JOÃO MAURÍCIO BRÁS

 .

A imigração africana e

a hipocrisia ocidental

Importa fixar uma asserção simples: quem tem condições materiais, dignidade, bem-estar e prosperidade raramente quer sair da sua terra.

𝖠 𝗁𝗂𝗌𝗍𝗈́𝗋𝗂𝖺 𝖿𝖺𝖼𝗍𝗎𝖺𝗅 𝖽𝗈 𝖼𝖺𝗈𝗌 𝗂𝗆𝗂𝗀𝗋𝖺𝗍𝗈́𝗋𝗂𝗈 𝗍𝖾𝗋𝖺́ 𝖽𝖾 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝗍𝗂𝗋 𝖽𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗍𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗀𝗋𝖺𝗇𝖽𝖾 𝗁𝗂𝗉𝗈𝖼𝗋𝗂𝗌𝗂𝖺 𝖾 𝖼𝗂𝗇𝗂𝗌𝗆𝗈 𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝖺𝗅𝖾𝗀𝖺𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖾𝗆𝗈𝖼𝗋𝖺𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗌 𝗅𝗂𝖻𝖾𝗋𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗀𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗌. 𝖠𝗌 𝖼𝖺𝗎𝗌𝖺𝗌 𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝗆𝗎𝗅𝗍𝗂𝖿𝖺𝗍𝗈𝗋𝗂𝖺𝗂𝗌, 𝗆𝖺𝗌 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺 𝖾́ 𝖽𝖾𝖼𝗂𝗌𝗂𝗏𝖺.

𝖠 𝗁𝗂𝗌𝗍𝗈́𝗋𝗂𝖺 𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝗅𝗈𝖼𝖺𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗆𝗂𝗅𝗁𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗌𝖾𝗋𝖾𝗌 𝗁𝗎𝗆𝖺𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗌𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗉𝗋𝖾𝖾𝗇𝖽𝖾 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝗅𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗌 𝗌𝗂𝗆𝗉𝗅𝗂𝖿𝗂𝖼𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗋𝖺𝗌, 𝗇𝖾𝗆 𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝗆𝗎𝗅𝗍𝗂𝖽𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗀𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖻𝗈𝗇𝖽𝗈𝗌𝖺 𝖾 𝗂𝗇𝖿𝖾𝗅𝗂𝗓, 𝗇𝖾𝗆 𝖾𝗑𝖾́𝗋𝖼𝗂𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝖾𝗆𝗈́𝗇𝗂𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗋𝗎𝗂𝖽𝗈𝗋𝖾𝗌. 𝖮 𝖽𝖾𝖻𝖺𝗍𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗋𝗋𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝗌𝗈𝖻𝗋𝖾 𝖺 𝗂𝗆𝗂𝗀𝗋𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝗂𝗅𝗎𝖽𝖾 𝗈 𝖿𝗎𝗇𝖽𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺𝗅 𝖾 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺́ 𝗋𝖾𝗉𝗅𝖾𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖼𝗂𝗇𝗂𝗌𝗆𝗈, 𝗅𝖾𝗏𝗂𝖺𝗇𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾, 𝗁𝗂𝗉𝗈𝖼𝗋𝗂𝗌𝗂𝖺 𝖾 𝗈𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗍𝗎𝗇𝗂𝗌𝗆𝗈.

