ANA RITA GUERRA

.

Clearview AI: 

o fim do anonimato

A capacidade de sermos anónimos quando vamos a algum lado é uma componente essencial da nossa liberdade individual. É isso que está em risco
.

𝖤𝗇𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝗇𝖺 𝖢𝗁𝗂𝗇𝖺 𝖺 𝖼𝗋𝗂𝗌𝖾 𝖽𝗈 𝖢𝗈𝗏𝗂𝖽-𝟣𝟫 𝗅𝖺𝗇𝖼̧𝗈𝗎 𝗈 𝗌𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖾𝗆𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝗏𝗂𝗀𝗂𝗅𝖺̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗍𝖺𝗅 𝗇𝗈 𝖼𝖺𝗈𝗌, 𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝗈𝗌 𝖼𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖺̃𝗈𝗌 𝗎𝗌𝖺𝗆 𝗆𝖺́𝗌𝖼𝖺𝗋𝖺𝗌 𝖼𝗂𝗋𝗎́𝗋𝗀𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗌 𝖾́ 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝖽𝗂𝖿𝗂́𝖼𝗂𝗅 𝗂𝖽𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗂𝖿𝗂𝖼𝖺́-𝗅𝗈𝗌, 𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝖤𝗌𝗍𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖴𝗇𝗂𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗅𝖾𝗏𝖺𝗇𝗍𝗈𝗎-𝗌𝖾 𝗈 𝗋𝖾𝖻𝗎𝗅𝗂𝖼̧𝗈 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝖼𝖺𝗎𝗌𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗆𝗂𝖼𝗋𝗈 -𝖾𝗆𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗌𝖺 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗋𝖾𝖼𝗈𝗅𝗁𝖾 𝖿𝗈𝗍𝗈𝗀𝗋𝖺𝖿𝗂𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗋𝖾𝖽𝖾𝗌 𝗌𝗈𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝖺𝗅𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺𝗋 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝖻𝖺𝗌𝖾 𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗋𝖾𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗁𝖾𝖼𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝖿𝖺𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗅. 𝖮𝗌 𝖽𝗈𝗂𝗌 𝗉𝖺𝗂́𝗌𝖾𝗌 𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝗉𝗈𝗅𝗈𝗌 𝗈𝗉𝗈𝗌𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗆𝖾𝗌𝗆𝖺 𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺̃𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝖺𝗌𝗌𝖺𝗅𝗍𝖺 𝗇𝖺 𝖺𝗅𝗏𝗈𝗋𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖺𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝗏𝗂𝗇𝗍𝖾. 𝖲𝖾 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗆𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝖾𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖺 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗋𝗎𝗂𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝗈 𝖺𝗇𝗈𝗇𝗂𝗆𝖺𝗍𝗈 𝗇𝖺 𝖾𝗋𝖺 𝖽𝖺 𝗂𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗅𝗂𝗀𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝖺𝗋𝗍𝗂𝖿𝗂𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗅, 𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖾́ 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗏𝖾𝗆 𝖺 𝗌𝖾𝗀𝗎𝗂𝗋?

.

𝖠 𝖼𝖾𝖽𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝗉𝗋𝗂𝗏𝖺𝖼𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖾𝗆 𝗍𝗋𝗈𝖼𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝗋𝖾𝖽𝖾𝗌 𝗌𝗈𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝗀𝗋𝖺𝗍𝗎𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗌, 𝖼𝗎𝗉𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝖾 𝗌𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖾𝗆𝖺𝗌 𝗈𝗉𝖾𝗋𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗏𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝗈𝗆𝗂𝗇𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗌 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗉𝖺𝗋𝗈𝗎 𝗈 𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗋𝖾𝗇𝗈. 𝖬𝖺𝗌 𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗍𝗈 𝗌𝗈𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗅 𝖺𝗌𝗌𝗂𝗇𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝗉𝖾𝗅𝗈𝗌 𝗎𝗍𝗂𝗅𝗂𝗓𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗋𝖾𝗌 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗂𝗇𝖼𝗅𝗎𝗂́𝖺 𝖺 𝗉𝗈𝗌𝗌𝗂𝖻𝗂𝗅𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝖾 𝗉𝖾𝗋𝖽𝖺 𝗍𝗈𝗍𝖺𝗅 𝖽𝗈 𝖺𝗇𝗈𝗇𝗂𝗆𝖺𝗍𝗈, 𝖾 𝖾́ 𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖾 𝗈 𝗅𝗂𝗆𝗂𝗍𝖾 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺́ 𝖺𝗀𝗈𝗋𝖺 𝖺 𝗌𝖾𝗋 𝗎𝗅𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗉𝖺𝗌𝗌𝖺𝖽𝗈.

.

𝖡𝖺𝗌𝗍𝗈𝗎 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗂𝗌𝗌𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗌𝗎𝗋𝗀𝗂𝗌𝗌𝖾 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗋𝗍𝗎𝗉 𝗌𝖾𝗆 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗌𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗀𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝖾́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝗈𝗌 𝗈𝗎 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗌𝗂𝖽𝖾𝗋𝖺𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝗆𝗈𝗋𝖺𝗂𝗌, 𝖿𝗎𝗇𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝖧𝗈𝖺𝗇 𝖳𝗈𝗇-𝖳𝗁𝖺𝗍 𝖾 𝖱𝗂𝖼𝗁𝖺𝗋𝖽 𝖲𝖼𝗁𝗐𝖺𝗋𝗍𝗓. 𝖠 𝖢𝗅𝖾𝖺𝗋𝗏𝗂𝖾𝗐 𝖠𝖨 𝖿𝗈𝗋𝗇𝖾𝖼𝖾 𝗎𝗆 𝖺𝗅𝗀𝗈𝗋𝗂𝗍𝗆𝗈 𝗌𝗂𝗆𝗉𝗅𝖾𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗂𝗆𝖺𝗀𝖾𝗇𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖼𝖺̂𝗆𝖺𝗋𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗌𝖾𝗀𝗎𝗋𝖺𝗇𝖼̧𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝖻𝖺𝗌𝖾 𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖼𝗁𝖾𝗂𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝖼𝖺𝗋𝖺𝗌. 𝖬𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝖼𝗂𝗌𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾, 𝗍𝗋𝖾̂𝗌 𝗆𝗂𝗅 𝗆𝗂𝗅𝗁𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖿𝗈𝗍𝗈𝗀𝗋𝖺𝖿𝗂𝖺𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖺 𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗋𝗍𝗎𝗉 𝗋𝖺𝗌𝗉𝗈𝗎 𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝗋𝖾𝖽𝖾𝗌 𝗌𝗈𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝖾 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝗉𝖾𝗃𝗈𝗎 𝗇𝗎𝗆 𝖼𝖺𝗅𝖽𝖾𝗂𝗋𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝗂𝗀𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗅. 𝖠 𝗌𝗎𝖺 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝖼𝗂𝗌𝖺̃𝗈, 𝗌𝖾𝗀𝗎𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝗀𝖺𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾, 𝖾́ 𝖽𝖾 𝟣𝟢𝟢%. 𝖤 𝗈 𝗌𝗈𝖿𝗍𝗐𝖺𝗋𝖾 𝖺𝗉𝖾𝗇𝖺𝗌 𝖾́ 𝗏𝖾𝗇𝖽𝗂𝖽𝗈 𝖺 𝖿𝗈𝗋𝖼̧𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖺 𝖺𝗎𝗍𝗈𝗋𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾, 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗈 𝗎𝗌𝖺𝗆 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗂𝖽𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗂𝖿𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗋 𝗌𝗎𝗌𝗉𝖾𝗂𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝖼𝗎𝗃𝗈𝗌 𝖼𝗋𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗌 𝖿𝗈𝗋𝖺𝗆 𝖼𝖺𝗉𝗍𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝖺𝗅𝗀𝗎𝗆 𝗍𝗂𝗉𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖼𝖺̂𝗆𝖺𝗋𝖺. 𝖠̀ 𝗉𝗋𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗂𝗋𝖺 𝗏𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖺, 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖾𝖼𝖾 𝗍𝖺̃𝗈 𝗆𝖺𝗎, 𝗉𝗈𝗂𝗌 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈? 𝖰𝗎𝖾𝗆 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖾𝗏𝖾, 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗍𝖾𝗆𝖾. 𝖳𝗈𝖽𝖺𝗏𝗂𝖺, 𝗉𝖾𝗇𝗌𝖾𝗆𝗈𝗌 𝖻𝖾𝗆 𝗇𝗂𝗌𝗍𝗈. 𝖠 𝖢𝗅𝖾𝖺𝗋𝗏𝗂𝖾𝗐 𝖠𝖨 𝖾́ 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝖺𝗆𝖾𝖺𝖼̧𝖺 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗍𝗈𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗇𝗈́𝗌.

𝖠 𝗉𝗋𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗂𝗋𝖺 𝗏𝖾𝗓 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗈𝗎𝗏𝗂 𝖿𝖺𝗅𝖺𝗋 𝗇𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺 𝗁𝗂𝗌𝗍𝗈́𝗋𝗂𝖺 𝖿𝗈𝗂 𝖺𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗏𝖾́𝗌 𝖽𝗈 𝗉𝗈𝖽𝖼𝖺𝗌𝗍 “𝖳𝗁𝖾 𝖣𝖺𝗂𝗅𝗒”, 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝖽𝗎𝗓𝗂𝖽𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗈́𝗋𝗂𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝗈 𝖭𝖾𝗐 𝖸𝗈𝗋𝗄 𝖳𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗌, 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗇𝗈𝗍𝗂𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗎 𝖾𝗆 𝖩𝖺𝗇𝖾𝗂𝗋𝗈 𝖺 𝖾𝗑𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺 𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗋𝗍𝗎𝗉. 𝖮 𝗋𝖾𝗅𝖺𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝖺 𝗃𝗈𝗋𝗇𝖺𝗅𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖺 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖿𝗈𝗂 𝖺𝗍𝗋𝖺́𝗌 𝖽𝖺 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗈́𝗋𝗂𝖺 𝗅𝖾𝗏𝖺𝗇𝗍𝗈𝗎 𝗍𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖺𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝗉𝖾𝗋𝗍𝗂𝗇𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖺 𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗍𝗎𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝖾 𝖻𝗈𝗇𝖺𝖼𝗁𝖾𝗂𝗋𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝗈 𝖢𝖤𝖮, 𝖧𝗈𝖺𝗇 𝖳𝗈𝗇-𝖳𝗁𝖺𝗍, 𝖿𝗈𝗂 𝗍𝖺̃𝗈 𝖺𝗅𝖺𝗋𝗆𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗎́𝖽𝗈 𝖽𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖽𝗂𝗌𝗌𝖾.

.

