PEDRO FILIPE SOARES

.

Eutanásia aprovada: 

os passos seguintes

Os próximos meses ainda serão centrados no Parlamento, com o processo de especialidade, mas os olhares já se começam a desviar para o Palácio de Belém.

𝓐 𝓿𝓸𝓽𝓪𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸 𝓮́ 𝓲𝓷𝓮𝓺𝓾𝓲́𝓿𝓸𝓬𝓪 𝓮 𝓼𝓮𝓶 𝓶𝓪𝓻𝓰𝓮𝓶 𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓪 𝓭𝓾́𝓿𝓲𝓭𝓪𝓼. 𝓐𝓼 𝓬𝓲𝓷𝓬𝓸 𝓲𝓷𝓲𝓬𝓲𝓪𝓽𝓲𝓿𝓪𝓼 𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓪 𝓭𝓮𝓼𝓹𝓮𝓷𝓪𝓵𝓲𝔃𝓪𝓻 𝓪 𝓶𝓸𝓻𝓽𝓮 𝓪𝓼𝓼𝓲𝓼𝓽𝓲𝓭𝓪 𝓯𝓸𝓻𝓪𝓶 𝓪𝓹𝓻𝓸𝓿𝓪𝓭𝓪𝓼 𝓹𝓸𝓻 𝓵𝓪𝓻𝓰𝓪 𝓶𝓪𝓻𝓰𝓮𝓶. 𝓞 𝓟𝓪𝓻𝓵𝓪𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓸 𝓭𝓮𝓬𝓲𝓭𝓲𝓾 𝓭𝓮 𝓯𝓸𝓻𝓶𝓪 𝓲𝓷𝓯𝓸𝓻𝓶𝓪𝓭𝓪 𝓮 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓼𝓬𝓲𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮, 𝓭𝓪𝓷𝓭𝓸 𝓾𝓶 𝓹𝓪𝓼𝓼𝓸 𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓪 𝓪 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓬𝓵𝓾𝓼𝓪̃𝓸 𝓭𝓪 𝓭𝓲𝓼𝓬𝓾𝓼𝓼𝓪̃𝓸 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓳𝓪́ 𝓵𝓮𝓿𝓪 𝓶𝓪𝓲𝓼 𝓭𝓮 𝓭𝓾𝓪𝓼 𝓭𝓮́𝓬𝓪𝓭𝓪𝓼 𝓭𝓮 𝓮𝔁𝓲𝓼𝓽𝓮̂𝓷𝓬𝓲𝓪 𝓷𝓸 𝓷𝓸𝓼𝓼𝓸 𝓹𝓪𝓲́𝓼. 𝓕𝓮𝓵𝓲𝔃𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮, 𝓸 𝓭𝓮𝓫𝓪𝓽𝓮 𝓯𝓸𝓲 𝓮𝓵𝓮𝓿𝓪𝓭𝓸 𝓮 𝓼𝓮𝓻𝓮𝓷𝓸, 𝓸 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓶𝓮 𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓮𝓬𝓮 𝓼𝓲𝓷𝓽𝓸𝓶𝓪 𝓺𝓾𝓮𝓻 𝓭𝓮 𝓾𝓶𝓪 𝓭𝓮𝓶𝓸𝓬𝓻𝓪𝓬𝓲𝓪 𝓶𝓪𝓭𝓾𝓻𝓪, 𝓺𝓾𝓮𝓻 𝓭𝓮 𝓾𝓶𝓪 𝓸𝓹𝓲𝓷𝓲𝓪̃𝓸 𝓪𝓶𝓪𝓭𝓾𝓻𝓮𝓬𝓲𝓭𝓪 𝓼𝓸𝓫𝓻𝓮 𝓸 𝓽𝓮𝓶𝓪.