𝖭𝗈 𝖼𝖺𝗌𝗈 𝖾𝗌𝗉𝖾𝖼ı́𝖿𝗂𝖼𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖠́𝖿𝗋𝗂𝖼𝖺, 𝗆𝗎𝗂𝗍𝖺 𝗀𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖿𝗈𝗀𝖾 𝗌𝗈𝖻𝗋𝖾𝗍𝗎𝖽𝗈 𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗎𝗆 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗂𝗇𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝗋𝗂𝗊𝗎ı́𝗌𝗌𝗂𝗆𝗈 𝗏𝗂𝗏𝖾 𝖾𝗆 𝗀𝗎𝖾𝗋𝗋𝖺, 𝖾𝗑𝗉𝗅𝗈𝗋𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾 𝖿𝗈𝗆𝖾 𝖾𝗑𝗉𝗈𝗇𝖾𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗂𝗌. 𝖠 𝖴𝗇𝗂𝖺̃𝗈 𝖤𝗎𝗋𝗈𝗉𝖾𝗂𝖺, 𝖽𝖾 𝗆𝗈𝖽𝗈 𝗁𝗂𝗉𝗈́𝖼𝗋𝗂𝗍𝖺, 𝖿𝖺𝗓 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝖠́𝖿𝗋𝗂𝖼𝖺 𝖺𝗅𝗀𝗈 𝗌𝖾𝗆𝖾𝗅𝗁𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖺𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖺𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝖾𝖼𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝖺 𝖴𝖼𝗋𝖺̂𝗇𝗂𝖺: 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝗉𝖾𝗃𝖺 𝖽𝗂𝗇𝗁𝖾𝗂𝗋𝗈, 𝗆𝖺𝗌 𝖺𝗅𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺 𝖾𝗆 𝗌𝗂𝗆𝗎𝗅𝗍𝖺̂𝗇𝖾𝗈 𝖺 𝖾𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗈𝗆𝗂𝖺 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖽𝗂𝗓 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝖻𝖺𝗍𝖾𝗋. 𝖤𝗌𝗍𝖾𝗌 𝗁𝗂𝗉𝗈́𝖼𝗋𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗌 𝖾𝗎𝗋𝗈𝗉𝖾𝗎𝗌 𝗇𝖾𝗀𝗈𝖼𝖾𝗂𝖺𝗆, 𝖺𝗈 𝗆𝖾𝗌𝗆𝗈 𝗍𝖾𝗆𝗉𝗈, 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝗍𝗂𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗂𝖺𝗌, 𝖼𝗅𝖾𝗉𝗍𝗈𝖼𝗋𝖺𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗌 𝖾 𝗀𝗈𝗏𝖾𝗋𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝖺𝖿𝗋𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝖻𝗋𝗎𝗍𝖺𝗂𝗌. 𝖨𝗆𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗍𝖺 𝖿𝗂𝗑𝖺𝗋 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝖺𝗌𝗌𝖾𝗋𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝗌𝗂𝗆𝗉𝗅𝖾𝗌: 𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗆 𝗍𝖾𝗆 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖽𝗂𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝗆𝖺𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗂𝖺𝗂𝗌, 𝖽𝗂𝗀𝗇𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾, 𝖻𝖾𝗆-𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗋 𝖾 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗌𝗉𝖾𝗋𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝗋𝖺𝗋𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗋 𝗌𝖺𝗂𝗋 𝖽𝖺 𝗌𝗎𝖺 𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗋𝖺.

𝖤𝗌𝗍𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗂𝗇𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖾́ 𝗋𝗂𝗊𝗎ı́𝗌𝗌𝗂𝗆𝗈 𝖾𝗆 𝗋𝖾𝖼𝗎𝗋𝗌𝗈𝗌 𝗇𝖺𝗍𝗎𝗋𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝗆𝖺𝗌 𝗌𝗂𝗆𝗎𝗅𝗍𝖺𝗇𝖾𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝗍𝖾𝗆 𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝖺ı́𝗌𝖾𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝗈 𝖯𝖨𝖡 𝗉𝖾𝗋 𝖼𝖺𝗉𝗂𝗍𝖺 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝖻𝖺𝗂𝗑𝗈 𝖽𝗈 𝗉𝗅𝖺𝗇𝖾𝗍𝖺. 𝖤𝗆 𝟤𝟢𝟤𝟧, 𝗈 𝖯𝖨𝖡 𝗇𝗈𝗆𝗂𝗇𝖺𝗅 𝖽𝖾 𝗍𝗈𝖽𝗈 𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗂𝗇𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖿𝗈𝗂 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗂𝗆𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝖾𝗆 𝖼𝖾𝗋𝖼𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝟤,𝟪𝟤 𝖻𝗂𝗅𝗂𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝗈́𝗅𝖺𝗋𝖾𝗌, 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝗎𝗆 𝖯𝖨𝖡 𝗉𝖾𝗋 𝖼𝖺𝗉𝗂𝗍𝖺 𝗇𝗈𝗆𝗂𝗇𝖺𝗅 𝖽𝖾 𝖺𝗉𝖾𝗇𝖺𝗌 𝟣𝟫𝟤𝟢 𝖽𝗈́𝗅𝖺𝗋𝖾𝗌, 𝗈𝗎 𝗌𝖾𝗃𝖺, 𝖺𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗑𝗂𝗆𝖺𝖽𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝗈 𝖯𝖨𝖡 𝖽𝖾 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗎́𝗇𝗂𝖼𝖺 𝖾𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗈𝗆𝗂𝖺 𝖾𝗎𝗋𝗈𝗉𝖾𝗂𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝗀𝗋𝖺𝗇𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗌𝖺̃𝗈, 𝖽𝗂𝗌𝗍𝗋𝗂𝖻𝗎ı́𝖽𝗈 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝟣,𝟦 𝗆𝗂𝗅 𝗆𝗂𝗅𝗁𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗉𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗈𝖺𝗌. 𝖮 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗎𝖽𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗋𝖾𝖿𝖾𝗋𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝖫𝖾́𝗈𝗇𝖼𝖾 𝖭𝖽𝗂𝗄𝗎𝗆𝖺𝗇𝖺 𝖾 𝖩𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗌 𝖪. 𝖡𝗈𝗒𝖼𝖾 (𝖠𝖿𝗋𝗂𝖼𝖺'𝗌 𝖮𝖽𝗂𝗈𝗎𝗌 𝖣𝖾𝖻𝗍𝗌, 𝟤𝟢𝟣𝟣) 𝗆𝗈𝗌𝗍𝗋𝖺-𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝖿𝖺𝖼𝖾 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖺 𝗋𝖾𝖺𝗅𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾. 𝖤𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖾 𝟣𝟫𝟩𝟢 𝖾 𝟤𝟢𝟢𝟪 𝗌𝖺ı́𝗋𝖺𝗆 𝖽𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗂𝗇𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝟩𝟢𝟢 𝗆𝗂𝗅 𝗆𝗂𝗅𝗁𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝗈́𝗅𝖺𝗋𝖾𝗌 𝖾𝗆 𝖼𝖺𝗉𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗅, 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗏𝖾𝗇𝗂𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗍𝗋𝗂𝗇𝗍𝖺 𝖾 𝗍𝗋𝖾̂𝗌 𝗉𝖺ı́𝗌𝖾𝗌 𝗌𝗎𝖻𝗌𝖺𝗋𝗂𝖺𝗇𝗈𝗌, 𝗎𝗆 𝗏𝖺𝗅𝗈𝗋 𝗊𝗎𝖾, 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝗃𝗎𝗋𝗈𝗌, 𝖺𝗌𝖼𝖾𝗇𝖽𝖾 𝖺 𝖼𝖾𝗋𝖼𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝟫𝟦𝟦 𝗆𝗂𝗅 𝗆𝗂𝗅𝗁𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝖾𝗆 𝟤𝟢𝟢𝟪, 𝗉𝗋𝖺𝗍𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖾𝗊𝗎𝗂𝗏𝖺𝗅𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖺𝗈 𝖯𝖨𝖡 𝗍𝗈𝗍𝖺𝗅 𝖽𝖺 𝖠́𝖿𝗋𝗂𝖼𝖺 𝖲𝗎𝖻𝗌𝖺𝗋𝗂𝖺𝗇𝖺 𝗇𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖾 𝖺𝗇𝗈. 𝖭𝗈 𝗆𝖾𝗌𝗆𝗈 𝗉𝖾𝗋ı́𝗈𝖽𝗈, 𝖺 𝖽ı́𝗏𝗂𝖽𝖺 𝖾𝗑𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗇𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝖻𝗂𝗇𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖾𝗌 𝗉𝖺ı́𝗌𝖾𝗌 𝗌𝗎𝖻𝗂𝗎 𝖽𝖾 𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝟧𝟢 𝗆𝗂𝗅 𝗆𝗂𝗅𝗁𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗉𝗈𝗎𝖼𝗈 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝟤𝟢𝟢 𝗆𝗂𝗅 𝗆𝗂𝗅𝗁𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝗈́𝗅𝖺𝗋𝖾𝗌.