𝖵𝖾𝗃𝖺𝗆: 𝖺 𝖾𝗆𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗌𝖺 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝖾𝗇𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝗌𝗈́ 𝗏𝖾𝗇𝖽𝖾 𝖺 𝖿𝗈𝗋𝖼̧𝖺𝗌 𝗉𝗈𝗅𝗂𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗂𝗌. 𝖬𝖺𝗌 𝖺𝗍𝖾́ 𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗈? 𝖣𝖾 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖿𝗈𝗋𝗆𝖺 𝗌𝖾 𝖾𝗏𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗋𝖺́ 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗌𝖾𝗃𝖺 𝖼𝗋𝗂𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝖺𝗉𝗉 𝖽𝖾 𝖺𝖼𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗈 𝗀𝖾𝗋𝖺𝗅? 𝖰𝗎𝖾𝗆 𝗏𝖺𝗂 𝗂𝗆𝗉𝖾𝖽𝗂-𝗅𝗈? 𝖲𝖾 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺 𝗍𝖾𝖼𝗇𝗈𝗅𝗈𝗀𝗂𝖺 – 𝗊𝗎𝖾, 𝗋𝖾𝗉𝗂𝗍𝗈, 𝖾́ 𝖽𝖾 𝖿𝗎𝗇𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝗌𝗂𝗆𝗉𝗅𝖾𝗌 – 𝖿𝗈𝗋 𝖽𝗂𝗌𝗉𝗈𝗇𝗂𝖻𝗂𝗅𝗂𝗓𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝖺𝗈 𝗉𝗎́𝖻𝗅𝗂𝖼𝗈, 𝗎𝗆 𝗀𝗋𝗎𝗇𝗁𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗏𝖾̂ 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗆𝖺̃𝖾 𝖾 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝖼𝗋𝗂𝖺𝗇𝖼̧𝖺 𝖺 𝗉𝖺𝗌𝗌𝖾𝖺𝗋 𝗉𝖾𝗅𝖺 𝗋𝗎𝖺 𝗉𝗈𝖽𝖾 𝗋𝖺𝗉𝗂𝖽𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝖼𝗈𝖻𝗋𝗂𝗋 𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗆 𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾 𝗈𝗇𝖽𝖾 𝗆𝗈𝗋𝖺𝗆. 𝖴𝗆 𝖿𝖺𝗇𝖺́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝗈 𝗉𝗈𝖽𝖾 𝗂𝖽𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗂𝖿𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗋 𝗈 𝖺𝖽𝖾𝗉𝗍𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗀𝗋𝗂𝗍𝗈𝗎 𝗂𝗆𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗉𝖾́𝗋𝗂𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝗈 𝗈𝗎𝗍𝗋𝗈 𝗅𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝖽𝖺 𝖻𝖺𝗇𝖼𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗌𝖾 𝗏𝗂𝗇𝗀𝖺𝗋 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝗍𝖺𝗋𝖽𝖾. 𝖰𝗎𝖺𝗅𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗋 𝗂𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗋𝖺𝖼𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝗌𝗈𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗅, 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝖻𝖺𝗇𝖺𝗅 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖾𝖼̧𝖺, 𝗍𝖾𝗋𝖺́ 𝗂𝗆𝗉𝗅𝗂𝖼𝖺𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝗉𝗈𝗍𝖾𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗂𝗌.

𝖠 𝖼𝖺𝗉𝖺𝖼𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝖾 𝗌𝖾𝗋𝗆𝗈𝗌 𝖺𝗇𝗈́𝗇𝗂𝗆𝗈𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝗏𝖺𝗆𝗈𝗌 𝖺𝗈 𝗌𝗎𝗉𝖾𝗋𝗆𝖾𝗋𝖼𝖺𝖽𝗈, 𝖺̀ 𝗉𝗋𝖺𝗂𝖺, 𝖺 𝗎𝗆 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖼𝖾𝗋𝗍𝗈, 𝖺𝗈 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝗊𝗎𝖾, 𝖺𝗈 𝗀𝗂𝗇𝖺́𝗌𝗂𝗈, 𝖺 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝖻𝗈𝗆𝖻𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝗀𝖺𝗌𝗈𝗅𝗂𝗇𝖺, 𝖾́ 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗉𝗈𝗇𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖾𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗅 𝖽𝖺 𝗇𝗈𝗌𝗌𝖺 𝗅𝗂𝖻𝖾𝗋𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝗂𝗇𝖽𝗂𝗏𝗂𝖽𝗎𝖺𝗅. 𝖮 𝖼𝖺𝗌𝗈 𝗍𝗈𝗋𝗇𝖺-𝗌𝖾 𝖺𝗂𝗇𝖽𝖺 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝗀𝗋𝖺𝗏𝖾 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝖼𝖺𝗎𝗌𝖺 𝖽𝖺 𝗋𝖾𝗂𝗏𝗂𝗇𝖽𝗂𝖼𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝟣𝟢𝟢% 𝖽𝖾 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝖼𝗂𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝗍𝖾 𝖽𝖺 𝖢𝗅𝖾𝖺𝗋𝗏𝗂𝖾𝗐 𝖠𝖨.

.