𝓞𝓼 𝓹𝓻𝓸́𝔁𝓲𝓶𝓸𝓼 𝓶𝓮𝓼𝓮𝓼 𝓪𝓲𝓷𝓭𝓪 𝓼𝓮𝓻𝓪̃𝓸 𝓬𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓻𝓪𝓭𝓸𝓼 𝓷𝓸 𝓟𝓪𝓻𝓵𝓪𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓸, 𝓬𝓸𝓶 𝓸 𝓹𝓻𝓸𝓬𝓮𝓼𝓼𝓸 𝓭𝓮 𝓮𝓼𝓹𝓮𝓬𝓲𝓪𝓵𝓲𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓮, 𝓶𝓪𝓼 𝓸𝓼 𝓸𝓵𝓱𝓪𝓻𝓮𝓼 𝓳𝓪́ 𝓼𝓮 𝓬𝓸𝓶𝓮𝓬̧𝓪𝓶 𝓪 𝓭𝓮𝓼𝓿𝓲𝓪𝓻 𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓪 𝓸 𝓟𝓪𝓵𝓪́𝓬𝓲𝓸 𝓭𝓮 𝓑𝓮𝓵𝓮́𝓶. 𝓞 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓯𝓪𝓻𝓪́ 𝓜𝓪𝓻𝓬𝓮𝓵𝓸 𝓡𝓮𝓫𝓮𝓵𝓸 𝓭𝓮 𝓢𝓸𝓾𝓼𝓪 𝓬𝓸𝓶 𝓪 𝓹𝓻𝓮𝓿𝓲𝓼𝓲́𝓿𝓮𝓵 𝓪𝓹𝓻𝓸𝓿𝓪𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸 𝓭𝓪 𝓛𝓮𝓲 𝓪𝓽𝓮́ 𝓪𝓸 𝓯𝓲𝓷𝓪𝓵 𝓭𝓸 𝓹𝓻𝓲𝓶𝓮𝓲𝓻𝓸 𝓼𝓮𝓶𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓻𝓮? 𝓒𝓸𝓶𝓮𝓬̧𝓪𝓶 𝓪 𝓼𝓾𝓻𝓰𝓲𝓻 𝓪𝓼 𝓸𝓹𝓲𝓷𝓲𝓸̃𝓮𝓼 𝓶𝓪𝓲𝓼 𝓭𝓲𝓿𝓮𝓻𝓼𝓪𝓼.

𝓠𝓾𝓪𝓲𝓼 𝓼𝓪̃𝓸 𝓪𝓼 𝓻𝓮𝓪𝓲𝓼 𝓸𝓹𝓬̧𝓸̃𝓮𝓼 𝓭𝓸 𝓟𝓻𝓮𝓼𝓲𝓭𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮 𝓭𝓪 𝓡𝓮𝓹𝓾́𝓫𝓵𝓲𝓬𝓪? 𝓔́ 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓱𝓮𝓬𝓲𝓭𝓪 𝓪 𝓼𝓾𝓪 𝓸𝓹𝓲𝓷𝓲𝓪̃𝓸 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓽𝓻𝓪́𝓻𝓲𝓪 𝓪̀ 𝓮𝓾𝓽𝓪𝓷𝓪́𝓼𝓲𝓪, 𝓱𝓪́ 𝓿𝓪́𝓻𝓲𝓪𝓼 𝓭𝓮𝓬𝓵𝓪𝓻𝓪𝓬̧𝓸̃𝓮𝓼 𝓸𝓷𝓭𝓮 𝓲𝓼𝓼𝓸 𝓯𝓲𝓬𝓪 𝓬𝓵𝓪𝓻𝓸, 𝓶𝓪𝓼 𝓜𝓪𝓻𝓬𝓮𝓵𝓸 𝓡𝓮𝓫𝓮𝓵𝓸 𝓭𝓮 𝓢𝓸𝓾𝓼𝓪 𝓹𝓻𝓸𝓶𝓮𝓽𝓮𝓾 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓷𝓾𝓷𝓬𝓪 𝓾𝓼𝓪𝓻𝓲𝓪 𝓸 𝓿𝓮𝓽𝓸 𝓹𝓸𝓵𝓲́𝓽𝓲𝓬𝓸 𝓮𝓶 𝓯𝓾𝓷𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸 𝓪𝓹𝓮𝓷𝓪𝓼 𝓭𝓪𝓼 𝓼𝓾𝓪𝓼 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓿𝓲𝓬𝓬̧𝓸̃𝓮𝓼 𝓹𝓮𝓼𝓼𝓸𝓪𝓲𝓼. 𝓠𝓾𝓮 𝓸𝓾𝓽𝓻𝓪𝓼 𝓲𝓭𝓮𝓲𝓪𝓼 𝓹𝓸𝓭𝓮𝓻𝓲𝓪 𝓾𝓼𝓪𝓻 𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓪 𝓳𝓾𝓼𝓽𝓲𝓯𝓲𝓬𝓪𝓻 𝓮𝓼𝓼𝓮 𝓯𝓲𝓶? 𝓥𝓮𝓳𝓪𝓶𝓸𝓼 𝓸𝓼 𝓪𝓻𝓰𝓾𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓸𝓼 𝓮𝓼𝓰𝓻𝓲𝓶𝓲𝓭𝓸𝓼 𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓪 𝓿𝓮𝓻 𝓼𝓮 𝓪𝓵𝓰𝓾𝓶 𝓼𝓮 𝓪𝓭𝓪𝓹𝓽𝓪 𝓪 𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓮 𝓹𝓻𝓸𝓹𝓸́𝓼𝓲𝓽𝓸.

𝓗𝓪́ 𝓺𝓾𝓮𝓶 𝓭𝓲𝓰𝓪 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓯𝓪𝓵𝓽𝓸𝓾 𝓭𝓮𝓫𝓪𝓽𝓮, 𝓶𝓪𝓼 𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓮 𝓪𝓻𝓰𝓾𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓸 𝓷𝓪̃𝓸 𝓬𝓸𝓵𝓱𝓮. 𝓟𝓸𝓻 𝓾𝓶 𝓵𝓪𝓭𝓸, 𝓹𝓸𝓻𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓯𝓸𝓲 𝓸 𝓹𝓻𝓸́𝓹𝓻𝓲𝓸 𝓟𝓻𝓮𝓼𝓲𝓭𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮 𝓭𝓪 𝓡𝓮𝓹𝓾́𝓫𝓵𝓲𝓬𝓪 𝓺𝓾𝓮𝓶 𝓻𝓮𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓱𝓮𝓬𝓮𝓾 𝓮𝓶 𝟐𝟎𝟏𝟖, 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓮 𝓽𝓮𝓶𝓪 𝓽𝓮𝓿𝓮 “𝓾𝓶 𝓭𝓮𝓫𝓪𝓽𝓮 𝓶𝓾𝓲𝓽𝓸 𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓽𝓲𝓬𝓲𝓹𝓪𝓭𝓸 𝓹𝓸𝓻 𝓽𝓸𝓭𝓸𝓼 𝓸𝓼 𝓺𝓾𝓪𝓭𝓻𝓪𝓷𝓽𝓮𝓼 𝓹𝓸𝓵𝓲́𝓽𝓲𝓬𝓸-𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓽𝓲𝓭𝓪́𝓻𝓲𝓸𝓼, 𝓻𝓮𝓵𝓲𝓰𝓲𝓸𝓼𝓸𝓼, 𝓼𝓸𝓬𝓲𝓪𝓲𝓼”. 𝓞 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓮𝓻𝓪 𝓿𝓮𝓻𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓮 𝓱𝓪́ 𝓭𝓸𝓲𝓼 𝓪𝓷𝓸𝓼 𝓷𝓪̃𝓸 𝓭𝓮𝓲𝔁𝓸𝓾 𝓭𝓮 𝓼𝓮𝓻 𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓻𝓮𝓽𝓪𝓷𝓽𝓸. 𝓞 𝓾𝓼𝓸 𝓭𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓮 𝓪𝓻𝓰𝓾𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓸 𝓼𝓲𝓰𝓷𝓲𝓯𝓲𝓬𝓪𝓻𝓲𝓪 𝓾𝓶𝓪 𝓬𝓪𝓶𝓫𝓪𝓵𝓱𝓸𝓽𝓪 𝓲𝓷𝓳𝓾𝓼𝓽𝓲𝓯𝓲𝓬𝓪́𝓿𝓮𝓵.