𝖠𝗌𝗌𝗂𝗆, 𝖺 𝖠́𝖿𝗋𝗂𝖼𝖺 𝖲𝗎𝖻𝗌𝖺𝗋𝗂𝖺𝗇𝖺 𝖾́, 𝗇𝖺 𝗏𝖾𝗋𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾, 𝖼𝗋𝖾𝖽𝗈𝗋𝖺 𝗅ı́𝗊𝗎𝗂𝖽𝖺 𝖽𝗈 𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝗈 𝗆𝗎𝗇𝖽𝗈. 𝖴𝗆𝖺 𝖠́𝖿𝗋𝗂𝖼𝖺 𝖾𝗌𝗉𝗈𝗅𝗂𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝗉𝖾𝗅𝖺𝗌 𝗌𝗎𝖺𝗌 𝗉𝗋𝗈́𝗉𝗋𝗂𝖺𝗌 𝖾𝗅𝗂𝗍𝖾𝗌, 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖺𝖾𝗆 𝖽ı́𝗏𝗂𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝗇𝗎𝗇𝖼𝖺 𝗉𝖺𝗀𝖺𝗌 𝗇𝖺 ı́𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗀𝗋𝖺 𝖾 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝗏𝗂𝖺𝗆 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝗍𝖾 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖾𝗆𝗉𝗋𝖾́𝗌𝗍𝗂𝗆𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝖺𝗌 𝗉𝗋𝗂𝗏𝖺𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝗇𝗈 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗀𝖾𝗂𝗋𝗈. 𝖭𝖺̃𝗈 𝗌𝖾 𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗍𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝗎𝗆 𝖿𝖾𝗇𝗈́𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗈 𝗎𝗇𝗂𝗅𝖺𝗍𝖾𝗋𝖺𝗅, 𝗆𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗋𝖾𝗅𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖼𝗎𝗆𝗉𝗅𝗂𝖼𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝗈𝗌 𝖼𝗋𝖾𝖽𝗈𝗋𝖾𝗌 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗀𝖾𝗂𝗋𝗈𝗌.

𝖮 𝗌𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖾𝗆𝖺 𝗉𝗈𝗅ı́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝗈 𝖽𝗈𝗆𝗂𝗇𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝗇𝗈 𝖮𝖼𝗂𝖽𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖾́ 𝖼𝗎𝗅𝗉𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝗈𝗆𝗂𝗌𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝗂𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖾 𝖽𝗂𝗋𝖾𝗍𝗈 𝗇𝗈 𝗇𝖾𝗀𝗈́𝖼𝗂𝗈. 𝖠𝗌 𝗂𝗇𝗌𝗍𝗂𝗍𝗎𝗂𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗌𝖾 𝖺𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗌𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺𝗆 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝖺𝗌 𝗀𝗋𝖺𝗇𝖽𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖾𝖿𝖾𝗇𝗌𝗈𝗋𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖺 𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗌𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝗂𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗇𝖺𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗅 𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾𝗆 𝗅𝖺𝗋𝗀𝖺 𝗆𝖾𝖽𝗂𝖽𝖺, 𝖼𝗎́𝗆𝗉𝗅𝗂𝖼𝖾𝗌, 𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺́ 𝖾𝗆 𝖼𝖺𝗎𝗌𝖺 𝖾́ 𝗌𝗈𝖻𝗋𝖾𝗍𝗎𝖽𝗈 𝖽𝗂𝗇𝗁𝖾𝗂𝗋𝗈 𝖾 𝗀𝖺𝗇𝖺̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺, 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝗏𝗂𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗁𝖾𝖼𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝖺 𝖻𝖺𝗇𝖼𝖺 𝖾 𝖽𝗈 𝗌𝖾𝗍𝗈𝗋 𝖿𝗂𝗇𝖺𝗇𝖼𝖾𝗂𝗋𝗈 𝗈𝖼𝗂𝖽𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺𝗅, 𝗌𝗈𝖻𝗋𝖾𝗍𝗎𝖽𝗈 𝖺𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗏𝖾́𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗃𝗎𝗋𝗂𝗌𝖽𝗂𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝗈𝖿𝖿𝗌𝗁𝗈𝗋𝖾. 𝖰𝗎𝖺𝗌𝖾 𝗆𝖾𝗂𝗈 𝖻𝗂𝗅𝗂𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗌𝖾𝗋𝖾𝗌 𝗁𝗎𝗆𝖺𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝗏𝗂𝗏𝗂𝖺𝗆 𝖾𝗆 𝗉𝗈𝖻𝗋𝖾𝗓𝖺 𝖾𝗑𝗍𝗋𝖾𝗆𝖺 𝖾𝗆 𝟤𝟢𝟤𝟦, 𝗇𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗋𝖾𝗀𝗂𝖺̃𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖽𝖾𝗍𝖾́𝗆 𝖺𝗅𝗀𝗎𝗆𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗈𝗋𝖾𝗌 𝗋𝖾𝗌𝖾𝗋𝗏𝖺𝗌 𝗆𝗎𝗇𝖽𝗂𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗆𝖺𝗍𝖾́𝗋𝗂𝖺𝗌-𝗉𝗋𝗂𝗆𝖺𝗌 𝖼𝗋ı́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗌 𝖾 𝖼𝖾𝗋𝖼𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝟨𝟢% 𝖽𝗈 𝗆𝖾𝗅𝗁𝗈𝗋 𝗉𝗈𝗍𝖾𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗅 𝗌𝗈𝗅𝖺𝗋 𝖽𝗈 𝗆𝗎𝗇𝖽𝗈.

𝖭𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗃𝗎𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗂𝗇𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾, 𝖺 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗈𝗋𝗂𝖺 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝟧𝟦 𝗉𝖺ı́𝗌𝖾𝗌 𝖺𝖿𝗋𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝖾́ 𝖼𝗅𝖺𝗌𝗌𝗂𝖿𝗂𝖼𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝗋𝖾𝗀𝗂𝗆𝖾 𝖽𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗍𝗈𝗋𝗂𝖺𝗅 𝗈𝗎 𝗁ı́𝖻𝗋𝗂𝖽𝗈, 𝖾 𝖺𝗉𝖾𝗇𝖺𝗌 𝗎𝗆 𝗎́𝗇𝗂𝖼𝗈 𝗉𝖺ı́𝗌, 𝖺𝗌 𝖬𝖺𝗎𝗋ı́𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗌, 𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗇𝗀𝖾 𝖺 𝖼𝖺𝗍𝖾𝗀𝗈𝗋𝗂𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝖾𝗆𝗈𝖼𝗋𝖺𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝗉𝗅𝖾𝗇𝖺. 𝖠 𝗂𝗇𝗌𝗍𝖺𝖻𝗂𝗅𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝖾𝗆𝗈𝖼𝗋𝖺́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝖺 𝖾́, 𝖺𝗌𝗌𝗂𝗆, 𝗎𝗆 𝗍𝗋𝖺𝖼̧𝗈 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗋𝗎𝗍𝗎𝗋𝖺𝗅 𝖾 𝗀𝖾𝗇𝖾𝗋𝖺𝗅𝗂𝗓𝖺𝖽𝗈, 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝖾𝗑𝖼𝖾𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝗉𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗎𝖺𝗅, 𝖾, 𝖺𝗂𝗇𝖽𝖺 𝖺𝗌𝗌𝗂𝗆, 𝖺 𝖴𝗇𝗂𝖺̃𝗈 𝖤𝗎𝗋𝗈𝗉𝖾𝗂𝖺 𝗇𝖾𝗀𝗈𝖼𝖾𝗂𝖺 𝖾 𝖺𝗌𝗌𝗂𝗇𝖺 𝖺𝖼𝗈𝗋𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝖾𝗋𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝖾 𝖽𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗈𝗉𝖾𝗋𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝖤𝗌𝗍𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖺𝖿𝗋𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝖼𝗅𝖺𝗌𝗌𝗂𝖿𝗂𝖼𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝖺𝗎𝗍𝗈𝗋𝗂𝗍𝖺́𝗋𝗂𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝖾𝗅𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝗋𝗈́𝗉𝗋𝗂𝗈𝗌 ı́𝗇𝖽𝗂𝖼𝖾𝗌 𝗂𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗇𝖺𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗂𝗌. 𝖬𝗎𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖺𝗌 𝖾𝗅𝗂𝗍𝖾𝗌 𝗏𝗂𝗏𝖾𝗆 𝗇𝗈 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗈𝗋 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗅𝗎𝗑𝗈𝗌, 𝖾𝗇𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝖺𝗌 𝗌𝗎𝖺𝗌 𝗉𝗈𝗉𝗎𝗅𝖺𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝗏𝗂𝗏𝖾𝗆 𝗇𝖺 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗈𝗋 𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝗆𝗂𝗌𝖾́𝗋𝗂𝖺𝗌.

𝖴𝗆 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖺𝗋𝗀𝗎𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝗋𝖾𝖼𝗈𝗋𝗋𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗌 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗃𝗎𝗌𝗍𝗂𝖿𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗋𝖾𝗆 𝗈 𝗂𝗇𝖾𝗏𝗂𝗍𝖺́𝗏𝖾𝗅 𝖾́ 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗇𝖾𝗀𝗈𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗋 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝖽𝗂𝗍𝖺𝖽𝗎𝗋𝖺𝗌 𝗌𝖾𝗋𝗂𝖺 𝗉𝗂𝗈𝗋 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝖺𝗌 𝗉𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗈𝖺𝗌. 𝖥𝖺𝗅𝗌𝗈: 𝖺 𝗍𝖾𝗌𝖾 𝖽𝖾 𝗊𝗎𝖾 "𝗂𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗋𝗈𝗆𝗉𝖾𝗋 𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗈𝗉𝖾𝗋𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖺𝗀𝗋𝖺𝗏𝖺𝗋𝗂𝖺 𝗈 𝗌𝗈𝖿𝗋𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝗉𝗈𝗉𝗎𝗅𝖺𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌" 𝖿𝗎𝗇𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝗎𝗆 𝗌𝗈𝖿𝗂𝗌𝗆𝖺 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗋𝖺𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗅𝗂𝗓𝖺𝗋 𝖾 𝗉𝖾𝗋𝗉𝖾𝗍𝗎𝖺𝗋 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗋𝖾𝗅𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖾𝗑𝗉𝗅𝗈𝗋𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝗅𝗎𝖼𝗋𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗏𝖺. 𝖳𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗌𝗂𝗀𝗂𝗋 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝗋𝖾𝗀𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗌 𝖺𝗎𝗍𝗈𝗋𝗂𝗍𝖺́𝗋𝗂𝗈𝗌 𝖾𝗆 𝗇𝗈𝗆𝖾 𝖽𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗇𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝖺𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝖾́ 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖼𝖾𝗉𝗍𝗎𝖺𝗅𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖺𝗇𝖺́𝗅𝗈𝗀𝗈 𝖺 𝖼𝖺𝗅𝗂𝖻𝗋𝖺𝗋 𝖺 𝗂𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗇𝗌𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝖾 𝗎𝗆 𝖺𝖻𝗎𝗌𝗈 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝖾𝗏𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗋 𝖺 𝗌𝗎𝖺 𝖾𝗌𝖼𝖺𝗅𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝖿𝖺𝗍𝖺𝗅: 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝖿𝖺𝗅𝗌𝖺 𝗉𝗋𝗎𝖽𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝗊𝗎𝖾, 𝗌𝗈𝖻 𝗈 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗍𝖾𝗑𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝖺 𝗆𝗂𝗍𝗂𝗀𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗋𝗂𝗌𝖼𝗈𝗌, 𝖿𝗂𝗇𝖺𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝖺 𝗂𝗇𝖿𝗋𝖺𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗋𝗎𝗍𝗎𝗋𝖺 𝖽𝖺 𝗈𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾 𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗌𝖿𝗈𝗋𝗆𝖺 𝗈𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗈𝗉𝖾𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗌 𝗈𝖼𝗂𝖽𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝖾𝗆 𝖼𝗎́𝗆𝗉𝗅𝗂𝖼𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝗂𝗋𝖾𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝗈 𝖾𝗆𝗉𝗈𝖻𝗋𝖾𝖼𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗋𝗎𝗍𝗎𝗋𝖺𝗅 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖺𝗌 𝗉𝗈𝗉𝗎𝗅𝖺𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌. 𝖠 𝖤𝗋𝗂𝗍𝗋𝖾𝗂𝖺, 𝗎𝗆 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗋𝖾𝗀𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗌 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝖿𝖾𝖼𝗁𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝗈 𝗆𝗎𝗇𝖽𝗈, 𝗌𝖾𝗆 𝖾𝗅𝖾𝗂𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌, 𝗌𝖾𝗆 𝗂𝗆𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗇𝗌𝖺 𝗅𝗂𝗏𝗋𝖾 𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝗌𝖾𝗋𝗏𝗂𝖼̧𝗈 𝗆𝗂𝗅𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗋 𝗈𝖻𝗋𝗂𝗀𝖺𝗍𝗈́𝗋𝗂𝗈 𝗂𝗇𝖽𝖾𝖿𝗂𝗇𝗂𝖽𝗈 𝖺𝗆𝗉𝗅𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖽𝗈𝖼𝗎𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝗍𝗋𝖺𝖻𝖺𝗅𝗁𝗈 𝖿𝗈𝗋𝖼̧𝖺𝖽𝗈, 𝖿𝗈𝗂 𝗋𝖾𝗉𝖾𝗍𝗂𝖽𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖾𝗅𝖾𝗂𝗍𝖺 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗈 𝖢𝗈𝗇𝗌𝖾𝗅𝗁𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖣𝗂𝗋𝖾𝗂𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝖧𝗎𝗆𝖺𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖺 𝖮𝖭𝖴 𝖺𝗈 𝗅𝗈𝗇𝗀𝗈 𝖽𝖺 𝗎́𝗅𝗍𝗂𝗆𝖺 𝖽𝖾́𝖼𝖺𝖽𝖺, 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝗈𝗎𝗍𝗋𝗈𝗌 𝗋𝖾𝗀𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗌 𝗂𝗀𝗎𝖺𝗅𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝗋𝖾𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗂𝗏𝗈𝗌.

𝖲𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾𝗇𝗏𝗂𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖺𝗇𝗎𝖺𝗅𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾, 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝗍𝖾 𝖽𝖺 𝖴𝖤, 𝖽𝖺 𝖮𝖭𝖴 𝖾 𝖽𝖾 𝖤𝗌𝗍𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖺 𝗍ı́𝗍𝗎𝗅𝗈 𝗂𝗇𝖽𝗂𝗏𝗂𝖽𝗎𝖺𝗅, 𝖽𝖾𝗓𝖾𝗇𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗆𝗂𝗅𝗁𝖺𝗋𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗆𝗂𝗅𝗁𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝗈́𝗅𝖺𝗋𝖾𝗌 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝖠́𝖿𝗋𝗂𝖼𝖺 (𝖺 𝖴𝖤 𝖾́ 𝗈 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗈𝗋 𝖽𝗈𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗋 𝗆𝗎𝗇𝖽𝗂𝖺𝗅 𝖽𝖾 𝖺𝗃𝗎𝖽𝖺 𝖺𝗈 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝖾𝗇𝗏𝗈𝗅𝗏𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈), 𝖾 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝗍𝖾 𝗌𝗂𝗀𝗇𝗂𝖿𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗏𝖺 𝗇𝗎𝗇𝖼𝖺 𝖼𝗁𝖾𝗀𝖺 𝗏𝖾𝗋𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾𝗂𝗋𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖺̀𝗌 𝗉𝗈𝗉𝗎𝗅𝖺𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌. 𝖠𝗅𝗀𝗎𝗇𝗌 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗈𝗋𝖾𝗌 𝗋𝖾𝖼𝖾𝗍𝗈𝗋𝖾𝗌 𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝗂𝗍𝖺𝖽𝗎𝗋𝖺𝗌 𝖾 𝖼𝗅𝖾𝗉𝗍𝗈𝖼𝗋𝖺𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝖺 𝖱𝖣 𝖢𝗈𝗇𝗀𝗈, 𝖺 𝖲𝗈𝗆𝖺́𝗅𝗂𝖺, 𝗈 𝖲𝗎𝖽𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾 𝖺 𝖤𝗍𝗂𝗈́𝗉𝗂𝖺. 𝖯𝗈𝖽𝖾𝗆𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝖾𝗋𝗀𝗎𝗇𝗍𝖺𝗋: 𝗌𝖾 𝗈 𝖮𝖼𝗂𝖽𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖿𝖾𝖼𝗁𝖺𝗌𝗌𝖾 𝖺 𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗍𝖺 𝖺 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺 𝗅𝖾𝗀𝗂𝗍𝗂𝗆𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝗂𝗍𝖺𝖽𝗎𝗋𝖺𝗌, 𝖽𝖾𝗂𝗑𝖺𝗋𝗂𝖺𝗆 𝖺 𝖢𝗁𝗂𝗇𝖺, 𝖺 𝖱𝗎́𝗌𝗌𝗂𝖺 𝗈𝗎 𝖺 Í𝗇𝖽𝗂𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝗇𝖾𝗀𝗈𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗋 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖾𝗌 𝗋𝖾𝗀𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗌? 𝖢𝗅𝖺𝗋𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈, 𝗆𝖺𝗌 𝗍𝖺𝗆𝖻𝖾́𝗆 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾𝗌𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖽𝖾𝗆 𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖺 𝗋𝖾𝗅𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈. 𝖮 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖼𝗁𝗈𝖼𝖺 𝖾́ 𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖾𝗆𝗈𝖼𝗋𝖺𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗌 𝖾𝗎𝗋𝗈𝗉𝖾𝗂𝖺𝗌, 𝖽𝖾 𝗆𝗈𝖽𝗈 𝖼ı́𝗇𝗂𝖼𝗈 𝖾 𝗁𝗂𝗉𝗈́𝖼𝗋𝗂𝗍𝖺, 𝖿𝗂𝗇𝗀𝗂𝗋𝖾𝗆 𝖾𝗑𝗂𝗀𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝖼𝗎𝗆𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗆, 𝗏𝖺𝗅𝗂𝖽𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖾𝗌 𝗌𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖾𝗆𝖺𝗌 𝖾 𝖺𝗌 𝗌𝗎𝖺𝗌 𝗉𝗋𝖺́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗌.

𝖭𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖽𝗂𝗓 𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗉𝖾𝗂𝗍𝗈 𝖾𝗌𝗉𝖾𝖼𝗂𝖿𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖺̀ 𝗂𝗆𝗂𝗀𝗋𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈, 𝗈 𝖼𝖺𝗈𝗌 𝗀𝖾𝗋𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝖾́ 𝖺𝗂𝗇𝖽𝖺 𝗉𝗈𝗍𝖾𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝗉𝖾𝗅𝖺 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝖼𝗎𝗋𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝗆𝖺̃𝗈-𝖽𝖾-𝗈𝖻𝗋𝖺 𝖻𝖺𝗋𝖺𝗍𝖺 𝗇𝗈 𝖮𝖼𝗂𝖽𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾, 𝗉𝖾𝗅𝗈 𝗏𝗂𝖾́𝗌 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗀𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖺 𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝖾𝗅𝗂𝗍𝖾𝗌, 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝗅𝗂𝗀𝖺𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝖻𝗅𝖾𝗆𝖺𝗌 𝗋𝖾𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝗉𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗈𝖺𝗌 𝖾 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗈𝖼𝗎𝗉𝖺𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝖾𝗆 𝗌𝗂𝗇𝖺𝗅𝗂𝗓𝖺𝗋 𝖺 𝗏𝗂𝗋𝗍𝗎𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝖾 𝗎𝗆 𝗁𝗎𝗆𝖺𝗇𝗂𝗌𝗆𝗈 𝖺𝖻𝗌𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗍𝗈 𝖾 𝗏𝖺𝗓𝗂𝗈, 𝖾 𝗉𝖾𝗅𝖺𝗌 𝗉𝗈𝗅ı́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗌 𝗂𝗇𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗉𝖾𝗍𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗂𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗀𝗋𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝗌𝖾𝗀𝗎𝗂𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝗉𝖾𝗅𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝗈𝗅ı́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝗈𝗌 𝖾𝗎𝗋𝗈𝗉𝖾𝗎𝗌 𝗇𝗈 𝗉𝗈𝖽𝖾𝗋.

𝖲𝖾 𝗌𝖾 𝗊𝗎𝗂𝗌𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗋𝗂𝖻𝗎𝗂𝗋 𝖾𝗆 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝗍𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝗈 𝖼𝖺𝗈𝗌 𝗆𝗂𝗀𝗋𝖺𝗍𝗈́𝗋𝗂𝗈 𝖺 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝗍𝗂𝗋 𝖽𝖾 𝖠́𝖿𝗋𝗂𝖼𝖺, 𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗂𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝗂𝗇𝖽𝗂𝗀𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝖾 𝖼𝗁𝗈𝖼𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗆𝗂𝗅𝗁𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗌𝖾𝗋𝖾𝗌 𝗁𝗎𝗆𝖺𝗇𝗈𝗌, 𝗌𝖾𝗋𝗂𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖽𝗂𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝗆ı́𝗇𝗂𝗆𝖺 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖾𝗆𝗈𝖼𝗋𝖺𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗌 𝖾 𝗈𝗋𝗀𝖺𝗇𝗂𝗌𝗆𝗈𝗌 𝖾𝗎𝗋𝗈𝗉𝖾𝗎𝗌 𝖽𝖾𝗂𝗑𝖺𝗌𝗌𝖾𝗆 𝖽𝖾 𝗇𝖾𝗀𝗈𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗋 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝗍𝗂𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗂𝖺𝗌 𝖾 𝖼𝗅𝖾𝗉𝗍𝗈𝖼𝗋𝖺𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗌 𝖺𝖿𝗋𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗇𝖺𝗌. 𝖨𝗌𝗍𝗈 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗌𝗂𝗀𝗇𝗂𝖿𝗂𝖼𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗋𝗍𝖺𝗋 𝖺𝗃𝗎𝖽𝖺 𝗁𝗎𝗆𝖺𝗇𝗂𝗍𝖺́𝗋𝗂𝖺 𝖽𝗂𝗋𝖾𝗍𝖺, 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗂𝗇𝖼𝗅𝗎𝗂 𝗌𝖺𝗎́𝖽𝖾, 𝖾𝖽𝗎𝖼𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾 𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗉𝗈𝗌𝗍𝖺 𝖺 𝖼𝗋𝗂𝗌𝖾𝗌, 𝖾 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖽𝖾𝗏𝖾 𝗆𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗋-𝗌𝖾 𝗈𝗎 𝗋𝖾𝖿𝗈𝗋𝖼̧𝖺𝗋-𝗌𝖾 𝗂𝗇𝖽𝖾𝗉𝖾𝗇𝖽𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖽𝗈 𝗋𝖾𝗀𝗂𝗆𝖾 𝗅𝗈𝖼𝖺𝗅. 𝖲𝗂𝗀𝗇𝗂𝖿𝗂𝖼𝖺 𝗋𝖾𝖼𝗎𝗌𝖺𝗋 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖾𝗑𝗉𝗅𝗈𝗋𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗋𝖾𝖼𝗎𝗋𝗌𝗈𝗌, 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖼𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝗆𝗂𝗇𝖾𝗂𝗋𝖺𝗌 𝖾 𝖺𝖼𝗈𝗋𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝖾𝗋𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝗅𝗎𝖼𝗋𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗏𝗈𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝗋𝖾𝗀𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝗈𝖼𝗎𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺𝖽𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝗋𝖾𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗂𝗏𝗈𝗌, 𝖾 𝗌𝗎𝗃𝖾𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗋 𝖺 𝖺𝗃𝗎𝖽𝖺 𝗈𝗋𝖼̧𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺𝗅 𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖽𝗂𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗅𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝗋𝖾𝖺𝗅 𝖾 𝖿𝗂𝗌𝖼𝖺𝗅𝗂𝗓𝖺𝖽𝖺.

𝖮 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝖻𝗅𝖾𝗆𝖺 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾́ 𝖺 𝖾𝗑𝗍𝗋𝖾𝗆𝖺-𝖾𝗌𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗋𝖽𝖺, 𝗇𝖾𝗆 𝖺 𝖾𝗑𝗍𝗋𝖾𝗆𝖺-𝖽𝗂𝗋𝖾𝗂𝗍𝖺, 𝗇𝖾𝗆 𝗈 𝖽𝗂𝗌𝖼𝗎𝗋𝗌𝗈 𝖽𝗈 𝗈́𝖽𝗂𝗈. 𝖲𝖺̃𝗈, 𝗌𝗂𝗆, 𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖾𝗆𝗈𝖼𝗋𝖺𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗌 𝗅𝗂𝖻𝖾𝗋𝖺𝗂𝗌, 𝖺𝗌 𝖾𝗅𝗂𝗍𝖾𝗌 𝖺𝖿𝗋𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗇𝖺𝗌 𝖾 𝗈𝗌 𝗆𝖾𝗋𝖼𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗂𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗇𝖺𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝗈𝗌 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗈𝗋𝖾𝗌 𝗂𝗇𝗂𝗆𝗂𝗀𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖠́𝖿𝗋𝗂𝖼𝖺. 𝖯𝗋𝖾𝖼𝗂𝗌𝖺𝗆𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗅𝗎𝖼𝗂𝖽𝖾𝗓 𝖾 𝖽𝖾 𝗏𝖾𝗋𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝗌𝗈𝖻𝗋𝖾 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖾 𝗍𝖾𝗆𝖺

* Doutorado em Filosofia. Professor e investigador. Escritor, ensaísta.

IN "NASCER DO SOL"-04/08/26 .