𝖨𝗌𝗍𝗈 𝗌𝗂𝗀𝗇𝗂𝖿𝗂𝖼𝖺 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖺 𝖿𝖺𝖻𝗋𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝖺𝖽𝗆𝗂𝗍𝖾 𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗅𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗋 𝗆𝖺𝗋𝗀𝖾𝗆 𝖽𝖾 𝖾𝗋𝗋𝗈 𝗇𝗈 𝗌𝗈𝖿𝗍𝗐𝖺𝗋𝖾, 𝖽𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝗀𝖺𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗍𝗂𝖺𝗌 𝖺𝗈𝗌 𝖺𝗀𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖺 𝗉𝗈𝗅𝗂́𝖼𝗂𝖺. 𝖮 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖺𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝖾𝖼𝖾 𝗌𝖾 𝗈 𝖺𝗅𝗀𝗈𝗋𝗂𝗍𝗆𝗈 𝗂𝖽𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗂𝖿𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗋 𝖺 𝗏𝗈𝗌𝗌𝖺 𝖼𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗉𝗈𝗇𝗌𝖺́𝗏𝖾𝗅 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝖺𝗀𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝖼𝖺𝗉𝗍𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝖾𝗆 𝗏𝗂́𝖽𝖾𝗈? 𝖠𝗌 𝖿𝖺𝗅𝗁𝖺𝗌 𝗇𝗈 𝗌𝗈𝖿𝗍𝗐𝖺𝗋𝖾 𝖽𝖾 𝗋𝖾𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗁𝖾𝖼𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝖿𝖺𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗅 𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝗆𝗎𝗂𝗍𝗈 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝖿𝗋𝖾𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗌 𝗇𝗈 𝖼𝖺𝗌𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗆𝗎𝗅𝗁𝖾𝗋𝖾𝗌 𝖾 𝗉𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗈𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗆𝗂𝗇𝗈𝗋𝗂𝖺𝗌 𝖾́𝗍𝗇𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗌, 𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗅𝖾𝗏𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖺 𝗋𝖾𝖼𝖾𝗂𝗈𝗌 𝖿𝗎𝗇𝖽𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗂𝖽𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾𝗌 𝗆𝗂𝗌𝗍𝗎𝗋𝖺𝖽𝖺𝗌.

.

𝖣𝗈𝗌 𝗏𝖺́𝗋𝗂𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖾𝗉𝖺𝗋𝗍𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗉𝗈𝗅𝗂́𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺̃𝗈 𝖺 𝗎𝗌𝖺𝗋 𝗈 𝗌𝗈𝖿𝗍𝗐𝖺𝗋𝖾 𝖽𝖺 𝖢𝗅𝖾𝖺𝗋𝗏𝗂𝖾𝗐 𝖠𝖨 – 𝗈 𝖭𝖸𝖳 𝗂𝖽𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗂𝖿𝗂𝖼𝗈𝗎 𝟨𝟢𝟢 – 𝖺 𝖬𝖾𝗍𝗋𝗈 𝖯𝗈𝗅𝗂𝖼𝖾 𝖽𝖾 𝖫𝗈𝗇𝖽𝗋𝖾𝗌 𝖾́ 𝗈 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝗋𝖾𝖼𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾. 𝖠 𝖽𝖾𝖼𝗂𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝗀𝖾𝗋𝗈𝗎 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗋𝗈𝗏𝖾́𝗋𝗌𝗂𝖺, 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗌𝗈́ 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝗌𝖾𝗋 𝗎𝗆 𝗌𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖾𝗆𝖺 𝗂𝗇𝗏𝖺𝗌𝗂𝗏𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗋𝖺𝗋𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝗌𝖾 𝗏𝗂𝗎 𝖿𝗈𝗋𝖺 𝖽𝖺 𝖢𝗁𝗂𝗇𝖺, 𝗆𝖺𝗌 𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖺 𝗉𝗋𝗈́𝗉𝗋𝗂𝖺 𝖿𝗈𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖽𝖺 𝖻𝖺𝗌𝖾 𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖾́ 𝖽𝗎́𝖻𝗂𝖺. 𝖠 𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗋𝗍𝗎𝗉 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗍𝖾𝗆 𝖺𝗎𝗍𝗈𝗋𝗂𝗓𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝗋𝖾𝖽𝖾𝗌 𝗌𝗈𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝗈𝗎 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗎𝗍𝗂𝗅𝗂𝗓𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗋𝖾𝗌 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗋𝖾𝖼𝗈𝗅𝗁𝖾𝗋 𝖺𝗌 𝗌𝗎𝖺𝗌 𝖿𝗈𝗍𝗈𝗀𝗋𝖺𝖿𝗂𝖺𝗌, 𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗆𝗈𝗍𝗂𝗏𝗈𝗎 𝖳𝗐𝗂𝗍𝗍𝖾𝗋, 𝖦𝗈𝗈𝗀𝗅𝖾, 𝖸𝗈𝗎𝖳𝗎𝖻𝖾, 𝖵𝖾𝗇𝗆𝗈 𝖾 𝖫𝗂𝗇𝗄𝖾𝖽𝖨𝗇 𝖺 𝖾𝗇𝗏𝗂𝖺𝗋𝖾𝗆 𝗆𝗂𝗌𝗌𝗂𝗏𝖺𝗌 𝗅𝖾𝗀𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝗋𝖾𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗋𝖾𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝖺 𝗌𝗎𝗌𝗉𝖾𝗇𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖺 𝖺𝖼𝗍𝗂𝗏𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾. 𝖤𝗆 𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗉𝗈𝗌𝗍𝖺, 𝖺 𝖢𝗅𝖾𝖺𝗋𝗏𝗂𝖾𝗐 𝖽𝗂𝗓 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗍𝖾𝗆 𝖽𝗂𝗋𝖾𝗂𝗍𝗈, 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗍𝖾𝗀𝗂𝖽𝗈 𝗉𝖾𝗅𝖺 𝖯𝗋𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗂𝗋𝖺 𝖤𝗆𝖾𝗇𝖽𝖺, 𝖽𝖾 𝖺𝖼𝖾𝖽𝖾𝗋 𝖺 𝗂𝗆𝖺𝗀𝖾𝗇𝗌 𝗉𝗎́𝖻𝗅𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗌.

𝖠𝗊𝗎𝗂 𝖾́ 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖳𝗈𝗇-𝖳𝗁𝖺𝗍 𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗆𝖺. 𝖯𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝖾𝗅𝖾, 𝖺 𝖼𝗎𝗅𝗉𝖺 𝖾́ 𝖽𝖾 𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗆 𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖺 𝗇𝗈 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝖺𝖿𝗂𝗈 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖾𝗓 𝖺𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝖾 𝖿𝖺𝖼𝗂𝗅𝗂𝗍𝖺 𝖺 𝗌𝗎𝖺 𝗂𝖽𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗂𝖿𝗂𝖼𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖿𝖺𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗅 𝖺𝗈 𝗅𝗈𝗇𝗀𝗈 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖺𝗇𝗈𝗌. 𝖰𝗎𝖾𝗆 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗋 𝗌𝖾𝗋 𝗂𝖽𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗂𝖿𝗂𝖼𝖺𝖽𝗈, 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗉𝗈𝖽𝖾 𝗉𝗈̂𝗋 𝖺 𝗌𝗎𝖺 𝖿𝗈𝗍𝗈 𝖾𝗆 𝗅𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝗇𝖾𝗇𝗁𝗎𝗆. 𝖭𝖺̃𝗈 𝗉𝗈𝖽𝖾 𝗍𝖾𝗋 𝗎𝗆 𝗉𝖾𝗋𝖿𝗂𝗅 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝖿𝗂𝗌𝗌𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗅 𝗇𝖾𝗆 𝗎𝗆 𝖼𝖺𝗋𝗍𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗏𝗂𝗌𝗂𝗍𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝗂𝗆𝖺𝗀𝖾𝗆. 𝖭𝖾𝗆 𝗉𝖺́𝗀𝗂𝗇𝖺 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝖿𝗂𝗌𝗌𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗅 𝗇𝖾𝗆 𝗉𝖾𝗋𝖿𝗂𝗅 𝗇𝗎𝗆 𝗌𝗂𝗍𝖾 𝖽𝖾 𝖻𝗂𝗌𝖼𝖺𝗍𝖾𝗌. 𝖬𝗎𝗂𝗍𝗈 𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝗆𝖾𝗍𝖾𝗋-𝗌𝖾 𝖾𝗆 𝗉𝖺́𝗀𝗂𝗇𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝗈 𝖥𝖺𝖼𝖾𝖻𝗈𝗈𝗄 𝗈𝗎 𝖳𝗐𝗂𝗍𝗍𝖾𝗋. 𝖤𝗌𝗍𝖺́ 𝗍𝗎𝖽𝗈 𝖼𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝗏𝖾𝗓 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝖽𝗂𝗀𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗅𝗂𝗓𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝖾 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾́ 𝗏𝗂𝖺́𝗏𝖾𝗅 𝗎𝗌𝖺𝗋 𝖾𝗆𝗈𝗃𝗂𝗌 𝗇𝗈 𝗅𝗎𝗀𝖺𝗋 𝖽𝖾 𝖿𝗈𝗍𝗈𝗀𝗋𝖺𝖿𝗂𝖺𝗌 𝗉𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗈𝖺𝗂𝗌. 𝖤́ 𝗆𝗂𝗌𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗌𝖾 𝗂𝗆𝗉𝗈𝗌𝗌𝗂́𝗏𝖾𝗅 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝖺𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖾𝖼𝖾𝗋 𝗈𝗇𝗅𝗂𝗇𝖾 𝖾, 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝗍𝖺𝗅, 𝖾𝗏𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗋 𝗂𝗋 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺𝗋 𝖺 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝖻𝖺𝗌𝖾 𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺.

𝖠 𝖢𝗅𝖾𝖺𝗋𝗏𝗂𝖾𝗐, 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝖾𝗇𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗇𝗍𝗈, 𝗌𝗈́ 𝗏𝖾𝗇𝖽𝖾 𝖺 𝗉𝗈𝗅𝗂́𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗌. 𝖬𝖺𝗌 𝗍𝖾𝗆 𝗂𝗇𝗏𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗂𝖽𝗈𝗋𝖾𝗌, 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗋𝖾𝗆 𝗏𝖾𝗋 𝖺𝗌 𝗋𝖾𝖼𝖾𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗌 𝗆𝗎𝗅𝗍𝗂𝗉𝗅𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗋-𝗌𝖾, 𝗌𝖾𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗈 𝗆𝖾𝗋𝖼𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝖿𝗈𝗋𝖼̧𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖺𝗎𝗍𝗈𝗋𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖾́ 𝗉𝖾𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗇𝗈. 𝖤𝗌𝗍𝖺 𝗉𝖾𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗇𝖺 𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗋𝗍𝗎𝗉 𝖿𝖾𝗓 𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖺𝗌 𝗀𝗋𝖺𝗇𝖽𝖾𝗌 𝗍𝖾𝖼𝗇𝗈𝗅𝗈́𝗀𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖲𝗂𝗅𝗂𝖼𝗈𝗇 𝖵𝖺𝗅𝗅𝖾𝗒, 𝗆𝖾𝗌𝗆𝗈 𝖺𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗍𝖾̂𝗆 𝗉𝗈𝗎𝖼𝗈𝗌 𝖾𝗌𝖼𝗋𝗎́𝗉𝗎𝗅𝗈𝗌, 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗈𝗎𝗌𝖺𝗋𝖺𝗆 𝖿𝖺𝗓𝖾𝗋. 𝖰𝗎𝖾𝗆 𝖺 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺𝗋𝖺́?

IN "DINHEIRO VIVO"
18/02/20

.