𝓞𝓾𝓽𝓻𝓸𝓼 𝓪𝓯𝓲𝓻𝓶𝓪𝓶 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓷𝓪̃𝓸 𝓼𝓮 𝓹𝓸𝓭𝓮 𝓭𝓮𝓬𝓲𝓭𝓲𝓻 𝓼𝓸𝓫𝓻𝓮 𝓪 𝓮𝓾𝓽𝓪𝓷𝓪́𝓼𝓲𝓪 𝓷𝓸 𝓟𝓪𝓻𝓵𝓪𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓸, 𝓹𝓸𝓻𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓸𝓼 𝓭𝓮𝓹𝓾𝓽𝓪𝓭𝓸𝓼 𝓯𝓸𝓻𝓪𝓶 𝓮𝓵𝓮𝓲𝓽𝓸𝓼 𝓼𝓮𝓶 𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓮 𝓽𝓮𝓶𝓪 𝓷𝓸𝓼 𝓼𝓮𝓾𝓼 𝓹𝓻𝓸𝓰𝓻𝓪𝓶𝓪𝓼 𝓮𝓵𝓮𝓲𝓽𝓸𝓻𝓪𝓲𝓼. 𝓜𝓪𝓲𝓼 𝓾𝓶 𝓪𝓻𝓰𝓾𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓸 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓸 𝓟𝓻𝓮𝓼𝓲𝓭𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮 𝓭𝓪 𝓡𝓮𝓹𝓾́𝓫𝓵𝓲𝓬𝓪 𝓷𝓪̃𝓸 𝓹𝓸𝓭𝓮 𝓾𝓽𝓲𝓵𝓲𝔃𝓪𝓻, 𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓸 𝓸 𝓑𝓵𝓸𝓬𝓸 𝓭𝓮 𝓔𝓼𝓺𝓾𝓮𝓻𝓭𝓪 𝓮 𝓸 𝓟𝓐𝓝 𝓽𝓲𝓷𝓱𝓪𝓶 𝓮𝓼𝓼𝓪 𝓹𝓻𝓸𝓹𝓸𝓼𝓽𝓪 𝓷𝓸 𝓹𝓻𝓸𝓰𝓻𝓪𝓶𝓪 𝓮𝓵𝓮𝓲𝓽𝓸𝓻𝓪𝓵 𝓮 𝓸 𝓟𝓢 𝓽𝓸𝓶𝓸𝓾 𝓹𝓾𝓫𝓵𝓲𝓬𝓪𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮 𝓪 𝓼𝓾𝓪 𝓹𝓸𝓼𝓲𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸 𝓼𝓸𝓫𝓻𝓮 𝓪 𝓶𝓪𝓽𝓮́𝓻𝓲𝓪 𝓷𝓾𝓶 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓰𝓻𝓮𝓼𝓼𝓸 𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓽𝓲𝓭𝓪́𝓻𝓲𝓸 𝓮𝓶 𝟐𝟎𝟏𝟔. 𝓝𝓲𝓷𝓰𝓾𝓮́𝓶 𝓯𝓸𝓲 𝓪𝓹𝓪𝓷𝓱𝓪𝓭𝓸 𝓭𝓮𝓼𝓹𝓻𝓮𝓿𝓮𝓷𝓲𝓭𝓸, 𝓷𝓪̃𝓸 𝓯𝓸𝓲 𝓷𝓮𝓷𝓱𝓾𝓶𝓪 𝓼𝓾𝓻𝓹𝓻𝓮𝓼𝓪. 𝓣𝓪𝓶𝓫𝓮́𝓶 𝓹𝓸𝓭𝓮𝓶𝓸𝓼 𝓻𝓲𝓼𝓬𝓪𝓻 𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓮 𝓪𝓻𝓰𝓾𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓸 𝓭𝓪 𝓵𝓲𝓼𝓽𝓪 𝓭𝓪𝓼 𝓳𝓾𝓼𝓽𝓲𝓯𝓲𝓬𝓪𝓬̧𝓸̃𝓮𝓼 𝓹𝓸𝓼𝓼𝓲́𝓿𝓮𝓲𝓼.

“𝓔 𝓸 𝓻𝓮𝓯𝓮𝓻𝓮𝓷𝓭𝓸?” - 𝓼𝓮 𝓪𝓵𝓰𝓾𝓮́𝓶 𝓯𝓲𝔃𝓮𝓻 𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓪 𝓹𝓮𝓻𝓰𝓾𝓷𝓽𝓪 𝓮́ 𝓭𝓮𝓼𝓶𝓪𝓼𝓬𝓪𝓻𝓪𝓭𝓸 𝓹𝓮𝓵𝓪𝓼 𝓹𝓪𝓵𝓪𝓿𝓻𝓪𝓼 𝓭𝓸𝓼 𝓹𝓻𝓸𝓹𝓸𝓷𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮𝓼. 𝓝𝓪̃𝓸 𝓬𝓸𝓵𝓱𝓮 𝓪 𝓶𝓾𝓭𝓪𝓷𝓬̧𝓪 𝓭𝓮 𝓸𝓹𝓲𝓷𝓲𝓪̃𝓸 𝓭𝓮 𝓻𝓮𝓼𝓹𝓸𝓷𝓼𝓪́𝓿𝓮𝓲𝓼 𝓭𝓪 𝓘𝓰𝓻𝓮𝓳𝓪 𝓒𝓪𝓽𝓸́𝓵𝓲𝓬𝓪 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓭𝓲𝔃𝓲𝓪𝓶 𝓺𝓾𝓮 “𝓿𝓲𝓭𝓪 𝓷𝓪̃𝓸 𝓮́ 𝓻𝓮𝓯𝓮𝓻𝓮𝓷𝓭𝓪́𝓿𝓮𝓵” 𝓮 𝓪𝓰𝓸𝓻𝓪 𝓭𝓮𝓯𝓮𝓷𝓭𝓮𝓶 𝓸 𝓻𝓮𝓯𝓮𝓻𝓮𝓷𝓭𝓸. 𝓣𝓸𝓭𝓸𝓼 𝓹𝓮𝓻𝓬𝓮𝓫𝓮𝓶𝓸𝓼 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓪 𝓹𝓻𝓸𝓹𝓸𝓼𝓽𝓪 𝓮́ 𝓪𝓹𝓮𝓷𝓪𝓼 𝓾𝓶𝓪 𝓽𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓪𝓽𝓲𝓿𝓪 𝓭𝓮 𝓰𝓪𝓷𝓱𝓪𝓻 𝓽𝓮𝓶𝓹𝓸 𝓷𝓪 𝓼𝓮𝓬𝓻𝓮𝓽𝓪𝓻𝓲𝓪 𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓪 𝓿𝓮𝓻 𝓼𝓮 𝓲𝓶𝓹𝓮𝓭𝓮𝓶 𝓪 𝓪𝓹𝓻𝓸𝓿𝓪𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸 𝓲𝓷𝓮𝓿𝓲𝓽𝓪́𝓿𝓮𝓵 𝓭𝓪 𝓮𝓾𝓽𝓪𝓷𝓪́𝓼𝓲𝓪. 𝓐𝓵𝓲𝓪́𝓼, 𝓺𝓾𝓮𝓻𝓮𝓶 𝓶𝓮𝓵𝓱𝓸𝓻 𝓮𝔁𝓮𝓶𝓹𝓵𝓸 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓸 𝓽𝓮𝔁𝓽𝓸 𝓭𝓮 𝓸𝓷𝓽𝓮𝓶 𝓭𝓮 𝓙𝓸𝓪̃𝓸 𝓜𝓲𝓰𝓾𝓮𝓵 𝓣𝓪𝓿𝓪𝓻𝓮𝓼 𝓸𝓷𝓭𝓮, 𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓪 𝓵𝓪𝓷𝓬̧𝓪𝓻 𝓪 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓯𝓾𝓼𝓪̃𝓸, 𝓹𝓻𝓸𝓹𝓾𝓷𝓱𝓪 𝓷𝓪 𝟐𝟓.ª 𝓱𝓸𝓻𝓪 𝓾𝓶𝓪 𝓷𝓸𝓿𝓪 𝓯𝓸𝓻𝓶𝓪 𝓭𝓮 𝓮𝓾𝓽𝓪𝓷𝓪́𝓼𝓲𝓪 𝓮 𝓸 𝓼𝓮𝓾 𝓻𝓮𝓯𝓮𝓻𝓮𝓷𝓭𝓸? 𝓔́ 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓿𝓮𝓻𝓼𝓪 𝓼𝓮𝓶 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓽𝓮𝓾́𝓭𝓸. 𝓝𝓪̃𝓸 𝓹𝓸𝓭𝓮 𝓼𝓮𝓻 𝓵𝓮𝓿𝓪𝓭𝓪 𝓪 𝓼𝓮́𝓻𝓲𝓸 𝓹𝓮𝓵𝓸 𝓟𝓻𝓮𝓼𝓲𝓭𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮 𝓭𝓪 𝓡𝓮𝓹𝓾́𝓫𝓵𝓲𝓬𝓪 𝓼𝓸𝓫 𝓹𝓮𝓷𝓪 𝓭𝓮 𝓬𝓪𝓲𝓻 𝓷𝓸 𝓻𝓲𝓭𝓲́𝓬𝓾𝓵𝓸.

𝓜𝓮𝓼𝓶𝓸 𝓪𝓼𝓼𝓲𝓶, 𝓮 𝓼𝓮, 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓽𝓻𝓪 𝓽𝓾𝓭𝓸 𝓮 𝓽𝓸𝓭𝓸𝓼, 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓽𝓻𝓪 𝓪 𝓬𝓸𝓮𝓻𝓮̂𝓷𝓬𝓲𝓪 𝓭𝓪𝓼 𝓼𝓾𝓪𝓼 𝓹𝓸𝓼𝓲𝓬̧𝓸̃𝓮𝓼 𝓮 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓽𝓻𝓪 𝓪𝓼 𝓼𝓾𝓪𝓼 𝓹𝓻𝓸𝓶𝓮𝓼𝓼𝓪𝓼 𝓸 𝓟𝓻𝓮𝓼𝓲𝓭𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮 𝓭𝓪 𝓡𝓮𝓹𝓾́𝓫𝓵𝓲𝓬𝓪 𝓿𝓮𝓽𝓪𝓻 𝓹𝓸𝓵𝓲𝓽𝓲𝓬𝓪𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮 𝓪 𝓵𝓮𝓲? 𝓐 𝓻𝓮𝓼𝓹𝓸𝓼𝓽𝓪 𝓮́ 𝓼𝓲𝓶𝓹𝓵𝓮𝓼 𝓮 𝓷𝓪̃𝓸 𝓻𝓮𝓺𝓾𝓮𝓻 𝓰𝓻𝓪𝓷𝓭𝓮 𝓲𝓶𝓪𝓰𝓲𝓷𝓪𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸: 𝓽𝓮𝓻𝓪́ 𝓭𝓮 𝓱𝓪𝓿𝓮𝓻 𝓾𝓶𝓪 𝓶𝓪𝓲𝓸𝓻𝓲𝓪 𝓭𝓮 𝓭𝓮𝓹𝓾𝓽𝓪𝓭𝓸𝓼 𝓮 𝓭𝓮𝓹𝓾𝓽𝓪𝓭𝓪𝓼 𝓷𝓪 𝓐𝓼𝓼𝓮𝓶𝓫𝓵𝓮𝓲𝓪 𝓭𝓪 𝓡𝓮𝓹𝓾́𝓫𝓵𝓲𝓬𝓪 𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓪 𝓻𝓮𝓪𝓯𝓲𝓻𝓶𝓪𝓻 𝓪 𝓵𝓮𝓲, 𝓯𝓲𝓬𝓪𝓷𝓭𝓸 𝓭𝓮𝓹𝓸𝓲𝓼 𝓸 𝓟𝓻𝓮𝓼𝓲𝓭𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮 𝓭𝓪 𝓡𝓮𝓹𝓾́𝓫𝓵𝓲𝓬𝓪 𝓸𝓫𝓻𝓲𝓰𝓪𝓭𝓸 𝓪 𝓹𝓻𝓸𝓶𝓾𝓵𝓰𝓪𝓻 𝓸 𝓭𝓲𝓹𝓵𝓸𝓶𝓪 𝓷𝓸 𝓹𝓻𝓪𝔃𝓸 𝓭𝓮 𝓸𝓲𝓽𝓸 𝓭𝓲𝓪𝓼 𝓪 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓽𝓪𝓻 𝓭𝓪 𝓼𝓾𝓪 𝓻𝓮𝓬𝓮𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸. 𝓟𝓪𝓻𝓪 𝓲𝓼𝓼𝓸, 𝓫𝓪𝓼𝓽𝓪 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓸𝓼 𝓶𝓮𝓼𝓶𝓸𝓼 𝓭𝓮𝓹𝓾𝓽𝓪𝓭𝓸𝓼 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓿𝓸𝓽𝓪𝓻𝓪𝓶 𝓯𝓪𝓿𝓸𝓻𝓪𝓿𝓮𝓵𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮 𝓷𝓸 𝓭𝓲𝓪 𝓭𝓮 𝓸𝓷𝓽𝓮𝓶, 𝓻𝓮𝓹𝓲𝓽𝓪𝓶 𝓮𝓼𝓼𝓪 𝓿𝓸𝓽𝓪𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸. 𝓝𝓪̃𝓸 𝓽𝓮𝓷𝓱𝓸 𝓷𝓮𝓷𝓱𝓾𝓶𝓪 𝓫𝓸𝓵𝓪 𝓭𝓮 𝓬𝓻𝓲𝓼𝓽𝓪𝓵, 𝓶𝓪𝓼 𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓮𝓬𝓮-𝓶𝓮 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓸 𝓟𝓻𝓮𝓼𝓲𝓭𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮 𝓷𝓪̃𝓸 𝓬𝓪𝓲𝓻𝓪́ 𝓷𝓮𝓼𝓼𝓪 𝓪𝓼𝓷𝓮𝓲𝓻𝓪, 𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓻𝓪𝓷𝓭𝓸 𝓯𝓻𝓪𝓰𝓲𝓵𝓲𝔃𝓪𝓭𝓸 𝓷𝓪 𝓬𝓪𝓶𝓹𝓪𝓷𝓱𝓪 𝓮𝓵𝓮𝓲𝓽𝓸𝓻𝓪𝓵 𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓪 𝓪𝓼 𝓹𝓻𝓸́𝔁𝓲𝓶𝓪𝓼 𝓹𝓻𝓮𝓼𝓲𝓭𝓮𝓷𝓬𝓲𝓪𝓲𝓼.

𝓔 𝓸 𝓮𝓷𝓿𝓲𝓸 𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓪 𝓸 𝓣𝓻𝓲𝓫𝓾𝓷𝓪𝓵 𝓒𝓸𝓷𝓼𝓽𝓲𝓽𝓾𝓬𝓲𝓸𝓷𝓪𝓵 (𝓣𝓒)? 𝓟𝓸𝓭𝓮 𝓪𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓽𝓮𝓬𝓮𝓻, 𝓶𝓪𝓼 𝓮́ 𝓾𝓶𝓪 𝓮𝓼𝓬𝓸𝓵𝓱𝓪 𝓹𝓻𝓮𝓬𝓪́𝓻𝓲𝓪 𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓪 𝓺𝓾𝓮𝓶 𝓺𝓾𝓮𝓻 𝓽𝓻𝓪𝓿𝓪𝓻 𝓮 𝓵𝓮𝓲. 𝓞 𝓪𝓽𝓾𝓪𝓵 𝓹𝓻𝓮𝓼𝓲𝓭𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮 𝓭𝓸 𝓣𝓒, 𝓒𝓸𝓼𝓽𝓪 𝓐𝓷𝓭𝓻𝓪𝓭𝓮, 𝓳𝓪́ 𝓭𝓮𝓯𝓮𝓷𝓭𝓮𝓾 “𝓲𝓼𝓽𝓸 𝓷𝓪̃𝓸 𝓮́ 𝓾𝓶 𝓹𝓻𝓸𝓫𝓵𝓮𝓶𝓪 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓼𝓽𝓲𝓽𝓾𝓬𝓲𝓸𝓷𝓪𝓵”, 𝓪𝓯𝓲𝓻𝓶𝓪𝓷𝓭𝓸 𝓪 𝓸𝓹𝓲𝓷𝓲𝓪̃𝓸 𝓺𝓾𝓮 “𝓺𝓾𝓪𝓵𝓺𝓾𝓮𝓻 𝓭𝓪𝓼 𝓼𝓸𝓵𝓾𝓬̧𝓸̃𝓮𝓼 𝓮́ 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓼𝓽𝓲𝓽𝓾𝓬𝓲𝓸𝓷𝓪𝓵, 𝓽𝓪𝓷𝓽𝓸 𝓪 𝓪𝓭𝓶𝓲𝓼𝓼𝓪̃𝓸 𝓭𝓪 𝓮𝓾𝓽𝓪𝓷𝓪́𝓼𝓲𝓪 𝓬𝓸𝓶𝓸 𝓪 𝓷𝓮𝓰𝓪𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸”.

𝓔𝓷𝓽𝓪̃𝓸, 𝓭𝓮𝓿𝓮𝓶𝓸𝓼 𝓯𝓪𝔃𝓮𝓻 𝓪𝓵𝓰𝓸 𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓪 𝓰𝓪𝓻𝓪𝓷𝓽𝓲𝓻 𝓪 𝓵𝓮𝓲 𝓭𝓪 𝓮𝓾𝓽𝓪𝓷𝓪́𝓼𝓲𝓪? 𝓢𝓲𝓶: 𝓪𝓬𝓸𝓶𝓹𝓪𝓷𝓱𝓪𝓻 𝓮 𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓽𝓲𝓬𝓲𝓹𝓪𝓻 𝓷𝓸𝓼 𝓽𝓻𝓪𝓫𝓪𝓵𝓱𝓸𝓼 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓸 𝓟𝓪𝓻𝓵𝓪𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓸 𝓵𝓮𝓿𝓪𝓻𝓪́ 𝓪 𝓬𝓪𝓫𝓸 𝓷𝓸𝓼 𝓹𝓻𝓸́𝔁𝓲𝓶𝓸𝓼 𝓶𝓮𝓼𝓮𝓼, 𝓪𝓼𝓼𝓮𝓰𝓾𝓻𝓪𝓷𝓭𝓸 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓸 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓯𝓸𝓲 𝓪𝓹𝓻𝓸𝓿𝓪𝓭𝓸 𝓷𝓪̃𝓸 𝓮́ 𝓭𝓮𝓼𝓿𝓲𝓻𝓽𝓾𝓪𝓭𝓸 𝓮 𝓪 𝓶𝓪𝓲𝓸𝓻𝓲𝓪 𝓭𝓮 𝓿𝓸𝓽𝓸𝓼 𝓼𝓮 𝓶𝓪𝓷𝓽𝓮́𝓶. 𝓡𝓮𝓪𝓯𝓲𝓻𝓶𝓪𝓷𝓭𝓸 𝓸 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓮𝓬𝓮 𝓪𝓰𝓸𝓻𝓪 𝓸́𝓫𝓿𝓲𝓸: 𝓱𝓪́ 𝓾𝓶𝓪 𝓶𝓪𝓲𝓸𝓻𝓲𝓪 𝓷𝓸 𝓹𝓪𝓲́𝓼 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓹𝓮𝓻𝓪𝓷𝓽𝓮 𝓪𝓵𝓰𝓾𝓮́𝓶 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓭𝓲𝔃: “𝓟𝓸𝓻 𝓯𝓪𝓿𝓸𝓻, 𝓪𝓳𝓾𝓭𝓮𝓶-𝓶𝓮, 𝓭𝓮𝓲𝔁𝓮𝓶-𝓶𝓮 𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓽𝓲𝓻” 𝓵𝓱𝓮 𝓻𝓮𝓼𝓹𝓸𝓷𝓭𝓮 𝓬𝓸𝓶 𝓱𝓾𝓶𝓪𝓷𝓲𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓮 𝓮 𝓬𝓸𝓶𝓹𝓪𝓲𝔁𝓪̃𝓸. 𝓕𝓸𝓲 𝓮𝓼𝓼𝓪 𝓻𝓮𝓼𝓹𝓸𝓼𝓽𝓪 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓭𝓮𝓲 𝓬𝓸𝓶 𝓸 𝓶𝓮𝓾 𝓿𝓸𝓽𝓸 𝓯𝓪𝓿𝓸𝓻𝓪́𝓿𝓮𝓵 𝓪̀ 𝓭𝓮𝓼𝓹𝓮𝓷𝓪𝓵𝓲𝔃𝓪𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸 𝓭𝓪 𝓶𝓸𝓻𝓽𝓮 𝓪𝓼𝓼𝓲𝓼𝓽𝓲𝓭𝓪.

* Deputado, líder parlamentar do Bloco de Esquerda, matemático.

IN "PÚBLICO"
21/02/20

.