝖺𝗋 𝖺𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝗈𝖽𝖾𝗋𝖾𝗌 𝗉𝗎́𝖻𝗅𝗂𝖼𝗈𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖺 𝗌𝗈𝖼𝗂𝖾𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖼𝗂𝗏𝗂𝗅 𝗉𝗈𝖽𝖾 𝖺𝗃𝗎𝖽𝖺𝗋 𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗌𝗍𝗋𝗎𝗂𝗋 𝗆𝖾𝗅𝗁𝗈𝗋𝖾𝗌 𝗉𝗈𝗅ı́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗌. 𝖴𝗆𝖺 𝖽𝖾𝗆𝗈𝖼𝗋𝖺𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝗌𝗈́𝗅𝗂𝖽𝖺 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗍𝖾𝗆𝖾 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗌𝗈𝖼𝗂𝖾𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖼𝗂𝗏𝗂𝗅 𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗏𝖺, 𝖼𝗋ı́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝖺 𝖾 𝗂𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗏𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗂𝗏𝖺. 𝖯𝖾𝗅𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖺́𝗋𝗂𝗈, 𝖽𝖾𝗉𝖾𝗇𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝖾𝗅𝖺.
* Especialista em Advocacy para os Direitos Humanos. Trabalhou no Parlamento Europeu e na Organização Mundial Contra a Tortura em Bruxelas
IN "DIÁRIO DE NOTÍCIAS" - 12/08/26 .
Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário